作者: admin

  • Melbourne coach issues challenge to Jack Viney ahead of long-awaited VFL return

    Melbourne coach issues challenge to Jack Viney ahead of long-awaited VFL return

    As the Melbourne Demons push toward a top-four finish and the September finals series, two key injured players are gearing up for a return through the club’s Victorian Football League (VFL) affiliate — but one of the team’s most decorated stars will not get a free pass back to the senior side based on his career legacy.

    Vice-captain Jack Viney has not featured in a senior AFL match since the final round of the 2023 season, sidelined first by an Achilles tendon injury that required off-season surgery, followed by a persistent back problem that kept him off the field for the entire 2024 campaign to date. Young forward Latrelle Pickett, meanwhile, has missed the past two weeks of game time after sustaining a concussion.

    Both players will hit the field for Melbourne’s VFL side this weekend, when the affiliate team faces Box Hill in its final regular season match Sunday. Speaking to reporters Tuesday morning, Demons interim senior coach Steven King clarified that while selection is not a matter of “earning” a spot through a grueling trial, the star midfielder will not be handed a senior game purely off his reputation.

    “The first thing for him is just to get through a whole game,” King explained. “It’s just about making sure he’s had a great runway to set him up to succeed. He’s coming from a back injury that has held him out for the whole season, so we have to respect what he’s been through. I feel like you can’t just get given a game on reputation and you have to actually perform.”

    King also addressed off-field speculation surrounding first-year player Pickett, dismissing recent reports in the *Herald Sun* that claimed club officials had confronted Pickett over drinking alcohol following his concussion. King labeled the story a “bit of a non-story” and said he was caught off guard by the published report.

    “He’s a first-year player who’s still just finding the balance between being a professional and a first-year player,” King said. “From me, there was no sanction, no conversation. I was surprised it was an article this morning.”

    The coach also provided an injury update on star forward Brody Mihocek, who was ruled out for the remainder of the 2024 season after sustaining a neck injury during the annual King’s Birthday match in June. Mihocek has progressed to light jogging as part of his rehabilitation, but King confirmed he would not return to competitive play this year.

    For the Demons’ senior side, the next fortnight will shape their finals aspirations. This weekend, the team travels to Adelaide to face Port Adelaide, before closing out the regular season at home against the Western Bulldogs. Melbourne is currently vying for a top-four finish that would grant them a home qualifying final to open the September finals series.

  • Trump Media reports $238m loss as crypto falls

    Trump Media reports $238m loss as crypto falls

    Donald Trump’s social media holding company, Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), operator of the former president’s Truth Social platform, has revealed a staggering $238 million net loss for the second quarter of 2025. The quarterly deficit, reported between April and June, is more than 10 times larger than the loss recorded in the same period one year prior, a jump driven largely by downturns in the alternative digital assets the firm has added to its investment portfolio as it expands beyond core social media operations.

    While the company delivered strong top-line growth, with total revenue climbing 89% year-over-year to hit $1.7 million, widespread declines in cryptocurrency prices erased any positive momentum from rising user and subscription income. As of the end of the second quarter, TMTG reported total consolidated assets of $2 billion, with roughly $1.9 billion categorized as liquid financial assets including cash holdings, short-term market securities and its volatile digital currency investments. To date, the firm has never posted an annual or quarterly profit, even as it has branched into new high-risk, high-reward sectors beyond social media, adding large cryptocurrency positions and clean energy projects to its business holdings.

    The most controversial addition to TMTG’s service lineup came in July 2025, when the company announced a new premium subscription tier that grants Wall Street traders and other paying subscribers early, faster access to Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts. Market analysts have widely noted that Trump’s posts frequently move prices for publicly traded stocks and other financial assets, meaning early access could give paying subscribers a significant trading edge. This new offering has already sparked intense debate around both legal compliance and ethical norms, as the Trump family retains majority ownership of TMTG, raising questions about the propriety of a private company controlled by the sitting president profiting directly from his public political statements.

    In spite of the sharp quarterly loss, interim TMTG chief executive Kevin McGurn struck an optimistic tone in comments accompanying the earnings release Monday. He confirmed that more than 10 high-end clients have already signed up for the premium early-access service, which company leadership frames as a critical new recurring revenue stream for the business. “I’m encouraged by this momentum, and shareholders should expect more frequent communication from us on our progress each quarter as we enter this next chapter,” McGurn said. The company also confirmed it would pivot back to prioritizing its core social media mission after its recent period of rapid diversification into unrelated sectors. The BBC has reached out to both TMTG and the White House to request additional comment on the quarterly results and the ongoing controversy around the premium subscription service, and has not yet received a response.

