分类: politics

  • The election campaign to replace Macron in France is heating up as the summer vacation season ends

    The election campaign to replace Macron in France is heating up as the summer vacation season ends

    PARIS – As France’s annual summer holiday period draws to a close, the 2027 race to succeed Emmanuel Macron as President of France has officially entered its active campaign phase. Macron, constrained by France’s constitutional term limits, cannot run for a third consecutive mandate – a rule that has sparked a flood of candidacies from across the political spectrum, producing one of the largest and most diverse candidate fields in modern French electoral history.

    France holds unique weight across the European Union: it is the bloc’s largest member state by territory, its second-largest national economy, and the only EU member with nuclear weapons capabilities, making this upcoming leadership vote one of the most consequential global elections of 2027. While not all declared and potential candidates will secure the required sponsorship signatures from elected officials to make it onto the April 18 first-round ballot, the historically crowded field already carries significant electoral risks for mainstream parties, analysts warn.

    A crowded fragmented field mirrors the 2002 presidential election, when a record 16 candidates split the first-round vote, allowing far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen – father of current candidate Marine Le Pen – to qualify for the second round, triggering a nationwide political earthquake. That same dynamic could work to Marine Le Pen’s advantage this cycle, experts say.

    Socialist Party chief Olivier Faure became the latest major figure to announce his candidacy over the weekend, joining more than two dozen other politicians who have either formally declared their intent to run or are actively exploring a presidential bid.

    For Marine Le Pen, this 2027 campaign marks her fourth attempt at the presidency, following failed runs in 2017 and 2022, and political analysts and pollsters agree this is her strongest shot at capturing the Elysee Palace for her nationalist, anti-immigration National Rally party. A Le Pen victory would send shockwaves across the European Union, placing one of the bloc’s core member states in the hands of a politician who has spent decades opposing EU integration and many of the bloc’s core collective policies.

    “It’s clearly a crucial election, just because the far right might win this one and it never was the case before,” explained Gilles Ivaldi, a populism and radical right politics researcher at Paris’ prestigious Sciences Po university. “With Le Pen as president, we know that the EU will be weakened. To what extent we don’t know, but we know she’s against the EU. This would create a lot of instability.”

    Polling conducted over the past several months has consistently placed Le Pen as the first-round front-runner, with a high likelihood that she will advance to the May 2 runoff as the top vote-getter – a first for her political career. In both 2017 and 2022, she trailed Macron in the first round before losing decisively in the head-to-head second round.

    Unlike her father, whose 2002 second-round qualification was seen as a massive upset and who was widely rejected by most voters over his ties to WWII Nazi collaborators and repeated hate speech convictions including Holocaust denial, most political observers now see a failure for Marine Le Pen to advance to the runoff as the real upset. Over the past decade, she has worked systematically to distance the National Rally from her father’s extremist rhetoric, and that rebranding has already paid major electoral dividends: since 2024, the National Rally has held the largest number of seats in the powerful lower chamber of the French parliament. She received another critical boost in July, when a Paris appeals court cleared her path to run by reducing a ban on holding public office linked to a prior embezzlement conviction.

    While Le Pen is broadly expected to secure one of the two spots in the decisive runoff, the race for the second spot remains wide open and highly unpredictable. Her most prominent competitors include veteran far-left anti-capitalist leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who is aiming to reach his first runoff after placing third in 2022 and fourth in both 2017 and 2012, as well as two centrist former prime ministers from Macron’s administration, Edouard Philippe and Gabriel Attal. Other leading potential candidates include conservative former Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, mainstream left European Parliament member Raphaël Glucksmann, and Ecologists party leader Marine Tondelier, who is campaigning ahead of the upcoming birth of her second child.

    Seven of the leading non-Le Pen candidates participated in an unofficial campaign kickoff debate last week at Paris’ iconic Roland Garros tennis arena, where they discussed policy proposals to address France’s persistent economic struggles and exchanged critical barbs aimed at Le Pen, who responded with criticism of her own.

    Polls currently indicate that if Le Pen and Mélenchon – the two candidates representing the far right and far left extremes – face off in the runoff, Le Pen would be likely to win. That scenario has led to speculation that some mainstream candidates may eventually drop out of the race to consolidate support behind a single mainstream alternative. “What we don’t know is who’s going to be against her” in a possible second-round matchup, Ivaldi noted. “The more the fragmentation, the more the chances that Mélenchon will be that person.”

