分类： world

Overnight attacks targeting Russian energy infrastructure marked a sharp escalation in cross-border strikes between Russia and Ukraine over the weekend, with Kyiv confirming successful hits on key fuel facilities while firmly rejecting Moscow’s accusations of an attack on Europe’s largest nuclear power station. Russian regional officials confirmed Sunday that descending drone debris sparked an inferno at a fuel storage depot in southwestern Russia’s Rostov Oblast, prompting emergency evacuations of nearby residential neighborhoods. A separate wave of drones inflicted damage to civilian infrastructure in neighboring Saratov Oblast, with independent Russian media outlet Astra reporting large flames engulfing a major oil refinery in the region’s capital city, also named Saratov.

In a rare public confirmation of cross-border action, Ukraine’s General Staff acknowledged Sunday that its unmanned aerial vehicles successfully targeted the Saratov refinery, igniting a large-scale blaze that remains under assessment for total damage. The statement noted the facility, owned by Russian state-owned energy giant Rosneft, produces gasoline and diesel for domestic and military use, and has been a key supplier fueling Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine that launched in early 2022. Ukrainian officials have repeatedly justified stepped-up attacks on Russian oil, gas and refining infrastructure in recent months, arguing the energy sector generates billions in revenue to fund the war effort while also producing fuel for Russian military vehicles and equipment.

Alongside the confirmed energy strikes, the weekend brought renewed tension over the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, a facility that has been the site of repeated safety scares since Russian forces seized it in the opening weeks of the 2022 invasion. Russia’s state nuclear operator Rosatom claimed Saturday that a Ukrainian kamikaze drone detonated after piercing the exterior wall of the turbine hall for the plant’s sixth power unit. Rosatom CEO Alexei Likhachev called the incident a deliberate, pre-planned attack by Ukrainian forces, though he stressed no critical core equipment was damaged in the blast.

Ukraine’s military swiftly dismissed the accusation as another disinformation propaganda effort, stating it had not launched any strikes targeting the plant and remains strictly committed to upholding international humanitarian law, which prohibits intentional attacks on civilian nuclear infrastructure. The military added that no offensive operations or weapons fire were conducted along the segment of the front line nearest the plant at the time of the reported incident. The Zaporizhzhia plant, which remains under Russian occupation close to active front lines in southern Ukraine, is one of four Ukrainian regions Russia has attempted to formally annex, a move that has not gained recognition from the global community.

Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, posted Sunday on social media platform X that he holds serious concern over the reported incident. Ukraine’s state nuclear regulatory agency has called for the damage alleged by Russian authorities to be independently verified by IAEA inspectors, who have maintained a permanent monitoring presence at the plant since 2022 to mitigate nuclear safety risks. Repeated shelling near the plant since the Russian occupation sparked global fears of a catastrophic nuclear accident, with Moscow and Kyiv repeatedly trading blame for deliberate strikes on the site.

In a parallel wave of Russian strikes overnight into Sunday, Russian forces launched nearly 300 drones across Ukrainian territory, according to Ukraine’s Air Force. Air defense crews successfully intercepted and downed 212 of the incoming unmanned aerial vehicles, while 14 managed to reach their intended targets. Falling drone debris was reported in five separate locations across Ukraine. Russian strikes sparked fires at an apartment area in the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro and at an oil refinery in the western Rivne region, local Ukrainian authorities confirmed. Oleksandr Koval, head of Rivne’s regional military administration, reported no casualties at the refinery, with emergency response teams already on site working to contain the blaze.

The cross-border strikes come as Ukraine continues to ramp up pressure on Russian energy supplies amid a grinding war that has stretched into its fourth year, with Kyiv actively lobbying Western allies for additional air defense systems and long-range strike capabilities to counter Russian offensive operations.

More than three years after Russian forces launched their full-scale invasion of Ukraine from Belarusian territory, Kyiv and Western capitals are sounding new alarms that Alexander Lukashenko, Belarus’ long-ruling authoritarian leader, could open a new front for the Kremlin by allowing Moscow to again use his country as a launchpad for aggression.

