标签: Africa

非洲

  • A fire at a girls’ school in central Kenya causes deaths and injuries

    A fire at a girls’ school in central Kenya causes deaths and injuries

    GILGIL, Kenya — A devastating overnight blaze broke out at a public girls’ boarding school in central Kenya early Thursday, leaving multiple people dead and others injured, as emergency crews and law enforcement teams continue working to locate every student and staff member unaccounted for. The fire ignited in the student dormitory block at Utumishi Girls School, located roughly 120 kilometers northwest of Kenya’s capital city Nairobi, in the Gilgil region. Local police confirmed they are heading up the multi-agency rescue and emergency response operation that launched immediately after the fire was reported. As of Thursday afternoon, officials have not released an official, confirmed count of casualties. An initial internal government incident assessment has placed the death toll at a minimum of 15, with dozens of injured people already transported to nearby regional hospitals for urgent medical care. The exact origin and cause of the fire remain under active investigation, with no preliminary conclusions shared by authorities as of press time. Tragic school dormitory fires are a persistent, recurring crisis across Kenya’s boarding school system. Past blazes have been linked to a range of causes, from malicious arson attacks to unaddressed faulty electrical wiring that creates fire hazards in aging campus buildings. The deadliest school fire in Kenya’s recent modern history occurred in 2001, when a dormitory blaze in Machakos County claimed the lives of 67 sleeping students. Just this year, in 2024, another deadly fire at a central Kenya boarding school killed 21 students, prompting President William Ruto to declare a national three-day period of mourning for the victims. Prior deadly incidents include a 2017 Nairobi school fire that killed 10 students, which ended in a student being charged with murder in connection with the blaze.

  • Trump administration to send Americans exposed to Ebola to a new facility in Kenya

    Trump administration to send Americans exposed to Ebola to a new facility in Kenya

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A senior anonymous administration official confirmed Wednesday that the Trump administration has advanced a new plan to route U.S. citizens exposed to the Ebola virus through a purpose-built regional facility in Kenya, rather than evacuating them directly back to the United States for care.

    Developed jointly by the U.S. Departments of Defense, State, and Health and Human Services, the new quarantine and treatment center is intended specifically to serve Ebola patients requiring urgent evacuation out of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where a rapidly spreading Ebola outbreak has outpaced local containment efforts. According to the official, the regional model cuts out the need for lengthy, hours-long medical evacuation flights across continents to U.S. medical facilities, streamlining access to care for people impacted by the outbreak.

    Details of the plan remain incomplete as of Wednesday: the administration has not disclosed the exact location of the facility within Kenya, nor has it confirmed whether Kenyan national authorities have formally approved the proposal. The official noted that the center will be equipped to manage all stages of Ebola infection, a pathogen infamous for its high fatality rate even among rare, severe viral illnesses. However, the plan also includes provisions to transfer patients to alternative facilities with more specialized capabilities if advanced care is required, the official added.

    The Ebola outbreak at the center of this planning effort has already posed severe challenges to Congolese and global health authorities. After the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola was identified in the region, public health teams revealed that confirmation of the pathogen was delayed for weeks, as initial testing only targeted the more common Ebola variant. The World Health Organization has already warned that case growth is outpacing containment efforts, a assessment backed by the latest official data from the DRC.

    As of Tuesday, Congolese health ministry data puts the total number of suspected Ebola cases in eastern DRC at nearly 1,000, with at least 220 suspected deaths attributed to the outbreak. So far, 101 cases have received formal laboratory confirmation, and contact tracers are monitoring more than 3,000 people who may have been exposed to infected individuals. Beyond the pathogen itself, response teams face layered structural barriers: active conflict from armed groups in eastern DRC, a large population of internally displaced people who lack regular access to healthcare, and crumbling basic infrastructure all complicate large-scale outbreak control.

  • Ghana begins repatriating citizens from South Africa due to anti-immigration tensions

    Ghana begins repatriating citizens from South Africa due to anti-immigration tensions

    On Wednesday, the first contingent of roughly 300 Ghanaian nationals departed Johannesburg for their home country, marking the launch of a voluntary repatriation program organized by Ghana’s government in response to escalating anti-immigration tensions across South Africa.