    This 2027 campaign is unfolding against an unusually volatile global and domestic backdrop unmatched by any French presidential race this century. The ongoing Iran conflict has driven up energy costs, adding further pressure to France’s already stagnant economy, while the war in Ukraine has left French policymakers concerned that Russia could target a NATO ally next, raising the risk of broader European conflict. A potential second Donald Trump U.S. presidency has also eroded French confidence in the stability of the trans-Atlantic alliance, while China’s growing manufacturing and export power and the rapid global AI revolution have stoked fears that France could fall behind economically and technologically.

    Domestically, France’s growing and increasingly costly public debt has shrunk the fiscal room for maneuver that Macron’s successor will inherit, and widespread public anger over Macron’s policy decisions during his two terms led to repeated mass street protests. Ultimately, the election will turn on whether French voters choose to upend the established order by backing two extreme candidates in the runoff, or rally around a mainstream candidate as a safer alternative. “It will be quite interesting to see which of these two forces will win in the end,” Ivaldi said. “These are two different forces, two antagonistic forces that are playing against one another.”

  • Zambia’s president to be sworn in for second term while opponent detained

    Zambia’s president to be sworn in for second term while opponent detained

    Zambia is preparing to inaugurate President Hakainde Hichilema for his second five-year term on Tuesday, a ceremony that comes against a backdrop of contested election results, treason charges against the main opposition candidate, and mixed assessments of the country’s nascent economic recovery.

    According to official electoral commission results, Hichilema secured a decisive victory in the August 13 poll, capturing 60% of the national vote. His main challenger, Brian Mundubile of the opposition, finished second with 38% of ballots cast, but has rejected the outcome, claiming widespread tampering with the results. Mundubile was ultimately blocked from launching a formal legal challenge to the election, after court buildings were sealed off on the final deadline for filing petitions.

    International observer missions have echoed some of the opposition’s concerns over procedural irregularities. While most observers acknowledged that voting proceeded largely without violent disruption on polling day, multiple teams flagged significant flaws in the national vote tallying process. A European Union observer mission noted that staff at numerous tallying centers failed to document results on official paper sheets immediately after they were announced, creating a gap between public announcements and formal records. The mission also reported widespread weak cross-verification between digital result entries and physical paper records, and found that local returning officers often paused counting operations for extended periods while waiting for guidance from electoral headquarters.

    Tensions escalated sharply in the days after the poll. The day after voting concluded, Zambian security forces raided a Lusaka property linked to Mundubile. The operation left a former cabinet minister dead and resulted in the arrest of multiple opposition figures. State authorities claimed the raid was necessary to foil a planned armed insurrection by the opposition, a charge opposition leaders have firmly denied. After days in hiding, Mundubile and his running mate Makebi Zulu were taken into police custody last week and formally charged with treason over the weekend.

    For Hichilema, the inauguration marks the start of a new term built on the economic stabilization work he prioritized during his first term, which began in 2021. When the 64-year-old former businessman first took office following a 2021 landslide win, Zambia was grappling with a recent default on its international sovereign debt and annual inflation that surpassed 24%. In pre-election comments to the BBC, Hichilema emphasized the depth of the crisis his administration inherited, describing the country as broken and the economy as steadily declining.

    Over his first term, Hichilema’s government successfully negotiated a major restructuring of Zambia’s outstanding debt and repaired frayed relations with international creditors. Inflation has also been pulled down from the extreme highs recorded in 2021, though persistent price growth continues to place heavy cost-of-living pressure on ordinary Zambians, many of whom still struggle to afford basic goods and services. Ahead of his inauguration, Hichilema has signaled he will focus on expanding on the economic foundations laid during his first five years in office.

    The inauguration ceremony is scheduled to take place at Lusaka’s National Heroes Stadium, with a number of regional heads of state in attendance. Confirmed guests include the presidents of Kenya, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Tanzania, among other African leaders. Hichilema will be sworn in alongside his vice presidential running mate, Mutale Nalumango, who will also begin her second term in office.

  • US-Venezuela oil deal deepens China’s energy security squeeze

    US-Venezuela oil deal deepens China’s energy security squeeze

    In a move that promises to upend decades of global energy market dynamics and reconfigure geopolitical power balances, the United States has announced a historic oil agreement with Venezuela that analysts warn could cut off Chinese refiners from a longstanding source of low-cost crude and grant Washington unprecedented influence over international oil pricing.

    U.S. President Donald Trump first made the deal public on August 28, framing it as the largest oil transaction in modern world history. Under the terms of the arrangement, the U.S. secures majority control of more than 65 billion barrels of Venezuela’s proven oil reserves without any financial burden on American taxpayers. A U.S.-backed private venture will hold a 55% stake in oil production across 17 development blocks, with exploitation rights extending for a full century. Venezuelan authorities project the deal will generate more than $209 billion in additional tax revenue for Caracas and attract nearly $100 billion in private sector investment to the country’s energy sector.

