作者: admin

  • Watch: Only world record broken at Enhanced Games won’t be recognised

    Watch: Only world record broken at Enhanced Games won’t be recognised

    A groundbreaking moment at the controversial Enhanced Games has turned into a dispute over sporting legitimacy, after officials confirmed a new world mark set by Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev will not receive formal recognition from any mainstream global sports governing bodies.

    The Enhanced Games, an event that has sparked fierce debate across the international athletic community, permits competitors to use performance-enhancing substances that are strictly banned under traditional anti-doping regulations. This core stance puts the competition in direct conflict with the long-standing rules and ethical frameworks established by leading international sports organizations.

    BBC correspondent Shaimaa Khalil has detailed the structural conflict that led to the automatic rejection of Gkolomeev’s record. Even though the Greek athlete delivered an impressive performance that surpassed existing global standards, the unauthorised status of the Enhanced Games means official bodies cannot acknowledge the result as a valid world record under their by-laws.

    The decision has reignited long-running conversations about the future of clean sport, the line between innovation and fairness in elite competition, and how governing bodies should respond to emerging alternative sporting events that challenge established anti-doping norms. While supporters of the Enhanced Games frame it as a progressive reimagining of elite athletics, traditional governing bodies have remained firm in protecting the integrity of drug-free competition, leaving records set at the alternative event outside the bounds of official recognition.

  • Leftist icon, millionaire lawyer, conservative senator: Who will be Colombia’s next leader?

    Leftist icon, millionaire lawyer, conservative senator: Who will be Colombia’s next leader?

    As Colombians prepare to head to the polls this Sunday to elect their next head of state, three candidates from wildly different political backgrounds have emerged as the clear frontrunners, each offering a sharply contrasting vision for the country’s future. At the top of pre-election polling is Ivan Cepeda, a veteran leftist senator, human rights advocate and close ally of outgoing President Gustavo Petro, Colombia’s first ever left-wing head of state. Trailing closely behind him are right-wing political newcomer Abelardo “The Tiger” de la Espriella and conservative opposition senator Paloma Valencia, a protégé of hardline former president Alvaro Uribe.

    Cepeda’s political journey has been defined by tragedy and resilience, shaped by decades of conflict in Colombia. He first stepped into the national spotlight in 1994, when at just 32 years old, he stood beside the bullet-riddled corpse of his father, a communist senator assassinated by far-right paramilitaries during a wave of political violence that killed more than 5,700 leftist leaders across the country. Speaking to reporters on that day, he demanded accountability, saying “Let this crime not go unpunished” — a moment broadcast live to millions of Colombians.

    Now 63, Cepeda spent years in exile across Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Cuba and France before returning to his home country to advocate for victims of the decades-long internal armed conflict. He played a pivotal role in crafting the 2016 historic peace accord that brought about the full disarmament of the FARC, Colombia’s once-largest rebel guerrilla group, and later was the architect of Petro’s controversial “total peace” initiative, an effort to end all remaining insurgent and criminal violence that ultimately failed to meet its core goals.

    A defining moment in his political rivalry with the right came when Cepeda led the investigation into Uribe’s alleged paramilitary ties, a case that led to Uribe becoming the first former Colombian president to be convicted of a criminal offense in 2024. Though the conviction was later overturned by a judge, the confrontation cemented Cepeda’s status as the left’s most prominent icon and Uribe’s greatest political foe. Known for rejecting neckties — which he calls a symbol of oligarchy — and often wearing a traditional Caribbean collared shirt, Cepeda has brushed off decades of attacks from opponents, noting during this campaign: “I have survived genocide, stigmatization and relentless persecution. And here I am, still standing.” His critics still attack him over his past, however, repeating accusations of hidden ties to the FARC and blaming him for the failures of Petro’s total peace plan.

    In second place in the polls is 47-year-old de la Espriella, a millionaire lawyer and businessman who has branded himself “The Tiger” and is making his first run for public office after years living a lavish lifestyle abroad. A self-identified right-wing outsider, de la Espriella left Colombia to live in Florence, Italy, where he enjoyed opera, traveled via private jet and built his businesses in rum and wine. He returned to run for president, he says, to stop the left from “destroying” Colombia, and counts among his political idols former U.S. President Donald Trump, Argentina’s libertarian leader Javier Milei and El Salvador’s hardline president Nayib Bukele.

    Over his decades-long legal career, de la Espriella has defended a wide range of high-profile Colombian figures, from top soccer stars to notorious drug traffickers. Now campaigning, he often wears a tailored suit and has recently taken to wearing a bulletproof vest to public events, a nod to his tough-on-crime platform. As the candidate of the hardline law-and-order movement, de la Espriella has proposed sweeping measures to tackle Colombia’s status as the world’s largest cocaine producer: he wants to create a military alliance with the United States and Israel to crack down on drug cartels, build a network of large mega-prisons, and expand legal access to firearms for civilians. “Any criminal who does not surrender will be taken down as the law allows,” he told AFP in a February interview.

    The candidate has drawn widespread controversy for his inflammatory rhetoric: he once called for the Colombian left to be “gutted” before later softening his language, has made remarks widely condemned as homophobic and sexist, and often uses aggressive, vulgar language in campaign events. His hot temper and unapologetic style have become defining parts of his political brand, attracting a base of angry, anti-establishment right-wing voters.

