分类: technology

  • Federal regulators back Trump’s plan to speed power to energy-hungry AI data centers

    Federal regulators back Trump’s plan to speed power to energy-hungry AI data centers

    WASHINGTON – In a landmark move tailored to the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, federal energy regulators have greenlit new rules to speed up connections between large power users — most critically AI-focused data centers — and the nation’s aging electric transmission system. The vote comes as U.S. policymakers race to meet surging energy demand for AI infrastructure and shore up American competitiveness against China in the fast-expanding tech sector.

    The policy shift was initiated eight months ago, when U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright called on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take bolder action to clear interconnection bottlenecks that have delayed data center development. In a unanimous vote by the five-member commission, FERC passed an order requiring that large power loads such as AI data centers gain timely, orderly access to high-voltage transmission lines. This marks the second major regulatory adjustment FERC has made in less than a year to accommodate AI infrastructure, following a December order that allowed data centers to connect directly to independent power plants.

    FERC Chair Laura Swett, a Trump administration appointee, framed the decision as a historic step to modernize the U.S. electricity market while shielding ordinary consumers from unexpected costs. Under the new order, data center operators are required to cover 100% of the costs for transmission upgrades needed to support their connections, addressing widespread concerns that general ratepayers would be forced to foot the bill for expanding the grid to serve AI facilities. “Many Americans are increasingly concerned that adding large power loads like data centers will push up their electricity bills, and that concern is shared by this commission,” Swett said. “We take very seriously our congressional mandate to ensure rates remain reasonable for American households.”

    The policy has drawn a mixed reception from stakeholders across the energy and political landscape. Tech giants and data center developers have welcomed the reform, which cuts through years-long interconnection backlogs that have left major AI companies scrambling to secure enough power to expand their operations. Major industry players including xAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, OpenAI and Amazon have already backed the administration’s efforts by signing the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, a voluntary commitment to build or purchase new power generation to match their data center demand, cover all grid upgrade costs, provide emergency backup power to avoid blackouts, and prioritize local hiring for construction projects.

    But the rule has sparked significant pushback from utilities, state governments, and regional grid operators, who argue that the new federal framework erodes their existing authority to manage local transmission planning and interconnection processes. Clean energy advocates have also raised alarms, warning that the policy could undermine state-level requirements to power new data centers with renewable energy sources, slowing progress on national decarbonization goals.

    Beyond regulatory and policy disputes, the FERC vote comes amid a growing grassroots backlash against data center development across the country. Local communities are increasingly pushing back against proposed facilities, citing fears that concentrated data center demand will drive up regional electricity prices, strain local water supplies, and cause environmental harm. Many residents have also protested the loss of open space and farmland to massive data center complexes, which have grown dramatically in size to meet AI’s extreme power requirements.

    Current industry data underscores the scale of AI’s growing energy footprint. An estimated 4,000 data centers are already operating across the U.S., with another 3,000 planned or under construction — some of which consume as much electricity as a small entire city. The Electric Power Research Institute estimates that data centers already account for roughly 5% of total U.S. electricity demand, a figure that could triple by 2035. In Virginia, a major hub for data center development, facilities already make up more than 25% of the state’s total electricity demand, a share projected to climb above 40% by 2030.

    Even with the new FERC rules, however, major structural challenges remain to matching AI’s power demand with available supply. The order does not address the growing gap between data center construction and the buildout of new power generation plants. In many regions, data center development is outpacing the addition of new generation capacity, leading to tightening energy supplies, rising retail electricity prices, and increased warnings of potential future blackouts.

    Industry analysis also shows that even with clearer interconnection rules, overall data center capacity buildout is lagging far behind projected demand. A recent J.P. Morgan report, which analyzed satellite imagery of planned projects, found that more than 60% of data center capacity scheduled for completion by 2027 has not yet broken ground, and an additional 7% of projects have already been delayed. The report cited persistent permitting bottlenecks, supply chain delays for critical equipment including gas turbines and transformers, and widespread shortages of skilled construction labor as the primary causes of backlogs.

    For the Trump administration, accelerating AI data center development is a core priority to maintain U.S. economic and military leadership in AI, a sector the White House views as critical to outcompeting China. President Trump has made AI competitiveness a central policy focus, recently signing an executive order to establish a 30-day national security vetting framework for the most advanced AI systems before they can be released to the public, while framing the sector as a magnet for global foreign investment into the U.S.