  • Torment of Afghan fathers as daughters deprived of education

    Torment of Afghan fathers as daughters deprived of education

    More than four years after the Taliban retook control of Afghanistan, a nationwide ban barring girls and young women from secondary and higher education has inflicted quiet, crippling torment on countless Afghan fathers, who watch their daughters’ academic dreams crumble with no path forward. In interviews with Agence France-Presse across the country, dozens of fathers — even deeply religious men who have backed the Taliban’s governance on other issues — choked back tears describing the anguish of seeing their bright, ambitious daughters locked out of classrooms, their futures narrowed by a policy that stands alone in the world.

    The Taliban justifies the ban, which has kept secondary schools closed to girls since March 2022, with universities barred to women later that same year, through its specific interpretation of Islamic law. But many devout Afghan fathers reject that framing. “You will never find in the Quran that education is only for men,” one committed religious father told AFP. Another, who openly praised the Taliban for restoring national security and cutting systemic corruption, said he simply could not “find any proper justification for this” sweeping restriction.

    All of the fathers interviewed, whose identities are kept confidential for their safety, described persistent emotional turmoil stemming from the ban. Many lose sleep nightly, grappling with how to support daughters who are openly frustrated by the sudden end to their education. Data from a 2023 United Nations survey underscores how widespread this opposition is: nine out of 10 Afghan men questioned said girls’ access to secondary education is a critical priority, and nearly two-thirds view supporting a daughter’s education as a pious, religious duty. Some men who have openly protested the ban have already been imprisoned, and the Taliban government has not responded to AFP’s requests for comment on the policy, which officials have repeatedly called temporary despite its four-year duration. UN estimates indicate at least one million girls have already been directly harmed by the secondary education restrictions.

    For many fathers, the dread of their daughters’ final day of primary school looms larger every day. Ahmad, a 40-year-old engineer from northern Afghanistan whose own wife — a former secondary school mathematics professor — can no longer work under the Taliban’s rules, said he never imagined he would watch his four daughters face a lifetime of effective illiteracy. Stopping education after sixth grade, he explained, leaves girls completely unprepared to navigate the demands of 21st-century life. With his eldest daughter approaching the end of primary school, clandestine underground classes cost more than half his monthly salary, leaving emigration as the only seeming option. Once on track to resettle his family in the United States after working for an international organization, his path was blocked by former President Donald Trump’s immigration restrictions, and European nations that regularly denounce the Taliban’s gender policies have also refused the family visas. Leaving illegally carries too much risk, Ahmad said, and his daughters constantly ask when they will depart, unaware that their parents’ hope is fading fast.

    Across Kabul province, Mohammad, a 42-year-old doctor in a small town, spent four years searching for a workaround to the ban after his two daughters, aged 12 and 14, reached the end of primary school. He once dreamed of sending them to top international universities, arguing that “for the development of Afghanistan we need women, not only for the home.” He first considered sending them across the border to Pakistan for schooling, but the border was sealed following intensified cross-border hostilities, closing that path. He now pays $153 a month — a steep sum for most Afghan families — for his daughters to attend a private religious school that secretly teaches general academic courses alongside religious studies. The school issues no official graduation certificates, and Mohammad lives in constant fear that Taliban inspectors will discover the secret classes and detain his daughters. Still, he tells his girls, “While I’m alive, I will find a solution for your education.”

    In southern Kandahar province, the Taliban’s historic stronghold, restrictions are even harsher: some girls are pulled out of primary school early if they are considered physically mature. N, a father who moved his family to Kabul for work, has a 12-year-old daughter with a passionate interest in astronomy who recently made a solar system collage and peppered him with questions about gravity. When he told her she would learn these topics in school, she replied, “How can I learn… if I cannot go beyond grade six.” N now pays for underground classes and online computer and design courses to keep his daughter learning, but declining international aid has squeezed household incomes across Afghanistan, and he says opportunities for secret education are shrinking by the day. He hides his stress from his daughter, who does not know how precarious her continued learning has become.

