标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Hundreds march in Kathmandu for Nepal’s Pride Month

    Hundreds march in Kathmandu for Nepal’s Pride Month

    Hundreds of LGBTQ+ activists, community members and allied supporters filled the streets of Nepal’s capital Kathmandu Saturday, marking Pride Month with a public demonstration of visibility and celebration amid a wave of incremental but groundbreaking legal and political wins for queer rights in the South Asian nation.

    Unlike many regional neighbors where gender and sexual minority rights remain heavily restricted or criminalized, Nepal has emerged as a surprising trailblazer for LGBTQ+ inclusion in Asia over the past 15 years. The nation’s progress traces back to a landmark 2007 Supreme Court ruling that mandated the government implement policy reforms to protect non-cisgender and queer citizens from discrimination. That ruling laid the legal groundwork for one of South Asia’s most progressive gender identification policies, which today allows people who do not fit within the traditional binary of male or female to select a dedicated “third gender” category on official government documents, including passports.

    That momentum was codified into national law with the adoption of Nepal’s 2015 constitution, which included an explicit ban on discrimination based on sexual orientation — a protection that put Nepal far ahead of most other Asian nations. More recently, the country solidified its status as a regional leader by becoming one of the first Asian countries to formally legalize same-sex marriage, a move that drew international attention as a milestone for queer rights in the region.

    The most recent step forward came following the general election held this past March, which brought Prime Minister Balendra Shah’s government to power. In a historic move for the nation, the new administration launched a dedicated cabinet-level department: the Ministry of Women, Children, Gender and Sexual Minorities and Social Security. This marks the first time Nepal has created a standalone government body specifically tasked with addressing policy and social issues affecting women and sexual minority groups, a shift that community leaders frame as a critical step toward embedding LGBTQ+ needs into national governance.

    Saturday’s Pride march was both a celebration of how far Nepal has come and a public affirmation of the growing visibility of the country’s queer community, which continues to build on the legal wins of the past 15 years to push for broader social acceptance and full equal rights.

  • Rain showers delay the start of the first India-Afghanistan one-day cricket match

    Rain showers delay the start of the first India-Afghanistan one-day cricket match

    Saturday’s highly anticipated opening fixture of the first-ever bilateral one-day international cricket series between India and Afghanistan in Dharamshala faced an early setback, as persistent inclement rain forced officials to push back both the pre-match coin toss and the game’s starting time.

    This three-match series marks a historic milestone for both cricketing nations, as it is the first time they have faced off in a standalone bilateral ODI arrangement. Prior to this series, the two sides only clashed in the 50-over format during top global and regional competitions: the ICC Cricket World Cup and the ACC Asia Cup. Across their four previous ODI meetings, India has claimed victory in three contests, while the fourth ended in a rare tied result.

    Heading into the opening match of the new series, the two teams bring contrasting recent run of forms to the pitch. India has struggled for consistency in its most recent 50-over outings, dropping three of its last five ODI matches. In sharp contrast, Afghanistan has built strong momentum ahead of the series, securing wins in four consecutive ODI fixtures ahead of Saturday’s game. This meeting comes just one week after India dominated Afghanistan in a one-off test match, sealing a massive innings-and-300-run victory inside just three days of play.

    The series is scheduled to continue after the Dharamshala opener, with the second ODI set to take place in Lucknow this coming Wednesday. The third and final match of the three-game series will be hosted in Chennai on June 20, wrapping up the historic first bilateral ODI contest between the two nations.

  • Woman critically injured in shark attack off Sydney’s Coogee Beach

    Woman critically injured in shark attack off Sydney’s Coogee Beach

    SYDNEY, Australia — A series of concerning shark encounters along Australia’s coastline has continued, with a woman in her 30s sustaining life-threatening critical injuries during an attack off one of Sydney’s most frequented recreational beaches on Saturday.

    According to official police statements, the attack unfolded at 11:15 a.m. local time in waters adjacent to Coogee Beach, where the victim was swimming when the shark struck. She sustained severe, penetrating wounds to both her legs and arms, prompting immediate action from bystanders who pulled her from the ocean and initiated emergency first aid on the sand before emergency medical personnel could reach the scene.

    Following initial stabilization, the injured woman was transported to a nearby rugby field, where a rescue helicopter airlifted her rapidly to a major metropolitan hospital. As of the latest police update, her condition remains classified as critical.

    This weekend’s attack comes in the wake of an unusually high cluster of fatal shark attacks that have rocked Australian coastal communities since mid-May. Three professional and recreational spearfishing divers have been killed in separate shark encounters across the country in just over a month, bringing the total number of fatal shark attack fatalities in Australia in 2024 to four, not including the critically injured victim from Saturday.

