分类: politics

  • Belgium considers becoming latest EU country to recognise Palestinian statehood

    Belgium considers becoming latest EU country to recognise Palestinian statehood

    In a landmark announcement Monday, Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot confirmed he has directed his ministerial team to finalize preparations for Belgium’s formal recognition of an independent Palestinian state. The long-awaited policy shift comes just after Hamas carried out a key prerequisite set by the Belgian government: dissolving its 18-year governing administration in the Gaza Strip.

    Speaking to public broadcaster VRT, Prevot acknowledged uncertainty over whether the preparations will be completed in time for this Friday’s scheduled council of ministers meeting, but emphasized that the issue will be brought to the body for a vote in the near future. “I don’t know if we will be ready by Friday, but it will be on the table soon,” Prevot told reporters.

    Hamas’s formal dissolution of its Gaza governance clears the path for a handover of power to the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), a Cairo-based body made up of independent Palestinian technocrats drawn from the Gaza Strip. This new administrative structure was designed to oversee daily civilian affairs in the enclave under the terms of the September 2025 ceasefire agreement mediated by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt.

    The pathway to this step was laid out more than a year ago, when Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever announced at United Nations headquarters in New York that Belgium would recognize Palestinian statehood only after two core conditions were met: the release of all remaining hostages held in Gaza, and the full withdrawal of Hamas from the territory’s governing institutions. A member of the Belgian parliament whose party had long pushed for recognition noted Monday that a cross-party agreement with the federal government had been reached the previous summer after months of negotiations, saying “Belgium must not break its word” on its commitment to recognize Palestine once conditions were met.

    If Belgium proceeds with recognition, it will join a growing wave of European nations that have formalized their recognition of Palestinian statehood following the outbreak of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in October 2023, which the report notes has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians to date, with thousands more still missing and presumed dead under rubble. Spain, Ireland, and Norway became the first Western European states to grant formal recognition in 2024, joining more than 140 existing United Nations member states that already recognize Palestinian statehood. Most recently, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia announced their recognition in September 2025, a move that was quickly followed by France and Portugal. The wave of recognitions has drawn sharp condemnation from both the United States and Israel, which have opposed unilateral recognition of Palestine by Western nations.

  • China protests Japan’s interference in research vessels’ work

    China protests Japan’s interference in research vessels’ work

    BEIJING – China has issued a firm formal protest to Tokyo over Japanese interference with the lawful operations of Chinese research vessels in waters adjacent to the Diaoyu Islands, according to Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, who made the announcement Tuesday.

    The diplomatic pushback came after the Japan Coast Guard claimed that a Chinese maritime survey ship had lowered a cable into the water last Friday in an area Japan claims as its exclusive economic zone.

    In her official remarks, Mao Ning reaffirmed China’s long-held and unambiguous position: the Diaoyu Islands and their affiliated islets have been an inherent part of Chinese territory since ancient times. Conducting regular research activities in adjacent waters falls fully within China’s sovereign rights, and the operations of Chinese vessels are entirely lawful and unquestionable, she added.

    The diplomatic exchange marks the latest escalation in ongoing territorial tensions over the Diaoyu Islands, a strategically significant island chain in the East China Sea that has been a point of contention between the two neighboring countries for decades.

  • Turkish delight: Trump revels in Erdogan’s lavish welcome

    Turkish delight: Trump revels in Erdogan’s lavish welcome

    When US President Donald Trump touched down in Turkey’s capital Ankara for a critical NATO summit this week, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan rolled out the most extravagant red carpet possible — a welcome tailored specifically to the 80-year-old American leader’s well-documented love of grandeur and pageantry.

    Diplomatic observers have long noted that world leaders hoping to win favor with the notoriously unpredictable Trump have found few tools more effective than hosting him with ceremonies and settings fit for a monarch. Erdogan, it turns out, executed this strategy perfectly, leaning into shared tendencies that have connected the two leaders for years: a mutual affinity for opulent presidential architecture and a top-down, authoritative governing style.

    Erdogan went so far as to greet Trump personally on the tarmac after he exited his newly retrofitted Air Force One. On multiple occasions, the 72-year-old Turkish leader guided Trump by the arm as the pair walked off the plane. That aircraft itself offers a subtle backdrop to how world leaders have already shaped Trump’s views: the retrofitted jet was a controversial gift to the US from Qatar’s royal family in 2024, gifted after Trump publicly complained that the older presidential transport plane was unacceptably outdated and embarrassing.

