博客

  • Labour MP Emily Thornberry urges Britain to defy Israeli order to close Jerusalem consulate

    Labour MP Emily Thornberry urges Britain to defy Israeli order to close Jerusalem consulate

    A growing diplomatic standoff has emerged in occupied East Jerusalem, after senior British lawmaker Emily Thornberry, chair of the UK Parliament’s influential Foreign Affairs Committee, has publicly called on the British government to reject Israel’s order to shut down the historic British consulate general in the region.

    Thornberry’s intervention comes as widespread anxiety mounts among Palestinian communities over whether Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband will cave to Israeli pressure and implement the closure as scheduled this Thursday. Sources close to diplomatic circles tell Middle East Eye that Miliband’s upcoming decision is being closely monitored by other European diplomatic missions based in East Jerusalem, including the French and Spanish consulates. Both nations fear that if Britain complies with the order, their own diplomatic presences in the occupied territory will be the next targets of Israeli expulsion demands.

    Speaking to Middle East Eye on Monday, Thornberry condemned the planned closure as a blatant act of retaliation against the United Kingdom for upholding international law. She stressed that the closure order itself violates established international legal standards. “I hope that Israel will not go through with closing this consulate, which has continuously served British nationals and Palestinian communities since 1838,” Thornberry said. “Britain should never allow Israel to enforce this unlawful measure.”

    Local religious leaders have added their voices to the campaign to save the mission, holding special intercessory prayers at Jerusalem’s Anglican Cathedral on Sunday morning that centered on preserving the consulate and protecting its local Palestinian staff, almost all of whom face immediate unemployment if the facility is shut down.

    Richard Sewell, Dean of St George’s College Jerusalem, told Middle East Eye he is deeply alarmed by the imminent closure. He framed the move as a targeted attack on the Palestinian community in East Jerusalem that will cause severe, long-lasting damage to the UK’s long-standing relationship with the Palestinian people. Beyond its impact on Palestinian residents, Sewell warned that closing the consulate will also disrupt critical consular services for UK citizens residing in East Jerusalem, as well as British pilgrims and international tourists visiting the holy city. “It is absolutely critical that this unjust move is resisted,” he added.

    The planned closure has also disrupted long-standing commemorative traditions: there are growing fears that the UK will be left without any official diplomatic representation at the annual Remembrance Day service scheduled for next month at the Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery on Jerusalem’s Mount Scopus. For more than a century, the British consul general has traditionally led the commemoration, which is followed by a public reception hosted on consulate grounds. The cemetery honors the more than one million Commonwealth troops, including thousands of British service members, who died in Palestine during the First and Second World Wars.

    Beyond the consulate itself, the future of the British Council’s East Jerusalem office, which relies entirely on British diplomatic status to operate, is now also at serious risk.

    The United Kingdom currently maintains two separate diplomatic missions for Israel and Palestine: an embassy in Tel Aviv focused on relations with the Israeli state, and the East Jerusalem consulate dedicated exclusively to Palestinian affairs, based in the contested Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood. For years, Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah have faced repeated forced eviction threats and ongoing Israeli settlement expansion in the area.

    Multiple Palestinians who spoke to Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity emphasized the unique and irreplaceable role the East Jerusalem consulate plays in documenting human rights abuses against Palestinians in the occupied territories and reporting those findings directly to British policymakers in London — a function the UK’s Tel Aviv embassy cannot fulfill. They warned that closing the British mission would set a dangerous precedent that could lead to the exit of other foreign diplomatic presences, as part of a broader Israeli campaign to erode Palestinian national identity across East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank.

    Middle East Eye withheld the full identities of all Palestinian sources who contributed to this report due to growing repression under Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. Palestinian residents who openly criticize Israeli policies now face heightened risks of arrest, imprisonment, and even torture, abuses that have been well-documented by leading human rights organizations including the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

    Israel’s decision to close the consulate was first announced by Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar last month, explicitly framed as retaliation for the UK’s recent policy banning trade with Israeli settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories. Many Palestinians who spoke to MEE noted that Saar’s choice to target the East Jerusalem consulate, rather than the Israeli embassy in Tel Aviv, was a deliberate strategic choice. By targeting the consulate, Israel has made it far more difficult for the UK to retaliate against Israeli diplomats based in London. More broadly, the move aligns with a long-running Israeli government strategy to disrupt and ultimately force out foreign organizations operating in occupied East Jerusalem, including international aid groups, multilateral bodies, and diplomatic missions.

    Palestinian legal observers and analysts have repeatedly pointed out that the closure order is inherently unlawful, because Israel’s 1967 annexation and ongoing occupation of East Jerusalem is widely recognized as illegal under international law. The position was recently reinforced when Miliband officially endorsed the landmark July 2024 ruling from the International Court of Justice, which found that Israel’s prolonged occupation of Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem, violates international law.

