标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Diplomatic relations between China and Myanmar are set for a key milestone this week, as Myanmar President Min Aung Hlaing prepares to embark on a five-day state visit to China starting Monday, according to a recent announcement from China’s Foreign Ministry. This trip marks Min Aung Hlaing’s first official visit to China since he was sworn in as Myanmar’s president in April this year, and is widely expected to strengthen long-standing fraternal ties and expand practical collaboration between the two neighboring nations.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold official talks with Min Aung Hlaing during the visit. Separately, Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, China’s top legislative body, will also meet with the Myanmar leader.

    In remarks at a regular press briefing, Lin emphasized that China and Myanmar share a deep history as traditional friendly neighbors and have committed to building a bilateral community with a shared future. Over the 75 years since the two countries established formal diplomatic relations, both sides have consistently upheld the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence—a framework they co-initiated. Through decades of standing together through challenges, supporting one another, and advancing collective cooperation, bilateral relations have delivered substantial, mutually beneficial progress.

    “Through this visit, China looks forward to working alongside Myanmar to carry forward the traditional ‘pauk-phaw’ fraternal friendship, deepen the bilateral comprehensive strategic partnership, achieve more tangible outcomes in advancing the China-Myanmar community with a shared future, and bring greater welfare to the people of both countries,” Lin added.

    The upcoming state visit builds on a string of recent high-level diplomatic exchanges between the two countries. Earlier this month, Myanmar Foreign Minister Tin Maung Swe traveled to Beijing for talks, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi paid an official visit to Myanmar back in April.

    Economic ties between the two nations have already shown strong growth in recent years: China has held the position of Myanmar’s largest trading partner for multiple consecutive years, and official Chinese data shows bilateral trade volume hit $19.4 billion in 2025, representing a 19.1% year-on-year increase.

    Just this week, during an appearance at the opening ceremony of 2026 Chinese Film Week in Myanmar’s capital Nay Pyi Taw, Min Aung Hlaing expressed public gratitude to China for its support, per Myanmar’s presidential office. He specifically thanked China for dispatching emergency humanitarian assistance after a recent major earthquake struck Myanmar, as well as for its continued long-term support for Myanmar’s social development across key sectors including education, public health, social welfare, and rural development.

    Zhou Fangyin, a professor specializing in international relations at Sun Yat-sen University based in Guangzhou, Guangdong, noted that the development of China-Myanmar relations has long been rooted in the core principles of mutual respect and mutual benefit. The strong political trust established by both sides over decades has laid a solid, enabling foundation for expanding practical cooperation in all areas moving forward.

  • Palestinian football chief denied entry to US in latest case of World Cup travel restrictions

    Palestinian football chief denied entry to US in latest case of World Cup travel restrictions

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, opened on Thursday to widespread controversy, as sweeping visa denials, entry bans and controversial security measures imposed by U.S. authorities have barred dozens of accredited football delegates, sports officials, journalists and fans from accessing matches, drawing accusations of politically motivated discrimination against the global football community.

    The most high-profile case involves Jibril Rajoub, president of the Palestinian Football Association, who holds official FIFA accreditation to attend the tournament. Though the Palestinian men’s national team did not qualify for this year’s World Cup, Rajoub planned to join fellow global football governing body delegates to watch matches in the U.S. Instead, U.S. consular officials rejected his visa application, leaving him stuck in Mexico City, where he watched the tournament’s opening fixture between Mexico and South Africa earlier this week.

    Rajoub has framed the visa refusal as a politically motivated attack on the fundamental right of global football representatives to participate in the world’s biggest sporting event. He highlighted the stark double standard between this tournament and the 2018 World Cup in Russia, where he traveled and attended matches without any diplomatic barriers. “I don’t believe that it’s fair to use or to abuse and deny the right of all footballers all over the world to attend,” he said, adding the restriction is fundamentally unfair.

    The refusal comes just one month after Rajoub declined a public request from FIFA President Gianni Infantino to shake hands with the head of the Israeli Football Association. Rajoub explained at the time that such a symbolic gesture would merely serve to whitewash Israel’s widely condemned unlawful actions in Palestinian territories.

    Rajoub is far from the only accredited World Cup stakeholder blocked from entering the U.S. The visa issues have already touched nearly every corner of the global football community, from top referees to national team delegations, working journalists, and ordinary ticket-holding fans.

    In one recent high-profile incident, Omar Abdulkadir Artan, named 2025 African Referee of the Year, was denied entry to the U.S. even though he held a fully valid visa issued by the U.S. Department of State. Members of Iraq’s official national delegation, including star striker Aymen Hussein and the team’s official photographer, were held for seven hours of detention at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. While Hussein was ultimately granted entry after extended questioning, the photographer was turned away and deported.

    The International Sports Press Association has confirmed that dozens of journalists from African nations and Iran have also been blocked from obtaining the multi-entry visas required to travel between all three co-host nations to cover matches. Even fans with confirmed match tickets have not been spared: fans from Scotland and Morocco have seen their pre-approved travel authorizations revoked or their visa applications rejected at the last minute, just days before they were set to travel for the tournament. Iran’s government additionally confirmed that the 8 percent ticket allocation allocated to official Iranian fans was revoked just days before the tournament kicked off, leaving hundreds of Iranian supporters who had already booked flights and accommodation stranded with no way to attend.

