作者: admin

  • British royals begin four-day US visit despite shooting

    British royals begin four-day US visit despite shooting

    Britain’s King Charles III and Queen Camilla kicked off their high-stakes four-day state visit to the United States on Monday, proceeding as planned despite a recent shooting incident at an event attended by US President Donald Trump and simmering diplomatic rifts between London and Washington over the ongoing Iran conflict. The trip, scheduled to coincide with the United States’ 250th anniversary of independence, is framed by the British government as a celebration of the centuries-long special relationship tying the two nations together.

    The itinerary for the royal tour carries significant symbolic weight: King Charles will become the first British monarch to address a joint session of the US Congress since his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, delivered remarks there in 1991. Beyond the address to lawmakers, the couple will meet with Trump and former First Lady Melania Trump for tea, attend a formal state dinner, travel to New York City on Wednesday to pay respects at the 9/11 Memorial Museum, and conclude the trip with a stop in Bermuda on Thursday – marking Charles’ first visit to a British Overseas Territory since ascending to the throne.

    The visit moved forward just two days after a shooting at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association gala, where Trump was in attendance. In a statement released Sunday, Buckingham Palace confirmed the tour would proceed unchanged, noting that Charles was “greatly relieved” that Trump, Melania Trump, and the vast majority of attendees escaped unharmed. The lone alleged shooter was taken into custody shortly after the incident, which left one member of Trump’s security detail wounded. UK Ambassador to the US Christian Turner told reporters in Washington Sunday evening that after multiple security reviews, “we are all very confident that all appropriate security measures are in place” for the entirety of the royal visit.

    While the trip is rooted in historic diplomatic tradition, it has sparked significant controversy on both sides of the Atlantic. The state visit was organized at the request of the UK government and President Trump, but deep divisions over the Iran war have opened a rare rift between the new UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government and the Trump administration. Trump has publicly lambasted Starmer for his opposition to the conflict, and has also criticized the UK government’s immigration and energy policies.

    The two leaders spoke by phone on Sunday, where Starmer extended his well wishes after the “shocking scenes” at the WHCA gala. The call also covered shared priorities in the Strait of Hormuz, with Starmer’s office confirming the pair discussed the “urgent need to get shipping moving again” amid disruptions that threaten severe harm to the global economy and already strained cost of living for households in the UK and worldwide. Though Starmer has repeatedly criticized Trump’s approach to the Iran war, he has defended the decision to move forward with the state visit, arguing that the British monarchy’s unique cross-party, cross-generational connections can help steady relations during tense periods. A YouGov poll conducted in early April found that 48 percent of British respondents supported canceling the visit, compared to a smaller share in favor of proceeding. For his part, Trump has said he believes the visit will absolutely help repair strained transatlantic ties, calling Charles a long-time personal friend who “represents his nation like nobody else can do it.”

    Observers note that Charles, 77, has a proven track record of deft diplomatic navigation: he earned widespread praise for his handling of Trump’s state visit to the UK in September 2024. Craig Prescott, a monarchy expert at Royal Holloway University of London, notes that Charles is “generally very good” at managing sensitive diplomatic occasions, but predicts he will address the transatlantic tensions over Iran – widely described as the “elephant in the room” – in coded language during his address to Congress on Tuesday.

    Another lingering controversy also hangs over the meticulously choreographed tour: the ongoing scandal surrounding King Charles’ younger brother, Prince Andrew, and his long-standing ties to disgraced late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The controversy reignited in mid-February when Andrew was arrested following new revelations about his relationship with Epstein, who died in prison while awaiting trial in 2019. Charles stripped Andrew of all his royal titles and patronages in October 2024, and issued a rare personally signed statement after the arrest affirming that “the law must take its course.” Andrew remains under active police investigation, has not been charged with any crime, and has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing. Organizers have structured the visit to avoid unscripted encounters: only official pool photographers will be permitted to document Charles’ Tuesday meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, with no press availability scheduled.

  • ‘It’s been quite sad’: Mark Nawaqanitawase readies himself for emotional Roosters farewell as Origin debut beckons

    ‘It’s been quite sad’: Mark Nawaqanitawase readies himself for emotional Roosters farewell as Origin debut beckons

    For rising rugby league star Mark Nawaqanitawase, the bittersweet reality of his impending departure from the Sydney Roosters at the end of the 2024 NRL season has finally set in — even as a career-defining milestone looms on the horizon: a potential debut for New South Wales in the State of Origin series just four weeks from now.

    At 25 years old, Nawaqanitawase has packed an extraordinary amount of achievement into just 31 top-flight NRL matches since switching codes from rugby union. The former Wallabies winger has not only notched one of the most iconic individual tries in recent rugby league memory, but also earned representative honors representing Australia in rugby league’s Ashes series. Now, he has emerged as the leading candidate to fill the vacant Blues wing spot left by Zac Lomax, who returned to rugby union after a standout 2023 Origin campaign for New South Wales.

    NSW Blues head coach Laurie Daley is widely expected to shortlist Nawaqanitawase for the game one squad, which will be announced next month. The dynamic winger has put his case for selection beyond doubt with a blistering run of form, crossing for three doubles in his last four outings. He also previously attended the Blues’ pre-camp earlier this year, putting him firmly in Daley’s plans.

    Despite the hype around his possible Origin call-up, the soft-spoken winger says his full attention remains on the Roosters, who sit comfortably in the top half of the ladder after a dominant Anzac Day win over their rivals. Speaking to reporters at Bondi Beach on Monday, where he joined teammates including Connor Watson and Daly Cherry-Evans for a recovery swim, Nawaqanitawase played down speculation about his selection.

