作者: admin

  • Batch of Allen’s Inside Outs recalled over plastic fears

    Batch of Allen’s Inside Outs recalled over plastic fears

    A popular confectionery line from Australian candy brand Allen’s has been pulled from retail shelves across Australia and New Zealand, after an equipment malfunction at a third-party production facility led to confirmed plastic contamination in some units of the product.

    The recall, which covers 130g sealed bags of Allen’s Inside Outs lollies, was launched as a proactive consumer protection measure following the incident, according to parent company Nestlé. The equipment failure at the contract manufacturer’s production site caused small fragments of plastic to break loose and enter the candy batch during manufacturing, the company confirmed in an official statement published on its website.

    Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), the regional bi-national food safety regulator, has issued a public warning advising any consumer who purchased the affected batch to avoid consuming the product and return it to the point of purchase for a full, no-questions-asked refund. The recalled products carry a best-before date of 30 June 2027, and fall under seven specific batch identification numbers: 6072T941, 6073T941, 6074T941, 6075T941, 6085T941, 6086T941 and 6088T941.

    Nestlé spokesperson Andrew Lawrey emphasized that consumer safety remains the company’s top priority in responding to the incident. “This recall is a precautionary action, taken in line with our rigorous quality standards,” Lawrey said, adding that company teams moved rapidly to alert food safety authorities and retail partners immediately after the contamination issue was identified. “If you have purchased any of these products, please return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.”

    As of the latest update, no consumer injuries or adverse health incidents linked to the contaminated batch have been reported. The recall is currently ongoing, with major supermarkets already removing the affected stock from store shelves.

  • Sailors stressed and exhausted after months trapped by Strait of Hormuz blockade

    Sailors stressed and exhausted after months trapped by Strait of Hormuz blockade

    For Pakistani captain Hassan Khan, who asked to keep his real identity hidden for safety, the glassy calm of the Gulf waters can often lull him into a fleeting moment of normalcy — before the weight of his situation crashes back. Three months have passed since his vessel, along with roughly 1,600 other commercial ships, became trapped in or near the Strait of Hormuz after the outbreak of the US-Israeli war with Iran in late February.

    Once the beating heart of global energy trade, carrying one-fifth of the world’s daily oil and gas supplies, this vital chokepoint has been reduced to a deadly no-man’s-land. Missiles streak across the sky above while uncharted mines drift beneath the surface, bringing all commercial transit to a grinding halt. An estimated 20,000 sailors remain stuck on vessels stranded on the wrong side of the strait, cut off from the open ocean and facing a daily battle against fear, exhaustion, and growing resource scarcity.

    On Khan’s ship, the crew has attempted to cling to familiar routines to maintain some semblance of normalcy. But the old dynamic has vanished entirely. Rarely do any crew members volunteer for the infrequent, tightly restricted shore leave. Lighthearted crew banter has been replaced by tense, anxious silence, broken only by the constant vibration of mobile phones as sailors check in with frantic family members back home. Even in their sleep, crew members startle awake at the smallest unexpected noise. “The stress never leaves our minds,” Khan explained. “Everyone is worn out, completely drained both physically and mentally.”

    The logjam of trapped vessels began days after the war started, when Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz — the only navigable exit from the Gulf to the Indian Ocean — and barred all commercial traffic from passing without explicit government approval. “It’s like being stuck in a pond with only one drain, and that drain is Hormuz,” described Shafiqul Islam, captain of the Bangladesh-owned bulk carrier *Banglar Joyjatra*, which is carrying 37,000 tonnes of fertiliser bound for South Africa.

    Islam has made two attempts to exit the Gulf over the past three months, and both have ended in disappointment. Following an April 8 ceasefire announcement, Islam learned that another commercial vessel had secured passage approval from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). He steered *Banglar Joyjatra* toward the strait alongside four other trapped ships, only to be turned away by Iranian military warnings before they could reach the waterway.

    Nine days later, a second opportunity appeared to open up when Iranian officials announced the strait would be “fully open” to all commercial traffic in compliance with the ceasefire terms. But Iran abruptly reversed its decision after the United States refused to lift its ongoing naval blockade of Iranian ports. By that time, Islam’s ship was already within 30 nautical miles of the strait, and he was forced to turn back amid repeated radio warnings of imminent attacks. Islam counts himself lucky, however: just two days into the conflict, his ship was anchored only 200 meters from Dubai’s Jebel Ali Port, a facility that was targeted in an Iranian retaliatory strike. Since then, he and his 30-member crew have witnessed dozens of attacks firsthand. “Sometimes missiles pass right over a nearby ship, and other times falling debris lands on the deck of the next vessel,” Islam said. “When attacks run all through the night, none of us can even close our eyes to sleep.”

