分类: politics

  • Keir Starmer says he’s staying put after defense secretary’s departure hammers his authority

    Keir Starmer says he’s staying put after defense secretary’s departure hammers his authority

    LONDON — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing the most severe threat to his premiership to date after the abrupt resignation of his most trusted senior cabinet member, Defense Secretary John Healey, has left his already fragile administration reeling and pushed growing internal unrest within the ruling Labour Party to a breaking point.

    Healey, a widely respected loyalist who had stood by Starmer through months of political turbulence, stepped down from his post Thursday, publicly breaking with the government over its failure to commit to accelerated military spending amid growing global security threats. In his resignation statement, Healey warned that current planned defense investment levels are insufficient to guarantee Britain’s national security at a moment of intensifying global risk. Just hours after Healey’s departure, junior defense official Al Carns also resigned, echoing criticism that the government’s long-awaited Defense Investment Plan lacks the transformative change the British military requires.

    The resignation hits Starmer particularly hard, as foreign and defense policy had remained the lone area where the embattled prime minister had retained consistent public and cross-party praise since he took office following a landslide general election victory in July 2024. During his short tenure, Starmer positioned Britain as a leading European security leader: he deepened military and diplomatic support for Ukraine, partnered with French President Emmanuel Macron to build a multinational “coalition of the willing” to secure Ukraine’s borders in the event of a future ceasefire, and joined Paris to launch a joint maritime security task force to protect commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. He also took a firm public stance aligning with pressure from former U.S. President Donald Trump, urging European NATO members to increase their own defense spending commitments to match the changing security landscape.

    “Starmer has been consistently staunch about warning of the security risk from Russia,” explained Olivia O’Sullivan, head of the U.K. in the World program at the London-based think tank Chatham House. “He’s been given quite a bit of credit by the public for having to deal with Trump and doing so with a level of steadiness and calm. And he has been, in line with previous U.K. governments, a close and consistent ally of Ukraine.”

    The core dispute that triggered Healey’s resignation centers on funding for the government’s 10-year Defense Investment Plan, which outlines a target to raise British military spending to 3.5% of gross domestic product by 2035. For years, the British military has pushed to reverse decades of underinvestment and capability decline, as Russia has grown increasingly militarily assertive following its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, regularly conducting overt and covert probes of NATO’s northern and eastern European defenses. Healey argued that accelerating spending to hit a 3% of GDP target by 2030 was non-negotiable, citing official British intelligence assessments that warn Russia could be prepared to launch an attack on a NATO member state as early as that year. He warned that a slower, lower-spending path “could make the country less safe.”

    Treasury Chancellor Rachel Reeves rejected Healey’s demand, refusing to revise the government’s existing timeline, prompting his resignation. The debate over defense spending divides political and policy observers in the U.K.: critics argue that military funding is often an open-ended demand, pointing to long-running issues with procurement delays and massive budget overruns on major defense projects. For his part, resigning junior minister Al Carns argued that the problem extends beyond total spending levels, telling the BBC that the government’s plan is not “transformative enough.” “I want to see a higher percentage for uncrewed systems, AI, data — data is the new gunpowder — and we’ve got to move that forward if we are going to win the next war,” he said.

    Healey’s exit marks the latest in a string of high-profile departures that have gutted Starmer’s cabinet in recent weeks. Last month alone, the prime minister lost multiple junior ministers followed by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who resigned explicitly to position himself for a potential leadership challenge if a contest is called. The most prominent potential challenger, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham, is widely expected to trigger a leadership race if he wins a special parliamentary election scheduled for this Thursday.

    Unlike previous resignations from figures with openly stated leadership ambitions, Healey’s departure from a minister long seen as a loyal team player with no personal designs on the top job signals that Starmer’s credibility is eroding even among his closest allies. “[It] suggests that Starmer’s credibility, even with his inner circle of ministers, is perhaps draining away,” O’Sullivan noted.

