分类： world

On Friday, the Norwegian Nobel Committee made a landmark announcement, naming 85-year-old veteran South African jurist Navi Pillay as the recipient of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. Pillay, who most recently chaired the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, was recognized for her decades-long, trailblazing work advancing global peace and the rule of international law.

The committee lauded Pillay as a figure of extraordinary courage and unwavering integrity who has paved the way for a more robust, inclusive global legal framework. In its official citation, the panel emphasized Pillay’s foundational role in pushing for accountability for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of genocide, noting that her work has fundamentally shaped the landscape of international criminal justice.

In her first public remarks following the announcement, delivered at the Nuremberg Palace of Justice’s historic Courtroom 600— the same venue that hosted the landmark post-WWII trials of Nazi war criminals—Pillay centered her most recent high-profile work: the UN commission’s 2025 authoritative report that found Israel responsible for acts of genocide in the Gaza Strip.

“The final work I have led is this report on Gaza, which names what is unfolding there for what it is: genocide,” Pillay told the gathering of friends and colleagues. Addressing widespread praise for her courage in releasing the report, she pushed back on the framing, asking: “Why would you need courage to speak the truth?”

Pillay’s career in international justice spans nearly 30 years, marked by a string of historic firsts that redefined global accountability for mass atrocities. Hand-picked for international service by then-South African President Nelson Mandela in 1995, she joined the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), tasked with prosecuting perpetrators of the 1994 Rwandan genocide. She would go on to serve as the tribunal’s president from 1999 to 2003, and under her leadership, the ICTR secured the first ever legal convictions for genocide in international judicial history.

As ICTR president, Pillay also established a groundbreaking jurisprudential precedent: she formally ruled that rape and sexual violence can be classified as acts of genocide, rather than secondary byproducts of conflict. That ruling, issued in the landmark Akayesu case, transformed how global courts address gender-based violence in mass atrocity contexts.

A founding judge of the permanent International Criminal Court, Pillay currently serves as an ad hoc judge at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), where she is currently participating in proceedings to determine whether Myanmar committed genocide against the Rohingya ethnic minority. She previously served as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014, expanding the office’s global reach and advocacy for marginalized communities.

In an interview with Middle East Eye’s *Expert Witness* podcast last year, Pillay connected her early groundbreaking work on sexual violence and genocide directly to her findings in Gaza. She explained that the UN commission identified clear parallels between the patterns of violence documented in the Akayesu case and the situation unfolding in Gaza.

“We found that widespread and gender-based violence was instrumentalized, not only as punishment against individual Palestinians, but as part of a deliberate pattern of collective punishment designed to fracture, humiliate, and subjugate the entire Palestinian population,” Pillay explained. She added that the legal precedent she helped set decades ago is directly applicable to the atrocities being committed in Gaza today.

The Nobel Committee explicitly highlighted both Pillay’s decades of precedent-setting judicial work and her recent findings on Gaza in its decision to award her the prize. The panel warned that global commitment to the rule of law is increasingly under threat, noting that international judges today face growing sanctions and attacks on the independent judicial institutions they represent.

“History has shown that a world operating without the rule of law is unjust, unwise and inhumane,” the committee said. “The judges—those who guard the thin red line between order and chaos—are therefore highly deserving of our praise. But today, as these same judges are sanctioned, and their institutions are attacked, we need people of courage, vision and determination—qualities that Navi Pillay demonstrates in every aspect of her work on the bench.”

This report was originally published by Middle East Eye, an independent media outlet that provides in-depth, unrivaled coverage of the Middle East, North Africa, and broader global affairs.

Amid swirling speculation of impending American military escalation against Iran, former U.S. President Donald Trump announced Thursday that no new attacks on the Islamic Republic will occur before the country’s November 3 midterm congressional elections. The announcement came via a post on his Truth Social platform, where Trump also noted that ongoing diplomatic talks with Tehran are yielding productive progress.

Trump’s public clarification followed multiple media reports fueling fears of imminent conflict. Axios, an outlet widely viewed as having close ties to Trump and his inner circle, was among the first to claim the U.S. Pentagon was drawing up plans for a new wave of high-intensity strikes against Iranian targets. The Atlantic separately reported that Trump was actively weighing a pre-election military attack to shift the political landscape ahead of the critical vote that will decide which party controls Congress.

