博客

  • Ex-prosecutor charged with treason in Mexico over US drug raid

    Ex-prosecutor charged with treason in Mexico over US drug raid

    A high-stakes legal case has unfolded in Mexico following the weekend arrest of César Jáuregui Moreno, the former top prosecutor of the northern border state of Chihuahua, who faces federal treason charges for granting unapproved access to U.S. agents during an April counter-narcotics raid. The incident that sparked the charges came to tragic light when two American agents, widely reported by U.S. media to be CIA operatives, died alongside two Mexican law enforcement officers from Chihuahua’s State Investigation Agency in a deadly car crash. The crash occurred as the team’s convoy returned from a mission targeting an illicit methamphetamine production lab in Chihuahua’s remote mountain terrain, when the vehicle veered off a roadway and plummeted into a deep ravine.

    Jáuregui held the position of Chihuahua’s attorney general from 2023 through early 2025, and is currently a member of Mexico’s conservative opposition National Action Party (PAN). Federal Attorney General Ernestina Godoy Ramos has laid out formal allegations that Jáuregui permitted foreign agents to carry out law enforcement activities that are legally reserved exclusively for Mexican state authorities, and that he deliberately withheld critical information about the agents’ involvement from federal officials. In addition to the federal treason charge, the ex-prosecutor also faces separate state charges in Chihuahua, including a count of abuse of public office.

    Following his arrest over the weekend, Jáuregui appeared before a judge on Sunday for an initial hearing on the state-level charges, where he issued a full denial of all accusations against him. He repeated his assertion that he never gave instruction or consent for U.S. agents to participate in the operational raid. When the crash first occurred in April, Jáuregui addressed reporters in his then-official capacity, framing the American individuals as “instructor officers” from the U.S. Embassy who were in the region for routine training as part of standard bilateral law enforcement exchange programs.

    A preliminary court hearing on the federal treason charge is scheduled for this coming Saturday, after which a judge will rule on whether sufficient evidence exists to move forward with a full trial, according to reporting from Reuters. The case comes at a tense moment in U.S.-Mexico relations, as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has faced growing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to escalate crackdowns on transnational drug trafficking. Sheinbaum has consistently rejected proposals for U.S.-led counter-narcotics operations within Mexican territory, maintaining a firm stance that all foreign personnel can only conduct activities on Mexican soil with explicit, prior authorization from the Mexican federal government. The president has repeatedly emphasized that upholding Mexico’s national sovereignty is non-negotiable, and that any breach of that sovereignty will not be tolerated.

  • Pope does not need further treatment after lung cancer surgery

    Pope does not need further treatment after lung cancer surgery

    Just days after being discharged from a Rome hospital following lung cancer surgery, Pope Leo XIV made his return to St Peter’s Square on Wednesday to resume his traditional weekly general audience, capping a remarkably swift recovery that has reassured followers around the globe.

    According to an official statement released by the Vatican, the 71-year-old pontiff’s medical team has confirmed he will not require any additional cancer treatment after a successful procedure to remove a malignant growth from his right lung. Post-surgical pathology tests on the extracted tissue verified the initial diagnosis of localized lung adenocarcinoma, with no indication the cancer had spread beyond the affected area. The statement noted that a full oncological review after the surgery finalized the medical team’s conclusion that no further intervention is needed.

    The 90-minute surgical procedure, which removed the lower lobe of Pope Leo’s right lung, took place on October 13. The pontiff had publicly announced the upcoming surgery himself during his weekly Sunday prayer service days earlier, telling the crowd gathered in St Peter’s Square that clinicians had detected a problematic nodule on his lung and that the growth had been caught at an early stage. He was discharged from Rome’s Gemelli Hospital over the weekend, just four days after the operation, and paused outside the facility to greet and thank well-wishers who had gathered to show their support.

    Even while still recovering in the hospital, Pope Leo maintained his active spiritual and diplomatic agenda. Days after the surgery, photos released by the Vatican showed the pontiff leading Mass from his hospital room, standing at a makeshift altar and wearing his ceremonial green vestments. On that same day, he held a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where he pushed for a temporary ceasefire in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian city of Oleshky. The Pope urged Putin to allow unimpeded access for humanitarian food aid to reach trapped civilians in the blockaded city, and reiterated his longstanding call for diplomatic dialogue to end the ongoing conflict. Two days later, on Monday, he held a similar call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss peace efforts and the humanitarian situation on the ground.

