分类: technology

  • US bans DeepSeek AI from government use as tech tension with China continues

    US bans DeepSeek AI from government use as tech tension with China continues

    In a sweeping move that escalates tensions in the global artificial intelligence race, the United States has ordered the full removal of AI technology developed by Chinese firm DeepSeek from nearly all federal civilian government systems, according to a public order issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

    The ban, which took effect at the end of July but was only disclosed to the public this week, prohibits civilian agencies across the federal government—including the Treasury Department, State Department and Department of Justice—from using any DeepSeek tools or any technology built using DeepSeek’s open-source AI models. Notably, the restriction does not apply to agencies under the Department of Defense, a detail that has not been explained by DHS officials.

    The action comes amid growing criticism of Chinese AI development from the Trump administration and leading U.S. AI firms, even as DHS has not publicly outlined specific security vulnerabilities tied to DeepSeek. The White House has ramped up rhetorical pressure on Chinese AI companies throughout 2025, with President Donald Trump repeatedly identifying China as Washington’s primary strategic rival in the AI sector, a technology he has framed as critical to long-term U.S. economic and national security. Earlier this year, White House technology advisor Michael Kratsios wrote in an internal memo that Chinese rivals have been engaged in widespread “malicious exploitation” of intellectual property developed by U.S. AI companies.

    Two of the biggest U.S. AI developers, Anthropic and OpenAI—both preparing for initial public offerings in the coming months—have publicly accused DeepSeek and other Chinese AI firms of directly copying proprietary core model architectures developed by U.S. companies. DeepSeek has not yet publicly responded to these allegations, and as of Tuesday, requests for comment have been sent to DHS, DeepSeek, and the Chinese Embassy in Washington D.C., with no official statements released by any of the three parties.

    DeepSeek has rapidly emerged as a disruptive force in the global AI ecosystem since its first public launch in early 2025, driven by its open-source business model that makes its core models free for most developers to access and adapt. For startups and independent developers, the cost of building tools on DeepSeek models is just a small fraction of the cost of licensing closed, proprietary models from U.S. providers like OpenAI, Google and Anthropic. The cost advantage extends to DeepSeek’s own development: the company revealed last year that it spent just $6 million to train its original flagship model, compared to the roughly $100 million price tag for OpenAI’s GPT-4 training. That announcement sent shockwaves through global tech markets last year, dragging AI-related stock prices down as investors re-evaluated the cost of competing in large model development.

    DeepSeek’s popularity has surged in recent months, even amid growing political scrutiny in the U.S. Its free consumer chatbot ranks among the most downloaded apps in Apple’s U.S. App Store, and its models have already been integrated into customer-facing products from major U.S. tech companies including Snowflake, Vercel and OpenRouter. Just last week, the company released its newest updated model, which has garnered widespread praise from developer communities online for outperforming OpenAI’s most advanced tools on common tasks like software coding.

    The ban marks the most significant restriction the U.S. has placed on a major Chinese AI provider to date, and it comes as the Trump administration is weighing additional restrictions on Chinese AI access to U.S. cloud infrastructure and venture capital funding. Industry analysts warn the ban could complicate cross-border AI collaboration and raise costs for thousands of U.S. startups that rely on DeepSeek’s low-cost open-source tools, even as the administration frames the move as critical to protecting U.S. technological advantage.

  • Musk and Anthropic pledge public share giveaways

    Musk and Anthropic pledge public share giveaways

    The global artificial intelligence industry is facing mounting pressure over the unregulated advancement of the technology and its potential long-term risks to humanity, pushing two major tech players to make unprecedented public-focused financial commitments aimed at easing public concerns.

    Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur who leads rocket firm SpaceX and AI startup xAI, announced via social media on Monday that starting next year, every child residing in the United States will receive one of his personal SpaceX shares. In his post, Musk framed the move as a response to a similar announcement from AI developer Anthropic, noting “I recommend giving the shares directly to the public. This is what I will be doing” and adding that this giveaway will be the first of many similar initiatives. As of publication, no detailed framework has been released outlining eligibility verification, distribution logistics or the exact value of the shares that will be transferred to recipients.

