分类： world

Four and a half years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a little-discussed but increasingly consequential development has reshaped the conflict’s dynamics: North Korea’s deepening military commitment to Moscow’s campaign. What began as a 2024 deployment of 13,000 elite North Korean troops to defend Russia’s Kursk region amid a Ukrainian offensive has evolved into a long-term, mutually beneficial arrangement that carries sweeping geopolitical ramifications for Europe and East Asia alike.

When North Korean soldiers first entered the Kursk battlefield in late 2024, their presence was unacknowledged by both Moscow and Pyongyang. Ukrainian forces did not confirm their first encounters with the newly deployed troops until November that year, and the first live North Korean prisoner of war was not taken until January 2025. It was only in April 2025 that Russia officially recognized their contribution, with Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov publicly praising their battlefield heroism.

Accounts from Ukrainian troops who faced the North Korean detachments paint a stark picture of their early combat performance. Members of Ukraine’s 95th Air Assault Brigade described North Korean forces as relying on relentless massed assaults, wave after wave of troops advancing on the same positions even after heavy casualties. Early in the campaign, the elite Storm Corps troops – handpicked from North Korea’s most indoctrinated military units – suffered staggering losses: Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR) estimates 3,000 killed and another 1,500 wounded, while a BBC analysis of North Korean memorial sites puts the confirmed death toll at 2,300.

Ukrainian troops also noted critical gaps in the North Korean force’s equipment and coordination with Russian allies. Many troops were found lacking basic protective gear including body armor, helmets and adequate winter clothing, and communication between Russian and North Korean units was reportedly poor. Most strikingly, captured North Korean soldiers and evidence from fallen troops confirm Pyongyang’s strict prohibition on surrender: almost all troops carry suicide ordnance, and thousands chose to kill themselves rather than be captured, a practice publicly celebrated as heroic by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. To date, only two North Korean soldiers have been taken alive by Ukrainian forces – both captured by accident after being incapacitated by combat injuries.

Despite the heavy human cost, analysts and officials agree that the initial Kursk deployment has already delivered transformative benefits for North Korea’s isolated, sanctions-battered regime. Economically, South Korean security analyst Lim Soo-ho estimates that arms sales and troop deployments to Russia have netted North Korea close to $10 billion over two and a half years – a sum equal to one-third of the country’s entire annual GDP. In exchange for its military contribution, Pyongyang receives critically needed supplies of food, energy and hard currency from Russia, which refuses to enforce international sanctions on the North Korean regime.

Beyond immediate economic gains, the partnership with Moscow has reshaped North Korea’s geopolitical position. For decades, North Korea relied heavily on China for diplomatic and economic support, but its deepening military cooperation with Russia has allowed Kim Jong Un to diversify his country’s alliances and position Pyongyang as a key player in the emerging multipolar order Kim describes as a “new Cold War.” That shift was formalized last September, when Kim stood alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin in the first trilateral public meeting of the three leaders, marking Pyongyang’s arrival as a core member of the anti-Western bloc.

Militarily, the deployment has given North Korea an unprecedented opportunity to test its troops against modern Western-backed weaponry. “North Korea now knows what modern combat is about,” notes Dr. Yang Uk, a research fellow at Seoul’s Asan Institute for Policy Studies. While early tactics proved costly against Ukrainian drone and artillery fire, Yang says North Korean forces rapidly adapted their tactics to the realities of 21st-century warfare, lessons that will strengthen Pyongyang’s own military capabilities for decades to come.

Today, the remaining 8,500 North Korean troops already deployed to Russia are stationed in four brigades under Russia’s “North” Group of Forces, tasked with defending the Kursk region border against further Ukrainian incursions. HUR confirms no North Korean combat troops have been deployed to Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory so far – but that could soon change.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued repeated warnings that North Korea is preparing to deploy up to 50,000 additional troops to Russia, up from an earlier estimate of 30,000, and is preparing to ship additional ballistic weapons to Moscow. Zelensky says preparations for the new deployment are already underway in Russia’s Voronezh region, and he has repeatedly called on South Korea – Ukraine’s ally, which has so far only provided non-lethal aid to Kyiv – to supply advanced air defense systems to counter the expanding North Korean-Russian military partnership.

For Russia, the growing North Korean deployment comes as Moscow faces a crippling manpower shortage four and a half years into its full-scale invasion. Western and Ukrainian intelligence estimates indicate Russia loses roughly 6,000 more troops each month than it can recruit, forcing Moscow to turn to foreign fighters from across the globe to fill its ranks. For North Korea, the arrangement remains a profitable, high-stakes gamble that has already reshaped its global standing – and analysts agree Pyongyang will continue to supply troops and weapons to Russia so long as the benefits outweigh the cost.

