标签: Africa

非洲

  • Zimbabwean football star survives gun attack in South Africa

    Zimbabwean football star survives gun attack in South Africa

    A shocking incident has shaken the southern African football community, after Zimbabwean and Mamelodi Sundowns defender Divine Lunga survived a targeted gun attack in Johannesburg, South African law enforcement officials have confirmed.

    The 31-year-old athlete, who holds starting roles for both his club side and Zimbabwe’s senior national men’s football team, was travelling through Hillbrow, an inner-city suburb of Johannesburg, on Sunday when an unidentified gunman opened fire on the vehicle he was driving, according to multiple on-the-ground reports. Contrary to early fears for his safety, Lunga escaped the attack without any injuries.

    Local South African outlet The Citizen has shared additional context on the incident, reporting that Lunga was travelling to a church service alongside his younger brother when the shooting occurred. Initial investigative findings suggest the gunman may have targeted Lunga in a case of mistaken identity, misidentifying the footballer as an undercover police officer.

    South African Police Service spokesperson Captain Tintswalo Sibeko confirmed that authorities have opened an attempted murder investigation into the attack. As of the latest updates, no suspects have been taken into custody, and police have not released further details about the ongoing probe to the public.

    The attack comes amid longstanding widespread public concern over violent crime in South Africa, which consistently registers one of the highest annual murder rates across the globe. Hillbrow, the suburb where the incident took place, has long been flagged as an area with elevated levels of violent and property crime by local security officials.

    The football community has not yet issued an official statement on the incident, with fans across southern Africa expressing widespread relief that Lunga escaped unharmed and calls for a swift conclusion to the police investigation.

  • Why some African nations are turning down Trump aid money

    Why some African nations are turning down Trump aid money

    Since dissolving the United States’ longstanding foreign aid body, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), last year, the Trump administration has rolled out a new approach to global health assistance, pushing direct bilateral agreements with individual nations across Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean. While the administration frames the strategy as a fix for the inefficiencies and dependency created by traditional aid models, it has sparked sharp pushback from multiple African governments over its transactional terms, threats to national sovereignty, and ties to U.S. strategic and commercial priorities.

    The framework was launched in December 2023 with a landmark $2.5 billion health partnership with Kenya, where the U.S. pledged $1.6 billion in funding over five years, and the Kenyan government committed $850 million of its own funds. Speaking at the signing, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hailed Kenya as an ideal first partner and expressed optimism that up to 50 nations would join the initiative. The deal survived a high-profile court challenge from Kenyan activists concerned about patient privacy and finally won cabinet approval last month, but it set the tone for widespread controversy that would follow.

    Under the new strategy, the U.S. has walked away from the multilateral global health system anchored by the World Health Organization (WHO), withdrawing from the body earlier this year over claims the organization mismanaged the COVID-19 pandemic, lacked transparency, and gave other nations an unfair funding advantage at U.S. expense. Unlike previous aid models that channeled most funding through non-governmental organizations, the new framework centers direct partnerships with national governments, requiring them to increase domestic health spending to build self-sustaining health systems. The administration argues this cuts wasteful overhead, eliminates donor-led dependency, and empowers local leaders to shape their own health outcomes.

    “Our aid to those countries will not just be dollars distributed to an NGO who then will go into the country and impose programmes,” Rubio told a congressional committee last month. “Not only are we treating the acute situations on the ground of people that are sick, we are helping them build the capacity and the capability to do this for themselves.”

    Critics point out that the restructuring of U.S. aid has already created immediate gaps in frontline health response. Most notably, the current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) — one of the first African nations to sign on to the new framework — has exposed severe disruptions from USAID cuts. Amadou Bocoum, country director for the humanitarian organization Care in the DRC, told reporters his team was forced to lay off 36 workers, a third of his staff, including specialists focused on Ebola prevention and community outreach. When the new outbreak emerged, prepositioned emergency supplies were gone, and understaffing delayed the response by 10 critical days. Jeremy Konyndyk, who led USAID’s response to the 2014 West African Ebola epidemic, noted that the dismantling of longstanding U.S.-funded health programs left critical gaps in outbreak detection, arguing the previous network would have caught the spread of the virus far earlier. The Trump administration disputes these claims, pointing to its $270 million donation for the outbreak response and saying the new structure is more aligned with U.S. priorities and more effective.