    Third in pre-election surveys is 50-year-old Paloma Valencia, a conservative senator from one of Colombia’s most politically powerful elite families. She is the granddaughter of Guillermo León Valencia, who served as Colombia’s president from 1962 to 1966, a conservative leader who took a hard line against early guerrilla groups and aligned Colombia closely with U.S. anti-communist policy in Latin America. If elected, she would become Colombia’s first female president.

    Valencia has long positioned herself as one of the most vocal critics of the Colombian left and guerrilla groups, and considers former president Uribe her political “father” and mentor, campaigning side-by-side with him across the country. Like Uribe, she opposed the 2016 FARC peace accord and supports the hardline militarized security strategy that defined his presidency. In a March campaign speech, she laid out her core policy contrast to Petro’s agenda: “We are going to put an end to ‘total peace’ in order to impose total security.”

    On social issues, Valencia holds staunch conservative positions on LGBTQ rights, and she supports expanding fracking — a controversial method of oil and gas extraction widely criticized for its severe environmental harms. As the most established right-wing candidate in the race, she draws support from traditional conservative voters who align with Uribe’s long-standing political movement.

    With just days to go before voting begins, polls show a tight three-way race that remains too close to call, leaving Colombians poised to choose between continuing the country’s left-wing shift or turning back to a hardline conservative security agenda.

  • California chemical tank explosion threat ‘eliminated,’ official says

    California chemical tank explosion threat ‘eliminated,’ official says

    A days-long public safety crisis in Orange County, California, has reached a critical turning point, with fire officials confirming Monday that the imminent threat of a catastrophic explosion from a leaking chemical storage tank has been fully neutralized. Even with the major risk removed, tens of thousands of displaced local residents are still required to remain outside their designated evacuation zones as emergency teams continue to monitor lingering safety hazards, official announcements confirm.

    Interim Fire Chief TJ McGovern of the Orange County Fire Authority announced the update in a video posted to social platform X Monday morning, stating, “We are happy to report that the threat… has been eliminated.” Despite the positive development, McGovern emphasized that evacuation orders remain in full effect, urging residents to “abide by those evacuation zones.” In a separate post on X, the authority added that “there is still an ongoing threat to public safety” that requires continued precautions.

    The emergency was triggered late last week, when crews first detected a leak, and later a structural crack, in a 7,000-gallon storage tank holding methyl methacrylate — a volatile, flammable liquid chemical used in plastic manufacturing. Located in Garden Grove, roughly five miles from the world-famous Disneyland Resort and in a heavily populated region southeast of Los Angeles, the tank’s compromised condition sparked urgent fears that a buildup of heat and pressure could trigger an explosion, prompting authorities to order evacuations for roughly 50,000 local residents starting Friday.

    By Sunday evening, emergency responders confirmed there was no longer an active leak, and continuous atmospheric monitoring detected no unauthorized chemical release into the surrounding air. On Monday, Incident Commander Craig Covey reported that pressure inside the damaged tank had continued to drop, and internal temperature had fallen to 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius), down from a hazardous high of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius). “The crack is there. We have verified that it’s there, and the tank has released its pressure,” Covey said. “That is incredibly positive news as we turn the corner on this incident.”

    Federal regulators stepped in rapidly to support the response, with a team of experts from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dispatched to advise on response strategies. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin told CNN Sunday that the “most catastrophic scenario” would have involved a chain reaction where one tank explosion triggered blasts at adjacent storage units, but the agency assessed from the start that the “most likely scenario” was a controlled low-volume release that would allow crews to contain and neutralize the risk — an outcome that aligns with the latest on-the-ground updates.

    The damaged tank is owned by GKN Aerospace, a global aerospace technology manufacturer headquartered in Birmingham, UK, that operates 32 production facilities across 12 countries. In a statement released Sunday, the company confirmed it was “working around the clock to mitigate the risk of a leak.” Nearby Disneyland Resort officials also released a statement early in the crisis noting that the popular tourist destination “remains open to guests,” and that resort leadership was keeping close track of developments.

    Public health experts warn that methyl methacrylate, the chemical stored in the tank, causes irritation to human skin, eyes, and mucous membranes. Acute or extended exposure can also trigger serious respiratory and neurological adverse reactions, making continued monitoring critical to protect both response crews and returning residents.

  • Russia threatens more Kyiv strikes and tells foreign nationals to leave

    Russia threatens more Kyiv strikes and tells foreign nationals to leave

    Just days after one of the largest aerial assaults on Ukraine’s capital since the full-scale invasion began, Russia has issued a explicit threat of a new wave of coordinated, systematic attacks targeting Kyiv. In an official statement released by the Russian foreign ministry, Moscow confirmed that upcoming strikes will focus on what it labels “decision-making centres and command posts” in the capital, alongside facilities Ukraine uses to manufacture unmanned aerial vehicles. The statement also urged all foreign nationals and diplomatic staff to evacuate Kyiv “as soon as possible”, and warned local Ukrainian residents to avoid moving near administrative and military infrastructure across the city.

    The large-scale barrage carried out by Russian forces on Saturday night left four people dead and approximately 100 others injured across Kyiv and surrounding regions, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed. Moscow has framed both this weekend’s attack and the coming new strikes as retaliation for what it claims was a deliberate Ukrainian strike on a student dormitory in the Russian-occupied eastern Ukrainian town of Starobilsk last Friday. Russian officials allege that 21 people were killed in that incident. Ukraine’s military has pushed back against this narrative, confirming it targeted an elite Russian military drone unit operating in the area and maintains no civilian facilities were intentionally targeted in the strike.

