标签: South America

南美洲

  • US military conducts a rapid response exercise at embassy in Venezuela’s capital

    US military conducts a rapid response exercise at embassy in Venezuela’s capital

    Four months after former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was removed from power, the United States military has carried out a rapid response drills in Venezuela’s capital Caracas, involving Marine Corps personnel and hybrid military aircraft.

    The exercise centered on two MV-22 Osprey aircraft — tiltrotor vehicles that combine the vertical takeoff and landing capabilities of a helicopter with the long-range, fuel efficiency of a fixed-wing plane. The aircraft flew over the recently reopened U.S. Embassy in Caracas before touching down in the embassy’s parking lot, where strong downdrafts from their rotors sent tree branches swaying across the area. After landing, uniformed Marine personnel exited the aircraft to complete the exercise’s operational drills.

    In a public statement posted to its official Instagram account following the drill, the U.S. Embassy emphasized that maintaining sharp, rapid response military capabilities is a core pillar of operational readiness for U.S. forces, both deployed in Venezuela and across all global U.S. mission locations. Venezuela’s interim government had pre-announced the exercise earlier in the week, with Foreign Minister Yván Gil clarifying that the drill was framed as a preparation to respond to potential medical or large-scale catastrophic emergencies in the capital.

    This military exercise comes just two months after the U.S. formally reopened its diplomatic mission in Caracas. The embassy reopening marked the full restoration of bilateral diplomatic ties between Washington and Caracas, a step that followed Maduro’s ouster from office in early January. The last time U.S. military aircraft operated over Caracas was on January 3, when U.S. elite special operations forces rappelled from military helicopters to capture Maduro and his wife. The pair were subsequently extradited to New York to face international drug trafficking charges, and both have entered formal pleas of not guilty to the allegations against them.

    The drill drew mixed reactions from local residents on Saturday. Dozens of Caracas locals gathered near the embassy compound to observe the aircraft and exercise activity, while a separate group of several dozen protesters assembled at another location across the city to demonstrate against the U.S. military operation. Protesters carried a large Venezuelan flag emblazoned with the phrase “No to the Yankee drill” to voice their opposition to the deployment of U.S. forces on Venezuelan territory.

  • Pitches, PlayStations and protein ice cream – A look inside Brazil’s World Cup base camp

    Pitches, PlayStations and protein ice cream – A look inside Brazil’s World Cup base camp

    As the world’s most anticipated football tournament draws near, all eyes are on how top contenders are shaping up for their quest for the trophy. Among the elite national sides preparing for the competition, Brazil has set up its pre-tournament base far from home, at the Columbia Park Training Facility nestled in Morris Township, New Jersey. BBC correspondent Brandon Livesay recently got rare access to the closed camp, offering football fans around the globe an unprecedented peek into how the five-time world champions are getting ready for their World Cup campaign.

    What stands out most about the Brazilian camp is the careful balance the team’s support staff have struck between high-performance training and personal comfort, designed to keep the squad in peak physical and mental condition ahead of the tournament. Beyond the meticulously maintained grass pitches, where players put in daily work on tactics, fitness and teamwork, the facility includes off-pitch amenities that cater to modern athletes’ needs for recovery and relaxation. To help players unwind after intense training sessions, the camp has been equipped with gaming stations including PlayStations, allowing team members to unwind with casual friendly competitions. Meanwhile, the nutrition team has tailored a performance-focused diet for the squad, that even includes specially sourced protein ice cream – a treat that fits the team’s strict fitness requirements while satisfying players’ cravings for sweet snacks.

    Choosing a pre-tournament base in the United States rather than in Brazil or closer to the tournament host nation was a strategic call by the Brazilian Football Confederation. The New Jersey location offers controlled privacy, cutting out distractions that often come with a high-profile side preparing for a major tournament, while still providing easy access to travel logistics for the final journey to the competition. Livesay’s tour confirms that every detail of the camp, from training infrastructure to off-field comfort, has been planned to give the Brazilian squad the best possible chance to lift the World Cup trophy, underscoring the side’s commitment to preparing thoroughly for every possible challenge ahead of the tournament.

  • Jackson smashes meeting record to win 200m

    Jackson smashes meeting record to win 200m

    The Xiamen Diamond League track and field meet delivered a day of thrilling competition and historic performances on Saturday, headlined by a masterclass victory from two-time 200m world champion Shericka Jackson.

    Fresh off a win at the opening Shanghai/Keqiao Diamond League stop a week prior, Jackson picked up right where she left off in Xiamen, delivering a dominant run that left her competitors trailing far behind. From the moment the starting gun fired, the Jamaican sprinter seized control of the race, putting her unparalleled strength on the bend to create an insurmountable gap over the rest of the field. She crossed the finish line with a blistering time of 21.87 seconds, breaking the existing meeting record and falling just one hundredth of a second short of claiming the current world leading time.

