分类: other

  • Cultural exchanges bring Shanghai and New York closer

    Cultural exchanges bring Shanghai and New York closer

    Two of the world’s most iconic waterfront metropolises, Shanghai sitting on the banks of the Huangpu River and New York along the Hudson, have renewed their cross-Pacific cultural connection through a landmark humanities dialogue that deepens mutual understanding between young people of China and the United States.

    On June 29, the core session of the third season of “Bund: A Global Urban Humanities Dialogue between Shanghai and New York” — titled “From Shanghai to New York: A Century-Long Cultural Journey Inspiring New China-US Dialogue” — took place at the China Institute of America in Manhattan, bringing together emerging scholars, artists and academic leaders from both nations to explore the intersections of technology, art and cross-cultural philosophy.

    The gathering builds on decades of people-to-people exchange between the two port cities, which share a foundational identity shaped by water and a shared ethos of openness and inclusiveness. Unlike formal high-level diplomatic talks, this dialogue centered on elevating youth engagement and bridging cultural divides through creative and intellectual collaboration, creating a dedicated space for younger generations to exchange ideas and advance cross-cultural mutual learning.

    Yu Yougen, education counselor at the Chinese Consulate General in New York, emphasized that the event represents far more than a cross-border academic exchange. “This is not only an academic dialogue across geographical boundaries, but also a cultural exchange that connects history with the future,” he said. Noting the decades of close, productive exchange between the two cities, Yu added that what travels across the Pacific Ocean between the Huangpu and Hudson extends far beyond exhibitions and discussions: it carries the shared desire of people from both countries to learn from one another.

    Yu Jin, president of the China Institute of America, framed the gathering as both a reflection on a century of people-to-people connection and a stepping stone for future collaboration. Founded in New York in 1926 by pioneering figures including Chinese scholar Hu Shih and leading American educators John Dewey and Paul Monroe, the China Institute is one of the oldest non-profit organizations in the U.S. focused on advancing U.S.-China understanding through cultural and educational programming. Yu Jin expressed hope that through deepened partnerships with East China Normal University and other collaborating institutions, the dialogue will help more young people develop cross-cultural awareness and build lasting connections across borders.

    Zhang Huihong, deputy chair of the University Council of East China Normal University, echoed that sentiment, noting that the two cities share far more than their status as leading global hubs. “Shanghai and New York are both cities shaped by water and recognized as international metropolises. Although they are thousands of miles apart, they share similar city spirits of openness and inclusiveness,” she said, adding that the event aims to unlock new opportunities for people-to-people exchange between the two nations through collaborative cultural creation and transoceanic dialogue.

    Complementing the core dialogue, a companion art exhibition will run at the China Institute gallery from July 9 to 30, featuring more than 100 works created by students and faculty from East China Normal University. The exhibition draws direct inspiration from Mei Lanfang’s historic 1930 tour of the United States, a landmark moment that introduced Chinese Peking Opera to American audiences and cemented its place as a foundational milestone in U.S.-China cultural exchange.

    Spanning prints, paintings, illustrations, animations and AI-generated works, the exhibition explores how contemporary creators can reimagine traditional Chinese art and intangible cultural heritage through modern design principles and emerging digital technologies. Wei Shaonong, a professor in the School of Design at East China Normal University, explained that the project encourages young creators to reconnect with their cultural roots while reinterpreting traditional motifs for contemporary audiences. “Traditional Chinese culture contains rich artistic elements, and we hope students can reinterpret them through today’s artistic language and creative approaches. In this process, they learn from tradition while exploring how traditional art can remain connected to contemporary life,” he said.

    Reflecting on Mei Lanfang’s enduring legacy, Wei noted that the legendary performer offered a timeless lesson for cross-cultural communication. Even though Peking Opera operated within a cultural context far removed from most 1930s American audiences, Mei’s tour was a resounding success because he grasped a core principle: when introducing art and culture to a new audience, creators must adapt their storytelling to resonate with shared understanding. “The great inspiration we gained from Mei Lanfang’s visit is that cultural communication requires translating not only language, but also the way stories are told and the cultural context behind them,” Wei added.

