分类: entertainment

  • Indian film union drops boycott call against Bollywood star Ranveer Singh

    Indian film union drops boycott call against Bollywood star Ranveer Singh

    A high-profile drama unfolding in India’s iconic Bollywood film industry has taken a new turn, with the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) reversing its earlier call for industry members to stop working with A-list actor Ranveer Singh, following his unexpected departure from the much-anticipated action sequel *Don 3* just weeks before a scheduled overseas production shoot.

    The union first rolled out the informal ban last month, after production team behind *Don 3* filed an official complaint alleging that Singh had walked away from the project unexpectedly. At the time of his exit, producers had already poured roughly 450 million Indian rupees (equivalent to $4.7 million USD) into pre-production work for the big-budget franchise installment.

    The reversal of the boycott came only after Singh reportedly submitted a formal legal notice to the film industry body, though the BBC has not independently obtained or verified a copy of this document. In public comments released this week, FWICE president BN Tiwari affirmed the union’s support for Singh, noting that the Indian film community stands behind the star and that the federation’s legal team will prepare an official response to the notice.

    FWICE chief adviser Ashoke Pandit clarified that the decision to lift the ban came after multiple leading industry organizations pushed for a de-escalation of the conflict. Pandit also extended an invitation to Singh for in-person talks to resolve the underlying dispute. “We celebrate his stardom… We don’t have any authority to ban anyone. We are hopeful that there will be a positive reaction from Ranveer,” Pandit told Indian broadcaster NDTV.

    To date, Singh has not issued any public statement addressing the *Don 3* conflict directly. His spokesperson previously released a brief comment noting that Singh holds the Indian film industry and the *Don* franchise in the “highest regard” and had chosen to refrain from public comment on the matter amid ongoing discussions.

    The *Don* franchise is one of Bollywood’s most valuable and long-running action intellectual properties. It first launched back in 1978, with Bollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan in the titular lead role. Filmmaker Farhan Akhtar, who is attached to direct *Don 3*, rebooted the franchise in the early 2000s with global superstar Shah Rukh Khan headlining the new installments. When *Don 3* was formally announced in 2023, Ranveer Singh was tapped as the new lead to carry the franchise forward into its next era.

    Singh is one of Bollywood’s biggest contemporary leading men, famous for his over-the-top public persona and a string of commercially successful critical hits including *Padmaavat* and *Gully Boy*. His most recent release, the two-part spy thriller *Dhurandhar*, ranks among the highest-grossing Indian films of recent years.

    This is not the first time FWICE has taken coordinated action against high-profile industry figures, though such moves remain rare. The organization has previously called for Indian artists to avoid working with Pakistani performers during periods of heightened cross-border tension, and in 2025 it issued a similar non-work directive against popular actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh after he appeared alongside Pakistani actor Hania Aamir in a Punj-language film.

    This current controversy is also not the first public pushback Singh has faced in his career. In 2025, he drew widespread criticism for mimicking a sacred cultural ritual sequence from the hit Kannada film *Kantara* during a public film festival appearance. Critics accused him of disrespecting the sequence’s cultural significance, and Singh ultimately issued a public apology to resolve the backlash.

  • Bayeux Tapestry to be moved in secret to British Museum: minister

    Bayeux Tapestry to be moved in secret to British Museum: minister

    One of Europe’s most iconic medieval cultural artifacts, the 11th-century Bayeux Tapestry that chronicles the 1066 Norman Conquest of England, is set to make a historic journey from its permanent home in the French town of Bayeux to London’s British Museum for a major exhibition opening this September. French Culture Minister Catherine Colonna confirmed the unprecedented loan in a Wednesday press conference in Paris, noting that the landmark arrangement was agreed by President Emmanuel Macron to strengthen ties between France and the United Kingdom.

    To safeguard the fragile 70-meter embroidery, which has already sustained more than 24,000 stains, 9,000 holes and 30 tears after nearly a thousand years of existence, every possible protective measure has been put in place. The exact travel date will remain undisclosed to the public for security reasons, and the artifact will be transported in a custom-built shock-absorbent container specifically engineered to minimize vibration and absorb harmful impacts. Officials revealed that experts completed a full trial run last month using a full-scale replica of the tapestry to test the logistics of the move, with a second round of testing carried out in April.