    After the airport greeting, Trump’s motorcade processed through central Ankara to the sprawling Bestepe Presidential Compound, popularly known as the “White Palace.” Mounted Turkish riders flanked the presidential limousine along nearly empty city streets, where a full honor guard in crisp red and blue uniforms waited to receive him. As the US national anthem *The Star-Spangled Banner* played, Trump stood at attention, and even attempted to deliver a short greeting in Turkish — a small gesture that fit the festive tone of the day. The ceremony concluded with a dramatic flyover by Turkish fighter jets, which left trails of red, white, and blue smoke trailing across the Ankara sky. Adding a theatrical historical flourish, two dozen soldiers clad in replica Ottoman-era armor, pointed helmets, and stylized false facial hair stood at attention outside the palace entrance.

    Completed in 2014 at a total cost of roughly $615 million, the massive White Palace complex draws architectural inspiration from Turkey’s ancient Seljuk and Ottoman imperial histories. Critics have long slammed the project as a symbol of Erdogan’s alleged authoritarian excess, pointing to its huge price tag as evidence of his increasingly autocratic leanings. But for Trump, the opulent complex was the perfect setting to leave an impression: the palace features soaring atriums lined with rare onyx and polished green marble, a level of grandeur that aligns perfectly with Trump’s long-admired fascination with the lavish residences of foreign leaders.

    As he pursues his second term in office, the former real estate billionaire has made no secret of his goal to reshape Washington D.C. into an imperial capital matching his personal vision. He has already demolished an entire wing of the White House to construct a $400 million grand ballroom, drawn up plans for a massive triumphal arch he has named the “Arc de Trump,” and launched a sweeping, multi-million dollar initiative to renovate the nation’s capital’s iconic monuments.

    This strategically opulent welcome from Erdogan fits into a clear pattern that has emerged across Trump’s second term: foreign leaders have learned to leverage the US president’s well-known obsession with palatial splendor to win goodwill. Just last month, French President Emmanuel Macron hosted Trump for a private state dinner at the Palace of Versailles following a G7 summit, where Trump praised the former residence of King Louis XIV as “the real deal.” Earlier in 2025, Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomed Trump with a full ceremonial welcome at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People, followed by a visit to the Temple of Heaven and private tea at the exclusive Zhongnanhai leadership compound. In September 2025, Britain’s King Charles III hosted Trump for a full state visit at Windsor Castle, complete with a ceremonial flyover and extensive pageantry — and Trump was still talking about the castle earlier this week, incorrectly describing it as “the longest building I’ve ever seen.” During a May 2025 visit to the Middle East, Trump openly expressed envy for his Arab hosts’ accommodations, praising the marble in Qatar’s royal palace as “perfecto” and marveling at the scale of Saudi Arabia’s modern architectural projects.

    In Turkey, one small personal gesture seemed to leave a particularly strong impression on Trump: he told reporters that Ankara’s airport had named a building after him, a tribute that left him “very happy.” The good mood came even as a US court recently blocked Trump’s own plan to add his name to Washington D.C.’s John F. Kennedy Performing Arts Center. After the arrival ceremony, Trump praised Erdogan to reporters, calling him “a great leader” and emphasizing that the relationship between the two leaders and their nations has been “very special.”

  • Congressional committee on China asks Wizards and Capitals owner to cut ties with Alibaba

    Congressional committee on China asks Wizards and Capitals owner to cut ties with Alibaba

    A top congressional panel focused on U.S.-China policy is escalating pressure on the owner of Washington D.C.’s major professional sports teams to end all business partnerships with Alibaba Group, the Chinese technology giant that is currently challenging a recent Pentagon designation labeling it a “Chinese military company.”

    Rep. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the U.S. House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, made the formal demand in a written letter sent to Ted Leonsis, founder and CEO of Monumental Sports & Entertainment (MSE). MSE is the parent company that owns both the NBA’s Washington Wizards and the NHL’s Washington Capitals, two of the capital city’s most high-profile professional sports franchises.

    Copies of the correspondence, obtained by The Associated Press, show Moolenaar tied his request directly to a decision made by the U.S. Department of Defense one month earlier, which added Alibaba to a growing roster of entities accused of supporting China’s state-led military-civil fusion strategy. The lawmaker gave Leonsis a deadline of July 15 to confirm MSE has ended or will end all active commercial ties with Alibaba and its subsidiaries.