    Close aides to the Pope have also confirmed that he remains committed to moving forward with his planned apostolic trip to Latin America, scheduled for early November, and has no intention of delaying the journey amid his recovery. Wednesday’s general audience marked his first return to a regular public schedule since his hospitalization, signaling to Catholic communities worldwide that he is back to leading the Church amid his recovery.

  • Rosenberg: US diplomatic push offers little hope for imminent Ukraine peace

    Rosenberg: US diplomatic push offers little hope for imminent Ukraine peace

    After two days of back-to-back diplomatic negotiations across Oslo, Norway, and St. Petersburg, Russia, the critical question lingers: has any meaningful progress been made toward ending the nearly three-year war in Ukraine?

    Norway’s prime minister characterized Tuesday’s discussions involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Steve Witkoff — U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy — and European representatives as “good and constructive.” During the Oslo meeting, participants floated the idea of a high-level trilateral summit, with the initial expectation that Witkoff’s visit to St. Petersburg would clear the path for a face-to-face meeting between Putin, Zelenskyy, and Trump to negotiate a ceasefire and a long-term peace deal.

    However, Putin has so far demonstrated little willingness to sit down with Zelenskyy on neutral ground, insisting that any such meeting must take place in Moscow. The Kremlin has indicated it would be open to resuming trilateral discussions next month in Abu Dhabi, but only at the technical working level, not among top leaders.

    Witkoff himself acknowledged the slow pace of progress in a post on X, admitting that “there is still important work to do” while reaffirming that “President Trump remains committed to seeing this war end.”

    The most revealing assessment of the talks came from Yuri Ushakov, Vladimir Putin’s foreign policy aide, who took part in the St. Petersburg negotiations. Ushakov confirmed that Witkoff had shared details of the Oslo discussions with Putin, including what Witkoff described as “new approaches from the Europeans and Kyiv.” But the Kremlin advisor made clear he was unimpressed with the proposals, stating bluntly: “In terms of resolving the Ukraine crisis, there wasn’t much there that was useful.”

    When pressed by Russian state television on how close the parties are to a peace deal, Ushakov offered only a vague, noncommittal response: “I don’t know how close we are getting, but things are moving in that direction.”

    This ambiguity points to a broader reality: Putin currently feels no urgent pressure to wrap up the conflict. He is well aware that Ukraine’s air defense systems are under unprecedented strain, and that the arrival of winter creates an opportunity to ramp up missile and drone strikes on energy infrastructure in an attempt to force Ukrainian submission. Additionally, Putin knows that the sitting U.S. president has repeatedly expressed a desire to pursue a closer, more economically beneficial relationship with Moscow.

    In recent weeks, Trump has paused the implementation of several new sanctions against Russia, approved the purchase of Russian diesel, and issued sharp public criticism of Zelenskyy — all moves that reduce diplomatic and economic pressure on the Kremlin. This shift has been warmly received by Russian officials. “Right now Trump is the only leader in the Western world who is doing something for peace,” Evgeny Popov, a Russian member of parliament and state television anchor, remarked in an interview. When asked if this meant peace on Russia’s terms, Popov responded plainly: “Of course!”

    While a trilateral summit between Putin, Zelenskyy, and Trump does not appear imminent, another high-profile meeting may go ahead next month on the sidelines of the APEC summit in China, where Putin, Trump, and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to gather. Some Russian commentators have already labeled this potential gathering “The New Yalta,” drawing a parallel to the 1945 Yalta Conference where Allied leaders Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill, and Franklin D. Roosevelt met to reorganize the political and territorial order of post-WWII Europe.

    “Russia, China and the United States are the only superpowers right now in the world,” Popov noted. “Of course, it will be good for the entire world if our leaders meet in China.” After nearly three years of war, such a meeting would place Putin exactly where he has long sought to be: back at the center of global high-stakes politics.

