分类: politics

  • In first papal speech to Spanish parliament, pope demands respect for migrants and international law

    In first papal speech to Spanish parliament, pope demands respect for migrants and international law

    In a groundbreaking moment for Vatican-Spanish relations, Pope Leo XIV delivered the first-ever papal address to Spain’s Cortes Generales on Monday, using the historic platform to urge global respect for migrant rights, international law, and ethical governance, while marking an unexpected shift in the secular country’s acceptance of the Catholic Church in public life.

    Addressing assembled lawmakers from across Spain’s deeply polarized political spectrum, the American pontiff framed the core argument of his speech around a universal call for “moral renewal” in public institutions, arguing that a nation’s true moral standing is measured not by its power or wealth, but by how it protects its most vulnerable community members. “The moral greatness of a nation is manifested, above all, in its capacity to accompany, protect and love those lives that are most fragile,” Leo told the chamber. This group, he emphasized, includes migrants, unborn people, and all marginalized populations.

    Papal addresses to foreign national legislatures are extremely rare, as the invitation itself signifies formal recognition of a religious leader by a sovereign state’s elected body. Prior precedent includes Pope Francis’ 2015 address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress, and Pope Benedict XVI’s 2011 speech to his native Germany’s Bundestag. For Spain, a nation where the Catholic Church was once a foundational pillar of Francisco Franco’s 20th-century dictatorship, but saw its influence wane dramatically after the transition to democracy in the 1970s, the invitation itself marks a milestone that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.

    Today, despite the fact that a majority of Spaniards still identify as Catholic, religious participation has plummeted amid widespread secularization, mirroring trends across other historically Christian European nations. Yet the address drew a rare show of cross-partisan enthusiasm: at the conclusion of Leo’s remarks, lawmakers from every ideological bloc rose to a minutes-long standing ovation, chanting “Viva el Papa!” (Long live the pope!).

    Leo delivered his address against the backdrop of escalating regional tensions between Israel and Iran, as retaliatory airstrikes between the two nations raised fears of a full-scale regional war in the Middle East. Reiterating his longstanding call for diplomatic conflict resolution, the pontiff emphasized that peace can only be built through dialogue, not force. “Peace demands diplomatic courage, ethical responsibility and a vision for the future grounded in respect for the identity of every people and in the obligation of states to resolve their disputes through the peaceful means offered by international law,” he said.

    He also voiced deep concern over the growing trend of rearmament across Europe, driven by the ongoing threat of Russian aggression following the invasion of Ukraine, and the Trump administration’s repeated threats to cut U.S. military and financial support for the continent. “It is therefore a cause for concern that, in various parts of the world — and in Europe as well — rearmament is once again being presented as an almost inevitable response to the fragility of the international situation,” he noted. In addition, Leo called for strict ethical regulation of artificial intelligence-powered autonomous weapons, stressing that life-or-death decisions must never be left to automated systems, and must remain rooted in human moral accountability.

    In a nod to Spain’s colonial history and the Catholic Church’s role in that era, Leo invoked the 16th-century School of Salamanca, a Spanish intellectual movement that laid early groundwork for modern international law and universal human rights in the aftermath of Spain’s conquest of the Americas. He praised the movement’s theologians for recognizing that power and self-interest could never be justified by force alone, and that all exercise of power has inherent moral limits. Acknowledging past failures, Leo admitted that both society and the Catholic Church itself often failed to live up to these moral principles, referencing his recent formal apology for the Holy See’s role in legitimizing the transatlantic slave trade and the colonial conquests of the Americas by Spanish and Portuguese rulers.

    A central focus of Leo’s address was the global migration crisis, echoing the priority placed on migrant rights by his predecessor Pope Francis, and doubling down on his own criticism of the Trump administration’s hardline crackdown on migration in the United States. Leo called for strengthened global action to dismantle human smuggling networks, and to create economic and social conditions that allow people to thrive in their home countries. But for those forced to flee conflict, poverty, and climate change, he demanded compassionate welcome and full integration. “This gives rise to a twofold demand for social justice: to offer safe and legal pathways, a respectful welcome and real opportunities for integration; and, at the same time, to promote the right to remain in one’s own land, working to ensure that no one has to leave their home due to a lack of peace, security or decent living conditions, including economic inequalities and the effects of the climate crisis,” he said.

    Leo’s address to Spanish lawmakers comes amid a delicate political moment for Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, whose Socialist-led minority government has been rocked by a series of corruption scandals affecting former officials and close allies, though Sánchez himself has not been directly implicated. For three years, Sánchez’s government has been unable to pass core legislation, including a national budget, as Spain grapples with deepening political polarization. In a direct reference to this division, Leo warned that political pluralism should never devolve into constant demonization of political opponents.