    “ We have seen horror and destruction with our own eyes,” added Rashedul Hasan, the *Banglar Joyjatra*’s chief engineer. Their fear is well-founded: the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) confirms that at least 11 sailors have been killed and one more remains missing across 39 verified violent incidents in the area.

    While the April ceasefire has reduced large-scale hostilities, the region remains on edge. Military activity continues to be a daily sight: sailors regularly spot drones, fighter jets, naval warships and submarines patrolling the waters. “The military vessels use bright searchlights and broadcast warnings over loudspeakers. They do this to deter any ship from trying to cross,” explained Sajid Masood, a Pakistani cook working on a stranded oil tanker who also requested a pseudonym for security.

    Beyond the constant threat of violence, trapped crews are facing a growing humanitarian crisis as critical supplies run short and prices skyrocket. While the Gulf’s major hubs, including Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Kuwait City, maintain established ship supply networks, delivery schedules have become completely unpredictable. For vessels that have shifted to safe anchorage off UAE ports, the cost of basic provisions has jumped exponentially. Hasan told reporters that a recent 180-tonne water delivery that would have normally cost between $1,500 and $2,000 wound up costing the crew $11,000. An anonymous South Korean sailor trapped on a different vessel accused some suppliers of price gouging, saying “it feels like many vendors are deliberately exploiting this crisis to charge inflated prices and make excessive profits.”

    The situation is set to worsen as summer approaches. Regional air temperatures already topped 30 degrees Celsius in May, and are expected to climb as high as 45 degrees Celsius in the coming months, increasing ships’ daily water demand for cooling and crew use. On Khan’s vessel, the crew still has enough staples to get by, but fresh produce and legumes have become almost impossible to source. “We can still get beef and chicken, but the easy access to fresh foods we had before is gone,” Khan said.

    For shipping companies, the crisis has already resulted in billions of dollars in lost revenue and cargo delays, and many are already planning to cut staffing costs to offset losses. For the trapped sailors, the human cost is far higher: most sailors’ employment contracts are expiring, and large-scale crew rotations have been put on hold indefinitely. Many seafarers are now rethinking their decision to work in the industry, saying the crisis has exposed just how quickly access to international waterways can become a weapon in future conflicts.

    Masood, whose contract ends in just one month, says he is now reconsidering his decades-long career at sea. But for now, his only focus is getting home to his family in Pakistan, where he planned to bring back gifts: Barbie dolls for his two daughters and a toy airplane for his young son. “I thought I would be home weeks ago, but we’re still stuck here,” he said. “Every single day my family messages asking when I’ll come home, and I have no answer to give them.”

    A small number of vessels — roughly 750 since late February, according to maritime analytics firm Kpler — have managed to secure passage through the strait. Jonathan Schroden, a researcher at Washington DC-based non-profit think tank CNA, noted that most of these successful transits are for vessels owned by companies from China, India, or Pakistan, and rely on direct government diplomacy with Tehran. “On top of diplomatic support, it appears ship owners have also paid a transit fee running into millions of dollars per vessel,” Schroden added.

    For the *Banglar Joyjatra*, diplomatic negotiations with Iran are the crew’s only path out. The Bangladeshi government has been working alongside the ship’s owner, state-run Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (BSC), to secure exit approval. Initially, BSC and the government agreed to pay the transit fee Iran demanded, but the plan collapsed after the United States threatened to impose sanctions on any entity that complied with Iran’s terms. “We are caught between two sides now,” said BSC managing director Commodore Mahmudul Hasan. “We are facing a double crisis that we can’t seem to escape.”

    Even for crew members who have managed to hold onto hope, the uncertainty of each passing day wears on. Hasan, the *Banglar Joyjatra*’s chief engineer, says he still believes the crew will get through this “critical moment” — but for thousands of trapped sailors across the Gulf, every day stuck at anchor is another day of fear, uncertainty, and waiting for a way home.

  • Putin remains uncompromising on Ukraine, but is public discourse on war changing in Russia?

    Putin remains uncompromising on Ukraine, but is public discourse on war changing in Russia?

    Five years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Russian state remains unapologetic in its prosecution of the war, with President Vladimir Putin doubling down on his commitment to achieve Moscow’s stated aims even as the originally planned short operation has devolved into a grinding, costly stalemate.

    The defining posture of modern Russia in 2026 is best captured by a blunt remark from popular folk singer Nadezhda Babkina, who, after receiving a state honor from Putin at the Kremlin, declared that Russia’s multi-ethnic national unity would never allow surrender, adding “Anyone who doesn’t like that can go and poison themselves.” That uncompromising tone echoes longstanding messaging from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who once framed Russia as unashamed of its identity and actions on the global stage – a description that fits Putin himself, who has never expressed remorse for ordering the 2022 invasion and shows no intention of halting military operations.

