作者: admin

  • Insecurity and instability drive voters in Peru’s tight presidential race

    Insecurity and instability drive voters in Peru’s tight presidential race

    On the dusty, sprawling hillsides of San Juan de Lurigancho, one of Lima’s most vulnerable working-class suburbs, bus driver Toño grips his steering wheel with a lingering trauma that never fully fades. Months ago, a local criminal gang ambushed him after the bus company he worked for refused to meet a $15,000 extortion demand. Bullets tore through his legs and abdomen, leaving him unable to work for four months. Though his external wounds have healed, the psychological scars remain.

    “I work every day in fear,” Toño told reporters, his voice tight with anxiety. “My wounds are closed on the outside, but the pain inside never goes away. If I had the money to leave this country, I would go — I’m terrified every time I leave my children at home.”

    Toño is far from alone. His attack is one of nearly 30,000 reported extortion incidents recorded across Peru in 2025, a crisis that has disproportionately targeted small business owners and public transport workers. According to an independent crime and violence observatory, 239 transport drivers were killed in gang-related attacks last year alone. At Toño’s bus depot, security chief Eiffel Calla confirms that five company drivers have been attacked in recent months: one killed, another left permanently brain-damaged in a vegetative state. Today, armed police guard the depot’s entrance, and Toño drives with plainclothes armed officers on board for protection. Like many Peruvians, he is calling for the next president to take a hard line against the growing wave of violence.

    Rising violent crime and widespread extortion have pushed public insecurity to the top of voter priorities ahead of Peru’s Sunday presidential runoff, which pits right-wing candidate Keiko Fujimori against left-wing challenger Roberto Sánchez. The race marks Fujimori’s fourth bid for the presidency, and she has centered her entire campaign on a hardline “tough-on-crime” platform, leaning into the legacy of her father, former president Alberto Fujimori, who ruled Peru from 1990 to 2000. Though Alberto Fujimori died in prison while serving a sentence for human rights abuses committed during his crackdown on insurgency, his supporters still credit him with restoring domestic order and stabilizing Peru’s economy.

    At her final campaign rallies, Keiko Fujimori declared open “war” on criminal extortion networks, promising to deploy military forces to combat organized crime, strengthen prison security, and work with financial institutions to freeze funds tied to extortion schemes. Economically, she champions a free-market agenda focused on attracting foreign direct investment, particularly from the United States, and building on Peru’s position as a leading global exporter of critical minerals like copper. Her supporters argue that her approach will deliver both the public safety and economic stability that Peruvians crave. “A heavy-handed response to insecurity is sorely lacking in these times,” said Piero, a rally attendee. “Peru is overflowing with crime right now, and we need someone who will fix it.” Janeth, another supporter, added that she backs Fujimori specifically to protect the country’s stable economic footing.

    Fujimori’s opponent, left-wing candidate Roberto Sánchez, has campaigned on a platform of sweeping structural change, promising to increase public spending, raise the minimum wage, renegotiate private mining contracts, expand state control over natural resources, and boost corporate taxes to redirect mineral wealth toward marginalized communities. He has also pledged to pardon former left-wing president Pedro Castillo, who was imprisoned in 2022 after attempting to dissolve congress to avoid impeachment.

    Sánchez’s supporters reject claims that his nationalist economic policies will trigger instability. “We are open to foreign investment that benefits our country,” said María Elena Linares, a local activist. “Claims that we will throw out all foreign investors are completely wrong. Our gold, our copper, all our raw materials flow out of this country to enrich other nations, and we are left in misery. That has to change.” Raúl, another backer, added that he supports Sánchez’s promise to increase public investment in health, education, and rural infrastructure outside of Lima and other major urban centers.

    The race has been roiled by ongoing political controversy even in its final days. Last week, a judge announced that Sánchez would face trial over allegations of undeclared campaign finances dating back to regional elections held between 2018 and 2020. Sánchez has denied all wrongdoing and pledged to appeal the ruling. Fujimori herself spent nearly 18 months in pre-trial detention between 2018 and 2020 over her own campaign financing allegations, though those charges were ultimately dropped in 2024.

    Peru has faced extreme political volatility over the past decade, with eight presidents holding office in 10 years and frequent congressional gridlock, as no single party has ever held a majority. Fujimori’s Popular Force party holds the largest minority bloc in congress, but analysts warn that deep ideological division between the two candidates will make governing difficult no matter the outcome.

    Young voters, who make up roughly a quarter of Peru’s eligible electorate, have been particularly vocal about their frustration with the country’s political class. Last year, mass “Gen Z” protests swept Lima, with young activists accusing the state of failing to address crime, corruption, and systemic inequality. Many young voters now say the election offers little more than a choice between two unsatisfactory options.

    Consuelo, 21, vice president of the student federation at Peru’s Pontifical Catholic University, described the race as a choice between the “lesser of two evils.” She says she fears that a Fujimori presidency would revive the authoritarianism associated with her father’s rule. “Fujimorism is synonymous with authoritarianism, and that represents an enormous fear for many students,” she explained. Cielo, 23, another student who has participated in anti-Fujimori protests, says even though her own family’s small business was targeted by extortionists, she cannot bring herself to support Fujimori. Alvaro, 22, says his preferred candidate was eliminated in the first round of voting, so he plans to vote critically for Sánchez solely to block Fujimori from office.

