分类: politics

  • Heavy weapons use in Iran war sparks concerns over US readiness in Taiwan: Report

    Heavy weapons use in Iran war sparks concerns over US readiness in Taiwan: Report

    A new report from The Wall Street Journal has brought urgent attention to a growing gap in U.S. military stockpiles, driven by extensive weapons expenditure in ongoing operations against Iran. Multiple senior U.S. officials have raised alarms that the heavy drawdown of munitions leaves America ill-prepared to execute its longstanding defense commitments to Taiwan in the event of a potential Chinese incursion in the near term. According to the report published Thursday, this munitions shortage would not only hinder U.S. military operations but also put American service members at substantially elevated risk if a conflict over Taiwan broke out in the near future.

    The scale of depletion is significant: U.S. forces alone have expended between 1,500 and 2,000 air defense interceptors during strikes and defensive operations against Iran, alongside more than 1,000 Tomahawk cruise missiles, one of America’s primary long-range offensive weapons. What makes the shortage particularly pressing is the extended timeline to replenish these stockpiles: defense industry production chains currently require up to six years to replace the munitions already used in the Iran campaign. This production lag has forced senior U.S. national security officials to open discussions about revising existing operational plans for Taiwan’s defense, an issue that remains the top strategic priority for U.S. policymakers in the Indo-Pacific.

    The ripple effects of this munitions shortage extend far beyond the Indo-Pacific, reshaping security dynamics across the Middle East. When the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran launched earlier this year in June 2025, regional U.S. allies including Gulf Cooperation Council states requested urgent resupplies of Patriot air defense interceptors to fend off retaliatory Iranian drone and missile strikes. However, the U.S. turned these requests down, as its own stockpiles were already drained supporting Israeli air defense operations during the opening phase of the war. As the conflict has dragged on, Iran has launched thousands of drones and missiles against Gulf states, with Bahrain, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates enduring the heaviest wave of attacks, and the U.S. has been unable to fill the growing security gap.

    This vacuum created by U.S. stockpile shortages has been filled by an unexpected actor: Ukraine. On Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that Kyiv has signed new security agreements with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar focused specifically on countering Iranian drone threats. Ukraine has first-hand experience countering the same Iranian-origin drones that Russia has deployed extensively against Ukrainian targets throughout the full-scale invasion, and has developed lower-cost anti-drone technologies that outperform more expensive American systems like the Patriot in this specific niche, making it an attractive alternative partner for Gulf states.

    The strategic ramifications of this depletion are already shifting the global balance of power. The Trump administration has acknowledged the need to ramp up domestic defense production, and the Pentagon unveiled its new 10-year $1.5 trillion defense budget proposal this week – the largest in U.S. history – designed to expand production capacity and rebuild stockpiles. Even so, many independent defense analysts argue that the ongoing Iran war has already handed China a major strategic advantage. By draining U.S. conventional arsenal and drawing American strategic attention and resources back to the Middle East, the conflict has strengthened China’s diplomatic and military influence across the globe.

    Recent reports have further highlighted this shifting dynamic. Following the June 2025 Iran war, Middle East Eye documented that China completed sales of air defense systems to Iran, and later followed up with deliveries of unmanned aerial vehicles. The New York Times added to these reports Saturday, confirming that U.S. intelligence assessments indicate China may have also provided man-portable shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles to the Iranian military. These developments mark a significant deepening of military ties between Beijing and Tehran, a shift that would have been far less likely if the U.S. had not been distracted and depleated by its own operations in the region.

  • Woodside grilled by senator over political donations amid calls for new gas tax

    Woodside grilled by senator over political donations amid calls for new gas tax

    Australia’s largest ASX-listed energy firm Woodside Energy has found itself at the center of a fiery senate inquiry, where executives defended the nation’s existing gas taxation framework amid intense scrutiny over the company’s decade-long $2.5 million in political donations to Australia’s three major parties: the Liberals, Nationals, and Labor.

    The hearing, focused on reviewing gas resource taxation rules, was led by Greens committee chair Steph Hodgins-May, who pressed Woodside representatives hard over the nature of their political giving. Hodgins-May challenged the company to disclose what policy access the donations secured, questioning whether corporate funding should even buy entry into policy discussions. “As a Greens senator I could never ever imagine taking money in exchange for a meeting with a stakeholder,” she stated during the session. She further pressed for details on private communications between Woodside executives and Western Australian Premier Roger Cook ahead of Cook’s public stance opposing new gas taxes ahead of the upcoming federal budget, a question Woodside officials declined to answer immediately, saying they would respond to the query on notice.

