作者: admin

  • At least one dead after car crashes into crowd in northern France

    At least one dead after car crashes into crowd in northern France

    A tragic vehicle collision has claimed one life and left 10 other people hurt after a car ploughed into a crowd of pedestrians near the main train station in the northern French city of Caen, regional law enforcement officials have confirmed.

    Local authorities told the British Broadcasting Corporation that a suspect has already been taken into police custody following a large-scale emergency response deployed across the Normandy region site moments after the incident occurred. According to initial on-the-ground reports, the crash unfolded close to a local bar, with regional media outlets indicating that a violent altercation broke out at the venue shortly before the car struck the crowd.

    Footage shared across social media platforms from the incident area shows large groups of onlookers gathering at the perimeter of a wide cordoned-off zone, where dozens of police cruisers and emergency ambulances have been positioned to respond to the event. A spokesperson for the Calvados regional administration, the department that administers Caen, confirmed to reporters that four of the injured people are currently receiving urgent care in the emergency department of a local hospital.

    The remaining six injured people are being treated for minor injuries that do not pose life-threatening risks, the spokesperson added. The probe into the exact circumstances of the collision is now being led by detectives from Caen’s Specialised Crime Division, who are working to piece together the sequence of events and determine whether the incident was intentional or accidental.

    Local residents and visitors have been formally advised to avoid the entire area surrounding the Caen train station while emergency and law enforcement operations remain ongoing. This is an active developing breaking news story, with more details surrounding the incident expected to be released as investigators uncover new information. Readers can access real-time updates by downloading the BBC News mobile app, or by following the official BBC Breaking account on X for the latest alerts.

  • Bunnings and Kmart sales grow as shoppers hunt for lower prices

    Bunnings and Kmart sales grow as shoppers hunt for lower prices

    Against the backdrop of a widespread cost-of-living squeeze hitting households across Australia, retail giant Wesfarmers has delivered an unexpectedly resilient full-year financial performance, with its two flagship discount-focused brands Bunnings and Kmart attracting growing numbers of budget-conscious shoppers. The Perth-based conglomerate, which operates across multiple retail and industrial segments, released its full-year earnings report on Thursday, revealing a net profit of $2.87 billion — a marginal 1.8% decline from the prior financial year.
    Wesfarmers Managing Director Rob Scott attributed the company’s solid performance to its deliberate long-term strategy of prioritizing everyday low prices, a positioning that has resonated strongly with consumers navigating rising inflation and stagnant wage growth. “Bunnings and Kmart Group’s everyday low prices continued to drive sales and earnings growth,” Scott stated in the company’s official release. “Disciplined execution of strategies helped offset broad-based cost pressures and delivered operating leverage across both businesses.”
    Heading into future trading periods, Scott confirmed that price competitiveness will remain a core strategic pillar, as the company acknowledges that persistent inflation continues to stretch household and business budgets across the country. “While Australian consumer demand remains resilient, cost-of-living pressures continue to affect many households across the economy,” he added. “Uncertainty regarding the outlook for inflation, house prices, interest rates and tax settings are affecting consumer sentiment, while higher costs of doing business are weighing on business confidence and spending.”
    Breaking down segment performance, Bunnings, Wesfarmers’ home improvement and outdoor living retail chain, once again carried the bulk of the group’s earnings growth, posting a 5.1% rise in earnings to reach $2.455 billion for the 12 months ending June 30. Discount department store chain Kmart Group matched that momentum, with earnings climbing 6% to hit $1.11 billion, while total sales for the brand rose 2.8% to $11.7 billion.
    The strong results from Bunnings and Kmart were partially offset by a sharp downturn at office supplies retailer Officeworks, where earnings fell 22.2% to just $165 million, reflecting softer business and consumer demand for office goods post-pandemic. Across the entire Wesfarmers group, total annual revenue rose 3.4% year-on-year to $47.27 billion. Excluding one-off significant items, earnings before interest and tax increased by 7.3% to $4.49 billion.
    In a positive signal to shareholders, the company confirmed it will issue a fully franked final dividend of $1.20 per share, payable to investors on October 7.

  • AFL 2026: Western Bulldogs coach addresses Tim English’s selection, future at the club

    AFL 2026: Western Bulldogs coach addresses Tim English’s selection, future at the club

    As the AFL finals race reaches a fever pitch, the Western Bulldogs have delivered a major boost to their premiership hopes, confirming star big men Aaron Naughton and Tim English are on track to take the field against Collingwood in Friday night’s do-or-die blockbuster clash. The announcement comes amid swirling off-season speculation linking English to an interstate move, but Bulldogs head coach Luke Beveridge has moved to ease fan fears, insisting the club is confident the ruckman will see out his contract and remain at the Whitten Oval beyond this campaign.

    English has been sidelined since sustaining a knee injury in round 22 of the regular season, while Naughton was forced to cut short his round 24 outing against Melbourne after an existing ankle injury flared up. Both stars completed a full training session this week, and Beveridge confirmed their fitness has progressed far better than expected ahead of the high-stakes encounter.

