作者: admin

  • Landslides in Bangladesh kill at least 8 Rohingya refugees while monsoon rains batter India

    Landslides in Bangladesh kill at least 8 Rohingya refugees while monsoon rains batter India

    Annual monsoon season has brought devastating loss of life and destruction to South Asia this year, with deadly landslides hitting Rohingya refugee camps in southeastern Bangladesh and widespread flooding claiming victims across northern and western India. As of the latest official updates, at least 21 people have been confirmed dead across both countries, with dozens more injured and thousands displaced from high-risk zones.

    In Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar district, home to more than 1 million Rohingya refugees who fled violence in neighboring Myanmar, the disaster unfolded between late Sunday and early Monday. Intense downpour loosened unstable soil on hilly slopes where thousands of makeshift refugee shelters are built, triggering multiple hill collapses that buried structures as residents slept. Dollar Tripura, a senior official with the district’s Fire Service and Civil Defense, confirmed to the Associated Press that eight bodies were recovered: seven by professional rescue teams, and an eighth by refugee residents themselves. All remains have been returned to their families, and two injured children have been pulled from the debris for medical treatment.

    The Cox’s Bazar refugee camps have long faced high risk of monsoon-related disasters. Data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) shows that between 2021 and 2026, 36 Rohingya refugees have been killed and at least 86 injured in similar landslide events across the camp network. In response to this latest disaster, local authorities have accelerated relocation efforts, moving vulnerable households away from steep, erosion-prone hill slopes. So far, more than 1,000 people have been moved to safer designated areas, but the Bangladesh Meteorological Department’s Dhaka office has forecast continued heavy rainfall in the region over the coming days, raising fears of further disasters.

    The crisis is not isolated to Bangladesh: monsoon rains have also battered large swathes of neighboring India, leaving 13 people dead in rain-related incidents across the country in recent days. In western India’s Maharashtra state, where the financial capital Mumbai is located, widespread flooding has closed schools, submerged critical road infrastructure, and disrupted daily life. In Pune district, landslides forced a temporary closure of key sections of the busy Mumbai-Pune Expressway, cutting off the primary traffic link between the two major urban centers. The India Meteorological Department has issued warnings for more heavy rainfall across Maharashtra in coming days, noting that low-lying areas face ongoing flood risks.

    Further north, in the Himalayan regions of Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh, torrential downpours have sparked flash floods and additional landslides. These events have damaged critical road networks, suspended public transport services, and cut off connectivity to dozens of remote mountain villages. Emergency response teams have already been deployed to the affected areas to evacuate stranded residents and deliver life-saving aid.

    India’s annual southwest monsoon, which runs from June through September, is a double-edged sword for the country’s 1.4 billion people. The seasonal rains are critical to the nation’s agricultural sector, which supports more than half of the country’s population, and replenishes critical freshwater reserves across the subcontinent. However, the intense annual rainfall also routinely causes widespread death and destruction, fueled by unplanned urban development, poor drainage infrastructure in dense population centers, and increased soil erosion in the ecologically fragile Himalayan region.

    Compounding the crisis in Bangladesh, recent renewed fighting between Myanmar’s military government and the Arakan Army in Rakhine State has sparked international concern that a new wave of Rohingya refugees could cross the border into Bangladesh, placing even more strain on the already overcrowded and high-risk Cox’s Bazar camp network.

  • ‘Overturn this’ – Belgium taunt US and say Trump move fired them up

    ‘Overturn this’ – Belgium taunt US and say Trump move fired them up

    Ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash between co-hosts the United States and Belgium, a controversial decision to suspend US striker Folarin Balogun’s automatic one-match red card ban sparked a firestorm of criticism from football governing bodies, national teams, and coaches — with former President Donald Trump later confirming he personally requested FIFA review the original suspension. The entire off-pitch drama did little to derail Belgium, who walked away with a dominant 4-1 victory over the Americans to book their spot in the tournament quarter-finals.

    Balogun, 25, looked set to miss the Seattle tie after receiving a straight red card for a foul on Bosnia-Herzegovina defender Tarik Muharemovic in the US’s previous group stage match. Under standard FIFA rules, a straight red card results in an automatic one-match suspension for the player’s next fixture. But just 24 hours before kickoff, FIFA made the unprecedented call to pause Balogun’s suspension for a 12-month period, clearing him to start against Belgium.

