标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Preacher launches legal challenge against UK government over IHRA antisemitism definition

    Preacher launches legal challenge against UK government over IHRA antisemitism definition

    A 76-year-old Methodist preacher and community organiser from Burnley, Lancashire, is preparing to make legal history as she launches the first ever formal legal challenge to the UK government’s deployment of the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. The action comes after government officials pressured her longstanding interfaith charity to remove her from her trustee position over a 2023 Facebook post that labelled Israel an apartheid state.

    Bea Foster, a veteran Palestine solidarity activist who co-founded the anti-racist organisation Building Bridges Burnley (BBB) more than two decades ago, will argue in court that the UK government unlawfully penalised her for exercising her right to peaceful political expression on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Her legal team contends that the action against her violates three core fundamental rights: freedom of expression, freedom of association, and protection from unlawful discrimination.

    In an exclusive interview with Middle East Eye, Foster explained that her decision to pursue the legal battle stems from growing concerns that public and private institutions across the UK are misusing the IHRA definition to silence legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies toward Palestinians. “The IHRA definition is proved to be used to undermine our ability to hold Israel accountable for its actions against the Palestinian people,” Foster said. “Criticising the Israeli government is not saying you are antisemitic.”

    Adopted by the UK government and dozens of other national governments and global public bodies since its release in 2016, the IHRA definition includes 11 illustrative examples designed to guide authorities in identifying antisemitic speech and conduct. While supporters frame it as a critical practical tool to combat rising antisemitism, critics have long warned that its vague wording risks conflating legitimate critique of Israeli state policy with antisemitic hatred.

    Foster’s case is rooted in the fallout after BBB received the King’s Award for Voluntary Service (KAVS) – the UK’s highest honour for local community groups, equivalent to an MBE for voluntary organisations – in November 2024. Just four months later, the UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) issued an ultimatum: BBB would lose its award unless Foster and a second trustee stepped down, following antisemitism allegations published in the *Jewish Chronicle* in February 2025.

    The newspaper’s report linked BBB to antisemitism by highlighting Foster’s participation in pro-ceasefire protests during the 2023-2025 Gaza war and referencing her viral Facebook post, which read: “APARTHEID – IT WASN’T OKAY IN SOUTH AFRICA. IT WASN’T OKAY IN NAZI GERMANY. WHY IS IT OKAY IN PALESTINE?” Following the publication, DCMS ordered a formal investigation through the Lancashire Lieutenancy, the body responsible for administering the KAVS in the county. Foster says she was never notified of the investigation or given any opportunity to respond to the claims against her.

    Foster ultimately stepped down reluctantly in 2025 to protect BBB’s award and the work of hundreds of volunteers who had built the organisation over decades. In her resignation letter, she rejected the antisemitism allegations outright. In March 2025, DCMS went a step further, barring Foster from any involvement with BBB for a three-year period, a decision that was formally approved on 10 March. In response to pre-litigation correspondence from Foster’s legal team in September 2025, DCMS confirmed it had classified Foster’s post as antisemitic under one of IHRA’s illustrative examples – specifically, the example that prohibits comparing contemporary Israeli policy to that of Nazi Germany.

    Foster’s legal team, led by the European Legal Support Centre with backing from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), argues that the post constitutes protected political speech under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law via the Human Rights Act 1998. The claim, which will name current Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy as the defendant, asserts that describing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians as apartheid is not inherently antisemitic, and that DCMS’s use of the IHRA definition to penalise Foster was unlawful.

    PSC Deputy Director Ryvka Barnard said the government’s action against Foster is a clear demonstration of the dangers posed by the IHRA definition. “The government’s discriminatory action against Bea Foster is a clear example of how the IHRA definition is used to try to punish people who stand up for Palestinian rights,” Barnard said. “Opposing the use of the IHRA definition is essential to protecting our fundamental human rights and to ensuring that solidarity with the Palestinian people cannot be silenced. If Bea wins her case, it could set a positive precedent to show that the IHRA [definition of antisemitism] in and of itself is not fit for purpose and should not be used again.”

    A lifelong community organiser and Methodist preacher, Foster’s commitment to Palestinian justice began after her retirement, when she took a religious pilgrimage to the Holy Land expecting to walk in the footsteps of Jesus. Instead, she witnessed first-hand what she describes as systemic injustice and oppression against Palestinian civilians, and has returned repeatedly to the region ever since, most recently joining a Christian delegation to support Palestinian olive harvest farmers.