    The coach noted that the club will carefully manage English’s game time to avoid aggravating his still-healing knee, but the outfit is targeting 70 percent game time for the key ruckman. “They both got through training yesterday, and all signs point to them being available to play,” Beveridge told reporters ahead of the clash. “We’re already short on tall personnel down the spine, so losing either of these two would have forced us to get creative with our line-up, like we had to do last week. Ryan Gardner stepped up really well in that fill-in role, even with limited minutes, and that was a great outcome for the whole group.”

    Beveridge added that Collingwood’s relatively undersized forward line and midfield eases some of the immediate pressure on the Bulldogs’ ruck division, even with English coming off a layoff. “Collingwood aren’t a side stacked with elite height across the park, so that takes some of the sting out of any potential disadvantage,” he said. “That said, the ruck contest is always a critical battle every week. Tim has had a few weeks off to recover, so there’s no question he’ll be a little underdone coming into this game. We’ll work through his minutes step by step, but right now it looks like he’ll get through, and we’re hoping he can spend at least 70 percent of the match on the field.”

    Beyond the immediate on-field preparation, Beveridge addressed rampant off-season speculation that English could request a trade to GWS at the end of the 2024 season, following his partner Rudi Ellis’s recent signing with Sydney-based Super Netball club the NSW Swifts. The coach pushed back on the rumours, saying the club has not received any internal indication that English wants to leave.

    “We’re pretty secure in the fact that Tim will be here next year, and for a fair bit longer beyond that,” Beveridge said. “We haven’t seen or heard anything internally that gives any of this speculation any credence. I fully expect him to see out his current contract. He hasn’t given any hint that he’s unhappy here, and he’s been an incredible servant of this club for a long time.”

    Beveridge added that he has no interest in entertaining hypotheticals about player movement during the finals campaign, with the club’s full focus fixed on this week’s cutthroat clash. “It’s probably not a time to be dealing in hypotheticals, and I’d rather not speculate on what might happen after the season,” he said. “All this silly season talk is not something we want to get wrapped up in right now. We’ll deal with those questions when we have to, but right now every bit of our energy is going towards preparing for this game.”

  • Dozens of US and Canadian citizens missing after flash flooding in Nepal

    Dozens of US and Canadian citizens missing after flash flooding in Nepal

    A devastating natural disaster has unfolded along the Nepal-Tibet border, where catastrophic flash floods and massive mudslides have left more than 150 people dead and hundreds more unaccounted for, including dozens of citizens from the United States and Canada, according to official Nepali authorities.

    Aerial footage of the disaster zone captured sweeping views of submerged communities and destroyed infrastructure, illustrating the full scale of the destruction that struck the region on Wednesday. Official data from Nepal police confirms that over 500 tourists are currently missing, 466 of whom are foreign nationals hailing from 28 different countries. Among the missing are 54 citizens of the United States and 24 citizens of Canada, alongside dozens of people from India, the United Kingdom, and more than 100 Nepali nationals.

    The U.S. State Department has confirmed that it is aware American citizens have been impacted by the disaster, but has declined to release specific figures or additional details due to privacy protections for affected individuals. A spokesperson for the department added that the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu is working in close coordination with local tour operators and Nepali authorities to provide support to any affected U.S. citizens. In a public statement shared on social media, the U.S. Embassy expressed its grief over the tragic loss of life. “We are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of life and devastation caused by the Bhote Koshi flood that struck Rasuwa district and communities downstream,” the statement read. “We extend our sincere condolences to the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives, and our thoughts are with all those affected by this disaster.”

    Canadian officials have also stepped in to monitor the rapidly evolving situation. Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed via social media platform X that the Canadian government is tracking developments closely. “As rescue efforts continue, Canada stands ready to provide support,” Carney wrote, urging all Canadian citizens currently in the region to register for the Registration of Canadians Abroad, a free emergency service that allows the federal government to reach and assist citizens during crises overseas. Global Affairs Canada noted that 820 Canadian citizens are currently registered as present in Nepal, with another five registered in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China, though the department emphasized these figures are only estimates, as registration is voluntary and may include individuals who have altered their travel plans. The department confirmed it is aware that Canadian citizens have been affected by the floods and stands by ready to provide consular assistance.

    On the Chinese side of the border, state media reports confirm three people have been killed and another 265 are missing after the floodwaters hit a border crossing crossing. Footage broadcast by Tibetan CCTV captured a massive surge of water and mud crashing into border infrastructure and nearby buildings.

    Initial reports after the disaster suggested a small earthquake may have triggered an ice avalanche that preceded the landslides and floods. However, new analysis from the U.S. Geological Survey has disproven this early hypothesis. The organization confirmed that further examination of seismic data shows the recorded seismic activity was actually generated by the landslide itself, not the other way around.

    Scientists note that landslides and avalanches in high-altitude Himalayan regions can have multiple triggers. One leading hypothesis is that increased water content—whether from heavy seasonal rainfall or accelerated glacial melt—destabilized the mountain slope and ice pack. While climate change is widely documented to be accelerating glacial melt across the Hindu Kush Himalaya region, researchers say it is too early to draw a direct link between this specific disaster and long-term climate shifts.