    While Jackson claimed the top spot on the podium, her fellow competitors also turned in impressive personal season-best results. Bahamian sprinter Shaunae Miller-Uibo took second place with a time of 22.04 seconds, while American sprinter Anavia Battle secured third with 22.29 seconds. Neither runner ever looked positioned to challenge Jackson for the win, however. 2023 world 100m champion Sha’Carri Richardson also notched a new season best, finishing fourth in 22.38 seconds. Great Britain’s Amy Hunt, the 2022 200m world junior silver medallist, crossed the line seventh out of nine competing athletes.

    The standout historic performance of the day came from 18-year-old Chinese javelin thrower Yan Ziyi, who rewrote multiple record books with a stunning 71.74m throw. Just one day after celebrating her 18th birthday, Yan’s effort broke not only the Xiamen Diamond League meet record but also the long-standing Asian senior record and the world under-20 record. This milestone comes just over a year after Yan set the world junior record at the age of 17, cementing her status as one of the most promising young track and field talents in the world. Her throw moves her into second place on the all-time global women’s javelin performance list.

    Another crowd-pleasing matchup came in the men’s 400m hurdles, which pitted 2024 Olympic bronze medalist Alison dos Santos of Brazil against Norwegian world record holder and 2024 Olympic silver medalist Karsten Warholm in a much-anticipated head-to-head duel. The two elite hurdlers quickly separated themselves from the rest of the pack, battling neck-and-neck for the top spot through every hurdle. In the final stretch, dos Santos pulled ahead to claim the win, finishing in 46.72 seconds – 0.10 seconds ahead of Warholm’s runner-up time.

  • Lionel Scaloni remains calm and cool as Argentina prepares to defend its World Cup title

    Lionel Scaloni remains calm and cool as Argentina prepares to defend its World Cup title

    As Argentina counts down to the 2026 FIFA World Cup, all eyes are fixed on head coach Lionel Scaloni, the quiet architect of the nation’s 2022 global title who is now chasing an almost unprecedented back-to-back championship. The iconic image of his icy composure after Gonzalo Montiel’s decisive penalty sealed Argentina’s third World Cup crown against France in 2022 remains etched in football fans’ memories: instead of erupting in celebration, Scaloni stood motionless and silent on the touchline, seemingly numb to the historic achievement he had just helped deliver. It was only minutes later, when a player embraced him and whispered the words “We are world champions,” that the coach finally broke down in tears. That unflappable temperament, it turns out, is no accident — it has been honed by a daily routine far from the roar of football stadiums.

    Longtime acquaintances of Scaloni trace his remarkable emotional control to his post-playing career hobby: long-distance cycling. Picked up on the advice of his friend, former Spanish tennis star Carlos Moyá, the 48-year-old dedicates two to three hours every day to pedaling, whether it be through the mountainous terrain of Mallorca — the Spanish island he calls home — or along the quiet trails of his native Pujato, in northwest Argentina. For Scaloni, cycling is far more than a fitness activity: it is a mental reset and a form of therapy that allows him to work through tactical plans, analyze opponents, and stay grounded amid the pressure of international football.

    “On the bike, you can think about your team, your opponent, how to prepare for the match. It really clears my head. It’s a good escape … it helps me lower my expectations, be calmer,” Scaloni explained in recent interviews.

    That calm has been tested repeatedly throughout his tenure as Argentina’s head coach, a role he never expected to hold long-term. After Argentina’s humiliating round-of-16 exit from the 2018 Russia World Cup, Scaloni — a former Argentina international with zero prior experience managing a professional club — stepped into the role on an interim basis, while the Argentine Football Association (AFA) courted high-profile candidates such as Mauricio Pochettino and Diego Simeone. At the time, even Argentine legend Diego Maradona dismissed him, sneering, “Scaloni? He can’t even direct traffic.”

    Undeterred by the widespread criticism of his inexperience, Scaloni steadily built a cohesive, hungry team. He led Argentina to the 2021 Copa América title, navigated a successful 2022 World Cup qualifying campaign, and silenced doubters again in Qatar after a shocking opening-match loss to Saudi Arabia. Mid-tournament, he revamped his lineup, giving opportunities to young rookies including Enzo Fernández, Alexis Mac Allister, and Julián Álvarez, and drew out the best performance of Lionel Messi’s long World Cup career, ultimately lifting the sport’s biggest prize.

    Today, Scaloni prepares to make history as only the third Argentine coach to lead the national side into consecutive World Cups, following legendary champions César Luis Menotti (1978, 1982) and Carlos Bilardo (1986, 1990). The youngest of the three, however, rejects any comparison to the iconic managers who came before him, noting “They have established careers, they defined an era.”