    Reflecting on the impact of losing her role at the organisation she helped build, Foster told Middle East Eye: “I’m not trying to make a drama out of it, but I was heartbroken. Absolutely heartbroken. Twenty years of my life. The work is part of me. It’s in my DNA. It’s about justice, equality, dignity and treating people fairly.”

    She added that her viral Facebook post reflected only what she had observed during her travels. “When I shared that post about apartheid, it reflected what I have seen with my own eyes at every level of Palestinian society,” she said. “Their lives are restricted in every way. They face injustice at every level. I shared it because, to me, it was the truth as I had witnessed it.”

    While Foster says she deeply regrets losing her position at BBB, she stands by her decision to speak out. “I regret losing Building Bridges very much. It was a huge part of my life and I miss it deeply. But I don’t regret standing up for the Palestinian people, because whatever has happened to me is nothing compared to what they have to live through every day,” she said.

    Foster has two core goals for the legal challenge: first, to clear her name of the antisemitism label, which she says has caused profound personal distress, and second, to spark a broader national conversation about justice and equal rights in Israel-Palestine. “Living with the label of antisemitism has been incredibly difficult. I know it isn’t true, but knowing that’s what people may think of me is very hard,” she said. Ultimately, she added, her goal is to advance a future of equal rights and peace for all people in the region. “Palestinians simply want what you and I have: the freedom to move, to make decisions, to study, to work, to build lives and have opportunities without restrictions. Ultimately, I want peace in that land where everyone has equal rights and is treated with dignity and respect. But before peace can come, there has to be justice.”

    As of publication, neither DCMS nor BBB had responded to Middle East Eye’s request for comment.

  • Yangtze 3 debuts Chongqing-Shanghai cruise route

    Yangtze 3 debuts Chongqing-Shanghai cruise route

    China Yangtze Shipping Group, the country’s leading inland waterway cruise operator, has launched a landmark premium cruise route connecting the southwestern metropolis of Chongqing and the eastern global commercial hub Shanghai, with its state-of-the-art flagship vessel Yangtze 3 marking the milestone service this Wednesday. This new route makes history as the first regular Yangtze River cruise service to include a stop at Shanghai’s Wusongkou International Cruise Terminal, a facility long known as a gateway for international ocean-going cruises that now opens its doors to inland river voyages along the world’s third-longest river.

    The inaugural voyage is scheduled to kick off on October 30, departing from Chongqing’s iconic Chaotianmen Port, a historic trading hub located at the confluence of the Jialing River and the main stem of the Yangtze. After a 9-day scenic journey downstream that will take passengers through the diverse landscapes and cultural sites along the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze, the Yangtze 3 will dock at the Wusongkou International Cruise Terminal on November 8. The return upstream voyage back to Chongqing will begin the following day, offering passengers a second perspective on the Yangtze’s changing scenery from east to west.

    As the longest-established operator of Yangtze River cruises, China Yangtze Shipping Group brings more than four decades of expertise to this new service. The company first launched commercial Yangtze cruise operations back in 1979, and over its decades of service, it has earned a strong reputation for excellence, having hosted countless domestic and foreign political dignitaries and tourists from around the world. This new route represents a major expansion of the company’s premium cruise offerings, and is expected to boost inland river tourism, trade connectivity, and cultural exchange between China’s western and eastern regions.

  • Trump says ceasefire is over and calls Iran leaders ‘scum’, as both sides launch attacks

    Trump says ceasefire is over and calls Iran leaders ‘scum’, as both sides launch attacks

    A month-old ceasefire memorandum between the United States and Iran has collapsed into open hostilities, after a series of tit-for-tat strikes across the Persian Gulf region prompted US President Donald Trump to announce Wednesday that the truce is definitively “over.”

    Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a NATO leaders meeting, Trump made the declaration just hours after the US launched more than 80 pre-planned airstrikes targeting Iranian military assets across the region. Washington framed the strikes as a direct response to a series of Iranian attacks on commercial shipping vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz carried out Tuesday.