    Just ahead of this year’s St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russia’s flagship event designed to attract global investment and showcase the country to international audiences, Moscow launched another massive wave of missile and drone strikes across Ukrainian territory. While high-profile Western investors and political figures abandoned the forum years ago, organizers claim delegations from more than 130 countries and territories are still set to attend. Even so, a years-long active war on a neighboring country is hardly an ideal selling point for a nation courting foreign capital – a contradiction that does little to shift Moscow’s behavior.

    Putin’s public demands remain unchanged: he continues to insist Ukraine cede full control of the entire Donbas region to Russia. What has shifted, however, is Moscow’s earlier high hopes for a favorable peace deal brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump. Last year, following the Anchorage summit between Trump and Putin, senior Russian officials repeatedly praised the so-called “spirit of Anchorage”, suggesting the two leaders had reached a mutually beneficial understanding that would force Kyiv to accept Moscow’s maximalist terms. Today, that optimism has faded: Putin’s top foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov recently told Russian state television he has never used the phrase, a quiet signal that the once-touted diplomatic breakthrough has all but evaporated.

    That dashed hope is one of many factors fueling Putin’s growing frustration. What was planned as a quick, short-term “special military operation” has become a bloody war of attrition entering its fifth year, leaving Russia with massive battlefield casualties, deep economic damage from sweeping international sanctions, and eroded technological capacity. The conflict has increasingly moved into Russian territory as well: Ukrainian drones now regularly strike deep inside the country, targeting key energy infrastructure including oil refineries. A large-scale drone attack on the Moscow region last month exposed gaps in the capital’s air defense network, prompting officials to scale back the iconic annual 9 May Victory Day parade on Red Square amid security fears. Sanctions and prolonged war have also strained Russia’s public finances, with a growing budget deficit and stagnant economic output becoming persistent problems.

    Rather than drawing down military operations to address these challenges, the Kremlin has opted for escalation, as demonstrated by the recent large-scale air raids on Ukrainian cities. Moscow frames the escalation as a response to a Ukrainian strike on a building in Starobilsk, a city in occupied eastern Ukraine, which Russia says was a student dormitory that left 21 dead. Ukraine confirms it targeted the headquarters of Russia’s elite Rubicon drone unit in the area but has not confirmed whether the building matched the one Russia identified.

    As Putin prepares to address delegates at the St Petersburg forum – a traditional venue for him to lay out his worldview and criticize the West – there is no indication he will use the speech to signal any shift in Russia’s position on the war. That said, faint signs of a growing domestic debate over the future of the conflict have begun to emerge, even within Russia’s tightly controlled media ecosystem.

    Writing in *Russia In Global Affairs*, a journal closely tied to Russia’s foreign policy establishment, prominent political scientist Vasily Kashin recently concluded that the core goal of removing the current Ukrainian government is fundamentally unachievable at this stage without a long-term full military occupation of the entire country – a step that is technically out of Russia’s reach. Other Russian commentators have echoed similar uncertainty: pro-Kremlin tabloid *Moskovsky Komsomolets* quoted political analyst Alexander Nosovich noting that the expert community is split, with one camp pushing to continue the war until all stated goals are met and the other arguing it is time to end the conflict, warning that the worst outcome is not defeat, but an endless open-ended war.

    In a striking break from the dominant narrative that frames Russia as a nation defined by victory, lawyer Dmitry Krasnov argued in the same outlet that throughout Russian history, lost wars and humiliating truces have often paved the way for critical reforms, breakthroughs and eventual future victories, suggesting major geopolitical setbacks can sometimes be more useful than military triumphs. When reporters attempted to access the article online days later, it had been removed, with a 404 access denied error appearing. While a limited public discourse over the war is emerging, it still operates within clear, strict boundaries set by the Kremlin.

    With no shift in Putin’s position and no diplomatic breakthrough on the horizon, an end to the devastating conflict remains as distant as ever.

  • 2 scientists charged with bringing deactivated mpox virus into the US and lying to authorities

    2 scientists charged with bringing deactivated mpox virus into the US and lying to authorities

    DETROIT — Federal law enforcement authorities announced criminal charges Tuesday against two senior U.S. government virologists accused of smuggling vials of deactivated mpox virus into the United States from central Africa and lying about the unauthorized samples during customs interviews at Detroit Metropolitan Airport.

    A federal criminal complaint unsealed in Detroit’s U.S. District Court names Vincent Munster, head of the virus ecology section at Rocky Mountain Laboratories, a National Institutes of Health facility based in Hamilton, Montana, and Claude Kwe, a research collaborator who works alongside Munster. Both were taken into custody following their January 2024 stop at the Detroit airport after traveling to the U.S. from Paris, following a nine-day research trip to the Republic of Congo, according to court documents.