    For M, a devout logistics manager from a working-class background who supports the Taliban’s work on security and anti-corruption, the pain of the ban has become unbearable. His 13-year-old daughter was forced to leave school earlier this year, and on a recent family holiday, while everyone else celebrated, she locked herself in her room crying. Beyond the education ban, girls are barred from public parks and recreation, leaving her with almost no opportunities for social activity. M takes her out to a restaurant once a week just to get her out of the house, but when she falls into deep despair, he admitted, “I go to another room and… I hide to cry.” He spent years saving to move the family to Iran so his daughter could study there, but the ongoing war in that country ended those plans. He enrolled her in a Quranic school to give her some social contact, but she recently stopped attending, telling him, “Even if I continue, there will be no future for me.”

    In Kabul, Nasir, 47, and his wife — a former teacher — have turned their home into a makeshift school for their daughters, using salvaged secondhand high school textbooks to keep their learning on track. They enforce a strict daily routine, waking the girls at the same time they would get up for formal school and sticking to a regular class schedule. But Nasir confides that his younger daughter, who saw her education cut short at 15, struggles with depression and often lacks the motivation to continue learning alone at home. The academic trophies his daughters won in primary school sit on the family’s home bookshelf next to their textbooks, a quiet reminder of what has been lost. Recently, the girls started attending secret outdoor classes in the neighborhood, after tutoring younger children in their apartment building for extra practice. “We have sleepless nights” worrying about their safety and their futures, Nasir said. “This regime does not want educated people. When will we go back to a normal life?”

  • Ceuta leader wants migrant detention centre after influx

    Ceuta leader wants migrant detention centre after influx

    A sharp political clash has erupted between Spain’s leftist national administration and right-leaning regional leadership over the fate of thousands of migrants who remain stranded in the North African enclave of Ceuta, following an unprecedented mass border crossing from Morocco last month. On Monday, Juan Jesus Vivas, leader of Ceuta’s Popular Party (PP) administration, issued an urgent call for the construction of a dedicated detention facility to hold the remaining migrants, clearing the way for faster processing and eventual expulsion from the small Spanish territory. The crisis unfolded on July 30 and 31, when roughly 72,000 migrants stormed the fortified border between Morocco and Ceuta in one of the largest mass border crossings in recent European history. Spanish government data confirms that approximately 70,000 of those migrants have since been repatriated back to Morocco. But thousands remain, among them hundreds of unaccompanied minor migrants who are protected from immediate summary deportation under Spanish and EU law. Currently, these remaining migrants are forced to live in makeshift conditions on Ceuta’s streets, with limited access to basic necessities including food, clean drinking water, emergency shelter and proper sanitation. The small enclave, whose permanent population numbers just 84,000, has seen its public resources completely overwhelmed by the sudden arrival of such a large group of people. The unresolved situation of the remaining migrants has opened a major rift between the central government led by left-leaning parties, and regional governments controlled by the conservative PP and far-right Vox party. Right-leaning regional administrations across Spain have refused to comply with existing legal requirements to accept and resettle the unaccompanied minor migrants from Ceuta, deepening the political deadlock. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Vivas argued that a centralized internment facility for irregular migrants is an urgent necessity to address the current chaos. “A space that acts as an internment centre for foreigners must be set up, where these people can be held and remain confined,” Vivas stated. He emphasized that the facility would allow authorities to speed up deportation procedures and remove homeless migrants from Ceuta’s public streets, describing the current situation as completely “unsustainable” for the small territory. Vivas also pushed back against central government figures, estimating the actual number of remaining migrants is between 8,000 and 11,000, far higher than the central government’s official count of roughly 2,500. The growing public discontent over the crisis boiled over on Sunday, when thousands of Ceuta’s permanent residents gathered for a mass protest to condemn the central government’s handling of the emergency. Protesters argued that the crisis has left the enclave unsafe and abandoned by national leaders. In response to the growing outcry, Angel Victor Torres, Spain’s minister for regional relations, sought to reassure Ceuta’s population that the national government was stepping up its response. Torres confirmed that security force numbers had been significantly increased, including a 40 percent boost in the deployment of the national Civil Guard to the enclave. He added that reuniting unaccompanied migrant children with their family members is the administration’s top priority, but made no mention of plans for further expulsions of the remaining migrants, leaving key questions about the crisis’s resolution unanswered.