  • AI executives gather at G7 as Europeans seek checks on American dominance

    AI executives gather at G7 as Europeans seek checks on American dominance

    On Wednesday, some of the world’s most influential artificial intelligence executives convened in France, capping off the Group of Seven major industrialized nations summit with a urgent conversation centered on balancing AI innovation with growing global demands for technological independence from U.S. industry dominance.

    While this year’s G7 summit was dominated by discussions of ongoing armed conflicts in Iran and Ukraine, the final day of the gathering carved out dedicated space for one of the most pressing technological issues of our time: the future of global AI governance and development. In a rare high-profile gathering of cross-border AI leadership, the chief executives of three of the world’s most powerful AI companies – OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei – gathered for a working lunch focused on the goal of “Ensuring a safe, rapid and effective deployment of artificial intelligence.”

    The meeting was not limited to the sector’s largest players: it also included the heads of emerging AI labs from across the globe, including Canada’s Cohere AI, French developer Mistral AI, Germany’s Black Forest Labs, Italy’s Domyn, Japan’s Sakana AI, and U.K.-based generative AI firm Synthesia.

    This summit comes amid a sharp rise in calls for tech sovereignty across Europe and other non-U.S. regions, driven by mounting concerns about the outsized control U.S. companies hold over the global AI ecosystem. Just weeks before the G7 gathering, the European Commission rolled out a sweeping tech sovereignty strategy aimed at accelerating the growth of homegrown European AI development. Even the Pope added his voice to the debate last month, calling for strict, globally coordinated regulation of artificial intelligence to prevent unchecked domination by a small number of major powers.

    Tensions around this issue flared just one week before the summit, when Anthropic was forced to take its two most advanced AI models, Claude 5 2 (wait correction original it’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5, right) – Fable 5 and Mythos 5 – offline globally to comply with an executive order from the Trump administration that cited unspecified U.S. national security priorities. The order barred all non-U.S. persons, regardless of their location, from accessing the models, forcing the company to cut off access for every international customer overnight.

    That sudden blackout served as a stark wake-up call for governments and industry leaders around the world, highlighting the extreme strategic vulnerability that comes from relying on foreign-controlled AI infrastructure. Zach Meyers, research director at Brussels-based think tank CERRE, noted that the incident laid bare just how exposed non-U.S. nations are to unilateral policy shifts from Washington. “There is a general anxiety about the state of Europe, the fact that we’re relying on other countries for quite important strategic infrastructure and a desire to do something about it, whatever that is,” Meyers explained.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney echoed that concern on his way to the G7 summit, speaking to reporters during a stop in Dublin. The Anthropic incident, he said, makes clear the urgent need for the global community to “build out and diversify” AI development capacity. True national sovereignty, Carney emphasized, depends on “unhindered access to AI” that cannot be cut off by the policy decisions of another country. Earlier this month, Canada unveiled its own plan to help middle powers and like-minded nations develop alternative AI ecosystems independent of the largest U.S. players. The move came just days after the Trump administration released an executive order outlining a new framework for oversight of cutting-edge AI systems.

    For host nation France, the conversation around digital AI sovereignty is far from new: French President Emmanuel Macron has made the issue a core policy priority for years, even mandating that French civil servants replace U.S.-owned video conferencing tools Zoom and Microsoft Teams with a domestic French alternative.

    Aidan Gomez, CEO of Canadian AI firm Cohere – which acquired leading German AI startup Aleph Alpha earlier this year – outlined his company’s goals for the summit, saying the firm aims to expand sovereign AI ecosystem partnerships beyond its existing bases in Canada and Germany to include all G7 nations and private sector stakeholders. The end goal, Gomez explained, is to establish a global standard that guarantees national and local ownership of AI models, training data, and computational infrastructure.

    In addition to the seven core G7 members – France, the United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom – the summit invited guest nations including Brazil, India, Kenya, and South Korea to participate in select discussions, broadening the global perspective on AI development and sovereignty.

  • AP Exclusive: Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says society needs ‘new social norms’ in the age of AI

    AP Exclusive: Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says society needs ‘new social norms’ in the age of AI

    SHERMAN, Texas — As the leader of the firm that ignited the global artificial intelligence boom, Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang laid out a comprehensive vision for AI’s integration into modern life Tuesday during an exclusive interview with the Associated Press, arguing that widespread embrace of the transformative technology will deliver broad societal benefits while calling for deliberate adaptation to new norms and targeted regulation.