    Across the political spectrum, Peruvians are united in a shared desire to end years of political instability and deliver tangible progress on crime, inequality, and economic development. But analysts warn that deep polarization and ongoing congressional gridlock make meaningful change unlikely in the near term. José Luis Pérez Guadalupe, a former Peruvian interior minister and professor at Pacific University, noted that the country’s long history of institutional volatility creates steep barriers to any new administration. “We have had eight presidents in 10 years, 24 justice ministers, 32 interior ministers. That is extremely high political volatility,” he explained. “With this level of great polarization, whoever wins will face enormous difficulty implementing their policy agenda.”

    For many voters like Consuelo, that reality leaves little room for optimism. “Whether Fujimori wins or Sánchez wins, we know there will most likely be a lot of instability,” she said. “In reality, it’s a pretty hopeless choice.”

  • Multiple people shot near festival in Ohio with suspect still at large, police say

    Multiple people shot near festival in Ohio with suspect still at large, police say

    A mass shooting has disrupted a popular annual community festival in Toledo, Ohio, leaving multiple people injured and triggering an urgent manhunt for the perpetrator or perpetrators, local law enforcement confirmed. The Toledo Police Department confirmed that officers were dispatched to the area of the Old West End Festival following an emergency report of gunfire, where they discovered multiple people with gunshot wounds. Multiple victims have already been transported to local medical facilities for urgent care, authorities said, though no official count of wounded individuals has been released to the public as of Saturday morning.

    The Old West End Festival, a long-running two-day celebration of one of the nation’s largest contiguous historic districts, draws thousands of attendees each year for a lineup of activities including live musical performances, open-air food markets, a public beer garden, historic home tours, and local artisan shopping. Investigative work is currently focused on the intersection of Delaware Avenue and Robinwood Avenue, an area that festival organizers mapped as the primary hub for the event’s food and live music offerings, placing the shooting in the heart of the festival grounds.

    In a public advisory, Toledo Police have ordered local residents and out-of-town visitors to avoid the perimeter of the active investigation scene to ensure public safety and support ongoing police work. The BBC has initiated official contact with the Toledo Police Department to request additional details surrounding the incident, including the number of victims, potential descriptions of the suspect, and possible motives. This is an active, developing breaking news story, and further updates will be published as more verified information becomes available. Readers can access real-time updates through the BBC News mobile application or by following the BBC Breaking News official account on X.

  • Streeting branded a hypocrite after accusing Starmer of ignoring Gaza war crimes

    Streeting branded a hypocrite after accusing Starmer of ignoring Gaza war crimes

    A deepening political firestorm has engulfed the UK Labour Party after former Health Secretary Wes Streeting publicly accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of dismissing detailed evidence of alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza, triggering accusations of deception, hypocrisy, and opportunism from across the political and activist spectrum.

    In a revealing interview with the News Agents podcast, Streeting, who stepped down from his cabinet post last month, claimed that when he circulated a dossier of testimony collected from British doctors who had worked in Gaza to fellow cabinet members, Starmer immediately questioned his motives, suggesting the move was a deliberate attempt to leak the document for political gain. Streeting pushed back against this characterization, noting that he never released the dossier to the public until this week, when private messages related to the document were made public, undermining Downing Street’s claims that he intended to leak it.

    Streeting explained his decision to circulate the dossier by saying he left meetings with visiting British doctors deeply distressed by their accounts, which included serious, credible allegations of widespread war crimes in Gaza. He argued that the United Kingdom holds both a moral and a legal obligation to respond to these allegations, rather than ignoring them. The existence of the dossier first came to light this week, when private messages from Peter Mandelson, the disgraced veteran New Labour figure and former UK ambassador to the US, were published. In the messages, Mandelson, who has long been a mentor to Streeting, dismissed Streeting’s calls for sanctions against Israel over alleged war crimes as “wild” and “hysterical”, further deriding the former health secretary’s initiative as “pathetic” and claiming he was suffering from an early midlife crisis. Cabinet minister Pat McFadden, another centre-right Labour figure aligned with Starmer and Mandelson, confirmed in the messages that Streeting had circulated the dossier and accompanying video footage to the full cabinet ahead of a scheduled meeting.

    Since Streeting’s public claims emerged, multiple parties have questioned both the accuracy of his account and his underlying motives, including British Palestinian medical professionals, Labour Party insiders, and Palestine solidarity campaigners. Most notably, Ghassan Abu Sittah, a prominent British Palestinian surgeon who has worked extensively treating casualties in Gaza, has directly refuted Streeting’s claim that he met with British doctors who collected the dossier’s evidence. Abu Sittah stated that neither he nor any British doctor he knows who has served in Gaza has ever met with Streeting, calling the former minister’s claims outright lies. He also condemned Streeting as a core part of the same political apparatus led by Starmer that has enabled what he describes as genocide in Gaza, pointing out that the party has suppressed public outrage and censored dissenting voices over the last two and a half years of the conflict.