The fate of the two captured North Korean soldiers remains unresolved. Both men have explicitly stated they fear returning to North Korea, where they say their families would be punished with execution for their capture, and have requested resettlement in South Korea. While Seoul has agreed to accept them, Ukraine has not yet formalized the transfer, and Russia is the only party that has formally requested their repatriation. Kyiv says it will abide by international human rights rules that prohibit forcing prisoners of war to return to countries where they face persecution, leaving their future in limbo even as a new wave of North Korean troops prepares to deploy to the conflict.

A sharp new wave of escalation has swept across the Middle East this week, driven by cross-border attacks from Yemen’s Houthi movement against Saudi military infrastructure and a separate long-range drone strike on a critical Saudi oil pipeline that has sparked a cross-border investigation involving Iraq and Iran.

On Sunday, the Houthi group formally claimed responsibility for a combined coordinated assault that mixed ballistic missiles and unmanned aerial drones against a major Saudi military installation located in the kingdom’s southern region. Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree confirmed in an official statement that the target of the operation was the Sharurah military base, where the group says key weapons stockpiles and command centers directing Saudi-led military operations against Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen are based. Saree added that all projectiles struck their intended targets, and issued a stark warning that future attacks would reach deeper into Saudi territory if cross-border military campaigns against Yemeni targets do not end.

Sunday’s attack comes amid a dramatic intensification of ground and air clashes between Houthi fighters and troops loyal to Yemen’s internationally recognized government, which receives extensive military backing from Riyadh. On the same day as the Houthi cross-border strike, Yemen’s official military announced it had carried out three separate air raids against Houthi outposts and troop barracks in the contested Taiz region. Local media aligned with the recognized Yemeni government, September Net, later confirmed that the air strikes resulted in multiple Houthi combatant casualties.

This latest round of violence builds on days of shifting territorial gains across Yemen: the Houthis have seized large swathes of territory in western Yemen in recent operations, while government-aligned forces have reported incremental advances in the northern al-Jawf province that lies along the Saudi-Yemeni border. Clashes have also intensified in and around the Red Sea coastal city of Mocha, a key strategic hub in southwestern Yemen.

Parallel to the violence in Yemen, a separate attack earlier this week has raised broader regional security concerns. On Thursday, Saudi officials confirmed that drones launched from Iraqi territory struck the kingdom’s critical East-West oil pipeline, an energy artery that carries crude from eastern oil fields to the western Red Sea coast, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. As a precautionary safety measure, Saudi authorities immediately shut down the pipeline following the attack.

Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera reported that Saudi investigators have traced the drone launch site to Iraq’s southeastern Maysan province, located along the Iran-Iraq border, approximately 800 kilometers from Riyadh and 1,100 kilometers from Medina. The distance of the strike from the target, Al Jazeera noted, indicates the drones used were not short-range tactical models, but advanced long-range systems. In the wake of the attack, Iraqi officials have publicly requested that Saudi Arabia refrain from any retaliatory action against Iraqi territory.

Iraqi security forces have since moved to secure the area, announcing that they have located and seized the drone launch platform suspected of being used in the pipeline attack. Lieutenant General Saad Maan, head of Iraq’s Security Media Cell, told state media that a joint task force of security and intelligence personnel successfully tracked down the launch equipment. Forensic and technical investigative teams are still working to process evidence from the site and identify the individuals and groups responsible for the strike.

In a notable development, General Maan confirmed that Iraq’s top commander has approved an official request from Iran to allow Iranian investigators to participate in the probe and review all collected evidence. Baghdad has also maintained direct real-time communication with Saudi security officials to share intelligence updates as the investigation progresses.

“Iraq adopts the principle of ‘preventive sovereignty’, which means not only preventing attacks on our territory, but also not allowing our land to be a launching pad against any other country, or for Iraq to be part of a proxy war,” Maan told Iraq’s state-run Iraqi News Agency. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, Iraqi authorities temporarily closed three key border crossings with Iran — Shalamcheh, Chazabeh and Mandali — to carry out mandatory security inspections, before partially reopening the crossings to allow limited humanitarian traffic to resume.

The overlapping outbreaks of violence come as international and regional pressure mounts on Baghdad to prevent its territory from being used as a staging ground for attacks connected to the broader, long-running confrontations roiling the Middle East.

