博客

On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled through the airspace of four ICC member states — Greece, Italy, France, and Canada — en route to New York to address the United Nations General Assembly, a journey that has reignited fierce global debate over compliance with an active International Criminal Court arrest warrant issued against him. The ICC issued the warrant for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024, after judges confirmed reasonable grounds to hold the pair accountable for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza starting from October 2023, including the deliberate use of starvation as a weapon of war.

As a non-member of the International Criminal Court, the United States faces no legal obligation to enforce the warrant, but the issue has still sparked domestic friction. New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani clarified in a July video address, following former U.S. President Donald Trump’s statement that Netanyahu would not face arrest during his visit, that local authorities lack independent legal jurisdiction to execute the ICC warrant. Despite this lack of power, Mamdani has publicly urged the federal government to acknowledge the warrant’s legitimacy and take action to enforce it.

Unlike the U.S., all four transited countries — as well as every European Union member state — are formal ICC parties bound by the Rome Statute to cooperate with the court’s arrest requests. This has left the four nations facing widespread criticism for repeatedly granting Netanyahu’s aircraft airspace access since the warrant was issued. Public flight trackers confirmed on Thursday that Netanyahu’s official aircraft, the Wing of Zion, successfully crossed all three EU nations before entering Canadian airspace, prompting fresh allegations that ICC member states are violating their binding international legal obligations.

Ahead of the flight, Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand announced that officials had launched a review of the submitted flight route, but she declined to directly answer questions on whether Ottawa recognizes Netanyahu as a war criminal. Anand only stated that Canada remains committed to respecting decisions of international courts, acknowledging the widespread suffering in Gaza, Palestine, and the West Bank, and upholding accountability for crimes against humanity. This marks a shift from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s clear statement last year that Netanyahu would be arrested if he entered Canadian territory.

Parallel to Netanyahu’s visit, the U.S. has once again drawn condemnation for denying entry visas to a high-level Palestinian delegation led by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, marking the second consecutive year Washington has blocked Abbas from attending the General Assembly in person. The Biden administration cited Palestinian efforts to pursue legal cases against Israel at both the ICC and the International Court of Justice as a core reason for the visa ban. In response, the General Assembly passed a vote allowing Abbas to deliver his address to the body remotely via video. Palestinian UN representatives have since called on all diplomatic missions to stage a coordinated walkout during Netanyahu’s speech, in protest of Israel’s military and governance actions in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

This week’s overflight controversy is not the first time ICC member states have faced scrutiny over their handling of Netanyahu’s travel. Last year, Netanyahu avoided French airspace on his trip to the General Assembly even after Paris granted permission, but his plane has since been allowed to cross French territory multiple times, including December 2025, February 2026, July 2026, and again this week. Canada, Greece, and Italy have also regularly appeared on Netanyahu’s flight routes to the U.S.

A clear precedent for the standoff emerged in 2025, when Hungary hosted Netanyahu for an official visit from April 3 to 6. ICC judges later ruled that Hungary had failed to meet its legal obligation to cooperate with the court and referred the non-compliance case to the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties. In response, Hungary initiated a full withdrawal from the court, but the process was reversed by the country’s new government before it could take legal effect.

Legal experts remain divided on the specifics of how the Rome Statute applies to overflights. The statute explicitly requires all member states to cooperate with arrest and surrender requests for ICC suspects, but it does not directly address the scenario of a suspect’s aircraft passing through a state’s airspace without landing. France has long taken the narrow legal position that it has no obligation under the Rome Statute to bar a state aircraft carrying an ICC suspect from crossing its airspace.

However, this interpretation has been widely challenged by independent legal experts. UN Special Rapporteur Ben Saul has argued that existing international law creates a clear path for enforcement. Under the 1963 Tokyo Convention, states are generally barred from interfering with in-flight aircraft to exercise criminal jurisdiction, but the treaty includes an explicit exception for cases where such intervention is necessary to uphold a state’s obligations under a multilateral international agreement. Saul notes that the Rome Statute qualifies as such an agreement, allowing ICC member states to compel an overflying aircraft carrying a wanted suspect to land for arrest. He further emphasizes that under general international law and the Convention on International Civil Aviation — which all four states in question have ratified — a state’s territorial airspace is considered full sovereign territory, just like its land or territorial sea, giving authorities full legal power to grant or deny access.