    The string of recent fatal incidents began on May 16, when a 4-meter great white shark fatally attacked 38-year-old spearfisher Steve Mattabonni off the coast of Perth, Western Australia. One week later, on May 24, 39-year-old diver Michael Jensz suffered fatal head injuries during a shark encounter on the Great Barrier Reef off Queensland’s northeast coast, where bull sharks had previously been spotted in the local area. Most recently, just one week before Saturday’s attack at Coogee Beach, 35-year-old Daniel Turpin was killed by a 4.5-meter great white shark while spearfishing with family members off Michaelmas Island, near Albany in Western Australia.

    Australia’s fourth fatal attack of the year occurred far earlier, in January, when a 12-year-old boy died in a Sydney hospital several days after being mauled by a bull shark in Sydney Harbor. Last year, the country recorded five total fatal shark attacks, exceeding the long-term national average.

    Long-term data collected by the Australian Shark Incident Database — a collaborative project between Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Flinders University, and the New South Wales state government — shows that Australia has averaged between 2 and 3 fatal shark attacks per year since the turn of the 21st century. Experts have attributed the gradual rise in reported attacks over recent decades to multiple shifting factors: steady population growth along coastal areas, and a sharp increase in participation in ocean recreation activities including surfing, scuba diving, and spearfishing, which bring more people into contact with sharks on a regular basis.

  • UAE paid Iran billions of dollars to halt strikes: Report

    UAE paid Iran billions of dollars to halt strikes: Report

    In a dramatic reversal of its long-held hardline stance toward Iran, the United Arab Emirates has reached a landmark agreement that includes billions of dollars in payments to Tehran in exchange for a permanent halt to Iranian attacks on Emirati territory, multiple international news outlets have reported. The development marks one of the most significant geopolitical realignments in the Persian Gulf in recent years, reshaping long-standing regional power dynamics in the wake of the US-led conflict against Iran.

    Details of the agreement remain fragmented across multiple anonymous sources, but the core framework has been confirmed by reporting from Reuters, Bloomberg, and Middle East Eye. According to two regional insiders cited by Reuters, the UAE has already transferred $3 billion to Iran as an initial installment, with the total value of the deal projected to reach as high as $10 billion. Two other anonymous sources, however, put the eventual total payout at $20 billion. It remains unclear whether the funds were drawn from frozen Iranian assets held in Emirati financial institutions or from the UAE’s own sovereign wealth funds, a question Reuters did not pursue in its initial reporting.

    The shift comes after years of the UAE positioning itself as one of Iran’s most vocal critics in the Gulf. Abu Dhabi once led regional lobbying efforts in Washington to push for continued aggressive US policy toward the Islamic Republic, and joined the US and Israel in launching dozens of strikes against Iranian targets during the recent regional war. It even took punitive measures against Pakistan when Islamabad hosted mediation talks aimed at ending the conflict, calling in outstanding debt obligations that forced Saudi Arabia to step in with a new emergency loan to stabilize Pakistan’s economy.

    In recent weeks, however, the rapid reversal of this policy has been impossible to ignore. Just days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a high-profile wartime visit to Abu Dhabi that resulted in a new joint defense acquisition deal between the two countries, the UAE’s powerful national security adviser and Abu Dhabi Deputy Ruler Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al-Nahyan hosted senior officials from Iran’s US-sanctioned Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps at his private guest house. This meeting was followed by a new round of face-to-face diplomatic talks between Emirati envoys and senior Iranian leaders this week, held to further de-escalate cross-border tensions, Bloomberg confirmed. A Gulf diplomat told Middle East Eye that the discussions were aimed explicitly at securing guarantees that the UAE would not be targeted in Iranian retaliatory attacks.

    The new arrangement has already played out in regional security dynamics: as Iran has launched retaliatory strikes against smaller Gulf states including Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan in recent weeks amid a fragile US-Iran ceasefire, the UAE has faced no attacks, and has refrained from joining new strikes against Iran. Analysts say the deal signals that Iran has emerged from the recent conflict in a strengthened regional position, despite coordinated pressure from the US, Israel, and Gulf allies.

    For decades, the UAE has served as a key financial and trade hub for Iran, with deep economic ties that have often outlasted periods of geopolitical tension. Iranians hold major stakes in the UAE’s lucrative real estate sector, and even after the outbreak of the US-Israeli war on Iran, when Abu Dhabi publicly considered freezing billions of dollars in Iranian-linked assets, it never followed through with a public implementation of that threat. Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, chief executive of the Bourse & Bazaar Foundation, noted on social media platform X that the agreement is likely the first step toward revitalizing these cross-border economic bonds. “Everyone needs to remember that the UAE is Iran’s most important trading partner. By ‘releasing’ funds to Iran, the UAE ensures those funds will be spent in the Emirates,” Batmanghelidj wrote. “Both countries will double down on economic interdependence and the multiplier effects of bilateral trade.”

