作者: admin

  • What to know: The 36 teams participating in the league phase of the Champions League

    What to know: The 36 teams participating in the league phase of the Champions League

    The landscape of European club soccer is shifting this season, as UEFA’s revamped Champions League introduces an expanded 36-team league phase – and the full list of participating clubs from across the continent is now finalized.

    English Premier League clubs have secured the largest representation in the expanded competition, with five teams earning their spots: Arsenal, Aston Villa, Liverpool, Manchester City and Manchester United. That five-club haul matches Spain’s La Liga, which will also send five contenders to the league phase: Atletico Madrid, Barcelona, Real Betis, 14-time Champions League winners Real Madrid, and Villarreal.

    Germany’s Bundesliga follows close behind, with four clubs qualifying for the expanded format: perennial contenders Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund, alongside Leipzig and newly-qualified Stuttgart. Italy’s Serie A also places four teams in the draw: Inter Milan, Napoli, Roma, and surprise qualifier Como, who earned their first-ever spot in the top tier of European competition.

    Two more top European leagues, France’s Ligue 1 and Portugal’s Primeira Liga, each contribute three and two teams respectively. Ligue 1 is represented by Paris Saint-Germain, Lens and Lille, while Porto and Sporting Lisbon will carry Portugal’s hopes in the tournament. The Netherlands sees both of its top clubs qualify: PSV Eindhoven and Feyenoord, while Turkey has two of its biggest clubs in the field – Galatasaray and Fenerbahçe.

    For the first time in the competition’s history, Norway will have two clubs competing in the league phase: Bodø/Glimt and Viking, marking a historic breakthrough for Nordic soccer. The remaining spots are spread across smaller European soccer associations: Club Brugge from Belgium, Slavia Prague from the Czech Republic, war-torn Ukraine’s Shakhtar Donetsk, Austria’s LASK, Azerbaijan’s Sabah, Greece’s AEK Athens, and Slovakia’s Slovan Bratislava.

    The expanded 36-team league phase marks the biggest overhaul of the Champions League in decades, replacing the previous 32-team group stage format with a new round-robin structure that guarantees each team more high-profile matches against elite European opposition. This historic change opens up opportunities for clubs from smaller federations to compete against the sport’s biggest names, bringing more diversity and drama to the world’s most prestigious club soccer competition.

    Full coverage of the 2024-25 Champions League season, including draw details, match previews and result updates, is available through Associated Press’s global sports reporting team.

  • Brazil sues online platform Discord over alleged failures in children protection

    Brazil sues online platform Discord over alleged failures in children protection

    SAO PAULO — In a high-stakes move that underscores growing global pressure on social and communication platforms to safeguard young users, Brazil’s federal government announced Wednesday it has filed a lawsuit against gaming communication giant Discord demanding 500 million reais (roughly $97 million) in damages over claims the company failed to enact robust protections for children and adolescents on its platform. The legal action comes directly in the aftermath of a July suicide case that authorities have linked to harmful activity on Discord, a development that has already sparked escalating tensions between the platform and Brazilian regulators. Earlier this month, Brazilian officials ordered Discord to suspend all live streaming features on its service in connection with the ongoing investigation into the incident.

    In an official statement released by the Solicitor-General’s office under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the government argues the sought-after damages address alleged widespread collective psychological harm that Discord’s inadequate safety frameworks have enabled. The 25-page legal filing, obtained and verified by the Associated Press, details critical gaps in Discord’s age verification systems and core user safety protections, claiming the platform has directly violated multiple Brazilian legal provisions mandating special safeguards for vulnerable groups including children and teenagers.

    Beyond financial damages, Brazilian authorities are asking the federal court to issue a mandatory order requiring Discord to immediately implement enhanced parental control tools, deepen information-sharing and cooperation with local law enforcement agencies, and roll out advanced automated detection systems to quickly identify and remove harmful, dangerous content from the platform. The lawsuit also notes that Discord is already facing similar regulatory and legal scrutiny across the globe, with active legal challenges pending in several U.S. states including Texas, Nevada, and New Jersey.

