分类: politics

  • Trump ‘anti-weaponisation’ fund  indefinitely blocked as judge wants guarantee it’s abandoned

    Trump ‘anti-weaponisation’ fund indefinitely blocked as judge wants guarantee it’s abandoned

    A federal judge in the United States has upheld a block on the $1.8 billion (approximately £1.3 billion) “anti-weaponisation” fund put forward by former President Donald Trump, rejecting verbal assurances from the administration that the plan has been scrapped and demanding formal sworn confirmation within seven days that the initiative will not move forward.

    The controversial proposal first emerged as part of a planned settlement in Trump’s personal lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, filed over the unauthorized leak of his confidential tax returns. Under the plan, the $1.776 billion fund would be overseen by a five-person independent commission tasked with reviewing and compensating claims from individuals who identified as victims of so-called “lawfare” and the “weaponisation” of the U.S. justice system.

    Almost immediately after the fund was announced, it sparked fierce bipartisan backlash in Congress, as lawmakers raised urgent alarms that the fund could be used to issue payouts to people charged or convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021 U.S. Capitol riot — including those found guilty of assaulting law enforcement officers during the insurrection. In response to the widespread public and congressional outrage, Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers on Capitol Hill earlier this month that the Trump administration would abandon the plan entirely, stating clearly “We’re not moving forward with the fund, period.”

    Last week, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema issued a temporary restraining order pausing the implementation of the fund, which was set to expire at the end of Friday. During a Friday court hearing, Brinkema pushed back against arguments that Blanche’s congressional testimony constituted sufficient assurance that the fund was dead. According to MS NOW, the judge repeatedly emphasized that verbal testimony was not enough to lock in the cancellation, and ordered that formal sworn confirmation of the fund’s termination be submitted by both Attorney General Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent within one week.

    The legal challenge to block the fund was brought by a coalition of plaintiffs, led by Andrew Floyd, a former federal prosecutor who has claimed he was wrongfully fired from his position after leading prosecutions of January 6 Capitol rioters. Following the judge’s ruling, Floyd released a statement reaffirming his commitment to the lawsuit. “I will continue this litigation to ensure that this unconstitutional fund does not erase the accountability imposed by judges and impartial jurors — and the hard-earned work of the victims, witnesses, law enforcement officers, and prosecutors who delivered it,” Floyd said.

    The ongoing legal battle over the fund highlights deep partisan and institutional tensions over the Trump administration’s approach to the justice system, and the widespread concern over potential attempts to pardon or compensate individuals convicted of crimes related to the 2021 Capitol insurrection.

  • Pope Leo XIV’s flight home from Spain was grounded so the king came to his aid

    Pope Leo XIV’s flight home from Spain was grounded so the king came to his aid

    After a busy seven-day apostolic visit across Spain that carried a strong message on migration policy and marked a historic milestone for Barcelona’s iconic Sagrada Familia, Pope Leo XIV’s journey back to Rome hit an unforeseen snag Friday at Tenerife North–Ciudad de La Laguna Airport in Spain’s Canary Islands. The Iberia Airlines charter jet scheduled to carry the pontiff and his delegation home developed a critical mechanical issue that grounded the aircraft, leaving the Vatican team stranded before a last-minute act of generosity from Spain’s monarch resolved the crisis.

    The problem emerged after Pope Leo had already boarded the plane: the aircraft’s engine failed to start, and initial attempts by the ground crew to repair the fault were unsuccessful. All passengers were required to exit the aircraft, and an investigation into the root cause of the malfunction was launched immediately. With the Canary Islands located off the northwest coast of Africa, far closer to the African continent than to mainland Spain, sourcing a replacement aircraft locally was not feasible. In response to the emergency, King Felipe VI extended an offer of his personal private jet, a Falcon, to transport the pope back to the Vatican.

    The Spanish king accompanied Pope Leo to the aircraft on the airport tarmac, where the pontiff and his core delegation boarded the jet. The plane departed more than three hours behind the original scheduled departure time, marking an unusual end to a visit that had otherwise proceeded without a hitch. The remaining passengers, including approximately 70 Vatican correspondents and support staff, were set to be picked up by a backup Iberia jet dispatched from Madrid, the airline confirmed.

