博客

  • Suspected hantavirus cases to be evacuated from cruise ship

    Suspected hantavirus cases to be evacuated from cruise ship

    A rare hantavirus outbreak that has claimed three lives on a Dutch-flagged polar expedition cruise ship has triggered an international public health response, with authorities finalizing plans to evacuate severely ill crew members and redirect the vessel to Spain’s Canary Islands. The MV Hondius, operated by Netherlands-based Oceanwide Expeditions, has been anchored off the coast of Praia, the capital of Cape Verde, since Saturday when Cape Verdean authorities barred the ship from docking over virus fears, placing all remaining 85 passengers and 59 crew members in isolation onboard.

    Operators confirmed Tuesday that two gravely ill crew members will be medically evacuated through Cape Verde to the Netherlands for urgent treatment, alongside a third individual who had close contact with a German passenger that died after developing the infection over the weekend. Following the evacuation, the vessel will set sail north for the Canary Islands, a three-to-four day journey that will bring it to the closest destination with the specialized medical infrastructure required to manage the outbreak, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

    Spanish health officials noted that once the ship docks at either the port of Gran Canaria or Tenerife, all passengers and crew will undergo comprehensive health screenings, receive necessary care, and be arranged for repatriation to their home countries. There are 23 nationalities represented among the people onboard the voyage, which departed Ushuaia, Argentina on April 1 bound for Cape Verde, carrying an original complement of 88 passengers and 59 crew.

    As of the latest update from the WHO, two cases of hantavirus have been laboratory confirmed: one of the three fatalities, and a British passenger who remains in intensive care in Johannesburg, South Africa. Five additional suspected cases have been recorded, bringing the total affected to seven. Among these cases, three have died; the British patient in Johannesburg remains in critical condition, and three people still onboard the MV Hondius experienced mild symptoms, one of whom has since become asymptomatic.

    The timeline of infections has raised questions about how the virus spread onboard. The first fatality was a Dutch man who developed symptoms on April 6 and died on April 11. His wife, also Dutch, accompanied his body off the ship at Saint Helena, a remote Atlantic island, and flew to Johannesburg with gastrointestinal symptoms. She deteriorated mid-flight and died in South Africa on April 26, making her the second fatality. The third death was the German passenger who died onboard Saturday.

    Contact tracing efforts are already underway for the 82 passengers and six crew members onboard the Airlink flight that carried the Dutch couple to Johannesburg. Airlink representative Karin Murray confirmed that the airline has followed South African health authority instructions to notify all passengers on the flight to contact local health departments for monitoring.

    Investigators are still working to identify the origin of the outbreak and confirm the specific strain of the virus. WHO epidemic preparedness director Maria Van Kerkhove told reporters that while full genomic sequencing is being conducted by South African researchers, the working hypothesis is that the responsible virus is the Andes strain, the only hantavirus variant previously linked to human-to-human transmission. Notably, Van Kerkhove added that there are no rats onboard the ship, which eliminates the common rodent-based transmission route that causes most hantavirus infections. The WHO also currently suspects the original Dutch couple were infected before boarding the vessel during travel in South America, opening the possibility that limited secondary transmission occurred among close contacts onboard.

    Ann Lindstrand, WHO representative to Cape Verde, confirmed that the evacuation process clears the way for the ship to continue to the Canary Islands as planned, bringing an end to the days-long standoff that left the vessel stranded off the African island nation’s coast.

  • Watch: Hundreds of beagles rescued from breeding facility being rehomed

    Watch: Hundreds of beagles rescued from breeding facility being rehomed

    A massive animal welfare effort is underway in the U.S. state of Wisconsin, where hundreds of beagles are currently going through the rehoming process following a high-profile rescue operation. More than 1,500 dogs total are being removed from a large-scale commercial breeding facility, after sustained public protests from animal rights activists pushed for action against the operation.

    The campaign against the breeder drew widespread public attention, with activists highlighting concerns over cramped living conditions, lack of adequate veterinary care, and the exploitative practices common in large-scale commercial dog breeding operations. Following the release of all the dogs from the facility, animal welfare organizations have stepped in to coordinate veterinary checks, behavioral assessments, and adoption placements for every beagle rescued.

    Volunteers and local animal shelters across the region have mobilized to support the effort, opening up space, providing foster care, and processing adoption applications from prospective pet owners eager to give the rescued dogs a second chance at life in a loving home. The operation marks one of the largest single canine rescue efforts in the state in recent years, shining a renewed spotlight on debates over commercial breeding regulations and animal protection standards.

  • Tuareg separatists and al-Qaeda-linked fighters combine to cause havoc in Mali

    Tuareg separatists and al-Qaeda-linked fighters combine to cause havoc in Mali

    Mali’s ruling military junta is facing one of its most serious security challenges in years, as an undeclared, cross-ideology collaboration between Tuareg separatist fighters and an al-Qaeda-linked armed coalition has plunged the country’s northern regions into widespread conflict. While the long-term durability and formal status of this unusual partnership remain unconfirmed, the coordinated violence it has already spawned has exposed critical gaps in the junta’s defenses and shifted control of key strategic territory across the Sahel nation.