    Abu Sittah further accused Streeting of pressuring the UK General Medical Council to launch what he called a “McCarthyite witch hunt” against doctors who have publicly spoken out against Israeli actions in Gaza. Streeting, while still serving as Health Secretary, supported new regulatory rules that make it easier for medical watchdogs to suspend or strike off doctors accused of antisemitism or racism over their pro-Palestine advocacy. Abu Sittah himself was reported to the GMC by pro-Israel group UK Lawyers for Israel, though independent tribunals have twice ruled that no disciplinary action is warranted.

    Critics also point to longstanding rumors that Streeting is positioning himself for a future leadership challenge to likely successor Andy Burnham, should Burnham win the upcoming Makerfield by-election and mount a challenge to Starmer. Streeting also faced tight re-election in his own Ilford North constituency in 2024, where British Palestinian independent candidate Leanne Mohamad came within just 528 votes of unseating him, driven largely by public anger over Streeting’s pro-Israel stances. Records also show Streeting has received significant campaign donations from prominent pro-Israel figures.

    Streeting acknowledged in his interview that Starmer’s controversial LBC interview, in which the prime minister claimed Israel had a right to cut off water and electricity to civilian communities in Gaza, nearly cost him his seat in the 2024 general election. Despite his criticism of Starmer’s slow, insufficient response to the Gaza crisis, Streeting has stopped short of describing Israeli actions in Gaza as genocide, a position that has drawn further criticism from activists. The death toll in Gaza has surpassed 73,000 Palestinians, according to local health authorities, with nearly the entire enclave’s infrastructure destroyed. Streeting told the podcast he rejects the use of the term genocide as an ideological litmus test for concern about Palestinian lives, claiming he has met with survivors of both the October 7 attacks by Hamas and the subsequent Israeli offensive, and that he values the lives of all Israelis and Palestinians equally. He also described Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist organization in the UK, as “evil and vindictive”.

    Activist groups have rejected Streeting’s framing, arguing that his belated public criticism is too little, too late, and that his past actions as a cabinet member in Starmer’s government make his current claims disingenuous. Palestine Solidarity Campaign deputy director Peter Leary argued that Streeting should not need a leadership race to find his voice on Israeli atrocities, and that if he is serious about atoning for his role in enabling Israel’s actions, he should back immediate, comprehensive sanctions including a full arms embargo on Israel — a step Streeting has so far refused to take. Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, added that Streeting was a sitting cabinet minister while the humanitarian catastrophe unfolded in Gaza, and that holding private discussions with Starmer is not enough to absolve him; he should either have forced a policy change or resigned immediately in protest. Dearden also noted that Andy Burnham, the likely front-runner to succeed Starmer, has similarly refused to take a clear stance, saying only that he does not know whether genocide is occurring in Gaza.

    One former senior Labour official, who has a long record of criticizing Starmer’s leadership, summed up the widespread anger at Streeting, calling him a “lying toad”. As of publication, Middle East Eye has reached out to Streeting’s office for a response to the allegations, but has not received a reply.

  • Labor lashes Pauline Hanson over One Nation housing policy confusion

    Labor lashes Pauline Hanson over One Nation housing policy confusion

    Australia’s political landscape has erupted in fresh criticism of One Nation after internal contradictions and public confusion gutted the right-wing populist party’s controversial new housing policy, which targets foreign-owned property across the country. Two key figures from both the ruling Labor Party and opposition Liberal-National Coalition have united in condemnation, calling the proposal unworkable and highlighting the deep disarray within One Nations’s policy drafting process.

    Amanda Rishworth, Australia’s Employment Minister and senior Labor Party MP, laid out the governing party’s criticism in an interview with Sky News on Sunday. She argued that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson’s flagship proposal — which would require foreign owners of Australian residential property to sell their holdings within a fixed period, or face government repossession — is fundamentally unworkable, and even One Nation’s own parliamentary representatives cannot answer basic questions about how the policy would operate.

    The policy’s rollout last week was plagued by immediate confusion. Senior crossbencher Barnaby Joyce initially told reporters the mandate would extend to permanent residents of Australia holding property, only to reverse his position just hours later, clarifying that permanent residents would be exempt from the forced sale rule. Rishworth pointed to this back-and-forth as proof that One Nation lacks the discipline to craft viable policy, even on a high-priority issue like housing affordability.

    “If One Nation wants to be taken seriously as a political force, they’ve got to put in the work to develop coherent, actionable policy,” Rishworth said. “They correctly identify that housing affordability is a major problem for Australian people, but their proposed solution is total chaos. They keep pulling half-baked ideas together on the fly that simply will never work. That’s the core issue with One Nation: I understand why voters disillusioned with the major parties are looking for alternatives, but they don’t actually have real, workable solutions to the problems they highlight.”

    Rishworth acknowledged widespread voter discontent with the center-right Liberal Party that has driven disaffected supporters to One Nation, noting “pretty clear signs” of a shift, but declined to weigh in on the internal rivalry between the two parties. “On most key issues, the two are really just two sides of the same coin,” she added. She also called out One Nation for failing to release costing analysis for the housing policy and other signature proposals, saying the party has offered only excuses for the omission.