    A newly published culture ministry study of the April trial found that the specially designed crate can absorb up to 96 percent of force from any major impact encountered along the entire route. While Minister Colonna acknowledged that absolute zero risk can never be guaranteed for any cross-border movement of ancient art, she emphasized that this relocation has undergone more pre-transport testing, protocol development and risk assessment than any single artwork relocation in modern history. She compared the custom crate to a carefully prepared cradle for a newborn baby, rejecting recent suggestions from skeptical experts that the French cultural authorities have acted incompetently in approving the move as “particularly unfair.”

    After its exhibition run at the British Museum concludes, the Bayeux Tapestry will return to France in late 2027, at which point it will undergo a long-planned major restoration project that was delayed to accommodate the cross-Channel loan.

  • CBS News fires correspondent Scott Pelley from 60 Minutes

    CBS News fires correspondent Scott Pelley from 60 Minutes

    In a high-profile shakeup that has sent ripples through American media, veteran ’60 Minutes’ anchor Scott Pelley was terminated by CBS News on Tuesday evening, becoming the latest high-profile departure amid sweeping organizational changes pushed by new ownership and leadership. Pelley’s immediate termination for cause was outlined in a formal letter from new ’60 Minutes’ executive producer Nick Bilton, who accused the long-serving anchor of open hostility, refusal to collaborate, and a stated lack of investment in the program’s future under new management. Tensions between the two dated back to Bilton’s arrival at the helm of the iconic news magazine in late May, with Bilton claiming Pelley rejected an introductory dinner invitation and displayed consistent coldness from the outset. The conflict boiled over during a Monday staff meeting, where Bilton alleged Pelley hijacked the discussion to launch a public, uncivil attack on his credentials, leadership, and vision for the program. Bilton added that even after the heated exchange, Pelley refused to engage in productive dialogue to resolve their differences, making his antipathy toward the new direction of the show undeniable. In a separate internal memo to the full ’60 Minutes’ staff, Bilton emphasized he had made repeated attempts to open lines of communication with Pelley but was unable to reach any mutually acceptable middle ground, framing the termination as an unavoidable outcome after Pelley rejected efforts to find common ground. This latest staff shakeup is far from an isolated incident: organizational upheaval at CBS began months before Pelley’s ousting, tracing back to August 2025 when David Ellison, a close political ally of former U.S. President Donald Trump, completed his acquisition of Paramount Global, CBS’s parent company. Last week alone, three other key figures exited the program: Tanya Simon, Bilton’s predecessor as executive producer, and veteran ’60 Minutes’ correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega, all of whom were terminated. The sweeping changes are being spearheaded by Bari Weiss, who was installed as CBS News’ editor in chief immediately following Ellison’s takeover. According to media outlet Status, which first reported details of the Monday confrontation, Pelley publicly accused Weiss of destroying the legacy of ’60 Minutes’ during the staff meeting clash, claiming she lacked the professional qualifications to lead the iconic program. The BBC, which maintains a content-sharing partnership with CBS News while retaining full editorial independence, has reached out to both CBS and Pelley to request comment on the termination, with no official response from either party released as of yet. The series of abrupt terminations at one of America’s most respected and long-running news programs has sparked widespread discussion about the impact of new ownership and political alignment on editorial independence in mainstream U.S. media.

  • Rare albino buffalo named after Donald Trump for its golden locks draws crowds at Bangladesh zoo

    Rare albino buffalo named after Donald Trump for its golden locks draws crowds at Bangladesh zoo

    A rare albino buffalo with a striking tuft of golden-blond hair and a 1,500-pound frame has become the most unexpected viral sensation in Bangladesh, packing the Dhaka National Zoo with curious visitors nearly a week after the animal was relocated from a rural farm to the capital’s public facility.

    The unusual saga began when a local farmer noticed the buffalo’s pale coat and distinctive hairstyle bore an uncanny resemblance to the signature look of former U.S. President Donald Trump. The farmer shared a short clip of the horned mammal to social media, and the video spread like wildfire across regional platforms, drawing hundreds of sightseers to the small farm located on the outskirts of Dhaka in the days that followed.