    In a legal opinion published last week, former British Attorney General Dominic Grieve KC backed this assessment, writing that Israel has made an unlawful claim to full sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory. Grieve noted that successive British governments have consistently affirmed that Israel’s legal standing in East Jerusalem is only that of an occupying power, not a sovereign state. “Israel is asserting a right it does not legally possess as an occupying power, to impose sovereign control over East Jerusalem,” Grieve wrote. He further added that British consuls general in East Jerusalem do not hold formal accreditation to the state of Israel for their work in the occupied territory, meaning Israel has no legal standing to withdraw that accreditation to force the consulate’s closure.

    Across every conversation with Palestinians in East Jerusalem, a consistent message emerged: a UK decision to comply with the closure would be widely viewed as a major political victory for the Israeli government, and a devastating setback for Palestinian aspirations and diplomatic representation internationally.

  • Spain PM pins hopes on housing crisis to help win snap election

    Spain PM pins hopes on housing crisis to help win snap election

    Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has announced a snap general election for 29 November, a strategic political move triggered by a recent narrow parliamentary defeat that exposed the crumbling majority of his left-wing coalition government. The catalyst for the early vote came Friday, when a sweeping package of tenant protection legislation designed to curb skyrocketing rental costs was voted down by unified opposition from right-wing parties, formally confirming that Sánchez’s administration no longer held the legislative upper hand in congress.

    Contrary to characterizations of the decision as a panicked reaction to defeat, political observers note the move aligns with a long pattern of calculated gambits throughout Sánchez’s political career. In recent months, the prime minister’s Socialist Party (PSOE) has faced mounting headwinds on multiple fronts: high-profile corruption scandals have implicated former senior party leaders Santos Cerdán and José Luis Ábalos, while ex-Socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has faced unproven accusations of financial profiteering from a state airline bailout, claims he has repeatedly denied. Most significantly, Sánchez’s wife Begoña Gómez is scheduled to stand trial on charges of misappropriating public funds and influence peddling—allegations both Gómez and Sánchez have forcefully rejected as politically motivated smears.

    Compounding these political challenges has been the unresolved crisis in Ceuta, Spain’s North African exclave, where an unexpected influx of more than 70,000 migrants in July sparked widespread public backlash. While most migrants have since crossed back into Moroccan territory, the logistical and political fallout of the crisis has remained a persistent liability for the prime minister, drawing thousands of protestors across the country to demonstrate against his administration’s handling of the border emergency.

    Until just weeks ago, Sánchez had repeatedly pledged to serve out the full term of his legislature, with the next election scheduled for summer 2026. But mounting public fury over Spain’s affordable housing crisis—consistently ranked as the top concern for Spanish voters in recent opinion polling—handed Sánchez a politically opportune moment to pivot away from scandals and the Ceuta crisis and call an early vote.

    Addressing progressive and left-leaning supporters on Monday, Sánchez issued a mobilization call, urging voters to turn out to deliver a larger progressive majority that can “defeat the elites, advance social rights, and continue transforming Spain.” On the campaign trail, Sánchez will almost certainly center his platform on housing, highlighting that right-wing opponents the conservative People’s Party (PP) and far-right Vox uniformly rejected his legislation, which would have strengthened tenant eviction protections, reformed rental contract terms, and restricted large investor purchases of residential property.

    For their part, the PP and Vox have framed Sánchez’s government as illegitimate for years, citing its reliance on Catalan and Basque nationalist parties to pass legislation as well as the ongoing corruption scandals. Ideologically, right-wing parties have long opposed direct state intervention in the housing market, arguing that policies like those Sánchez proposed are ultimately counterproductive to increasing housing supply and lowering costs.

    Earlier in 2026, when Sánchez gained international and domestic political capital for his high-profile criticism of Israeli military actions in Gaza and public clashes with U.S. President Donald Trump, political analysts widely speculated he would call an early election then. But Sánchez opted to wait, a choice that political analysts say reflects his calculation that the housing crisis is a far more potent issue for mobilizing left-wing turnout.

    Despite this strategic positioning, polling data consistently shows the PSOE trailing the opposition PP heading into the campaign. While framing the election around housing gives Sánchez a potential boost to unify progressive voters, securing a new mandate to remain in office is widely viewed as the toughest political challenge of his decades-long career.

  • Turkey supplies Korkut air defence systems to Ukraine, sources say

    Turkey supplies Korkut air defence systems to Ukraine, sources say

    Since the full-scale escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Turkey has emerged as a key supplier of defensive military equipment to Kyiv, and a newly revealed transfer of advanced air defence systems highlights the depth of this military cooperation. Multiple anonymous sources familiar with the deal told independent outlet Middle East Eye that Ankara shipped a batch of Turkish-made Korkut anti-drone air defence systems to Ukraine earlier in 2024, granting Ukrainian forces the opportunity to field-test the new hardware while strengthening Ukraine’s air defence capabilities against Russian aerial attacks.