    For the opposition, Shadow Treasurer Tim Wilson also labeled One Nation’s proposal shocking during his own Sky News appearance. Wilson argued that forcing law-abiding property owners — many of whom pay taxes and contribute to local Australian economies — to sell their homes and leave the country is a disturbing overreach that exposes One Nation’s true governing priorities.

    “It’s quite shocking that One Nation’s core agenda here is simply to evict people from their homes and expel them from the country,” Wilson said. “These are people acting in full compliance with Australian law, they’re local property owners contributing to our communities. This says something really distressing about what their objectives would be if they held government power. It’s a remarkably aggressive approach to people who are already here paying their taxes.”

    Wilson, however, defended the Coalition’s own controversial migration policy that would bar permanent residents from accessing the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and other federal welfare programs, even though many permanent residents pay federal income and other taxes. He drew a clear distinction between the Coalition’s policy and One Nation’s proposal, noting that the Coalition’s welfare changes would be grandfathered for existing residents and would not include forced home sales or expulsion.

    “Our focus is on ensuring that people who come to Australia commit to the country and contribute to it,” Wilson explained. “We don’t believe it’s in the best interest of anyone — existing Australians or new migrants — for people to actively seek out welfare immediately upon arrival. This is a very different approach from what One Nation is proposing.”

    Confusion around One Nation’s policy persisted into the weekend, when One Nation Senator Sean Bell failed to clarify key outstanding details during a Sydney radio interview on 2GB. When pressed on whether the government would actually repossess properties if owners failed to sell within Hanson’s proposed two-year window, Bell evaded the question, only stating that it is “perfectly reasonable” to prioritize home ownership for Australian citizens. Interview host Mark Levy cut the conversation short after Bell failed to provide clear answers, saying the party needed to get its own story straight first.

  • Ragas and symphonies: Indian maestro Ilaiyaraaja is still reshaping music 50 years on

    Ragas and symphonies: Indian maestro Ilaiyaraaja is still reshaping music 50 years on

    Fifty years after he first stepped onto the Indian film music scene, Ilaiyaraaja — affectionately known to millions of devotees as “the Maestro” — still resonates across generations, his compositions filling living rooms, sold-out concert venues and cinema screens from one end of India to the other.

    Now 83 years old, the Tamil Nadu-born composer has carved out an unmatched place in Indian cinematic history: he has scored music for more than 1,000 feature films across nine different languages, a feat no other composer in the industry has matched. His career, built from humble, poverty-stricken origins, reimagined the very sound of South Indian film music, starting with his game-changing 1976 debut *Annakili* that marked a watershed moment for the art form.

    Renowned Carnatic musician TM Krishna notes that Ilaiyaraaja’s arrival upended long-held conventions of Indian film scoring, bringing a fresh perspective rooted in a wholly distinct social and artistic background. Before Ilaiyaraaja’s breakthrough, most mainstream Indian film music drew almost exclusively from traditional Indian classical roots, with Western symphonic influences rarely integrated into popular soundtracks. Unlike his predecessors, Ilaiyaraaja drew freely from a vast global tapestry of musical traditions, weaving disparate styles into a cohesive, singular sound that remains instantly recognizable to fans.

    “What’s unique is that he creates a cohesiveness to all the different forms he’s taken from different genres of music. That is the genius of Ilaiyaraaja,” Krishna explained.

    Following the massive success of *Annakili*, Ilaiyaraaja went on to produce hundreds of hit scores across multiple Indian languages, including iconic works for *Pathinaaru Vayathinile*, *Olangal*, *Sadma*, *Geetanjali*, *Chinna Gounder* and *Nayakan*. Across his career, he has composed more than 8,000 original film songs, many rooted deeply in Tamil Nadu’s rural folk and ballad traditions that shaped his childhood. Just last year, he made history as the first Indian composer to write and perform a full Western classical symphony with London’s Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, an achievement the orchestra called a “milestone in global music history.”

    Born R Gnanathesikan in 1943 in the small Tamil Nadu town of Pannaipuram, Ilaiyaraaja grew up immersed in the rural folk music that his father, a cardamom estate supervisor, sang regularly. When he was just seven, his father died suddenly, leaving his mother Chinnathayammal to support the entire household alone through years of severe financial hardship. “We went through a difficult period,” recalled Gangai Amaran, Ilaiyaraaja’s younger brother who would later go on to become a celebrated music composer in his own right, in an interview with the BBC.

    Born into a poor, socially marginalized family, Ilaiyaraaja faced steep barriers to professional opportunity from childhood. But music was a constant: his eldest brother, singer and playwright Paavalar Varadharajan, performed regularly at Communist Party events, which held major sway in the region in the 1950s. “We travelled from village to village with our elder brother. That’s how we learnt folk and rural musical traditions,” Amaran said. When Varadharajan fell ill ahead of a major performance, their mother convinced a young Ilaiyaraaja to step in — marking his first ever public performance.

    Forced to drop out of school at 14, Ilaiyaraaja moved with his brothers to Madras (now Chennai) in 1968 to pursue work in the film industry. He later recalled walking miles to save money on bus fares and often going to bed hungry as he struggled to get a foothold in the industry. He studied Western music under Dhanraj Master, mastering guitar and piano while diving deep into the works of Bach, Beethoven, Mozart and Schubert. “It’s God’s gift. Learning and mastering musical instruments came to him naturally,” Amaran said.