    Alibaba has already pushed back against the Pentagon’s classification, filing a federal lawsuit seeking to have its name struck from the government’s blacklist. The current list of designated Chinese military companies includes 188 total entities, spanning from state-owned defense manufacturing conglomerates to private Chinese technology firms such as Alibaba. This designation reflects a sharp rise in longstanding concerns among U.S. national security officials over Beijing’s strategy of leveraging private and non-state commercial enterprises to advance its military modernization and technological development goals.

    As of Monday, MSE officials had not issued an immediate response to AP’s request for comment on the congressional demand. Notably, MSE is far from the only U.S. professional sports organization with financial or commercial connections to Alibaba. Joseph Tsai, the co-founder of Alibaba who remains a major stakeholder in the firm, owns the NBA’s Brooklyn Nets and the WNBA’s New York Liberty, meaning the Chinese tech giant has deep existing ties to North American professional sports.

    The House select committee, which was first established in 2023 to coordinate congressional oversight and policy on U.S.-China relations, has increasingly turned its attention to global sports in recent months. Earlier this year, Moolenaar and the committee’s top Democratic member, Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, sent a joint letter to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) raising concerns over the World Anti-Doping Agency’s handling of a doping case involving 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for performance-enhancing substances.

    Twelve months ago, the panel also sent a letter to then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, voicing concerns about Alibaba’s global sponsorship deal with the IOC, and warning that the partnership could lead to a similar commercial agreement between the firm and organizers of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games. The letter at the time highlighted steps that Paris 2024 organizers had taken to reduce Alibaba’s operational role in the 2024 Summer Games.

    Weeks after the committee sent that 2023 letter, Los Angeles Olympic organizers announced that Google, one of Alibaba’s major global technology competitors, would serve as the official cloud services provider for the 2028 Games, ending speculation that Alibaba would secure that high-profile contract.

  • What to know about the electronic monitor a French court says Marine Le Pen must wear

    What to know about the electronic monitor a French court says Marine Le Pen must wear

    PARIS (AP) — A Paris appeals court handed down a modified conviction Tuesday to French far-right leader Marine Le Pen, upholding her original guilty verdict for embezzlement while adjusting penalties in a ruling that clears the path for her potential 2027 presidential candidacy. The court ordered Le Pen to serve one year of house arrest equipped with an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet — a sentence adjustment increasingly used in France to address the country’s long-standing crisis of prison overcrowding.

    Le Pen, 57, was originally handed a four-year prison sentence and a five-year ban from holding elected public office following her initial conviction. Tuesday’s ruling cut the prison term to three years, with two of those years suspended, and reduced the ineligibility ban to 45 months, two-thirds of which are also suspended. She remains ordered to pay a €100,000 ($114,000) fine for the conviction.

    The electronic monitoring at the center of post-ruling debate is not an unprecedented measure for high-profile French public figures, nor is it an unusual sentence in the French justice system. Chronic overcrowding in French prisons and deteriorating detention conditions have been repeatedly flagged by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, and alternative sentencing options like electronic home detention help avoid adding further strain to the overburdened prison infrastructure.

    Under French law, offenders sentenced to electronic home detention are required to wear a GPS-enabled ankle monitor and are barred from leaving their home or another court-approved designated location outside of hours explicitly authorized by the overseeing judge. The specific terms of the location permitted for detention and allowed out-of-residence hours will be set by a specialized sentence enforcement judge in the coming weeks or months, following Tuesday’s conviction.

    While the sentence allows Le Pen to retain her eligibility to run in the 2027 presidential election, the electronic monitoring requirement creates significant barriers to running a full, active campaign — though it does not rule out a candidacy entirely. French presidential elections are scheduled to hold their first round on April 18, 2027, with a second runoff round set for May 2. Depending on how long administrative processing takes to fit the monitor, and potential sentence reductions allowed under French law, Le Pen could be free of the device before the final stretch of the campaign.

    French law permits sentence adjustments of up to six months off per year of a sentence for compliant offenders, including the possibility of early conditional release. Céline Bertetto, president of the national association of sentence enforcement judges, noted that the court’s ruling intentionally opened the door for a 2027 candidacy, a decision that should be respected. “For a one-year sentence, there can be a six-month reduction, but she must comply with the permitted hours of movement and pay the criminal fine,” Bertetto explained.

    Le Pen had previously stated explicitly that she would abandon a 2027 presidential run if the court ordered her to wear an electronic monitor, arguing the device would make active campaigning impossible. “If I can be a candidate, I will be a candidate, provided that I am able to campaign,” Le Pen said in a recent interview with French broadcaster LCI. “Because if I’m allowed to be a candidate but am effectively prevented from campaigning freely, then you understand that wouldn’t be possible.” When asked if an ankle monitor would be a disqualifying barrier, she responded: “Well, of course. I can’t be dependent on a judge to authorize me to go hold a campaign rally … or to visit a market.”