When Putin launched his full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, tens of thousands of Russian troops massed in northern Belarus under the pretense of joint military drills, then launched a rapid push south toward Kyiv, just 90 kilometers from the Belarusian border. Putin’s bid for a quick capture of the Ukrainian capital crumbled in the face of fierce Ukrainian resistance, with stretched-out Russian armored convoys sitting vulnerable to ambushes along narrow highways. Just over a month into the invasion, heavily damaged Russian forces with crumbling supply lines retreated from northern Ukraine, a move the Kremlin framed as a “goodwill gesture” amid early peace efforts. Those early peace talks were actually hosted on Belarusian territory, bringing Russian and Ukrainian delegates together for the first negotiation before talks shifted to Istanbul, where no breakthrough agreement was ever reached.

Unlike the opening days of the war, Belarus has not deployed its own troops to fight in Ukraine, but Lukashenko’s regime has become an integral, often overlooked pillar of Putin’s war effort. Over nearly three years of conflict, Minsk has opened its borders to host Russian military infrastructure, tactical nuclear weapons, and training grounds for Russian troops, offered its hospitals to treat wounded Russian soldiers, and integrated its domestic manufacturing sector into Russia’s war supply chain.

Ukrainian sanctions envoy Vladyslav Vlasiuk confirmed that fragments of a Russian Oreshnik ballistic missile fired at Ukraine in May contained microchips manufactured in Belarus. The Belarusian opposition military monitoring group BELPOL, made up of former military and law enforcement officers who oppose Lukashenko, estimates more than 500 Belarusian industrial plants are currently involved in producing weapons components, repairing Russian military equipment, and providing logistics support for Moscow’s campaign. The group’s head, Uladzimir Zhyhar, told reporters that “Lukashenko’s regime is quite seriously involved in the war. Lukashenko is helping Russia in every way he can.”

Zhyhar added that new infrastructure construction, including a large-scale firing range and barracks capable of housing thousands of troops, is already underway in Belarus’ Gomel region along the Ukrainian border. This ongoing military buildup has forced Kyiv to divert tens of thousands of troops from the main 1,000-kilometer front line in eastern and southern Ukraine to defend its northern border, stretching Ukrainian defensive resources thin.

Beyond conventional military support, Belarus has become a core part of Russia’s nuclear deterrence posture in Europe. Geographically, Belarus shares borders with three NATO member states — Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland — making it a strategically critical outpost for the Kremlin. In 2024, Moscow updated its nuclear doctrine to place Belarus firmly under Russia’s nuclear umbrella, and announced that it had deployed its new nuclear-capable Oreshnik intermediate-range missile system to Belarusian territory. Russia has already used conventionally armed variants of the Oreshnik to strike targets inside Ukraine three times in the last six months. Earlier this month, Moscow and Minsk held large-scale joint nuclear force drills that simulated delivering nuclear warheads to missile units and preparing for a launch, with a joint Belarusian-Russian crew test-firing a nuclear-capable Iskander missile from a southern Russian range.

“Belarus lacks military sovereignty, and as soon as Moscow sees it as necessary for its strategy, Moscow will naturally use Belarus as a launchpad for a new invasion of Ukraine or some kind of armed conflict with NATO countries,” Zhyhar explained, noting that Belarus offers a “very convenient springboard” for any new northern push toward Kyiv.

Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Kyiv’s intelligence services had detected a sharp increase in Russian efforts to push Belarus into deeper direct involvement in the war, and prepare for new offensive operations launched from Belarusian territory. Zelenskyy said potential targets include the Chernihiv-Kyiv corridor in northern Ukraine, or even a strike against a NATO member state sharing a border with Belarus. In response, Zelenskyy has ordered Ukrainian military and security agencies to strengthen northern border fortifications and prepare a coordinated defensive response.

