作者: admin

  • Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Rohingya refugees face fierce new wave of hostility in Malaysia

    Nine years ago, then-Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak stood as a public advocate for the Rohingya, a stateless Muslim minority that fled systematic violence and discrimination in Myanmar. “We must defend them, not just because they are of the same faith, but because they are humans, their lives have value,” Razak declared in 2017. Today, that commitment has evaporated, replaced by a surging wave of anti-Rohingya hostility that has upended the fragile safety the community spent years building in the Southeast Asian nation.

    For Rohingya children, who have long been barred from enrolling in Malaysia’s public education system, even the simple act of attending classes has become fraught with risk. That is the reality described by Irhan, a Rohingya refugee who established a community learning center for 6- to 15-year-old children in northern Malaysia (his name has been changed to protect his safety). Last month, eight uniformed police officers raided Irhan’s center, photographed the students, and ordered multiple children to return home immediately. “The students are just here to learn. Now their families are afraid,” Irhan explained.

    Across the country, other unlicensed community-run learning spaces, the only educational option available to most Rohingya children, have been targeted by crackdowns. A center in the western state of Selangor suspended operations for a full month, and when it reopened in late July, it imposed strict new rules: students may not wear school uniforms, and must leave immediately after classes end, with no lingering or group gathering allowed. “We’re keeping a low profile to protect our students from getting attacked,” said Farooq, a Rohingya teacher at the center.

    Crackdowns on Rohingya communities are uneven, widely driven by shifting public anger, and have already forced dozens of learning centers to close permanently in recent months. Beyond education, Rohingya families that have lived in Malaysian villages for years are now being forcibly evicted. Local residents have repeatedly claimed to Malaysian media that allowing the refugees to stay would lead to unspecified “social problems.” Most recently, 120 Rohingya—more than half of them children—were left homeless after eviction from a fishing village near Penang. When the group sought shelter outside the Kuala Lumpur office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), they were taken into temporary detention by authorities.

    For a community that has already survived decades of persecution, this new wave of uncertainty has reinstated a constant state of fear. “In the early years, the Malaysians were our friends. They cared for our children. But it’s changed,” Irhan said. The refugee, who first arrived in Malaysia as a teenage asylum seeker in 2001, added, “I would leave if I could, but where else can I go? We are not wanted anywhere.”

    ### Background of a Global Displacement Crisis
    The UNHCR estimates that more than 126,000 Rohingya currently reside in Malaysia, making the country the world’s second-largest host for the displaced community, after Bangladesh. Human rights groups believe the actual number is far higher, as thousands arrive via unregulated sea crossings.

    The Rohingya’s crisis stems from their disenfranchisement in their home country, Myanmar. A majority-Buddhist nation, Myanmar has refused to grant citizenship to the Rohingya, who trace centuries of ancestral roots in Rakhine State. Successive governments have instead labeled the group as illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh. Decades of simmering ethnic tension exploded into a brutal 2017 military crackdown, when Myanmar’s military killed thousands of Rohingya, raped women and girls, and burned hundreds of Rohingya villages to the ground. The UN labeled the campaign “textbook ethnic cleansing,” and the Biden administration later formally designated it a genocide. Myanmar currently faces a landmark genocide case at the International Court of Justice, where former leader Aung San Suu Kyi—who was widely criticized for downplaying the 2017 violence—testified on the country’s behalf.

    After the 2017 crackdown, more than 1 million Rohingya fled to neighboring Bangladesh. But overcrowded refugee camps, rising violence, and declining international aid pushed thousands to undertake deadly, smuggling-led sea voyages across the Andaman Sea to Malaysia. Thousands have died en route on overcrowded, unseaworthy fishing vessels.

    While Malaysia has never formally granted legal status to asylum seekers—leaving refugees with no formal right to work, housing, or education—the majority-Muslim nation was long viewed by the Rohingya as a relatively safe haven, aligned with its leaders’ past rhetoric of solidarity. That welcome began to erode during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Rohingya were falsely blamed for spreading the virus and accused of stealing jobs from local Malaysians. Petitions calling for mass deportations spread rapidly across social media, and Malaysian authorities turned away hundreds of Rohingya asylum seekers who had been stranded adrift at sea for weeks.

    ### A Surge in Organized Vitriol
    Today, that anti-Rohingya sentiment has returned with far greater intensity, fueled once again by viral social media misinformation. In May, unsubstantiated claims that Rohingya improperly disposed of animal remains after the Eid al-Adha holiday went viral, quickly snowballing into false, exaggerated claims that the community was demanding automatic Malaysian citizenship, seeking political power, and planning to “take over” the country. One online petition calling for the removal of all Rohingya from Malaysia gathered more than 420,000 signatures before it was removed following outcry from human rights groups.