    Discord’s Brazilian leadership pushed back immediately against the government’s action, releasing a statement calling the lawsuit “disproportionate” and arguing it does not accurately reflect the company’s existing commitments to user safety and compliance with Brazilian national legislation.

    The legal filing comes as the Lula administration prioritizes youth internet regulation ahead of October’s general election, where Lula is running for reelection. Brazil’s Supreme Court has also backed efforts to create stricter rules for minor online activity, though past attempts at meaningful regulation have delivered mixed results. Brazil is far from alone in this push: countries including Australia, Canada, and Indonesia have all recently advanced similar regulatory efforts to protect young people online.

    Brazil’s first lady Rosângela Lula da Silva, widely known by her nickname Janja, first publicly called for Discord to be fully taken offline in early August, directly referencing the July suicide case that triggered the current legal action. Brazil’s justice ministry has confirmed that five teenagers have been arrested thus far in connection with the death. Launched primarily as a communication hub for gaming communities, Discord now boasts more than 90 million active daily users across the globe, according to data published on the company’s official website.

  • US drug agency approves breakthrough treatment for pancreatic cancer

    US drug agency approves breakthrough treatment for pancreatic cancer

    In a landmark step forward for cancer care, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has greenlit a new targeted treatment for pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal forms of the disease globally, after clinical data demonstrated it nearly doubles the average overall survival time for patients.

    Developed by biotech firm Revolution Medicines, the treatment, generically named daraxonrasib and sold under the brand name Rasonque, is being hailed as a long-awaited breakthrough for a cancer that has defied effective treatment for decades. Results from a late-stage clinical trial involving 500 pancreatic cancer patients revealed that participants who took the daily oral pill achieved a median overall survival of 13.2 months, compared to just 6.6 months for patients treated with standard chemotherapy.

    Unlike traditional chemotherapy that attacks both cancerous and healthy cells, daraxonrasib works through targeted precision: it binds to and inactivates the mutated KRAS gene, a genetic driver that fuels uncontrolled tumor growth. This specific mutation is present in more than 90% of all pancreatic tumors, making the treatment widely applicable for the most common form of the disease.

    Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest major cancers, with grim statistics underscoring the urgent need for new treatment options. The American Cancer Society reports roughly 67,000 new cases are diagnosed in the U.S. each year, and the cancer carries the highest mortality rate among all common malignancies. Most cases are detected at an advanced stage after the cancer has already spread, and more than half of patients die within three months of receiving a diagnosis.

    The path to approval was accelerated due to the urgent unmet medical need for effective pancreatic cancer treatments. In 2025, the FDA awarded daraxonrasib a “Breakthrough Therapy” designation, a special status that streamlines review for treatments targeting serious, life-threatening conditions. The agency ultimately issued its approval six months ahead of its original regulatory deadline, a decision driven by the treatment’s unmatched trial results.

    Angelo de Claro, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, emphasized the transformative potential of the new approval, noting the drug “showed unprecedented results in an area of high unmet need.” The FDA itself described the treatment as a “critical new option for patients facing an extraordinarily difficult and historically hard-to-treat cancer.”

    Data on side effects also show the new treatment is better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy. While common adverse reactions include rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue and vomiting, the rate of severe side effects was 44% for patients taking daraxonrasib, compared to 57.5% for those on chemotherapy. High-profile patient outcomes have also highlighted the drug’s promise: former U.S. Senator Ben Sasse, who announced a Stage 4 pancreatic cancer diagnosis in December, is currently enrolled in the clinical trial and has confirmed the treatment has reduced the size of his tumors.

    This approval marks a turning point in pancreatic cancer care, opening a new door of hope for thousands of patients facing a diagnosis that has long carried very poor prognoses.

  • Reagan advisor Norman Bailey, a victor in the Cold War, dies at 95

    Reagan advisor Norman Bailey, a victor in the Cold War, dies at 95

    On August 18, Dr. Norman A. Bailey, a towering figure in 20th-century American statecraft and a core architect of the Ronald Reagan administration’s Cold War strategy that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, passed away at 95 in Greensboro, North Carolina, following a prolonged battle with illness. A decorated public servant, educator, and scholar with wide-ranging intellectual pursuits, Bailey left an indelible mark on global history that standard academic accounts of the Cold War era have often overlooked.