    Compounding growing tensions over access to the tournament, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security recently confirmed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) enforcement agents will be deployed inside World Cup stadiums hosted on U.S. soil as part of the tournament’s security plan. More than 120 U.S. and international civil rights organizations have condemned the decision, warning that the presence of uniformed immigration enforcement agents inside venues will undermine the personal safety of both international visitors and stadium staff, particularly for fans and workers from immigrant backgrounds.

    In response to widespread criticism of the visa restrictions and disruptions, FIFA issued a formal statement asserting that the governing body does not intervene in the domestic immigration and visa adjudication processes of the tournament’s host nations. This neutral stance has already drawn comparisons to FIFA’s 2023 decision to strip Indonesia of the right to host the Under-20 World Cup, after Indonesian local government officials objected to Israel’s participation in the tournament.

    This independent reporting was originally produced by Middle East Eye, a global outlet focused on in-depth coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • UK lords working for consulting firm lobbying for UAE

    UK lords working for consulting firm lobbying for UAE

    An investigation by independent outlet Middle East Eye has uncovered a contentious link between three sitting members of the UK House of Lords and a global consultancy firm that is registered to lobby senior UK officials on behalf of the United Arab Emirates, a Gulf state widely accused of enabling widespread human suffering in Sudan’s ongoing civil war.

    The three peers in question are Thangam Debbonaire, a former Labour Member of Parliament and shadow culture secretary elevated to the House of Lords by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in 2024; Conservative peer Ruth Porter, a former deputy chief of staff to ex-prime minister Liz Truss who serves as a managing director at the firm FGS Global; and Andrew Cooper, an independent peer and former senior advisor to ex-prime minister David Cameron, who holds a partner role at the company.

    Per filings with the UK’s Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, FGS Global has conducted active lobbying outreach to UK parliamentarians, senior civil servants, and other key stakeholders on behalf of the UAE since October 2025. The firm’s registered activities include organizing in-person meetings, telephone calls and email correspondence to boost awareness of the UAE-UK bilateral relationship, alongside providing strategic media guidance and content support to the UAE’s embassy in London.

    The connection comes amid grave international allegations against the UAE: rights groups and United Nations Security Council investigators have repeatedly documented that the Gulf state has funneled weapons and logistical support to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a Sudanese paramilitary group that has carried out mass atrocities over three years of civil war. The conflict has displaced an estimated 13 million Sudanese people and left hundreds of thousands dead, with UN investigators confirming that an RSF attack on the besieged city of El Fasher in October 2024 bore clear “hallmarks of genocide” that killed at least 6,000 people in just three days. The UAE has consistently denied all allegations of providing support to the RSF.

    FGS Global has stated that no wrongdoing has occurred, emphasizing that all of its staff adhere strictly to UK transparency, disclosure and advocacy rules. The firm also clarified that none of the three House of Lords members associated with the company have worked on the UAE client account. No evidence has been presented to suggest the peers have engaged in any improper activity related to the UAE contract.

    Despite these denials, transparency and human rights campaigners have raised urgent alarms about the conflict of interest inherent in having senior parliamentarians hold paid roles at firms lobbying for foreign governments accused of mass human rights violations. Steve Goodrich, head of research and investigations at Transparency International UK, argued that the current regulatory framework fails to address clear risks to democratic accountability. “When members of the House of Lords hold senior roles at firms lobbying for foreign governments, it’s hard to know whose interests are being represented,” Goodrich told Middle East Eye. “Peers are in Parliament to serve the public, not to open doors for paying clients. The rules should require peers to choose: keep their seat in the Lords, or keep their interests in the lobbying industry.”

    Kristyan Benedict, crisis response manager at Amnesty International UK, echoed these concerns, noting that all parliamentarians have a duty to scrutinize the entities they associate with, particularly when those entities work for governments accused of breaking international law. The case of Debbonaire, one of the three peers, has added layers of controversy: she has previously been a vocal critic of outside paid lobbying for lawmakers, calling for a ban on second jobs for House of Commons members during a 2021 parliamentary standards debate, where she declared that “MPs should not be for sale” and that lawmakers are elected to serve the public good rather than private interests. In 2024, she also publicly opposed a proposed UAE-led takeover of UK media outlets the Telegraph and the Spectator, arguing that a foreign power-backed acquisition should not be approved.

    Further scrutiny of FGS Global’s ties to UK politics has emerged following the investigation: the firm donated more than £27,000 to the UK Labour Party in 2024, with a portion of the funds used to second an FGS staff member, Kamella Hudson, as an election campaign advisor to current Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves. Hudson was previously accused of arranging private meetings between UK ministers and Chinese fast-fashion giant Shein, another FGS client, in 2024. The donations also funded a high-profile drinks reception following Reeves’ keynote speech to the 2024 Labour Party conference, UK media reports confirm.

    The controversy also overlaps with longstanding criticism of the UK government’s continued arms sales to the UAE. Despite a full UN arms embargo on Sudan imposed in 2024, and UN findings that UK-manufactured arms are being diverted to the RSF via the UAE, the UK government has approved multiple arms export licenses to the Gulf state in 2025, including components for military vehicles, drone parts and gun silencers. “The UAE has been a known hub for arms diversion for years and the UK government has long been aware of weapons being routed through the Emirates to conflict zones like Sudan and Libya,” Benedict said. “The UK government has committed to help end the conflict in Sudan and to work to prevent atrocities, but it still hasn’t suspended all arms sales to the UAE, which it must do immediately.”