    For long-time Rohingya residents, the shift in public attitude has been staggering. Karim, a 45-year-old activist who first arrived in Penang in 2003, recalled that local hospitality once made him feel safe. “Life as a refugee is tough. It’s disappointing to be stuck working in construction all these years. However, I found Malaysians to be very friendly and kind, which made me feel safe,” he said. “Now, however, life has become increasingly difficult. I am often afraid to go outside. I’ve been asked several times while on my commute, ‘Why are you making a mess of our city? Why don’t you go back?’”

    Most Rohingya say they wish to return to Myanmar eventually, but returning is not a viable option today. Myanmar has been locked in a brutal civil war since the 2021 military coup, and Rakhine State has been reduced to ruins by intense fighting between the military junta and the Arakan Army. Displaced Rohingya who return face the threat of forced conscription by the junta or targeting by rebel groups.

    A new UN report from an independent fact-finding mission released this week warned that the conditions for minorities across Myanmar have “plummeted to a new low.” The Rohingya are “suffering misery and cruelty on multiple levels and across the country that is heartbreaking,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said this week.

    Many Rohingya say they are being scapegoated for Malaysia’s own domestic struggles, including rising cost of living, because they are the country’s largest group of undocumented asylum seekers. “I’m not saying that all Rohingya are good. There are good and bad people in every community. So why should a few individuals’ actions be used to typecast a whole community?” Farooq asked. “I escaped the genocide in Myanmar hoping to find safety. Instead, many Rohingya today continue to live with fear of simply being who we are.”

    ### Anti-Rohingya Rhetoric Enters Mainstream Politics
    The growing acceptance of anti-Rohingya hostility in mainstream Malaysian politics has alarmed observers. In a July campaign speech, current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that Myanmar had agreed to repatriate 5,000 Rohingya refugees, citing improved bilateral relations between the two countries. Anwar added a warning to the Rohingya community: “This is our country. Malaysia is our country. Let no one else interfere.”

    High-profile public figures have gone even further in their rhetoric. Nurulhidayah Zahid, daughter of Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, compared the Rohingya community to “monkeys in the forest” in a viral Threads post. “Enough of using religious and humanitarian sentiments. Do good in moderation. Don’t let the monkeys in the forest be fed, while the children at home die of hunger,” she wrote alongside a photo of Rohingya refugees. Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay, a former deputy Malaysian police chief, described the Rohingya influx as a “cancer” requiring immediate, aggressive action.

    Human rights researchers warn that anti-Rohingya sentiment will only intensify as Malaysia approaches a general election required by law before February 2028. “Refugees and migrants are once again being turned into convenient political scapegoats to divert attention from deeper domestic challenges,” said Yap Lay Sheng, a Malaysia-based researcher with human rights organization Fortify Rights. “For years, the Malaysian government has sought to present the country internationally as a humane and compassionate Muslim nation. Its treatment of the Rohingya exposes the hollowness of that claim.”

    Back at his learning center, Irhan is far more focused on his students’ future than on national political shifts. “I don’t know where to get help, or who can get us registered as a school,” he said. “I hope the Malaysians can understand that the children just want an opportunity to learn.”

  • Jacob Elordi on why The Dog Stars had him asking ‘What am I missing’ in life?

    Jacob Elordi on why The Dog Stars had him asking ‘What am I missing’ in life?

    Legendary filmmaker Sir Ridley Scott is set to debut his haunting new post-apocalyptic sci-fi thriller *The Dog Stars* in UK cinemas on August 28, bringing Peter Heller’s 2012 bestselling novel of the same name to the big screen with a star-studded cast and sharp, timely themes that draw direct parallels to modern global crises. At the core of the story is a bleak 2030s landscape, where a devastating global flu pandemic has wiped out most of humanity, leaving behind only immune survivors in a fractured, anarchic society ravaged by environmental collapse. Leading the cast is 29-year-old Jacob Elordi, fresh off his first Oscar nomination for *Frankenstein*, who stars as Hig, a former mechanic turned civilian pilot who roams the empty skies over Colorado alongside his loyal German shepherd companion Jasper in search of signs of a better, more meaningful future.

    In an interview with the BBC, Elordi explained that the film frames its apocalyptic setting not as a mere action backdrop, but as a mirror to examine the universal human condition. Even when everything familiar has been destroyed, he noted, the core impulse to seek more, hope for more, and crave connection remains unchanged. The cast also includes A-list talents Guy Pearce, Margaret Qualley and Josh Brolin, with Pearce playing Pops—a retired Navy SEAL and veteran survivor who takes in Hig after the younger pilot makes an emergency landing near Pops’ isolated homestead. For both Elordi and Pearce, the story’s themes of environmental collapse hit close to home: both actors grew up in Australia, a nation that has faced increasingly severe and widespread bushfires in recent years, with Pearce’s home state of Victoria suffering major damage just this year.

