博客

  • Why an international arrest warrant didn’t stop Netanyahu’s US trip

    Why an international arrest warrant didn’t stop Netanyahu’s US trip

    When the International Criminal Court issued an international arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this year, many global observers assumed that any cross-border trip by the leader would end in his detention. But when Netanyahu traveled to the United States to address the United Nations General Assembly in New York, no arrest took place — leaving many people around the world asking why the warrant never led to enforcement during the high-profile visit.

    To unpack this outcome, it is first necessary to break down the structural limitations of the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant framework. Unlike domestic law enforcement agencies, the ICC does not have its own standing police force that can execute warrants across sovereign borders. Instead, it relies entirely on cooperation from member states to carry out arrests on their territory. Even for countries that have formally joined the ICC, political considerations and bilateral diplomatic relationships often override legal obligations to enforce a warrant.

    The United States holds a unique position in this dynamic, as it has never been a member of the International Criminal Court, and has long-standing legal and political policies that reject the court’s jurisdiction over American personnel and allied foreign leaders. Washington has repeatedly made clear that it does not recognize the ICC’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu, and has no legal obligation to comply with it. As the host country for the United Nations headquarters in New York, U.S. law enforcement authorities are the only agencies with the power to carry out arrests on UN premises, outside of the UN’s limited internal security jurisdiction.

    Another key factor is the long-standing security and diplomatic alliance between the U.S. and Israel. The Biden administration has repeatedly reaffirmed its unwavering support for Israel amid ongoing regional conflicts, and has publicly criticized the ICC’s warrant as unjust and counterproductive to regional peace efforts. For U.S. officials, arresting a visiting allied head of government would represent an unprecedented rupture in bilateral relations, a outcome that no sitting U.S. administration would be willing to entertain regardless of legal arguments from the ICC.

    Even beyond U.S. policy, the precedent of sovereign immunity plays a major role in this outcome. As the sitting head of government of a sovereign state, Netanyahu retains full sovereign immunity under international law when traveling on official diplomatic business, including to attend a session of the UN General Assembly. Many legal scholars argue that this immunity supersedes the ICC arrest warrant under existing international conventions, even for states that recognize the court’s authority.

    This case has laid bare the deep gap between the ICC’s formal authority to issue arrest warrants and the practical ability of the court to enforce those warrants against powerful leaders backed by major global powers. It has sparked renewed debate about the effectiveness of international justice mechanisms, and how political power dynamics often shape whether international law is enforced in high-profile cases.

  • Zelensky says Russia has widened attacks to hit Ukraine’s data centres

    Zelensky says Russia has widened attacks to hit Ukraine’s data centres

    As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine enters its fourth year, Moscow has expanded its military campaign to systematically target Ukraine’s digital and civilian critical infrastructure, leaving four dead after a recent drone strike on a Kyiv business hub and triggering widespread connectivity disruptions across the country.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Friday’s strike on the Inkom business center in central Kyiv killed four civilians and damaged a data facility operated by Ukrainian internet provider Datagroup. Within hours of the attack, Russia’s defense ministry issued a formal statement confirming it had targeted the site, claiming the data center was being utilized by Ukraine’s military intelligence wing for operational purposes. Independent verification by the BBC has confirmed visual footage of the severe damage to the multi-story business building that housed Datagroup’s operations.

    The strike is part of a broader, coordinated Russian effort to disable Ukraine’s digital ecosystem, a campaign that Zelenskyy says is designed to inflict maximum disruption on the daily lives of ordinary Ukrainian citizens. “All this affects people’s ability to stay connected, study, work,” Zelenskyy said in a social media post Friday. “The Russians are constantly expanding their escalation operation: American and other businesses, data centres, internet providers – for Russia, all ordinary life is simply a target. It is important that the world responds to all of this and that Russia feels the response to its terror.”

    Connectivity disruptions have already rippled across Ukraine following a wave of earlier strikes earlier this week. Roughly 100,000 households across Kyiv and the surrounding region were left without internet access after Russian strikes on Wednesday, with multiple private companies already beginning the process of transferring sensitive data from damaged onshore servers to secure offshore facilities to avoid total data loss. Even in cities hundreds of kilometers from Kyiv, the impact of the digital infrastructure attacks was felt: in the northwestern city of Lutsk, all electronic public transport information boards went dark on Friday after the strike knocked out core data services the system relies on. Local city officials directly attributed the outage to damage from the Kyiv attack.

    Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha emphasized that Russia’s targeting of data centers goes beyond disrupting everyday life, threatening systems that save lives. “Rapid alerts about missile and drone threats are essential – they save lives. This is critical civilian infrastructure… It is not a military target. It is essential to keeping everyday life functioning,” he said Wednesday.