As rumors of conflict spread, and following confirmation of fresh vessel attacks in the Persian Gulf, global energy markets reacted sharply. Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, jumped 4.5% in trading on Thursday. Two commercial tankers were targeted in attacks Wednesday: one off the coast of Qatar, roughly 500 kilometers west of the Strait of Hormuz, and a second off Oman’s coast outside the key shipping waterway.

While direct armed confrontation between the U.S. and Iran has largely calmed in recent weeks, the two nations remain locked in a tense struggle over control of critical global energy chokepoints including the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. On this front, the U.S. has thus far held the upper hand: energy analytics firm Kpler reported that total oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz returned to nearly 90% of pre-conflict levels by late September. However, supplies of refined petroleum products remain constrained, with refined fuel flows through Hormuz stuck at roughly half their pre-war volume. This supply squeeze has driven sharp price increases for U.S. consumers, creating major political risk for Trump ahead of the midterms. Over the past month alone, U.S. diesel prices have surged 14% to an average of roughly $6 per gallon, placing additional strain on household budgets and business operations across the country.

The regional crisis, sparked by the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran, has now escalated into a broader conflict centered on Yemen, where Saudi Arabia and a coalition of allies are working to push back Houthi forces following a sweeping Houthi offensive along the Red Sea coast last month. The Houthis, who control large swathes of northern Yemen, are backed by Iran with arms and training, and oppose Saudi Arabia’s support for Yemen’s internationally recognized government. This week, Riyadh activated a new joint defense pact with two new regional partners, Turkey and Pakistan, marking a major shift in regional security alliances.

Middle East Eye was the first outlet to report that Turkey would deploy advanced weapons systems including air defense batteries, along with military personnel, to support Saudi defense operations. Pakistan separately confirmed to CNN that it would also send weapons to bolster Saudi security. The involvement of Ankara and Islamabad has raised urgent questions about how deeply the two countries will commit to the conflict against the Houthis. Both nations have clear strategic goals: they aim to strengthen bilateral ties with Saudi Arabia and position themselves as reliable guarantors of a new regional security framework, amid growing global uncertainty over long-term U.S. commitment to the Middle East. At the same time, both countries are cautious about becoming trapped in a protracted conflict with an Iranian-aligned group that controls territory along one of the world’s busiest international trade routes.

The U.S. has so far declined to join open combat operations against the Houthi movement. On Thursday, The New York Times published a report claiming Pakistani warplanes had conducted airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen. The Pakistani government quickly issued a formal denial, clarifying that it would only provide defensive support to Saudi Arabia and would not engage in offensive operations inside Yemen.

Tensions around the Yemeni front spiked further this week following a series of cross-border attacks. Saudi Arabia has blamed the Houthis for strikes on the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina, claims the group has repeatedly denied. The Houthis have garnered broad sympathy across much of the Arab and Muslim world for their strikes targeting Israeli shipping, which the group says are a protest against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza that began after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on southern Israel. The Gaza assault has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians to date, a death toll that has led the United Nations and multiple genocide scholars to label the campaign a genocide.

Most regional states including Qatar, Syria and Somalia have publicly condemned Houthi strikes against Saudi territory. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan reiterated Thursday that Turkey supports Saudi Arabia’s backing of Yemen’s legitimate government against the Houthis, but emphasized the new defense pact is strictly defensive in nature. “When a country party to the pact comes under attack, you stand by it in its defence. This is not an offensive agreement. Turkey will not send troops to another country to carry out attacks on its territory,” Fidan stated.

Despite Riyadh’s ongoing offensive against Houthi positions in Yemen, the group has continued to launch powerful retaliatory strikes deep into Saudi territory. On Wednesday, the Houthis claimed responsibility for coordinated attacks on Abha International Airport in southern Saudi Arabia and King Khalid International Airport in the capital Riyadh, which left at least three people dead. The group launched a second strike on Riyadh’s main airport on Thursday, with social media video footage showing at least two drones striking the facility. Regional officials speaking to Middle East Eye confirmed that at least one commercial Saudi aircraft suffered severe damage in the attack.

The cross-border strikes have dealt a significant blow to Saudi Arabia’s efforts to position itself as a stable global business and tourism hub. While neighboring Gulf states including Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates suffered widespread disruption and attack damage after the U.S.-Israeli strike on Iran, Saudi Arabia had thus far remained largely unscathed. Following this week’s attacks, Germany’s flagship carrier Lufthansa announced Thursday it would suspend all flights to Riyadh until October 16, the most high-profile international business reaction to the escalating instability.