    “This deal is a huge win for both the American and Venezuelan people,” stated Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the lead U.S. negotiator who finalized the agreement alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez.

    The geopolitical picture grows more complex when paired with a parallel U.S. sanctions campaign targeting Iran. Just four days before the Venezuela deal was announced, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent unveiled Operation Economic Outcast, a sweeping set of sanctions designed to cut off all remaining government revenue streams for Iran. The campaign also intentionally restricts China’s access to discounted Iranian crude, with preliminary August data showing Chinese imports of Iranian oil falling to 534,000 barrels per day, down sharply from 823,000 bpd in July. The sanctions have disrupted the tanker, brokerage, and banking networks that facilitate China’s Iranian oil purchases, driving the steep decline.

    Chinese analysts have largely characterized the U.S.-Venezuela agreement as a significant setback for Beijing’s long-term energy security strategy. The consensus among most commentators is that the deal will allow the U.S. to reduce its reliance on oil imports from Canada and the Middle East, while forcing China to turn to more expensive crude supplies, particularly from Canada, leading to higher domestic fuel costs in China even as American consumers see lower prices at the pump.

    “The U.S. is already the world’s largest oil producer, and with control over these 65 billion barrels added on, its say over global oil prices will reach an unprecedented level,” wrote a Shaanxi-based columnist who uses the pen name Xiaoche. “The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will see its influence further weakened, and the geopolitical standing of traditional producers like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates will be challenged.”

    Xiaoche added that for China, a major net energy importer, the U.S. now holds an additional leverage point that can be deployed at any time to exert targeted pressure. “If Washington one day says it wants oil prices below a certain level, it may actually be able to make that happen,” he noted. He also argued that Venezuela has effectively become an economic dependency of the U.S., ceding full control over production, pricing, and sales of its massive reserve, with Rodríguez’s political position now dependent on U.S. backing that leaves Caracas with very limited policy independence. “This episode shows how, when the stakes are large enough, rules can be rewritten and sovereignty redefined,” he said. However, he also pointed out that China and Russia, both of which hold substantial Venezuelan debt claims, are unlikely to accept the U.S. takeover passively. The two countries are expected to use diplomatic pressure and targeted economic support to back anti-U.S. factions within Venezuela, creating long-term obstacles for Washington’s ambitions.

    Following the announcement of the deal, Bloomberg reported on August 29 that Venezuelan officials are actively considering a full withdrawal from OPEC, a move that aligns with Caracas’s deepening alignment with U.S. interests following the capture of former President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces earlier this year. While the proposal has been discussed with U.S. officials, no final decision has been made. A withdrawal from OPEC would free Venezuela from the cartel’s production quotas at a time when the country, currently pumping just 1.16 million barrels per day, is looking to sharply increase output under the new U.S. development deal.

    Shaanxi-based energy commentator Zhenqing noted that a full Venezuelan exit from OPEC would trigger a profound restructuring of the global energy market, touching three core pillars of the current system: First, the U.S. dollar would almost certainly regain its status as Venezuela’s primary currency for oil settlement, reversing a partial shift toward the euro, yuan, and cryptocurrencies that was pushed forward by previous sanctions, strengthening the decades-old petrodollar system. Second, U.S. Treasury yields would become more stable, as increased U.S.-controlled oil supply reduces the risk of extreme price volatility, easing domestic inflation pressure and giving the Federal Reserve more flexibility to manage interest rates. Third, the cohesion of the broader OPEC+ alliance would face additional strain, as available spare capacity would become even more concentrated in Saudi Arabia and Russia, particularly if Venezuela ramps up output outside of OPEC+ production caps. This would complicate the alliance’s market management efforts through 2027.

    Zhenqing added that while China would face indirect headwinds from these shifts, the direct impact on Chinese refiners would be mild and manageable, since Venezuelan crude accounts for less than 3% of China’s total oil imports, even after the loss of discounted supply.

    The new agreement is the most visible outcome of a broader shift in U.S. grand strategy toward the Western Hemisphere, rooted in the Trump administration’s December 2025 National Security Strategy that introduced a “Trump Corollary” to the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine. The doctrine pledges to expand U.S. military and economic influence across the Americas, prioritize development of the region’s strategic resources in partnership with regional allies, reposition U.S. military forces to address hemispheric threats, and make energy dominance across oil, gas, coal, and nuclear power a core national priority to create domestic jobs, lower energy costs, and curb the influence of rival global powers.