    The inquiry comes amid growing public and political pressure to implement a new 25% minimum tax on gas exports, a push Hodgins-May has publicly backed. She has pushed back against industry warnings that the time is not right for such a reform, arguing that energy giants have long delayed sharing their extraordinary windfall profits with the Australian public, the rightful owners of the nation’s natural resources. This momentum for higher gas taxes has built following a global energy price surge triggered by ongoing geopolitical conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, which has delivered Australian gas exporters a combined $149 billion in export profits since 2022. Over that same period, Australia’s national debt has swelled to nearly $1 trillion, with economic analysts projecting a 25% export tax would add roughly $17 billion in annual government revenue.

    In his opening testimony before the committee, Woodside Chief Financial Officer Graham Tiver defended the company’s record and the current taxation structure. Tiver emphasized that Woodside already makes a massive contribution to Australian public finances and the national economy, noting that over the past four years, the company has paid roughly $13.8 billion in taxes, royalties, Petroleum Resource Rent Taxes, and other levies, equal to around 44% of revenue from its gas projects being returned to government. “Each year Woodside makes a very substantial contribution back to the Australian community through tax, royalties and other levies. When Woodside succeeds, Australian workers, community and shareholders share in that success, and governments receive the revenue needed to fund essential services such as hospitals, schools and roads,” Tiver said.

    Tiver added that Australia’s existing tax framework strikes the right balance between generating public revenue and supporting the stable, competitive investment environment needed to maintain domestic energy security, create jobs, and keep local energy prices affordable. He noted that Woodside invests more than $10 billion in upfront capital for new projects, and that effective tax rates increase naturally over the lifecycle of gas developments as upfront costs are depreciated.

    Market analysts have noted that the debate over windfall gas taxes brings legitimate arguments on both sides. Morningstar market strategist Lochlan Halloway explained that it is understandable for Australians to feel frustrated by the sudden surge in gas producer profits at a time of broader cost of living pressures. He acknowledged that as the collective owners of Australia’s natural resource endowment, the Australian public currently receives a smaller share of windfall profits than resource holders in comparable nations such as Norway or Qatar. However, Halloway warned that retroactively imposing a new windfall tax carries long-term economic risks. Unlike Norway, where the government is not just a tax collector but also an equity participant that shares upfront project costs and downside risks, a unilateral windfall tax in Australia would shift all asymmetric risk to private investors: the public would collect gains during price booms, but private capital would still bear all losses during price downturns. Halloway noted that the United Kingdom implemented a similar unbalanced windfall levy, and the policy has already led to a complete halt in new offshore North Sea oil and gas exploration, a situation not seen since 1964. Such an outcome in Australia would risk deterring future energy investment and undermining long-term energy security, he argued.

  • EU unblocks funds as Ukraine presses for membership progress

    EU unblocks funds as Ukraine presses for membership progress

    After months of diplomatic gridlock driven by Hungarian opposition, European Union leaders have formally given final approval to a €90 billion ($105 billion) aid package for Ukraine, paired with a new round of anti-Russia sanctions. The breakthrough comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in the Cypriot coastal resort of Ayia Napa for talks with EU leaders, where he immediately shifted the conversation to advancing Kyiv’s long-held ambition of full European Union membership.

    Zelensky opened his remarks by expressing profound gratitude for the long-delayed financial support, noting that the funds would be critical to keeping Ukraine’s military equipped and sending a clear, unified message to Moscow that European backing for Kyiv remains unshaken. But speaking to reporters outside the seaside conference venue, the Ukrainian leader made clear that his priority now is moving accession talks forward, stating bluntly: “We will push everybody.” He added that his ultimate goal is securing full Ukrainian membership in the bloc by 2027.

