分类: politics

  • Jailed crypto founder Sam Bankman-Fried seeks Trump pardon

    Jailed crypto founder Sam Bankman-Fried seeks Trump pardon

    Disgraced cryptocurrency tycoon Sam Bankman-Fried, who is currently incarcerated following a fraud conviction that upended the global crypto industry, has formally submitted a pardon request to U.S. President Donald Trump, according to newly released federal records.

    Now 34, the former billionaire was handed a 25-year prison term two years ago after a jury found him guilty on a sweeping set of federal charges tied to the collapse of FTX, the major crypto exchange he founded and led, and his affiliated trading firm Alameda Research. Court documents show Bankman-Fried has applied for a post-sentence pardon through the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of the Pardon Attorney, a mechanism that would legally erase his fraud conviction if granted after he completes his full prison term.

    Notably, the application does not ask for sentence commutation — a separate executive action that would cut short the prison time he is currently serving. Bankman-Fried has continued to assert his innocence throughout the legal process and is actively pursuing an appeal of his conviction and sentence.

    Bankman-Fried rose to global prominence as one of the most recognizable faces of the cryptocurrency sector in the early 2020s, when FTX grew to count millions of users worldwide and became one of the largest digital asset exchanges in the industry. That momentum collapsed abruptly in 2022, when investigators uncovered that Bankman-Fried had improperly siphoned billions of dollars in customer deposits held by FTX to fund personal investments, cover trading losses at Alameda Research, and settle private debts.

    Records from the Pardon Attorney’s office show Bankman-Fried’s request is one of more than 20,000 pending applications for either pardons or commutations currently under review. President Trump has exercised his pardon power extensively during his second term, issuing clemency to a wide range of individuals including hundreds of rioters who participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple former White House and campaign staff facing criminal charges, the founder of an illegal dark web drug marketplace, and even the former head of Binance, another leading global crypto platform.

    Despite this broad pattern of granting clemency, Trump publicly indicated earlier this year that he would not pardon Bankman-Fried when asked directly about the possibility. Representatives from the White House declined to offer any comment on the new pardon application, and legal counsel for Bankman-Fried did not respond to repeated requests for statement on the filing.

  • Retired Supreme Court justice becomes Canada’s Governor General, the representative of King Charles

    Retired Supreme Court justice becomes Canada’s Governor General, the representative of King Charles

    TORONTO – In a formal ceremonial event held Monday, retired Canadian Supreme Court Justice Louise Arbour officially took office as Canada’s 29th Governor General, the personal representative of King Charles III, Canada’s constitutional head of state. The 79-year-old trailblazing legal figure succeeds Mary Simon, who made history in 2021 as Canada’s first Indigenous Governor General, stepping into a role that carries formal constitutional obligations but functions largely as a symbolic and ceremonial position within the country’s parliamentary system.

    The swearing-in ceremony, hosted on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, featured musical performances by the Central Band of the Canadian Armed Forces, including the traditional rendition of “God Save the King,” alongside the official raising of the Governor General’s flag to mark the transfer of office. Prior to the ceremony, Arbour held a private audience with King Charles III at Buckingham Palace last week to mark her appointment.

    Unlike many holders of the role, Arbour brings a decades-long global career in law, human rights, and international justice to the viceregal post. Her judicial resume spans key positions across Canada’s legal system, including appointments to the Supreme Court of Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal, and ultimately the Supreme Court of Canada, where she served as a sitting justice before taking on landmark international roles. In 1996, the United Nations tapped Arbour to serve as Chief Prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. It was in this role that she led historic prosecutorial efforts that secured two major milestones in international law: the world’s first conviction for genocide after the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention was adopted, and the first-ever war crimes indictment issued against a sitting head of state. Later in her career, from 2017 to 2018, she also served as the United Nations Special Representative for International Migration.

    In her inaugural address to the nation as the King’s representative, Arbour emphasized that peaceful coexistence across differing perspectives and identities is the cornerstone of a functional, rules-based democratic society. She also turned her attention to one of the most pressing modern technological issues: the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence. Arbour issued a stark caution against growing overreliance on AI tools, noting that widespread instant access to massive volumes of information has created a dangerous temptation to overlook source credibility.

    “The lines between knowledge and belief, between truth and falsehood, between facts and assumptions are increasingly blurred,” Arbour told the assembled audience. “AI could be threatening not only the way we live and work, but also the control we exercise over our own destiny.”

