分类: politics

  • Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    Vance calls Michigan Senate candidate El-Sayed ‘evil’ at campaign rally

    A heated Michigan Senate campaign has devolved into raw personal confrontation this week, after U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivered a blistering attack on Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed at a campaign rally for Republican nominee Mike Rogers in suburban Detroit Monday night. Vance, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, labeled the 41-year-old Muslim candidate “a very, very evil” person seeking to “destroy” the United States, framing El-Sayed as a divisive extremist who represents a dangerous rising force in American politics.

    The vice president’s tirade came after El-Sayed made controversial remarks about Vance’s family, specifically suggesting that Vance’s late grandfather would not accept Usha Vance, the Hindu Second Lady and Vance’s wife. Addressing that comment directly, Vance issued a sharp public warning: “keep my wife’s name the hell out of your mouth.”

    Vance also sought to tie El-Sayed to far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who once claimed the U.S. “deserved” the 9/11 terrorist attacks. El-Sayed appeared alongside Piker during his primary campaign, but has repeatedly denied sharing Piker’s views and publicly distanced himself from the 9/11 comment. Undeterred, Vance repeated unsubstantiated insinuations that El-Sayed sympathizes with terrorists and aligns with anti-American ideology, claiming the candidate sided with attackers over victims of a shooting at a Detroit-area synagogue.

    Within hours, El-Sayed pushed back forcefully against Vance’s accusations during an interview with CNN, turning the “evil” label back on the Trump administration’s policy agenda. He argued that the real harm facing American communities comes from what he called the Trump White House’s unethical policy choices: “Evil is ripping healthcare away from working people in exchange for tax breaks for billionaires. Evil is making people pay more for groceries and gas while pushing for trade wars and actual war. Evil is dividing people for your own gain. Evil is selling out your morals for a little bit of power.”

    El-Sayed also moved to clarify his earlier comments about Usha Vance, explaining that his remarks were never intended as a personal attack. Instead, he said, they were meant to illustrate what he frames as Vance’s core political belief: that some people are inherently “more American than others” based on their identity or background.

    The contest between El-Sayed and Rogers, a long-time former law enforcement official and seasoned political figure, has already become one of the most closely watched races of the 2026 midterm elections. Michigan is a critical battleground state: it went to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, and flipped back to Donald Trump in 2024, making this Senate seat a key target for both major parties as they fight for control of the upper chamber.

    A recent poll released by Michigan-based research firm Epic-MRA shows the race remains tight, with El-Sayed holding only a narrow four-point lead over his Republican opponent ahead of the general election. The rapid escalation of personal hostility between the candidates has underscored the deep polarization that continues to shape competitive electoral contests across the U.S. ahead of 2026’s voting.

  • Exclusive: British Museum’s Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund

    Exclusive: British Museum’s Bayeux Tapestry sponsor backs Israeli defence tech fund

    When the British Museum opened its doors to the public on Thursday morning, it launched what has been billed as the most anticipated exhibition in its 273-year history: the first display of the Bayeux Tapestry on English soil in almost a century. The 70-meter medieval embroidery, which chronicles the 1066 Norman Conquest of England, has been housed in France since the Middle Ages, and British negotiators have worked to secure a temporary loan of the fragile artifact since 1931. After nearly 100 years of diplomatic efforts, the tapestry finally arrived in London this summer under heavy security, with an 11-month exhibition run planned.

    Demand for tickets has been unprecedented: all allocations for the exhibition’s first four months sold out within hours on the single busiest sales day in the museum’s history, drawing projections that hundreds of thousands of visitors will view the work before it returns to France. This landmark cultural event would not have been possible without a £5 million ($6.75 million) sponsorship from Igor Tulchinsky, founder, CEO and chair of U.S.-based investment firm WorldQuant, who was named the exhibition’s official sponsor in February. Tulchinsky, who maintains a low public profile, stood alongside senior dignitaries including King Charles III, French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham at the exhibition’s official opening reception last week, where the leaders viewed the tapestry through its protective security casing. A fundraising gala in Tulchinsky’s honor is scheduled to take place at the museum next month to recognize his support.

    But new revelations about Tulchinsky’s lesser-known business interests have sparked fierce backlash and renewed ethical scrutiny of the British Museum, which has already faced intense criticism in recent years over its removal of Palestinian heritage references from its galleries and its history of controversial corporate partnerships. In April, two months after Tulchinsky signed on to sponsor the tapestry exhibition, he launched WorldQuant Genesis, a Tel Aviv-based venture capital fund focused on early-stage defense technology startups. The fund is led by retired Israeli Major General Saar Tzur, who stepped down from his senior command posts leading the Israeli military’s Northern Corps and Manoeuvre Array in October 2024, just one year into Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza that has been accused of genocide by multiple human rights and legal bodies.

