作者: admin

  • British leader expected to impose teen social media ban that goes further than Australia’s

    British leader expected to impose teen social media ban that goes further than Australia’s

    LONDON – On Monday, United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer is scheduled to announce a far-reaching ban on social media use for children under the age of 16, a policy crafted to shield young people from toxic online content and reduce the public health risks linked to excessive screen time. The planned regulatory move positions Britain as the latest country in a rapidly expanding global coalition working to strengthen online safety protections for minors, with multiple nations already rolling out or developing similar age-based access restrictions.

    The initiative comes at a tense moment for Starmer, who has faced growing internal criticism from members of his own party, with many calling for his resignation over what they characterize as ineffective leadership. Framing the upcoming policy as a “world-leading” intervention to protect children, Starmer noted it will go further than Australia’s existing under-16 social media ban to limit underage access to major platforms.

    Across the world, the push for stricter youth online safeguards has gained consistent momentum in recent years. Australia, Canada, Brazil and Indonesia have already enacted formal legislation or introduced binding age-based restrictions for social media access, while France, Spain, Denmark, Thailand and South Korea are currently in the process of researching or drafting their own parallel regulatory frameworks.

    In a pre-announcement statement released Sunday, Starmer framed the policy as a defining moral choice for the government. “How we keep kids safe online is one of the biggest debates of our time,” he said. “This is a choice about whose side we’re on: families across the country, or a status quo that isn’t working.”

    According to reporting from The Sunday Times, the under-16 ban will apply to all of the world’s largest social media platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, Snapchat, Threads, Twitch, Kick and Reddit. Beyond the core under-16 ban, the paper also reported additional planned restrictions: new rules for chatbot tools, limits on social media-style features integrated into popular gaming apps, and a targeted late-night curfew to stop older teenagers from scrolling social media during overnight hours.

    The upcoming announcement is the culmination of a months-long public consultation process that drew an extraordinary 116,000 responses from parents, tech industry stakeholders, and children and young people themselves. This level of public engagement ranks second only to the 2012 public consultation on equal marriage in the UK, reflecting the intense public interest in the issue of youth online safety. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy confirmed that an overwhelming majority of respondents, including young people, supported implementing an under-16 ban. Nandy emphasized that the ban will be paired with additional complementary safeguards, rather than standing as a standalone solution. “I don’t think banning social media on its own is the silver bullet solution, but I do think Australia has shown very clearly that it has a significant role to play,” Nandy told the BBC on Sunday.

    The new regulations have already sparked diplomatic tension with the United States. In a public statement, the U.S. Embassy in London warned that overly broad UK regulations could violate international free speech commitments, and expressed concern that the new rules would impose disproportionate regulatory costs on major U.S.-based technology companies.

    Not all experts have backed the planned ban, however. Jon Crowcroft, a professor of communications systems at the University of Cambridge, argued that while proponents of the ban act with good intentions, the policy is likely to backfire. He noted that overly broad access restrictions could cut off young people from legitimate, beneficial online resources, and carry a real risk of pushing underage users onto unregulated, less safe platforms that operate outside mainstream oversight. “There is a real risk this will drive some users to worse sites and policing devices is close to impossible technically,” Crowcroft said. “Policing platforms is far easier, if only regulators would bother.”

  • Trump heads to G7 summit with wind at his back after announcing agreement aimed at ending Iran war

    Trump heads to G7 summit with wind at his back after announcing agreement aimed at ending Iran war

    In the hours ahead of his departure for the annual Group of Seven summit in the French Alpine resort of Evian-les-Bains, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a landmark tentative agreement that he says will bring an end to the 15-week U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran – a deal that reshapes the dynamics of this year’s gathering of world leaders even as it draws immediate skepticism from political opponents and key U.S. allies alike.

    For days, both Trump’s team and Iranian officials signaled steady progress toward a negotiated ceasefire. But the road to the announcement remained rocky as recently as Sunday, when fresh cross-border strikes erupted between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah militants along the Lebanese border. Key details of the agreement remain tightly held: neither the White House nor Iranian authorities have released the full text of the deal, and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi clarified Sunday that Tehran will continue its closure of the Strait of Hormuz until the agreement is formally signed. Pakistan, which served as the primary mediator for the indirect negotiations, confirmed that preliminary pre-implementation talks will kick off this week, setting the stage for 60 days of technical negotiations focused on Iran’s nuclear program.