This past weekend, the Indian capital played host to a high-stakes gathering of global leaders at the 2026 Brics Summit, bringing together heads of state from a bloc that has increasingly positioned itself as a counterweight to Western-dominated global governance. Opening the summit, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi framed the group’s collective mission: to evolve from passive “rule-takers” in the existing global order to active “rule-shapers” that reflect the interests of the world’s emerging economies. Among the attendees were heavyweight leaders including Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, newly inaugurated Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

It is no understatement to call this assembly of leaders remarkable on its own. Brics’ current membership brings together nations with long-running disputes, competing geopolitical interests, and even recent military conflicts. The 2020 deadly border clash between India and China remains a source of underlying tension, while Iran and the United Arab Emirates have found themselves on opposite sides of the ongoing Middle East war that has roiled global energy markets and sent shockwaves through the global economy. That India managed to bring all these rival leaders together for in-person talks stands as a major demonstration of New Delhi’s growing diplomatic clout, and offered a rare space for powers to reassess their bilateral relationships in the wake of escalating regional conflict.

Despite this diplomatic win, the summit was defined by underlying tensions between members with competing visions for the bloc’s future. For core members including China, Russia, and Iran, Brics serves as a key tool to reduce the geopolitical and economic influence of the United States and Western Europe. But India has long rejected framing the bloc as an explicitly anti-Western alliance, a position driven by New Delhi’s goal of maintaining strategic ties with both Western and non-Western powers. “The group is not against anyone,” Modi emphasized in his opening remarks. Veteran Indian diplomat and former ambassador Anil Trigunayat explained that India’s core goal for the summit was to advance collective strategic autonomy for Global South nations amid a period of widespread geopolitical conflict, rather than positioning the bloc as a hostile counter to the West. “There are countries in the grouping which would like it to become anti-western, but it is not that,” Trigunayat noted.

Against a backdrop of stark divisions that had derailed two previous joint ministerial statements earlier this year, the summit did achieve a rare milestone: the adoption of the consensus-based New Delhi Declaration. What the declaration omits, however, is as notable as what it includes. To reach consensus, negotiators side-stepped the bloc’s most divisive issues, offering only vague language that avoided assigning blame for ongoing conflicts. On the escalating Middle East war, the text calls for “maximum restraint,” condemns attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities, and reaffirms support for a two-state solution for Palestinians while opposing forced displacement and prolonged occupation – but names no responsible parties. In a sharp break from previous Brics declarations, the text makes no mention whatsoever of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. On trade and economic policy, the declaration voices concern over “indiscriminate rising tariffs” and condemns unilateral punitive sanctions, but again avoids naming the United States, a choice widely seen as an effort to avoid triggering backlash from the Trump administration. Trump has previously labeled Brics’ collaborative initiatives, including plans for linked cross-border central bank digital currencies, as explicitly “anti-American,” leading many member states to avoid provoking his anger. Praveen Donthi, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, noted that the vague, un-named framing of contentious issues bears the clear mark of India’s negotiating approach. “Not mentioning any country by name, even as they condemned the conflict in the Middle East, bears the hallmark of India,” Donthi said, adding that the inclusion of strong language on tariffs was a notable surprise, as it allowed India to quietly convey its economic displeasure without direct confrontation.

Beyond the formal declaration, the summit created space for diplomatic breakthroughs that seemed unthinkable just months earlier. Most notably, Iranian President Pezeshkian held face-to-face talks with Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince – the highest-level in-person meeting between the two rival states since the outbreak of the latest Middle East war. For Iran, which is facing intense military pressure from the U.S. and Israel, sweeping American sanctions, a U.S.-led naval blockade of its ports, and Washington’s “Operation Economic Outcast” campaign to isolate Tehran globally, the summit offered a critical opportunity to demonstrate that it remains a respected global actor with regional and international partners. Pezeshkian used his time at the summit to push for deeper economic integration and expanded trade ties with other Brics members, including Malaysia, India, and Ethiopia.

The summit also marked a key milestone for India and China: it was President Xi’s first visit to New Delhi in seven years, a trip that came amid gradual de-escalation of border tensions that reached a crisis point with the 2020 Galwan Valley clash. While deep mistrust and a massive lopsided trade imbalance in Beijing’s favor remain unresolved, the two leaders held cordial talks, agreeing to expand bilateral business ties, improve cross-border transport links, and work to reduce remaining trade barriers. Though Xi stayed less than 24 hours and skipped the summit’s gala dinner, trading only a handshake rather than Modi’s signature welcoming hug, Trigunayat framed the meeting as part of a gradual warming of bilateral ties, driven by mutual interest in cooperation. “We have to trust, but verify first,” he noted, adding that whether the talks will produce tangible long-term progress remains to be seen.

