作者: admin

  • Iran war diverts US military and attention from Asia ahead of Trump’s summit with China’s leader

    Iran war diverts US military and attention from Asia ahead of Trump’s summit with China’s leader

    Fifteen years after former U.S. President Barack Obama first announced his landmark “pivot to Asia” strategy — a plan intended to wind down long-running wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and refocus American power to counter China’s growing global influence — a new conflict with Iran has once again pulled U.S. military resources and political attention away from the Indo-Pacific, stoking widespread fears that Washington is ceding strategic ground to Beijing.

    Obama’s 2011 framework was built on a clear core vision: after a decade of costly conflict in the Middle East, the U.S. would turn toward the Asia-Pacific’s massive economic potential and cement American leadership as China’s influence expanded across the region. But from the very start, the strategy faced repeated setbacks: the signature Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement collapsed in the U.S. Senate, President Donald Trump withdrew Washington from the deal shortly after taking office in 2017, and successive administrations have repeatedly been pulled back into Middle East tensions.

    Today, the pattern is repeating. As the U.S. escalates operations to counter Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, it has reallocated critical military assets from the Asia-Pacific to the Middle East. This shift has already forced Trump to delay a much-anticipated trip to Beijing, pushing back a high-stakes summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping that was set to address pressing economic and strategic tensions. Critics warn that the distraction from the Iran conflict is undermining longstanding U.S. deterrence efforts against China, particularly as Beijing speeds up its plans to assert control over the self-governing island of Taiwan.

    “This is precisely the wrong time for the United States to turn away and be sucked into another intractable Middle East conflict,” said Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute. “Rebalancing to Asia is highly relevant to America’s national interests, but it has been undercut by many bad decisions.”

    Lawmakers who recently traveled to the region have confirmed deep unease among U.S. allies. A bipartisan delegation led by Senate Foreign Relations Committee top Democrat Jeanne Shaheen visited Taiwan, Japan and South Korea earlier this year, where local leaders raised alarm over the withdrawal of key U.S. military capabilities, including a rapid-response Marine unit from Japan and missile defense systems from South Korea, as well as the impact of the Iran conflict on global energy prices.

    Shaheen told the Associated Press that Chinese leadership has already accelerated its timeline for potential military action against Taiwan, and global conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East are directly shaping Beijing’s strategic calculations. “Failure is not an option,” she said, noting that U.S. defense industries are already stretched thin to replenish munitions expended in the Middle East, leading to delayed weapons deliveries to Indo-Pacific allies. Even so, Shaheen added she is encouraged by moves from Taiwan, Japan and South Korea to expand their own defense capabilities.

    Independent analysts echo these concerns. Kurt Campbell, who served as deputy secretary of state under the Biden administration, warned that the critical military capabilities the U.S. spent years building up in the Indo-Pacific may never return to their full strength even after the Iran conflict concludes. Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute specializing in U.S. Asia strategy, added that extended conflict in the Middle East will not only drain ongoing resources and attention from the region, but also harm future U.S. arms sales to Indo-Pacific allies.

    “The United States has expended substantial numbers of munitions in the Middle East and will have to keep an increased force presence there, some of which has been redirected from Asia,” Cooper explained. “Meanwhile, Xi Jinping’s preparation of a ‘wartime’ economy through stockpiling and expanding alternate energy sources has proven strategically advantageous for Beijing.”

    Not all observers criticize the current U.S. approach, however. Supporters of Trump’s policy argue that confronting Iranian and Venezuelan aggression actually serves the broader goal of countering China globally, noting that Beijing is a key backer of the adversarial regimes Washington is targeting. “Beijing is the chief sponsor for the adversaries that President Trump is dealing with sequentially, and it’s wise to do this sequentially,” said Matt Pottinger, who served as deputy national security adviser in Trump’s first term, in a recent podcast appearance.

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has also framed the multi-theater challenge as an inherent reality of great power competition. Speaking Thursday at the Ronald Reagan Institute in Washington, Rutte noted that China could leverage its partnerships across regions to divert U.S. attention if it moves against Taiwan, meaning any crisis will not be limited to the Indo-Pacific. “Most likely it will not be limited, something in the Indo-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific,” he said. “It will be a multi-theater issue.”

    The current state of U.S. strategy lays bare just how elusive Obama’s original pivot vision remains after 15 years and three presidential administrations. After Trump took office for his second term, his 2025 national security strategy reaffirmed that deterring Chinese aggression in the Taiwan Strait and along the First Island Chain — the string of U.S.-aligned islands off China’s coast that block Beijing’s access to the Western Pacific — is a core national priority. The document explicitly stated that Washington’s historic reasons for heavy engagement in the Middle East would recede as U.S. domestic energy production ramped up. Just months later, the Iran conflict upended that plan.

  • Remember the Titans: Gold Coast heap more misery on the battered Eels as star fullback puts on attacking show

    Remember the Titans: Gold Coast heap more misery on the battered Eels as star fullback puts on attacking show

    In a dominant NRL round six matchup at CommBank Stadium on Sunday, the Gold Coast Titans delivered one of the most impressive performances of the young season, crushing the Parramatta Eels 52-10 to extend the home side’s losing streak and secure a rare victory on Sydney turf. The lopsided win, which marked the Titans’ second-highest single-game score in NRL history, was anchored by a career-defining 80-minute display from young fullback Keano Kini, putting to rest any lingering debate over the club’s starting role at the position.