    FGS Global’s lobbying work for the UAE extends far beyond the UK: the firm is also registered as a foreign agent for the Gulf state in the United States, where it has additionally represented the breakaway Somali region of Somaliland. Per US disclosure filings, FGS was contracted by the UAE to shape US policy on bilateral trade, investment and geopolitical issues through outreach to policymakers, media outlets, think tanks and academic circles. The UAE’s expanded global lobbying push comes as the country navigates a major diplomatic rift with its former ally Saudi Arabia, driven by disagreement over the UAE’s backing of secessionist movements across Yemen, Libya and Somalia.

    In addition to the UAE, FGS Global’s UK client roster includes US tech giant Oracle, a company co-founded by billionaire Larry Ellison with close ties to the second Trump administration. Oracle is a major funder of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, a think tank chaired by former UK prime minister Tony Blair that sparked widespread controversy in February 2025 after it was revealed that institute staff had drafted plans for a post-war Gaza dubbed the “Trump Riviera”, a proposal widely condemned for appearing to endorse the ethnic cleansing of the territory’s Palestinian population. Blair currently serves on US President Donald Trump’s so-called “Board of Peace”, a body tasked with overseeing the besieged enclave after a planned end to Israeli hostilities.

  • Australia embraces immigrants on World Cup squad with message that soccer is for everyone

    Australia embraces immigrants on World Cup squad with message that soccer is for everyone

    As Australia’s men’s national football team, the Socceroos, prepares to kick off its 2026 FIFA World Cup Group D campaign against Turkey in Vancouver, British Columbia this Saturday, the squad is using the global tournament spotlight to deliver a unifying message: soccer belongs to everyone, regardless of where you come from. This intentional stance comes as anti-immigrant rhetoric and hostility surges across Australia and much of the globe, creating a fraught backdrop for the team’s statement of inclusion.

    Central to the message is the team’s own diverse makeup, which is showcased in a new video released by Professional Footballers Australia (PFA). Multiple current squad members arrived in Australia as refugees, each carrying a unique journey to the world’s biggest football stage. For attacking player Awer Mabil, who is set to make his second World Cup appearance after growing up in a Kenyan refugee camp born to South Sudanese parents, representing Australia carries layered meaning. “There’s a lot of journeys behind the jersey, so to be a Socceroo has many different meanings, but with one purpose, and that is to do the country proud,” Mabil shared in the video.

    Mabil is not alone in his refugee background. Two of his teammates, both making their World Cup debuts this year, share similar origin stories. Mohamed Touré, a forward who currently plays club football for Norwich, was born to Liberian parents in a Guinean refugee camp before his family resettled in Adelaide. Nestory Irankunda, an attacker plying his trade at Watford, was born in a Tanzanian camp after his parents fled conflict in Burundi; his family first moved to Perth before ultimately putting down roots in Adelaide, where he and Touré became close friends. Even defender Milos Degenek’s story is shaped by refugee experience: his family fled Croatia when he was an infant, sought asylum in Serbia, and later resettled in Sydney to build a new life.

    The timing of the Socceroos’ celebration of immigrant team members is anything but accidental. Across the world, recent weeks have seen growing tensions stoked by anti-immigrant rhetoric. Earlier this month, a knife attack in Northern Ireland, fueled by anti-migrant speech, sparked two consecutive nights of violent rioting. In the United States, where the team has been training in Oakland, California, the Trump administration’s sweeping immigration crackdown has even spilled over into the World Cup: Somali referee Omar Artan was denied a visa to enter the country for the tournament, barring him from his officiating assignment. Within Australia itself, a series of anti-immigrant “March for Australia” rallies have been held across the country, with events resulting in multiple arrests on hate speech charges and violent clashes with counter-protesters who support inclusive immigration policy.

    PFA Chief Executive Beau Busch explained that the team’s public embrace of its multicultural roots is a deliberate rebuke to divisive rhetoric. “At a time when some seek to divide us and question who belongs, the Socceroos stand as a powerful reminder of who we truly are as a nation and as Australians,” Busch said. “The Socceroos highlight the profound impact of multiculturalism on our country. People who have come from all corners of the world have shaped football, our community and our sense of self in the world.”

    Off the pitch, the team’s final preparations hit a small bump earlier this week when Touré—one of 17 first-time squad members selected for the tournament—was absent from a Wednesday training session, causing minor concern among coaching staff. Teammates confirmed Thursday that Touré had returned to practice, clearing the way for him to be available for Saturday’s opener. This will mark Australia’s sixth consecutive World Cup appearance; the Socceroos have advanced to the knockout round of 16 twice in their tournament history, including during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.

  • Palestine Action activists sentenced as terrorists

    Palestine Action activists sentenced as terrorists

    In an unprecedented decision that has sent shockwaves through Britain’s legal and activist communities, a British High Court judge has branded four Palestine Action protesters as terrorists and sentenced them to seven years in prison — an extraordinary move that comes even after a jury refused to convict the group on any terrorism-related charges.

    The case stems from a August 2024 direct action protest at an Elbit Systems UK facility near Bristol, where the four activists — Leona Kamio, Samuel Corner, Fatema Rajwani, and Charlotte Head — were found guilty by jurors only of criminal damage linked to the raid. Two additional co-defendants, Jordan Devlin and Zoe Rogers, were cleared of all charges entirely. Elbit Systems UK is a local subsidiary of the Israeli arms manufacturing giant that produces drones and military weapons deployed by the Israeli military in its ongoing military campaign in Gaza.