    Chinese state media has framed the U.S. strategic shift to the Americas as a victory for Beijing in the ongoing U.S.-China trade war, arguing that it represents a U.S. retreat from the Indo-Pacific region. Following the release of the new strategy, the Trump administration moved quickly to implement its agenda: U.S. forces captured Maduro on January 3, 2026, and launched direct strikes against Iran on February 28 – a country outside the Western Hemisphere, but central to the U.S. goal of global energy dominance as a major oil producer.

    Not all Chinese commentary has been uniformly negative, however. Some analysts have pointed to potential silver linings, noting that deeper U.S. involvement in Venezuela’s oil sector could help Chinese stakeholders recover decades of outstanding investments in the country. “Over the past decade or so, China has provided Venezuela with total loans of $50 billion to $60 billion through platforms including the China-Venezuela Joint Fund, mostly financing infrastructure such as railways, power plants, housing and oilfield upgrades,” explained Henan-based commentator Tangtangtutu. “Venezuela agreed to repay the principal and interest by channeling part of its oil export earnings into designated accounts.”

    Tangtangtutu noted that outstanding loans still total between $10 billion and $20 billion, and the original “oil-for-debt” repayment mechanism was cut off after the U.S. took control of Venezuela’s oil sales. But he added that expanded Venezuelan exports under the new deal could improve Caracas’s fiscal position, making debt repayment to China more likely than it has been in recent years. Under current expectations, Beijing is likely to either extend the repayment timeline or continue accepting oil in lieu of cash payments, rather than agreeing to major debt write-downs.

    Other commentators have noted that even though Chinese refiners are being forced to switch to more expensive Canadian heavy crude – which currently trades $8 to $9 higher per barrel than Venezuelan heavy crude – the shift is not entirely a negative outcome. Yunnan-based writer Xiaoman pointed out that Canadian oil sands crude has a similar chemical profile to Venezuela’s heavy crude, requiring only minor adjustments to Chinese refinery infrastructure. Additionally, shorter shipping routes from Canada to China mean faster delivery turnaround times and more consistent supply chains, offsetting some of the higher per-barrel cost.

  • Trump posts AI slop of Iran bombing

    Trump posts AI slop of Iran bombing

    Over a 24-hour period spanning late Sunday and early Monday, former and current U.S. President Donald Trump posted a series of erratic messages on his Truth Social platform, one of which featured an artificial intelligence-generated deepfake video falsely claiming to show U.S. military forces destroying Kharg Island—Iran’s central export hub for crude oil. This inflammatory post came only hours after U.S. military forces carried out a targeted strike on Larak Island, a position located hundreds of kilometers to the east of Kharg Island within the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

    In the caption accompanying the deepfake, Trump declared “Kharg Island being blown to smithereens!!!” The U.S. leader, who regularly shares nonsensical AI-generated content with his 13 million followers on the platform, has a long history of public threats to seize or destroy Kharg Island, leading political analysts to speculate whether he intentionally misidentified the target of Sunday’s strike or confused the two Iranian sites.

    Shortly after Trump’s post circulated online, an anonymous senior U.S. official confirmed to Reuters that no U.S. attack targeting Kharg Island had been carried out during Sunday’s operations. The head of Iran’s state-owned national oil company, Hamid Bovard, dismissed the false post as absurd, confirming that operations on Kharg Island remained “calm and appropriate” with no disruptions to oil export activity.

    The incident has escalated already heightened tensions between the two nations: in response to the U.S. strike on Larak Island, Iran launched a retaliatory drone attack against two U.S. military bases located in Jordan, and formally denounced the latest U.S. aggression as a clear violation of the United Nations Charter. In an official statement, the Iranian Foreign Ministry placed full blame for any future escalation on the U.S. government, noting that Washington’s ongoing economic war, maritime blockade, and military strikes against Iranian territory are illegal under international law, and that any parties complicit in these actions would bear responsibility for the consequences.

    This direct military exchange between U.S. and Iranian forces marks the first major escalation in weeks, amid stalled diplomatic efforts to end the ongoing conflict launched by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in late February. The war, which remains broadly unpopular globally, triggered a severe international energy crisis that drove up domestic gasoline prices across the U.S. and sparked widespread international warnings of an impending global food security emergency.