    By mid-May, 32 countries across the Americas, Caribbean and Africa had signed the proposed health memoranda of understanding, but at least three African nations — Ghana, Zimbabwe and Zambia — have openly rejected the deals, citing a range of sovereignty and economic concerns. In Zambia, the government pushed back against U.S. attempts to tie health aid to a separate critical minerals agreement that would grant Washington preferential access to the country’s natural resources. Zambian Foreign Minister Mulambo Haimbe said his government wanted to negotiate the two deals separately on their own merits, rather than accepting them as a bundled package. A State Department spokesperson did not explicitly confirm the linkage but affirmed the administration’s “America First” approach, noting U.S. foreign assistance is “strategic capital” designed to advance American interests, and that recipient nations are expected to prioritize U.S. strategic and commercial goals.

    The most widespread point of contention across countries that rejected the deals is data and biosecurity sovereignty. Ghana rejected a proposed $109 million bilateral health deal in April specifically over data protection concerns. Arnold Kavaarpuo, executive director of Ghana’s Data Protection Commission, said the deal required Ghana to share a broad scope of domestic health data, including patient information and disease-causing pathogen samples, with U.S. authorities, with no reciprocal protections for Ghanaian data or guarantees that Ghana would retain control over the information once it left the country. Zimbabwe similarly rejected a deal over data access concerns, noting that the agreement did not guarantee that local populations would get access to drugs or vaccines developed from their country’s pathogen samples — pointing to the existing, equitable data sharing framework already in place through the WHO.

    The U.S. maintains that the data it requests is the same aggregated, de-identified data that has been used for global infectious disease research for decades through previous programs like USAID and PEPFAR, and that sharing is critical to advancing global scientific progress. But global health governance experts say the context of the data requests has changed dramatically. Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, a PhD fellow at Denmark’s Roskilde University, noted that while past data sharing relationships were unequal, they could be framed to domestic populations as altruistic efforts to improve public health. Today, he argues, the arrangement is clearly a transactional form of leverage that prioritizes U.S. interests.

    Many African nations also draw lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, when African countries held large amounts of valuable pathogen data but were left struggling to access vaccines developed from that data. More than 50 African civil society groups have signed an open letter warning that the new U.S. terms do not align with African national or regional interests, a position echoed by South Africa’s government. South Africa has already seen the U.S. withdraw all funding for its national HIV/AIDS programs over what Washington called Pretoria’s failure to meet unconnected policy requests, including a debunked claim that the country is carrying out a “white genocide” against the Afrikaner community. “Frankly speaking, no nation on Earth that respects itself should accede to [these requests],” South African Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi told the BBC, noting the U.S. seeks permanent access to local pathogen genome data in exchange for just five years of funding.

    Public health experts warn that the shift to a purely bilateral approach to global health ignores the transnational nature of pandemic and disease response. “Global health, by definition, is transnational, crosses borders, does not concern just one country,” said Dr. Kevin DeCock, a former director at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control who spent decades leading infectious disease response efforts. “Global health problems require global approaches, and no country can go it alone.”

    A small number of policy analysts argue the new strategy deserves a chance to prove its effectiveness. Writing for the conservative American Enterprise Institute, analysts Brett Schaefer and Roger Bate acknowledged the risks of walking away from the multilateral system, particularly the withdrawal from WHO, but argued the shift is not the end of U.S. global health leadership. Instead, they frame it as a test of whether conditional, results-driven bilateral partnerships deliver better outcomes than reliance on a multilateral institution that has repeatedly failed to reform itself.

    Months after the first deal was signed in Kenya, adoption of the new framework across Africa remains patchy and deeply divisive. While Tanzania has recently joined the partnership, the growing number of African nations rejecting the terms leaves the future of the Trump administration’s reshaping of global health aid far from certain.