    Pearce pointed out that the film’s desolate, scorched landscape shots echo real-world footage of climate-driven disaster, making the dystopian premise feel far from abstract. “All round the world now there’s just more and more effects of climate change so it’s pretty terrifying that a lot of those things are not far away,” he said. Both cast members also highlighted the film’s undercurrent of hope, rooted in the natural world’s ability to regenerate. Elordi noted that just a few years after the apocalyptic pandemic in the story, lush green forests, thick grass and wildflowers begin to regrow across the scarred landscape, mirroring how coastal ecosystems bounce back after devastating wildfires. “This provides a note of hope and an idea of redemption,” he explained.

    Beyond climate, the story also pushes audiences to reflect on the everyday privileges many people take for granted, from access to groceries to the simple joy of sharing a meal with loved ones. Pearce, who previously collaborated with Scott on 2012’s *Prometheus*, noted that this message feels particularly pertinent even today, when billions of people around the world lack these basic comforts. Elordi added that his character’s quiet restlessness—his search for purpose even when he has secured survival—mirrors the unspoken dissatisfaction many people feel in modern, developed societies: “Everything is sweet for us… and we still go to bed and think ‘What else is there?’, ‘What am I missing?’”

    Scott, the film’s director, shared that the project drew dual inspiration from the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic and the original novel’s roots, which was written in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. Combining these two periods of widespread chaos, he explained, created the perfect foundation for a story of societal breakdown: “If you put those two together you’ve got a great combination of chaos. If you have chaos, you get panic and anarchy and away you go.” Scott also drew from his own personal experience building the film’s post-apocalyptic world: born during World War II, he recalled childhood memories of sheltering from incendiary bombings, an experience that gave him first-hand insight into what it feels like to live through an existential crisis.

    For Elordi, working with Scott—an industry pioneer who defined the modern sci-fi and thriller genres—was an unforgettable privilege. “I would have done any movie he sent through for me to make, it’s a privilege to get to work with a pioneer of our industry in my lifetime—it’s kind of unfathomable,” he said. Early critical reception of *The Dog Stars* has been mixed. The Guardian gave the film three stars, calling it “limp and lethargic” that only briefly sparks audience curiosity, while *Empire*’s two-star review criticized it for failing to deliver a convincing answer to its core question about the difference between surviving and thriving. *The Telegraph* also awarded three stars, noting that the film’s action sequences are more nonsensical than frightening. On the more positive side, *The Hollywood Reporter* described the film as “muted but never dull” and an “appealingly mellow watch” that rewards patient viewing.

  • Why India wants Bangladesh’s Tarique Rahman in Delhi

    Why India wants Bangladesh’s Tarique Rahman in Delhi

    Diplomatic intrigue between South Asia’s two largest neighboring nations has spilled into public view, after an accidental internal email from India’s presidential palace exposed New Delhi’s urgent behind-the-scenes efforts to host Bangladesh’s newly inaugurated Prime Minister Tarique Rahman for a landmark bilateral reset.

    The early August email, sent to officials ahead of a scheduled change of guard ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan, notified recipients that the traditional event would be canceled to make way for rehearsal activities ahead of a formal ceremonial welcome for Rahman. The catch? No official announcement of the visit had been made by either government. The email was swiftly withdrawn within hours, but it validated weeks of growing speculation over the long-rumored trip and laid bare New Delhi’s eagerness to lock in the first visit from Rahman since his Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) won a landslide parliamentary election in February 2026.

    The election marked the end of a decades-long political era for Bangladesh, coming on the heels of a mass 2024 popular uprising that ousted long-serving Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who now lives in exile in India after fleeing Dhaka amid the unrest. Hasina, who was sentenced to death in absentia by a Bangladeshi special tribunal on charges of ordering lethal force against anti-government protestors – charges she denies – has become the central sticking point in New Delhi’s push to reset strained bilateral ties.

    After Hasina’s removal, an interim government led by Muhammad Yunus took power in Dhaka, and bilateral relations deteriorated sharply. Now, New Delhi views Rahman’s newly seated administration as a critical opening to repair the relationship, but Dhaka has made the extradition of Hasina a non-negotiable precondition for any high-level summit.

    “We called for the creation of a propitious environment and are awaiting response from the Indian side regarding expediting extradition of Sheikh Hasina,” AAM Saleh, press secretary to the Bangladeshi prime minister, confirmed to media. For its part, India has stated only that the extradition request is under active review, a response that has left Dhaka unsatisfied. As of late August, Rahman has not yet confirmed his acceptance of India’s invitation, with Saleh noting that “no decision has yet been made on the visit.”

    Despite the impasse over Hasina, New Delhi has pulled out all stops to court Rahman’s government. A formal invitation was extended within days of Rahman taking office, and India’s High Commissioner to Bangladesh Dinesh Trivedi has held multiple high-level discussions with Rahman and senior Bangladeshi officials in recent weeks. Trivedi has publicly stated that a visit from Rahman would see the new leader “accorded the highest honour” and given a “memorable welcome” – an unusually public show of enthusiasm for a visiting neighbor, a departure from India’s typical restrained diplomatic protocol.