    The announcement came just one day after Anthropic, the company behind the popular large language model Claude, revealed that it would earmark 5% of its total outstanding shares for a newly established public benefit fund dedicated to charitable initiatives aligned with public good. The firm added that its board of directors retains the authority to allocate an additional 2% of company shares to the fund at a later date. In a key clarification to address growing concerns over corporate influence in policy, Anthropic emphasized that no assets held in the public benefit fund will be used for lobbying activities or political donations, whether in the U.S. or in international markets.

    The two announcements arrive as both firms prepare for or have recently completed landmark stock market listings. Anthropic’s upcoming initial public offering is widely expected to be one of the largest tech debuts in recent history, with industry analysts projecting a potential valuation exceeding $1 trillion. SpaceX made history in June when it closed its IPO, raising $85.7 billion to claim the title of the largest initial public offering in global market history.

    These public pledges come at a moment of intense global scrutiny of the AI sector, centered on growing safety fears, widespread concerns over job displacement, and uncertainty about the technology’s long-term impact on global society. Recent data underscores these risks: a 2024 research report from the International Monetary Fund estimates that nearly 40% of all jobs worldwide will be impacted by AI adoption, with that figure jumping to as much as 60% for advanced economies. Already, thousands of workers across the tech sector globally have been laid off as companies adopt AI tools to boost operational efficiency, leading to growing public backlash against unregulated AI expansion.

    Safety concerns have also intensified following high-profile warnings from within the industry itself. Last month, a 27-year-old AI researcher named Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic, publishing a viral public post warning that AI development was advancing far too quickly for regulators to mitigate risks. In interviews following his resignation, Coxon stated that many AI insiders are “genuinely frightened” by the pace of progress, adding that “if we don’t slow down at the current rate of progress, there is a strong chance that we could all die in the immediate future.”

    Coxon’s former CEO, Anthropic founder Dario Amodei, has previously publicly called for a temporary slowdown in cutting-edge AI development to allow for the implementation of proper safety guardrails, a position that has drawn both support and skepticism from industry observers. Amodei’s call has been backed by two of the biggest names in the AI sector: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk, both of whom have supported calls for industry-wide deceleration, binding government regulation, and independent third-party monitoring of advanced AI model development.

    On the policy front, the U.S. government has taken recent tentative steps to address AI risks. Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a “morally binding” safety agreement with the CEOs of all major AI firms, requiring companies to take responsibility for ensuring the safety of their own AI systems. Notably, President Trump has repeatedly refused to support binding legislative regulation of AI development, despite ongoing bipartisan and public debate over the technology’s risks. Following the signing of the agreement, Trump announced the creation of a new White House AI task force, to be led by Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton. The task force will be tasked with coordinating U.S. government engagement with AI companies, consumers, and religious organizations on AI-related issues.

  • Israeli spyware targeted ‘hundreds of millions’ through zero-click ads, researchers find

    Israeli spyware targeted ‘hundreds of millions’ through zero-click ads, researchers find

    A groundbreaking investigation from Canada’s independent digital watchdog The Citizen Lab has exposed a sweeping global cyber surveillance campaign that leverages mainstream digital advertising infrastructure to deliver the notorious Israeli mercenary spyware Candiru to millions of devices, entirely without any action from the target. This marks the first publicly confirmed instance of zero-click mercenary spyware being distributed via targeted online advertisements, according to the organization’s official report published Thursday.

    The investigation details that Discover-Tech, an Israeli firm that operates under the facade of a legitimate digital advertising company, actually acts as a front for major mercenary spyware operators, including Candiru, which recently rebranded to Integrity Labs following a 2025 acquisition by unsanctioned U.S. private equity firm Integrity Partners. Through its advertising operations, Discover-Tech placed targeted ads that forced millions of devices across dozens of countries to connect directly to Candiru-controlled servers, enabling covert tracking and deep digital reconnaissance of affected users.

    Notably, the report confirms that between 2024 and 2025, at least 45 devices connected to Al Jazeera Media Network were specifically targeted in a string of these zero-click ad attacks commissioned by Discover-Tech. The company controls a proprietary platform called Controlium that enables its mercenary spyware partners to de-anonymize users, collect unique device fingerprints, and automatically deploy malware infections the moment an ad loads on a user’s device. No click, no interaction, and no action from the target is required for the infection to succeed, making these attacks nearly invisible to the average user.