    The Republic of Congo, located in central Africa, has been the epicenter of a devastating mpox outbreak that killed more than 2,000 people over the past two years, before global health authorities declared the public health emergency over in April. When the pair was stopped for routine customs screening after their international flight, Munster “adamantly denied” bringing any biological samples or materials into the country with him, FBI agents wrote in a formal court filing.

    However, subsequent forensic testing confirmed that the two researchers were carrying multiple vials of deactivated mpox virus in their luggage, the FBI confirmed. The pair failed to declare the biological materials to U.S. customs and border protection officials and did not secure the required legal permits to transport the virus samples into the country.

    Marcus Sykes, a supervisory investigator with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, emphasized the severity of the alleged conduct in a statement accompanying the charges. “Any deliberate effort to conceal and smuggle biological materials into the United States without proper authorization is a breach of the public’s trust and could have placed the public at risk,” Sykes said.

    Court records do not include any explanation for why the researchers allegedly chose to smuggle the deactivated samples into the country rather than follow standard permit protocols. But investigators confirmed that both scientists have spent years leading public health research on mpox, so the samples were intended for their ongoing lab work. When pressed about documentation for the materials, Munster told investigators the necessary paperwork was stored on his personal laptop, but added, “you don’t need them. I do this all the time,” according to the FBI’s official transcript of the airport interview.

    FBI analysts concluded that Munster’s statements to customs officers about holding the required documentation were “materially false.”

    To provide context for the public, the World Health Organization notes that mpox, which was renamed from monkeypox in 2022, typically causes mild to moderate symptoms including rash and fever, though it can lead to severe illness in vulnerable groups, and most patients make a full recovery. The virus was first discovered in 1958, when pox-like outbreaks were detected in research monkey colonies. For decades, nearly all human cases were limited to central and West Africa, linked to close contact with infected wild animals. That pattern shifted dramatically in 2022, when researchers confirmed mpox could spread through close sexual contact, triggering unprecedented outbreaks across more than 70 non-endemic countries around the world.

    As of Tuesday, neither Munster nor Kwe had issued a public response to the charges, and they did not reply to media requests for comment ahead of their scheduled first appearance in federal court in Missoula, Montana on Wednesday. The National Institutes of Health, which oversees Rocky Mountain Laboratories and falls under the umbrella of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

  • South Koreans vote in local elections seen as a gauge of support after President Lee’s first year

    South Koreans vote in local elections seen as a gauge of support after President Lee’s first year

    South Korean voters headed to polling stations across the country on Wednesday to cast ballots in high-stakes local elections and parliamentary by-elections, widely viewed as a pivotal mid-term assessment of public support for President Lee Jae Myung’s one-year-old liberal administration. The election cycle comes 18 months after former conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol’s catastrophic martial law declaration triggered a national political crisis that ended with Yoon’s impeachment, removal from office, and eventual conviction on rebellion charges, leaving the main conservative opposition People Power Party (PPP) fractured and deeply weakened.

    Across roughly 14,300 polling locations open from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. local time, more than 44.6 million eligible voters chose candidates for 17 key races, including 16 mayoral and provincial gubernatorial seats, 12 of which are currently held by the PPP. The elections also fill 14 vacant seats in South Korea’s 300-member National Assembly through by-elections, adding another layer of political consequence to the day’s voting.

    Early pre-election opinion polling pointed to a dominant showing for Lee’s Democratic Party (DP), with some projections suggesting the liberal party could seize as many as 15 of the 16 available gubernatorial and mayoral posts. But more recent survey data indicates that PPP and independent candidates have narrowed the gap, with some even pulling ahead of DP contenders in five to seven competitive races. Political analysts widely agree that given the opposition’s fractured position, the DP needs a landslide victory — including a win in the closely watched Seoul mayoral race — to solidify Lee’s political mandate and extend liberal control of South Korean politics for years to come.

    “The conservatives’ support base has been fractured and weakened in the wake of Yoon’s impeachment, while the liberals’ support base has grown stronger. Considering that, results of the elections will determine whether their dominance would prolong for a considerable time,” explained Jeong Han-Wool, director of the Korean People Research Institute.

    Choi Jin, head of the Seoul-based Institute of Presidential Leadership, noted the DP entered the contest with a built-in advantage: widespread public anger remains over Yoon’s 2024 martial law imposition, and the Lee administration is still viewed by many voters as a new government that deserves more time to deliver results, rather than facing pushback mid-term. Choi defines a resounding DP victory as winning at least 12 of the 16 top local posts, and warns that a loss in the Seoul mayoral race would deal “a tremendous blow” to Lee’s government.