    When interim Titans coach Josh Hannay took charge of the side earlier this season, he openly anointed Kini as his first-choice fullback, turning down calls to shift incumbent Jayden Campbell into the starting 1 spot. On Sunday, the pint-sized speedster turned that vote of confidence into a stat line that would look more at home in a video game than a professional rugby league matchup. Kini played a pivotal role in the Titans’ opening four tries, setting up all three of the side’s first-half tries and breaking the game open within the opening quarter. His most memorable play came on a brilliant spin pass that sent AJ Brimson over the line for a try, before he broke away on a 70-metre run off an Eels kick to set up rookie winger Sialetili Faeamani, pushing the Titans’ lead to 18-0 after just 15 minutes of play. Early in the second half, he burst through Parramatta’s soft middle defence to set up Campbell for another try. By full time, Kini finished the match with 226 running metres, four try assists, three line breaks and nine tackle busts, a performance the official NRL social media team described as unstoppable.

    Kini was far from the only Titans playmaker to produce a standout attacking display. Winger Jojo Fifita pounced on a loose Eels pass to spark a blistering 85-metre counterattack, linking up with Phil Sami to finish the long-range try that left the crowd stunned. Campbell later put the final cherry on top of the result when he intercepted an errant Parramatta pass to score another late Titans try, capping off a day where everything went right for the Gold Coast side.

    For the Parramatta Eels, the result marks yet another devastating low point in a disastrous start to the 2026 season. The Eels slumped to second-last on the ladder after six rounds, after conceding nine tries and missing a staggering 43 tackles against a Titans side that had struggled for attacking momentum heading into the round. Parramatta’s defensive woes have become the worst in the entire competition this season, with the club already conceding 226 points across the opening six weeks. On Sunday, both the edge and middle defensive lines were repeatedly exposed by Gold Coast’s dynamic attack, leaving head coach Jason Ryles with major questions to answer. Ryles will particularly be frustrated by the ease with which Cooper Bai barged over from close range for a second-half try, one of many soft tries the Eels conceded on the day.

    Parramatta’s attack was little better on Sunday. The side’s only first points came from a try that appeared to come off a clear forward pass, and by the time the Titans hit the 50-point mark late in the match, the home fans at CommBank Stadium voiced their anger with a raucous chorus of boos that rang out across the ground.

    Making matters far worse for the Eels is a worsening injury crisis that has gutted the club’s playing squad ahead of their upcoming fixture. Powerhouse forwards Sam Tuivaiti and Kelma Tuilagi both suffered head knocks during Sunday’s match and will be forced to miss next week’s game, joining a growing list of sidelined stars. The club is already missing starting lock J’maine Hopgood, edge forward Matt Doorey and winger Bailey Simonsson for the entire 2026 season, while Isaiah Iongi and Jonah Pezet are among other key players currently sidelined with injury. Tuivaiti’s injury came just 10 minutes after he came onto the field as a reserve, when his head collided with Arama Hau’s hip while making a tackle, and he was ruled out of the rest of the match immediately after the incident.

  • Vance says talks failed to reach agreement with Iran

    Vance says talks failed to reach agreement with Iran

    After 21 hours of closed-door negotiations hosted in Islamabad, Pakistan, United States Vice President JD Vance announced Sunday that direct talks with Iranian representatives have concluded without reaching a binding consensus, though Washington’s so-called “final and best offer” remains under consideration by Tehran.

    The negotiations came amid a fragile two-week pause in joint US-Israeli military strikes against Iranian sensitive sites, a truce that went into effect Tuesday to create space for diplomatic negotiations. Vance emphasized that the core sticking point throughout the discussions remained Iran’s long-term nuclear ambitions, a dispute that has fueled escalating tensions across the Middle East for years.

    Speaking to reporters at the luxury Islamabad hotel where the negotiations were held, Vance outlined Washington’s non-negotiable core demand: a clear, long-term commitment from Iran that it will abandon all efforts to develop a nuclear weapon, and will also forgo access to the materials and infrastructure required to build a nuclear device rapidly. “The simple question is, do we see a fundamental commitment of will for the Iranians not to develop a nuclear weapon — not just now, not just two years from now, but for the long term?” Vance said. “We haven’t seen that yet. We hope that we will.”

    Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes, including energy production and medical research, a claim that successive US administrations have rejected. Tensions escalated further after the US and Israel launched a new wave of attacks on Iranian infrastructure on February 28, following earlier strikes on Iranian sites last year.

    Vance declined to elaborate on disagreements over a second critical issue: the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s global oil supplies transit daily. The strait has been a flashpoint for regional tensions for decades, with disruptions to shipping through the waterway capable of sending global energy prices soaring.

    The Vice President pushed back against any suggestion that the White House took an inflexible stance, noting that President Donald Trump instructed the negotiating team to approach the talks in good faith and prioritize flexibility. Just one day before Vance’s announcement, Trump made unorthodox comments in Washington saying he did not have a personal stake in whether a deal was ultimately reached. Despite the lack of progress to date, Vance reaffirmed that the US side is leaving the final offer on the table to give Iranian leadership time to review the proposal and respond. “We leave here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding that is our final and best offer. We’ll see if the Iranians accept it,” he added.