    The event also included the launch of “Collaborative Learning,” an in-person intercultural roundtable discussion initiated by Paul J. D’Ambrosio, a professor of Chinese philosophy at East China Normal University. D’Ambrosio emphasized that cultural exchange thrives through diverse, accessible forms of engagement beyond traditional academic scholarship. “As scholars, we should remember that cultural exchange happens through many different forms,” he said. “It can happen through films, music, entertainment and many other creative expressions. While academic research and focused discussions remain important, we also need to stay open to broader forms of communication.”

  • Weekly quiz: Who did Donald Trump anger after saying they begged for a photo with him?

    Weekly quiz: Who did Donald Trump anger after saying they begged for a photo with him?

    Over the past seven days, a range of notable events have unfolded across the globe, spanning international diplomacy, political scandal, and a viral act of grassroots accountability. In the international sphere, the United States and Iran have entered another week of ongoing negotiations aimed at forging peace and de-escalating long-running tensions between the two nations. Meanwhile, in Scottish politics, Peter Murrell, the former chief executive of the Scottish National Party (SNP), has received a prison sentence after being convicted of embezzling more than £400,000 in party funds. Halfway across the United Kingdom in Cardiff, a local resident made headlines after taking matters into his own hands: after reviewing CCTV footage to track down a person who illegally dumped seven bags of rubbish on his property, he personally delivered the waste right back to the perpetrator’s doorstep.

    Beyond these headline-grabbing stories, the world saw countless other developments over the past week, and this collection of events has been turned into an interactive quiz for readers to test how closely they have followed the week’s news. The quiz was compiled by journalist Ben Fell, who has put together this recurring feature to engage audiences and encourage them to revisit underreported stories from the past seven days. For readers eager to test their knowledge further, additional quizzes are available: those who enjoyed this week’s challenge can access last week’s quiz, or explore a range of older quizzes stored in the feature’s online archives. This week’s quiz also includes topical questions centered on high-profile figures and global events, including former U.S. President Donald Trump, the annual G7 summit of world leading economies, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

  • Key dates in the history of the Titanic and the battles over its final resting place

    Key dates in the history of the Titanic and the battles over its final resting place

    More than 114 years after the world’s most famous maritime disaster sent the RMS Titanic to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, the wreck and the artifacts pulled from its site remain at the center of a heated new legal battle, as the United States government moves to block a planned auction of dozens of salvaged items. The long, fraught history of the Titanic has been marked by tragedy, discovery, and decades of debate over how to honor the more than 1,500 lives lost, while balancing commercial and historical interests.

    The story of the Titanic began in early 1912, after two years of ambitious construction that billed the vessel as ‘unsinkable.’ On April 10 of that year, the ocean liner departed Southampton, England, making brief stops in France and Ireland before setting out across the Atlantic for New York City, carrying roughly 2,200 passengers and crew aboard. Just four days into the voyage, despite multiple repeated warnings of ice fields in the region, the Titanic struck an iceberg off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, shortly before midnight on April 14. Within hours, by the early morning of April 15, the once-unsinkable ship had fractured and slipped 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles) down to the ocean floor, leaving only around 700 survivors and claiming the lives of approximately 1,500 people.

    For more than seven decades, the exact location of the Titanic’s wreckage remained a mystery, until a joint team of French and American researchers finally located the vessel’s final resting place on September 1, 1985. Their discovery confirmed long-held speculation that the ship had split into two large pieces before sinking. The following year, in July 1986, a crew of researchers became the first people to directly observe the wreck since its sinking, using a manned submersible to complete 11 dives that captured thousands of photos and hours of video footage of the site, leaving all artifacts undisturbed. Just three months later, the U.S. government passed legislation to set formal guidelines for future expeditions and protect the wreck, but the law lacked the enforcement power to halt private salvage trips or the removal of artifacts from the site.

    The first artifacts were pulled from the wreck in 1987, when American firm Titanic Ventures partnered with a French research institute to recover passenger dishes and more than 1,800 total items in the months that followed. At the time, the group made a public promise not to sell the collection and to keep all recovered items intact as a single curated holdings. In May 1993, Titanic Ventures sold its salvage rights to RMS Titanic Inc., which launched a new expedition just one month later that pulled 800 additional artifacts from the wreck, ranging from personal passenger belongings like a pocket watch and leather suitcases to ship fixtures, decorative items, and unexpected finds including a complete set of bagpipes and original sheet music.