    She also highlighted Canada’s unique global standing, noting that while the nation accounts for less than 0.5% of the world’s total population, it holds nearly 7% of global land area and 20% of the world’s total freshwater reserves. “The world looks at us with justifiable envy,” she said.

    As a former British colony and current member of the Commonwealth of Nations, Canada has retained its constitutional monarchy structure after gaining full sovereignty. Following the United States’ successful war of independence from Britain, Canada remained under British colonial rule until 1867, when it gained self-governance while retaining the British monarch as its formal head of state, a structure that remains in place today.

  • Fujimori and nationalist Sánchez virtually tied as vote count continues in Peru

    Fujimori and nationalist Sánchez virtually tied as vote count continues in Peru

    LIMA, Peru — Peru’s historic presidential runoff election remained locked in a razor-thin deadlock this week, leaving the South American nation without a declared winner just days after voters cast their ballots. With 93% of all ballots fully tallied, conservative contender Keiko Fujimori and nationalist congressional leader Roberto Sánchez are separated by less than 0.2 percentage points, a gap so narrow it has thrown the final outcome into uncertainty. As of the latest count, Fujimori holds 50.095% of valid votes, equal to roughly 8.75 million ballots, while Sánchez trails narrowly at 49.905% with around 8.73 million votes cast in his favor.

    Whoever ultimately claims victory will become Peru’s ninth president in just 10 years, a statistic that underscores the deep political instability the country has grappled with for over a decade. Both candidates advanced to the runoff after emerging from an April first round that featured 35 total candidates, where neither broke the 20% support threshold. It took electoral authorities more than a month to confirm the two finalists for the runoff, a delay that already fueled public frustration with Peru’s political process.

    Peru’s top election official, Roberto Burneo, has issued a public call for voters and political factions to exercise democratic patience and responsibility as the final counting process wraps up, confirming that the official final result will not be announced for up to 30 days. The slow pace of tabulation is not a product of mismanagement, but rather a legal requirement that mandates every individual ballot and polling station tally sheet be physically transported to one of more than 100 regional processing offices. Adding to the timeline, more than 1.2 million ballots from Peruvian voters living abroad across 63 countries — primarily in the United States and Argentina — must also be shipped to the capital for counting, a logistical feat that extends the process significantly.

    Turnout on election day was visibly lower than in previous contests across Lima, even though voting is legally mandatory for all Peruvian citizens between the ages of 18 and 70, with fines of up to $32 for non-compliance. Many polling stations reported no waiting lines at any point during the day, a sign of widespread voter apathy that has defined this election cycle.

    For most Peruvians, runaway violent crime — and specifically the growing extortion crisis across the country — is the top issue shaping this election. A 2025 national survey from Peru’s National Institute of Statistics and Informatics found that 84% of urban residents fear they will fall victim to a crime within the next 12 months. Policy analysts trace the rising power of organized criminal networks in Peru to massive profits from decades of illegal gold mining operations in the Andes Mountains and Amazon rainforest, which have allowed groups to expand their influence across the country.

    Neither candidate has managed to win broad public trust, however, as both are inextricably linked to disgraced former Peruvian presidents mired in corruption and authoritarian controversy. Fujimori, 51, is the daughter of Alberto Fujimori, the late former president whose 1990s administration was marked by authoritarian rule, systemic corruption, and widespread human rights abuses. She stepped into the role of Peru’s first lady in 1994 after her parents separated, and this marks her fourth bid for the presidency. During her campaign, she has centered her platform on aggressive anti-crime policies, including new surveillance technology to track extortion rings, border militarization, increased deployment of police and military forces in high-crime areas, and mandatory prison labor to require incarcerated people to “repay society” for their crimes. In the sole runoff debate, she defended her father’s legacy, claiming he defeated the violent Shining Path extremist group and promising she would replicate that success against modern criminal groups. Speaking to supporters ahead of the final count, she urged calm, noting “So far, there is no winner in this race.”

    On the other side of the race, 57-year-old Sánchez, a former cabinet minister popular with rural and working-class voters, is one of the closest political allies to imprisoned former president Pedro Castillo, who was removed from office amid corruption allegations and widespread chaos during his 16-month term that saw more than 70 cabinet reshuffles. Sánchez often wears a wide-brimmed peasant hat gifted to him by Castillo as a symbol of his alliance. His policy platform focuses on rooting out corruption within the national police force and implementing reforms to allow the military to support civilian security operations. He has also expressed openness to a wide range of pro-growth economic policies and reaffirmed his support for continued Chinese investment in Peru. Speaking to supporters from a hotel balcony in Lima Sunday, he thanked Indigenous communities, farming groups, and working-class backers “who have decided to come and reclaim the government for the people.”