    Over a four-month monitoring period, Citizen Lab researchers recorded Discover-Tech’s ads running across nearly 200,000 distinct websites and mobile applications for both Android and iOS operating systems, spread across dozens of nations. Beyond its partnership with Candiru, the investigation also links Discover-Tech to two other known mercenary spyware actors: Intelos and Bindecy.

    Candiru first drew international regulatory attention in 2021, when the U.S. government added the firm to its trade blacklist over findings that it engaged in activities that threatened U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. Candiru is not the first Israeli spyware firm to face such sanctions: it was added to the blacklist alongside the infamous NSO Group, another major mercenary spyware provider that has been linked to global surveillance of journalists, activists, and government officials.

    This is not Candiru’s first documented targeting of independent Middle Eastern media outlets either. In 2021, it was revealed that the firm’s spyware had been used to target the independent news outlet Middle East Eye (MEE) and dozens of other regional websites. A 2020 investigation by cybersecurity firm ESET uncovered a multi-wave Candiru surveillance campaign running between April 2020 and August 2021 that focused heavily on targets with connections to the Middle East, particularly organizations and individuals focused on the conflict in Yemen.

    A particularly troubling revelation from the new investigation is that Discover-Tech was listed as a certified, approved vendor by both Google and IAB Europe, the leading trade association for the European digital advertising industry. The company was able to place its malicious ads across major global ad networks including Google, Russian search giant Yandex, and ad platform Beeswax.

    Wolfie Cristl, a senior researcher at The Citizen Lab, emphasized the systemic risk this campaign exposes to the global digital ecosystem. “The way online advertising works today is a systemic security threat,” Cristl told Reuters, noting that the risk extends equally to governments, private sector entities, civil society groups, and ordinary individual internet users.

    Confiant, a New York-based advertising security firm, released a parallel independent report on the campaign the same day as The Citizen Lab. Jerome Dangu, Confiant’s co-founder, told reporters that Discover-Tech was deploying as many as 10 million malicious advertisements every day across the globe. Dangu explained that standard industry data-sharing practices, known as cookie matching, allowed the firm to track users even after they left websites or apps that ran its ads. “Very likely hundreds of millions of people would have been touched by Discover-Tech,” Dangu said.

    Following the publication of the two research reports, major digital ad platforms including Google, IAB Europe, and Beeswax have already moved to cut off Discover-Tech’s access to the global digital advertising market, halting its ability to run new malicious ads for the time being.

  • Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    A high-profile cyber incident has disrupted official social media channels of Ireland’s national police force, An Garda Síochána, after unauthorized actors gained access to two prominent accounts on the X platform earlier this week to push cryptocurrency promotions. According to Ireland’s national public service broadcaster RTÉ, the compromised accounts — @GardaTraffic, the force’s main account for road safety and traffic updates, and @GardaInfo, a general public information account — had their official Garda branding stripped from their profiles by Wednesday night. The bad actors replaced the original branding and began publishing a stream of posts advertising an unspecified cryptocurrency. Multiple posts were automatically flagged by X’s content moderation systems, which added warnings linking the content to an already suspended third-party profile. The hackers also altered the profile location setting to list Amsterdam, masking the actual origin of the activity. In an official statement released shortly after the breach was discovered, An Garda Síochána confirmed that the unauthorized access was limited exclusively to its two public-facing X accounts. The force emphasized that no internal police data systems were compromised in the incident, and there has been no loss of sensitive police information or disruption to core operational work. A police spokesperson issued a public advisory urging social media users to avoid interacting with any content posted to the two compromised accounts, or any imposter accounts claiming to represent the official Garda channels. “An Garda Síochána continues to carry out our internal enquiries and work with the X platform to understand how this unauthorised access has occurred,” the spokesperson added in the initial statement. By Thursday, the force issued an updated announcement confirming that the two compromised accounts had been successfully recovered and restored to police control. However, officials confirmed the accounts will remain inactive over the coming days to allow the Garda National Cyber Crime Bureau to conduct a full forensic investigation into the incident, identify the attackers, and shore up any security vulnerabilities that allowed the breach. The incident highlights the growing risk of unauthorized access to public institution social media accounts, which bad actors often target to spread misinformation or promote fraudulent schemes to large follower bases.