    The coordinated campaign of attacks launched on April 25 marked a dramatic escalation of long-running instability in northern Mali. On that day, fighters from the Tuareg separatist Azawad Liberation Front (FLA) and Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam Wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the al-Qaeda-affiliated armed coalition, launched synchronized assaults on multiple military and government targets across Malian cities. In a shocking high-profile strike, Malian Defense Minister Sadio Camara was killed in a suicide bombing at his official residence. In the days following the opening attacks, rebels have advanced, with the FLA claiming full control of the northeastern city of Kidal and the strategically critical Tessalit military base. JNIM, a coalition of disparate armed groups across Mali that aligned with al-Qaeda in 2017, has also imposed a blockade on the capital Bamako and called for a unified popular front to oust the junta and pave the way for what it describes as a peaceful, inclusive political transition.

    A senior anonymous Malian government official, speaking to Middle East Eye, described the assaults as sudden, meticulously planned, and deliberately targeted at the heart of the state’s command structure, hitting sensitive sites including military installations and the capital’s airport. The coordinated timing and speed of the offensive, the official added, revealed major failures in defensive coordination between government and allied forces. While the junta, which seized power via back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, has publicly claimed the overall security situation remains under control, and that the Russia-backed Malian military retook most captured positions within hours of the initial attacks, on-the-ground accounts from northern Mali tell a far different story.

    Ahmed, a Timbuktu resident who has family and community ties to the Azawad separatist movement, confirmed that clashes continue to flare across wide swathes of the north. He told reporters that multiple fighters from Russia’s Africa Corps paramilitary force, the main foreign backer of the Malian junta, have been captured by FLA fighters. “Kidal, Gao and surrounding areas are witnessing intermittent fighting, with some locations effectively under siege,” Ahmed explained.

    Tuareg separatist sentiment has deep roots in northern Mali, stretching back more than a century, with repeated uprisings against central state rule breaking out since French colonial forces withdrew from the country in 1960. The most transformative of these uprisings came in 2012, when the secular separatist National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) formed an uneasy alliance with the hardline Islamist Tuareg group Ansar Dine to seize control of the entire northern region. The seizure of the north triggered a coup in Bamako, and while the separatists declared an independent state of Azawad, infighting between the secular and Islamist factions, followed by French and United Nations military intervention, defeated the rebellion. Many fighters remained active in remote border regions, however. Ansar Dine eventually became a core founding member of JNIM, while the FLA was established earlier this year through a merger of the MNLA’s remaining factions and other smaller Tuareg separatist groups.

    For years after the 2012 collapse of their alliance, FLA predecessor groups avoided close ties to JNIM, rooted in deep ideological divisions over the coalition’s hardline interpretation of Islamic law. But faced with a shared enemy in the Mali junta, the two groups have set those differences aside to launch coordinated operations. Sahel political analyst Jibrin Issa described the new partnership as “a marriage of necessity from Azawad’s perspective, and an operational arrangement from al-Qaeda’s perspective.” The core strategic goal, he explained, is to stretch Malian government defenses thin by opening simultaneous multiple fronts: separatist fighters tie down army units in the north, while JNIM pushes south to encircle the capital.

    Paris-based Malian journalist Hamdi Jowara echoed this analysis, framing the alignment as a temporary tactical partnership rather than a permanent merger: “It’s a temporary alignment driven by the presence of a strong common enemy that neither side can defeat alone.” Coordination, he added, “is reflected more in a division of roles across fronts than in any formal organisational integration.” This on-the-ground understanding was confirmed by Ahmed, who noted that the two groups maintain an unwritten agreement to avoid conflict with one another, coordinate attack timelines, and respect de facto spheres of influence. “We are not fighting each other… our enemy is the same,” Ahmed said of the relationship between FLA and JNIM.

    The northern city of Kidal, a Tuareg-majority hub located roughly 1,500 kilometers northeast of Bamako, has emerged as the epicenter of the current offensive. While the FLA claims it holds full control of Kidal, JNIM asserts it jointly controls the city alongside separatist forces. Sharif Ag Akli, an FLA fighter based in Kidal, told reporters: “The city has been under our control since the start of the fighting. We returned to our city and want to live freely. We are not terrorists, we are demanding our legitimate rights.” Footage shared by Ag Akli shows largely calm, quiet streets in the city following the offensive.

    Local and official accounts confirm the capture of Kidal came via a large-scale, dual-front surprise offensive that overwhelmed outnumbered government forces. The Malian government official estimated that more than 2,000 combined rebel and jihadist fighters participated in the assault, forcing government troops and their allies to retreat to reposition in other northern outposts. JNIM forces are now active across large areas of central and western Mali, while junta and Africa Corps forces retain control of most of southern Mali and the capital, despite frequent small-scale attacks.

    Ahmed noted that the presence of Russian paramilitary support has changed the dynamic of fighting compared to past uprisings. “In previous confrontations, the Malian army would withdraw, but the situation has changed due to the support of the African Corps,” he said, adding that fighting has become “more intense and organised” as a result.