    Notably, the atheist prime minister and the American pope have found uncommon common ground on a range of major global policy issues, despite the Catholic Church’s historical alignment with Spain’s conservative Popular Party. After meeting Leo at the Vatican last month, Sánchez praised the pontiff as a “moral compass” for global politics. Both leaders have emerged as outspoken critics of military escalation in the Middle East, with Leo labeling recent Israeli strikes on Iran as unjust, and Sánchez positioning himself as Europe’s most vocal advocate for diplomatic negotiation over conflict. Echoing Sánchez’s stance, Leo declared: “Weapons may impose a temporary silence; but they can never build a genuine and lasting peace.” This alignment has created an unlikely alliance between Spain’s progressive government and the Vatican, particularly on migration policy: Sánchez’s government has broken with the restrictive trend seen across much of Europe and the U.S., launching a major legalization campaign earlier this year for hundreds of thousands of unauthorized immigrants already living and working in Spain, arguing that migration is critical to shoring up the country’s aging workforce and sluggish economy.

  • Peru election result close as vote counting continues

    Peru election result close as vote counting continues

    Peru’s high-stakes presidential runoff has devolved into a razor-thin deadlock, leaving the nation facing a prolonged period of political uncertainty that echoes chaotic electoral battles from recent years. Early independent vote tracking by leading pollster Ipsos places left-wing candidate Roberto Sánchez on a narrow 50.3% to 49.7% edge over right-wing veteran Keiko Fujimori, a margin so tight it qualifies as a statistical tie. Though this tally is not the official count, Ipsos’ tracking has proven a reliable predictor of final outcomes in past Peruvian elections. Official counting, which has processed over 85% of all ballots, confirms the race remains too close to call, with a full recount widely expected to take weeks to resolve.

    The contest brings two fundamentally opposing visions for Peru to the ballot box, pitting a veteran of national politics against a first-time presidential frontrunner campaigning for systemic change. Fujimori, a household name in Peruvian politics who is making her fourth bid for the presidency, has leaned heavily into the controversial legacy of her late father, former President Alberto Fujimori. Though Alberto Fujimori was ultimately imprisoned for crimes against humanity, his base credits him with crushing violent insurgencies and delivering tangible social support to impoverished communities. Keiko Fujimori has centered her campaign on one key voter priority: a brutal military crackdown on soaring organized crime and extortion, issues that have dominated voter anger across the country.

    On election day, Fujimori kicked off her voting in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima’s most populous district, where informal impoverished settlements cling to steep, arid mountains. She was greeted by throngs of enthusiastic supporters, who voiced urgent hope that she would deliver on her anti-crime pledges. “She will fight crime like her father did years ago,” supporter Alicia told reporters. Another voter, Catalina Solana Guamá, noted that previous administrations had ignored the needs of working-class hillside communities like hers. “It’s about time a woman governed us, one who makes us feel valued,” she said, adding that she backed Fujimori’s promise to deploy the military against gangs that have targeted transportation workers for extortion. “It’s not right that we go out to work and don’t know if we’ll come back alive.” Jennifer, another local voter, echoed that frustration, saying “right now things are very bad, especially in this district… there’s extortions and killings, she wants to fight that.”

    Sánchez, by contrast, is running on a platform of sweeping left-wing economic and state reforms, including expanding the government’s role in regulating Peru’s lucrative natural resource sector, increasing public investment in marginalized rural regions, overhauling the national tax system, and renegotiating existing mining contracts. He frames these changes as critical to redressing deep systemic inequality, arguing that wealth from Peru’s vast copper and gold reserves has failed to reach most working and poor Peruvians. His platform has earned him intense support in rural and highland Andean regions, but has also spooked domestic financial markets, echoing the investor anxiety that marked the 2021 election of former left-wing President Pedro Castillo.

    Sánchez’s campaign is closely tied to Castillo, who he served under as a cabinet minister. A key campaign pledge from Sánchez has been his promise to issue a presidential pardon for Castillo, who was jailed in 2022 after attempting to illegally dissolve Congress and rule by emergency decree. The 2021 election, which also pitted Castillo against Fujimori, ended in a similarly razor-thin result that dragged on for weeks of vote counting and political chaos, a parallel that has amplified anxiety around the current deadlock.

    Ipsos’ early tracking lays bare the deep geographic divide shaping the 2026 result: Fujimori carried the capital Lima, urban centers, and coastal regions, while Sánchez swept rural areas and the Andean highlands. Analysts expect Sánchez to gain additional ground as the last remaining rural ballots are processed, a dynamic that keeps the final outcome too uncertain to call.

    In statements to their supporters following the release of early counts, both candidates stuck to sharply differing narratives. Sánchez framed his narrow lead as a reflection of popular demand for systemic change, calling it an “important lead that reaffirms the will of the people, who want democracy and justice.” Fujimori, by contrast, described the race as an unambiguous “dead heat” warning that “there will be long days ahead” before a winner can be declared. She argued it would be “irresponsible” to call the result based on early partial tallies, stressing that “every single tally sheet must be counted.”