    At Johannesburg’s OR Tambo International Airport, traveling Ghanaians and their families gathered with packed luggage, as Ghanaian consular staff and South African law enforcement worked in tandem to coordinate check-in and departure procedures. This repatriation effort comes on the heels of renewed demonstrations targeting illegal immigration in multiple regions of South Africa, where deep-seated public frustration over persistently high unemployment, rising violent crime, and unequal access to basic public services has stoked resentment toward foreign-born residents.

    Benjamin Quashie, Ghana’s High Commissioner to South Africa, confirmed to reporters on-site that more people seeking evacuation arrived at the airport than had pre-registered for the first flight. He added that these additional applicants would have their registration processed in time for the next scheduled repatriation flight, set to depart for Ghana this coming Sunday.

    Diplomatic friction between the two African nations began when Ghana summoned South Africa’s ambassador to Accra to protest reported targeted attacks on Ghanaian citizens living in South Africa, shortly before the evacuation initiative was formally announced.

    According to Loren Landau, a migration scholar and political analyst at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, the repatriation program carries more symbolic weight than it does practical protection for the small number of citizens being evacuated. He explained that the move is fundamentally a diplomatic signal from Ghana to South Africa that the current wave of anti-immigrant hostility is politically unacceptable, rather than a large-scale emergency rescue effort.

    Some of the Ghanaian citizens on Wednesday’s flight had previously been held at South Africa’s Lindela Repatriation Centre for immigration violations. In total, more than 800 Ghanaians have registered with the Ghana High Commission in Pretoria to take part in the evacuation program, after weeks of anti-immigrant protests left many foreign-born residents feeling increasingly unsafe.

    Ghanaian authorities have emphasized that the entire repatriation operation is being conducted in close coordination with South African government officials, launched out of urgent concerns for the personal safety and well-being of Ghanaian migrants in the country. For its part, the South African government has formally condemned all acts of violence against foreign nationals, while simultaneously acknowledging that public anxiety over unregulated illegal immigration is a legitimate domestic concern.

    The unrest has also drawn pushback from other African nations: Nigeria has publicly criticized the treatment of its own citizens residing in South Africa, and confirmed it is evaluating its own potential evacuation program for Nigerian nationals.

  • Uganda closes its border with Congo as cases of a rare Ebola type surge

    Uganda closes its border with Congo as cases of a rare Ebola type surge

    KAMPALA, UGANDA – In an unprecedented move that contradicts global public health recommendations, Ugandan health officials announced an immediate full closure of the country’s long border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo on Wednesday, as cases of a rare, untreatable strain of Ebola skyrocket in Congo and potential exposure clusters emerge within Uganda itself.

    The Bundibugyo strain of Ebola at the center of this outbreak has no clinically approved vaccines or antiviral treatments available, a reality that has amplified alarm across East Africa even as both Uganda and Congo have years of prior experience managing past Ebola outbreaks. The closure order was issued by Uganda’s national Ebola response task force following a steady rise in the number of Ugandan healthcare workers exposed to the virus by infected Congolese patients who crossed the border before the outbreak was officially declared on May 15.

    Dr. Diana Atwine, permanent secretary of Uganda’s Ministry of Health, confirmed to reporters that only limited cross-border movement will be permitted for emergency purposes, including outbreak response deployments, essential cargo shipments, and security operations. Any individual allowed entry from Congo under these exceptions will be required to complete a 21-day mandatory isolation period, the full incubation window for the Ebola virus.

    As of this week, Congolese health authorities report 101 confirmed cases of Ebola, with more than 3,000 at-risk contacts currently under monitoring. The total number of suspected cases across eastern Congo has climbed to nearly 1,000, with at least 220 suspected deaths linked to the current outbreak. Ebola, a severe hemorrhagic fever, spreads through direct contact with the bodily fluids of infected or deceased patients, with healthcare workers and family members caring for patients facing the highest risk of transmission. Public health experts universally identify proactive contact tracing and prompt isolation of exposed individuals as the most critical steps to halting community spread.