    The last-minute deal hands Trump a key political win as he sits down with G7 leaders, many of whom have openly criticized his handling of the conflict that sent global energy prices soaring over the past three months. Polls show a majority of American voters disapprove of Trump’s management of the war, and Republican lawmakers have openly worried about the damage it could do to the party’s prospects in the upcoming November midterm elections. Friction has already been simmering for months between Trump and the four leading European G7 members – French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – over Trump’s decision to launch the conflict without consulting NATO allies. In turn, Trump has pushed back against the leaders, accusing them of failing to offer sufficient U.S. backing during the conflict. The tentative deal is expected to shift the tone of this week’s talks, with demining the Strait of Hormuz already set as a top agenda item. Roughly 20% of the world’s global crude oil supplies pass through the strategic waterway, and mining fears have brought nearly all commercial tanker traffic to a halt since the conflict began. Both Britain and France have already signaled they are willing to assist with clearing operations once a ceasefire takes effect, a step seen as critical to restoring global shipping confidence and easing energy market volatility.

    Macron, this year’s G7 host, has structured the summit to center heavily on the Middle East following the deal announcement. He extended invitations to the leaders of Egypt, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates – three non-G7 nations with deep stakes in the region – for a dedicated Tuesday session focused on the implications of the new agreement. In a Sunday social media video, Macron outlined the session’s goals: assessing the agreement’s impact, extending support to Lebanon, planning for the long-term reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and advancing negotiations toward a final deal on Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

    A core point of controversy already emerging around the deal centers on its lack of transparency, particularly regarding nuclear safeguards and proposed economic incentives for Tehran. Trump famously pulled the U.S. out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the multilateral nuclear agreement negotiated by former President Barack Obama, arguing that the deal failed to block Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon and funneled billions of dollars in sanctions relief to the Islamic Republic. But Trump has yet to release key details of his new framework, including who will verify Iranian compliance, and how the deal will address the 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium buried at nuclear sites damaged by U.S. strikes last summer. Senior White House officials have confirmed the deal includes sanctions relief and economic incentives for Iran tied to compliance benchmarks, echoing the core structure of the Obama-era deal Trump once condemned.

    Critics from both parties have already seized on the lack of transparency. Senate Intelligence Committee top Democrat Mark Warner noted Sunday on CBS’ *Face the Nation* that Trump’s unilateral framework lacks the multilateral oversight and allied buy-in that defined the JCPOA. “For all his critique of JCPOA, we had international observers, we actually had an alliance there that included the Europeans, and Russia and China were all signatories,” Warner said. “Now it is America going alone or going with Israel only, and that does not make us safer.” Even prominent Trump ally and Iran hawk Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham has voiced skepticism, noting that key discrepancies already exist between U.S. and Iranian descriptions of the agreement. Graham added that any final nuclear deal with Iran requires congressional review and approval, and said he expects Vice President JD Vance, described by Graham as “the architect of the deal,” to present the full framework to lawmakers soon.

    Beyond Iran, the G7 summit will also address the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, which has been largely overshadowed by the 15-week Iran conflict. Macron invited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend a working session on the war Tuesday, though no one-on-one meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump is currently scheduled. On Sunday, a day before the summit kicked off, Trump held separate phone calls with both Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters the call with Putin lasted nearly an hour, with Trump emphasizing his commitment to ending hostilities and stating he would push European allies and Kyiv toward a negotiated settlement during his G7 appearances. Ushakov also noted Trump told Putin recent strikes on Russian civilian targets have complicated peace efforts. The White House has not issued any comment on the call, and Ushakov added that Trump envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner are expected to travel to Russia for follow-up talks in the near future. In a Telegram statement, Zelenskyy said he updated Trump on recent improvements to Ukraine’s defensive positions along the eastern front, and the two agreed to hold further discussions in person during the summit. The two last met in December at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Since returning to the White House, Trump’s focus on delivering a quick end to the war in Ukraine – a core promise of his 2024 presidential campaign – has been sidelined by the outbreak of the conflict with Iran and the subsequent global energy disruptions.

