标签： Asia

High-stakes diplomatic engagement between Russia and North Korea has entered a new active phase, after Russian President Vladimir Putin held a closed-door meeting with North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui at the Kremlin, where he openly thanked Pyongyang for its backing of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian state media has confirmed.

Choe’s unannounced, unscheduled trip to Russia — extended at the formal invitation of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, with North Korean state media confirming her departure from Pyongyang over the weekend — has sparked widespread international speculation that the visit lays the groundwork for a new potential trip to Russia by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. To date, Pyongyang has not released any detailed statement on the core agenda of Choe’s meetings in Moscow beyond confirming the visit itself.

South Korea’s Unification Ministry, the government body tasked with managing inter-Korean affairs, announced Monday that Seoul is maintaining close, real-time monitoring of the diplomatic exchanges between Moscow and Pyongyang. Spokesperson Yoon Min Ho declined to offer any on-the-record assessment of whether a new summit between Putin and Kim is currently under negotiation.

According to Russia’s state-owned Tass news agency, Putin used Sunday’s meeting to reinforce his public praise for the steady deepening of bilateral ties between the two nations. He repeated explicit gratitude to “the North Korean leadership and people” for their consistent support of Russia’s military operations in Ukraine. In response, Tass reported, Choe conveyed to Putin that Kim remains fully committed to advancing the “comprehensive development” of the Russia-North Korea relationship.

This latest meeting builds on a years-long trend of rapidly expanding strategic cooperation between the two authoritarian states. Kim has already traveled to Russia’s Far East for two separate summits with Putin, in 2019 and 2023. During a landmark June 2024 summit in Pyongyang, Putin extended a formal invitation for Kim to make a return visit to Russia, and the two leaders signed a sweeping new strategic partnership agreement that includes pledges of mutual military assistance if either nation faces an act of aggression.

Over the past several years, Kim has prioritized alignment with Moscow as a core pillar of North Korea’s foreign policy. Independent defense analysts widely confirm that Pyongyang has supplied Russia with thousands of artillery rounds, millions of artillery shells, and short-range ballistic missiles to support its war effort in Ukraine, alongside deploying thousands of North Korean troops to frontline operations. In exchange, experts say North Korea has received badly needed economic aid and access to advanced Russian military and aerospace technology that has accelerated the development of Pyongyang’s domestic nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile programs.

Choe’s trip to Moscow comes on the heels of a flurry of high-level diplomatic exchanges between North Korea and China, another key partner for Pyongyang as it works to build a united bloc opposing U.S. influence in the Indo-Pacific. Earlier this month, North Korean Premier Pak Thae Song, Kim’s top economic advisor, traveled to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and senior Chinese Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning traveled to Pyongyang for talks with Kim. Kim hosted Xi for a formal summit in Pyongyang earlier this summer, as part of Pyongyang’s strategy of positioning itself as a core member of a so-called “new Cold War” front against Washington.

Since the 2019 collapse of nuclear disarmament talks with then-U.S. President Donald Trump, Kim has frozen all substantive diplomatic engagement with both the United States and South Korea. Analysts note that Kim has leveraged global attention focused on Russia’s war in Ukraine to speed up development of North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs, while repeatedly refusing to enter new talks with Washington unless the U.S. abandons its requirement that Pyongyang commit to nuclear disarmament as a precondition for any negotiation.

NEW DELHI — On Monday, as India’s national Parliament prepared to open its annual monsoon session, thousands of demonstrators aligned with the youth-led “Cockroach Movement” defied a formal police protest ban to push forward with a planned march to the legislative building, stepping up their demands for the resignation of the country’s top education official amid growing public fury over systemic failures in India’s examination system.

Delhi law enforcement had already rejected the organizers’ application to hold the march, citing needs to preserve public order in the vicinity of Parliament during the opening week of the session. Scores of police officers were deployed to the designated starting point of the demonstration at Jantar Mantar, a central New Delhi landmark long used for public protests, where barricades were erected to block demonstrators from moving toward the Parliament complex, located just a few kilometers away. Police repeatedly broadcast calls for the crowd to disperse over loudspeakers, raising widespread fears of potential violent confrontation if protesters pushed past the police cordon.