    The ruling drew immediate condemnation across global football. UEFA, European football’s top governing body, said the last-minute intervention to cancel a pre-tournament knockout suspension “crossed a red line.” England manager Thomas Tuchel also spoke out against the decision, warning it set a dangerous precedent for future international competition. “Where to draw the line is the question that I ask,” Tuchel noted, pointing to England’s own recent red card for defender Jarell Quansah in their Round of 16 win over Mexico, where Quansah will serve his mandatory suspension in the next round.

    Historical records underscore how unusual FIFA’s call was: of the 189 other red cards issued in men’s World Cup history prior to this tournament, only one player has ever avoided an automatic suspension — Brazil icon Garrincha in 1962, a decision made before the modern mandatory red card suspension system was implemented.

    The Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) confirmed it was “astonished” by the ruling and formally appealed FIFA’s decision, contesting Balogun’s eligibility to play in the Round of 16 tie. FIFA ultimately rejected the appeal, ruling Belgium was not an “interested party” to the original red card decision as it was only the US’s next opponent, not a party to the previous match.

    On Monday, Trump confirmed during a White House appearance that he had personally reached out to FIFA to request a review of Balogun’s ban, saying he “didn’t think it was a foul.” The US president confirmed he spoke directly to FIFA president Gianni Infantino, but insisted he only asked for a review and did not pressure FIFA to reverse the suspension. “I think it would have left a big stain on the tournament if the ban had stayed,” Trump said. “I can’t tell them what to do. I don’t believe they made the decision; I believe it was the commission that made the decision. And it was the right decision.” Trump had reiterated that stance Sunday, calling FIFA’s ultimate ruling the correct one.

    Despite the cleared striker in the US starting line-up, Belgium controlled the match from start to finish, securing a lopsided 4-1 win that eliminated the co-hosts from the tournament.

    Belgium midfielder Nicolas Raskin, who also plays club football for Rangers, told reporters after the match that the entire squad had left the off-pitch controversy with a “sense of injustice” over the ruling, and used that feeling as motivation heading into the game. “A lot has happened off the pitch over the last two days,” Raskin said. “There was a sense of injustice within the squad, and we were determined to respond on the field.”

    Captain Youri Tielemans echoed that sentiment, adding the controversial ruling had only unified the Belgian side and boosted their focus ahead of kickoff. “We told ourselves we had to respond on the pitch. That’s what we did,” he said.

    After scoring their fourth goal, multiple Belgian players were photographed celebrating with a dance mimicking the viral “Trump dance” — the signature hip-swaying, slow arm-pumping routine that gained widespread attention during Trump’s 2024 US presidential campaign. The Belgian national team’s official Instagram account further leaned into the mockery of the situation, posting a photo of striker Romelu Lukaku cupping his ear to the crowd with the caption “overturn this,” a clear reference to FIFA’s decision to reverse Balogun’s ban.

    Belgian head coach Rudi Garcia noted that Balogun approached him after the final whistle to speak about the controversy, and Garcia made clear he held no ill will toward the striker. “It’s not his fault, he’s not the one to blame and that’s what I told him,” Garcia said. When asked how the off-pitch chaos impacted his side, Garcia added that his mature squad stayed focused on their own game plan regardless of the US line-up. “Regardless of the US starting line-up, what really mattered to us is our game plan. The group is very mature. I told them what matters the most is us.”

    The incident also drew international criticism from Iran, who was eliminated from the 2026 World Cup in the group stage amid visa and travel disruptions caused by ongoing US military conflict with the country. Iran posted a side-by-side screenshot on their official website showing their 1-1 draw with Belgium alongside the US’s 4-1 defeat, with the caption: “Now the whole world is dancing for the humiliating defeat of politics against football.” The dig referenced a previous comment from US Homeland Security chief Markwayne Mullin, who said he “danced a happy dance” after Iran was eliminated from group stage play.

  • Round 19 team lists: Tom Dearden set to return after Origin blow, Souths stun as Jye Gray dropped

    Round 19 team lists: Tom Dearden set to return after Origin blow, Souths stun as Jye Gray dropped

    As National Rugby League clubs across the competition hold their breath waiting for fitness and availability updates on their State of Origin representatives, two of the league’s top playmakers have been cleared to work their way back into game day squads this weekend, bringing critical boosts to their respective teams.