    The unplanned aircraft swap is an extremely rare event in modern papal travel. Veteran Vatican journalists who cover papal visits could only recall a handful of similar disruptions during the decades-long pontificate of St. John Paul II. In 1986, a snowstorm closed Rome’s airports en route back from India, forcing John Paul II to divert to Naples before completing the journey by special train. Two years later, severe weather forced an unscheduled landing in South Africa during a trip to Lesotho – a country the pontiff was visiting as part of a tour that intentionally excluded apartheid-era South Africa over its policy of racial segregation.

    Papal air travel follows longstanding standard protocols: typically, Italy’s national carrier ITA Airways transports the pope to his destination, and the host country’s national carrier handles the return flight. For particularly long journeys or trips to nations without the capacity to host large papal charter flights, ITA Airways often handles the full round-trip. Papal charters are structured with the pope, his delegation, and security detail in the forward section of the aircraft, while traveling journalists occupy standard economy seating.

    Earlier in the visit, Iberia had publicly celebrated its role as the host carrier, releasing official video footage of Pope Leo sitting in the cockpit of the jet during his flights between Madrid, Barcelona, and the Canary Islands. In the clips, the pontiff is seen smiling and waving to Spanish military escort pilots – a traditional honor provided by the host nation for visiting top dignitaries.

    During the week-long visit, Pope Leo prioritized advocacy on migration issues, delivering multiple sharp speeches calling out global indifference to the plight of migrants crossing dangerous Atlantic routes to reach the Canary Islands. He also made history by inaugurating the completed final tower of the Sagrada Familia, Antoni Gaudí’s unfinished architectural masterpiece that has been under construction for more than 140 years.

  • Israeli firm BlackCore meddled in US and Scottish elections, French watchdog says

    Israeli firm BlackCore meddled in US and Scottish elections, French watchdog says

    A growing international scandal over suspected cross-border digital election meddling has expanded after France’s national disinformation watchdog Viginum confirmed that an Israeli cyber company already accused of sabotaging French local elections is also suspected of interference efforts in elections in New York City and Scotland, global news agency Reuters reported.

    The accusations were laid out publicly during a Thursday press conference that included French Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu, where Viginum director Marc-Antoine Brillant stated that technical forensic investigations had pointed to Israeli cyber firm BlackCore as the actor behind the global influence operations. Brillant emphasized that the company’s pattern of covert meddling was not confined to France’s municipal election cycle.

    “This modus operandi was not limited to municipal elections in France,” Brillant told reporters. “It also appears to have been used to carry out foreign digital interference operations in other countries or regions, such as Angola, Togo, the elections in Scotland, and the 2025 municipal election in New York.”

    As it stands, however, French investigators have not been able to uncover who ultimately commissioned BlackCore to carry out the covert interference operations targeting French political candidates. Brillant acknowledged that ongoing probes have not yielded definitive answers about the identity of any hidden backers.

    “Our investigations did not make it possible to identify the sponsor or sponsors, if indeed they exist, behind this foreign digital interference,” he said.

    The first public allegations against BlackCore emerged last month, when French authorities tied the firm to a coordinated online smear campaign targeting three left-wing mayoral candidates from France Unbowed (LFI), a leftist party with explicit pro-Palestine positions. The covert interference campaign, first detected by Viginum in March, leveraged fake websites, inauthentic social media profiles, and targeted negative digital advertising to spread false criminal accusations—including claims of sexual assault—against candidates running in the cities of Marseille, Toulouse, and Roubaix.

    A subsequent joint investigation by French outlet *Libération* and Israeli newspaper Haaretz found digital traces of the operation on a server linked to BlackCore and two other Tel Aviv-based companies. Lecornu confirmed that the French government has formally requested that Israeli authorities provide explanations for BlackCore’s alleged activities and assist in identifying the hidden backers of the smear campaign.

    “I do not doubt for a single instant that if a French private group, from French soil moreover, had engaged in foreign digital interference in Israel, they would have done the same to its ambassador on site,” Lecornu added.

    Israel’s embassy in Paris has confirmed that French officials reached out regarding the case, noting that Israeli authorities are waiting to receive full details of the French investigation to launch their own internal inquiry.