    Le Pen left the courthouse without commenting on Tuesday’s ruling, and is expected to address the decision in a scheduled primetime television interview later in the day.

    Electronic monitoring is not a new experience for senior French political figures convicted of criminal offenses. Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was ordered to wear the same type of ankle monitor last year after he received a one-year prison conviction in a separate corruption case. Media reports at the time showed Sarkozy leaving his home for daily jogs while wearing the device, and he was granted conditional release that allowed him to remove the monitor after just over three months of serving his sentence. He was originally authorized to leave his home between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. daily, with extended hours until 9:30 p.m. on certain weekdays to allow him to attend additional court proceedings.

    Petrequin reported from London. John Leicester in Paris contributed to this report.

  • Sinn Féin bring forward bill for United Ireland working group

    Sinn Féin bring forward bill for United Ireland working group

    On Tuesday, a broad delegation of Sinn Féin politicians from both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland gathered at Dublin’s Leinster House to rally behind groundbreaking new legislation that would establish a Citizens’ Assembly focused on planning for Irish unification.

    Under the framework of Sinn Féin’s proposed bill, the Citizens’ Assembly would be composed of 99 randomly selected Irish citizens and chaired by an independent expert moderator. This model, already tested by previous Irish citizens’ assemblies that examined abortion legislation and the future of Ireland’s drug policy, is designed to facilitate in-depth, deliberative public discussion on the highly consequential issue of unification before recommendations are submitted to the Irish government.
    The bill does not stop at creating the assembly: it also mandates the Irish government to publish a comprehensive Green Paper outlining preparations for constitutional change, covering policy areas ranging from national economic governance to public healthcare and housing. Additionally, it requires the taoiseach (Irish prime minister) to conduct structured consultations with a broad set of stakeholders, including Northern Ireland’s unionist and Protestant representatives, cross-sector civil society groups, all political traditions across the island, subject-matter experts, and historically underrepresented communities.
    Sinn Féin party leader Mary Lou McDonald framed the push for planning as an urgent matter of timing, telling reporters that a border poll on unification is a question of when, not if, and that the Irish government must begin logistical and policy preparations immediately. She argued the current political context is uniquely favorable for forward planning, noting that all devolved first minister roles in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales are currently held by nationalist leaders. “We ask the government to prepare for opportunity, we have the space now, we have the time, we’re about halfway through the electoral cycle in this jurisdiction,” McDonald said, adding that lawmakers across parties from Fianna Fáil to Fine Gael have privately acknowledged the common sense of advancing planning work.
    In a last-minute shift, the sitting Irish government has confirmed it will oppose the Sinn Féin bill in a Dáil vote, abandoning an earlier plan to table a counter-motion. While the bill will proceed to a vote, political observers widely expect it to fail to pass. Government officials, who made the decision to oppose the legislation during a virtual cabinet meeting on Tuesday, cited existing work to strengthen cross-border ties through the Shared Island initiative and ongoing diplomatic engagement with the British government as reasons for their concerns over the bill’s timing.
    Notably, the push for unification planning is already gaining traction across Ireland’s political mainstream. In recent weeks, Fine Gael, one of the governing parties, has announced it will develop its own separate blueprint for Irish unity, with a final report scheduled for completion by November. Tuesday’s gathering at Leinster House included Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O’Neill alongside serving Stormont ministers and assembly members, a sign of the cross-border coordination driving Sinn Féin’s unification agenda.

  • Kazakhstan’s top court rules that President Tokayev can seek another term

    Kazakhstan’s top court rules that President Tokayev can seek another term

    On Tuesday, Kazakhstan’s highest judicial body delivered a landmark ruling that paves the way for incumbent President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev to run for a third seven-year term when his current term ends in 2029. The decision hinges on constitutional amendments approved by national referendum in March that entered into legal force earlier this month, which reset presidential term count rules entirely.

    Under the revised constitutional framework, Tokayev’s current tenure, which began after he took power in 2019, does not count toward the new two-term limit established by the amendments. This ruling aligns Kazakhstan with a broader trend across several former Soviet states including Russia, Belarus, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, where ruling leaders have modified national constitutions to expand executive authority and extend their time in office.