    Presiding Justice Jeremy Johnson formally added the controversial “terrorism connection” designation to the activists’ offenses during Friday’s sentencing hearing. The judge first flagged a potential terrorism link in a March 2025 preliminary ruling, arguing the protesters aimed to influence the Israeli government by disrupting arms supply chains. Crucially, this preliminary finding was never shared with the jury that ultimately convicted the group on non-terrorism charges.

    This ruling marks the first time in United Kingdom legal history that the terrorism designation has been applied to non-violent direct action protesters who were never convicted of terrorism offenses or intentional harm to people. Johnson justified his decision in court, stating the designation was grounded in findings that the group caused “serious property damage”, intended to pressure both the UK and Israeli governments, and intimidated members of the public, while acting to advance a clear political and ideological cause.

    A central point of contention in the sentencing phase has been the late submission of prosecution evidence used to quantify the damage from the raid. Prosecutors turned over a report from an independent forensic consultant just days before the hearing, which estimated total damage just over £1.2 million, covering harm to building infrastructure, IT systems, operational equipment and 40 separate military assets.

    Chief defense counsel Rajiv Menon KC lambasted the timing of the submission, calling it a last-minute move that came 20 months after the protest, long after Elbit finalized its insurance claim in March 2025. Menon argued that the delayed filing gave the defense no meaningful opportunity to review or challenge the report, which he dismissed as full of hearsay and unsubstantiated opinion. He further noted that the report included damage claims for sections of the factory the four defendants never even entered during the protest.

    Menon argued that relying on this unvetted evidence to increase the sentence and apply the terrorism designation would be a fundamental violation of the activists’ right to a fair trial. He criticized prosecutors for their inconsistent approach to evidence: “The Crown cannot have their cake and eat it. It can’t exclude evidence on the one hand and somehow bring it through the back door for sentencing.”

    Outside the courtroom, the ruling sparked immediate mass protest: hundreds of demonstrators gathered to demonstrate support for the activists, and police reported that more than 100 people were arrested simply for displaying signs in solidarity with Palestine Action, which has been proscribed as a terrorist organization in the UK.

  • England crush Sri Lanka in Women’s T20 World Cup as Wyatt-Hodge’s 105 powers record total

    England crush Sri Lanka in Women’s T20 World Cup as Wyatt-Hodge’s 105 powers record total

    BIRMINGHAM, England — Host nation England got its 2024 Women’s Twenty20 World Cup campaign off to a historic, electrifying start on Friday, cruising to an overwhelming 87-run victory over Sri Lanka in front of a sold-out-feeling crowd of 14,865 cheering fans at Edgbaston.

    The story of the match was written by England’s batters, who delivered a tournament record-breaking performance to post the highest total in Women’s T20 World Cup history: 219 runs for the loss of just one wicket at the close of their 20 overs. The standout of the innings was opening batter Danni Wyatt-Hodge, who recently returned to international cricket after maternity leave, finishing an unbeaten 105 runs off 62 deliveries.

    Wyatt-Hodge shared the crease for a game-changing opening stand with Amy Jones, who was promoted up the batting order to open the innings. The pair put on 135 runs together, a new record for England’s highest opening partnership in T20 World Cup history, hitting 100 runs inside the first 10 overs. Jones survived two dropped catches on 12 and 48 before finally being dismissed for 53 runs off 38 balls, cementing her role in the dominant opening display.

    England captain Nat Sciver-Brunt, who only recently made her return to competitive cricket after suffering a torn calf injury in April, also made history during the innings. She survived a dropped catch when she was on 14, and went on to score an unbeaten 46 runs off just 22 deliveries. This knock pushed her career T20 World Cup run total to 784, overtaking former captain and current England head coach Charlotte Edwards’ previous record of 768 to become the nation’s all-time leading run-scorer in the tournament.

    In the final over of England’s innings, Sciver-Brunt gave the final two deliveries to Wyatt-Hodge, who was stuck on 97 runs at the time. The opener wasted no time, hitting the first of the two behind square for a boundary to bring up her century — just the seventh hundred in Women’s T20 World Cup history, and only the second ever scored by an English player. She followed that with another four off the final delivery, closing her innings on 105 not out with 13 fours, marking her third career T20 century.

    After reaching the milestone, Wyatt-Hodge punched the air in celebration before re-creating the iconic baby-rocking celebration first made famous by Brazilian soccer star Bebeto at the 1994 men’s FIFA World Cup. The celebration was a tribute to her newborn daughter Daisy, who was born on May 20 to Wyatt-Hodge and her wife. “It was great fun out there,” Wyatt-Hodge told reporters after the match. “My century celebration was for my daughter Daisy. I hope TV got it.”

    Wyatt-Hodge’s impact extended far beyond her batting performance. In the fourth over of Sri Lanka’s chase, she ran from deep square leg, dove over her shoulder, and pulled off a spectacular one-handed catch to remove Chamari Athapaththu — Sri Lanka’s dangerous captain and biggest batting threat — for just 4 runs. Though she dropped two subsequent catching chances, neither miscue proved costly for England.

    Left-arm fast bowler Freya Kemp turned in a career-defining performance with the ball as Sri Lanka’s chase collapsed. Kemp finished with career-best figures of 4 wickets for just 21 runs, including three wickets in a single over that crumbled Sri Lanka’s batting order and reduced them to 92 runs for 8 wickets. Sri Lanka was eventually bowled out for 132 runs, sealing England’s 87-run opening win.

