博客

  • Tunisia: Ghriba Jewish pilgrimage sees increased turnout after years of restrictions

    Tunisia: Ghriba Jewish pilgrimage sees increased turnout after years of restrictions

    After years of tightly restricted access driven by repeated security threats, the annual pilgrimage to Tunisia’s iconic Ghriba Synagogue — one of the oldest active Jewish sites on the African continent — is witnessing a notable revival in 2025, with rising international participation and boosted security protections from Tunisian authorities.

    The centuries-old pilgrimage, held each spring on Tunisia’s Djerba Island, was for decades a major global Jewish gathering, drawing thousands of worshippers and visitors from across Europe, North America and beyond. But the event was gutted by scaled-down operations following a devastating attack on the synagogue complex in May 2023, which left six people dead including two visiting pilgrims and three Tunisian security officers.

    That attack, carried out by off-duty National Guard officer Wissam Khazri, unfolded on the final day of the 2023 pilgrimage. Khazri first killed a fellow officer, seized the officer’s ammunition, and opened fire on worshippers and security personnel at the site before being fatally shot by responding security forces. Nine additional people were injured in the violence. The attack was the deadliest incident targeting the synagogue since a 2002 suicide truck bombing that killed 21 people at the same location.

    In the two years after the 2023 attack, attendance was drastically limited to address ongoing safety concerns. In 2024, public processions were canceled entirely, with events restricted to small-scale prayer services and candle lighting. Just 50 pilgrims participated that year, a drop from the roughly 7,000 attendees that took part in the 2023 gathering before the attack occurred. That low turnout also came on the heels of a separate anti-Jewish attack just one week before the 2024 event, when a Jewish jeweller was stabbed in his Djerba shop by an assailant wielding a butcher knife.

    The trial of individuals accused of aiding Khazri concluded in February 2025, with all convicted accomplices receiving prison sentences ranging from one to 15 years. The legal proceedings remain controversial, however: both defense attorneys representing the defendants and lawyers for civil parties harmed in the attack have publicly condemned the investigation as deeply flawed, while Tunisian government officials have never formally labeled the 2023 attack as an antisemitic act.

    This year, authorities have taken a new approach, permitting organized international pilgrimage groups to travel to Djerba while rolling out sweeping enhanced security measures across the island and around the synagogue. Rene Trabelsi, former Tunisian Tourism Minister and one of the lead organizers of the pilgrimage, told Agence France-Presse that a clear rebound in turnout is already underway this year. “This year, there has been a marked return of pilgrims to the island. We estimate that around 200 have come from abroad,” Trabelsi said. He added that confidence in the event is slowly recovering, noting that organizers are grateful for the extensive security infrastructure the Tunisian state has deployed to protect attendees.

    Constructed as early as the 6th century BCE, Ghriba Synagogue holds the distinction of being the oldest active synagogue in Africa, and it is widely viewed as a landmark symbol of Tunisia’s long history of religious and cultural diversity. Today, roughly 1,500 Jewish residents remain in Tunisia, with the majority residing on Djerba Island. That number is a sharp decline from the estimated 100,000 Jews who lived in the country before it gained independence from France in 1956, when large numbers of Jewish residents emigrated to Israel and France in the decades following independence.

  • US aviation worker accused of  using work computer to threaten Trump

    US aviation worker accused of using work computer to threaten Trump

    A 35-year-old Federal Aviation Administration contractor based in New Hampshire has been taken into federal custody on charges of threatening to assassinate former President Donald Trump, in what marks the fourth high-profile prosecution targeting threats against Trump in just one week, U.S. law enforcement officials announced Monday.

    Prosecutors allege Dean DelleChiaie, a mechanical engineer working for the FAA — the federal agency tasked with overseeing U.S. civil airspace — used his government-issued work computer to research how to smuggle a firearm into a federal facility, and directly searched the explicit phrase: “I am going to kill Donald John Trump”. Investigators also say DelleChiaie conducted online searches for personal information about the families of Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    According to a sworn affidavit submitted to the court, the FAA first flagged DelleChiaie’s activity to federal law enforcement after he reached out to the agency’s IT department requesting that his entire search history be erased from his work device. U.S. Secret Service agents interviewed DelleChiaie at his residential property on February 3, where investigators say he confessed to carrying out the concerning internet searches.