    What made the small circle of Reagan administration visionaries that Bailey joined so extraordinary was their willingness to reject the dominant conventional wisdom of the early 1980s. At a time when the transatlantic political and policy elite universally accepted that the Soviet Union was a permanent, unbeatable geopolitical force—and even leading figures like former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger publicly predicted a Soviet victory in the Cold War—Bailey and his handful of colleagues committed to a goal that Washington’s establishment dismissed as impossible: forcing the collapse of Soviet communism.

    The author of this obituary, David P. Goldman, first encountered Bailey in 1981, six months after Reagan’s inauguration. In their first meeting, Bailey confidently laid out the administration’s two-pronged strategy: drive robust economic recovery at home while rapidly expanding U.S. military capabilities, a combination he predicted would bring down the Soviet bloc by 1987. He was off by just two years. Though Goldman initially thought Bailey’s claim was wildly optimistic, he immediately signed on to join his team. At the time, the entire National Security Council (NSC) staff numbered just 120 people, a small group operating against overwhelming institutional and ideological headwinds, where even within the Reagan administration, advocates for an aggressive Cold War strategy remained a distinct minority.

    At the heart of this strategy was the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a proposed technology-driven missile defense program that most of Reagan’s own advisers dismissed as a fringe idea. Reagan’s trust in the project stemmed from his long-standing relationship with renowned physicist Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb, which began during Reagan’s tenure as governor of California when Teller led the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Bailey and NSC leadership under William Clark threw their full support behind SDI, and as a young staffer, Goldman drafted a memo at Bailey’s request arguing that civilian technological spillovers from the program would offset its full cost.

    While SDI was still years away from practical deployment when Reagan first announced it, its psychological and strategic impact on Soviet leadership was transformative. As Bailey wrote in his 1988 monograph, the program demonstrated to Moscow’s military and scientific establishment that the U.S. had both the economic resources and political will to invest in cutting-edge military technology that the Soviet Union simply could not match, even after pouring enormous resources into matching American air, sea, and space power. Beyond that, Reagan and his team framed SDI as a path to end the Cold War without direct military conflict, shifting the global nuclear agenda from offensive capabilities to defensive protection. Reagan’s offer to share SDI technology with the Soviet Union also paved the way for the historic 1987 arms reduction agreement.

    Beyond his work on Cold War strategy, Bailey played a critical role in navigating the 1982–1983 Latin American debt crisis. Fluent in Spanish, Portuguese, and French, Bailey recognized early that the economic upheaval caused by spiking U.S. interest rates posed a major strategic threat to American influence in the Western Hemisphere. His policy work laid the groundwork for the debt restructuring framework later implemented through the iconic Brady Bonds during Reagan’s second term.

    Remarkably, the core of the Reagan foreign policy revolution was planned and executed in just over two years. By 1983, the Soviet Union had been forced onto the defensive, the U.S. economy was booming after nearly half a decade of deep recession, and the traditional Washington establishment gradually reclaimed key positions within the administration. The small band of revolutionaries was soon scattered: William Clark left the NSC to lead the Interior Department in 1983, with Secretary of State George Shultz assuming de facto control of national security policy. CIA Director Bill Casey, who had overruled his own Russia chief Robert Gates to back the push for Soviet defeat, became incapacitated by illness in 1986. Bailey himself left the administration in 1983 following a high-stakes Oval Office standoff with Treasury Secretary Donald Regan over Latin American debt policy.

    After leaving government, Bailey founded a strategic consulting firm, and returned briefly to public service from 2006 to 2007 at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He spent decades as an educator, teaching at the Institute of World Politics, a Washington-based graduate institution training national security professionals and diplomats, as well as at the University of Haifa in Israel. Until his final illness, he remained a sharp, insightful commentator on global affairs, publishing frequent analysis and contributing multiple books, including many pieces for Asia Times.