    Legal battles over control of the wreck and its artifacts began shortly after, when a U.S. federal court granted RMS Titanic Inc. exclusive salvage rights to the site in 1994, though the ruling stopped short of naming the company as the legal owner of the recovered items. Five years later, a federal appeals court further weakened the company’s exclusive claim, ruling it could not block other firms from visiting or photographing the wreck site. In 2000, the largest ever collection of Titanic artifacts opened to the public in Chicago, though the exhibition drew sharp criticism from multiple cultural institutions that argued retrieving artifacts from the wreck amounted to unethical archaeological plundering of a maritime grave site.

    A 2011 federal court ruling granted RMS Titanic Inc. formal ownership of more than 1,000 artifacts recovered between 1993 and 2004, with one critical binding condition: the entire collection had to remain intact, and no individual items could be sold separately. In 2017, the U.S. ratified an international treaty protecting the Titanic wreck, requiring any individual or organization under U.S. jurisdiction to secure formal approval from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) before conducting any salvage or research activity that would disturb the site.

    The modern chapter of the Titanic’s story opened with a second devastating tragedy in June 2023, when the experimental submersible Titan imploded during a descent to the wreck, killing all five people on board. One of the victims was Paul-Henri Nargeolet, a veteran French underwater explorer who served as director of underwater research for RMS Titanic Inc. Just two months after the implosion, the U.S. government launched legal action to block the company from a planned salvage expedition to retrieve additional historically significant items from the wreck, citing the 1986 federal law and the 2017 international protection treaty.

    In July 2024, RMS Titanic Inc. carried out its first expedition to the wreck site since 2010, focused on documenting the deteriorating wreck and surveying remaining artifacts, no salvage work was conducted. By January 2025, the U.S. government dropped its 2023 legal challenge, confirming the company no longer planned dives that would violate federal protections. The peace was short lived: in March 2026, RMS Titanic Inc. revealed in court filings a proposal to auction 100 separate lots of artifacts first pulled from the wreck in 1987, with plans for a global public tour of the items ahead of the sale. Details of the proposed auction remain sealed under a court order, but in June 2026, a judge ordered the documents unsealed, making public the fact that both the U.S. government and NOAA are formally opposing the proposed sale, reigniting a century-long debate over the future of the Titanic’s legacy.

  • David Briscoe, AP journalist who chronicled Philippines’ democratic revolution, dies at 82

    David Briscoe, AP journalist who chronicled Philippines’ democratic revolution, dies at 82

    Veteran Associated Press journalist David Briscoe, whose decades-long career was defined by his vivid on-the-ground coverage of the collapse of authoritarian rule and the birth of democracy in the Philippines during one of the nation’s most turbulent modern eras, has died at the age of 82. His wife, Leonor Briscoe, confirmed he passed away Sunday at an assisted living community in Kapolei, Hawaii, following an April diagnosis of amyloidosis, a progressive condition marked by dangerous protein buildup that damages vital organs.

    Over a career that stretched across five decades and multiple continents, Briscoe brought his signature relentless curiosity to assignments across his home state of Utah, the nation’s capital in Washington D.C., and Hawaii. But it was his posting as Manila bureau chief that placed him at the center of the most consequential story of his professional life.

    When Briscoe took the reins of the AP’s Manila bureau in 1980, he spent the next six years documenting the final declining years of Ferdinand Marcos’ brutal authoritarian regime, and the national chaos that erupted following the assassination of opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr. Briscoe and his reporting team crisscrossed the archipelago, traveling via chartered aircraft, rented jeeps, and on one notable occasion, a horse-drawn cart, to keep up with the fast-moving story. They covered a relentless string of corruption investigations, legislative hearings, and the unlikely 1986 presidential campaign that saw Aquino’s grieving widow, Corazon Aquino, pushed into the national spotlight to lead a grassroots democratic movement.

    The iconic finale of that movement, which saw Corazon Aquino sworn in as president and Marcos forced into sudden exile, remained etched in Briscoe’s memory for the rest of his life. He often recalled searing, unforgettable images from that period: “of nuns kneeling in front of military tanks” and “soldiers and civilians crying in each other’s arms.” Writing for AP World, the outlet’s in-house publication shortly after the revolution in 1986, Briscoe noted, “I expect to witness or cover no greater event in my life.”