    The disaster caused widespread damage to critical infrastructure across the affected region. Initial estimates from Nepali government officials put the total cost of destroyed and damaged roads and bridges at more than 15 billion Nepalese rupees, equal to approximately £72.18 million or $98.33 million. Entire small communities were swept away by the fast-moving flash flood, leaving rescue teams working to reach cut-off areas and locate survivors.

    Nepali President Ram Chandra Paudel has issued a public call to action, urging government agencies, political parties, civil society organizations, security forces, and the general public to scale up rescue and relief operations. “I urge everyone to remain vigilant and actively engage in necessary coordination and cooperation in the lower coastal areas,” President Paudel said.

  • ‘If you started running, they shot you’ – inside Nigeria’s growing kidnapping crisis

    ‘If you started running, they shot you’ – inside Nigeria’s growing kidnapping crisis

    Deep in north-western Nigeria’s Zamfara state, 55-year-old Fatima sits in a dusty makeshift displacement camp, her voice breaking as she recounts the pre-dawn attack that stole her entire family. In the early hours of a June morning, dozens of motorcycle-borne bandits swept into her small village of Bia Buki, splitting into three units to trap every resident before opening fire. “If you hid in a room, they burned it down. If you ran, they shot you dead,” she told BBC World Service in a harrowing firsthand account. By the end of the coordinated raid, an estimated 70 villagers—including Fatima’s husband and six of his seven siblings—lay dead. Children fleeing the gunfire fell into hidden ditches and were left injured or abandoned, while surviving residents fled into the surrounding bush for shelter.

    Fatima is one of roughly 800,000 Nigerians displaced by unrelenting violence in the country’s north-west, according to United Nations estimates. While some attacks in the region are carried out by militant Islamist factions, the vast majority of violence is perpetrated by local criminal gangs widely known as bandits. These groups, whose members are mostly drawn from the traditionally pastoralist Fulani ethnic group, have abandoned livestock herding and cattle trading for far more lucrative criminal enterprises: kidnapping for ransom, extortion, theft, and targeted killings. Operating in large mobile convoys of up to hundreds of motorcycles, they launch lightning-fast raids, escape before under-resourced security forces can respond, and enforce their control by forcing local communities to pay crippling protection fees—barring farmers from accessing their own fields unless they hand over large cash sums.

    Official and independent conflict data confirms the crisis is worsening at an alarming rate. The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (Acled) recorded a 78% jump in bandit attacks across north-western Nigeria’s bandit heartlands in the first half of this year, compared to the same period in 2025. Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission reports that nationwide kidnappings have doubled over the same timeframe. “There is no region in northern Nigeria currently that does not experience one form of mass abduction or the other,” explains Malik Samuel, a security analyst at the non-profit research and advocacy group Good Governance Africa.

    What began as a localized crisis in the north-west and north-east has now spread across the country, touching regions once considered safe. For over a decade, the north-east has faced an insurgency led by Boko Haram, which first gained global notoriety for the 2014 kidnapping of 276 Chibok schoolgirls. Today, kidnapping of soft targets—including schools, churches, mosques, and remote rural communities—has become a widespread revenue stream for armed groups of all ideologies, and violence is pushing steadily southward.

    In May of this year, that spread became impossible to ignore when motorcycle-borne gunmen raided three schools in Oyo State, south-western Nigeria—a region long viewed as a stable, low-violence area. Thirty-nine children (the youngest just two years old) and seven teachers were abducted; one teacher was killed during the attack, and a second’s murder was filmed and shared widely on social media. After 56 days in captivity, the remaining 44 hostages were released; Nigerian authorities report they refused to pay ransom, and the hostages were freed following a security operation, with three perpetrators sentenced to life in prison after confessing to links with a Boko Haram affiliate. The attack left the community of Oriire reeling: hundreds of parents pulled their children out of school, dozens of families fled the area, and one attacked school remained shuttered for months. Oba Tajudeen Abioye, the area’s traditional ruler whose niece was abducted, says fear still grips the region. “For those of us who are left here, we are relying on the security officials, the soldiers” sent to protect the community, he says.

    The spread of violence comes as Nigeria’s security forces are already stretched thin by multiple overlapping crises: the long-running Islamist insurgency in the north-east, separatist unrest in the south-east, and recurring ethnic and resource-fueled clashes in central Nigeria, where competition over water and grazing land has fueled deadly intercommunal violence. A 2025 UN report found that most Nigerian police stations are chronically underfunded and understaffed, with officers widely reported to lack critical training in hostage negotiation and forensic investigation.

    In response to the growing crisis, President Bola Tinubu’s administration has increased Nigeria’s defence and security budget by 10% since December 2025, bringing it to the largest allocation in the country’s history, and has approved the recruitment of 28,000 new soldiers. To further augment overstretched regular forces, the government has turned to arming and training local community vigilante groups, particularly in violence-hit Zamfara. Thousands of local residents have joined these groups to fight back against bandit incursions.

    One anonymous vigilante, interviewed by the BBC in July, says he has fought bandits at least 20 times, and requests for his group’s intervention come in weekly. Armed with an AK-47 and operating from a small concrete headquarters, he says the government has tasked his group with rooting out bandits from local communities. “Let the bandits understand that when they attack a place and kill, they can also be killed,” he says. While he notes that some areas have become safer, violence remains rampant in others, and he has called on the state government to arm and recruit more volunteers, arguing that “these people won’t be afraid of you unless you have proper weapons to fight them.”

