分类: world

  • Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Nine years ago, then-Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak stood as a public advocate for the Rohingya, a stateless Muslim minority that fled systematic violence and discrimination in Myanmar. “We must defend them, not just because they are of the same faith, but because they are humans, their lives have value,” Razak declared in 2017. Today, that commitment has evaporated, replaced by a surging wave of anti-Rohingya hostility that has upended the fragile safety the community spent years building in the Southeast Asian nation.

    For Rohingya children, who have long been barred from enrolling in Malaysia’s public education system, even the simple act of attending classes has become fraught with risk. That is the reality described by Irhan, a Rohingya refugee who established a community learning center for 6- to 15-year-old children in northern Malaysia (his name has been changed to protect his safety). Last month, eight uniformed police officers raided Irhan’s center, photographed the students, and ordered multiple children to return home immediately. “The students are just here to learn. Now their families are afraid,” Irhan explained.

    Across the country, other unlicensed community-run learning spaces, the only educational option available to most Rohingya children, have been targeted by crackdowns. A center in the western state of Selangor suspended operations for a full month, and when it reopened in late July, it imposed strict new rules: students may not wear school uniforms, and must leave immediately after classes end, with no lingering or group gathering allowed. “We’re keeping a low profile to protect our students from getting attacked,” said Farooq, a Rohingya teacher at the center.

    Crackdowns on Rohingya communities are uneven, widely driven by shifting public anger, and have already forced dozens of learning centers to close permanently in recent months. Beyond education, Rohingya families that have lived in Malaysian villages for years are now being forcibly evicted. Local residents have repeatedly claimed to Malaysian media that allowing the refugees to stay would lead to unspecified “social problems.” Most recently, 120 Rohingya—more than half of them children—were left homeless after eviction from a fishing village near Penang. When the group sought shelter outside the Kuala Lumpur office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), they were taken into temporary detention by authorities.

    For a community that has already survived decades of persecution, this new wave of uncertainty has reinstated a constant state of fear. “In the early years, the Malaysians were our friends. They cared for our children. But it’s changed,” Irhan said. The refugee, who first arrived in Malaysia as a teenage asylum seeker in 2001, added, “I would leave if I could, but where else can I go? We are not wanted anywhere.”

    ### Background of a Global Displacement Crisis
    The UNHCR estimates that more than 126,000 Rohingya currently reside in Malaysia, making the country the world’s second-largest host for the displaced community, after Bangladesh. Human rights groups believe the actual number is far higher, as thousands arrive via unregulated sea crossings.

    The Rohingya’s crisis stems from their disenfranchisement in their home country, Myanmar. A majority-Buddhist nation, Myanmar has refused to grant citizenship to the Rohingya, who trace centuries of ancestral roots in Rakhine State. Successive governments have instead labeled the group as illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh. Decades of simmering ethnic tension exploded into a brutal 2017 military crackdown, when Myanmar’s military killed thousands of Rohingya, raped women and girls, and burned hundreds of Rohingya villages to the ground. The UN labeled the campaign “textbook ethnic cleansing,” and the Biden administration later formally designated it a genocide. Myanmar currently faces a landmark genocide case at the International Court of Justice, where former leader Aung San Suu Kyi—who was widely criticized for downplaying the 2017 violence—testified on the country’s behalf.

    After the 2017 crackdown, more than 1 million Rohingya fled to neighboring Bangladesh. But overcrowded refugee camps, rising violence, and declining international aid pushed thousands to undertake deadly, smuggling-led sea voyages across the Andaman Sea to Malaysia. Thousands have died en route on overcrowded, unseaworthy fishing vessels.

    While Malaysia has never formally granted legal status to asylum seekers—leaving refugees with no formal right to work, housing, or education—the majority-Muslim nation was long viewed by the Rohingya as a relatively safe haven, aligned with its leaders’ past rhetoric of solidarity. That welcome began to erode during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Rohingya were falsely blamed for spreading the virus and accused of stealing jobs from local Malaysians. Petitions calling for mass deportations spread rapidly across social media, and Malaysian authorities turned away hundreds of Rohingya asylum seekers who had been stranded adrift at sea for weeks.

    ### A Surge in Organized Vitriol
    Today, that anti-Rohingya sentiment has returned with far greater intensity, fueled once again by viral social media misinformation. In May, unsubstantiated claims that Rohingya improperly disposed of animal remains after the Eid al-Adha holiday went viral, quickly snowballing into false, exaggerated claims that the community was demanding automatic Malaysian citizenship, seeking political power, and planning to “take over” the country. One online petition calling for the removal of all Rohingya from Malaysia gathered more than 420,000 signatures before it was removed following outcry from human rights groups.