    The Seoul contest has emerged as the highest-profile race of the election cycle, pitting the DP’s Chong Won-o — a former Seoul district leader who rose to prominence after Lee praised his local governance last fall — against incumbent mayor and PPP political heavyweight Oh Se-hoon. On the eve of voting, Oh argued that the national political landscape benefits from bipartisan checks and balance, urging voters to keep Seoul, the last major conservative stronghold, in opposition hands. “Our country would be safer when the rival forces keep each other in check than one side controlling everything. Please, leave Seoul, the last stronghold, in our hands,” Oh told reporters Tuesday.

    For his part, Chong called on Seoul voters to deliver what he framed as a “stern verdict” on Oh’s tenure, criticizing the incumbent for what he described as incompetent and irresponsible leadership during his time in office.

    Thursday marks exactly one year since Lee took office, after winning a snap election called following the Constitutional Court’s ruling to remove Yoon from office over his martial law order. Lee currently holds an approval rating above 60%, and Yoon was convicted of rebellion and sentenced to life in prison by a Seoul district court in February 2025.

    In the wake of Yoon’s ouster, the PPP has been mired in bitter internal conflict between reformist lawmakers who supported the impeachment and hardline loyalists who remained loyal to the ousted leader. One of the highest-stakes parliamentary by-elections pits expelled PPP reformist leader Han Dong-hoon against DP candidate Ha Jung-woo, a former AI policy adviser to Lee, in Busan — South Korea’s second-largest city. Polling shows Han holds a narrow lead in the race.

    Jeong argues that a Han win could allow anti-Yoon conservative reformists to regroup and establish a new competitive force within South Korea’s divided conservative movement. But Choi offers a different take, noting a Han victory could actually deepen conservative divisions, as Yoon loyalists would feel heightened political pressure and close ranks to defend their influence.

  • US reaffirms Somali sovereignty in blow to Somaliland and Israel

    US reaffirms Somali sovereignty in blow to Somaliland and Israel

    More than a year after Israel made global headlines as the first nation to formally recognize the breakaway Somali region of Somaliland as an independent state, the United States has issued a definitive policy stance that effectively shatters Somaliland’s lingering hopes for international sovereignty recognition. In a congressionally mandated report examining opportunities for expanded U.S. engagement with Somaliland, the U.S. State Department made clear that Somaliland is formally considered part of the Federal Republic of Somalia — a position that aligns with longstanding international consensus on the region’s status. The report also notes that within this territorial framework, Washington will maintain a positive, pragmatic working relationship with Hargeisa’s regional authorities and continue exploring new avenues for cooperation.

    The diplomatic chain of events that led to this moment began in November 2023, when Somaliland President Abdirahman Abdullahi Mohamed held a closed-door meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Mossad Director David Barnea, and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar in Jerusalem. One month later, on December 26, 2023, Israel officially recognized Somaliland’s sovereignty, and Saar traveled to the breakaway region shortly after the announcement to cement bilateral ties. In reciprocation, Somaliland recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and announced plans to open an embassy in the contested city, drawing vocal support from prominent pro-Israel figures in Western politics and media. Earlier this year, a delegation of high-profile Western backers including former Jewish Chronicle editor Jake Wallis Simons, Henry Jackson Society associate fellow Andrew Fox, and former UK Conservative Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson traveled to Hargeisa to attend Somaliland’s annual self-declared independence day celebrations, boosting the region’s global profile.

    Somaliland’s leadership has held out high hopes that Israel’s recognition would open the floodgates for further international backing, with the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, India, Cyprus, and Georgia targeted as next potential recognizers. For months, lobbying efforts by former Trump administration officials Tibor Nagy and Peter Pham had raised optimism among Somaliland’s political circles that Washington might also shift its position to formal recognition. However, a congressional source familiar with internal discussions told Middle East Eye that the Trump administration never signaled any willingness to break with longstanding U.S. policy on the issue, even as Somaliland courted Washington with offers of access to valuable mineral resources including lithium and coltan, both critical to global technology and energy supply chains. Analysts add that former President Trump’s well-documented public hostility toward Somalia and Somali Americans — including racist remarks labeling Somalis as “low IQ” and “crooked,” and attacking Somali American U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar as “garbage” — made any policy shift unlikely from the start.

    For Somaliland, the U.S. announcement marks a major setback to its decades-long push for independence. One anonymous Somali policy analyst who works with officials on both sides of the sovereignty dispute described the State Department report as a “consequential announcement that may effectively close the door on any lingering hopes of U.S. recognition.” The analyst noted that the decision aligns with Washington’s broader strategic ambitions across the entire territory of Somalia, arguing that “why settle for part of the cake when the whole cake remains within reach.”