  • The wrong man (of the match) – De Allende picks up Willemse’s award

    The wrong man (of the match) – De Allende picks up Willemse’s award

    An awkward administrative mix-up overshadowed an otherwise landmark day for South African rugby in Johannesburg, as two-time world champions the Springboks claimed a victory over England at Ellis Park, and the wrong player was incorrectly awarded the man of the match honor.

    The standout performance of the match belonged to Damian Willemse, who was marking his 50th test cap appearance for the Springboks. Playing at full-back, Willemse delivered a masterclass for the home crowd: he dominated aerial battles, landed a clinical, game-changing 50:22 kick, gained more attacking meters than any other South African player on the pitch, and consistently anchored the world champions’ offensive structure to great effect.

    Supersport, South Africa’s leading local sports broadcaster, had internally selected Willemse as the rightful recipient of the player of the match award. But a critical breakdown in communication between the commentary team and on-pitch presentation staff at Ellis Park led to the honor being mistakenly awarded to his teammate, Damian de Allende – himself a double Rugby World Cup winner with the Springboks, who went on to pose for the official presentation photos and completed the required post-award interviews before the error came to light.

    Remarkably, the mix-up did little to dampen the Springboks’ post-victory celebrations, with the two Damians posing together for photos to formally celebrate Willemse’s 50th cap milestone, a lighthearted moment that softened the impact of the on-field mistake.

    Looking ahead to the next round of the international rugby series, South Africa is set to host Scotland in Pretoria this coming Saturday. For that fixture, Willemse will shift position to take over de Allende’s spot at inside centre, after the double world cup winner was rested for the match. BBC Sport has confirmed it reached out to Supersport for official comment on the award error, with no response published as of yet.

  • Ebola deaths in Congo top 500 as health workers threaten to strike

    Ebola deaths in Congo top 500 as health workers threaten to strike

    A rapidly spreading Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has crossed a grim threshold, with official data confirming more than 500 fatalities from over 1,500 confirmed infections, even as the response effort faces a fresh crisis: frontline workers battling the outbreak have threatened to suspend work over unmet pay and unsafe working conditions.

    Congo’s Ministry of Health released the updated statistics in a Sunday night briefing, reporting that since the outbreak was first declared on May 15, a total of 1,561 confirmed cases have been documented, with 506 people succumbing to the virus. Current data shows the virus’ transmission continues to outpace the ability of response teams to contain it, according to the official update.

    The strike threat was issued Sunday by frontline teams deployed in Ituri province, the geographic epicenter of the current outbreak. Workers gave authorities a 24-hour deadline to address their grievances, warning that work would stop if demands were not met. The vast majority of these frontline staff are local health professionals, who have worked for months with minimal rest while navigating two extraordinary additional challenges: violent attacks from hostile local communities, and deep-rooted public skepticism about the existence of the virus.

    A copy of the workers’ formal notice to the national government, obtained by the Associated Press, details multiple long-running grievances. Workers both inside hospital facilities and out in the community conducting contact tracing and testing report they have not received earned hazard benefits since the outbreak was declared, and still lack sufficient basic supplies to carry out their high-risk work. Additional complaints include chronically low base salaries, disrespectful treatment from elite response teams deployed from the capital Kinshasa, a pattern of bringing in outside labor from other provinces instead of prioritizing hiring of local Ituri workers, and persistent shortages of adequate personal protective equipment and other critical medical gear.

    The timing of the strike threat has amplified concerns among public health officials, as it comes just days after enrollment opened for experimental clinical trials for Ebola treatments in the region. A work stoppage would not only derail the trial process, but also significantly slow broader efforts to curb transmission of the virus, which has already spread beyond Ituri to two additional eastern provinces: North Kivu and South Kivu.

    Response efforts have been complicated from the start by key biological characteristics of the current outbreak: this event is caused by the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, for which there are no currently approved vaccines or specific antiviral treatments. By contrast, Congo’s 16 previous Ebola outbreaks were almost all caused by the more common Zaire strain, for which an effective, widely deployed vaccine already exists.