    Born David Chesley Briscoe on July 30, 1943, in Salt Lake City, Utah, Briscoe grew up in a working-class household, where his father worked as a union steward and his mother as a homemaker, raising Briscoe and his brother in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He first discovered his passion for journalism while studying at the University of Utah, writing for the campus student newspaper before landing his first professional role at the Deseret News, where he cut his teeth writing obituaries and profiles of high-achieving local students.

    After two years at the Utah paper, Briscoe joined the Peace Corps and was assigned first to Paracale, then to Naga City in the Philippines, where he taught English. For a young man who had barely left his home state of Utah in his early life, every corner of the Philippines was a revelation: from water buffalo cooling off in muddy waterholes to children running along sunbaked dirt roads.

    Briscoe quickly fell in love with his adopted country, and bristled at the thought of leaving when his Peace Corps service came to an end. He took a job at a local Philippine newspaper, and while covering an event featuring a speech by Ferdinand Marcos, he met Leonor Aureus, an editor at a competing local outlet. The pair bonded over their shared love of journalism, and soon married, decorating their wedding aisle with copies of their respective papers, The Naga Times and the Bicol Mail.

    In 1970, Briscoe was hired by the AP’s Manila bureau, where he covered major breaking stories including a deadly earthquake that shook the capital, an assassination attempt on Pope Paul VI during a pastoral visit, and a commercial plane hijacking. By 1971, however, AP leadership ordered Briscoe to return to the United States to take up a domestic posting. He moved back to Salt Lake City, holding out hope that fate would one day bring him back to the Philippines he had come to love.

    During his time back in Utah, Briscoe found himself increasingly at odds with the Latter-day Saint Church that had shaped his upbringing. His wife recalled he faced church discipline after speaking out against the Church’s longstanding ban barring Black men from the priesthood during a discussion class he taught; Briscoe openly opposed the exclusion, which the Church eventually lifted years later. He also ran afoul of Church leadership after co-writing a three-part investigative series with colleague Bill Beecham that examined the Church’s extensive network of business holdings, estimating that annual revenue from member tithing alone exceeded $1 billion. No major Utah newspaper dared to publish the reporting, the pair later said.

    After nine years back in Salt Lake City, AP leadership offered Briscoe the chance to return to Manila as bureau chief. He immediately called his wife with the news, asking her, “Noree, are you sitting down?”

    After completing his six-year term leading the AP Manila bureau, Briscoe relocated to Washington D.C. in 1986, where he covered international affairs. He went on to serve as AP’s Honolulu bureau chief from 2001 until his retirement in 2009. In Hawaii, dressed in casual aloha shirts and soaking up the tropical sunshine, Briscoe often said he felt “halfway back” to the Philippines he cherished.

    Until his final days, Briscoe held his time covering the Philippines close to his heart. As his health declined in his final weeks, his family gathered at his side to pray. He squeezed his wife’s hand, told her he loved her, and asked her to let him pass peacefully.

    Per his family’s plans, a boat will carry Briscoe’s ashes out into the Pacific Ocean, where they will be scattered, with the hope that ocean currents will carry his remains back to the Philippines that became his adopted home. “The land that David learned to love,” his wife said, “and where he met the love of his life.”

  • Lao president visits China Academy of Space Technology

    Lao president visits China Academy of Space Technology

    For decades, China Daily Information Co (CDIC) has maintained clear intellectual property guidelines for all content hosted on its official digital platform. First established with copyright protection in 1994, the company retains full legal rights to every piece of content published on the site, covering a broad range of material from written articles and photographic work to interactive multimedia resources. Under CDIC’s intellectual property rules, no party is permitted to republish or reuse any content from the platform in any format without obtaining explicit, written advance authorization from the organization.

    Beyond its copyright policies, the website also provides practical guidance for visitors, recommending that users access the platform through browsers configured to a minimum resolution of 1024*768 for the optimal viewing experience. The site also holds the required official licensing for online multimedia publication, with a published license identifier 0108263 and official registration number 130349 on record.

    To help visitors engage more deeply with the organization, the platform lists a range of quick access links for core services and resources. These include a detailed informational page about China Daily, resources for brands and organizations interested in purchasing advertising space on the site, contact information for general inquiries, current open job vacancies for job seekers, and dedicated employment resources for expatriate workers looking for opportunities with the organization. Visitors are also invited to follow China Daily’s content across its social media channels to stay updated on the latest news and updates.