    Undeterred by the growing rebellion, Starmer struck a defiant tone during a public interview Friday, vowing to hold onto power and fight any challenge to his leadership. “It’s my job to make hard-edged decisions,” he said, emphasizing that “defense is my number one priority. And I have taken the difficult decisions to make sure that we are safe as a country.”

    “I’m not going to go away. I don’t think we should plunge the country into the chaos of a leadership election,” Starmer added. “I don’t think it should happen, but if it does, then I will fight.”

  • NATO weighs options to defend Europe as the US plans for conflict elsewhere

    NATO weighs options to defend Europe as the US plans for conflict elsewhere

    BRUSSELS — NATO’s top military leader is developing backup defense strategies for Europe in the event of a Russian attack, following a major announcement from the United States that it will reduce the number of aircraft and warships it makes available to the alliance during security crises. The alliance’s longstanding core deployment framework, known as the NATO Force Model, has served as the primary plan for coordinating military assets from 32 member states across peacetime, crisis, and full conflict, outlining what resources commanders can draw on in phases during the first six months of any armed confrontation. But last month, the Pentagon notified its NATO partners that it would scale back its European theater commitments to reorient its military posture toward growing strategic threats in the Indo-Pacific, primarily from China.

    This announcement capped more than a year of anxious waiting among European allies and Canada, after the Trump administration first flagged that Europe would no longer be counted as the United States’ top security priority. While allies have known for months that defense cuts were coming, they have remained in the dark about the scale, speed, and specific scope of the reductions. U.S. General Alex Grynkewich, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander, emphasized in comments at the ILA Berlin Air Show Thursday that the U.S. still remains committed to providing limited, but strategically critical, capabilities to the alliance.

    “Our priority right now is focusing on capabilities that we can acquire rapidly, deploy quickly, scale at pace, and sustain over extended periods of time – that applies to long-range fires systems as well as unmanned aerial systems,” Grynkewich said. “These types of assets will help us offset near-term defense risks if we are called on to deter aggression and defend alliance territory.”

    Following a June 2-3 meeting of alliance defense leaders to assess capability gaps created by the U.S. drawdown, Grynkewich called on European NATO members and Canada to fill these gaps by contributing additional manned combat aircraft, unmanned drones, and naval vessels to the alliance’s crisis stockpile, saying the contributions are needed “now and in the immediate near term.” While the exact details of the U.S. cuts remain classified, independent media reports in Germany and the United States indicate the drawdown will remove an entire aircraft carrier strike group, including its accompanying warships and air wing, plus a nuclear-powered submarine from the European theater. The cuts are also expected to eliminate access to dozens of fighter jets and multiple aerial refueling tankers, assets that are already in critically short supply across European armed forces, leaving alliance leaders uncertain where they can source these capabilities on short notice. The White House has demanded that allies present detailed backfill plans ahead of the NATO summit scheduled for July 7-8 in Turkey, where President Donald Trump will meet with alliance heads of state and government.

    In a separate development announced Friday, NATO military headquarters confirmed it will implement additional cuts to its Kosovo peacekeeping force, withdrawing an unspecified number of troops and pieces of equipment. The Kosovo Force, better known as KFOR, has been deployed to the region since 1999, with a mandate to maintain peace between Kosovo and neighboring Serbia. At the height of its deployment, KFOR numbered 50,000 troops, but it has been gradually scaled back over decades as regional tensions cooled. A 1,000-strong reinforcement was deployed to the region in 2023, however, after a new wave of violent ethnic unrest broke out.

    Grynkewich noted that current security conditions in Kosovo allow NATO to further adjust the force’s size and operational posture. His office declined to specify which units would be withdrawn, or whether any U.S. troops would be part of the drawdown. “This adjustment is not about raw troop numbers, it is about optimizing the force to better guarantee safety and security for all people living in Kosovo and across the wider Balkan region,” a spokesman for Grynkewich explained. Currently, the U.S. deploys 590 troops to KFOR, making it the second-largest contributing nation after Italy, which has 907 personnel in the theater. The U.S. also stations a fleet of Black Hawk helicopters at Camp Bondsteel, the large U.S. military base that has operated in Kosovo since the 1999 intervention.