    Rooble Mohamed, a communications adviser for the Somaliland government, acknowledged the current reality of U.S. non-recognition, drawing a parallel to Washington’s informal relationship with Taiwan: the U.S. does not formally recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, but maintains extensive unofficial ties and cooperation with Taipei, an arrangement Somaliland appears willing to accept for now. When asked about the risks of aligning with Israel amid global backlash over the ongoing military campaign in Gaza that has drawn widespread condemnation, Mohamed pushed back on criticism, noting “We are one of the Muslim countries of the world, I don’t think we are different. I think it is normal to have a relationship with Israel. It does not mean the Palestinians are our enemies.” He added that after decades of unrecognized statehood, formal sovereignty recognition remains Somaliland’s top priority, and the government sees no viable alternative to its current diplomatic outreach.

    The strategic importance of Somaliland’s location on the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a critical chokepoint connecting the Red Sea and Indian Ocean that carries a third of the world’s global shipping trade, has grown dramatically in recent years amid rising Houthi activity in Yemen and escalating regional tensions with Iran. Even before the 2020 Abraham Accords normalized Israeli-UAE relations, Israeli military and intelligence operatives assisted the UAE in building a network of military bases across the Gulf of Aden to counter Iranian influence, with the key Somaliland port of Berbera serving as a central node in that network. While that network has been partially disrupted by a recent rift between the UAE and its former Yemen coalition partner Saudi Arabia, Berbera remains a key strategic asset for regional powers. Currently, UAE logistics giant DP World operates Berbera’s port, with a minority stake held by the UK government through its foreign investment arm, and Israeli and Somaliland officials are currently in talks to establish an Israeli military base at the site.

    The U.S. State Department report explicitly acknowledges Somaliland’s strategic value, noting that its location “positions it as a potential partner on shared security interests, including freedom of commercial and military navigation from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean.” The report also notes that Somaliland authorities have actively courted U.S. investment in natural resources and prioritized infrastructure development, trade, and economic growth, pointing to ongoing expansion of Berbera’s airport and seaport that will turn the site into a major logistics hub for landlocked Ethiopia, creating new commercial opportunities for U.S. firms. Even so, the report concludes that core challenges remain: the unresolved sovereignty dispute between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, and Somaliland’s refusal to cooperate with Somalia’s federal government, create persistent barriers to foreign investment, banking access, and expanded international trade.

  • Ahead of NBA finals, advocates renew call for league to sever ties with UAE

    Ahead of NBA finals, advocates renew call for league to sever ties with UAE

    As the New York Knicks prepare to take the court in the NBA Finals, a growing coalition of U.S. lawmakers and human rights advocates is putting intense pressure on the league to end its multi-billion dollar partnerships with the United Arab Emirates, accusing the Gulf nation of using global sports as a tool for “sportswashing” its backing of a paramilitary force accused of mass human rights abuses in Sudan’s ongoing civil war. The campaign, led by Democratic Congressman Jim McGovern, co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, spotlights a years-long pattern of financial, logistical and military support that Abu Dhabi has provided to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a group widely documented to have committed widespread atrocities against civilians across Sudan during the four-year conflict. The UAE has repeatedly denied these allegations, despite mounting evidence including satellite imagery, flight tracking data, weapons records and firsthand testimony from former RSF commanders reported by multiple independent outlets. The NBA currently holds two major high-value deals with UAE entities: a 2021 partnership with the UAE Department of Tourism that expanded in 2026 to include a global NBA academy in Abu Dhabi, and a 2024 sponsorship agreement with Emirates Airlines that rebranded the league’s popular in-season tournament as the Emirates NBA Cup, which the Knicks won earlier this season. Beyond the league-wide agreements, the New York Knicks themselves hold an independent $30 million sponsorship deal with the UAE, and English Premier League side Arsenal – which recently claimed the 2023-24 league title before falling in the Champions League final – also maintains high-profile ties to Gulf sponsors. Both teams count New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani as a vocal public supporter, a connection advocates say highlights how effectively sports branding can obscure problematic political ties. During a virtual press briefing held Tuesday, McGovern was joined by a cohort of humanitarian advocates to formally demand the NBA sever all partnerships with the UAE, arguing that the league’s commercial ties directly enable human rights catastrophe in Sudan, which currently hosts the world’s largest ongoing humanitarian displacement crisis. “Fans should know that the sport that they are enjoying is fuelling crimes against humanity. They should know that the NBA is investing in the UAE, and the UAE is investing in atrocities in Sudan,” McGovern stated during the event. He added that after he sent a formal letter raising concerns to NBA leadership, the league only responded with a generic form reply that failed to address questions about its corporate social responsibility commitments, noting that the league said only that it abides by U.S. State Department guidance in all markets where it operates. “Our goal is for the NBA to get the UAE to divest from atrocities in Sudan; we know you can, and your reputation and your conscience will benefit from it,” McGovern added. John Prendergast, a former Clinton White House official and co-founder of investigative watchdog group The Sentry, warned that the partnerships between the NBA, WNBA and the UAE put the leagues just one step removed from what he called “perhaps the worst case of racial violence and injustice in the world.” Prendergast estimated the combined deals will generate roughly $500 million in combined advertising revenue for both the NBA and the UAE government. Niemat Ahmadi, president of the Darfur Women Action Group, pushed back against the idea that the league relies on these Gulf sponsorships to turn a profit, arguing that the dynamic is reversed. “The NBA doesn’t need the Emirates. The Emirates needs the NBA. That’s why they jumped into this partnership,” Ahmadi said. “There are many, many American companies who have way more money to spend…[the NBA] did not go to the Emirates and ask for this deal. The Emirates is trying to rebrand.” Prendergast pointed to the recent end of Arsenal’s “Visit Rwanda” sleeve sponsorship, which was canceled last year after sustained fan pressure over human rights concerns, as evidence that similar public pressure can push the NBA to cut ties. Advocates also noted that New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s recent public appearance in an Arsenal kurta during Eid al-Adha prayers highlighted how invisible sportswashing can be to the general public. “We’re going to reach out to his office,” said Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International. “I think what it underscores is just how effective the sportswashing approach is. People put an Arsenal jersey on. They put an NBA jersey on. They don’t even think about what it says on the front…They don’t think about what that implies.” In response to mounting criticism, Emirati officials and allies have pushed back against accusations that the UAE is singularly responsible for fueling the Sudan conflict. Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, an Emirati academic with close ties to Abu Dhabi’s leadership, recently argued that the UAE has been unfairly singled out, noting that the RSF also receives support from other regional actors including Uganda, Ethiopia and Chad. Middle East Eye, which originally reported on this story, has reached out to both the NBA’s media team and the Sudanese ambassador to the United States for comment on the demands. The outlet has also previously published multiple investigations documenting the evidence linking the UAE to RSF support.