    Following his retirement from the military, Tzur joined the advisory board of Ottopia, an Israeli technology startup that provides remote control technology for unmanned military vehicles deployed by the Israeli army in Gaza. In public statements on Ottopia’s website, Tzur has described these teleoperated vehicles as critical “force multipliers” for Israeli operations in Gaza, noting that the technology allows soldiers to carry out combat operations without putting troops at risk. Ottopia markets its technology as “battle proven” in direct combat and target engagement, counting remote-controlled bulldozers and explosive-laden armored personnel carriers (APCs) among its products. Company founder Amit Rosenzweig has confirmed that these explosive APCs have been supplied to Israeli forces operating in Gaza, explaining that operators can control the vehicles from a safe location using a joystick.

    Human rights groups have directly linked the widespread use of these remote-controlled explosive vehicles to widespread civilian casualties, mass displacement, and systematic destruction of civilian and cultural infrastructure in Gaza. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, Israel first deployed these vehicles in densely populated residential areas of Gaza in May 2024, with use intensifying that October as part of the Israeli military’s “Generals’ Plan” to depopulate and forcibly displace all residents from northern Gaza. Between August and October 2025, the group recorded that Israeli forces deployed an average of 15 explosive remote vehicles per day, dropping an estimated 100 tonnes of explosives on residential neighborhoods monthly and destroying roughly 300 residential units every day. Gaza residents describe the blasts from these vehicles as far more destructive than conventional airstrikes, with entire multi-story buildings reduced to fine rubble in seconds, forcing mass panic and displacement.

    While an October 2025 ceasefire agreement paused large-scale use of the vehicles, Euro-Med Monitor has documented a renewed escalation in their deployment across northern and eastern Gaza over the past two months. While the group has not been able to independently confirm that the vehicles it has documented use Ottopia technology, it notes that the vehicles match the description of systems marketed by the firm and Tzur. Beyond civilian harm, the widespread use of these weapons in populated areas has put Gaza’s millennia-old cultural heritage at severe risk. While no direct hits to heritage sites from these vehicles have yet been recorded, multiple iconic heritage sites—including the Old al-Omari Mosque, the Byzantine Church of Jabalia, and al-Sheikh Saad Mosque—are located in areas where large-scale vehicle operations have taken place, and have sustained damage from adjacent attacks. Euro-Med Monitor estimates that more than 70% of Gaza’s total documented cultural heritage sites have already been destroyed or damaged during the current conflict, a pattern the group says matches the definition of cultural genocide laid out in a recent UN report.

    Tulchinsky has publicly confirmed his longstanding support for Israel and the Israeli military, noting that he has provided direct financial donations to the Israeli military since the start of the war in October 2023, and that WorldQuant has maintained an office in Israel since 2009. “Even against the backdrop of the complex reality, my commitment to Israel and its future remains intact,” he said in a statement following the launch of WorldQuant Genesis, which has already invested in Israeli defense tech startup NavAiro, which develops counter-drone technology for the military. There is no proven direct link between Tulchinsky’s fund and Ottopia, but campaigners say Tulchinsky’s clear ties to the Israeli defense industry that has overseen the destruction in Gaza make his sponsorship of a major cultural institution deeply unethical.

    Artists for Palestine UK, a leading network of cultural workers and artists, has called the British Museum’s decision to accept Tulchinsky’s sponsorship “outrageous” and “shameful.” “How can the museum’s trustees possibly have come to the conclusion that Tulchinsky, with his links to the ongoing erasure of Gaza and parts of Lebanon, was a suitable sponsor?” the group said in a statement. “And, more fundamentally, how are basic ethical standards, human rights and international law not guiding factors in such decisions, even before considerations of reputational damage?”

    This is not the first time the British Museum has faced criticism over its sponsorship choices: the institution previously drew widespread protests for accepting a £50 million 10-year sponsorship deal from fossil fuel giant BP to fund its major masterplan redevelopment. It also faces ongoing calls from UK Members of Parliament for an investigation into its removal of multiple references to Palestine from its public galleries. The Guardian also recently revealed that the museum hosted a private preview of the Bayeux Tapestry for Peter Thiel, the billionaire founder of Palantir, a U.S. tech firm that provides advanced AI and data analysis tools to the Israeli military. Neither the British Museum, WorldQuant nor Ottopia have responded to multiple requests for comment from Middle East Eye on the revelations.

  • Norway’s new king takes oath as mourners pay respects to his late father

    Norway’s new king takes oath as mourners pay respects to his late father

    Norway has entered a new chapter in its modern constitutional monarchy this week, as the nation’s newly appointed king completed the formal oath of office to mark the start of his reign. The historic inauguration unfolded against a backdrop of quiet national grief, with the late King Harald V — the new monarch’s father and one of Norway’s longest-serving heads of state — lying in state at Oslo’s Royal Palace to allow members of the public to pay their final respects.

    The oath-taking ceremony, a constitutional requirement that formalizes the transfer of royal power following the passing of the previous monarch, stands as one of the most significant symbolic events in modern Norwegian political life. While the nation grapples with the loss of a beloved leader who steered the country through decades of social and economic change, the peaceful transition of power has reaffirmed the stability of Norway’s constitutional institutions.

    Thousands of mourners have already queued through the grounds of the Royal Palace to pay tribute to King Harald V, who was widely admired for his down-to-earth demeanor and unifying influence across Norwegian society. Many have left flowers, handwritten notes, and other tributes outside the palace gates, reflecting the deep affection the Norwegian public held for the late monarch. At the same time, political and civic leaders have welcomed the new king, emphasizing their confidence in his ability to carry forward the constitutional role of the monarchy and serve as a unifying figure for the nation.