    While Ukrainian defense technology advisor Serhii Beskrestnov acknowledged that local connectivity disruptions are likely to continue and that consumer internet costs may rise to cover repair and rebuilding expenses, he sought to reassure the public that a total nationwide blackout of internet services is not possible. Beskrestnov stressed that Ukraine’s digital network was built with a highly decentralized architecture, meaning that even with targeted strikes on major facilities, the country “will not be left without internet access.” Datagroup also moved quickly to limit service disruption, confirming that all of its offerings continue to operate via preconfigured backup infrastructure while technical teams assess the full extent of the damage from Friday’s strike. Russia’s defense ministry added that it has targeted a range of other major digital and telecommunications facilities across Ukraine in recent days, including facilities operated by New-Telco, United DC, Kyivstar and Parkovyi.

    The shift to targeting digital infrastructure comes as Russia has already ramped up strikes on other critical civilian systems ahead of the approaching winter months, including energy generation facilities and railway lines, in a bid to break Ukrainian public resilience. Ukraine has responded with its own long-range strikes targeting Russian oil refineries and military logistics hubs, arguing that these sites support Russia’s war financing and operational capacity.

    The escalation of Russian attacks on infrastructure connected to Ukraine has spilled beyond Ukraine’s borders, raising new alarm among NATO member states about potential hybrid attacks targeting European infrastructure. In a separate development Friday, Polish prosecutors announced they had opened a formal investigation into an arson attack on a Starlink satellite internet station in the Polish village of Wola Krobowska that occurred on Wednesday. The station is part of a network that routes internet connectivity from Europe to Ukraine, using SpaceX’s Starlink satellite systems that have become a critical communication lifeline for Ukraine throughout the war. Poland’s national prosecutor’s office said there is reasonable suspicion that the perpetrators carried out the attack on the orders of Russian intelligence services; Moscow has not yet issued any comment on the allegation.

    In recent weeks, multiple NATO countries have issued warnings that Russia is preparing to launch a series of hybrid attacks on critical infrastructure in European allied states to test Western commitment to supporting Ukraine, claims Moscow has repeatedly denied. Earlier this month, German authorities blamed Russian actors for an attempted drone attack on Leipzig/Halle Airport, while French authorities have ordered a sweeping national plan to harden security for critical infrastructure and defense industry sites across the country.

  • Two arrested after people seen mysteriously emerging from various New York City sewers

    Two arrested after people seen mysteriously emerging from various New York City sewers

    A routine security response in New York City has intersected with high-stakes global event preparations, after local law enforcement apprehended two of three men spotted emerging from an underground sewer manhole just blocks from the hotel where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to stay during the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).

    The incident unfolded at approximately 4:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on Wednesday, when first responders were dispatched to the scene after reports of unauthorized individuals exiting the manhole. Law enforcement sources from the New York Police Department (NYPD) confirmed that all three men fled the location immediately after being spotted, but investigators were able to take 26-year-old Kevin Rodriguez and 25-year-old Samuel Reveron—both Queens residents—into custody a day later. The pair now face criminal charges of conspiracy and trespassing.

    In an official statement shared with the BBC, the NYPD noted that unauthorized entries into the city’s sewer system have become an increasingly common occurrence in recent months. In most cases, people enter the underground network after major storm events to search for discarded valuables and scrap metal that gets washed into the pipes. “This incident fits that same criteria, but out of an abundance of caution given the U.N. General Assembly and the sensitivity of the location, the NYPD is conducting additional security sweeps with our federal partners,” the department’s statement read.

    Court records from the pair’s initial hearing Friday morning show that both Rodriguez and Reveron entered not guilty pleas to all charges against them, and were subsequently released from custody pending future court proceedings. The third man involved in the incident remains at large as of press time.

    This arrest is far from an isolated case: New York City law enforcement has documented a string of similar unauthorized sewer entries across multiple boroughs since the start of 2024. In August alone, two separate incidents were recorded: one captured a single person emerging from a Queens manhole in the early hours of the day, while another found three people dressed in work overalls and fitted with headlamps climbing out of a manhole near midtown Manhattan’s Penn Station, one of the city’s busiest transit hubs. Back in May, surveillance cameras in South Brooklyn recorded a small group moving a manhole cover to climb down into the city’s sewer network.

    City officials have repeatedly warned that unauthorized entry into New York’s sewer system is both a criminal offense and an extreme safety hazard. The enclosed, confined space of sewer pipes carries constant risks of exposure to toxic fumes and sudden flash flooding that can trap and kill anyone inside. “For these reasons, members of the public should never enter a pipe, drain, catch basin, manhole, or outfall,” the city’s Department of Environmental Protection told the BBC in a prior statement. The danger of unregulated manhole activity was tragically demonstrated earlier this year, when a pedestrian woman in Midtown Manhattan died after stepping into an unsecured open manhole while exiting her vehicle.

  • UK’s new Israel sanctions haven’t suspended any weapons transfers

    UK’s new Israel sanctions haven’t suspended any weapons transfers

    Just weeks after the UK government unveiled high-profile plans to cut off trade — including weapons shipments — with Israeli illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, new parliamentary disclosures reveal the touted sanctions regime has resulted in zero additional arms licenses being suspended or revoked. The revelation confirms longstanding criticism that the current Labour government’s pledge to distance itself from Israel’s occupation is little more than performative policy.