  • AI giant Anthropic sees revenue surge ahead of stock market listing

    AI giant Anthropic sees revenue surge ahead of stock market listing

    Leading artificial intelligence developer Anthropic has delivered a 45% jump in third-quarter revenue, reaching $16.8 billion (£12.7 billion) in the three months ending September, according to sources familiar with the company’s investor briefing obtained by the BBC.

    The explosive growth figure was shared Wednesday with potential investors during a presentation at Anthropic’s San Francisco headquarters, as the firm behind the Claude large language model lays the groundwork for an initial public offering (IPO) projected to launch before the end of 2024. A company spokesperson declined to confirm or comment on the unpublished financial data when contacted by reporters.

    This strong quarterly result extends a pattern of consecutive growth for Anthropic throughout 2024. Revenue climbed from $4.7 billion in the first quarter to $11.6 billion in the second quarter, and the firm notched a second consecutive profitable quarter, according to the briefing materials.

    Anthropic’s financial performance, paired with results from industry rival OpenAI, serves as a key benchmark for measuring the broader AI sector’s actual growth trajectory and its capacity to fund the massive computing infrastructure required to advance next-generation model development.

    The upbeat earnings update comes at a moment of heightened market volatility across AI-focused and tech hardware stocks, as investor anxiety grows over the enormous capital outlays required to build out AI capacity. On Wednesday, major U.S. technology shares pulled back, with leading semiconductor manufacturers including AMD, Nvidia and Intel recording sharp share price drops.

    Market unease spread to Asian exchanges Thursday morning. Shares in Japanese technology investment conglomerate SoftBank fell 9%, while South Korean semiconductor leaders Samsung dropped 8.4% and SK Hynix declined more than 6%. South Korea’s tech-heavy Kospi index tumbled 7.6% in early morning trading.

    The recent market declines follow critical remarks from Hock Tan, chief executive officer of U.S. tech manufacturing firm Broadcom, delivered at an industry conference in Singapore earlier this week. Tan argued that many investors hold “extreme expectations” for AI returns that are disconnected from actual market fundamentals, comparing current AI investment sentiment to gambling in a casino where many participants “have no clue” about the underlying risks.

    Beyond market concerns over infrastructure spending, the AI industry continues to grapple with widespread debate over model safety. Last month, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman confirmed his firm would not pursue an IPO in 2024, prioritizing work to address outstanding safety risks before moving forward with a public listing. The ChatGPT developer is also preparing for a blockbuster IPO that is projected to value the company at more than $1 trillion.

    Anthropic has itself been a prominent voice in calls for more deliberate AI development, with CEO Dario Amodei repeatedly urging the industry to slow the pace of advanced model rollouts to mitigate unaddressed safety risks. Despite these public concerns over sector risks, the company has continued its global expansion, opening a new regional office in Singapore on the same day it held its investor briefing in San Francisco.

  • FBI arrests Saudi OpenAI engineer over hidden recording device

    FBI arrests Saudi OpenAI engineer over hidden recording device

    A high-stakes national security case has emerged around one of the world’s most influential artificial intelligence firms, after U.S. federal prosecutors filed criminal charges against a former OpenAI engineer accused of sneaking a hidden recording device into the company’s top-level executive conference room. The incident has amplified already urgent conversations about protecting sensitive AI development as global competition for advanced artificial intelligence technology intensifies.

    The U.S. Department of Justice announced the charges this week, confirming that federal law enforcement agents arrested 35-year-old Abdulrahman Alfozan, a Saudi national and legal permanent U.S. resident, last week. Alfozan made his first formal court appearance at a federal hearing on Tuesday, with the case moving rapidly through the judicial system amid heightened scrutiny of AI sector security.