    In 1969, Ilaiyaraaja landed a role as an assistant to leading film composer GK Venkatesh, who would become his mentor and encouraged him to develop his own orchestral writing. He built his skills as a session guitarist while drafting his own original compositions, following a grueling daily routine for years: early morning music lessons, full days of recording sessions, and late returns home close to midnight. By the time he got his big break, he had already contributed to more than 200 films, honing his craft and building critical industry connections.

    His breakthrough came when writer and lyricist Panchu Arunachalam invited him to pitch for the upcoming film *Annakili*. With no instrument available to play at the meeting, Ilaiyaraaja used a wooden table as a percussion instrument to sing his composition for the producers, who left instantly impressed. Arunachalam also rebranded the young composer, giving him the name Ilaiyaraaja — meaning “young king” in Tamil.

    The runaway success of *Annakili* catapulted Ilaiyaraaja to fame, and he quickly became the most in-demand composer in South Indian cinema. As music critic Shaji Chen notes, his rise aligned perfectly with a technological shift that transformed how Indians consumed music: the advent of affordable cassette tapes and personal music systems allowed audiences to listen to their favorite tracks on demand, moving beyond the limited reach of state-run radio and public vinyl playings. At the peak of his career, Ilaiyaraaja scored more than 50 films in a single year, and audiences frequently packed cinemas repeatedly just to hear his compositions — with many hit films running for more than 100 days in theaters driven primarily by the popularity of his scores.

    “He understands the emotional textures and themes of a film. He brings out those emotions. That is why his scores stand out,” says music critic Suanshu Khurana.

    One of his most iconic works, *Rakkamma Kaiya Thattu* from the 1991 gangster drama *Thalapathi*, perfectly exemplifies his signature style. The track fuses Tamil folk traditions, Carnatic structure, Western classical fugue and polka, with shifting tempos and subtle rhythmic flourishes tying together its contrasting sections. In a 2002 global poll run by the BBC World Service, the track was voted the fourth most popular song in the world.

    A lifelong relentless experimenter, Ilaiyaraaja regularly blended Carnatic ragas, Indian folk melodies, and Western classical works from composers like Schubert and Mozart into single cohesive compositions. During a recent performance of his *Valiant* symphony in Chennai, he explained how he wove themes from Schubert’s Unfinished Symphony into *Idhayam Pogudhey*, a track from his 1979 Tamil film *Puthiya Vaarpukkal*. “They [styles] were from two different cultures. But I wanted to prove that they were not different; it’s the same thing,” he said.

    Ilaiyaraaja dominated Tamil film music through the 1980s, and even after the rise of AR Rahman in the early 1990s, he remained a defining force in Indian music — and a key influence on the next generation of composers. Before rising to fame himself, Rahman worked as a keyboard player in Ilaiyaraaja’s orchestra, and in 2019 he called working with the Maestro equivalent to attending a top music school. “His life itself has been an inspiration to me,” Rahman said.

    To date, Ilaiyaraaja has delivered hit scores for decades of beloved films, including *Nizhalkuthu*, *Virumaandi* and *Cheeni Kum*, and has also composed original works based on ancient Tamil devotional literature, including the acclaimed *Thiruvasagam*. In 2018, he was awarded the Padma Vibhushan, India’s second-highest civilian honor, in recognition of his contributions to the arts.

    Even at 83, Ilaiyaraaja shows no signs of slowing down: he still scores music for several films every year, recently performed his *Valiant Symphony* in major Indian cities Chennai and Bengaluru, and continues to tour internationally for live concert performances. A new generation of listeners is now discovering his work through streaming platforms and viral remixes, with one 1983 Malayalam track *Kiliye Kiliye* recently finding a new mainstream audience after being featured in the recent film *Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra*.

    In recent years, Ilaiyaraaja has also made headlines for high-profile legal battles over royalty rights and the unauthorized use of his work by third parties. Beyond his musical innovations, his decades-long career also upended long-standing social barriers in Carnatic music, a field long dominated by upper-caste musicians and closed to artists from marginalized backgrounds. Ilaiyaraaja’s mastery of the form forced a reckoning with old hierarchies, breaking down barriers for future generations of composers.

    “He transcended social and caste hierarchies through his music,” Krishna says.

  • ICC states should respect judges’ report on prosecutor, says Norway’s deputy foreign minister

    ICC states should respect judges’ report on prosecutor, says Norway’s deputy foreign minister

    As the International Criminal Court (ICC) approaches a critical vote that will decide the future of its chief prosecutor Karim Khan, Norway’s deputy foreign minister Andreas Kravik is calling on member states to prioritize established procedural rules to prevent harmful perceptions that the review process has been politicized. In an exclusive interview with Middle East Eye (MEE) conducted ahead of the Monday voting deadline for the ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP) Bureau, Kravik emphasized that institutional respect for pre-set protocols for investigating misconduct allegations is non-negotiable to protect the court’s global integrity.