Other legal analysts have echoed this position, noting that even if there is debate over the obligation to force a landing, member states retain the clear right to refuse entry to their airspace for an aircraft carrying an ICC suspect. The ongoing controversy surrounding this week’s flight underscores deep divisions between international legal obligations and political realities, as major ICC member states balance their formal commitments to the court against geopolitical priorities tied to their relationships with Israel and the United States.

On Wednesday, Israeli military forces launched a large-scale demolition operation targeting residential and infrastructure in the village of Janba, located in the Masafer Yatta region of the occupied southern West Bank, leaving more than 170 Palestinians homeless, including 85 children.

According to documentation from leading Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, military personnel and armored bulldozers entered the village before dawn on September 23, 2026. By the end of the operation, crews had destroyed 24 residential buildings, 16 agricultural outbuildings, 16 residential solar energy units, and 14 communal and residential water storage tanks. Beyond destroying standing structures, forces also sealed off natural caves that local residents had used for generations to store supplies, shelter livestock, and even as permanent family homes.

For residents like Najah Jabarin, the operation erased nearly every asset her family relied on. “We lost our home; we lost three rooms – the kitchen, the sheep shed and the bread oven,” Jabarin told Middle East Eye in an on-site interview. “We have nothing left.” Like dozens of other displaced families in Janba, Jabarin’s 11-member household currently has no alternative permanent housing, but she says the family remains committed to rebuilding on their ancestral land and refusing to leave the area.

This latest demolition is part of a sharp upward trend in forced displacement and home destruction across Masafer Yatta that has accelerated dramatically since October 2023. Just weeks earlier, Israeli forces carried out two large-scale demolition operations in neighboring communities in the region. On September 2, the military demolished almost the entire hamlet of Khirbet al-Taban, leveling 12 homes that held 70 residents, 28 of whom were children. One week after that, all five homes in Khirbet al-Fakhit were destroyed, displacing 32 additional people, alongside the loss of all local livestock pens, water access infrastructure, and off-grid solar energy systems that sustained the community.

Janba resident Nu’man Jabarin, a 57-year-old who was born in the village and has lived in the same cave compound his family has occupied for three generations, described the operation as a total erasure of his life’s holdings. “Today, they wiped out everything I owned,” he said. “I have no bathroom, no kitchen, no room and no cave left.”

In the days since the demolition, Jabarin’s two-month-old grandson has been forced to sleep in the open, with no shelter to protect him from the elements. “If you came to us at midnight, you would find our children out in the open, with no shelter,” he added. When Jabarin attempted to present Israeli military crews with official documents proving his family’s ownership of the land, he said soldiers dismissed the papers, declaring the entire area a closed military training zone. Soldiers explicitly ordered him to relocate elsewhere after destroying his home, but the lifelong resident says he has no intention of complying. “There is no alternative; this is my land. I was born here, and my father was born here. I have the documents and proof to show for it,” Jabarin said. “They don’t care about Palestinians anywhere. They want to displace us to Jordan, but I will not leave. I will die with my children in my village.”

Another Janba local, Nidal Jabarin, argues that the escalating demolitions are a deliberate strategy to make daily life unbearable for Palestinian residents, with the ultimate goal of forcing mass out-migration. He noted that these campaigns often intensify ahead of Israeli national elections, when the lives and rights of Palestinians become political collateral. Israeli political parties across the spectrum, he claimed, are competing to demonstrate increasingly harsh repression against Palestinians to win voter support. “They race to make people’s lives extremely difficult, to harm and destroy them, and to ruin everything in this village,” he said, adding that the demolitions target not just current residents, but the centuries-long historical and geographic connection Palestinians have to the land.

Janba is one of 13 small Palestinian communities that fall within the boundaries of “Firing Zone 918,” a 30,000-hectare area Israel designated as an exclusive military training zone back in the 1980s. This designation placed all Palestinian structures in the entire area under permanent demolition orders, leaving residents with no legal protection for their homes or infrastructure. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) estimates that roughly 1,200 Palestinians currently live in these 13 isolated communities. In May 2022, Israel’s Supreme Court upheld the military’s authority over the zone, removing the last legal barrier to large-scale demolitions and mass displacement of the area’s Palestinian population.