  • The Revolutionary War’s chief villain is being rehabilitated — just in time for America’s 250th

    The Revolutionary War’s chief villain is being rehabilitated — just in time for America’s 250th

    As the United States prepares to mark its 250th year of independence, a long-held popular portrayal of King George III – the man Americans were taught to see as a tyrannical, mad monarch who drove the colonies to revolution – is undergoing a long-overdue reassessment by historians and cultural institutions.

    For generations, American popular culture has cemented this one-note image of George III: the maniacal villain of the Broadway megahit *Hamilton*, the central figure of *The Madness of King George*, and the tyrant referenced in the classic educational song *No More Kings* who imposed unfair taxes without colonial consent. But new archival access and modern scholarship are upending this long-accepted narrative, revealing that the founding story’s iconic villain was far more complex than wartime propaganda depicted.

    Leading British historian Andrew Roberts, author of the 2021 biography *The Last King of America*, argues that the simplified caricature of George III grew from wartime misinformation, a pattern common to most conflicts. “Truth became the first casualty of the American War of Independence, as it is in most wars,” Roberts notes, pointing out that 25 of the 27 grievances against the king listed in the Declaration of Independence collapse under historical scrutiny. In his view, the American Revolution was not a reaction to fabricated tyranny of George III, but rather a reflection of colonists’ deep desire for political autonomy.

    Even in 1972, decades before this recent wave of reappraisal, then-Prince Charles (now King Charles III) pushed back against the pervasive narrative in a foreword to a George III biography. “If the average schoolchild remembers anything about history after leaving school, he will remember that George III was mad,” Charles wrote. “If he is American as well then madness is often given as a reason for the ‘irrational’ behavior of the King toward the Colonists, making it necessary for them to declare independence.” He closed with a hope that Americans would one day see the true king without centuries of bias.

    Historical context confirms that George III, who inherited the British throne in 1760 at just 22 years old, was a constitutional monarch operating within existing British political structures. As is still the case in the modern UK, all legislation and taxation were approved by Parliament, not imposed unilaterally by the crown. While George stood with Parliament as tensions escalated – from the 1765 Stamp Act to the 1773 Coercive Acts that responded to the Boston Tea Party – his role was largely ceremonial, bound by the will of elected lawmakers. When the first shots of the revolution rang out at Lexington and Concord in 1775, the conflict was as much a dispute between Parliament and colonial assemblies as it was a rejection of the monarchy itself.

    A major catalyst for this historical shift came in 2015, when Queen Elizabeth II oversaw the public release and digitization of 280,000 uncatalogued Georgian Papers from Windsor Castle’s archives. The complete record revealed a meticulous, engaged monarch who tracked everything from crop yields to parliamentary politics in detailed journals and notes, and offered new granular insight into his long-debated medical condition. The long-popular theory that George suffered from the genetic metabolic disorder porphyria has now been discredited; modern medical analysis of the new records points to Type 1 bipolar affective disorder, which only caused severe, extended manic episodes after 1788 – more than a decade after the Revolutionary War ended.

    That finding confirms a core claim of the reassessment: George III was not experiencing mental instability during the revolution, a point that cultural institutions across the U.S. are now highlighting as part of 250th anniversary programming. The Library of Congress’ major exhibit *The Two Georges* frames the revolution as a clash between two contemporary leaders – George III and George Washington – rather than a battle against a mad tyrant. Philadelphia’s Museum of the American Revolution opens its core exhibit by acknowledging that, in the 15 years before the revolution, many colonists held George III in such high regard that they widely referred to him as “the king of liberty” and displayed royal symbols on everyday household objects and public buildings.

    This new framing received a high-profile public validation in April 2024, when current King Charles III twice referenced his five-times great-grandfather George III during a visit to Washington D.C., marking the upcoming 250th anniversary. Speaking from the U.S. Congress rostrum, he lightheartedly endorsed the “Tale of Two Georges” exhibit theme, joking: “King George never set foot in America, and, please rest assured, I am not here as part of some cunning rear-guard action.” The assembled lawmakers reacted with no hostility, and Charles repeated the reference that evening during a White House state dinner, noting “As the direct descendant of King George III, I know this is a nation that never gives up.”