    That widespread distrust in both candidates has led many Peruvian voters to opt for blank or spoiled ballots. Magali Quiquia, a 44-year-old food vendor in Lima, told reporters she submitted a blank ballot because neither contender convinced her she could trust them. “Five years ago, I was disappointed by Castillo with his corruption, and … Roberto Sánchez is the same,” she said, adding that “Fujimori hasn’t done anything either” despite her party holding multiple seats in Congress. A pre-runoff poll conducted by Ipsos one week before voting found roughly 3 in 10 voters remained undecided heading into election day, mirroring the deep public disillusionment with the country’s political class.

    More than 27 million Peruvians are registered to vote in this election. The winner of the runoff is set to be inaugurated for a five-year presidential term on July 28.

  • Watch: Why is China’s Xi Jinping visiting North Korea?

    Watch: Why is China’s Xi Jinping visiting North Korea?

    Chinese President Xi Jinping has arrived in Pyongyang for an official visit, marking his first trip to North Korea in seven years. The North Korean capital rolled out a vibrant, ceremonial welcome for the Chinese leader, featuring elaborate cultural displays and formal reception rituals that underscored the significance of the high-level diplomatic engagement.

    This long-awaited visit draws global attention to the evolving dynamics of bilateral relations between Beijing and Pyongyang, as well as broader regional security and political trends in Northeast Asia. Diplomatic analysts note that the meeting comes at a time of shifting geopolitical alignments on the Korean Peninsula, with discussions expected to cover a range of key issues including regional denuclearization, economic cooperation, and coordination on regional and global affairs.

    The colorful welcome ceremony, which included traditional performances, honor guard inspections, and public greeting displays, signals the importance North Korea places on its relationship with China, its largest trading partner and key diplomatic ally. Observers from across the international community are closely monitoring the outcomes of the visit, which is expected to shape the trajectory of inter-Korean relations and major power interactions in the region in the coming months.

  • US Politics Unspun: Sign up for our BBC newsletter

    US Politics Unspun: Sign up for our BBC newsletter

    After a turbulent 12 months in American political life, the BBC is launching a new weekly newsletter dedicated to cutting through the noise and delivering clear, experienced analysis of the fast-changing developments shaping Washington and the wider world. Titled *US Politics Unspun*, the newsletter is specifically designed to help readers follow the constant twists and turns of Donald Trump’s second presidential term, with new issues delivered straight to subscriber inboxes every Wednesday.

    Helming the project is Anthony Zurcher, a journalist with nearly three decades of experience covering US politics, including more than 10 years reporting on elections, congressional operations and White House affairs for the BBC. Each weekly edition will feature Zurcher’s core takeaways on the most critical developments readers need to follow, paired with context that connects domestic US political shifts to their broader global implications. To help audiences deepen their understanding, each issue will also curate a list of essential supplementary reading materials, and Zurcher has noted that the newsletter will not shy away from the lighter, more absurd sides of American political life that often make headlines alongside serious policy debates.

    *US Politics Unspun* is the newest addition to a growing roster of specialty newsletters from the BBC, which caters to readers both inside and outside the United Kingdom. For audiences based in the UK, the BBC offers multiple additional focused newsletters: *Politics Essential* delivers top-tier political analysis to keep readers updated on key developments at Westminster and across the UK; *BBC InDepth*, helmed by Emma Barnett and John Simpson, releases thought-provoking long-form analysis and deep dives every Saturday; and *Royal Watch*, written by royal correspondent Sean Coughlan, keeps subscribers up to date on the latest news and analysis related to the British royal family.

    Sign-up processes vary slightly by location. Readers based in the UK can sign up for *US Politics Unspun* and the broadcaster’s other newsletters via a dedicated UK link, while audiences based outside the UK can access sign-up and explore the full range of available newsletters through a separate global portal.