    Court documents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation lay out the timeline of the alleged surveillance plot. Alfozan joined OpenAI as an engineer in July 2025, and investigators say he planted the custom recording device approximately two months after starting his role, around September 28. The thumb-sized device, equipped with both a microphone and camera, was concealed inside a roll of toilet paper and connected to an available USB port behind a mounted television in OpenAI’s San Francisco executive meeting space. Company staff discovered the covert device just two days later, on September 30. All data stored on the device remained encrypted, leaving investigators unable to access any recorded content as the probe continues. A second identical custom-built recording device was also seized from Alfozan’s personal bag during searches, according to the complaint.

    Beyond placing the device, the FBI alleges Alfozan leveraged an AI productivity tool to gather key details: meeting room schedules, layout blueprints, and technical capabilities of the space he targeted. Once the device was discovered, OpenAI said it used its own proprietary AI models to link the device to Alfozan and trace how it was planted. Internal investigations by the company also uncovered evidence that Alfozan had planned to place additional covert recording devices across other sensitive areas of OpenAI’s office to capture more private executive discussions.

    In an official statement posted to X, OpenAI moved quickly to reassure stakeholders that no critical company data had been compromised. “At this time, we have no indications of this individual inappropriately accessing or exfiltrating model weights, source code, or customer data. The employee was terminated immediately following the discovery,” the company said.

    FBI Director Kash Patel emphasized the severity of the alleged plot in an official statement, noting that Alfozan “allegedly concealed a covert recording device inside his employer’s executive conference room to secretly capture sensitive communications about the company’s super intelligence technology.” The FBI’s investigation into the incident remains active and ongoing.

    Public records show Alfozan has been a legal permanent resident of the United States since September 2020. His public LinkedIn profile lists academic credentials from two of the country’s most prestigious technology programs: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of California, Berkeley. He is also listed as holding prior engineering roles at two other major U.S. tech firms, Meta and Microsoft. Outlets including Middle East Eye have not been able to independently confirm the accuracy of the details posted to his LinkedIn profile. As of this reporting, Alfozan has not issued any public response to the criminal allegations against him.

    If convicted on the current charges, Alfozan faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison, a $250,000 fine, and three years of court-supervised release following incarceration.

    The case has struck a nerve across the global tech and policy communities, as private companies and national governments around the world pour billions of dollars into a race to develop cutting-edge, next-generation artificial intelligence. With so much economic and strategic advantage riding on breakthroughs in AI, the incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of even the most high-profile AI firms to insider threats and espionage targeting confidential development information.

  • Toilet paper and secret recorders: What we know about the arrest of the Saudi OpenAI engineer

    Toilet paper and secret recorders: What we know about the arrest of the Saudi OpenAI engineer

    A Saudi national and former OpenAI engineer has been arrested and charged by federal authorities in the United States over allegations he planted a hidden listening device in a sensitive internal conference room at the leading AI firm’s offices. Thirty-five-year-old Abdulrahman Alfozan, a legal permanent U.S. resident who had worked at OpenAI for roughly a year, made his first federal court appearance this week in California following his October 9 arrest by FBI agents.

    Court documents filed by prosecutors lay out a month-long alleged pattern of planning stretching from mid-August to mid-September this year. According to the official complaint, Alfozan first used a productivity AI tool to gather critical information about the company’s meeting infrastructure, repeatedly querying the system for details about meeting room schedules, common meeting locations for external partner discussions, and daily bookings for the target conference room.

    Prosecutors further allege that in September, Alfozan used a chatbot linked to his spouse’s account to ask for guidance on constructing, installing, and remotely accessing a covert recording device. The targeted meeting room, investigators note, was routinely used to host discussions covering highly sensitive material: including confidential technical development updates, commercial strategy, OpenAI’s government partnerships, and private business relationships. Alfozan held no authorization to participate in or access meetings held in this space, the complaint confirms.

    Closed-circuit security footage captured Alfozan near the restricted conference room on eight separate occasions throughout September, according to investigators. On September 30, OpenAI staff made the first discovery: a hidden audio recording device, wrapped in toilet paper to conceal it, tucked behind a mounted television in the room.