    The dual ceremonies of mourning and inauguration underscore the unique balance of continuity and change that defines Norway’s monarchy: as the country says goodbye to a leader who shaped its modern identity, it also welcomes a new sovereign to guide the institution through the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.

  • Zambia president inaugurated for second term after disputed vote and opposition arrests

    Zambia president inaugurated for second term after disputed vote and opposition arrests

    LUSAKA, Zambia — In a ceremony drawing thousands of cheering supporters to the capital’s National Heroes Stadium, Hakainde Hichilema was officially sworn in Tuesday for his second five-year term as President of Zambia, an inauguration that comes against a backdrop of deep electoral controversy, detained opposition figures, and restricted access to legal challenges against the poll outcome.

    According to Zambia’s Electoral Commission, Hichilema secured a decisive victory in the August election, capturing roughly 60 percent of the national presidential vote. His main challenger, opposition leader Brian Mundubile, garnered approximately 38 percent of ballots cast. Almost immediately after the results were announced on August 18, Mundubile rejected the outcome, leveling claims of widespread voting irregularities across the southern African nation.

    Zambia has a three-decade history of largely peaceful electoral competition since it restored multiparty democracy in 1991, a track record that has been called into question by the chaotic aftermath of this year’s poll. In the weeks following the election, multiple opposition leaders have been taken into custody, and the country’s courts were temporarily closed to prevent the opposition from filing formal legal appeals challenging the election results.

    The controversy deepened after Mundubile and his running mate Makebu Zulu were taken into custody. The opposition leader told reporters he had gone into hiding immediately after disputing the results, after security forces raided his residence the day after the election, saying he feared for his personal safety. The pair eventually surrendered to law enforcement on August 24, after seeking temporary shelter in a United Nations facility in Lusaka. Local Zambian media has confirmed the two are currently being held at Mukobeko Maximum Security Prison, located in central Zambia.

    The United Nations’ top human rights official has already issued public statements expressing concern over the arrests of opposition figures following the election, and Mundubile now faces additional accusations of treason, a charge that carries severe legal penalties in Zambia.

    Several regional heads of state attended Tuesday’s inauguration to signal diplomatic support for Hichilema’s new administration, including Kenyan President William Ruto, newly inaugurated Botswana President Duma Boko, and Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa.

    In his inaugural address to the gathered crowd, Hichilema struck a unifying tone, acknowledging the voices of voters who supported opposition candidates despite the contested outcome. “We receive your support with humility and with a clear understanding of the responsibility it places upon our shoulders. To those who chose other candidates or other parties, we say with equal sincerity, we have heard you,” he told the audience, framing his new term as a mandate to govern for all Zambians regardless of their vote.

  • RSS globalised: Inside the Hindu nationalist paramilitary leader’s carefully staged NYC celebration of ‘universal oneness’

    RSS globalised: Inside the Hindu nationalist paramilitary leader’s carefully staged NYC celebration of ‘universal oneness’

    For over 140 years, New York City’s Madison Square Garden has stood as the world’s most iconic arena, hosting everything from championship NBA games to blockbuster sold-out concerts for global superstars. But on a recent Saturday afternoon, this legendary venue played host to a far different gathering: thousands of Indian and Hindu Americans, dressed in vibrant saffron accessories and traditional cultural garments, traveled from across the United States to hear from Mohan Bhagwat, the head of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right Hindu nationalist paramilitary organization whose affiliate groups have been linked to escalating violence against religious minorities in India.

    Organized by a group called American Hindus for Engagement And Dialogue (Ahead), the gathering was branded as the “Universal Oneness Celebration,” marketed as an afternoon of interfaith dialogue, shared cultural expression, and collective unity. As a correspondent for Middle East Eye, I gained access to the event after passing a strict identity-based vetting process — a requirement that contradicts the event’s public framing of radical inclusion. To receive a free ticket, attendees were required to list an affiliated Hindu temple or organization, provide a unique five-digit code for that group, and submit a reference from within the organization. Unlike many other prospective guests who received follow-up screening calls or were denied entry entirely, I was approved without question, a outcome I attribute to my clearly Hindu Brahmin surname — a detail that aligns with the RSS’s long history of Brahmin dominance within its leadership ranks.

    Founded in 1925, the RSS boasts more than 5 million members worldwide and is built around the political ideology of Hindutva, a project that seeks to transform India, a constitutionally secular state, into a ethnically homogeneous Hindu nation. The movement’s earliest ideologues openly drew inspiration from authoritarian exclusionary projects: MS Golwalkar, the RSS’s second supreme leader, once framed Nazi Germany’s ethnic cleansing of European Jews as “a good lesson for us in Hindustan to learn and profit by,” explicitly targeting India’s Muslim community. VD Savarkar, widely considered the founder of Hindutva, held up the Zionist project in Palestine as a model for his exclusionary vision for India.