    The affidavit notes DelleChiaie acknowledged his actions were driven by anger at the current administration over a range of political issues, including the 2024 presidential election results, presidential pardon grants, and the release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. DelleChiaie also admitted to law enforcement that he owns three privately held firearms, prosecutors confirmed.

    The threat escalated on April 21, when DelleChiaie used his personal email account to send a message to the White House with the subject line “Contact the President,” prosecutors say. In the email, he allegedly wrote: “I, Dean DelleChiaie, am going to neutralize/kill you – Donald John Trump – because you decided to kill kids – and say that it was War – when in reality – it is terrorism. God knows your actions and where you belong.”

    DelleChiaie is scheduled to make his first court appearance on Tuesday. As of Monday evening, legal counsel for the accused had not been reached for comment on the charges. If convicted on all counts, he faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000.

    DelleChiaie’s arrest comes amid a sharp uptick in public threats against former President Trump, with three additional separate prosecutions for threats against Trump filed in the seven days prior to his arrest, the U.S. Department of Justice, which oversees the Federal Bureau of Investigation, confirmed.

    The most high-profile of these earlier cases involves former FBI Director James Comey, who turned himself in to law enforcement last Wednesday on charges stemming from an Instagram post featuring a photo of seashells that prosecutors allege contained a coded threat against Trump. On Monday, the same day DelleChiaie was taken into custody, a South Carolina man was arrested by Secret Service agents after he wrote a threat to kill Trump on the exterior of his vehicle, stating he was traveling to Washington to “kill the pres.” One week prior, a Florida man entered a guilty plea on charges of making threats against Trump, multiple members of Congress, and other senior public officials.

    “Criminal threats directed at public officials are becoming alarmingly more common, and this must stop now,” U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Florida John Heekin said during a press conference announcing the Florida man’s guilty plea. “We have zero-tolerance for such criminality in the Northern District of Florida and will seek maximum punishments to keep our public officials safe.”

    The string of threat arrests also comes less than two weeks after a gunman forced his way into the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington D.C., in what investigators allege was a planned attempt to assassinate Trump and other senior U.S. government officials.

  • Chinese companies suing governments the world over

    Chinese companies suing governments the world over

    A high-stakes international legal conflict is unfolding over the strategic Port of Darwin, after Chinese-owned infrastructure firm Landbridge Group launched formal arbitration proceedings against the Australian federal government over its push to transfer the port’s operating lease to an Australian owner. The case, filed at the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in late April by Landbridge founder Ye Cheng, marks one of a growing number of investment disputes between Chinese firms and national governments that are reshaping how countries weigh national security policy against international trade obligations.

  • Met police chief condemned for claiming pro-Palestine protests intended to go past synagogues

    Met police chief condemned for claiming pro-Palestine protests intended to go past synagogues

    A growing controversy has erupted in London over claims from Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley that organizers of pro-Palestine protests have repeatedly intentionally routed demonstrations past synagogues, a claim that major pro-Palestine advocacy groups have denounced as false and defamatory.

    Four leading campaign organizations — the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Friends of Al-Aqsa, the Stop the War Coalition, and the Palestinian Forum of Britain — have banded together to publicly call on Rowley to issue an immediate, public retraction of his remarks, which they label a scurrilous misrepresentation of their protest planning practices. The accusation stems from comments Rowley gave to The Times, where he argued that repeated attempts by organizers to include synagogues on march routes sent a message that felt like antisemitism.

    “The fact that features as the organisers’ intent, I think that sends a message… that feels like antisemitism. That may be a fair or unfair inference, but that’s the message it sends,” Rowley told the outlet.

    In a formal response, the coalition flatly rejected Rowley’s account, saying his claims are not just unfounded but damaging to community relations. The groups pointed to their planning for the upcoming Nakba Day demonstration scheduled for May 16 as clear evidence of their commitment to avoiding sensitive Jewish sites. They told Rowley they first submitted a proposed route from Embankment to Whitehall back in December 2023 — a path they had used twice previously that does not pass any synagogues. After three months of no response, police rejected the route, they said, on the grounds that far-right figure Tommy Robinson had been granted permission to hold a demonstration in central London, forcing the pro-Palestine groups to relocate.