    The deal also carries implications for US diplomacy in the region. One source told Reuters that the arrangement allows Iran to secure the financial concessions it demanded for a ceasefire, while enabling the Trump administration to publicly claim it did not directly pay Iran for the agreement. A former US intelligence official told Middle East Eye that it is nearly impossible that Washington was unaware of the IRGC meeting hosted by Sheikh Tahnoun, given the extensive US intelligence footprint in the Gulf. The shift in UAE-Iran ties comes as the US and Iran are on the verge of finalizing a 60-day memorandum of understanding to negotiate over security in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program.

    The Reuters report follows a similar recent development reported by the Washington Post, which claimed Qatar agreed to shut down its Ras Laffan refinery in exchange for Iran halting attacks on Qatari territory. Qatar has since denied any such coordination with Tehran.

  • Turkey captain Hakan Calhanoglu says his ‘more talented’ team will ‘dominate’ Australia in World Cup

    Turkey captain Hakan Calhanoglu says his ‘more talented’ team will ‘dominate’ Australia in World Cup

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia — A tense pre-match war of words has emerged ahead of Turkey’s long-awaited return to the FIFA World Cup, as captain Hakan Calhanoglu has declared his side will dominate their opening Group clash against Australia this Saturday at BC Place. For Turkey, this tournament marks their first appearance on the world’s biggest football stage in 22 years, having failed to qualify for the previous five editions of the competition despite consistent strong performances at the continental level through much of the 21st century. The 32-year-old Inter Milan midfielder, who lifted the Serie A title with the Italian giants just this past season, doubled down on his confidence in comments made Friday. “I think we will dominate Saturday’s game, because we have more qualities and a more talented team,” Calhanoglu said. “So we will see what happens this weekend.”

    Australia, by contrast, heads into this match as a seasoned World Cup competitor, appearing in their sixth consecutive finals tournament after advancing to the knockout round at the 2022 Qatar World Cup. The Socceroos were quick to respond to Calhanoglu’s bold claim, with midfield star Aiden O’Neill saying the Turkish captain was entitled to his perspective while emphasizing his own side’s competitive strength. “He’s allowed to have his own opinion,” O’Neill said Friday. “We’ve got quality players on our team, too, so we’re ready.”

    Not all interactions between the two camps have been tense, however. Turkish manager Vincenzo Montella, who previously managed top-flight clubs across Europe, offered a complimentary nod to Australia’s playing style, noting that he found the Socceroos’ tactical approaches compelling. “I would like to use some of their techniques because I think they are interesting techniques,” Montella said.

    This opening match is set to be a test of two teams with contrasting recent World Cup trajectories: a Turkey side hungry to prove it belongs back among the world’s elite after two decades away, and an Australia side looking to build on their impressive 2022 run and silence their opponent’s pre-match bravado.

  • Iran and US confirm they are on cusp of new ceasefire, as they fight to frame terms

    Iran and US confirm they are on cusp of new ceasefire, as they fight to frame terms

    After months of indirect negotiations mediated by Pakistan, the United States and Iran have moved to the brink of signing a landmark memorandum of understanding (MOU) that could reshape geopolitics across the Middle East, though stark public disagreements over the agreement’s core terms have cast uncertainty over its final shape.

    On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi offered the clearest confirmation yet that a final deal is imminent, writing on social media that the so-called Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding is closer than ever. He urged media outlets to avoid unfounded speculation ahead of the text’s formal finalization. US President Donald Trump quickly shared Araghchi’s statement, but hours later launched a scathing rebuke of Iranian claims about the MOU’s content.

    The dispute broke into public view after Iran’s Mehr News Agency reported the draft agreement would unlock $24 billion in Iranian assets frozen by international sanctions, codify Iran’s long-held control over the Strait of Hormuz, and include a full ceasefire across regional hotspots including Lebanon. A senior Iranian source later confirmed that account to Reuters, adding the deal would also lift restrictions on Iranian oil exports and require an end to hostilities on all regional fronts. Multiple Iranian officials have long maintained that any ceasefire agreement must include an end to Israel’s ongoing military campaign in southern Lebanon, where Israeli forces have expanded ground operations in recent weeks.