    “What will be, will be. But I’m just trying to put my best foot forward here at the Chooks, play some good footy and make sure that we’re moving along well this year,” he said. “It’s always nice to get a higher honour. But again, I’m not really focused on it at the moment. Yeah definitely I watched Origin all the time growing up. I think it’s been a part of most kids who play rugby league growing up. It’s always been something that I’ve wanted to do, so if it happens, it happens.”

    At the end of the season, Nawaqanitawase will return to rugby union, where he will face a difficult choice: compete in the upcoming Rugby League World Cup with Australia, or join the Wallabies on their annual Spring Tour of Europe. For now, though, he is focused on soaking up his remaining months in the NRL, having grown deeply attached to the club and code that welcomed him when he made the cross-code switch.

    “This week and the last few weeks I’ve come to the realisation it’s going to be my last few months coming up,” he said, leaving open the possibility of a return to the Roosters further down the line. “So it’s been quite sad thinking about it because I love the club, I love the boys and just the whole environment. My family and I are really going to miss it, so I’ve just got to make sure I enjoy every moment that I can. I’ve been shown a lot of love and support from all fans, even ones that don’t even follow the Roosters. So it’s been a great experience for me, and I’ve just got to enjoy it because it doesn’t last forever. Coming over to rugby league and just the NRL as a whole has super exceeded what I thought I was going to feel and be a part of. I’m going to miss it every week.”

    When Nawaqanitawase first arrived in the NRL from rugby union, few predicted he would adapt so quickly to become one of the competition’s most exciting attacking weapons, earning a reputation as a high-flying offload specialist capable of turning the faintest half-chance into a spectacular try. The winger says his time in rugby league has transformed his game, adding layers of physicality and defensive discipline that will serve him well no matter where his career takes him.

    “I’m a different player to what I was two or three years ago now,” he said. “In a non-arrogant way, it’s a bigger, better, faster kind of thing. I’ve grown up a little bit, obviously learnt a lot physically and being able to do a lot more and just defensively as well. I’ve learnt so much and I know it will make me a better player wherever I go.”

  • Fernandez sends Chelsea into FA Cup final to lift gloom after Rosenior sacking

    Fernandez sends Chelsea into FA Cup final to lift gloom after Rosenior sacking

    The chaos of Chelsea’s turbulent 2024-25 campaign took a sudden, redemptive turn at Wembley Stadium on Sunday, as midfielder Enzo Fernandez’s first-half header secured a 1-0 FA Cup semi-final victory over Leeds United, sending the Blues through to a May 16 final showdown with Manchester City. The result comes just four days after Chelsea sacked head coach Liam Rosenior, capping a dramatic week that has upended the club’s season amid a devastating run of poor form.

    Rosenior’s tenure at Stamford Bridge ended after just 106 days, cut short following a five-game losing streak that saw Chelsea fail to find the net once – the club’s worst such run since 1912. The writing was on the wall after a humiliating 3-0 away defeat to Brighton & Hove Albion on Tuesday, where Rosenior publicly criticized his players’ commitment and fighting spirit. That outburst proved to be the final straw for Chelsea’s ownership, deepening already visible rifts between the manager and the first-team squad that had surfaced after Rosenior dropped Fernandez for two matches. The Argentine had been dropped after hinting in a media interview that he could consider leaving the club at the end of the season, a controversy that undermined Rosenior’s already fragile authority from his earliest weeks in charge.

    Rosenior’s departure follows widespread unrest in the dressing room, with multiple key players having already expressed frustration over the sacking of previous manager Enzo Maresca earlier this year, and internal leaks over team selection further eroding trust. The terrible run of form has already ended Chelsea’s hopes of qualifying for next season’s UEFA Champions League: the club sits 10 points behind fifth-placed Aston Villa with just four matches remaining in the Premier League, eliminating any chance of securing a top-five finish that would have earned a European spot.

    Stepping into the interim role just days before the semi-final was Calum McFarlane, previously the head coach of Chelsea’s Under-21 side who was promoted to assist Rosenior earlier in the season. Inheriting a fractured dressing room and a squad low on confidence, McFarlane has already earned praise for coaxing a cohesive, focused performance out of the players in their first match since the sacking. For Chelsea, a club with eight FA Cup titles to their name and 16 previous final appearances, a win over Guardiola’s side at Wembley would not only deliver their first FA Cup crown since 2018, but also salvage a campaign that has otherwise been written off as a failure. It would also make McFarlane one of the most unlikely title-winning managers in the competition’s long history.

    Sunday’s semi-final was a missed opportunity for Leeds, who reached their first FA Cup semi-final since 1987 and had not appeared in a final for 53 years. The Championship side came close to taking an early lead when Brenden Aaronson broke clean through on goal after a slip from Chelsea defender Trevoh Chalobah, but the American dragged his attempt off target, failing to beat Blues goalkeeper Robert Sanchez. Chelsea responded immediately with a chance of their own, as Joao Pedro drilled a low close-range strike against the near post, wasting the opening.

    It was Fernandez who broke the deadlock in the 23rd minute, quieting the anxiety that hung over Chelsea’s side. After Leeds defender Pascal Struijk gave away possession deep in his own half, Pedro Neto intercepted the loose ball and curled a pinpoint cross into the six-yard box, where Fernandez headed into the far corner for what would prove to be the only goal of the game. The strike ended a nearly 300-minute goal drought for Chelsea, whose last goal had come against third-tier side Port Vale in the FA Cup quarter-finals.