    In a separate early Monday Truth Social post, Trump doubled down on his aggressive rhetoric, claiming Iran is “officially a Failed Nation” and shouting in all capital letters, “IT IS DEAD!” He went on to list alleged failures of the Iranian government, claiming the country no longer has functional naval or air forces, its currency has collapsed, it cannot pay military and police personnel, inflation has surged to 300%, and national leadership is in complete disarray. Trump also called for Iranian leaders to be tried for alleged war crimes against humanity—a demand that carries notable irony, as the U.S. president himself has faced credible, well-documented accusations of committing war crimes in Iran and other global conflict zones.

    Trump’s bombastic claims of total U.S. military victory over Iran directly contradict internal assessments from top U.S. national security officials. Earlier this month, senior defense advisors reportedly warned Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth that continuing large-scale combat operations against Iran is unsustainable long-term, and puts U.S. national security at risk by eroding Washington’s ability to respond to other threats, including those targeting the U.S. homeland. U.S. intelligence assessments have also confirmed that, contrary to Trump’s public claims, the Iranian government remains fully functional after six months of continuous U.S. bombing campaigns.

    Domestic political opponents have seized on the incident to criticize Trump’s mental stability and judgment. Representative Ted Lieu, a California Democrat who has backed congressional efforts to end the unauthorized war, wrote in a social media post Monday that “The president of the United States is mentally unwell and has been for quite some time. He fantasized blowing up Iran’s Kharg Island. Except it didn’t happen.” Lieu also highlighted a clear contradiction in Trump’s public claims: “And why would Trump need to blow it up if, as Trump claims, the U.S. has total control of the Strait?”

  • Police officer admits to closing missing person cases to avoid work

    Police officer admits to closing missing person cases to avoid work

    A damaging institutional scandal has rocked South Korea’s law enforcement community, after a senior police officer on the popular tourist island of Jeju admitted to intentionally closing dozens of missing person investigations without completing required work to avoid additional workload pressure. The officer, identified only by his surname Bu, was taken into custody earlier this month following allegations that he falsified records to shut down active cases and lied to grieving family members of missing individuals.

    In the wake of growing public outrage over the revelation, Jeju Provincial Police launched belated search operations for the long-neglected missing persons, recovering four dead bodies in recent weeks. Investigations have confirmed Bu deliberately prematurely closed at least two high-profile cases, for which he now faces three formal criminal charges: forgery of public electronic records, obstruction of official duties, and gross dereliction of duty.

    Court documents and police statements detail that in both confirmed cases, Bu falsely recorded that he had made contact with the missing individuals, then closed the cases without ever verifying their locations or confirming their safety. During interrogation, Bu told investigators his decision stemmed from workload and administrative pressure: he stated, “The missing person was a typical adult so I thought about it carelessly. If the case was not closed, there would have been a lot to take care of, and out of a sense of pressure over the case handover, I falsely closed it.”

    One of the falsified cases involved 37-year-old Jang Mi-ran, who went missing in May after her boyfriend filed a missing person report. Bu told Jang’s boyfriend that he had spoken to her, and that she explicitly refused to meet with police or have any contact with her boyfriend – a claim authorities have confirmed was entirely fabricated. Bu entered the false narrative into official police records, even logged that Jang had been killed in a traffic collision, before permanently closing the case. Last week, search teams found Jang’s remains near a palm tree plantation on Jeju.

    The second confirmed case involved a man in his 60s reported missing in July. Bu repeated the same pattern, falsely claiming he had contacted the man and that the man requested no further contact. The man’s body was discovered earlier this month.

    Investigators now suspect Bu may have improperly closed as many as 25 additional missing person cases, though officials note that some of those individuals have since been independently confirmed alive and unharmed.

    Contextual data on missing persons in South Korea frames the severity of the scandal: while violent crime rates are extremely low across the country, South Korea has one of the highest suicide rates in the developed world. More than 70,000 adults are reported missing every year, and 99% of those cases are officially marked as resolved within 30 days – a statistic that has now come under renewed scrutiny following Bu’s admission.

    The scandal has erupted at an extraordinarily sensitive political juncture for South Korean law enforcement. Just weeks before the arrest, the national government passed landmark legislation shifting full investigative authority from public prosecutors to the national police, a reform designed to reduce prosecutors’ outsized influence over political affairs. However, the transfer of power has already faced widespread public pushback, as many South Koreans have long raised concerns about systemic corruption and institutional incompetence within police ranks.

    In response to the growing outcry over the Jeju scandal, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has publicly pledged to implement sweeping police reforms. In a formal address Tuesday, Lee expressed regret over the incident, noting that a small number of unethical officers “who muddy the well water” are eroding public trust and damaging the reputation of the vast majority of hardworking, honest law enforcement personnel across the country.