Both Lukashenko and senior Russian officials have rejected Kyiv’s warnings. Lukashenko has insisted Belarus has no plans to enter the war unless it is directly attacked, while Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu dismissed Zelenskyy’s claims as a fearmongering tactic designed to pressure Western allies into sending more military aid to Kyiv.

Even so, the growing risk has prompted unprecedented diplomatic outreach from Western powers. On May 24, French President Emmanuel Macron held his first call with Lukashenko since the 2022 invasion to warn of the severe risks if Belarus is dragged deeper into the conflict. Lukashenko responded by announcing he would host a French envoy the following week to discuss European security and potential easing of European Union sanctions on Minsk.

Ukrainian border guard spokesperson Andrii Demchenko noted that while intelligence confirms Russia is increasing pressure on Lukashenko to enter the war directly, Ukrainian forces have not yet detected a large-scale buildup of Russian or Belarusian troops and equipment along the border. Belarusian opposition leader-in-exile Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who visited Kyiv last week, emphasized that “Belarus must never again become a springboard for aggression. Russian tanks must never again march through Belarus to Chernihiv, Zhitomir, Rivne, or Kyiv. Ukraine is fighting for itself and for all the peoples who have lived in the shadow of empire for too long. It is fighting for the right to live in peace. And the fate of my country, Belarus, also depends on Ukraine’s success.”

Independent military analysts based in Minsk argue that a large-scale offensive launched from Belarus is militarily unlikely at this stage. Belarus has just under 49,000 active-duty troops, a fraction of Russia’s 1.5 million active force, and while Minsk could theoretically mobilize up to 290,000 reservists, those forces lack modern weapons and sufficient training to conduct offensive operations. Minsk-based military analyst Alexander Alesin estimates an offensive would require mobilizing as many as 500,000 personnel — a move that would cripple Belarus’ domestic economy and require massive Russian arms supplies to equip the force.

“Even with a small force, the Ukrainians can easily defend themselves and inflict heavy losses on the Belarusian army,” Alesin said, noting that Ukraine has already built layered heavy fortifications along the entire border and planted extensive minefields that would slow any incursion. Alesin added that Lukashenko has little incentive to pursue direct involvement, pointing out that the Belarusian leader benefits greatly from his current role as a quiet supplier to Russia’s war machine. “The last thing Lukashenko wants is to fight, and he’ll cling to his current position at any cost, so he can avoid fighting while profiting handsomely from the war,” Alesin said.