    One of the most anticipated comebacks belongs to North Queensland Cowboys co-captain Tom Dearden, who has been sidelined since a damaging syndesmosis injury against the Parramatta Eels in Round 10. The injury forced the 2023 Wally Lewis Medal winner to miss the entire 2024 State of Origin series, but he has earned a spot on the Cowboys’ extended bench for this weekend’s clash against the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles.

    Cowboys head coach Todd Payten told reporters that Dearden’s recovery has progressed better than expected, with a final call on his inclusion coming after the team’s main training session and captain’s run. “He’s tracking along all right. He’s got a couple of boxes to tick,” Payten said. “The main session is tomorrow (so hopefully) he gets through that, and then we have the captain’s run. Depending on how he pulls up, we’ll make a judgment call on that. But things are looking promising.” If Dearden gets the green light to play, current playmaker Jaxon Purdue is expected to shift to the centres to accommodate his return.

    Over at the Melbourne Storm, the club has secured a massive boost with former Dally M Medal winner Jahrome Hughes returning to the starting line-up for their match against the Gold Coast Titans, after recovering from a hamstring strain that kept him sidelined for multiple weeks. Hughes isn’t the only returnee for the Storm: Nick Meaney, Jack Howarth and Manaia Waitere are also back in the squad to reinforce the team’s backline. Mid-season recruit Oryn Keeley has been named to Melbourne’s extended bench and is in line to make his club debut this weekend if called up.

    Wests Tigers have also received positive injury news, with playmaker Jarome Luai cleared to return after completing the NRL’s concussion protocols, while forward Samuela Fainu is back from a foot injury. The Tigers will be without hooker Api Koroisau, who continues to recover from a pectoral injury, so Josese Lanyon will step into the dummy-half role for the clash against the New Zealand Warriors. The Warriors have suffered a loss of their own, with winger Dallin Watene-Zelezniak ruled out with a hamstring injury, but they welcome back key forwards James Fisher-Harris and Leka Halasima to the squad.

    The Dolphins and Cronulla Sharks have kept fans and analysts guessing, with all their State of Origin stars named only to extended benches pending late fitness checks. Down at the South Sydney Rabbitohs, head coach Wayne Bennett has made a surprising shake-up to his backline: experienced fullback Matt Dufty will replace young talent Jye Gray in the starting line-up, while Jayden Sullivan comes into the side to replace suspended playmaker Cody Walker. Gray has been dropped to the reserves bench for the clash.

    For the Canterbury Bulldogs, forward Jacob Preston has been named as a reserve and could come in as a last-minute inclusion if any starter pulls out injured. The Canberra Raiders welcome back veteran forward Josh Papalii and youngster Noah Martin for their upcoming fixture. Raiders head coach Ricky Stuart chose not to name winger Savelio Tamale, who was taken out early in the team’s last match against the St George Illawarra Dragons after a messy first 30 minutes. However, Stuart has named playmaker Ethan Strange, who was considered a doubt for the State of Origin decider earlier this month with an ankle injury, confirming he will be available this weekend.

    Finally, Sydney Roosters legend Daniel Tupou is set to hit a major career milestone this weekend, hitting 300 NRL games after overcoming a recent injury. The Roosters have also named Hugo Savala at halfback as a back-up, in case Queensland Maroons star Sam Walker is unable to back up after Origin decider duties.

  • Marine Le Pen’s 2027 bid for French presidency is at stake in Paris court ruling

    Marine Le Pen’s 2027 bid for French presidency is at stake in Paris court ruling

    On Tuesday, a Paris appeals court prepared to deliver a landmark ruling that will determine the political future of French far-right leader Marine Le Pen, a decision carrying sweeping implications for the 2027 French presidential election and the broader political landscape of the European Union.

    The 57-year-old leader of the National Rally (RN), one of France’s most consequential major political forces, is challenging a March 2025 lower court conviction. The original ruling found Le Pen and multiple other RN officials guilty of misappropriating European Parliament funds between 2004 and 2016, when the party used money earmarked for EU parliamentary assistants to pay internal party staff. The lower court issued a suspended prison sentence and imposed a five-year ban on holding elected public office, a penalty that would bar Le Pen from running in the 2027 contest.

    The verdict is scheduled to begin reading at 1:30 p.m. local time, with legal observers noting it could take several hours to complete. Outgoing French President Emmanuel Macron is constitutionally prohibited from seeking a third consecutive term, opening an open race for the Elysee Palace that would be dramatically reshaped if Le Pen, the RN’s most popular and recognizable figure, is forced out of contention.