    For all the ongoing adjustments to NATO’s defense posture, Grynkewich stressed that there is no immediate threat of a Russian attack on alliance territory. Current intelligence assessments and observations of Russian force movements indicate “Russia is not seeking a direct armed conflict with NATO,” he said. Russia remains heavily committed to its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and continues to face significant challenges recruiting enough troops to sustain its current operations. Even so, European governments and intelligence services have warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin could have the capacity to launch an attack on other parts of Europe within three to five years, particularly if he succeeds in securing his territorial aims in Ukraine.

    Associated Press correspondents Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin and Zana Cimili in Pristina, Kosovo contributed reporting to this article.

  • Niger military junta introduces new penal code criminalizing homosexuality with 5-10 years in prison

    Niger military junta introduces new penal code criminalizing homosexuality with 5-10 years in prison

    NIAMEY, NIGER – In a policy shift that deepens legal restrictions on LGBTQIA+ people across West Africa, Niger’s ruling military junta has enacted a sweeping new penal code that formally criminalizes same-sex relations and LGBTQIA+ identity, a senior adviser to the country’s justice ministry confirmed Friday to the Associated Press.

    The new legislation, which went into full effect Thursday, marks a major change from Niger’s prior legal framework, where same-sex relations were never explicitly outlawed, even as widespread social stigma marginalized LGBTQIA+ communities for decades. Niger is the second West African nation to implement such a ban this year, following similar restrictive legislation passed in Senegal earlier in 2024.

    According to the full text of the penal code, any individual found to have “committed or attempted to commit an immodest or unnatural act or practices lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual (LGBTQIA+) acts” faces a mandatory prison sentence ranging from five to 10 years, in addition to substantial financial fines. The harsh penalties extend far beyond the individuals engaged in same-sex relationships: anyone who officiates a same-sex marriage, acts as a witness for the union, consents to the ceremony, or organizes the event is subject to the same five-to-10-year prison term and fines.

    Hamidou Julien, the justice ministry adviser who confirmed the law’s implementation, did not comment on whether the junta plans to prioritize enforcement of the new provisions in the coming months. Human rights observers have already raised alarms over the policy, noting that it will exacerbate systemic discrimination and push already marginalized LGBTQIA+ Nigeriens further underground.

    The legal change places Niger among a large bloc of African nations with anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation. Across the continent’s 54 recognized countries, more than 30 currently classify same-sex sexual conduct as a criminal offense. Many of these nations, including Kenya, Sierra Leone and Tanzania, impose maximum prison sentences of 10 years or longer for conviction. In three African countries – Somalia, Uganda and Mauritania – people convicted of same-sex relations can legally be sentenced to death.

  • Iran insists on nuclear enrichment under any deal with US

    Iran insists on nuclear enrichment under any deal with US

    Fresh days after former U.S. President Donald Trump announced a final draft nuclear and war-ending deal with Iran was ready for signing, Tehran made its non-negotiable demands clear on Friday: the Islamic Republic will retain its sovereign right to enrich uranium and maintain full control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, no matter what final agreement is reached with Washington.

    The current negotiations mark weeks of indirect diplomatic talks between the two nations, aimed at ending the full-scale conflict that erupted when U.S. and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran on February 28. A ceasefire has been in place since April, but intermittent clashes have continued to stoke global fears of a resumption of open war, even as Trump has repeatedly claimed a final agreement is imminent.

    Israel, a key U.S. ally in the region, has stated that Trump promised it any deal would require Iran to give up all of its existing enriched nuclear material. But Iran’s official IRNA news agency has flatly rejected this condition, saying such a concession is not even under discussion. According to IRNA, after both sides signed an initial memorandum of understanding, formal detailed negotiations will extend over 60 days, and Tehran will make its right to enrich uranium and retain enriched material a core priority for inclusion in the final text.

    Beyond its nuclear demands, Iran is also refusing to cede authority over the Strait of Hormuz, the critical global chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies pass. Since the outbreak of the war, Tehran has blockaded most international traffic through the waterway, only allowing a small number of vessels to transit after receiving approval from Iranian armed forces. IRNA confirmed Friday that the current draft text contains no Iranian commitment to hand over management of the strait or restore pre-war access conditions.