The diverse crowd gathered for the demonstration included university students, working professionals, and even entire families with young children. Many participants came prepared for an extended day of action, carrying backpacks stocked with bottled water and non-perishable food, while others waved national Indian flags as they marched. demonstrators chanted coordinated slogans calling for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling government.

The satirical yet rapidly growing movement, which formally calls itself the Cockroach Janta Party, has its origins in an offhand comment from India’s Supreme Court Chief Justice back in May. During an unrelated public hearing, the chief justice compared a group of unemployed young job seekers to “cockroaches” — a dismissive remark that supporters reclaimed intentionally, turning the pejorative label into the identity of a grassroots movement that has already amassed millions of followers across major Indian social media platforms.

The movement has gathered explosive momentum in recent weeks amid a string of repeated high-profile leaks of competitive entrance exams for government jobs and medical college seats, scandals that have sparked widespread public anger. Many young people see these repeated leaks as evidence of deep-rooted corruption and systemic failure in India’s education and employment systems, which leave millions of graduates competing for a tiny pool of stable public sector positions.

Protests gained even more national attention over the weekend, when Delhi police forcibly transferred prominent activist Sonam Wangchuk, who had been leading a hunger strike at Jantar Mantar, to a local hospital on Saturday. For the past month, self-identified “cockroach” protesters have maintained a continuous encampment at Jantar Mantar, with dozens of student groups across the country joining the action and joining Wangchuk’s hunger strike. Large solidarity rallies have also been held at major universities and urban centers across India, expanding the movement’s reach far beyond the national capital.

Before the Monday march, Wangchuk set clear conditions for ending his 21-day hunger strike: either the central government must formally accept responsibility for the systemic failures that enabled the repeated exam leaks, or authorities must allow demonstrators to march unimpeded to Parliament, where lawmakers must pledge to debate the movement’s demands in both upper and lower houses of the legislature.

Alongside demanding Pradhan’s resignation, the movement is calling for sweeping structural reforms to India’s national examination system, as well as financial compensation for the families of dozens of students who have died by suicide in the wake of the repeated exam leaks, which have derailed the academic and career prospects of hundreds of thousands of young people.

The protest movement represents one of the most significant public challenges to Modi’s Hindu nationalist government since the prime minister won a third consecutive term in 2024 national elections. It has drawn cross-sector support from major national opposition parties, prominent human rights activists, and even well-known Bollywood celebrities. Protesters argue that space for public dissent has shrunk dramatically under Modi’s administration, which has faced repeated international criticism for jailing opposition activists, restricting peaceful protest, and in some cases ordering aggressive police crackdowns on dissenting gatherings.

Senior leaders from Modi’s ruling party have taken a uniformly hard line against the movement. Pradhan has publicly accused protesters of acting against national interests, while other senior government ministers have acknowledged the widespread frustration among unemployed students but have refused to open any formal negotiations with movement organizers.

Jyoti Rajput, a yoga teacher who joined the Monday demonstration, summed up the frustration shared by many participants. “This rotten system refuses to take action,” she said. “It cannot see the pain of students, and that’s why so many people have joined this movement.”

MANILA, Philippines — Top foreign policy leaders from across Southeast Asia are gathering in the Philippine capital this week for annual Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) talks, joined by senior diplomatic representatives from major global powers including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union. With renewed large-scale hostilities roiling the Middle East emerging as one of the most urgent threats to global stability, the bloc’s diplomats are set to signal grave concern over escalating tensions in their first formal joint session Tuesday.

This year, the Philippines holds the rotating chairmanship of the 11-member ASEAN bloc, and will host three full days of diplomatic negotiations and high-level meetings. Confirmed attendees include U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Ukraine’s top diplomat Andrii Sybiha has received an invitation to a Friday ceremony marking the 1976 ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, but will not take part in the core working meetings that Lavrov and Rubio will attend. As of the opening of the talks, no formal or informal meetings between Rubio, Lavrov, or Sybiha have been scheduled, according to official statements.