  • Mexican man apologises for making racist gesture at World Cup

    Mexican man apologises for making racist gesture at World Cup

    An international incident sparked widespread public outrage after a Mexican man made a widely recognized anti-Asian racist gesture during a World Cup match between South Korea and the Czech Republic, held in Guadalajara, Mexico last Thursday. The perpetrator, Ulises Fernando Bernal Miramontes, who served as president of the College of Geomatics and Topographic Surveying Engineers of Jalisco (CITGEJ), has since issued a public apology and been removed from his leadership position over the offensive act. The incident was captured by popular South Korean content creator Yoon Su-jin, better known online by her alias Ino Cat, who boasts 6.6 million YouTube subscribers and more than 2 million TikTok followers. Yoon posted the clip to her Instagram, documenting the moment Bernal, seated directly behind her in the stadium stands, pulled the corners of his eyes into a slanted shape — a gesture long understood as a demeaning, racist mockery of East Asian people — before laughing at the action. In her caption accompanying the viral video, Yoon wrote: “You traveled across the world for the World Cup… and experienced racism…” The clip quickly spread across major social media platforms, amassing more than 65,000 comments and at least 120,000 shares or reposts within days. The overwhelming majority of reactions condemned Bernal’s behavior, with many commenters expressing disgust at the casual, unapologetic racism on display. One widely liked comment read: “Ugh so terrible. And then he laughs like he cracked the best joke.” Notably, dozens of commenters identifying themselves as Mexican also issued collective apologies on behalf of their compatriot, stressing that Bernal’s offensive actions do not represent the views or behavior of the broader Mexican population. In the wake of the viral backlash, leadership of CITGEJ confirmed to the New York Post that Bernal had been removed from his post as organization president. Two days after the incident, on Sunday, Bernal released a formal public apology addressing the widespread circulation of the clip and the heated public reaction it sparked. “For that reason, I believe it is important to offer a public apology,” he wrote in the statement. “I sincerely regret everything this situation has caused. I have taken time to reflect on what happened and I understand the responsibility I have in this moment.” Bernal declined to attempt to justify his action or debate varying interpretations of the gesture, adding: “Throughout my personal and professional life, I have always tried to treat others with respect, and I will continue working to ensure that my actions consistently reflect those values.” The match itself ended with South Korea staging a second-half comeback to secure a 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic.

  • Trump heralds Iran deal but questions – and risks – remain

    Trump heralds Iran deal but questions – and risks – remain

    A surprise breakthrough in diplomatic talks between the United States and Iran that will end open hostilities between the two nations has landed as a politically timely birthday gift for former and current US President Donald Trump – one that comes wrapped in significant layers of uncertainty, multiple senior sources and official statements confirm.

    In a social media post announcing the tentative agreement over the weekend, Trump confirmed the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of the world’s daily oil supply, will reopen to unimpeded commercial shipping, and the US will end its naval blockade of Iranian export routes. “Let the oil flow!” Trump wrote in the post Sunday.

    The president went on to frame the agreement as a historic win, contrasting it with what he cast as failed diplomatic efforts by his predecessors. He claimed the deal would deliver lasting “peace and security to the whole region” – sweeping rhetoric that mirrors past declarations from Trump, including his 2025 claim that a ceasefire deal ending the Gaza War would bring “a peace for all eternity.” That agreement has yet to deliver on its most ambitious promises, with stability remaining elusive in the region more than a year on.

    As with all high-stakes international diplomatic accords, the success or failure of the US-Iran deal will ultimately come down to fine print – and right now, that fine print is largely missing.

    US Vice President JD Vance told Fox News in a Sunday evening interview that a permanent ban on Iran developing a nuclear weapon is a core component of the agreement, and that Washington has secured robust mechanisms to verify Iranian compliance. But critical questions remain unanswered: what specific limits will be placed on uranium enrichment activities, and how will the deal address Iran’s existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium?

    A 60-day extension of the current ceasefire has been agreed to allow for further technical negotiations and to resolve outstanding details. But after decades of international efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions through both negotiation and pressure, no final outcome can be guaranteed, even within the framework of the newly announced memorandum of understanding.

    Iran’s Supreme National Security Council underscored this ambiguity in a Sunday statement, noting that “final negotiations will be postponed until after the implementation of the other party’s commitments under the memorandum.” The exact text of those commitments, and how Iran chooses to interpret them, will be a core determinant of whether the deal holds long-term.

    Energy market analysts caution that even with the deal in place, full pre-conflict shipping volumes through the Strait of Hormuz will not rebound overnight. Clearing a massive backlog of stranded tankers, removing naval mines laid during the conflict, and restoring regular oil production and export infrastructure will take weeks of coordinated work.

    With the official signing ceremony still several days away, both sides have time to resolve sticking points – but that window also leaves room for the agreement to collapse entirely. One major wildcard that could derail the deal is Israel, which has been a key actor in the recent regional conflict.

    Speaking to the Wall Street Journal on Sunday, Trump said he was furious with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over newly ordered Israeli strikes in Lebanon that the US president believes nearly killed the nearly finalized Iran deal. While the agreement survived to be announced, any new large-scale Israeli military operations in Lebanon could push Iran to reclose the Strait of Hormuz, putting new pressure on the global economy and sinking the accord.

    Vance acknowledged Sunday that the months-long conflict has already hit American households hard, driving up energy prices and creating broader economic ripple effects across the country. “My primary message to the American people is thank you,” he said, promising that energy costs will begin to fall in the coming weeks.

    How quickly energy prices decline, and how fast those savings translate to lower overall consumer costs for households already struggling with financial strain, will play a major role in determining whether political pressure on Trump’s Republican Party eases ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections. Recent polling shows growing public discontent with the administration’s economic performance: a YouGov survey released last week found 63% of Americans disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy, with 57% saying they believe economic conditions are worsening.