    Mali’s shift toward Russia followed the 2021 coup that brought President Assimi Goita to power, when the junta severed long-standing security ties with former colonial power France and aligned closely with Moscow. Initially, the Kremlin deployed fighters from the Wagner Group paramilitary network to prop up Goita’s government. Following the 2023 Wagner mutiny and the effective collapse of the original group, Moscow reorganized its deployed fighters into a formalized paramilitary unit called Africa Corps. Kremlin spokespeople have repeatedly reaffirmed Russia’s commitment to combating terrorism in Mali, and the Malian government official described Russia’s role as “central at both the military and logistical levels,” though he added that expanding offensive operations across multiple fronts remains a major challenge. Turkey also supports the Malian military with unmanned aerial vehicles and tactical training, the official confirmed.

    While the tactical alignment has delivered early gains for the FLA, analysts warn the partnership carries major long-term risks for the separatist movement’s goal of an independent Azawad. Issa noted that any formal or sustained alignment with a UN-designated terrorist organization linked to al-Qaeda will close off diplomatic pathways and cut off potential international mediation. “It could close the door to mediation and complicate the regional landscape,” Issa said, as major international institutions and Western and regional governments are unlikely to engage with a separatist movement openly tied to al-Qaeda.

    The Goita junta has already made unsubstantiated claims that the offensive was stoked and supported by anti-Malian powers including France and Ukraine. But the most damaging revelation for the junta may come from within its own ranks: last week, a military tribunal prosecutor announced that preliminary investigations have found “serious evidence” implicating current active-duty Malian soldiers, retired officers, and even potential political figures in plotting and coordinating the April 25 attacks. Issa noted that the scale and coordination of the offensive make internal infiltration highly likely.

    While Jowara claims the government is gradually stabilizing the situation and has a formal response plan in place, he predicts further military escalation in the coming weeks. Issa warned that sustained coordination between the FLA and JNIM could extend the conflict and make a political resolution even more elusive. For civilians across northern Mali, however, the reality of the conflict is already a daily reality. “People have been living with war for years… families flee deep into the desert, and the men return to fight,” Ahmed said. “Daily life is now tied to the rhythm of the fighting.”

  • Sudan’s Burhan confronts UAE and Ethiopia over Khartoum airport drone strikes

    Sudan’s Burhan confronts UAE and Ethiopia over Khartoum airport drone strikes

    On Monday, five drone attacks targeted Khartoum International Airport, throwing an already volatile region into deeper crisis and pushing already fraught relations between Sudan and its eastern neighbor Ethiopia toward the brink of open confrontation. The incident has also dragged the United Arab Emirates into a fresh wave of mutual accusations, as Sudan’s top military leadership says its forces stand ready to defend national sovereignty against cross-border aggression.

    Sudan’s army chief, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, confirmed in an interview with Middle East Eye that his command is prepared to safeguard the country’s territorial integrity. If ongoing investigations confirm the drones originated from Ethiopian territory, Burhan noted the Sudanese military will take all appropriate defensive measures in coordination with the international community.

    A senior Sudanese intelligence source disclosed to MEE that the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and its Joint Forces partners have begun preparations for a heavy military deployment to Blue Nile State, which shares a long border with Ethiopia, as well as to al-Fashaga, a long-disputed border region between the two nations. The source added that both Sudan’s military and civilian leadership anticipate a rise in cross-border attacks amid rapidly deteriorating bilateral ties, with the risk of full-scale military confrontation growing by the day.

    This latest escalation follows an exclusive MEE report last month that revealed the Ethiopian military maintains an operational base in Asosa, located in the country’s Benishangul-Gumuz region, that is used to support the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The RSF has been locked in a brutal civil war with the SAF since April 2023, and the paramilitary group is openly backed by the UAE, a key diplomatic and military ally of Ethiopia. After that report was published, Sudanese officials say Ethiopia refused to respond directly to repeated requests for clarification on the base’s use, and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has still not agreed to a meeting with Burhan to de-escalate tensions.

    Following Monday’s attacks, Sudan’s government, military and intelligence officials directly accuse both Ethiopia and the UAE of complicity in the RSF drone strikes. The attacks were carried out by modified CH-series kamikaze drones originating from China, which have been altered to carry up to four missiles and are designed for silent flight. According to Sudanese officials, all five drones were launched from Ethiopia’s Bahir Dar airport. One of the incoming drones was intercepted by Sudanese air defenses before it could reach its target, crashing into a residential home in an eastern Khartoum neighborhood.

    During a midnight joint press conference in Khartoum, SAF spokesperson Brigadier General Asim Awad Abdelwahab and Sudanese Foreign Minister Mohieddin Salem went public with their accusations, stating the country holds solid, concrete evidence of foreign involvement. “We have strong and hard evidence proving the involvement of Ethiopia and UAE in this aggression against Sudan, which represents a violation of our sovereignty and of international laws,” Awad told reporters. He added that Sudanese air defense units have intercepted drones launched from Ethiopian territory on multiple occasions since the start of March. On March 1 alone, three drones launched from Bahir Dar struck targets across White Nile, Blue Nile, and both North and South Kordofan states. After a March 17 attack, Awad said military investigators confirmed drone serial number S-88 was owned by the UAE and transferred from Bahir Dar to carry out the strike. He also tied Ethiopia and the UAE to recent RSF drone attacks on Kurmuk in Blue Nile State and el-Obeid in North Kordofan.