    But analysts warn that reliance on untrained, armed vigilantes carries long-term risks. Back in 2020, Zamfara state banned a large vigilante faction over evidence that extrajudicial killings carried out by the group were driving cycles of retaliatory violence. Authorities argue the new generation of vigilantes are better trained and regulated, but Samuel calls the policy a “time bomb waiting to happen.” “If citizens arm themselves how do you control them at the end of the crisis, how are you able to disarm them?” he asks.

    For displaced survivors like Fatima, who now lives in a makeshift camp in Gusau, Zamfara’s state capital, 16 miles from her destroyed village, the daily reality of survival is grim. She shares the overcrowded camp with more than 1,000 other displaced people, where there is no adequate shelter, food is chronically scarce, and humanitarian aid arrives only irregularly. Families send children out to collect firewood to sell for small amounts of cash to buy food—but 22 of these children have already been kidnapped by bandits while gathering wood, Fatima says. Many days, most women in the camp go without breakfast. “When we had peace, we had our own wealth, but now the tables have turned and we have become beggars,” Fatima says, breaking down in tears.

    Even 25 miles from her former home, the threat of violence never fully disappears. While army and vigilante patrols have reduced gunfire near the camp, the security situation remains tense, and military escorts are now standard for all traffic on the main road into Gusau. Fatima says she longs to return to her village, but holds little hope of that ever happening: her former home is now a de facto bandit base, where the local gang leader acts as the unofficial ruling authority, even resolving domestic disputes for families that remain. Nearby villages have been completely emptied, she says—“completely empty, not even a chicken lives there… empty villages like that are countless.” Even if she were able to return, there would be no way to rebuild: “you farm and when you go to harvest, they stop you or kidnap you.”

    Fatima stops short of accusing the government of failing her community, but echoes the vigilantes’ call for more action. “Even if it is trying, it needs to do more,” she says. “There are problems and we think with more effort and more security agents, villages will be peaceful.”

    Nigeria already holds one of the world’s highest out-of-school child populations, with UNESCO estimating 19 million children currently out of school, a crisis deepened by the targeting of schools for abductions. As violence spreads and insecurity grows across all regions of the country, the human cost continues to mount, with hundreds of thousands of displaced residents left waiting for more robust action to restore safety.

  • Iceland holds knife-edge referendum on EU – and it could be decided on fish

    Iceland holds knife-edge referendum on EU – and it could be decided on fish

    On a small North Atlantic island with a population of just under 400,000, Icelanders are heading to the polls this Saturday to settle one of the most consequential and long-running debates in their modern history: whether to restart frozen negotiations to join the European Union. Latest polling shows the race is a statistical dead heat, with neither side holding a decisive lead, making the final outcome impossible to call with any certainty.

    Inside a sunlit waterfront fish processing plant outside Reykjavik, workers in hairnets and heavy blue overalls sort through freshly caught cod and haddock, with most of the finished fillets destined for European markets. For Pétur Pálsson, head of the Visir fishing firm, the threat of EU membership hangs heavy over his operation. He warns that joining the bloc would mean ceding control of Iceland’s lucrative fishing waters to Brussels policymakers, risking thousands of domestic jobs and pushing processing facilities overseas. “If we are in the EU, they will be the ones who make the policy,” Pálsson says.

    The push for a new referendum comes after Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir’s centre-left government won a snap 2024 election on a pledge to revisit the EU question by 2027. That timeline was accelerated dramatically by shifting global geopolitics: Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has sharpened great power rivalries in the Arctic, while unpredictable trade policy from former U.S. President Donald Trump, including tariff threats and repeated public remarks about his desire to acquire Greenland, has pushed the question of Iceland’s global standing to the top of the national agenda.

    “Things have been moving very rapidly with respect to geopolitical challenges,” Finance Minister Daði Már Kristófersson, whose Liberal Reform Party leads the pro-accession campaign, told the BBC. “That has pushed Iceland’s place in the world up the agenda.” Iceland occupies a strategically critical position at the mouth of the GIUK Gap, a key North Atlantic shipping and surveillance corridor where Western militaries closely monitor Russian maritime activity. A founding member of NATO, Iceland has no standing military of its own, relying instead on a 1951 bilateral defense pact with the U.S. and collective security commitments from its NATO allies.

    Polling has shifted dramatically in the lead-up to the vote: one recent survey put the Yes camp ahead by a slim 51.3% to 48.7% margin, while earlier polls showed the two sides deadlocked. “It’s impossibly hard to predict,” said Eirikur Bergmann, a professor of politics at Bifröst University. “Both camps are throwing everything they have at it.” For supporters, the case for EU membership rests on two core pillars: security and economic stability. Kristófersson argues that joining the bloc would strengthen Iceland’s position against competing great powers, while adopting the euro would tame the country’s notoriously volatile currency and curb sky-high living costs that have left many struggling. “We see the opportunity of joining the EU and adopting the euro as a very significant benefit to Icelandic companies and to the Icelandic general public,” he says.