    What makes the story even more surprising is the buffalo’s original fate: the animal had been purchased ahead of Eid al-Adha, the annual Muslim Festival of Sacrifice, and was marked for slaughter. Instead, Bangladesh’s Ministry of Home Affairs ordered the buffalo seized and transferred to the Dhaka zoo, citing growing public safety risks from the uncontrolled crowds gathering at the rural farm. Authorities issued a full refund to the buyer who had purchased the buffalo for the holiday ritual to finalize the transfer.

    Since the move, hundreds of visitors have continued to brave sweltering, humid Bangladeshi summer temperatures each day to catch a glimpse of the viral buffalo. On Tuesday, crowds pressed against the railings of the animal’s enclosure, many holding up smartphones to capture footage, with parents lifting small children onto their shoulders to get a clearer view of the attraction. Zoo staff have rolled out special pampering care for the new star: keepers regularly style its blond hair, spray it down with cool water, and set up fans nearby to help it beat the heat.

    Many visitors who traveled from across the country say the comparison to the former U.S. president is impossible to miss. “There is a clear resemblance to Donald Trump in its eyes, hairstyle, and skin color,” said Mohammed Nasim, a university student based in Dhaka. “And just as Donald Trump has a one-of-a-kind personality and lives a life that’s always in the spotlight, this buffalo, after going viral, is living a similar life now – it gets endless attention and special treatment that no other animal here gets.”

    Not everyone has welcomed the joke, however. Initially, the zoo posted a display sign next to the enclosure that openly labeled the buffalo “Donald Trump,” but that signage has since been removed. The zoo’s head curator was fired from their post the previous Saturday, with no official explanation released for the dismissal, a move widely linked to backlash over the naming.

    Critics argue that attaching the name of a prominent global political leader to a farm animal is a disrespectful misstep. “Giving a farm animal the name of one of the world’s most influential leaders was certainly the wrong thing to do,” said Mohammad Joynal Adedin, a Dhaka resident who still visited the zoo to see the buffalo despite his objection. “It seems disrespectful. I think the farmer who did this made a poor decision.”

    For many other visitors, though, the viral fame of the buffalo was reason enough to make the trip. “Since before Eid, I had been seeing posts on Facebook saying that ‘Donald Trump’ would be sacrificed. Later, I heard that instead of being slaughtered, it had been placed in the zoo,” said Mohammad Habibur Rahman, a traveler who made the trip to Dhaka from Jashore, a city in southwestern Bangladesh. “So, I thought I would come to the zoo and see ‘Donald Trump’ for myself.”

  • Turkey raps Kanye West for offending ‘spiritual sensitivities’

    Turkey raps Kanye West for offending ‘spiritual sensitivities’

    Controversial American rapper Kanye West has once again found himself at the center of global criticism, this time from Turkish officials who have publicly denounced his recent sold-out weekend performance in Istanbul, which drew nearly 120,000 attending fans. Unlike multiple European nations that have blocked West’s tour stops over well-documented antisemitic and pro-Nazi remarks, Turkey’s objections center on claims that the show included content that violates the country’s deeply held spiritual and cultural values.

    In an official statement posted to the social platform X, Oktay Saral, senior chief advisor to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, outlined the government’s concerns, noting that the performance featured rhetoric and symbolic imagery that directly clash with Turkey’s national faith and foundational civilizational principles. Saral highlighted one particularly alarming moment: the crowd of tens of thousands of concertgoers enthusiastically chanting lyrics from West’s 2013 track “I Am a God,” a moment he described as a serious issue requiring immediate and thorough review.

    Saral further argued that the Istanbul show was far more than a standard commercial music event, pointing to the participation of 82-year-old eccentric French designer Michele Lamy. Known for her signature gothic aesthetic, heavy kohl eye makeup, full-body tattoos, and ink-stained hands from her work as a designer, Lamy was framed by Saral as connected to occult practices and dark ideological symbols that run counter to Turkish cultural norms. Most concerning, Saral added, was what he framed as infiltration of this “cultural siege” into conservative segments of Turkish society. He called on Turkey’s Ministry of Tourism to implement much stricter scrutiny for future large-scale events that could impact the nation’s shared spiritual and cultural sensitivities.