    Notably, Brillant did not explicitly name the targets of the alleged interference in New York City’s 2025 election, which was won by Zohran Mamdani, a candidate well known for his public support of the Palestinian cause. Multiple relevant stakeholders, including Mamdani’s team, the New York Police Department, and the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, have not yet responded to Reuters’ requests for comment, while the Federal Bureau of Investigation declined to issue any statement on the matter.

    Viginum also confirmed that social media accounts linked to BlackCore targeted Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney, who has publicly labeled the humanitarian situation in Gaza a man-made catastrophe and warned that a genocide could be unfolding in the besieged territory.

    Before the allegations became public, BlackCore removed all of its public online presence following press inquiries. Prior to taking its website offline, the firm marketed itself as “an elite influence, cyber, and technology company built for the modern era of information warfare” that offered governments and political campaigns “cutting-edge strategies, advanced tools, and robust security to shape narratives.” BlackCore has not responded to multiple repeated requests for comment on the allegations from news organizations.

  • Clashes erupt in Congo’s capital as opposition rejects changes to presidential term limits

    Clashes erupt in Congo’s capital as opposition rejects changes to presidential term limits

    On Friday, the capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kinshasa, became the site of bloody street clashes as thousands of opposition demonstrators gathered to protest a controversial constitutional overhaul that opponents warn would allow sitting President Félix Tshisekedi to run for a third term in office. The protest was organized by the newly unified opposition coalition C64, also called Coalition Article 64, which brought together Congo’s once-fractured main opposition parties back in May specifically to block the proposed changes.

    The confrontation broke out outside the country’s Parliament building, where anti-reform protesters came face-to-face with supporters of the ruling administration. As violence escalated between the two groups, security forces moved in to disperse the crowd using tear gas. Among those wounded in the chaos was Martin Fayulu, a leading opposition figure and the runner-up in the 2018 presidential election. Footage posted to Fayulu’s official Facebook page showed the opposition leader with visible blood on his face and shirt collar, assisted away from the violence by his supporters.

    Tshisekedi, 62, first took office in 2019 and is currently serving his second five-year presidential term, which is scheduled to conclude in 2028. Under current Congolese law, the constitution explicitly prohibits any revision of presidential term limits, which currently cap a president’s tenure at two terms. However, a draft bill now under debate in the National Assembly, Congo’s lower legislative chamber, would create a legal loophole: it would permit changes to term limit provisions if a “major dysfunction” is declared to have paralyzed state institutions, a change that would ultimately be put to voters in a public referendum. Tshisekedi has publicly stated he would only pursue a third term if the change is approved by Congolese voters.

    Beyond the political crisis sparked by the proposed reforms, Congo is already grappling with multiple overlapping national crises. An ongoing Ebola outbreak has strained the country’s under-resourced public health system, while in eastern Congo, a decades-long internal conflict has intensified in recent years. The Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group is one of more than 100 armed factions fighting for territorial control in the region, displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians and fueling a major humanitarian emergency.

    Opposition leaders warn that the push to rewrite term limits represents a direct threat to Congo’s fragile democratic institutions and overall national stability. The C64 coalition has framed the proposed changes as a deliberate power grab by Tshisekedi to hold onto the presidency beyond his constitutionally mandated time in office, turning a planned peaceful protest into a violent confrontation that has escalated the country’s political tensions.

  • Trump accuses Iran of leaking agreement details that ‘bear no relation to the truth’

    Trump accuses Iran of leaking agreement details that ‘bear no relation to the truth’