  • Long running legal stoush between miners Gina Rinehart, Angela Bennett over billions in mining royalties nears climax

    Long running legal stoush between miners Gina Rinehart, Angela Bennett over billions in mining royalties nears climax

    One of Australia’s longest-running and highest-stakes business disputes is poised to reach a critical turning point this week, as the Western Australian Supreme Court prepares to issue a landmark judgment in a multi-billion-dollar battle between two of the nation’s most powerful mining figures. At the center of the clash is Gina Rinehart, Australia’s wealthiest individual and head of Hancock Prospecting Pty Limited (HPPL), and Angela Bennett, an influential mining heiress who controls Wright Prospecting Pty Limited (WPPL), the family firm of her late father Peter Wright.

    The roots of the disagreement stretch back to the 1950s, when Wright and Rinehart’s father, Lang Hancock—two pioneers of Western Australia’s Pilbara region iron ore industry—first discovered the mineral deposits that would become the productive Hope Downs mining complex. Decades after their joint exploration, the two families that built their fortunes from that discovery are now fighting over who holds legal rights to critical royalties and assets at the site.

    Today, Hope Downs is operated as a 50-50 joint venture between global mining giant Rio Tinto and HPPL, producing roughly 50 million tonnes of iron ore annually. The project generates hundreds of millions of dollars in annual royalty income, with HPPL currently receiving a 2.5% cut of all production revenue. WPPL, however, argues that a historic agreement between Wright and Hancock entitles the Wright family to half of that 2.5% royalty stream, as well as a 25% stake in three specific Hope Downs tenements that hold the high-value East Angelas deposits, which have been in operation since 2013.

    If the court rules in WPPL’s favor, the firm would be entitled to 1.25% of all royalty payments backdated to the start of commercial mining at Hope Downs in 2007. Industry analysts value that retroactive payout alone at hundreds of millions of dollars, and the total value of the disputed assets is estimated to exceed $1 billion. Under a successful WPPL claim, Rio Tinto would retain its 50% stake in the project, while HPPL and WPPL would each hold 25% of the remaining share.

    Rinehart’s HPPL has pushed back aggressively against the claims, contending that the firm has taken on all financial and operational risks to develop the Hope Downs project, and thus holds exclusive rights to the assets and royalty stream outside the terms of the original Hanwright partnership agreement.

    The case has drawn extra attention due to the addition of other interested parties beyond the two main billionaire combatants. Rinehart’s own children, John Hancock and Bianca Rinehart, have joined the proceedings, as they already have an ongoing separate dispute with their mother over control of family trust assets established by Lang Hancock. The pair claim Rinehart improperly transferred trust shares meant for them to benefit herself. DFD Rhodes, a firm controlled by associates of the late Lang Hancock, has also laid claim to a 1.25% stake in the Hope Downs royalties, making the judgment’s outcome far-reaching for multiple stakeholders. Even joint venture partner Rio Tinto is impacted, as the ruling will reallocate which parties receive profit distributions from the mine.

    While Wednesday’s judgment will determine whether any of the claimants hold valid rights to the disputed royalties and assets, legal proceedings will not end there. Any follow-up dispute over the exact monetary value of what is owed will be settled in a separate, future trial, extending what has already been one of the most drawn-out legal battles in Australian mining history.

  • Why this disillusioned Trump voter spends hours searching Epstein files

    Why this disillusioned Trump voter spends hours searching Epstein files

    Nearly a decade after Jeffrey Epstein’s first arrest and years after his controversial prison death, the trove of court and investigative files tied to the disgraced convicted sex offender remains a raw, dividing issue within former President Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement—even as top headlines have shifted to pressing international crises like the ongoing conflict in Iran. For 19-year-old Cayden McBride, a Rome, Georgia college student and self-identified lifelong Trump supporter, digging through thousands of pages of declassified documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice has become a daily routine. After wrapping up his classes each day, McBride opens his laptop and spends hours sifting through flight logs, witness transcripts, photos, and video footage, chasing new details about Epstein’s crimes and his long-rumored connections to powerful figures across U.S. politics and public life.

  • India refuses to criminalise marital rape. This new series shines a light on it

    India refuses to criminalise marital rape. This new series shines a light on it

    In a media landscape where many taboo topics remain buried under social and cultural norms, a breakout Hindi web series on India’s JioHotstar streaming platform has thrust a long-ignored injustice into the national conversation: marital rape, a crime still not outlawed in the world’s largest democracy.

    Titled *Chiraiya* – Hindi for ‘little birds,’ a quiet nod to the women who are often caged and silenced by patriarchal norms – the series premiered in March 2025 and has already amassed an audience of millions, ranking among the streamer’s most popular Hindi original series in recent months. Widely praised by critics for its unflinching portrayal of a topic widely sidelined in Indian popular culture, the show has reignited social media discussions around sexual consent, systemic misogyny, and the failure of Indian law to protect married women from violence. At the same time, it has drawn sharp pushback from conservative and men’s rights groups, who have labeled the series ‘anti-men’ and claim it undermines the perceived ‘sanctity of marriage.’

    Adapted from the successful Bengali series *Sampoorna* and reimagined for the deeply patriarchal cultural context of northern India, *Chiraiya* centers on the intersecting lives of two women shaped by opposing views of gender roles. The first is Pooja, an educated, socially conscious young advocate for gender equality played by actor Prasanna Bisht, who marries Arun – a man widely seen as an ideal match, raised like a son by middle-aged homemaker Kamlesh, portrayed by award-winning veteran actor Divya Dutta. Kamlesh, a lifelong housewife who has internalized the belief that a woman’s place is in the home, initially holds the traditional view that sexual consent is automatically implied by marriage.