    This latest round of violence comes after a series of escalating attacks on Kyiv that began earlier this May, when a temporary ceasefire timed to coincide with Moscow’s annual Victory Day military parade expired. Within days of the ceasefire ending, Russian strikes on a Kyiv residential apartment block killed 24 people, including three children. The assault carried out overnight Saturday marked one of the most intense large-scale aerial attacks on the capital since the start of the full-scale invasion.

    Footage shared by Kyiv residents on social media platforms captured sustained explosions lighting up the night sky across the capital, with multiple blasts reported that shook buildings across wide areas of the city. Dozens of ballistic and cruise missiles, alongside hundreds of attack drones, were launched against Kyiv in the assault. Russian forces also fired a nuclear-capable Oreshnik hypersonic missile targeting the area of Bila Tserkva, a city located roughly 90 kilometers south of the Ukrainian capital.

    The attack left a trail of destruction across both cultural and civilian sites in Kyiv. The Chernobyl Museum, located in the city’s historic central district, and the National Art Museum of Ukraine both suffered significant damage. Multiple residential buildings, a public market and a large commercial shopping centre in Kyiv’s Lukanivka neighborhood were completely destroyed.

    Analysts and political observers broadly view Russia’s public call for foreign nationals to evacuate Kyiv as a deliberate tactic of psychological warfare designed to sow panic and instability among the capital’s population. Large-scale strikes on Kyiv have been a consistent feature of Russian military strategy since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

    After four and a half years of continuous full-scale war, Ukraine has built out a sophisticated, multi-layered air defense network that now intercepts the vast majority of Russian drones and missiles. However, Russia often launches attacks with such large volumes of projectiles that Ukrainian defenses are periodically overwhelmed, allowing a significant number of weapons to reach their targets. Ukraine’s air defense capabilities also remain heavily reliant on military support from Western allies, a vulnerability that Ukrainian leadership has repeatedly highlighted. Back in March, Zelensky warned that Ukraine faced a critical deficit of air defense weapons due to shifting defense resource priorities driven by conflicts involving the U.S. and Israel.

  • Threat of massive chemical tank explosion is ‘eliminated’, California officials say

    Threat of massive chemical tank explosion is ‘eliminated’, California officials say

    California fire officials have announced that the imminent threat of a catastrophic explosion from a damaged volatile chemical storage tank in Orange County has been successfully resolved following a hours-long overnight emergency operation. The breakthrough comes after days of tense uncertainty that displaced tens of thousands of Southern California residents and triggered a statewide state of emergency.

    Interim Chief TJ McGovern of the Orange County Fire Authority confirmed Monday that the risk of a Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion, more commonly known as a BLEVE — the most severe feared outcome of the incident — has been fully taken off the table. “We are happy to report that the threat of a BLEVE is now off the table. That threat has been eliminated,” McGovern stated in a joint public briefing with Division Chief Craig Covey.

    The tank, located at the GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems facility in Garden Grove, roughly 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, holds thousands of gallons of methyl methacrylate, a highly flammable, volatile chemical compound used to produce industrial plastics and resins. The vessel developed a critical crack over the weekend, which sparked dangerous internal pressure buildup and rapid heating that put the entire structure at risk of catastrophic failure. Officials confirmed Monday that the crack itself has enabled controlled pressure release, and emergency cooling efforts have successfully brought internal temperatures down from a peak of 100°F (38°C) to a safer 93°F (34°C).

    Covey, who shared initial on-site updates via a social media video, noted that safety constraints prevented frequent temperature monitoring over the weekend amid extreme heat conditions. “We were not doing tank temperature checks during the day while the sun was on it in the most extreme conditions for that tank to go the wrong direction,” Covey explained. “We were only doing tank temperatures at night.” He also confirmed that response crews had observed the tank starting to bulge under the rising internal pressure as the crisis unfolded.

    Since Sunday, hundreds of emergency responders have worked around the clock to stabilize the tank. Following unexpected rapid temperature increases starting last Thursday, teams have continuously sprayed the vessel with water to keep internal temperatures in check and slow the exothermic chemical reactions driving pressure buildup. As of Monday, officials say there is still no active leak of the dangerous chemical, though they warn a spill remains a possible future outcome. Precautionary containment measures, including the rapid construction of dykes and earthen dams, have already been completed to stop any leaked chemical from reaching local storm drains or the Pacific Ocean, should a breach occur.

    As a critical precaution, evacuation orders remain in effect for more than 50,000 residents across six Orange County cities: Garden Grove, Stanton, Anaheim, Cypress, Westminster, and Buena Park. California Governor Gavin Newsom has already issued a formal state of emergency for the region to unlock additional state resources for the response effort. GKN Aerospace, the private company that owns the facility and the tank, has issued a public apology to all local residents displaced by the incident.

    Per U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines, methyl methacrylate is classified as an irritant that can cause damage to human skin, eyes, and mucous membranes upon exposure. High levels of exposure can also trigger acute respiratory and neurological symptoms in affected people, making unplanned release a serious public health risk.