    Huang, whose company’s explosive growth fueled by AI demand has pushed its market capitalization past $5 trillion to make it the world’s most valuable publicly traded company, has long voiced unbridled optimism about AI’s ability to reshape economies and accelerate scientific discovery. But as public anxiety grows over the technology’s potential harms — from mass layoffs to existential safety risks — the industry’s most prominent executive has stepped forward to address critics, pushing back against fears while acknowledging the need for proactive change.

    “We need to create new social norms,” Huang said during the interview. “I would advocate that everybody use AI. Just go engage it.”

    His remarks come at a moment when AI has become a contentious political flashpoint across the United States. Communities have pushed back against plans to build new AI-focused data centers over environmental and infrastructure concerns, while workers across sectors worry that rapid adoption will leave millions jobless without adequate social safety nets. These growing concerns have eroded public support for the technology even as the U.S. faces intensifying AI competition with China — a race Huang says the U.S. can only win by maintaining an open, globally engaged approach to AI development.

    Huang pushed back against narratives that AI will leave non-technical workers behind, noting that the technology has already narrowed the digital divide by enabling people without coding or software development skills to complete complex tasks ranging from website design and dense document analysis to cutting-edge scientific research and home renovation planning.

    Drawing a historical parallel to the introduction of automobiles, Huang argued society will adapt to AI just as it adjusted to the new technology of a century ago. “Cars were once portrayed as killing children, but the world changed its norms by having sidewalks and crosswalks and stopping kids from playing in the streets,” he explained, framing current anxiety as a natural part of integrating a transformative new technology.

    On the topic of regulation, Huang acknowledged that targeted government oversight and baseline safety standards are necessary, stressing that national security must remain a top priority for a technology that has been a key driver of recent U.S. stock market gains and economic growth.

    He voiced skepticism over a recent cross-ideology proposal that would have the U.S. government take equity stakes in AI companies to ensure the public broadly shares in the sector’s windfall profits, an idea floated by former and current President Donald Trump, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, and even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Huang noted that American companies already deliver broad benefits to the public through multiple channels: “Their success benefits the stock price, of which many Americans are investors in. It generates taxes, which helps many Americans. It creates a lot of jobs.” He added that growth in the AI sector also lifts profits for connected industries including energy, construction and hardware manufacturing, meaning Americans already hold a natural stake in AI firms’ success across the economy.

    Huang addressed the Trump administration’s recent shift toward stricter AI regulation, including new export controls on Anthropic’s latest AI models that forced the company to suspend public access to the tools, and a new executive order requiring voluntary government screening of high-impact AI models before release. He agreed that national security must be the top priority for all emerging technologies, but called for clear, targeted policy: “you have to be very specific about the risk that you’re concerned about, before setting up policies for export controls.”

    This is not Huang’s first run-in with AI export controls: during the Biden administration, Nvidia pushed back against restrictions on chip sales to China, rejecting the argument that a ban would protect U.S. AI advantages. Huang warned at the time that broad restrictions would undermine the development of a global U.S.-led AI ecosystem, as China would respond by accelerating development of its own advanced chips.

    Huang also identified energy supply as one of the most critical vulnerabilities for U.S. AI development, noting that AI training and inference data centers require massive amounts of electricity that risks straining the national power grid and raising household utility costs. “The United States is woefully behind in energy production,” he said. “We just suffocated energy production for too long.” Without expanded energy output, he warned, the U.S. will struggle to capitalize on its leading position in AI chips, models and infrastructure. Huang complimented Trump’s policy of expanding domestic fossil fuel production, declining to comment on Trump’s rejection of large-scale solar and wind energy development.

    The interview took place during a visit to Sherman, Texas, for the expansion of a Coherent factory building new laser systems that transmit data between chips, a technology that could cut AI power consumption by as much as 50%.

    Huang’s close public friendship with Trump has drawn criticism from Democrats, and Huang shed new light on how the relationship began. The pair first connected last year, when Huang was in South Florida to accept the Edison Achievement Award for his work on AI, and Trump invited him and his wife Lori to dinner at his Mar-a-Lago private club. “He was incredibly engaging, incredibly charismatic, conversational, asked a lot of questions,” Huang recalled of the meeting. “From the moment that I met him, the only thing that he’s ever talked to me about is creating more jobs, reindustrializing the United States, protecting national security, winning.” Huang added that Trump often calls him unexpectedly to discuss policy around these priorities, and arranged for Huang to be picked up by Air Force One in Alaska during Trump’s recent state visit to China.