    Leeds made a half-time substitution, bringing on German midfielder Anton Stach, who came inches away from equalizing with his very first touch – a long-range thunderbolt that forced a brilliant save from Sanchez. Leeds improved considerably after a lackluster first half, but Dominic Calvert-Lewin failed to convert a good headed chance, directing his effort straight at the Chelsea keeper. Tensions boiled over moments later when Sanchez required treatment for a knock, with Leeds players accusing the Spaniard of feigning injury to allow Chelsea a tactical break, leading to a heated scuffle on the touchline. While tempers flared, the match never approached the intensity of the infamous brutal 1970 FA Cup final between the two historic rivals.

    Chelsea held firm through the final minutes to close out the win, restoring a small measure of pride to a season that has been overshadowed by off-field chaos and poor results. They now turn their focus to Wembley next month, where they will face a Manchester City side that fought back from a one-goal deficit to beat Southampton 2-1 in the other semi-final on Saturday, in what is set to be one of the most hotly anticipated FA Cup finals in recent memory.

  • Colombia road bombing death toll rises to 20

    Colombia road bombing death toll rises to 20

    A devastating bombing on Colombia’s Pan-American Highway has pushed the confirmed death toll to 20, with 36 additional people injured, according to an update shared Sunday on social media platform X by Octavio Guzman, governor of the restive southwestern Cauca Department where the attack took place.

    Local and national authorities have pinned the blame for the weekend attack on non-state armed groups operating in the region, with the violence hitting just over a month before Colombia is set to hold its presidential election on May 29. Guzman called the incident “the most brutal and ruthless attack against the civilian population in decades” for the region, noting that the explosion carved out a 200-cubic-meter crater at the site. All 20 killed were adults, comprising 15 women and five men. Three of those injured remain in intensive care as of Sunday, while five children who were hurt in the blast have been stabilized and are out of danger, Guzman added.

    The force of the explosion left passenger buses and vans crumpled and destroyed along the major highway, with multiple civilian vehicles flipped onto their roofs or sides by the blast’s shockwave. Colombian military chief Hugo Lopez told reporters Saturday that the attack was coordinated: assailants first blocked the highway with a hijacked bus and a second vehicle to stop all traffic, then detonated the hidden explosive once a crowd of stranded travelers had gathered.

    “This is a terrorist attack against the civilian population,” Lopez emphasized. Incumbent leftist President Gustavo Petro issued a forceful condemnation via X, calling the perpetrators “terrorists, fascists and drug traffickers” and ordering the country’s top military personnel to hunt down those responsible. Petro directly attributed the attack to Ivan Mordisco, Colombia’s most-wanted fugitive criminal, whom he has previously compared to Pablo Escobar, the infamous late cocaine kingpin who dominated Colombia’s illegal drug trade in the 1980s and 1990s.

    This latest mass casualty attack follows a separate bombing that hit a military base in Cali, Colombia’s third-largest city, on Friday. That attack injured two service members, and kicked off a sustained wave of violence across the neighboring Valle del Cauca and Cauca departments. Lopez confirmed that authorities have recorded at least 26 separate attacks across the two regions in just 48 hours as of Sunday. Defense Minister Pedro Sanchez announced Saturday that federal authorities have deployed additional military and police personnel to the affected areas to bolster security and respond to the surge in violence.

    Colombia has a long history of armed groups—funded largely through illegal activities including drug trafficking, unregulated mining, and extortion—using targeted violence to disrupt and influence national elections. Remnant factions of the former FARC rebel movement that rejected a 2016 national peace deal with the Colombian government have stepped up disruptive attacks in recent months, as peace talks between the groups and Petro’s administration have stalled.

    Security policy has emerged as one of the most contentious central issues in the 2025 presidential campaign, after high-profile political violence put the issue in the national spotlight last year. In June 2024, rising young conservative presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay was shot in broad daylight while campaigning in Bogota, the nation’s capital, and died from his injuries two months later.

    As of the latest polling, leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, the main architect of Petro’s controversial policy of pursuing negotiated peace deals with armed groups, holds a lead in the race. He is followed closely by right-wing candidates Abelardo de la Espriella and Paloma Valencia, both of whom have campaigned on promises of a hardline military crackdown on rebel and criminal factions. All three leading presidential candidates have confirmed they have received credible death threats during the campaign, and all are conducting campaign events under heavy armed security protection.

  • Global military spending surges on insecurity: report

    Global military spending surges on insecurity: report

    Global military expenditure has climbed to nearly $2.9 trillion in 2025, extending an uninterrupted annual growth streak to 11 years, according to a new report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The world’s three largest defense spenders – the United States, China, and Russia – accounted for just over half of the global total, with a combined outlay of $1.48 trillion in 2025. Overall global spending rose 2.9 percent year-on-year, even as the world’s single largest spender, the U.S., recorded a nominal reduction in its 2025 defense budget.

    Lorenzo Scarazzato, a SIPRI researcher, told AFP that the U.S. cut was fully offset by sharp spending increases across Europe and Asia, driven by what he described as “another year of wars and increased tensions.” This upward trend is mirrored in the global “military burden” – the share of total global GDP allocated to defense spending – which reached its highest level since 2009. “Everything points to a world that feels less secure and is spending on its military to compensate for the global landscape,” Scarazzato noted.