  • Trump’s vow to escalate on Iran rings hollow amid warnings from top US generals

    Trump’s vow to escalate on Iran rings hollow amid warnings from top US generals

    Fresh geopolitical tensions have erupted across the Middle East after a series of tit-for-tat strikes between the United States and Iran, with President Donald Trump threatening harsh retaliation even as the nation’s most senior military leaders have privately warned that a large, prolonged conflict with Iran would severely undermine U.S. national security.

  • US army secretary resigns after months of tension

    US army secretary resigns after months of tension

    A major shakeup continues to unfold across the top ranks of the US military, as the nation’s top civilian leader for the US Army, Secretary Dan Driscoll, has formally stepped down from his post after just 18 months in office. The departure was first confirmed by CBS News, US media partner of the BBC, which traced the resignation back to months of growing tensions between Driscoll and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    At 41 years old, Driscoll made history as the youngest person ever to hold the Army Secretary role. He was widely known in Washington circles as US President Donald Trump’s so-called “drone guy,” a nickname he earned for his strong, public advocacy for integrating emerging unmanned and digital battlefield technologies into military operations. In an official statement shared with CBS, the White House praised Driscoll’s tenure, noting he was “highly effective” at advancing the administration’s “Make America Strong Again” agenda and provided “outstanding leadership” during military operations.

    Driscoll’s exit is not an isolated event: it marks the latest in a growing wave of high-profile departures among senior military and defense leaders since Hegseth took leadership of the Pentagon. Hegseth has already removed more than a dozen top uniformed and civilian defense officials, including the chief of naval operations and the vice-chief of staff of the US Air Force. Earlier this year in April, Navy Secretary John Phelan stepped down abruptly, and other recent departures include former Army Chief of Staff Randy George, Army Gen. David Hodne and Maj. Gen. William Green. While full details of the behind-the-scenes friction between Driscoll and Hegseth remain undisclosed, CBS reports that Driscoll shared a close personal friendship with George, who was pushed to resign by Hegseth.

    The position of Army Secretary is the highest civilian leadership role for the US military’s ground branch, with oversight over roughly a million active-duty, National Guard and reserve soldiers across the globe. Driscoll brought first-hand military experience to the role: he commissioned as an Army officer in 2007, led a cavalry platoon and deployed to Iraq on a five-month tour in 2009. Beyond his work on military technology, Driscoll held other key roles during his 18 months in office:

    He took a leading role last year in high-level diplomatic negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, making multiple overseas trips and holding direct talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He is also a long-time close ally and personal friend of Vice-President JD Vance, with the pair having met while attending Yale Law School together. During his tenure, Driscoll was a central figure in the Trump administration’s decision to deploy National Guard troops to cities across the US, and he also served temporarily as acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The BBC has reached out to the White House, Pentagon and US Army for additional comment on the resignation, with no additional response as of press time.