  • Turkey, Qatar, Pakistan and Indonesia forge ‘Badr’ deal to jointly produce weapons

    Turkey, Qatar, Pakistan and Indonesia forge ‘Badr’ deal to jointly produce weapons

    On Wednesday, four nations across the Middle East, South Asia, and Southeast Asia took a major step forward in expanding global defense collaboration, signing a groundbreaking memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for joint military hardware production, as well as deeper cooperation across military training, research, and development. Turkey has grown into one of the world’s most prominent defense industry exporters in recent years, with Turkish defense firms annually selling billions of dollars worth of military equipment, including cutting-edge drones, robust air defense systems, and armored vehicles, to international buyers.

    The signing ceremony took place in Doha, the capital of Qatar. Turkey’s defense delegation was led by Defense Minister Yasar Guler and Haluk Gorgun, President of Turkish Defence Industries. They were joined by Qatari Deputy Prime Minister Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif, and Indonesian Deputy Defense Minister Yusuf Jauhari for the official signing.

    In a statement released after the ceremony, Turkey’s defense ministry announced that the new agreement would be called the “Badr deal.” The name draws its origin from the Battle of Badr, a foundational 624 CE conflict in the Arabian Peninsula that marked one of the earliest major military victories for the Prophet Muhammad and his followers. “Badr translates to full moon, and the name reflects how the four participating nations complement one another through this pact, which carries substantial military and economic weight for all involved,” the statement explained. “By combining each country’s unique strengths in military production, we will achieve greater cooperation and integration, expand collective defense industry capacities, and better meet the security needs of allied and friendly nations around the world.”

    Sources familiar with the implementation process, speaking exclusively to Middle East Eye, outlined the next steps for the partnership. First, each signatory will map out its specific domestic security requirements within its own national defense framework. After that, an executive board made up of technical experts from all four countries will draft detailed plans for joint production projects. These plans will then be forwarded to a higher strategic board composed of defense ministers, deputy ministers, and senior defense industry officials from each nation. This strategic body will make final decisions on critical issues including project budgets and production site locations, clearing the way for the launch of shared production lines.

    According to the sources, Qatar has committed to providing both financial investment and technological expertise to the initiative. This move comes as Qatar and other Gulf states have faced growing pressure to upgrade their air defense capabilities in the wake of rising tensions following the Iran war. Most joint production facilities are expected to be hosted in Turkey, which already boasts the most extensive and advanced defense manufacturing infrastructure in the region.

    Qatari sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Middle East Eye that the deal was shaped by lessons learned during recent regional tensions between Qatar and Iran, as well as ongoing security crises in the Strait of Hormuz. For Qatar, the partnership delivers two key benefits: it deepens already strong bilateral ties with Ankara, while also addressing Doha’s top priority of accessing cost-effective air defense systems to meet its security needs.

    Overall, the Badr initiative is designed to strengthen defense industry connections between the four countries, boost regional and international security and stability, and build collective production capacity to meet the demand for military equipment from allied and friendly nations. A senior Turkish defense industry insider, speaking to Middle East Eye in May, noted that Gulf states have increasingly turned to Turkish defense systems in recent years because major alternative suppliers like the United States are facing multi-year delivery delays for systems such as Patriot and Thaad air defense platforms and their associated ammunition. “Gulf countries can purchase Turkish systems on much shorter timelines, and they also have the option to localize production and engage in joint development if conditions are favorable,” the insider explained. “More and more, these nations are recognizing that working with Turkey offers a far better value proposition.”

  • Gaza’s breast cancer patients face a deadly wait for treatment amid Israel’s genocide

    Gaza’s breast cancer patients face a deadly wait for treatment amid Israel’s genocide

    In the partially wrecked halls of Gaza City’s al-Shifa Hospital, 46-year-old Palestinian breast cancer patient Najat Abu al-Sheikh just completed another round of treatment. She and her husband now wait outside for a ride home, but the life-sustaining care she needs to beat her cancer remains tragically out of reach.

    Abu al-Sheikh was diagnosed with stage two breast cancer in January 2026. Three weeks after her diagnosis, she received her first dose of chemotherapy at al-Helou International Hospital. She completed eight rounds of chemo and underwent a mastectomy, but her treatment regimen is still incomplete. The radiotherapy that was supposed to start in February cannot be accessed anywhere in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip, and the delay puts her at higher risk of cancer recurrence and sharply reduces her odds of a full recovery. Today, she only receives preventive targeted therapy at al-Shifa to lower that risk, and she waits desperately for permission to travel abroad for the missing radiotherapy treatment.