  • Belfast solicitor to represent suspected mob boss Kinahan

    Belfast solicitor to represent suspected mob boss Kinahan

    More than two months after his extradition back to Ireland to face major organized crime charges, alleged transnational cartel leader Daniel Kinahan has finally secured legal representation for his upcoming court proceedings. The 49-year-old suspected organized crime boss appeared via videolink from Ireland’s high-security Portlaoise Prison before Dublin’s Special Criminal Court on Monday, marking his second public court appearance since his August extradition.

    Defence barrister David Perry informed the three-judge, non-jury court that Darragh Mackin, a prominent solicitor from Belfast-based Phoenix Law in Northern Ireland, will act as Kinahan’s lead defence solicitor for the case. Mackin was unable to attend Monday’s hearing in person due to unforeseen, urgent commitments that required his presence elsewhere, Perry told the court. In response to Perry’s request for a one-week adjournment to allow Mackin to prepare and join the proceedings, Judge Caroline Biggs granted the adjournment, remanding the case until next Monday.

    Perry also confirmed to the court that Kinahan will appear in person for the next scheduled hearing, noting that a in-person appearance is the defendant’s own preference. This update marks a key procedural shift for Kinahan’s case: during his initial court hearing last August, immediately following his extradition, Kinahan had no legal representation lined up.

    Kinahan’s path to trial in Ireland began when he was first arrested by law enforcement in the United Arab Emirates this past April. He launched a lengthy legal battle to block his extradition, but all of his appeals were ultimately rejected by UAE courts. On August 9, he was transferred into Irish custody and flown back to Dublin aboard the Irish government’s new official jet, in a high-security operation that drew international attention to the high-profile case.

    Upon his arrival, Kinahan was formally charged by Irish authorities with directing the activities of a proscribed criminal organization between October 18, 2015, and April 6, 2017. The charges stem from long-running investigations into the Kinahan cartel, which global law enforcement agencies have labeled one of the world’s most harmful transnational criminal networks. The UK’s National Crime Agency has previously documented that the cartel is responsible for smuggling thousands of tonnes of illegal narcotics and trafficked firearms across global markets, and has been directly linked to at least 14 gangland-related killings. The U.S. Treasury Department has also publicly designated the Kinahan cartel as one of the most dangerous organized crime groups operating internationally, and Kinahan has long been a target of law enforcement actions on both sides of the Atlantic.

    The case against Kinahan is being heard by the Special Criminal Court, a specialized Irish court that hears organized crime and terrorism cases without a jury, instead relying on a panel of three senior judges to rule on evidence and deliver a verdict.

  • Three years after Israeli bombing, Palestinian man recovers wife’s remains

    Three years after Israeli bombing, Palestinian man recovers wife’s remains

    For 41-year-old Palestinian father Adham Heriz, every day for nearly three years has carried the same heavy, unfulfilled weight: the need to find, recover and give a proper burial to the family he lost in an Israeli airstrike on Gaza City. That long, agonizing search reached a partial, bittersweet milestone last month, when civil defense crews recovered the remains of his 37-year-old wife Hiam — but the body of his 17-year-old eldest son Anas remains missing, swallowed by miles of collapsed concrete in eastern Gaza’s Al-Yarmouk neighborhood.

    Hiam, Anas, and two of Heriz’s other daughters — 18-year-old Shahad and 15-year-old Dareen — were killed on October 25, 2023, when a massive wave of Israeli bombardment leveled the entire residential block where the family lived. The attack flattened 18 multi-story buildings holding roughly 175 occupied apartments, according to Mahmoud Basal, spokesperson for Gaza’s Palestinian civil defense. Around 450 people, including doctors, academics, journalists, infants and children, were inside the structures when the strikes hit.

    The intensity of the bombardment left an unprecedented scene of destruction. “There were people thrown by the explosion around 200 metres. Entire families were wiped out. Many dead bodies were completely disintegrated, leaving little or no trace behind because of the massive explosives used in the bombs,” Basal told Middle East Eye in an interview. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Israeli forces continued advancing and launching strikes on the area, leaving civil defense teams unable to conduct a full, systematic search. Most of their heavy machinery and excavation vehicles were also destroyed in the bombing, meaning crews could only recover 120 bodies in the initial response, leaving hundreds more trapped beneath thousands of tons of rubble.

    Heriz, who lived with his seven-member family on the sixth floor of a seven-story apartment building, still carries sharp, searing memories of the day his life collapsed. The family had just finished lunch together; Hiam and two of their daughters had stepped into the kitchen to wash dishes when the first strike hit. “It was like a black cloud covering everything,” Heriz recalled. “I felt like I was flying and being thrown under the rubble with each strike. I could not hear anything. I could not breathe because of the bomb powder and dust.”

    Though most of his bones were broken in the collapse, Heriz managed to pull himself free from the debris. He found his 8-year-old son Ahmed alive beside him, bleeding badly, and soon learned his two youngest daughters — 3-year-old Siwar and 10-year-old Dima — had also escaped, though both suffered serious injuries. Ahmed survived, but Hiam, Anas, Shahad and Dareen remained trapped. Heriz’s brother and his brother’s five family members were also killed in the strike. “People moved me to an ambulance while I was crying for my family under the rubble. ‘Forgive me, my children. I can’t pull you out. I can’t feel my hands; they are broken,’” he said.