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren was among the Democratic critics who attacked Huang for declining to testify before a Senate panel while attending the high-profile Mar-a-Lago dinner, which reportedly had a $1 million per person admission price. Huang pushed back on the political criticism, noting that he supports presidential success regardless of party affiliation: “We could differ with politics, but we should want him to succeed. Because when President Trump succeeds, our country succeeds.”

    Huang also reaffirmed that AI’s long-term impact will be overwhelmingly positive, arguing that full engagement with the technology rather than fear-driven restriction will position the U.S. to lead the world in delivering shared growth and progress.

  • Rights groups call for a halt of AI tech use in the military

    Rights groups call for a halt of AI tech use in the military

    A broad coalition of more than 100 global human rights organizations and technology activists has issued an urgent warning about the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence into military operations, pointing to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as a catastrophic and dangerous precedent for the future of warfare. The joint statement, signed by prominent groups including Amnesty International, Access Now and the Stop Killer Robots Campaign, warns that expanding AI’s role in end-to-end military kill chains carries severe risks of escalating civilian casualties and eroding mechanisms for holding perpetrators of violence accountable for human rights violations.

    The coalition specifically highlights the widespread deployment of AI-powered targeting systems by the Israeli military during its ongoing operations in Gaza, where more than 73,000 Palestinians have been confirmed killed, with thousands more still trapped and presumed dead beneath the rubble of destroyed residential and infrastructure sites. Three AI tools in particular — named Lavender, Gospel, and Where’s Daddy — have been leveraged to generate air strike targeting lists, drawing on massive Israeli mass surveillance datasets collected on Palestinian residents of Gaza. Rights groups argue that this AI-driven targeting process, which selects targets with little to no active human oversight, is a key contributing factor to the unprecedented scale of death and displacement in the territory.

    “The adoption of AI targeting systems in this campaign follows the example of the Israeli government’s weaponisation of data analysis and machine learning tools, powered by mass surveillance, in its genocidal attacks on Gaza,” the statement reads. “By diluting human responsibility for life-and-death decisions, Israel’s use of systems such as Lavender, Gospel, and Where’s Daddy may contribute to the obfuscation of international crimes behind a veneer of perceived algorithmic objectivity while also obfuscating accountability.”

    The coalition has issued a clear call to action for global technology companies to immediately end all provision of AI and related technical support to the Israeli military and other state armed forces, warning that unregulated deployment risks normalizing and accelerating the proliferation of AI-powered tools of war. In recent years, many of the world’s largest technology firms have deepened their institutional ties to military establishments, particularly the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). OpenAI has publicly confirmed it provides AI services to the DoD, while Google holds a DoD contract to “develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges across warfighting and enterprise domains.” Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have also all secured contracts to provide cloud data storage, processing capacity, and other core enterprise infrastructure to support the DoD’s warfighting programs.

    These corporate military partnerships have triggered significant internal backlash from technology workers, who fear they are being forced to participate in projects that enable human rights abuses. Last month, hundreds of employees at Google DeepMind’s UK artificial intelligence division voted overwhelmingly to unionize, driven by growing concerns over the company’s technology being used by the U.S. for military action against Iran and by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza. UK-based DeepMind staff formally requested that Google management recognize the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and Unite the Union as their official workplace representatives, a move organizers say marks the first unionization drive at a major global frontier AI research lab. In the internal vote among CWU members at DeepMind, 98 percent of participants supported the unionization push. Beyond union representation, DeepMind workers are demanding an end to the use of Google AI by Israel and the U.S. military, the restoration of a previously scrapped corporate commitment not to develop AI-powered weapons or surveillance tools, the creation of an independent ethics oversight body to review high-risk projects, and formal legal protection for workers who refuse to participate in projects on moral grounds.

  • Japan’s tech business SoftBank rolls out OpenAI ‘patches’ against cyberattacks

    Japan’s tech business SoftBank rolls out OpenAI ‘patches’ against cyberattacks

    Two major global technology players, Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp. and U.S.-based OpenAI, announced Tuesday the official launch of a new artificial intelligence-powered cybersecurity service designed to counter the rapidly growing threat of sophisticated cyberattacks across Japan, according to joint statements from both firms.