    Even if the deal’s larger strategic goals remain unfulfilled for now, Sunday’s announcement is expected to ease at least some of the economic strain caused by the conflict. If gasoline prices begin to fall substantially, that will give voters a tangible signal of improvement ahead of the midterms.

    The agreement marks a notable step back toward the regional stability that existed before the outbreak of the US-Iran war, even as Trump’s core policy goals remain unmet and he continues to face significant political risk at home.

  • Why Delhi feels hotter than what temperatures show

    Why Delhi feels hotter than what temperatures show

    For weeks, New Delhi, India’s bustling capital, has been trapped in the grip of an unrelenting severe heatwave, with official daily air temperatures regularly climbing past the 40-degree Celsius mark. Weather forecasts routinely note that “real feel” temperatures run even higher, but a new on-the-ground investigation by Greenpeace India has laid bare just how stark the gap between official readings and the dangerous heat experienced by street-side workers and low-income residents actually is.

    On the Tuesday the survey was conducted, the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) logged an official maximum air temperature of 43.5C across the capital. But when Greenpeace researchers deployed a high-resolution thermal camera to measure surface temperatures across crowded streetscapes, the readings told a far more alarming story: in sun-exposed spots, surface temperatures hit as high as 64C, more than 20 degrees above the official air measurement.

    It is important to note the difference between the two metrics: IMD’s official data measures ambient air temperature under standardized shaded conditions, while thermal imaging captures the temperature of solid exposed surfaces. On intense heat days, asphalt roads, concrete infrastructure, idling vehicles, and open ground absorb solar radiation far more intensely than the surrounding air, pushing their temperatures far higher than official air readings. These extreme surface temperatures amplify heat absorption by the human body through radiant heat, making urban areas feel vastly hotter than official forecasts suggest—especially in areas with almost no tree cover or shade.

    The Greenpeace team’s first measurement stop came at midday at the IIT flyover, one of south Delhi’s busiest traffic intersections, where hundreds of thousands of vehicles pass daily and peak-hour waits can stretch to 10 minutes. When researcher Nibedita Saha pointed the camera at shaded areas under the flyover, the reading hit 42C. But when she shifted focus to idling motorcyclists waiting under direct sun at the stop line, the reading spiked to 64C. The open pavement where the team stood registered 61C—yet just 10 feet away under the cover of a single tree, the temperature dropped sharply to 39.8C.

    “Consistent exposure to such extreme heat can trigger serious, life-threatening health complications,” Saha explained, noting the transformative impact of even one tree. “We felt immediate relief just moving that short distance. That’s how much difference a single tree can make.”

    Medical experts warn that the gap between official temperatures and actual on-the-ground heat creates severe public health risks. Dr. A Fathahudeen, a leading pulmonologist, explains that the human body maintains a core temperature of 37C, and prolonged exposure to high surrounding heat can push this core temperature higher. “When core temperature exceeds 40C, the body stops functioning normally,” he said. “The most common issue is heat exhaustion, marked by extreme sweating, headaches, and fatigue. In more severe cases, people experience confusion, disorientation, and even seizures. Without urgent medical intervention, patients can develop multi-organ failure and die.”

    To reduce risk during heatwaves, Dr. Fathahudeen advises the public to drink water regularly even when not thirsty, wear loose light-colored clothing, and use sun protection like umbrellas. He also called on the Indian government to enforce mandatory restrictions banning outdoor labor between 10:30 a.m. and 3 p.m., when heat is at its peak.

    But for Delhi’s millions of low-income workers who rely on daily street-side work to survive, following this guidance is not a viable option. When the Greenpeace team traveled to Old Delhi’s iconic Red Fort to speak with street vendors, they found hundreds of people still working through the brutal heat, driven by the need to earn enough to feed their families.

    “What choice do poor people like me have?” asked Sanjana Ben, a dry fruit vendor who sells her goods from the pavement. She sat on a thin cloth cushion on the scorching ground, with stacks of dry fruit laid out in front of her. The thermal camera recorded a temperature of nearly 40C on her face, but the ground just inches from her body hit 51.4C, and nearby open pavement registered 57C.

    “Sometimes my head starts spinning and my vision blurs,” Sanjana Ben told the reporting team. “When the ground feels too hot, I stand up for a minute, but I can’t stand all day, so I have to sit back down.”

    Nearby footwear vendor Mohammad Mahfouz Alam described the unrelenting nature of the heat, which seeps up from the ground and beats down from the sun with no escape. “There’s no relief day or night,” he said. “I feel sluggish all day, my legs ache, and I get home completely exhausted. Even after I bathe, I can’t sleep—the fan just blows hot air, and I toss and turn all night.”