    At 73, Tokayev brings decades of diplomatic and government experience to the role: a former Soviet official and veteran United Nations diplomat, he has governed the oil-rich Central Asian nation, home to 20 million people, since he stepped into the acting presidency in 2019 following the resignation of Nursultan Nazarbayev, the autocrat who led Kazakhstan through its post-Soviet independence for nearly 30 years. Widely viewed as Nazarbayev’s handpicked successor, Tokayev has navigated complex geopolitical currents since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, maintaining a carefully calibrated balancing act between Moscow and Western powers amid sweeping sanctions imposed on Russia.

    The constitutional overhaul that cleared the way for his potential re-election won overwhelming support in the March referendum, and has significantly consolidated Tokayev’s hold on national power. The package of changes merged Kazakhstan’s previously bicameral parliament into a single chamber, restored the dormant vice presidential post, and granted the president authority to appoint all top government officials subject only to parliamentary approval. It also established a new legislative advisory body, the People’s Council, whose members are all appointed directly by the president and granted the power to initiate new legislation and call referendums.

    Tokayev has defended the constitutional amendments as a necessary adjustment for a rapidly shifting global landscape, arguing the changes will enable faster, more decisive policy-making to address evolving challenges. However, the changes come against a backdrop of limited political opposition in Kazakhstan: mainstream opposition groups hold no seats in government institutions and lack the capacity to shift widespread public opinion. Tokayev’s tenure has also been marked by controversy: in 2022, he ordered a harsh crackdown on widespread nationwide protests that became known as “Bloody January” to locals, which left 238 people dead and thousands more injured. In the wake of the unrest, Tokayev positioned himself as a pro-reform candidate and called an early presidential election later that year, which he won by a landslide.

  • Colombia’s president-elect suspends transition after Petro alleges fraud

    Colombia’s president-elect suspends transition after Petro alleges fraud

    BOGOTA, Colombia — Colombian politics has entered a period of unprecedented uncertainty just weeks before a scheduled presidential handover, after President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella announced an immediate suspension of the formal transition process with the outgoing administration of incumbent President Gustavo Petro. The breakdown comes one day after Petro rejected the conservative candidate’s narrow electoral victory, leveling unsubstantiated claims of systemic electoral fraud.

    A first-time political candidate endorsed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, de la Espriella took to social platform X to confirm the suspension, labeling Petro’s government “corrupt” and accusing the sitting administration of actively seeking to undermine the nation through its policy choices and official conduct. With Petro’s four-year term set to conclude in just 30 days, the suspension of the formal handover — known locally in Colombia as “empalme” — throws preparations for the incoming government into disarray. This long-standing institutional process requires outgoing officials to share critical administrative, budgetary and policy information to allow a president-elect to build a functional governing team before taking office.

    The tension quickly escalated after de la Espriella’s announcement: Germán Ávila, finance minister and transition coordinator for the Petro administration, ordered his own team to halt all handover activities in response. In a live televised address to the nation, Ávila pushed back against criticism from de la Espriella’s camp, emphasizing that the transition process is not a criminal inquiry or a public trial. “We have absolutely nothing to hide,” he stated, rejecting the incoming team’s insinuations of wrongdoing by the outgoing government.

    The escalating standoff is the latest in a series of reciprocal accusations between the two ideological rivals that have marked the post-election period. De la Espriella has indicated he will deliver a public address in the coming hours to elaborate on his decision to suspend the transition and outline his next steps for resolving the impasse.

    The political newcomer, a businessman and lawyer with diverse commercial interests spanning apparel, wine and spirit brands, and hospitality, secured a narrow win in the June 21 presidential runoff, defeating progressive candidate Iván Cepeda by just one percentage point — a margin of more than 251,000 votes. Cepeda had run on a platform of continuing Petro’s core policy agenda, including the controversial, largely unsuccessful effort to negotiate peace dialogues with active armed groups operating across Colombia. The close result was widely interpreted as a popular rebuke of Petro’s four-year tenure, whose progressive reforms have divided Colombian voters.

    Independent international observer missions have already validated the integrity of the election result. A European Union observer delegation praised the transparency and efficiency of the vote-counting process, while the U.S.-based Carter Center concluded that the election’s results management system was “reliable, transparent and fully traceable.”

  • UK hard-right leader resigns as MP to force snap vote in finances row

    UK hard-right leader resigns as MP to force snap vote in finances row

    In a high-stakes political move that has sent shockwaves through British politics, prominent hard-right and anti-immigration figure Nigel Farage announced on Tuesday he will resign his parliamentary seat for Clacton to trigger an early by-election. The dramatic step comes as Farage, whose Reform UK party currently tops national public opinion polls, faces intensifying scrutiny over allegations of failure to disclose large political donations, including funds linked to a convicted fraudster.