    Local search teams and residents were eventually able to recover the bodies of Shahad and Dareen, but the sheer volume of rubble left Hiam, Anas and dozens of other victims beyond reach. For years, Heriz and his relatives made repeated trips to the site, digging through debris by hand with no heavy machinery to move the larger chunks of concrete. He had largely lost hope of ever recovering his wife and son’s remains until last month, when Gaza civil defense launched a coordinated 20-day search operation in Al-Yarmouk, supported by the International Committee of the Red Cross, with excavation vehicles supplied by Egypt and fuel provided through the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

    Over three weeks of digging, crews recovered the remains of 105 people from the neighborhood’s rubble, including Hiam, Heriz’s brother, and his brother’s entire family. Heriz described the devastating small discoveries the team made as they cleared debris: “We found a less-than-one-year-old child in his crib beneath the rubble, still holding his milk pacifier in his hand. When his father saw him and identified him by the clothes he was wearing, he collapsed from the shock.” Across the 20-day operation, Heriz said crews recovered 37 dead children from the ruins of his former apartment building alone. Still, after sifting through tons of concrete, Anas’s body was nowhere to be found.

    For other survivors of the October 25 attack, the long-delayed recovery operation has dragged traumatic, vivid memories back to the surface. Just hours before the bombardment, 21-year-old Abd Al Rahman Heriz had been sitting with relatives and neighbors in Al-Yarmouk, talking about their hope that the ongoing conflict would soon end with a ceasefire. He had just returned home to help his younger sister with a primary school math lesson when the bombing began.

    His home was only partially damaged, sitting just a short distance from the 18 buildings leveled in the strike. When he and his family rushed outside, they could barely recognize the neighborhood they had grown up in. “The sky was black with dust, rubble and fire. Injured and killed people were everywhere. Houses were destroyed. There were no trees, no signs of anything,” Abd Al Rahman said. Outside his building, he found the body of a neighbor cut in half by the blast, a bundle of bread still lying at his side. Most of the relatives and neighbors he had been sitting with just hours earlier were killed, their bodies trapped under the ruins.

    With civil defense teams blocked from entering the area by ongoing fighting, Abd Al Rahman and other local survivors used nothing but basic hand tools — hammers, shovels, metal cutters — to dig through rubble for days in search of survivors. “I remained for three days with many of my surviving neighbours, doing our best to help pull people out,” he recalled. The small team managed to pull two young sisters out alive; their father lay dead beside them, and the children cried for him as rescuers moved his body to an ambulance and tried to calm them. They also pulled a woman alive from the rubble after she had been trapped for three days. But as Israeli attacks intensified, the survivors were forced to flee, even as they could still hear voices calling for help from beneath the concrete.

    “We could hear the voices of people who were still alive but trapped under the rubble, as well as the bodies of hundreds of others, including people of my extended family,” Abd Al Rahman said. The trauma of that experience has never faded. “I still have nightmares. I hear in my mind the voices of people calling for help: ‘Help us, pull us out.’ One girl was calling, ‘My sister is dead beside me. Pull her and me out.’”

    Of the 105 remains recovered in the recent 20-day operation, 36 have not yet been identified. Basal, the civil defense spokesperson, explained that teams face enormous challenges identifying victims who have been buried for months. “They had reached an advanced stage of decomposition and their facial features were no longer recognisable. There is no DNA testing or any other means of identifying who they are,” he said.

    The tragedy in Al-Yarmouk is just one small part of the broader humanitarian catastrophe unfolding across the Gaza Strip. Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza has killed approximately 75,000 people to date, and official estimates suggest roughly 8,000 more people remain missing, still trapped beneath rubble across the enclave.

  • Israel bans Zack Polanski after Green Party backs ‘Zionism is racism’ motion

    Israel bans Zack Polanski after Green Party backs ‘Zionism is racism’ motion

    A diplomatic and political firestorm has erupted between Israel and the UK Green Party of England and Wales after the party’s membership approved a divisive conference motion that formally labels Zionism as a form of racism, prompting Israel to immediately bar the party’s leader from entry to the country.

    The contentious vote, held at the party’s annual conference in Brighton over the weekend, marked a historic turning point: the Green Party became the first major mainstream UK political party to officially adopt the framing of Zionism as racism, while also backing a one-state solution for historic Palestine that guarantees equal rights for all ethnic and religious groups, rejecting the long-debated two-state framework. When final votes were counted, 1,022 party members supported the motion, while 813 voted against it.

    In response to the vote, Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a formal statement Sunday condemning the resolution, arguing it meets the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism by rejecting the Jewish people’s right to self-determination. The statement added that the motion effectively legitimizes calls for the destruction of the sovereign State of Israel. As an immediate first step, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar issued an order barring Green Party leader Zack Polanski from entering Israeli territory.