    Abu al-Sheikh is far from alone in this agony. She is one of roughly 11,000 Gaza cancer patients who cannot get the full, life-saving care they need, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. The scope of the healthcare collapse in Gaza is staggering: the World Health Organization confirms that 94 percent of all hospitals in the enclave have been completely or partially destroyed during Israel’s military campaign. Al-Shifa, Gaza’s largest hospital, was raided twice by Israeli forces and rendered non-functional, only resuming limited operations in December 2025.

    Despite registering for medical evacuation with the Palestinian health ministry back in April 2026, Abu al-Sheikh has not yet secured a spot for treatment abroad. Her doctor ordered her to leave for radiotherapy in February, and she remains stuck in a deadly waiting game. She is one of more than 21,000 patients who have waited for months to leave Gaza for urgent medical care. Israeli restrictions on departures have already led to the deaths of at least 1,570 waiting patients, including 505 cancer patients and 264 children, according to data from Physicians for Human Rights Israel.

    The crisis of cancer care in Gaza extends far beyond individual patient stories. Dr. Mohammed Abu Nada, director of the Gaza Cancer Centre, reports that more than 500 new breast cancer cases were diagnosed in Gaza between 2024 and 2025, a number he calls “significant” — and he warns the true number is almost certainly higher. “These figures do not necessarily reflect the actual number of cases due to the disruption of diagnostic services, the difficulty of accessing medical services and hospitals, as well as the existence of cases that may not have been diagnosed or recorded,” he explained. Israel’s war has shattered every step of breast cancer care, from early screening and diagnosis to treatment and post-treatment follow-up, and only a tiny handful of hospitals can still offer any level of oncology services.

    The destruction of Gaza’s healthcare infrastructure has been systematic: Israel’s ground invasion in October 2023 seized control of the Turkish-Palestinian Friendship Hospital, Gaza’s only dedicated cancer care facility, which Israeli forces converted into a military barracks before demolishing it months later. In June 2025, Israeli forces also seized control of the European Gaza Hospital, the main referral center for cancer patients in southern Gaza. While a 2025 ceasefire was supposed to end hostilities and open the border for critical medical supplies and equipment to restock Gaza’s damaged hospitals, Israel has continued to violate the agreement through ongoing bombardments and strict restrictions on aid entry.

    Three years after the start of the conflict, Gaza’s cancer patients and healthcare workers still face crippling shortages of diagnostic tools, lab supplies, and essential medications. Dr. Abu Nada notes that critical imaging services are largely unavailable: before the war, Gaza had 15 mammography machines for breast cancer screening, and now only three remain functional across the entire enclave. The World Health Organization has repeatedly condemned the ongoing restrictions on medical imports, noting that securing an entry permit for even basic supplies takes a minimum of two and a half months, with requirements changing constantly. These shortages have forced clinicians to alter or delay treatment plans entirely, and in some extreme cases, doctors have been forced to use expired chemotherapy drugs because no other alternatives exist.

    For patients, the struggle to access care is compounded by the collapse of every other basic service in Gaza. Widespread displacement, deep poverty, and the breakdown of transportation, electricity, and water infrastructure turn an already brutal battle with cancer into an even greater hardship. Even basic supportive care items are out of reach for many: Abu al-Sheikh cannot afford the vitamins her recovery requires, and there are no cosmetic creams available to help with the appearance of her mastectomy scar.

    Thirty-four-year-old Tahrir Atallah, another stage two breast cancer patient waiting for evacuation approval, summed up the collective despair of Gaza’s cancer community: “Beyond all the suffering related to our health and treatment, life after the war makes us even more exhausted.” Like many others, she has to walk long distances to reach her chemotherapy appointments because no public transportation is operating, and she must manage household chores by hand when there is no electricity or gas for appliances, all while managing the debilitating side effects of treatment.

    For thousands of cancer patients across Gaza, every day of delay is a day that brings them closer to preventable death, as the international community fails to hold violating parties accountable and ensure life-saving care reaches those who need it most.