    India’s current ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), emerged directly from the RSS’s ideological coalition, the Sangh Parivar, and nearly all of its top leaders — including Prime Minister Narendra Modi — hold active membership in the organization. In recent years, senior BJP cabinet ministers have delivered public hate speeches calling for the killing of Indian Muslims, labeling the community “green snakes” that must be eliminated.

    Even before entering the venue, the demographic homogeneity of the crowd — carefully curated to align with the RSS’s core values — was unmistakable. As more than 5,000 attendees waited in line to enter MSG’s Infosys Theater, the crowd broke out into repeated chants of “Jai Shri Ram,” a phrase that originated as a Hindu religious greeting but has since become a battle cry for perpetrators of anti-minority violence in India. The slogan was politicized in the 1980s to rally support for the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of the 16th-century Babri Masjid, a mosque demolished by Hindu mobs led by prominent BJP leaders in 1992.

    Attendees also chanted repeatedly “Vande Mataram,” India’s national song, whose full version — championed exclusively by the RSS and affiliated groups — includes references to Hindu deities that secular Indian leaders have long argued contradict the country’s secular constitutional identity. The final stanzas of the full version call for 70 million people to “lift swords” and “drive out every invader who came from land and sea,” a clear dog whistle targeting India’s Muslim and Christian minority communities. Just weeks before the MSG event, the BJP-led national government passed legislation criminalizing any disruption or insult to the full version of the song, codifying the RSS’s preferred framing into national law.

    Conversations with attendees made clear the deep ties between the gathering and the global Sangh Parivar network. One woman traveling with her young son said they had come from a local shakha — or local chapter — of the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS), the RSS’s official international wing, near Edison, New Jersey, which is one of more than 250 HSS chapters across the United States. Other attendees identified as members of Sangh-affiliated groups ranging from the campus-based Hindu Students Council to Hindu Yuva, another youth organizing project tied to the movement. According to research from Savera, an anti-Hindutva advocacy organization, Ahead’s leadership has direct, extensive ties to both the RSS and BJP, and the group listed more than 250 partner organizations from across the U.S. that sent delegates to the New York event.

    Outside the arena, dozens of activists from organizations including the Anti Imperialist South Asian Alliance Philadelphia (AISA Philly) and South Asian Left (Salam) gathered to protest the event. Rishi Arun, a member of both protesting groups, told Middle East Eye that the MSG gathering was the culmination of a decades-long project to legitimize Hindutva ideology among the South Asian diaspora in the United States. “These organisations have covertly pushed Hindutva propaganda while masquerading as cultural organisations, and using the language of universality, spirituality, and often inclusion,” Arun explained.

    Inside the venue, the event opened with a showcase of three South Asian drumming traditions, but the crowd only erupted into excitement when performers took up the Maharashtrian Dhol Tasha — a style organizers explicitly noted has military origins. As the drums played, an image of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, a 17th-century Maratha king, was projected onto the main stage; while many mainstream historians dispute this framing, Hindu nationalists have rebranded Shivaji as an early icon of armed Hindu resistance against Muslim rule in India.

    After short informational videos about “Hindu Dharma” and the nation of “Bharat” — the name Hindu nationalists insist on for India, rejecting both the “Hindustan” and “India” labels imposed by Muslim and British rulers respectively — the program continued with a regional cultural dance showcase. The crowd’s loudest cheers came during a segment celebrating the Middle East, performed to “Fa9la” by Bahraini artist Flipperachi — the viral entry theme for the Pakistani villain in the 2025 Bollywood film *Dhurandar*, which has been widely described as a Hindu nationalist revenge fantasy against Pakistan. Through carefully curated cultural programming, the event evoked core Hindutva sentiments without ever explicitly stating its exclusionary political goals.

    The tone shifted after the cultural portion of the event, as organizers convened what they framed as an interfaith summit “One World, One Humanity,” with Bhagwat standing center stage flanked by clergy from Jewish, Muslim, Christian, and other major global faith traditions. Bawa Jain, founder of the World Council of Religious Leaders, introduced a centennial call to action for the RSS, reaffirming the organization’s stated commitment to global interfaith harmony. In opening remarks to the summit, Bhagwat told the crowd, “if any Hindu thinks there should be no Muslims in India, he will not remain Hindu” — a statement critics dismiss as tailored for a Western audience, even as the RSS continues to fuel anti-minority violence back in India.

    Human rights monitoring group Genocide Watch has explicitly warned that India is currently in the precursor stages of an anti-Muslim genocide, and has directly linked the RSS to arming and training Hindu nationalist groups to carry out organized communal violence. In his 40-minute closing speech, Bhagwat told attendees that “every nation has a destiny to fulfil” and that the destiny of “Bharat” is to “make the world realise” the idea of “unity in diversity.”

    A day after the event, RSS leadership praised the New York gathering on social media platform X, framing it as a key global outreach initiative during Bhagwat’s multi-city tour of the U.S., Canada, and the United Kingdom. But critics of the event say Bhagwat’s moderate, inclusive rhetoric for American audiences stands in stark contrast to the daily violence carried out by RSS affiliates in India.