    Speaking at the launch event held in Tokyo, SoftBank’s iconic Chief Executive Masayoshi Son framed Japan’s current cybersecurity gaps as an urgent national crisis, noting that modern cyber threats are far more destructive and widespread than previous generations of attacks. He drew a stark comparison between today’s threat landscape and historical risks, describing contemporary cyberattacks as equivalent to a machine gun assault, versus the far less damaging rifle-level attacks of years past.

    The new offering, branded as an AI-powered vulnerability patching service, will first target Japan’s 3,000 largest companies that oversee the country’s most critical public and economic infrastructure — including airport operations, national power grids, and nationwide transportation networks, Son confirmed. For Son, the project is more than a commercial venture: “I feel it is our duty,” he stated, repeatedly labeling malicious cyber actors as “the bad guys” that the new service is built to stop.

    The service follows a two-step workflow to shore up defenses: first, it runs a comprehensive diagnostic scan to map unaddressed security weaknesses across an organization’s digital systems, then it leverages OpenAI’s advanced technology to analyze vulnerabilities and generate targeted fixes for these security gaps.

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who was originally scheduled to appear in person at the Tokyo event, was unable to attend after his daughter was born earlier than expected. Instead of an in-person talk, Altman delivered remarks via a pre-recorded short video, and OpenAI’s Chief Researcher Mark Chen attended the launch on his behalf.

    The partnership behind this new service builds on a collaboration the two firms forged last year, when they launched SB OAI Japan, a 50-50 joint venture focused on building and exclusively distributing customized AI solutions for the Japanese domestic market.

    While no financial details of the new cybersecurity service rollout were disclosed at Tuesday’s presentation, SoftBank confirmed that all attendees of the Tokyo event are eligible to apply for a complimentary initial vulnerability diagnosis of their organizational systems.

    Industry observers note that the widespread adoption of generative AI by both defenders and attackers has reshaped the cybersecurity landscape in recent years: bad actors have used AI to scale up the volume and complexity of their attacks exponentially, forcing security providers to pivot to AI-powered defense tools that can match the speed and sophistication of modern threats. This new SoftBank-OpenAI offering marks one of the most high-profile commercial launches of AI-powered cybersecurity tailored for a national critical infrastructure network to date.

  • Anthropic to meet White House over AI tool suspension

    Anthropic to meet White House over AI tool suspension

    Top leadership from leading artificial intelligence startup Anthropic will convene with senior White House and U.S. Department of Commerce officials in Washington D.C. this Monday, a gathering prompted by emerging national security risks tied to the company’s recently launched cutting-edge AI models, two anonymous sources familiar with the planned meeting confirmed.

    The scheduled discussion comes on the heels of a rapid sequence of events that saw Anthropic halt all public access to its latest AI tool release this past Friday. The pullback followed an explicit federal order barring the company from granting any foreign national access to the advanced technology, which carries far greater capabilities than most publicly available AI systems currently on the market.

    The models at the center of the current debate are Fable 5 and Mythos 5, two variants of Anthropic’s next-generation Claude Mythos architecture. Fable 5, the version configured with additional safety guardrails, was released for general public use, while Mythos 5 — which operates under alternative access controls — is restricted to a small curated group of approved organizations. The Claude Mythos line first made headlines back in April, when Anthropic rolled out limited preview and testing access to a small cohort of entities, including multiple U.S. government agencies.

    According to insiders, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei will personally attend the Monday meeting alongside Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Official spokespersons for the White House declined to provide any on-the-record comment when reached for this report, while representatives from both the Commerce Department and Anthropic also did not respond to requests for comment.

    Last week, when Anthropic first announced the public rollout of Fable 5, the company openly acknowledged the rollout carried inherent risks. In a public statement, Anthropic noted that Fable 5 outperforms every model the company has ever released for general use, a capability that has drawn heightened scrutiny from federal regulators.

    Just days after the public launch, federal authorities flagged that they had identified a potential “jailbreak” vulnerability — a loophole that could allow bad actors to coerce the AI into carrying out functions it was never designed or approved to perform. Anthropic responded Friday that it had only received unsubstantiated verbal reports of the claimed vulnerability, with no concrete evidence provided to date.

    The current standoff over the new models marks the second high-profile conflict between Anthropic and the federal government this year. Earlier in 2025, Anthropic filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense over disputes regarding permissible use cases for its AI models. Just a few weeks ago, however, tensions appeared to ease after company leaders held a “productive” meeting with senior White House officials, raising hopes that regulatory disagreements could be resolved collaboratively.