  • Pope denounces ‘scourge’ of abuse before meeting victims

    Pope denounces ‘scourge’ of abuse before meeting victims

    During a high-stakes seven-day apostolic visit to Spain, Pope Leo XIV opened a pivotal chapter of the Catholic Church’s reckoning with clergy sexual violence on Monday, forcefully condemning the decades-long crisis as an enduring “scourge” ahead of a closed-door meeting with abuse survivors. Speaking to the country’s College of Bishops ahead of the expected gathering at the Vatican’s Madrid apostolic nunciature, the head of the global Catholic Church outlined a clear path forward for the institution. “Faced with this scourge, the ecclesial community is called to respond with listening, truth, justice, reparation and an ever more determined commitment to prevention and a culture of care,” the pontiff said. He added that every person wounded by abuse must “be able to find sincere listening, welcome, protection and real paths to healing.”

    The planned meeting has already sparked controversy, however, as multiple Spanish victim advocacy groups say they have been locked out of the session. Speaking to Agence France-Presse outside the nunciature, Juan Cuatrecasas, spokesperson for leading survivor association Infancia Robada (Stolen Childhood), expressed deep disappointment with the exclusion. “We are disappointed that the pope, instead of listening to a sufficiently large and solid representation of victims, prefers to leave us out,” Cuatrecasas said. “We are going to keep pushing until the end, insisting that the Pope has to see us, has to hear us, we have a voice.”

    Vatican officials have declined to release detailed information about the meeting’s guest list or format ahead of time, citing a commitment to “respect for the victims” as the reason for withholding details ahead of the gathering. In pre-visit remarks to reporters aboard his flight to Madrid Saturday, the 70-year-old pontiff acknowledged that the clergy sexual abuse crisis remains “an open wound” for the global Church. Official data underscores the scale of the crisis in Spain: a 2023 report from the Spanish national ombudsman estimates that roughly 200,000 minors have suffered sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic clergy in the country since 1940. After years of criticism over institutional opacity and reluctance to address the crisis, the Spanish government under Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and the Spanish Catholic Church reached a landmark agreement in March to provide financial compensation to survivors.

    Earlier on Monday, Pope Leo made history as he delivered an unprecedented address to the Spanish parliament, earning a lengthy standing ovation from assembled legislators. In his speech, the pontiff touched on a range of pressing global and domestic issues, starting with calls for collective global action on migration. He framed irregular migration as a “tragic drama” that requires open, compassionate policy, urging Spanish lawmakers to create “safe and legal pathways” for migrants and ensure new arrivals receive “a respectful welcome and real opportunities for integration.”

    His remarks aligned with the relatively liberal immigration stance advanced by Sanchez’s left-wing government, which has faced growing political pressure on the issue from the conservative Popular Party and far-right Vox, now the third-largest political force in the Spanish legislature. The pope’s visit will include a stop at the Canary Islands, a major entry point for irregular migrants traveling from Africa to Europe, where he will honor those who have died during the dangerous sea crossing.

    The pontiff also used his parliamentary address to reaffirm longstanding Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life, calling for protection of life “from conception to its natural end.” His comment comes as Sanchez’s government has implemented progressive social policies including the legalization of euthanasia under regulated conditions, and is pushing to enshrine abortion access in the Spanish constitution. Reiterating his well-documented anti-war position, which has drawn sharp criticism from former U.S. President Donald Trump — who has also attacked Sanchez for the same stance — Pope Leo called for de-escalation across global conflict zones, arguing that diplomatic dialogue must replace military escalation and rearmament. “Weapons may impose a temporary silence but they can never build a genuine and lasting peace,” he said.

    Monday’s parliamentary address came one day after the pope celebrated a massive open-air Mass in central Madrid that drew more than 1.5 million worshippers. The remainder of his visit will include a series of high-profile engagements: on Wednesday, he will bless the newly completed tower of Barcelona’s iconic Sagrada Familia, the unfinished Antoni Gaudí masterpiece that recently earned the title of the world’s tallest church. The visit will conclude with stops in the Canary Islands next Thursday and Friday, where Prime Minister Sanchez will join the pontiff for public events.

  • In first papal speech to Spanish parliament, pope demands respect for migrants and international law

    In first papal speech to Spanish parliament, pope demands respect for migrants and international law

    In a groundbreaking moment for Vatican-Spanish relations, Pope Leo XIV delivered the first-ever papal address to Spain’s Cortes Generales on Monday, using the historic platform to urge global respect for migrant rights, international law, and ethical governance, while marking an unexpected shift in the secular country’s acceptance of the Catholic Church in public life.