    Foreign Minister Salem emphasized that cross-border violations from Ethiopia and the UAE have become a repeated pattern, and said Sudan will pursue formal international complaints against both countries. “Ethiopia and the UAE have repeatedly practised these violations against Sudan, and we have the right to react – and they know that when we say it, we mean it,” Salem stated.

    In response, Ethiopia’s foreign ministry issued an official statement rejecting the accusations as unfounded. The statement added that Ethiopia has shown significant restraint over past months, choosing not to publicize what it calls repeated violations of Ethiopian territorial integrity and national security by belligerent parties in Sudan’s civil war. The Ethiopian government further accused the SAF of arming, funding, and hosting Tigrayan rebel forces, a claim Sudan has not publicly addressed. The UAE has also consistently denied any involvement in Sudan’s ongoing internal conflict.

    A senior official with Sudan’s Civil Aviation Authority told MEE that all incoming and outgoing flights at Khartoum Airport have been suspended indefinitely as a security precaution. The official added that the attacks caused only minor structural damage that could be repaired quickly, but the strike was intentionally timed to disrupt the planned resumption of direct international flights from Khartoum, scheduled to launch May 4 to multiple neighboring countries. Prior to the attacks, the airport had only operated limited local flights, with all international services routed through Port Sudan’s airport.

    Additional sources and eyewitnesses confirmed that Monday’s attacks were not limited to Khartoum Airport. Multiple military air bases across the region were also targeted, though SAF ground defenses successfully repelled all other attempted strikes. Separate military sources confirmed that radar and monitoring systems helped intercept a planned strategic drone attack in Blue Nile State near the Ethiopian border, as well as another strike targeting Jabal Awliya, a city south of Khartoum.

    Satellite imagery collected between February 26 and May 4 by Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab has already confirmed damage consistent with aerial bombardment at a key fuel depot in Kenana, White Nile State, matching recent strike claims from Sudanese military officials.

    Civilians across Khartoum and its neighboring twin city of Omdurman described being woken early Monday morning by the sound of massive explosions. “We woke up in the morning with the sounds of the bombs and the ground defence forces coming from around Wadi Seidna military airport in Omdurman,” one local resident told MEE in a phone interview. Another eyewitness, who lives just meters east of Khartoum Airport on Obaid Khatim Street, said, “I heard the bombs and saw the smoke coming from the airport at 12pm on Monday.”

    The strikes have sparked widespread panic and unfounded rumors among civilian populations, particularly for the thousands of displaced residents who have only recently returned to their homes in Khartoum as frontlines stabilized in recent weeks. “This has caused panic and spread of rumours among civilians, especially the thousands of people who have recently come back to their homes in Khartoum,” one recently returned civilian told MEE. A Khartoum native who lives just west of the airport added, “I think these attempts are aimed at creating panic among the people and spoiling the attempts of voluntarily returning people to their homes. So, we urge the Rapid Support Forces and those who are supporting it not to attack these civilian locations and complicate the life of the civilians. We also demand that the SAF works seriously on the protection of civilians.”

    Two employees at major telecommunications companies operating in Sudan confirmed to MEE that their firms have evacuated all non-essential staff from Khartoum to the safer city of Atbara in River Nile State, including staff from regional giants MTN and Zain.

    As of Tuesday, daily life across most of Khartoum and Omdurman has continued largely as normal, but residents and officials warn that the recent strikes threaten to derail the ongoing government and grassroots initiative to encourage displaced civilians to return to their homes in the capital.

  • Saka ends Arsenal’s 20-year wait to reach Champions League final

    Saka ends Arsenal’s 20-year wait to reach Champions League final

    After two decades of near misses, unfulfilled potential and long-suffering fan expectation, Arsenal Football Club has finally punched its ticket to the UEFA Champions League final, with homegrown star Bukayo Saka delivering the decisive goal in a tense 1-0 semi-final second leg victory over Atletico Madrid at a sold-out, electric Emirates Stadium on Tuesday.

    The result sees Mikel Arteta’s side advance 2-1 on aggregate, after the two sides played out a 1-1 draw in the first leg in Madrid last week. Saka’s clinical finish in the 44th minute of the first half proved enough to hold off a late Atletico push, ending the north London club’s 20-year drought since their only previous Champions League final appearance in 2005-06.

    Arsenal now set their sights on the May 30 final in Budapest, where they will face either defending champions Paris Saint-Germain or German powerhouse Bayern Munich. PSG carry a narrow 5-4 aggregate lead into their second leg tie in Munich on Wednesday, and have already knocked Arsenal out of the Champions League at the semi-final stage last season.

    For a club that has not lifted European football’s most prestigious prize in its history, the milestone marks a cathartic turning point. Arsenal’s only previous major European honours date back to the 1970 Inter-Cities Fairs Cup and the 1994 Cup Winners’ Cup, and their most recent continental final appearance ended in a 4-1 defeat to Chelsea in the 2019 Europa League. This run to the final is already the highlight of decades of European effort for the Gunners.

    What makes this achievement even more remarkable is that the club is on the cusp of an unprecedented domestic and European double, sitting atop the Premier League table with just three matches remaining in the title race. Just 24 hours before Saka’s match-winning strike, second-placed Manchester City dropped points in a draw at Everton, handing the Gunners a critical advantage in the title chase. If Arteta’s side can close out wins against West Ham United, Burnley and Crystal Palace, they will claim their first English top-flight title since the iconic 2003-04 ‘Invincibles’ season – and could cement this as the greatest season in the club’s entire history if they go on to win the Champions League.