    “Bhagwat’s words are one thing. And the bloodshed that the RSS commits on a near-daily basis in India is entirely another,” said Safa Ahmed, board member of the Indian American Muslim Council and a co-organizer of the external protest. Ahmed referenced Golwalkar’s original writing, which argues that religious minorities must be “wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation” — a standard that Ahmed says represents the RSS’s true vision for minority communities in India.

    Just one week before the MSG event, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom called on the Biden administration to impose sanctions on the RSS for its role in “violent attacks against religious minorities, including Christians, Dalits, Muslims, and Sikhs,” and urged the State Department to revoke Bhagwat’s travel visa to the United States.

    As the event drew to a close, attendees closed out the gathering with a new, globalized twist on the traditional RSS closing chant. While RSS shakhas in India traditionally end with “Bharat Mata ki jai” (“Victory to Mother India”), the New York crowd chanted “Vishwa dharma ki jai” — “Victory to universal dharma” — a clear signal that the RSS is actively expanding its ideological project beyond India’s borders into the U.S. diaspora.

  • Norway’s King Haakon pledges an oath of allegiance to the constitution as his father lies in state

    Norway’s King Haakon pledges an oath of allegiance to the constitution as his father lies in state

    OSLO, Norway – In a historic moment marking the start of a new era for the Norwegian monarchy, King Haakon VIII formally pledged allegiance to Norway’s constitution during a ceremony in Parliament Tuesday. The symbolic step comes just days after the passing of his father, King Harald V, who ruled the Scandinavian nation for 35 years and died last Friday at the age of 89.

    Haakon, who ascended to the throne immediately following Harald V’s death, has chosen the motto “All for Norway” – a phrase that traces its origin back to his great-grandfather, reflecting continuity with the nation’s long royal legacy. On Tuesday morning, the 53-year-old new monarch traveled the short distance from the Royal Palace to the Storting (Norway’s Parliament) in an open vehicle, where the day’s formal proceedings got underway.

    Masud Gharahkhani, the Speaker of the Storting, opened the ceremony by making the official announcement of King Harald V’s death and Haakon’s succession to the throne. After the announcement, Haakon took the historic oath of office, stating: “I promise and swear that I will govern the Kingdom of Norway in accordance with its Constitution and Laws; so help me God, the Almighty and Omniscient.”

    The Norwegian monarchy is one of the oldest continuing institutions in Europe, with roots stretching back to King Harald Fairhair in the 9th century. When Norway regained full independence from Sweden in 1905, a national referendum saw three-quarters of voters support the restoration of the monarchy. Today, while the monarchy holds a largely ceremonial role with all governing power vested in the elected parliament and government, the royal family remains a key cultural and diplomatic asset that helps promote Norway’s interests and image around the globe.

    In the days leading up to the oath-taking ceremony, the late King Harald V’s coffin was transported to the Royal Palace chapel in central Oslo on Monday. The coffin will remain at the chapel ahead of King Harald V’s funeral scheduled for September 9. From Tuesday afternoon through September 8, the chapel will be open daily to allow members of the public to pay their final respects by walking past the coffin. The Royal Palace has issued guidelines for visitors: no photography or videography is permitted inside the chapel, and guests are asked not to leave flowers or other tributes at the site.

    The procession bringing the coffin to the palace chapel on Monday marked the first official public appearance of Haakon’s wife, Queen Mette-Marit, since she assumed her new title. The queen had largely stayed out of the public eye after undergoing a lung transplant in June of this year. However, just ahead of Tuesday’s swearing-in ceremony, the palace announced that Queen Mette-Marit would be unable to attend the event due to post-transplant complications.

    In a statement, the palace shared a comment from Are Holm, a pulmonologist at Oslo University Hospital, who explained that post-transplant complications are not unusual, and that the queen has experienced these complications on multiple occasions, including on the day of the ceremony. “As a result, the Queen must remain under observation throughout the day. Unfortunately, the Queen will therefore be unable to attend the swearing-in ceremony at the Storting today,” Holm said.

  • Liberals sweep three seats in boost for Carney after trade tensions with US

    Liberals sweep three seats in boost for Carney after trade tensions with US

    In a significant show of political force that underscores continued public confidence in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s leadership, Canada’s ruling Liberal Party claimed victory in all three federal parliamentary by-elections held across the country on Monday. The outcome comes more than a year into Carney’s premiership, and on the heels of high-stakes trade friction with the United States that appears to have rallied domestic support behind the government.

    The special elections were called to fill vacancies left by the resignations of three sitting Members of Parliament. The most high-profile upset came in the Quebec riding of Chicoutimi-Le Fjord, where the Liberals flipped the seat from the official opposition Conservative Party. In the other two contests, held in Beaches-East York (Ontario) and North Vancouver-Capilano (British Columbia), the governing party held onto the seats, matching pre-election polling projections.

    Carney’s standing in national opinion polls has risen sharply since he made the decision to end stalled trade negotiations with the U.S., accusing Washington of pushing unfair terms that would harm Canadian economic interests. Taking to social media platform X to celebrate the by-election results, the prime minister congratulated the three winning Liberal candidates and struck a determined tone on the challenges ahead. “Canada is being tested in a changing world, and Canadians are up for it,” Carney wrote.