    West’s 2024 planned tour has faced repeated cancellations and bans across Europe over his pattern of inflammatory, extremist remarks. In recent years, the rapper has sparked global outrage for comments glorifying Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler and repeated antisemitic rants, behavior he has repeatedly attributed to his well-documented diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Last year, West released a track titled “Heil Hitler” and sold swastika-branded T-shirts through his official website, triggering a widespread backlash that has derailed most of his European tour schedule this year.

    In April, United Kingdom border officials barred West from entering the country to headline a major music festival, forcing organizers to scrap the entire set. Just one week later, he postponed a planned performance in Marseille after reports emerged that France’s interior minister was moving to block the show. A Polish stadium canceled a scheduled June 19 performance, with the country’s culture minister stating Poland would refuse to host an artist who promotes Nazism. Italy followed suit weeks later, banning a planned July 18 concert over cited public safety concerns.

    In a bid to repair his reputation earlier this year, West published a full-page open advertisement in *The Wall Street Journal* in January, where he stated publicly: “I am not a Nazi or an antisemite” and “I love Jewish people.” He again framed his past harmful comments as the result of a manic episode connected to his bipolar disorder. Despite the string of cancellations, West still has several un-canceled European performances scheduled: two shows in the Netherlands set for June 6 and 8, a performance in the Albanian capital of Tirana on July 11, and a show in Prague scheduled for July 25.

  • Peabo Bryson, R&B singer behind Beauty and the Beast, dies aged 75

    Peabo Bryson, R&B singer behind Beauty and the Beast, dies aged 75

    The world of music and film is mourning the loss of iconic R&B singer Peabo Bryson, whose smooth, powerful vocals defined some of the most beloved Disney soundtracks in modern cinematic history. Bryson, best known for recording the Grammy-winning classics *Beauty and the Beast* and *A Whole New World*, passed away at the age of 75 on Tuesday evening.

    In a formal statement released to the public, Bryson’s family confirmed that he died peacefully while surrounded by close family and loved ones at his side. While no official cause of death has been made public, the singer suffered a major stroke over the weekend prior to his passing and had been receiving ongoing medical care following the health event.

    Bryson’s career spanned an extraordinary five decades in the entertainment industry, launching his first charting hits in the 1970s and continuing to produce beloved work well into the 2010s. Beyond his globally recognized Disney collaborations, he built a robust solo catalog of fan-favorite tracks that include *Feel the Fire*, *Reaching for the Sky*, *I’m So Into You*, *If Ever You’re In My Arms Again*, and *Can You Stop the Rain*. For generations of listeners, his work became the backdrop to life’s most meaningful moments, from romantic milestones to quiet moments of comfort.

    “For more than five decades, Peabo’s extraordinary voice served as the soundtrack to some of life’s most cherished moments,” his family shared in the statement. “His music carried generations through joyful celebrations, great love stories and enduring moments of comfort and inspiration, creating a legacy that will forever live in the hearts of those who loved him and the countless lives he touched through song.”

    Bryson’s most decorated professional achievements came from his iconic Disney collaborations, which earned him two Grammy Awards across 1992 and 1993. His 1992 duet of *Beauty and the Beast* with Celine Dion, recorded for the animated classic of the same name, took home the award for Best Pop Performance by a Group or Duo With Vocals. The following year, his duet *A Whole New World* with Regina Belle, created for Disney’s *Aladdin*, won the same Grammy category, along with the award for Song of the Year. Both tracks remain cultural touchstones that define the golden age of Disney animation for millions of fans worldwide.

    “While our hearts are broken, we find comfort in knowing how deeply Peabo was loved and how many lives were touched by his voice and his generous spirit,” the family added. “His legacy and music will live on for generations to come.”

    Just weeks before his passing, Bryson remained active in his career. In mid-May, he took the stage for a joint concert with fellow R&B star Jeffrey Osborne in Georgia, United States. He had also planned a series of performances later this year as part of his *Golden Touch Tour*, a celebration marking his 50 years working in the music industry. As recently as April, Bryson celebrated his 75th birthday with friends and family, sharing photos from the joyous gathering with his followers on social media.