  • The rare Ebola outbreak is one danger. Attacks on healthcare workers are another

    The rare Ebola outbreak is one danger. Attacks on healthcare workers are another

    In the sun-scorched working-class neighborhoods of Bunia, the epicenter of a spiraling Ebola outbreak in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, Red Cross volunteer Vanny Birungi carries out her daily awareness work against two lethal enemies. The first is the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, a pathogen for which no licensed vaccine or targeted treatment currently exists. The second is the open hostility of local residents, who have responded to outreach with stone-throwing, verbal harassment, and deep-rooted suspicion that has derailed containment efforts even as suspected cases creep toward the 1,000 mark.

    This volatile northeast region of Congo has been fractured by years of armed insurgency, which has left thousands dead and hundreds of thousands displaced. For a population long traumatized by violence and distrustful of outside actors, even aid workers focused on stopping a spreading virus are viewed with skepticism. That distrust has been compounded by critical delays: experts confirm the outbreak was detected weeks after it first began spreading, and years of funding cuts to global health surveillance programs from the U.S. and other donors have gutted local capacity to monitor for emerging pathogens.

    For many residents like 56-year-old Bunia local Pierre Basola, suspicion curdles into outright denial. “Ebola is a white man’s invention,” Basola said. “These people just want to get rich, and they should stop bothering us.” This widespread skepticism has turned violent in recent days, with three separate attacks on healthcare facilities in just one week. On Sunday, a mob of angry young men stormed a hospital treating Ebola patients, forcing all medical staff to evacuate as gunfire echoed through the building. A day earlier, local residents set fire to an Ebola screening and isolation tent run by Doctors Without Borders in the nearby town of Mongbwalu, leading more than a dozen suspected Ebola patients to flee into surrounding communities. Just days before that, an Ebola response center in Rwampara was burned to the ground after relatives were blocked from retrieving the body of a man who died from suspected infection.

    Public anger is amplified by a core cultural conflict: standard Ebola infection control protocols bar traditional handlings of deceased bodies, which are a central part of local final rites. This restriction hits especially hard because the Bundibugyo strain causes sudden, dramatic illness marked by vomiting and external bleeding, leaving families reeling and unwilling to abide by rules they do not understand. Ebola spreads exclusively through close contact with bodily fluids of infected people or the deceased, meaning traditional funeral practices are among the highest-risk activities for new transmission. Yet without community buy-in, even the most evidence-based protocols cannot be enforced.

    “Trust is almost as important as the health response, because if you get this massive distrust in the communities, they’re not going to go to the health centers,” explained Heather Kerr, country director for the International Rescue Committee in Congo. Beyond community distrust, aid groups face a second deadly obstacle: ongoing armed conflict across the region. The outbreak is centered in Ituri province, more than 620 miles from Congo’s capital Kinshasa, and travel between outbreak zones requires passing through territory regularly targeted by insurgent attacks. A key regional airport that serves as a humanitarian hub has been under rebel control for more than a year, and many local clinics rely on old generators for power, leaving barely any infrastructure to support outbreak response.

    As of Monday, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus confirmed the outbreak has reached more than 900 suspected cases and more than 220 suspected deaths. “We are now playing catch-up with a very fast-moving epidemic,” Tedros said.

    For long-time residents like 70-year-old Mado Nditamba, the scale of the outbreak has left communities feeling helpless. “The last time Ebola came, it was not on the scale that we see today,” Nditamba said. “But this epidemic today is worse. We go to the doctors in the hospitals, but they also die. That’s what worries us. We don’t know what to do and we leave everything to God.”

    Congo has faced 17 previous Ebola outbreaks, and the WHO says the country has the general infrastructure to mount a response, but critical missteps early on cost valuable time. Initial diagnostic tests only screened for the more common Zaire strain of Ebola, failing to identify the rare Bundibugyo variant and delaying formal recognition of the outbreak. Even now, there are few laboratories in the region capable of testing for this specific strain.

    Frontline health workers report they are drastically underprepared and underprotected, and the virus has already begun to infect responders. A Congolese doctor working on the response was confirmed dead in Rwampara on Sunday, and at least three Ugandan health workers have been infected after the outbreak crossed the border into Uganda, where a small cluster of cases has emerged. Most concerningly, three Red Cross volunteers died in Mongbwalu in late March after handling bodies for a non-Ebola related task. If their deaths are confirmed to be from Ebola, that would push the start of the outbreak back weeks earlier than the first officially confirmed death in late April, meaning the virus has been spreading undetected far longer than initially thought.

    Even as funeral homes in Bunia prepare for an increasing death toll, a large share of the local population remains convinced Ebola is a myth. A mid-May survey by Action Aid, one of the international humanitarian groups working on the response, found widespread skepticism and lack of basic understanding about the virus across Ituri province. Humanitarian leaders agree that sustained, trusted community engagement is the only path to getting the outbreak under control, but it remains unclear how that engagement can be scaled quickly enough to reverse the outbreak’s trajectory. Both the WHO and Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warn that the actual number of cases is almost certainly far higher than the current confirmed count.