    Still, historian Roberts is skeptical that the traditional caricature will fade entirely from American popular memory. When asked if his scholarship had shifted broader public perception, he wrote via email: “Nothing will dislodge the Americans from their desire to see GIII as an evil dictator.”

  • Legacy of Himalaya’s ‘Sherlock Holmes’ lives on in digital

    Legacy of Himalaya’s ‘Sherlock Holmes’ lives on in digital

    Nestled in a bustling Kathmandu restaurant, thousands of meters below Nepal’s snow-capped Himalayan peaks, German climber Billi Bierling sits across from expeditions returning from high altitude, grilling them on the details of their summit bids. Every answer, every triumph and every disputed claim gets logged into the Himalayan Database, a 60-year-old authoritative record of Himalayan mountaineering that has become the gold standard for climbers, researchers, and historians worldwide.

    The archive traces its origins back to 1963, when American journalist Elizabeth Hawley traveled to Nepal to cover a US expedition to Mount Everest. Though Hawley herself never climbed a mountain and never once visited a Himalayan base camp, she became captivated by the people who pursued these high-altitude feats. She began conducting mandatory post-expedition interviews with every team that returned from the mountains, meticulously hand-writing every detail of their journey.

    Over five decades of relentless work, Hawley earned the nickname “the Sherlock Holmes of the mountaineering world” from Sir Edmund Hillary, who alongside Tenzing Norgay completed the first recorded ascent of Everest in 1953. By the time of her death in 2018, she had cemented her reputation as the most trusted voice on Himalayan climbing, and her growing archive had become the definitive record of every major expedition in the region. As Bierling, who inherited stewardship of the project from Hawley, tells it, Hawley applied the same rigorous fact-checking to everyone she interviewed, from climbing legends like Reinhold Messner (the first person to summit Everest solo) and Ueli Steck to casual climbers just starting out.

    Bierling first crossed paths with Hawley in 2001, when she traveled to Nepal to climb 7,129-meter Baruntse. She began assisting Hawley with the project in 2004, and took over full leadership after Hawley’s passing. Today, she leads a small team of volunteers that continues to expand and update the database at a time when Himalayan mountaineering is growing faster than ever before.

    The archive’s journey into the digital age began back in 1991, when American climber Richard Salisbury recognized the historical value and vulnerability of Hawley’s handwritten records, which filled 40 full file drawers. He proposed digitizing the entire collection, a painstaking process that took nearly 11 years to complete. Today, the archive exists as a fully searchable digital resource, accessible to climbers and researchers around the world.

    For the mountaineering community, the database’s authority is unmatched. “If it wasn’t recorded, it didn’t happen,” explains Garrett Madison, a veteran expedition organizer who has led teams in Nepal since the 2000s. For climbers chasing first ascents of unclimbed peaks, the resource is irreplaceable. Japanese climber Tatsuro Sugimoto, who recently completed the first ascent of 6,473-meter Jarkya, notes that the database lets climbers quickly verify which peaks have not yet been summited, eliminating redundant work for teams exploring new routes.

    As commercial mountaineering has boomed in recent decades, the work of maintaining the database has changed dramatically. Where Hawley once only had to interview a handful of teams each season, working from her blue Volkswagen Beetle at Kathmandu’s small airport, Nepal this spring issued a record 492 solo permits for Everest alone, with hundreds more climbers tackling other peaks across the Himalayas. Hundreds of climbers now attempt high-altitude summits every season, with many targeting multiple peaks in a single trip.

    Bierling says the sheer volume of expeditions makes it impossible to interview every single climber in person, a shift that has forced the team to adapt. “If we wanted to meet everybody in person, we’d need an army of 100 people,” she explains. “It’s all so quick. People come and go, they fly in, they fly out.” The team now supplements its interviews with official expedition permit data from Nepal’s Ministry of Tourism, and focuses its in-person reporting on groundbreaking ascents: first summits, new routes, and climbs that push the boundaries of what is thought possible on the world’s highest peaks.

    Even with these adaptations, the team still adheres to the core principles Hawley established decades ago. The team starts by trusting a climber’s account of their summit, only digging deeper to verify claims when questions arise. Volunteers cross-reference photos, check topographical details, and investigate conflicting reports from other climbers, and disputed claims are tagged clearly in the database. For Bierling, every disputed claim brings her back to the question that guides all her work: what would Elizabeth Hawley do in this situation? As the mountaineering world continues to change, Hawley’s legacy lives on, preserved for future generations in the digital archive she built.