    Alam added that Delhi’s weather has grown far more erratic over the years, a shift that hits street-dependent workers the hardest. “Seasons aren’t predictable anymore—summer, winter, monsoon all come and go when they shouldn’t, and it hits us worst of all,” he said. Gesturing to the tree behind his stall, he added, “If this tree wasn’t here, I couldn’t work here at all. The day it’s cut down, that’s the end of me working this spot.” When the thermal camera scanned Alam’s surroundings, it registered 58.65C on nearby open pavement, and 44.8C on his shoulder.

    A short walk from the Red Fort stalls lies Chandni Chowk, Delhi’s historic bustling shopping district, where a main pedestrian promenade was built years ago with stone seating areas for visitors to rest. But with no shade covering the open promenade, the seats go unused: the thermal camera registered 56.9C on the concrete pillar where a young toy vendor was sitting.

    By the time the team traveled to Sundar Nagri, a lower-middle-class neighborhood in east Delhi’s Seelampur area, it was past 5 p.m. and the sun had begun to weaken. Even so, sun-exposed concrete surfaces were still scorching: a public bench at the neighborhood entrance registered 51.6C.

    In this crowded neighborhood, small concrete homes are packed tightly along narrow lanes barely wide enough for one person to pass. For two weeks, 19-year-old Abhishek has kept a “Garmi Khata”, or heat register, for a Greenpeace research project, documenting how the extreme heat has disrupted his family’s health, sleep, income, and daily routines. When the team visited, the thermal camera registered 42C just outside Abhishek’s home. Walking up a narrow flight of stairs to the family’s two-room home, the team found almost no reprieve indoors: temperatures of dishes and kitchen surfaces on the wall hovered around 40C, barely lower than the outdoor reading.

    The home has no window or ventilation to let trapped hot air escape, and only a small ceiling fan that circulates the same stale hot air through the rooms. “When it’s this hot, I feel nauseous all the time,” said Abhishek’s sister Kajal. “You can’t stand being outside, but you can’t stand being inside either.”

    Abhishek read a recent entry from his register, which detailed how the heat has upended the family’s daily life: “This week’s heat has changed all our routines. Everyone gets home late, and no one can sleep properly,” he wrote. “In the mornings, we turn off the fan to cook, and the heat becomes unbearable. My sister can barely get her chores done, and my mother is more tired than I’ve ever seen her.”

    For Abhishek, the worst part of the heatwave is the sweltering nights. “I cut my hair short, I get up multiple times a night to wash my face, I even sleep without a shirt, and I still can’t sleep,” he said. “Outside, at least there’s a little breeze. Inside, it feels like standing right next to a burning oven.”

  • Russian attack sets fire to centuries-old religious site in Kyiv and kills 5 in Kharkiv

    Russian attack sets fire to centuries-old religious site in Kyiv and kills 5 in Kharkiv

    On a chaotic Monday morning, Ukraine faced one of the most destructive large-scale Russian aerial assaults in recent weeks, with attacks spreading across multiple major cities that left first responders dead, civilians injured, and a globally significant historic religious site damaged by fire.

    The deadliest toll of the day was recorded in Ukraine’s second-largest city, Kharkiv, where five emergency service rescuers lost their lives when a second Russian strike hit the site while they were extinguishing a blaze started by an initial missile attack. Ukrainian Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko confirmed that at least five additional emergency workers were also wounded in the secondary strike.

    In the capital city of Kyiv, the assault unfolded in waves: a first volley of ballistic missiles was followed by a swarm of Iranian-made Shahed assault drones, sending loud explosions echoing across residential neighborhoods. Terrified residents rushed to underground shelters as local officials repeatedly urged the public to stay in safe cover amid the ongoing attack. Klymenko confirmed that Kyiv was the primary target of the assault, with widespread damage recorded across non-military civilian infrastructure.

    According to Tymur Tkachenko, chief of the Kyiv City Military Administration, at least 20 people in Kyiv, including one minor child, have required medical attention for injuries sustained in the strikes. Over the course of less than 30 minutes, five separate Russian projectiles hit civilian locations in the capital’s Shevchenkivskyi district. Targets included a 25-story residential apartment block, an open-air market and a local grocery store, all of which broke out in large fires. In Kyiv’s Obolonskyi district, a nine-story residential building was hit by a direct strike. Tkachenko said the targeting of these residential blocks was no accident, stating “This is their deliberate decision.”

    Beyond civilian residential and commercial sites, the attack caused severe damage to the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, a centuries-old sprawling monastic complex that ranks among Eastern Christianity’s most important pilgrimage sites. Tkachenko emphasized that Russian forces deliberately targeted the site, calling the strike an attack on “the heart of one of the largest Christian shrines.” A large fire broke out at the UNESCO World Heritage Site following the strike, with the roof of the complex’s Dormition Cathedral catching fire.