  • Iran’s Jews: From ancient roots to the modern day

    Iran’s Jews: From ancient roots to the modern day

    In March 2015, as then-US President Barack Obama prepared to finalize a landmark nuclear deal with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a high-stakes address to a joint session of the US Congress. Seeking to sway lawmakers against the agreement by framing Iran as an existential threat to the Jewish people and the state of Israel, Netanyahu made a notable factual error when he misrepresented the Biblical story of Esther, claiming that ancient Jews living in Persian-ruled territory were targeted for death by a Persian viceroy. The actual account holds that it was Haman, an Amalekite court official, who plotted the extermination of Iranian Jews, a scheme foiled by Queen Esther and her cousin Mordecai, after which Persian King Ahasuerus ordered Haman’s execution and spared the Jewish community.

    Far less widely reported in Western discourse is the deep, continuous history of Jewish life in Iran that stretches back nearly three millennia. Today, the tomb of Esther and Mordecai stands in the western Iranian city of Hamedan, a site that has drawn Jewish pilgrims for centuries and was designated a national heritage site by the Iranian government under then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2008. This long-standing presence challenges the pervasive Western narrative that frames Iran as a uniformly antisemitic nation, scholars and community members emphasize.

    “Compared to many countries in the region and certainly in the West, Iran has not had a history of anti-Jewish sentiment,” explains Farhang Jahanpour, former dean of the Faculty of Languages at the University of Isfahan. “Most Iranian Jews regard Iran as their home and have a strong feeling of affinity for Iranian culture, literature, music and cooking.”

    For Etan Mabourakh, a member of a centuries-old Iranian Jewish family that left the country during the reign of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, this cultural connection remains vivid decades after his family’s departure. “There’s a deep pride for Iranian Jews in our cultural heritage, and distinct traditions that we hold on to,” he says. “My father’s side hail from Hamedan, and we have a Hamedani cookbook with traditional Jewish recipes that I still cook dishes from to this day – on Passover we still practice the Jewish Iranian tradition of beating each other with scallions when we sing Dyenu. These traditions are a real source of pride for us.”

    Jews first arrived in what is now Iran following the Babylonian exile of the 6th and 7th centuries BCE, when they were displaced from the ancient kingdom of Judea by King Nebuchadnezzar II. Initial settlements centered in what is now Isfahan, before communities spread across the Iranian plateau. Biblical accounts themselves reference deep ties between ancient Jews and Persian rulers, with many holy sites associated with Jewish prophets still standing across the country today. “The Hebrew Bible speaks very highly of ancient Persians and reveals very close Jewish connections with ancient Iran and its kings,” Jahanpour notes.

    After the advent of Islam in Iran in the 7th century, the Jewish population continued to grow, drawn in large part by opportunities along regional trade routes. “We have testimonies of Jews from the period when Islam came to Iran that they were actually very pleased to see the Muslim army coming,” says Lior Sternfeld, a professor of History and Jewish Studies at Pennsylvania State University. “The message of Islam and the recognition of the people of the book was quite liberating for Iranian religious minorities. They believed it might bring positive change to their status and protections.”

    Between the arrival of Islam and the establishment of Shia Islam as Iran’s state religion in 1501, the community experienced periods of both stability and intermittent repression. By the 17th century, Jews were formally recognized as a protected and tolerated minority under Iranian law. A major milestone came with the 1906 Constitutional Revolution under the Qajar dynasty, which established Iran’s first parliament and granted Jews a guaranteed parliamentary seat, formally placing them on equal legal footing with Muslim citizens. This progress followed years of targeted violence, including a 1839 pogrom in the northeastern city of Mashhad that forced Jews to choose between conversion to Islam and exile.

    Under the Pahlavi dynasty, which took power in 1925, Iran’s new legal protections for Jews drew Jewish migrants from across the region and Europe. In the 1930s, prominent Jewish professionals and intellectuals fleeing Nazi Germany’s race-based purges arrived in Iran, followed by hundreds more Jewish refugees who fled the 1941 Farhud pogrom in Iraq that killed more than 500 Jews. By the mid-20th century, Iran’s Jewish community was a diverse tapestry of Persian, Kurdish, Iraqi, Mountain, and Ashkenazi Jews, with Ashkenazi refugees establishing a still-operational synagogue in Tehran.

    During World War II and the Holocaust, Iran hosted as many as 300,000 Polish refugees, between 5,000 and 20,000 of whom were Jewish, who settled in camps on the outskirts of Tehran, Isfahan, and Ahvaz. While the decision to accept the refugees was driven by British occupying forces and created significant food shortages for local Iranians, Sternfeld notes that contemporary accounts consistently highlight the widespread hospitality ordinary Iranians extended to the displaced Jewish arrivals. Around 780 orphaned Jewish refugees, known as the Children of Tehran, were eventually resettled in Mandatory Palestine.

    By the 1940s, Iran’s Jewish community had become integral to the Pahlavi Shah’s national development project, taking prominent roles in government bureaucracy, trade, and science, and rising to become a core part of Iran’s urban middle and upper classes. By the late 1940s, the community numbered around 100,000 and continued to grow over the next three decades. When Israel was established in 1948, only a small minority of Iranian Jews – between 17,000 and 20,000 between 1949 and 1953 – chose to emigrate, and migration effectively halted by the 1960s. For decades, Iran maintained close diplomatic ties with Israel, supplied the Jewish state with oil, and in return received military training from the Israeli army for the Shah’s brutal secret police force, Savak.

    Life for Jews under the Shah was not without tension, however. “The generation that came of age during Mohammed Reza’s time no longer carried the burden of Jewish persecution on their shoulders and they became much more Iranian,” Sternfeld explains. “They went to universities, became involved in political activism and they shared the grievances of their fellow Iranians about the shah’s dictatorship. They were also over-represented in opposition movements, and the shah didn’t cut slack for Jews in these groups, so many ended up being in exile or prison.”