    To identify who placed the device, investigators positioned a surveillance camera inside the conference room. On October 5, Alfozan was recorded entering the room and checking the spot where the listening device had been installed, court documents state. That same day, security personnel found an unattended bag Alfozan left in a separate meeting room; inside, they discovered a second matching recording device, along with the engineer’s wallet and official identification.

    In a public statement posted to the platform X, OpenAI confirmed it had leveraged its own proprietary AI models to help analyze the device and trace its origins. The company also stressed that, to date, investigators have found no evidence that Alfozan successfully accessed or removed sensitive core company assets, including AI model weights, proprietary source code, or private customer data. Alfozan’s employment contract with OpenAI has since been terminated following his arrest.

    A native of Saudi Arabia, Alfozan was educated in the U.S. and has held legal permanent resident status in the country since 2010, according to court records. His defense attorney William Pernik pushed back on the allegations in a statement to media, noting that Alfozan built his life in the U.S. after arriving years ago as a young person chasing opportunity. Pernik described the charges as entirely out of character for his client, saying the legal team will conduct a full, exhaustive review of all evidence presented by the government to clarify what actually occurred.

    Pernik emphasized that under U.S. legal principles, Alfozan is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the public allegations released so far do not constitute a finding of guilt. He asked the public to refrain from passing judgment until all facts come to light in court.

    A detention hearing is scheduled for October 19 to decide whether Alfozan will remain in federal custody while the criminal case proceeds. The FBI’s investigation into the alleged plot remains ongoing. If convicted on the single charge of illegally attempting to intercept oral communications, Alfozan faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.

  • How long will humans be needed for translation?

    How long will humans be needed for translation?

    Machine translation has evolved from a niche experimental tool to a global workhorse, with Google alone reporting that users now run one trillion words through its Google Translate service every single month. That massive volume does not even include translations processed by competing platforms, from DeepL and Microsoft’s translation tools to generative AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude and Google’s own Gemini, plus the custom-built corporate translation solutions that power countless international businesses today. By 2023, the direct market for standalone machine translation, separate from general AI subscription services, reached an estimated value of $1.4 billion (£1 billion), reflecting just how central automated translation has become to global communication.

    Idiomatic language has long been one of the biggest hurdles for AI translation. Take the common French phrase for heavy rain: “Il pleut des cordes,” which translates literally to “it’s raining ropes.” While a well-trained AI system will recognize this as an idiom and substitute the equivalent English phrase “it’s raining cats and dogs,” experts question whether it can consistently find the right equivalent in less widely spoken languages, such as Indonesian. What seems like a trivial example for weather commentary points to a broader challenge: as AI translation moves into high-stakes sectors from legal work to healthcare, small mistakes can carry severe consequences.

    For many low-stakes use cases, industry leaders agree that raw AI translation is already the most practical choice. Jonathan Zimmermann, founder of Swiss non-profit Open Knowledge Association (OKA) – the largest single contributor of translated articles to Wikipedia – explains that for internal company documents or public product listings, spending 100 times more to catch a tiny share of remaining errors is economically irrational. Even for OKA’s Wikipedia work, AI has been transformative: translating 10,000 articles via traditional human-only methods would cost millions of dollars, but OKA’s hybrid model, where AI produces a first draft and human translators review every line, makes the work accessible.

    What has shifted most dramatically in just the last two to three years is the quality of AI output. Zimmermann notes that when tools like DeepL first became widespread, human translators still had to rewrite large portions of every AI draft. Today, many AI-generated translations require no editing at all. This shift has led to a growing industry-wide temptation to cut human oversight out of the process entirely, raising the core question: is AI translation now good enough to replace human translators entirely?

    Specialized translators working in high-stakes fields say the answer is still no. Ariella Baltié, a legal translator who converts court documents from English to French, recently reviewed a set of AI-translated legal papers that contained two critical errors in the opening lines alone. The AI incorrectly rendered “Le demandeur” – the legal term for plaintiff – as “the requester,” a mistranslation that is entirely inappropriate for formal legal documents. It also mistook the noun phrase “Madame X, épouse Y” (meaning “Ms X, wife of Y”) for a verb phrase, outputting “Ms X marries Y” instead. Mistranslations of this type in legal work are not merely embarrassing: in the United States, errors in machine-translated asylum applications have already led to prolonged delays in detainee release.