    Now, the challenge of repeating as champion looms larger than ever. No men’s World Cup champion has successfully defended their title since Brazil in 1962, and Scaloni faces no shortage of obstacles: his star player Messi, 38, is nearing the end of his international career; the AFA is mired in off-field turmoil, with leadership facing corruption accusations and widespread internal anger over league format changes and refereeing calls. Even World Cup preparation has drawn criticism: the AFA has arranged warm-up friendlies against low-ranked sides, including Indonesia, Puerto Rico, Angola, Mauritania, and Zambia, with two final pre-tournament matches scheduled against non-qualifiers Honduras and Iceland in June.

    Scaloni, for his part, has refused to publically air grievances. While he shocked fans in November 2023 by hinting at a potential exit after a qualifying win over Brazil — later clarifying he was overwhelmed by serious health issues affecting his elderly parents, amid unconfirmed rumors of friction with players over off-field behavior — he has remained in the role and stayed true to his no-nonsense approach. He has made clear to his squad that winning the 2022 title does not guarantee anyone a spot on the 2026 roster, demanding constant focus and hunger from his players.

    “I don’t dwell on past achievements; you always have to keep looking ahead,” he said in late 2025. “With this jersey, you don’t have time to relax and think your place is secure.”

    His approach has paid off in the years since Qatar: Argentina claimed back-to-back Copa América titles in 2021 and 2024, and finished top of South American 2026 World Cup qualifying, even with Messi missing multiple matches due to injury. 20 of the 26 players from the 2022 title-winning squad, including Messi, have been included in Scaloni’s preliminary 55-man roster for the upcoming tournament.

    Jorge Valdano, a 1986 World Cup champion with Argentina, praised Scaloni’s work in an interview with the Associated Press, noting “Argentina has achieved the best thing a national team can achieve: being a team. It’s a team with very clear leadership, that of the coach and Leo Messi, and players who haven’t lost their hunger.”

    Argentina kicks off its 2026 World Cup Group J campaign in Kansas City on June 16 against Algeria, followed by matches against Austria on June 22 and Jordan on June 27. Scaloni retains the same calm demeanor that carried his side to glory four years ago, fully aware of the weight of expectation from Argentine fans who demand another title and will not accept disappointment.

    “We’re doing well, we’re eager. We’re aware that our opponents will play us differently because we’re the reigning champions,” Scaloni said. “The important thing is that we’ll be there. After that, it’s football, and anything can happen.” “To win a World Cup, a lot of things have to come together, not just playing well. It’s very difficult, but not impossible.”

  • Argentine freed from Venezuelan prison urges pressure to release remaining prisoners

    Argentine freed from Venezuelan prison urges pressure to release remaining prisoners

    BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – Nearly two months after walking free from a Venezuelan prison following 448 days of detention on disputed political charges, Argentine national Nahuel Gallo is urging the international community to ramp up pressure on Venezuela’s interim government to secure the release of hundreds of people still jailed for political motives.

    The 35-year-old was released on March 1, more than 14 months after he was arrested at a Venezuelan immigration checkpoint in December 2024 while traveling to meet his Venezuelan partner and their toddler son. At the time of his arrest, the country was still under the control of now-ousted former President Nicolás Maduro, who leveled accusations of espionage and terrorist activity against Gallo that he has repeatedly denied.

    Gallo shared a harrowing account of his detention in exclusive comments to the Associated Press, detailing systematic abuse and inhumane conditions he endured while held at the Rodeo I prison. From his initial interrogation by Venezuelan military counterintelligence agents to his eventual release, Gallo described a pattern of violence, psychological torment, and neglect that still haunts him months after gaining freedom.

    Upon his arrest, agents found WhatsApp conversations between Gallo and his partner discussing Venezuela’s volatile political and economic situation, which prompted immediate accusations of dissent. When a search of his phone uncovered contacts linked to Argentine judicial agencies, officers labeled him a spy outright. Gallo recalled being threatened with death, with a gun pressed to his skull and a Taser held to his body as agents threatened to throw him from a moving truck during interrogations. He said he was repeatedly beaten and kicked while handcuffed in the early days of his custody.

    Nearly three weeks after his arrest, then-Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab publicly announced formal charges that Gallo had participated in “terrorist actions” against the Maduro government.

    Transferred to Rodeo I prison to serve out his pre-trial detention, Gallo faced conditions that tested his ability to survive. As a foreign detainee, he was barred from receiving any outside visits, and he was cut off from all contact with Argentine consular officials for more than a year. He was given only limited access to medical care, and all inmates were restricted to just a few minutes per day for bathing, washing clothing, and using restroom facilities. Prison guards regularly sprayed detained people with pepper spray as punishment and intimidation, according to Gallo’s account.

    It was only after a full year of detention and a sustained hunger strike that Gallo was finally allowed his first phone call with his partner. For him, the worst abuse was not the violence inflicted on him directly, but the helplessness of watching other prisoners tortured nearby.