    Beyond his public service career, Bailey was a man of extraordinary intellectual breadth. He spoke five languages fluently, with deep expertise in both history and economics. He served as the authorized English translator for the plays of Nobel Prize-winning Italian dramatist Luigi Pirandello, and his translations are still regularly used in theatrical productions today. A passionate scholar of Byzantine history, he wrote and lectured widely on the topic. At the age of 80, he converted to Judaism and remained an observant member of the faith for the rest of his life.

    As this obituary notes, Reagan’s historic Cold War victory succeeded not only because Reagan’s intuitive grasp of global affairs outperformed the flawed prejudices of the Washington elite, but also because he was surrounded by dedicated, knowledgeable public servants like Bailey who combined high purpose with deep cultural and historical expertise. Bailey is survived by his wife of 25 years, attorney and epidemiologist Dr. Barbara Billauer, as well as four children and numerous grandchildren.

  • New agreement sees dissolution of Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces

    New agreement sees dissolution of Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces

    In a landmark step toward national unity after decades of conflict in Syria, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) has formally announced its dissolution, fulfilling a long-negotiated agreement with the country’s interim government. The announcement, delivered Tuesday in a televised public address, marked the conclusion of a journey that began a decade ago when the coalition of Kurdish and Arab factions formed in 2015 with a singular core mission: to defeat the expansion of the Islamic State (IS) group across northern Syria.

    Speaking after a high-level meeting with interim Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharra, SDF commander-in-chief Mazloum Abdi confirmed that the group has wrapped up its original mandate, and all its fighters and structures will be absorbed into Syria’s official national military institutions. “We want this day to mark a real transition: from the battlefield to the field of development, from the era of arms to the era of peace, and from defending Syria to building Syria,” Abdi said in his address.

    The path to this agreement has not been smooth. The two sides first reached a preliminary framework for force integration on January 29, but bitter disagreements over key terms derailed the process, sparking violent armed clashes that put the entire deal on hold for months. This week’s announcement comes after renewed negotiations that resolved outstanding sticking points, according to statements from both sides.

    On Wednesday, Syrian local publication Al-Majalla released what it reported to be the full text of the finalized agreement between Abdi and Sharra. Among the most notable concessions outlined in the document is a national commitment to recognize Kurdish as an official minority language, with provisions allowing “theoretical” coursework to be taught in Kurdish in public schools. The deal also specifies that the Women’s Protection Units (YPJ), the prominent all-female combat brigade that formed a core part of the SDF’s counter-IS campaign, will be transferred to the Syrian Ministry of Interior to serve as part of the country’s internal security and counterterrorism force. Middle East Eye attempted to confirm these details with the Syrian Ministry of Information ahead of publication, but received no official response by the time of reporting.

    The announcement has drawn largely positive reactions from key regional players, including two nations that have long held opposing views of the SDF: Saudi Arabia and Turkey. For decades, Turkey has classified the SDF as a terrorist organization due to its historical ties to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a group labelled terrorist by Ankara and much of the international community. Despite this historic tension, Turkish officials welcomed the dissolution as a critical step forward for Syria. Burhanettin Duran, communications director for the Turkish presidency, wrote on the social platform X that “At this stage, the dissolution of the SDF represents an important step forward in strengthening state authority across the country and uniting the various segments of society.” He added that continued inclusive governance from the interim Syrian administration would be essential to locking in lasting stability across the war-torn nation.

    This development comes against a fragile backdrop for Syria’s new leadership, which has faced immense challenges since the overthrow of former President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024. Ahmed al-Sharra’s interim government has struggled to reunify a country fractured by 13 years of civil war, which left deep divisions between armed factions and minority communities across the country. Thousands of people have been killed in renewed violence since Assad’s ouster, with clashes breaking out between armed groups and security forces, and between the state and minority populations including Alawis, Druze, and Kurds.

    At the height of its power, the SDF controlled vast stretches of territory across northern Syria, and was credited with driving IS out of almost all the territory the extremist group once held in the country, a campaign supported heavily by U.S. air power. But the geopolitical landscape shifted dramatically after Assad’s fall: the U.S. withdrew its military and political backing for the SDF to align with the new interim government in Damascus, which also seized control of most of the territory the SDF once administered, setting the stage for the negotiations that led to this week’s announcement.