    Public health officials also still face major gaps in basic investigation of the outbreak: investigators have not yet identified patient zero, the initial case that sparked the current transmission chain, and are still working to trace tens of thousands of potential contacts who may have been exposed to infected people, a core step to stopping further spread. The World Health Organization has already warned that the first month of this outbreak was the worst on record for early Ebola spread in Congo.

  • Tanzanian authorities arrest dozens ahead of anti-government protests

    Tanzanian authorities arrest dozens ahead of anti-government protests

    DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania — Tanzanian security forces have detained dozens of opposition-aligned activists in the lead-up to a scheduled series of anti-government demonstrations, launching a preemptive crackdown on growing calls for sweeping democratic changes and the release of jailed opposition leader Tundu Lissu. The planned protests, called by youth activist groups for Tuesday, are intentionally timed to coincide with two major events in the country: the 72nd founding anniversary of Tanzania’s long-ruling political party, and the opening of the 50th annual Dar es Salaam International Trade Fair, widely known locally as SabaSaba — one of the East African nation’s largest recurring commercial gatherings.

  • Ebola deaths in DR Congo top 500 amid continued community transmission

    Ebola deaths in DR Congo top 500 amid continued community transmission

    KINSHASA, July 6 — The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has reached a grim new milestone, with the total number of fatalities surpassing 500, national health authorities announced in an official update released Sunday.

    As of the latest data compilation, the outbreak has recorded 1,561 laboratory-confirmed Ebola infections, of which 506 have resulted in death. So far, 254 patients have successfully recovered from the virus, while 628 confirmed cases are currently receiving care in isolation facilities or hospital settings. Health officials are also investigating 354 additional suspected cases, which have already been linked to 110 deaths.

    The outbreak has spread across 36 separate health zones distributed across three DRC provinces, and transmission trends continue to move in a worrying direction. Official epidemiological data shows weekly confirmed case counts have kept climbing, with the 25th and 26th epidemiological weeks of the outbreak marking the highest infection levels recorded since the event began. Each of these two weeks reported more than 300 new confirmed cases, providing clear evidence that sustained community transmission is still ongoing across affected regions.

    In response to the growing public health crisis, the World Health Organization announced Thursday that a new clinical trial has begun recruiting patients in the DRC to test promising candidate treatments for the current strain of the virus. The ongoing outbreak is caused by Bundibugyo ebolavirus, a pathogen for which no approved vaccine or specific, standardized treatment currently exists. The trial is being hosted at the CME Ebola treatment center located in Rwampara health zone, Ituri Province — the geographic epicenter of the current outbreak.

  • More than 300 children killed or injured in Sudan war in 6 months, UNICEF says

    More than 300 children killed or injured in Sudan war in 6 months, UNICEF says

    CAIRO – In a stark new assessment released Monday, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has revealed that more than 300 children have been killed or injured across Sudan over the past six months, with the vast majority of these casualties linked to increasingly widespread drone strikes across the war-torn nation.

    Sudan’s brutal internal conflict, which pits the country’s official military against the powerful paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has stretched on since April 2023, leaving the nation fragmented and its population in crisis. Today, the heaviest fighting is concentrated in three key regions: Kordofan, Darfur, and Blue Nile states. According to UNICEF’s casualty analysis, drone attacks account for 60 percent of all child harm recorded in the latest six-month period.

    International bodies and major global powers including the United Nations, the United States, and the United Kingdom have raised urgent alarm over reports of potential mass atrocities as both factions battle for control of el-Obeid, a strategically critical city in North Kordofan. The battle for this urban center has worsened already desperate conditions for civilians trapped in the crossfire.

    The full scale of the conflict’s human cost is staggering. Official estimates place the total death toll at no less than 59,000 people, while more than 13 million Sudanese have been forced from their homes to escape violence. Large swathes of the country are now on the brink of famine, and more than 30 million Sudanese – nearly two-thirds of the nation’s population – require life-saving humanitarian aid to survive.

    Indiscriminate drone strikes and artillery shelling have repeatedly targeted civilian infrastructure that communities depend on, including schools, public markets, fuel depots, and water distribution stations. UNICEF estimates that these deliberate attacks have put more than 500,000 civilian lives at direct risk, and residents across contested areas have endured nearly a year of conditions that amount to a de facto siege, cutting them off from basic supplies and emergency care.