    According to a formal statement from US defense officials, the overnight American strikes targeted a wide range of Iranian military infrastructure: Iran’s air defense networks, command and control communications hubs, coastal radar stations, anti-ship missile stockpiles, and more than 60 small fast attack boats operated by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s elite revolutionary military force. US officials said the operation was designed to permanently degrade Tehran’s capacity to target commercial shipping in the strategic waterway.

    The Iranian attacks that preceded the US strikes targeted three commercial tankers near Omani waters, including a Qatari-owned liquefied natural gas carrier named the Al Rekayyat. UK Maritime Trade Operations, a UK-based security body that monitors global shipping activity, confirmed the LNG carrier was struck while it was en route to the Gulf of Oman.

    Within hours of the US strikes, Tehran launched a massive retaliatory attack, sending waves of missiles and drones targeting US military installations stationed in Bahrain and Kuwait early Wednesday. The IRGC confirmed it struck exactly 85 separate targets across the two Gulf nations. Local military and security officials confirmed the attacks: Kuwait’s armed forces activated their national air defense systems to intercept incoming projectiles, while Bahrain’s interior ministry triggered public air raid sirens and urged residents to seek emergency shelter.

    In unusually harsh remarks Wednesday, Trump launched a blistering verbal attack on Iran’s political leadership, calling the ruling faction “scum” and dismissing any further negotiations as a waste of time. “They’re scum. They’re sick people. They’re led by sick people, and they’re vicious, violent people,” Trump told reporters. “Far as I’m concerned, it’s just a waste of time dealing with them. They’re liars… there’s something wrong with them. They’re cuckoo. As far as I’m concerned, it’s over.” The president added that while he would allow US negotiating teams to continue talks if they wish, he sees no path to a successful diplomatic outcome. “They can talk, but I think they’re wasting their time. They’re a bunch of lying guys,” he said. “They’re bad people, and frankly, I don’t want to waste my time with them. Now, I’ll let our wonderful negotiators keep talking if they want, but I don’t see it.”

    Qatar, which has served as a key neutral mediator between Washington and Tehran throughout the ceasefire talks, issued a sharp condemnation of Tuesday’s shipping attacks. Majed al-Ansari, spokesperson for Qatar’s foreign ministry, called the strikes on commercial vessels a “serious and explicit violation” of international law, and said Tehran would be held responsible for the act of aggression.

    Tensions over shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz have been building for weeks. Oman has recently pushed a proposal to reroute international commercial shipping along a new corridor closer to its own coastline, a plan Iran has repeatedly rejected. Tehran has also threatened to impose a navigation toll on all commercial vessels accessing the waterway, and claims US efforts to advance the new shipping route already violate the terms of last month’s ceasefire memorandum.

    Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of Iran’s parliament, accused Washington of multiple “major” violations of the truce even before this week’s hostilities, citing US opposition to Tehran’s position on the Strait of Hormuz, unapproved Israeli military aggression in Lebanon, and the recent US move to reimpose full oil sanctions on Iran. In a post on the social platform X Wednesday, Ghalibaf pushed back against US pressure, writing: “The era of bullying and extortion is over. It leads nowhere. We don’t fold.”

    Hours after Tuesday’s shipping attacks, the US formally revoked a temporary sanctions waiver that had allowed limited Iranian oil exports, another step that escalates the bilateral conflict. The original ceasefire memorandum signed last month launched a 60-day window for negotiations to reach a permanent truce and resolve longstanding international disagreements over Iran’s nuclear program. This week’s open hostilities bring that negotiating process to the brink of total collapse.

  • Ireland passes bill banning goods from Israel-occupied settlements in West Bank and Jerusalem

    Ireland passes bill banning goods from Israel-occupied settlements in West Bank and Jerusalem

    On Tuesday, Ireland’s national parliament passed a historic piece of legislation that bans the import of all goods produced in Israeli settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

    Officially titled the Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill, the new law targets goods originating from Israeli settlements that fall outside of Israel’s 1967 armistice lines, which are not recognized as part of Israel under international law. The legislation explicitly frames its actions as compliance with Ireland’s binding international legal obligations, as outlined in the landmark advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 19, 2024.