  • Brazil sues Discord over child safety measures, demands $100 mln in damages

    Brazil sues Discord over child safety measures, demands $100 mln in damages

    Brazilian federal authorities have launched a major legal action against communication platform Discord, pushing for sweeping changes to the company’s child protection systems and demanding nearly $100 million in compensation for collective harm, after a 13-year-old girl was coerced into dying by suicide during a live broadcast on the service.

    The lawsuit, filed Wednesday by Brazilian government bodies, comes after weeks of failed regulatory negotiations, during which Discord’s proposed safety adjustments were labeled inadequate to mitigate documented threats to young users. The move marks the latest escalation in Brazil’s aggressive crackdown on global social media and digital platforms that fail to meet strict new online child protection requirements.

    The crisis that prompted the latest legal action unfolded in July, when a 13-year-old girl from a small town in central-western Brazil was targeted during a livestream held on Discord. According to Brazilian Justice Ministry cyber intelligence officials from Ciberlab, a group of participants taunted and pressured the girl for more than 45 minutes: first forcing her to attempt to kill an animal, then urging her to take her own life when she refused the initial demand. Six people, including five teenagers—one just 14 years old—and one adult, have been arrested in connection with the girl’s death.

    In early August, Brazil’s National Data Protection Agency (ANPD), the country’s top digital regulator, ordered Discord to immediately halt all livestreaming services within the country’s borders. On August 17, the platform, which boasts over 90 million daily active users globally, complied with the order, issuing a public statement saying it was actively working to “make Discord safer for teens.” But Brazilian regulators argue that the platform has not fixed fundamental gaps in its age verification and user protection frameworks, leaving minors and other vulnerable users exposed to severe harm.

    Government officials clarified that the lawsuit has two core goals: first, to compel Discord to implement comprehensive, effective safety measures that protect children, adolescents, and women from harm in the platform’s digital space; second, to force the company to pay 500 million Brazilian reals, equivalent to roughly $97 million, in collective moral damages.

    This legal action against Discord is not an isolated move, but part of a broader regulatory push by Brazil to hold digital platforms accountable for online child safety. Just one day before the Discord lawsuit was filed, ANPD imposed a nearly $30 million fine on ByteDance-owned short-video platform TikTok for its own failures to meet child protection obligations. Regulators called that fine a “powerful signal” to all platforms operating in Brazil that non-compliance will not be tolerated.

    ANPD director Lorena Giuberti Coutinho confirmed last week that the agency has opened compliance reviews for 22 major social media networks and digital platforms, to check alignment with a new national law enacted this year that strengthens protections for children and teenagers online. She told reporters that users and companies should prepare for far more aggressive enforcement actions from the regulator in the coming months.

    Brazil has already implemented sweeping rules for digital platforms, including mandates that require all user accounts for people under 16 to be linked to a parent or legal guardian’s account, alongside broad crackdowns on the spread of disinformation across digital services.

  • UAE president’s letter to elderly Saudi king seen as jab at Crown Prince

    UAE president’s letter to elderly Saudi king seen as jab at Crown Prince

    Diplomatic circles across the United States and the Arab world are buzzing with analysis after United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed made an unusual direct communication to 90-year-old King Salman of Saudi Arabia, a move widely interpreted as a deliberate effort to bypass the kingdom’s de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known universally as MBS.

    Multiple Saudi and Emirati media outlets confirmed the outreach on Monday, confirming that the UAE leader sent a handwritten letter delivered via the UAE’s ambassador to Riyadh, Mater Salem Ali Marran al-Dhaheri, to Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Waleed Elkhereiji. Saudi reports note the correspondence addressed the current state of bilateral relations between the two neighboring Gulf monarchies, while the UAE’s official state news agency WAM framed it primarily as a personal invitation for King Salman to attend a United Nations-sponsored water conference hosted in Abu Dhabi this coming December.