    The Trump administration has pushed back forcefully against Iran’s version of events. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump dismissed Iranian leaks of the deal’s terms as entirely disconnected from the written agreement under negotiation. “Very dishonorable people to deal with,” he wrote. “They better get their act together, and FAST!”

    A senior anonymous Trump administration official outlined a far different set of agreed terms to reporters, saying Tehran has committed to five core pillars, including the destruction and permanent removal of all its enriched nuclear material from Iranian territory. The official confirmed that some Iranian assets are tied to the agreement, but stressed no funds will be released until Tehran fully meets all its performance-based obligations. The administration’s version also states the MOU will require the Strait of Hormuz—a critical global energy chokepoint through which 25% of the world’s oil supplies pass—to be kept open to all international shipping, and bars Iran from providing military funding to regional proxies including Lebanon’s Hezbollah. US Vice President JD Vance echoed that pushback in a post on X, emphasizing that no Iranian funds will be released immediately upon signing the MOU, calling widespread reports to the contrary “fake information.”

    Despite the conflicting public narratives from the two negotiating parties, Pakistan—the key third-party mediator facilitating the indirect talks—has confirmed that both sides have reached a final agreed text. “We can confirm that a final, agreed upon text of the peace deal has been reached,” Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif wrote on X Friday. “Pakistan is now working closely with both sides to finalize the next steps. Peace has never been this close as it is now.”

    International markets reacted swiftly to the news of progress: global oil prices dropped sharply, while equity markets surged, as investors priced in the possibility of a broader breakthrough that could ease geopolitical tensions and open up new Iranian oil supplies to global markets. The possibility of a diplomatic breakthrough also gained further cred Friday when Switzerland’s foreign ministry confirmed it had been in contact with both parties and offered to host the signing ceremony if both sides agree to the venue.

    Senior US officials have struck a cautiously optimistic tone, saying a formal signing could come as early as the next several days, with Trump floating the possibility of a ceremony in Europe. One senior US official told reporters on a background call that the likelihood of a final agreement had climbed throughout the day, from an estimated 75% that morning to between 80% and 85% by Friday afternoon, stopping short of declaring a done deal. It is not the first time Trump has announced a near-completed agreement with Iran; past announcements of impending deals have ultimately collapsed before reaching a final signing.

  • Ein al-Auja: How settler attacks and water diversion erased a Palestinian community

    Ein al-Auja: How settler attacks and water diversion erased a Palestinian community

    North of Jericho in the occupied West Bank, Ein al-Auja once stood as a lush, life-giving Palestinian oasis: a cascading natural spring whose waters flowed at more than 1,000 cubic meters per hour, sustaining hundreds of people, thousands of hectares of irrigated farmland, and a tight-knit Bedouin community that had called the land home for generations. Today, that oasis is a hollowed-out shell, its spring reduced to a faint trickle, its soil parched and cracked, and its entire Indigenous population displaced to remote, underserved encampments miles away. For Haitham Rashaidh, one of the last residents to abandon Ein al-Auja, the departure was not a choice—it was the breaking point of years of relentless pressure.

    Rashaidh’s family packed their tents and loaded all their possessions onto a tractor earlier this year, trekking two hours across rough terrain to al-Balqa, a sparsely populated stretch of the Jordan Valley where they now camp alongside dozens of other displaced neighbors. “Leaving Ein al-Auja felt like losing a part of ourselves,” Rashaidh told Middle East Eye in an interview. For years, he said, his community resisted repeated attempts to push them out. “We did not leave the first time they tried to push us out. We came back, rebuilt what we could, and tried to continue our lives. But it didn’t stop. Every time we returned, the pressure came back stronger: more restrictions, more attacks, less access to water.” By January 2026, the community could endure no more.

    For displaced families in al-Balqa, the consequences of displacement are immediate and devastating. The remote encampment has no access to public services, and the nearest city center is more than two hours away. Rashaidh’s children can no longer attend school regularly, a reality shared by dozens of displaced children across the area. The crisis in Ein al-Auja has accelerated dramatically since the October 7 attacks and the outbreak of the Gaza war, reshaping life for Palestinian communities across the occupied West Bank.

    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) data underscores the sharp escalation of violence: between 2017 and 2023, the agency recorded just two settler attacks resulting in casualties or property damage in the Ein al-Auja area. Since early 2024, however, Israeli settlers have established multiple new illegal outposts in the region, pushing the number of documented attacks to at least 38 in 2025 alone. Access to water has become the primary battleground, OCHA noted in a January 2026 report: settlers linked to the new outposts have repeatedly cut and damaged water pipes connected to the Ein al-Auja spring, blocked access roads for water delivery, emptied residential water tanks, and assaulted residents and herders attempting to collect water, destroying local livelihoods in the process. In one high-profile incident earlier this year, 124 people across 26 families were forcibly displaced amid coordinated violence by armed settlers and Israeli troops.