  • Married at First Sight UK allegations ‘deeply disturbing’, says watchdog

    Married at First Sight UK allegations ‘deeply disturbing’, says watchdog

    The UK’s broadcast regulator Ofcom has described rape allegations against popular reality series *Married at First Sight UK* (MAFS UK) as deeply shocking and disturbing, launching an official regulatory review after an explosive investigative report exposed claims of sexual assault against multiple cast members. The controversy unfolded two weeks ago, when BBC’s *Panorama* aired an investigation bringing forward three separate allegations from female cast members: two women claimed they were raped during filming, while a third reported being subjected to a non-consensual sexual act. All men named in the allegations have denied any wrongdoing.

    Following the release of the investigation, a cross-party group of members of Parliament contacted both Channel 4, the network that airs MAFS UK, and Ofcom, demanding clear answers about how the allegations were handled ahead of broadcast. The House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee submitted a formal list of questions addressing the two bodies’ responses to the claims, putting increased pressure on regulators and network executives to account for cast welfare oversights.

    In an official response to MPs, Cristina Nicolotti Squires, Ofcom’s Group Director of Broadcast and Media, confirmed the watchdog takes the allegations extremely seriously. Squires noted that Ofcom has been in direct communication with Channel 4 leadership since *Panorama* first raised public concerns, and that the network has already commissioned an independent external review focused on contributor welfare protocols across the series. “We have asked Channel 4 to provide us with an advance copy, and we will urgently review the findings to determine whether any regulatory action is necessary,” Squires wrote in the official correspondence.

    When asked by MPs when Ofcom first received concerns about cast mistreatment on the series, Squires explained that individual complaints remain confidential during ongoing assessment. She did confirm that Ofcom has received viewer complaints about the series dating back to its debut season in 2015, noting that receiving a high volume of audience complaints about specific broadcast content is not uncommon for popular reality programming. Crucially, she added that after thorough review, none of the past viewer complaints raised substantive enough concerns to trigger a formal investigation prior to the *Panorama* report.

    Channel 4 CEO Priya Dogre also released a formal response to MPs’ questions, addressing lingering criticism over the network’s handling of the allegations ahead of broadcast. Dogre confirmed that Channel 4 was aware of some details related to the claims, but not the full scope of information exposed by *Panorama*, before the most recent relevant season went to air. She emphasized that all broadcast decisions were made based on the information available to network leaders at the time, and pushed back against claims the network dismissed the allegations out of hand. The network’s initial description of the claims as “wholly uncorroborated and disputed” was taken out of context by the BBC, Dogre argued, adding that MAFS UK operates under some of the most comprehensive and robust contributor welfare protocols in the UK reality TV industry.

    In the wake of the scandal, Channel 4 has pulled all episodes of the series from its on-demand streaming platform, and one of the show’s major commercial sponsors has already ended its partnership with the program. London’s Metropolitan Police has also issued a public call for any additional potential victims of sexual assault connected to the series to come forward to assist with any potential investigations.

    For context, MAFS UK is one of Channel 4’s most popular unscripted series, following single people who agree to marry a complete stranger during an on-camera mock wedding ceremony. While the unions are not legally binding, the series films contestants nearly every day as they go on a honeymoon, move in together, and navigate building a new relationship from scratch.

  • Legendary 130-year-old French wine restored after decades under Czech castle floor

    Legendary 130-year-old French wine restored after decades under Czech castle floor

    A remarkable piece of viticultural history has been brought back to life after more than a century of hiding: eight bottles of legendary 130-year-old Chateau d’Yquem Sauternes wine, which survived both World War II and decades of communist rule tucked beneath the floorboards of a Czech castle, have been carefully restored by the very Bordeaux winery that originally produced them.

    The bottles form part of a larger 136-bottle rare spirit collection unearthed in the 1980s at Becov nad Teplou Castle in western Czechia, and all the recovered bottles are set to go on public display once preparations are complete. The collection originally belonged to the noble Beaufort-Spontin family, who were forced to flee Czechoslovakia abruptly at the close of World War II over allegations of collaboration with Nazi occupying forces. In their haste to leave, they hid their valuable wine assortment beneath the floorboards of the castle’s chapel, right next to the revered Shrine of St Maurus, where it lay undisturbed for four decades.