    “The greatest torture is seeing something being done to someone else and not being able to do anything,” Gallo said.

    Following Maduro’s ouster and capture by U.S. forces in January, interim President Delcy Rodríguez took power and pledged to implement sweeping democratic reforms. Her government has previously denied allegations of systematic human rights abuses in Venezuelan prisons. This week, National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez – the interim president’s brother – announced plans to release 300 detainees, a number that includes many detainees classified as political prisoners by international human rights organizations.

    Despite this announced reform, critics warn that hundreds of people remain behind bars solely for their political views, a reality that leads Gallo to argue Venezuela’s old repressive system remains largely intact. Even after his release, Gallo says he still feels imprisoned until every one of his former fellow inmates is freed.

    “I think we’re still imprisoned until our fellow inmates are freed,” Gallo said. Before he left Rodeo I, he recalled, his cellmates shared one simple plea: “Gallo, don’t forget about us.”

    That promise has shaped Gallo’s work in the weeks since he returned to Argentina. He has turned to social media to shine a light on the abusive conditions inside Venezuelan prisons and advocate for the release of all remaining political detainees. “The person who’s still inside is waiting for the one who got out to do something,” he explained.

    On Thursday, Gallo met with U.S. Ambassador to Argentina Peter Lamelas in Buenos Aires. After the meeting, Lamelas released a statement reaffirming the U.S. position that the former Maduro regime “used the arbitrary detention of foreign citizens as a tool of political repression.”

  • Colombian army deploys hundreds of soldiers in country’s southwest after land dispute leaves 7 dead

    Colombian army deploys hundreds of soldiers in country’s southwest after land dispute leaves 7 dead

    BOGOTA, Colombia – Fresh deadly inter-communal violence has sparked a major security deployment in southwestern Colombia, after a long-running territorial dispute between two Indigenous groups erupted into open conflict that left multiple people dead and dozens more injured.

    On Thursday, violent clashes broke out in a rural zone of Cauca department’s Silvia municipality, pitting the Misak and Nasa Indigenous communities against one another. Both groups have laid overlapping claims to the same parcel of land, a source of simmering tension that has persisted for months. By Friday morning, official preliminary counts put the death toll at seven people, with more than 110 others wounded – most hit by gunfire. Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez cautioned that the number of fatalities and casualties could climb in the coming hours as rescue teams reach isolated areas of the conflict zone.

    In response to the violence, Colombian national security forces launched a large-scale deployment to the region on Friday. The national army announced via social media that more than 500 infantry soldiers, backed by air support, have entered the Silvia area to restore public safety for local residents and prevent further escalation of the conflict. The deployment aims to separate the rival groups and create a secure environment for dialogue to resume.

    Tensions between the two communities first began to rise in April of this year. Colombia’s state-run National Land Agency has been involved in the dispute since that time, taking part in formal mediation sessions and technical working groups designed to resolve ambiguity over the official territorial boundaries between the two Indigenous groups. In the wake of Thursday’s violence, the agency repeated its call for both communities to set down weapons and return to the negotiating table to resolve their differences through peaceful dialogue rather than armed confrontation.

    The violence drew swift international reaction: the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Colombia mission released a statement Thursday calling for an immediate end to hostilities and urging national authorities to launch a full investigation into the violence, holding all those responsible for deaths and injuries legally accountable.

    The region where the clashes occurred already faces significant security challenges, with multiple illegal armed factions active across Cauca department. Among these active groups are dissident units of the former Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) that refused to disarm under the terms of the landmark 2016 national peace agreement with the Colombian government. These armed groups often exacerbate local tensions over land and resources to extend their own control over territory in remote rural areas.

  • Trump’s Cuba strategy echoes his Venezuela playbook. But there are key differences

    Trump’s Cuba strategy echoes his Venezuela playbook. But there are key differences

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s hardline strategy to destabilize Cuba has increasingly mirrored the pressure campaign that led to the ouster of Venezuela’s former leader Nicolás Maduro, featuring an escalating oil blockade, expanded U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, federal criminal charges against top Cuban officials, and repeated public threats of direct military intervention. But regional policy experts warn that copying the Venezuela playbook does not guarantee a similar outcome, even as President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that “Cuba is next” on his list of regional regime changes.

    Brian Finucane, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group and former State Department legal advisor, noted that Trump views the successful removal of Maduro as a major policy win and has attempted to replicate that model across adversarial regimes, including Iran. “But obviously, Cuba, like Iran, is a very different country than Venezuela,” Finucane emphasized. Unlike Venezuela, where the U.S. was able to install a compliant successor after capturing Maduro in January, Finucane says there is no obvious alternative Cuban leader willing to cooperate with the Trump administration. Unnamed Cuban officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to restrictions on public commentary, echoed this assessment, bluntly stating “there is no Delcy in Cuba” — a reference to Maduro’s former second-in-command Delcy Rodríguez, who assumed power with U.S. backing after Maduro’s ouster.