Ultimately, the 2026 Brics Summit in New Delhi made clear that the bloc has carved out a unique role in global politics: it provides a space for rival powers to talk, advance their shared interests in reforming the global order, and operate outside the framework of Western-led international institutions. The core question that remains unanswered, however, is what comes next. While all members agree that a more inclusive, multipolar global order is needed now more than ever, reaching consensus on what that new order should look like, and how to achieve it, remains the bloc’s greatest unmet challenge.

A deadly ferry incident in Indonesia’s Java Sea has left one person dead, with search and rescue teams racing to locate dozens of missing passengers after the vessel lost contact amid severe bad weather, national search authorities confirmed.

The stricken vessel, identified as Virgo Transport 8, was carrying a total of 243 passengers and crew when it ran into distress on its scheduled route from Surabaya, East Java, to Banjarmasin, the capital of South Kalimantan on Borneo. The last official communication from the ship was received at approximately 2:00 a.m. local time on Sunday, when it was located around 150 kilometers south of its destination port of Banjarmasin. Contact was abruptly lost shortly after that, triggering an immediate large-scale rescue response.

As of the latest official update, 102 people have been pulled from the sea safely by responding teams. The search operation remains active, with multiple dedicated search and rescue vessels and a helicopter deployed to the incident zone. Authorities have also issued an alert to all commercial and private ships transiting through that section of the Java Sea, asking mariners to immediately report any sightings of debris or missing passengers to rescue coordination centers.

This latest maritime incident comes just one month after another ferry emergency off Indonesia’s Madura Island, where a vessel fire claimed five lives. For the world’s largest archipelagic nation, which comprises more than 17,000 separate islands spread across thousands of kilometers of ocean, ferries serve as the primary and most widely used mode of inter-island transport for both passengers and cargo. The country’s long history of maritime accidents has repeatedly raised questions about safety standards for domestic ferry operations, particularly during monsoon season when severe weather and rough seas are common.

Indonesia’s national search and rescue agency has not yet released additional details on the exact cause of the Virgo Transport 8 incident, nor the identities of the fatality and missing passengers. Authorities have pledged to continue search operations until all remaining people on board are accounted for.

In comments made Saturday, former U.S. President Donald Trump revealed that Yemen’s Houthi movement has privately reached out to the United States, calling for Washington to stay out of its intensifying military conflict with Saudi Arabia. “The Houthis called us, and they let us know that they don’t want to fight with us. They don’t want me to go after them,” Trump stated publicly.

Trump further noted that the Houthi group has allowed the vast majority of commercial vessels to pass unimpeded through regional waters, adding that their hostility is focused solely on a single nation. He also indicated he expects to resolve the ongoing standoff through diplomatic channels.

Trump’s remarks came in the wake of a rapid, large-scale Houthi military advance across Yemen’s Red Sea coastline this week. In a lightning offensive, the Iran-aligned movement captured a broad stretch of territory along the strategic waterway, including key islands and control of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait — a critical global shipping chokepoint that sits between Eritrea, Djibouti, and Yemen. The strait serves as the primary transit route for crude oil shipments leaving Saudi Arabia bound for Asian markets, making its control a critical geopolitical and economic flashpoint.

According to a Friday report from Axios, Saudi Arabia — which backs Yemen’s internationally recognized government — had formally asked the Trump administration twice to launch direct military strikes against Houthi targets as the group advanced on the Red Sea chokepoint. Trump, the outlet confirmed, turned down both requests.

The escalation of tensions extended beyond Yemen this week. On Friday, Saudi Arabia announced it had temporarily halted operations through its key East-West Pipeline after a drone attack launched from Iraqi territory targeted the infrastructure. The kingdom said it would hold off on retaliatory action at the request of the Iraqi government.

In response to the incident, Iraqi authorities launched an official investigation, confirming that security forces had located drone launch platforms in the al-Tib region near the Iraq-Iran border. Following the discovery, the Iraqi government ordered the temporary closure of three border crossings connecting the country to Iran.

When asked about the pipeline attack, Trump said he believes Iran was “probably” responsible for the strike that originated in Iraqi territory, though he offered no concrete evidence to support the claim. The former president also added that he had spoken by phone with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whom he referred to as a personal friend.

This week has also seen the Houthis step up cross-border attacks directly targeting Saudi energy infrastructure, launching a large-scale wave of drone and missile strikes against Saudi oil facilities. The expanding scope of the conflict has stoked global market fears of potential disruption to energy supplies, which could push already volatile oil prices even higher.

In the most recent incident Saturday evening, just hours after Saudi authorities issued public warnings of imminent potential attacks, a Houthi projectile wounded two people in a southern Saudi region bordering Yemen.