    Under Israel’s foundational Law of Return, any individual with at least one Jewish grandparent and their spouse holds an automatic legal right to enter, settle in, and obtain Israeli citizenship. However, Israeli authorities have long exercised the power to ban entry to individuals, including Jewish people, deemed to pose a security risk or question the state’s legitimacy—a policy that has disproportionately targeted political opponents of Israeli government policy in practice.

    Internal divisions within the Green Party were laid bare by the vote. Co-deputy leader Mothin Ali, a prominent supporter of the motion, told Middle East Eye that Zionism amounts to an ethno-nationalist ideology that has enabled ethnic cleansing and the entrenchment of belief in the superiority of one group over others. The party’s sitting Green MPs, Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay, publicly criticized the measure, aligning with a bloc of opposing members. Following the vote’s passage, all five sitting Green MPs released a joint statement emphasizing that they would never accept any form of discrimination or harassment, adding that support for Palestinian rights does not need to come at the cost of rejecting the rights of Jewish people.

    Members rejected an amendment that would have protected party members from internal disciplinary action for their affiliation to Zionist-aligned Jewish community institutions, including synagogues and community centers, or for holding pro-Zionist views that would not be penalized if expressed by non-Jewish members. In a shift that reflected the party’s pro-Palestinian positioning, delegates did approve a separate amendment affirming Palestinians’ inalienable right to self-determination, according to party insiders who spoke to Middle East Eye. As of Sunday morning, party spokespeople declined to confirm whether Polanski personally supported the unamended motion.

  • Yemen’s child soldiers: How poverty and war are pushing minors to the frontlines

    Yemen’s child soldiers: How poverty and war are pushing minors to the frontlines

    At just 17 years old, Ibrahim can expertly handle a Kalashnikov rifle. Unlike formally enlisted troops in Yemeni government-aligned forces, he fights alongside his older brother and male cousins as an informal volunteer, driven by a single goal: defending his home from advancing Houthi forces. “When the Houthis approached our village, dozens of local residents picked up personal weapons to push back, and I was among them,” he explained in an interview with Middle East Eye. Grabbing his father’s stored rifle, Ibrahim joined a local resistance cell aligned with official government forces. Growing up in Yemen, firearm familiarity came early: “We’ve kept a Kalashnikov in our home for years, and I’ve fired it at weddings and community gatherings before, so I knew how to use it,” he said. For Ibrahim, this fight is temporary. He has no ambition for a long-term military career, and plans to lay down his arms once his village is retaken to resume his studies, with the dream of one day working as an automotive engineer.

    Ibrahim’s story is far from unique. Since the latest outbreak of large-scale fighting between Houthi rebels and Yemeni government forces, the widespread use of child soldiers has reemerged as a devastating feature of the country’s decade-long conflict, with both major warring parties trading accusations of underage recruitment to front lines and support roles. Neither side publicly acknowledges recruiting minors, but independent verification from the United Nations, international media, and regional human rights groups has confirmed the practice persists on both sides of the conflict.

    A 2025 report from the UN Secretary-General on children and armed conflict documented 564 verified cases of child recruitment and deployment in Yemen between 2021 and 2023. Of these confirmed cases, 345 were linked to Houthi forces, while 210 were attributed to Yemeni national armed forces and their affiliated armed groups. The remaining small number of cases were traced to unidentified actors and the Yemen-based affiliate of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The UN confirmed the children recruited ranged in age from 8 to 17 years old. Of the total, 293 were deployed directly to combat roles, while 187 served in support positions including checkpoint guards, informants, and military drivers. Twenty-seven of the children sent into active combat were younger than 15 years old.

    Ahmed, Ibrahim’s 41-year-old cousin who fights alongside him, pushed back against claims that the teen serves on the front lines. He explained Ibrahim only carries out support duties behind frontline troops, a role suited to his current skills and physical size. “Frontline combat demands experience that most teenagers don’t have; it’s not a role anyone can step into,” Ahmed told Middle East Eye. “Even so, fighters like Ibrahim provide critical backup for our main forces, and that support makes a real difference when circumstances are this desperate.”

    Recent cases of underage participation have drawn international attention. Last month, as fighting intensified around the embattled city of Taiz, the BBC broadcast an interview with a 16-year-old fighter aligned with government forces who claimed he had taken part in active frontline combat. In response to the report, Colonel Abdul Basit al-Bahr, deputy head of the Moral Guidance Department at the Taiz Axis Command, told Middle East Eye the teenager was only accompanying his father and was never enlisted as a combatant for government forces. “Our armed forces have an explicit policy banning child recruitment; it is strictly forbidden to accept children into our ranks or push them into military operations,” al-Bahr said. He did, however, acknowledge that government forces regularly encounter children on battlefields, some as young as 10 years old. “We follow appropriate legal and humanitarian protocols for these children, and refer them to relevant authorities to resolve their situations in line with Yemeni law,” he added, noting that minors captured while fighting alongside Houthi forces are treated as vulnerable children rather than adult enemy combatants.