  • Sudan’s RSF and Israel held discreet meetings over last two years: Report

    Sudan’s RSF and Israel held discreet meetings over last two years: Report

    A newly published investigation by Africa Intelligence has uncovered ongoing covert diplomatic and intelligence contacts between Israeli officials and senior leaders of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), holding meetings and hosting RSF delegations in Tel Aviv throughout Sudan’s brutal three-year civil conflict. The inquiry, which was released Friday, details two official RSF delegations that traveled to the Israeli coastal capital, with the first visit taking place in May 2025 and the second held in February 2026. According to the investigation’s findings, RSF representatives held closed-door talks with senior officials from the Africa Division of Israel’s foreign ministry as well as top leaders from Israeli national intelligence agencies. These high-level contacts are not a new development, the investigation confirms, but rather form part of a broader security and intelligence partnership that was established long before Sudan’s civil war erupted in April 2023. The first RSF delegation was led by Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, the deputy commander of the paramilitary group and brother of RSF chief Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, widely known by his nickname Hemedti, alongside a third Dagalo brother, Algoney Hamdan Dagalo. For the second February 2026 visit, the Dagalo brothers were joined by Ezzadean Elsafi, the RSF’s top legal advisor, the report notes. Investigators found that the years-long cooperation between Israeli officials and Hemedti’s inner circle has reportedly centered on the transfer of sensitive surveillance technologies to the RSF, a development that could significantly expand the paramilitary group’s operational capabilities on the battlefield across Sudan. Israel has a long documented history of parallel outreach to both of Sudan’s competing warring parties, maintaining ties with the official Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, while cultivating a separate relationship with the RSF through Israel’s national intelligence agency Mossad. Diplomatic relations between Khartoum and Tel Aviv were formally normalized in 2021, when Sudan’s post-uprising Transitional Sovereignty Council signed the US-brokered Abraham Accords, making Sudan the third Arab-majority nation to officially normalize ties with the Jewish state. The revelation of these secret meetings comes as the RSF faces mounting international accusations of mass atrocities, including genocide and ethnic cleansing, during its military campaign across Sudan. Earlier this year, the United Nations’ Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for Sudan released a landmark conclusion that the RSF’s months-long October 2025 siege of el-Fasher, the capital of Sudan’s North Darfur region, carried all the “hallmarks of genocide.” In early July of 2026, an anti-terrorism and state crimes court based in Port Sudan, which is held under SAF control, handed down death sentences in absentia to RSF leader Hemedti and 15 other senior RSF figures. The court convicted the group on multiple charges including their role in the 2023 assassination of West Darfur Governor Khamis Abdullah Abakar, as well as crimes against humanity, war crimes, unlawful warfare, and acts of genocide in the West Darfur capital of el-Geneina. This historic ruling marks the first time RSF leadership has been formally convicted by a Sudanese judicial body since the outbreak of the civil war in April 2023. The trial centered heavily on the assassination of Governor Abakar, who was killed just one day after he publicly condemned RSF shelling attacks on the residential el-Jamarik neighborhood of el-Geneina. In 2024, global human rights watchdog Human Rights Watch released its own investigation concluding that the systematic violence carried out by the RSF in el-Geneina amounted to ethnic cleansing, and likely constituted genocide targeting the Masalit people and other non-Arab ethnic communities in the region. Despite widespread evidence including circulated video footage showing RSF fighters mutilating Abakar’s body, the RSF has repeatedly denied all responsibility for the killing and has instead blamed the atrocities on the SAF. As early as June 2023, just two months after the war began, independent regional outlet Middle East Eye reported that roughly 1,500 civilians had been killed in el-Geneina alone within the first eight weeks of conflict. The violence forced tens of thousands of Masalit civilians to flee their homes on foot, crossing the Sudan-Chad border to seek safety in eastern Chad.

  • Days after Trump announces Venezuela oil deal, White House fills in some of the details

    Days after Trump announces Venezuela oil deal, White House fills in some of the details

    WASHINGTON – The White House formally introduced a landmark partnership with North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP) on Monday, advancing former President Donald Trump’s policy initiative to unlock and develop Venezuela’s underutilized oil industry. The agreement, which establishes a new joint venture between the U.S. and the Venezuelan-led energy firm, grants the U.S. Pentagon a direct ownership stake in a holdings controlling roughly one-fifth of the South American nation’s massive proven oil reserves.

    The disclosure comes several days after Trump announced what he billed as “the biggest oil deal in history,” with new details released publicly Monday evening clarifying key terms of the sweeping agreement that had been withheld by the White House since the initial announcement. NABEP, which is owned by prominent Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt, already operates as the second-largest oil producer in Venezuela, trailing only U.S.-headquartered Chevron.

    Under the terms of the deal, Venezuela’s interim government led by acting President Delcy Rodríguez has granted the new joint venture 100-year development rights to 17 oil fields holding 65 billion barrels of proven reserves. According to White House documentation, the majority of these fields were previously controlled by energy firms based in Russia and China.

    The agreement allocates a 35% ownership stake in the new joint venture to the U.S. Department of Defense, while the U.S. State Department has secured a guarantee to purchase 20% of all oil output from the fields at production cost. Betancourt’s NABEP has committed to investing $100 billion to build and upgrade critical oil extraction and transportation infrastructure across the concession area.

    The Trump administration’s push for this deal follows a January military operation that resulted in the capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on federal charges of narcoterrorism and drug trafficking, clearing a major political hurdle for the initiative to move forward.

    Administration officials have framed the agreement as a financially risk-free arrangement for U.S. taxpayers, noting that the deal comes at “zero cost” to the federal government. The U.S. will also hold veto power over all board appointments, and a majority of the joint venture’s board members will be U.S. citizens.

    “The agreement with NABEP is governed by U.S. law and falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of U.S. courts, and NABEP will retain independent, reputable U.S.-based auditors, legal counsel and strategic advisers,” the White House outlined in an official fact sheet published alongside the new details.

    Despite the administration’s optimistic framing, energy and policy analysts have expressed widespread skepticism that the deal will deliver on its near-term promises, noting that it will likely take years of sustained investment and development to meaningfully restart and scale oil production in the concession. Even so, Trump and his senior advisors argue that the deal lays the groundwork to establish a major new oil producing power in the Western Hemisphere.