  • UK teachers could be banned from wearing ‘Free Palestine’ and ‘watermelon’ badges

    UK teachers could be banned from wearing ‘Free Palestine’ and ‘watermelon’ badges

    A government-commissioned independent review into rising antisemitism in British schools is set to recommend new restrictions on political expression by school staff, including proposed guidance that would discourage teachers from wearing pro-Palestine badges and symbols, according to advance reports of the findings. The report, led by former education chief Sir David Bell, is expected to be published imminently, and the UK government has already signaled it will adopt all of its recommendations in full.

    The review’s key statistical finding, which has been pre-reported by multiple outlets, will confirm that 60% of Jewish school students in the UK have personally encountered antisemitic abuse within school settings, while one in five students of all backgrounds have witnessed antisemitic incidents on campus. In framing the report’s core argument, Bell has argued that previous broad commitments to combating hate crime have failed to specifically name and target antisemitism as a distinct form of prejudice. “If you don’t name it, you don’t actually know what you’re tackling or what you’re going to be able to do to respond to it,” Bell stated in pre-released commentary.

    Among the most controversial recommendations slated to appear in the report is advice for schools to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, a non-binding framework that has faced widespread criticism over its impact on free speech. Originally drafted in 2004 to help global bodies monitor antisemitic incidents, the IHRA definition includes an example that labels claims that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour” as antisemitic. Even Kenneth Stern, the original author of the definition, has repeatedly warned against using it as a disciplinary tool, arguing it would unfairly chill legitimate political criticism of Israel. In 2018, prominent human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC issued a legal opinion concluding that widespread adoption of the definition would have a chilling effect on free speech by discouraging legitimate commentary on Israeli policy.

    On the issue of staff political expression, advance reports indicate the review will stop short of calling for a total ban on all political badges, but will advise school leaders to examine whether pro-Palestine insignia — including the widely used watermelon symbol, which has become a popular visual shorthand for Palestinian solidarity — are appropriate for classroom settings. The report will also call on the UK Department for Education to develop updated, clearer guidance for teachers on maintaining impartiality when leading discussions of the Israel-Palestine conflict, alongside new educational resources for the topic. Additional recommendations include mandatory media literacy training to help students identify and push back against antisemitic conspiracy theories shared online, and updates to Holocaust education curricula to frame antisemitism as a central, explicit theme of the Holocaust atrocity.

    The commissioning of the Bell review followed a specific political incident: a school visit planned by Damien Egan, a Labour MP and deputy chair of the pro-Israel lobbying group Labour Friends of Israel, was cancelled after organisers learned pro-Palestine protests were planned outside the school campus. Since the outbreak of the current Israel-Gaza war last year, UK authorities have reported a sharp rise in the number of school children referred to the controversial Prevent counter-extremism programme over their display of pro-Palestine badges and stickers, in a trend that has raised alarms among free speech advocates.

    In response to early media coverage of the review’s contents, a Department for Education spokesperson told independent outlet Middle East Eye that the full report has not been made public, and all current claims about its findings are still based on speculation.

  • Nigeria’s first Ebola patient holidayed in Uganda, officials say

    Nigeria’s first Ebola patient holidayed in Uganda, officials say

    A decades-long Ebola outbreak centered in East Africa has reached Nigeria, with health authorities confirming the country’s first imported case this week and launching an urgent contact-tracing effort to stop the virus from spreading further. The infected patient is a 42-year-old woman, the wife of a Ugandan diplomat based in Nigeria’s capital Abuja, who recently returned from a trip to East Africa.

    According to Dr. Jean Kaseya, head of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), the woman arrived back in Abuja on October 3, and first developed telltale Ebola symptoms three days later on October 6. Nigeria’s Health Minister Muhammad Ali Pate told the BBC she spent two and a half weeks in Uganda’s capital Kampala during her trip, and made a two-hour stopover in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on her return journey to Nigeria.

    Initially, the woman sought care at two private hospitals, where medical staff suspected she had malaria — a common endemic illness in Nigeria that shares key early symptoms with Ebola, including fever, muscle aches, and headaches. It was not until October 19, when her condition failed to improve, that public health authorities were alerted. She tested positive for Ebola the following day, after three rounds of laboratory testing. As of this week, Pate says the patient is in stable condition and showing signs of improvement. She has not left Abuja since arriving back in the country, and 44 people who came into contact with her have been identified and placed in isolation. None of the contacts have developed Ebola symptoms to date, according to the minister. “We cast the net wide so that we contain it as broadly as possible,” Pate told the BBC.