    A second proposed route, from the Israeli embassy in West London to Trafalgar Square, also included no synagogues, according to the coalition. That proposal was also rejected, with police instead arbitrarily imposing a much shorter route on the organizers. “The truth is that at no point have we ever requested to ‘walk by’ a synagogue on any of our marches,” the coalition stated. “We have no interest in doing so. Police recordings of our meetings with you will confirm this.”

    In an official clarification following the coalition’s demand, a Metropolitan Police spokesperson pushed back, saying Rowley’s comments were not targeted specifically at the upcoming May demonstration. Instead, the spokesperson said the commissioner was referring to the full scope of pro-Palestine protests held since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza conflict in October 2023. Over that period, the coalition has organized roughly 30 large-scale marches across London. Half of those events, the Met said, were originally planned to start, end, or pass near a synagogue, and police intervened to change the route 20 times to protect Jewish communities from potential disruption or intimidation. Rowley still maintains that repeated attempts to gather near synagogues sends a threatening message to Jewish communities that amounts to antisemitic intimidation, according to the spokesperson.

    The pro-Palestine coalition argues that Rowley’s false accusations, coming from the UK’s most senior police officer, are completely unacceptable and risk inflaming already heightened community tensions across the country. This is not the first time the groups have pushed back against efforts to discredit their movement: just last week, they condemned coordinated attempts by politicians and mainstream media outlets to smear the protests and floated proposals to ban the demonstrations entirely.

    The controversy comes in the wake of a recent stabbing attack in Golders Green, a majority-Jewish neighborhood in northwest London, where two Jewish men were stabbed by a 45-year-old Somali-born British national. The suspect is also accused of stabbing a Muslim man, Ishmail Hussein, in a separate attack in south London earlier the same day. Following the attack, senior politicians including Prime Minister Keir Starmer publicly linked the violence to pro-Palestine protests and called for severe restrictions on the demonstrations. Appearing on the BBC’s *Today* program over the weekend, Starmer said offensive language used at protests should be actively policed, and suggested that a full ban on mass pro-Palestine demonstrations could be justified under current circumstances.

  • Trump again assails Pope Leo, potentially complicating Rubio’s visit to the Vatican this week

    Trump again assails Pope Leo, potentially complicating Rubio’s visit to the Vatican this week

    A fresh public dispute between former U.S. President Donald Trump and the first American-born pontiff, Pope Leo XIV, has created new diplomatic complications, just days before U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to travel to the Vatican for a planned fence-mending meeting. The escalating tension has also spilled across borders, drawing pushback from top Italian government leaders and adding unexpected political friction ahead of upcoming U.S. midterm elections.

    In an interview aired Monday with conservative media personality Hugh Hewitt, Trump doubled down on his previous attacks against Pope Leo. He claimed the pontiff was aiding Iran and undermining global security through two key positions: the pope’s public calls for respectful treatment of immigrants, and his stance on the ongoing Iran conflict. Trump went a step further, falsely asserting that Pope Leo supports Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, arguing the stance endangers Catholics and communities worldwide.

    This claim directly contradicts the pope’s long-held public positions. Pope Leo has never backed Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear program; instead, he has repeatedly called for expanded diplomatic peace talks to resolve the Iran standoff, and publicly condemned both general military conflict with Iran and Trump’s past threats of mass civilian strikes against the country. The pontiff has repeatedly emphasized that his public statements are rooted in biblical and Catholic Church teaching, not political opposition to any U.S. administration.

    Responding to Trump’s latest remarks to reporters Tuesday, Pope Leo pushed back forcefully against the misrepresentation of his views. “The Catholic Church for years has spoken out against all nuclear weapons, so there is no doubt there,” he stated. The pontiff also reaffirmed that his calls for peace and dialogue in the Middle East conflict stem directly from religious doctrine. “The mission of the church is to preach the Gospel, to preach peace. If someone wants to criticize me for announcing the Gospel, let him do it with the truth,” he added.