    Independent Yemeni human rights group SAM Organisation for Rights and Liberties has documented an even larger scale of recruitment: the group recorded 11,310 cases of child recruitment across Yemen between 2014, when the current conflict escalated, and February 2023. More than half of those children – 6,269 – were between 8 and 11 years old, an age group developmentally unprepared for any form of conflict participation.

    SAM president Tawfeeq al-Homaidi explained that the years-long economic collapse sparked by ongoing war has created fertile ground for armed groups to exploit vulnerable children and their families. “When a family loses all income, when the breadwinner stops getting paid, when a child is forced out of school because the conflict has closed education facilities, the small sum of cash, bag of food, or monthly stipend an armed group offers stops being a choice – it becomes a matter of basic survival for the whole family,” al-Homaidi said. In a September 2026 joint statement signed by 266 Yemeni human rights and civil society organizations, the Yemeni Network for Rights and Freedom condemned the Houthi movement for weaponizing extreme economic hardship to force minors onto the battlefield. “Children have borne the worst of these violations: forced recruitment, deployment to active battlefields, and exploitation of their needs and their families’ socioeconomic desperation through ideological and military indoctrination,” the statement read.

    Yet al-Homaidi cautioned against reducing child recruitment solely to poverty, noting a wider range of driving factors. “Ideological mobilization, exploitation of school and summer camp programs, social and tribal pressure, the lure of status, personal weapons, and steady pay, interrupted schooling, and in some cases direct physical coercion – all of these play a role,” he explained. A recent Al Jazeera English investigation from Houthi-controlled northern Yemen revealed how armed groups lure children with tangible incentives: promises of a personal Kalashnikov rifle, a month of military training, and a monthly stipend equal to roughly $94 USD.

    Al-Homaidi added that recent UN briefings on Yemen have repeatedly raised urgent alarms about Houthi-run summer camps, where thousands of children are exposed to military training and sectarian ideological indoctrination ahead of deployment. While Houthi forces have faced the majority of international scrutiny for the practice, al-Homaidi stressed that child recruitment is not limited to Houthi-held territory. “The UN has documented cases among government forces and their affiliated armed groups as well, even if the numbers are far smaller, and coercion is far less common,” he said.

    As of 2026, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimates more than 22 million Yemenis – nearly two-thirds of the country’s population – require urgent humanitarian assistance and protection, including 5.2 million people internally displaced by years of fighting. The latest resurgence of full-scale conflict has only created new openings for armed groups to draw children into fighting, whether through formal enlistment, informal local resistance cells, family pressure, or the overwhelming force of economic desperation. Under UN definitions, child recruitment extends far beyond formal military enlistment, encompassing any use of minors in combat or support military roles.

    For Ibrahim, however, these formal definitions mean little. He does not see himself as a child soldier; he sees himself as a young Yemeni defending his home. “I’m here to take back our village,” he says. For the sake of Yemen’s children and the country’s future, human rights advocates warn, ending this cycle of exploitation will require both a ceasefire to end ongoing fighting and coordinated international action to address the economic collapse and systemic vulnerability that drive recruitment. (Note: All names of minors featured in this report have been changed at the request of sources to protect their safety.)

  • Yemen’s child soldiers: How poverty and war are pushing minors to the frontlines

    Yemen’s child soldiers: How poverty and war are pushing minors to the frontlines

    At just 17 years old, Ibrahim possesses a skill that no teenager should ever need to master: he can operate a Kalashnikov rifle with confidence. Though he is never formally enlisted in Yemeni government-aligned troops, he stands alongside his older brother and male cousins to fight against Houthi forces that advanced on his home village.

    When Houthi fighters moved toward the community, Ibrahim grabbed his father’s personal rifle and joined local pro-government resistance ranks. Growing up in Yemen, he says familiarity with firearms is common, even for young people. “We keep a Kalashnikov at home, and I have fired it at weddings and other local gatherings,” Ibrahim explained in an interview with Middle East Eye. Unlike many adult combatants, he has no ambition to build a military career. For Ibrahim, this fight is strictly temporary: once his village is retaken, he plans to lay down his rifle and return to school to pursue his dream of becoming an automotive engineer. “We joined only to take back our home,” he said. “Once that goal is met, we will stop fighting.”

    Ibrahim’s story is far from unique. Since the latest round of conflict erupted in Yemen, child combatants have reemerged on front lines across the country, with both major warring parties repeatedly trading accusations that the other illegally recruits and deploys minors. While neither side has formally admitted to recruiting underage fighters, independent investigations, United Nations data and international media reports have consistently confirmed that the practice occurs on both sides of the conflict.