  • Trump admin abandons $1.8 bn fund to compensate supporters

    Trump admin abandons $1.8 bn fund to compensate supporters

    In a sudden reversal of one of former President Donald Trump’s most polarizing second-term policy proposals, the Trump administration has officially abandoned plans to establish a $1.8 billion compensation fund that critics widely labeled a partisan “slush fund” for the president’s political backers. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, a one-time personal attorney to Trump, confirmed the decision during sworn testimony before the U.S. House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.

    “We are not moving forward with the fund. Period,” Blanche told the panel, ending weeks of legal and political wrangling over the proposal that had sparked backlash from across the political spectrum.

    The scrapped initiative, officially branded the “anti-weaponization fund,” was first established as part of an extraordinary legal settlement between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The settlement resolved a civil lawsuit Trump filed after his tax returns were leaked by a former government contractor. A key addendum to the settlement, which Blanche confirmed remains intact, permanently bars the IRS from pursuing any outstanding back tax claims against Trump, his immediate family, and his business entities dating back to the May 18 settlement date. The settlement structure was highly unusual: rather than resolving the lawsuit through standard financial or procedural terms, it redirected $1.8 billion in potential federal claims to create a fund for people who claimed to have been unfairly targeted by the U.S. government.

    Trump and his administration framed the fund as a corrective for what they call government “weaponization” and “lawfare” — the president’s longstanding framing of law enforcement and regulatory actions against his conservative supporters as politically motivated. But the proposal faced immediate, fierce criticism from opponents, who argued it lacked a clear legal foundation, had almost no independent public oversight, and created a clear pathway to distribute taxpayer dollars to Trump loyalists. Most notably, critics raised alarms that the fund could be used to compensate individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed Congress to try to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory.

    Shortly after returning to office, Trump granted clemency to more than 1,500 people convicted in connection with the Capitol riot. The administration has also moved to purge Justice Department press releases about January 6 prosecutions, dismissing the materials as “partisan propaganda.”

    Legal challenges further stalled the initiative before its official cancellation. Last week, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema issued a temporary injunction blocking the administration from taking any further steps to launch or operate the fund, as she considered whether to impose a permanent injunction. The proposal also became politically toxic even within Trump’s own Republican Party. Senate Republican leaders were forced to postpone a vote on a critical spending bill for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Border Patrol, in large part because of GOP concerns that the fund could open the door to sending taxpayer money to January 6 defendants.

    Blanche’s confirmation that the plan is being fully scrapped marks the end of one of the most controversial early proposals of Trump’s second term, which drew opposition from Democrats, nonpartisan legal experts, and even rank-and-file Republicans who warned it represented an unprecedented abuse of executive power and public funds.