    The story unravels dramatically on Pooja and Arun’s wedding night, when Arun rapes Pooja. When Pooja confronts him, he dismisses her complaint, declaring he has only ‘taken what is mine’ – and points out that under Indian law, marital rape is not a criminal offense, leaving her with no legal recourse. When Pooja dares to speak out about the abuse, even her own family pressures her to stay silent and adjust to the situation, arguing that public discussion of the issue would only bring shame to the entire family. As the series progresses, Kamlesh is forced to confront her own deep-seated beliefs, choosing between staying in her comfortable, socially approved bubble or standing with a woman she initially dislikes. By the story’s midpoint, she undergoes a gradual transformation, emerging as a loyal ally to Pooja.

    In comments to the BBC, Dutta explained that the core theme of *Chiraiya* is the concept of consent, specifically within the institution of marriage, which is widely framed as an inherently sacred, unbreakable bond in Indian culture. ‘Marital rape is very difficult to talk about. Every woman who goes through it thinks it’s just her story. She thinks if she speaks about it, there will be social stigma, the harmony of the house will be disrupted,’ she said. Director Shashant Shah added that the creative team intentionally avoided framing the show’s male characters as one-dimensional villains. Instead, he noted, they are ordinary people molded by a deeply entrenched patriarchal system that normalizes misogyny, often without people even recognizing their own harmful biases. ‘They are not monsters – they are just regular people we encounter in our daily lives. Patriarchy is so deeply entrenched that most people are not even aware they are being misogynistic,’ Shah said. Unlike the original Bengali series, which centered an already radicalized feminist protagonist, *Chiraiya* follows Kamlesh, a woman so immersed in patriarchal conditioning that she does not even recognize the misogyny shaping her life. Through her gradual awakening, the creative team hoped to craft a character that millions of women across India could see themselves in. ‘We wanted to raise this question to the society – how do you look at it? We wanted to make people aware,’ Shah explained, adding that while Pooja’s story is fictional, it reflects the lived reality of millions of married women in India.

    The series arrives amid a long-running national battle over the criminalization of marital rape in India. Official Indian government data shows that 6.1% of ever-married women in the country have experienced sexual violence at the hands of their spouses. Despite decades of advocacy from women’s rights activists, India remains one of roughly three dozen countries around the world – alongside Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia – that have not criminalized marital rape. A colonial-era law still in force today exempts men from criminal prosecution for forced sex with an adult wife, and successive Indian governments, along with conservative religious groups and men’s rights organizations, have repeatedly blocked efforts to amend the legislation. Public outrage erupted last year after a man convicted of raping his wife (who died within hours of the assault) was released on appeal, after judges ruled that India does not legally recognize marital rape as a crime.

    For *Chiraiya*’s scriptwriter Divy Nidhi Sharma, the gap in Indian law and social acceptance of marital rape made telling this story a moral imperative. ‘This injustice is happening within our homes, in our neighbourhoods. What I find most troubling is that there’s no legal or social recourse. So, as a writer I felt I should do my bit about it,’ he told the BBC. While critics and opponents have slammed the series for its portrayal of marital abuse, Sharma says the creative team’s only goal was to drag a taboo topic into public view. ‘But our aim was to just start a conversation. We are artists, we can’t make laws, we can’t curb crimes, we can’t change society rapidly, but we can use art to make a taboo topic mainstream,’ he said.

    Reception to the series has been overwhelmingly positive, according to Dutta, who says the response has been ‘absolutely overwhelming.’ ‘I’ve been getting midnight messages and calls and personal notes on Instagram and Twitter. Everyone’s watching it. Veteran actors are calling me to say thank you for doing this. Someone sent me a sari with a heartfelt note, somebody’s sent a poem they’ve written. I think it really stirred something within everyone,’ she said. Though a small minority of viewers have reacted negatively, Dutta says she chooses to focus on the widespread support for the show’s message. Dutta added that she believes stories like *Chiraiya* carry unique power to drive social change, starting with conversations within households. ‘I think this will make a difference in more ways than one because it is telling us where we are going wrong. And rather than just putting the onus on the outside, for someone else to do something for us, this show just emphasises that let’s start from home first. And that is a first step, but it is a very strong step,’ she said.

  • Lavelle and Heaps score to give USWNT a 2-1 win over Japan

    Lavelle and Heaps score to give USWNT a 2-1 win over Japan

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — The U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team kicked off a three-game friendly series against reigning Women’s Asian Cup champions Japan with a tense 2-1 win on Saturday, extending their undefeated run to 10 consecutive victories for the first time since 2023.

    Rose Lavelle delivered a standout performance to mark her 100th international start for the U.S., netting one goal and notching an assist that set up Lindsey Heaps’ first-half strike, putting the Americans up 2-0 early in the second half. The milestone goal came in the ninth minute, when Trinity Rodman flicked a free kick from Sam Coffey into Lavelle’s path, putting her away for the 28th international goal of her career.

    Less than three minutes after halftime, Lavelle turned provider, slipping a precise pass to Heaps who converted for her 40th career goal in a U.S. uniform. Japan finally broke a long U.S. shutout streak in the 61st minute, when Riko Ueki headed home to cut the deficit in half. Ueki’s score marked the first goal the U.S. had allowed since an October 26 win over Portugal, ending a 866-minute scoreless run for the American defense.

    The match also marked a feel-good milestone for Sophia Wilson, who earned her first national team start since giving birth to her daughter, and her first cap for the U.S. since October 2024.