    Mabourakh’s own family was forced to flee Iran for the US and Israel during the Shah’s rule due to their political activism. “They were treated like second-class citizens,” he says, adding that modern glorification of the Pahlavi dynasty does not align with his family’s experience. “Reza Pahlavi has been reframed as this figure to bring Iran back to greatness, but the more you read about the brutal oppression of the Savak under his father, the more you realise it’s no better than what exists today.”

    After the 1979 Islamic Revolution that ousted the Shah, the execution of prominent Jewish businessman Habib Elghanian, a figure linked to the former regime, sparked widespread fear among Iran’s Jewish community. Community leaders traveled to the holy city of Qom just days after the execution to meet with Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini to clarify the status of Jews under the new Islamic Republic. The meeting resulted in a landmark fatwa that formally drew a distinction between Iranian Jews and Zionism, stating that Iranian Jews are full members of the Iranian nation, while Zionism is a separate political movement opposed to religious teachings. Under the edict, Iranian Jews are guaranteed full protection as a religious minority.

    Despite this guarantee, mass emigration resumed after the revolution, with nearly half of Iran’s Jewish community leaving over the course of the 1980s. Unusually, only a minority of emigrants settled in Israel; roughly 70 percent relocated to the Los Angeles area in the United States. For the community that remained, experiences have varied across successive administrations: former President Hassan Rouhani, who held office from 2013 to 2021, enacted progressive reforms including legislation protecting Jewish inheritance rights and allowing Jewish students to be absent from school on Shabbat, the Jewish sabbath.

    Today, Iran is home to between 10,000 and 15,000 Jews, the third largest Jewish population in the Middle East after Israel and Turkey. Most reside in Tehran, with sizeable communities in Shiraz and Isfahan. Though the community is a fraction of its mid-20th century peak, it remains an integrated part of Iranian society, with 60 operational synagogues, Jewish schools, kosher food outlets, and other communal institutions, granting Iranian Jews a comparatively high degree of religious autonomy. While community members cannot publicly express support for Israel, they maintain a nuanced relationship with the Jewish state, drawing a distinction between its religious significance to Judaism and its political status relative to Iran. “They make the separation between Israel as a holy place and Iran as their political homeland,” Sternfeld says.

    Most recently, after an Israeli air strike on Tehran damaged the Rafi-Nia synagogue last month, Iran’s Jewish community publicly condemned the attack, reaffirming their loyalty to the Iranian state. “The Zionist regime with its brutal ambitions has not only attacked the Muslim community but also the Jewish community,” said Homayoun Sameh, the Jewish representative to Iran’s parliament. Rabbi Younes Hamami Lalehzar, a leading Iranian Jewish community leader, added: “Beyond being an inhumane and terrorist act, this clearly shows that all the claims made by the Israeli regime about defending Jews are nothing more than a shameful lie.”

    Mabourakh, who works with the National Iranian American Council, echoed that condemnation, noting that the Iranian government’s response to the attack revealed a respect for Jewish life that is rarely acknowledged in Western media. “I felt disgusted that the synagogue had been blown up in a war that my tax dollars are funding. The fact that so much infrastructure has been targeted – these are war crimes and we should call them out,” he says. “The Jewish community asked the rescue mission not to use heavy machinery to clear the rubble, to avoid damaging Torah scrolls and other items, so the teams used their hands to retrieve them. I think there is a genuine respect from Iranian authorities towards people of the book, and this is not communicated in the West.”

  • US and Israel ‘actively working’ to strip Jordan of Al-Aqsa custodianship, sources say

    US and Israel ‘actively working’ to strip Jordan of Al-Aqsa custodianship, sources say

    A controversial covert plan backed by senior U.S. and Israeli figures to dismantle Jordan’s century-old custodianship of Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque complex has been revealed by multiple anonymous sources in an exclusive reporting to Middle East Eye, threatening to upend decades of regional stability and upend the long-standing status quo governing one of the Muslim world’s most revered religious sites.

    Multiple layers of sources—including serving U.S., Jordanian, Palestinian, Western and Gulf Arab officials—have confirmed the proposal is being spearheaded by former White House advisor Jared Kushner, who holds no official role in the current U.S. administration, and current U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Under the terms of the draft plan, the Jordanian-backed Islamic Waqf, which has overseen day-to-day administration of the site for generations, would be stripped of all governing authority immediately. A new Israeli-created regulatory body would reclassify the 35-acre compound, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, as a multi-faith religious center, granting Jews equal access and formal permission for organized large-group communal prayer on the site, which has been an exclusively Islamic holy site under the long-standing international status quo.

    The plan would also grant the Israeli government significant influence over key personnel decisions at the mosque, including the appointment of imams, senior clerics and preachers, as well as approval power over the content of weekly Friday sermons. Two senior U.S. officials confirmed that Washington has already drafted a policy document outlining this vision for the site’s future, stating the Trump administration’s goal is to erase the site’s exclusive Muslim identity and rebrand it as a cross-religious tourist landmark open to followers of all three Abrahamic faiths.