  • Russia bars only anti-war party from elections

    Russia bars only anti-war party from elections

    On Monday, Russia’s highest judicial body upheld a legal challenge brought by a pro-Kremlin nationalist faction, issuing a ruling that excludes Yabloko, the country’s sole remaining openly anti-war political party, from participating in the upcoming September State Duma parliamentary elections. The decision eliminates the last electoral option for Russian voters who oppose the ongoing 4.5-year military conflict in Ukraine.

    “The claims seeking to annul the registration of the federal list of candidates for the State Duma of the ninth convocation, nominated by the Yabloko political party, were granted,” announced Judge Vyacheslav Kirillov from the bench.

    Against a backdrop where nearly all of President Vladimir Putin’s prominent political rivals have been imprisoned, forced into exile, or killed, Yabloko stands as the last liberal-leaning political organization still legally operating within Russia’s borders. The party has earned public support from multiple exiled opposition figures, including Yulia Navalnaya, widow of deceased opposition leader Alexei Navalny — both Navalnaya and her late husband are officially labeled “extremists” by Russian authorities.

    Shortly after the ruling was made public, roughly 100 Yabloko supporters, a majority of whom were young people, assembled outside the Supreme Court building, repeating chants of “Shame! Shame!” to protest the decision. Speaking to the gathered crowd following the hearing, Yabloko party leader Nikolay Rybakov confirmed that the organization would launch an appeal against the court’s ban.

    “We have a long way ahead and we have a big and important task: to stop deaths and bring the peace back,” Rybakov told supporters. “Everything we do should be dedicated to that.”

    Before the court issued its decision, 22-year-old Yabloko backer Yevgenia spoke with AFP, explaining that she planned to cast her vote for the party to signal to the Kremlin that “we are not satisfied with the current state of affairs”. She added, “We would really like to reach some kind of peaceful agreement so that this special military operation can finally come to an end,” using the official Russian terminology for the full-scale offensive in Ukraine.

    As Ukrainian cross-border retaliatory strikes increasingly target Russian infrastructure including oil refineries and e-commerce storage facilities, disrupting daily life for ordinary citizens across the country, Yabloko had centered its electoral campaign on its anti-war peace platform, hoping to resonate especially with younger voter demographics. The party also aimed to channel growing public discontent over widespread internet shutdowns implemented by Russian authorities to mitigate the impact of Ukrainian drone attacks.

    Years of growing pressure have been placed on Yabloko and its members, who have faced repeated legal repercussions for their open opposition to the conflict. In a pre-ruling interview with AFP over the weekend, Rybakov shared that approximately 40 of the party’s activists currently face criminal prosecution.

    Earlier this year in June, the party’s deputy leader Maxim Kruglov was sentenced to seven years in prison over social media posts criticizing the military campaign, while Lev Shlosberg, head of Yabloko’s Pskov regional branch, was arrested by authorities in 2023. Rybakov himself was issued a fine last December for sharing a photo of Alexei Navalny on social media, a penalty that also disqualifies him from running as a candidate in the September election.

    Polling conducted earlier in 2024 placed Yabloko — whose name translates to “apple” in Russian — at just 3% public support, a figure that falls short of the 5% vote threshold required to secure seats in Russia’s lower legislative house. Founded in 1993 by a group of pro-Western former government officials shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Yabloko saw modest electoral success in the 1990s. But since 2003, as the Kremlin consolidated control over Russia’s electoral system, the party has failed to win any State Duma seats, with Putin’s ruling United Russia party securing a supermajority in every parliamentary election held since that time.

    To date, all diplomatic efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine have stalled. Putin has maintained hardline territorial demands as a condition for ending fighting, and has repeatedly ruled out any peace negotiations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Despite this official stance, independent public opinion polls show that a majority of Russian residents favor opening peace negotiations with Kyiv.

  • Trump insists Netanyahu relationship ‘very good’ despite Gaza rift

    Trump insists Netanyahu relationship ‘very good’ despite Gaza rift

    U.S. President Donald Trump moved to quell growing speculation of a fractured bilateral relationship on Monday, publicly affirming that his partnership with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains “very good” — days after the Israeli leader openly rejected a Washington-brokered postwar framework for Gaza. The clarification came in response to a reporter’s shouted question at the conclusion of an official event held in the White House Oval Office.