    For long-time Rohingya residents, the shift in public attitude has been staggering. Karim, a 45-year-old activist who first arrived in Penang in 2003, recalled that local hospitality once made him feel safe. “Life as a refugee is tough. It’s disappointing to be stuck working in construction all these years. However, I found Malaysians to be very friendly and kind, which made me feel safe,” he said. “Now, however, life has become increasingly difficult. I am often afraid to go outside. I’ve been asked several times while on my commute, ‘Why are you making a mess of our city? Why don’t you go back?’”

    Most Rohingya say they wish to return to Myanmar eventually, but returning is not a viable option today. Myanmar has been locked in a brutal civil war since the 2021 military coup, and Rakhine State has been reduced to ruins by intense fighting between the military junta and the Arakan Army. Displaced Rohingya who return face the threat of forced conscription by the junta or targeting by rebel groups.

    A new UN report from an independent fact-finding mission released this week warned that the conditions for minorities across Myanmar have “plummeted to a new low.” The Rohingya are “suffering misery and cruelty on multiple levels and across the country that is heartbreaking,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said this week.

    Many Rohingya say they are being scapegoated for Malaysia’s own domestic struggles, including rising cost of living, because they are the country’s largest group of undocumented asylum seekers. “I’m not saying that all Rohingya are good. There are good and bad people in every community. So why should a few individuals’ actions be used to typecast a whole community?” Farooq asked. “I escaped the genocide in Myanmar hoping to find safety. Instead, many Rohingya today continue to live with fear of simply being who we are.”

    ### Anti-Rohingya Rhetoric Enters Mainstream Politics
    The growing acceptance of anti-Rohingya hostility in mainstream Malaysian politics has alarmed observers. In a July campaign speech, current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that Myanmar had agreed to repatriate 5,000 Rohingya refugees, citing improved bilateral relations between the two countries. Anwar added a warning to the Rohingya community: “This is our country. Malaysia is our country. Let no one else interfere.”

    High-profile public figures have gone even further in their rhetoric. Nurulhidayah Zahid, daughter of Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, compared the Rohingya community to “monkeys in the forest” in a viral Threads post. “Enough of using religious and humanitarian sentiments. Do good in moderation. Don’t let the monkeys in the forest be fed, while the children at home die of hunger,” she wrote alongside a photo of Rohingya refugees. Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay, a former deputy Malaysian police chief, described the Rohingya influx as a “cancer” requiring immediate, aggressive action.

    Human rights researchers warn that anti-Rohingya sentiment will only intensify as Malaysia approaches a general election required by law before February 2028. “Refugees and migrants are once again being turned into convenient political scapegoats to divert attention from deeper domestic challenges,” said Yap Lay Sheng, a Malaysia-based researcher with human rights organization Fortify Rights. “For years, the Malaysian government has sought to present the country internationally as a humane and compassionate Muslim nation. Its treatment of the Rohingya exposes the hollowness of that claim.”

    Back at his learning center, Irhan is far more focused on his students’ future than on national political shifts. “I don’t know where to get help, or who can get us registered as a school,” he said. “I hope the Malaysians can understand that the children just want an opportunity to learn.”

  • Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb military commander infamously known as the ‘Butcher of Bosnia’ for orchestrating Europe’s worst act of mass genocide since World War II, has passed away at the age of 84. His death was first reported by Serbia’s state-owned public broadcaster RTS, and later independently confirmed by Mladic’s legal representative to Reuters news agency.

    Mladic rose to prominence in the 1990s, amid the violent collapse of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Then-Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic pursued an aggressive nationalist agenda to forge a ethnically pure ‘Greater Serbia’ from the fragments of the disintegrating federation, a project that inflamed long-simmering ethnic and religious tensions and sparked a series of brutal wars across the Balkans. As the top commander of Bosnian Serb separatist forces, Mladic became the primary military architect of this campaign, which targeted non-Serb populations across Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    The most horrific chapter of Mladic’s campaign came in July 1995, when his forces overran the UN-designated safe zone of Srebrenica. In the weeks leading up to the massacre, Mladic invoked a 14th-century Serbian military defeat by the Ottoman Empire to frame his campaign as a act of revenge against Bosniak Muslims, six centuries after the original conflict. Over the following days, Mladic’s troops systematically captured more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys, before executing them in cold blood. Widespread sexual violence was perpetrated against Bosniak women and girls, while perpetrators covered up the atrocity by burying victims in mass graves, later exhuming remains and scattering them across remote secondary burial sites to destroy evidence of the crime.

    Mladic was also directly responsible for the 44-month siege of Sarajevo, a brutal blockade that subjected the capital’s civilian population to systematic terror, starvation, and constant attack.

    In total, the Bosnian war claimed the lives of roughly 100,000 people and displaced more than 2.2 million from their homes, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in post-WWII European history.

    For nearly 16 years after the end of the war, Mladic evaded international justice, with covert support from factions within the Serbian state that helped him hide from authorities. His years on the run became one of the longest and most high-profile manhunts in modern history, coming to an end only in May 2011, when Serbian security forces arrested him in a small village north of Belgrade.