    The U.S. recorded a 7.5 percent annual reduction in 2025 military spending, finishing the year at $954 billion. The drop is largely attributed to the failure of Congress to approve new military aid packages for Ukraine in 2025, after Washington committed a total of $127 billion to Kyiv over the preceding three years. However, analysts expect this dip to be temporary: the U.S. Congress has already approved a $1 trillion+ defense budget for 2026, and spending could surge to $1.5 trillion in 2027 if the budget proposal put forward by U.S. President Donald Trump is enacted.

    The biggest contributor to the 2025 global spending increase was Europe, which includes both Russia and Ukraine. Total regional spending surged 14 percent year-on-year to hit $864 billion. Scarazzato outlined the two core drivers behind the surge: the ongoing full-scale war in Ukraine, and shifting U.S. defense policy that pushes European nations to take greater responsibility for their own security in the face of reduced American engagement. Germany, the world’s fourth-largest military spender, raised its 2025 expenditure by 24 percent to $114 billion, while Spain recorded a dramatic 50 percent increase to $40.2 billion, pushing its defense spending above 2 percent of GDP for the first time since 1994.

    Both Russia and Ukraine have ramped up military spending amid the active conflict, with both nations allocating a larger share of government expenditure to defense than any other countries tracked by SIPRI. Russia’s spending rose 5.9 percent to $190 billion in 2025, equal to 7.5 percent of the country’s total GDP. Ukraine, by contrast, boosted its defense outlay by 20 percent to $84.1 billion – a staggering 40 percent of its entire annual GDP.

    In the Middle East, where long-running geopolitical tensions remain high, regional spending rose only marginally by 0.1 percent to $218 billion. While most nations in the region increased their defense budgets, both Israel and Iran recorded nominal decreases. Iran’s spending fell 5.6 percent to $7.4 billion, a drop driven almost entirely by the country’s 42 percent annual inflation rate; spending actually rose in nominal terms. For Israel, the 4.9 percent drop to $48.3 billion followed a January 2025 ceasefire in the Gaza war that reduced immediate military operational needs. Even with the decline, Israel’s 2025 defense spending remains 97 percent higher than it was in 2022.

    Across Asia and Oceania, total military spending reached $681 billion in 2025, an 8.5 percent year-on-year increase that marks the region’s largest annual jump since 2009. Scarazzato identified China as the region’s major player, noting that the country has now expanded its military spending every year for 30 consecutive years, hitting an estimated $336 billion in 2025. Beyond China’s ongoing military modernization, Scarazzato highlighted growing threat perceptions among other regional actors as a key growth driver. Japan raised its defense expenditure by 9.7 percent to $62.2 billion in 2025, equal to 1.4 percent of GDP – its highest GDP share for defense spending since 1958. Taiwan also increased its spending by 14 percent to $18.2 billion amid shifting regional security dynamics.

  • How climate change threatens the economic backbone of the Pacific

    How climate change threatens the economic backbone of the Pacific

    Stretching across more than 3.4 million square kilometers of the central Pacific Ocean, the small island nation of Kiribati holds an outsize role in the global tuna industry. Despite having a total land area roughly equal to that of New York City, this scattered archipelago of 33 islands sits at the heart of the world’s most productive tuna fishing grounds, which collectively supply more than half of the global tuna catch. For Kiribati, this abundant marine resource is not just a cultural cornerstone — it is the entire backbone of the country’s economy. Unlike larger Pacific neighbors such as Papua New Guinea, Kiribati has almost no other natural resources to draw on: its highest natural elevation above sea level is just two meters, with limited fresh water reserves and virtually no terrestrial mineral or agricultural assets. As a result, revenue from selling tuna fishing licenses to international fleets makes up more than 70% of the country’s total government income, the highest proportional dependence of any nation on Earth, according to official data. Between 2018 and 2022, this revenue equaled roughly 40% of Kiribati’s entire GDP, figures from the International Monetary Fund show. In 2024 alone, license sales generated $137 million for the government, a sum officials describe as a “critical financial lifeline” for the nation of 130,000 people. Today, large fishing vessels from major tuna-consuming nations including Japan, China, the United States, and European Union member states travel to Kiribati’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to harvest the region’s abundant stocks of skipjack, yellowfin, and bigeye tuna. As veteran fisheries specialist Simon Diffey, who has worked on Kiribati for more than 30 years, notes, more than half of all canned tuna sold globally comes from the Western Central Pacific, including Kiribati’s waters. The global tuna industry is currently valued at over $44 billion per year, making Kiribati’s control over its vast EEZ an invaluable economic asset. Yet the same ocean that sustains Kiribati now threatens its very survival, driven by the impacts of human-caused climate change. Warming ocean temperatures are already reshaping tuna migratory patterns, and scientists warn that the tiny nation is at extreme risk of losing its most valuable natural resource. Tuna are extremely sensitive to even small shifts in water temperature, able to detect changes as small as one-tenth of a degree Celsius. As Pacific surface waters warm, research consistently shows that tuna populations are migrating eastward in search of cooler habitats — a shift that would pull stocks permanently out of Kiribati’s EEZ. For Kiribati, this potential migration carries cascading economic and food security risks. If tuna leave the country’s territorial waters, international fleets will no longer purchase fishing licenses, sending government revenue plummeting and creating extreme fiscal volatility. The Pacific Community, a regional development organization, has identified Kiribati as one of the nations worst impacted by projected tuna migration. Preliminary modeling from Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries estimates that if global greenhouse gas emissions remain at high levels, the country could lose more than $10 million in annual fishing access fees by 2050. Even in a best-case low-emissions scenario, where overall tuna biomass in Kiribati’s EEZ remains stable, local small-scale fisheries are still projected to see substantial catch declines. The Line Islands, one of Kiribati’s three island groups, could see local catches drop by two-thirds even under low emissions. These declines come as Kiribati’s population grows and rapid urbanization in the capital Tarawa puts additional strain on already limited land and food resources. Fish have long been the primary source of protein for Kiribati’s communities, with the average resident consuming 100 kilograms of fish per year — more than 10 times the average per capita consumption in the United States. As local stocks decline, households are increasingly turning to imported processed foods, which drives up household costs and reduces nutritional quality, especially for remote outer island communities. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization warns that this shift is creating a growing food security crisis for the nation. Facing these overlapping threats, Kiribati and international partners are rolling out new adaptation strategies to build resilience and diversify the country’s economy. Last year, the United Nations Green Climate Fund launched a $156.8 million regional adaptation project covering 14 Pacific nations and territories, focused on supporting tuna-dependent economies like Kiribati. The initiative aims to strengthen early warning and stock monitoring systems to help Kiribati better predict tuna migrations, protect food security, and stabilize government revenue. According to Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries, the project is expected to provide roughly four million nutritious fish meals annually for local communities. The Kiribati government is also pursuing domestic economic shifts to reduce its dependence on foreign license sales. It is expanding domestic tuna processing and canning facilities to capture more value from its tuna resources, rather than exporting the raw catch via foreign fleets. Officials are also developing ocean aquaculture for species including milkfish, snapper, and sea cucumbers, to both boost domestic food security and create new export opportunities. Beyond the fishing sector, the government is working to diversify national revenue through expanding tourism, developing renewable energy infrastructure, and growing the country’s offshore sovereign wealth fund. “Kiribati retains grounds for optimism and strategic opportunity,” says Riibeta Abeta, permanent secretary for Kiribati’s Ministry of Fisheries. Still, the nation faces an existential threat from the broader impacts of climate change, with even the most ambitious adaptation measures dependent on global action to cut greenhouse gas emissions and slow ocean warming.