    In the medical field, translation errors can be life-threatening. Carol Bereuter, a specialist in medical translation, recalls an AI-translated document that misrendered the Greek letter μ – the standard symbol for “micro,” meaning one-millionth of a unit – as “milli,” which equals one-thousandth of a unit. That error changes a prescribed microgram of medication to a milligram, meaning a patient would receive 1,000 times the intended dose. Bereuter adds that modern AI’s improved fluency has actually made errors harder to catch: early machine translation often produced obviously clunky, grammatically incorrect text that stood out to human reviewers, but today’s AI output sounds natural and coherent, hiding subtle but dangerous mistakes.

    François Yvon, a research director specializing in automatic translation at France’s National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), warns that context-dependent ambiguity continues to trip up even the most advanced AI systems. A human translator immediately understands that the phrase “translate into Polish” refers to converting text to the Polish language, but Yvon notes that AI can easily misinterpret the phrase to refer to polishing shoes, translating the sentence to be about shoe polish. Similarly, without understanding that a text refers to a football match, AI will often misinterpret “taking a corner” as a physical action rather than a soccer play.

    A 2023 study run by OKA and funded by Wikimedia underscores the scale of remaining errors. Researchers analyzed 119 articles across 10 language pairs, tracking more than 1,000 hours of human translator work, and found that 27% of AI-generated text still required corrections before publication. Three-quarters of those corrections fixed errors introduced by the AI itself, and between 5% and 6% of those AI errors fundamentally altered the meaning of the original text.

    Yvon argues that fully eliminating these errors is a fundamental challenge given how current AI translation systems work. Large language models select words based on statistical probability, choosing the word that is most likely to fit rather than the word that is definitively correct. That discrepancy matters in language, a domain defined by subtlety and nuance that can easily throw AI off course.

    Looking forward, Yvon says next-generation systems are likely to improve performance through hybrid AI architectures, where one model generates the translation, a second critiques it for errors, and a third produces a revised final version. But the true breakthrough, he argues, will not arrive until AI systems can communicate when they are uncertain about a translation. Until that day, even as AI handles more and more translation volume globally, human oversight remains critical for any high-stakes use case.

  • Saudi man charged with planting ‘sophisticated’ recording device in OpenAI office

    Saudi man charged with planting ‘sophisticated’ recording device in OpenAI office

    In a high-profile case that spotlights growing security risks within the global artificial intelligence industry, federal prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice have formally charged a Saudi national employed as an engineer at leading AI developer OpenAI with orchestrating a covert surveillance operation inside the company’s San Francisco office.

    The defendant, identified as Abdulrahman Alfozan, has been accused of one federal count of using or attempting to use an electronic surveillance device to intercept private oral communications. Court documents outline that Alfozan had joined OpenAI as an engineer only months prior, in July 2025.

    OpenAI, the organization behind the world-dominating chatbot ChatGPT, first flagged suspicious activity after internal teams uncovered a well-concealed, sophisticated recording device tucked inside one of the company’s executive conference rooms. According to official complaint details, the device was wrapped in toilet paper and plugged into an unused USB port mounted on the rear of a conference room television — a spot chosen specifically to avoid easy detection. The device was discovered by OpenAI staff on September 30, two full days after prosecutors allege Alfozan installed it, and investigators confirmed the device was encrypted to protect any data it collected.

    Remarkably, OpenAI confirmed that it leveraged its own proprietary AI models to trace the origins of the rogue device, ultimately pinpointing Alfozan as the person who planted it. The company immediately notified the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to launch a formal criminal investigation, and moved quickly to terminate Alfozan’s employment. To date, OpenAI has confirmed there is no evidence that sensitive corporate assets including core model source code, model weights, or private customer data were improperly accessed or exfiltrated during the incident.

    FBI Director Kash Patel released an official statement confirming the allegations, noting that Alfozan “allegedly concealed a covert recording device inside his employer’s executive conference room to secretly capture sensitive communications.” Patel added that the stated goal of the operation was to obtain confidential internal information about OpenAI’s cutting-edge AI product development.