    That ICJ ruling, which was formally upheld by the United Nations General Assembly, determined that Israel’s long-term occupation of Palestinian territories beyond the 1967 borders is unlawful under international law, and requires all UN member states to take active steps to avoid complicity in maintaining the illegal occupation. Aligning with this global mandate, the coalition government that backed the Irish bill says the measure is intended to cut off trade ties that enable the perpetuation of the illegal status quo Israel has established in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

    Ireland has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Israeli policy toward Palestinians among European nations in recent years. The country formally recognized Palestinian statehood in May 2024, and became the first government in the European Union to officially characterize Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as an act of genocide. This string of pro-Palestine actions has triggered sharp diplomatic backlash from Israel: Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has already responded to the new import ban by ordering the permanent closure of Israel’s embassy in Dublin.

    The import ban vote is only the latest in a series of escalatory steps taken by Dublin against Israel over the past year. Just last month, Ireland imposed entry bans on two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who had already been sanctioned in June for repeated public incitement to violence against Palestinian communities. Alongside Spain, Ireland has also taken a leading role in pushing the European Union to conduct a full formal review of the 1995 EU-Israel Association Agreement, the foundational trade and cooperation pact that governs bilateral relations between the bloc and Israel. Most recently, Ireland joined Spain at an emergency international summit co-hosted by Colombia and South Africa in July 2025, where attendees coordinated collective concrete measures to hold Israel accountable for its alleged violations of international law.

    Public opinion in Ireland reflects the government’s hardening stance, with opinion polls consistently showing among the highest levels of popular support for Palestinians in Europe. Current polling data finds that 86 percent of the Irish public agrees with the assessment that Israel is carrying out genocide in Gaza, while 62 percent of respondents — a clear majority — support the EU imposing harsh economic sanctions on Israel, mirroring the restrictive measures imposed on Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The country’s recently elected president, Catherine Connolly, who won an overwhelming landslide victory in the October 2025 presidential election, has long been one of the most prominent Western political voices in support of Palestinian rights. Connolly recently spoke publicly about her pride in her sister, Dr. Margaret Connolly, who was one of six Irish citizens detained by Israeli forces in April while participating in the Global Sumud Flotilla, an effort to deliver humanitarian aid to blockaded Gaza.

    Despite this widespread public and political support for Palestinian statehood and accountability for Israel, the new import ban marks a notable shift from Ireland’s prior largely symbolic actions toward concrete policy change. While Ireland is the first EU member state to formally pass this type of settlement goods ban, Spain already implemented its own ban on settlement imports along with a full arms embargo against Israel back in September 2025.

    Still, policy analysts have raised questions about the real-world impact of Ireland’s legislation, noting that watered-down compromises made to secure passage may leave the measure with little tangible effect. The bill retains provisions that allow pre-existing trade contracts to continue uninterrupted and includes broad exemptions for certain types of goods, softening the policy’s potential impact.

    The push for a ban on Israeli settlement goods first emerged in Irish politics nearly a decade ago, with the original version of the Occupied Territories Bill first introduced in 2018. At that time, the sitting Irish government blocked the bill from ever taking effect. The current centre-right coalition government has approved a heavily revised version of the original proposal that only bans physical goods from settlements, and entirely excludes trade in services — a sector that makes up roughly 70 percent of all bilateral trade between Ireland and Israel.

    Diplomatic and economic pressure from the United States political establishment was a key factor driving the decision to weaken the legislation, according to political sources. In October 2025, Democratic Congressman Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey published an open letter to Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin, warning that passing a full ban on settlement goods would cause significant long-term damage to Ireland’s economic credibility and its commercial partnerships with U.S. businesses.

  • Businesses report blocked payments from Saudi Arabia to the UAE, raising fears of worsening ties

    Businesses report blocked payments from Saudi Arabia to the UAE, raising fears of worsening ties

    Rumors of delayed or frozen cross-border money transfers from Saudi Arabia to United Arab Emirates-based accounts have sparked growing alarm that long-simmering political tensions between the two wealthy Gulf neighbors are finally spilling over into their critical bilateral commercial relationship. Multiple anonymous sources speaking to the *Financial Times* confirmed that starting in May, payments routed through Saudi banks to UAE accounts held by Dubai-based companies and individual clients have been repeatedly held up or returned, in most cases with no formal explanation provided for the hold. One Western executive working for a Dubai-headquartered healthcare firm told the outlet that since mid-May, Saudi financial institutions have blocked and reversed multiple payments coming from a long-standing Saudi customer of the company.