    A sharp public rift has erupted over the contours of a potential Iran peace deal after leaked supposed terms circulated by Iranian media drew a blistering rejection from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who declared that good-faith negotiation with Tehran is impossible.
    The breakdown in public messaging comes weeks after a broad wave of U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets that launched the latest open conflict in February. Iran retaliated with attacks on Israeli positions and Gulf states aligned with Washington, and effectively shut down the Strait of Hormuz — the global economy’s critical chokepoint for oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. An April ceasefire paused large-scale hostilities, but intermittent tit-for-tat strikes have continued, including two back-to-back exchanges just this week.
    The chaos erupted just 24 hours after Trump’s own volatile shift in messaging: on Thursday, he first threatened new military strikes on Iran, then hours later announced he had called off the attacks because negotiators had reached a “great settlement” that would be signed imminently. Iranian officials quickly pushed back, calling any claims of a finished agreement pure speculation.
    On Friday, Iranian state media outlets published what they claimed were the finalized terms of the emerging agreement, laying out terms that aligned with longstanding public demands from Tehran. The leaked details included an immediate end to the U.S. naval blockade on Iran, the release of at least $300 billion in frozen Iranian assets to cover damage from the recent U.S. and Israeli strikes, and preconditions for full negotiations: half of all frozen assets must be unblocked, oil sanctions suspended, and the blockade lifted before formal talks on core issues begin. The leaked draft also calls for a final deal to be ratified by a United Nations Security Council resolution, with talks limited to enrichment activity, sanctions relief, and Iranian economic reconstruction. It also includes Tehran’s longstanding demand for an end to Israeli hostilities with Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon.
    Iran’s top diplomat Seyed Abbas Araghchi walked back the leak, however, acknowledging that a deal has never been closer but urging media to avoid unconfirmed speculation about the content of ongoing talks.
    U.S. officials quickly pushed back against every core element of the Iranian leak. A senior Trump administration official told the BBC that the U.S. vision for any agreement requires the full destruction and removal of Iranian nuclear material and the permanent dismantling of Iran’s enrichment program. No Iranian assets will be released, the official said, until Tehran meets all U.S. demands, reopens the Strait of Hormuz permanently, and commits to cutting off funding for proxy groups including Hezbollah across the Middle East. The nuclear dispute has spanned decades: Western nations have long accused Iran of pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, a charge Tehran consistently denies, saying its program is exclusively for peaceful energy and scientific research.
    U.S. Vice President JD Vance also issued a public correction Friday, noting “a couple of bizarre things” in the leaked reporting. “Iranians are not receiving any cash, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting,” Vance wrote in a post on X. He emphasized that the potential agreement is structured to prioritize U.S. and allied security concerns, with economic benefits only unlocked after Iran verifiably meets all its obligations.
    In his most blunt comments Friday, Trump rejected the leaked terms out of hand, saying the published details “bears no relation to the truth” and have “nothing to do with the terms that were agreed to” in private talks. “They were very dishonorable people to deal with,” Trump wrote of Iranian negotiators, urging Tehran to “get your act together, and FAST!” He added that there is “no such thing as dealing in good faith” when negotiating with the Islamic Republic.
    The indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran, which do not include Israeli negotiators, have been mediated primarily by Pakistan. The goal of the current discussions is to extend the fragile April ceasefire and set a framework for future negotiations on core contentious issues, including Iran’s nuclear program.

  • UK faces hard choices over military spending: analysts

    UK faces hard choices over military spending: analysts

    The recent high-profile resignations of two senior British defence officials have thrust long-simmering tensions over the United Kingdom’s military resourcing and future strategy into the global spotlight, leaving Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s new administration facing a series of unenviable decisions over the country’s defence priorities. Just days after former Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces Minister Al Carns stepped down in protest of the government’s upcoming, still-unreleased 10-year Defence Investment Plan (DIP), Starmer appointed Dan Jarvis, a veteran ex-Parachute Regiment officer with a decades-long record of security service, to take the helm of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on Thursday.

    At the core of the controversy is a projected £28 billion funding gap in the MoD budget between the present day and 2030, a deficit that has already eroded military readiness and forced difficult trade-offs between modernisation, infrastructure upgrades, and global operational capability. In his scathing resignation letter, Healey accused Starmer and the Treasury of failing to allocate the critical resources needed to protect UK national security amid a rapidly growing global threat environment, noting that promised additional defence funding had been “backloaded” to the final years of the 10-year plan. Fenella McGerty, a senior analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, explained that this funding structure creates a so-called “hockey-stick” growth trajectory, where nearly all spending increases do not take effect until the end of the decade, leaving the military underresourced for immediate readiness needs.