    Metropolitan Epiphanius, the head of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, condemned the attack as another in a series of Russian crimes “against humanity, against history, against Christianity” and issued a public appeal for global prayers to help preserve the landmark site.

    Known colloquially as the Monastery of the Caves, the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra is a sprawling collection of churches and monastic structures constructed between the 11th and 19th centuries, featuring an extensive network of underground cave passages spanning more than 600 meters that connect many of its key buildings. Perched on the right bank of the Dnipro River running through Kyiv, the site has drawn Christian pilgrims from across the globe for more than a millennium.

  • Uruguay lands in Miami after flight delay ahead of World Cup opener against Saudi Arabia

    Uruguay lands in Miami after flight delay ahead of World Cup opener against Saudi Arabia

    MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. – The Uruguay men’s national football team touched down in South Florida on Sunday evening, wrapping up a disrupted travel day that saw their flight delayed for two hours on the ground in Mexico, just one day before their opening match of the 2025 expanded FIFA World Cup.

    Set to kick off Group H play against Saudi Arabia on Monday night at Hard Rock Stadium, one of the 16 host venues for the tournament’s new 48-team format, the squad had completed a scheduled training session in Cancun earlier the same Sunday morning before heading to the airport for their final journey to the match site.

    In an official statement released following the disruption, FIFA explained the hold-up stemmed from an administrative permitting error on the airline’s part in Mexico. “The airline has apologized for the inconvenience caused. FIFA remained in close contact with the Uruguay national team throughout their delay and worked alongside airport and operational partners to help expedite the process and minimize disruption to the team’s travel arrangements,” the governing body noted.

    Despite the unplanned disruption, both head coach Marcelo Bielsa and starting defender Jose Maria Gimenez struck a relaxed tone when speaking to reporters at the stadium shortly after the team’s arrival. Bielsa downplayed the issue, saying the delayed flight “caused no problem” to the squad’s preparations.

    Speaking through a professional interpreter, Gimenez acknowledged the unexpected complications but framed the delay as a non-issue for the team. “We had some complications. It was a difficulty but we actually took advantage of it because we were able rest at the hotel,” the defender added.

    Fans and officials can follow full coverage of the 2025 FIFA World Cup via AP News’ dedicated tournament hub.

  • Amad Diallo scores in the 90th minute to lift Ivory Coast past Ecuador 1-0 in the World Cup

    Amad Diallo scores in the 90th minute to lift Ivory Coast past Ecuador 1-0 in the World Cup

    PHILADELPHIA — A dramatic late finish at Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field has handed Ivory Coast a memorable 1-0 opening win over Ecuador in their first FIFA World Cup appearance in 12 years, with Manchester United winger Amad Diallo netting the decisive goal in the final minute of regulation.

    The encounter was a tense, chance-filled affair from kickoff, with both sides crashing the crossbar three times combined before Diallo found the back of the net. The substitute winger, who entered the match in the 56th minute, struck a clinical left-footed finish from just inside the 18-yard box that beat Ecuador goalkeeper Hernán Galíndez, who had dived full-stretch in an attempt to make the save. Wilfried Singo set up the game-winner with a dynamic attacking run down the right flank to create the scoring opportunity.

    For Ivory Coast, this result marks a promising start to their fourth World Cup campaign — their first since the 2014 tournament — and puts them in a strong position to push for a spot in the knockout round for the first time in the nation’s World Cup history. For Ecuador, the loss brings a stunning end to a 19-game unbeaten run that dated back more than nine months; their previous defeat came in a 1-0 friendly loss to Brazil in September 2024.

    The near-misses began early in the opening half, when Ecuador’s John Yeboah and Nilson Angulo each hit the woodwork in the first 45 minutes. Shortly after halftime, Ivory Coast’s Elye Wahi also struck the crossbar, keeping the match deadlocked heading into the final stretch.

    Ecuador entered the match as de facto favorites with a home-field advantage in Philadelphia, as a capacity crowd of 68,274 packed Lincoln Financial Field, with the vast majority of fans clad in the yellow kits of La Tri, who were making their fifth World Cup appearance and looking to advance to the knockout stage for just the second time in their history.

    Ecuador controlled much of the run of play before Diallo’s late strike, their best opening coming in the 68th minute when Gonzalo Plata unleashed a powerful 25-yard effort that was pushed away by Ivory Coast goalkeeper Yahia Fofana to keep the scoreline level.