    Sánchez’s supporters in Lima voiced similar determination to see their candidate win, with many warning that they would take to the streets in protest if the result does not go their way. Many cited Castillo’s ouster and imprisonment as a core motivation for backing Sánchez this cycle. Giovanna, a Sánchez supporter gathered to hear him speak Sunday night, condemned the Fujimori family’s legacy, referencing the forced sterilization program carried out under Alberto Fujimori that harmed thousands of Indigenous and poor Peruvian women. “If we have to rise up, at the very least I would do it,” she said. Street vendor Hilda, who voted for Castillo in 2021, echoed that threat, saying “We voted for change… Previously we voted for Pedro Castillo, but our president who was elected has been removed and is in prison. That’s why we’re voting for Sánchez. Everyone is going to protest, we are going to go out into the streets.”

    The runoff comes after a chaotic first round marked by delays in delivering electoral materials to polling stations, with both sides trading accusations of electoral fraud. For the second round, however, independent election observers and Peru’s National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) have confirmed that voting proceeded without major disruptions or irregularities. Still, the prospect of weeks of recounting and political wrangling leaves Peru facing a fresh period of instability, a challenge that has plagued the country’s electoral system for much of the last decade.

  • Armenia’s pro-West government wins election despite Russian pressure

    Armenia’s pro-West government wins election despite Russian pressure

    Armenia’s 2026 parliamentary election has delivered a decisive mandate for Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and his centrist Civil Contract Party, cementing the country’s trajectory toward deeper integration with the West even as traditional ally Russia wields economic pressure to alter its course. The final vote count released by Armenia’s electoral commission confirmed Civil Contract won 49.8% of the popular vote, a clear lead that will give the party a dominant majority in the national assembly. Trailing far behind were the pro-Russian Strong Armenia Alliance at 23.2%, the also pro-Russia Armenia Alliance at 9.9%, and conservative Prosperous Armenia with just 4% of the vote, with most of the 19 competing parties and blocs failing to clear the threshold for parliamentary representation. Overall voter turnout hit 59%, in line with pre-election projections.

    This vote marked the first general election Armenia has held since its 2023 crushing military defeat to neighboring Azerbaijan over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, a conflict that reshaped the country’s domestic political landscape and foreign policy priorities. Widely framed as a de facto referendum on Armenia’s geopolitical alignment, the election outcome is set to shape the small South Caucasus nation’s ties with both Moscow and Western capitals for years to come.

    Pashinyan, who first rose to power in 2018 on a wave of mass anti-establishment protests against former leader Serzh Sargysan, declared victory early Monday morning, as preliminary results pointed to his party’s clear win. In his victory address, Pashinyan framed the outcome as a popular mandate for cross-border cooperation and regional stability. “Armenian people voted for peace, regional prosperity and cooperation,” he told supporters. He also clarified that while his administration would continue advancing its pro-Western rapprochement agenda, Armenia would remain an active member of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the customs bloc that has long delivered tangible economic benefits to the country.

    The result has drawn swift reaction from across the globe, with European Union leadership and France among the first Western powers to extend congratulations, praising both the democratic conduct of the vote and Armenia’s ongoing efforts to deepen ties with European institutions. U.S. President Donald Trump has also previously endorsed Pashinyan’s accelerated peace talks with Azerbaijan, brokered through U.S. mediation.

    What makes this victory particularly notable is that it comes despite a marked decline in Pashinyan’s domestic approval ratings in recent years. Public opinion polling puts his current support at roughly 30%, down from 54% in the 2021 election. The erosion of popularity is largely tied to the fallout of the 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which ended with Azerbaijan retaking full control of the mountainous enclave that had been home to 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Pashinyan’s critics across the political spectrum have refused to forgive his diplomatic concessions to Azerbaijan to advance peace, including his refusal to advocate aggressively for the release of former Nagorno-Karabakh leaders imprisoned in Baku. Even with the victory, the ongoing peace process with Azerbaijan remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with one recent poll showing 44% support and 41% opposition to the proposed framework.

    In the lead-up to the vote, Russian leadership made clear its opposition to Pashinyan’s pro-Western shift, repeatedly pressuring the Armenian government to clarify its geopolitical alignment. In late May, Russian President Vladimir Putin called for an immediate public referendum on whether Armenia would pivot to European integration or remain within the Russian-led EAEU, pointing out the steep economic costs of a Western shift. Last month, Putin explicitly warned Armenia that moving closer to the West would carry the same kind of crisis that followed Ukraine’s own efforts to pursue EU accession, highlighting that Russia currently supplies Armenia with natural gas at $177.50 per 1,000 cubic meters, a heavily discounted rate far below the European market price of over $600 per 1,000 cubic meters. In the final two weeks before election day, Moscow ramped up economic pressure further by banning exports of key Armenian goods including flowers, cognac, mineral water, and fresh produce, a move widely seen as an attempt to sway voter sentiment against Pashinyan.