    In 2017, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), based in The Hague, found Mladic guilty on 10 counts of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Presiding judge Alphons Orie described Mladic’s offenses as ranking among ‘the most heinous known to humankind,’ and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

    Despite his well-documented atrocities and international conviction, Mladic remains a glorified figure among Serbian ultranationalists, and many senior Serbian political leaders have continued to deny or downplay the severity of crimes committed by Bosnian Serb forces during the conflict. The ICTY ultimately prosecuted nearly 100 individuals for war crimes and atrocities committed during the Yugoslav wars, with Mladic’s trial standing as one of the tribunal’s final and most high-profile cases.

  • Haaretz: Israel arms drug dealers to commit ‘war crimes’ and loot homes in Gaza

    Haaretz: Israel arms drug dealers to commit ‘war crimes’ and loot homes in Gaza

    An explosive investigation published by leading Israeli newspaper Haaretz has uncovered a rapidly expanding Israeli program that deploys mercenaries, local criminal gangs, and convicted drug dealers as proxy forces to commit war crimes in the Gaza Strip on behalf of the Israeli state and its military.

    Drawing on firsthand testimony from active-duty Israeli soldiers, verified United Nations documentation, and high-resolution satellite imagery, the probe details how increasingly heavily armed collaborator militias have systematically displaced Palestinian communities from their homes and launched offensive operations across multiple areas of the besieged enclave. According to the investigation, Israeli military and intelligence agencies have trained and equipped at least five separate militia groups to date, with evidence pointing to the possible formation of a sixth. All of these groups operate out of heavily fortified bases located in Israeli-occupied sections of Gaza.

    One unnamed Israeli soldier, speaking on condition of anonymity to Haaretz, described the explicit division of labor between Israeli regular forces and the proxy militias: “The state, army and Shin Bet intelligence service send armed and trained militias to commit war crimes, and I’m the one who has to protect them during their operations so they don’t get hurt.”

    The investigation comes against a backdrop of already heightened international scrutiny of Israeli conduct in Gaza. Israel is currently facing a formal genocide case brought before the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court has already issued public arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the enclave.

    Haaretz’s findings also reveal alarming connections between the Israeli-backed militias and extremist groups. At least one armed faction supported and supplied by Israel had confirmed links to the Islamic State, according to the investigation. That group was led by Yasser Abu Shabab, who was killed by Hamas forces in December 2025. News of his death was widely celebrated across Palestinian communities, and even his own family publicly disowned him as a traitor for collaborating with Israeli authorities. Despite his death, Haaretz notes that the broader militia project he represented has continued to grow in scope and power, particularly in the period following the October 2025 ceasefire agreement.

    Another high-profile militia leader, Shawqi Abu Nasira, has openly acknowledged his cooperation with Israel in a widely circulated online video. “I made the decision to liberate the land from Hamas,” he stated. “If people say that makes me a collaborator, then I’m a collaborator.” The vast majority of Palestinians across all political factions, regardless of their stance on Hamas leadership, uniformly view collaboration with Israel as an act of treason against the Palestinian people.

    The investigation also documents how Israel has built dedicated military infrastructure for these proxy groups amid the widespread destruction of Gaza’s built environment. Near one major militia base in the Gaza neighborhood of Shujaiya, Israeli forces completely flattened a large historic Palestinian cemetery to clear space for an expanded training compound for the militias.

    Testimony from soldiers confirms that the operational integration between the Israeli military and the proxy gangs has grown increasingly close. Fighters from the militias are allowed to move freely through Israeli army outposts across occupied areas of Gaza, and the investigation notes that the gunmen regularly stage public shows of force, film the events, and upload the footage to social media platforms like Facebook for propaganda and new recruitment drives. Israel provides all small arms and heavy weapons for the militias, and also backs their ground operations with artillery support and drone surveillance and strikes.

    Beyond frontline combat roles, the proxy mercenaries serve a second core strategic purpose aligned with Israeli government policy: targeting Palestinian civilians struggling to survive under ongoing Israeli occupation and blockade. The gangs drive Palestinian families from their residential areas, loot personal and private property, and burn homes to the ground. This activity aligns with repeated public statements from senior Israeli ministers who have openly called for making life unlivable in Gaza as part of a broader campaign to ethnically cleanse the enclave and clear space for new Jewish Israeli settlements.

    One Israeli soldier described a typical raid carried out by the mercenaries: They arrived in unmarked pickup trucks, then “they just ran and shot at people. They entered every structure, looted everything they could get their hands on, came out with piles of stuff – and then burned down the house.”

    While claims that Israel has deployed local criminal gangs to advance its ethnic cleansing strategy in Gaza have circulated for more than a year, the new firsthand testimony from Israeli soldiers provides definitive confirmation that these groups now operate as a formal “operational arm” of both the Israeli military and the Shin Bet domestic intelligence service.