    Addressing assembled lawmakers from across Spain’s deeply polarized political spectrum, the American pontiff framed the core argument of his speech around a universal call for “moral renewal” in public institutions, arguing that a nation’s true moral standing is measured not by its power or wealth, but by how it protects its most vulnerable community members. “The moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to accompany, protect and love those lives that are most fragile,” Leo told the chamber. This group, he emphasized, includes migrants, unborn people, and all marginalized populations.

    Papal addresses to foreign national legislatures are extremely rare, as the invitation itself signifies formal recognition of a religious leader by a sovereign state’s elected body. Prior precedent includes Pope Francis’ 2015 address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress, and Pope Benedict XVI’s 2011 speech to his native Germany’s Bundestag. For Spain, a nation where the Catholic Church was once a foundational pillar of Francisco Franco’s 20th-century dictatorship, but saw its influence wane dramatically after the transition to democracy in the 1970s, the invitation itself marks a milestone that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.

    Today, despite the fact that a majority of Spaniards still identify as Catholic, religious participation has plummeted amid widespread secularization, mirroring trends across other historically Christian European nations. Yet the address drew a rare show of cross-partisan enthusiasm: at the conclusion of Leo’s remarks, lawmakers from every ideological bloc rose to a minutes-long standing ovation, chanting “Viva el Papa!” (Long live the pope!).

    Leo delivered his address against the backdrop of escalating regional tensions between Israel and Iran, as retaliatory airstrikes between the two nations raised fears of a full-scale regional war in the Middle East. Reiterating his longstanding call for diplomatic conflict resolution, the pontiff emphasized that peace can only be built through dialogue, not force. “Peace demands diplomatic courage, ethical responsibility and a vision for the future grounded in respect for the identity of every people and in the obligation of states to resolve their disputes through the peaceful means offered by international law,” he said.

    He also voiced deep concern over the growing trend of rearmament across Europe, driven by the ongoing threat of Russian aggression following the invasion of Ukraine, and the Trump administration’s repeated threats to cut U.S. military and financial support for the continent. “It is therefore a cause for concern that, in various parts of the world — and in Europe as well — rearmament is once again being presented as an almost inevitable response to the fragility of the international situation,” he noted. In addition, Leo called for strict ethical regulation of artificial intelligence-powered autonomous weapons, stressing that life-or-death decisions must never be left to automated systems, and must remain rooted in human moral accountability.

    In a nod to Spain’s colonial history and the Catholic Church’s role in that era, Leo invoked the 16th-century School of Salamanca, a Spanish intellectual movement that laid early groundwork for modern international law and universal human rights in the aftermath of Spain’s conquest of the Americas. He praised the movement’s theologians for recognizing that power and self-interest could never be justified by force alone, and that all exercise of power has inherent moral limits. Acknowledging past failures, Leo admitted that both society and the Catholic Church itself often failed to live up to these moral principles, referencing his recent formal apology for the Holy See’s role in legitimizing the transatlantic slave trade and the colonial conquests of the Americas by Spanish and Portuguese rulers.

    A central focus of Leo’s address was the global migration crisis, echoing the priority placed on migrant rights by his predecessor Pope Francis, and doubling down on his own criticism of the Trump administration’s hardline crackdown on migration in the United States. Leo called for strengthened global action to dismantle human smuggling networks, and to create economic and social conditions that allow people to thrive in their home countries. But for those forced to flee conflict, poverty, and climate change, he demanded compassionate welcome and full integration. “This gives rise to a twofold demand for social justice: to offer safe and legal pathways, a respectful welcome and real opportunities for integration; and, at the same time, to promote the right to remain in one’s own land, working to ensure that no one has to leave their home due to a lack of peace, security or decent living conditions, including economic inequalities and the effects of the climate crisis,” he said.

    Leo’s address to Spanish lawmakers comes amid a delicate political moment for Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, whose Socialist-led minority government has been rocked by a series of corruption scandals affecting former officials and close allies, though Sánchez himself has not been directly implicated. For three years, Sánchez’s government has been unable to pass core legislation, including a national budget, as Spain grapples with deepening political polarization. In a direct reference to this division, Leo warned that political pluralism should never devolve into constant demonization of political opponents.