Nasr Nawajaa, a local human rights activist based in Masafer Yatta, called the Janba demolitions a clear case of ethnic cleansing. He emphasized that the current wave of destruction is timed ahead of Israel’s national election scheduled for October 27, with the military ramping up pressure on Palestinians through road blocks, infrastructure destruction, and home demolitions to appeal to right-wing voters. “The entire goal is displacement; dozens of homes have been demolished or damaged, and more than 180 Palestinians have been displaced, all for the sake of election campaigning,” Nawajaa said. “Even without the elections, the village is being subjected to ethnic cleansing.”

B’Tselem echoed this assessment, stating that the latest demolitions are part of what the group terms an “Elimination Project” Israel is implementing across the occupied West Bank to remove Palestinian presence from strategic areas. The organization reports that since October 2023 alone, Israeli forces and Jewish settlers have violently expelled more than 4,800 Palestinians from their home communities across the West Bank. “The demolitions and the expulsion of communities are part of a mechanism of ethnic cleansing and territorial takeover that Israel is using to dismantle the conditions that enable Palestinians to continue living on their land, while clearing the way for expanding Jewish-Israeli presence and control,” the group said in a statement.

Official data bears out the scale of the ongoing displacement crisis. Data collected by the Commission Against the Wall and Settlements shows that between January and August 2026 alone, Israeli forces carried out 492 separate demolition operations across the West Bank, destroying a total of 1,060 Palestinian structures. As of September 23, UN data confirms that more than 1,600 Palestinians have been displaced by these demolition operations across the occupied territory this year.

In the wake of the escalating US-Israel-Iran regional conflict, Lebanon has been hit by a crippling new shock: fuel prices have doubled in a matter of weeks, sending already catastrophic living costs soaring even higher and pushing a population worn down by decades of crisis to the edge of survival.

This week, local fuel prices jumped to nearly $1.60 per liter, a surge that aligns with a global uptick in energy costs that has already sparked mass demonstrations across neighboring Syria. For Lebanon, this new price shock does not exist in a vacuum — three years of open conflict with Israel, layered on top of ongoing regional military tensions, has already gutted an economy that was on its knees long before the latest crisis.

The Lebanese Trade Union Federation has issued an urgent ultimatum to the national government: declare a formal state of economic emergency by next week, or face an open-ended general strike across the country. While newly seated President Joseph Aoun has publicly pledged to address the unions’ demands, decades of financial collapse have left the cash-strapped state with almost no fiscal room to cushion the blow of rising prices for essential goods that Lebanese residents already struggle to afford.

Fears of widespread social unrest have been amplified by the recent wave of protests across Syria, where demonstrations erupted immediately after the government enforced sharp fuel price hikes of its own. For ordinary Lebanese citizens, the pain of the current crisis is not an abstract economic statistic — it is a daily reality of hunger and financial ruin.

Bassam, a furniture moving truck driver based in Beirut’s southern suburbs, an area that bore the full force of Israel’s intense bombardment during the most recent conflict, described the situation as unlivable. “It’s really difficult for everyone,” he told Middle East Eye. “The cost of living is so high, there are people who can’t afford to eat. There are people who seriously can’t even afford a loaf of bread anymore, especially after going through the war and being out of work, and now this petrol crisis. By God, it’s a disaster.”

The latest World Bank analysis underscores the severity of Lebanon’s economic trajectory. After a fragile, modest economic recovery followed a 2024 ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel, renewed fighting in March shattered that progress. The bank now projects that Lebanon’s economy will contract by 6.4% in 2026.

The country’s current crisis stretches back to 2019, when a catastrophic financial collapse unfolded after Lebanese banks defaulted on their obligations, locking millions of ordinary depositors out of their life savings. Today, the domestic banking sector carries more than $72 billion in accumulated losses, and the country’s public debt has ballooned to 176.5% of GDP. Inflation has remained in double digits for five consecutive years, and since the 2019 crash, the Lebanese pound has lost more than 98% of its value against the U.S. dollar, wiping out nearly all purchasing power for ordinary households.

Ihab Abou Zeineddine, a father of two who earns $600 a month working as a private driver, said his income is barely enough to cover basic household needs. “You’re too embarrassed to go into a shop with $20, you can’t buy anything with that,” he said. “People are destitute.”

Even the most basic staple, bread, has become out of reach for many Lebanese. For years, the government subsidized and regulated wheat markets to keep bread affordable, but rising fuel-driven production costs forced the Ministry of Economy to raise bread prices for the second time this year just last week.