  • With presidents, cowboys and A-listers – King Charles in US over the years

    With presidents, cowboys and A-listers – King Charles in US over the years

    For nearly his entire adult life, King Charles III has maintained a steady thread of official and unofficial visits to the United States, building connections with U.S. presidents, cultural icons, and communities across the country across more than five decades. Now, he is set to make his most high-profile U.S. trip yet: his first official state visit to the nation since ascending to the British throne following the death of Queen Elizabeth II.

    The newly crowned monarch will touch down in the U.S. on Monday, kicking off a multi-stop itinerary that will take him to Washington D.C., Virginia, and New York, before he departs for the British overseas territory of Bermuda. This trip marks a major milestone: it is the first official state visit to the U.S. by a reigning British monarch in nearly 20 years, the last being Queen Elizabeth II’s 2007 visit hosted by then-President George W. Bush.

    To contextualize the significance of this upcoming historic visit, it is worth tracing the long arc of Charles’s connections to the U.S., dating back to his first official trip as a 21-year-old prince in 1970. During that debut visit, Charles took a seat in the White House Oval Office for a formal meeting with President Richard Nixon. That same trip, he and his sister Princess Anne enjoyed a distinctly American leisure activity: a baseball game at Washington D.C.’s iconic RFK Stadium, where they joined the children of the U.S. president and vice-president in the stands. In a 1974 stop during a naval deployment to San Diego, Charles traveled to Palm Springs to meet then-California Governor Ronald Reagan — a meeting that came six years before Reagan would be elected to the Oval Office. That same year, during a trip to Los Angeles, Charles visited the Warner Bros. set of *Funny Lady* where he met legendary American entertainer Barbra Streisand, sparking a decades-long personal friendship between the two.

    Charles’s 1977 U.S. trip brought both protests and lighthearted moments. During a campus visit in Cleveland, Ohio, mounted police were deployed to manage demonstrations against British involvement in Northern Ireland. Later that year, a visit to a Los Angeles department store brought a playful encounter: Charles shared a laugh with actors posing as the King’s Guard during the event. In 1980, a polo match at Florida’s Palm Beach Polo Club ended with an unexpected health scare, when Charles was hospitalized and treated for heat exhaustion and dehydration after the game.

    As Charles’s public role evolved, so did the nature of his U.S. visits. In 1985, he and his first wife, the late Princess Diana, made a stop at a Springfield, Virginia, department store, where Diana browsed jewelry selections while Charles chatted with a sales clerk. The following year, during a trip to Austin, Texas, the mayor of the city presented Charles with a traditional cowboy hat, which he gamely wore for photographers.

    It would be 20 years before Charles made another landmark official U.S. trip, after his divorce from Diana and his remarriage to Queen Camilla (then Camilla Parker Bowles). In 2005, he returned to the White House for an official dinner with President George W. Bush. That same New York trip, Charles met future president Donald Trump and his wife Melania at a reception held at the Museum of Modern Art, and also took time to greet students at Georgetown University in Washington D.C. A decade later, in 2015, Charles returned to the Oval Office once again for a meeting with President Barack Obama during another U.S. trip.

    Across more than 50 years of visits, Charles has built a long history of engagement with American political, cultural, and civic life, making his first state visit as monarch a highly anticipated event that carries both historical weight and new diplomatic meaning for the special relationship between the U.K. and the United States.