    Last month, the World Health Organization categorized the outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the global body’s highest alert level. Even while acknowledging that neighboring nations like Uganda face extremely high risk of imported cases, the WHO has explicitly advised against full border closures. The agency warns that official closures force cross-border movement to shift to unregulated informal footpaths and crossings, which lack any health screening or monitoring – a dynamic that ultimately increases the risk of unobserved disease spread.

    Uganda and Congo share a hundreds-mile-long border crisscrossed by dozens of informal foot trails that are impossible to fully seal. Cross-border daily travel for family visits and small-scale trade is a longstanding norm for communities on both sides of the frontier.

    Congo’s public health teams have struggled to get the outbreak under control since the Bundibugyo strain was confirmed months ago. Initial diagnostic delays slowed the response: early samples were tested for more common Ebola strains, pushing back confirmation of the outbreak by weeks. The WHO has acknowledged that the spread of the virus is currently outpacing response efforts.

    Multiple structural and security challenges have complicated containment work in eastern Congo. The region is plagued by ongoing violence from active armed groups, hosts a large population of displaced people fleeing conflict, and lacks basic transportation and health infrastructure. This week, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus took to social media to call for an immediate ceasefire in the region, emphasizing that attacks on health facilities make contact tracing and case management nearly impossible.

    Local response teams have also reported being chronically underresourced: frontline workers lack adequate personal protective equipment like face shields and full-body hazmat suits, testing remains limited, and even basic supplies like body bags for safe burials of Ebola victims are in short supply. Many residents in the conflict-affected region have deep-seated distrust of outside authorities, and response volunteers and health clinics have faced repeated attacks, with locals throwing stones and harassing teams working to educate communities about Ebola risks.

    In a related development, the U.S. Trump administration announced Wednesday that it would route any American citizens exposed to Ebola for treatment at a newly constructed isolation facility in Kenya, rather than repatriating them to the United States for care. That announcement came the same week Canada introduced its own entry measures, requiring mandatory self-isolation for all travelers arriving from Congo, Sudan, and Uganda over Ebola concerns.

    To date, Uganda has recorded seven confirmed Ebola cases, with the first case – a 59-year-old Congolese man who crossed into Uganda – dying in the capital Kampala on May 14. While confirmed case counts have not yet spiked exponentially in Uganda, the number of Ugandan healthcare workers exposed to the virus through border crossing patients continues to climb. Atwine noted that each exposed worker has their own household contacts, driving a steady expansion of the at-risk population.

    The health official also publicly criticized crowds of Ugandan soccer fans who gathered in large groups to celebrate Arsenal’s English Premier League title win, a reminder that pandemic fatigue and low public vigilance remain additional obstacles to containment. Atwine urged all Ugandans to remain alert, adopt basic preventive measures including avoiding handshakes, and regularly using hand sanitizer.

    This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in Congo. Global health experts warn that aid cuts to regional response programs implemented by the U.S. and other wealthy donor nations last year have severely undermined preparedness in eastern Congo, a region that has long been classified as high-risk for epidemic spread. Aid organizations currently on the ground fighting the outbreak confirm they are still lacking critical equipment to protect workers and safely manage cases.

  • South African government and Afrikaners reject US claim of a humanitarian emergency for white people

    South African government and Afrikaners reject US claim of a humanitarian emergency for white people

    JOHANNESBURG – In a sharp rebuke of a controversial unilateral decision from the outgoing Trump administration, South Africa’s national government and leading advocacy groups representing the country’s Afrikaner white minority have publicly rejected the claim that a humanitarian emergency endangers white South Africans. The baseless assertion formed the core legal and political rationale for the Trump White House to adjust the nation’s annual refugee quota, adding 10,000 exclusive slots for white Afrikaners while effectively closing the program to qualifying applicants from all other countries.