Just one day before the two-year anniversary of the October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel, Israeli authorities have demolished multiple structures belonging to Yousef Zyadna, a Palestinian Bedouin citizen of Israel who drew widespread praise across Israel for rescuing 30 Israelis from the deadly Nova music festival massacre. The demolitions are part of a long-running state campaign targeting unapproved construction in Bedouin communities in the Negev (Naqab) region, and Zyadna’s neighborhood faces a total of 65 pending demolition orders that threaten to displace dozens of families.

According to local Israeli news outlet Local Call, dozens of Israeli bulldozers entered Zyadna’s neighborhood near the southern Bedouin city of Rahat on Monday, leveling a warehouse and chicken coop owned by Zyadna, as well as the home of his nephew. The newlywed nephew had already demolished the home himself to avoid the humiliation of a state-forced demolition, social commentator Zachary Foster reported on social media. Zyadna, a part-time minibus driver, drove to the festival grounds in the early hours of the October 7 attacks to ferry trapped attendees to safety, an act of bravery that later earned him a public award at Israel’s Friends of Zion Museum.

Despite the loss of his family’s property, Zyadna says he holds no regret for his actions on October 7. “These are our values. This is how we were raised,” he told Local Call. Tragically, the Zyadna family already suffered devastating loss from the October 7 attacks: four family members were taken hostage by Hamas, and while two were released in a November 2023 hostage exchange, two others—Hamza and Yousef—died in captivity, with their remains only returned to the family in January 2025. Zyadna says he holds Ottoman-era land documents that prove his family has lived on the land continuously long before the founding of the State of Israel, and he remains defiant in the face of the state’s demolition campaign. “I will not leave my land,” he said.

The demolitions have drawn sharp condemnation from Israeli opposition politicians, who describe the action as a moral failure that betrays the spirit of coexistence Zyadna came to represent. “Yousef Zyadna is an Israeli hero and a symbol of coexistence,” said Knesset member Naama Lazimi of the opposition Democratic Party. “Monday’s demolition is a moral and ethical disgrace. The shared trauma and solidarity of October 7 cannot remain only in ceremonies and speeches. It must also be expressed in policy, in recognition of heroism, and in the state’s responsibility toward all of its citizens.”

Zyadna also revealed that he has required ongoing mental health treatment in the years since the October 7 attacks, but the Israeli state has provided no financial support for his care. He canceled a planned scheduled media interview just days after the demolition, inviting reporters to instead come to his neighborhood to see the destruction firsthand.

The demolitions targeting Zyadna’s community are part of a broader policy pushed by Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who has made clearing so-called illegal construction in Bedouin Negev communities a central policy priority. Ben Gvr frames the campaign as an effort to “restore governance” to the region, and just one day after the Rahat demolitions, he celebrated additional home demolitions in occupied East Jerusalem on social media platform X, writing, “The bulldozers of governance never rest for a moment.”

Bedouin communities make up roughly a third of the Negev’s total population, numbering around 320,000 people. For decades, Bedouin communities in the region have faced systemic displacement and dispossession, and they remain among the poorest and most socially marginalized groups in Israeli society. Rahat, the city near Zyadna’s neighborhood, was itself established decades ago as part of a state campaign to force Bedouin communities off their ancestral grazing lands and into concentrated, state-approved settled communities.

On Wednesday, a fatal attack carried out by Israeli settlers against Palestinian agricultural workers in the occupied West Bank left one farmer dead and nine others injured, marking the latest escalation in a documented wave of settler violence targeting local communities during the annual olive harvest season. The slain worker was identified by the Palestinian Ministry of Health as 44-year-old Ali Hassan al-Bazari, who was among a group of harvesters tending to olive groves on their ancestral land between the town of Burqa and the Ramin Plain, located east of Tulkarm.

Eyewitness accounts and local officials confirm that Israeli military personnel were present at the scene during the assault and provided protection for the attacking settlers. As of initial reports, it remains unconfirmed whether al-Bazari’s fatal wound was caused by gunfire from settlers or from Israeli army forces. The nine injured Palestinians have wounds ranging from minor to life-threatening, with one victim listed in critical condition. A woman is counted among those hurt, with casualties transported to two separate medical facilities: Thabet Thabet Government Hospital in Tulkarm and Rafidia Hospital in Nablus.