    The public rift has built steadily over more than a week, culminating in Netanyahu’s explicit Sunday rejection of the U.S.-led proposal, which requires Israel to begin a phased drawdown of its military forces in Gaza in parallel with Hamas fulfilling disarmament commitments. Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving sitting prime minister, is navigating a high-stakes political contest ahead of the country’s October 27 national elections — the first national vote since the devastating October 2023 Hamas attack that triggered the ongoing Gaza war. Recent polling shows the leader either neck-and-neck with opposition candidates or trailing in key matchups.

    The U.S. Gaza plan faces deep backlash among Netanyahu’s core right-wing electoral base, and influential far-right members of his governing coalition have repeatedly pressured him to reject the proposal outright. Until the recent public split, Netanyahu centered much of his reelection campaign on his close, mutually beneficial relationship with Trump, who has taken historically pro-Israel steps during his time in office, including the controversial decision to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

    The two leaders aligned closely earlier this year when they launched a joint military campaign against Iran in late February, but their strategic priorities have diverged in recent months. Trump has pushed for a permanent ceasefire and negotiated political settlement to the Gaza conflict, as the protracted war has dragged down his domestic approval ratings and pushed global oil prices sharply higher.

    The U.S.-backed Gaza plan represents the next phase of a ceasefire agreement brokered by Washington earlier this year, which has reduced the scale of Israeli military operations in the enclave but failed to end hostilities entirely. According to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry — whose casualty data is deemed reliable by the United Nations — more than 1,250 Palestinian civilians and fighters have been killed by Israeli operations in Gaza since the ceasefire took effect. The Israeli military has confirmed five of its soldiers have died in the same period.

  • Trump order pushes for overhaul of childhood vaccine schedule

    Trump order pushes for overhaul of childhood vaccine schedule

    On a Monday afternoon in the Oval Office, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order calling for a sweeping review of childhood vaccine mandates for K-12 schools, doubling down on a long-debunked call to split the combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine into three separate single-disease shots. The signing ceremony was attended by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longstanding anti-vaccine advocate who built his public profile around spreading false claims of a link between childhood immunization and autism, a claim that has been thoroughly disproven by decades of peer-reviewed clinical research.

    Critics across the medical and public health communities have quickly decried the order as scientifically unfounded and a direct threat to decades of successful public health progress. The policy push also faces immediate structural limitations: the federal government holds no direct authority over school vaccine requirements, which are set independently by individual U.S. states and territories. As outlined in the text of the order itself, the Trump administration can only advise state and local governments to revisit their existing immunization rules for school enrollment, making the measure largely symbolic rather than immediately enforceable.

    The order does include one actionable provision: it directs the Department of Health and Human Services to convene a new interagency task force to work with private pharmaceutical manufacturers and international partners to develop and approve separate MMR vaccines, while retaining the existing combined shot as an option. Even if the task force moves forward immediately, leading pediatric health experts warn that full regulatory approval and widespread distribution of separate shots would take more than a decade to complete.

    “This entire order is rooted in politics and conspiracy theories, not evidence-based public health,” Alister Martin, New York City’s Health Commissioner, said in a public statement following the signing. “Vaccination recommendations should not be set by the president, and thankfully, they are not. Cities and states retain authority to set their own rules, and here in New York City, we will continue to follow science-based guidance, not politically motivated misinformation.”

    Decades of large-scale clinical trials and population-level data consistently confirm that the combined MMR vaccine is safe for children. Public health experts note that the combined formulation delivers faster, broader protection against three dangerous contagious diseases, while also reducing logistical burdens for families who may face barriers to scheduling multiple doctor’s appointments for separate shots. Despite this overwhelming consensus, President Trump used the signing ceremony to repeat a series of inflammatory, unsubstantiated claims contradicting established medical guidance.

    Leading national medical organizations have uniformly rejected the administration’s proposals. Andrew Racine, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), emphasized that the development process for separate MMR vaccines would take more than 10 years to complete under the best of circumstances. “We are advising all pediatric providers and parents to continue following the existing schedule, which uses a vaccine that has 70 years of proven safety data behind it,” added Aaron M. Milstone, a member of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases.

    Even some members of the president’s own party have publicly denounced the move. Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician whose decisive vote confirmed Kennedy’s controversial appointment as Health Secretary, posted to social media platform X that the order would only worsen existing vaccine hesitancy and put American children at greater risk of preventable disease. “This executive order is wrong,” Cassidy wrote. “The President does not have the medical expertise to make these changes. Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe. Vaccines are effective. Vaccines DO NOT cause autism.”