  • What to know about King Charles’s state visit to US

    What to know about King Charles’s state visit to US

    Nearly 20 years after Queen Elizabeth II’s final state visit to the United States, Britain’s current monarch King Charles III and his wife Queen Camilla have arrived for the first British state visit to the US in nearly two decades, set to run from April 27 to 30. Coming as the US prepares to mark the 250th anniversary of its Declaration of Independence from British rule, the four-day trip is framed as a celebration of the longstanding, close diplomatic alliance between the two nations. Unlike official working visits conducted by British prime ministers, state visits are formal, head-of-state-level engagements hosted by the invited nation’s head of state, placing this visit on the highest tier of diplomatic exchange.

    The royal couple’s itinerary weaves together formal diplomacy, cultural exchange, and commemorative events across three jurisdictions: Washington DC, New York, and Virginia. Their first engagement on opening day will be an intimate afternoon tea with President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump at the White House, followed by a guided tour of the recently expanded White House Beehive on the South Lawn. Later that day, a garden party will welcome British and American guests at the official residence of the British ambassador to the US. This marks the first time a British royal garden party has been held on American soil in decades; the last such event was hosted by King George VI and Queen Elizabeth at the Washington embassy back in 1939.

    Day two of the visit will be centered on full formal diplomatic ceremonies at the White House. The Trumps will lead an official welcome featuring a full ceremonial military review, a tradition stretching back to the 1700s that will include the US Marine Band performing the national anthems of both countries and a 21-gun salute from the Presidential Salute Battery. Thousands of guests spanning cabinet members, congressional representatives, the British official delegation, military families, and students from the British International School of Washington will gather on the South Lawn to hear remarks from President Trump. After the welcome ceremony, the two heads of state will hold a bilateral meeting following a gift exchange and a formal receiving line for both national delegations. Parallel to this, Queen Camilla and First Lady Melania Trump will join American students for a cross-cultural education event that uses cutting-edge virtual reality headsets and AI-powered glasses to walk attendees through the shared history of the US and UK. In the evening, the Trumps will host a formal state dinner in the White House East Room in honor of the royal couple, where both President Trump and King Charles will deliver additional addresses. A key diplomatic highlight of the day will be King Charles’ address to a joint session of the US Congress, making him only the second British monarch ever to address the full legislative branch, following Queen Elizabeth II’s 1991 address during her state visit.

    The visit has not proceeded without pre-event turbulence. Just two days before the royal couple’s arrival, a suspected gunman attempted to force entry into the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington DC, prompting questions about whether security arrangements would force a postponement or adjustment to the trip. UK Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister Darren Jones confirmed that additional security consultations would be held immediately following the incident, but stressed that appropriate security measures would be put in place to mitigate any risk. By Sunday evening, Buckingham Palace issued an official confirmation that the visit would proceed unchanged, noting that “The King and Queen are most grateful to all those who have worked at pace to ensure this remains the case and are looking forward to the Visit getting underway tomorrow.” President Trump has expressed strong optimism about the trip’s impact on US-UK relations, telling reporters that the visit will absolutely repair and strengthen bilateral ties, praising King Charles as a fantastic, brave man with whom he has maintained a longstanding personal relationship.

    After wrapping up their two days of engagements in the national capital, the royal pair will travel to New York City on Wednesday. Their first stop in the city will be the 9/11 Memorial, where they will meet first responders and family members of victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani will attend the memorial event but has no plans for a private meeting with the King, per a statement from his office. While in New York, King Charles will also visit a local community organization and meet with a gathering of transatlantic business leaders, while Queen Camilla will attend a literary celebration marking 100 years since the creation of the beloved children’s character Winnie the Pooh. The day will conclude with a high-profile reception focused on supporting the creative industries, with widespread expectation that A-list celebrities will be in attendance, though no guest lists have been released to the public.

    On the final day of the state visit, the King and Queen will return to Washington DC for a formal farewell ceremony with the Trumps, followed by a wreath-laying ceremony honoring fallen service members from both nations, a tribute to the longstanding US-UK military alliance. From Washington, they will travel to Virginia to visit a national park, engage with Indigenous communities and learn about the region’s Appalachian cultural heritage, before joining a public community celebration marking the 250th anniversary of American independence. After concluding the US state visit, King Charles will travel to Bermuda, a British overseas territory of which he is head of state, for his first official visit to the territory as monarch, before returning to the United Kingdom.

    Several key absences and unresolved controversies have marked the lead-up to the visit. BBC sources have confirmed that the royal couple will not hold a meeting with Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and his wife Meghan, who stepped down as working royals several years ago and currently reside in California. Additionally, there have been growing public calls from US lawmakers and Epstein survivor advocates for King Charles to meet with survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The calls come after King Charles’ brother, Prince Andrew, who had well-documented close ties to Epstein, was arrested in the UK in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office; Prince Andrew has repeatedly and vigorously denied all wrongdoing against him. Buckingham Palace has confirmed that King Charles will not hold a meeting with survivors during this visit, citing concerns that such a meeting could compromise ongoing police investigations and legal proceedings. Queen Camilla, however, is scheduled to meet with representatives of organizations working to end domestic abuse and violence against women during one of her public events on the trip.

    In a series of informal interviews with the BBC ahead of the visit, everyday Americans shared their own suggestions for the royal couple’s downtime, with one lighthearted, widely shared recommendation: find time to try authentic American gelato during their stay across the country’s east coast.