    In 1985, communist secret police stumbled upon the hidden collection during a search. While the Shrine of St Maurus was immediately transported to Prague for extensive restoration work before returning to Becov for public display in 2002, the forgotten wine was left undisturbed in its original hiding spot. It was not until a routine inventory audit a decade later that the cache was rediscovered, prompting a meticulous, years-long rescue and restoration project led by Chateau d’Yquem, the iconic producer of some of the world’s most expensive and sought-after sweet white wine from Bordeaux’s Sauternes region.

    The eight bottles restored by the winery were produced in two vintages: 1892 and 1896. Working to verify and preserve the rare liquid, the winery’s team conducted careful sensory testing to confirm the wine’s authenticity. “We tasted a very small quantity to be sure that, aromatically and in terms of balance on the palate and overall perception, the wine corresponded to a Chateau d’Yquem of that age,” explained Toni El Khawand, cellar master at Chateau d’Yquem. Follow-up laboratory analysis confirmed the wine’s provenance, allowing the team to move forward with conservation work: original degraded corks were replaced, fresh protective capsules were fitted to the original glass, and in some bottles where significant oxidation had occurred, the wine was transferred to new containers. As a result of this necessary conservation, only five fully intact original bottles will return to Becov for display.

    El Khawand described tasting the well-preserved wine, which survived the decades-long burial thanks to its naturally high sugar content that acts as a preservative, as an extraordinary experience. “What we’re really doing when we open it is unveiling a time capsule. We pull out this cork that has sealed the liquid off from its surroundings and, in a way, from the passage of time,” he told reporters at the official presentation of the restored bottles.

    Against all expectations, the 130-year-old wine retained remarkable brightness and complexity. “The wine impressed us with its freshness on the palate. It is very, very fresh, with an almost acidic freshness,” El Khawand noted. He went on to detail the wine’s layered bouquet, highlighting notes of cedar, dried fruit, saffron, cinnamon and nutmeg, alongside age-characteristic Chateau d’Yquem notes of chocolate, coffee, mocha and oud.

    While recent vintages of Chateau d’Yquem already retail for hundreds of dollars per bottle, the Czech National Heritage Institute estimates the entire 136-bottle recovered collection would fetch roughly $5 million if put up for auction. El Khawand, however, emphasized that the wine’s value extends far beyond its market price. “First and foremost, it has moral and historical value,” he said. “It is a memory, ultimately — a liquid memory, to be sure — but it is a memory of all those who came before us, of the work that was done.”

    There are currently no plans to auction the collection. Instead, Becov Castle is preparing a public exhibition that will showcase all recovered bottles of wine and cognac, including other rare vintages such as an 1899 Pedro Ximenez sherry and an 1892 port. To fund the exhibition space and further restoration work, the castle has launched a public fundraising campaign. If enough funds are raised, collections manager Katerina Nyvltova says the team plans to conduct more in-depth analysis of the remaining wines and complete restoration of all salvageable bottles in the collection. “If we raise the money, we will definitely want to do a more thorough analysis of the wines. And if we can recondition the rest, we’ll definitely go for it,” she told AFP.

  • Steampunk festival creates an unlikely capital for Victorian style and sci-fi oddity in New Zealand

    Steampunk festival creates an unlikely capital for Victorian style and sci-fi oddity in New Zealand

    Nestled along the coast of New Zealand’s South Island, the quiet rural town of Ōamaru — population 14,000, plus a colony of 3,000 endangered native penguins — transforms every year into a bustling, fantastical parallel world where Victorian-era steam power meets imaginative science fiction, for one of the world’s most beloved steampunk festivals.

    This year marked the event’s 17th iteration, drawing thousands of enthusiasts from across New Zealand and around the globe to embrace the genre’s core ethos: the stranger, the better. For four days, the town’s perfectly preserved 19th-century Victorian harbor street becomes a playground for eccentric personas, handcrafted costumes, and one-of-a-kind creative traditions built around the steampunk movement.