    In an official response to inquiries from the *Financial Times*, Saudi Arabia’s central bank issued a denial, stating it had not put in place any “direct restrictions on specific countries” as part of its routine financial oversight.

    The reported disruptions have hit one of the most economically significant bilateral partnerships in the Gulf region. Though the two nations have long been framed as formal allies, their relationship has been fraying for years over a growing list of regional policy disagreements. Most notably, the UAE has built a close strategic alliance with Israel, a step Riyadh has refused to take, as the Saudi government still does not formally recognize Israeli statehood. Saudi policymakers also have publicly opposed the UAE’s support for separatist political movements active in both Somalia and Yemen.

    As the two largest economies in the Arab world, their commercial ties carry massive regional weight: Saudi Arabia boasts a gross domestic product of roughly $1.2 trillion, while the UAE’s economy totals around $550 billion, and annual bilateral trade between the two already tops $20 billion. For decades, international and regional companies have used Dubai’s business-friendly ecosystem as a regional hub to access the Saudi market, but in recent years Riyadh has pushed aggressively to encourage firms to relocate their regional operations to the kingdom as part of its Vision 2030 economic diversification plan, which aims to retain more domestic business, job opportunities and foreign investment within Saudi borders.

    Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, a Middle East fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute, noted that strategic and economic competition between the two powers is nothing new, and past periods of tension have not resulted in a permanent breakdown of ties. “There has always been economic competition between the two sides and this is not the first time that such measures have reportedly been deployed to raise the stakes, and the relationship survived previous bouts of tension in the late 2000s and in 2021 as well,” Ulrichsen told *Middle East Eye*. The most severe recent escalation of tensions dates back to last December, when Riyadh accused Abu Dhabi of backing a secessionist Yemeni faction that launched an offensive against military forces aligned with Saudi Arabia. The confrontation eventually forced the UAE to withdraw its own military personnel from Yemen, after Saudi forces launched targeted attacks on UAE-backed Yemeni groups. At the time, Saudi Arabia stated that the UAE, once its core partner in the Saudi-led coalition that entered Yemen’s civil war in 2015 to fight the Houthi movement, had threatened Saudi national security by supporting the secessionist offensive. The years-long Yemeni conflict has failed to defeat the Houthis and has already claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of Yemeni civilians and combatants.

    That December dispute triggered the worst diplomatic rupture between the two Gulf states in decades, and brought long-simmering rivalries over trade strategy, oil policy and regional influence out into the open. Tensions were temporarily sidelined after the United States and Israel launched their campaign against Iran, as Gulf states moved to present a unified front following Iranian strikes on regional targets in retaliation. Ulrichsen explained that the underlying disagreements never truly resolved themselves, only faded from immediate focus. “It’s likely that the tensions never really went away but the immediacy and urgency of the Iranian attacks on the Gulf meant that they faded into the background during the war,” he said.

    Early this year, the UAE surprised neighboring Gulf states with its announcement that it would withdraw from OPEC, the oil exporting cartel that is effectively led by Saudi Arabia. While Abu Dhabi framed the decision as a reflection of its independent “economic vision and evolving energy profile,” the move was widely interpreted as a major strategic snub to Riyadh. Despite mounting diplomatic friction, Saudi officials have repeatedly maintained that political tensions with the UAE will not damage bilateral trade and economic ties.

  • Five crew remain missing after plane wreckage found in Pakistan

    Five crew remain missing after plane wreckage found in Pakistan

    A multiagency air and sea search operation has located the wreckage of a missing private cargo plane off Pakistan’s Arabian Sea coast, 12 hours after the Boeing 737 lost contact with air traffic controllers mid-flight, national aviation officials confirmed. All five crew members on board the aircraft, which was operated by Pakistani carrier K2 Airways, remain missing as rescue efforts enter a new phase.

    The cargo jet departed Karachi, Pakistan’s southern coastal commercial hub, on Tuesday bound for Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. According to official statements from the Pakistan Airports Authority, the plane suffered a sudden, rapid descent and cut off communication with ground control at 21:21 local time (16:21 GMT). Only minutes before the unexpected descent, the flight crew had reported a critical failure in the aircraft’s navigation systems, authorities added.

    Search teams pulled the wreckage from waters 53 nautical miles south of Ormara, a small port town situated roughly 223 miles west of Karachi, the plane’s departure point. The 12-hour search operation deployed both maritime and aerial assets to scan the remote stretch of Arabian Sea before debris was located.