  • Why Trump’s allegations that white people are being persecuted in South Africa have been denied

    Why Trump’s allegations that white people are being persecuted in South Africa have been denied

    CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA — In a sweeping and divisive policy shift, former U.S. President Donald Trump has expanded the annual U.S. refugee quota reserved for white South Africans, adding 10,000 new slots to bring the total annual allocation to 17,500. The Trump administration framed the expansion as a response to what it claims is growing racially motivated violence targeting white South Africans, perpetrated by the country’s Black-led national government and opposition political groups. As of the announcement’s release, no specific evidence of the cited incitement to violence has been made public.

    This move marks the latest chapter in Trump’s long-held claim that minority white Afrikaners — descendants of 17th-century Dutch and French settlers who established colonial rule in South Africa — face systematic, state-backed persecution, a charge the South African government has repeatedly and categorically denied. Below is a breakdown of the claims, counterclaims, and broader geopolitical context surrounding the controversial decision.

    ### The Debate Over Farm Violence
    Trump first laid the groundwork for the targeted refugee program for Afrikaners through an executive order issued last year, which claimed the group suffers widespread racial violence enabled by official South African policy. U.S. officials have pointed to a small number of home invasions targeting white farmers as core evidence of systematic persecution, but South African officials and independent analysts reject this framing as a deliberate distortion of the country’s broader crime landscape.

    South Africa struggles with a nationwide violent crime crisis that impacts all racial groups, with official data recording more than 23,000 homicides across the country between April 2025 and March 2026. The vast majority of these killings affect the country’s poor Black majority, which makes up more than 80% of South Africa’s 62 million total population. By comparison, lobby group AfriForum — the leading Afrikaner organization advocating for greater attention to rural crime — recorded just 29 farm homicides in 2025, accounting for roughly 0.1% of all national homicides that year.

    Critics note that farm attacks are overwhelmingly driven by criminal opportunism rather than racial animus, and that Black farmers and farmworkers are also regularly killed in these incidents. Neither national South African police, which do not track rural crime by victim race, nor AfriForum — which says it does not “racialize” the issue — publish separate data on the racial breakdown of farm homicide victims, reinforcing the lack of evidence for a targeted anti-white campaign.

    ### Claims of State-Backed Anti-White Rhetoric Are Unfounded, Officials Say
    The Trump administration justified the expansion by claiming an “unforeseen emergency refugee situation” driven by growing state-endorsed incitement to violence against Afrikaners. But this claim collapses under scrutiny, analysts and South African officials say: there is no public record of incitement to violence from the country’s governing coalition, which includes 10 political parties, several led by white politicians. White South Africans, including many of Afrikaner descent, currently hold seats in the national cabinet, and the Afrikaans language remains one of South Africa’s 11 officially recognized languages, taught in schools and widely used across public and private life.

    Afrikaners hold prominent positions across South African politics, business, and sports, and their cultural monuments and institutions are preserved as part of the country’s diverse national heritage. The only example of anti-white rhetoric cited by the Trump administration comes from a small far-left opposition party, which has occasionally revived the apartheid-era resistance chant “kill the Boer,” a phrase targeting white farmers that has been investigated for hate speech. The far-left party holds no national governing power, and while the South African government has declined to formally outlaw the chant, framing it as a historical artifact of the anti-apartheid struggle rather than a literal call for violence, it has never endorsed violence against white South Africans.

    ### Affirmative Action Misrepresented as Anti-White Oppression
    The Trump administration has also pointed to South Africa’s post-apartheid affirmative action laws as proof of systematic anti-white policy. The laws, enacted after the end of white minority apartheid rule in 1994, are designed to redress decades of state-backed oppression by expanding economic and social opportunities for Black South Africans, women, and people living with disabilities, though the efficacy of the policies remains a matter of public debate within South Africa.

    High-profile allies of Trump, including South African-born billionaire Elon Musk, have claimed the laws discriminate against white South Africans. Musk has argued he was blocked from obtaining an operating license for his Starlink satellite internet service in South Africa solely because of his race. But the South African government refutes this claim, noting that Starlink is eligible to operate in the country so long as it complies with standard regulations requiring a minority stake for historically disadvantaged groups — a rule already followed by more than 600 U.S. companies currently operating in South Africa.