    A March 2025 report from the UN Secretary-General focused on children and armed conflict documented 564 verified cases of child recruitment and deployment in Yemen between 2021 and 2023. Of these confirmed cases, 345 were linked to Houthi forces, while 210 were attributed to Yemen’s official armed forces and their affiliated armed groups. The remaining small number of cases were assigned to unidentified actors and the Yemen-based affiliate of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The UN confirmed that recruited children range in age from 8 to 17 years old. Of the verified cases, 293 children were deployed directly in combat roles, while 187 served in support positions including military checkpoint guards, informants, and drivers. Twenty-seven of the children used in active combat were under the age of 15.

    Ahmed, Ibrahim’s 41-year-old cousin, pushed back against claims that the teen serves in frontline combat. He explained that Ibrahim carries out support duties behind the main line of troops, a role his physical size and experience allow him to fill. “Frontline fighting requires real combat experience — it is not something any untrained person can step into,” Ahmed told Middle East Eye. “Young fighters like Ibrahim provide critical backup to main force units, and their contribution matters a great deal in these desperate circumstances.”

    Weeks prior, as fighting between Houthi and government-aligned forces escalated in the Taiz region, a BBC investigation broadcast an interview with a 16-year-old pro-government fighter who claimed he had participated in active frontline combat. In response to the BBC report, Colonel Abdul Basit al-Bahr, deputy head of the Moral Guidance Department at the Taiz Axis Command, told Middle East Eye that the teenager was only accompanying his father and was never enrolled as an official combatant for government forces.

    “We in the armed forces maintain a clear policy on child recruitment: it is strictly forbidden, and children are never accepted into our ranks or forced to take part in military operations,” al-Bahr said. Even so, he acknowledged that government forces regularly encounter children on battlefields, some as young as 10 years old. “We implement appropriate legal and humanitarian measures for these children, and refer them to relevant authorities to resolve their situations in line with Yemeni law,” he added, noting that minors captured while fighting alongside Houthi forces are treated as vulnerable children rather than adult enemy combatants.

    Independent Yemeni human rights group SAM Organisation for Rights and Liberties has documented a far larger scale of child recruitment: between 2014, when full-scale conflict resumed in Yemen, and February 2023, the group recorded 11,310 cases of recruited children, more than half of whom — 6,269 — were between the ages of 8 and 11.

    SAM president Tawfeeq al-Homaidi explained that years of catastrophic economic collapse have created fertile conditions for armed groups to exploit children and their families. “When a family loses its only source of income, when the breadwinner stops getting a salary, when a child is pulled out of school because no one can pay fees, the small cash payment, food ration, or monthly stipend an armed group offers becomes a matter of basic survival, not a free choice,” al-Homaidi said.

    In a joint public statement released September 26, 2026, the Yemeni Network for Rights and Freedom joined 266 Yemeni human rights and civil society organizations to condemn the Houthi movement’s exploitation of children. The statement emphasized that armed groups have weaponized extreme economic hardship to force minors onto battlefields, noting that “children bear the worst of these violations: forced recruitment, deployment to active battlefields, and exploitation of their own needs and their families’ poverty through ideological and military indoctrination.”

    Even so, al-Homaidi warned against framing child recruitment as solely a product of poverty, noting a broader web of driving factors. “It is wrong to reduce this problem only to poverty,” he said. “There are many other causes: ideological mobilization, exploitation of school and summer camp programs, social and tribal pressure, the allure of status, weapons and cash, interrupted education, and in some cases, direct physical coercion.”

    A recent Al Jazeera English investigation from Houthi-controlled northern Yemen revealed how armed groups lure children to front lines with tangible incentives: promises of a personal Kalashnikov rifle, a one-month military training course, and a monthly stipend worth roughly $94 (50,000 Yemeni riyals). Al-Homaidi added that recent UN statements have raised sharp alarms about Houthi-run summer camps, where thousands of children are exposed to military training and sectarian ideological indoctrination.

    While Houthi forces have faced the bulk of international scrutiny for child recruitment and indoctrination, the practice is not limited to their ranks. “Child recruitment is not confined only to areas under Houthi control,” al-Homaidi stressed. “UN data confirms cases among government forces and their affiliated armed groups too, though the numbers are far smaller, and coercion is rarely used.”

    According to 2026 estimates from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), more than 22 million Yemenis — over two-thirds of the country’s population — still require urgent humanitarian assistance and protection services, including 5.2 million people internally displaced by years of conflict. This ongoing humanitarian catastrophe, paired with newly intensified fighting, has created new openings for armed groups to draw children into conflict, whether through formal recruitment, local militia mobilization, family pressure, or economic desperation.

    The UN’s definition of child recruitment extends far beyond formal military enlistment, encompassing any use of children in combat or support roles. For Ibrahim, however, these technical labels hold little meaning. Regardless of formal status, he carries a rifle, and he says he is fighting only to take back his home.

    To protect the identities of vulnerable minors, the names of child soldiers featured in this reporting have been changed at the request of sources.

  • Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools after blacklisting company, BBC told

    Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools after blacklisting company, BBC told

    After months of a high-stakes public and legal conflict over access and safety protocols, the U.S. Department of Defence has confirmed it has fully ended all use of AI tools developed by leading artificial intelligence firm Anthropic, multiple sources close to the matter have confirmed.

    The standoff between the Pentagon and Anthropic dates back to February of this year, when Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly labeled the company a national security supply chain risk and set an end-of-August deadline for the full removal of its tools from all department systems. Despite that public order, multiple sources including former senior defence officials, AI defence contractors and department insiders told the BBC that Anthropic’s flagship Claude model remained in active use across critical Pentagon operations as recently as last week.

    For more than two years starting in 2024, Anthropic held a groundbreaking position in U.S. government AI deployment: it was the first advanced AI company to have its models cleared for use in classified work across federal agencies, and Claude quickly became an indispensable tool for the Pentagon. The model was integrated into the Maven Smart System, the Palantir-operated core platform the U.S. military uses to organize intelligence data, drone footage, satellite imagery and operational information. Defence analysts relied on Claude to sort through massive datasets, identify potential military targets, and condense complex intelligence assessments into executive briefs for senior command, even during active military operations against Iran, according to insiders.

    The root of the conflict between the two sides emerged earlier this year, when Pentagon officials pushed Anthropic to remove built-in AI safety guardrails from Claude and grant the military unrestricted, unfettered access to the model’s full capabilities. Anthropic leadership refused the demand, citing long-standing company concerns about the risks of mass surveillance and unregulated development of autonomous lethal weapons systems. In response, Hegseth applied the national security supply chain risk designation to Anthropic—a classification historically reserved for companies based in adversarial foreign nations.

    Anthropic pushed back forcefully against the designation, calling it “unprecedented and unlawful” and filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration to overturn the labeling. The case remains ongoing in federal courts.

    Even as the legal battle proceeded, the Pentagon moved to replace Anthropic’s tools, signing new AI contracts with other major industry players including Google, Elon Musk’s xAI, and OpenAI. In recent months, OpenAI’s models have seen expanded adoption across multiple military departments, two insiders familiar with the department’s AI rollout confirmed.

    Despite the public order to phase out Anthropic by late August, full removal took far longer than initially planned, industry analysts note, because of Claude’s deep integration into the Maven platform. Lauren Kahn, senior research analyst at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology and a former U.S. defence official, explained that integrated AI tools are not simple plug-and-play systems that can be swapped out quickly. “Once they become integrated it can be painful to remove them,” Kahn noted, adding that the months-long timeline for full removal underscores the technical complexity of overhauling embedded AI infrastructure in large government systems.

    Interestingly, the Pentagon’s confirmation of the full phase-out comes amid a surprising warming of relations between Anthropic and the White House. Just last week, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei met with President Donald Trump twice at the White House, alongside other leading technology executives. Speaking to reporters after one meeting with Trump at his side, Amodei acknowledged that AI risk remains a key concern for the company, but expressed optimism about collaboration. “How we address those risks is still under discussion,” Amodei said, “but if we work with the president, we can win safely.” Trump also offered public praise for the Anthropic CEO following the meeting, calling him “great” and “fantastic.”

    A spokesperson for Anthropic declined to provide any comment on the Pentagon’s phase-out announcement when contacted by the BBC. Details of the full termination of the department’s use of Anthropic products have not been reported prior to this confirmation.

  • Watch: What caused the US to remove its bombers in such a hurry?

    Watch: What caused the US to remove its bombers in such a hurry?

    In an unexpected development that has sparked widespread international speculation, the United States Department of Defense, commonly known as the Pentagon, issued an official confirmation on Sunday confirming that it has completed the urgent withdrawal of its B-1 Lancer strategic bombers from an overseas forward operating base back to their permanently assigned home stations within the continental United States.

    According to multiple defense industry and intelligence sources familiar with the deployment, approximately 12 of the heavy bombers were part of the sudden redeployment operation. The Pentagon did not release additional details about the specific location of the forward base that the bombers were withdrawn from, the timeline of the withdrawal, or the underlying reasons for the accelerated move. This lack of official transparency has left defense analysts and global policy observers debating the drivers behind the unusual, hurried action.

    Several preliminary theories have emerged in defense policy circles. Some analysts suggest the withdrawal could be a pre-planned adjustment to US global force posture, part of a broader rotation of strategic assets that was accelerated for unannounced logistical or operational security reasons. Other observers raise questions about whether the move comes in response to a shifting threat assessment, potentially tied to emerging regional security risks that the US has chosen not to disclose publicly to avoid escalating tensions.

    The B-1 Lancer, a supersonic strategic bomber operated exclusively by the US Air Force, has long been a core component of America’s conventional global strike capability, regularly deployed to forward bases to project power and support allied security commitments. This sudden redeployment of a dozen of these aircraft marks an unusual shift in the US military’s global strategic posture, with broader implications for regional security dynamics that are still unfolding.