Two anonymous Southeast Asian diplomatic sources confirmed to reporters that ASEAN foreign ministers will deliberate on the escalating cross-border hostilities between the United States and Iran, which have already spilled into neighboring Middle Eastern states and stoked widespread fears of a full-scale regional war. Following closed-door deliberations, the bloc will release a joint statement voicing alarm at the rapidly shifting security situation and calling on both Washington and Tehran to de-escalate and resume diplomatic negotiations, the sources added.

The ongoing conflict has already disrupted critical commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic maritime chokepoint through which approximately 20 percent of the world’s total oil supplies passed before the latest outbreak of fighting. For Southeast Asia — a dynamic, densely populated region home to more than 680 million people that depends heavily on imported Middle Eastern energy — the conflict has already delivered severe economic shocks. Disruptions to global energy supplies and sharp price volatility have hit the region hard, prompting Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to declare a national energy emergency back in March. The declaration was aimed at securing consistent access to fuel, food, and other essential commodities, while cracking down on hoarding and price gouging.

Beyond the immediate humanitarian and economic fallout from the Iran conflict, the crisis has sparked quiet unease across the Asia-Pacific: Washington’s deployment of additional military resources to the Middle East has diverted attention and capacity from long-standing U.S. priorities in the Indo-Pacific, including countering what regional powers describe as increasingly aggressive Chinese actions in the disputed South China Sea and around Taiwan. The Trump administration has previously made formal commitments to deter Chinese expansion in the region, leading to questions about whether those commitments will be weakened by the Middle East crisis. Rubio’s attendance at the Manila talks is designed specifically to reaffirm U.S. commitments to the region. “The secretary’s visit advances a clear U.S. priority: a free and open Indo-Pacific that delivers safety, security and prosperity for the region and for the American people,” State Department spokesperson Thomas Pigott told reporters from Washington.

On the sidelines of the formal ASEAN meetings, Rubio is also scheduled to take part in a gathering of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, better known as the Quad. The bloc, established in 2007, counts the U.S., India, Japan, and Australia as members, and is widely viewed as a core pillar of American strategy to counter growing Chinese influence across the Indo-Pacific. Beijing has repeatedly criticized the bloc as an American-led initiative designed to contain China’s rise as a global power.

Alongside the major international conflicts on the agenda, ASEAN foreign ministers are facing growing pressure to make tangible progress on long-simmering regional disputes, most notably the ongoing civil war in Myanmar and overlapping territorial claims in the South China Sea. Myanmar has been mired in conflict since the country’s military seized power from the democratically elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. Data from the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, an independent human rights monitoring organization, shows that more than 8,100 people have been killed in fighting across the country, while nearly 22,500 political detainees remain in custody.

In 2021, ASEAN leaders agreed to a five-point peace plan designed to end the violence, but the framework has failed to deliver progress, largely due to non-compliance from Myanmar’s military junta. In response, ASEAN imposed a ban on junta leaders and the country’s top foreign policy official from attending the bloc’s top-level meetings, a ban that remains in place for this week’s Manila gathering. In an effort to break the years-long deadlocked, ASEAN diplomats led by Philippine Foreign Secretary Theresa Lazaro — who also serves as this year’s ASEAN special envoy for Myanmar — held a historic meeting with Myanmar’s top diplomat in Bangkok earlier this month, the first such engagement between the bloc and a junta representative in five years. During that meeting, ASEAN leaders reiterated calls for an immediate de-escalation of violence and renewed efforts to launch inclusive dialogue between all warring factions. A day after the Bangkok meeting, Lazaro and Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow held consultations with high-level representatives of Myanmar’s ethnic armed opposition groups in the Thai resort city of Pattaya.

Human rights organizations have sharply criticized the decision to meet junta foreign minister Tin Maung Swe, arguing that the move effectively reverses ASEAN’s long-standing ban on engaging senior junta officials and rewards military leaders without securing any concrete concessions toward peace. Lazaro pushed back against those criticisms, stressing that the engagement did not represent a departure from the bloc’s 2021 five-point consensus. “The path to peace can only be obtained through resolute diplomacy with all parties to the conflict,” she said.