    Pashinyan has spent the last several years deliberately steering Armenia away from Moscow’s sphere of influence: his administration has passed formal legislation to launch the EU accession process, hosted a high-profile summit of EU leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Yerevan earlier this year, and advanced U.S.-brokered peace talks with Azerbaijan. Despite these steps, European integration remains a long-term goal: Armenia has not yet been granted EU candidate status, and full membership is still years, if not decades, away. For now, the election result confirms that a majority of Armenian voters back Pashinyan’s balancing act: deepening ties with the West while maintaining existing economic and political arrangements within Russian-led blocs.

  • Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan claims victory following general election

    Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan claims victory following general election

    In the early hours of Monday, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan declared victory in the country’s snap general election, after official preliminary results confirmed his ruling Civil Contract Party secured a dominant first-place finish with 49.81% of the popular vote. The outcome of Sunday’s vote is widely viewed as a defining mandate for Pashinyan’s proposed new geopolitical trajectory for Armenia, a small South Caucasus former Soviet republic that has increasingly sought to distance itself from long-standing ally Moscow and advance its membership aspirations with the European Union.

    Preliminary data from Armenia’s Central Election Commission shows that three opposition blocs crossed the 4% vote threshold required to secure seats in the new national parliament. The runner-up position went to the Strong Armenia bloc, led by imprisoned billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who captured 23.29% of the vote. Karapetyan, who amassed his business fortune in Russia, is currently under house arrest on charges of plotting to overthrow the sitting government — allegations he has repeatedly dismissed as a politically motivated fabrication targeting his opposition. His bloc’s platform centers on rebuilding and expanding deep economic and political ties with Russia, and it has openly accused Pashinyan of reckless actions that risk triggering direct conflict with the Kremlin.

    Two smaller parties also won parliamentary representation: the pro-Russia Armenia bloc took 9.94% of the vote, while Blossoming Armenia secured exactly the 4% threshold needed to enter the legislature. Final official data put overall voter turnout at 59.97%, a correction from an earlier erroneous report that incorrectly cited a 97% turnout figure.

    Speaking to reporters at his campaign headquarters shortly before official results were confirmed, Pashinyan asserted his party had secured a historic landslide win and planned to form a single-party majority government without needing to enter a coalition with opposition groups.

    The election outcome drew immediate congratulatory responses from top European Union leaders, who frame the contest as a critical litmus test for Russian influence across the post-Soviet space. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen highlighted the enduring legacy of Pashinyan’s 2018 Velvet Revolution, the mass protest movement he led that ousted long-time pro-Russian leader Serzh Sargsyan. In a public social media statement Monday, von der Leyen said, “The spirit of the Velvet Revolution you led in 2018 is alive and well. We deeply value our partnership with a democratic Armenia that is drawing ever closer to Europe. Armenia can count on us.”

    European Council President António Costa also extended his congratulations, emphasizing the EU’s growing strategic interest in the South Caucasus, a region that connects European energy markets to vast fossil fuel reserves in Central Asia. “Together, the EU and Armenia are building stronger links between people and creating new opportunities in energy, trade, and digitalization. Our strong partnership is an investment in a more peaceful and prosperous future for the region as a whole,” Costa wrote in a post on the social platform X.

    The result comes amid mounting pressure from Moscow on Yerevan, with the Moscow-led Eurasian Economic Union previously threatening to suspend Armenia’s membership over its push to deepen ties with Brussels. The election confirms a clear popular mandate for Pashinyan’s pro-Western shift, setting the stage for new geopolitical realignment in the volatile South Caucasus region.

  • Hong Kong proposes to let city leader decide what counts as national security offense

    Hong Kong proposes to let city leader decide what counts as national security offense

    HONG KONG – The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government tabled new subsidiary legislation to the city’s legislature on Monday, introducing a formal mechanism that lets the city’s chief executive label specific criminal acts as national security offenses. The move marks the latest step in the regional government’s ongoing efforts to strengthen national security frameworks in the Asian financial hub, a process that has drawn sharp scrutiny from critics who argue it is accelerating the erosion of long-held civil liberties.

    This new legislative proposal comes in the wake of two major national security measures already enacted in the city. First, after large-scale pro-democracy protests upended daily life in Hong Kong in 2019, the central Chinese government in Beijing implemented a sweeping national security law that has been used to detain dozens of high-profile pro-democracy activists. Most recently, in 2024, the Hong Kong government passed a second standalone security law targeting offenses including espionage and unlawful disclosure of state secrets.

    Critics of these existing frameworks argue that the two laws have effectively gutted the Western-style civil liberties that Beijing agreed to preserve under the handover agreement when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. But regional authorities have repeatedly pushed back against this criticism, maintaining that robust national security legislation is a non-negotiable foundation for the city’s long-term political and social stability.