    Iran’s state Mehr news agency, citing an anonymous source close to the country’s negotiating team, published details of the draft agreement currently being finalized Friday. The draft would end hostilities across all fronts, including Lebanon, unlock $24 billion in Iranian assets frozen by international sanctions, suspend restrictions on Iranian oil and petrochemical exports, and lift the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports imposed in mid-April. It also requires the U.S. and its allies to pay war reparations to Iran and commit at least $300 billion to post-war reconstruction projects in the country. Final negotiations will not begin until half of Iran’s blocked funds are released, oil sanctions are suspended, and the naval blockade is lifted, the report added.

    Trump’s announcement that a draft deal had been approved by Iranian leadership triggered immediate global market shifts: major stock markets rallied on reduced geopolitical risk, while oil prices dropped sharply in response to expectations that Iranian crude would soon return to global markets. The U.S. leader also canceled a planned wave of bombings on Iranian targets Thursday, saying the signing date and location would be announced shortly, and maintained that the fine print of the deal had been approved by the U.S. and its regional allies including Israel. When pressed Friday about whether Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei had signed off on the draft, Trump reaffirmed his position, saying he understood the answer was yes.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, however, has pushed back against Tehran’s current demands. His office confirmed that Netanyahu had spoken with Trump, who repeated his vow that any final deal would include the removal of all Iranian enriched uranium and the dismantling of Iran’s missile infrastructure. “As long as I am the Prime Minister of Israel, Iran will not have nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu reiterated Friday.

    Inside Tehran, ordinary Iranian citizens hold mixed views on the potential deal. Many expressed uncertainty over whether an agreement would improve their daily lives. “I don’t know if it will be good or bad for us,” a 29-year-old cafe worker told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity out of fear of government retaliation. “The main purpose of this war was for the US to remove the system and this did not happen. So what does a deal do?” Some locals fear any deal would only strengthen the hold of Iran’s current ruling establishment, leaving ordinary citizens with few tangible benefits.

  • Indonesian students protest in against state spending, fuel price hike

    Indonesian students protest in against state spending, fuel price hike

    On Friday, hundreds of university and college students flooded the streets of Jakarta, Indonesia’s capital, to voice fierce opposition to the policies of newly inaugurated President Prabowo Subianto, warning that unbridled wasteful state spending could push the nation into bankruptcy. The demonstration, which escalated into minor scuffles with police, is the most prominent display of public discontent since violent anti-government protests rocked the country last August, and it comes as growing frustration over perceived state mismanagement simmers across the archipelago.

    Protesters laid out three core demands: an immediate end to what they call reckless public expenditure, a full scrapping of Prabowo’s signature free school and community meals program, and a reversal of the recent steep fuel price hike that has strained household budgets. The free meals initiative, which was the centerpiece of Prabowo’s successful 2024 presidential campaign, has been plagued by controversy in recent months: multiple mass food poisoning incidents have sickened hundreds of recipients, while widespread allegations of graft have eroded public trust in the program. Just last week, Prabowo dismissed the head of the government agency tasked with overseeing the $28 billion annual initiative in response to the growing scandal.

    Earlier this week, state-owned energy giant Pertamina announced it would raise prices for the widely used Pertamax fuel grades by more than 30%, a move that immediately sparked public outcry. The price hike came after years of government-regulated fuel price stability, but ballooning budget pressures from large-scale flagship programs like free meals left the government with little choice, according to insiders. Students argue the increase disproportionately hits the middle class and working poor, already grappling with rising cost of living across the country.

    During the march toward the iconic Hotel Indonesia roundabout, a historic site for political demonstrations in Jakarta, students clashed with riot police deployed to block their path. Footage from BBC Indonesian shows participants attempting to push through police barricades, with some throwing objects at officers, though no injuries have been reported in the immediate aftermath of the protest. Speaking to reporters on the scene, student protester Zaki questioned the government’s commitment to constitutional protections for peaceful assembly.