    A striking contradiction sits at the heart of Israeli policy in Gaza: While the Israeli government continues to arm and expand these local criminal gangs, it simultaneously demands that Hamas disarm and rejects all proposals for the formation of an independent Palestinian security force to govern Gaza after a permanent ceasefire. This arrangement allows Israel to deploy the militias to target anyone it labels a Hamas affiliate, while also turning the groups loose on ordinary Palestinian civilians.

    Hamas officials speaking to Haaretz confirmed that the group will not agree to surrender its defensive weapons as long as Israeli-backed armed militias remain active in Gaza, noting that the collaborator groups have explicitly targeted Hamas members and supporters. The group would be left vulnerable to sustained attack if it disarmed while these proxies remain fully armed and supported by Israel, the sources added.

    Haaretz’s investigation concludes with a stark warning that Israel’s current proxy strategy is creating the conditions for mass atrocities on a scale not seen in decades, drawing a direct parallel to the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre. During that event, Lebanese Phalangist forces allied with Israel slaughtered up to 3,500 Palestinian and Lebanese civilians while Israeli troops surrounded the Beirut refugee camps, secured the perimeter, and oversaw the 48-hour killing spree.

  • About 90 Americans unaccounted for after catastrophic floods hit Nepal and Tibet

    About 90 Americans unaccounted for after catastrophic floods hit Nepal and Tibet

    Deadly catastrophic flash floods that swept through a mountainous border region straddling southwestern China and northern Nepal have left hundreds dead and triggered an urgent search effort, with roughly 90 U.S. citizens still unaccounted for as of Thursday, one day after the disaster struck. As of Thursday afternoon, U.S. State Department officials confirmed that no American fatalities have been confirmed, while three U.S. nationals have already been pulled from flood-affected areas to safety.

    A large share of the missing U.S. citizens were part of religious pilgrimages to Mount Kailash in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, a site considered deeply sacred across multiple faiths including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Bon. By Thursday, worried family members and friends had begun sharing posts across social media platforms begging the public for information and updates on their missing loved ones, who range from a Virginia woman traveling with an organized tour and a Texas couple celebrating a birthday to a mother accompanying her 14-year-old daughter on the trip.

    One of the unaccounted-for U.S. citizens is Venus Rajnikant Patel, a 45-year-old Indian-born American who had recently relocated from St. Louis, Missouri, to Cincinnati, Ohio, to be closer to and support his family. Patel was traveling as part of a guided tour when the floods hit, according to his friend Jolene Gosha. Gosha told reporters she and other close friends knew Patel was traveling in the border region, but were devastated to discover he was staying at a hotel directly in the path of the rushing floodwaters.

    “We’re just holding out hope, hoping that by some miracle he managed to climb to safety and get out,” Gosha said in an interview. “I try not to let myself build up false hope, because I know the terrible reality is that he’s likely not with us anymore.”

    Gosha described Patel as a passionate adventure traveler with a joyful, outgoing personality, who loved dancing and often organized surprise flash mob performances to celebrate his friends’ weddings and birthdays. “He’s always grinning from ear to ear, and he’d dance in the silliest way without a care in the world who was watching,” she added.

    Indian spiritual leader Jaggi Vasudev, more widely known by his followers as Sadhguru, revealed in a post on the social platform X that 77 pilgrims returning from their Mount Kailash trip with groups organized by his non-profit Isha Foundation were at an immigration facility in Gyirong, Tibet, when the flash floods hit. In a subsequent comment to ABC News, the Isha Foundation confirmed that 22 of the 77 pilgrims at the center during the disaster are U.S. citizens. The Isha Foundation is an India-based spiritual organization that runs a U.S. yoga and meditation retreat campus, the Isha Institute of Inner-sciences, located in the mountains outside McMinnville, Tennessee.

    Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, former U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that senior U.S. officials had already held talks with Nepalese government leaders, and that the U.S. had extended an open offer of assistance to support response and recovery efforts. “We have offered them anything they want, any help they need,” Trump said. He also noted that initial estimates placed between 50 and 60 U.S. citizens in the affected area, adding that a full, formal accounting of all foreign nationals in the region was still ongoing.

    This report included contributions from Associated Press writers Matthew Lee and Collin Binkley based in Washington, D.C.

  • Allan Little: I met dangerously fanatical Mladić early in Bosnian war

    Allan Little: I met dangerously fanatical Mladić early in Bosnian war

    The death of Ratko Mladić, the Bosnian Serb military commander infamously labeled the “Butcher of Bosnia” for his role in the 1990s Balkan Wars, has pulled the world’s attention back to one of the darkest chapters of European conflict since World War II. Mladić, who was convicted of genocide and multiple other war crimes by an international tribunal, died while serving his life sentence in a European prison.

    Veteran BBC correspondent Allan Little, who covered the entire dissolution of the former Yugoslavia and encountered Mladić in the opening months of the Bosnian War, shared his searing, firsthand memories of the violence and human cost that unfolded alongside the commander’s campaign.