    The path to membership talks has recently cleared significantly, following the electoral defeat of Hungarian nationalist leader Viktor Orban earlier this month, who had spent months blocking progress on both the aid package and the opening of accession negotiating clusters. Orban, who skipped what would have been his final EU summit before leaving office, had wielded his veto over the €90 billion loan as leverage to force Ukraine to repair a pipeline damaged in a Russian strike. With repair work completed this week, Russian oil has resumed flowing through the pipeline to both Hungary and Slovakia, resolving the last sticking point for the aid package.

    European Council President Antonio Costa, who represents the bloc’s 27 member states, signaled openness to moving forward, saying the EU must “look forward and prepare the next step”, which would include formally opening the first negotiating clusters for Ukraine’s accession. However, not all EU capitals are on board with accelerating the process. Several senior leaders have pushed back against a fast track, arguing that accession must follow a strict merit-based system that requires Ukraine to meet all membership criteria before advancing. “Fast tracks are not possible,” Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said. Luxembourg Prime Minister Luc Frieden echoed that stance, noting that “you simply cannot become a member of a club without meeting the conditions.”

    French President Emmanuel Macron declined to take a position on accelerated membership, but called on the EU executive branch to draft a clear timeline and outline next steps to be completed in the coming weeks. For his part, Zelensky has rejected calls for a lesser, symbolic membership status, reiterating that Ukraine will accept nothing less than full membership in the bloc. Zelensky also outlined plans for the aid, saying the €90 billion will go toward strengthening Ukraine’s military, expanding domestic air defense production, and shoring up the country’s damaged energy grid. He expects the first disbursement of funds to arrive by late May or early June at the latest.

    Beyond Ukraine, the summit in Cyprus, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency, will tackle a range of pressing global and internal issues. EU leaders will turn their attention to the ongoing Middle East conflict and its economic fallout, which has driven sharp spikes in global energy prices. The island nation was drawn into the conflict in March when a drone struck a British military base located on Cypriot territory. On Friday, EU leaders will be joined by their counterparts from Lebanon, Egypt, Syria and Jordan for what a senior EU official described as “intensive dialogue” on regional stability.

    A top economic priority for the bloc is addressing disruption to global energy supplies linked to tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. A de facto partial closure of the key shipping route has already pushed oil prices sharply higher and reduced jet fuel supplies across Europe. Leaders will also hold their first discussion on the EU’s 2028-2034 multi-year budget. The European Commission has proposed a expanded two trillion euro ($2.3 trillion) budget to account for new priorities including aid for Ukraine and defense spending, but many national governments have already pushed back against calls to increase their national contributions to the bloc.

  • US soldier charged after winning $400,000 betting on removal of Maduro

    US soldier charged after winning $400,000 betting on removal of Maduro

    An active-duty U.S. Army special forces soldier has been arrested and charged by the Department of Justice for illegally trading on classified information about the military operation that captured former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, turning confidential mission details into hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal profits, federal officials announced Thursday.

    Gannon Ken Van Dyke, a soldier stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, used nonpublic classified information about Operation Absolute Resolve — the codename for the night-time raid that seized Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores from their Caracas compound on January 3 — to place targeted bets on Polymarket, a cryptocurrency-based prediction platform, according to the unsealed indictment. Prosecutors allege that Van Dyke, who was involved in the planning and execution of the operation between December 2025 and January 2026, gained authorized access to highly sensitive mission details including the operation’s timing and expected outcome.

    In late December 2025, Van Dyke created a Polymarket account and invested more than $33,000 across Venezuela and Maduro-related prediction markets, all with the explicit goal of personal financial gain, the DOJ said. When the operation concluded as planned, Van Dyke walked away with more than $409,000 in winnings from his insider trades.

    Polymarket officials confirmed Thursday that after the platform detected suspicious activity tied to classified government information, it immediately referred the case to the Department of Justice and fully cooperated with the ongoing investigation. “Insider trading has no place on Polymarket. Today’s arrest is proof the system works,” the company said in a social media statement.

    Van Dyke faces five separate federal charges: unlawful use of confidential government information for personal gain, theft of nonpublic government information, commodities fraud, wire fraud, and making an unlawful monetary transaction. As a member of the U.S. military granted access to classified information, Van Dyke had previously signed binding non-disclosure agreements promising he would never reveal or misuse any classified or sensitive operational information for any unauthorized purpose, DOJ officials noted.