    In the official document submitted to the Legislative Council on Monday, the Hong Kong Security Bureau and Department of Justice laid out the details of the new subsidiary legislation, which aims to formalize and codify the classification process for what the existing legal framework labels “other offenses endangering national security.”

    Under the proposed rules, if the chief executive issues an official certificate confirming that a given criminal act in a pending case involves national security interests, that case will automatically be classified as a national security offense. The proposal also specifies that if a suspect faces both a primary national security charge and an alternative secondary charge stemming from the same actions, the alternative charge will also be categorized as an offense endangering national security.

    Officials emphasized in the document that amid today’s increasingly complex global geopolitical environment, national security threats remain a persistent risk for Hong Kong. Codifying this classification mechanism through subsidiary legislation, they argued, will strengthen both the legal framework and enforcement infrastructure that Hong Kong relies on to protect national security.

    The authorities added that the new legislation is designed solely to refine procedural details and add greater clarity and predictability to the implementation of existing national security provisions. Crucially, officials stressed that the subsidiary legislation does not create any new criminal offenses, introduce harsher penalties, or grant new enforcement powers to authorities.

    The Hong Kong government has called for the legislative process to be completed as soon as possible, noting that the final text of the proposal will be adjusted to incorporate feedback from sitting legislators before it is finalized. Once approved, the legislation will go into effect immediately on the day it is published in the Hong Kong government gazette.

  • Iran fires missiles at Israel in retaliation for continued attacks on Lebanon

    Iran fires missiles at Israel in retaliation for continued attacks on Lebanon

    In a sharp escalation of Middle East tensions that has upended months of tentative ceasefire efforts, Iran launched a barrage of missiles toward northern Israel on Sunday, carrying out a long-threatened retaliation for Israel’s expanding military campaign in Lebanon. The attack marks the first direct Iranian strike on Israeli territory since a fragile truce was reached in April, and it has pushed the region closer to a full-scale regional conflict that risks drawing in major global powers.

    Prior to launching the strikes, Iranian leaders issued a clear ultimatum: Israel must immediately halt its air assaults across Lebanon, particularly intensified targeting of Beirut’s southern Dahieh suburb, or face severe consequences. Following the missile launch, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) explicitly tied the operation to Israel’s recent escalation in Lebanon, confirming that the attack was a direct response to Israeli strikes that had crossed what Iran called “all red lines.”

    “We had previously warned that if the crimes in the Dahieh area of Beirut expand, we will attack targets in the occupied territories,” the IRGC’s top joint military command stated in an official announcement after the strikes.

    Israeli military officials confirmed that they detected the incoming missile launches immediately and activated their layered air defense networks to intercept the projectiles. Despite interception efforts, the incident has dramatically raised stakes, with an unnamed Israeli official warning that any direct Iranian attack on Israeli soil would trigger an immediate military retaliation, and could even open a window for Israel to restart its full cross-regional military campaign.

    General Ali Abollahi, commander of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, doubled down on Iran’s warnings Sunday, as Israeli air defense crews worked to neutralize the incoming missile salvos. “The Israeli army must stop its attacks on southern Lebanon and the suburbs, and if it expands its attacks to that region or responds to Iran’s action, it will face more devastating and regrettable blows,” Abollahi said.

    The escalation has already derailed ongoing diplomatic efforts to reach a permanent ceasefire deal, according to U.S. President Donald Trump. Speaking to Fox News, Trump said that Sunday’s Israeli strike on Beirut had ruined momentum that had been building toward a final agreement, which he said was expected to be finalized as early as this week.

    “I had expected an agreement could be signed “on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday and now this takes place,” Trump said. He added that he was “not happy” about the Beirut strike that prompted Iran’s retaliation, and confirmed that the Israeli operation had not been coordinated with the U.S. government.

    Trump also noted that Iran’s missile launch would only further hinder diplomatic progress, saying “it is certainly not going to help negotiations.” Amid the escalating crisis, the U.S. president confirmed that American military forces positioned across the Middle East have been placed on high alert.

    The current tensions grow out of a broader conflict that began in February, when Trump launched U.S. air strikes alongside Israel against Iran. Negotiations between Washington and Tehran have remained deadlocked in recent weeks, even as the Trump administration has pushed for a quick final deal. Just days before the latest escalation, in an interview recorded Friday and broadcast Sunday during Trump’s visit to his New Jersey golf course, he repeated his aggressive threat to resume large-scale bombing if Iran did not accept a deal swiftly.

    “We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going to blow the hell out of them,” Trump told NBC News.

    The rapid sequence of escalations — from Israel’s expanded strikes in Beirut to Iran’s direct missile attack on Israel — has once again stoked widespread fears that the localized conflict could spiral into a full-scale regional war that draws in multiple neighboring countries and major powers beyond the immediate combatants.