    Little recalls that during the darkest nights of the conflict, orange flames from systematically burned settlements painted the landscape, the only visible light across the dark valleys of Bosnia. These fires were the visible signature of the ethnic cleansing campaign that Mladić’s forces waged across the region. Local men, carrying outdated weapons passed down through generations alongside centuries-old intergroup fears and distrust, patrolled their homes in shadow, bracing for violence that would upend their communities permanently.

    He vividly recounts one morning when a procession of 40,000 displaced people emerged from a dense forest. Two days prior, they had been driven from their homes by a sudden unprovoked Serb military advance, fleeing with only the small possessions they could carry. Most walked the long, brutal path to safety; others were crammed into the backs of aging farm carts pulled by donkeys. Among the exhausted crowd was an 80-year-old man, who looked close to collapse after the journey. He told Little he had been separated from his wife during the trek, and had no idea if she had survived. When Little asked if he was Croat or Muslim — the simplistic ethnic labeling that came to define coverage of the war — the man answered simply, “I am a musician.” That reply has haunted Little for decades, a reminder that the conflict’s dehumanizing ethnic labels erased the full, complex humanity of thousands of ordinary people who were reduced to targets solely because of their background.

    Little met Mladić himself in the first sweltering summer of the war, at the Lukavica barracks on Sarajevo’s southern edge. The compound was flooded with loose weapons and aggressive, menacing paramilitary fighters. A Kalashnikov rifle cost just $200 on the open market there; a single hand grenade sold for $1 — the same price as a single fresh egg in the besieged city of Sarajevo at the time. When Little shook Mladić’s hand, the commander held the grip tight, pulling Little close, still buzzing with adrenaline from a recent trip to the front lines in central Sarajevo. Mladić held Little’s gaze for minutes as he claimed to be the defender of brotherhood and unity across the former Yugoslavia, saying he dreamed of a world without weapons or war. Even then, Little writes, Mladić came across as unflinchingly fanatical — a dangerous fanatic whose ideology would unleash unspeakable suffering.

    In the years that followed, forces under Mladić’s command carried out the worst war crimes seen on European soil since the Nazi regime. They gave the global lexicon of war the chilling term “ethnic cleansing,” perpetrating mass murder, systematic sexual violence, forced expulsion of entire communities, and the systematic burning of hundreds of villages. The ultimate goal of this campaign was to carve out an ethnically pure Serbian territory across parts of Bosnia and Croatia. The campaign culminated in the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, where more than 8,000 Bosniak Muslim men and boys were systematically killed — a crime the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ruled constituted genocide.

    For Little, the war hit close to home just two days after he encountered the displaced 80-year-old musician on a muddy roadside. His colleague and friend, 25-year-old cameraman Tihomir Tunukovic, a talented young filmmaker from Zagreb who had worked alongside Little for 18 months, was killed by a Serb gunner positioned on a ridge overlooking the road Tunukovic was driving. Little and his team carried Tunukovic’s body back across rutted mountain trails to the coastal city of Split for burial, and the grief of that loss connected them directly to the cycle of vengeance that drove the war’s endless cycle of violence.

    While Mladić never pulled the trigger that killed Tunukovic or the tens of thousands of other civilians who died during his campaign, Little writes, the culture of unaccountable violence that Mladić fostered under his command directly enabled the mass loss of life that defined the Bosnian conflict. His death closes a grim chapter in modern European history, but the scars of the atrocities he oversaw remain deeply etched across the Balkans and the collective memory of a continent.

  • Mali music star Salif Keïta cancels South African concerts over ‘xenophobic violence’

    Mali music star Salif Keïta cancels South African concerts over ‘xenophobic violence’

    Legendary Malian recording artist Salif Keïta, globally celebrated as the “Golden Voice of Africa,” has sent shockwaves through southern Africa’s cultural and political spheres by pulling out of a headline performance at South Africa’s upcoming Macufe festival, citing widespread ongoing xenophobic violence against undocumented African migrants. The 77-year-old music pioneer, who spent decades cementing African music’s place on the global stage, said his decision to cancel the Free State province concert was not a rejection of the South African people, but a deliberate stand against hatred that runs counter to the nation he has long known.

    Keïta’s cancellation arrives as South Africa grapples with a surging wave of anti-migrant activism led by fringe groups, who have set an unofficial 30 September deadline for all undocumented foreign nationals to leave the country. As tensions have escalated over the past several months, more than 160,000 migrants from across the African continent have opted to participate in voluntary repatriation programs, leaving behind homes, jobs and belongings they built over decades in the continent’s wealthiest nation, which has long drawn migrants seeking improved economic opportunity and safety.