    Ivory Coast’s attack was consistently dangerous thanks to the impact of RB Leipzig forward Yan Diomande, who created multiple clear scoring chances with his work down the right flank. One of those opportunities created Wahi’s second-half near-miss: Diomande whipped a hard cross into the box that Wahi flicked toward goal, only to see it bounce off the crossbar.

    The match was physical from the opening moments, with Ivory Coast captain Franck Kessié setting the tone with a hard challenge just four minutes in. Kessié picked up one of three first-half yellow cards for Les Éléphant, all for reckless tackles, while Ecuador’s Jackson Porozo received a caution in the 73rd minute.

    Looking ahead to the next round of group stage matches in Group E, Ivory Coast will face off against four-time World Cup champion Germany, who opened their campaign with a dominant 7-1 win over Curacao earlier on Sunday. Ecuador will take on Curacao, with both matches scheduled to kick off on June 20.

  • What to know about the G7 summit Trump is attending in France

    What to know about the G7 summit Trump is attending in France

    Fresh off celebrating his 80th birthday, U.S. President Donald Trump has traveled to the scenic Alpine spa town of Evian-les-Bains, France, for the annual summit of the G7 group of major world democracies, where simmering tensions with U.S. allies over conflicts, trade, and geopolitics are set to take center stage.

    The entire narrative of the three-day gathering, running from Monday to Wednesday, shifted dramatically just hours before Trump departed Washington: he announced a landmark agreement to end the recent U.S.-Iran conflict, a development that has already altered expectations for negotiations between leaders. Only days earlier, the ceasefire between Washington and Tehran hung in the balance, with offensive military operations resuming after a brief pause, leading analysts to predict heated clashes and an early exit by Trump from the heavily secured summit zone. French President Emmanuel Macron, this year’s host, has sealed off the lakeside town to protect visiting leaders and invited guests, creating a tightly controlled security bubble for the talks.

    The G7, founded in 1975 as a forum for leading industrialized democracies to coordinate responses to global economic crises, counts Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States as its core members. Over its 50-plus year history, the bloc has maintained an unbroken record of full attendance by all sitting leaders, and has limited membership exclusively to democratic nations — a policy that allowed Russia to join as a G8 member in 1998 following the collapse of the Soviet Union, but resulted in Russia’s expulsion in 2014 after its illegal annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula, and has continued to exclude China, which is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party. France took over the rotating G7 presidency from Canada last year, and will hand the role to the United States in 2027.

    Macron has structured the summit agenda to place the most divisive topics in the opening 24 hours, starting with the new Iran ceasefire deal and the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has slipped down the list of the Trump White House’s foreign policy priorities in recent months.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Volodymyr Zelenskyy, an invited guest, will lead Tuesday morning’s dedicated session on Ukraine, where he will have a critical opportunity to lay out tangible progress made by Ukrainian forces against Russia’s full-scale invasion. Maria Snegovaya, a Russia expert at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, notes that Zelenskyy comes into this meeting with a far stronger hand than he had during a tense Oval Office meeting with Trump and Vice President JD Vance last year. If Zelenskyy can successfully convince Trump that Russian President Vladimir Putin cannot secure a military victory in Ukraine, experts say he may be able to persuade the U.S. president to back pushing Putin into formal peace negotiations. Snegovaya adds that the Trump administration tends to view nations more favorably when they hold tangible leverage on the ground, a shift that works in Zelenskyy’s favor this time around.

    Discussions over the new Iran agreement, set for a Tuesday lunch focused on Middle East policy, remain unpredictable. The formal ceasefire deal is scheduled to be signed this Friday, with 60 days of technical negotiations to work out core details. G7 allies that Trump criticized for refusing to join the U.S.-Israel offensive against Iran earlier this year are already breathing a sigh of relief: if the deal reopens the strategic Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical chokepoint for global energy exports, it will restore free flow of Persian Gulf oil and gas to global markets, easing pressure on already strained energy prices across Europe.

    France and the United Kingdom have already prepared plans to clear potential mines from the Strait of Hormuz and provide escorted safe passage for commercial tankers, and are ready to launch the mission once a permanent ceasefire is confirmed. G7 leaders will also discuss expanding alternative energy export routes out of the Persian Gulf, including pathways through Egypt. The leaders of Egypt, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates have been invited to join these talks, and Trump will hold separate one-on-one meetings with each of these regional leaders during the summit.

    On Wednesday, the summit will shift to economic discussions, where China — though not a G7 member — is expected to be a top focus. G7 nations have grown increasingly concerned that China is flooding global export markets with heavily subsidized goods, undercutting domestic industries across the bloc and leading to widespread job losses. With an economy larger than all G7 members except the United States, China’s trade practices have emerged as a shared point of contention for the bloc in recent years.