    It is fitting that it was Saka, the face of Arsenal’s youth-driven rebuild under Arteta, who delivered the decisive moment. The academy graduate, who has been a consistent standout for the Gunners throughout this historic campaign, reacted fastest to a parried shot to slot home from four yards out. The sequence started with a clever run from Viktor Gyokeres that stretched Atletico’s defense, pulling defenders out of position and creating space for Leandro Trossard to fire a low effort toward goal. Atletico keeper Jan Oblak could only push the shot weakly into the path of Saka, who made no mistake from close range.

    The opening 15 minutes of the match had been fraught with tension for Arsenal, with Atletico carving out two dangerous early chances on the counter: Julian Alvarez dragged a shot just wide, before Giuliano Simeone’s close-range effort deflected past the post. But Arsenal stabilized after those early scares and seized control of the half, ultimately earning the reward they deserved with Saka’s goal.

    After the break, Atletico threw everything forward in search of an equalizer to force extra time, but Arsenal’s defense held firm. Gabriel Magalhaes produced a last-ditch tackle to deny Simeone a certain goal, while keeper David Raya made a key save to turn away a powerful strike from Antoine Griezmann, preserving the clean sheet and the aggregate lead.

    In the stands, and long before kick-off, the emotion was palpable. Thousands of jubilant Arsenal fans gathered outside the Emirates Stadium, greeting the team bus with flares, flags and deafening chants, turning north London into a sea of red and underlining how much this milestone means to a fanbase that has waited a generation for a return to the Champions League final. Only weeks earlier, the side faced heavy criticism after a four-loss dip in form that sparked old fears of another late-season collapse, with fans and pundits alike labeling the Gunners ‘nearly men’ and questioning their mental toughness. Those doubts are now all but erased, as the club stands 90 minutes from a domestic title and one win from a historic European crown.

    Arteta, the Spanish architect of Arsenal’s rebuild, celebrated jubilantly after Saka’s goal, punching the air in front of the delirious home crowd. The manager has revealed in recent weeks that he visualized this exact moment even during the difficult, early stages of his tenure, when the club was fighting just to qualify for the Champions League. Now, his long-held daydream is just one win away from becoming a glorious reality.

  • How a deadly hantavirus outbreak unfolded on a cruise ship for weeks before it was identified

    How a deadly hantavirus outbreak unfolded on a cruise ship for weeks before it was identified

    A rare, deadly hantavirus outbreak has swept through an Antarctic expedition cruise over the past month, leaving three passengers dead and multiple others ill, according to official updates from the World Health Organization (WHO), the vessel’s operator, and global ship tracking data.

    The MV Hondius, operated by Dutch expedition cruise firm Oceanwide Expeditions, departed Ushuaia in southern Argentina on April 1 on a planned month-long voyage that would carry 149 passengers and crew from 23 nations to Antarctica and remote South Atlantic islands. These premium expedition trips, which target travelers seeking to visit some of Earth’s most isolated wilderness regions, cost between $6,000 and $25,000 per passenger, depending on cabin selection.

    The first case emerged just five days into the voyage, when a 70-year-old Dutch passenger developed a fever, headache, and mild diarrhea on April 6. His condition deteriorated rapidly, and he died from respiratory distress on April 21 while the ship was traversing the open South Atlantic between the British overseas territories of South Georgia and Saint Helena. At the time, no clear cause of death could be identified on board, so the cruise continued its planned itinerary.

    The vessel stopped near the remote island of Tristan da Cunha before reaching Saint Helena on April 24, where the passenger’s body was disembarked. The man’s 69-year-old wife, who had already started showing early symptoms of illness, left the ship to accompany her husband’s remains and boarded a commercial flight bound for South Africa. She grew critically ill mid-flight and collapsed upon landing in Johannesburg, dying in a local hospital on April 26.

    After the ship left Saint Helena bound for Ascension Island, located 800 miles north of its previous stop, a third British passenger developed symptoms including high fever, shortness of breath, and pneumonia. He was evacuated from Ascension Island to a South African hospital for intensive care on April 27. A fourth passenger, a German woman, developed pneumonia-like symptoms and died on board on May 6, after the ship had altered course for Cape Verde off the West African coast. Her body remains in isolation on the vessel.

    It took nearly three weeks from the first death for health officials to confirm hantavirus as the cause of the outbreak. After all routine tests on the hospitalized British passenger returned negative, South African public health labs ran a hantavirus analysis, which returned a positive result on May 6. Posthumous testing of the Dutch woman’s body returned a second positive hantavirus result the following day. As of the latest update, two cases are laboratory-confirmed, and WHO has classified the event as a full hantavirus outbreak, suspecting the other fatalities are also linked to the virus.

    Currently, the MV Hondius is anchored off the coast of Cape Verde, with three symptomatic people still on board waiting for evacuation. The hospitalized British patient remains in intensive care in South Africa.