    In a public statement explaining his withdrawal, Keïta made clear he could not in good conscience perform amid reports of targeted attacks on migrant communities. “When I see migrants attacked, I do not see ‘politics’. I see people looking for work, safety, and dignity,” he wrote, adding that the current wave of xenophobia does “not match the South Africa I know.” Keïta left open the possibility of performing in South Africa at a future date, once the violence and anti-migrant rhetoric subsides.

    Officials with Free State’s culture department, which hosts the annual Macufe festival framed as a celebration of pan-African unity, expressed deep regret over Keïta’s decision. “We are disappointed that the renowned musician will not be gracing our stage, but we respect his personal stance on the issue,” the department said in a formal response.

    The news of Keïta’s cancellation coincided with the first repatriation flight carrying 173 Tanzanian migrants home from Durban, the coastal city that has emerged as a flashpoint for the largest and most violent anti-migrant demonstrations. For many on board the flight, the journey home closed a chapter of decades spent building lives in South Africa that ended in displacement and danger.

    Abdul Idi, who moved to South Africa in 2006 chasing economic opportunity, spoke to reporters upon landing at Dar es Salaam International Airport Wednesday night, saying he was just grateful to return alive after months of growing danger. “Foreigners are not wanted there,” Idi said.

    Fellow returnee Rashid Ramadhan, 53, who lived in South Africa for 30 years, described being forcibly evicted from his Durban apartment two months prior, joining hundreds of other migrants who have been left homeless and jobless amid the unrest. “We have nowhere to go, nothing left there,” Ramadhan explained.

    AFP data shows that since May, repatriated migrants include citizens from Malawi, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Ghana and Nigeria, among other African nations. The anti-migrant activist group March and March, which organized the initial wave of protests in June that left multiple people injured and displaced, has announced a larger, better organized second wave of nationwide demonstrations set for 30 September. During a recent Southern African Development Community (SADC) summit held in Durban earlier this month, the group publicly called on regional heads of state to “fetch your people” and remove their citizens from South Africa.

    As governments across the continent work to support the thousands of returning citizens, the crisis has spilled into diplomatic and economic channels. Ghana’s foreign ministry recently made headlines for rejecting a $1.7 million donation from MTN Ghana, the local subsidiary of South African telecom giant MTN Group, that was earmarked to support the evacuation and reintegration of repatriated Ghanaians. Ghana’s government stated it would fully fund the process of supporting its returning citizens on its own.

    South African authorities have responded to the unrest by cracking down on unauthorized migration, while also moving to arrest activists and civilians who have taken violent action against migrant communities. Despite government intervention, the issue of undocumented migration has become one of the most polarizing political topics in the country in recent years, with anti-migrant protesters arguing that undocumented arrivals place unsustainable strain on South Africa’s public health, education, and social welfare systems, and contribute to rising crime rates – claims that are disputed by independent researchers and migrant advocacy groups.

  • Russia dismisses as ‘scare stories’ US reports about attacking NATO

    Russia dismisses as ‘scare stories’ US reports about attacking NATO

    In the wake of an uncommon high-level meeting between CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Russian intelligence officials in Moscow, the Kremlin has moved quickly to dismiss widespread US media reports that suggested Russia was preparing a potential limited strike against a NATO member as baseless “scare stories”. Senior officials from both the US and the European Union have echoed this dismissal, casting significant doubt on the intelligence assessments that sparked the initial media reports.

    Two major US outlets, The Wall Street Journal and CBS News, first broke the story last week, citing unnamed intelligence sources who claimed Ratcliffe traveled to Moscow specifically to warn Russian leadership against any attempt to test the transatlantic alliance. The Journal’s reporting went further, claiming US intelligence assessments suggested President Vladimir Putin could order a “limited assault” on NATO territory within the next few years.

    During his daily press briefing on Thursday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov pushed back firmly against these claims. “A lot of such scare stories are being published right now. Of course, they have nothing to do with reality,” Peskov told reporters. He also reaffirmed Russia’s long-stated position on its ongoing military operation in Ukraine, noting that Moscow still prefers to reach its goals through diplomatic channels but will continue its campaign if peaceful options remain unavailable. Peskov also criticized Western European backers of Kyiv, saying Russia is confronting increasingly aggressive policy stances from European capitals. To date, Russia has repeatedly rejected Ukrainian calls for direct face-to-face peace talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, instead demanding Kyiv withdraw its forces from the contested eastern Donbas region as a precondition for negotiations.

    The pushback against the NATO attack claims extended beyond the Kremlin, with senior Western leaders also downplaying the risk. Former US President Donald Trump, who was asked about the reports, said he had held constructive discussions with Putin and insisted the Russian leader had no plans to target NATO territory. In Brussels, a senior anonymous EU official added that European intelligence services have not detected any preparations for a Russian attack on a NATO member, and that the bloc’s long-standing risk assessment has not changed.