  • Weekly quiz: Which tennis star dazzled the French Open with an ‘Eiffel Tower’ dress?

    Weekly quiz: Which tennis star dazzled the French Open with an ‘Eiffel Tower’ dress?

    The past seven days have brought a string of high-profile headlines across vastly different sectors, capturing public attention in fragmented waves. First, new developments in the widely discussed *Married At First Sight UK* controversy have emerged this week, with more behind-the-scenes details of the on-screen scandal coming into public view.

    In a separate, more serious political development, Peter Murrell, the former chief executive of the Scottish National Party (SNP), has pled guilty to embezzling more than £400,000 in funds from the party, a revelation that has sent ripples through Scottish political circles.

    Meanwhile, in Australia, a planned celebratory drone light display over Sydney’s iconic Darling Harbour went dramatically awry when nearly 90 of the participating unmanned aerial vehicles crashed into the water below, disrupting the event and leaving onlookers surprised.

    Against this backdrop of headline-grabbing events, compiled by quiz editor Ben Fell, this weekly current affairs quiz challenges readers to test how closely they have paid attention to all global developments from the past week, not just the top trending stories. For those eager to continue testing their knowledge, opportunities to try the previous week’s quiz or explore past quizzes from the outlet’s archives are also available.

  • Love birds: twice-extinct parakeet gets lifeline from randy pair

    Love birds: twice-extinct parakeet gets lifeline from randy pair

    Deep in New Zealand’s conservation efforts, a species once written off twice is staging a remarkable comeback, all thanks to one extraordinarily prolific pair of feathered parents. The orange-fronted parakeet, known locally as kakariki karaka, has bounced between extinction declarations and rediscovery for decades, holding the grim title of one of the world’s rarest parakeet species. Today, a viral pair of captive breeders have become unlikely saviors, pushing the species’ total population to a more stable 450 individuals scattered across protected sanctuaries, predator-free offshore islands, and small remote wild habitats.

    Nacho and Trixie, the power couple at the heart of this success story, were paired for the first time in early 2024 at the Isaac Conservation and Wildlife Trust based in Christchurch. In less than a full breeding cycle, the pair has produced an astonishing 55 chicks – with 33 of those hatching in 2024 alone. Even more remarkably, as the official breeding season draws to a close, Trixie shows no signs of slowing down, with a seventh clutch of new chicks currently under her care.

    Leigh Percasky, wildlife manager at the Isaac Conservation and Wildlife Trust, has showered praise on the hardworking pair, particularly highlighting Trixie’s relentless dedication as a “super-mum”. “Ideally we’d prefer her to stop so she can have a rest, but she shows no signs of that,” Percasky explained in an interview, adding that researchers and conservation staff are still stunned by the pair’s endless energy. Nacho, for his part, has also earned recognition for his consistent support: he takes on the full responsibility of foraging for food to sustain Trixie and their growing brood, a demanding full-time role through every stage of chick rearing.

    Captive breeding programs like this one form the backbone of New Zealand’s efforts to save endemic species lost to invasive predators, a longstanding threat to the country’s unique native birdlife. Wayne Beggs, who leads the orange-fronted parakeet recovery program for New Zealand’s Department of Conservation, explained that pairs like Nacho and Trixie are the backbone of the species’ survival. Wild populations of the parakeet remain extremely vulnerable to stoats, rats, and other introduced predators that have decimated New Zealand’s native bird populations over the past two centuries. Without captive breeding programs to build a safe backup population and supply individuals to reestablish new wild colonies on predator-free islands, the species would have no safety net against extinction.

    “Nacho and Trixie have made a massive contribution to the survival of their species,” Percasky noted. After their current clutch of chicks reaches independence, conservation planners are planning to give the tireless love birds a long, well-earned break from breeding duties to recover before the next cycle. For a species that has already been declared extinct twice, this surge in population from one dedicated pair offers a rare hopeful story for global conservation efforts.

  • Dang Van Phuoc, AP combat photographer who lost an eye in the Vietnam War, dies at 91

    Dang Van Phuoc, AP combat photographer who lost an eye in the Vietnam War, dies at 91

    Dang Van Phuoc, the fearless former Associated Press photographer who built a legendary career covering the Vietnam War through devastating personal injury and immense hardship, has passed away at the age of 91. He died suddenly Saturday at his home in Southern California, confirmed his nephew Van Nguyen.