    Coming into Saturday’s clash, Japan carried major momentum after a dominant run to win the 2025 Women’s Asian Cup. The Nadeshiko outscored all their tournament opponents by a combined 29-1, capped off by a 1-0 defeat of host Australia in the final that secured their ticket to the 2026 Women’s World Cup in Brazil. For the U.S., qualifying for the same World Cup will come in the CONCACAF W Championship set to take place this coming November. Japan also held a recent upper hand over the Americans, having beaten the U.S. 2-1 in the 2025 SheBelieves Cup final.

    The three-match series will continue Tuesday night in Seattle, before wrapping up this coming Friday in Commerce City, Colorado.

  • Hungarians decide whether to end 16 years of Orbán rule and elect rival

    Hungarians decide whether to end 16 years of Orbán rule and elect rival

    As Hungarians prepare to cast their ballots in a landmark general election on Sunday, the nation stands at a pivotal crossroads. After 16 years of unbroken rule under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, the outcome of this vote has the potential to upend the country’s domestic trajectory and send ripples of change across Europe, transatlantic relations, and global geopolitics centered on Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    Most leading public opinion surveys point to a narrow but clear advantage for challenger Péter Magyar, the founder of the grassroots Tisza party, who launched his political movement after splitting from Orbán’s ruling Fidesz party. Yet in the final hours of campaigning, the long-serving incumbent showed no sign of backing down, striking a defiant tone before thousands of gathered supporters in Budapest’s Castle Hill. “We are going to achieve such a victory that will surprise everyone, perhaps even ourselves,” Orbán told the crowd, leaning into the familiar, polarizing campaign themes that have defined his political career for over a decade.

    Voting will open at 6 a.m. local time (4 a.m. GMT) and close at 7 p.m. local time, with preliminary results expected to begin trickling in later that evening. In the days leading up to the vote, Orbán amplified rhetorical tensions, claiming the opposition would “stop at nothing to seize power.” In response, Magyar issued a plea to supporters, urging them not to cave to what he called “Fidesz pressure and blackmail.”

    During Orbán’s 16 years in office, the European Parliament has repeatedly labeled his administration a “hybrid regime of electoral autocracy.” Magyar and Tisza have centered their campaign on a promise of “regime change”: a full reset of Hungary’s strained relationship with the European Union and an end to Orbán’s close bilateral ties to Moscow, a policy that has put Budapest at odds with its NATO and EU allies.

    In a sign of shifting momentum, Magyar’s final campaign rally in Debrecen, Hungary’s second-largest city, drew a far larger crowd than Orbán’s closing event in the capital. The incumbent, however, retains high-profile international backing: former U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly urged Hungarian voters to turn out for Orbán, whom he called his “true friend, fighter, and WINNER.”

    Addressing supporters on the final Saturday of campaigning, Orbán doubled down on his core messaging targeting Brussels and Kyiv, reiterating his hardline stance that “we don’t give our children, we don’t give our weapons and we don’t give our money” to Ukraine. The message resonated with his base, with long-time Fidesz supporter Johanna telling reporters she backed Orbán’s policies on family protection and his approach to the ongoing war in Ukraine.

    While Orbán has secured four consecutive election victories, political analysts broadly agree that a fifth term is far from guaranteed. Hungary is currently grappling with persistent economic stagnation, and Fidesz has been battered by a string of high-profile corruption scandals in recent months. Most notable is the public revelation that Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó held regular off-the-record talks with his Russian counterpart before and after every EU summit, a detail Szijjártó has since confirmed.

    Orbán’s continued veto of a €90 billion EU aid package for Ukraine has left his European allies furious, deepening the rift between Budapest and the bloc. Róbert László, an election specialist at Budapest-based independent think tank Political Capital, notes that Hungary’s three most reputable polling firms all point to a “huge lead” for Tisza. Contrary to most analysts’ predictions that Fidesz would close the gap as the election neared, László says that narrowing has failed to materialize.

    Magyar has framed his campaign around the need for a two-thirds supermajority in Hungary’s 199-seat parliament — not just a simple absolute majority — to roll back the sweeping constitutional changes Fidesz enacted over the past 16 years that weakened judicial independence, consolidated state control over media, and centralized power in the ruling party. Hungary consistently ranks near the bottom of Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index, a reflection of widespread concerns about graft in the Orbán administration.

    László says the most likely outcome is a comfortable absolute majority for Tisza that falls just short of the two-thirds threshold, though he adds that a supermajority cannot be ruled out entirely. In recent weeks, current and former figures from Hungarian law enforcement, the military, and the business community have all publicly broken with Fidesz, a shift László calls a clear sign that the national mood has turned definitively against Orbán.

    Hungary’s complex electoral system has long benefited Fidesz, a fact Orbán himself has acknowledged. Of the 199 parliamentary seats, 106 are filled by direct constituency elections, while the remaining 93 are allocated via national party lists, with votes open to Hungarians living both at home and abroad. Votes from losing parties in constituency races, as well as excess votes from winning candidates, are transferred to the national list, a mechanism that has historically delivered additional seats to Fidesz. Parties must clear a 5% national vote threshold to gain any parliamentary representation.

    One of the only polling firms that still projects a potential Orbán victory is the Nézőpont Institute. Its director, Ágoston Mráz, points to 22 competitive “battleground constituencies” that will decide the race. If Fidesz can win a majority of these swing seats, Mráz says Orbán could still secure a fifth term. Because 5% of votes in these key districts will not be counted immediately, a final official result may take several days to emerge.