    Shyam Saran, a former Indian foreign secretary, told reporters that New Delhi has already gone to great lengths to accommodate Dhaka’s priorities beyond the extradition issue. “Except for actually handing over Hasina, they have gone pretty far in terms of reaching out to Dhaka,” Saran said, noting that India has moved quickly to meet Bangladesh’s immediate needs including expanded supplies of electricity and fuel, streamlined processing for medical visas, and the revival of multiple bilateral trade facilitation mechanisms. Still, Saran acknowledged that New Delhi is growing frustrated by the continued delay in securing the visit.

    Geostrategic and economic stakes for both sides are extraordinarily high. India and Bangladesh share a 4,096-kilometer open border, and share deep cultural and linguistic ties that stretch back centuries. Bilateral trade between the two nations topped $12 billion in the last calendar year, with a substantial trade surplus in India’s favor. For India, Bangladesh is also critical to improving overland access to its geographically isolated northeastern states; during Hasina’s 15 years in office, the two governments expanded cross-border road, rail, and port connectivity that cut travel times to India’s northeast dramatically, and collaborated closely on counterinsurgency security operations, with Hasina’s government cracking down on insurgent groups that New Delhi said operated from Bangladeshi territory.

    But India’s close alignment with Hasina became deeply unpopular in Bangladesh in her final years in power, with critics accusing New Delhi of turning a blind eye to growing concerns over democratic backsliding and human rights abuses under her administration. Hasina’s continued presence on Indian soil has kept these public tensions high, and tensions flared again earlier this month when Hasina delivered a virtual address to a press event hosted by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of South Asia in New Delhi, where she vowed to return to Bangladesh in December and accused Rahman’s BNP government of political repression against her supporters.

    Dhaka reacted with fury, stating it was “outraged” that Indian authorities allowed Hasina to speak publicly from Indian territory. India’s foreign ministry attempted to de-escalate the situation, stating it had “no role” in organizing the event and did not “endorse anything said at the forum, especially with regard to the duly constituted government of Bangladesh.” Even so, the incident derailed tentative progress on a visit: Dhaka University international relations professor Lailufar Yasmin told media that Rahman had been seriously considering accepting the invitation before Hasina’s address, which triggered a major public backlash in Bangladesh that forced the new government to pump the brakes. “It actually created a huge backlash in Bangladesh,” Yasmin said. “Questions were raised whether Indian authorities were sincere about a reset in bilateral relationship.”

    For Rahman, agreeing to a visit to New Delhi while Hasina remains in exile in India carries significant domestic political risk, as he seeks to establish his government’s independent foreign policy footing. Beyond the Hasina issue, New Delhi is also facing a new geostrategic challenge: since Hasina’s ouster, Bangladesh has moved to rebuild long-dormant ties with India’s long-standing regional rival Pakistan, with the two nations exchanging high-level military delegations and publicly discussing plans to expand bilateral defense cooperation.

    The issue has taken on added urgency this month with the announcement of the so-called Mecca Pact, a collective defense agreement modeled on NATO’s mutual defense principle signed by Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan. While the details of the pact and membership obligations remain unclear, Bangladeshi junior foreign minister Humayun Kabir confirmed this week that Dhaka views potential participation positively. “If there is a security arrangement among Islamic nations in the Middle East, it is not unusual for us to consider participating,” Kabir said. “It is being viewed positively.” Saudi Arabia has also extended a separate bilateral invitation for Rahman to visit the kingdom, adding another option for the new Bangladeshi leader as he weighs his diplomatic priorities.

    Yasmin noted that Bangladesh has good reason to move cautiously on joining the pact, arguing that “Bangladesh should be a bit cautious about entering into any defence pact. It’s not just about antagonizing India; Bangladesh needs to wait for a while to see which way it’s going and whether it will align with our interests.”

    For New Delhi, the shifting diplomatic landscape makes clear that the unusually close bilateral relationship it enjoyed with Bangladesh during Hasina’s tenure can no longer be taken for granted. For Rahman’s government, meanwhile, there is strong domestic pressure to demonstrate that Bangladesh’s foreign policy is not overly reliant on its much larger neighbor. Even so, there are two upcoming high-profile opportunities for Rahman to finally make the trip: Yasmin has publicly urged Rahman to visit New Delhi ahead of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York in mid-September, and India will host a BRICS summit later that month where Bangladesh has been invited as a special guest. After weeks of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, public overtures, and one accidentally leaked email that exposed New Delhi’s hand, all eyes remain on Dhaka to see if Rahman will finally accept India’s invitation.