    ### Broader Geopolitical Tensions Underpin the Dispute
    South African officials have uniformly rejected the classification of Afrikaners as persecuted refugees, stating that any South African — including Afrikaners — is free to emigrate to the U.S. for economic opportunity, but that claims of systemic persecution are completely baseless. “The assertion that white Afrikaners, in particular, endure systemic persecution is entirely without foundation,” South African foreign ministry spokesperson Chrispin Phiri told the Associated Press in a recent statement.

    U.S. data shows that around 6,000 South Africans have relocated to the U.S. since the targeted Afrikaner refugee program launched last year. Observers note that the Trump administration’s push on this issue is tied to broader geopolitical frictions between the U.S. and South Africa, particularly over South Africa’s longstanding support for Palestinian statehood. South Africa recently brought a high-profile genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, a move that has drawn fierce condemnation from the U.S. and its allies. The Trump administration has also criticized South Africa’s diplomatic relations with Iran, framing the country’s foreign policy as inherently anti-American — another charge South Africa denies.

  • Ghana welcomes Pope’s apology over Catholic Church’s role in slavery

    Ghana welcomes Pope’s apology over Catholic Church’s role in slavery

    In a landmark address that intersects global reckoning with historical injustice and modern ethical discourse, Pope Leo XIV has issued the Catholic Church’s clearest ever apology for its centuries-long complicity in the transatlantic slave trade, labeling the Church’s role a “deep, open wound in Christian memory”.

    The historic apology was included in *Magnifica Humanitas* (“Magnificent Humanity”), the Pope’s first encyclical — a formal teaching document addressed to global Catholic bishops that also carries wide-ranging messages for the international community — released on Monday. In addition to confronting the Church’s historical sins, the encyclical also explores pressing contemporary ethical risks tied to artificial intelligence development.

    In the text, the Pope offered a unreserved plea for pardon on behalf of the entire Catholic Church, writing that “it is impossible not to feel deep sorrow when contemplating the immense suffering and humiliation endured by so many” stolen from their African homelands. He openly acknowledged that for generations, Church leaders bowed to the demands of colonial rulers, creating formal regulations that legitimized systems of racialized subjugation, including the enslavement of non-Christian communities. He further confirmed that medieval ecclesiastical institutions themselves owned enslaved people, a long-unacknowledged chapter of Church history.

    Ghana, the West African nation that was a central trafficking hub during the 16th to 19th century transatlantic slave trade, has welcomed the apology as an extraordinary act of moral courage. Historical records estimate that between 12 and 15 million enslaved Africans were forcibly shipped across the Atlantic to the Americas during this era, with roughly 2 million dying in brutal conditions on the crossing. Many of these captives were held in stone forts along Ghana’s coast, structures that still stand today as haunting memorials to the atrocity.

    For decades, Ghana has led global calls for formal apologies and reparations from Western powers and institutions for their roles in the slave trade and colonial exploitation. In a formal statement released late Tuesday, the Ghanaian government framed the Pope’s acknowledgment as a critical milestone on the path to collective healing, intergenerational reconciliation, and the building of a more just global society. “This apology reinforces the growing global understanding that confronting historical injustices demands truth-telling and moral responsibility as essential foundations for justice and reconciliation,” the statement read.

    The apology comes as the global movement for reparations gains new institutional momentum. In March of this year, Ghana spearheaded a successful United Nations resolution, backed by the African Union and led by Ghanaian President John Mahama, that formally classifies the transatlantic enslavement of African people as “the gravest crime against humanity” in modern history. The resolution lays the groundwork for advancing reparations claims and addressing the enduring harms of slavery, from systemic racial inequality to persistent global discrimination.

    This latest development follows Pope Leo XIV’s first papal visit to Africa in April, an 11-day tour that took him to four African nations. During the trip, the pontiff delivered sharp criticisms of foreign actors that continue to extract Africa’s natural resources for private profit, earning widespread praise across the continent for his forthright stance.

    Ghanaian officials noted that the apology arrives at a pivotal moment, as the global community engages in deeper collective reflection on the ongoing harms of slavery and colonialism. In June, Ghana will host an international conference to outline next steps for the reparations movement, following the adoption of the UN resolution. The gathering will bring together activists, government officials, and global stakeholders to advance work on healing and redress.