    Finucane also pointed to key differences in U.S. military posture between the two campaigns. In the months leading up to Maduro’s removal, the U.S. assembled a massive, threatening naval buildup off Venezuela’s coast. By contrast, current U.S. military force levels in the Caribbean are far smaller and less intimidating. Additionally, while criminal charges against sitting Venezuelan president Maduro provided a legal justification for his capture, an indictment against 94-year-old former Cuban leader Raúl Castro — who stepped down from daily leadership years ago — carries far less practical impact for the current Cuban government.

    To understand the gaps between the two pressure campaigns, it is necessary to break down their core similarities and divergent dynamics:

    ### Repeated Escalating Threats of Military Action
    Months before launching the operation that removed Maduro from power, Trump steadily laid groundwork for intervention through a cascade of public threats, a pattern he has now repeated for Cuba. He has pressured Caribbean regional governments to align with U.S. policy or face consequences, and just weeks before the special operation that captured Maduro, Trump issued a final public warning to the Venezuelan leader from Florida, alongside his top national security team. “If he wants to do something, if he plays tough, it’ll be the last time he’ll ever be able to play tough,” Trump told reporters in December.

    Within days of Maduro being transported to the U.S. to face trial, Trump shifted his focus to Cuba, identifying the island as his next target. “Cuba is ready to fall. Cuba looks like it’s ready to fall. I don’t know if they’re going to hold out,” he told reporters on January 5. He followed this by threatening to impose tariffs on any country that supplies oil to Cuba, and claimed the U.S. might “have the honor of taking Cuba” after concluding operations in Venezuela and Iran. He repeated these threats last Thursday, dismissing Cuba as “a failed country” and claiming he will be the first U.S. president to resolve the decades-long standoff over the island’s governance.

    ### Divergent Goals Behind Linked Oil Embargoes
    The U.S. oil embargoes imposed on both Cuba and Venezuela share the core objective of squeezing ruling elites to force political change, but they target opposite sides of the oil trade to achieve this. For Venezuela, the Trump administration originally targeted the country’s oil exports to cut off revenue for the Maduro government. After Maduro’s ouster, the focus shifted to blocking unapproved Venezuelan oil exports to Cuba — which for years received crude in non-cash barter arrangements — while forcing Venezuela’s new government to comply with U.S. terms for oil shipments. Today, most of Venezuela’s crude output is routed to U.S. refineries.

    For Cuba, the embargo is designed to cut off the energy-import dependent island from critical oil supplies. While the U.S. has allowed a small number of limited shipments to proceed, Cuba recently publicly confirmed it has exhausted its stored oil reserves. The current embargo is an expansion of the broader U.S. trade blockade on Cuba that has been in place for decades, and it has already severely strained the Cuban government’s ability to provide consistent electricity and gasoline to civilian residents.

    Finucane warned that this pressure could spiral into unintended consequences for the U.S. If the embargo destabilizes Cuba enough, it could trigger a new wave of mass migration to Florida, similar to the refugee crisis that unfolded in the 1990s when thousands of Cubans crossed the 90-mile stretch of ocean in makeshift vessels. “President Trump especially cares about immigration. And if they push too hard on Cuba and destabilize the island, there’s the possibility of some kind of a refugee crisis,” he said.

    ### Criminal Charges Carry Different Strategic Weight
    During Trump’s first term in 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice charged Maduro with narco-terrorism conspiracy and multiple other criminal counts. That indictment was later used as legal justification for his capture, and Maduro now remains in New York awaiting trial, where he has pleaded not guilty to all charges. The removal of Maduro upended decades of U.S.-Venezuela relations, opening the door for U.S. companies to purchase previously sanctioned Venezuelan oil and allowing Venezuelan crude to re-enter global markets — a massive shift from years of near-total restrictions on dealings with Venezuela’s government and oil sector.

    For Cuba, the indictment against Raúl Castro stems from the 1996 shootdown of two civilian planes flown by Miami-based Cuban exiles, and includes charges of murder and aircraft destruction. William LeoGrande, a professor specializing in Latin American politics at American University in Washington, said the charges are primarily a tactical step to escalate the Trump administration’s pressure campaign, rather than a precursor to immediate policy change. Even if the U.S. were to detain Castro, LeoGrande argued it would not alter the day-to-day operations of Cuba’s current government. “Castro still has influence and the leadership seeks his opinion on major decisions, but he is not running the government on a day-to-day basis,” LeoGrande explained.