  • Virgin Australia profits soar to $404m after avoiding costly fuel crisis

    Virgin Australia profits soar to $404m after avoiding costly fuel crisis

    Australia’s competitive domestic aviation market has delivered a sharp divide in full-year financial results, with Virgin Australia recording a robust 21% jump in annual profit and issuing its first shareholder dividend since returning to public markets, while rival Qantas has absorbed hundreds of millions of dollars in losses tied to a global jet fuel crisis.

    In its latest full-year market update released this week, Virgin Australia reported an underlying net profit after tax of $404 million, representing a substantial year-over-year increase from the prior reporting period. The airline’s strong performance is largely attributed to a proactive risk management strategy that saw it fully hedge fuel prices months ahead of the extreme volatility that roiled global energy markets in recent months.

    As refining margins for jet fuel skyrocketed from roughly $US20 per barrel to a peak of $US130 per barrel, airlines across the globe were left grappling with ballooning operational costs. Unlike many of its industry peers, Virgin Australia’s hedging strategy insulated the carrier from the worst of these price shocks, allowing it to keep costs stable and preserve margins through the period of volatility.

    The contrast with Qantas could not be clearer. The larger Australian carrier confirmed this reporting cycle that geopolitical instability tied to the ongoing war in the Middle East, paired with skyrocketing fuel costs that far outpaced growing demand for international travel, erased $420 million from its annual profit.

    Thursday’s results mark Virgin Australia’s first full-year financial report since the company relisted on the Australian Securities Exchange on June 24, 2025. To reward investors for their patience following the carrier’s post-pandemic restructuring and relisting, the board has approved a maiden dividend of 7.6 cents per share for qualifying shareholders.

    Virgin Australia Chief Executive Dave Emerson framed the strong results as validation for the company’s multi-year strategy to build a leaner, more resilient business model focused on Australian travelers. “Looking ahead, we remain focused on providing value and choice to Australians to meet their travel needs,” Emerson said. “As an industry, we all have a role to play in managing costs so aviation doesn’t become unaffordable for Australians.”

    The divergent results between the two major Australian airlines highlight how differing risk management approaches can lead to drastically different outcomes during periods of widespread industry disruption, with well-positioned carriers able to capitalize on volatility to gain ground on larger competitors.

  • Congo begins Ebola vaccinations to fight country’s worst outbreak on record, health minister says

    Congo begins Ebola vaccinations to fight country’s worst outbreak on record, health minister says

    KAMPALA, Democratic Republic of Congo – In a urgent, long-awaited step to curb the deadliest Ebola outbreak the nation has ever faced, Congolese health authorities officially launched a nationwide vaccination campaign on Thursday in the eastern provincial capital of Kisangani, Health Minister Roger Kamba announced.

    The campaign prioritizes high-risk groups first, with frontline health workers, response personnel and close contacts of confirmed Ebola patients topping the list of those to receive doses. Minister Kamba confirmed that the campaign will use the Ervebo vaccine, currently the only widely available Ebola vaccine authorized for emergency use. As of this week, government data puts the outbreak’s toll at 5,713 confirmed cases across six affected provinces – Ituri, North Kivu, South Kivu, Tshopo, Haut-Uele, and Bas-Uele – with 2,744 recorded deaths, translating to a 48% mortality rate among confirmed infections.

    This current outbreak, driven by the rarely-seen Bundibugyo Ebola variant, has spread rapidly against a backdrop of crippling systemic challenges: persistent regional insecurity, mass population displacement, a recent nationwide strike by health care workers, and unregulated cross-community population movements. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned the outbreak remains fully out of control, and is on track to exceed the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic – the previous global deadliest on record, which claimed more than 11,000 lives across Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.

    To address the crisis, global health bodies have fast-tracked vaccine shipments to Congo. Congolese state media confirm the country has already received more than 50,000 doses of Ervebo, while the WHO approved a total of 70,000 doses for deployment in the outbreak response last week. Of the total approved doses, 50,000 are allocated to frontline and at-risk health workers, with the remaining 20,000 reserved for a clinical trial investigating Ervebo’s efficacy against the Bundibugyo variant.

    Crucially, Ervebo is only formally approved to protect against Zaire ebolavirus, a different strain of the virus, and no vaccine is yet specifically authorized for Bundibugyo Ebola. The rollout is proceeding under a compassionate use framework, which permits unapproved off-label use of medical products during public health emergencies when no targeted alternatives exist. Health officials note that the two Ebola strains are genetically related, leading experts to hypothesize Ervebo may offer partial cross-protection, though this hypothesis remains unconfirmed and is the subject of ongoing clinical investigation.

    Placide Mbala Kingebeni, director of research, clinical trials and innovation at the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), confirmed that systematic efficacy data will be collected throughout the vaccination campaign to answer critical questions about Ervebo’s performance against Bundibugyo Ebola. The initial phase of the campaign will target 14 high-risk health zones across Tshopo, Bas-Uele, and Haut-Uele provinces, the three current hotspots of transmission.