    Notably, the atheist prime minister and the American pope have found uncommon common ground on a range of major global policy issues, despite the Catholic Church’s historical alignment with Spain’s conservative Popular Party. After meeting Leo at the Vatican last month, Sánchez praised the pontiff as a “moral compass” for global politics. Both leaders have emerged as outspoken critics of military escalation in the Middle East, with Leo labeling recent Israeli strikes on Iran as unjust, and Sánchez positioning himself as Europe’s most vocal advocate for diplomatic negotiation over conflict. Echoing Sánchez’s stance, Leo declared: “Weapons may impose a temporary silence; but they can never build a genuine and lasting peace.” This alignment has created an unlikely alliance between Spain’s progressive government and the Vatican, particularly on migration policy: Sánchez’s government has broken with the restrictive trend seen across much of Europe and the U.S., launching a major legalization campaign earlier this year for hundreds of thousands of unauthorized immigrants already living and working in Spain, arguing that migration is critical to shoring up the country’s aging workforce and sluggish economy.

  • Peru election result close as vote counting continues

    Peru election result close as vote counting continues

    Peru’s high-stakes presidential runoff has devolved into a razor-thin deadlock, leaving the nation facing a prolonged period of political uncertainty that echoes chaotic electoral battles from recent years. Early independent vote tracking by leading pollster Ipsos places left-wing candidate Roberto Sánchez on a narrow 50.3% to 49.7% edge over right-wing veteran Keiko Fujimori, a margin so tight it qualifies as a statistical tie. Though this tally is not the official count, Ipsos’ tracking has proven a reliable predictor of final outcomes in past Peruvian elections. Official counting, which has processed over 85% of all ballots, confirms the race remains too close to call, with a full recount widely expected to take weeks to resolve.

    The contest brings two fundamentally opposing visions for Peru to the ballot box, pitting a veteran of national politics against a first-time presidential frontrunner campaigning for systemic change. Fujimori, a household name in Peruvian politics who is making her fourth bid for the presidency, has leaned heavily into the controversial legacy of her late father, former President Alberto Fujimori. Though Alberto Fujimori was ultimately imprisoned for crimes against humanity, his base credits him with crushing violent insurgencies and delivering tangible social support to impoverished communities. Keiko Fujimori has centered her campaign on one key voter priority: a brutal military crackdown on soaring organized crime and extortion, issues that have dominated voter anger across the country.

    On election day, Fujimori kicked off her voting in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima’s most populous district, where informal impoverished settlements cling to steep, arid mountains. She was greeted by throngs of enthusiastic supporters, who voiced urgent hope that she would deliver on her anti-crime pledges. “She will fight crime like her father did years ago,” supporter Alicia told reporters. Another voter, Catalina Solana Guamá, noted that previous administrations had ignored the needs of working-class hillside communities like hers. “It’s about time a woman governed us, one who makes us feel valued,” she said, adding that she backed Fujimori’s promise to deploy the military against gangs that have targeted transportation workers for extortion. “It’s not right that we go out to work and don’t know if we’ll come back alive.” Jennifer, another local voter, echoed that frustration, saying “right now things are very bad, especially in this district… there’s extortions and killings, she wants to fight that.”

    Sánchez, by contrast, is running on a platform of sweeping left-wing economic and state reforms, including expanding the government’s role in regulating Peru’s lucrative natural resource sector, increasing public investment in marginalized rural regions, overhauling the national tax system, and renegotiating existing mining contracts. He frames these changes as critical to redressing deep systemic inequality, arguing that wealth from Peru’s vast copper and gold reserves has failed to reach most working and poor Peruvians. His platform has earned him intense support in rural and highland Andean regions, but has also spooked domestic financial markets, echoing the investor anxiety that marked the 2021 election of former left-wing President Pedro Castillo.

    Sánchez’s campaign is closely tied to Castillo, who he served under as a cabinet minister. A key campaign pledge from Sánchez has been his promise to issue a presidential pardon for Castillo, who was jailed in 2022 after attempting to illegally dissolve Congress and rule by emergency decree. The 2021 election, which also pitted Castillo against Fujimori, ended in a similarly razor-thin result that dragged on for weeks of vote counting and political chaos, a parallel that has amplified anxiety around the current deadlock.

    Ipsos’ early tracking lays bare the deep geographic divide shaping the 2026 result: Fujimori carried the capital Lima, urban centers, and coastal regions, while Sánchez swept rural areas and the Andean highlands. Analysts expect Sánchez to gain additional ground as the last remaining rural ballots are processed, a dynamic that keeps the final outcome too uncertain to call.