    The context for this new policy stretches back to 2024, when Israel’s large-scale military assault on Gaza was intensifying. Then-Prime Minister Keir Starmer paused 30 of roughly 350 active arms export licenses to Israel at that time. But new data from the UK-based campaign group Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) shows that since October 2023, the UK has already approved at least £178 million ($235 million) in fixed-value military export licenses for Israel. This total does not include exports authorized under open-ended licenses, which covers the bulk of British components supplied for the multinational F-35 fighter jet program that Israel participates in.

    UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband framed the new restrictions as a “double lock against arms sales” that would uphold existing suspensions and reject any new applications for arms that “materially contribute to the occupation” of Palestinian territories. Almost immediately after the announcement, however, CAAT warned that while the policy was a step in the right direction, it contained critical loopholes that would allow arms flows to continue. One major loophole permits the UK to keep supplying F-35 components to a global spare parts pool accessed by the Israeli military, while another allows Israel to use UK-exported military equipment for third-country operations.

    Prominent progressive parliamentarians, including former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, MP Zarah Sultana, and Green Party leader Zack Polanski, have argued that the limited trade ban should only be the first step toward a full, comprehensive arms embargo on Israel. Their calls have gained new urgency after Declassified UK reported September 16 that the UK Department for Trade confirmed, in response to a question from MP Iqbal Mohamed, that no additional licenses have been revoked or suspended since the new policy was announced on September 8.

    In a statement to parliament, trade officials claimed the lack of new actions was “largely because licenses for items that might materially contribute to the occupation have already been suspended because of Israel’s conduct in the Gaza conflict.” The government also asserts that most remaining licenses cover goods intended for re-export to third countries or military-grade items for civilian use, such as body armor. But reporting by Declassified UK directly challenges these claims.

    Despite government assertions, F-35 fighter jet components still flow to the global spare pools used by Israel, and UK-made parts for trainer aircraft that support the F-35 program are still exported directly to Israel. When questioned about these trainer aircraft components, the trade department told parliament that the parts “are not used in Gaza and… do not materially contribute to Israel’s illegal occupation.” This claim contradicts previous acknowledgements from the UK Foreign Office, which has confirmed that Israeli M-346 trainer aircraft are “used to train [Israeli Air Force] fast-jet pilots” and “facilitate the development of an offensive capacity.”

    Dearbhla Minogue, a lawyer with the Global Legal Action Network — which brought a successful legal challenge against the UK over arms exports to Israel in 2024 — told Declassified UK that the new disclosures show “no concrete consequences for Israel after this government recognized the likelihood of war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and what it terms Israeli terrorism.”

    Sam Perlo-Freeman, research coordinator at CAAT, said successive UK governments “have done everything in their power to continue aiding and abetting genocide and war crimes with deadly and devastating consequences.” He described the new “double-lock” policy as “nothing more than a soundbite designed to appease voters, whilst failing to deliver meaningful policy change, and continuing to allow arms dealers to profit from Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”

    This revelation about UK policy toward Israel comes amid growing criticism of the government’s continued military support for Saudi Arabia. Just days before this disclosure, Prime Minister Andy Burnham confirmed the UK would continue providing “defensive” air-to-air refueling support to Saudi Arabia as the kingdom launches new airstrikes against Houthi forces in Yemen. A new CAAT report finds that the UK approved £464.8 million in military exports to Saudi Arabia in the first quarter of 2026 alone, most of which consists of air-to-surface weapons. Between 2015 and 2022, the Saudi-led war in Yemen killed an estimated 377,000 people from both direct combat and indirect causes such as famine and lack of access to healthcare. During that eight-year conflict, CAAT documents show the UK approved £7.1 billion ($9.4 billion) worth of military exports to the Saudi government.

  • U2 celebrate 50th anniversary at the school where they formed

    U2 celebrate 50th anniversary at the school where they formed

    Half a century after four teenage strangers gathered around a Dublin kitchen to form what would become the world’s most iconic rock bands, U2 has returned to where their journey started. On September 25, 2026, exactly 50 years after their first audition, the legendary quartet played a surprise seven-song set for current students on the playground of Dublin’s Mount Temple Comprehensive School – the same institution where all four members were pupils in the mid-1970s.

    Stepping onto the temporary stage built in the playground, frontman Bono greeted the cheering crowd with a playful quip: “We’ve escaped from the lab. How’s the experiment working for you?” Though most of the school’s current students were not alive when U2 reigned as the world’s biggest band, the reception was nothing short of hero worship. Young fans waved hand-painted signs reading “I love U2”, “It’s a beautiful day – no school”, and “Bono, my mum says hi!” as the band launched into a career-spanning set that pulled from five decades of hits, alongside their brand-new single *Silencio*.