    Unlike rigid historical reenactment, steampunk re-imagines the Victorian era, blending its signature aesthetics and steam-based mechanics with modern sci-fi creativity to build a world where the industrial revolution never ended and imagination sets the only limit. The movement also prioritizes do-it-yourself craft and sustainable upcycling: enthusiasts spend months honing sewing, metalworking, and hat-trimming skills to build custom outfits that match their invented alter egos.

    Many attendees lead ordinary lives as bricklayers, engineers, farmers, and artists the rest of the year, and many describe themselves as shy in daily life. But at the festival, they step into entirely new identities. For festival regular Juliet Thorn, who attends as the charismatic Lady Sarsaparilla Ovabyte alongside her partner Greg “Captain Bob McSpoon” Thorn, the experience is transformative. “The first time you dress up and go out in public is really scary and then people get such a buzz out of it,” she explained. “It’s so cool that you take on a different personality.”

    Over nearly two decades, the festival has spawned its own unique set of quirky sporting events and community traditions. Hundreds of attendees pack into historic community halls to compete in unconventional contests, from speed cookie-dunking (where the goal is to dunk, then eat a soggy cookie faster than any competitor) to theatrical parasol dueling, judged just as much on style as speed. One of the most popular events is teapot racing, created by local enthusiast Ross McKay, now known by his steampunk persona Captain Roscoe Dangerfield. In the contest, participants navigate remote-controlled vehicles fitted with teapots through a tricky obstacle course, much to the delight of cheering crowds. McKay, a retired banker and self-described history geek and sci-fi nerd, originally thought steampunk was just “a bunch of weirdos” when he first saw photos, but quickly fell in love with the community. He has since brought teapot racing to steampunk events around the world, joking that “it’s lots of fun and the judges will take bribes.”

    This small South Island town was an unlikely pick to become the self-proclaimed steampunk capital of the world. For decades, Ōamaru was little more than a rest stop for travelers driving between the larger cities of Christchurch and Dunedin, overshadowed by the dramatic Lord of the Rings-era film locations that draw tourists to nearby regions. What put Ōamaru on the global steampunk map is its architectural quirk: a fully intact Victorian-era commercial street built from pale local stone, a leftover from the 1800s when Ōamaru was a bustling export hub shipping New Zealand meat, wool, and grain to Britain. Today, those historic buildings serve as the perfect immersive backdrop for the festival, which coexists peacefully with the town’s separate, historically accurate Victorian celebration held later in the year.

    Unlike the rigid social hierarchies of the actual 19th century, steampunk rewrites Victorian social norms to create an inclusive, equal-opportunity community. “Women, unlike in Victorian times, can be anything,” explained Iain Clark, the festival’s co-founder, who goes by the steampunk name Agent Darling. “We have female engineers, captains of industry, captains of airships, adventurers, explorers, scientists.” There are no hard rules for costumes or personas: attendees regularly bring multiple outfits to swap over the four-day event, and no concept is too wild to turn heads. Over the course of the festival, a Star Wars stormtrooper might wander past a group of costumed “wolves,” while first-time attendees jump straight into the fun, no experience required.

    For long-time guests, the community’s radical acceptance and celebration of creativity is what keeps them coming back. “You can be creative and you can be somebody else and no one cares,” said John Syben, attending his fourth festival. His partner Chris Sinclair noted that the pair have grown bolder with their costumes every year, adding: “There’s always someone who’s more nuts than you.” For countless steampunks, the small New Zealand festival has become more than an event — it’s their tribe.

  • Bollywood divided over bid to cap punishing work hours

    Bollywood divided over bid to cap punishing work hours

    India’s iconic Hindi film industry, Bollywood, is currently roiled by a rare public debate over one of its most entrenched cultural norms: punishing, 12-to-18-hour daily shooting schedules that have been accepted as an unavoidable part of movie-making for generations. The conversation over implementing a mandatory 8-hour daily work cap has split top talent and industry leaders, pitting calls for humane work-life balance against practical concerns of big-budget production logistics.