    Speaking to reporters at the White House, Rubio sought to downplay the rift between Trump and the Vatican, framing Trump’s criticism as rooted in shared global opposition to Iran obtaining a nuclear arsenal. “Trump doesn’t understand why anybody — leave aside the pope, the president and I, for that matter — think most people cannot understand why anyone would think that it’s a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon,” Rubio said. Still, political analysts widely note that Trump’s unprompted new attack makes Rubio’s diplomatic outreach far more challenging when he meets with Pope Leo this Thursday.

    This is not an isolated conflict: Trump first lashed out at Pope Leo last month on social media, attacking the pontiff for criticizing his administration’s hardline immigration and deportation policies, as well as his handling of the Iran war. In response, Pope Leo stated that God does not hear the prayers of warmongers. The dispute escalated further when Trump shared a social media graphic that compared himself to Jesus Christ; he deleted the post after widespread public backlash, refused to issue an apology to the pope, and later attempted to deflect criticism by claiming he misinterpreted the image as depicting him as a medical professional.

    The tension has now spilled into Italian domestic politics, where long-time Trump ally Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has publicly rejected the U.S. former president’s comments about Pope Leo. Trump has hit back at Meloni as part of his growing frustration with NATO allies over what he calls insufficient support for U.S. policy on the Iran war. That friction has already led to U.S. plans to withdraw thousands of American troops from Germany in the coming months.

    Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani also issued a public rebuke of Trump’s comments via social media, writing that the remarks were “neither acceptable nor helpful to the cause of peace.” Tajani added, “I reaffirm my support for every action and word of Pope Leo; his words are a testament to dialogue, the value of human life, and freedom. This is a vision shared by our government, which is committed through diplomacy to ensuring stability and peace in all areas where conflicts exist.”

    Alongside his meeting with Pope Leo in Vatican City, Rubio is scheduled to hold talks with Meloni and Tajani in Rome on Friday. A practicing Catholic, Rubio has now visited Italy or the Vatican at least three times in the past 12 months, and has been repeatedly tasked with softening or clarifying Trump’s sharp rhetoric on issues related to Europe, NATO, and the Middle East. Beyond diplomatic fallout, the public dispute between Trump and Pope Leo also carries tangible domestic political implications for the upcoming U.S. midterm congressional elections, as both parties seek to court Catholic voters across key swing districts.

  • Italy’s Meloni denounces deepfake photo as a political attack

    Italy’s Meloni denounces deepfake photo as a political attack

    ROME – In a striking reveal that has sparked new debate over the dangers of unregulated artificial intelligence misuse, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni went public this Tuesday to condemn the spread of a non-consensual deepfake image that depicted her in inappropriate lingerie on a bed. The AI-manipulated image, created to damage the premier’s reputation, has drawn attention to the growing threat of deepfake technology for political and personal attacks.

    Meloni took an unflinching approach to the incident by sharing the manipulated image directly to her own official Facebook page, alongside a post sent to her by a user named Roberto, who had originally circulated the fake content with a message calling on Meloni to feel ashamed of the fabricated scene.

    In her public address on the platform, Meloni emphasized that deepfake technology poses a broad societal risk, not just a personal one. She warned social media users against sharing unvetted visual content, noting that altered AI images have the power to mislead audiences, distort public opinion, and harm the reputation of innocent people.

    “I can stand up for myself against this sort of attack,” Meloni wrote in her post. “But far too many people who find themselves targeted by deepfakes do not have the platform or reach to defend themselves the way I can.”

    As of Tuesday evening, it remained unconfirmed whether Meloni would file an official complaint with law enforcement over the incident, a step many of her followers and political commentators urged her to take in comments on her post. In a surprising display of dry wit, Meloni acknowledged that the manipulated photo had actually edited her appearance to look more flattering than real life, but added that the lighthearted observation does not negate the seriousness of the incident.

    “Even so, the core fact remains: anyone looking to attack an opponent and fabricate falsehoods can now turn to any tool, no matter how unethical or inappropriate, to achieve their goal,” she added.

    This is not the first time that the Italian prime minister’s image has gone viral for manipulated or coincidental similarities. Back in February, a small public controversy erupted when a painted cherub in a historic Roman church was noted to bear an uncanny resemblance to Meloni, Italy’s first ever female head of government. On that occasion, Meloni brushed off the comparison with characteristic humor, posting a photo of the artwork to social media alongside the joke “No, I definitely don’t look like an angel” and a laughing-crying emoji.