    The tournament continues Saturday with three group-stage matches: Ireland faces Scotland, Australia takes on South Africa, and defending champion New Zealand meets the West Indies.

  • ‘I hope Rama resigns’: Why Albania’s Flamingo Revolution isn’t actually about flamingos

    ‘I hope Rama resigns’: Why Albania’s Flamingo Revolution isn’t actually about flamingos

    As the clock strikes 6 p.m. on a midweek Wednesday, several hundred Albanian demonstrators assemble along the perimeter of Tirana’s central Skanderbeg Square. A small group of speakers steps forward to address the crowd, while new arrivals stream in, carrying hand-painted posters and national flags. Roughly 30 minutes after the first gathering, the crowd begins a coordinated march toward the residential compound of Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama, located in the capital’s core. Along the route, informal street vendors do brisk business selling Albanian national flags, branded scarves, whistles, and traditional white wool qeleshe hats, a symbol of national identity. By the time the crowd reaches the prime minister’s office, their numbers have swollen to thousands, stretching nearly a full kilometer along the city’s central boulevard. Chants ring out across the thoroughfare, mixed with the sound of drumming, whistles, and defiant singing. One slogan, scrawled on signs and shouted in unison, translates plainly: “Edi Rama ka mbaru” — Prime Minister Edi Rama’s time is up. By 9 p.m., the march has spread through central Tirana, gridlocking traffic for blocks. But most stranded drivers do not express frustration; instead, many wave Albanian flags, cheer on the marchers, or lean on their horns in solidarity, with some even climbing onto the roofs of their vehicles to display their support. What began as a localized environmental demonstration against a controversial luxury development has erupted into a sustained national uprising, entering its 13th consecutive day of action by the end of last week. The unrest first ignited on May 30, sparked by plans for high-end resorts on Sazan, Albania’s largest island, and within the protected Vjosa-Narta nature reserve — a unique ecosystem home to flamingos, sea turtles, more than 200 bird species, and over 70 plants and animals classified as endangered. The multi-billion-dollar development project is led by Affinity Partners, the private investment firm founded by Jared Kushner, son-in-law of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Public scrutiny of the project intensified after Ivanka Trump, Kushner’s wife, claimed she “discovered” Sazan during a private yacht trip, a comment that drew widespread anger among Albanians. In 2024, the Rama administration oversaw amendments to legislation governing protected natural areas, a change critics say deliberately opened formerly off-limits conservation zones to private tourism development. Construction work on the project kicked off in late May, and local residents immediately began staging small protests around the fenced construction site, which was guarded by private security contractors. Tensions boiled over after a video went viral showing security guards dragging a protester across the ground, an incident that galvanized public anger and drew thousands of new demonstrators to the movement. In the opening days of the protest, demonstrators centered their opposition on the threat to Vjosa-Narta’s fragile ecosystem, with viral photos of marchers holding signs featuring the reserve’s iconic pink flamingos spreading across social media. But in less than two weeks, the movement has undergone a profound transformation: what started as a single-issue environmental campaign has evolved into a broad-based anti-government uprising targeting Rama’s administration and the entire Albanian political establishment. Rama has repeatedly dismissed the protests, dismissing the movement as “engineered digital hysteria,” accusing international media of exaggerating the scope of public anger, and drawing a hard line on the development project. “There is no chance for this investment to stop as long as I am here,” the prime minister said. For demonstrators, however, anger extends far beyond the proposed resort. Many have grown deeply frustrated with years of unaddressed public grievances, entrenched corruption, and policy decisions they say prioritize the interests of wealthy foreign investors over the basic needs of ordinary Albanian citizens. Oljam Dervishi, founder and CEO of Albanian environmental NGO Resu, explained that the project sets a dangerous precedent for the future of the country’s protected natural spaces. “If the resort gets built, that will mean that everywhere where there are protected areas, they are not protected anymore,” Dervishi told Middle East Eye. “This project shouldn’t happen. If they want to develop, they should develop somewhere else.” Dervishi added that the movement’s priorities have already shifted far beyond environmental protection: “I don’t think this is a question of protected areas or the environment anymore. People feel like decisions are not taken for the people, but for investors. And that’s why they are furious.” Jonida, a computer programming student who has joined every day of the protests since they began, echoed that sentiment, noting that opposition to the project is not rooted in anti-American sentiment or opposition to the Trump family specifically. “Even if it was another billionaire, we would still be here,” she said. “Because the real problem is the principle of selling the country.” For Jonida, the Albanian government should be prioritizing far more urgent domestic issues: improving the country’s underfunded healthcare and public education systems, and lowering skyrocketing fuel prices. “This needs to be fixed first. You can think about tourism for elites after. But even then, it has to be outside of protective areas. You cannot change laws through corruption.” Like many demonstrators, Jonida’s ultimate demand goes far beyond canceling the resort: she is calling for Rama’s resignation, and says she does not support the country’s traditional political opposition either. Instead, she hopes the protests will pave the way for a new grassroots people’s party that will prioritize the needs of Albanian citizens. “I hope there will be a party that cares about Albanian citizens; that there will be people who are in it for the country and not for the money.” Rezarta, a 21-year-old architecture student and fellow protester, laughed off Ivanka Trump’s comment about “discovering” the island, noting “Ivanka the explorer says she found our island, but it was ours to begin with.” While Rama has promoted the resort as a major driver of economic growth for Albania, Rezarta says ordinary Albanians will see none of the benefits. “We Albanians get nothing. Only Ivanka, her friends, our prime minister and his friends can enjoy it.” For her, the protests are a reflection of widespread anger at a political system that prioritizes elite luxury tourism over the basic needs of the Albanian public. “The healthcare is horrible and living here is very expensive compared to the wages we get. We cannot take it anymore.” Rezarta also joined calls for the removal of the entire top political leadership, including both Rama and opposition leader Sali Berisha, echoing the popular protest slogan “Rama to prison; Berisha to prison.” The 81-year-old leader of the Democratic Party, who previously served as prime minister and president, is widely accused by demonstrators of colluding with Rama to protect elite interests. “We know that they are working together,” Rezarta said. “We want them gone from our politics. We want new people and new faces.” She added that the large presence of young people at the protests reflects a last stand for the future of the country: “Many of the people here are Gen Z and Millennials. You can feel that they’re here to fix everything – or else we’re all leaving Albania.” That fear of a mass exodus of young people is what drove Hortensa, a mother of two, to join the protests. Her motivation is simple: “I don’t want my kids to leave Albania.” Her anxiety is well founded: roughly 1.2 million Albanians — a third of the country’s total population — currently live abroad. “What don’t we have that Italy or Germany have?” she asked. “Our youth should remain in Albania.” Redes, a dentist who has watched dozens of his relatives and friends emigrate “because of this corrupted government,” shares that frustration. Even with a stable professional career, Redes says daily life in Albania remains a struggle. “The wages are bad. Everyone is fed up.” He is also calling for Rama’s resignation, arguing the resort project is designed to line the prime minister’s pockets and curry favor with the U.S. “But at what cost?” he asked. “None of the working-class people would be able to go to the resort. It’s for billionaires, not for us. Even though this is our land.” Ilir, a long-time anti-government activist who has been demonstrating against Albanian administrations for years, notes this movement is different from previous small-scale protests. “In the past, it was just a couple of hundred people. This time is different. Most people here want both the government and opposition leaders in prison. We consider them traitors,” he said. Ilir accuses the government of “selling and destroying the most beautiful parts of Albania,” adding that the protected natural areas were “sold to foreigners under the table.” While the protests have already shifted far from their original environmental roots, they have notched early partial wins. Albania’s top anti-corruption judicial body, SPAK, has launched a formal investigation into the project and frozen assets and bank accounts linked to the developing company. Separately, the European Commission has issued a formal warning that the project could create significant complications for Albania’s bid to join the European Union — a goal that public polling shows is supported by 91% of Albanians. Earlier this week, a European Commission spokesperson confirmed that after the body raised formal concerns, Albania’s environment minister committed to pausing construction and ordering a full independent environmental impact assessment of the project. As of Friday, when the protests entered their 13th consecutive day, there is no sign of the movement winding down. For Dervishi, even the act of sustained public protest is already a victory. “One of my goals is to end this state of being scared of speaking out,” he said. “That’s why this protest is so meaningful for me and for all the people here. And I’m very positive that the protests will have good outcomes that will serve the people of Albania.”