    There is currently a public disagreement between Nigerian health officials and the Ugandan Ministry of Health over the details of the patient’s travel history. Earlier statements from Uganda claimed the woman was a Nigerian national who traveled to eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) for business and only transited through Uganda, adding that there are no active confirmed Ebola cases in Uganda currently. Pate and Kaseya have pushed back against this account, but both have downplayed tensions, emphasizing cross-border collaboration is the priority.

    Kaseya urged all African nations to share transparent, timely information to help investigators trace the woman’s movements and pinpoint where she contracted the virus. He also called on Western nations to avoid imposing broad travel bans, arguing that collaboration and continental solidarity are the most effective tools to curb the ongoing outbreak.

    The current outbreak, which originated in the DRC this past May, has already been linked to more than 9,500 confirmed cases and at least 4,600 deaths, per data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. After the outbreak was first announced, Uganda reported a small number of cases that left two people dead, but the country declared itself Ebola-free in August following the discharge of its last patient. In recent weeks, the virus has spread further east, with Kenya confirming at least nine infections. On Monday, the U.S. State Department raised its travel advisory for Kenya, urging American citizens to reconsider travel plans to the country due to Ebola-related health risks.

    This outbreak is caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, for which no approved vaccine or specific treatment currently exists, though clinical trials for new countermeasures are ongoing. Unlike many countries in the region, Nigeria has prior experience successfully containing an Ebola outbreak: back in 2014, the country stopped the spread of the virus after recording 20 confirmed cases and eight deaths. Pate expressed confidence that Nigeria can replicate that success today, pointing to strengthened disease surveillance systems, expanded laboratory capacity, and thousands of trained epidemiologists. “Nigeria has muscle memory that has been activated, but we are not fighting the past outbreak in exactly the same way. We have to be vigilant,” he said.

    Currently, there are no rapid, on-demand Ebola tests available to screen cross-border travelers, so public health officials rely on basic temperature monitoring to identify potential cases at ports of entry. Ebola spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids such as blood or vomit. The virus has an incubation period ranging from 2 to 21 days, meaning exposed individuals can remain asymptomatic for weeks after contracting the virus, making contact tracing and containment particularly challenging.

  • Meta fined $25bn for ‘lies’ over user data privacy

    Meta fined $25bn for ‘lies’ over user data privacy

    In a landmark ruling that signals a growing crackdown on big tech’s disregard for user privacy, Meta Platforms – the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – has been ordered to pay a $25 billion (£18.6 billion) fine, the largest punitive penalty the company has ever faced for deceptive business practices.

    The ruling, handed down Wednesday by a New Mexico state judge following a two-week trial held earlier this year, found that Meta spent more than a decade lying to the public about its handling of Facebook user data. In his decision, Judge Francis Mathew emphasized that the company’s dishonesty was not limited to isolated data missteps, but instead penetrated to the core of Meta’s core operating model.

    The legal case traces its origins back to the 2016 Cambridge Analytica scandal, when a political consulting firm harvested personal data from millions of unwitting Facebook users to aid its work on Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign. Long after that scandal broke, New Mexico’s legal team argued, Meta executives continued to falsely claim that user data was never shared with or accessed by third parties without explicit user consent – a falsehood that impacted roughly 2 million New Mexico residents, the entire state population. A jury in the case ultimately determined Meta violated state privacy laws more than 40 million times across an 11-year period of misconduct, stretching from 2010 to 2021.

    Judge Mathew wrote in his formal order that internal communications among Meta’s top leadership, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, were deliberately crafted to mislead the public. He characterized the violations as willful, and set the $25 billion fine – a figure roughly equal to Meta’s average quarterly profit – to match the scale of the deception. While the total potential penalty calculated from thousands of individual violations topped $219 billion, the judge reduced the final amount to $25 billion. State prosecutors had initially sought up to $40 billion in fines, while Meta had argued any penalty above $3.4 billion was unconstitutional.