    Environmental researchers trace the spring’s collapse to both systemic water diversion by Israeli authorities and compounding pressure from climate change. Ayman Abu Zaher, an environmental researcher who monitors the local hydrological system, explained that Ein al-Auja draws its water from a deep regional aquifer. Historically, three state-managed wells in the area reached depths of 500 to 600 meters, but over the past three decades, Israeli authorities have deepened these wells to nearly 1,000 meters and added a fourth. Collectively, these wells pump between four and six million cubic meters of water annually from the deep aquifer—water that is almost entirely diverted to nearby Israeli settlements, rather than supplied to local Palestinian communities.

    Local Palestinian wells, by contrast, are limited to the shallow aquifer and rarely exceed 100 meters in depth, leaving them insufficient to meet community needs. Abu Zaher estimates that the spring’s flow has dropped by 50 to 70 percent in recent years, and it often runs completely dry during dry seasons. Where more than 3,000 hectares of irrigated orchards and cropland once covered the Ein al-Auja area, only 300 hectares remain actively farmed today, pushing the region toward accelerating desertification.

    For displaced women like Naifa Zaied, who relocated to al-Balqa earlier this year, the water crisis has rewritten daily life. When the community lived near Ein al-Auja, women could fill their household water containers at the spring in minutes. Now, Zaied said, they must walk kilometers under the scorching Jordan Valley sun to find water tankers or distribution points, and they are often turned away by Israeli forces or left empty-handed when supplies run out. “We used to have water close to us. Today, every litre has become a struggle,” Zaied said. “Sometimes we wait for water tankers that never arrive, and we are forced to save water for drinking before anything else.”

    The crisis has extended beyond household survival to destroy traditional Bedouin livelihoods across the region. Repeated settler raids, livestock theft, and movement restrictions have left herding families with massive losses: in one early 2025 raid, settlers stole roughly 1,500 sheep and goats from the Ein al-Auja community, and dozens of animal carcasses were found the following day. With their land and livestock gone, many displaced Bedouin men have been forced to take unregulated, low-wage work in nearby Israeli settlements, commuting through dangerous checkpoints with no work permits or legal protections. Rashaidh, who once farmed and raised livestock, now works as a day laborer on a date palm farm near al-Balqa. “It is a highly risky environment, without work permits, and many of us are injured or arrested while going to or returning from work,” he said.

    Displacement has also fragmented long-standing community social support networks and cut off access to basic services. Many children now miss school regularly due to the long, unsafe commute from al-Balqa, and the community is cut off from the hospitals and markets they once relied on. “Everything has become far. Even reaching basic services takes hours now,” one anonymous displaced resident told MEE. “We are cut off from the places we used to depend on.”

    Ein al-Auja’s collapse has also devastated the local tourism industry, which once drew Palestinian and international visitors to its scenic waterfall and mountain trails. The region already saw a massive drop in tourism revenue after the 2023 Gaza war outbreak, and repeated attacks on visitor groups have deterred what little traffic remains. In January 2023, a group of international hikers including American, Italian, and French nationals was confronted by armed settlers who attacked the group with clubs and pepper spray, injuring two people. Israeli forces took hours to arrive and secure the group’s exit. Today, the roads that once carried tour buses and weekend visitor traffic are nearly empty, and local vendors go hours without customers. “We used to wait for buses coming from the northern and southern West Bank every weekend, but now traffic has become almost nonexistent,” said Muhammad Taha, a Jericho-based vendor.

    For the displaced families, a court petition to Israel’s High Court has become their last formal hope of returning to their land. Last year, residents petitioned the court to order the dismantling of the illegal settlement outposts encroaching on Ein al-Auja and to guarantee their safe return. The Israeli state has denied any formal evacuation policy, arguing there is no barrier to residents returning, despite the ongoing violence and water access restrictions that made life untenable.

    In February 2026, the court ordered Israeli authorities to facilitate the community’s return and submit a security plan within 60 days. By April, the state had missed the deadline, and petitioners asked the court to compel compliance. The state continues to contest the order, arguing it has no obligation to station permanent security forces in the area. The case follows a familiar pattern for Palestinian land rights petitions: most are rejected or stalled indefinitely in Israeli courts, which grant the state broad discretion over land management even when long-term Palestinian residency is well-documented. By the time the court issued its February order, the last families had already left Ein al-Auja.