    The clean sweep preserves Carney’s narrow working majority in the House of Commons, a critical outcome for the government’s legislative agenda going forward.

    Canadian election projections confirmed a commanding victory for the Liberals in Chicoutimi-Le Fjord. The party’s candidate, Daniel Gobeil, a third-generation dairy farmer, won more than 50% of the popular vote to claim the seat, defeating Bloc Québécois (second) and Conservative (third) challengers. This marked a shift from the previous election in the riding, which was a tight three-way contest. Speaking to supporters in French, Gobeil framed the win as a mandate for advancing national unity across all regions of Canada, according to public broadcaster CBC.

    In Ontario, Tanveer Shahnawaz secured the Beaches-East York seat for the Liberals, while Braeden Caley held the North Vancouver-Capilano riding for the party in British Columbia, capping off an undefeated night for the governing bloc.

    The results add to a string of struggles for the Conservative Party, which has failed to narrow its polling gap with the Liberals since losing the 2025 federal election. Current national surveys show the Conservatives trailing Carney’s party by roughly 10 percentage points. Since the April 2025 vote, four Conservative MPs have crossed the floor to join the Liberals, while three more have resigned or announced plans to leave office. The Quebec seat contested on Monday was vacated when former Conservative MP Richard Martel resigned last month after Carney appointed him to the unelected Canadian Senate.

    The loss of Martel’s former seat delivers another major blow to Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who won a landslide leadership confidence vote in January but has faced growing scrutiny over his ability to connect with Canadian voters in the current political climate.

    Meanwhile, new polling data released Monday by Canadian research firm Abacus Data shows Carney’s government approval rating has risen four percentage points in recent weeks, alongside a matching jump in the prime minister’s personal popularity. Abacus Data founder David Coletto attributes the upward trend to two key factors: deeply negative views of U.S. President Donald Trump among Canadian voters, and a national rallying effect around Carney’s decision to walk away from unfavorable trade talks with the White House.

    Coletto noted that the shift in approval is most dramatic in Quebec, where Carney’s personal approval rating is now higher than in any other Canadian province. The province is also set to bear the brunt of new 50% tariffs on a wide range of Canadian goods imposed by Trump, which took effect after trade talks collapsed earlier this month. Global forecasting firm Oxford Economics recently warned that Quebec could lose up to C$2 billion ($1.4 billion) in annual economic output by 2028 if the tariffs remain in place.

  • Trump admin is urged to end sanctions impacting Iranian students

    Trump admin is urged to end sanctions impacting Iranian students

    On Monday, the most prominent grassroots advocacy organization representing Iranian American communities, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), issued a formal appeal to top officials in the Trump administration demanding an urgent reversal of new sanctions that have effectively sent a message the United States is in conflict with the Iranian public, while calling for permanent exemptions for all humanitarian, educational and cultural initiatives.

    NIAC’s open letter was addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and it warned that the imminent withdrawal of long-standing general licenses will deepen growing harm already being felt across sectors that have long connected U.S. and Iranian communities. These licenses previously cleared the way for U.S. universities, educational testing providers and other non-governmental entities to offer life-changing academic opportunities to Iranian citizens.

    The appeal comes in the wake of multiple confirmed reports that major testing providers have already restricted access for Iranian students following the new sanctions rollout. The Education Testing Service (ETS), which administers two of the most widely required standardized tests for international study — the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) and the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) — has halted all testing operations within Iran. The Duolingo English Test, a popular alternative proficiency assessment run by global language learning platform Duolingo, has also been taken offline for users in Iran and any test-takers holding Iranian identification.

    Labeled “Operation Economic Outcast,” the Trump administration’s new sanctions are formally framed as a response to the Iranian government’s decision to restrict access to the Strait of Hormuz, a retaliatory move amid the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war against Iran. But NIAC President Jamal Abdi argued in the letter that these new restrictions will have no meaningful impact on the Iranian ruling establishment, despite their stated policy goal.

    “Instead, it is already being felt by American entities and Iranian students,” Abdi wrote. “Iranian students have been barred from taking key exams required for academic studies by US organizations.”

    Abdi called on the administration to immediately reinstate two critical regulatory frameworks: 31 CFR § 560.544, which grants authorization for U.S. individuals and organizations to conduct certain educational activities in third countries, and Iran General License G, the legal provision that explicitly permits educational exchange programs between the two nations.

    “The Trump administration would be wise to bolster the limited educational, humanitarian, and cultural channels that exist between ordinary Iranians and the United States, rather than send a message that the US is at war with the Iranian people,” Abdi stated.

    For decades, Iran has ranked among the countries with the highest global demand for TOEFL testing, as thousands of Iranian students pursue undergraduate and graduate study at international institutions each year. Abdi noted that cutting off access to these core testing infrastructure will create insurmountable barriers for Iranian citizens seeking global educational opportunities.

    NIAC outlined the overlapping barriers Iranian students already face when pursuing study in the United States: a long-standing travel ban that blocks most Iranians from securing U.S. visas, paired with the new sanctions that eliminate access to required English proficiency exams, academic services and university enrollment.