In response, the Federation of Bakery and Oven Trade Unions issued a warning that continuous price hikes have “placed the bakery sector and the Lebanese people, particularly the working classes, in an extremely precarious situation.”

More than five months after the most recent ceasefire with Israel went into effect, Lebanon is now bracing for widespread collective action. Transport sector unions and national labor federations have called for a nationwide mobilization next Wednesday, raising the prospect of large-scale unrest as public anger simmers. Some ordinary residents are already questioning why mass action has not erupted sooner.

Ibtissam, an aesthetician who lives roughly 20 kilometers southeast of Beirut, told reporters she has started carpooling to work appointments in the capital just to cut down on fuel costs. “People are angry. Why are they not going on strike or protesting? I don’t know. I don’t know why people are staying silent like this,” she said.

Cross-border tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan have surged to their highest level in months after Pakistan conducted a second wave of air strikes across Afghan territory this week, marking a sharp collapse of the brief three-month ceasefire that held between the neighboring nations.

Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban administration confirmed Thursday that the air raids hit three Afghan provinces – Kandahar, Paktia, and Khost – the country’s southern and eastern border regions. According to the Taliban, four civilian lives were lost in the strikes, which follow a deadly September 18 attack on a police compound in northwestern Pakistan that left 31 people dead. That attack was claimed by a faction aligned with the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an anti-Islamabad militant group that Pakistan has long accused the Afghan Taliban of sheltering – a charge the Taliban repeatedly denies, arguing that cross-border militancy is an internal issue for Pakistan.

Local witnesses on the ground have painted a chaotic picture of the strikes. In Kandahar, the Taliban’s political and military heartland, a resident told reporters the sound of military jet engines was quickly followed by a massive blast that ignited large fires across the targeted area. In Khost, midnight strikes damaged civilian residential properties, though no fatalities were reported in that province. “People were shouting, and there was panic all around,” local eyewitness Abdullah told news outlets. Another Khost resident, Salamat Khan, insisted the area hit held no military infrastructure: “there is no military base here, nor are there any military personnel, there are only the homes of ordinary civilians.” In Paktia, strikes targeted the 203 Mansouri Corps of the Taliban-controlled Afghan Armed Forces, though no casualty figures have been released for that strike.

Pakistan’s government has defended the operation as a targeted counterterrorism measure. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar described the strikes as “deliberate, precise, calibrated, and proportionate,” noting they were “strictly limited to identified military objectives directly linked to the attempted attacks against Pakistan.” A prior statement from Pakistani forces confirmed 10 separate targets were hit across Afghan territory, though officials declined to share specific locations.

This latest wave of attacks comes just one week after Pakistan’s first cross-border air strike on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region. In that earlier strike, Pakistan claimed it killed 28 militants, but local Taliban officials and the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama) confirmed at least three civilian deaths and four additional injuries.

Tensions have built steadily since the September 18 police compound attack, and even escalated in the 48 hours before Thursday’s strikes. On Wednesday, Pakistan announced it had intercepted and neutralized multiple drones launched from Afghan territory, a claim the Afghan Taliban immediately rejected as unfounded.

The current escalation reflects a long-running failure to resolve cross-border hostilities despite international mediation efforts. After a particularly deadly Pakistani air strike in March that killed more than 260 people – which the Taliban said hit a civilian drug rehabilitation center, a claim Pakistan denied – the two sides agreed to a temporary ceasefire that held for roughly three months. That calm dissolved with the September 18 compound attack. Unama data underscores the heavy human toll of ongoing violence: between October 2025 and June 2026, cross-border clashes between Pakistani security forces and Taliban-led Afghan forces killed at least 499 civilians and injured more than 1,200 others.

Diplomatic efforts remain deadlocked. Speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly earlier this week, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar called for “concrete and verifiable” guarantees from Kabul that Afghan territory would not be used to stage terrorist attacks against Pakistan. For their part, Taliban officials have promised an “appropriate response” to Thursday’s strikes, with spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid condemning the attacks as “reckless, careless, and hostile” and warning the action “will have adverse consequences for the Pakistani military.” Pakistan has in turn warned that it will match any further “provocative act” from Afghan soil with a forceful response, leaving the border region on high alert for further escalation.