  • A bitter Eid al-Adha in Mali’s capital as al-Qaida-linked blockade sends sheep prices soaring

    A bitter Eid al-Adha in Mali’s capital as al-Qaida-linked blockade sends sheep prices soaring

    As millions of Muslims across the globe gear up for the annual Eid al-Adha festival of sacrifice, the holy occasion is tinged with heartbreak and hardship in Bamako, the capital of conflict-stricken Mali. A months-long blockade enforced by al-Qaida-affarmed insurgents has sent livestock prices skyrocketing, pushing the holiday’s central religious ritual — slaughtering an animal and distributing its meat to low-income communities — out of reach for countless local families.

    The crisis stems directly from a blockade of major supply routes into Bamako announced earlier this month by Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the main al-Qaida-linked militant group operating in the Sahel. The fighters have systematically targeted and burned convoys of commercial trucks carrying goods and fuel heading toward the capital, choking off the steady flow of supplies the landlocked nation depends on. Unlike many neighboring coastal countries, Mali has no direct access to international seaports, so nearly all essential goods, from fuel to livestock, are trucked in from neighbors including Senegal and Ivory Coast.

    Analysts note the blockade is a deliberate strategic move: militants aim to cripple the national economy to erode public trust in the ruling military junta, which seized power in a 2020 coup. The blockade is not entirely sealed — insurgents avoid maintaining permanent roadblocks for fear of retaliation from Malian government forces, allowing small volumes of goods to trickle into the city. This limited flow has so far prevented a total breakdown of food access, but it has been enough to send prices of key goods including meat soaring and create widespread fuel shortages, forcing residents to queue for hours at the handful of gas stations still open.

    This is not a sudden disruption. JNIM has already enforced a stifling blockade on oil imports into the country since September 2025, laying the groundwork for the current crisis ahead of the major holiday. For ordinary Bamako residents, the impact hits closest to home during Eid al-Adha, where the sacrifice of a sheep is a centuries-old central tradition.

    Mountaga Touré, a 38-year-old local teacher, told reporters he visited multiple livestock markets across the city before abandoning his plan to purchase a sheep for his family. Since the blockade took effect, prices have jumped by nearly 50%: a small sheep that previously cost roughly $177 now sells for $266 or more, out of his budget. To adapt, many families in Bamako’s neighborhoods have begun pooling funds to buy cows instead of the traditional individual sheep, a last-minute adjustment to ensure they can still have meat for the holiday.

    The current blockade follows a sweeping wave of coordinated attacks across Mali carried out by separatist and jihadi forces last month — the largest large-scale offensive the country has seen in more than 10 years of ongoing insurgency. Mali has been grappling with overlapping crises for over a decade: a separatist rebellion in the northern regions, paired with expanding insurgencies led by militants affiliated with both al-Qaida and the Islamic State group. After the 2020 military coup, the ruling junta cut ties with Western security partners and turned to Russia for military support against the insurgency. But analysts confirm that security conditions across the country have deteriorated sharply in recent months, with a record high number of militant attacks recorded. Both government forces and Russian mercenary groups have also faced accusations of extrajudicial killings of civilian residents suspected of collaborating with insurgents.

    At present, the Malian army, backed by Russian Africa Corps mercenaries, has attempted to circumvent the blockade by providing armed escorts for supply convoys heading to Bamako’s markets. Military officials regularly announce strikes on militant-held positions to clear routes. But residents and traders say these efforts have not been enough to restore steady, adequate supply to the capital.

    Amadou Cissé, a 45-year-old livestock trader who has specialized in supplying Eid sheep for Bamako markets for years, explained that under normal circumstances he would bring up to 200 sheep to the capital for the holiday (known locally as Tabaski) each year. This year, he has only managed to transport 50, because limited space on army-escorted convoys restricts how much livestock he can move. Most of his ordered sheep remain stranded in Diema, a major livestock producing town 215 miles west of Bamako. “I was told more escorted convoys would be organized, but so far none have left Diema, so I doubt the sheep will arrive before the holiday,” Cissé said.