    Sources familiar with Monday’s planned agenda say the meeting will center on a full formal documentation of the alleged national security and vulnerability concerns raised by federal officials. As of this report, it remains uncertain whether Anthropic will be permitted to restore public access to Fable 5 and limited access to Mythos 5 following the discussion.

  • Dozens of Stanford grads walk out on Google CEO’s speech

    Dozens of Stanford grads walk out on Google CEO’s speech

    In a striking display of public dissent that has drawn widespread attention, dozens of graduating students from Stanford University walked out of the commencement speech delivered by Google’s CEO mid-address. The demonstration, captured on camera by BBC journalists, saw protesters leave the ceremony venue carrying handcrafted signs that highlighted their deep unease over Google’s controversial partnership with the United States government.

    The walkout, which unfolded in front of thousands of fellow graduates, guests, and university faculty, spotlights growing tension between big tech firms and younger tech professionals over the ethical implications of corporate work for government agencies. Critics of the partnership have raised a range of concerns, from questions about data privacy and civil liberties to the potential misuse of artificial intelligence and other Google technologies in government programs. Many of the protesting students, who are set to join the tech workforce in the coming months, say they cannot in good conscience stay silent while their future industry leader engages in work they view as ethically compromised.

    This demonstration is not an isolated incident: in recent years, Google employees and student tech groups have repeatedly organized walkouts and petitions to protest the company’s business decisions, from workplace inequality to international government contracts. Monday’s walkout at one of the world’s most prestigious universities signals that this grassroots opposition within the tech community continues to gain traction, even as the company maintains its government partnerships and defends its policy decisions.

  • Russian families use AI to ‘resurrect’ loved ones killed in Ukraine

    Russian families use AI to ‘resurrect’ loved ones killed in Ukraine

    Since mid-2025, a new, deeply divisive trend has taken root on Russian social media: AI-generated videos that depict Russian soldiers serving in Ukraine returning home to their families, or appearing as peaceful spiritual figures after their deaths. For grieving relatives, these clips can offer a fragile, longed-for sense of closure. But critics denounce the practice as unethical, exploitative, and a dangerous distortion of the reality of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The trend gained widespread attention after a 15-second AI-generated clip posted by popular blogger Katya Jin went viral. Set against a backdrop of snowy Moscow streets, the video features billboards bearing the message: “The Special Military Operation is over. Our heroes are coming home” – language that mirrors the Kremlin’s official framing of its war on Ukraine. At the center of the clip is a reunion: an airbrushed woman pushing a stroller hugs a man in military uniform, tears in her eyes. The fictional couple is modeled on Jin and her own husband, who, like tens of thousands of Russian troops, went missing on the front line, his fate still unconfirmed.

    Jin was not the only creator behind this content. Until recently, she shared regular AI videos with her 10 million TikTok followers and 50,000 Instagram followers, even offering step-by-step tutorials for making similar clips. She also turned her personal grief into a commercial service: customers could submit photos of their own missing or deceased loved ones, and Jin would generate custom AI videos for a fee. Dozens of relatives placed orders, hoping to see a final embrace or peaceful final moment with the soldiers they lost. After BBC Russian reached out to Jin for comment, she removed all of her AI-generated content from her social media accounts and did not respond to questions.

    Across Russia, other creators have built similar businesses around the trend. Anna Korableva, based in the Ural Mountain town of Kamensk-Uralsky, launched her “Farewell Video” project alongside her sister in May 2025. Korableva says her goal is to help families process “unfinished farewells,” giving them the chance to “embrace” husbands, fathers, and children one more time. “In the first months of working on these videos, I cried almost every day,” she told the BBC. “Over time, I learned to separate my emotions from work. I try to focus on the technical side, to make sure the video turns out beautiful and worthy of someone’s memory.” Most of Korableva’s requests come from families of soldiers killed in Ukraine since Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion.

    As of 2026, a joint investigation by the BBC, Russian independent outlet Mediazona, and volunteer researchers has verified the deaths of at least 225,000 Russian soldiers in the war, with the true death toll widely believed to be far higher. Russian state officials have never released full, reliable casualty figures, and generally avoid public discussion of mass military deaths.