    In his remarks launching the campaign, Kamba issued a strong call to action for all frontline health workers to accept vaccination, emphasizing that protecting care providers not only saves their lives, but also prevents secondary transmission of the virus from health settings into the broader community.

  • Rodri debuts with Barcelona as fans show support for Catalonia. Chelsea wins in League Cup

    Rodri debuts with Barcelona as fans show support for Catalonia. Chelsea wins in League Cup

    In a night of dramatic on-pitch action and off-pitch tension across European soccer, Spain’s La Liga and England’s League Cup delivered a mix of sporting milestones and unexpected political gestures this Thursday.

    At Barcelona’s iconic Camp Nou stadium, the biggest talking point off the pitch overshadowed what was supposed to be a celebration of national success. The club had planned a pre-match tribute to the eight Spanish World Cup-winning players in its squad, headlined by new signing Rodri, who captained Spain to the 2022 World Cup title before his summer move from Manchester City. But the planned ceremony was scrapped entirely after a controversial incident the previous weekend: during Barcelona’s away fixture at Elche, a fan was detained and injured by police after officers attempted to confiscate his estelada, the pro-independence flag of Catalonia.

    In place of the World Cup tribute, a local activist group organized a mass show of support for the estelada, with roughly 10,000 small pro-independence flags distributed to fans and displayed across the stadium stands.

    On the pitch, the evening still marked a long-awaited milestone: Rodri made his official Barcelona debut, coming off the bench in the 62nd minute to a warm reception from the packed Camp Nou crowd. Speaking after the final whistle, the midfielder expressed his excitement at his new chapter with the club. “I’m happy to play my first game with Barcelona, happy for the victory, the second in a row for the team,” Rodri said. “It’s important to start gaining rhythm. I felt good with my first minutes.”

    Barcelona’s on-pitch performance delivered the result fans hoped for, as goals from Raphinha in the first half and Fermín López in the second sealed a 2-0 victory over Athletic Bilbao, giving the defending La Liga champions their second consecutive win to open the new season. Athletic’s goalkeeper Unai Simón, Spain’s starting goalkeeper at the World Cup, earned praise for a string of standout saves that prevented Barcelona from running up a larger scoreline. In the other La Liga fixture of the night, Osasuna secured a 2-1 come-from-behind victory away to 10-man Celta Vigo.

    Across the English Channel, the second round of the English League Cup continued with two London clubs advancing to the third round. Chelsea claimed a 2-0 win over third-tier side Luton Town, with a first-half strike from Danny Welbeck and a second-half own goal from Luton’s Hakeem Odoffin putting the game to bed. Notably, star midfielder Enzo Fernandez, who has been repeatedly linked with a transfer move to Manchester City in recent rumors, was absent from Chelsea’s matchday squad entirely. Chelsea, under new manager Xabi Alonso, fielded a relatively strong side just days after picking up a 3-2 Premier League win away to Fulham on Monday. Luton, for its part, is led by 34-year-old Jack Wilshere, the former Arsenal and England international midfielder, in his first senior managerial role.

    In the other League Cup fixture, Fulham cruised to a 3-0 win over third-tier Wimbledon, with goals from Emile Smith Rowe, Rodrigo Muniz and Gonzalo García wrapping up a comfortable victory. The result marked the first competitive win for new Fulham manager Álvaro Arbeloa at the helm of the London club.

    In Europa League playoff action, Turkish side Trabzonspor, recently joined by Egyptian star Mohamed Salah, suffered a devastating elimination at the hands of Hungary’s Ferencvaros. Trabzonspor fell 4-0 in the second leg in Budapest, capping a 5-0 aggregate defeat that ended their European campaign. The night went from bad to worse for Trabzonspor, which finished the match with only nine players on the pitch after Ruslan Malinovskyi was sent off in the 13th minute and Sidny Lopes Cabral received a red card in the 57th. Salah, who scored his first goals for his new club over the previous weekend, was substituted off in the second half.

    Portugal’s Benfica secured their spot in the Europa League group stage with a 3-1 away win over Denmark’s AGF, advancing 6-2 on aggregate. Gianluca Prestianni, who was disciplined last season for verbally abusing Real Madrid star Vinícius Júnior during a Champions League fixture, scored two of Benfica’s three goals. In the Conference League final playoffs, Scotland’s Rangers suffered a shock elimination, falling to Czech side Jablonec in a penalty shootout.

  • Trump orders Lake Ontario to be renamed ‘Lake America’

    Trump orders Lake Ontario to be renamed ‘Lake America’

    In a provocative escalation of the ongoing trade conflict between the United States and Canada, former US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday that would unilaterally rename the shared border body of water Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” drawing an immediate and firm rejection from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The unprecedented diplomatic gambit comes just days after high-stakes bilateral trade negotiations collapsed at the eleventh hour, leading the two longstanding North American allies to impose matching retaliatory tariffs on each other’s goods.