    The set included staples *I Will Follow*, *Vertigo*, *With Or Without You*, *Beautiful Day*, *Out of Control* and *One*, and even featured guest accompaniment from student musicians of Ireland’s Music Generation education programme – an initiative U2 helped found and fund 15 years ago. During the performance, teachers at first had to pull down students who had climbed onto their classmates’ shoulders for a better view, but many soon dropped their discipline and joined in the dancing. Standing on the ground where U2 played their very first debut gig in 1976, Bono was visibly overcome with emotion, pausing mid-speech before managing to express his gratitude: “Thanks for, er… Yeah… I didn’t… Wow.”

    The band’s origin story, shared in new interviews with BBC News, is equal parts messy chance encounter and happy accident. It all began when 14-year-old drummer Larry Mullen Jr pinned a handwritten note to Mount Temple’s noticeboard that read simply: “Drummer seeks musicians to form band.” Mullen Jr. revealed the idea was never actually his – it was his frustrated father, tired of his son practicing alone at home, who pushed him to find collaborators. “I wasn’t very good at many things, and playing the drums was included in that. So I think he, out of frustration, said I should try and play with other people,” Mullen Jr. explained, with Bono joking in response: “And unfortunately, he got the three of us.”

    Auditions were held just a few days later, on 25 September 1976, in the Mullen family kitchen. Bono, then going by his birth name Paul Hewson, was 16 and nearly skipped the audition entirely – he thought he was too old to fit in with a group of younger students. It was only a ride from his friend Reggie Manuel on a rickety old Yamaha DX100 motorbike (which Bono jokes he still tells people was a Harley Davidson) that convinced him to attend. The first rehearsal was far from promising: there was more chatting than playing, future bassist Adam Clayton was selected more for his “best hair” than his (non-existent) bass skills, and Bono – who hoped to play guitar – forgot to bring his instrument. But even that chaotic first day had a hint of what was to come: halfway through the rehearsal, a group of screaming young fans already tried to climb the Mullen family garden wall. Clayton recalled that moment sealed the deal for him: “Larry already had a fan club, and we thought, ‘Well, if he’s got a fan club, that looks pretty good to us. Maybe if we hang out with this guy, it might stretch a little further.’” Mullen Jr. infamously turned a garden hose on the crowd, a move he still defends as playful kindness on a hot day, leading Bono to joke: “It’s been the story of our lives ever since. He doesn’t even want to have fans, but we quite like them.”

    From that humble kitchen starting point, the band that was first called Feedback, then The Hype, and finally U2 would go on to conquer the world. They have sold more than 175 million records worldwide, packed stadiums across every continent, and reinvented rock stadium touring with boundary-pushing productions like the 1992 Zoo TV Tour, which revolutionized the use of large video screens and multimedia backdrops for live shows. Over decades, they shifted from scrappy punk upstarts to arena rock icons, then embraced electronic and dance experimentation on 1990s albums *Achtung Baby*, *Zooropa* and *Pop*, never sticking to one sound. Guitarist The Edge, born Dave Evans, credits the band’s 50-year longevity to their lack of formal musical training: “It’s been a guiding light, in some ways, the limitations of the band. We’re in this place where, musically, we never know what’s about to happen. It can fall apart or it can become something extraordinary. And that’s the beauty of U2.” A core decision to split all earnings equally among the four members has also helped them stay close for five decades.

    Back at Mount Temple on Friday, Bono paid tribute to the school that nurtured the band’s early days, dedicating the performance to the late school councillor Jack Heaslip, who later served as a traveling chaplain for U2’s tours before passing away from motor neurone disease in 2015. He noted that the support of teachers allowed the band to realize their potential right where they were: “maybe all we needed was around us, just under our feet.”

    The surprise homecoming gig also doubled as a launch pad for U2’s next chapter. Ahead of the show, the band officially announced their 16th studio album, *Carnaval de Luz*, set for release this November. The record will cap off a three-part project that began with February’s fiery *Days of Ash* EP, which addressed global crises including ICE killings in the U.S., the war in Ukraine and the Israel-Palestine conflict, followed by April’s softer *Easter Lily* EP. The band describes *Carnaval de Luz* as “a messy, provocative, sacred collection of songs”, with Bono promising “loud guitars, deep bass [and] ecstatic rhythms.” The album’s closing track, *Torn*, holds extra historic weight: it was co-written with country icon Dolly Parton, and marks Parton’s final recorded performance before her death last month. The track is described as “a tender country song detailing broken family ties, that holds wider resonances.” BBC News will publish a full interview with the band about the new album and *Torn* in the coming weeks.

  • Athen’s rebel quarter Exarcheia fights gentrification and state repression

    Athen’s rebel quarter Exarcheia fights gentrification and state repression

    For more than half a century, Exarcheia has stood as a one-of-a-kind social and political landmark in the heart of Athens. This central neighborhood has long functioned as a welcoming gathering space for grassroots movements, anti-authoritarian and left-wing activist networks, and displaced migrants and refugees, all of whom found mutual aid and a strong sense of community within its boundaries. Today, however, Exarcheia is undergoing an irreversible transformation, and the communities that forged its unique identity are being systematically pushed to the margins.