  • US to safety test new AI models from Google, Microsoft, xAI

    US to safety test new AI models from Google, Microsoft, xAI

    In a marked shift from its earlier hands-off approach to artificial intelligence oversight, the Trump administration has secured voluntary agreements from three major tech players — Google, Microsoft, and Elon Musk-led xAI — to submit all new AI tools and capabilities for pre-release testing by the U.S. Department of Commerce, three people familiar with the arrangement confirmed this week.

    Under the new pacts, the companies will send their cutting-edge AI models to the Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) for independent evaluation before the tools launch to the general public. The partnerships expand on earlier voluntary safety commitments secured during the Biden administration from leading AI developers including OpenAI and Anthropic, which established the framework for third-party testing of high-risk AI capabilities before public release. All participating companies’ models will undergo rigorous assessment of both functional capabilities and cybersecurity safeguards under the expanded program.

    “These expanded industry collaborations help us scale our work in the public interest at a critical moment,” CAISI director Chris Fall said in a statement announcing the new agreements.

    The scope of CAISI’s evaluations covers three core areas: hands-on functional testing, collaborative public-private research, and the development of industry-wide best practices for safe commercial AI deployment. Each of the three new participating firms brings high-profile, widely used AI tools to the testing framework: Google’s flagship model, Gemini, developed by its DeepMind subsidiary, already powers consumer Google products and is currently in use by U.S. defense and military agencies. Microsoft’s most prominent public AI offering is the CoPilot generative assistant integrated across its productivity and cloud platforms. xAI, which is controlled by Musk’s SpaceX, has only one public product to date: the Grok chatbot, which drew widespread public criticism and scrutiny last year after it was found to generate non-consensual deepfake pornographic images that undressed depicted individuals without consent.

    CAISI officials noted Tuesday that the center has already completed 40 prior AI tool evaluations, including assessments of multiple unreleased state-of-the-art models. The center declined to specify whether any models evaluated in earlier rounds have been blocked from public release over safety concerns, and representatives for Google, Microsoft, and SpaceX did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the new testing agreements.

    The expansion of pre-release voluntary testing marks a notable departure from the Trump administration’s initial policy stance. When Trump took office, his administration adopted a largely deregulatory, hands-off approach to AI oversight, framing heavy regulation as a barrier to U.S. global competitiveness in the fast-growing sector. Last year, Trump signed a series of executive orders that laid out his administration’s official AI Action Plan, which he said would “remove red tape and onerous regulation” surrounding AI development to ensure the U.S. “wins” the global race to lead AI advancement and control the technology.

    But shifting national security priorities and growing industry warnings about unregulated powerful AI have pushed the administration to revise its approach. The U.S. military has rapidly expanded its own adoption of AI tools for operational and planning use in recent years, while leading AI developer Anthropic made headlines late last year when it publicly announced it had developed a new high-capability model called Mytho, which it deemed too powerful and high-risk to release to the public. Last month, senior Trump administration staff held a closed-door meeting with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, as first reported by the BBC, amid an ongoing legal dispute between Anthropic and the U.S. Department of Defense. The lawsuit stems from Anthropic’s refusal to remove built-in safety guardrails from its models for unfiltered government use.

  • Venice Biennale previews in chaos as war follows art into world’s oldest exhibition

    Venice Biennale previews in chaos as war follows art into world’s oldest exhibition

    The 61st edition of the Venice Biennale, the world’s longest-running major contemporary art exhibition, opened its previews to the public on Tuesday amid unprecedented turmoil that has thrown the event’s core structure into question. The chaos erupted just days earlier, when the entire jury stepped down in protest over the event’s decision to allow pavilions for Israel and Russia, a move that has split participating artists, curators and organizers along geopolitical lines.