    For regional analysts and Gulf affairs watchers, the unconventional outreach is a clear reflection of the increasingly fragile relationship between MBS and his Emirati counterpart, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed. One anonymous Western official with direct knowledge of the diplomatic dynamic told Middle East Eye, “The Emiratis felt they had no other option than to go straight to the top.” The official added that MBS, who has held effective day-to-day control over Saudi governance for nearly a decade, is expected to take umbrage at the bypassing tactic.

    King Salman ascended to the Saudi throne in 2015 following the passing of his half-brother King Abdullah, but age has greatly reduced his public and diplomatic activity in recent years. The monarch rarely travels outside Saudi borders, with his last confirmed international public appearance dating back to a 2019 Arab League Summit in Tunisia. All major decision-making and high-level diplomatic representation now falls to MBS, who just completed a high-profile two-day visit to Paris where he met with French President Emmanuel Macron to discuss bilateral trade agreements and regional security issues across the Middle East.

    This is not the first time a foreign government has attempted to communicate directly with King Salman outside MBS’s established diplomatic channels, but the timing of the letter is particularly significant: it comes amid steadily growing friction between the two major oil-rich Gulf powers, who were once considered close and coordinated allies. Tensions between the pair boiled over into open conflict earlier this year, when Saudi military forces carried out airstrikes on secessionist factions in Yemen that are backed by the UAE. The disagreement has spread to another regional conflict, with Riyadh and Abu Dhabi backing opposing armed factions in Sudan’s ongoing devastating civil war.

    The United States had stepped forward to offer mediation to resolve the rift, with a senior Washington administration official expected to travel to the UAE for talks this week. However, a U.S. source confirmed that the planned visit never went ahead. Separately, Middle East Eye has learned that a planned trip to the UAE by Steve Witkoff, former President Donald Trump’s special peace envoy, also scheduled earlier this month, was similarly canceled at the last minute.

    A brief moment of renewed alignment between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi emerged in recent weeks amid the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran, with both Gulf states joining the U.S. in military strikes on Iranian targets. That tentative alignment quickly dissolved, however, after Saudi Arabia moved to back a mediation effort led by its longstanding ally Pakistan – a push that the UAE actively worked to block.

    Earlier this month, Saudi Arabia joined Pakistan and Turkey to launch the Mecca Pact, a new joint defense cooperation agreement. The framework is widely viewed by regional analysts as an alternative security bloc to the expanding formal partnership between the UAE and Israel. While Saudi Arabia and its Pact partners have publicly insisted the agreement is not intended to counter the UAE and is open to new member states, the deal has drawn sharp criticism from Emirati political commentators. Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a prominent Emirati political analyst and former advisor to Mohamed bin Zayed, questioned the purpose of the new alliance, writing, “One of the conditions for the success of any alliance is identifying the common enemy. So who is the enemy for the countries of this alliance?”

    Beyond bypassing MBS, the UAE president’s letter also sends a clear signal that Abu Dhabi rejects the separate mediation channel proposed by the Saudi crown prince earlier this year. Middle East Eye previously reported that MBS sent a letter to Emirati National Security Advisor Tahnoon bin Zayed, the president’s brother, laying out Riyadh’s concerns over UAE activities in both Yemen and Sudan. That correspondence offered an official mediation channel led by MBS’s brother, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman. Tahnoon, widely nicknamed the “spy sheikh,” is the UAE’s top diplomatic troubleshooter who led the 2021 reconciliation effort that restored diplomatic ties with Qatar after the 2017 Gulf diplomatic rift. Most recently, Reuters reported that Tahnoon hosted senior leaders from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps for talks focused on ending attacks targeting Emirati territory.

  • BBC visits hospital in Kathmandu as families wait for news

    BBC visits hospital in Kathmandu as families wait for news

    A catastrophic flash flood that swept across the Nepal-Tibet border has triggered a massive human tragedy, leaving more than 150 people confirmed dead and hundreds more still missing, as anxious families gather in Kathmandu hospitals waiting for any update on their loved ones. A BBC reporting team has gained on-the-ground access to a major hospital in Nepal’s capital, where grieving and worried relatives have crowded waiting areas, clinging to faint hopes that their family members will be found alive amid the ongoing disaster response.