    The unfolding controversy stems from sexual misconduct allegations brought against Khan in May 2024, which the prosecutor has repeatedly and forcefully denied. After the original complainant declined to cooperate with the ICC’s internal investigative body, the ASP commissioned an independent UN-led probe, whose findings were then passed to a three-judge panel appointed by the 21-member ASP Bureau for a formal advisory review. In March, MEE reported that the judge’s panel reached a unanimous conclusion: the UN investigation had failed to produce evidence confirming any wrongdoing by Khan. In a striking departure from standard process, however, a majority of Bureau members voted weeks later to disregard the panel’s assessment, opening the door to a finding of serious misconduct against Khan.

    Legal experts have already warned that the Bureau’s rejection of the independent judges’ advisory opinion creates significant risk that the entire misconduct inquiry will be seen as politically motivated, a threat to the court’s legitimacy that Norway says it cannot accept.

    “What we have said is that the ICC needs to look at this case in conformity with the procedures that have been established for examining such allegations of misconduct,” Kravik told MEE during the interview at the Norwegian foreign ministry in Oslo. “Because otherwise, there will be at least a perception of politicisation of the process. And that would hurt the integrity of the court. That’s something that we cannot afford, especially in this time when the court is under real pressure by other states and where certain states are trying, at the best of their ability, to portray the court as a politicised entity not operating in conformity with core principles of international law.”

    Norway has been a member of the ICC since the court’s founding under the Rome Statute in 2002, but it holds no seat on the current ASP Bureau. Kravik confirmed that Norway has not been granted access to the highly confidential UN and judicial panel reports, and is not privy to closed-door Bureau deliberations. Even so, based on credible public and off-the-record briefings on the probe’s outcomes, Kravik said the judges’ independent conclusion should carry full legal weight in the decision-making process for both the Bureau and the full 125-member ASP.

    “We haven’t seen the full reports. But we understand that there has been an investigation by the UN entity responsible for carrying out such investigations,” Kravik shared in a forthcoming episode of MEE’s *Expert Witness* podcast. “The conclusions of that report have been transferred to a legal panel comprising three judges, and they have looked at it, and their conclusion is that there are no grounds for taking certain actions against the prosecutor, at least in terms of alleviating him from his responsibilities as prosecutor. From my vantage point, without getting ahead of the curve, it seems that that is a sensible conclusion.”

    Kravik stressed that Norway will make a final, fact-based determination on the matter if the vote advances to the full ASP, but that procedural integrity remains the country’s top priority. “For us, the most important thing here is that the procedures that have been established are respected and that all individuals, also the prosecutor, are entitled to the judicial safeguards enshrined in those judicial guarantees that are giving guidance to these processes,” he added.

    If the Bureau ultimately recommends a finding of serious misconduct against Khan, the full 125-member ASP will hold two consecutive votes: first to uphold the misconduct finding, which requires a two-thirds majority to pass, and a second vote to decide whether to remove Khan from office permanently. The ongoing misconduct probe has plunged the court into an unprecedented state of institutional uncertainty, with persistent media leaks about the unproven allegations further eroding stability around Khan’s leadership.

    Khan has already made clear that if the ASP votes to remove him, he will file an appeal with the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization (ILOAT), the independent body that handles employment-related appeals from ICC staff. Last month, former International Court of Justice judge Abdul Koroma issued a legal opinion shared with all ICC member states warning that the ILOAT could order Khan’s reinstatement and order the ICC to pay up to €1.5 million ($1.74 million) in damages if his removal is found to be improperly justified.

    The controversy surrounding Khan comes against a highly charged geopolitical backdrop: the prosecutor’s ongoing war crimes investigation into Israeli officials over alleged atrocities in Gaza has already drawn intense pushback from the United States and its allies, who have sought to disrupt the ICC’s work. Elected as ICC chief prosecutor by the ASP in February 2021, the British barrister has overseen investigations into alleged serious international crimes committed by leaders across the globe, securing arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Myanmar’s junta leadership, and Taliban officials in Afghanistan. None of the US, Russia, or Israel are ICC member states, but the court holds jurisdiction over crimes committed by their nationals on the territory of ICC member states.

    In 2024, the Trump administration imposed retaliatory economic sanctions on Khan over his investigative work, measures that were later expanded to target two deputy prosecutors, eight ICC judges, the UN special rapporteur on Palestine, and multiple Palestinian NGOs that submitted evidence to the court. Russian courts have also issued an in absentia arrest warrant for Khan in retaliation for his work.

    In his interview with MEE, Kravik reaffirmed Norway’s unwavering support for the ICC and its commitment to enforcing all outstanding arrest warrants, including the one issued for Netanyahu. “The fact that some third states who aren’t party to the court have decided to sanction court officials for just doing their jobs is unconscionable,” he said. “We are in close discussions with our European partners, but also partners beyond Europe, about how we should oppose these actions taken primarily by the US. As a state party, we are committed to doing everything we can to ensure that those who are working for the court can do so without being subjected to sanctions or any other measures that try to prevent them from carrying out their functions under the court’s mandate.”