  • Trump talking points: Hegseth changes D-Day subject to migrants

    Trump talking points: Hegseth changes D-Day subject to migrants

    On the 80-plus anniversary of one of World War II’s most consequential moments, a controversy has erupted after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth turned a solemn D-Day memorial event into a platform for anti-migrant rhetoric that has drawn widespread condemnation from political leaders, veterans, and European community groups alike.

    June 6, 1944, stands as one of modern history’s defining turning points: on that day, hundreds of thousands of Allied troops launched a massive amphibious invasion of Nazi-occupied Normandy, France, suffering thousands of fatal casualties but ultimately opening the western front that would bring down the Third Reich. Eighty years on, Hegseth returned for a second consecutive year to the Normandy American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, a site honoring the US service members who lost their lives in the landings, to deliver remarks at a Saturday D-Day remembrance event.

    In his speech, Hegseth, a top cabinet official in the second Trump administration, drew a deeply controversial parallel between the 1944 Nazi invasion of Western Europe and modern irregular migration to the continent. “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies,” he said. “Beaches in Spain, in Italy, in Greece, and Bulgaria – boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion? Or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not.”

    Critics across the political and ideological spectrum were quick to denounce the remarks, labeling the speech a racist and white nationalist diatribe that disrespected the legacy of the D-Day fallen, who gave their lives to defeat fascist and racist authoritarianism. Multiple US political leaders joined the rebuke: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, noted that thousands of American heroes died on D-Day to defend freedom and defeat fascism, saying “Pete Hegseth should honor and respect their memory. Not politicize their ultimate sacrifice. May God Bless the Greatest Generation on D-Day and every day.”

    Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia also condemned the speech on social media, writing, “Apparently our nitwit secretary of war(drobe) thinks a D-Day commemoration is an appropriate time to push his far-right ideology in Europe.” US Army veteran and progressive advocate Mike Lavigne went further, calling Hegseth “a disgrace to his office and to the nation.”

    The backlash extended across the Atlantic to France, host of the commemoration events. Following his speech, Hegseth notably skipped the main international D-Day anniversary ceremony held in the coastal village of Langrune-sur-Mer that afternoon, according to French outlet France 24. Even if he had attended, local residents made clear he would not have been welcomed. A local municipal civic association, Langrune en commun, had previously called for Hegseth’s planned visit to be canceled outright, arguing the Pentagon chief “espouses values contrary to democracy, human rights and peace” and has a record of “numerous anti-European remarks,” “warlike statements,” and “American supremacist pronouncements.”

    Association member Sylvie Lamy Thepaut told French broadcaster BFM TV, “He has very warlike views and it seems to us that this man does not share our democratic values.” The group’s formal statement added, “The honor of Langrune, that of France, and the memory of the young Allied soldiers – American, British, Canadian – who died on our beaches in the name of democracy would dictate canceling this individual’s visit.”

    Hegseth’s inflammatory comments came just 24 hours after another top Trump administration official, US Vice President JD Vance, similarly stoked controversy with anti-migrant rhetoric tied to a high-profile killing in the United Kingdom. Vance claimed on social media that Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old student fatally stabbed in the UK last year by a British national who has since been sentenced to life in prison, would still be alive “if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.”

    Vance added that “stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership” – a core priority of the second Trump administration, he argued.

    A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer rejected Vance’s framing, noting that the Nowak family had explicitly asked that the teen’s death not be exploited to stoke further division, hatred, or tension. “In recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets,” the spokesperson said. “They have said they don’t want his death to be used to create further division, hatred, or tension. We should be respecting their wishes. Our politics should bring people together even in the most terrible of circumstances. That is who we are as a country.”

    Both Vance and Hegseth’s recent remarks are fully aligned with the Trump administration’s December 2025 National Security Strategy, a policy document that heavily embraces rhetoric commonly associated with far-right white nationalist circles. The strategy accuses the European Union of pursuing migration policies that “are transforming the continent and creating strife,” warns that “should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less,” and states that US policy aims to help “Europe to remain European, to regain its civilizational self-confidence, and to abandon its failed focus on regulatory suffocation.”

    The controversy comes as the 27-member European Union recently advanced a sweeping overhaul of its bloc-wide migration policy, a move that human rights advocates have criticized as echoing the hardline immigration enforcement model the Trump administration has implemented through US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the United States. Silvia Carter, spokesperson for the Brussels-based Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, told The Associated Press that “Across the Atlantic, we see the violence and fear created by ICE’s brutal immigration enforcement. Europe should be learning from the harms of that model, not building its own version of it.”

    Irregular migration to Europe already carries a devastating human cost: the International Organization for Migration reported in February 2026 that at least 7,667 people died or went missing on global migration routes in 2025 alone. That toll includes more than 2,185 people who died or disappeared crossing the Mediterranean Sea, and another 1,214 on the Western Africa/Atlantic route toward Spain’s Canary Islands, with the organization noting the true death toll is almost certainly higher than recorded figures.