    “Children are being caught in a relentless cycle of violence, displacement and deprivation,” said Sheldon Yett, UNICEF’s top representative for Sudan. In line with the agency’s statement, the United Nations has issued a formal call to both warring parties, demanding that they uphold international humanitarian law by protecting civilians and civilian infrastructure, grant unimpeded, rapid, and safe access for humanitarian aid convoys, and take every possible measure to shield children from the harm of ongoing conflict.

  • As East Africa’s oceans change, coastal women build new livelihoods

    As East Africa’s oceans change, coastal women build new livelihoods

    Along the sunbaked Indian Ocean coastline of East Africa, generations of small-scale fishing communities have built their lives around the sea. But today, rapidly warming waters, rampant overfishing, and illegal industrial fishing operations have pushed traditional livelihoods to the breaking point, forcing coastal residents — and women in particular — to reimagine their relationship with the ocean through conservation-led enterprises that offer both hope and stability.

    In Malindi, a coastal town northeast of Kenya’s major port Mombasa, 54-year-old Nuru Mohamed is putting the final touches on her new beachside restaurant, where fishing nets hang as rustic decor while her daughter sweeps away construction sand. For most of her life, Mohamed was one of the region’s rare female artisanal fishers, but she has faced declining catches, stolen boats, and unfair competition from large-scale industrial trawlers that operate illegally in nearshore waters. A nearby Chinese-owned fish processing facility stands as a stark reminder of how the local industry has shifted beyond the reach of small-scale operators. “I can’t compete with that kind of power or scale,” she says. “I fought to remain a fisherwoman. But I think it’s a fight I can no longer win.” For Mohamed and the women working with her on the restaurant, the new business is more than just a construction project — it is a lifeline. “For us women, this is hope,” she says. “It will help support many families that have depended on the ocean for decades.”

    This shift is not an isolated case. Across East Africa’s entire coastal belt, communities are turning to tourism, mangrove and seagrass restoration, and other conservation-focused ventures to build sustainable incomes as traditional fishing becomes increasingly unviable. In Kenya, women have turned restored mangrove forests into income streams through beekeeping and ecotourism; in Tanzania’s Zanzibar archipelago, fishing communities run locally managed coral reef protected areas to reverse ecosystem damage; in Mozambique, seagrass restoration projects create jobs while reviving critical marine habitats. Far from abandoning the ocean that has sustained their families for generations, these initiatives redefine resilience as restoring the marine ecosystem while building long-term livelihoods that work with, not against, the ocean’s natural health.

    Ten kilometers from Mohamed’s restaurant, where the Sabaki River flows into the Indian Ocean, Beatrice Mwanyiro manages both a mangrove nursery and a community restaurant, run by a 30-member women’s self-help group called ReSea that receives funding from the Canadian government. “We have to adapt to the changing times,” Mwanyiro says. “The number of fish coming into the shallow waters are falling every year. Without another source of income, we won’t be able to feed our families.”

    Critical coastal ecosystems — mangroves, coral reefs, seagrass meadows, and nearshore fisheries — provide far more than food: they buffer coastlines from destructive storm surges, support biodiversity, and store massive amounts of carbon that help slow global climate change. Yet these habitats are increasingly threatened by warming oceans, plastic pollution, habitat destruction, and overfishing. In Lamu, Kenya’s UNESCO World Heritage coastal site, veteran fishery leader Mohamed Somo notes that where boats once brought in up to 100 kilograms of fish per trip, today catches often top out at less than 30 kilograms. While Kenyan law restricts industrial trawlers to operating at least 5 nautical miles offshore, Somo says many vessels flout the rules, moving into shallow, nearshore waters where small-scale fishers work overnight to strip the remaining fish stocks. “By morning, there’s very little left for us,” he says.

    This crisis is not unique to Kenya. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing costs the global economy roughly $23 billion annually, while threatening marine biodiversity and the food security of billions of people who rely on fish as their primary source of protein.