On the South China Sea, ASEAN ministers will hold formal talks with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to advance negotiations on a long-planned code of conduct, a binding agreement designed to prevent the region’s overlapping territorial disputes from escalating into open conflict. Territorial claims in the strategically vital waters are split between China, Taiwan, and four ASEAN member states: Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. In recent years, armed confrontations between Chinese and Philippine coast guard and naval forces have become increasingly frequent, raising tensions across the region.

A mass protest movement demanding sweeping education reforms in India is moving forward with a scheduled march to the country’s parliament on Monday, after authorities forcibly removed a prominent hunger-striking activist from the demonstration site over the weekend, spurring escalating tensions between protesters and the ruling government.

The movement is led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a grassroots group that first launched as a satirical online movement in May to push back against widespread exam paper leaks and systemic irregularities in India’s education system. Founded by Abhijeet Dipke, the group has rapidly gained a massive national following, with thousands of protesters – who refer to themselves as “cockroaches” – having maintained a continuous month-long sit-in at Delhi’s historic Jantar Mantar observatory.

The demonstration gained national attention after well-known activist and educator Sonam Wangchuk joined the cause, launching a 21-day hunger strike in solidarity with the CJP. Through the scorching Delhi summer heat, Wangchuk sustained himself only on salt and water, losing more than 9 kilograms and suffering severe physical pain. Despite his declining health, he vowed to join the planned parliament march, even joking to supporters that if he died during the fast, his ghost would still join the protest.

That vow was cut short on Saturday morning, when dozens of local police and paramilitary forces raided Wangchuk’s stage at the protest site. Officers covered the activist with bedsheets to shield the removal from public view, pushed back crowd members who attempted to intervene, and transported him via ambulance to Delhi’s government-run Safdarjung Hospital for medical care. Wangchuk has refused to end his hunger strike even in hospital care, according to his wife Gitanjali Angmo. In an update Sunday, Angmo outlined a clear condition for ending the fast: sitting political leaders must meet with Wangchuk at the hospital and commit to making education accountability a top priority during the upcoming parliamentary session.

The forced removal did not derail the protest, however. CJP founder Dipke reaffirmed Sunday that the planned march to parliament will proceed as scheduled on July 20, and launched an indefinite hunger strike of his own Saturday to replace Wangchuk at the protest site. “If they think that taking Wangchuk away will end this movement, they are mistaken,” Dipke said in a statement. “We will remain here, and will march to parliament on 20 July.” Thousands of people from across the country have already confirmed they will join the march in solidarity with the reform movement.

The CJP’s protests were sparked by a string of high-profile exam cancellations tied to confirmed paper leaks. In May, a critical national medical entrance exam – taken by nearly 2.28 million aspirants – was scrapped after a leak was confirmed. A retest was held June 21, but according to family reports, more than 20 affected candidates have died by suicide in the wake of the disruption to their academic and career plans.

Protesters initially put forward two core demands: the cancellation of compromised exams and the resignation of India’s Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, who they argue must take moral accountability for the systemic failures that allowed the leaks to occur. Pradhan has previously dismissed the CJP and its supporters as “the B-team of disruptive elements,” and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s central government has refused to open any dialogue with the movement. Following Saturday’s forced removal of Wangchuk, the CJP escalated its demands, now calling for Prime Minister Modi’s resignation. Dipke called the government’s action a “despicable act” that merits the prime minister stepping down.

Opposition political parties have widely condemned the government’s handling of the protest, describing the forced removal of Wangchuk as “shocking coercive state violence” and “an assault on democracy.” In recent days, growing pressure from opposition leaders and civil society groups has pushed the government to engage with the protest, with many public figures visiting the Jantar Mantar sit-in to affirm that the protesters’ demands for education reform are legitimate and require a government response.

Heavy security deployments, including scores of police and paramilitary personnel, are already in place across central Delhi ahead of Monday’s planned march, as the country braces for a major showdown between the reform movement and the ruling government.

A coalition of leading Palestinian human rights organizations has issued a stark warning about deep procedural flaws and growing political interference in the disciplinary process against suspended International Criminal Court (ICC) Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan, just days before the court’s 125-member Assembly of States Parties (ASP) votes on whether to remove him from office. In a joint public statement released Friday by the Palestinian Human Rights Organizations Council (PHROC) — an umbrella group counting Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and Addameer among its members — the coalition stressed it is not taking sides on the merits of the misconduct allegations against Khan or the prosecutor’s defense. Instead, it is sounding the alarm that systemic failures in the proceeding violate fundamental human rights protections and mark a dangerous departure from the rule of law that threatens the ICC’s core institutional independence.