    Mráz also argues that Fidesz’s support is undercounted in most polls, thanks to a large bloc of “hidden voters.” “Conservative voters are not normally as enthusiastic or their self-confidence is probably limited. They are more hidden voters, they are not ready to answer questions of pollsters, and among the Fidesz voters there are more, in percentage, blue-collar voters than in the Tisza party voter camp,” he explained.

    The northwestern city of Györ, Hungary’s sixth-largest city located near the Slovak border, has emerged as a critical battleground that will likely shape the final result. Orbán put the city in the national spotlight last month when he lost his temper amid jeers from protesters, accusing the crowd of “pushing Ukrainian interests.” Just weeks later, Magyar drew a massive crowd for a rally in Györ’s central square, showcasing his strength in the once-safe Fidesz area.

    For many young and first-time voters in the city, ousting Fidesz is the top priority. Gergely Németh, a 20-year-old university student, told reporters he and his family have faced persistent financial hardship under Orbán’s policies, even with the prime minister’s widely promoted pro-family tax breaks for households with multiple children. “I think it’s not the man, Péter Magyar, who’s most important. More important is that someone changes these politicians in the parliament,” Németh said, adding that nearly every young person he knows supports removing Fidesz from power.

    Györ has been led by an independent mayor and deputy mayor for the past two years, though Fidesz still holds a majority on the local city council. Deputy Mayor Roland Kósa, an independent, has criticized Fidesz for its arrogant approach to power, saying that even after independent leaders were elected, “Fidesz basically looked through us and said and thought we do not exist – this is still their city, this is still their country.” Kósa accuses the ruling party of squandering massive public funds and years of economic opportunity in the city.

    Magyar’s political ascent has been built on a broad, cross-partisan appeal. A former center-right Fidesz insider who broke with the party just two years ago, he has attracted disaffected voters from across the ideological spectrum, allowing even voters who are skeptical of him personally to back Tisza as a unified movement to oust Orbán.

    Unlike Orbán, who built his opposition movement decades ago through local “citizen circles,” Magyar built Tisza from the ground up through a network of local “Tisza islands” — small activist cells embedded in Fidesz’s traditional strongholds. While the model is not new, it has grown into a robust national movement that has challenged Fidesz’s decades-long hold on local political organizing. Unlike many established opposition parties, Tisza’s candidates are largely non-career politicians: the party’s slate includes practicing surgeons, public school teachers, and local business leaders with direct experience addressing gaps in Hungary’s healthcare and education systems.

    This election has defied many conventional European campaign norms. Notably, the two leading candidates have refused to face off in a nationally televised debate, with the entire race being fought out on social media and in open-air rallies across the country. While other minor parties are competing in the election, only Fidesz and Tisza hold enough support to win parliamentary power.

    Outwardly, Fidesz officials maintain they are confident of victory, but Balázs Orbán, the party’s political director, has already pre-emptively suggested that the opposition would refuse to accept a Fidesz win. Mráz, from Nézőpont Institute, shares concerns about post-election unrest, warning that Tisza supporters may reject an Orbán victory by claiming widespread fraud. “I’m really afraid of getting violence on the streets because tension is in the air. I hope very much that every politician will be smart enough to help voters avoid violence on the street,” he said.

    So far, large opposition gatherings have remained peaceful: at least 100,000 anti-Fidesz supporters packed Budapest’s Heroes’ Square on Friday for a pre-election concert and rally, with no reported incidents. Magyar has repeatedly urged his supporters to remain calm and avoid falling for any provocations that could lead to unrest, regardless of the final outcome.

  • From blast off to splashdown: My days following Nasa’s historic mission to the Moon

    From blast off to splashdown: My days following Nasa’s historic mission to the Moon

    Over 10 extraordinary days that will be written into the annals of human spaceflight, four astronauts made unprecedented history, venturing deeper into deep space than any humans have ever traveled on a round-trip voyage to the Moon and back. As a BBC journalist embedded with the science team covering every phase of the Artemis II mission, I tracked every moment from the thunderous launch to the dramatic lunar flyby and the heart-pounding final landing back on Earth.

    Before liftoff, the crew reminded reporters that on launch day, astronauts are consistently the calmest people on site. I cannot say the same. My excitement bubbled over completely, and my unfiltered reaction as the 98-meter tall rocket ignited its massive boosters and climbed skyward quickly went viral across social media.

    Standing beside the countdown clock at Florida’s Kennedy Space Center alongside BBC colleagues Alison Francis and Kevin Church, the experience felt visceral enough to touch. The blinding burning white glow of the launch was impossible to look away from, the deafening roar took several seconds to reach the crowd and shook every bone in my body, and the shockwave of the blast rippled straight through the ground. More than anything, I still struggled to process the reality that four living, breathing people were strapped into the capsule at the top of that massive rocket, on their way to the Moon.

    As commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen caught their first full view of Earth from deep space, Glover shared his thought with the world: “Planet Earth, you look beautiful.” After a short burn of the Orion capsule’s main engine, the crew set off on the 250,000-mile journey toward the lunar orbit.

    Live streams beamed directly back to Earth from the capsule as the crew adjusted to microgravity, and viewers immediately got a sense of just how cramped their living quarters were. For 10 days, the four astronauts ate, slept, worked and lived in a space no larger than the interior of a minivan. No privacy existed between crew members, and none from the millions of people around the globe following every development of the mission in real time.