    As coastal communities fight to survive, growing pressure has pushed ocean conservation higher up the global political agenda. Conservation leaders emphasize that the communities that depend on the ocean are also its most effective protectors, particularly when women lead local efforts. “Communities that depend on the ocean are also its best stewards,” says Andreane Martel, ReSea’s project director. “When local people, especially women, lead conservation, they protect biodiversity while creating more resilient and inclusive livelihoods.”

    Jerry Mang’ena, co-founder and executive director of Tanzania-based conservation group Action for Ocean, which restores mangrove habitats along the country’s coast, echoes this view. “Coastal communities are on the frontlines of climate change and declining ocean health, but they are also among the strongest drivers of resilience,” he says. “Supporting sustainable livelihoods, from aquaculture and eco-tourism to ecosystem restoration, helps families adapt while reducing pressure on the ocean. If we’re serious about protecting our seas, we must invest in the people who have cared for them for generations.”

    At the recent Our Ocean Conference held in Mombasa, conservation groups called on African governments to quickly ratify the landmark UN Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement, also known as the High Seas Treaty. The global pact, which entered into force in January this year, establishes frameworks to create marine protected areas in international waters and ensure equitable sharing of marine genetic resources. As of April, 145 countries have signed the agreement, and 81 have fully ratified it. For small-scale fishers like Mohamed, the outcome of global ratification efforts could reshape their future, reducing the pressure of unregulated fishing on nearshore stocks and creating more stable conditions for their new conservation-led livelihoods.

    “The BBNJ Agreement gives African governments a historic opportunity to protect the high seas and safeguard the future of our fisheries,” says Aliou Ba, oceans campaign lead at Greenpeace Africa. “But protecting the ocean also means confronting illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing that is stripping African waters of marine life and robbing coastal communities of food and income. Governments cannot afford to delay.”

    This reporting on climate and environment by The Associated Press is supported by funding from multiple private foundations, with AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • The African fishermen who blame Chinese trawlers for their woes

    The African fishermen who blame Chinese trawlers for their woes

    On sun-baked beaches along Sierra Leone’s Sherbo Island, 120 kilometers south of the capital Freetown, the age-old ritual of collective shore fishing unfolds much as it has for generations. A dozen villagers strain against thick ropes, shouting in coordinated bursts as they haul a heavy net bulging with snapper, mackerel, barracuda and rays out of the Atlantic surf. But where this communal work once yielded enough to feed local families and earn steady incomes, today’s hauls tell a story of growing crisis: small-scale local fishermen across the country say their catches have plummeted in recent years, and they point to one clear culprit – large, unregulated foreign trawlers operating illegally inside protected coastal waters.

    Marie Pierre, one of the local workers sorting sardines from discarded jellyfish after the net comes ashore, says illegal international vessels have been violating the country’s official seven-mile exclusion zone – an area reserved exclusively for small-scale domestic fishing – in growing numbers. For many fishermen, the incursions go far beyond just stealing fish. Musa Gassimo, a local Sherbo Island fisherman, alleges that foreign trawlers deliberately cut the lines of small-scale fishing nets when local crews return to shore overnight. Each replacement net costs up to $250, a catastrophic expense for low-income artisanal fishermen who rely on their gear to make a living.

    West Africa has long been recognized as the global epicenter of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. A 2024 global analysis estimates that 40% of the world’s unlicensed fishing catch is harvested from the region’s waters, costing West African governments a combined $10 billion in lost annual revenue while putting the food security of more than 30 million people who depend on local fishing at risk. Industry observers note that little progress has been made to reverse the crisis in the two years since the report was published.

    Thomas Turay, president of Sierra Leone’s Fishermen’s Union, confirms the severity of the decline, saying average catches for local members have dropped by roughly 40% since illegal incursions surged. Speaking from Tombo Harbour near Freetown, Turay points to large foreign vessels anchored just outside the exclusion zone, saying these ships slip into protected coastal waters almost every night under cover of darkness. Multiple local fishermen who spoke with reporters shared personal accounts of damage and loss: 70-year-old Abou Waisissé described an incident where dozens of small local boats had their nets cut in a single incursion, while 55-year-old Mohamedi Kamara said his small fishing craft was badly damaged in a collision with a large international trawler.