    Hantavirus is primarily a rodent-borne pathogen, spread to humans through direct contact with infected rodents, their saliva, urine, or fecal droppings. While person-to-person transmission is extremely rare for most hantavirus strains, the Andes hantavirus — the specific variant identified in this outbreak, which is endemic to Argentina and Chile — can spread between humans in rare cases. In severe infections, hantavirus causes life-threatening respiratory failure and kidney damage, with a high mortality rate for serious cases.

    International health authorities have stressed that the global risk from this outbreak remains very low, due to the virus’s limited ability to spread between people. WHO officials are currently conducting contact tracing for all passengers who shared the April 25 flight from Saint Helena to Johannesburg with the infected Dutch woman, to monitor for any secondary spread. The ship’s passengers and crew have been placed in full cabin isolation with strict physical distancing protocols, a measure that mirrors lockdown measures implemented widely during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    As of Tuesday, Oceanwide Expeditions announced plans to deploy medical evacuation aircraft to Cape Verde to extract three people from the ship: two passengers requiring urgent medical care and one companion of the deceased German woman. The evacuated passengers will be flown to the Netherlands for care, though an exact arrival timeline has not been released. After the evacuation, the MV Hondius will sail approximately three days to the Spanish Canary Islands, though Spanish officials have not yet finalized their approval for the vessel’s port of entry as of Tuesday evening.

    Investigations into the source of the outbreak remain ongoing. WHO officials are reviewing the travel histories of the first two infected passengers, who visited Argentina and other parts of South America before boarding the expedition cruise, to determine how the virus was introduced to the vessel.

  • Google DeepMind staff unionise over Israel and US military ties

    Google DeepMind staff unionise over Israel and US military ties

    In a historic move that marks a watershed moment for global tech labor organizing, hundreds of Google DeepMind employees based in the United Kingdom have overwhelmingly voted to form a union, driven by urgent ethical concerns over the misuse of the company’s artificial intelligence technology by the U.S. and Israeli militaries in conflicts involving Iran and Gaza.

    Following the internal ballot held among Communication Workers Union (CWU) members at DeepMind, official results showed a 98% majority in support of unionization. On Tuesday, workers formally submitted a request to Google DeepMind’s leadership to recognize both the CWU and Unite the Union as their official workplace representatives. If recognized, this organizing effort will become the first formal union at a major global frontier artificial intelligence research lab, according to campaign organizers.

    At the core of the workers’ demands is an immediate end to the provision of Google AI tools to the Israeli military and U.S. defense entities. Additional demands include the reinstatement of a previously discarded company pledge to refrain from developing AI-powered weapons and mass surveillance tools, the establishment of an independent ethics oversight body with decision-making authority, and formal guarantees that individual employees retain the right to decline work on specific projects on moral or ethical grounds.

    This unionization push is part of a broader global grassroots movement among DeepMind staff, with employees across international locations planning coordinated in-person protests and so-called “research strikes,” a work stoppage action where researchers suspend their regular work to highlight their concerns.

    One anonymous DeepMind employee emphasized that no staff want their cutting-edge AI research to become complicit in violations of international law, noting that the technology is already aiding what the employee called Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. “Even if our work is only used for administrative purposes, as leadership has repeatedly told us, it is still helping make genocide cheaper, faster, and more efficient,” the worker said. “That must end immediately, as must harm to Iranians and human lives anywhere.”

    The successful unionization vote would cover at least 1,000 DeepMind employees based at the company’s London headquarters. In the formal letter submitted to management, workers have given DeepMind leadership 10 working days to voluntarily recognize the two unions or enter into mediated negotiation talks. If management fails to meet the deadline, workers will launch a formal legal process to force official recognition.

    The vote comes at a time when the UK government is actively pursuing policies to attract major global technology investment, positioning the country as a leading hub for AI innovation. Already, several high-profile AI firms including Anthropic have announced plans to expand their London-based operations in recent months.

    CWU national officer John Chadfield framed Tuesday’s announcement as a defining moment for tech workers around the world. “This is a really important moment where tech workers at Google’s frontier AI lab are connecting with some of the most oppressed people in communities around the world in meaningful ways, based on foundational values of solidarity and trade unionism,” Chadfield said. “By exercising their rights to collectivise they are in a strong position to demand their employer stop circling the ethical drain of military-industrial contracts, echoing the sentiment of many working people in the UK and elsewhere.”

    This latest labor action is the culmination of years of growing internal unrest among Google employees over the company’s military contracts. Earlier this year, more than 600 Google staff across the company’s AI and cloud divisions signed an open letter urging leadership to cut off the Pentagon’s access to Google technology for classified military operations. Google previously drew widespread backlash after firing dozens of employees who participated in protests against Project Nimbus, a joint initiative with Amazon to provide cloud and AI services to the Israeli government amid the ongoing military campaign in Gaza. In 2023, the company also faced heavy criticism for its acquisition of Israeli cloud security firm Wiz, which was founded by former veterans of Unit 8200, the Israeli military’s elite cyber espionage and surveillance unit.

  • Road tax proposal could end fuel excise as EV uptake surges

    Road tax proposal could end fuel excise as EV uptake surges

    Australia’s electric vehicle market is seeing its fastest growth driven by middle-income families on the outskirts of the country’s largest cities, and a new progressive policy proposal aims to overhaul the nation’s road taxation system to replace the decades-old fuel excise, delivering thousands of dollars in annual savings for low-income motorists.