    One of the mission’s most high-profile (and widely discussed) snags emerged early on: the $23 million custom-designed Universal Waste Management System, better known as the crew’s toilet, developed unexpected plumbing issues. During a live media briefing, reporters got unvarnished details on how the issue impacted the crew’s daily routine. As it turned out, solid waste operations functioned as normal, but the crew had to rely on collapsible, portable contingency bags with funnels for urine collection.

    Later in the mission, I got the chance to visit the Johnson Space Center in Houston to stand inside mission control, the central nervous system of the entire Artemis II operation. The team of flight controllers sat glued to their displays, monitoring a constant flood of real-time data from every one of the capsule’s systems, from navigation to life support. This constant vigilance was never unnecessary: Artemis II was a test flight, the first time humans had flown both the new Space Launch System rocket and the Orion capsule, and test flights carry inherent, tangible risks.

    Those risks were driven home in an interview I did with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen for the 13 Minutes Presents: Artemis II podcast, recorded while he was in pre-launch quarantine. Hansen told me he had spoken openly with his wife and three children about the very real possibility that he might not return home from the mission. Commander Reid Wiseman similarly shared that he had been fully honest with his two daughters about the dangers of the mission; Wiseman has raised his daughters alone as a single father since his wife Carroll died six years before the flight.

    That personal loss became one of the most poignant, memorable moments of the entire mission. As the capsule approached the Moon, and the lunar surface grew larger in the capsule’s viewing window, the crew spotted a striking, bright new crater visible from Earth that had not yet been named. To honor Wiseman’s late wife, they officially named the crater after her. The entire crew, gathered to hug their commander, were all in tears, and back in Houston’s mission control, there was not a dry eye in the room, including among our BBC reporting team.

    Every NASA staff member we spoke to, from administrator Jared Isaacman to junior engineers and veteran fellow astronauts, felt a deep personal connection to the four-person crew, and pulled for them with every fiber of their being. And in the end, the crew delivered on every expectation.

    After breaking the 50-year-old record set by Apollo 13 for the farthest humans have ever traveled from Earth, the Artemis II crew kept pushing forward, ultimately reaching 252,756 miles from Earth’s surface. As they flew past the Moon, the crew captured thousands of high-resolution images and recorded detailed audio descriptions of the stark, desolate beauty of the lunar landscape passing beneath their capsule.

    The legacy of the Apollo program runs deep through the Artemis program. Pre-recorded messages from Apollo veteran astronauts Charlie Duke and Jim Lovell (recorded before Lovell’s death in 2025) were played for the crew during their voyage. Still, critics have questioned whether the $93 billion investment in the Artemis program is just an exercise in nostalgic nostalgia, asking why the U.S. is returning to the Moon when it already landed astronauts there more than 50 years ago.

    Administrator Isaacman explained that NASA’s goal is to build on the Apollo program’s achievements, not just repeat them. The agency already has a full slate of future lunar exploration plans, including a crewed landing scheduled for 2028, a permanent lunar outpost, and long-term ambitions to land the first humans on Mars. Critics have also questioned whether human exploration of the Moon is necessary at all, when robotic orbiters, rovers and landers can carry out research at a far lower cost and risk. Isaacman pushed back firmly, arguing that human exploration is encoded in human DNA, and that robotic missions cannot replace the insight and judgment that human researchers bring to exploration. He did, however, acknowledge that all progress in space exploration comes with inherent risk.

    That risk was never more visible than during the mission’s final and most dangerous phase: the crew’s re-entry and return to Earth. Glover described re-entry as riding on the back of a fireball through the atmosphere; as the capsule hurtled toward the ocean, its heat shield reached temperatures equal to half the temperature of the surface of the Sun. Watching the descent from mission control was a nail-biting, anxiety-fueled experience, made all the more tense when communications went completely black for six long minutes as the capsule was enveloped in plasma during re-entry.

    When a tiny, bright white dot of the descending capsule was spotted high above the Pacific Ocean, and Wiseman’s voice came through loud and clear with “Houston, We have you loud and clear,” the wave of relief in mission control was palpable. The capsule descended slowly under massive parachutes and made a gentle splashdown in the Pacific, and the four astronauts were safely back on Earth. The focused, quiet calm of mission control evaporated as the room erupted in cheers and celebration; the thousands of people who worked years on the project had brought their friends home safe.

    The Artemis II crew has had an experience unlike any other in human history, and they have acknowledged it will take a long time to fully process what they have seen and done. They have also formed an unbreakable bond with each other. Near the end of their voyage, I spoke to the crew from Earth and asked what they would miss most once they got home. Without a moment of hesitation, Koch said she would miss the camaraderie – that after 10 days crammed together in deep space, the crew is now family.

    When they launched, the four astronauts were little known to the general public. Now, after their historic voyage, Wiseman, Glover Koch and Hansen have returned to Earth as household names. Covering this mission has felt like having a front row seat to history being written. My colleagues and I have been constantly surprised by how deeply this mission has gripped the public imagination, as we worked around the clock to meet the world’s insatiable demand for every new update from the voyage. For 10 extraordinary days, the four astronauts took millions of people around the world along with them, pulling us away from our daily lives on Earth and letting us share in the adventure of deep space exploration. If NASA achieves its ambitious exploration goals, and other spacefaring nations join the effort, this will only be the first chapter of a new era of human lunar exploration.