  • ‘Been there’: Pauline Hanson supportive of BRS after her 2003 criminal conviction

    ‘Been there’: Pauline Hanson supportive of BRS after her 2003 criminal conviction

    A controversial comparison between a decades-old electoral fraud conviction and a historic war crime prosecution has sparked debate in Australian federal politics, with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson saying she understands the turmoil charged former Special Air Service soldier Ben Roberts-Smith is currently enduring.

    Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living service member and a Victoria Cross recipient, was taken into custody on April 7 this year. He faces five separate charges of murder for alleged unlawful killings of unarmed civilians during his deployment to Afghanistan. The former soldier has repeatedly and forcefully rejected all accusations against him, maintaining his conduct throughout his service aligned with military values, training and official rules of engagement. In a public statement released 12 days after his arrest, Roberts-Smith said he remained proud of his service and the work of his fellow service members, particularly those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty, and expressed gratitude for the widespread public support he has received.

    Speaking to a gathering of Roberts-Smith’s supporters in Brisbane over the weekend, Senator Hanson drew a direct parallel between the veteran’s current criminal prosecution and her own legal battle two decades ago. In August 2003, Hanson was found guilty of electoral fraud and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. She spent 11 weeks behind bars before the Queensland Court of Appeal overturned her conviction.

    “I’ve been in Ben Roberts-Smith’s shoes, as far as facing a criminal trial,” Hanson told the crowd. “I’ve been there, and it’s a distressing time, especially when you know you’re innocent, and I think Ben needs to know that people are supportive of him. In some ways, I know exactly what he’s going through.”

    A longstanding public backer of Roberts-Smith, Hanson confirmed she has spoken multiple times with the former soldier and his family since his arrest. She declined to rule out the possibility of Roberts-Smith running for public office one day on the One Nation party ticket, but added that it would be unfair to place that level of political pressure on him while he navigates his upcoming trial. “He’s going through a hell of a thing at the moment,” she noted. Echoing a commitment to judicial process, Hanson added: “I’m not going to judge him, I can’t, that’s up to the courts now.”

  • Chinese leader Xi heads to North Korea for closely watched talks with Kim

    Chinese leader Xi heads to North Korea for closely watched talks with Kim

    For the first time in seven years, Chinese President Xi Jinping will touch down in Pyongyang on Monday for a two-day diplomatic visit that experts say carries far-reaching implications for the balance of power across Northeast Asia and global geopolitical rivalry with the United States. The core highlight of the trip will be a scheduled summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, marking the first face-to-face meeting between the two leaders since their last encounter in Beijing last September, when both attended a major military parade alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin. No official public agenda has been released for the talks, but foreign policy analysts widely frame the visit as a deliberate bid to reinforce China’s historical influence in Pyongyang while advancing mutual strategic goals at a moment when both countries face escalating tensions with Washington.

    This high-profile trip comes on the heels of consecutive summits Xi held in Beijing with U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Putin just one month prior, and it precedes a planned September visit by Xi to the U.S. for another meeting with Trump. According to Kwak Gil Sup, head of the Seoul-based One Korea Center, a research outlet focused on North Korean affairs, the visit is designed to showcase China’s outsize influence across the Korean Peninsula and cement its role as the leading power in Northeast Asia amid intensifying great power competition with the United States.

    For decades, China has served as North Korea’s primary economic lifeline and its most critical diplomatic backer on the global stage. It is widely reported that Beijing has refrained from fully implementing United Nations sanctions imposed on Pyongyang over its nuclear program and has discreetly provided critical aid to support the economically struggling North Korean regime. This year also marks the 75th anniversary of the establishment of bilateral diplomatic ties and the 65th anniversary of the two countries’ mutual defense treaty, a key milestone that adds symbolic weight to Xi’s trip.

    In recent years, however, questions have grown over the stability of the Sino-North Korean alliance, as Pyongyang has deepened its strategic and military cooperation with Moscow. North Korea has supplied thousands of troops and artillery ammunition to support Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, and in exchange, it has received significant economic assistance and advanced military technology from the Kremlin. Still, analysts note North Korea cannot depend exclusively on Russia for support, creating an opening for Beijing to reassert its traditional role.

    For Xi, restoring China’s exclusive strategic sway over North Korea would deliver a key diplomatic advantage ahead of his upcoming talks with Trump, who has repeatedly stated his desire to restart diplomatic negotiations with Kim Jong Un over Pyongyang’s nuclear program. Experts point out that enforcing UN sanctions on North Korea is not a top priority for the Chinese government. In a pre-visit op-ed published by North Korea’s state-run flagship newspaper Rodong Sinmun on Monday, Xi emphasized that Beijing and Pyongyang must deepen strategic coordination and work jointly to push back against “hegemonism and coercive politics” to build a balanced, multipolar global order.