    The sudden, destructive flash flood hit the cross-border region with little warning, catching local communities and travelers off guard. Rescue teams have been working around the clock to reach hard-hit, remote areas, but damaged infrastructure and unpredictable terrain have slowed search operations. As the death toll continues to climb, authorities across both Nepal and the Tibetan region have mobilized additional resources to step up recovery and search efforts for the still-missing victims. For families gathered in Kathmandu’s hospitals, every passing hour brings a new wave of uncertainty, as they wait for official confirmation of whether their relatives are among the survivors or the growing list of casualties.

  • At Dollywood, superfans honor the late singer and local hero

    At Dollywood, superfans honor the late singer and local hero

    In the rolling hills of eastern Tennessee, thousands of fans and local community members have flocked to Dollywood, the iconic theme park built by country music star Dolly Parton, to pay their respects to the legendary entertainer who passed away earlier this week at the age of 80.

    For many long-time admirers, showing up at the park immediately after news of Parton’s death was not just a choice — it was a promise kept. Rebekah Donchatz, a 35-year-old mortgage processor from Asheville, North Carolina, traveled to Pigeon Forge with her sister to honor a decades-old pact. “Years and years ago, my sister and I made a pact that when Dolly died we’d come to Dollywood immediately,” Donchatz said. “We just needed to be here.”

    Since opening its gates in 1986, Dollywood has grown far beyond a standard leisure destination. What started as a small regional attraction has expanded to a 150+ acre complex featuring more than 50 rides, a dedicated museum, adjacent water parks, resort hotels, and daily live performances that celebrate Appalachian culture. Today, the park draws 4 million annual visitors and supports more than 4,000 local jobs, injecting much-needed economic vitality into the historically underserved communities of the Appalachian Mountains.

    At the heart of the park stands a full-scale replica of the humble two-room log cabin in Locust Ridge, outside Sevierville, where Parton grew up alongside 11 siblings. Walking through the tiny space, Donchatz paused to examine the original family heirlooms on display, reflecting on what Parton meant to her and people across the region. “I think growing up in Appalachia, she’s always been my hero,” Donchatz said. “She made me proud to be Appalachian. She put us on the map a little bit — a lot.”

    Parton remained deeply involved with the park throughout her life, making regular visits to check on operations and connect with guests as the property expanded. For local business owners, Dollywood’s presence has been life-changing. Laurie Blanton Faulkner, co-owner of the family-owned Pottery House Cafe just steps from the park’s entrance, said the attraction has transformed the entire regional economy. “It’s been a huge impact, for not just our business but the whole community” in Sevier County and beyond, Faulkner said from her bustling dining room. “Having them at the back door has been such a blessing for us.”

    That impact extends across the entire state. Eugene Naughton, president of Dollywood Parks & Resorts who worked closely with Parton for many years, told AFP the park generates approximately $2 billion in annual economic activity for Tennessee. He added that Parton’s core values guided every decision made at the park over its 38-year history. “Family, faith and doing good in the community where we live and work” have been key commitments that Parton and her partners have strived for over the past four decades, Naughton said.

    Long-time visitors say they have watched the region transform alongside the park. Retirees Ray and Patti White, who have traveled to Pigeon Forge from their South Carolina home every year since 1989, rolled through the park’s shaded paths on mobility scooters this week, reflecting on how much has changed. “It’s grown immensely because of Dollywood,” the 77-year-old Ray White said, noting the widespread positive economic ripple effects of Parton’s project.

    Beyond economic growth, one of Dollywood’s most enduring draws is its work to preserve and celebrate Appalachian mountain culture, a way of life that has gradually faded from mainstream American life. Guests can wander through working blacksmith shops and historic corn mills, sample local specialties like Dollywood’s famous cinnamon bread, and find quiet reflection in an authentic on-site Appalachian chapel. For fans near and far, the park will remain a living legacy to the girl from a log cabin who lifted up an entire region.