    A Yes vote this weekend will only restart negotiations with Brussels: any final membership deal would require a second national referendum and approval from all 27 existing EU member states. A No vote would shelve the accession question for the foreseeable future. Many voters planning to back Yes say they support restarting talks precisely because the final decision remains down the line. “We have to know what’s in the package from the EU,” said Reykjavik resident Anna Ragnarsdottir. “If we say no, we won’t ever know.”

    The biggest sticking point, both when Iceland first began accession talks in 2010 and today, is fishing. Marine industries account for nearly 40% of Iceland’s total exports, and the country’s fishing waters are woven into its national identity and political culture. Opponents warn that joining the EU would force Iceland to share access to its waters under the bloc’s Common Fisheries Policy, eroding national sovereignty and threatening the core of the country’s economy. Opposition leader Guðrún Hafsteinsdóttir, who leads the No campaign, has vowed that Iceland’s waters will never be opened to foreign fleets. Prof Bergmann notes that no Icelandic politician could survive making such a concession: “Fishing is inseparable from Iceland’s culture and political identity, and no politician ever could make that concession. They’d be expelled from the country.”

    The No campaign’s slogan, “Iceland for sale? No thanks,” has resonated with voters who prioritize protecting national control over key industries. Margrét Ágústa Sigurðardóttir, head of the Icelandic Farmers’ Association, is skeptical of the government’s promise to secure a special exemption for Iceland’s fishing and agricultural sectors. “No member state has been granted a permanent opt-out,” she says, arguing that EU policy would always prioritize the interests of 450 million EU consumers over the unique needs of a small 400,000-person nation.

    Iceland’s government argues that a special arrangement is achievable, pointing to precedent: Norway secured favorable terms even before it abandoned its own accession bid, while existing EU members Finland and Sweden won carve-outs for northern agricultural sectors. But economic concerns remain top of mind for most voters, regardless of their position: Iceland ranks among the most expensive countries in the world, with recent analysis showing prices are 84% higher than the EU average, and interest rates have climbed to 8% to curb persistent inflation. “We get higher salaries, and it goes straight to the cost of everything,” said Snærós Sindradóttir, a leading Yes supporter with the European Movement in Iceland. “It’s like a dog chasing its own tail constantly.”

    Ironically, while the referendum was called largely because of shifting security concerns, geopolitics has barely featured in public debate. For Sindradóttir, that omission is deeply frustrating: the referendum is happening now “100% because of security matters,” she says. Recent events have heightened security anxieties: in June, Icelandic authorities tracked a Russian intelligence ship passing through the country’s exclusive economic zone, and Trump’s repeated gaffes — including mistaking Iceland for Greenland during a Davos speech, and a joke from his ambassador that Iceland could become the 51st U.S. state — have left many Icelanders questioning the long-term reliability of their security alliance with the U.S. While the “special relationship” remains formally unchanged, Kristófersson argues that EU membership adds a critical additional pillar of security, a position that led the government to sign a new defense partnership with the bloc in March.

    On the streets of downtown Reykjavik, voters are split between economic anxiety and concerns over sovereignty. “The biggest problem right now is for the generation who are trying to buy their own housing,” said 62-year-old Adolf Fridriksson. “The mortgage rates are terrifying.” For 22-year-old Helga, the cost of membership and loss of control are too great a risk: “The fishing industry, and everything else, should be in our control.”

    The result will be closely watched across Europe. When Iceland abandoned accession talks in 2013, 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were already completed, meaning a Yes vote could restart talks in months rather than years. The outcome is also being closely monitored in neighboring Norway, another Eurosceptic EEA member where support for EU accession is growing. For Hallgrímur Oddsson, head of EU-Iceland think tank European Currents, a Yes vote would be a much-needed boost for the EU’s stalled enlargement agenda. “But a No vote could also be perceived as a loss,” he says.

  • Qantas profit slumps $330m as US-Iran war doubles fuel prices

    Qantas profit slumps $330m as US-Iran war doubles fuel prices

    The ongoing US-Iran conflict has sent global jet fuel prices skyrocketing, delivering a severe financial hit to Australia’s largest air carrier Qantas that has forced the company to trim domestic flight capacity and put a planned $150 million share buyback on hold, the airline confirmed in its latest market update.

    In the report released this week, Qantas detailed that its underlying annual profits have fallen 13.1% year-on-year to $2.06 billion, representing a $330 million drop from the same 12-month period last year. Statutory after-tax profits saw an even steeper decline, dropping 19.7% to $1.289 billion. The airline directly attributed much of this downturn to the market volatility triggered by the US-Iran conflict, noting that the conflict has pushed jet fuel prices to more than double their levels from February, adding more than $420 million in unplanned costs to the company’s balance sheet.

    Qantas executives note that the final $610 million in total cost impacts would have been realized without swift intervention. To offset these rising expenses, the carrier has already implemented a series of adjustments, including raising passenger fares, reallocating aircraft to high-demand international routes, and cutting underperforming domestic capacity to match shifting travel demand.

    Despite the major headwinds from fuel costs, the airline reported stronger-than-expected revenue growth across both its Qantas mainline and low-cost Jetstar brands, driven by resilient customer travel demand. Underlying earnings before interest and taxes rose to $1.44 billion in the reporting period, outperforming some analyst projections.