    Le Pen has consistently denied all wrongdoing and has publicly expressed her intention to mount a fourth presidential bid in 2027. Should the appeals court uphold the five-year ban, her decades-long political career – which pulled the National Rally from the far-right fringe to the center of French electoral politics – would effectively be sidelined. A ruling upholding the ban would also shake EU politics by removing one of the bloc’s most vocal and influential critics from mainstream electoral competition.

    If Le Pen is barred from running, her 30-year-old protégé Jordan Bardella, the current president of the anti-immigration, EU-skeptic National Rally, is lined up to take her place as the party’s presidential nominee. Political analysts have already noted Bardella is ideologically aligned but not an identical political copy of Le Pen, meaning his candidacy would shift the party’s campaign dynamic.

    Multiple alternative outcomes remain on the table. The court could uphold Le Pen’s conviction but reduce the public office ban to two years or less, a timeline that would see the penalty expire before the first round of the 2027 presidential election scheduled for April 2027. The court could also choose to impose no ban at all. Even if the ban is shortened, Le Pen has signaled she may still opt out of the race if other judicial restrictions – including a unsuspended prison sentence, electronic monitoring, or other limits that impede free campaigning – are put in place. In a recent interview last week, she clarified: “If I’m allowed to be a candidate but am effectively prevented from campaigning freely, then you understand that wouldn’t be possible.”

    Prosecutors have urged the appeals court to issue a four-year prison sentence, three of which would be suspended, alongside retaining the original five-year ban on holding elected office. Prosecutors have alleged Le Pen led an organized “system” designed to “siphon off” EU public funds for the benefit of the National Rally. While prosecutors did not request that the ban take immediate effect – as the lower court ruled – the appeals court retains the authority to order immediate implementation of the penalty.

    Even if the ruling goes against Le Pen, she retains the right to appeal the verdict to France’s highest court, the Court of Cassation. It remains uncertain whether the high court would agree to suspend the sentence while the final appeal is processed, though the Court of Cassation has previously confirmed that if it accepts the case, it will aim to issue a final ruling ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

  • Fans react to US World Cup loss after red card drama

    Fans react to US World Cup loss after red card drama

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosts the United States have seen their tournament run cut short in a match marred by red card controversy, leaving soccer supporters across the nation processing an early and unexpected exit.

    The United States men’s national team crashed out of the competition following a tense contest that turned on a pivotal red card decision. The call shifted the entire momentum of the match, leaving the Americans down a player for a critical stretch and ultimately unable to claw their way back into contention for advancement.

    BBC correspondent Nada Tawfik hit the streets to speak directly with heartbroken, frustrated, and reflective US fans in the immediate aftermath of the elimination. Many supporters expressed raw disappointment, saying the team had built high hopes coming into the tournament as co-hosts, and an early exit was far from what they expected. Others questioned the controversial red card ruling, arguing it changed the entire trajectory of the match and unfairly derailed the US side’s chances.

    Despite the widespread disappointment, some fans also offered measured reflections, pointing to young talent on the roster that they hope will develop for future tournaments. Even so, there is no masking the letdown across the US soccer community, which had poured energy into supporting the team ahead of what was supposed to be a historic home-region World Cup run.

  • Yacht owners and public housing residents once shared Venezuela’s coast. Now they share its ruin

    Yacht owners and public housing residents once shared Venezuela’s coast. Now they share its ruin

    Along Venezuela’s sun-dappled Caribbean coastline, Caraballeda long stood as a rare experiment in cross-class coexistence. Wealthy yacht owners with marina-access apartments and working-class public housing residents shared the same curving waterfront street, both waking every morning to sweeping views of powdery white sand and clear turquoise waters. This intentional integration, designed by successive Venezuelan governments to break down socioeconomic segregation, became a testament to the country’s long-running housing policies—until a devastating earthquake struck on June 24. In seconds, violent shaking reduced dozens of buildings to rubble, killing hundreds of residents mid-holiday or rest, and leaving thousands of survivors facing an uncertain future.