  • Canada’s Carney has enjoyed a long political honeymoon. Now comes the test

    Canada’s Carney has enjoyed a long political honeymoon. Now comes the test

    One year into Mark Carney’s tenure as Canada’s Prime Minister, the former two-country central banker with elite academic credentials from Harvard and Oxford finds himself at an unprecedented high in public approval, capping a meteoric rise from political outsider to leader of a G7 nation that has defied all conventional political playbooks.

    Carney entered the political landscape 12 months ago, replacing Justin Trudeau as leader of the Liberal Party with a sterling professional resume but zero prior experience running for public office. Critics and political observers widely warned that his lack of elected experience would prove a fatal liability, but Carney defied those early expectations: he led the Liberals to a minority government in his first election, and within a year, secured a narrow parliamentary majority after five opposition Members of Parliament crossed the floor to join his caucus.

    His rapid ascent has earned him international acclaim matching his domestic popularity. Last week, Time Magazine included Carney on its annual list of the world’s 100 most influential people. In a tribute written for the outlet, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde dubbed Carney a “rock-star” economist and politician, crediting him as the first global leader to clearly conceptualize the breaking point of the old geopolitical order, fractured in the wake of Donald Trump’s second presidential term in the United States. “I trust he will now reinvent cooperation among the willing for the common good of all,” Lagarde wrote.

    Carney’s high profile grew even larger following a January keynote address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he emerged as a leading global voice pushing back against Trump’s unilateral agenda. In the speech, he openly called out the rupture of the post-WWII rules-based international order and urged middle powers to collaborate to counter the growing risks of the new era of great power rivalry. The address was widely praised for its candor, cementing Carney’s reputation both at home and abroad as a steady leader for turbulent times.

    Polling data from aggregate site 338Canada puts Carney’s current support at 46% — the highest approval rating of his tenure to date. David Coletto, CEO of leading Canadian polling firm Abacus Data, explains that a large part of Carney’s popularity stems from shifting voter priorities in Canada amid heightened tensions with the United States. Trump’s deeply unpopular policies, including steep sectoral tariffs on Canadian goods and repeated public comments suggesting Canada should become the 51st U.S. state, have left Canadians viewing external threats as the most pressing risk facing the country. This has upended long-standing Canadian political norms, where voters have historically prioritized domestic issues over foreign policy, Coletto notes. “It matters to Canadians that Canada has a leader that many in other parts of the world wish they had,” Coletto told the BBC, adding that the global acclaim reinforces public perception that Carney is “right for the job” at this moment of global uncertainty.

    Carney has laid out an ambitious policy agenda for Canadians: the most sweeping housing construction plan since World War II, a push to position Canada as a global energy superpower, reduced economic dependency on the United States, and a forceful pushback against Trump’s tariffs. With high approval and a solid majority in parliament, expectations for transformative change run high. But as Carney enters his second year in office, political observers warn he has reached a critical inflection point: can he maintain his status as a global standard-bearer for progressive multilateral cooperation while delivering on core domestic promises to Canadian voters?

    In his first year in office, Carney spent weeks traveling abroad, courting investment and trade opportunities in key markets including China, India, and the United Arab Emirates. But that global focus has drawn criticism from opposition leaders, who argue critical domestic files have been sidelined. Conservative Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre has attacked Carney for lack of progress on renegotiating the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which is set for a mandatory review this summer. Steep U.S. tariffs on Canadian metals, automotive products, and lumber have already cost thousands of Canadian jobs, and as of yet, no formal negotiating date has been set for talks to resolve the dispute. Carney’s new U.S. Ambassador Mark Wiseman confirmed the timeline uncertainty to parliamentarians earlier this month. “What has Mark Carney really done in a year on this? He hasn’t held negotiations in five months,” Poilievre told reporters in Ottawa. “He’s done absolutely nothing on this file in the last year other than to stoke fear and distract from his catastrophic failings here at home.”

    Domestic affordability is also reemerging as a top voter concern, putting pressure on Carney to deliver results. Global oil price spikes driven by the ongoing U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran have pushed up fuel costs across Canada, home prices remain out of reach for millions of first-time buyers, and youth unemployment has stayed stubbornly high. Carney has moved to address immediate pain points, recently announcing a temporary fuel tax cut and a one-time grocery rebate that will be deposited directly to eligible Canadians’ bank accounts in June. But longer-term promises have lagged: his flagship pledge to double annual home construction to cool housing prices has faced criticism from experts, who note his first budget allocated insufficient funding to the effort, and instead relies largely on tightening immigration to reduce housing demand. In a post-budget op-ed for the Toronto Star late last year, Mike Moffatt, a Canadian economist and former advisor to Justin Trudeau, wrote that Carney’s housing pledges had effectively been “watered down.”

    Still, political insiders note Carney has room to deliver on his promises before the next general election, which is not scheduled until 2029 thanks to his newly secured parliamentary majority. “The country has been willing to give him a lot of rope to go out and do what he believes he needs to do in order to protect the country’s interests,” said Carlene Variyan, a veteran Ottawa-based political strategist who has worked with the Liberal Party for more than a decade, including a stint as the party’s national campaign spokesperson. The core question that will define Carney’s tenure, Variyan added, remains whether he can succeed as a global standard-bearer for a new multilateral coalition “while also taking care of his own people here at home.” Carney has acknowledged the growing pressure, releasing a 10-minute social media video last week reassuring Canadians that his administration “is acting and will continue to act” to solve the country’s most pressing challenges. But Poilievre argues that reassurances are not enough: Canadians need tangible action, not social media messaging.