    “Fuel prices are going up, and our lives are getting harder,” Zaki shouted to officers. “Why are you afraid of student voices? The constitution guarantees our right to demonstrate, but that guarantee means nothing today.” Another student, Rina, emphasized that public calls to end the troubled free meals program have been repeatedly sidelined by the administration. “This program was unclear from the start,” she said. “We’ve had mass poisonings, we’ve had corruption exposed, and the government still refuses to listen to people’s demands to shut it down.”

    Government officials have defended the free meals initiative, framing it as a long-term investment in Indonesia’s future designed to address chronic child malnutrition, improve educational performance, and boost domestic economic activity. But critics argue that poor planning and a lack of transparency have turned the high-cost program into a drain on public finances. Adding to the nation’s economic woes, the Indonesian rupiah has recently slid to new record lows against major global currencies, further stoking public anxiety over the state of the economy.

    Protesters have organized their movement online under the hashtag #MenujuIndonesiaBangkrut, which translates to “Towards Bankrupt Indonesia”, drawing thousands of additional comments and expressions of support from social media users across the country. Friday’s protest is the largest outbreak of public discontent since August 2025, when the death of a motorcycle delivery rider triggered widespread anger over elitist governance and alleged systemic mismanagement, leading to violent demonstrations that left multiple people dead. Analysts note that the latest rally signals growing public frustration with the Prabowo administration just months into its term, as economic pressures and policy controversies continue to mount.

  • In pictures: Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies at age 47

    In pictures: Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies at age 47

    Thailand’s Royal Household has confirmed the passing of Princess Bajrakitiyabha, the eldest daughter of King Vajiralongkorn, at the age of 47. The announcement marks the end of a three-and-a-half-year medical battle for the princess, who fell into a coma in late 2022 after collapsing during a routine outing to exercise her pet dogs.

    Widely regarded as one of the most high-achieving and publicly active members of the Thai royal family, Princess Bajrakitiyabha built a distinguished public career beyond ceremonial duties. A trained lawyer by profession, she served as Thailand’s ambassador to Austria, and spent years advocating for meaningful reforms to Thailand’s national criminal justice system, drawing on her legal expertise to push for greater fairness and transparency. She also represented Thailand on global stages, including a 2009 appearance at the United Nations Human Rights Council session in Geneva.

    Throughout her public life, the princess maintained a close relationship with her father, 73-year-old King Vajiralongkorn. At the time of her death, the Thai monarch had not officially named an heir to the throne, and political analysts widely viewed Princess Bajrakitiyabha as a likely key figure in the future royal succession, given her proven public profile and proximity to the king.

    In the wake of the announcement, mourners have gathered outside Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn Hospital, where the princess had received ongoing medical care since her collapse, to pay their respects. Photos from the scene show members of the public holding portraits of the princess and sharing grief over her early passing.

    Prior to her health crisis, Princess Bajrakitiyabha was a familiar presence at national public events, from joining royal processions through Bangkok alongside the king and Queen Suthida to leading community activities honoring senior members of the royal family, including a 2015 cycling event held to tribute her grandfather, the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej.

  • Indonesian students protest government policies as economic pressures grow

    Indonesian students protest government policies as economic pressures grow

    Amid growing economic strain that has squeezed household budgets across Southeast Asia’s largest democracy, hundreds of university students took to the streets of Indonesia’s capital Jakarta on Friday to deliver a clear message to the administration of President Prabowo Subianto: rein in soaring prices and roll back costly, controversial public spending programs.

    Organized by a national student coalition, the demonstration drew roughly 1,500 participants, most clad in their institutions’ signature yellow university jackets, who gathered following weekly Friday prayers with plans to march to the iconic Hotel Indonesia traffic circle, a historic gathering point for public demonstrations in central Jakarta. Security forces, however, moved quickly to impede the group’s progress, blocking key arterial routes leading to the Indonesian presidential palace — the traditional end point for most major Jakarta protests — and diverting crowds away from central government hubs. In total, more than 6,000 combined police and military personnel were deployed across the capital to manage the demonstration.