    Drissa Traoré, another Bamako-based sheep seller with more than a decade of experience, confirmed that overall supply has dropped by 50% compared to typical Eid seasons. “This year, we have barely half the number of sheep we usually have during Tabaski,” he said.

    Beyond disrupting holiday meals, the insecurity has upended long-held holiday travel traditions. Sidi Diarra, an employee at a major Bamako financial institution, typically travels 240 kilometers to the city of Segou each year to celebrate Eid with his parents. This year, he has canceled his plans out of fear of militant attacks along the route. “This year, I am afraid to go because of attacks by extremist groups. It is safer to stay in Bamako,” he said.

  • Ebola-hit DR Congo faces ‘catastrophic collision’ of disease and conflict, WHO warns

    Ebola-hit DR Congo faces ‘catastrophic collision’ of disease and conflict, WHO warns

    The World Health Organization’s director-general Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has issued a stark warning that persistent armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is severely undermining global and local efforts to curb an accelerating Ebola outbreak that has already claimed hundreds of suspected lives. With the epicenter of the current outbreak located in DR Congo’s violence-wracked Ituri Province, Tedros described the crisis as a “catastrophic collision of disease and conflict”, noting that the virus is spreading faster than response teams can contain it.

    In a public post on the social platform X, Tedros emphasized that public health work cannot progress under active combat: “We cannot build community trust or isolate the sick while bombs are falling.” He confirmed that he will travel to DR Congo on Wednesday to lead efforts to scale up response capacity and slow the outbreak’s spread. As of the latest updates, 220 suspected Ebola-related deaths have been recorded since the outbreak was officially declared, with roughly 1,000 people currently exhibiting symptoms consistent with the viral disease. Only 17 of those deaths have been definitively confirmed via laboratory testing, leaving response teams working with incomplete data on the outbreak’s true scope.

    The challenges facing medical teams extend far beyond active fighting. Ituri has been under direct military rule since 2021, when the central government replaced civilian leadership with a military commander in a bid to disarm dozens of active armed groups operating in the region. Chronic poor road infrastructure makes travel across affected areas slow and dangerous, while mass population displacement from conflict has fractured the already fragile local public health system — a strain worsened by recent cuts to international aid funding. Tedros stressed that halting Ebola transmission in the region is entirely dependent on unimpeded, sustained humanitarian access to affected communities. Ongoing clashes have forced tens of thousands of people to flee their homes, pushing many exposed to the virus into overcrowded displacement camps that create ideal conditions for further spread, while cutting off critical routes that medical teams rely on to reach patients. “Frontline workers are risking everything, while attacks on health facilities make tracking cases and their contacts nearly impossible,” he added. He has called on all armed parties and the Congolese government to agree to an immediate ceasefire to grant medical teams safe, unobstructed access to all affected areas.

    Adding another layer of complexity to the response, this outbreak is caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, for which no widely approved vaccines or targeted therapies currently exist. Response teams are currently working against the clock to trace more than 3,600 people who have been identified as close contacts of confirmed or suspected cases, a critical step to stop chains of transmission. While 2,000 testing kits have already been distributed to affected areas, a further 4,000 are scheduled for deployment in the coming days, and experimental treatments including an antibody developed in the United States are expected to be deployed soon.

    The head of Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) in DR Congo, Ewald Stals, told the BBC that the organization and other aid groups are working to move critical supplies and personnel into the outbreak’s epicenter, but persistent insecurity and inadequate transport links in Ituri have slowed progress dramatically. “Slowly but surely, there is, of course, some activity going on, but overall, we’re still far behind having a control on the situation,” Stals said. “So we still do not have a full picture of what is happening, and that is mainly due to insufficient testing. So we need more testing, we need more diagnosis to make sure that we get a full picture of what is going on — so we do not have that for the moment. And as long as that is the case, we can say that we’re running behind the virus, that the virus is still ahead of us, and that we really have to catch up.” MSF estimates it will take several weeks to put the full infrastructure needed to contain the outbreak in place.