    Farage, the long-time leader of the Brexit campaign that pushed the UK to leave the European Union, has been under formal investigation by Parliament’s standards watchdog over unreported donations from two wealthy individuals. By stepping down from his seat, Farage has effectively forced the suspension of these ongoing inquiries, a highly unusual move that has drawn sharp criticism from established political parties.

    In a televised public address defending his decision, Farage framed the coming by-election as a showdown between ordinary voters and Britain’s political establishment. “The people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions,” he stated. “This will be a people versus the establishment by-election. It’s a chance to stick two fingers up to the entire establishment to frankly tell them where to go, and that is why I will be putting my name forward to stand in this by-election.”

    Farage only secured his first parliamentary seat in the July 2024 general election, after eight failed attempts to enter Parliament over decades of political campaigning. He was the most visible face of the successful 2016 Brexit referendum campaign that remains one of the most divisive events in modern British political history.

    Reform UK, which campaigns on a platform of mass deportations of irregular migrants and the elimination of the UK’s legally binding net-zero carbon emissions targets, has held a consistent lead over the ruling Labour Party in national opinion polls for more than a year. Widespread fears among Labour MPs that Reform could win the next scheduled general election in 2029 recently prompted a party revolt that forced sitting Prime Minister Keir Starmer to announce his resignation last month.

    The core of the current controversy surrounds an undeclared £5 million ($6.6 million) donation from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand-based cryptocurrency billionaire and long-time major donor to Reform UK. Under UK parliamentary rules, newly elected MPs must register any funds received in the 12 months before taking office, unless the funds cannot reasonably be connected to political activity. Farage has argued the donation was a personal gift to cover his personal security costs, a claim that Harborne has publicly corroborated.

    Farage also confirmed Tuesday that the parliamentary standards commissioner, Daniel Greenberg, is also investigating fresh allegations published in the *Sunday Times* over the weekend. The reports claim that George Cottrell, a convicted fraudster, paid for Farage’s security and social media staff in the period immediately before Farage took his parliamentary seat. Cottrell, a 32-year-old cryptocurrency entrepreneur from a British aristocratic family, pleaded guilty to wire fraud charges in the United States in 2017 and served an eight-month prison sentence.

    Both the ruling Labour Party and the centrist Liberal Democrats have formally requested that Greenberg fully investigate these new allegations. Rejecting all wrongdoing, Farage insisted “I have done nothing wrong. I have not broken the law in any way at all,” adding that parliamentary standards rules were “now being used as a political tool” targeting him. He also framed the security need for the donation as the result of him being “the most physically and verbally attacked public figure or politician of modern times.”

    Farage won the Clacton seat in 2024 with a comfortable majority of 8,405 votes, but the upcoming by-election is already set to be a highly competitive contest. Restore Britain, a rival hard-right party led by Rupert Lowe and backed by US tech billionaire Elon Musk, has signaled it will challenge Farage for the seat. The as-yet-unscheduled by-election will also serve as an early critical test for Andy Burnham, who is widely expected to be elected Labour’s new leader and become Britain’s next prime minister later this month.

  • ‘We don’t need anybody’s help’: Trump renews Nato criticism

    ‘We don’t need anybody’s help’: Trump renews Nato criticism

    At a high-stakes summit gathering of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, sitting U.S. President Donald Trump has once again doubled down on his long-standing skepticism of the transatlantic alliance, repeating scathing criticism that has left alliance partners reassessing Washington’s commitment to collective defense. In public comments made during the summit proceedings, Trump made clear that his dissatisfaction with the 75-year-old security pact has not softened, telling attendees and reporters that he has been consistently let down by the organization’s performance and burden-sharing dynamics. Central to his latest round of critique was a blunt assertion of American self-sufficiency: the president declared firmly that the United States “doesn’t need anybody’s help” to guarantee its own national security, a remark that breaks with decades of bipartisan U.S. commitment to NATO’s core principle of collective defense, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. Trump’s repeated broadsides against NATO have roiled alliance relations for years, with many European leaders pushing back against his claims that the U.S. carries an unfair share of the alliance’s defense cost burden, while other observers have warned that his persistent criticism erodes the deterrence power that has kept European security stable since the end of World War II. This latest public rebuke comes as the alliance gathers to address shifting global security challenges, from rising great power competition to regional instability, making the White House’s open dissatisfaction a major point of tension on the summit’s agenda.