    Walking through the Biennale’s iconic Giardini gardens, the geographic and political divides are impossible to miss. Only a short distance from the Russian Pavilion, where a small group of attendees danced to house music spun by an Argentine DJ during opening events, Ukrainian artists gathered beside a large origami deer sculpture evacuated from the war-torn eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk, just 5 kilometers from the active front line with Russia. Meanwhile, a group of Palestinian activists marched through the gardens, their shirts emblazoned with the names of fellow artists killed in the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Event organizers have braced for more protests throughout preview week.

    The unprecedented upheaval has reignited long-simmering debates about the core structure of the 129-year-old exhibition, which centers on 100 independent national pavilions operating alongside a centrally curated main exhibition featuring 110 independent artists and collectives. Critics argue that the nation-based pavilion model has grown outdated in a globalized art world, where most creators work across international borders, and that the structure gives nation states an unmerited platform to push political propaganda.

    Marie Helene Pereira, one of five curators stepping in to lead the main exhibition *In Minor Keys* after original curator Koyo Kouoh passed away last year while preparing the show, said the current unrest makes clear that the concept of centering nation states within the exhibition space is now openly contested.

    “We can see how much that can bring tension, especially in the midst of the political chaos we find ourselves in,” Pereira told reporters. She added that the moment calls for a full rethinking of institutional structures to better center artists and the creative process, while noting that this does not mean art should be divorced from political context.

    Prior to the full jury’s resignation, panel members had publicly stated they would refuse to award prizes to any country whose leaders are facing investigation by the International Court of Justice, a designation that explicitly includes both Russia and Israel. Some participating artists have welcomed the jury’s departure. Israeli artist Belu-Simion Fainaru, whose Kabbalah-inspired installation is on display, called the resignation a fair outcome.

    “I should be treated as an equal artist, and I should not be discriminated against because of my race, that I am a Jew, and not because of my nationality or passport,” Fainaru said. “I have to be seen as I am: I am an artist that wants to show my art, and I have the right to be evaluated. The Biennale should be a place where you can feel safe to create and do whatever you believe in.”

    For Ukrainian participants, who have seen their country grapple with a full-scale Russian invasion for more than two years, the decision to allow Russia to participate is unacceptable. Ukrainian co-curator Ksenia Malykh, whose team evacuated the *Origami Deer* sculpture from a Pokrovsk park to serve as the centerpiece of the 2024 Ukrainian Pavilion, condemned the Biennale’s claim of neutrality as a hollow falsehood.

    “You can’t stay neutral in these times. You can’t be neutral when people are dying every day because of Russians,” Malykh said. “Nobody is talking about their art. They are only talking about the statement that they are here, and I am absolutely sure this was their goal.”

    Organizers have placed unprecedented restrictions on the Russian Pavilion: it will only operate to invited guests during the preview week that ends Friday, and will remain closed to the general public for the entire 6.5-month public run that begins Saturday. Russian curators declined to comment for this report. The decision to allow Russian participation has already carried major financial consequences: the EU has cut 2 million euros ($2.3 million) in three-year funding for the Biennale over the move, and Biennale leadership’s position has also put it at odds with the Italian national government. Even the official event catalog acknowledges the uncertainty, leaving a placeholder entry where the Russian pavilion’s statement would normally appear and noting that participation was “under review” when the catalog went to press.

    The jury’s resignation has also upended one of the Biennale’s most iconic traditions: the awarding of Golden Lion prizes, the event’s highest honor that has drawn comparisons to Olympic medals for the art world. With no professional jury in place, no jury-awarded Golden Lions will be handed out this year for best national pavilion and best main exhibition participant. Instead, visitors will vote for two winners, which will be announced on November 22, the final day of the exhibition. Malykh argues that the shift undermines the Biennale’s institutional credibility.

    “It’s an important moment. If the prize is given by the public… It’s not a professional institution after that,” Malykh said.

  • Israeli officers ‘threaten Gaza flotilla activists with death’ during interrogations

    Israeli officers ‘threaten Gaza flotilla activists with death’ during interrogations

    The detention of two humanitarian activists by Israeli forces in international waters has sparked international outcry, as legal representatives reveal the pair have been subjected to routine psychological abuse, poor detention conditions and explicit threats of death or decades-long imprisonment. The two men — Thiago Avila, a Brazilian national, and Saif Abu Keshek, a Spanish-Swedish citizen of Palestinian descent — were seized last Wednesday when Israeli naval forces intercepted the Global Sumud Flotilla, a civilian convoy carrying humanitarian aid to the blockaded Gaza Strip, approximately 600 nautical miles off Gaza’s coast near the Greek island of Crete.