    The incident marks the first major aviation accident in Pakistani airspace in nearly six years. The last major tragedy occurred in 2020, when a Pakistan International Airlines domestic passenger flight crashed on approach to Karachi’s main airport. Out of the 99 people on board that flight, only two survived the crash.

    Authorities have not yet released details on potential causes of the 2024 incident, nor an updated timeline for the ongoing search for the missing five crew members. Rescue teams are continuing to comb the crash site in hopes of recovering additional debris and locating the crew.

  • From the 2010 Olympics to the World Cup, Vancouver has pioneered Indigenous inclusion

    From the 2010 Olympics to the World Cup, Vancouver has pioneered Indigenous inclusion

    As soccer fans pack Vancouver’s 2026 FIFA World Cup fan festival, filling the air with cheers broadcast on giant screens and the aroma of local Canadian specialties like poutine, one element sets this fan zone apart from those of many past major international tournaments: curated exhibits highlighting the three Indigenous nations that have lived on this land since time immemorial — the Squamish, Musqueam, and Tsleil-Waututh peoples. This inclusion is no afterthought: the three First Nations hold formal partnership status with the local World Cup organizing committee, building on a groundbreaking precedent set at the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics.

    This model of centering Indigenous voices in mega-sporting events has become an increasingly common industry standard, spreading from the 2023 Women’s World Cup co-hosted by Australia and New Zealand to the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles. For Vancouver organizers, the core goal was to move beyond performative recognition, seat Indigenous leaders at the planning table from day one, and create a sustainable platform that elevates public awareness of local Indigenous communities while leaving long-term, tangible benefits for future generations.

    “What we learned from the 2010 Games, and what we carry forward today, is that a key message of this partnership is to share the incredible cultural diversity that shapes this region,” explained Tewanee Joseph, who leads major events strategy for the Squamish Nation and previously served as CEO of the Four Host First Nations for the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics. “We are not a people who only exist in history books. We are still here, we are living, and our cultures are thriving today.”

    The 2010 Winter Games marked a historic turning point for Indigenous inclusion in global sports: it was the first time the International Olympic Committee formally granted Indigenous groups status as official co-host partners for the event, which was held on the traditional territories of the Squamish, Tsleil-Waututh, Musqueam, and Lil’Wat nations.

    Vancouver is not the only 2026 World Cup host city to embed Indigenous leadership in its planning. In Seattle, the Puyallup Tribe holds the title of official Presenting Legacy Sponsor for the city’s 2026 World Cup host organization, SeattleFWC26. Toronto opened its 2026 World Cup welcoming ceremonies with performances by Indigenous dancers and Grammy-nominated Peguis First Nation musician William Prince, while the city’s fan festival hosts the Tkaronto Market, which showcases handcrafted goods and art from local Indigenous creators. South of the border in Mexico, FIFA has partnered with the National Fund for the Promotion of Handicrafts to elevate Indigenous artisans, who create unique soccer-themed folk art for the tournament.

    FIFA has formalized this commitment for the 2026 tournament, naming Indigenous engagement as a central pillar of its global sustainability and human rights strategy, with a mandate to build respectful collaborative relationships with Indigenous communities across all three 2026 host nations: Canada, the United States, and Mexico. This policy builds on work the governing body launched in 2023, when it partnered with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to run the Unite for Indigenous Peoples campaign.

    The 2023 Women’s World Cup in Australia and New Zealand served as a test case for this new inclusive framework. Led by an advisory panel of six Indigenous women, FIFA fully integrated First Nations culture in Australia and Māori culture in New Zealand into every level of tournament operations. Indigenous place names and terminology were added to all official signage, Indigenous flags were flown full-time at match stadiums, New Zealand featured the traditional Māori karanga welcome call before every match, and Australia included formal Welcome to Country ceremonies led by Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander elders at all pre-match events.

    The push for deeper Indigenous inclusion extends far beyond FIFA’s World Cup events. Organizers for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics drew on the Indigenous origins of lacrosse to reinstate the sport as an official Olympic medal event for the first time in more than a century, since the 1908 London Games. The Haudenosaunee Confederacy, which is widely recognized as the original creator of lacrosse, has lobbied for years to compete as an independent delegation at the Olympics, though that bid has not yet been successful.