    The latest policy push comes as the Trump administration already saw a prior attempt to overhaul federal vaccine policy blocked by a federal court earlier this year, after major medical organizations successfully argued the administration’s actions violated federal law. A judge issued a stay on the changes pending ongoing legal proceedings.

    Monday’s order arrives at a critical moment: as children across the United States prepare to return to in-person schooling for the new academic year, the country is currently grappling with the worst measles outbreak it has seen in 35 years. Public health officials widely blame rising vaccine hesitancy, fueled in large part by anti-vaccine misinformation spread by Kennedy and other allies of the president, for the resurgence of the once-eliminated disease.

    Recent polling shows a majority of American voters support evidence-based childhood vaccination requirements, and both Kennedy and Trump had softened their anti-vaccine rhetoric in recent months amid fears that hardline anti-vaccine positions would hurt Republican candidates in the upcoming November midterm elections. Monday’s signing makes clear that rolling back existing vaccine policy and advancing anti-vaccine misinformation remains a core priority of the administration’s public health agenda, as both men continue to endorse the thoroughly debunked claim that immunization causes autism.

  • Return of displaced Syrian Kurds to hometown suspended after violence

    Return of displaced Syrian Kurds to hometown suspended after violence

    Months after a landmark reconciliation deal between Kurdish factions and Syrian national authorities that paved the way for the return of hundreds of thousands of displaced people, plans to repatriate Kurdish residents to their northeastern hometown of Ras al-Ain have been thrown into chaos. The process was suspended just hours after the first cohort of returnees departed for the border town, following a targeted attack on the convoy that ignited mass protests across Kurdish-majority regions of northern Syria.

    On Monday morning, hundreds of families loaded their remaining belongings onto trucks at staging areas outside the provincial capital of Hasakeh, with many telling Agence France-Presse reporters they had waited years for the chance to go home. Among them was 37-year-old Nora Khodor, who described the long-awaited return as “like a dream” after half a decade of displacement. Thirty-nine-year-old Rawda Mohammed added that even confirmation her former home had been completely destroyed did not dim her excitement: “we’re happy to return, and when we get there we’ll see what we can do.”

    Jawan Isso, a representative of the Ras al-Ain Displaced Persons Committee, confirmed that roughly 2,500 people made up the first repatriation batch, with a second group scheduled to depart in the following days. In total, more than 100,000 displaced residents from the Ras al-Ain region have submitted applications to return to their pre-war homes. But within hours of departing, the convoy came under attack by unidentified armed groups, Isso said.

    In response to the violence, Mahmud Khalil Ali, deputy head of Hasakeh province’s security forces, announced the immediate suspension of all repatriation trips as a precautionary safety measure. “Several of those involved in the attacks were arrested,” Ali said, adding that “these trips will resume as soon as the situation stabilises and full protection is provided for the returnees.”

    The attack quickly sparked widespread anger across northern Syria’s Kurdish communities. In the nearby city of Qamishli, an AFP correspondent witnessed hundreds of angry protesters attempt to storm a local security forces headquarters, only to be pushed back by Syrian security officers. Further west in the Kurdish-majority town of Kobane, Syrian state television reported that protesters targeted government administrative buildings and removed the national flag from outside the local security headquarters. Authorities subsequently imposed a full curfew on Kobane as they launched a manhunt for the attack organizers.

    Mazloum Abdi, leader of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who signed the January reconciliation deal with Damascus, condemned the attack on returning families in a post on X. “We understand the angry reactions in the Kurdish street in response to this assault,” Abdi wrote. “At the same time, we call on our people to exercise self-restraint, refrain from being drawn into any irresponsible acts, and preserve our civil and security institutions.”

    Ahmad al-Hilali, deputy governor of Hasakeh province, issued a unified condemnation of both the original attack on returnees and the subsequent attacks on state institutions across the region. “A number of rioters have already been arrested in several areas,” al-Hilali said, vowing that there would be “no leniency” toward any actors that threaten “civil peace.”

    The current unrest has its roots in the 2019 Turkish cross-border offensive that pushed Kurdish forces out of a 120-kilometer strip of Syrian territory along the Turkish-Syrian border, including Ras al-Ain (known as Sari Kani to Kurds). The operation displaced tens of thousands of Kurdish residents from the region, and international human rights groups have documented widespread looting and seizure of abandoned Kurdish homes by pro-Turkish armed groups, many of whom have since relocated their families to the formerly mixed-ethnicity area. Turkey launched multiple successive offensives against Kurdish-led forces in northern Syria before the December 2024 collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s government, which saw new Islamist-led national authorities extend central control across all formerly autonomous regions of the country, including Kurdish-held territories.