    The debate first gained national traction last year, after leading A-list actress Deepika Padukone reportedly walked away from a major upcoming project over disputes around working hour limits, a request she raised after returning to work following motherhood. Padukone’s exit pushed the long-underreported issue of unregulated work conditions in Indian entertainment firmly into the public spotlight, opening the floodgates for widespread discussion across the industry.

    For decades, Bollywood has been synonymous with grueling production timelines: it is not uncommon for shooting shifts to stretch 12 to 18 hours a day, with intensive sequences sometimes requiring continuous work for more than 24 hours straight. What was once framed as a necessary sacrifice for cinematic success is now facing growing scrutiny, as an increasing number of industry professionals demand standardized, humane working conditions that protect cast and crew alike.

    Advocates for the 8-hour cap argue that the existing unregulated system places disproportionate strain on women in the industry. Women who push for shorter work hours are often labeled uncooperative or difficult, a social stigma that is almost never attached to male stars who set similar boundaries. A slate of high-profile names have publicly backed the push for clearer work-hour boundaries, including actors Suniel Shetty, Kajol, and Ram Kapoor. Kapoor notes that once artists achieve industry success, they gain the bargaining power to set their own working limits — a comment that underscores a key reality: negotiating power for better work conditions remains deeply tied to an artist’s name recognition and status in Bollywood.

    However, opponents of a rigid 8-hour mandate argue that fixed limits are unworkable for large-scale, big-budget productions, given the unpredictable nature of filmmaking. “This is not like a corporate job,” explained actor Ali Fazal, pointing out that different projects have wildly varying demands, especially action-heavy or technically complex shoots. Actress Chitrangda Singh echoed this perspective, noting that unforeseen disruptions from bad weather to unexpected equipment failures routinely derail even the most carefully planned schedules, forcing productions to extend shifts to hit deadlines. Singh added that filmmaking is ultimately shaped by unforgiving business realities that cannot be ignored when crafting industry rules.

    Industry insiders elaborate on these economic pressures: large-scale productions can accrue daily costs exceeding $26,000 just for location rentals, crew wages, and equipment, creating enormous pressure to maximize every minute of shooting time. Amit Behl, a former official with the Cine & TV Artistes’ Association, highlighted the example of hit action blockbuster *Animal*, whose location rental alone cost 25 lakh rupees (roughly $26,300) per day. On top of that base cost, productions face additional expenses for supporting cast, catering, power, star accommodation, and on-site security, leaving little room for unplanned downtime. Behl added that filmmakers simply cannot afford to halt mid-sequence when large crews or elaborate action set pieces are already assembled.

    Critics of the status quo push back, arguing that these cost concerns often serve as a cover for systemic inefficiency and poor production planning, shifting the entire burden of disorganization onto the backs of lower-paid cast and crew. Acclaimed filmmaker Shekhar Kapur has criticized Bollywood’s hierarchical structure, which often prioritizes convenient scheduling for top-billed actors while ignoring the needs of low-wage technicians and supporting crew. Kapur insists that work-hour protections should extend to every person on a set, not just A-list stars. “Everyone should have the privilege to define the hours they want to work,” he told AFP.

    The ongoing debate has also drawn attention to deep inequities within Bollywood: while established stars have the clout to negotiate for shorter hours, junior artists, entry-level technicians, and daily-wage crew members have almost no bargaining power to push for better conditions, leaving them stuck in grueling schedules with no recourse.

    Many industry observers frame the current split as a sign of a broader generational shift in Bollywood, where both rising young professionals and established senior stars are beginning to push back against outdated norms that prioritized output over worker well-being. Still, opinions on a mandatory 8-hour cap remain deeply divided.

    Behl pointed to the example of Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan, who has been known to work 27 hours straight to complete a key sequence, even though his fame and fortune mean he is not required to do so. “You can’t leave a scene mid-way… if it is an action scene where fighters are involved, anything can happen… it is not like shutting a laptop and working for an IT company,” he explained.

    Veteran star Madhuri Dixit framed the issue as a matter of personal choice rather than a systemic problem that requires regulation. Speaking of her 2025 crime thriller *Mrs Deshpande*, Dixit noted the cast worked 12-hour or longer shifts daily, but added “if a woman wants to work fewer hours, that is her prerogative, her life… more power to her. To each his own, I’m a workaholic!”