    In statements to their supporters following the release of early counts, both candidates stuck to sharply differing narratives. Sánchez framed his narrow lead as a reflection of popular demand for systemic change, calling it an “important lead that reaffirms the will of the people, who want democracy and justice.” Fujimori, by contrast, described the race as an unambiguous “dead heat” warning that “there will be long days ahead” before a winner can be declared. She argued it would be “irresponsible” to call the result based on early partial tallies, stressing that “every single tally sheet must be counted.”

    Sánchez’s supporters in Lima voiced similar determination to see their candidate win, with many warning that they would take to the streets in protest if the result does not go their way. Many cited Castillo’s ouster and imprisonment as a core motivation for backing Sánchez this cycle. Giovanna, a Sánchez supporter gathered to hear him speak Sunday night, condemned the Fujimori family’s legacy, referencing the forced sterilization program carried out under Alberto Fujimori that harmed thousands of Indigenous and poor Peruvian women. “If we have to rise up, at the very least I would do it,” she said. Street vendor Hilda, who voted for Castillo in 2021, echoed that threat, saying “We voted for change… Previously we voted for Pedro Castillo, but our president who was elected has been removed and is in prison. That’s why we’re voting for Sánchez. Everyone is going to protest, we are going to go out into the streets.”

    The runoff comes after a chaotic first round marked by delays in delivering electoral materials to polling stations, with both sides trading accusations of electoral fraud. For the second round, however, independent election observers and Peru’s National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) have confirmed that voting proceeded without major disruptions or irregularities. Still, the prospect of weeks of recounting and political wrangling leaves Peru facing a fresh period of instability, a challenge that has plagued the country’s electoral system for much of the last decade.

  • Armenia’s pro-West government wins election despite Russian pressure

    Armenia’s pro-West government wins election despite Russian pressure

    Armenia’s 2026 parliamentary election has delivered a decisive mandate for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and his centrist Civil Contract Party, cementing the country’s trajectory toward deeper integration with the West even as traditional ally Russia wields economic pressure to alter its course. The final vote count released by Armenia’s electoral commission confirmed Civil Contract won 49.8% of the popular vote, a clear lead that will give the party a dominant majority in the national assembly. Trailing far behind were the pro-Russian Strong Armenia Alliance at 23.2%, the also pro-Russia Armenia Alliance at 9.9%, and conservative Prosperous Armenia with just 4% of the vote, with most of the 19 competing parties and blocs failing to clear the threshold for parliamentary representation. Overall voter turnout hit 59%, in line with pre-election projections.

    This vote marked the first general election Armenia has held since its 2023 crushing military defeat to neighboring Azerbaijan over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, a conflict that reshaped the country’s domestic political landscape and foreign policy priorities. Widely framed as a de facto referendum on Armenia’s geopolitical alignment, the election outcome is set to shape the small South Caucasus nation’s ties with both Moscow and Western capitals for years to come.

    Pashinyan, who first rose to power in 2018 on a wave of mass anti-establishment protests against former leader Serzh Sargysan, declared victory early Monday morning, as preliminary results pointed to his party’s clear win. In his victory address, Pashinyan framed the outcome as a popular mandate for cross-border cooperation and regional stability. “Armenian people voted for peace, regional prosperity and cooperation,” he told supporters. He also clarified that while his administration would continue advancing its pro-Western rapprochement agenda, Armenia would remain an active member of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the customs bloc that has long delivered tangible economic benefits to the country.

    The result has drawn swift reaction from across the globe, with European Union leadership and France among the first Western powers to extend congratulations, praising both the democratic conduct of the vote and Armenia’s ongoing efforts to deepen ties with European institutions. U.S. President Donald Trump has also previously endorsed Pashinyan’s accelerated peace talks with Azerbaijan, brokered through U.S. mediation.

    What makes this victory particularly notable is that it comes despite a marked decline in Pashinyan’s domestic approval ratings in recent years. Public opinion polling puts his current support at roughly 30%, down from 54% in the 2021 election. The erosion of popularity is largely tied to the fallout of the 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which ended with Azerbaijan retaking full control of the mountainous enclave that had been home to 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Pashinyan’s critics across the political spectrum have refused to forgive his diplomatic concessions to Azerbaijan to advance peace, including his refusal to advocate aggressively for the release of former Nagorno-Karabakh leaders imprisoned in Baku. Even with the victory, the ongoing peace process with Azerbaijan remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with one recent poll showing 44% support and 41% opposition to the proposed framework.