    This penalty marks the latest in a string of costly legal setbacks for Meta in 2025. Just months ago, New Mexico hit the company with a separate nearly $1 billion fine for misleading the public about how safe its platforms are for minors. The judge in that child safety case infamously compared Meta to an industrial polluter, noting that the company’s product pollutes the digital environment with “the psychological harm and sexual exploitation of children.”

    Earlier this year, Meta also agreed to an $18 billion settlement with the state of California over child safety failures on its platforms. A multi-state lawsuit over similar child harm allegations just settled days into a planned multi-week trial, with Meta agreeing to resolve the case without paying a fine or admitting wrongdoing. The 2019 U.S. Federal Trade Commission previously fined Meta $5 billion over the same data privacy misconduct at the center of the New Mexico case, but Wednesday’s $25 billion penalty far outpaces that earlier action.

    “For too long, powerful technology companies have operated as though their size and influence put them beyond the reach of the law,” New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said in a statement following the ruling. “Today’s result makes clear that no corporation is too powerful to be held accountable.” As of Thursday evening, a Meta spokesperson had not issued a response to requests for comment on the new ruling.

  • India ‘cockroach’ leaders who called on election chief to quit are freed from jail

    India ‘cockroach’ leaders who called on election chief to quit are freed from jail

    Two prominent youth leaders of India’s Gen Z-driven Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) have walked free from New Delhi’s maximum-security Tihar Jail, just seven days after their arrest on trespassing charges at a recently de-designated protest site.

    Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka were released hours after a Delhi special executive magistrate court issued the release order, according to Indian legal publication Bar and Bench. The pair were taken into custody last week after they crossed police barricades and climbed a locked gate at Jantar Mantar, a historic New Delhi venue that was recently stripped of its status as an officially designated protest space. Both men have maintained their innocence throughout the proceedings.

    Speaking to reporters from a police van after his release was granted, Das declared: “Truth alone triumphs. Long live the revolution.”

    The CJP, an unregistered grassroots youth collective that started as an internet meme in May, has rapidly grown into a notable political force in India over the past several months. Its origin traces back to a comment from India’s top judge, who compared unemployed young protestors to “cockroaches” — a label the movement reclaimed as its own identity. The collective first mobilized thousands of young people to protest over a leaked national exam paper, and by July it had cemented its place as a major critic of the ruling government. A July march to India’s parliament ended in violent clashes with police, drawing national media attention and escalating public pressure that ultimately forced the resignation of India’s federal education minister.

    More recently, the CJP has shifted its focus to challenging what it says are irregularities in India’s electoral process. Alongside opposition parties, student groups and other government critics, the CJP is calling for the resignation of India’s Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), a nationwide voter roll update exercise. Critics allege the SIR process has been manipulated to remove names of eligible voters from rolls in a way that benefits Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

    Since the SIR launched last year, roughly 130 million names have been struck from India’s national voter lists. Critics warn that large numbers of eligible voters have been incorrectly excluded, disenfranchising them ahead of upcoming national elections. Both the Election Commission of India and the BJP have repeatedly rejected these accusations, with the election body stating the SIR’s sole purpose is to remove ineligible entries including deceased voters and duplicate registrations.

  • ‘Targeted’ attack on much-loved MP leaves Australian town heartbroken

    ‘Targeted’ attack on much-loved MP leaves Australian town heartbroken

    The quiet rural Victorian town of Wangaratta, home to just under 30,000 residents, has been shaken by a brutal alleged attack that has left its well-loved federal independent member of parliament fighting for recovery, after a violent incident that has left locals and national leaders alike stunned.

    Long known as a welcoming stop for tourists heading to nearby regional wineries and the host of a popular annual jazz and blues festival, Wangaratta is now in an unwanted national spotlight. All conversations here now turn to the events of Monday afternoon, when police say Helen Haines, the town’s sitting MP, was deliberately struck by a car outside her local electorate office.

    In the wake of the attack, Haines was airlifted to a major hospital in Melbourne, where surgeons were forced to amputate both of her legs. In an update shared this week, her husband Phil Haines confirmed that while her recovery will be long and arduous, the MP’s core health remains strong. “The two most important parts of Helen – her heart and her mind – are in good shape,” he said.