    The official death toll from the disaster has now climbed above 3,500, with roughly 17,000 people left homeless in a country already grappling with years of economic collapse. For these survivors, the path to secure housing runs through the same Venezuelan government that has faced widespread condemnation for its botched disaster response and decades of politicizing access to homes. Even amid the national crisis, housing has remained a defining aspiration for Venezuelan people stretching back more than half a century. When an oil boom in the late 20th century flooded state coffers, the government funded large public housing complexes, wealthy Venezuelans bought multiple vacation properties, and low-income families built informal brick-and-cement homes called ranchos. Even after Venezuela’s economy collapsed in 2013, most citizens still retained some form of shelter—whether through state handouts from the socialist government, deeply discounted purchases from families fleeing the country, informal stacked ranchos, or occupation of abandoned properties.

    Most public housing units built by the ruling socialist party, which has held power for 27 years and is currently led by acting President Delcy Rodríguez, do not grant residents formal property deeds. Still, for many low-income families, these assigned homes offered a stability they had never known. Carlos Ortega, a local resident, lost 11 of his relatives when the public housing tower where they lived collapsed. The family had received the apartments more than a decade earlier, after a previous mudslide left them homeless. “It was their home, their house. It was an immense joy when they were assigned these houses here,” Ortega explained. “Imagine, they were given a home after losing everything, but now they’ve lost everything, even their lives.” Only one of Ortega’s siblings survived the collapse; his son, who worked at a nearby convenience store when the quake hit, remains missing more than a week after the disaster. As Ortega sifts through rubble looking for any trace of his family, a short distance away rescuers work through the wreckage of an upscale apartment building adjacent to a yacht club, where a military general’s wife waits for news of her husband and children.

    The policy of integrating low-income public housing into wealthy coastal neighborhoods predates Hugo Chávez’s 1999 rise to the presidency, but Chávez’s socialist movement expanded the strategy to gain political advantage, explained Ronal Rodríguez, a researcher at the Venezuela Observatory of Colombia’s Universidad del Rosario. Building public housing in opposition-leaning wealthy neighborhoods diversified the local voter base, helping the ruling party maintain political control. But the signature Grand Housing Mission launched under Chávez, continued by former president Nicolás Maduro until his ouster by U.S. military intervention in January, carried a critical catch: no residents receive formal property ownership. “What Chavismo tries to do is maintain political dependence,” Rodríguez said. “That is, if at any point you turn against me and stop supporting me, then I’ll take away the roof I’ve given you.” This political arrangement leaves survivors particularly vulnerable now, as many have openly criticized the government’s slow and inadequate search-and-rescue response to the earthquake.

    To date, the Rodríguez administration has not released any timeline for long-term housing reconstruction or support for displaced survivors. Satellite analysis conducted by Microsoft’s AI for Good Lab estimates that at least 10,000 structures—roughly one-third of all buildings in Catia La Mar, a coastal city west of Caraballeda in La Guaira state—sustained damage. Decades of substandard construction, aging infrastructure and hazardous coastal geography left the entire region disproportionately exposed to damage from strong seismic activity.

    Today, thousands of survivors are living in makeshift tent camps set up in public parks and private parking lots across the affected region, each grappling with their own loss and uncertainty. In a Catia La Mar pharmacy parking lot, 68-year-old Benito Mantilla lives in a small tent after his privately owned home was destroyed. His wife fled to the Dominican Republic for safety, but Mantilla stayed to salvage what he can and look for work in Caracas, 40 minutes away; the earthquake also destroyed the car repair shop he co-owned with his brother. Not far from Mantilla’s tent, a woman whose daughter is a local ruling party organizer holds out hope the government will quickly assign her a new home. For 44-year-old Caryudedi González, who bought her working-class home at age 21 after years of hard work, the goal is not a new handout—she just wants to rebuild the half of her property that slid into a nearby ravine. “In many countries, it’s very difficult to own a home, and here, we work so hard to have what’s ours,” González said.

  • NATO readies for a ‘big reveal’ on arms deals to prove its firepower to Trump

    NATO readies for a ‘big reveal’ on arms deals to prove its firepower to Trump

    As NATO gathers for its two-day annual summit in Ankara, Turkey, hosted at President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s sprawling presidential palace, the transatlantic military alliance is making a high-stakes push to win over U.S. President Donald Trump ahead of his arrival. On the eve of the gathering, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte announced that Tuesday’s “big reveal” event will showcase a slate of new multi-billion dollar military procurement projects, many of which involve contracts with American defense contractors.