    “Our men and women in uniform are trusted with classified information in order to accomplish their mission as safely and effectively as possible, and are prohibited from using this highly sensitive information for personal financial gain,” said acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche. “Widespread access to prediction markets is a relatively new phenomenon, but federal laws protecting national security information fully apply.”

    U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York — the judicial district where the case will be tried — echoed that sentiment, emphasizing that prediction markets do not qualify as safe havens for actors looking to profit from misappropriated confidential or classified information. The independent U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission also filed a separate civil complaint against Van Dyke on Thursday, bringing additional insider trading allegations against him.

    The raid that captured Maduro transferred the former Venezuelan leader and his wife to New York, where they face ongoing charges of weapons trafficking and drug trafficking, allegations the pair have repeatedly denied.

    During a press briefing on an unrelated matter Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters he had not yet been briefed on the allegations against Van Dyke but would review the case. When asked about growing concerns that unregulated prediction markets create openings for widespread insider trading involving sensitive government information, Trump said he disapproved of the practice. “The whole world, unfortunately, has become somewhat of a casino, and you look at what’s going on all over the world, in Europe and every place, they’re doing these betting things,” he said. “I was never much in favour of it.”

  • Trump ‘gold card’ visa granted to one person so far: US commerce chief

    Trump ‘gold card’ visa granted to one person so far: US commerce chief

    A high-profile immigration initiative launched by US President Donald Trump has marked its first formal approval, with only one applicant successfully clearing the process for the administration’s signature $1 million ‘gold card’ residency visa to date, the nation’s top commerce official told lawmakers this week.

    US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made the disclosure Thursday during a hearing before the US House of Representatives, updating Congress on the status of a program that has sparked intense debate since its unveiling last year. First ordered into creation by Trump in September 2024, the gold card scheme offers permanent US residency in exchange for a flat entry fee. It opened its application portal to prospective candidates in December 2024.

    Beyond the single completed approval, Lutnick confirmed that hundreds of additional candidates are currently moving through the multi-stage review pipeline. All applicants face not just the steep financial cost, but also rigorous background screening. The program sets a $1 million fee for individual applicants, while corporate sponsorship of candidates carries a $2 million price tag. Applicants must also cover a separate $15,000 processing fee charged by the US Department of Homeland Security, and all submissions undergo what Lutnick described as ‘most serious vetting and analysis.’

    The gold card program was paired with another Trump immigration policy: a new $100,000 annual fee added to the popular H-1B skilled worker visa program for foreign employees. When first announcing the initiative, Trump framed it as a measure that would attract high-impact job creators to the US while generating new revenue to help cut the federal national deficit.

    The update on the gold card program comes amid broader shifts in US immigration policy under Trump’s second term. Since returning to the presidency in 2025, the administration has pushed for stricter immigration controls and carried out a series of large-scale, aggressive deportation raids across the country.

  • Palestine Action defendant wounded by taser and sledgehammer in raid, court hears

    Palestine Action defendant wounded by taser and sledgehammer in raid, court hears

    A high-profile trial of six Palestine Action activists opened this week at London’s Woolwich Crown Court, with shocking testimony about police use of force and violent confrontations during an August 2024 raid on an Israeli-owned arms factory near Bristol.

    On the first day of witness testimony Thursday, the court heard detailed accounts of the injuries sustained by 30-year-old Leona Kamio, a nursery school teacher from Swansea and one of the six defendants facing joint criminal damage charges linked to the break-in at Elbit Systems’ Filton facility. A medical examination following her arrest documented multiple injuries: taser burns to her right arm and right hip, a bruise to her chin, a small scratch, and a distinct wound to her right hand inflicted by a sledgehammer. Kamio told the court she cannot identify who caused the sledgehammer wound.

    Body-worn camera footage from arresting officer PC Peter Adams played in court shows Adams deploying his taser against Kamio during the raid. After being stunned, Kamio was tackled to the ground, where she hit her chin on the floor and went rigid. Kamio described the experience of being tasered as “not good, very painful”, adding that Adams twisted her arm behind her back and attempted to drag her up by her wrist while she screamed in pain. The footage captures Kamio shouting “you’re fucking hitting me” as Adams attempted to place her in handcuffs, calling the officer an “idiot” in response to his own verbal provocation. Kamio emphasized she was not faking her pain or resisting arrest, joking to the court “I failed drama” to underscore the authenticity of her reaction.