    “There is no world in which the US preventing young Iranians from taking English proficiency tests leads to the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and yet that appears to be the rationale for this cruel new policy,” Abdi said in an accompanying public statement. He reiterated that preserving and expanding people-to-people connections between U.S. and Iranian communities is a far more productive policy path than cutting these ties.

    Beyond educational access, Abdi also pressed administration leaders to reverse the suspension of licenses that permit Iranian Americans to send remittances to immediate family members residing in Iran, as well as licenses that allow athletic competitions between U.S. and Iranian teams. He warned that the suspension of sports exchange licenses creates unnecessary complications for the 2028 Summer Olympic Games scheduled to be hosted in Los Angeles, damages the U.S.’s global reputation as a welcoming host nation, and delivers no tangible policy benefits to advance U.S. strategic goals.

    Abdi explained that the exemptions now being rolled back by the White House were first introduced more than a decade ago specifically to mitigate harmful unintended consequences of earlier U.S. sanctions regimes, which had accidentally cut off ordinary Iranians from access to academic opportunities and people-to-people exchanges.

    “Now, it appears that these have become very much intended consequences aimed at the Iranian people, which is a self-defeating message for the US to send to Iranians and the world,” Abdi continued. “There is absolutely no justification for this.”

  • UK leader Burnham faces lawmakers for first time since taking office

    UK leader Burnham faces lawmakers for first time since taking office

    Six weeks after stepping into the role of United Kingdom Prime Minister, Andy Burnham will finally face questioning from fellow lawmakers in the House of Commons on Tuesday, taking the floor at a moment when dual active conflicts in Europe and the Middle East hang heavily over his core campaign pledges to reboot Britain’s stagnant economy and ease the crippling cost of living crisis.

    Burnham assumed office on July 20, following Keir Starmer’s two-year tenure marked by widespread public pessimism. Since taking power, he has toured the UK to tout a vision of renewed national optimism, rolling out a slate of targeted, modest cost-cutting policies designed to give households and struggling businesses much-needed “breathing space.” These measures include a tax reduction on residential energy bills and lower business levies for pubs and nightclubs, two sectors hit particularly hard by post-pandemic economic volatility and rising energy costs.

    Until Tuesday, however, neither opposition parties nor dissenting voices within Burnham’s own Labour Party have had the opportunity to challenge the prime minister on the details of his commitments, which are being pursued against a fraught backdrop of mounting global security threats and persistent domestic economic strain, amplified by ongoing conflict linked to Iran.

    Parliament returns this week from its summer recess, and Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch — who reshuffled her top opposition team on Monday to appoint new spokespeople for the economy and foreign affairs — will get her first formal chance to grill Burnham on his policy agenda.

    A former Greater Manchester mayor who spent nearly a decade outside of parliamentary politics before winning a House of Commons seat in June, Burnham is set to deliver a flagship statement outlining his vision for a more interventionist yet less centralized British state. According to Downing Street, the prime minister will lay out “a clear plan for how we turn things round” for the UK, highlighting his proposal for greater public oversight of water, energy, and transportation sectors. Burnham argues this increased public involvement will drive long-term economic growth and reduce household financial pressure, though observers remain uncertain how far he intends to reverse decades of privatization in these core economic pillars.

    Opposition lawmakers are prepared with a long list of contentious questions, starting with Burnham’s plan to open a second prime ministerial office dubbed “No. 10 North” in Manchester. Burnham frames the project as a key step to devolve more power to regional leaders and rebalance economic growth away from London and the Southeast, but critics have dismissed it as a costly political gimmick that will do little to address regional inequality.

    Domestic challenges extend far beyond the devolution debate. Burnham is also facing mounting political pressure over the crisis of overcrowding in British prisons, after he was forced to roll back plans to release some low-risk offenders early. The reversal came after widespread public outcry, including a high-profile appeal from the widow of a police officer killed in a hit-and-run who demanded her husband’s killer remain behind bars.

    On the foreign policy front, Burnham has already moved to cement Britain’s longstanding support for Ukraine, making his first international trip as prime minister to Kyiv last month to reaffirm the UK’s commitment to the country’s defense against Russian invasion. Like other Western European allies, the UK faces growing pressure to ramp up military spending to address ongoing aggression from Russia and align with shifting global security priorities, compounded by changes to U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration.

    In the coming weeks, Burnham’s government will be required to detail exactly how it plans to fund its pledge to meet NATO’s target of spending 3.5% of gross domestic product on defense by 2035, a commitment that will require difficult trade-offs with domestic spending priorities. The prime minister also faces a deeply contentious looming decision on whether to approve new oil and gas extraction projects in the North Sea. The policy is publicly backed by U.S. President Donald Trump but faces fierce opposition from climate activists and clean energy advocates who warn expanding fossil fuel production will undermine the UK’s net-zero climate commitments.

  • The election campaign to replace Macron in France is heating up as the summer vacation season ends

    The election campaign to replace Macron in France is heating up as the summer vacation season ends

    PARIS – As France’s annual summer holiday period draws to a close, the 2027 race to succeed Emmanuel Macron as President of France has officially entered its active campaign phase. Macron, constrained by France’s constitutional term limits, cannot run for a third consecutive mandate – a rule that has sparked a flood of candidacies from across the political spectrum, producing one of the largest and most diverse candidate fields in modern French electoral history.