    ### Modest Military Buildup Versus a Massive Regional Deployment
    In the months leading up to Maduro’s capture, the U.S. deployed a large fleet of warships to waters off Venezuela, marking one of the largest U.S. military buildups in Latin America in modern history. The U.S. Navy’s most advanced carrier at the time, the USS Gerald R. Ford, was rerouted from European deployments to join the operation, while three amphibious assault ships carried a Marine expeditionary unit, attack helicopters, and Osprey tiltrotor aircraft. U.S. forces carried out months of anti-smuggling operations targeting drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, while fighter jets conducted regular patrols over the Gulf of Venezuela. The final mission to capture Maduro involved more than 150 aircraft deployed across the Western Hemisphere.

    Today, the U.S. maintains a much smaller military contingent in the Caribbean, consisting of two amphibious assault ships with Marine detachments onboard. This week, coinciding with the announcement of charges against Raúl Castro, the U.S. military publicized the arrival of the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier and its accompanying escort warships in the region. However, the Nimitz is on its final deployment before being decommissioned, and is only participating in routine maritime exercises. For experts, this scaled-back presence underscores the gap between the two campaigns. “They’re very different situations, and it’s very difficult to see similar outcomes,” Finucane said. “A snatch-and-grab raid against Raúl Castro or someone who’s actually in a leadership position doesn’t seem like it’s going to have the same outcome in Cuba as in Venezuela.”

    Associated Press writer Andrea Rodríguez in Havana contributed reporting to this article.

  • Trump is putting pressure on Cuba – why and to what end?

    Trump is putting pressure on Cuba – why and to what end?

    Decades of fragile, strained relations between the United States and Cuba have plunged to new lows in recent weeks, following a series of aggressive moves by the second Trump administration that have put the Caribbean nation on high alert for potential military intervention.

    Since his return to the White House, US President Donald Trump has openly stated his goal of ousting Cuba’s current ruling leadership, even speculating publicly that the island’s government is on the brink of collapse. In March, he claimed Cuba was mired in deep crisis and teased the possibility of a so-called “friendly takeover” of the country. While no formal military invasion plans have been announced, heightened surveillance activity in the region has amplified Cuban anxieties. Over the past seven days, US military aircraft have intentionally kept their flight transponders active while operating near Cuban airspace, broadcasting their positions publicly on global flight-tracking platforms. Dr. Steve Wright, a UK-based expert in unmanned aerial and surveillance technology, called the choice to leave transponders enabled almost certainly intentional, noting the move is designed to send an unambiguous message that US intelligence maintains constant oversight of the island as it ramps up pressure.

    The most provocative recent US action came this week, when federal prosecutors unsealed an unprecedented murder and conspiracy indictment against 94-year-old Raúl Castro, Cuba’s former president and the symbolic “Leader of the Cuban Revolution.” The charges stem from a 1996 incident in which Cuban fighter jets shot down two small civilian aircraft operated by Brothers to the Rescue, a Miami-based Cuban exile group. Four people, three of them US citizens, were killed in the incident. Washington has long maintained the planes were shot down over international waters, while Cuba has consistently argued the aircraft entered its sovereign airspace after repeated incursions that posed a national security threat. Along with Raúl Castro, five other Cuban figures face charges including conspiracy to kill US nationals, murder, and destruction of US aircraft; a conviction could carry a life sentence or the death penalty. Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said the charges reflected that the US “does not, and will not, forget its citizens,” but Cuban leaders have denounced the indictment as a baseless political gambit to justify military action. Cuba’s current president Miguel Díaz-Canel called the prosecution “a political manoeuvre, devoid of any legal foundation,” reaffirming that the 1996 downing was a legitimate act of self-defense within Cuban national waters.

    Experts and Cuban officials note the indictment is a deliberate strike at the heart of Cuba’s ruling structure. While Díaz-Canel formally holds both the presidency and leadership of the Cuban Communist Party, the Castro name remains the most powerful symbolic and political force on the island, commanding deep loyalty within the military and security services that dominate Cuban politics and economics. Raúl Castro, who led the country from 2008 to 2018 after decades as defense minister under his older brother Fidel, remains the figurehead of the 1959 revolution that established the island’s anti-imperialist, one-party communist system. The Cuban military’s sprawling conglomerate GAESA controls most of the island’s key economic assets, underpinning the power of the ruling political-military elite. In a recent video address to the Cuban people, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that GAESA operates as a “state within a state,” controlled by a corrupt, incompetent elite that blocks reform and any potential rapprochement with the US. Rubio confirmed that the White House prefers a diplomatic resolution to the current standoff, but said Trump retains the right and obligation to respond to any purported US national security threat, adding that the probability of reaching a peaceful agreement is “not high.” Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez has dismissed Rubio’s comments as an attempt to “instigate a military aggression.”