  • Hundreds of academics and lawyers urge Burnham to lift Palestine Action ban

    Hundreds of academics and lawyers urge Burnham to lift Palestine Action ban

    More than 250 leading British legal and academic figures have issued an open letter to UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham, pressing his new Labour government to implement sweeping policy shifts on Israel—including ending all forms of military cooperation and reversing the terrorist designation of the pro-Palestinian direct action group Palestine Action.

    Dated August 25 and obtained exclusively by Middle East Eye, the letter bears signatures from high-profile public figures, among them prominent human rights barrister Michael Mansfield, renowned Oxford University historian Avi Shlaim, Defend Our Juries co-founder Tim Crosland, and King’s College London academic Laleh Khalili (previously affiliated with the University of Exeter).

    In the scathing opening of the letter, the signatories argue that despite repeated, well-documented accusations of Israeli war crimes in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories, successive UK governments have maintained unwavering military, economic, and diplomatic backing for Israel. They condemn the current government’s approach: rather than reversing course and halting complicity in what the letter frames as violations of international law, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and allegations of genocide, the UK Home Office and judicial system have instead targeted activists who speak out in solidarity with Palestine.

    “Rather than put a stop to the most grievous state crime of the twenty-first century, our government has chosen to impose increasingly authoritarian restrictions upon political protest in general and upon Palestinian solidarity in particular,” the letter reads.

    The signatories, who identify as legal scholars, practicing legal professionals, and public intellectuals focused on upholding global ethics, justice, and international law, anchor their demands in the 1948 Genocide Convention—a binding international treaty that requires all signatory states to take active measures to prevent and punish acts of genocide. “We respect and commend citizens who refuse to stand by as mere spectators while their government fails to honour its legal obligations,” they add.

    Central to the letter’s demands is a call for Burnham to turn his earlier symbolic apology into tangible policy change. Ahead of taking office in July 2025, Burnham publicly apologized for the previous Labour leadership’s decision under Keir Starmer to back Israel’s 2023-2024 military campaign in Gaza and reject early calls for a ceasefire. The letter urges Burnham to align his actions with this apology, to “underscore the UK’s respect for international law, freedom of speech and assembly.”

    Specific policy demands include an immediate end to all forms of military and security cooperation with Israel: this covers a full halt to arms exports, the termination of joint surveillance flights, intelligence sharing, military training programs, and joint operational activities. The signatories also formally demand the government remove Palestine Action from the UK’s list of proscribed terrorist organizations, and enshrine the right for all defendants in political protest cases to present a full legal defense and submit all relevant evidence to trial juries.

    Additional demands include the UK government officially backing South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and supporting the International Criminal Court (ICC) in its efforts to enforce outstanding arrest warrants against senior Israeli officials accused of international law violations.

    Palestine Action, a direct action group focused on opposing Israeli occupation and UK corporate complicity in Israeli settlement expansion, was officially designated a terrorist organization by the incoming Labour government in July 2025. The designation makes membership in or public support for the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years’ imprisonment. Since the ban took effect, thousands of people across the UK have been arrested simply for holding placards stating “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

    Since taking office, Burnham has faced growing pressure from within his own party’s backbenches to take a harder line on Israeli policies, including imposing a trade ban on goods produced in illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Earlier this month, Middle East Eye reported that Burnham’s administration is preparing to unveil a package of new policies toward Israel as early as September, with a ban on goods from illegal Israeli settlements expected to be a core measure.

    According to MEE’s sources, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has been a leading advocate for stronger action against Israel, and has held a series of consultations with civil society organizations to shape the upcoming policy package. Last Wednesday, Miliband confirmed the government would announce new measures in response to Israel’s recent plans for new settlement construction in areas east of Jerusalem—construction that would split the occupied West Bank into two disconnected segments.

    Closing the open letter, the signatories emphasize the urgency of the situation in Gaza and the occupied territories, and call on Burnham to respond to their demands within one month, by the end of September. “Given the catastrophic scale of the emergency that confronts us, we hope that your new government might now address these imperatives as a matter of urgency,” the letter concludes.