    Today, the oasis is silent. There are no children’s voices, no grazing herds, no vendors serving visitors. Only the wind blows across the cracked, dry soil where a community once thrived. Back in al-Balqa, Rashaidh says international and regional solidarity is the only path forward for displaced Palestinian communities facing expanding settler pressure. “No one leaves their land willingly, and that is one of the hardest things in life,” he said. “But to stand alone is not enough. We defended our land alone, and we lost our land, our livestock and our water. If we do not stand together, we will all lose.”

    This report was produced as part of the 2026 Middle East Eye Fellowship.

  • US officials say Hormuz oil flows reaching half of pre-war levels

    US officials say Hormuz oil flows reaching half of pre-war levels

    In a series of public remarks delivered Friday, senior United States government officials have confirmed that the US Navy is carrying out nightly escort missions for dozens of commercial tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, moving millions of barrels of crude oil through the critical chokepoint amid an ongoing regional conflict that has disrupted global energy supplies.

    US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the Bloomberg Energy Security Executive Briefing held in Houston, Texas on Friday that tankers under American protection currently carry approximately seven million barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz each day. That volume accounts for roughly half of the total daily traffic that passed through the waterway before the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran began on February 28. Wright noted that current shipping volumes are continuing to climb, closing the gap left by the post-conflict blockade.

    “Flows today are approaching half of the gap, and they’re rising,” Wright told attendees at the briefing.

    Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum echoed Wright’s confirmation in an interview with CNBC Friday, adding that the operation escorts up to 20 vessels through the strait each night, with some nights seeing more than 20 commercial ships pass through under US protection. Burgum emphasized that the operations have already moved large volumes of crude out of the Gulf, and that global energy markets have already priced in this recovery ahead of mainstream media coverage.

    “Some nights, more than 20 ships [are] coming out,” Burgum said. “Substantial amounts of oil have come out of the strait. I think the markets figured that out before some of the tabloid press did, because you’re starting to see a softening of oil prices.”

    The confirmation comes after US President Donald Trump earlier this week claimed that the US had been carrying out secret escort operations for commercial vessels leaving the Gulf. Trump claimed that the operations have already allowed more than 200 commercial ships and 100 million barrels of oil to bypass Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

    As ceasefire negotiations between Washington and Tehran continue, it remains unclear whether Iran has implicitly approved the ongoing escort operations. Earlier this week, an American Apache attack helicopter operating in the waterway was shot down, according to US media, which linked the aircraft to the escort mission. Iranian officials have downplayed the severity of the incident, offering few details on the encounter.

    Global oil markets saw extreme volatility after the US and Israel launched their military campaign against Iran, with international benchmark Brent crude spiking to $112 per barrel in the immediate weeks after the conflict began. Energy analysts have long noted that public exchange prices have not fully reflected the actual premiums paid for physical crude cargoes, particularly in Asia, a region that relies heavily on crude exports from Gulf producing states.

    Many market analysts predicted even steeper price spikes after Iran seized control of the Strait of Hormuz and imposed a blockade on energy shipments from neighboring Gulf states. In response, the US implemented its own counter-blockade that removed Iranian crude barrels already under international sanctions from global markets.

    Global oil markets stabilized after a series of policy interventions: Western nations released 400 million barrels of crude from their strategic emergency reserves, while China made an unprecedented cut to its crude import volumes to reduce demand. China’s May crude imports fell roughly three million barrels per day compared to year-ago levels, according to trade data.

    Neither Burgum nor Wright offered a clear timeline for how long the nightly escort operations will continue. But the operations have already coincided with a steady downward trend in global oil prices this month. Brent crude, the global benchmark, has fallen roughly 20 percent over the past 30 days. On Friday, the benchmark traded 3.5 percent lower at $87.17 per barrel, as both Iran and the US publicly signaled that a new ceasefire agreement is within reach.

  • Reading Marjane Satrapi’s comic book Persepolis during Iran war

    Reading Marjane Satrapi’s comic book Persepolis during Iran war

    Renowned Iranian-French comic author Marjane Satrapi passed away in Paris last week at the age of 56, mere days before a new wave of conflict erupted between Israel and her native Iran. In death, as in life, Satrapi’s body of work has found renewed, urgent relevance amid the rising regional tensions that trace their roots to the same historical forces she spent decades documenting. Satrapi’s work stands apart in how it masterfully interlaces intimate personal narrative with the sweeping arc of Iran’s modern political and social history, turning centuries of upheaval into a accessible, human story for global audiences.