    Data from a new report released by progressive think tank the McKell Institute, backed by the Electric Vehicles Council, highlights a surprising trend in Australian EV adoption: outer suburban regions have posted explosive growth in new registrations, outpacing uptake among high-income households. Since 2021, annual EV registrations have jumped 119% in western Sydney, and grown an even more dramatic 125% in Melbourne’s west. Contrary to common assumptions that EV uptake is led exclusively by wealthy buyers, the report confirms middle-income earners are accelerating adoption faster than the top income brackets.

    To address the growing gap in road tax revenue as more drivers switch to EVs, which currently do not contribute to fuel excise that funds road maintenance, the McKell Institute has put forward a bold long-term plan to phase out the fuel excise entirely and replace it with a national, progressive road user charging system tied directly to driver income.

    Under the proposed model, the per-kilometre charge would be adjusted across four income bands to protect lower-earning road users. Drivers in the lowest income bracket would pay just 3.74 cents per kilometre, working out to an average annual road tax bill of roughly $444. By comparison, highest-income earners would pay 12.88 cents per kilometre, totaling an average of $1,531 per year. Lower-income motorists and concession card holders would be automatically enrolled in the reduced rate, with charge adjustments handled through existing individual tax return systems to avoid administrative complexity.

    McKell Institute chief executive Edward Cavanough explained that the plan relies on built-in road usage tracking technology that will become standard in new vehicles over time, particularly as EV adoption grows. Once EVs make up 30% of Australia’s national light vehicle fleet, they would be integrated into the new charging system, creating a path to fully eliminate the fuel excise over the coming decades.

    “Over time, if our model is adopted, more and more vehicles will include this tracking technology and fall under this taxation framework,” Cavanough said. “This transition will eventually allow us to phase out the fuel excise entirely.” Cavanough noted that full elimination of the fuel excise, which stood at 48.2 cents per litre before a temporary cut during the 2022 global fuel crisis, would likely take around 20 years to complete. In the interim, the new system would protect vulnerable motorists from the wild price volatility that has shaken global fuel markets in recent years, he added.

    “Lower-income earners are the most exposed to swings in petrol prices,” Cavanough said. “We want to move away from a system that exposes everyday drivers to this kind of unpredictable pricing at the bowser. This model creates a far more predictable tax revenue stream for governments, and gives drivers clear visibility into exactly how much road tax they are paying each year, based on how much they actually drive.”

    The think tank has also proposed an alternative simpler model, which would introduce a flat $600 annual charge for all light vehicles regardless of fuel type starting in 2031, a policy that McKell estimates would generate roughly $12 billion in annual revenue for road maintenance.

    The proposal comes as state governments have begun rolling out their own standalone EV road user charging policies, a move the McKell Institute and Electric Vehicles Council have criticized as disjointed and counterproductive to Australia’s EV transition targets. New South Wales has already legislated to introduce an EV road user charge starting July 1, 2027 – or when EV uptake hits 30% of the state’s fleet – which will set a flat rate of 2.97 cents per kilometre for EV drivers. Cavanough argues that this state-by-state approach creates a messy patchwork of tax rules, and that a coordinated national system is the only sustainable long-term solution.

    “This is not the best path forward,” Cavanough said of the NSW plan. “State governments are correct to identify declining fuel excise revenue from growing EV uptake as a major fiscal problem, but we need a coordinated national approach to build a universal system, not a hodgepodge of inconsistent state tax rules.”

    Electric Vehicles Council chief executive Julie Delvecchio added that the flat NSW EV charge risks discouraging the outer suburban working families who are currently driving EV growth from making the switch, trapping them in higher ongoing petrol costs. “Working households in outer Sydney who are switching to EVs are doing so to cut their monthly household costs after seeing how much they spend on petrol,” Delvecchio said. “This EV-specific tax will shut the door on those families in Parramatta and Penrith who are trying to reduce their cost of living.”

    NSW Premier Chris Minns has defended the state’s policy, framing it as an unavoidable step toward long-term tax reform to protect funding for critical road infrastructure. “I know this is a difficult truth, but as EV use continues to grow – and it will only grow, not decline – falling fuel excise revenue will put enormous pressure on our ability to fund road repairs,” Minns said. “Anyone who drives around Sydney right now can see our roads are full of potholes that need fixing, and we have relied on fuel excise to fund that maintenance for generations. We need a new source of revenue to keep our road network in good repair.”

  • Mission is to preach peace, says Pope in response to Trump attacks

    Mission is to preach peace, says Pope in response to Trump attacks

    A high-profile public disagreement between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Pope Leo has taken center stage in global diplomatic discourse, centered on competing stances toward the ongoing Middle East conflict, just as U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio prepares for a key two-day visit to Vatican City and Italy.

    The core of the conflict stems from Pope Leo’s consistent, vocal opposition to the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. In a recent public statement, the pontiff reaffirmed his long-held pacifist position: as a spiritual leader, his core mission is to spread the Gospel and advocate for global peace, and he will not step back from that calling even in the face of harsh political criticism. “The mission of the Church is to preach the Gospel, to preach peace,” Pope Leo told reporters ahead of Rubio’s arrival. “If someone wants to criticize me for preaching the Gospel … I hope simply to be listened to because of the value of God’s words.” Last month, he doubled down on this stance, noting, “As a pastor, I cannot be in favour of war. I would like to encourage all to make efforts to look for answers that come from a culture of peace and not from a place of hate and division.”