  • Portugal’s Leão sent off for punching in World Cup warmup win over Chile

    Portugal’s Leão sent off for punching in World Cup warmup win over Chile

    In a pre-tournament friendly tune-up for the 2026 FIFA World Cup held on Saturday in Lisbon, Portugal’s 2-0 victory over Chile was overshadowed by a first-half brawl that saw star forward Rafael Leão ejected from the match before halftime. The ugly confrontation unfolded after Leão took exception to what he perceived as a rough foul from a Chilean player, sparking a heated exchange between the AC Milan winger and Chilean center-back Ivan Román. Video footage from the match clearly captured Leão throwing a closed-fist punch at Román, who immediately responded in anger to the unprovoked strike. Referees acted swiftly, handing both Leão and Román straight red cards and dismissing them from the pitch just moments before the halftime whistle.

    Five-time Ballon d’Or winner Cristiano Ronaldo, who is on track to tie the all-time record for most World Cup appearances with six tournament berths, started the match for Portugal but was substituted out during the halftime break. Ronaldo’s replacement, Portuguese winger Gonçalo Guedes, capitalized on his opportunity minutes into the second half, slotting home the opening goal to put Portugal in the lead. Manchester United playmaker Bruno Fernandes extended Portugal’s advantage to two goals with a well-placed finish in the 75th minute, putting the match out of reach for the Chilean side. Chile managed to pull one goal back deep into stoppage time via a strike from Lucas Cepeda, but the late consolation was not enough to change the final result, leaving Portugal with a confidence-boosting 2-1 win ahead of the tournament.

    Fernando Santos’ side has been drawn into Group K for the upcoming World Cup, where they will face off against Colombia, Uzbekistan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Portugal will kick off their World Cup campaign against Congo on June 17, with the opening group stage match set to take place in Houston, Texas. The warm-up win gives Portugal a positive momentum boost ahead of the tournament, though the red card for Leão raises questions about his availability and disciplinary form heading into the opening match.

  • Hegseth attacks Europe over ‘invasion’ of migrants on its beaches in D-Day speech

    Hegseth attacks Europe over ‘invasion’ of migrants on its beaches in D-Day speech

    Eighty-two years after the largest seaborne invasion in modern history, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used the anniversary of the 1944 D-Day landings in Normandy, France, to launch a sharp public rebuke of European nations’ handling of irregular migration, drawing widespread pushback for tying the historic military operation to contemporary immigration debates.

    Hegseth’s address, delivered on the very beaches where Allied troops from the U.S., United Kingdom, and Canada gave their lives to liberate Northwestern Europe from Nazi occupation, claimed that modern European coastlines are now facing a different kind of incursion. “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies,” he told the assembled crowd. “Beaches in Spain, in Italy, in Greece and Bulgaria. Boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion?”

    The U.S. defense secretary also argued that post-WWII European leaders have grown complacent in protecting the hard-won freedom secured by D-Day casualties. “The men who fought and died here restored freedom to Europe,” Hegseth said. “That freedom must be maintained by this generation of leaders and war fighters or what they fought for was merely temporary. Freedom is not free.”

    Irregular migration across the Mediterranean and English Channel has been one of the most polarizing political issues across Europe for more than a decade. Sea arrivals of asylum seekers and migrants to mainland Europe hit a peak in 2015, when United Nations figures recorded more than one million crossings of the Mediterranean. More recently, between April 2025 and March 2026, a total of 169,341 irregular sea arrivals were recorded across the UK, Greece, Italy, Spain and Cyprus, with approximately 23% of those arrivals crossing to the UK. For the first five months of 2026, 9,142 people crossed the English Channel from France to the UK in small boats, marking a 38% drop from the same period in 2025.

    Hegseth’s comments are not an isolated incident: they reflect a coordinated pattern of criticism of European migration policy from senior officials in the second Trump administration. Just days before the D-Day anniversary, U.S. Vice President JD Vance linked the 2025 fatal stabbing of 18-year-old British student Henry Nowak in Southampton to what he called a “mass invasion of migrants”, calling for “righteous anger” in response. Downing Street pushed back forcefully against Vance’s remarks, condemning outside interference in British domestic politics, and noting that the Nowak family had explicitly requested their son’s death not be exploited to sow political division.

    President Donald Trump himself has repeatedly attacked European immigration approaches, telling the United Nations General Assembly last year that European countries were “going to hell” due to what he labeled “uncontrolled migration”. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer rejected Trump’s claims as “not right”, though he has acknowledged that irregular small boat crossings remain a pressing policy challenge his government is working to address.

    In December 2025, the Trump administration released its updated National Security Strategy, which went even further, warning that if current migration trends continue, Europe would be “unrecognisable in 20 years or less”, claiming that the continent’s longstanding economic challenges are “eclipsed by the real and more stark prospect of civilisational erasure”.

    At home, the Trump administration has centered restrictive anti-immigration policy as a core pillar of its domestic agenda. Since taking office in January 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have carried out thousands of arrest operations targeting undocumented migrants living in the country, advancing the administration’s promise of sweeping immigration enforcement.