  • Israeli spyware firm targeted Whatsapp users despite US court order

    Israeli spyware firm targeted Whatsapp users despite US court order

    Facebook parent company Meta has uncovered new unlawful activity by the notorious NSO Group, claiming the Israeli-founded spyware developer has repeatedly violated a permanent US court injunction by targeting WhatsApp users across Jordan and Lebanon, the tech giant confirmed earlier this week.

    Meta’s security investigation found that NSO Group carried out coordinated spear-phishing operations against a small number of WhatsApp accounts in the two Middle Eastern nations. The firm also created unauthorized test accounts and discussion groups on the messaging platform, according to Meta’s findings.

    Following the discovery, WhatsApp published the three domain names NSO Group used to facilitate one-click device infections: ikhwancast, ghazacast and fr24cast. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at University of Toronto’s cybersecurity watchdog Citizen Lab, has raised questions over whether the fr24cast domain was intentionally designed to impersonate respected international French news outlet France24, a common tactic in deceptive phishing attacks.

    A look at NSO Group’s history of controversial activity shows the firm is the creator of Pegasus, the world-famous (and widely condemned) spyware that can silently infiltrate WhatsApp accounts to extract sensitive personal data including private messages, photos, call logs and other user information. After years of legal and regulatory scrutiny, the company came under US ownership in 2024.

    The 2025 court battle between Meta and NSO Group resulted in a major ruling against the spyware firm. A US judge ordered NSO Group to pay Meta $167 million in damages, a figure that was later reduced to $4 million, but the most impactful outcome was a permanent nationwide ban that forbids NSO Group from accessing or targeting any WhatsApp services or its global user base.

    Meta says this newly uncovered campaign is clear proof NSO Group has blatantly violated that court order. The firm has a long-standing placement on a US Commerce Department blacklist that bars any American company from doing business with NSO Group, a designation the Biden administration implemented after determining the firm’s activities posed a threat to US national security and foreign policy interests.

    Recent industry reporting indicates NSO Group has been lobbying heavily to be removed from the US blacklist under the second Trump administration, a push that aligns with the firm’s 2024 appointment of David Friedman as executive chair. Friedman served as the US Ambassador to Israel throughout Trump’s first presidential term from 2017 to 2021, a high-profile pick widely interpreted as an effort to win favor with the current White House.