    Beyond the legal charges, the most impactful pressure on Cuba has come from a total US oil blockade and sweeping new sanctions that have crippled the island’s already fragile economy. For years, Venezuela and Mexico supplied the vast majority of Cuba’s crude oil and fuel, but both halted shipments after the Trump administration removed Venezuela’s sitting president in January and threatened tariffs on any country that sent petroleum to Havana. Since the blockade was implemented, only one Russian oil tanker has successfully delivered fuel to the island, leaving Cuba facing chronic fuel shortages that have sparked months of widespread, hours-long blackouts across the country. Shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods have also reached crisis levels, forcing hospitals to scale back critical care and forcing schools and government offices to close repeatedly. Public discontent has boiled over into repeated street protests across the capital Havana, including a demonstration this week where demonstrators blocked roads with burning debris and chanted anti-government slogans. This month, the US added new sanctions targeting senior Cuban officials in the energy, defense, finance, and security sectors, accusing them of human rights abuses and corruption.

    Washington has also offered $100 million in humanitarian aid to Cuba, but attached strict conditions requiring the aid be distributed through the Catholic Church and independent non-governmental organizations, completely bypassing the Cuban government. The Trump administration says Cuba has rejected the aid, but Rodríguez countered that Cuba does not refuse assistance offered in good faith, and the most meaningful help the US could provide would be lifting the blockade entirely.

    Unconfirmed intelligence reports published by US news outlet Axios have further escalated tensions, claiming that Cuba holds roughly 300 combat drones and is planning potential strikes on US targets including the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Key West, Florida, and US naval vessels operating in the region. The report also claimed Iranian military advisors are present in Havana, an allegation Cuban officials have dismissed as part of a fabricated pretext for military intervention. Rodríguez has repeatedly emphasized that Cuba “neither threatens nor desires war” but is fully prepared to repel any external aggression.

    Backchannel talks between the two governments were confirmed by both sides in March, but Cuba has so far responded only with formal public condemnation of US actions, characterizing the entire campaign as “collective punishment” of the Cuban people. Two of Cuba’s key international allies, China and Russia, have both spoken out against US actions, with Beijing calling on Washington to end its coercion and threats, and the Kremlin saying the pressure on Cuba “borders on violence.” As the blockade continues and rhetoric hardens on both sides, the Caribbean faces one of its most severe security crises in decades.

  • Cubans grapple with fuel shortages and blackouts as US steps up pressure

    Cubans grapple with fuel shortages and blackouts as US steps up pressure

    Decades after a fateful mid-1990s incident that left four people dead, the shadow of a Cold War-era tragedy has reemerged to roil already strained relations between the United States and Cuba. On Wednesday, U.S. authorities unsealed a grand jury indictment charging former Cuban president Raúl Castro and five other co-defendants with murder over the 1996 shooting down of two civilian aircraft operated by Brothers to the Rescue, a Cuban-American activist group. All four people killed in the incident, including three U.S. citizens, have remained a flashpoint between the two nations for nearly 30 years, and the charges have etched the event back into the collective consciousness of communities in both Havana and Miami.

    The announcement comes amid a sharp escalation of pressure from the Trump administration, which has spent years pushing for a regime change in Cuba. The White House has repeatedly called for broad political and economic overhauls on the island, with publicly stated demands including opening the island’s economy to expanded foreign direct investment and removing Russian and Chinese intelligence assets from Cuban territory. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has framed Cuba as an ongoing national security threat to the U.S., and recently warned that the odds of reaching a peaceful diplomatic breakthrough between the two nations remain “not high.” Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel has already rejected the charges, dismissing them as a baseless political stunt with no legitimate legal standing.

    While global headlines focus on the diplomatic firestorm, most ordinary Cubans on the island have been cut off from the full scope of the news, as the country grapples with crippling 20-hour daily blackouts that have paralyzed daily life. The prolonged power outages stem from a near-total U.S. fuel blockade that has disrupted every sector of the Cuban economy, from public services to residential living. For vulnerable residents of Havana, the crisis has upended basic routines and created life-threatening conditions.

    Seventy-something widow Ana Rosa Romero, a retired philosophy teacher who lives in an 11th-floor apartment in Havana’s iconic Granma Dos social housing complex, knows this hardship firsthand. When her husband passed away recently, a neighborhood blackout left her unable to arrange for his body to be moved for hours, forcing her to sit with his remains alone in the dark. These days, with the building’s elevator out of service more often than it runs, Romero says she barely leaves her small apartment. A 70-year-old woman carrying groceries up 11 flights of unlit stairs faces significant fall risks, and uncertainty hangs over every outing: no one knows when the power will cut out, or how long the blackout will last.

    “ If you do venture out, it’s with the uncertainty of not knowing what’s coming next. When is the power due to go out? When is it coming back? How many hours are we going to be without electricity?” Romero says. A framed portrait of Fidel Castro hangs on her wall, a quiet reminder of the decades of political upheaval and economic pressure her country has already weathered.