    Speaking to reporters at the White House during the signing ceremony, the 80-year-old Republican confirmed the name change would take effect immediately. When pressed by an Agence France-Presse reporter on why he chose to target a close ally rather than traditional US adversaries over the dispute, Trump dismissed Canadian officials as “nasty people” who had “treated us very badly.” Visual aids behind the president in the Oval Office underscored the gesture: two maps, one overwriting the lake’s historic name with “Lake America” in bold red text, and another bearing the slogan “Making the Great Lakes Even Greater.”

    As the smallest of the five Great Lakes by surface area, Lake Ontario straddles the US-Canada border, touching the Canadian province of Ontario and the US state of New York. Trump’s order mirrors a similar unilateral action he took in January 2025, when he renamed the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America” — a change that Mexico has also refused to recognize. The executive order directs the US Department of the Interior to update all official geographic naming records within 30 days and mandate that all federal agencies adopt the new name, justifying the move on the grounds that the lake’s deepest section lies within US territory, giving the United States “claim to most of the Lake’s volume.”

    Carney, a former central banker for both Canada and the United Kingdom, quickly pushed back against the order in a public post on X, noting that the name “Lake Ontario” has persisted for 400 years — predating the founding of both the United States and Canada, and deriving from an Indigenous term meaning “the lake is beautiful, the lake is big.” “We know that America is changing,” Carney wrote. “Canadians also know that naming reality means calling it Lake Ontario — then, now and always.” Carney’s recent defiant stance against Trump has earned widespread approval from Canadian voters, after he declared earlier this week that Ottawa was “at war” following what he framed as unfair economic attacks from the US.

    The name change dispute is not an isolated incident: throughout his second presidential term, Trump has repeatedly angered close US allies with outlandish territorial and naming claims. He has previously suggested Canada should become the 51st US state, laid a public claim to Greenland (an autonomous territory of NATO member Denmark), and claimed he would annex Venezuela as a US state after American forces captured former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. In recent days, he has also announced plans to claim the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway between Iran and Oman, as US territory amid the ongoing active conflict with Iran.

    Trump’s latest provocation comes as he faces plummeting domestic approval ratings tied to the ongoing Iran war and widespread economic struggles at home, with critical midterm congressional elections scheduled for November. The president hinted that the Lake Ontario renaming could just be the start of a broader effort, suggesting he may also move to rename the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans that border the United States. “We have a gulf and we have a lake. Now all we need is an ocean,” Trump said. “So, maybe we’ll have to change the name of the Atlantic and/or the Pacific. Maybe we’ll change them both.” The president added that the renaming idea was one he had pondered for years, after confirming earlier this week that he was giving the proposal serious consideration and releasing a TikTok video Wednesday confirming he would move forward with the order.

  • Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, architect of Srebrenica genocide and ‘Butcher of Bosnia’, dies aged 84

    Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb military commander infamously known as the ‘Butcher of Bosnia’ for orchestrating Europe’s worst act of mass genocide since World War II, has passed away at the age of 84. His death was first reported by Serbia’s state-owned public broadcaster RTS, and later independently confirmed by Mladic’s legal representative to Reuters news agency.

    Mladic rose to prominence in the 1990s, amid the violent collapse of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Then-Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic pursued an aggressive nationalist agenda to forge a ethnically pure ‘Greater Serbia’ from the fragments of the disintegrating federation, a project that inflamed long-simmering ethnic and religious tensions and sparked a series of brutal wars across the Balkans. As the top commander of Bosnian Serb separatist forces, Mladic became the primary military architect of this campaign, which targeted non-Serb populations across Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    The most horrific chapter of Mladic’s campaign came in July 1995, when his forces overran the UN-designated safe zone of Srebrenica. In the weeks leading up to the massacre, Mladic invoked a 14th-century Serbian military defeat by the Ottoman Empire to frame his campaign as a act of revenge against Bosniak Muslims, six centuries after the original conflict. Over the following days, Mladic’s troops systematically captured more than 8,000 Bosniak men and boys, before executing them in cold blood. Widespread sexual violence was perpetrated against Bosniak women and girls, while perpetrators covered up the atrocity by burying victims in mass graves, later exhuming remains and scattering them across remote secondary burial sites to destroy evidence of the crime.

    Mladic was also directly responsible for the 44-month siege of Sarajevo, a brutal blockade that subjected the capital’s civilian population to systematic terror, starvation, and constant attack.

    In total, the Bosnian war claimed the lives of roughly 100,000 people and displaced more than 2.2 million from their homes, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in post-WWII European history.