    In the lead-up to the vote, Russian leadership made clear its opposition to Pashinyan’s pro-Western shift, repeatedly pressuring the Armenian government to clarify its geopolitical alignment. In late May, Russian President Vladimir Putin called for an immediate public referendum on whether Armenia would pivot to European integration or remain within the Russian-led EAEU, pointing out the steep economic costs of a Western shift. Last month, Putin explicitly warned Armenia that moving closer to the West would carry the same kind of crisis that followed Ukraine’s own efforts to pursue EU accession, highlighting that Russia currently supplies Armenia with natural gas at $177.50 per 1,000 cubic meters, a heavily discounted rate far below the European market price of over $600 per 1,000 cubic meters. In the final two weeks before election day, Moscow ramped up economic pressure further by banning exports of key Armenian goods including flowers, cognac, mineral water, and fresh produce, a move widely seen as an attempt to sway voter sentiment against Pashinyan.

    Pashinyan has spent the last several years deliberately steering Armenia away from Moscow’s sphere of influence: his administration has passed formal legislation to launch the EU accession process, hosted a high-profile summit of EU leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Yerevan earlier this year, and advanced U.S.-brokered peace talks with Azerbaijan. Despite these steps, European integration remains a long-term goal: Armenia has not yet been granted EU candidate status, and full membership is still years, if not decades, away. For now, the election result confirms that a majority of Armenian voters back Pashinyan’s balancing act: deepening ties with the West while maintaining existing economic and political arrangements within Russian-led blocs.

  • Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan claims victory following general election

    Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan claims victory following general election

    In the early hours of Monday, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan declared victory in the country’s snap general election, after official preliminary results confirmed his ruling Civil Contract Party secured a dominant first-place finish with 49.81% of the popular vote. The outcome of Sunday’s vote is widely viewed as a defining mandate for Pashinyan’s proposed new geopolitical trajectory for Armenia, a small South Caucasus former Soviet republic that has increasingly sought to distance itself from long-standing ally Moscow and advance its membership aspirations with the European Union.

    Preliminary data from Armenia’s Central Election Commission shows that three opposition blocs crossed the 4% vote threshold required to secure seats in the new national parliament. The runner-up position went to the Strong Armenia bloc, led by imprisoned billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who captured 23.29% of the vote. Karapetyan, who amassed his business fortune in Russia, is currently under house arrest on charges of plotting to overthrow the sitting government — allegations he has repeatedly dismissed as a politically motivated fabrication targeting his opposition. His bloc’s platform centers on rebuilding and expanding deep economic and political ties with Russia, and it has openly accused Pashinyan of reckless actions that risk triggering direct conflict with the Kremlin.

    Two smaller parties also won parliamentary representation: the pro-Russia Armenia bloc took 9.94% of the vote, while Blossoming Armenia secured exactly the 4% threshold needed to enter the legislature. Final official data put overall voter turnout at 59.97%, a correction from an earlier erroneous report that incorrectly cited a 97% turnout figure.

    Speaking to reporters at his campaign headquarters shortly before official results were confirmed, Pashinyan asserted his party had secured a historic landslide win and planned to form a single-party majority government without needing to enter a coalition with opposition groups.

    The election outcome drew immediate congratulatory responses from top European Union leaders, who frame the contest as a critical litmus test for Russian influence across the post-Soviet space. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen highlighted the enduring legacy of Pashinyan’s 2018 Velvet Revolution, the mass protest movement he led that ousted long-time pro-Russian leader Serzh Sargsyan. In a public social media statement Monday, von der Leyen said, “The spirit of the Velvet Revolution you led in 2018 is alive and well. We deeply value our partnership with a democratic Armenia that is drawing ever closer to Europe. Armenia can count on us.”

    European Council President António Costa also extended his congratulations, emphasizing the EU’s growing strategic interest in the South Caucasus, a region that connects European energy markets to vast fossil fuel reserves in Central Asia. “Together, the EU and Armenia are building stronger links between people and creating new opportunities in energy, trade, and digitalization. Our strong partnership is an investment in a more peaceful and prosperous future for the region as a whole,” Costa wrote in a post on the social platform X.

    The result comes amid mounting pressure from Moscow on Yerevan, with the Moscow-led Eurasian Economic Union previously threatening to suspend Armenia’s membership over its push to deepen ties with Brussels. The election confirms a clear popular mandate for Pashinyan’s pro-Western shift, setting the stage for new geopolitical realignment in the volatile South Caucasus region.