    Rising residential rents, booming tourism, surging foreign property investment, large-scale urban redevelopment schemes, and an increasingly visible police presence are combining to rewrite the neighborhood’s social map, eroding the tight-knit community that defined its character for generations. “The human geography of Exarcheia is changing a lot,” explains Nikos, a long-term resident and core organizer with the No Metro in Exarcheia Square assembly, a movement that launched five years ago to oppose the local construction project. “The cost of living crisis is rampant at the moment. Many people who have been active in our neighborhood’s social movements have been forced to relocate because of skyrocketing housing costs, and that has gutted the collective dynamics and strength of our community.”

    Exarcheia’s gradual shift began years before Greece’s center-right New Democracy party took national power in 2019. In the years during and after Greece’s devastating decade-long economic crisis, platforms for short-term holiday rentals like Airbnb exploded across central Athens, as international investors poured capital into the country’s relatively affordable property market. This trend was accelerated further by the introduction of Greece’s Golden Visa program, which grants five-year renewable residency permits to non-EU nationals and their families in exchange for property investment.

    The impact of these shifts has been uniquely dramatic in Exarcheia. Research from the Athens Social Atlas found that foreign buyers accounted for 42.5% of all property purchases in the neighborhood in 2018, with Israeli citizens making up the largest single group of foreign purchasers during that period. Since taking office, the New Democracy government has doubled down on a policy of expanding state control and pushing forward major redevelopment projects in Exarcheia, a combination that has accelerated the neighborhood’s transformation.

    The most visible and contentious of these projects is the construction of Athens’ new Metro Line 4 directly beneath Exarcheia Square, the historic heart of the neighborhood’s community and political life. Work began on the project in 2022, turning a beloved open public gathering space into a heavily fenced-off, restricted construction zone. Residents and activists have repeatedly raised urgent safety concerns over the site’s layout, which at one point left only 1.5 meters of clearance between the construction barriers and adjacent buildings – too little, they argue, for pedestrians and emergency vehicles to navigate safely.

    For opponents of the project, the reclamation of the square is a powerful symbol of the neighborhood’s broader erasure. For decades, the open space served as the primary meeting point for political organizing, community events, and grassroots mutual aid work. The construction has also brought with it a heavy, aggressive police presence, which Nikos frames as a deliberate effort to crush dissent against the government’s redevelopment plans. “We have faced extreme police presence and police repression around the construction site,” he says. The anti-construction movement has responded with a wide range of direct action tactics, including public cultural events, mass protests, site blockades, and confrontations with law enforcement.

    Greek government officials have framed their intervention in Exarcheia as a project to restore “normality” and reassert state control over a neighborhood long known for its autonomous organizing. In the days before New Democracy won the 2019 national election, current Migration and Asylum Minister Thanos Plevris released a viral campaign video filmed in Exarcheia, in which he pledged a hardline crackdown on the neighborhood’s culture of self-governance and anti-authoritarian politics. This framing became a core part of the party’s law-and-order election platform, with incoming leaders promising to bring state authority back to a neighborhood long associated with left-wing and anti-fascist movements.

    Years later, this policy is visible across Exarcheia, from the expanded riot police patrols to the Metro construction and a wave of other redevelopment projects that have reshaped the area. Activists reject the “restoring normality” framing, arguing that these changes are deliberately pricing out long-term low-income and activist residents to remake the neighborhood for wealthy new arrivals and foreign investors.

    The pressures facing Exarcheia extend far beyond the Metro construction. Nikos frames tourism, foreign real estate speculation, and gentrification as interconnected parts of the same deliberate transformation, as rising property values make it impossible for many generations of residents to stay. The new face of the neighborhood is visible immediately around the square: at the intersection of Themistokleous and Solomou streets, the historic Hotel Exarchion has been rebranded as the upscale Square Hotel by X&N, currently undergoing renovations.

    The 93-room property is under a 12-year lease awarded via public tender to Aura 1 Monoprosopis SA, a firm represented by Dan Israel Hineson, a partner of the Israeli investment firm Ficus Investments, according to Greek financial outlet Dnews. The hotel is just one high-profile example of the wave of Israeli property investment in Exarcheia: data from the height of Greece’s economic crisis shows Israeli buyers purchased 74 properties in the neighborhood, more than any other foreign nationality. Israeli investment in Greek real estate has continued to grow in recent years, hitting €129 million in 2024 – a 46.5% increase from 2023 – and Israeli buyers remain among the largest groups of foreign property purchasers in both Athens and Thessaloniki, Greece’s second-largest city.

    Tourism has also become a core pillar of Exarcheia’s shifting economy. As demand for tourist accommodation outgrew Athens’ traditional tourist zones like Plaka, Monastiraki, and Psyrri, Exarcheia grew in popularity with visitors drawn to its alternative bars, restaurants, iconic street art, and reputation as Athens’ preeminent counterculture hub. Researchers have labeled this shift the “touristification” of Exarcheia, with the boom in short-term holiday rentals driving up housing costs for permanent residents.