The coalition argues the disciplinary process has devolved into a political referendum driven by the competing national interests of individual ASP member states. “It is impossible to extricate such national interests from the political impact of the Chief Prosecutor’s decisions made in the various situations currently before the ICC,” the statement reads, noting that this political capture opens the door to widespread overreach that risks eroding the court’s credibility as an impartial arbiter of international justice.

The controversial proceeding stems from unproven allegations of sexual misconduct leveled against Khan in April 2024, a claim Khan has repeatedly and vehemently denied. The ASP’s executive governing body, the Bureau, suspended Khan from his post on June 8 after a majority of its 21 members voted to label his actions “serious misconduct.” PHROC’s criticism centers heavily on the Bureau’s rejection of the findings of an independent three-judge panel the Bureau itself appointed to review a United Nations investigation into the claims. In a unanimous March ruling, the panel concluded the evidence presented did not meet the ICC’s strict “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard to prove misconduct, noting the probe produced only conflicting testimonies and largely hearsay-based evidence. No independent legal body, PHROC emphasizes, has formally found the facts of the investigation amount to serious misconduct or a major breach of the prosecutor’s official duties — yet the Bureau’s contrary finding deliberately side-stepped the panel’s binding legal conclusions.

PHROC also pushes back against the Bureau’s unsubstantiated claim that Khan engaged in an inappropriate sexual relationship with the complainant, enabled by an asymmetric power dynamic. The coalition notes that neither Khan nor the accuser has ever corroborated this framing, and the Bureau’s ruling failed to establish the non-consensual sexual misconduct that formed the core of the original complaint. “The Bureau, as a political body composed of diplomats, does not have the independence, impartiality or legal expertise to make assessments on the legal characterisation of conduct, nor did it enjoy the same timeframe as the ad hoc Panel to independently examine the two reports and 5,000-pages of evidence,” the statement adds.

Further drawing condemnation is the Bureau’s last-minute rushed change to voting procedures, which PHROC says was designed to lower the bar for Khan’s removal. Previously, the process required a two-thirds majority vote to first confirm serious misconduct, followed by a separate vote requiring 63 member state votes to remove the prosecutor. The Bureau rewrote the rules to combine these steps into a single vote, eliminating the higher two-thirds threshold for a misconduct finding. According to PHROC, this procedural change dismantles critical checks and balances on the Bureau’s political decision-making, clearing a path for removal that would have otherwise been impossible to achieve.

The coalition directly ties the push to oust Khan to a broader, coordinated campaign by the United States, its allies, and Israel to undermine the ICC’s ongoing investigation into war crimes committed during Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Following Khan’s May 2024 decision to request arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on war crimes charges, the U.S. imposed retaliatory sanctions on the prosecutor, later expanding the measures to target two ICC deputy prosecutors, eight ICC judges, the United Nations special rapporteur on Palestine, and multiple Palestinian rights groups that provided evidence for the Gaza investigation.

PHROC traces this pattern of interference back years, noting that several current Bureau member states challenged the ICC’s jurisdiction over the Palestinian territories in 2020, and the United Kingdom launched a formal legal challenge to Khan’s 2024 arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. Most recently, Israel cited leaked details from the misconduct investigation in a November 2025 court filing asking that Khan be disqualified from leading the Gaza war crimes probe.

The coalition warns there is a clear and present danger that Israel and its political allies have already compromised the disciplinary process through political interference in bodies like the Bureau. “There is a very serious risk that State Parties will again prioritise their national interests and support for Israeli impunity over any genuine care or concern for either the interests of the complainant, the Prosecutor, or for the integrity of the Court,” the statement reads. The ongoing process, which launched in late 2024, has failed all parties involved, PHROC concludes, and stands to cause irreversible, far-reaching damage to both the ICC and the global project of international criminal justice. The ASP is scheduled to hold its special vote on Khan’s removal at United Nations headquarters in New York on July 24.