For many Romanians, the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine has stopped being a distant conflict unfolding across a border. It has arrived on their doorsteps, leaving a gaping hole in an apartment building and a population gripped by anxiety over future attacks. The incident in the northeastern Romanian city of Galati, which occurred in the early hours of Friday while most residents were asleep, marks the most severe incursion of the war into NATO and European Union member Romania since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. On Saturday, reporters climbed 11 stories to the building’s damaged roof, where a jagged, two-meter wide concrete puncture from the downed drone was covered with a temporary plastic tarp. The blast sparked an immediate fire that left the apartment directly below the roof heavily damaged, and a mother and her teenage son were hospitalized with bruising and minor burns. Disaster experts and local residents have emphasized that the outcome could have been far deadlier: the drone struck the building’s concrete lift shaft, which absorbed the majority of the explosion’s force. If the strike had hit a residential side of the structure, an entire floor or more could have been destroyed. Costel Patrichi, the building’s resident manager, described the chaotic morning of the incident. Just before 2 a.m., his phone buzzed with an official air threat alert warning that an unidentified drone was moving toward the city from the nearby Ukrainian border, located only a few dozen miles away. Seconds after the alert arrived, a deafening explosion shook the entire building. Like many Galati residents, Patrichi expressed deep frustration at the failure of Romanian air defenses to intercept the incoming drone. “They told us we are protected by NATO, not to worry. But look where we are now!” he told reporters. He added that the strike has shattered any sense of safety for local residents: “Now I’m afraid. If I go back to my flat tonight, I will sleep with fear. Because this could happen again.” This pervasive sense of vulnerability echoes the constant fear that Ukrainian civilians face nightly, as Russian attack drones regularly target residential infrastructure across the country, killing civilians and destroying homes. But for Romania, a NATO member, the strike represents a dangerous new escalation of the war. Moscow has repeatedly denied any connection to the drone, with Russian President Vladimir Putin claiming there is no evidence linking the weapon to Russian forces. But Romanian officials have pushed back firmly against these denials, confirming the drone is a Russian-produced Geran-2, also widely known as a Shahed. Romanian President Klaus Iohannis told the BBC that the identification is unambiguous: this was a Russian drone, matching the design of another unexploded Russian drone that crashed in Romanian territory just four to five weeks prior. The drones in the region are part of a sustained Russian campaign targeting key Ukrainian Danube River ports, which serve as a critical export hub for Ukrainian grain. On the day of the Galati strike, Romanian defense officials tracked a swarm of 43 Russian drones moving west along the border. According to Iohannis, one of the drones was damaged by Ukrainian air defenses, veered off course, and crossed into Romanian territory before striking the apartment building. NATO allies have formally condemned the incident, calling Russia’s conduct in the war reckless and blaming Moscow’s unprovoked aggression for the incursion. But the international response has been marked by deliberate caution, as leaders work to avoid a direct military confrontation between nuclear-armed Russia and the 31-member alliance. Bucharest government officials confirmed that they briefly considered invoking Article 4 of the NATO treaty, which would trigger an emergency collective security consultation, but rejected the move to prevent widespread public panic. The more drastic step of invoking Article 5 – NATO’s collective mutual defense clause, which defines an attack on one member as an attack on all – has not been put forward for discussion, as no alliance member has accused Russia of launching a deliberate attack on Romanian territory. In response to the strike, Romania has ordered the closure of a Russian consulate in the Black Sea port city of Constanta as a formal diplomatic warning. Iohannis noted that the next step in Romania’s planned diplomatic escalation would be the expulsion of Russia’s ambassador to Bucharest, but no such move has been ordered as of yet. Bucharest has also called on NATO to accelerate the delivery of promised additional air defense equipment to Romania’s eastern border region, and the Romanian government has moved forward with plans to acquire its own fleet of attack drones, including future joint development projects with Ukrainian defense firms. The European Union has also accelerated work on a new round of economic sanctions targeting Moscow. For residents of Galati, diplomatic maneuvers and sanctions have done little to ease the constant sense of danger. Adrian, a local resident who surveyed damage to his family’s apartment in the struck building, called the incident “insane”, noting that the strike occurred in a dense residential neighborhood in the middle of the city. “No-one feels safe now,” he said. Adrian placed full blame for the incident on Russia and Vladimir Putin, adding that existing international sanctions have done little to deter Russian aggression. “But I don’t think the sanctions are enough,” he said. “Because they could take everything from Russia, and they would still attack.” As the war enters its fourth year, the risk of the conflict spilling beyond Ukraine’s borders into neighboring NATO territory is higher than it has ever been, and ordinary Romanians on the front lines of the border region are left living with the constant possibility of another strike.

On Friday, a Russian drone crashed into a residential apartment block in Romania, triggering a destructive blaze and leaving two people with injuries, according to official statements from Romanian authorities. The incident has sent waves of anxiety and unease across local communities, with many residents saying they now face an uncertain future marred by constant fear of further attacks. One local resident summed up the widespread mood of trepidation, saying, “I will sleep with fear” going forward. The strike comes amid heightened regional tensions following months of cross-border drone and missile incidents linked to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which shares a long border with NATO member Romania. Emergency services were quick to respond, extinguishing the fire and launching an investigation into the exact origins of the drone and how it crossed into Romanian territory. Romanian officials have yet to release a full public account of the strike’s trajectory, but the incident has already sparked renewed discussion among NATO allies about reinforcing eastern flank security to deter further accidental or intentional incursions into alliance territory. For residents of the affected building and surrounding neighborhoods, the immediate impact has been deeply personal, with many displaced from their homes and left grappling with property damage and emotional trauma.