    Alongside Kamio, the other defendants facing criminal damage charges are Charlotte Head, 29, Jordan Devlin, 31, Fatema Rajwani, 21, Zoe Rogers, 22, and 23-year-old Samuel Corner. Corner faces an additional charge of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm, for allegedly striking two police officers with a sledgehammer during the confrontation.

    Testifying earlier on Thursday, Corner – an autistic Oxford graduate with an ADHD diagnosis – explained his actions as a reaction to the panic and disorientation caused by Pava, a synthetic incapacitant pepper spray sprayed at him by PC Aaron Buxton. Corner told the court the spray produced an “all consuming” stinging and burning effect that left him unable to see or focus clearly. He added that he did not initially recognize the approaching responders as police officers, and believed they were aggressive security guards intent on harming him and his fellow activists.

    “I was scared about what they were going to do to us, especially the women,” Corner told the court. He explained that when he heard screaming and saw what he believed was a large male security guard attacking a fellow female activist, he acted instinctively. He has since acknowledged the person he struck was Sergeant Kate Evans, a female police officer who was not attacking Rogers, the activist he thought was in danger.

    Corner admitted he raised his sledgehammer and struck Evans twice, but said he had no intent to cause her serious harm. When pressed by prosecutor Deanna Heer KC on whether attacking a police officer with a sledgehammer was unreasonable, he responded: “it seemed reasonable to do something and I had to act quite quickly. If I had thought about what it was going to do to her, I agree it would have been unreasonable.” When asked if he understood the severity of harm he could have caused, he replied “I genuinely didn’t.” Footage also shows Corner striking PC Buxton twice with the sledgehammer, though Corner says he has no memory of the encounter.

    Multiple character witnesses have described Corner as a gentle, compassionate person with a strong commitment to justice who finds any form of violence abhorrent. The court heard he has even helped fellow prisoners improve their literacy skills while in pre-trial detention.

    Kamio, for her part, told the court how she joined Palestine Action in March 2024, after receiving an email from the direct action group about its campaign to close Elbit Systems facilities across the UK. She was soon added to a Signal messaging group to plan the Filton raid, which the group identified as Elbit’s most important UK site, opened in July 2023 by the Israeli ambassador to the United Kingdom.

    The activists’ stated goal, Kamio told the court, was to remain inside the facility for as long as possible to destroy as many weapons components as possible. Organizers had told the group security would not enter the facility, but head of security Nigel Shaw burst into the area within the first five minutes, an encounter that left Kamio frightened. “He looked so angry. Everything about his body language and face was just rage. He was charging towards us,” she said, adding that she believed Shaw was holding his umbrella in a position to strike her. She said she shouted at him to “fuck off” and told him confronting activists was “above your paygrade” – that stopping them was a job for police, not private security. She only later realized Shaw had been injured and was bleeding.

    Kamio added that a second security guard, Angelo Volante, appeared extremely unpredictable, swinging an angle grinder and holding a hammer. “I panicked because I’m at Elbit, this is a very evil company, the people that work there describe themselves as being the backbone of the Israeli military,” she explained. She stressed she never intended to harm anyone, and had the sledgehammer taken from her before she could use it against anyone. She also reaffirmed her belief that the action was necessary: “I came here to do something to stop people from suffering. Working with children, I would put one of their lives before any property.”

    Kamio’s employer at the Swansea nursery where she works submitted a character reference confirming that her extended pretrial detention has “upset and confused” the children in her care, and that “I cannot imagine her ever hurting anyone.”

    The trial, which is being closely watched by activists on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is set to continue in the coming days.

  • US says Iran players welcome at World Cup amid Italy uproar

    US says Iran players welcome at World Cup amid Italy uproar

    A controversial idea to swap Iran out of the 2026 World Cup and give their spot to Italy has been firmly rejected by both the U.S. government and Italian authorities, bringing clarity to months of uncertainty around Iran’s participation in the co-hosted tournament. Addressing reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio explicitly stated that Iran’s national football team will be welcomed to the competition, drawing a clear line between Washington’s official policy and the unsolicited proposal put forward by Italian-American envoy Paolo Zampolli.