    For British Columbia’s Indigenous tourism sector, the World Cup partnership is more than a symbolic win — it delivers meaningful economic opportunity. Data from Destination British Columbia shows Indigenous tourism generates CAD 1.1 billion in annual economic activity for the province, with 31% of international travelers actively seeking out authentic Indigenous cultural experiences during their visits.

    Indigenous Tourism BC’s Paula Amos notes that the fan festival exposure is designed to create long-term demand, not just short-term buzz during the tournament. “We’re telling visitors that once the final whistle blows on the World Cup, the experience doesn’t end here,” Amos explained. “We want to inspire people to come back with their families, to explore authentic Indigenous tourism experiences across the province. Vancouver is the perfect gateway to British Columbia, so we’re using this platform to highlight destinations and experiences across every region of the province to encourage longer, deeper visits.”

    As formal planning partners, each of Vancouver’s three host First Nations will receive CAD 6 million to fund community legacy projects. The Squamish Nation has already announced plans to use its allocation to build a public youth soccer field in West Vancouver. But community leaders say the most important impact of the partnership cannot be measured in dollars or infrastructure.

    For Joseph, the most meaningful outcome is seeing Indigenous community members participate openly and proudly in the global tournament. “My favorite part of this whole experience is seeing our nation’s members walking the streets of Vancouver, joining in the fan festival, gathering at our community watch parties, and carrying themselves with such pride,” he said. “Visitors ask questions about our culture, they want to learn about our role on this land, and that recognition means everything. To see our people front and center, standing tall and proud of who they are — those are the memories that will last. This is all about people, and the connection between different cultures that comes from this work.”

  • Israel kills Gaza elder tasked with broadcasting Egypt-Argentina game

    Israel kills Gaza elder tasked with broadcasting Egypt-Argentina game

    A deadly Israeli airstrike in central Gaza City has killed a senior Egyptian aid official and two other civilians, including a child, drawing sharp diplomatic pushback from Cairo amid ongoing ceasefire negotiations hosted by the Egyptian capital. The Tuesday attack targeted a civilian vehicle traveling through the al-Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City, claiming the life of Mohamed Fawaz al-Wahidi, who held dual leadership roles as public relations director for the Egyptian Relief Committee (ERC) and head of the committee’s Office of Mukhtars and Community Elders at its Gaza City headquarters, according to multiple regional news outlets including the Palestinian Information Center and Arabi Post. Two additional passengers in the vehicle — one a minor — also died in the strike, and several bystanders sustained injuries. Wounds
    The timing of the attack carried unusual resonance: it unfolded mere hours before the ERC was set to host a free public screening of the World Cup match between Egypt and Argentina, a popular community event the aid organization had organized across multiple Gaza locations. Prior to the strike, Wahidi had just wrapped up work at a local neighborhood reconciliation meeting, a role he was widely recognized for across the Gaza Strip. ERC spokespeople described Wahidi as a deeply respected community figure who dedicated his career to mediating local disputes and supporting Palestinian families in need. The al-Sabra strike pushed the total death toll from Israeli strikes across all of Gaza on that Tuesday to at least seven people, with an additional 20 people injured, according to casualty tallies from local medical sources. Additional drone strikes were confirmed Tuesday in the southern city of Khan Younis and across northern Gaza, local sources told Israeli outlet Haaretz and medical teams at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza. Founded under the direction of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the ERC is a key humanitarian actor in blockaded Gaza, coordinating a broad range of critical aid operations that include food distribution, rubble clearance after airstrikes, and management of displacement camps for Palestinians displaced by repeated rounds of conflict. The attack comes at a sensitive diplomatic moment: Cairo is currently hosting high-level talks aimed at securing a second phase of a regional ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Following the strike, Egyptian authorities delivered a strongly worded formal protest to Israel, demanding a full explanation for the killing of the Egyptian-affiliated aid worker, Haaretz reported. This strike is far from an isolated incident: Israel has sustained a regular campaign of airstrikes and ground operations in Gaza even after a US-brokered ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas took effect last October. In the eight months following the ceasefire’s implementation, at least 1,072 Palestinians have been killed and more than 3,460 injured in Israeli actions across the Gaza Strip, according to aggregated casualty data. This report draws on verified on-the-ground sourcing from multiple independent regional and international news outlets covering the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

  • Eight killed after landslide hits girls’ school in Bangladesh

    Eight killed after landslide hits girls’ school in Bangladesh

    A devastating landslide has claimed the lives of eight people, among them seven student girls, after it struck a girls’ Islamic study school at the world’s largest Rohingya refugee settlement in Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar, compounding a growing humanitarian crisis fueled by relentless seasonal monsoon rains.