    Qantas Chief Executive Vanessa Hudson framed the company’s current operating landscape as split between two vastly different economic environments: the stable, high-demand period before the outbreak of the US-Iran conflict, and the uncertain climate that has followed. “The final four months of the year saw business and consumer confidence fall as the conflict and broader economic headwinds created widespread uncertainty,” Hudson explained in the update. “Some large corporates and government agencies responded by managing their costs more tightly, which directly reduced demand for premium business travel.”

    “In response to the surge in fuel prices, we quickly adjusted fares and capacity and redeployed aircraft to give customers more options to fly to Europe, where demand for leisure travel remains strong,” Hudson added.

    In addition to capacity cuts, Qantas confirmed it is pausing the $150 million share buyback program first announced in April, as the company prioritizes preserving cash to buffer ongoing fuel price volatility. The airline’s board has approved a final dividend of 19.8 cents per share for shareholders, a payout that reflects the company’s continued effort to balance investor returns with cost stability amid global uncertainty.

  • Meta’s $18bn settlement may hasten reckoning for social media on child safety

    Meta’s $18bn settlement may hasten reckoning for social media on child safety

    In a sudden development that cut short a high-stakes legal showdown, Meta Platforms has agreed to a $17 billion settlement with 29 U.S. states over allegations that it illegally collected and misused personal data from children under 13, violating the decades-old Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The surprise conclusion came just five days into the trial, before Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg was scheduled to testify, ending what many observers had expected to be weeks of tense courtroom proceedings that would put the social media giant’s child safety practices on public trial.

    The case, filed by nearly two-thirds of U.S. states, was never just a technical dispute over compliance with a 30-year-old privacy law written long before today’s largest social platforms even existed. For the global tech industry, 2026 has already emerged as a turning point: social media platforms across the board are facing mounting global scrutiny over their impact on young users, and this case represented one of the most significant coordinated challenges to Big Tech’s long-held approach to online safety.

    For months leading up to the trial, Meta had poured extensive resources into defending its track record, repeatedly highlighting the dozens of safety tools it has rolled out for young users over the years. Senior Meta executives have walked journalists through the company’s safety initiatives at private briefings, including a presentation at Meta’s London headquarters that detailed more than 60 separate safety tools for Instagram alone. Yet the company’s efforts to frame itself as a responsible steward of child safety have been undermined by the experiences of parents who say they have struggled to navigate the overwhelming number of opt-in tools that require ongoing parental oversight. During the trial, damaging testimony from former Meta insiders further eroded the company’s position.

    Whistleblower Arturo Bejar, a former Instagram engineer, told the court that he had alerted senior leadership to harmful content affecting young users on the platform years ago, but no meaningful action was taken. Another senior Meta executive acknowledged he could not recall denying that the company had sometimes chosen to pay regulatory fines instead of changing harmful business practices. Internal documents presented during the trial also revealed that Meta knew opt-in safety tools have far lower adoption rates than default-enabled features — yet still chose to roll out child protection measures that users had to actively turn on themselves.

    Legal analysts had warned that a guilty ruling could have resulted in staggering fines for Meta, with the worst-case scenario reaching $1.4 trillion — a sum equal to the company’s entire current market value — calculated by applying the maximum COPPA penalty for every underage user who accessed Meta platforms for more than 30 minutes a day over a 12-year period. While that extreme outcome was never considered likely, even more realistic estimates projected hundreds of billions of dollars in penalties. By comparison, the $17 billion settlement, paid out over 10 years, represents a far smaller financial hit for the company. Crucially, the settlement does not require Meta to admit any wrongdoing, a outcome that legal experts say protects Meta’s core social media advertising business, which still generates the vast majority of the company’s revenue even as it prioritizes artificial intelligence development.

    As a core condition of the settlement, Meta has agreed to implement sweeping new default safety rules for teen users on both Facebook and Instagram, changes that child safety advocates have called long overdue. The new rules include a default daily 2-hour time limit for teen users across both platforms (excluding direct messaging), automatic notification muting between midnight and 6 a.m. and between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. on school days, and a full platform-wide hiding of post likes for all teen accounts. Most of these changes will be rolled out as default or optional settings for teen users within six months, though new systems to accurately identify underage users on the platforms will take up to a full year to deploy.

    Industry observers widely expect these new rules will not remain limited to the U.S. for long, as governments around the world facing similar pressure over child online safety will almost certainly move to adopt similar standards. Meta has argued that the new measures will only deliver meaningful protection if competing platforms also adopt similar rules, and analysts note that mounting global backlash against social media’s impact on children could force rivals like TikTok and Snapchat to follow Meta’s lead in tightening restrictions for teen users.

    The settlement has drawn mixed reactions from stakeholders. One parent of a child harmed by Meta platforms summed up the response as a long-overdue step forward, saying “Finally, something was done.” But Bejar, the former Meta whistleblower, emphasized that the real test will be whether the new measures actually improve outcomes for young users. “At the end of the day, Meta needs to be held accountable for results, not efforts,” he said. Looking ahead, the settlement raises bigger questions about the future of social media: if platforms deliberately tone down engaging, addictive content to protect teens, will young users continue to engage? Some analysts even speculate that the growing wave of regulation could bring the era of unregulated social media to a natural end, as older users gradually exit the space and young users lose interest in a more muted, less addictive experience.