    Pressure to increase defence spending has also come from across the Atlantic, where former US President Donald Trump has repeatedly called on NATO allies to raise their own defence contributions and reduce reliance on US security support. Starmer has already made public pledges to incrementally raise UK defence spending: the target is set to reach 2.5% of GDP next year, rising to 3% by 2029 if the Labour Party wins the next general election, and hitting 3.5% by 2035. However, defence analysts argue even these increases will not be enough to fund a truly global military posture. “This would only cover operations very much focused on the mainland and the near vicinity of the UK,” explained Jamie Gaskarth, a senior research fellow at London-based think tank Chatham House.

    Nick Reynolds, a land warfare expert at the Royal United Services Institute, emphasized that the UK faces unavoidable hard choices about which military capabilities it can afford to maintain. Both the British Army and Royal Navy require extensive refurbishment of existing aging equipment, he noted, a process that will demand a significant budget increase even before any major modernization efforts can begin. Recent operational challenges have laid bare these resource gaps: when conflict erupted in the Middle East earlier this year following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, it took the Royal Navy several weeks to deploy just one single vessel to the region to reassure allied partners. Gaskarth attributed this delay to a long-running strategic shift toward maintaining fewer, more technologically advanced platforms, a trend that has left the UK with too few deployable assets to respond to multiple global crises simultaneously. “It actually means in a crisis you can no longer rely on the idea that you will have assets in place in different regions around the world,” he said.

    Beyond underfunding, the second major point of contention from the resigning ministers is the DIP’s perceived lack of innovation, particularly its failure to prioritize emerging technologies that have already proven decisive on the battlefield in Ukraine. Carns, who resigned shortly after Healey, publicly criticized the plan for being designed to “fight the last war rather than the next one”, arguing it failed to incorporate critical lessons from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. He called for increased investment in uncrewed systems, famously noting that “data is the new gunpowder” for modern warfare.

    Unnamed senior military sources quoted by The Times have echoed this criticism, arguing the unpublished plan overemphasizes expensive traditional hardware such as new warships, main battle tanks, and fighter jets at the expense of next-generation capabilities including AI-enabled command software, space and cyber defence tools, hypersonic weapons, and low-cost attack drones. Reynolds explained that drones offer a uniquely cost-effective lethal capability for modern militaries: “Drones are a cheap, highly precise artillery system and give a lot more range than traditional artillery. So it’s essential they are part of the force structure, because they can grant an affordable volume of lethal capability.” While the UK has already begun investing in drone technology, Gaskarth noted that it has not yet made the wholesale strategic shift needed, with current policy focused on domestic production rather than rapidly scaling capabilities through partnership with Ukrainian manufacturers. Gaskarth added that while senior policymakers, military leaders, and politicians all acknowledge that threats to the UK are growing and immediate, the pace of defence reform remains glacial.

    The long-delayed DIP is currently scheduled for publication ahead of the upcoming NATO summit set to take place in Turkey on July 7, Starmer has confirmed. In terms of identifying the UK’s most pressing security threats, analysts and officials broadly agree that Russia remains the most urgent immediate threat following Moscow’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, while China poses a growing long-term challenge to global security norms. Carns, in a post on social media following his resignation, argued that Britain has spent a decade shrinking its global influence at a time when major powers are rewriting the rules of global communications, energy, and trade. “Right now the rules on communications, energy and trade are being rewritten. By China. By Russia. By countries that take their own security seriously. We need to be at that table. That’s a choice we must make,” he wrote.

  • Discovery of €1.2m jewellery prompts fresh probe into former Spanish PM

    Discovery of €1.2m jewellery prompts fresh probe into former Spanish PM

    In an unprecedented development for modern Spanish politics, former Socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has been formally placed under investigation for tax fraud and smuggling, following the recovery of €1.2 million worth of luxury watches and jewelry from his office during a recent search linked to a separate corruption probe.

    Zapatero, who held the nation’s top office from 2004 to 2011 and remains a powerful, influential figure within the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) led by his close ally current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, was already under investigation for alleged influence peddling connected to the 2021 €53 million government bailout of struggling Spanish airline Plus Ultra. The bailout was approved as part of a national state fund created to support strategically important businesses impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic.