    A small number of cases have already been detected in neighboring Uganda, prompting growing global concern about cross-border spread. Multiple countries have already implemented strict travel restrictions in response to the outbreak: Last week, the United States banned entry for non-citizens who have recently traveled to DR Congo, Uganda, or South Sudan. Canada followed this week with a temporary 90-day entry ban on residents from the three affected countries, while the Bahamas has implemented mandatory quarantine or isolation for foreign nationals arriving from the region.

    International health bodies have begun moving to boost their on-the-ground response capacity. On Wednesday morning, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) announced it would increase its in-country presence, deploying additional outbreak experts via the EU Health Task Force to support local and international response efforts. The WHO and partnering organizations have stressed that without an immediate end to hostilities in Ituri, the outbreak will continue to outpace response efforts and could spread beyond DR Congo’s borders.

  • First Ghanaians set to be repatriated from South Africa over anti-immigrant protests

    First Ghanaians set to be repatriated from South Africa over anti-immigrant protests

    In the early hours of Wednesday, the first cohort of Ghanaian citizens began their journey home from South Africa, amid growing fears of renewed xenophobic violence sparked by a recent wave of anti-illegal immigration protests across the country. Dozens of buses chartered by the Ghanaian embassy arrived at Johannesburg’s OR Tambo International Airport by 3 a.m. local time, dropping off hundreds of departing passengers spanning all age groups, including men, women, and children. A small subset of travelers was transported separately in a police van, kept isolated from the main group under constant police observation, according to on-the-ground reporting from the BBC.

    This mass repatriation effort comes in response to weeks of demonstrations led by March and March, a grassroots citizen movement pushing for stricter South African immigration reform. The group has set a June 30 deadline for all undocumented migrants to leave the country, a timeline that has stoked widespread anxiety among foreign residents. Among those departing is Rudolph, a Ghanaian small business owner who has operated a hair salon in South Africa for a decade. In a rare interview with the BBC, Rudolph explained that the shifting social climate had made staying in the country untenable. “It’s not comfortable for us to stay here anymore, so we have to go. I think we will find peace at home,” he said, echoing the fears of many other foreign residents. He added that the protests, which originated in Durban before spreading to multiple other provinces, could easily escalate into targeted violence ahead of the deadline, and that he had no plans to ever return to South Africa.

    Ghanaian authorities confirmed that only 300 of the roughly 800 registered citizens would depart on Wednesday, with the remaining travelers undergoing additional security and eligibility screenings before boarding future flights. Officials estimate that roughly 25,000 Ghanaians currently reside in South Africa, a large portion of whom have been affected by the recent unrest. Ghanaian High Commissioner Benjamin Quashie emphasized that the repatriation effort is rooted in the government’s core responsibility to protect its citizens abroad. “The Ghanaian government listened to the plight of its citizens in South Africa, who felt that their lives were in danger, who felt like the economic activity that they were engaging in had come to a standstill, who felt unwelcome in this country, and it is the responsibility of every government to ensure that its citizens are taken care of both home and abroad,” Quashie told the BBC.

    Quashie also outlined the Ghanaian government’s plan to support returning citizens, noting that a comprehensive reintegration strategy is already in place to help returnees reestablish their businesses and livelihoods back home. He added that the effort also aligns with South Africa’s own goals around immigration management: “The government is willing to establish them into whatever business they were doing in South Africa. In a way, we’re also helping the South African economy, because it’s clear that some of them are undocumented. So taking them out of here will let them know that we are not people who condone undocumented people in countries.”

    Political analysts have pointed to upcoming local elections scheduled for November as a potential driving factor behind the recent resurgence of anti-migrant sentiment in South Africa. The country has a bloody history of large-scale xenophobic violence: in 2008, attacks targeting foreign nationals left 62 people dead, and another 12 people were killed in similar unrest in 2019. Organizers of the current wave of protests have maintained that their demonstrations have been entirely peaceful, a claim echoed in recent statements from the South African government. Earlier this month, government officials condemned any criminal targeting of foreign residents while acknowledging that the country faces legitimate challenges around managing undocumented immigration that must be addressed.