    Investigative records further outline that Alfozan used common workplace productivity tools and an external chatbot to plan his operation in advance. Prosecutors allege that chat prompts linked to Alfozan include research queries on building, customizing, installing, and hiding audio recording devices, adding remote access functionality, improving live audio capture quality, and encrypting data stored on the device’s memory card.

    Prosecutors say that on October 5, roughly a week after the device was installed, Alfozan returned to the executive conference room to check on the covert recorder. Closed-circuit security camera footage from the office confirms his presence at the site, directly tying him to the location of the device. On that same day, Alfozan reportedly left an unattended bag in another section of the OpenAI office building. When the company’s security team inspected the bag, they found Alfozan’s wallet and government identification, along with a second recording device matching the design of the one found in the conference room.

    Alfozan made his first federal court appearance on Tuesday, and as of the latest update, it remains unclear whether he has secured legal representation to fight the charges. If he is ultimately convicted on the single federal charge, Alfozan faces a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine.

    The incident has sparked new conversations about insider threat risks for high-stakes AI development firms, which hold closely guarded intellectual property that is widely considered among the most valuable commercial assets in the global technology sector.

  • Fridges in French supermarkets hit by cyber attack

    Fridges in French supermarkets hit by cyber attack

    In a brazen and unprecedented cyber attack that has sent shockwaves through France’s food retail sector, hundreds of supermarket locations across the country have fallen victim to hackers who deliberately compromised temperature control systems for cold storage units, leading to massive food spoilage and potential multi-million euro losses.

    The attack targeted outdated remote temperature management software developed by Danish engineering firm Danfoss, which is widely used by major French grocery chains to regulate refrigerators and freezers across their store networks. Hackers were able to seize full control of the systems, forcing cold units to rise to dangerous, warm temperatures over an extended period rather than the brief, controlled temperature increase that happens during standard overnight defrost cycles.

    According to official statements from affected retailers, Intermarché and its discount brand Netto reported disruptions at 180 stores, with an additional 100 locations hastily disconnected from the internet as a preemptive protective measure. Coopérative U CEO Dominique Schelcher described the incident as “extremely serious and unprecedented,” confirming that more than 100 of the chain’s outlets were targeted. Other major national retailers including Carrefour, Monoprix, and E.Leclerc also confirmed breaches: Carrefour reported 80 of its 6,000 French stores were affected, while roughly 5% of Monoprix’s 400-plus locations suffered attacks.

    Across affected locations, temperatures inside freezers and refrigerated display cases climbed as high as 50°C (120°F) and held at that level for up to six hours overnight into Monday, according to Intermarché representatives. When store managers arrived for opening on Monday morning, they were greeted by blasts of hot air pouring from malfunctioning cold units, with some locations even reporting small electrical fires sparked by the overheating systems. Two stores in the Alsace region alone have already reported combined losses of €270,000, leading industry observers to project that total nationwide losses could reach millions of euros. All spoiled fresh and frozen products have been discarded to avoid public health risks, and some display units remained out of service as of Monday afternoon, with stores working to restock shelves quickly.

    Danfoss later confirmed that the compromised systems were older model refrigeration units whose security software could not be updated to patch a previously identified vulnerability. The company noted that it had “long advised” businesses operating outdated, unsupported infrastructure to upgrade their systems to maintain security, adding that it is committed to supporting affected customers as they work to restore operations.

    To date, around 400 stores out of the roughly 15,000 total supermarkets operating across France have been confirmed affected, though authorities note the full scale of the breach is still being assessed. French national prosecutors have launched a formal cyber-crime investigation into the incident, which the Paris prosecutor’s office has labeled a “large-scale cyber-attack affecting the refrigerators of several major food retail chains across France.”

    The attack has already drawn international attention, with European Food Commissioner Christophe Hansen condemning the hack on social media platform X, warning that “Food security requires more attention at all levels. Because the weaponisation of food has become a reality.” Coopérative U CEO Schelcher echoed that condemnation, saying that targeting critical infrastructure tied to the nation’s food supply is “unacceptable” and calling for a full, thorough investigation into the breach. Store teams across the country remain fully mobilized alongside refrigeration and cybersecurity specialists to restore normal operations as quickly as possible.