    Former U.S. government energy policy advisors have also warned that the agreement carries significant long-term political risk. Changes in administration in either Venezuela or the United States could lead to future legal or political challenges to the deal’s legitimacy and terms, creating uncertainty for investors and stakeholders.

  • UN spotlights nuclear weapon states’ refusal to ratify test ban treaty at divisive time

    UN spotlights nuclear weapon states’ refusal to ratify test ban treaty at divisive time

    On the International Day Against Nuclear Tests, top United Nations disarmament officials have issued a stark public warning: the fragile decades-long global restraint on nuclear explosive testing is at grave risk of collapse, with rising geopolitical tensions pushing major nuclear-armed states closer to resumption that could ignite a dangerous new global arms race.

    Held at U.N. Headquarters in New York, the commemorative General Assembly meeting came amid a rapidly shifting landscape of global distrust. Last year, the world’s two largest nuclear powers — the United States and Russia — both openly raised the possibility of resuming explosive nuclear tests, sending shockwaves through the international nonproliferation community. Then-U.S. President Donald Trump accused Russia and China of carrying out covert nuclear tests, claims both nations have flatly denied. Earlier this year, Russia took the unprecedented step of revoking its ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), the 1996 global agreement designed to permanently ban all nuclear explosive testing.

    Addressing assembled delegates, U.N. High Representative for Disarmament Affairs Izumi Nakamitsu emphasized the gravity of the current moment. The world is facing “deep geopolitical tension, growing division and diminishing trust,” she noted, creating fertile ground for a rollback of decades of progress on nuclear nonproliferation. “Even contemplating such a course is dangerous,” Nakamitsu warned. “Any resumption would erode decades of restraint, deepen mistrust and risk triggering reciprocal tests and an arms race. This must never become reality.”

    The CTBT, which was adopted by the international community in 1996, carries a strict requirement for entry into force: it must be ratified by 44 specific countries identified as possessing nuclear technology or infrastructure. To date, nine of those countries have failed to complete ratification. The U.S., China, Iran, Egypt and Israel have signed the treaty but never moved to ratify it. India, Pakistan and North Korea have neither signed nor ratified the agreement, leaving the treaty stuck in a decades-long limbo that has prevented it from formally entering into force. Even with that barrier, the CTBT has become the cornerstone of global norms against nuclear testing, with nearly all nations adhering to an informal moratorium for nearly 30 years.

    In a small glimmer of progress, Robert Floyd, executive head of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) that monitors global compliance with the treaty, announced that Tonga’s recent ratification has pushed the total number of states party to the agreement to 179. Still, Floyd stressed that the underlying geopolitical risks have never been higher. Since the first atomic test in 1945, more than 2,000 nuclear explosions have been conducted across the globe, he noted. While that number has dropped sharply to fewer than 12 total tests over the past three decades — a testament to the strength of the global moratorium — the shifting global landscape has erased much of that progress. “The international scene is tense, full of mistrust,” Floyd cautioned, “including about nuclear testing.”

    If major powers walk away from the testing moratorium, Floyd warned, the consequences will be catastrophic. A return to regular testing would pave the way for the development of far more advanced, lethal nuclear arsenals, drastically increase the risk of accidental nuclear use, and leave the world facing “devastation from nuclear ‘bad luck.’”

    The International Day Against Nuclear Tests, established to mark the 1991 closure of the Soviet Union’s Semipalatinsk test site — now located in Kazakhstan, where 456 nuclear tests were conducted over decades — also centers the human cost of nuclear testing that is often overlooked in global diplomatic debates. This year, survivors and affected community leaders shared first-hand accounts of intergenerational harm caused by unregulated nuclear testing.

    Tina Cordova, co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, an advocacy group formed to support communities affected by the 1945 Trinity atomic test in New Mexico, told delegates how five generations of her family have suffered from radiation-related illnesses linked to the first ever nuclear bomb test. “We were never warned before or after of the danger, so we lived our lives off the land as we always did,” Cordova said. Every generation of her family has battled cancer caused by radiation exposure from the test, she added, a fate shared by thousands of affected communities around the world.

    Cordova emphasized that New Mexico survivors are not isolated in their struggle. Nuclear testing programs carried out across the globe have left communities in Guam, French Polynesia’s Tahiti, Kazakhstan, and Indigenous Aboriginal lands in Australia, as well as multiple U.S. states including Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Montana, suffering chronic health impacts from radiation exposure. Uranium miners and processing workers and their families have also faced disproportionate harm from nuclear testing programs. “We’re the people that became the collateral damage to the development and testing of nuclear devices and were left to deal with the consequences on our own,” Cordova said. “It is why we fight for acknowledgment and assistance.”