    This is not the first time NSO Group’s spyware has been linked to invasive surveillance of targets in the Middle East. A 2021 collaborative investigation coordinated by the journalism non-profit Forbidden Stories exposed how multiple Middle Eastern governments were using Pegasus to spy on journalists, human rights activists, and political opposition figures. Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates were among the nations named in the investigation as clients of NSO Group. One high-profile incident from 2022, documented by independent regional outlet Middle East Eye, captured the human cost of this surveillance: Finsbury Park Mosque chair Mohammed Kozbar was filmed explaining to his son that the family’s devices had been compromised by Pegasus, a moment observers described as a heartbreaking illustration of the harm invasive spyware inflicts on ordinary people.

    As of this week, NSO Group has not issued any public response to Meta’s allegations, after declining to comment on the claims when approached by The Guardian. Meta has not yet announced what legal action it may pursue in response to the reported court order violation.

  • UK imam’s house firebombed and suspicious device found at mosque in Bolton

    UK imam’s house firebombed and suspicious device found at mosque in Bolton

    In a sequence of shocking, suspected coordinated attacks targeting local Muslim community figures in Bolton, northern England, a suspicious device was discovered outside a local mosque, followed hours later by a firebomb arson attack on the home of a prominent local imam. The discovery of the suspicious package, which contained a battery pack, was made early Wednesday morning outside Zakariyya Jaam’e Masjid, local outlet Manchester Evening News first reported.

    By the end of the same day, the residential property of 42-year-old imam Hassan Patel, also located within Bolton, had been firebombed in a deliberate attack. Captured closed-circuit television footage documents a masked man, clad in a helmet and all-black clothing, approaching the driveway of Patel’s home. The footage shows the suspect lighting an accelerant-laden object, smashing a front window of the property and throwing the lit item inside.

    Patel resides in the home with his wife, four children, and nephew, bringing the total number of people in the property at the time of the attack to seven. Greater Manchester Police (GMP) confirmed that all seven residents managed to escape the attack without physical injury, and emergency services safely evacuated the entire family.

    In a statement following the attack, Patel expressed that his family has been left devastated by the brazen, cold-hearted act, which was carried out in broad daylight. He emphasized the attack was an intentional, dangerous act that deliberately put every member of his family at mortal risk. Patel, a long-time Bolton resident who has a track record of interfaith engagement with people across all religious and secular backgrounds, noted that law enforcement have so far not classified the incident as a hate crime. Even so, he argued that all potential motives must be examined thoroughly, with no lines of inquiry ruled out before investigations are complete.

    As of the latest update, GMP confirmed that a full criminal investigation is active and ongoing, and no arrests have yet been made. Detective Chief Inspector Mike Sharples of GMP released an official statement stressing that attacks of this nature have no place in the region, and no member of any local community should ever be made to feel unsafe, threatened or intimidated in their own home. Sharples acknowledged the understandable anxiety the incident has sparked across Bolton’s wider community, adding that officers are working at full speed to identify and prosecute the perpetrators. He confirmed that the attack is being treated as a deliberate, targeted act, and there is no ongoing threat to the general public. GMP has issued a public appeal for any members of the public with relevant footage or information about the attack to come forward to assist with the investigation.

    The dual incidents in Bolton have already sparked significant political fallout, with local leaders and party figures weighing in on the attack and the perceived lack of national response. Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, who was born in nearby Salford, publicly criticized Prime Minister Keir Starmer for failing to issue any public condemnation of the Bolton attacks. Writing on the social platform X, Polanski called the silence disgraceful, arguing that a troubling double standard has emerged: some attacks are met with widespread cross-party condemnation, blanket media coverage and urgent emergency response, while others are ignored entirely by senior national leaders.

    Local Labour MP for Bolton Yasmin Qureshi also spoke out, noting that the back-to-back targeting of a mosque and a local imam has left Muslim residents across the town feeling anxious about walking public streets and bringing their children to worship. Qureshi refused to downplay the nature of the attacks, stating that when a mosque and an imam’s home are targeted within hours of one another, the message to the local Muslim community is clear, and it is a message she recognizes too. “Islamophobia has no place in Bolton. None. Our Muslim community is part of the fabric of this town, and an attack on them is an attack on all of us,” Qureshi said.

    The Bolton incidents come one day after violent race riots broke out in Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland, where hundreds of masked far-right rioters set fire to homes and vehicles owned primarily by ethnic minority residents. Rioters even set up informal checkpoints to stop and search vehicles for foreign nationals, following the arrest of a Sudanese asylum seeker charged with attempted murder earlier that same Tuesday. The suspect, Hadi Alodid, a 30-year-old who has been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, was filmed carrying out a knife attack on a man on a residential Belfast street, an act many political commentators have described as an attempted beheading.

    Following the Belfast attack, high-profile far-right activist Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) and X owner Elon Musk both publicly called for anti-migrant protests across the UK. Anti-migrant demonstrations were subsequently held in Belfast, Glasgow and Southampton this week, raising tensions around interfaith and immigrant community safety across the country.

  • Israel expels Palestinians from their homes to use them as military posts

    Israel expels Palestinians from their homes to use them as military posts

    For Mohammed Rahal, a Palestinian father who survived 18 months of displacement after Israeli forces drove him from his original home in Jenin Refugee Camp in the occupied West Bank, the dream of stability was short-lived. After pooling every resource he and his sons could gather to purchase a new home on the edge of the camp and working up to 20 hours a day for months to ready the space for his extended family, Israeli soldiers arrived at his door with a new order: evacuate the property immediately so it could be converted into an Israeli military outpost for a minimum of two months.