    Russian foreign intelligence chief Sergei Naryshkin also downplayed the significance of the meeting with Ratcliffe, confirming the gathering took place but framing it as nothing out of the ordinary. “Yes, the meeting did take place, but there is nothing unusual about it,” Naryshkin told Russia’s state-run TASS news agency, adding that the two sides only discussed standard intelligence agency matters that he described as “quite a delicate and special matter”.

    CBS News further reported that beyond the NATO speculation, the talks also covered the ongoing conflict around Iran, with Ratcliffe issuing a warning that new US sanctions would be imposed if the Strait of Hormuz remained closed to commercial shipping traffic. Trump, however, pushed back on this framing, describing the Moscow meeting as “very sort of semi-routine” and saying the core focus was on ending the war in Ukraine, not NATO or Iran. The White House has not yet responded to multiple requests for comment from Agence France-Presse on the meeting.

    Ratcliffe’s visit marks one of the highest-level trips by a US official to Russia since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The last serving CIA director to travel to Moscow was William Burns, who visited in November 2021 to warn Putin against launching an invasion. Three months after that meeting, the Kremlin launched its offensive, which has grown into the largest European conflict since World War II. Beyond diplomatic discussions, the CIA has also worked with Russia on high-profile prisoner swap deals, including a major exchange completed in mid-2024.

    Currently, the conflict remains locked in a grinding stalemate four and a half years after it began. Widespread use of long-range drones on both sides of the front line has largely eliminated the possibility of swift, large-scale territorial advances, leaving neither side able to secure a decisive advantage. Putin has faced growing domestic and international pressure in recent months, as increasing Ukrainian drone strikes deep inside Russian territory have caused mounting casualties and economic damage.

  • A fire at a gas and chemical plant in Russia’s Far East has killed 15

    A fire at a gas and chemical plant in Russia’s Far East has killed 15

    A devastating fire that erupted earlier this week at the Amur Gas Chemical Complex, a high-profile Russian-Chinese joint petrochemical project in Russia’s Far East, has left 15 people dead, facility management confirmed in an official statement released Thursday.

    Footage circulated widely across social media platforms captured chaotic scenes from Tuesday, when large groups of construction and plant workers scrambled to escape the spreading blaze to reach safe zones. All 15 victims killed in the incident were on-site employees, according to the complex’s official statement. Of the deceased, one holds Russian citizenship, while the remaining 14 are foreign nationals, though management has not released additional identifying information. The previous day, officials had confirmed the recovery of eight bodies: one Russian national and six Chinese citizens.

    Situated in Russia’s Amur region just kilometers from the Chinese border, roughly 5,500 kilometers east of Moscow, the complex is a major joint venture between China’s state-owned energy giant Sinopec and Russian petrochemical leader Sibur. Still under construction, the facility is slated to become one of the world’s largest production hubs for polyethylene and polypropylene, with a planned annual output of 2.7 million tonnes of the two widely used plastics when it enters full operation in early 2027.

    Russia’s national Investigative Committee has opened a formal investigation into the fire, focusing on identifying the root cause and examining potential violations of workplace safety protocols. As of Thursday, investigators have found no evidence that the fire was the result of sabotage or intentional foul play.

    When contacted by reporters for additional comment, Sibur directed inquiries to the Amur Gas Chemical Complex’s official statement, which noted that emergency recovery operations have already been launched in close coordination with Russia’s Ministry of Emergency Situations. The statement added that construction and installation work at sections of the facility that escaped fire damage will proceed on their original schedules, and continuous air quality monitoring is underway across the site. Officials confirmed that so far, emissions of hazardous substances have remained below regulated maximum allowable limits. Preliminary investigations have also found the fire was confined to the complex’s auxiliary process area, leaving the facility’s core production equipment undamaged.

    China’s state-run Global Times reported that the local Chinese consulate has deployed a special response team to the incident site to assist with response and identification efforts. The Associated Press’ request for additional comment from Sinopec had not received a response as of Thursday’s statement. This report includes contributing reporting from AP correspondent Fu Ting in Washington, D.C.

  • Aid chief tells UN that US-backed Board of Peace is ‘failing’ Gaza

    Aid chief tells UN that US-backed Board of Peace is ‘failing’ Gaza

    Tensions over the fragile ceasefire in the Gaza Strip have escalated, with the leader of a major coalition of international humanitarian organizations issuing a stark rebuke of the US-backed Board of Peace, accusing the body of failing its mandate and enabling the entrenchment of Israel’s unlawful occupation of the Palestinian enclave.

    Athena Rayburn, executive director of the Association of International Development Agencies (AIDA), delivered the critical assessment directly to the United Nations Security Council this week. The Board of Peace, established during former US President Donald Trump’s administration and granted an official mandate by the Security Council last November, is supposed to oversee stability and humanitarian access in Gaza, but Rayburn says it has instead become a tool that allows Israel to block critical life-saving aid from reaching desperate civilians.