    Most AI-generated clips follow a predictable, sentimental narrative. For killed soldiers, common tropes show the uniformed man embracing his family, then walking slowly up a staircase into a bright blue sky, often flanked by angels, or appearing as a gentle “ghost” embracing his family from heaven. Videos for soldiers still serving on the front sometimes add symbolic angel wings to shield the man from harm. In nearly all clips, the reality of the war in Ukraine – the Russian invasion, widespread destruction, and Ukrainian civilian and military casualties – is entirely erased, with Russian soldiers uniformly framed as heroic defenders of their homeland and families.

    This whitewashing has sparked fierce outrage among Ukrainians who encounter the clips online. “You should be ashamed to show your ‘heroes’ who went to earn blood money by killing our children,” one Ukrainian commenter wrote.

    International generative AI tools have been largely blocked or restricted for users in Russia, pushing customers to turn to local independent creators like Jin and Korableva. Prices for custom AI content range from just 200 roubles (£2) to 10,000 roubles (£100), and quality varies widely: some low-budget clips produce distorted figures with missing limbs or grotesquely altered faces. Even so, low production costs allow popular creators to turn a significant profit. Ulyana Lebed, a creator whose husband is also a Russian serviceman, told the BBC she earns between 150,000 and 200,000 roubles (£1,500 to £2,000) per month – roughly double the average Russian monthly wage. This commercialization has drawn criticism from online users who accuse creators of cashing in on mass grief: “Be careful that loss doesn’t come knocking at your door. Some subjects should not be touched — but you just wanted to make money,” one commenter wrote under a AI clip of a dead soldier.

    Academics studying the trend say it fits into a growing global “digital afterlife” industry that uses AI to create posthumous avatars and content for deceased people, already seen in museums, courtrooms, and political campaigns. It is no surprise, experts say, that this trend has flourished amid a brutal war where mass death and grief are pervasive. But the ethical and psychological impacts remain deeply understudied and hotly contested.

    “Creating ‘deadbots’ of Russian soldiers or deepfakes of fallen Russian soldiers returning from Ukraine is extremely complex and ethically difficult to assess in a clear-cut way,” explained Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basińska, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence. Ethically, she notes, the political context of the war makes these videos deeply problematic. Psychologically, it remains unclear whether AI-generated depictions help grieving families process loss or trap them in unhealthy denial that deepens their pain. “In a sense, we are all in the midst of a technological and cultural experiment,” she said.

    Reactions from people who have commissioned these AI works are similarly divided. Some say the clips provide no meaningful comfort, calling them what they are: an illusion. “Could technology help me accept that I will never hug my son again? No. It’s an illusion,” one grieving mother told the BBC. Another woman, who bought an AI-generated photo of her late husband for his headstone, said, “Psychologically, no, of course it didn’t help – how could it?” even as she hung two other AI prints of him in her bedroom. For others, however, the virtual connection offers a small, valuable sense of peace, even if it exists only in a digital fantasy. “Thank you, AI, for this opportunity to be with my loved one,” one Russian woman wrote beneath a farewell video of her husband, who has been dead for nearly two years.

  • Israeli spyware firm targeted Whatsapp users despite US court order

    Israeli spyware firm targeted Whatsapp users despite US court order

    Facebook parent company Meta has uncovered new unlawful activity by the notorious NSO Group, claiming the Israeli-founded spyware developer has repeatedly violated a permanent US court injunction by targeting WhatsApp users across Jordan and Lebanon, the tech giant confirmed earlier this week.

    Meta’s security investigation found that NSO Group carried out coordinated spear-phishing operations against a small number of WhatsApp accounts in the two Middle Eastern nations. The firm also created unauthorized test accounts and discussion groups on the messaging platform, according to Meta’s findings.

    Following the discovery, WhatsApp published the three domain names NSO Group used to facilitate one-click device infections: ikhwancast, ghazacast and fr24cast. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at University of Toronto’s cybersecurity watchdog Citizen Lab, has raised questions over whether the fr24cast domain was intentionally designed to impersonate respected international French news outlet France24, a common tactic in deceptive phishing attacks.

    A look at NSO Group’s history of controversial activity shows the firm is the creator of Pegasus, the world-famous (and widely condemned) spyware that can silently infiltrate WhatsApp accounts to extract sensitive personal data including private messages, photos, call logs and other user information. After years of legal and regulatory scrutiny, the company came under US ownership in 2024.

    The 2025 court battle between Meta and NSO Group resulted in a major ruling against the spyware firm. A US judge ordered NSO Group to pay Meta $167 million in damages, a figure that was later reduced to $4 million, but the most impactful outcome was a permanent nationwide ban that forbids NSO Group from accessing or targeting any WhatsApp services or its global user base.