    France holds unique weight across the European Union: it is the bloc’s largest member state by territory, its second-largest national economy, and the only EU member with nuclear weapons capabilities, making this upcoming leadership vote one of the most consequential global elections of 2027. While not all declared and potential candidates will secure the required sponsorship signatures from elected officials to make it onto the April 18 first-round ballot, the historically crowded field already carries significant electoral risks for mainstream parties, analysts warn.

    A crowded fragmented field mirrors the 2002 presidential election, when a record 16 candidates split the first-round vote, allowing far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen – father of current candidate Marine Le Pen – to qualify for the second round, triggering a nationwide political earthquake. That same dynamic could work to Marine Le Pen’s advantage this cycle, experts say.

    Socialist Party chief Olivier Faure became the latest major figure to announce his candidacy over the weekend, joining more than two dozen other politicians who have either formally declared their intent to run or are actively exploring a presidential bid.

    For Marine Le Pen, this 2027 campaign marks her fourth attempt at the presidency, following failed runs in 2017 and 2022, and political analysts and pollsters agree this is her strongest shot at capturing the Elysee Palace for her nationalist, anti-immigration National Rally party. A Le Pen victory would send shockwaves across the European Union, placing one of the bloc’s core member states in the hands of a politician who has spent decades opposing EU integration and many of the bloc’s core collective policies.

    “It’s clearly a crucial election, just because the far right might win this one and it never was the case before,” explained Gilles Ivaldi, a populism and radical right politics researcher at Paris’ prestigious Sciences Po university. “With Le Pen as president, we know that the EU will be weakened. To what extent we don’t know, but we know she’s against the EU. This would create a lot of instability.”

    Polling conducted over the past several months has consistently placed Le Pen as the first-round front-runner, with a high likelihood that she will advance to the May 2 runoff as the top vote-getter – a first for her political career. In both 2017 and 2022, she trailed Macron in the first round before losing decisively in the head-to-head second round.

    Unlike her father, whose 2002 second-round qualification was seen as a massive upset and who was widely rejected by most voters over his ties to WWII Nazi collaborators and repeated hate speech convictions including Holocaust denial, most political observers now see a failure for Marine Le Pen to advance to the runoff as the real upset. Over the past decade, she has worked systematically to distance the National Rally from her father’s extremist rhetoric, and that rebranding has already paid major electoral dividends: since 2024, the National Rally has held the largest number of seats in the powerful lower chamber of the French parliament. She received another critical boost in July, when a Paris appeals court cleared her path to run by reducing a ban on holding public office linked to a prior embezzlement conviction.

    While Le Pen is broadly expected to secure one of the two spots in the decisive runoff, the race for the second spot remains wide open and highly unpredictable. Her most prominent competitors include veteran far-left anti-capitalist leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who is aiming to reach his first runoff after placing third in 2022 and fourth in both 2017 and 2012, as well as two centrist former prime ministers from Macron’s administration, Edouard Philippe and Gabriel Attal. Other leading potential candidates include conservative former Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, mainstream left European Parliament member Raphaël Glucksmann, and Ecologists party leader Marine Tondelier, who is campaigning ahead of the upcoming birth of her second child.

    Seven of the leading non-Le Pen candidates participated in an unofficial campaign kickoff debate last week at Paris’ iconic Roland Garros tennis arena, where they discussed policy proposals to address France’s persistent economic struggles and exchanged critical barbs aimed at Le Pen, who responded with criticism of her own.

    Polls currently indicate that if Le Pen and Mélenchon – the two candidates representing the far right and far left extremes – face off in the runoff, Le Pen would be likely to win. That scenario has led to speculation that some mainstream candidates may eventually drop out of the race to consolidate support behind a single mainstream alternative. “What we don’t know is who’s going to be against her” in a possible second-round matchup, Ivaldi noted. “The more the fragmentation, the more the chances that Mélenchon will be that person.”

    This 2027 campaign is unfolding against an unusually volatile global and domestic backdrop unmatched by any French presidential race this century. The ongoing Iran conflict has driven up energy costs, adding further pressure to France’s already stagnant economy, while the war in Ukraine has left French policymakers concerned that Russia could target a NATO ally next, raising the risk of broader European conflict. A potential second Donald Trump U.S. presidency has also eroded French confidence in the stability of the trans-Atlantic alliance, while China’s growing manufacturing and export power and the rapid global AI revolution have stoked fears that France could fall behind economically and technologically.

    Domestically, France’s growing and increasingly costly public debt has shrunk the fiscal room for maneuver that Macron’s successor will inherit, and widespread public anger over Macron’s policy decisions during his two terms led to repeated mass street protests. Ultimately, the election will turn on whether French voters choose to upend the established order by backing two extreme candidates in the runoff, or rally around a mainstream candidate as a safer alternative. “It will be quite interesting to see which of these two forces will win in the end,” Ivaldi said. “These are two different forces, two antagonistic forces that are playing against one another.”