  • The question dominating Indian politics: Is it worse when women swear?

    The question dominating Indian politics: Is it worse when women swear?

    A 35-day education reform protest led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) at Delhi’s iconic Jantar Mantar demonstration ground wrapped up on July 25, but a viral clip showing young female protesters using expletives has reignited a fierce national conversation about gender bias, double standards, and the state of India’s public discourse. Weeks after the protest concluded, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi has injected new energy into the debate by calling out Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s framing of the women’s language as a “culture shock” as a product of systemic patriarchy.

    The protest, which spread to multiple Indian cities, was organized in response to widespread public anger over repeated exam paper leaks, with demands for sweeping education policy changes. During the weeks of demonstrations, a number of young female participants used aggressive, foul language targeting Prime Minister Modi, sparking swift outrage from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’s base. Even some Modi opponents argued the women had crossed acceptable lines of political speech. Viral clips and images of the exchanges quickly spread across social media, drawing national attention and putting a 15-year-old female participant at the center of the controversy. The teen received violent online harassment, including rape threats, ultimately forcing her to release a public apology and remove her original post. Her single mother later told local media the ongoing harassment had forced the family to relocate multiple times to escape abuse.

    After the protest ended, Modi addressed the incident in an Instagram selfie video, framing the young women’s language as a deeply upsetting “culture shock.” “Some naughty children used extremely abusive expletives which have no place in a civilised society,” he said, noting the language targeted him and even his late mother. While he extended forgiveness to the young protesters, saying childhood mistakes should be a learning opportunity rather than a cause for permanent condemnation, he did not address two key points: the violent police crackdown deployed against demonstrators, and the ongoing violent threats targeting women who participated in the protest.

    Weeks later, during a student gathering in the western city of Pune, Gandhi – leader of the opposition Congress party in India’s lower parliamentary house – pushed back directly against Modi’s framing. Pointing out that male protesters also used foul language during the demonstration, Gandhi questioned why Modi only called attention to the language used by women. “If boys swear, there is no problem and it is allowed. But if a girl swears, it is a cultural shock,” he said, arguing that this selective criticism grows out of patriarchal mindsets that restrict women’s public speech while granting men full freedom to express anger. “We have to smash this patriarchy,” he added.

    Leading gender journalists and activists have echoed Gandhi’s critique of double standards, pointing to longstanding cultural traditions that normalize women’s use of profanity in many parts of India. Namita Bhandare, a prominent gender columnist for the Hindustan Times, told the BBC that women using profanity is nothing new in Indian society: in many northern Indian rural communities, a traditional pre-wedding ritual sees women from the bride’s family sing songs full of expletives to welcome the groom’s party, a practice that is widely accepted and rarely considered offensive.

    Bhandare also highlighted the hypocrisy of political leaders calling out women’s profanity, noting that politicians across the ideological spectrum – including Modi and senior BJP leaders – have a long history of misogynistic slurs and offensive language targeting women. This contradiction, she pointed out, comes as Modi has positioned himself as a champion of women’s empowerment: in his 2022 Independence Day address, he called on Indians to combat misogyny, and his government runs multiple high-profile programs aimed at advancing women’s social and economic status, with Modi holding strong popularity among many female Indian voters. Still, he has faced repeated criticism for misogynistic language, including offensive remarks made at political rallies in 2004 and 2012. Criticism for misogynistic speech is not limited to the BJP: senior leaders from Gandhi’s own Congress party have also faced public outrage for offensive comments targeting women in recent months.

    “Women are treated so shabbily and it’s so easy to target them. And then when they use profanity, then everyone asks, how can our girls cuss and swear,” Bhandare said.

    Not all observers frame the debate solely around gender. Social activist Sunil Jalan, who has run the national Gali Bandh Abhiyan campaign to curb public use of profanity since 2014, argues that the focus should be on reducing harmful expletive language across the board, regardless of who uses it. “we must focus on swearing, not on the gender of who uses it,” he said. A 2025 survey conducted by Jalan’s NGO, which included more than 70,000 participants across 28 Indian states and 8 union territories, found that 55% of respondents admitted to regular use of foul language, with particularly high prevalence in northern Indian states: 80% in Delhi, 78% in Punjab, and 74% in both Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Rates were far lower in southern India, and between 15% and 18% in India’s northeast. Jalan noted that the current national conversation is the first widespread public dialogue about the normalization of profanity in Indian society, and he hopes it will lead to meaningful change, arguing that popular culture from comedy to films has normalized aggressive language that needs to be reined in.

    For India’s Gen Z and the CJP organizers, however, profanity has long been a core tool of grassroots protest. CJP spokesperson Sourav Das told the BBC that “Profanity and protest have gone hand in hand for ages. There’s a shock-and-awe factor to it, which is fundamental to protest. It may be distasteful to some people and not to others. But it absolutely can’t be criminal.”