    Today, more than 13 years after the start of Syria’s civil conflict, the United Nations estimates that 5.5 million people remain internally displaced across the country, many of whom have spent years waiting for the chance to return to their pre-war homes.

  • Southern Cross Media shares slump as first results reveal sharp profit drop

    Southern Cross Media shares slump as first results reveal sharp profit drop

    Australia’s Southern Cross Media Group, the newly merged entity created from the combination of Kerry Stokes’ Seven West Media and the original Southern Cross radio business, has delivered a disappointing first full-year financial result, posting a net after-tax loss and a dramatic slump in underlying profits against a challenging economic backdrop.

    The combined media group, whose portfolio includes major assets such as *The West Australian* newspaper and the nationally popular Triple M radio network, recorded a statutory net after-tax loss of $3.8 million for the 2026 fiscal year. On a pro forma basis, which normalises results to reflect the merged structure for comparison with the prior year, net after-tax profit came in at $9.9 million — a 57.6% nosedive from 2025 levels.

    The result revealed stark divergence across the group’s three core divisions, with steep declines in television performance partially offset by resilient growth in the audio (radio and digital) segment. Immediately following the release of the results, the group’s shares traded 1.83% lower on opening, falling to $0.54 apiece.

    The television division bore the brunt of the downturn, driven by a widespread contraction in free-to-air advertising spending that fell 9.9% across the full year, with market conditions deteriorating sharply in the final fourth quarter. When combined with $13 million in writedowns on existing television content contracts, the television division finished the period in the red.

    In contrast, the group’s audio division posted solid gains that helped soften the broader financial decline. Total audio revenue climbed 1.4% year-on-year to reach $429.9 million, with double-digit growth in digital audio revenue hitting $6.5 million, enough to counteract softness in traditional advertising for both metropolitan and regional radio broadcasting.

    The group’s publishing division also faced headwinds, with total revenue slipping 3.1% to $187 million as advertising revenue contracted and subscription revenue stayed flat compared to the prior year. Across all divisions, Southern Cross reported total annual revenue of $1.9 billion, representing a 4.5% decline from the previous year. Weaker advertising markets across all segments delivered a $125 million hit to the group’s top line.

    Despite the weak headline financial results, company executives highlighted bright spots in audience and digital growth. Southern Cross noted that it expanded total audience reach across its television and audio platforms over the fiscal year, with digital revenue across key platforms including 7plus, Listnr, and *The Nightly* delivering double-digit annual growth.

    Rohan Lund, who was appointed chief executive officer of Southern Cross in May 2025, acknowledged the challenging trading environment that shaped the full-year result. “Trading conditions were difficult, particularly in television through Q4, and revenue came in below where we expected,” Lund said in a statement accompanying the results. “Share gains and cost discipline partially offset that, and EBITDA finished above our revised guidance.”

    Lund struck an optimistic tone about the merged group’s long-term position, noting that the newly combined business now reaches more than 20 million Australian consumers each month. “Each of our three businesses – television, audio and publishing – strengthened its market position during FY26,” he added. “While we expect conditions to stay subdued, our focus doesn’t change: bring Australians together through content they love and trust, turn that connection into audiences that work for advertisers and run the business with discipline and unity.”

  • Dashcam video shows moment lorry slams into New York overpass

    Dashcam video shows moment lorry slams into New York overpass

    Striking footage captured by a dashboard camera has documented the sudden moment a heavy goods tractor trailer collided with a highway overpass in New York. The incident, which unfolded on a local roadway, has drawn attention to the importance of adhering to infrastructure clearance regulations for large commercial vehicles. According to official reports, the operator of the tractor trailer walked away from the crash without sustaining any physical injuries. Despite the lack of harm to the driver or other motorists on scene, law enforcement officials issued a traffic citation to the driver in response to the violation: the vehicle’s total height surpassed the posted maximum clearance limit for the overpass. The video, which has circulated in local media, highlights how a seemingly straightforward administrative oversight can lead to dangerous and avoidable roadway incidents. Local transportation authorities have reiterated that clear height markings are posted at low-clearance structures across the state to prevent these types of collisions, which can cause long-term damage to infrastructure and create major traffic disruptions for commuters.