    One of Satrapi’s most iconic works, the graphic memoir *Persepolis* (later adapted into an acclaimed film), weaves personal coming-of-age with a clear-eyed retelling of Iran’s 20th century power shifts. The work opens with context for the 1979 Islamic Revolution, tracing the lineage of unrest back to 1925, when Iranian military officer Reza Khan overthrew the Qajar dynasty with quiet encouragement from British officials who had already installed sympathetic monarchies in Iraq and Jordan. Instead of backing the secular republic Khan initially sought, British powers pushed him to declare himself shah, founding the Pahlavi dynasty that would rule Iran until it was toppled in the 1979 revolution. Satrapi anchors every major turning point to the lives of ordinary Iranian citizens, whose fates are shifted by foreign interference and political upheaval beyond their control. Rendered in a stark, striking monochrome art style, her work roots the long-simmering Iranian resentment of foreign meddling in personal experience, rather than abstract political rhetoric.

    For all its enduring acclaim, *Persepolis* has long been a source of polarizing debate. Critics have frequently attacked the work for alleged historical inaccuracies, but this critique misses Satrapi’s core purpose: she was not a professional historian, but a storyteller drawing on her own lived experience growing up in Iran and building a life abroad. This controversy has spilled into academic spaces, as the article’s author, historian Ibrahim Al-Marashi, can attest firsthand. In 2007, while teaching a course on Iranian history at Istanbul’s Bogazici University, Al-Marashi assigned *Persepolis* as required reading for the class. Student activists affiliated with the campus Communist party accused him of secretly promoting Western-backed regime change, arguing that the work’s focus on religious oppression under the Islamic Republic amounted to anti-Iranian propaganda.

    Al-Marashi’s intention was far simpler: he assigned the memoir because it offered valuable context, artistic merit, and deep insight into modern Iranian life that could not be found in traditional academic texts. But the protests persisted, growing loud enough that Al-Marashi was ultimately forced to resign his position and leave Turkey.

    *Persepolis* opens in the early days of the 1979 revolution, with Satrapi’s father Ebi explaining to his young daughter why thousands of Iranians had taken to the streets to overthrow the monarchy. He frames the uprising as the culmination of 2,500 years of foreign and domestic tyranny: starting with native emperors, followed by foreign invasions from the west and east, and ending with centuries of modern Western imperial meddling. That “modern imperialism” includes Britain’s role in installing Reza Khan as shah, then removing him in World War II over his pro-German leanings to install his more compliant son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. When democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh launched a popular internal coup to curb monarchical power in 1953, MI6 and the CIA orchestrated a counter-coup to restore Mohammad Reza to the throne, cementing decades of Western influence over the Iranian state.

    Throughout the Cold War, the U.S. armed the restored shah with advanced military hardware to counter Soviet influence in the region, including top-of-the-line F-14 fighter jets. The constant presence of American military advisors and personnel on Iranian soil fanned the flames of nationalist anger that eventually boiled over into the 1979 revolution, which ousted the monarchy and brought Ruhollah Khomeini’s Islamic Republican faction to power. Like the Russian Revolution, the Iranian Revolution’s path to stable rule was marked by bloodshed and chaos. When Iraqi forces invaded Iran in September 1980, Khomeini’s faction consolidated control by leaning into surging nationalist sentiment, turning the war into a unifying cause for the new republic.

    *Persepolis* captures the quiet human cost of this era through one iconic anecdote centered on Iran’s unofficial nationalist anthem, “Ey Iran.” The track, which predates both the Pahlavi monarchy and the Islamic Republic, was written in the 1940s during the Allied occupation of Iran, after poet Hossein Gol-e-Golab witnessed an American soldier beating an Iranian greengrocer. The anthem’s lyrics declare fierce devotion to the Iranian homeland, ending with the line: “May my life be sacrificed for my pure motherland.” During an early retaliatory raid against Iraq following the bombing of Tehran, the father of one of Satrapi’s schoolmates—one of the pilots flying Iran’s U.S.-built F-14s—died in the mission, fulfilling that oath even as the anthem played on state radio to celebrate the attack. Satrapi does not shy away from the complexity of this moment: her own father, a leftist activist who helped overthrow the shah only to oppose the Islamic Republic, often wept when he heard the song. Decades later, Al-Marashi notes, the track still brings Iranian students to tears, a testament to how deeply personal grief and nationalist pride are intertwined in the country’s modern history.

    Satrapi’s singular genius lay in her ability to synthesize a century of messy, overlapping history, personal memory, political upheaval, and cultural identity into a coherent, deeply human narrative rendered in bold, unforgettable art. As new conflict erupts across the Middle East, her work remains as vital today as it was when it was first published, offering a rare unfiltered window into the historical forces that continue to shape Iran and its relationship with the wider world.