    Analysts forecast that Xi will bring tangible economic incentives to strengthen bilateral ties during the visit, including packages of urgently needed rice and fertilizer aid, a relaunch of Chinese group tourism to North Korea, and pledges to advance stalled cross-border joint economic development projects. “North Korea can’t solely rely on Russia. It needs to maintain a balanced alignment with China,” Kwak noted. The warm welcome extended by North Korean state media reflects Pyongyang’s enthusiasm for the visit: Rodong Sinmun referred to Xi as “the most honored state guest” in a Monday editorial, noting that Pyongyang’s capital was already steeped in a welcoming atmosphere of friendship ahead of the trip.

    A key concession Kim is expected to seek from Xi is a softer approach on the contentious issue of North Korean denuclearization. Analysts expect Xi will avoid pressing Kim aggressively for denuclearization commitments, instead offering vague general statements in support of regional peace and stability. This leniency is critical for Kim, who is actively pushing for global recognition of North Korea as a legitimate nuclear-armed state as a core prerequisite for convincing the international community to lift crippling UN sanctions.

    “Chinese officials have long taken the position of not speaking publicly about denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula, while still keeping it as a stated long-term policy goal. Kim appears to want Xi to accept North Korea as a nuclear neighbor,” explained Leif-Eric Easley, a professor of international studies at Ewha University in Seoul.

    In recent weeks, Kim has ramped up public displays of his nuclear ambitions. Just one week before Xi’s visit, Kim presided over the opening of a new industrial facility for producing enriched uranium, a core material for nuclear weapons, and pledged to expand North Korea’s nuclear arsenal “at an exponential rate.” He also oversaw sea trials of a newly built guided missile destroyer and called for accelerating efforts to develop a sea-based nuclear force capable of holding regional and global targets at risk. On the eve of Xi’s visit, Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of Kim Jong Un and a top senior Pyongyang official, doubled down on the regime’s position, dismissing U.S. demands for full denuclearization as an “escapist and anachronistic dream.”

    Since the collapse of high-stakes denuclearization talks with Trump in 2019, Kim Jong Un has rejected repeated overtures for negotiations from both Washington and Seoul, focusing exclusively on expanding and modernizing his country’s nuclear and missile arsenals. Last September, Kim noted he still held “good personal memories” of his previous interactions with Trump, but insisted the U.S. must drop its demand for complete denuclearization as a precondition for any new diplomatic talks. Experts ultimately predict Kim aims to eventually enter into arms reduction negotiations with the U.S. to secure sanctions relief and other economic concessions in exchange for partial rollbacks of his nuclear program.

  • Trump storms out of tense, rain-plagued NBC interview

    Trump storms out of tense, rain-plagued NBC interview

    In a chaotic, weather-disrupted interview filmed on a Wisconsin farm on June 5, 2026, during US President Donald Trump’s visit for a rural economy roundtable, Trump abruptly walked out mid-conversation after host Kristen Welker of *Meet the Press* pressed him to back up his long-debunked false claims of election fraud. The outdoor interview, set against a backdrop of farm tractors and hay bales, was repeatedly interrupted from the start by severe thunderstorms. Torrential rain hammered the structure’s roof, creating deafening audio disruptions that forced multiple pauses. When Welker asked if the crew should halt recording to wait out the storm, Trump insisted on continuing, saying, “No. People will understand — we’re on a farm.”

    After working through the weather issues, the conversation shifted to Trump’s strategy around Iran and his past campaign promises to keep the United States out of endless foreign conflicts. Pushed on his approach, Trump pushed back against Welker’s questioning, rejecting his earlier pledge to avoid new wars. “First of all, I didn’t guarantee no war. Why would I have built the strongest military in the world?” he said, before labeling Welker a “big liberal, a big progressive.” When Welker clarified she was only doing her job as a journalist, Trump added that his current actions in the region did not amount to another endless conflict: “I don’t like these endless wars. This is not an endless war. We’ve been doing this for three months.”

    Tensions flared again when the discussion turned to Trump’s newly proposed “weaponization fund” — a taxpayer-funded program that would compensate individuals he claims were wrongfully prosecuted under the previous Biden administration. Speaking angrily, Trump lashed out at the press and his predecessor: “I love the idea because people like you, the fake dirty press, the crooked press, people like stupid Biden … they destroyed people. They sent people to jail who did nothing wrong.” When Welker pushed back, noting there was no evidence to support his claims, the conversation devolved further.

    It was at this point that Trump doubled down on his repeated false assertions that the 2020 presidential election was rigged, adding that last week’s California primary was also stolen. When Welker held her ground and repeatedly asked him to produce evidence to back up these claims, Trump erupted. “You are either crooked or you’re stupid,” he told the host, before standing up and storming out of the frame, ending the interview early as Welker attempted to get him to stay.

    In on-air remarks Sunday when the interview was broadcast, Welker told viewers that she had spoken with Trump the day after the confrontation to address the weather disruptions that had complicated the recording, and that Trump had agreed to reschedule a full interview with NBC at a later date.