  • Qantas tests new long range Airbus ahead of direct Aus-NY and London flights

    Qantas tests new long range Airbus ahead of direct Aus-NY and London flights

    Australia’s flagship carrier Qantas has moved one significant step closer to launching the world’s longest commercial non-stop passenger flights, after completing the maiden test flight of its custom-built ultra-long-range Airbus jet this week. The milestone comes even as global supply chain headwinds have pushed back initial delivery timelines, with the airline still on track to launch the revolutionary service by 2027.

    The test aircraft, an A350-1000ULR (ultra-long-range) modified specifically for Qantas’ Project Sunrise initiative, departed from Airbus’ industrial hub in Toulouse, France, at local time Tuesday afternoon. The four-hour test flight, operated by an Airbus flight test crew, climbed to a cruising altitude of more than 41,000 feet, successfully validating the jet’s new extended-range fuel system and core performance capabilities. This aircraft is the second of 12 custom ULR jets Airbus is building for Qantas, and will now enter the outfitting phase to install Qantas’ exclusive four-class cabin layout.

    The ULR variant of the A350-1000 features purpose-built modifications designed to extend its maximum range: an additional fuel tank that adds 1,800 kilometers of flying distance, paired with lighter, more energy-efficient galley refrigeration systems to cut unnecessary weight and maximize range. These adaptations will allow the jet to complete non-stop flights of up to 22 hours, a capability no commercial airliner serving Qantas’ routes has held to date.

    Per Qantas’ announcement, the successful maiden test flight kicks off a two-month global flight testing campaign that will accumulate around 80 hours of in-air validation, alongside extensive ground inspections and certification checks for all the redesigned and custom components built into the jets. The first finished jet is still scheduled for handover to Qantas in April 2027, after Airbus confirmed last week that supply chain disruptions had delayed initial delivery by four months. A Qantas spokesperson confirmed that following the first delivery, four additional aircraft will arrive in quick succession, putting the entire delivery program back on its original schedule by November 2027.

    The second ULR jet, earmarked as the first to be delivered to Qantas, is already in advanced final assembly and will exit Airbus’ paint shop in the coming days, before proceeding to cabin outfitting and engine installation. Meanwhile, Qantas has already begun training future pilots to operate the new jets at full-flight simulators based in Sydney, to prepare for commercial launch once deliveries are complete. By the end of this month, Qantas has said it will confirm the exact launch routes and commercial service timeline for the new non-stop flights.

    Project Sunrise, first announced by Qantas in 2017, is the airline’s decades-long initiative to launch non-stop service from Australia’s populous east coast to major global hubs London and New York. Currently, the airline’s longest non-stop route runs between Perth and London at approximately 18 hours of flight time. The new service will cut total travel time by roughly four hours for passengers departing east coast Australian hubs like Sydney and Melbourne, eliminating the need for a layover en route.

    Once launched, Qantas’ new routes will claim the title of the world’s longest commercial non-stop flights, overtaking the two current record-holders operated by Singapore Airlines, which run from New York and Newark, New Jersey, to Singapore. Qantas already holds three spots on the global list of top 10 longest non-stop routes, with its Perth-London, Melbourne-Dallas, and Paris-Perth services ranking fourth, fifth and sixth respectively, and the Auckland-New York service (shared with Air New Zealand) ranking seventh. The new ultra-long-range jets are part of Qantas’ broader $15 billion national fleet renewal program, designed to modernize its long-haul network and open new non-stop connections between Australia and major global destinations.

  • Watch: Men seen entering NYC sewer manhole in surveillance footage

    Watch: Men seen entering NYC sewer manhole in surveillance footage

    Newly released surveillance footage from New York City has captured a striking, unusual scene: two unidentified men climbing down through an open sewer manhole into the sprawling underground network that lies beneath the city’s busy streets. The New York City Police Department has launched an investigation into the incident, which has sparked curiosity across local communities.

    According to initial law enforcement assessments, authorities believe the two men are likely amateur treasure hunters or passionate urban explorers. For decades, urban exploration has drawn adventure-seekers to the hidden, off-limits infrastructure of major cities, including unused tunnels, abandoned subway stations, and even active sewer systems, with many participants chasing the thrill of accessing spaces closed off to the general public. In some cases, explorers have also held long-running rumors that forgotten valuables or historic artifacts could be hidden within New York City’s more than 6,000 miles of sewer lines, a myth that has driven occasional unauthorized entries into the system.

    Entering the city’s sewer system without official authorization is illegal and extremely dangerous. NYPD officials have warned that underground sewer environments pose severe hazards including toxic gas buildup, sudden flooding from rain or wastewater surges, unmarked drops, and structural instability. First responders also face major challenges when called to rescue people who get trapped underground, due to the complex, maze-like layout of the network.

    As of the latest update, the two men have not been identified, and police have not reported any arrests or injuries connected to the incident. Authorities are asking members of the public who recognize the individuals from the surveillance footage to come forward with information to assist the ongoing investigation.