    For many local activists and residents, the problem is not simply tourists visiting the neighborhood – it is the political tensions that arise from the intersection of massive Israeli investment and Exarcheia’s long-standing identity as a hub of Palestinian solidarity and anti-Zionist politics. Those commitments have been renewed with urgency since Israel’s 2023 military campaign in Gaza, and activists report open tension with Israeli visitors who publicly express support for the Israeli government and its military offensive. Pro-Palestinian graffiti and posters line the walls of nearly every street in the neighborhood, and mass solidarity demonstrations and actions have become a core part of Exarcheia’s modern identity.

    For Ahmed, a Palestinian activist originally from Gaza who has lived in Exarcheia for years, this political identity is personal. “Exarcheia for me means to fight for your right,” he says. Ahmed credits his time in the neighborhood with shaping his activist work, saying he built deep connections with other organizers who share his commitment to Palestinian freedom and resistance.

    Today, it remains uncertain whether Exarcheia can preserve the unique counterculture identity that made it famous around the world. Nikos acknowledges that the neighborhood can never return to what it was a decade ago, but he remains defiant about preserving its legacy. “The important thing is that memory doesn’t fade away. There is a community that is eager to uphold this memory and to preserve it in a way,” he says. “We are doomed to win. In a way, it is a necessity for us, for our community.”

    Still, as Exarcheia’s transformation accelerates, the core question remains unanswered: where will the communities that built the neighborhood’s identity go, and what will be left of the radical, welcoming culture that made Exarcheia unlike anywhere else in the world?

  • Supreme Court revives controversial US data system for citizenship checks

    Supreme Court revives controversial US data system for citizenship checks

    In a sharp partisan split decision that has sent ripples through American electoral politics, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned lower court rulings to lift restrictions on the Trump administration’s use of a controversial federal citizenship database for voter eligibility checks.

    The program at the center of the legal battle is the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, commonly known as SAVE. Originally launched in 1986, the database was designed for a narrow purpose: to help government agencies confirm the citizenship and immigration status of individuals applying for federal public benefits. Last year, the Trump administration implemented a significant expansion of the tool, adding the ability to run bulk searches of voter roll records using Social Security numbers to identify and flag alleged non-citizens potentially registered to vote.

    The policy quickly faced legal pushback. In June of this year, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Soonnan, an appointee of President Joe Biden, ruled that the revamped SAVE program was illegal. In her ruling, Soonnan found that the federal government had “knowingly trampled on the privacy rights” of U.S. citizens, in a move that put the fundamental right to vote at direct risk. Her ruling blocking the expanded program was subsequently upheld by a federal appeals court, setting up a final appeal to the nation’s highest court.

    On Friday, the Supreme Court overturned the lower courts’ decisions in a 6-3 vote that broke along ideological lines. All six conservative justices backed the Trump administration’s request to restore access to the database, while the court’s three liberal justices issued a joint dissent opposing the ruling.

    The decision marks a major political and legal victory for the Trump administration, which has centered its election policy agenda on cracking down on unsubstantiated claims of widespread non-citizen voting. But critics have raised urgent alarms over the long-term impacts of the ruling, warning that the use of the database for voter roll purges carries a high risk of erroneous removals that would disenfranchise thousands of eligible American citizens who are legally entitled to cast ballots in upcoming elections.

  • Trump and Xi exchange warm words at state dinner but little progress on key issues

    Trump and Xi exchange warm words at state dinner but little progress on key issues

    On a Thursday evening in Washington D.C., the White House opened its doors for a lavish state dinner hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump, marking Xi’s first visit to the United States in more than a decade. The high-profile gathering brought together the leaders of the world’s two largest economies, alongside a roster of America’s most prominent business and tech titans, but yielded little tangible progress on the long list of divisive issues that define the bilateral relationship.

    The diplomatic event was framed by warm public rhetoric from both leaders. In his toast, Trump emphasized that despite deep ideological and systemic differences between the two nations, bilateral relations have never been on friendlier footing, and he toasted to a future of harmony, peace and shared success for both countries. He also presented Xi with a custom sculpture of a bald eagle, America’s national emblem, which he revealed had been co-designed by First Lady Melania Trump.

    For his part, Xi framed the meeting as a critical historic juncture for U.S.-China ties, arguing that the two global powers have a shared responsibility as major nations to chart a new, constructive model for coexistence that meets the expectations of both peoples and aligns with the trend of the times. He noted that the two leaders held in-depth discussions and reached common ground on a range of issues, and stressed that both countries’ core ambitions can ultimately be mutually reinforcing. On the topic of artificial intelligence, a key area of strategic competition between the two nations, Xi pushed for a shared commitment to ensuring AI development remains under human control. Beyond this general statement, however, no details emerged about concrete agreements or progress on governing the rapidly advancing technology, an area where Trump has explicitly named China as America’s top rival.