In addition to the attack on the farmers, the Palestinian Ministry of Health reported that Israeli army forces also targeted ambulance crews responding to the incident, as medics attempted to access the Ramin Plain to evacuate wounded civilians. Soldiers detained three paramedics and one civilian volunteer, seized the keys to their ambulances, and only released the group after ordering them to abandon the area entirely. This blockade delayed emergency care for bleeding casualties for nearly three hours, according to local officials.

Shadi Abu Omar, a representative of the Burqa Village Council, explained that the attack unfolded in a part of the West Bank classified as Area B under the Oslo Accords, a zoning that places all civil administration under the Palestinian Authority. The site is also located far from any official Israeli settlements or unofficial outposts, meaning the harvesting residents had no reason to expect an confrontation with settlers. “Residents had gone to the area to harvest olives and were not expecting to encounter settlers,” Abu Omar told Middle East Eye. He detailed the sequence of the assault: “A group of settlers arrived in a vehicle and opened fire on them. After the shooting, the settlers approached the harvesters, began beating them and then bound them. Among them was al-Bazari, who had been shot in the back. Despite bleeding from the wound, he, along with the other injured people, including a woman, was tied up.”

Abu Omar added that the entire attack transpired under the watch of Israeli forces, who made no attempt to intervene to remove the settlers. Settlers also personally blocked medics from reaching multiple wounded victims, issuing threats to shoot anyone attempting to access the incident site and prevent emergency evacuation.

This deadly assault comes as part of a dramatic, well-documented surge in settler violence against Palestinian civilians, disproportionately targeting farmers during the critical annual olive harvest, a core component of many West Bank Palestinian livelihoods. Data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) shows that from the start of the current year through early September, more than 1,100 Palestinians have been injured in settler-linked attacks, with over 1,000 of those injuries directly inflicted by settlers.

OCHA records highlight a steep upward trend in such violence in recent years: in 2020, an average of one Palestinian was injured in settler attacks every three days; by 2025 that rate rose to two injuries per day, and so far in 2026 it has reached more than three injuries per day. Since January, the UN has documented over 1,300 separate settler attack incidents impacting roughly 250 Palestinian communities across the West Bank – an average of more than six attacks per day. These incidents span a wide range of hostilities, including physical assaults, arson attacks on homes and vehicles, deliberate vandalism of private property and cultivated farmland, and targeted attacks against Palestinians attempting to access their own agricultural land.

Settler violence during the olive harvest carries particular economic and social harm, as OCHA has repeatedly identified access to agricultural land and livelihoods as one of the primary contexts for settler aggression. The UN has documented widespread injuries to harvesters and the destruction of hundreds of mature olive trees and agricultural assets across multiple West Bank towns.

Salah al-Khawaja, director of the central office of the Wall and Settlement Resistance Commission, argued that settlers in the West Bank operate with near-total impunity for their attacks against Palestinians. “Settlers are carrying out killings in front of the media, shooting at farmers and burning farmland,” he said. “We are facing a government that supports terrorism and criminality, providing full backing to settlers because it is a terrorist government.”

While high-profile tensions between Washington and Tehran have dominated global headlines in 202X, a rapidly intensifying conflict in Yemen between the Iran-aligned Houthi movement, the internationally recognized Yemeni government backed by Riyadh, and Saudi Arabia itself is emerging as a threat of equal consequence to regional stability and global energy markets. This long-simmering conflict has gained new momentum this year, amplified by overlapping geopolitical alignments that draw in major global powers and raise the risk of an uncontrolled escalation.

Yemen’s internal conflict carries layers of complexity that cannot be overstated, with violence deeply intertwined with broader regional rivalries between Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as the ongoing standoff between the United States, Israel, and Iran over control of the Strait of Hormuz. The competing alliances in the conflict have divided major global powers: Iran provides military and political backing to the Houthis (officially named Ansar Allah, or Partisans of God), while Saudi Arabia supports Yemen’s internationally recognized governing body, the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC). The U.S. has aligned with its long-time de facto ally Saudi Arabia, while Russia and China stand alongside Iran. Most recently, Saudi regional allies Turkey and Pakistan have finalized plans to activate a newly signed mutual defense agreement, committing to deploy troops to defend Saudi territory if it comes under further Houthi attack.