    In total, Israeli forces intercepted at least 21 vessels during the raid, detaining 175 activists across the convoy. Flotilla organizers have labeled the interception, which took place far outside Israel’s recognized territorial boundaries, as an unambiguous act of piracy on the high seas.

    Adalah, the Israeli legal center representing Avila and Abu Keshek, released a detailed statement on Monday outlining the abusive conditions the two men have endured since their capture. Both have been held in solitary confinement for more than a week, held in cells kept at extremely low temperatures and illuminated by constant bright lighting — a well-documented coercive tactic used to induce sleep deprivation and psychological disorientation. Whenever the pair are removed from their cells, even for scheduled medical check-ups, they are forced to wear blindfolds, a practice Adalah says constitutes a severe violation of international medical ethics.

    Avila has been subjected to repeated interrogations lasting as long as eight hours at a time, during which interrogators allegedly threatened that he and Abu Keshek would either be killed or locked away for a century. Both men deny the multiple serious charges filed against them, which include assisting an enemy during wartime, maintaining contact with a foreign agent, membership in a designated terrorist organization, providing services to that group, and transferring funds to the organization.

    In protest against their unlawful seizure and abusive detention conditions, Avila and Abu Keshek have entered their sixth day of a hunger strike. Last Tuesday, an Ashkelon District Court extended their pre-trial detention until Sunday. Legal team members Hadeel Abu Salih and Lubna Tuma argued in court that the entire case is fundamentally flawed and illegal, emphasizing that Israel has no legal jurisdiction to apply its domestic law to foreign nationals seized in international waters far from its own territory.

    The interception has already drawn formal condemnation from the activists’ home countries. On Friday, the governments of Spain and Brazil released a joint statement declaring the detention of Avila and Abu Keshek to be illegal under international law.

  • France reckons with Nazi-looted art in new Paris museum gallery

    France reckons with Nazi-looted art in new Paris museum gallery

    PARIS – Nearly 83 years after it was seized by Nazi agents in occupied Paris for Adolf Hitler’s personal collection, an 1891 Alfred Stevens painting of two children staring out over the Normandy coast has found a new, permanent public home at Paris’ Musée d’Orsay. More than that, it anchors a groundbreaking new exhibition space unlike any other in France: the first permanent gallery dedicated entirely to “orphaned” works of art looted during the Nazi era, pieces whose rightful pre-war owners have never been identified. For France, the opening marks a major step forward in the nation’s slow, decades-long reckoning with its own role in the mass plunder of Jewish property during the Holocaust.

    The Stevens canvas was one of hundreds of thousands of artworks swept up in the systematic Nazi seizure of property from Jewish families across occupied Europe. Acquired in Paris in 1942 specifically for Hitler, it was originally destined for the Führer’s planned grand cultural complex, the never-built Führermuseum in his hometown of Linz, Austria, before being reassigned to his private mountain retreat in Bavaria in 1943. After Germany’s defeat in World War II, the famous Monuments Men – the Allied recovery team later immortalized in George Clooney’s 2014 feature film – tracked the painting down and returned it to France. To this day, however, no heir has come forward to claim it, and no records confirm who owned it before its 1942 seizure.

    The Stevens work is far from alone. Across France, 2,200 unclaimed looted artworks are held under the designation MNR, short for *Musées Nationaux Récupération* (National Museums Recovery). These works, recovered from Germany and Austria in the aftermath of the war, were entrusted to French national museums in the early 1950s. The French state does not claim ownership of the pieces; instead, it holds them in permanent trust for any rightful heirs who may eventually come forward. The Musée d’Orsay currently holds 225 of these orphaned works, 13 of which are on display in the new gallery.

    What makes this exhibition space unique beyond its focus is its intentional design: every work is hung to allow visitors to examine the back of each canvas, where the original stamps, inventory marks, and transit labels trace the journey of each piece from stolen private property into Nazi hands. The museum has also launched a dedicated new research unit, staffed by six Franco-German provenance researchers led by the Orsay’s head of provenance research Ines Rotermund-Reynard, to systematically investigate each work’s history and track down potential heirs.