    This showcase comes as NATO seeks to prove to the U.S. commander-in-chief that European and Canadian allies are following through on longstanding pledges to boost defense investment and convert financial commitments into tangible military capabilities. Trump has repeatedly criticized NATO, labeling the alliance a “paper tiger” that relies entirely on U.S. military leadership and technology to function, and has demanded that allies meet higher defense spending targets. Even before the summit, Rutte attempted to ease U.S. frustrations by presenting a new chart branded “The Trump Trillion,” which highlights that European allies and Canada have spent a combined $1.2 trillion on defense since 2017. However, Trump remained unmoved by the figure, noting he was still disappointed that many allies declined to back the U.S.-led and Israel-supported military campaign against Iran, launched without prior alliance consultation. “We don’t need their money — we don’t need anything,” Trump told reporters. “I just want loyalty.”

    Among the key contracts set to be unveiled at the event is a major deal to replace NATO’s aging fleet of AWACS surveillance aircraft, which have been in service for roughly 50 years. While all frontline weaponry in NATO is owned by individual member states rather than the alliance itself, NATO operates a shared fleet of surveillance aircraft complemented by newer drone systems. A portion of the new projects will be funded through the European Union’s low-interest defense loan system, which has raised up to $170 billion on international capital markets for this purpose. Rutte emphasized that the goal of this push is to turn economic capacity into usable military strength. “We need to ensure that we are translating our economic might into military capabilities, putting the cash to work from defense plans to drones, from money to missiles and interceptors,” he said.

    Beyond defense spending debates, the summit has been roiled by a growing diplomatic dispute over a potential U.S. F-35 fighter jet sale to Turkey. Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019 after purchasing Russian-made S-400 air defense systems, but Trump, who maintains close personal ties with Erdogan, has hinted that the U.S. could resume sales during his Ankara visit. The move has drawn sharp pushback from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who publicly urged the U.S. to block the sale during an appearance on Fox News’ *Fox & Friends* Monday morning. Netanyahu argued that the sale would upend regional military balances, noting that Erdogan has “called openly for the annihilation of Israel.” Relations between Turkey and Israel have been deeply strained since the outbreak of the Gaza war, which began after the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel. Erdogan has repeatedly accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza, while Netanyahu has pushed back against Turkish policy in the region. “Selling Turkey F-35s would upset the power balance in the Middle East, which is ultimately guaranteed by Israeli air superiority and also, I think, by America’s posture in the Middle East,” Netanyahu said. Israel’s own air force operates a large fleet of U.S.-manufactured fighter jets, including dozens of F-35s alongside older F-16 and F-15 models.

    The core strategic agenda of the 2025 Ankara summit centers on the framework of “a stronger Europe for a stronger NATO,” aligned with the Trump administration’s push to reorient U.S. foreign policy. Washington has made clear that it wants European allies to take full ownership of continental security, allowing the U.S. to shift its military and diplomatic focus to countering China in the Indo-Pacific region. The Pentagon is advancing this shift under a vision it calls “NATO 3.0,” which restructures the alliance to put Europe in the lead for its own defense while maintaining U.S. support.

    Even so, increasing defense spending to meet alliance targets has proven politically fraught for many member states, as it requires either tax hikes or reallocating funds from domestic priorities. Just last month, United Kingdom Defense Secretary John Healey resigned unexpectedly over the British government’s refusal to approve higher military spending amid rising global security threats. Outgoing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who announced his resignation on June 22, is attending what is expected to be his final foreign trip in office. Starmer’s government has committed to reaching the NATO target of devoting 3.5% of gross domestic product to defense by 2035, but has faced widespread criticism from military leaders, opposition parties, and even some members of his own center-left Labour Party for failing to release a concrete roadmap to hit the target. Current plans only project defense spending will reach 2.7% of GDP by 2029.

    Across Northern and Central Eastern Europe, allied capitals are growing increasingly concerned that Russian President Vladimir Putin could launch a large-scale hybrid attack on NATO territory as he continues to face stalemate in his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Hybrid attacks combine limited conventional military action with subversive tactics including cyberattacks, disinformation, and proxy operations to destabilize alliance members without triggering a full collective defense response.

  • A shambolic end for the American dream – did Balogun saga play a part?

    A shambolic end for the American dream – did Balogun saga play a part?