    Other items on the packed agenda include regulatory and policy talks on artificial intelligence, with a specific focus on protecting children and young people from online harms, as well as discussions over new economic development aid packages for low-income nations. Alongside Zelenskyy and the regional Middle Eastern leaders, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and Kenyan President William Ruto will also take part in select portions of the summit.

    John Kirton, a leading G7 scholar at the University of Toronto, explains that the informal, closed-door structure of G7 summits has long been key to their impact. “Many of the great G7 summit initiatives have come from leaders’ spontaneous collaboration, created by them on the spot, based on free, unrestricted dialogue about the values, shared memories and even common interests like sports that they share,” Kirton notes. But this year, long-running friction between Trump and key European allies has been amplified by Trump’s decision to launch the Iran offensive alongside Israel in February without any prior consultation with allies, making the tone of this first post-offensive gathering uncertain. Many analysts had predicted sharp confrontations ahead of the ceasefire announcement, but the last-minute deal has opened the door for a more cooperative tone — even as core disagreements on multiple critical issues remain.

  • ‘Reminiscent of the West Bank’: Pro-Israel activists attack protesters at London settlement event

    ‘Reminiscent of the West Bank’: Pro-Israel activists attack protesters at London settlement event

    A tense demonstration outside a London venue hosting an Israeli real estate event tied to illegal settlements in occupied Palestine devolved into violence on Sunday, as pro-Israel counter-protesters assaulted anti-apartheid activists opposing the controversial gathering. The event, branded the “Great Israeli Real Estate Event”, was held at Edgware United Synagogue in north London, drawing immediate condemnation from human rights organizations and political figures who argue it normalizes the displacement of Palestinian people and the expansion of unlawful Israeli settlements.

    Anti-apartheid and pro-Palestine demonstrators assembled outside the synagogue to highlight the event’s core purpose: marketing and selling property built on occupied Palestinian land that the international community universally recognizes as illegally occupied. Public records of participating companies, published by the event’s sponsor earlier in the week, confirmed that at least four participating entities either explicitly advertise real estate in illegal Israeli settlements or are directly involved in settlement construction in the occupied West Bank.

    Andrey Khrzhanovskiy, a journalist and long-standing activist working to document Israeli settler violence in the West Bank, was on site during the confrontation. He told independent outlet Middle East Eye that the aggression from pro-Israel counter-protesters mirrored exactly the violence he had witnessed first-hand in occupied Palestinian territories. “We are surrounded by a bunch of Zionists who are counter-protesting and attacking people — a bunch of Palestinian activists were attacked by the Zionists and then got arrested,” Khrzhanovskiy explained. “This is very reminiscent of everything that I’ve seen in the West Bank… I feel like I’ve been here before.”

    Disturbing footage of the confrontation, circulated widely across social media platforms, captured extreme rhetoric from pro-Israel counter-protesters. The crowd chanted “There is no Palestine, we flattened it”, while even children in the counter-protest were recorded shouting misogynistic slurs at pro-Palestine and anti-apartheid demonstrators. Online footage also shows anti-Zionist activists entering the event space to disrupt the proceedings and publicly denounce the trade of illegally seized Palestinian land.

    Criticism of the event extended far beyond the protest line. More than 100 sitting British Members of Parliament have joined human rights groups in calling on the UK government to block the gathering over its explicit ties to illegal settlement expansion. For many Jewish activists opposing Israeli apartheid, the event held at a British synagogue represents a profound betrayal of Jewish values and history. Paul, one of the Jewish pro-Palestine activists speaking to Middle East Eye from the protest, emphasized that the occupation and displacement of Palestinians violates core tenets of his faith.

    “I’m a true practising and very proud Jew who sees what’s going on between Israel and the Palestinians as an abomination of Judaism,” Paul said. “This event is land theft. They are trading land to explicitly only a Jewish population in order to organise settlers to move to their apartheid state. And in the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, we say this is a disgrace to Jewish history of resistance against fascism and racism. They are the fascists, they are the racists, and we will not stand for a moment while they trade in Palestinian land.”

    Amnesty International UK has echoed these criticisms, framing events like this London gathering as “apartheid and annexation with a sales pitch”. Ahead of the event, legal advocacy group The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians delivered an official legal notice to Edgware United Synagogue, formally warning leadership of the “serious legal and reputational concerns regarding the event” hosted on their property.

    Maya Saad, a Middle East Eye reporter covering the protest on the ground, confirmed that cross-party political opposition and widespread rights advocacy had failed to convince the UK government to intervene to cancel the event, leaving protesters to challenge the gathering directly outside the venue. The confrontation marks the latest high-profile flashpoint in growing global tensions over Israeli settlement expansion and apartheid policies toward Palestinians, as grassroots movements push for stronger governmental action to hold Israel accountable for violations of international law.