    Juana Garcia, the building’s superintendent, says the crisis has hit vulnerable residents the hardest. Nine tenants rely on pacemakers to regulate their heartbeats, and cannot risk being caught in a blackout without power to their devices, or trapped between floors if the elevator cuts out mid-ride. That has forced many to stay confined to their apartments for weeks on end. For six months straight, Garcia has carried or pumped fresh water up multiple flights of dark stairs for more than 100 residents, including bedridden elderly tenants who would go without water entirely without help from neighbors. “It’s dangerous to go up and down these stairs without lights. This is such a difficult situation. We know we’re going through tough times, but it’s sad to see this great building stuck in the darkness,” Garcia said. She holds out hope that the Cuban government will be able to provide solar panels to bring at least small relief to the building’s most vulnerable residents.

    Elsewhere in the capital, in the Barrio Toledo neighborhood, Cuban officials are pushing forward with an innovative small-scale project to address the country’s decades-old acute housing crisis, even amid fuel and power shortages. Around 40 decommissioned shipping containers are being repurposed into fully functional two-bedroom homes, each fitted with a kitchen and bathroom. A dozen of the container units are nearly complete, with exterior shipping company logos still visible on the metal walls and new windows cut into the sides. The development will eventually center on a small community playground and a local corner store, but no residents have moved in yet as work proceeds through ongoing supply constraints.

    Critics warn that the metal structures will trap unbearable heat during Cuba’s hot, humid summer months. But Orlando Diaz, the site’s foreman and a self-identified committed revolutionary, argues the adaptive reuse project is a practical, well-ventilated solution to a critical housing shortage. “This technique is already being used successfully in other countries,” he notes. “We’re just catching up.” Like many Cubans, Diaz plans to join a government-organized march this Friday to show public support for Raúl Castro and reject the U.S. charges. He describes the indictment as a “vile lie,” and points out that Washington never brought charges against late Cuban-American militant Luis Posada Carriles, who Cuba has long accused of orchestrating the 1973 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed 73 people.

    When asked if he believes the indictment could be a precursor to U.S. military action, similar to the January removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces, Diaz is unyielding. “Venezuela is Venezuela, but Cuba is Cuba,” he says defiantly. “And here we don’t lack the necessary courage to face this moment.”

    Back on her 11th-floor balcony, Ana Rosa Romero gazes out across Estadio Latinoamericano, the iconic baseball stadium where just over a decade ago she watched then-President Barack Obama and Raúl Castro sit side by side at an exhibition game, a moment that raised hopes of a long-term thaw in U.S.-Cuba relations. Today, she contemplates the prospect of U.S. military intervention on her island, and speaks with the quiet resolve of a person who has lived through generations of crisis. “At my age, I know I’m going to die in Cuba,” she says matter-of-factly. “We’ve faced so many things over the years. And if now we have to face an invasion, then I guess we’ll face that too.”

  • At least 24 killed in two separate attacks in Honduras

    At least 24 killed in two separate attacks in Honduras

    On Thursday, two shocking acts of violence ripped through different regions of Honduras, leaving a minimum of 24 people dead and sending fresh ripples of concern across the Central American nation already grappling with a generations-long public safety crisis.

    The first and deadliest assault unfolded on a remote ranch located on the outskirts of Trujillo, in northern Honduras. Official reports confirm that at least 19 farm workers were gunned down in the attack. As of Friday morning, the full, final death toll for this incident remains unconfirmed. Edgardo Barahona, spokesperson for Honduras’ National Police, told the Associated Press that family members of the victims had already begun recovering and removing victims’ bodies from the crime scene before forensic teams could complete a full count. In a separate briefing with reporters, Honduran Security Minister Gerzon Velasquez offered a different account to Reuters, suggesting that many bodies were likely carried off by either the attackers’ associates or individuals with criminal connections before law enforcement could secure the site.

    A second, coordinated shooting took place just hours later in Omoa, a small coastal town sitting hard against Honduras’ northern border with Guatemala. Four active-duty police officers and one civilian were killed in this attack. Authorities confirmed the officers were en route to Omoa from the country’s capital, Tegucigalpa, as part of a pre-planned anti-gang operation when they were ambushed.

    To date, no suspects have been taken into custody in connection with either attack. Investigators have not yet established a clear motive for the mass killing of ranch workers in Trujillo, but the region has been a hotspot for simmering, long-running agrarian conflict that has occasionally spilled over into lethal violence for decades.

    In response to the back-to-back attacks, Honduras’ National Police released an official statement announcing that it would launch a “direct intervention” operation in both affected regions to restore order and advance investigations.

    The violence has cast renewed attention on Honduras’ persistent struggle with violent crime, rooted in widespread gang activity and the country’s strategic role in transnational drug trafficking routes between South American producers and North American consumers. While recent years have seen a gradual decline in the national homicide rate, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights still ranks Honduras as holding the second-highest homicide rate in the Americas, outpaced only by one other nation in the region.