  • Pope Leo begins Spain visit with praise for government

    Pope Leo begins Spain visit with praise for government

    Pope Leo XIV has launched his first official papal visit to Spain, opening the trip with public praise for the Spanish government’s commitment to peace, international law, and support for displaced migrants, against a backdrop of growing political and global tensions. In a formal welcome ceremony hosted at Madrid’s Royal Palace alongside King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia, the Chicago-born pontiff highlighted Spain’s long-standing “active commitment to peace and solidarity among peoples,” specifically commending the administration of socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez for its “faithful adherence to international law and multilateralism.”

    The endorsement comes as Sanchez has already engaged in high-profile public clashes with former U.S. President Donald Trump over policy toward Iran, and with the Israeli government over the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Pope Leo, who has himself faced repeated harsh criticism from Trump for his outspoken anti-war stances, acknowledged that his unwavering message of peace faces pushback in today’s divided political climate. “At present unfortunately strikes some as naive and others as confrontational,” he told assembled guests, “but [it] should instead be welcomed by those who do not shut themselves off in preconceived ideologies.”

    Over the course of his seven-day tour, the pope will prioritize two of the most polarizing and pressing issues facing Spain and the global Catholic Church: addressing long-running clerical sexual abuse scandals within the Church, and advocating for more humane policies toward irregular migration. He is scheduled to hold private meetings with survivors of clergy abuse, engage with migrant advocacy organizations, and make history by becoming the first pope to deliver an address before the Spanish parliament. A large-scale prayer vigil expected to draw roughly 400,000 predominantly young attendees is also planned for Saturday near Real Madrid’s iconic Santiago Bernabéu Stadium.

    Even before arriving in Madrid, Pope Leon emphasized the urgency of addressing decades of unaccounted abuse, describing the ongoing crisis as “an open wound” that the Church cannot ignore. In a reflection of shifting attitudes toward the scandal, King Felipe publicly praised the pope’s approach to the issue Saturday, highlighting his “clarity and firmness” as “essential in the process of healing and reparation of the damage inflicted.”

    The conversation around abuse accountability in Spain has gained new momentum in recent years. Earlier this year in March, Sanchez’s government and the Spanish Catholic Church finalized a landmark agreement to provide financial compensation to thousands of survivors, after years of widespread public outrage over religious leaders’ repeated failures to investigate and address claims of abuse. A 2023 inquiry conducted by Spain’s national ombudsman’s office estimated that roughly 1.1% of the Spanish population — equivalent to 440,000 people — have experienced sexual abuse at the hands of clergy or Church-affiliated individuals, a figure the Church has formally contested.

    On migration, the pope’s visible focus during the visit is widely interpreted as a show of public support for Sanchez’s progressive government, which has carved out a policy stance sharply different from most other European nations. Immigration remains a deeply divisive political issue in Spain, but the current left-wing administration has pushed forward an ambitious plan to grant legal status to approximately 500,000 undocumented migrants currently residing in the country, allowing them to access formal employment and social integration. Later in the tour, the pope will join Sanchez in the Canary Islands to hold a memorial for the more than 9,000 migrants who have died attempting to cross the Atlantic to reach Europe, according to estimates from Spanish NGO Caminando Fronteras. Data shows that nearly 47,000 irregular migrants arrived in the Canary Islands in 2024 alone.

    In a moment of lighthearted levity amid the weighty policy and social agenda, Pope Leo responded to a reporter’s question on the flight to Madrid about whether he supports Spanish football giants Barcelona or Real Madrid. Displaying characteristic diplomatic skill, he first told reporters the pope supports all teams — then added with a nod to his roots, “But Prevost is for Real Madrid,” referencing his birth name, Robert Francis Prevost.

  • Brighton agree £21.5m deal for winger Yohanna

    Brighton agree £21.5m deal for winger Yohanna

    English Premier League side Brighton & Hove Albion has confirmed a pre-agreement to sign exciting 18-year-old winger Zadok Yohanna from Swedish top-flight club AIK Stockholm for a transfer fee of £21.5 million. The teenage Nigerian attacker is set to put pen to paper on a five-year professional contract with the Seagulls once the summer 2026 transfer window officially opens on Monday, 15 June, when the deal will be formally finalised. Brighton’s young head coach Fabian Hurzeler has expressed his enthusiasm for the incoming signing, highlighting the prospect of working with the emerging talent. After reviewing Yohanna’s performances and assessing his on-pitch strengths, Hurzeler noted that the winger possesses the quality to change games in the attacking final third, a valuable asset for any top-flight side. Acknowledging Yohanna’s youth, Hurzeler added that the player will require adequate time to adjust to the rhythm of the Premier League and integrate into Brighton’s system, but emphasized that the attacker is a dynamic, thrilling prospect whose creative style of play will excite the club’s fanbase. Yohanna’s journey to the Premier League began at Nigeria’s Ikon Allah Football Academy, before he made the move to AIK Stockholm in 2025. He made his senior debut for the Swedish club in August 2025, and has already built an impressive goalscoring and creative record in his short senior career: across 18 first-team appearances, he has notched five goals and provided four assists for his current side this season. The transfer marks one of the first major high-profile moves of the 2026 summer window, highlighting Brighton’s continued strategy of investing in young, high-potential attacking talent from around the world.