    Protesters anchored their grievances in the rapidly rising cost of living, a crisis they trace largely to global oil price shocks triggered by the U.S.-Iran conflict that has driven up domestic fuel prices across Indonesia. Compounding these economic pressures, the Indonesian rupiah has faced severe downward pressure on global currency markets, hitting an all-time low of 18,000 rupiah to the U.S. dollar earlier this month, further inflating prices for imported goods and basic necessities.

    The rally organizers laid out five core demands for the Prabowo administration, starting with immediate cuts to what they label wasteful and excessive state spending. Top of their list for rollback are two flagship government programs: a widely publicized free nutritious meal initiative and a national rural revitalization scheme. The free meals program, which carries an annual price tag of 268 trillion rupiah (equivalent to roughly $15 billion) for 2024 alone, was originally designed to tackle widespread poverty and childhood malnutrition. But the initiative has been plunged into scandal in recent weeks, after Prabowo dismissed the program’s national director amid a sweeping high-level corruption investigation that has already resulted in multiple arrests of senior nutrition agency officials.

    Beyond economic demands, protest leaders also called for an end to what they describe as the expanding role of the military in civilian governance — a shift they warn poses a direct threat to Indonesia’s young democratic institutions, which only transitioned away from authoritarian rule in 1998.

    Yatalathof Ma’shum Imawan, chair of the student organization that coordinated the Jakarta rally, accused the Prabowo administration of refusing to confront the severity of the country’s ongoing economic crisis. “The government is in denial about the current situation,” Imawan told reporters on site. “We urge Prabowo to have the courage to acknowledge his mistake and stop denying it.”

    Friday’s protest is one of the largest coordinated student mobilizations the country has seen since major nationwide demonstrations erupted last August. That wave of unrest saw thousands of Indonesians take to streets across the archipelago, with violent clashes between protesters and security forces leaving at least 13 people dead. Friday’s action was not limited to the capital: parallel demonstrations were also held in the West Java city of Bandung and in Pontianak, a major urban center on Indonesia’s Borneo island, showing growing discontent with economic policy among young people across the country.

  • US scholar with history of activism in Myanmar arrested in China on suspicion of espionage

    US scholar with history of activism in Myanmar arrested in China on suspicion of espionage

    In a development that adds new friction to already strained U.S.-China relations, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed Friday that an American scholar specializing in Myanmar studies and Chinese foreign policy has been taken into custody on suspicion of endangering national security through espionage activities.

    The detained academic, Min Zin, stands accused of coordinating spying operations that threaten China’s core national interests, ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed in an official statement. This arrest is highly unusual; Beijing rarely publicly detains and charges U.S. citizens with national security violations, making the case a notable flashpoint just one month after a high-profile meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, a meeting billed as a step toward resetting the two countries’ turbulent diplomatic ties.

    Details of Min Zin’s disappearance first emerged from a Burmese activist familiar with the scholar, who spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity over fears of retaliation and arrest by Chinese authorities. The activist confirmed Min Zin vanished on June 3 shortly after arriving in Kunming, the capital of China’s southwest Yunnan Province, to attend an academic conference. This trip was not out of the ordinary for Min Zin, the source added, noting the scholar had made multiple prior visits to China without incident over the course of his research career.

    A former key figure in Myanmar’s pro-democracy movement, Min Zin first rose to prominence as a student organizer during the 1988 nationwide uprising against Myanmar’s military junta, which was violently crushed by state security forces. After the crackdown, Min Zin fled Myanmar and eventually was granted political asylum in the United States. Contrary to some early unconfirmed reports, the activist who spoke to reporters emphasized Min Zin has not engaged in direct on-the-ground political activism for years, focusing his work almost entirely on academic research and policy analysis.