  • Iran war lands ‘triple blow’ to flood-ravaged Sri Lankans

    Iran war lands ‘triple blow’ to flood-ravaged Sri Lankans

    For Indrani Ravichandran and her family, the nightmare began in the pitch-black of a November night, when Cyclone Ditwah’s unprecedented rainfall sent floodwaters surging through their small village of Kudugalhena in Sri Lanka’s Kandy district. Within minutes, rising waters swallowed portions of their home, forcing the family to flee into lashing rain, slippery hillsides and constant fear of encountering venomous wildlife displaced by the storm. They escaped with their lives, leaving almost all their belongings behind. Today, months after the cyclone passed, they have returned to the only section of their home that remained standing, joining hundreds of thousands of Sri Lankans still picking up the pieces of the worst natural disaster to hit the island nation in modern history.

    Cyclone Ditwah left a trail of destruction that experts say outstripped even the devastating 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in terms of infrastructure damage. Over just 72 hours, parts of Sri Lanka’s central highlands received up to 500 millimeters of rain – nearly two months of average rainfall – triggering catastrophic flash floods and landslides that washed away entire communities, businesses and residential settlements. The official human toll stands at 643 confirmed dead, with another 173 people still unaccounted for. Close to two million people across all 25 of Sri Lanka’s districts were impacted, with more than 165,000 people remaining displaced months after the storm, housed in temporary shelters or with host families.

    According to estimates from the United Nations and international aid agencies, total damage from the cyclone reaches roughly $4 billion – an amount equivalent to 4% of Sri Lanka’s entire annual gross domestic product. Dr. Ganeshan Wignaraja, a visiting senior fellow at London’s ODI Global Institute, notes that while the cyclone’s death toll was lower than that of the 2004 tsunami, its damage to roads, public utilities, private property and critical economic infrastructure is unmatched in the country’s modern history.

    The cyclone hit at the worst possible moment for Sri Lanka. The South Asian island nation had only just begun to claw its way back from a crippling 2022 economic crisis, when a collapse in foreign currency reserves led to a sovereign debt default and widespread shortages of food, medicine, fuel and cooking gas. Those shortages sparked mass public protests that ousted then-president Gotabaya Rajapaksa, and the new government had implemented austerity measures including cutting electricity subsidies and raising top income tax rates to 36% in an effort to stabilize public finances and restore growth.

    Now, the fallout from the ongoing Iran conflict has compounded the country’s existing challenges, creating what Wignaraja calls a “triple shock” to the fragile economy: first, the $4 billion in damage from Cyclone Ditwah; second, skyrocketing global fuel prices driven by Middle East tensions; and third, a looming drought in parts of the country that threatens to deepen resource shortages.

    In response to shrinking fuel supplies and spiking global prices, the Sri Lankan government has been forced to implement emergency austerity measures in recent weeks: fuel rationing, broad price hikes, a mandatory four-day working week to cut energy consumption, a 40% increase in electricity tariffs, and rolling power and water cuts to conserve dwindling resources. Fuel and cooking gas shortages have already triggered panic buying across the country, stirring grim memories of the 2022 crisis, when daily power cuts stretched up to 13 hours and basic essentials were unobtainable for millions.

    As the government struggles to fund post-cyclone reconstruction, it has secured only around $750 million of the estimated $4 billion in recovery costs – barely one-fifth of what is needed. Unlike the 2004 tsunami, which drew immediate billions in international donor pledges from across the globe, the international response to Cyclone Ditwah has been far more muted. Only neighboring India moved quickly to mount a large-scale relief effort, launching Operation Sagar Bandhu – “Friend Across the Sea” – deploying two warships including an aircraft carrier, launching rescue sorties that saved hundreds of people including foreign citizens, setting up field hospitals, restoring critical infrastructure, and delivering more than 1,000 tonnes of emergency supplies. New Delhi also provided $450 million in grants and direct aid, making it by far the largest international donor to date.

    In contrast, long-time Sri Lankan ally and major investor China has offered minimal support: less than $2 million in financial aid and roughly 100 tonnes of emergency supplies. The Sri Lankan government formally requested Chinese support for key infrastructure reconstruction projects in January, but has yet to receive a substantive response.

    Sri Lankan disaster management officials acknowledge that while most families with partially damaged homes – like the Ravichandrans, who received 50,000 rupees ($325) in repair aid plus additional support for their young children – have received government assistance, compensation for families who lost their entire homes or businesses has been delayed. KG Dharmathilake, a senior official in the country’s disaster management division, says the delay stems from the government’s focus on “building back better”: officials are prioritizing identifying safe, disaster-resilient land for new housing to protect families from future extreme weather events, rather than rushing construction in high-risk areas. He adds that more than 80% of all affected residents have already received the financial support they are eligible for.

    For displaced Sri Lankans and economic analysts alike, the outlook has grown even bleaker in recent weeks due to the Iran conflict. Beyond spiking fuel prices, the crisis threatens Sri Lanka’s key source of foreign exchange: remittances from the estimated one million Sri Lankan workers based in Gulf nations. Last year, those remittances totalled roughly $7 billion, nearly matching the country’s current total foreign reserves of $7 billion. While mass layoffs have not yet occurred, economists warn that a prolonged conflict in the Middle East could cut off new job opportunities for Sri Lankan migrant workers and reduce overall remittance inflows, further straining the country’s ability to pay for critical imports and fund reconstruction.

    Economists say that with careful fiscal management, the current $7 billion in foreign reserves should be enough to get the country through the immediate crisis of cyclone recovery and spiking fuel prices. But a prolonged fallout from the Iran conflict would push the country back into the kind of economic chaos it saw in 2022. For President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who took office after the 2022 crisis, successfully navigating this compound of natural disaster and geopolitical economic shock will be the defining test of his leadership.