    As part of that ongoing influence peddling inquiry, Spanish National Police executed a raid on Zapatero’s private office last month. During the search, investigators uncovered a cache of high-end gold jewelry including necklaces, bracelets, rings and earrings studded with sapphires and emeralds, sourced from Zambia and Thailand according to Spanish media reports. The total estimated value of the seized items comes to roughly €1.2 million, equivalent to £1.02 million.

    Investigators have confirmed that their new probe centers on suspicions that Zapatero cannot provide valid documentation proving he paid required customs duties for the luxury goods. Close associates of the former prime minister have told reporters the collection of jewelry is inherited family property, and Zapatero’s official spokesperson Luis Arroyo has stated that the former leader “will provide full explanations before the judge” regarding the seized items. Zapatero has been formally summoned to give testimony before a court later this month.

    This new investigation marks a historic moment in recent Spanish politics: it is the first time any former Spanish prime minister has been subjected to a formal criminal probe. The development is also the latest in a string of damaging corruption scandals to hit the ruling PSOE. Last month, police also raided the party’s central Madrid headquarters, seizing a range of relevant documents, and carried out coordinated searches at the private residences of senior party officials and a prominent Spanish business leader. Multiple close associates of Sánchez, including the prime minister’s wife and brother, currently face separate corruption-related charges, all of which they have vigorously denied. Zapatero has also repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in the ongoing Plus Ultra influence peddling case, stating he never accepted any improper payments in exchange for intervening to secure the airline bailout.

  • Watch: Four UFO videos newly declassified by US government

    Watch: Four UFO videos newly declassified by US government

    In a fresh step toward greater transparency around unexplained aerial phenomena, the U.S. government has officially declassified and released four previously undisclosed UFO videos captured by eyewitnesses. The newly released footage, which has begun circulating publicly, documents a series of bright, circular glowing orbs moving across the sky above an undisclosed location in the northeastern region of the United States.

    This declassification follows a series of previous releases of unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) records by the U.S. government over recent years, as federal agencies have increasingly prioritized formal documentation and public disclosure of encounters that cannot be immediately explained by conventional aircraft, weather phenomena, or known man-made objects. The move comes amid ongoing work by congressional committees and Pentagon-led task forces mandated to investigate UAP sightings reported by military personnel and civilian observers across the country.

    While the origins of the glowing orbs captured in the footage remain unconfirmed, the release of these videos marks another data point for researchers and officials working to categorize and understand unexplained aerial encounters. Officials have not yet issued additional commentary on whether the objects observed in the new videos have been linked to any known natural or human activity, leaving open ongoing analysis of the sighting.

  • Migrant rights will be safeguarded at third-country return hubs, EU migration commissioner says

    Migrant rights will be safeguarded at third-country return hubs, EU migration commissioner says

    Amid ongoing implementation of the European Union’s landmark new migration and asylum pact, the bloc’s top migration official has reaffirmed that non-negotiable international human rights standards will govern any proposed asylum return hubs planned in non-EU countries, pushing back against widespread criticism from rights advocacy groups.

    Speaking at a press conference hosted during a gathering of EU migration ministers in Nicosia, Cyprus on Friday, EU Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner emphasized that every agreement establishing these processing centers for rejected asylum seekers will undergo independent review to guarantee full compliance with legal protections. Brunner confirmed that both the International Organization for Migration and the United Nations Refugee Agency will participate in the vetting process to audit the terms of any finalized deal, stressing that “Human rights standards and international law is non-negotiable.”

    The return hub framework, a central provision of the EU’s updated migration policy, has drawn significant skepticism from human rights organizations, which have raised urgent alarms that the facilities could devolve into overcrowded long-term detention centers, leaving failed asylum seekers trapped in prolonged legal limbo with no clear path forward. Critics have also warned that the pact’s streamlined assessment processes could cut off access to protection for legitimate asylum claimants.

    On the same day, Greece’s migration ministry confirmed that a coalition of five EU member states — Greece, Germany, Austria, Denmark, and the Netherlands — are currently in active negotiations with several African nations to host the hubs on their territory. Under the coalition’s current timeline, agreements with the unnamed third countries are expected to be finalized this year, with the facilities scheduled to become operational by 2027. When pressed to name the countries under consideration, Brunner deferred to the negotiating member states, noting that “We created the rules, we create the basis, but it’s up to the member state to negotiate agreements if they want to.”