    Beyond the ceremonial niceties, deep underlying tensions remain largely unaddressed. The most sensitive flashpoint, the Taiwan issue, hung over the talks. Earlier in the day, Xi privately urged the U.S. to handle the question with prudence and publicly called on Trump to adopt a correct position on the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as part of its sovereign territory. The issue has gained new urgency after Trump paused a long-planned $14 billion arms sales package to Taiwan, a move he described earlier this year as a “good negotiating chip” with Beijing, following a May warning from Xi that mishandling the issue could lead to open conflict between the two powers. Washington has not yet issued a public response to Xi’s latest closed-door remarks on the issue, and no breakthrough was announced during the Washington visit.

    Other core sticking points also remained out of public view. Beijing has grown increasingly concerned that Washington is pursuing a deliberate policy to contain China’s rise as a global superpower, particularly in the areas of trade and advanced technology, and has repeatedly called for the U.S. to step back from interfering in what it considers its core interests. Trump for his part entered the talks aiming to secure new trade concessions, including lower Chinese tariffs on American manufactured goods, increased access to Chinese rare earth mineral exports critical to U.S. tech and manufacturing sectors, and expanded market access for American agricultural producers. No details on any progress toward these goals were released following the dinner.

    The guest list for the extravagant dinner reflected the deep economic and tech ties that bind the two nations, even amid rising strategic rivalry. In attendance alongside top Trump administration officials — including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House Chief of Staff Monica Crowley, and senior advisor Jared Kushner — were dozens of the biggest names in American business and technology. Elon Musk, Tim Cook of Apple, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Sam Altman of OpenAI, Sundar Pichai of Google, Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, and billionaire TikTok investor Jeff Yass all counted among the attendees, with Musk, Cook and Huang sharing the main table with the two leaders. Executives from major traditional firms including General Motors, Visa, ExxonMobil and Paramount Skydance were also present. Trump noted ahead of the event that “everybody wanted to be there,” adding that the gathering drew leaders from across the entire tech sector, entire banking industry, and far beyond. One notable absence was leading AI firm Anthropic, which has not yet explained whether it was uninvited or declined to attend.

    The First Lady’s office, which organized the state dinner, designed the evening to blend American culinary tradition with subtle nods to Chinese culture. The menu featured first course of yellow squash, wild mushrooms and crispy pancetta, served atop bright red tablecloths — a choice that references red’s symbolism of luck and good fortune in Chinese culture. The main course paired sesame-crusted sea bass with braised bok choy and roasted eggplant, while dessert consisted of vanilla crémeux with sour cherry confit and ice cream made from honey harvested on the White House grounds. The wine selection included Schramsberg Blanc De Noir, a deliberate callback to the 1972 “Toast to Peace” between U.S. President Richard Nixon and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, who shared a bottle from the same California vineyard to mark the normalization of U.S.-China relations five decades ago.

    The evening of diplomacy was not without opposition: as the two leaders arrived for the dinner, protesters gathered just outside the White House gates to shout demonstrations against the meeting, and a number of protesters were arrested by law enforcement.

    On Friday, Xi and Trump kicked off the final day of the visit with a private tea gathering in the White House Red Room alongside their wives, before traveling to the U.S. National Archives for a guided tour of the institution’s iconic exhibits, which house the founding documents of the United States including the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Xi was expected to depart Washington later that day.

    Looking ahead, the two leaders confirmed that they will hold two additional summits before the end of the year: first on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders’ meeting scheduled for Shenzhen, China, in November, followed by a second meeting at the G20 summit hosted in Florida later that same month. Xi framed the ongoing talks as a collaborative effort to “chart the course for the great shift of China-U.S. relations,” closing his remarks by thanking the Trumps and the American side for the “meticulous care and consideration” extended to him and his wife during the visit.

  • Ed Sheeran’s next US concerts cancelled due to storm warning

    Ed Sheeran’s next US concerts cancelled due to storm warning

    Two highly anticipated Ed Sheeran performances at Foxborough, Massachusetts’ Gillette Stadium, scheduled for Friday and Saturday this weekend, have been called off entirely amid active severe weather warnings across the New England region. The shows were a planned stop on the pop star’s ongoing United States tour, a run that has already dominated entertainment headlines for a heated political controversy surrounding the removal of opening act Macklemore.

    In an official statement released Wednesday, venue management confirmed the cancellation, noting that after close consultation with local emergency officials and reviewing persistent weather forecasts for dangerous conditions across the Boston area and New England through the entire weekend, tour organizers and promoters made the tough call to scrap both performances. “Every decision we made centered on the safety of concertgoers, venue staff, and every member of the tour team, that was our non-negotiable top priority,” the statement added.

    High wind warnings remain in effect across southern New England through early Sunday morning, with state transportation officials already urging non-essential drivers to avoid travel as much as possible to prevent accidents. Ticketholders will be eligible for full refunds: purchases made directly through the original point of sale can be processed immediately, while all tickets bought via Ticketmaster will receive automatic refunds to the original payment method.

    This cancellation comes just weeks after the tour became the center of a fierce national debate over free speech and political expression in live music. The controversy erupted when Macklemore, the tour’s original supporting act, was dropped from the lineup after making public pro-Palestinian comments during earlier shows. The rapper had called for a free Palestine, described the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as genocide, and projected images of damage in Gaza during his sets, which sparked pushback from venue owners.