    Today, Min Zin leads the Institute for Strategy and Policy Myanmar (ISP Myanmar), an independent think tank he founded that produces regular research on cross-border trade and Chinese foreign policy toward Myanmar, which shares a long southwestern border with China. The think tank has maintained open, regular exchange programs with peer research institutions in China for years, and has published widely discussed analysis on topics ranging from rare earth mineral trade flows from Myanmar to China to infrastructure investment projects along the bilateral border. Beyond his think tank work, Min Zin is also a Ph.D. candidate in political science at the University of California, Berkeley, one of the top U.S. academic programs for Southeast Asian studies.

    Global human rights advocacy organization Amnesty International has already issued an urgent public call for Chinese authorities to release Min Zin immediately, citing deep alarm over the circumstances of his detainment and the vague national security charges against him. “The opaque circumstances around Min Zin’s unexplained disappearance and subsequent arrest are deeply disturbing, and the espionage accusation against a respected academic is extremely concerning,” said Joe Freeman, a senior Myanmar researcher at Amnesty International.

    The arrest comes at a delicate moment for U.S.-China relations, even after the leaders’ meeting in Beijing last month. Both countries have been engaged in tit-for-tat detentions of foreign citizens on national security grounds in recent years, and incidents like this often escalate diplomatic friction at a time when the two powers are already at odds over trade, regional security, and human rights policy.

  • Iranian woman among migrants deported from the US to the Central African Republic

    Iranian woman among migrants deported from the US to the Central African Republic

    A deportation flight organized by the former Trump administration is set to land in the Central African Republic’s capital Bangui on Friday, carrying roughly two dozen migrants from third countries, including one Iranian woman who had previously been granted protection from deportation to her home nation, legal representatives confirmed.

    This transfer marks the latest high-profile example of the controversial, largely secretive agreements Washington struck with multiple African and Latin American nations to accept deportees who are not citizens of their receiving countries, a policy that has drawn widespread condemnation from immigration advocates and legal experts.

    According to immigration rights advocates, the Central African Republic — a chronically impoverished, conflict-battered nation — is one of at least 10 African countries that have signed onto these third-country deportation arrangements. As part of a broader hardline U.S. immigration crackdown during the Trump administration, officials struck these often-unpublic deals to expel thousands of non-citizen migrants to countries that are not their country of origin, across roughly 24 nations total.

    Immigration lawyers argue the policy is a deliberate legal loophole, designed to indirectly force asylum seekers who would otherwise be protected from return to their home countries into dangerous third-party states, effectively circumventing court-ordered deportation protections.

    The flight departed Louisiana late Thursday bound for Bangui, though exact passenger numbers have not been officially confirmed. Ali Rahnama, president of the Iranian American Legal Defense Fund, who has been in direct contact with several of the detained migrants, confirmed the group includes nationals from Iran, Jordan, Armenia, Turkey, Georgia and Afghanistan.

    Sahar Jalili Pawelski, an immigration lawyer representing three Iranian women initially slated for deportation on this flight, explained that two of her three clients secured emergency court orders that temporarily paused their removal, while judges review whether the U.S. government’s deportation action is legally valid. All three Iranian women had previously received court-ordered protection from deportation to Iran, after judges ruled they faced credible threats of persecution based on their political beliefs or religious identity, both Pawelski and Rahnama confirmed. Only one Iranian woman remains on the flight scheduled to land Friday.

    An elderly Syrian migrant also scheduled for deportation to the Central African Republic similarly obtained an emergency temporary order halting his removal, according to his attorney Margaret Stock.

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials declined to comment on the specific case Thursday, citing security policies that prevent confirmation of upcoming removal operations. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the deportation flight.

    The receiving country, the Central African Republic, has been ravaged by years of armed conflict between government forces and rebel factions, and ranks among the poorest countries on Earth. Despite holding extensive gold reserves, one in three Central African citizens survives on less than $2 USD per day. The nation is also a historic hub of activity for the Russian private mercenary group Wagner, which for years provided security to President Faustin-Archange Touadéra and led combat operations against rebel groups.

    While the Central African Republic remains one of Russia’s closest African allies, recent tensions have emerged between Touadéra and Moscow, after Russia demanded Wagner be replaced by the state-run Africa Corps. Rahnama has raised particular alarm over the deportation of the Iranian asylum seeker to the Central African Republic, pointing to Russia’s widespread influence in the country and the close security partnership between Moscow and Tehran, which puts the migrant at heightened risk of harm.