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup co-host United States saw its fairytale first-ever title dream go up in smoke on Tuesday, falling to a lopsided 4-1 defeat to Belgium in the round of 16 that sent the European side through to a quarter-final clash against Spain. What was supposed to be a festive, history-making night at Seattle Stadium, kicked off with all the expected fanfare: a raucous, flag-waving American crowd, pre-match fireworks, billowing smoke flares, and a ceremonial military flyover that stoked patriotic fever. But by the final whistle, the stands were half-empty, and the momentum that had carried the US through to the knockout stage had dissolved into disappointment.

    The 4-1 scoreline marks the Americans’ heaviest World Cup defeat since 1990, and the result was overshadowed by days of controversy surrounding US striker Folarin Balogun, who was cleared to start the match despite receiving a straight red card in the team’s previous round fixture against Bosnia-Herzegovina. FIFA’s shock decision to suspend Balogun’s automatic one-match ban sparked widespread outrage from football governing bodies and opposing coaches, including UEFA, Belgium’s camp, and England manager Thomas Tuchel. The controversy even spilled into US politics, with former President Donald Trump confirming he had personally asked FIFA to review the original red card ruling, arguing the challenge on Bosnian defender Tarik Muharemovic was not a foul.

    Going into the match, Belgium defender Timothy Castagne openly acknowledged the controversy had shifted global public opinion in his side’s favor, saying, “It’s great to have the world on our side against the United States.” Balogun, who entered the match with three tournament goals to his name, offered little comment on the uproar: “I accepted the decision when I was given the red card, and then I also accepted the decision when I was told I could play. There’s not too much else I can really say on the matter.” Despite the off-field noise, Balogun failed to threaten the Belgian defense all night, leaving the US attack toothless for much of the match.

    US manager Mauricio Pochettino, whose contract expires at the end of the tournament, dismissed claims that the controversy impacted his side’s performance. “It didn’t affect our performance. It’s not an excuse. It wasn’t our day,” he told reporters after the match. Pochettino did, however, hit out at critics who accused the US federation of manipulating the process, adding, “I feel disappointed with too many people. They put politics and manipulation, talk about ethics and integrity [first]. If we talk about the history of this game, I am disappointed in a personal way.” After the final whistle, Belgium manager Rudi Garcia revealed Balogun had approached him post-match, and he made clear he held the striker blameless: “It’s not his fault, he’s not the one to blame and that’s what I told him.”

    While the Balogun saga dominated headlines in the build-up, poor defensive discipline and unforced errors, not off-field drama, were the root of the US collapse. Charles De Ketelaere scored two first-half goals for Belgium, first tapping in an opener after being left unmarked in the 18-yard box, then outjumping two American defenders to head home just minutes after the US had equalized the score. The most calamitous US mistake came for Belgium’s third goal, when hesitant goalkeeper Matt Freese strayed off his line to clear a loose ball, only to be dispossessed by De Ketelaere, leaving Hans Vanaken with an empty net to slot home from outside the penalty area. The 3-1 lead drained the life out of the home crowd, with fans streaming for the exits in the final 10 minutes before Romelu Lukaku put the final nail in the coffin with an injury-time fourth goal.

    Pochettino conceded his side never found their rhythm from the first whistle. “Everyone saw from the beginning that we did not connect with the game,” he said. “We were never in the game, even when we scored the goal [to equalise], we conceded in the next action. It was really tough from the beginning.” Reactions from fans exiting the stadium reflected the disillusionment, with one telling BBC Sport, “There was no willingness to go for the ball. There was nothing there. There was no drive, football wasn’t alive today.” Another acknowledged Belgium’s clinical performance: “The US had unforced errors all over. They didn’t play their best game but Belgium played the way they needed to win that game. To silence the crowd like they did, they put themselves in a great spot to win.”

    The exit makes the US the third North American co-host to exit the tournament at the last 16 stage, following earlier knockouts for Canada and Mexico. Despite the disappointing end to the campaign, many players and fans struck a measured tone about the long-term impact of hosting the World Cup on American soccer. After a slow pre-tournament build-up, public interest surged as the US advanced to the knockout stage, with fan zones and bars across the country packed for matches, and national team jerseys becoming ubiquitous. US midfielder Tyler Adams argued the campaign still achieved its core goals off the pitch: “You have good days and bad days and this was a bad day. We didn’t go as far as we’d like. But if we inspire a few kids on this journey then we have done something right.”