    Cyprus, which currently holds the bloc’s rotating six-month presidency, will join the return hub negotiations once its term ends on July 1, according to Cypriot Deputy Minister for Migration Nicholas Ioannides. Ioannides pushed back against rights groups’ criticism of the new pact, arguing that the framework’s core goal is to prepare the bloc for future large-scale migration flows, similar to the 2015 refugee crisis that caught EU institutions off guard. “These groups disagree with the gist of this project, with the whole architecture,” Ioannides said, adding that implementing clear new rules is the EU’s top priority to avoid repeating past unpreparedness.

    Brunner defended the new migration pact, arguing that it delivers more effective, streamlined rules that target criminal people smuggling networks and irregular migration routes, while concentrating protection resources on claimants with legitimate humanitarian needs. He pointed to early data showing the bloc’s migration reforms are already delivering results: irregular arrivals along the Western Balkan route have plummeted 90% over the past three years, and crossings from Turkey to Greece’s Aegean islands dropped 67% in the first four months of this year compared to previous periods.

    In a separate development announced Friday, Cyprus has finalized a bilateral agreement with Lithuania to relocate migrants already granted international protection to the Baltic EU member state, a small but significant step to share migration responsibility across the bloc.

  • ‘Surrender or face full force’ of state, Nigerian president warns armed groups

    ‘Surrender or face full force’ of state, Nigerian president warns armed groups

    On Nigeria’s annual Democracy Day, a national holiday commemorating the 1999 transition back to civilian rule after decades of military dictatorship, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu delivered a stern national address that paired a tough ultimatum to domestic armed groups with major new announcements to boost the country’s struggling security apparatus.

    Tinubu opened his remarks by acknowledging that this year’s celebrations were overshadowed by a fresh wave of mass school abductions that have reignited public anxiety across the country. The West African nation has grappled with persistent insecurity for decades, with insurgent attacks, village raids, and ransom-fueled mass kidnappings concentrated largely in northern and central states – a crisis that has grown more acute in recent months. The president specifically referenced recent abductions of schoolchildren in Oyo and Borno states, noting that security forces remain optimistic about securing the safe release of all captives.

    “Democracy without security is not solid enough,” Tinubu told the nation, as he outlined a sweeping package of security investments. His administration is rolling out a recruitment drive for more than 50,000 new police officers, has approved thousands of additional military personnel, and has earmarked a record 5.41 trillion naira (equivalent to roughly $4 billion) for defense and security in the 2026 national budget.

    Defending his administration’s performance since he took office in May 2023, Tinubu claimed that Nigerian military forces have killed 13,000 people classified as terrorists over the past 12 months. He added that civilian fatalities linked to insurgent activity have dropped 81% compared to 2015 levels, and that more than 124,000 armed fighters and their family members have surrendered and disarmed under the government’s Operation Safe Corridor, a national reintegration program for former insurgents.

    These claims have been challenged by independent security analysts, who note that violent attacks continue to disrupt communities across multiple Nigerian states, and that insurgent activity is now spreading into previously stable southern regions of the country. The rising insecurity has coincided with a prolonged economic crisis that has left millions of ordinary Nigerians struggling to afford basic goods. Civil society organizations and labor unions have organized peaceful mass protests across major state capitals, calling for urgent government action to address both widespread insecurity and skyrocketing costs for food and transportation, driven by persistent high inflation. The groups have repeatedly raised alarms about the heavy toll of rising prices on low- and middle-income households.

    Tinubu defended the controversial economic reforms his administration has implemented since taking office, including the elimination of a long-standing national fuel subsidy and the deregulation of Nigeria’s foreign exchange market. He argued that these unpopular measures were necessary to stabilize the country’s public finances and rebuild confidence among international and domestic investors, steps he says will lay the groundwork for long-term economic growth.

    Beyond security and economic policy, the president used the 27th anniversary of civilian rule to pay tribute to the activists and national heroes who led the country’s pro-democracy movement. He gave special recognition to figures linked to the annulled June 1993 presidential election, widely believed to have been won by the late Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, whose victory was overturned by the military junta in power at the time, a turning point in Nigeria’s struggle for democratic governance.