    Rubio pushed back against widespread speculation that the U.S. had pushed for Iran’s expulsion from the tournament, emphasizing that no official from the U.S. government had moved to bar the country’s athletes from entering. He did, however, note that entry restrictions could apply to other members of the Iranian delegation who are alleged to have links to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a group labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. and multiple other governments. “The problem with Iran, it would be not their athletes, it would be some of the other people (they) would want to bring with them, some of whom have ties to the IRGC. We may not be able to let them in, but not the athletes themselves,” Rubio clarified.

    The unapproved proposal originated from Zampolli, a businessman and socialite who claims to have introduced former U.S. President Donald Trump to his wife Melania. Zampolli told the Financial Times he had pitched the idea of Italy taking Iran’s spot to Trump and FIFA, saying it would be a “dream” to see the four-time World Cup champions compete in the 2026 tournament co-hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Italy failed to qualify for the event, falling to Bosnia and Herzegovina in a penalty shootout in their qualifying playoff final, marking the third consecutive World Cup the side has missed out on.

    Italian officials quickly dismissed the proposal out of hand on Thursday. Sports Minister Andrea Abodi told local news agencies ANSA and AGI that the idea “first, is not possible; second, is not appropriate, you qualify on the pitch.” That stance was echoed by Luciano Buonfiglio, president of Italy’s Olympic Committee, who added: “I would feel offended. You have to earn your place in the World Cup.” The Iranian embassy in Rome also condemned the suggestion, calling it evidence of U.S. “moral bankruptcy” and noting Italy does not need “political privileges” to prove its footballing standing.

    Iran’s participation in the 2026 World Cup has been clouded by geopolitical unrest following the outbreak of open conflict between Iran, the U.S. and Israel in late February. Earlier this year, the Iranian Football Federation confirmed it was in negotiations with FIFA to move the country’s scheduled group stage matches out of the U.S. and into Mexico. But FIFA President Gianni Infantino has repeatedly reaffirmed that Iran will remain in the tournament and play their matches at the venues assigned in the original draw, a position the governing body stood by Thursday when contacted by AFP, pointing to Infantino’s recent public comments. This is not the first time Zampolli has pushed this type of proposal: in 2022, he made an identical push to have Italy replace Iran at the Qatar World Cup amid protests in Iran, a suggestion that was ignored entirely by global football officials.

  • Iran blames US as truce talks reach a deadlock

    Iran blames US as truce talks reach a deadlock

    Truce talks aimed at de-escalating conflict between the United States and Iran have reached an impasse, with top Iranian leaders directly blaming Washington’s bad-faith tactics and uncompromising posture for the breakdown, as escalating military and maritime moves in the strategic Strait of Hormuz threaten global energy supplies. As of April 23, 2026, Washington has unilaterally extended its proposed ceasefire on its own terms, but ongoing exchanges of attacks and counterattacks have continued to disrupt critical commercial shipping through the key waterway, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil flows daily.

    In a public social media statement released Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian pushed back against US claims that Iran has refused to negotiate in good faith, emphasizing that the Islamic Republic has consistently remained open to meaningful dialogue. “Bad faith, siege and threats are the main obstacles to genuine negotiation,” Pezeshkian said. “The world is witnessing your hypocritical empty talk and the contradiction between your claims and your actions.”

    Hours after Pezeshkian’s remarks, US President Donald Trump issued his own provocative social media statement, announcing he had ordered the US Navy to “shoot and kill” any small Iranian vessels that attempt to block passage through the strait. “There is to be no hesitation,” Trump added, doubling down on his administration’s aggressive posture toward Iran.

    The day before Trump’s order, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the White House cites inconsistent messaging from Tehran as a core barrier to progress, noting that US leadership retains full authority to end the unilateral ceasefire extension at any time. “We see a lot of different messaging and rhetoric,” Leavitt said, adding that the US maintains full control of the regional situation and holds significant leverage over the Iranian government. “Not only have they been significantly weakened and obliterated militarily, but they are losing economically and financially every single moment that passes with this blockade. So the president is going to continue to lead the free world, to run the United States of America as we await the Iranian response,” she said.

    In response to the ongoing US blockade and escalating rhetoric, Iranian legislative and security bodies are now reviewing a new framework to assert full sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iran’s official Mehr News Agency. Fada Hossein Maleki, a senior member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, confirmed Thursday that both parliament and the Supreme National Security Council are conducting joint reviews of proposals for the strategic waterway.

    Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a Wednesday social media post that any meaningful ceasefire can only function if Washington ends its maritime blockade, which Tehran argues is holding the global economy hostage. Ghalibaf stressed that reopening full unimpeded navigation through the strait is impossible while Washington flagrantly violates the terms of the proposed truce. “They did not achieve their goals through military aggression, nor will they through bullying. The only way forward is to recognize the rights of the Iranian nation,” he added.

    On Thursday, Iran’s state-run media outlets Islamic Republic News Agency and Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting released the first public footage of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N) operations in the strait, directly contradicting recent claims from the Trump administration that Iran’s naval capabilities have been completely destroyed. The IRGC confirmed it has seized two foreign commercial vessels for violating Iranian shipping restrictions in the waterway, and opened fire on a third vessel that failed to comply with orders.

    Tasnim News Agency, another Iranian state outlet, also reported Thursday that the first revenue collected from new shipping tolls imposed on vessels passing through the strait has been deposited in the Central Bank of Iran, marking the formal launch of the country’s new toll regime for the waterway.

    For its part, US Central Command confirmed Thursday that American forces have diverted or ordered 31 vessels back to port as part of Washington’s ongoing economic blockade against Iran. Most of the redirected vessels are oil tankers, US officials said, and the vast majority have complied with US orders to avoid the region.

    A recent Pentagon assessment, first reported by The Washington Post, estimates that it would take up to six months to clear all naval mines laid by Iran from the strait, a timeline that would keep global oil prices elevated for an extended period. International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Birol confirmed the severe impact of the ongoing conflict on global energy markets, noting that the world is currently losing 13 million barrels of oil supply per day due to disrupted shipping and production tied to the confrontation.

  • Turkey and UK to sign strategic partnership agreement during Fidan’s visit

    Turkey and UK to sign strategic partnership agreement during Fidan’s visit

    On Thursday morning, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan touched down in London, kicking off a high-stakes two-day diplomatic visit that will culminate in the signing of a landmark UK-Turkey strategic partnership framework agreement by Thursday afternoon.

    Fidan’s first scheduled engagement of the visit is a formal meeting with British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper set for 4 p.m. local time. While the full scope of the upcoming strategic partnership framework remains under wraps ahead of the signing, preliminary outlines of the agenda have emerged from diplomatic and media sources.

    Turkish state-affiliated broadcaster TRT World has confirmed that Fidan plans to open the discussion by highlighting the steady upward momentum of bilateral ties between Ankara and London, and to lay out Turkey’s ambition to deepen cooperation across multiple priority areas. One key bilateral issue Fidan is expected to raise is the ongoing delays Turkish residents in the UK face when processing applications for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), a long-term residency status that impacts hundreds of thousands of Turkish citizens currently living in Britain.

    Defense industry collaboration and expanded energy sector partnership are also set to be core topics on the meeting agenda, with both sides expected to formalize a shared commitment to advancing work in these two critical areas. Beyond bilateral concerns, Fidan and Cooper will also turn their attention to regional and global tensions, particularly the ongoing standoff between the United States and Iran. The two top diplomats are expected to explore pathways to advancing a diplomatic resolution to the conflict and align on shared goals for de-escalation.

    This visit marks the second high-level meeting between Fidan and Cooper in less than a week, following Cooper’s attendance at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum in southern Turkey last weekend, where the pair held preliminary talks. Beyond his meeting with Cooper, Fidan’s packed two-day schedule includes engagements with British members of parliament, a public address at the University of Oxford’s Global History Centre as part of the university’s Changing Global Order Program, and a closed-door meeting with representatives of the UK’s large Turkish community, which is estimated to number between 350,000 and 500,000 people across the country.

    The visit also comes on the heels of stark remarks Fidan delivered at the Antalya Forum regarding shifting security alliances in the Eastern Mediterranean. During that appearance, Fidan warned that Muslim nations across the region are growing increasingly alarmed by the expanding military partnership between Israel, Greece, and Cyprus, noting that Greece’s participation in the alliance is notable given its status as a fellow NATO member. “Israel has been pursuing an overtly expansionist foreign policy in recent months, so Turkey’s security concerns are not without justification,” Fidan stated at the forum.