  • Survey: China critical for US businesses

    Survey: China critical for US businesses

    Against a backdrop of escalating decoupling rhetoric from hardline U.S. China policy hawks, new industry data confirms that the Chinese market remains an irreplaceable strategic asset for American multinational firms, with the nation’s massive consumer base, evolving status as a global innovation center and robust, resilient supply chains continuing to strengthen U.S. companies’ competitive edge worldwide, according to business leaders and policy experts.

    The findings emerge from the latest annual member survey conducted by the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC), which reveals that a staggering 95 percent of responding U.S. firms rate China as somewhat to very critical to maintaining their global market standing. Summarizing the report, which was published publicly on Wednesday, the USCBC stressed that “For U.S. companies, China is not optional.”

    USCBC President Sean Stein noted that the survey results leave no room for ambiguity: even amid rising geopolitical and economic tensions, gaining a foothold and competing in the Chinese market is a non-negotiable prerequisite for many American firms to succeed on the global stage. The report further underscores that U.S. businesses have no plans to withdraw from China, as the market offers value beyond its sheer size, acting as a multifaceted catalyst that drives global competitiveness for participating companies.

    Nearly half of all survey respondents reported that they adapt operational insights and competitive experience gained from their China-based activities to improve performance in other global markets. The report draws an apt analogy: China has evolved into a “boxing gym” for Western corporations, where head-to-head competition with domestic Chinese firms hones operational skills, sharpens strategic thinking and deepens industry insight.

    In recent weeks, bilateral economic relations between Washington and Beijing have shown encouraging signs of progress. Last month, the two world powers reached an agreement to launch two new intergovernmental cooperation bodies: the China-U.S. Trade Council and the China-U.S. Investment Council. These platforms are designed to resolve commercial disputes before they escalate into larger conflicts, cultivating a more stable, predictable operating environment for businesses in both countries. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce confirmed that the new trade council will discuss targeted tariff reduction initiatives for specific product categories, with the two sides already reaching a preliminary agreement to cut tariffs on reciprocal goods shipments totaling at least $30 billion on each side.

    Liu Ying, a senior researcher at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, pointed out that while China and the U.S. now compete across a growing range of high-value sectors, this does not rule out productive mutually beneficial cooperation. “It just requires a far more nuanced, sophisticated approach than the straightforward complementary trade model that defined relations in past decades,” she explained.

    Former International Monetary Fund Deputy Managing Director Zhu Min echoed this view, noting that while differences between the two economic giants are unavoidable, deep-seated interdependence makes cooperation equally inevitable. “If both sides adopt a constructive approach, using expanding cooperation to manage existing differences, both nations, their people, and the entire global economy will share in the benefits,” Zhu Min said. “Our priority should be to continuously grow the list of areas where we can collaborate, while shrinking the list of outstanding disputes.”

    The commitment of U.S. firms to engaging with the Chinese market is further illustrated by upcoming industry events. The first week of this month, Beijing will host the second China International Supply Chain Expo, and U.S. companies and industry institutions are on track to be the largest group of foreign exhibitors for the fourth consecutive year, according to the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade. This continued high participation reflects U.S. firms’ ongoing interest in deepening industrial and supply chain collaboration with Chinese partners.

    Henry Ding, president of 3M China, shared the industrial conglomerate’s long-term outlook for the Chinese market. China is 3M’s largest overseas market, and the company remains confident that China’s ongoing high-quality economic development will unlock broad new growth opportunities. In recent years, 3M has accelerated full value chain localization in China, integrating local research and development, product testing, and manufacturing operations into its regional strategy. “Currently, more than 50 percent of the products 3M sells in China are manufactured locally,” Ding said. This year, 3M China will continue expanding local R&D investment, with plans to launch more than 30 percent more new products than it did in 2025, a growth rate that far outpaces the company’s targets for other global markets.

    Even with this widespread optimism and long-term commitment, the USCBC survey does acknowledge the significant headwinds facing U.S. companies operating in China. Fragile bilateral relations, ongoing uncertainty surrounding China’s economic growth trajectory, and long-standing U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports remain the top three most pressing challenges for responding firms. “U.S.-China relations continue to be the single greatest challenge for companies operating in the Chinese market, and even after the recent tariff truce, both governments continue to roll out new economic security policies that create additional uncertainty,” the council noted.

    As Beijing and Washington set working agendas for the newly established trade and investment councils, Stein said the 2026 survey results should act as a clear wake-up call for policymakers on both sides. “This is a tangible opportunity to make meaningful progress that goes far beyond just tariff reductions,” he added, emphasizing that sustained engagement aligned with the clear priorities of the business community on both sides will deliver shared, long-term benefits.