    Trump has repeatedly lashed out at the Pope over these anti-war remarks, distorting the pontiff’s position to claim Pope Leo supports Iran acquiring nuclear weapons—a claim Pope Leo has never made. In an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt this week, Trump argued that the Pope’s stance is “endangering a lot of Catholics and a lot of people.” On social media, Trump went further, attacking Pope Leo’s character and legitimacy, claiming he was only elected to the papacy because church leaders picked an American to curry favor with his administration, writing “If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican.” He also labeled Pope Leo “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.” After that social media post, Trump drew widespread backlash for sharing an edited image that depicted him as a Jesus-like figure; he later tried to downplay the incident, telling reporters he believed the image showed him as a doctor before the post was removed.

    Several top U.S. officials have lined up to support Trump’s criticism of the Vatican. Vice President JD Vance, a convert to Catholicism, argued that the Vatican should “stick to matters of morality” rather than weigh in on international military policy. Even so, U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See Brian Burch has sought to downplay tensions between the two governments, telling reporters this week that there is no “deep rift” between Washington and the Vatican. “Nations have disagreements, and I think one of the ways that you work through those is … through fraternity and authentic dialogue,” Burch said. He added that Rubio’s scheduled meetings with Vatican and Italian leaders will create a structured space to work through any existing differences.

    The disagreement has also created friction between Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, once a close political ally of the former president. Meloni, who has also criticized the Middle East conflict, has publicly come to Pope Leo’s defense. When reporters asked whether she would meet with Rubio during his visit, she simply confirmed, “I think so.”

    Rubio, a Catholic himself, is set to hold a series of meetings with both Vatican officials and Italian government counterparts during his trip. A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department confirmed that the official agenda for the visit includes advancing bilateral relations between the U.S. and both Italy and the Vatican, discussing the ongoing crisis in the Middle East, and aligning on mutual interests in the Western Hemisphere. The visit comes as diplomatic positioning around the Middle East conflict continues to split global leaders, with this high-profile clash between a sitting pontiff and a former U.S. president putting new attention on the rifts over the war.

  • ‘I thought he was going to hit me’ OpenAI co-founder says of Musk

    ‘I thought he was going to hit me’ OpenAI co-founder says of Musk

    OAKLAND, Calif. — In dramatic testimony unfolding in a Northern California federal courtroom, OpenAI President and co-founder Greg Brockman has laid bare a tense 2017 confrontation with Elon Musk, the billionaire initial co-founder who is now locked in a bitter legal battle over OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit structure. The trial, which is scheduled to run a full month, entered its second week this week as the two sides clash over what Musk knew about OpenAI’s planned transition away from its original non-profit founding model.

    Brockman, who is named as a defendant in Musk’s lawsuit seeking to roll back OpenAI’s corporate restructuring, told jurors that Musk began pushing aggressively to seize greater control of the startup just two years after its 2015 founding. The billionaire reportedly tried to court both Brockman and fellow early co-founder Ilya Sutskever to build support for his power grab, a courtship that Brockman described as systematic “buttering up.”

    When Brockman rejected Musk’s proposal to expand the billionaire’s influence over the company, Brockman testified, Musk’s demeanor shifted suddenly and sharply. The confrontation grew so heated that Brockman told the jury “I actually thought he was going to hit me.” The meeting wrapped up immediately after the exchange, with Musk announcing he would cut off the financial backing he had provided to OpenAI since its launch.

    Court documents introduced by OpenAI’s legal team included August 2017 text exchanges between Sutskever and Brockman that referenced the pressure campaign, with one message asking: “Will a model 3 make you be willing to accept massively unfavourable terms?”

    The core of Brockman’s testimony has centered on a key point at the heart of the dispute: he confirmed that Musk was fully informed years ago of OpenAI’s long-term plans to adopt a for-profit structure to support massive capital needs for AI research. Founded as a non-profit entity, OpenAI later established a capped-profit subsidiary to raise billions in investor funding, and last year moved to reorient the entire company around its for-profit operations. Musk, who departed the OpenAI board in 2018, has argued the transition violates the founding agreement he helped craft, while OpenAI maintains all changes were done with Musk’s full knowledge.

    Since leaving OpenAI, the startup has grown into one of the world’s most valuable technology firms, following the explosive mainstream success of its flagship product ChatGPT. Musk, who has become one of OpenAI’s most prominent public critics, launched his own rival AI startup xAI in 2023, directly competing with OpenAI’s dominant chatbot.

    The next witness expected to take the stand is Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children. During his testimony, Brockman noted that Zilis remained on OpenAI’s board long after Musk left the company, saying “We trusted her to keep the Elon conflict under control.” Zilis departed the board in March 2023, just as Musk prepared to publicly launch xAI. Brockman also told jurors that when Zilis informed him she had given birth to twins years ago, he only learned Musk was the father from public reports, after which Zilis clarified the children were conceived via IVF and her relationship with Musk was entirely platonic.