    In recent months, Turkey has worked to rebuild and expand regional diplomacy, launching regular formal dialogue mechanisms with key regional powers including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan to coordinate on shared regional security and policy challenges. This current diplomatic outreach to the UK represents another step in Ankara’s broader strategy of strengthening ties with both regional and Western actors amid a shifting global security landscape.

  • Canada’s US booze boycott could be resolved if Trump addresses tariffs, Carney says

    Canada’s US booze boycott could be resolved if Trump addresses tariffs, Carney says

    As the mandatory July 1 review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) draws near, trade tensions between Canada and the United States have escalated sharply, centered on retaliatory Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol imports imposed in response to sweeping Trump-era tariffs. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has outlined a clear negotiating position: Ottawa is ready to begin detailed trade discussions with Washington immediately, but it will not rush an unfavorable deal and is prepared to wait for the right conditions if necessary.

    The current standoff traces back to 2025, when former U.S. President Donald Trump implemented new tariffs on key Canadian export sectors including steel, aluminum, automobiles and agricultural goods, a measure he claimed would protect American manufacturing and create U.S. jobs. In response, multiple Canadian provinces – led by Ontario, home to the world’s largest single alcohol purchaser, the Ontario Liquor Control Board – pulled all U.S.-produced alcoholic beverages from store shelves. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has remained unwavering in this policy, confirming that U.S. liquor will not return to shelves until the targeted tariffs are fully lifted.

    Carney confirmed Thursday that the reversal of provincial alcohol bans could happen rapidly once progress is made on resolving the core tariff dispute, telling reporters, “Issues such as decisions on which alcohol to put on the shelves – we can make progress very quickly on that with progress in other areas.” He emphasized that the Trump administration’s tariffs violate the terms of the existing USMCA free trade framework, and pushed back against U.S. demands for unilateral concessions, noting “We’re not sitting here taking notes and taking instruction from the U.S.”

    In recent days, senior U.S. officials have ramped up pressure on Canada over the alcohol ban. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the restriction “disrespectful” Wednesday, while U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer threatened consequences if the issue is not resolved. Lutnick also dismissed Canada’s cautious, wait-and-see negotiating approach as “the worst strategy I’ve ever heard,” pointing to the vast size discrepancy between the U.S. and Canadian economies.

    Ford, speaking to CNN Thursday, countered that the U.S. is already suffering steep economic losses from the dispute, noting that Canadian consumer boycotts of U.S. goods and reduced cross-border travel are costing the American economy “tens of billions of dollars.” “This can come to a quick end, everyone can thrive and prosper,” Ford said, if Washington agrees to roll back the tariffs.

    Under Canadian law, liquor regulation falls under provincial rather than federal jurisdiction, meaning provincial leaders hold final authority over whether to restore U.S. alcohol sales. Candace Laing, newly appointed to Carney’s Canada-U.S. trade advisory committee and president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, confirmed that Canada is open to using the alcohol issue as negotiating leverage to secure tariff rollbacks, but will not make unilateral concessions outside of a balanced reciprocal agreement. “Canada is not going to give any concessions that aren’t in the context of a real negotiation,” Laing said.

    Many policy analysts argue that Canada’s negotiating position has strengthened considerably in recent months. Fen Hampson, a Carleton University international affairs professor and co-chair of the institution’s Canada-U.S. relations expert group, noted that Trump’s domestic political standing has eroded amid widespread public opposition to the U.S.-Israel military campaign in Iran, a factor that could shift control of Congress in upcoming midterm elections. At the same time, Carney has consolidated power, with recent special elections and parliamentary defections granting his government a stable majority in Parliament.

    Hampson argued that Canada’s willingness to wait is a deliberate, strategic choice that gives Ottawa a “last mover advantage,” allowing Canadian negotiators to see what terms Trump secures with Mexico and other trading partners before finalizing any agreement. He added that Canada also holds key structural advantages, as it supplies the U.S. with critical goods including energy, base metals and critical minerals that American industry depends on. “The Canadians are very smart here,” Hampson said. “They’re ragging the puck, they’re running the clock down.”

    Washington has identified a handful of ongoing trade irritants with Canada, including the alcohol ban and access to Canada’s protected dairy market, that it hopes to address during the upcoming USMCA review negotiations, which must conclude by July 1 under the terms of the existing agreement.