    Many fans echoed that sentiment, noting that while the result was disappointing, hosting the tournament has already pushed soccer further into the American mainstream. “It is an amazing event we have put on and we are really excited for the future of soccer in the country,” one fan said. Another acknowledged the gap that remains for the US to compete with elite football nations: “Long term we have a lot of catching up to do. There’s a culture built around football and we’re just not there yet.”

    The biggest lingering question following the exit surrounds Pochettino’s future. The former Tottenham Hotspur manager’s contract with the US Soccer Federation is set to expire after the tournament, and he offered no clarity on his next steps Tuesday. “Now it’s [time] to rest a little bit, to think, to have conversations and see what the decision is from the federation and from us,” he said. “I am so happy we built a very good relationship, but now is not the moment. In the next weeks we can start to talk, if the federation wants to talk.” For Belgium, however, the focus already turns to their quarter-final showdown with Spain, as they chase a deep run in the 2026 World Cup.

  • Landslide in northwestern China leaves 5 dead and 12 still trapped

    Landslide in northwestern China leaves 5 dead and 12 still trapped

    A devastating landslide in northwestern China has claimed five lives and left a dozen people still missing and buried under debris, state media confirmed Tuesday. The disaster unfolded shortly before 7 a.m. local time in Nanhe township, located in Longnan city of Gansu province, burying a total of 33 people under fallen earth and rock, according to China’s official Xinhua News Agency.

    As of Tuesday’s official update, investigators have not yet determined the root cause that triggered the landslide. Visual footage and photographs shared online by state-owned broadcaster China Central Television show a large-scale rescue operation underway, with three heavy excavators working alongside dozens of emergency responders on massive piles of displaced earth. The incident site is situated in a largely forested, lush green mountainous area, with footage recording clear, sunny weather at the time of rescue efforts.

    Local authorities have already completed relocation of nearby residents to safe temporary locations to avoid the risk of secondary disasters, as search and recovery operations continue around the clock to reach the 12 trapped people.

  • Another suspected case of H5 bird flu as sick bird found in SA

    Another suspected case of H5 bird flu as sick bird found in SA

    Australian agricultural and animal health authorities have detected a second suspected case of the highly pathogenic H5 bird flu strain in South Australia, even as neighboring New South Wales has cleared a recent suspicious testing case, delivering a much-needed relief to local officials.

    South Australia’s Department of Primary Industries and Regions confirmed that the suspected infection was found in an ailing migratory giant petrel picked up at Hardwicke Bay, located on the state’s Yorke Peninsula. The discovery was triggered after a member of the public reported the sick bird to the national Emergency Animal Disease Hotline, and initial screening returned a positive result for the deadly H5 subtype.

    Pending final confirmation of the diagnosis, this incident would mark the second confirmed H5 case in South Australia and the eighth nationwide across Australia. To date, the virus has been confirmed in five wild birds in Western Australia and one giant petrel in New South Wales, found late last week.

    South Australia’s Industries Minister Clare Scriven called the new suspected discovery disappointing, but emphasized that ongoing active surveillance and public participation remain critical to tracking the spread of the virus. “Every report from the community is reviewed, and if H5 bird flu is suspected, our response teams are deployed immediately to collect samples and test,” Scriven explained, thanking members of the public for reporting sick or dead birds they encounter.

    Skye Fruean, chief veterinary officer for PIRSA, noted that state authorities have been building preparedness for an incursion of H5 bird flu for several years. She added that the current suspected case is considered geographically isolated, with no other sick birds detected in the surrounding Hardwicke Bay area. “This is an encouraging sign,” Fruean said. “To date, there is still no evidence that the virus has spread into Australia’s native wildlife populations.”

    Across the border in New South Wales, officials have announced a negative result for a sick cormorant found over the weekend at Narrabeen, which had raised alarm among local response teams. Samples from the bird were tested at the state’s Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institution, which confirmed the bird did not carry the H5 strain.

    NSW Chief Veterinary Officer Jo Coombe said the negative result was publicly released to address widespread public interest in the case. Since activating the state’s H5 response protocol on June 19, Coombe explained, dozens of investigations into sick or dead birds have been completed, with only one positive result confirmed – the giant petrel found near Hawks Nest late last week.

    As of the latest update, Coombe confirmed there have been no detections of H5 bird flu in domestic poultry flocks across Australia, no evidence of spread to local wild populations, and no reports of large-scale animal mortality linked to the virus. She also reiterated that the current risk of H5 bird flu transmission to human health remains extremely low.