    For nearly 16 years after the end of the war, Mladic evaded international justice, with covert support from factions within the Serbian state that helped him hide from authorities. His years on the run became one of the longest and most high-profile manhunts in modern history, coming to an end only in May 2011, when Serbian security forces arrested him in a small village north of Belgrade.

    In 2017, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), based in The Hague, found Mladic guilty on 10 counts of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Presiding judge Alphons Orie described Mladic’s offenses as ranking among ‘the most heinous known to humankind,’ and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

    Despite his well-documented atrocities and international conviction, Mladic remains a glorified figure among Serbian ultranationalists, and many senior Serbian political leaders have continued to deny or downplay the severity of crimes committed by Bosnian Serb forces during the conflict. The ICTY ultimately prosecuted nearly 100 individuals for war crimes and atrocities committed during the Yugoslav wars, with Mladic’s trial standing as one of the tribunal’s final and most high-profile cases.

  • Moroccan minister questions Spanish sovereignty over enclave of Ceuta

    Moroccan minister questions Spanish sovereignty over enclave of Ceuta

    A fresh sovereignty row over the North African enclave of Ceuta has sent diplomatic tensions between Morocco and Spain soaring, after a senior Moroccan cabinet minister publicly questioned Madrid’s rule over the territory during an official state ceremony.

    Ahmed Toufiq, Morocco’s Minister of Habous and Islamic Affairs, made the contested remarks at an event marking the birth of the Prophet Muhammad, held at Rabat’s Royal Palace and hosted by King Mohammed VI. During his speech highlighting centuries of Islamic scholarly work on the life and teachings of the Prophet, Toufiq named three influential texts written by Islamic intellectuals hailing from Ceuta: Al-Shifa by Qadi Iyad, Al-Durr al-Manzum by Al-Azafi, and the well-known collection of prayers Dala’il al-Khayrat by Imam Al-Jazuli.

    Toufiq went on to frame Dala’il al-Khayrat as a historic symbol of Moroccan collective mobilization to free what he called “occupied cities” along Morocco’s Atlantic coast during the early modern era. The reference was a clear nod to 15th and 16th century Moroccan resistance movements that pushed back against Portuguese and Spanish territorial expansion along both the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of the region.

    The comments sparked immediate outrage in Spain, which is already grappling with persistent diplomatic friction and migration pressures linked to a massive border crisis at Ceuta that unfolded in late July. During that crisis, more than 72,000 people crossed from Morocco into Ceuta, including roughly 7,000 unaccompanied minors, according to official Spanish data. Viral footage captured thousands of migrants swimming around the border barrier to reach the enclave, many relying on basic flotation devices to make the dangerous crossing. While most migrants returned to Morocco within hours, several thousand remained in Ceuta, overwhelming local reception facilities. Madrid ultimately rolled out an emergency plan to relocate 500 of the most vulnerable minors to the Spanish mainland to ease overcrowding.

    At least 141 people were killed during the July 30 crossing incident, an event that already drove a sharp wedge between the two neighboring countries. Many Spanish political figures have openly accused Moroccan authorities of deliberately enabling the mass migration surge to pressure Madrid over longstanding territorial disputes.

    Toufiq’s sovereignty claim is not an isolated incident: he is the second senior Moroccan government official to publicly stake a claim to Ceuta and the neighboring adjacent enclave of Melilla in the months following the July crisis. Just one week prior, Moroccan Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi publicly referenced Morocco’s “historical and geographical right” to both territories, and proposed establishing a bilateral commission to negotiate their “return to the homeland.”

    Spanish officials have moved swiftly to reject the new claims. On Tuesday, Spanish Migration Minister Elma Saiz issued a firm rebuke of Toufiq’s comments during a public press briefing. “Ceuta and Melilla are Spanish,” she stated. “They are our southern borders, as well as the borders of Europe. There is nothing more to add.” Madrid has previously “categorically” rejected any challenge to its sovereignty over the two territories.

    Ceuta and Melilla are both Spanish autonomous cities located entirely within Moroccan territory along the country’s northern Mediterranean coast. They host the only shared land border between the European Union and the African continent, making their status a critical point of both diplomatic and policy contention for the EU as well. The Moroccan government has never formally recognized Spanish sovereignty over either enclave, leaving the issue as one of the longest-running unresolved disputes in North African-European relations.

  • Zambia opposition leader sought refuge following disputed elections. Now he’s accused of treason

    Zambia opposition leader sought refuge following disputed elections. Now he’s accused of treason

    LUSAKA, Zambia — Two weeks after Zambia’s deeply contested presidential election, the southern African nation’s top opposition figure has been taken into police custody on treason allegations, marking a sharp escalation of political tensions following the disputed vote. Brian Mundubile, who ran against incumbent President Hakainde Hichilema in the August 13 ballot, turned himself in to law enforcement officials Thursday alongside his running mate Makebi Zulu, after spending weeks in hiding that included taking refuge in a local United Nations facility for safety.