    According to one proposal that has circulated among regional stakeholders, Arab nations including Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates have already received briefings on the plan and could be offered rotating oversight responsibilities for the complex. Multiple Gulf Arab sources and a source familiar with Jordanian government policy confirmed that Saudi Arabia—Jordan’s close historic ally—has already publicly taken a stance opposing the proposal.

    The idea of altering Al-Aqsa’s governance was first raised by Israeli officials to the U.S. government nearly a decade ago, but gained new momentum after Huckabee took up his post as U.S. ambassador last year. A devout Evangelical Christian and long-time hardline pro-Israel advocate who has openly supported illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory, Huckabee has repeatedly pressured Washington to move forward with the plan, sources say. A source familiar with Jordan’s position noted the U.S. has long resented Amman’s frequent use of its custodianship status to file formal complaints against Israeli actions at the compound, most recently this month when Jordan’s parliament formally condemned Israeli seizures of Palestinian property and Islamic endowments in areas adjacent to the mosque.

    The proposal also leaves the future of Jerusalem’s Christian holy sites—for which Jordan’s Hashemite monarchy also holds formal custodianship, including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Church of the Ascension, plus a veto over appointments to the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem—unaddressed, a gap that has sparked deep new concerns among regional stakeholders. “This plan says nothing about the Christian sites, which raises a whole new set of concerns,” one senior source told MEE.

    A senior Jordanian government official reaffirmed Amman’s unwavering position on the issue, stressing that Hashemite custodianship of Jerusalem’s holy sites is formally recognized under international law and binding bilateral treaties, including Article 9 of the 1994 Jordan-Israel peace treaty. The official added that Jordan is coordinating closely with Palestinian, Arab and international partners to protect the sites’ Arab, Islamic and Christian identity and block any attempt to alter the historical and legal status quo.

    The current governing framework for Al-Aqsa, the status quo arrangement, has been in place for more than half a century. Following Israel’s 1967 seizure of East Jerusalem, the two countries reached a formal agreement that left the Islamic Waqf in charge of all internal religious and administrative affairs at the compound, while Israel retained control over external security. Under the terms of this arrangement, non-Muslims are permitted to visit during set time windows, but are barred from holding prayer services at the site. For Jewish communities, the site holds deep religious significance as the location of the two ancient Jewish temples destroyed in antiquity.

    Jordanian and Palestinian officials warn the proposed new framework closely mirrors Israel’s long-standing policy at Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque, also known to Jews as the Tomb of the Patriarchs. Following a 1994 massacre carried out by an Israeli extremist settler that killed 29 Muslim worshippers, Israel imposed a formal division of the site, allocating 63% of the compound to Jewish worship even though the site is equally revered by all three Abrahamic faiths as the burial place of the Prophet Abraham.

    For Jordan’s Hashemite monarchy, custodianship of Jerusalem’s holy sites is a core pillar of its domestic and regional legitimacy. The ruling family’s claim to custodianship dates back to 1924, shortly after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the abolition of the Islamic Caliphate, when the British Mandate administration granted the Hashemites oversight of Jerusalem’s Muslim and Christian holy sites after the family lost control of Mecca and Medina, Islam’s two holiest sites, to the Al Saud dynasty. The custodianship was later reaffirmed in the 1994 peace treaty with Israel, which explicitly recognized Amman’s special role in governing Jerusalem’s Islamic holy sites.

    For years, Palestinian and Jordanian officials have warned that the status quo is being steadily eroded by successive Israeli governments and emboldened far-right nationalist groups pushing for greater Jewish control of the compound. Frequent Israeli police raids inside the mosque, growing numbers of visits by ultranationalist Jewish activists, and repeated calls by senior Israeli cabinet ministers for formal Jewish prayer rights at the site have led to widespread accusations that Israel is incrementally altering the long-standing arrangement. Waqf officials have also repeatedly documented that Israel imposes harsh restrictions on Palestinian worshippers and blocks the Waqf from carrying out critical maintenance and repair work at the site.

    Mustafa Abu Sway, deputy head of the Waqf council, described Hashemite custodianship as an non-negotiable foundation for regional peace. “The Hashemite Custodianship is a cornerstone for stability in the region, undermining it is tantamount to undermining the very principles for peace,” he said, adding that Palestinians view Jordan’s role as a strategic lifeline that has consistently defended the status quo in international forums including UNESCO.

    The Palestinian Jerusalem Governorate said it had not received formal notification of the proposal but rejected it outright, noting that there has already been a dangerous escalation in Israeli interference in the Waqf’s work, including restrictions on Waqf security and staff, and growing incursions into the compound by extremist Israeli settlers.

    Gulf Arab sources say Jordan, which relies on regional support to counter the U.S.-Israeli proposal, can count on Saudi opposition to the plan. Saudi Arabia fully understands that any move to alter Hashemite custodianship would ignite widespread anger across the Middle East and inflame regional conflict, one senior Gulf Arab source said. “The Saudis may have disagreements with Jordan on some issues, but on Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa they understand the consequences of dismantling the existing arrangement,” the source added.

    In recent years, Jordanian Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah has built a close working relationship with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, with bilateral ties deepening following the 2020 Abraham Accords that saw a number of Arab states normalize relations with Israel. It remains unclear how Saudi Arabia would respond if the UAE or Bahrain chooses to publicly back the proposal, sources noted.