    The opening of the gallery caps more than half a century of growing public acknowledgement of France’s role in Nazi-era plunder. For decades after the war, France largely stayed silent about the collaboration of its wartime Vichy government, which not only assisted in the deportation of 80,000 French Jews to death camps but also oversaw a thriving Paris art market that profited from the sale of property seized from murdered and displaced Jewish families. It was not until 1995 that then-President Jacques Chirac formally acknowledged the French state’s own responsibility for crimes of the Vichy era, standing at the site of the 1942 Vél d’Hiv mass roundup of Jewish Parisians. A national inquiry into Nazi art looting launched two years later accelerated efforts to return works to their rightful owners.

    Of the roughly 100,000 cultural objects looted from France during the Nazi occupation, around 60,000 were recovered after the war, and 45,000 were returned to their owners. Roughly 15,000 works remained without a known owner, and the 2,200 MNR works were selected from that pool. For nearly 40 years, between 1954 and 1993, France returned only four MNR works to heirs. Since Chirac’s 1995 acknowledgement, the Orsay alone has returned 15 works, most recently two pieces by Alfred Sisley and Auguste Renoir that were handed over to the heirs of Jewish collector Grégoire Schusterman in 2024.

    The 13 works on display in the new gallery each carry the unmistakeable imprint of the Holocaust. A Degas copy of a 1879 Berlin ballroom scene was purchased by Jewish collector Fernand Ochsé in 1919; Ochsé was deported to Auschwitz and murdered during the occupation. A Renoir portrait of the wife of writer Alphonse Daudet was sold to a German museum in Cologne in 1941, with no record surviving of who sold the looted work. A Paul Cézanne canvas dismissed as a fake by a Louvre curator in the 1950s has recently been re-evaluated and may well be an authentic work by the Post-Impressionist master.

    Early visitors to the new gallery say the transparent display changes how they engage with the history of these works. Daniel Lévy, a software engineer from Strasbourg who visited on opening day, stopped to examine the Cézanne’s back marking. “You walk past these labels your whole life and you do not read them. Now I will read them,” he said. “My grandmother lost some of her family in the camps. Some of these paintings were probably hanging in homes like hers.” Another visitor, retired Lyon schoolteacher Marie Duboisse, noted she had seen the MNR designation on works at the Louvre for years without understanding what it meant, having previously assumed it marked a donor.

    Historians and curators emphasize that the mass looting of Jewish art could not have happened on the scale it did without the active participation of the Paris art world. In the early 20th century, Paris was the richest art hub in Western Europe, and the city’s central auction house Hôtel Drouot reopened just months after the Nazi occupation began in 1940, running continuous sales of looted and forced-sale property through the entire war. French art dealers acted as middlemen for German buyers, with Hitler’s agents taking the most coveted works for Hitler’s personal collection and Nazi officials.

    “Almost every museum in Nazi Germany sent buyers to Paris to expand its collections,” Rotermund-Reynard explained. “Hitler himself wanted to build the world’s largest museum, in Linz, the city in Austria where he grew up. Hermann Göring, Hitler’s deputy, traveled 21 times to Paris during the occupation to help himself to works taken from Jewish collectors. There was an enormous thirst both for the possessions of Jewish collectors, and for acquisitions to expand the German museums.” For Rotermund-Reynard, the looting cannot be separated from the broader genocide of Jewish people: “All of this is part of the history of the Shoah. When you try to understand this drive to take from Jewish families, it is part of the terrifying Nazi ideology to erase Jewish life.”

    While the gallery was not created specifically as a response to rising antisemitism in France, curators say its opening carries new weight amid a recent surge in anti-Jewish acts. According to the French Interior Ministry, antisemitic incidents reached near-record levels of 1,320 in 2025, following a sharp increase after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. “There is no statute of limitations on these crimes,” said François Blanchetière, the Orsay’s chief sculpture curator and co-curator of the new gallery. The mission of the space, he explained, is to bring the hidden history of these works into the open, and continue the work of repairing the harm of the Holocaust, one canvas at a time.