    Across the tight-knit community, residents uniformly describe Haines as a unifying, deeply caring public servant, with no one able to explain why she would be targeted. Jane Hill, who owns a party supply shop just a few hundred metres from the attack site on Wangaratta’s main street, told reporters: “Everyone knows Helen. She is such a good person in our community. She’d go to everything – celebrations, funerals, she’s one of those genuinely kind people – and so is her entire family.”

    Brendan Nugent, a local man whose father has shared a decades-long friendship with Haines, has been charged with three offences including intentionally causing harm following a court appearance on Wednesday. Victoria Police have confirmed they are considering additional, more severe charges, including attempted murder.

    First elected to federal parliament in 2019, Haines has built a national profile for her years of persistent advocacy that led to the establishment of Australia’s national anti-corruption commission, which officially launched under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Labor government in 2023. Her push for the independent body grew out of years of frustration over high-profile political scandals, which she said saw public funds wasted for partisan political gain, excessive spending on unnecessary “shiny infrastructure” in marginal electorates, and policy decisions that prioritized wealthy political donors over the needs of everyday Australians.

    Beyond her national anti-corruption work, Haines has focused heavily on delivering for her often-overlooked regional constituency, securing funding for new housing developments, upgrades to regional rail networks, and expanded local health infrastructure. A former nurse and midwife before entering politics, she has also earned praise for her work on climate action and Indigenous rights from local leaders, including Wangaratta Mayor Irene Grant, who called her “warm, cheerful, and deeply committed” to her community.

    Victoria Police Commissioner Mike Bush also highlighted Haines’ support for local law enforcement last year, when two officers were shot and killed in nearby Porepunkah. Even in the moments after the attack, as she lay severely injured, bystanders who rushed to help her recalled Haines stopping to thank those who came to her aid.

    Jacklyn Black, one of the first responders on the scene, told Australia’s Nine Network Today show: “We were having conversations, she was telling me about her grandkids. To be in that situation and be as calm as she could be in the moment, but also thankful to the aid that the community had given her – I could not speak any more highly of her.” Fellow bystander Cody Lepoidevin echoed that sentiment, saying simply: “She just thanked everyone.”

    The community has rallied around Haines in the days since the attack, with floral tributes piling up outside her Wangaratta office, and hundreds of residents gathering for a candlelight vigil at the local Holy Trinity Anglican Cathedral to offer support. Many attendees wore campaign T-shirts emblazoned with “Team Helen Haines”, sharing hugs with clergy and one another as they grieved and prayed for Haines’ recovery.

    The attack has also spurred acts of bravery from other locals. Ricky Jefferies, owner of RickyChops barbershop located next door to Haines’ office, rushed outside when he heard commotion and pinned the suspect to the ground until police arrived. “I just leant over him and once he was on the ground and he was no longer a threat, I just stood with him, and I told him that he can’t leave,” Jefferies explained. Dismissing calls that he is a hero, Jefferies said: “I don’t think I’m a hero. I think that I just was a person who had an opportunity to intervene in a safe-ish sort of way.” The community has already pushed back on his humility, leaving a bouquet of flowers and a thank-you balloon tied to his barbershop door.

    Australia’s Governor-General Sam Mostyn, who represents King Charles as the nation’s head of state, echoed the shock felt across the country during a Wednesday press conference, saying: “People are simply dumbfounded and finding it very hard to fathom the scale of this tragedy.”

    Many locals have stressed that the attack does not reflect the values of their close community. One resident stood outside Haines’ office this week holding an Australian flag, wearing a T-shirt that read “Wangaratta – this is not us!!”, a sentiment repeated by residents across the town. Austin Longfield, who lives in nearby Albury, said: “Whether you vote for her or not, she seems to have the community at heart so that’s all you can really ask for; a politician that represents your community. It’s just something that you wouldn’t expect in our community. You see it in other countries and it’s just something that I didn’t comprehend could happen here.”

    Phil Haines said this week the family has been overwhelmed by the outpouring of support, saying he has received “thousands upon thousands” of messages of love from across the country. “I can only say how much of a difference that makes to all of us,” he said. “Helen’s road to recovery will be long and difficult, but we know she is a fighter.”