    The incident also shines a light on a broader erosion of civility in India’s public discourse, where expletives and personal attacks have become increasingly common across every space, from street protests to television panels, courtrooms, and even parliament. Just this week, a viral video showed a public altercation on state-owned Doordarshan television, where a temple priest unleashed a volley of expletives at a Congress spokesperson, who retaliated with the same language. In 2023, sitting BJP MP Ramesh Bidhuri faced widespread national criticism after using Islamophobic slurs and threatening a Muslim opposition MP directly on the floor of parliament, only issuing an apology after sustained public outrage.

    Sociologist Shiv Vishwanathan argues that the growing normalization of profanity in all spaces of public life is a symptom of a far deeper breakdown in India’s democratic culture. “the use of expletives is the symptom of a deeper breakdown of democracy, it shows there’s end of discussion and a lack of respect,” he explained. When expletives become common in institutions designed for deliberation, like parliament and the courts, “it shows there’s a breakdown of language, there’s a decline of argument and decline of democracy.” For grassroots protesters, he added, the turn to aggressive language is a natural response when marginalized groups are denied respect and a platform to be heard: “when there’s a weaker sense of respect, expletives become a response.”

  • What scientists know so far about Nepal’s deadly floods

    What scientists know so far about Nepal’s deadly floods

    On Wednesday morning, a catastrophic disaster of flash floods and landslides struck the Nepal-Tibet border region, leaving at least 160 people dead and hundreds unaccounted for, as experts work to untangle the causes of the event and unpack what it signals about growing hazard risks in the Himalayan highlands.

    Footage captured from the Chinese side of the border captures the devastating force of the surge: a towering, churning wall of mud and debris slammed into a multi-story building, swallowing the structure whole and sweeping away buses and private vehicles as if they were lightweight children’s toys. In Nepal’s Nuwakot district, residents have been forced to navigate streets coated in thick, clinging mud in the disaster’s aftermath.

    Initial reports suggested a 4.4-magnitude earthquake had triggered a landslide that blocked a mountain river, with the flood unleashed when the natural dam eventually burst. That account was put forward by Nepal’s Foreign Minister Shishir Khanal, but new analysis from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has revised that narrative. USGS experts found that the seismic activity initially recorded was not caused by an earthquake, but rather by the massive movement of the landslide itself.

    Preliminary findings from the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), an intergovernmental organization based in Kathmandu, have ruled out any unusual activity originating on the Chinese side of the border. According to Sarthak Shrestha, a remote sensing and geo-information analyst at ICIMOD, the most likely sequence is that a rock-ice avalanche occurred on Nepal’s side of the border, which blocked the Lhende River and set off the cascading flood that swept through downstream communities.

    One of the most alarming details experts have highlighted is that the disaster struck with almost no warning. Hatim Sharif, a hydrologist at the University of Texas San Antonio, noted that there was no heavy rainfall in the region ahead of the flood — a detail that renders most operational global early warning systems useless for this type of event.

    By the time a fast-moving mud surge like this is visible to people in its path, it is already too late to escape by running or even by car, Sharif explained. The mixture of water and rock debris moves at high speed and becomes dense enough to act like “liquid concrete,” making escape along flat ground impossible. Sharif’s guidance is that the only chance of survival is to immediately climb to high ground of at least six meters (20 feet) above the river level.

    Looking ahead, Sharif said that one viable long-term adaptation is to install real-time river level monitoring gauges across high-risk Himalayan river systems. While this would not prevent the disaster, it could give vulnerable communities 20 to 30 minutes of advance warning to evacuate to safe ground.

    Dorothy Heinrich, a climate and hazard researcher at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom, explained the unique geographic factors that make these blockage-induced floods so dangerous in mountain regions. “In these mountain environments, the rivers can be quite narrow in areas,” she noted. When any kind of landslide or avalanche blocks a narrow river channel, water rapidly accumulates behind the natural obstruction, and the eventual breach releases an incredibly fast, powerful surge downstream.

    ICIMOD head of climate and environmental risks Qianggong Zhang has warned that the risk is not yet over: an upstream blockage remains in place, raising the possibility of a second destructive flood in the coming days.

    While it is too early to draw a direct, definitive link between this disaster and human-caused climate change, scientists say well-documented environmental shifts across the Himalayas — often called the “Roof of the World” — have already increased the likelihood of similar events. Nepal is particularly vulnerable to glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), catastrophic events that occur when glacial melt leads to a sudden breach of a natural glacial lake dam, releasing billions of liters of water downstream. A major GLOF event originating in China’s Gyirong County hit Nepal’s Rasuwa District just last July, though investigators have not yet confirmed a GLOF caused the latest disaster.

    In the coming weeks, climate scientists around the world will conduct event attribution studies to examine what role climate change may have played, comparing the probability of such an event occurring in today’s fossil fuel-warmed climate versus the climate of the pre-industrial era. Heinrich noted that researchers already have high confidence that climate change is driving major shifts across the Himalayas: rising temperatures, more frequent heatwaves, widespread glacial retreat, and permafrost thaw, all of which increase the frequency and severity of landslides, avalanches, and outburst floods. Still, she emphasized that a definitive connection to this specific disaster can only be confirmed through formal attribution analysis.