    Since signing the Abraham Accords, both the UAE and Bahrain have significantly deepened political, economic and security ties with Israel, even as regional anger over Israeli actions in Jerusalem and Gaza has grown. The UAE has positioned itself as Israel’s closest Arab partner, expanding cooperation across trade, technology, energy and defense sectors. Emirati-backed diplomatic and religious initiatives have also promoted a framework of multi-faith coexistence that Jordanian and Palestinian officials fear could be used to legitimize changes to Al-Aqsa’s historical status quo. In 2023, the UAE opened a state-backed multi-faith complex in Abu Dhabi housing a mosque, church and synagogue. Bahrain has similarly built close ties with Israel, framing its engagement as a critical tool to counter Iran, and has generally avoided public criticism of Israeli policy in Jerusalem, stoking fears it is willing to accommodate Israeli demands over the holy sites.

    “They [UAE and Bahrain] understand how explosive this issue is in the Arab and Muslim world,” a Gulf Arab source said. “Given that they are closely aligned with Israel, they should be cautious about publicly supporting changes to the status quo.”

    MEE reached out to the foreign ministries of Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and the UAE for comment, but received no response prior to publication. The Jordanian government, which has banned MEE access in the country since May 2025, acknowledged receipt of questions but declined to comment.

  • Cambodia’s new conscription law takes effect in wake of conflict with Thailand

    Cambodia’s new conscription law takes effect in wake of conflict with Thailand

    PHNOM PENH, Cambodia – Cambodia’s overhauled military conscription framework, which carries criminal penalties of up to five years behind bars for people who refuse mandated military service, officially entered into force on Monday, according to Prime Minister Hun Manet. The new law was formally signed into effect this past Saturday by Senate President Hun Sen, who stepped in as acting head of state while Cambodia’s monarch King Norodom Sihamoni receives ongoing medical care for prostate cancer in Beijing. The push to update the country’s decades-old draft rules comes on the heels of two deadly outbreaks of cross-border armed clashes with neighboring Thailand last year, a series of conflicts that claimed roughly 100 lives and forced hundreds of thousands of civilians to flee their homes near the shared border.

    Structured across eight chapters and 20 individual articles, the updated regulation replaces a 2006 conscription law that was never put into practice and had long been labeled outdated by policymakers. Under the new guidelines, all Cambodian men between the ages of 18 and 25 are required to complete a two-year active service term in the national military, while female citizens are eligible to enlist on a voluntary basis. Recipients of conscription summons are legally mandated to report for processing within 30 days of receiving their official notice, unless they can demonstrate a qualified, legitimate exemption; failure to meet this requirement results in being formally classified as a draft evader.

    Penalties for evasion are tiered based on whether the nation is in a state of peace or active conflict. During peacetime, convicted evaders face between six months and two years of imprisonment, plus financial fines ranging from $250 to $1,000. If the country is at war or facing an imminent foreign incursion, the penalties jump to 2 to 5 years in prison and fines between $1,000 and $2,500.

    A narrow set of groups qualify for permanent exemptions from the mandatory service requirement, including Buddhist monks, recognized religious clergy, people with permanent disabilities, and individuals holding high-demand specialized skills in science and technology. After completing their mandatory active service, conscripts transition to the national military reserve force and remain eligible for reserve activation until they turn 45 years old.

    Speaking to Cambodian lawmakers earlier in October, Prime Minister Hun Manet framed the new law as a critical institutional foundation for nurturing national identity among young Cambodians, encouraging love of country, building a culture of patriotism, and cultivating a widespread willingness to serve the nation’s defense needs. This policy shift comes as Cambodia continues to navigate lingering regional border tensions and seeks to strengthen its national defense capabilities following last year’s deadly clashes.

  • Brazil’s Lula starts radiotherapy after removal of skin lesion

    Brazil’s Lula starts radiotherapy after removal of skin lesion

    Eighty-year-old Brazilian incumbent President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has embarked on a course of preventive radiotherapy starting this Monday, following the surgical removal of a cancerous skin lesion from his scalp last month, according to an official statement released by Sao Paulo’s Sirio-Libanes Hospital. The treatment comes as the veteran leftist politician campaigns for a fourth presidential term in Brazil’s upcoming October general election, a race that has already put health and age-related questions at the center of public discourse.

    Last month, dermatologist Cristina Abdalla removed a visible basal cell carcinoma from Lula’s scalp. Abdalla previously noted that this type of skin growth is extremely common and primarily triggered by long-term sun exposure, easing initial public concern over the diagnosis. After the successful surgical excision of the lesion, medical teams made the collective decision to administer complementary preventive superficial radiotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence, the hospital confirmed in its latest announcement.

    In the weeks since the lesion removal, Lula has been spotted wearing a head covering during all public appearances, a habit he previously adopted after a 2024 emergency surgery to address a brain hemorrhage sustained in a domestic accident. This is not the only minor health procedure Lula has undergone this year: he also underwent cataract surgery on his left eye back in January, adding to a string of publicized health events that have drawn scrutiny amid the election cycle.

    To pre-empt growing public anxiety over his fitness for office at 80, Lula and his campaign team have ramped up social media outreach over the past several months. The president has repeatedly shared content showcasing his daily exercise routines, framing an image of vitality to counter questions about whether his age will hinder his ability to serve another four-year term. On the campaign trail, Lula’s most likely leading challenger is Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of former far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who has built a leading position in pre-election polling to secure the main opposition’s nomination.