    When asked about the nationalities of the illegal vessels operating off Sierra Leone’s coast, Steve Trent, CEO and co-founder of the global advocacy group Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF), says the vast majority are flagged to China. While vessels from South Korea, Taiwan and European countries have operated illegally in the region in the past, Trent says Chinese trawlers now overwhelmingly dominate unlicensed fishing activity across West Africa.

    Local fishermen say they have repeatedly reported illegal incursions to Sierra Leone’s Ministry of Fisheries, but their complaints have gone unanswered. Turay blames systemic corruption for the lack of enforcement, saying operators of illegal trawlers bribe government officials to avoid penalties. “I know that somebody who is doing this illegal business has the money to bribe and pay,” he says. “Government authorities are afraid to help the local fishermen.”

    These allegations of widespread unenforced regulation are strenuously denied by Sheku Sei, director of Sierra Leone’s Ministry of Fisheries. Sei acknowledges that illegal fishing was once a major problem, but argues that new regulatory measures have reduced incursions significantly. He says all international vessels operating in Sierra Leone’s waters are now required to carry transponders to track their movements, and government inspectors conduct routine checks on foreign fleets. When asked about the common global practice of vessels turning off transponders to avoid detection of illegal activity, Sei claimed this does not happen in Sierra Leone’s waters. He also argued that steep financial penalties for violating the seven-mile exclusion zone act as a strong deterrent, but could not name a single instance where penalties had actually been applied over the past 10 years.

    The Chinese Chamber of Commerce in Sierra Leone did not respond to BBC requests for comment on the allegations. Last month, however, the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued a blanket denial after similar claims of illegal Chinese fishing in Latin American waters, saying “China is a responsible fishing nation, strictly enforcing the regulation of its distant-water fishing activities and engaging in mutually beneficial fisheries cooperation with relevant countries in accordance with international law.”

    Trent from EJF rejects this claim, arguing the Chinese government has adopted a deliberate “head-in-the-sand” approach to the crisis. “It’s simply not credible for them to carry on in this way. China, to date, still is not doing nearly enough to control its fleet. In fact, I would say they’re enabling it, through subsidies, through a lack of oversight and control.”

    Trent says the solution to the crisis requires two key changes: improved global tracking of commercial fishing vessels, and increased international pressure on the Chinese government to enforce regulations on its distant-water fleet. He notes that fish illegally harvested from West African waters are sold to consumers around the world, giving everyday shoppers the power to drive change by choosing only legally and sustainably sourced seafood, a choice that protects the livelihoods of vulnerable small-scale fishermen in poor coastal nations.

  • Queiroz leaves Ghana following World Cup exit

    Queiroz leaves Ghana following World Cup exit

    Veteran football manager Carlos Queiroz has ended his tenure as head coach of Ghana’s men’s national team, stepping down just three months after accepting the role following the Black Stars’ early elimination from the 2026 FIFA World Cup at the round of 32 stage.

    The 73-year-old coach was appointed to lead Ghana back in April this year, and steered the side to a third-place finish in their Group L during the group stage, which earned them a spot in the knockout round. Their run in the tournament was cut short, however, after a narrow 1-0 defeat to Colombia in the first knockout fixture, which saw the Ghanaian side exit the competition.

    Queiroz boasts an extensive resume in elite football management, including a notable spell as assistant manager to Sir Alex Ferguson at English Premier League giants Manchester United. He held the assistant position at Old Trafford across two stints: first from 2002 to 2003, before returning to the club from 2004 to 2008, where he contributed to multiple major trophy wins during his time at the club. This World Cup marks the fifth consecutive major tournament where Queiroz has held a head coaching position at the competition; he previously led the national teams of Iran, Portugal, and Egypt at World Cup finals.

    Queiroz was not the only head coach to part ways with his national team on the day of the announcement. Following his departure, it was also confirmed that the Jordan Football Association had split with head coach Jamal Sellami, after Jordan finished the tournament in fourth place in their Group J bracket. The dual departures add to the wave of post-tournament coaching changes that typically follow early elimination from the FIFA World Cup.