    Rahal’s story is far from an isolated case. The seizure of private Palestinian civilian homes for military use has become a rapidly growing practice across the occupied West Bank, a trend that has accelerated sharply since October 2023, amid a broad intensification of Israeli military crackdowns across the territory. When Israel launched a large-scale offensive across the northern West Bank districts of Jenin, Tulkarm and Tubas in early 2025, the operation left a trail of destruction across the region’s refugee camps: hundreds of structures were demolished, burned or seized by military forces, pushing nearly 40,000 Palestinians from their homes. The overwhelming majority of those displaced are residents of Jenin Refugee Camp.

    Human rights organizations and global policy experts have formally condemned the campaign, accusing Israel of committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing in its West Bank offensive. Rahal was among the first to flee when the January 2025 offensive began; his original multi-family building, home to him, his five brothers and all their extended families, was partially destroyed in the operation. For 14 months, his entire clan crowded into overcrowded student housing at the Arab American University, a period he describes as marked by unrelenting hardship. Determined to rebuild a stable life, the family scraped together savings to buy their new property in Jabriyat, a hillside neighborhood overlooking Jenin Refugee Camp.

    The Rahal home sits on the edge of a seven-dunum plot of land that Israeli forces seized in May 2025, despite the area falling under Oslo Accords designation as Area A — territory formally administered by the Palestinian Authority. Just two months after the Rahal family moved in, Israeli soldiers arrived on a Tuesday and ordered them to evacuate within 10 minutes. After negotiations with the family, the deadline was extended to the following Thursday morning, giving Rahal just 48 hours to remove all the furniture and belongings he had spent weeks acquiring and arranging. Today, he waits for the evacuation order to expire on August 23, clinging to faint hope he will be allowed to return, but deeply skeptical of Israeli promises.

    “Even though the order is for two months, the occupation is unpredictable,” Rahal said. “They could extend the takeover for another period, and then another, until the house is seized permanently.”

    Down the street from Rahal, Fidaa Abu al-Haija received an identical evacuation order. Her home overlooks the newly seized land, a location that has fueled widespread local fears that the military takeover is intended to be permanent, with Israeli forces planning to build a full military camp across the confiscated plot, expanding seizures to encompass the entire neighborhood over time. Abu al-Haija lives in the home with her three children; her husband has been held in an Israeli prison for nearly four years. Her brother-in-law, also imprisoned by Israel for more than four years, received an evacuation order for his nearby home as well, forcing his family of four to leave their property too.

    Long before the formal evacuation order, Abu al-Haija said, Israeli forces carried out repeated raids on her home during the Jenin offensive, traumatizing her young children and damaging rooms so badly that much of her furniture is already unusable. She often was forced to abandon trips home from work mid-journey, when military checkpoints and deployments blocked access to the neighborhood. “I knew they wouldn’t leave me alone,” she said. The formal eviction order marks a dangerous new escalation, she added, and with her husband’s original family home inside Jenin Refugee Camp already destroyed, she has no safety net. As workers carried her belongings out of her home, she told reporters she was scrambling to find an affordable rental while trying to salvage what little remains of her family’s life.

    “The furniture is piled up outside because I want to save it before it’s destroyed,” she said. “We’ve been living through this tragic situation for more than a year.”

    Jabriyat’s vantage point overlooking Jenin Refugee Camp makes it strategically valuable to Israeli forces, and increasingly dangerous for the Palestinian residents who call it home. Mu’tasim Istaiti, a neighbor who already survived more than a year of displacement when soldiers seized his home during the initial offensive, returned to the neighborhood to protect his property only to find the area transformed. “Since we came back, it feels like we’re living in a ghost town,” he said. “All we hear are military vehicles. This used to be a vibrant neighborhood. Now it’s almost deserted.” Over safety fears, he rarely allows his children to leave the home unaccompanied, and Israeli forces have blocked the neighborhood’s main access road with barbed wire, forcing residents to take a dangerous, unpaved alternative route. “We know staying here is dangerous, but we want to protect our homes until the very last moment,” he said. “We don’t know what the future holds for our children and us after the decision to confiscate the land near us.”

    Mohammad Jarrar, mayor of Jenin, told Middle East Eye that Jabriyat is one of the city’s largest residential neighborhoods, home to roughly 10,000 Palestinian residents. At least 15 families have already been forced from their homes in the neighborhood since the early 2025 offensive began, and Israeli restrictions have blocked Jenin municipal crews from accessing areas near the camp to deliver basic services to residents who remain. In one case, a broken sewage pipe has flooded local streets, creating a severe public health hazard, but workers have not been permitted to reach the site to make repairs.

    “We fear the displacement of these families will become permanent,” Jarrar said. “The occupation appears intent on displacing as many residents as possible out of the neighborhoods surrounding the camp.” According to Jenin municipal data, approximately 800 families have already been displaced from neighborhoods across Jenin city, not counting the thousands more displaced from the Jenin Refugee Camp itself. “Even those who remain are being pressured through the withholding of services,” Jarrar added. “The aim is to make life so difficult that people leave on their own.”

    Global human rights advocates warn that the accelerating pattern of home seizures and forced displacement in northern West Bank marks a dangerous escalation of Israel’s decades-long occupation, with long-term consequences for the territorial and humanitarian status of the region.