    Meta says this newly uncovered campaign is clear proof NSO Group has blatantly violated that court order. The firm has a long-standing placement on a US Commerce Department blacklist that bars any American company from doing business with NSO Group, a designation the Biden administration implemented after determining the firm’s activities posed a threat to US national security and foreign policy interests.

    Recent industry reporting indicates NSO Group has been lobbying heavily to be removed from the US blacklist under the second Trump administration, a push that aligns with the firm’s 2024 appointment of David Friedman as executive chair. Friedman served as the US Ambassador to Israel throughout Trump’s first presidential term from 2017 to 2021, a high-profile pick widely interpreted as an effort to win favor with the current White House.

    This is not the first time NSO Group’s spyware has been linked to invasive surveillance of targets in the Middle East. A 2021 collaborative investigation coordinated by the journalism non-profit Forbidden Stories exposed how multiple Middle Eastern governments were using Pegasus to spy on journalists, human rights activists, and political opposition figures. Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates were among the nations named in the investigation as clients of NSO Group. One high-profile incident from 2022, documented by independent regional outlet Middle East Eye, captured the human cost of this surveillance: Finsbury Park Mosque chair Mohammed Kozbar was filmed explaining to his son that the family’s devices had been compromised by Pegasus, a moment observers described as a heartbreaking illustration of the harm invasive spyware inflicts on ordinary people.

    As of this week, NSO Group has not issued any public response to Meta’s allegations, after declining to comment on the claims when approached by The Guardian. Meta has not yet announced what legal action it may pursue in response to the reported court order violation.

  • Japan’s struggling flagship H3 rocket returns to flight with the debut of a low-cost variant

    Japan’s struggling flagship H3 rocket returns to flight with the debut of a low-cost variant

    Japan’s long-troubled next-generation flagship H3 rocket has notched a pivotal victory for the country’s commercial space ambitions, as its new low-cost variant successfully completed its debut flight and reached its targeted orbital destination on Friday.

    Lifting off from the Tanegashima Space Center, located on a remote island in southwestern Japan, the mission unfolded without incident during live broadcast coverage from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). Confirmations from the agency indicate that the rocket’s second stage properly inserted itself into the planned orbit, and all six small research satellites carried onboard — developed by Japanese universities and independent research institutions — successfully separated from the launch vehicle as scheduled.

    Friday’s flight marked the first operational deployment of the H3’s new 30 configuration, a cost-optimized variant fitted with three liquid-fueled LE-9 main engines and no supplemental solid rocket boosters. Designed as the most affordable option in the H3 product line, this new variant is one of three modular configurations engineered to meet diverse payload demands from commercial and government customers around the globe, boosting the rocket series’ competitiveness in a crowded global launch market.

    This successful flight comes after two costly early failures that grounded the H3 program for the better part of a year, and delivered a much-needed win for the program that was built to replace Japan’s workhorse H-2A rocket — a launch vehicle that boasted an almost unbroken record of successful missions over its decades of service. The H3 program’s core mandate is to deliver dramatic cost reductions that let Japan compete in a global launch market currently dominated by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which has upended the industry with its low-cost reusable rocket technology. For Japanese policymakers and space industry leaders, a reliable, commercially competitive domestic launch capability is viewed as a critical strategic asset for both the nation’s long-term space exploration plans and national security.

    The H3’s development has been marked by early setbacks. During its maiden flight in March 2023, the rocket failed to ignite its second-stage engine, forcing a planned destruction of the vehicle mid-flight. A second attempt in December 2023 successfully launched, but a second-stage malfunction left the rocket unable to insert its navigation satellite payload into the correct orbit, resulting in another total mission failure. The rocket has remained grounded while engineers investigated and corrected the flaws that caused those failures, and a third consecutive failure on Friday would have delivered a devastating setback to Japan’s upcoming space initiatives — including the country’s planned 2028 robotic Mars exploration mission. Japan’s other small-lift rocket program, the Epsilon S, has also faced delays after a test firing accident in early 2024.

    Co-developed by JAXA and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, the H3 program aims to eventually reach a cadence of six to eight launches per year once the design is fully mature and operational. Friday’s successful debut of the low-cost 30 configuration puts the program back on track to meet that goal, opening the door for future commercial and scientific missions.