  • Indian Dalit man’s alleged custodial death and a family’s wait for justice

    Indian Dalit man’s alleged custodial death and a family’s wait for justice

    Nearly two months after 26-year-old Akash Delison died in a Tamil Nadu government hospital, his body remains unclaimed in a morgue, held hostage by a grieving family’s demand for justice. Akash, a member of India’s marginalized Dalit community who aspired to become a lawyer to serve his people, died on March 8, just 48 hours after he was taken into police custody alongside a friend in an ongoing criminal case. What began as a local tragedy has now reignited national and international scrutiny of India’s long-running crisis of custodial death and police torture, a problem that disproportionately targets the country’s most vulnerable communities.

    Akash’s parents, Rajesh and Anandhi Delison, allege their son was brutally tortured by officers during his detention. Anandhi, who visited her son hours before he succumbed to his injuries, told the BBC he had been blindfolded and beaten severely; an autopsy later confirmed more than 20 external and internal injuries, including a fractured right leg, brain hemorrhaging, and swelling of the heart and lungs. Gopi, the second man arrested alongside Akash, remains in judicial custody. Local police have rejected the torture claims, asserting Akash suffered fatal injuries when he jumped off a bridge while attempting to escape custody.

    Widespread public outcry over the incident has already led to administrative action: six police officers have been suspended from duty, and the Tamil Nadu state government has ordered a full probe by the state’s top anti-crime agency. Still, Akash’s family refuses to retrieve his body for funeral rites until all officers deemed responsible for his death are taken into custody. Dalit organizations across the state have condemned the killing and thrown their full support behind the family’s campaign for accountability.

    Akash’s death is not an isolated incident. It marks the third reported custodial death in Tamil Nadu alone in 2026, putting a fresh spotlight on a pattern of unlawful violence that stretches across the entire country. Just weeks before Akash’s arrest, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) concluded that the 2025 custody death of 27-year-old Ajith Kumar, a temple security guard held in connection with a false robbery complaint in Sivaganga district, was directly caused by police excessive force. Earlier in April, a special court in Madurai handed down death sentences to nine police officers for the 2020 custody killings of a father and son, a case that previously sparked massive nationwide protests.

    Official data from India’s federal home ministry underscores the scale of the crisis: between 2025 and March 15, 2026, 170 custodial deaths have been recorded across the country. The northern state of Bihar reported the highest number at 19, followed by Rajasthan with 18 and Uttar Pradesh with 15. Beyond formal custody deaths, rights groups also document widespread extrajudicial “encounter killings,” staged confrontations that police use to eliminate suspects without going through the formal legal process, a practice disproportionately reported in Uttar Pradesh and Assam.

    The crisis has drawn sharp condemnation from the international community. In its 2026 Global Torture Index, the World Organisation Against Torture ranked India as a “high risk” country for torture and ill-treatment by security forces, placing it alongside Pakistan, Nigeria, Colombia and Mexico. The report explicitly notes that severe abuse, including beatings and forced confessions, disproportionately targets marginalized groups: Dalits, Adivasi tribal communities, Muslims, LGBTQIA+ people, and informal migrant workers.

    In February 2026, United Nations human rights experts sent an open letter to the Indian government calling for independent, transparent investigations into what they described as “alarming allegations of hundreds of extrajudicial killings and torture-related deaths.” The letter raised particular alarm over the normalized practice of “encounters” and “half-encounters,” warning that the routine use of unlawful violence risks eroding the rule of law. To date, Alice Edwards, the UN Special Rapporteur on torture, confirmed the Indian government has not responded to the letter, and the 60-day deadline for a reply has expired. The BBC has reached out to India’s federal home ministry, Tamil Nadu’s home secretary, and the state’s police director general for comment on Akash’s case and the broader allegations, but has not received a formal response as of publication.

    Legal experts and human rights activists say that while holding individual officers accountable for high-profile cases like Akash’s is a critical step, deep systemic reform is the only way to end the ongoing crisis. India’s constitution and existing criminal code already include formal legal safeguards against custodial abuse, but consistent enforcement remains weak across the country. Anupama Arigala, a New Delhi-based legal consultant, argues that police, magistrates, and prosecutors must shift away from a culture prioritizing arrests and convictions over due process.

    “These three parties must carefully analyze if there’s really a need for police or judicial custody, or if the accused can participate in the investigation just as effectively while out on bail,” Arigala explained. She added that magistrates must proactively screen for signs of torture when suspects are brought to court, a step that is often skipped due to overloaded dockets and systemic understaffing that plagues India’s judicial system.

    UN experts and activists alike have also called on India to ratify the UN Convention Against Torture, a step that would require the country to pass a standalone national law explicitly criminalizing torture—legislation that does not currently exist on India’s federal books. While activists acknowledge that a new law will not eliminate custodial abuse overnight, they say it would mark a critical formal recognition of the crisis and create a framework for long-term institutional change.

    For Rajesh Delison, that change cannot come soon enough. He told the BBC his family has yet to recover from the shock of losing Akash, a young man who worked in his shop while studying to become a lawyer to help his marginalized community. “They have snuffed out the life of an active young man who had big dreams for the future,” he said. For now, his family remains resolved: they will continue to leave Akash’s body in the hospital morgue until they get the justice they have pledged to fight for.