    The disaster unfolded on Wednesday afternoon, when a cascade of mud and debris buried the makeshift school hut, triggering immediate, frantic search and rescue operations led by local relief authorities. As of the latest official updates, rescue teams have managed to extract 13 people trapped beneath the mudslide, eight of whom could not be revived after being pulled from the debris. Among the fatalities are seven students between the ages of 7 and 12 and one female teacher, while five other injured children have been transported to local medical facilities for urgent care. The total number of people who were inside the school at the time of the landslide remains unconfirmed, local officials confirmed.

    This landslide is just the latest in a string of rain-triggered disasters that have shaken the Cox’s Bazar region since Sunday, when this year’s monsoon season intensified to bring record levels of rainfall to the coastal district. Prior to the school disaster, official data already recorded at least eight additional Rohingya refugee deaths from separate landslides across the settlement, five of which were children.

    Cox’s Bazar is currently home to more than 1 million Rohingya refugees, the vast majority of whom fled a brutal military crackdown in their native Myanmar in 2017 that left thousands of Rohingya dead and forced more than 700,000 to cross the border into Bangladesh. As a stateless ethnic Muslim minority in majority-Buddhist Myanmar, Rohingya people have long been denied full citizenship and basic rights in their home country, leaving them dependent on humanitarian aid in the overcrowded Bangladesh camps. Most refugees live in flimsy, makeshift homes constructed from tarpaulin and bamboo, many of which are built on precarious steep hillsides that are extremely vulnerable to mudslides during heavy monsoon rains.

    Local disaster management authorities have warned that the risk of further catastrophe remains high, with additional heavy rainfall forecast across the region in the coming days. Officials have already issued urgent warnings for impending landslides and flash floods, and have begun moving high-risk families out of vulnerable slope-side settlements to safer emergency shelters.

  • At least 5 children die in monsoon landslide at a Rohingya camp in Bangladesh

    At least 5 children die in monsoon landslide at a Rohingya camp in Bangladesh

    A devastating monsoon-driven landslide has claimed the lives of at least five children after crashing into an Islamic school within a sprawling Rohingya refugee camp in southeastern Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar district, a senior fire service official has confirmed. The Cox’s Bazar camp complex hosts more than 1 million displaced Rohingya refugees who fled persecution in neighboring Myanmar, making it one of the largest refugee settlements in the world.

    Dollar Tripura, local head of Bangladesh’s Fire Service and Civil Defense, stated that the disaster struck mid-lesson, when children were gathered in their classes for the school day. Rescuers managed to pull five injured children out of the debris alive, but the official warned that the death toll is likely to rise, as teams suspect additional people remain trapped and buried under the mud and rubble.

    As of Wednesday evening, search and rescue efforts were still ongoing, with crews working through the night to locate possible survivors. This latest tragedy comes just three days after separate rain-induced landslides in the same camp region killed at least eight other people, amplifying concerns about the safety of refugees living in at-risk hilly terrain.

    Bangladesh’s national weather office, based in the capital Dhaka, has issued warnings for additional heavy rainfall across the region over the coming days, raising fears of more landslides. In response to the ongoing risks, local authorities have launched an urgent relocation effort to move refugees out of high-risk hilly areas that are prone to mudslides during monsoon season. More than 1,000 refugees have already been moved to safer locations, though officials report that many displaced families remain reluctant to leave their makeshift huts and small plots of land, even after repeated official warnings of the dangers.

    For years, Bangladesh has hosted the bulk of the Rohingya refugee population, who fled a 2017 military crackdown in Myanmar’s Rakhine State that the United Nations has labeled ethnic cleansing. The Bangladeshi government has repeatedly called on the international community to support a safe repatriation process for refugees to return to their homeland in Myanmar, but years of negotiations have failed to move the process forward, leaving the repatriation initiative effectively stalled.