    This report was compiled by correspondent Banchereau in Dakar, Senegal, with additional contribution from Associated Press writer Rebecca Santana based in Washington.

  • The migration pact: What’s in the EU’s landmark asylum reform?

    The migration pact: What’s in the EU’s landmark asylum reform?

    On June 12, a sweeping overhaul of European Union migration and asylum rules formally comes into force, marking the first time the bloc has established a unified, bloc-wide framework for managing irregular migration and border processes. According to EU Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner, the reform is designed to give individual member states greater control over cross-border population movements, ending years of fragmented national policies that have strained regional cooperation.

    The new system introduces sweeping changes to how the EU processes people crossing its external borders illegally. Under the updated rules, all irregular arrivals will undergo mandatory identity and security screenings completed within a seven-day window. Biometric data, including facial scans and fingerprints, alongside basic identity documentation, will be stored in a centralized EU database. The primary goal of this screening is to triage applicants: sorting those eligible for standard or accelerated asylum processing from those who will be ordered deported to their country of origin or a prior transit country. Human rights organizations have already raised red flags, warning that the process will effectively result in widespread detention for most migrants, including unaccompanied minors, for the full duration of screening.

    A core component of the reform is a new fast-track rejection pathway for applicants deemed to have low protection prospects or pose potential security risks. This includes nationals from countries such as Morocco and Bangladesh, where at least 80 percent of asylum applications are typically rejected by EU member states. These cases will be processed entirely in dedicated facilities located near the EU’s external borders—encompassing land frontiers, maritime ports and international airports—with a maximum processing timeline of 12 weeks. Rights advocates argue this compressed timeline will lead to rushed, flawed asylum decisions and extend detention periods for vulnerable people, while applicants from regions with higher approval rates will still follow the bloc’s existing standard asylum procedures.

    For years, the EU’s original migration rules placed full responsibility for processing asylum claims on the member state where an irregular migrant first arrived. This system placed disproportionate burden on southern EU states including Italy, Greece and Malta, which have received the vast majority of sea and land arrivals over the past decade. To address this imbalance, the reform introduces a mandatory solidarity mechanism that requires all member states to contribute to sharing the burden. States can either agree to relocate a set number of asylum seekers from frontline border states, or opt to pay a contribution of 20,000 euros (equivalent to roughly $23,000) per asylum seeker to the receiving frontline country. The mechanism is designed to relocate at least 30,000 asylum seekers annually, though early negotiations have already hit major stumbling blocks: a first round of talks held last year saw multiple member states refuse to accept any relocation assignments.

    The overhaul also includes a dedicated emergency response framework to address sudden, large-scale migration surges, similar to the 2015-2016 crisis that saw more than two million asylum seekers, most fleeing conflict in Syria and Afghanistan, enter the bloc. Under surge conditions, member states will be permitted to roll back standard asylum protections and hold migrants in external border detention centers for longer periods than the rules normally allow. The framework also applies to what the EU calls “instrumentalization of migration,” a practice the bloc has repeatedly accused Belarus and Russia of engaging in, claiming the two countries push irregular migrants across EU borders to destabilize the 27-nation bloc.

    Despite the formal entry into force, major implementation challenges remain. A dozen member states have not yet completed necessary preparations, including building the border infrastructure required to carry out the new mandatory screenings. Other countries have already reported technical issues with integrating national systems into the new centralized biometric database. Public opinion across much of the bloc has hardened further on migration since the pact was agreed, pushing national governments to demand even stricter measures. Currently, an additional legislative package focused on expanding deportations of asylum seekers whose claims have been rejected is moving rapidly through the EU’s lawmaking process.

    These developments have amplified concerns from human rights groups that European policymakers are prioritizing political expediency over basic humanitarian protections. Judith Sunderland, associate Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch, criticized the incoming rules, saying “The Pact takes a sledgehammer to the right to asylum at a time when the world needs Europe more than ever to champion human rights.”