    Phuoc’s life was marked by struggle from its earliest days. Born in 1935 in a small Vietnamese village near Quang Ngai, south of Da Nang, he was orphaned by his mid-teens: his father was killed by Viet Cong insurgents when Phuoc was around 10 years old, and his mother died a few years later, leaving him homeless with no support system.

    In his young adulthood, Phuoc volunteered to carry equipment at a Saigon film studio where his aunt worked as a cook. It was in this space that he first encountered a camera, teaching himself the fundamentals of photography through self-guided practice and on-the-job observation.

    In 1965, Horst Faas, AP’s then–photo chief, hired Phuoc to replace a local photojournalist who had been killed while on assignment. It did not take long for Phuoc to earn a distinctive reputation among fellow journalists and coalition troops: he had an almost preternatural ability to reach the center of active combat, putting him in position to capture raw, unflinching images of the war that other photographers could not access. Faas would later dub Phuoc the news agency’s “secret weapon” for his unmatched prowess in the field. Phuoc regularly walked alongside the lead point man on combat patrols, a choice that produced extraordinary photography but exposed him to constant mortal danger.

    Over his 10-year tenure covering the war for AP, Phuoc sustained at least five separate combat injuries. Just five months after he was hired, a grenade explosion sprayed shrapnel into his chest and leg, but he returned to frontline reporting within a few months to continue covering the protracted conflict between North Vietnam’s Communist forces and the U.S.-backed South Vietnamese military. In 1968, he suffered a concussion when a rocket fragment struck his head while he documented intense street fighting in Saigon. That same year, he braved continuous sniper fire to carry a wounded U.S. soldier to safety, earning a formal commendation from the Ninth U.S. Army Infantry Division for his act of courage.

    The most devastating injury came in 1969, when a grenade explosion during a patrol with a U.S. Ranger battalion south of Da Nang cost Phuoc his right eye. Undeterred, he relearned how to frame and shoot photographs with a single eye and returned to his post within months. In a 2011 interview for AP’s institutional archives, Phuoc opened up about the unique challenges of working with one eye: he had to balance peering through his camera viewfinder while also staying alert for silent hand signals from the soldiers accompanying him on patrol.

    Huỳnh Công “Nick” Út, Phuoc’s colleague in AP’s Saigon bureau and the Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer behind the iconic image of a burned Vietnamese girl fleeing a napalm attack, remembered Phuoc as both a fearless professional and a devoted friend. “He was fearless and resourceful in the field,” Út said. “Behind the scenes, he was a giving man and loyal friend who treated me like a brother. When I heard he had passed, I cried, ‘My brother, he’s gone.’ Everyone loved him so much.”

    Though Phuoc was celebrated for his gripping combat photography, he often said the images that mattered most to him were those that captured the suffering of civilian civilians trapped in the crossfire of war. In the 2011 interview, he framed his work as a quiet act of service, comparing himself to “a small grain of sand” who used his camera to amplify unheard stories of civilian hardship to a global audience.

    When Saigon fell to North Vietnamese forces in 1975, Phuoc fled Vietnam with his family, carrying only the clothes on their backs and a single bottle of milk for his child. After being stranded in a Guam refugee camp, AP reporter Linda Deutsch—who was covering the camp at the time—intervened to help the family resettle, and they were flown to the U.S. to process at Camp Pendleton in Southern California.

    Phuoc briefly returned to Asia to work for AP’s Hong Kong bureau before leaving the news organization and settling permanently in Southern California with his family. He built a second career as a professional portrait photographer in Orange County, home to Little Saigon, the largest community of Vietnamese refugees outside Vietnam.

    In retirement, Phuoc remained deeply engaged in his craft and his community. He was a founding member of The Artistic Photography Association, where he trained generations of young emerging photographers. He also served as a civilian volunteer for the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, and was named the county’s Volunteer of the Year in 1994.

    Kim Nguyen, Phuoc’s great-nephew, reflected on his legacy Tuesday, recalling the childhood portraits Phuoc took of him as an infant and a recent visit to a Vietnamese museum where he brought his own infant son to view Phuoc’s wartime work on public display.