    Among the most prominent opponents was Robert Kraft, owner of Gillette Stadium and the New England Patriots, who is Jewish. Kraft called Macklemore’s comments hate speech and stated the rapper would not be permitted to perform at his venue, and lobbied alongside other venue owners to have him removed from the tour entirely.

    In the aftermath of the decision, Ed Sheeran moved to distance himself from the call, saying the choice to drop Macklemore was made by tour promoters, not him. Promoters clarified their position in turn, explaining that venue owners including Kraft had threatened to block the entire show from taking place if Macklemore remained on the performance bill.

    The removal sparked widespread backlash: multiple other supporting and backing artists on the tour dropped out in protest of the decision, and a heated national conversation emerged over whether venue owners should have the power to cede artists for political statements. When Sheeran returned to the stage the following weekend, he addressed the controversy for the first time, telling fans: “I’ve had to make hard calls along this tour, I’ve made mistakes, and I am so, so sorry.”

    What was already one of the most debated stops on Sheeran’s 2024 U.S. tour will now not go forward, as weather concerns take priority over live entertainment for the weekend.

  • Thailand investigating Jewish group over ‘network of Israelis’ buying up land

    Thailand investigating Jewish group over ‘network of Israelis’ buying up land

    Thai national authorities have launched a broad regulatory investigation into as many as nine Chabad Jewish community centers, known as Chabad houses, spread across the kingdom, scaling up official scrutiny of the New York-based Chabad-Lubavitch ultra-Orthodox movement.

    Deputy Interior Minister Polpeera Suwannachawi has issued formal instructions to all provincial governors to carry out on-site inspections of these facilities, with a specific focus on verifying that all operating and construction permits meet national legal requirements. In comments reported by a local Thai media outlet, Suwannachawi added that local officials have been ordered to coordinate with multiple relevant government agencies to confirm land ownership titles, cross-check all construction approvals, and trace the original source of funding for the centers’ operations.

    The official inspection order, announced on Tuesday, comes at a moment of rising public and political backlash across Thailand against the conduct of Israeli tourists, a large share of whom are retired Israeli soldiers. Broader public anger over Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, alongside long-simmering questions about whether Israeli-linked entities operating in Thailand are complying with domestic laws, has further amplified official scrutiny of Chabad-linked activities in the country.

    Chabad-Lubavitch is a messianic ultra-Orthodox Jewish movement with documented ties to radical settler politics in the occupied Palestinian territories, and it has grown into one of the most globally influential Jewish organizations in recent decades. High-profile figures linked to the movement include Jared Kushner, son-in-law of former U.S. President Donald Trump, and Kushner’s wife Ivanka Trump.

    Suwannachawi confirmed that preliminary inspections have already documented multiple regulatory irregularities related to construction permitting. These violations include unapproved rooftop extensions and other structures built without formal authorization from Thai authorities. During an inspection of a Chabad house in the popular tourist destination of Phuket, officials also seized a stock of imported goods that investigators suspect were brought into the country and sold without the required trade permissions.

    The deputy minister added that multiple sitting members of Thailand’s parliament had alerted his office to a network of Israeli citizens involved in cemetery development and other commercial projects that have purchased land valued at nearly 100 million Thai baht, equivalent to roughly $3 million U.S. dollars. Amid widespread local concerns that the group’s planned land use would conflict with Thailand’s dominant local religious and cultural traditions, Suwannachawi noted that officials must fully clarify the intended purpose of all acquired parcels.

    The current expanded investigation follows an earlier probe opened in September by Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation, which targeted Thailand’s chief rabbi Yosef Chaim Kantor and Israeli-born businessman Maimon David Marciano, according to local Thai media reports. That ongoing investigation is focused on the legality of past land purchases, whether Thai citizens were used as illegal nominees to bypass foreign land ownership rules, and unapproved alterations to existing buildings. Kantor has obtained Thai citizenship, while no public records confirm whether Marciano holds citizenship, and as of the latest announcement, no charges have been filed against either man.

    Since Israel launched its military operation in Gaza in October 2023, the number of Israeli tourists visiting Thailand has surged dramatically. Official data shows that roughly 230,000 Israeli travelers visited the kingdom in 2023, and that number has nearly doubled in the years since. More than 410,000 Israeli tourists visited in 2025, and industry projections forecast the total will surpass 500,000 by 2026.

    A large share of these Israeli tourists are recent veterans of the Israeli military, many of whom have served in the military campaign in Gaza, enforced Israeli apartheid rule in the occupied West Bank, or participated in other Israeli military operations across the Middle East, including conflicts in Lebanon, Syria and strikes on Iran.

    Thai residents across popular tourist regions have filed repeated complaints about behavior from some Israeli tourists, ranging from pervasive arrogance and open disregard for local cultural customs to skipping restaurant bills and damaging rented private properties. These widespread community grievances have fueled growing grassroots campaigns calling for formal restrictions on Israeli tourism to the kingdom.