With so many interconnected stakeholders holding competing interests, analysts warn the conflict could spiral outward rapidly, engulfing the entire Middle East and sending shockwaves through already strained global fuel supplies.

Against the backdrop of a stalemate in the direct U.S.-Iran standoff over the Strait of Hormuz – the critical chokepoint that previously carried 20% of the world’s daily oil and liquefied natural gas trade – the Houthis have stepped up their operations to support their Iranian backers. Holding control of roughly one-third of Yemen, including the capital Sanaa, the Houthi movement has consolidated its hold over another strategically vital waterway: the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which links the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean. Since July, the group has made steady territorial gains across Yemen as it pushes to seize full control of the country, while launching repeated targeted attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure, commercial tankers, and King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh.

A recent Houthi attack has once again halted crude oil pumping through Saudi Arabia’s East-West Pipeline, a key export route Riyadh has relied on to ship oil via Bab el-Mandeb after the Strait of Hormuz was effectively closed to regular commercial traffic amid the U.S.-Iran standoff. In response, combined Yemeni and Saudi forces have launched a large-scale counteroffensive to retake territory held by the Houthis, bringing the country back to the brink of full-scale civil war and threatening to plunge Yemeni civilians into an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe.

Riyadh has formally requested that Washington carry out direct airstrikes against Houthi positions, but U.S. President Donald Trump has declined to commit American troops to active combat, offering only support from U.S. intelligence and military advisors. Trump has made clear he has no interest in expanding the existing U.S.-Iran conflict and drawing the U.S. into another protracted Middle Eastern war, though the risk of a full-scale resumption of hostilities with Iran remains elevated. Observers also note that Trump is acutely aware of the impact of ongoing conflict on American consumers, who face soaring gasoline prices and mounting cost-of-living pressures. With U.S. midterm elections just one month away, Trump’s Republican Party is scrambling to shore up its support among voters, making new military entanglement a politically risky move.

With no direct U.S. military support on the table, Saudi Arabia has turned to its new security partners Turkey and Pakistan. For weeks, both countries had hesitated to commit to intervention, balancing their alliance with Saudi Arabia against the risk of alienating Iran and its major strategic partners Russia and China, but they finalized their commitment to deploy military forces this week.

The renewed outbreak of fighting has already inflicted devastating harm on Yemeni civilians: more than 800 people have been killed, 3,000 injured, and 158,000 displaced since hostilities escalated. This death toll comes on top of the hundreds of thousands of Yemenis who have died since the original civil war and Saudi-led intervention began in 2014–15, with many deaths caused not just by direct fighting, but by secondary crises including widespread hunger, preventable disease, and the total collapse of health infrastructure and basic services.

The worsening conflict in Yemen carries growing risks for the entire global economy. While the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed to regular traffic due to widespread fears of attacks on commercial vessels, a small number of tankers have been able to transit the waterway either after reaching agreements with Iran’s newly established Persian Gulf Strait Authority or under the protection of U.S. naval escorts. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently claimed that 13 million barrels of crude oil are passing through the strait daily, a figure Iranian officials have immediately disputed.

On October 4, Iranian Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf reaffirmed that the strait will not fully reopen until the U.S. meets all of Iran’s core demands: a full ceasefire across all fronts, an end to the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports, and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets held abroad. Compounding this disruption, the Houthis announced a full blockade of Saudi ports in July and began targeting Saudi-linked commercial shipping in the Red Sea, a move that is expected to worsen already severe disruptions to global oil supplies.

At its core, this expanding, multi-dimensional crisis is rooted in the U.S.-Iran conflict. If Trump opts to escalate hostilities with Iran through the use of additional lethal force, Iranian officials have made clear they will retaliate aggressively, and have warned that U.S. Arab allies in the Persian Gulf could face far more severe targeting than in previous rounds of conflict. The entire regional situation remains a tinderbox, and only a de-escalation of tensions between Washington and Tehran, followed by a return to negotiated settlement, can prevent full-scale conflict. While a negotiated agreement remains a distant prospect at this stage, it is still within reach, argues emeritus professor of Middle Eastern Studies Amin Saikal of the Australian National University, the University of Western Australia, and Victoria University.

This analysis is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.