    Rayburn detailed the sweeping and often arbitrary restrictions Israel has imposed on humanitarian supplies entering Gaza, calling out actions that violate basic humanitarian norms. Among the items rejected by Israeli authorities are basic medical and accessibility hardware: scissors used by medical providers, crutches for injured civilians, wheelchairs for people with mobility impairments, and prosthetic limbs for those who have lost limbs in conflict. Israel has categorized all of these items as “dual-use” goods, a classification typically reserved for materials that could be repurposed for military use.

    Beyond medical equipment, Rayburn noted that Israel has barred entry to specialized medical personnel who have come to Gaza to treat wounded civilians, and imposed such strict limits on the flow of engine oil – critical for operating ambulances, aid delivery trucks, and emergency power generators – that black market prices for the commodity have skyrocketed to 45 times the normal market rate. Even basic food staples are not spared from the arbitrary bans: Israel has blocked shipments of watermelon and onions under an unpublished, unaccountable “humanitarian policy” that has never been publicly disclosed or justified to the international community.

    “What is unclear is why the mandate handed by this council to the Board of Peace is being used to violate the most fundamental rights of the Palestinians in Gaza and the most basic rules of humanitarian law,” Rayburn told the Security Council. “This cannot be the new status quo,” she added, urging the council to intervene to reverse the current trajectory.

    The grim assessment from the aid coalition comes amid a mounting human cost even after the nominal ceasefire that took effect in October 2025. According to conflict trackers, at least 1,303 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the ceasefire was supposed to begin. Since large-scale hostilities first broke out in October 2023, a total of 73,438 Palestinians have been killed in what the report terms a genocide.

    Israeli forces currently control more than 60 percent of the Gaza Strip, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed earlier this month that the government’s goal is to expand that controlled area to roughly 70 percent of the enclave. The Board of Peace has tied any Israeli withdrawal from territories beyond the Yellow Line – the demarcation that splits Gaza into Israeli-occupied and Palestinian-administered areas – to the full disarmament of Hamas, a condition that has been a major sticking point in negotiations.

    Meanwhile, the United Nations’ top envoy for Gaza has issued an urgent warning that if the current fragile ceasefire collapses, the region will reach an irreversible “point of no return.” Speaking to the Security Council on Wednesday, Nickolay Mladenov, the UN High Representative for Gaza, laid out the catastrophic consequences of a resumption of full-scale hostilities.

    “A resumption of fighting in Gaza would mean ‘no roadmap to return to, there will be no administration to deploy, and there will be nothing left on the ground to rebuild. That would not be a setback. It would be a point of no return for everyone,’” Mladenov told council members.

    Mladenov also acknowledged gaps on the side of Hamas, noting that the group has made a formal commitment to cease all military activities under a roadmap agreed to on July 30, but that this commitment has not yet been fully implemented. The July roadmap stipulates that the decommissioning of weapons will be supervised by the International Stabilisation Force, which has not yet deployed to Gaza to carry out its mandate.

    “Every weapon carried, every tunnel still worked on, and every convoy still obstructed sets the process back and hands an argument to those who want to resume war,” Mladenov added, highlighting the dual risks to the ceasefire from both sides. This reporting comes from Middle East Eye, an outlet that provides independent, in-depth coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Tracing the deadly path of the Nepal-Tibet flash flood

    Tracing the deadly path of the Nepal-Tibet flash flood

    A devastating cross-border flash flood has carved a deadly trail across regions spanning Nepal and Tibet, leaving a wake of destruction that has prompted detailed investigative work to understand how the disaster unfolded. Using cutting-edge verification techniques and cross-referenced, user-generated video content, BBC Verify has undertaken a comprehensive investigation to reconstruct the exact route the floodwaters took as they surged through mountain valleys and low-lying communities.

    Flash floods in the high-altitude Himalayan region have long posed a severe threat to local populations, driven by unpredictable weather patterns and rapid glacial melt that can send torrents of water downstream with little warning. This latest event, which has already been linked to multiple fatalities and widespread damage to infrastructure, highlights the growing risk of such extreme water-related disasters in one of the world’s most geologically vulnerable mountain systems. By analyzing timestamped, geolocated video clips captured by witnesses on the ground, the investigation team has been able to fill critical gaps in initial reports, clarifying how the flood expanded from its initial outbreak point to impact communities on both sides of the Nepal-Tibet border.

    The verification process has also helped to correct earlier misinformation circulating on social media about the scale and origin of the flood, providing local authorities and disaster response teams with a clearer picture to guide future emergency planning and risk mitigation efforts. For residents living in the flood-affected areas, the detailed tracing of the flood’s path offers key insights into which zones face the highest risk during future extreme weather events, enabling more effective evacuation planning and community preparedness. As climate change continues to alter glacial dynamics and increase the frequency of intense rainfall events in the Himalayas, this kind of on-the-ground investigative work has become increasingly vital for building resilience against future disasters in the region.