标签: North America

北美洲

  • Workers paint Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue

    Workers paint Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool blue

    As the United States prepares to mark its 250th anniversary this summer, a high-profile renovation project at one of Washington D.C.’s most iconic national landmarks has sparked fierce political and ethical debate. Workers have already started applying what former President Donald Trump calls “American Flag Blue” paint to the 2,030-foot Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, a 104-year-old historic site stretching between the Lincoln Memorial and Washington Monument that has suffered from decades of chronic problems: persistent leaks, structural decay, broken plumbing, rampant algae overgrowth, and accumulated bird waste.

    Trump framed the project as a signature beautification effort for the national celebration, pushing back against original renovation proposals that came with a $300 million price tag and a multi-year construction timeline that would have required removing and replacing the pool’s original 1922 granite foundation. In an April video address from the Oval Office, Trump criticized the pool as “filthy, dirty, and it leaked like a sieve for many years”, crediting Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, whose department oversees national monuments, with committing to deliver a solution on his watch.

    Instead of moving forward with the government’s standard procurement process, Trump turned to contractors he had previously hired for private swimming pool renovations, touting a low-cost alternative approach that he claimed would cost only $1.5 million to $2 million. Under the accelerated plan, workers first cleaned the original granite, repaired and regrouted the entire structure over roughly two weeks, and are now applying an industrial-grade pool coating in the custom blue shade selected by Trump. The president has claimed the finished work will eliminate leaks entirely, last 40 to 50 years, and result in a more beautiful pool than the 1922 original, all at a fraction of the originally projected cost.

    However, reporting from The New York Times has revealed the actual contract awarded by the Trump administration came in at $6.9 million – more than three times the president’s public estimate – and was granted as a no-bid agreement using an emergency exemption that skips standard competitive bidding requirements designed to prevent favoritism and waste. The no-bid award has drawn sharp criticism from government watchdog groups, who argue the project bypasses critical legal safeguards to advance what they call a vanity project for the president.

    Tim Whitehouse, executive director of the nonpartisan nonprofit watchdog Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, called the project clear evidence that “the system of checks and balances has broken down in the United States”. He added that Burgum “is dispensing with a variety of legal safeguards to improperly facilitate Trump vanity projects in the nation’s capital”. The BBC has reached out to the White House for official comment on the controversy, as of yet no response has been issued.

    This blue paint renovation is just the latest in a series of controversial changes Trump has advanced in Washington D.C. during his second term. Other projects include a plan to build a 250-foot victory arch on the National Mall, the demolition of the White House East Wing to construct a large new presidential ballroom, and the rebranding of multiple federal and cultural institutions to add Trump’s name to their official titles. While the president frames these changes as upgrades to the nation’s capital that honor American history ahead of the semiquincentennial, critics argue they represent a dangerous concentration of power and the abuse of federal authority for personal political gain. Experts also remain uncertain whether the cosmetic paint renovation will actually address the root structural issues that have plagued the nearly century-old reflecting pool for decades.

  • Iran sends response to US proposals to end war

    Iran sends response to US proposals to end war

    Nearly three months after the United States and Israel launched military strikes against Iran that sparked an open regional conflict, diplomatic efforts have reached a critical juncture: Iranian officials have formally submitted their reply to U.S. peace proposals mediated through Pakistan, according to multiple Iranian state media outlets. As of Sunday evening, neither Tehran nor Washington has released any public details of the response or the original American draft, but reporting from U.S. news outlet Axios has shed light on the framework of the proposal, which is structured as a 14-point memorandum of understanding that paves the way for full negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

    A temporary ceasefire designed to create space for diplomatic talks has been largely upheld since it was implemented in February, though sporadic exchanges of fire have continued across front lines. However, two major punitive measures have kept tensions high and roiled global energy markets: Iran has maintained a total blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical chokepoint for global oil and natural gas trade, while the U.S. Navy has enforced its own blockade of Iranian commercial ports to pressure Tehran to accept Washington’s terms. The American naval embargo has sparked fierce outrage across Iranian leadership.

    Speaking publicly on Sunday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian struck a defiant tone, emphasizing that Tehran would not concede to foreign pressure. “We will never bow our heads before the enemy,” Pezeshkian said in a post to X, clarifying that any willingness to engage in talks does not equate to surrender. “If talk of dialogue or negotiation arises, it does not mean surrender or retreat. Rather, the goal is to uphold the rights of the Iranian nation and to defend national interests with resolute strength.”

    Axios, citing four anonymous sources briefed on the proposal that included two senior U.S. officials, reported the 14-point draft includes core provisions: a permanent suspension of Iranian uranium enrichment, the phased lifting of international sanctions on Tehran’s economy, and the full restoration of unimpeded commercial transit through the Strait of Hormuz. All key terms are contingent on reaching a final binding agreement, the sources added. A senior Iranian lawmaker previously dismissed the American proposal as nothing more than a “wish list” that ignores Tehran’s core red lines.

    Iran has doubled down on its blockade of the strait, which normally carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily traded oil and natural gas supplies. The closure has already driven a sharp spike in global crude prices, and Tehran has issued repeated warnings to neighboring countries and commercial shipping firms that any vessel attempting to cross the strait without prior approval from Iran will face severe consequences. In comments carried by Iran’s official IRNA news agency, military spokesman Mohammad Akraminia dismissed U.S. claims of an effective blockade of Iranian ports, saying “Americans will never be able to turn this vast expanse in the northern Indian Ocean into a real blockade by covering it with their fleet.”

    Tensions have spilled over to neighboring U.S. allies in the Gulf in recent days. On Sunday, the UK Maritime Trade Operations Centre (UKMTO) confirmed that a bulk carrier was struck by an unidentified projectile approximately 23 nautical miles northeast of Doha, Qatar. The attack sparked a small fire on board but caused no reported casualties. Iran’s Fars News Agency later cited an anonymous Iranian source claiming the vessel was flagged to and owned by the United States. Separately on Sunday, Kuwaiti military officials confirmed that unidentified drones entered Kuwaiti airspace, and that forces had “dealt with” the incursion. Hours later, the United Arab Emirates announced its air defense systems had intercepted two drones launched from Iranian territory.

    The U.S. has maintained a large and visible military footprint across the Gulf, with permanent military bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman. U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly predicted a swift end to the conflict, reiterating this week that most global stakeholders understand his core goal of eliminating Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions. In a May 6 post to Truth Social, Trump issued a stark threat to Tehran: if Iran rejects the U.S. proposal, “the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.”

    On Monday, defense ministers from more than 40 countries will gather for a UK-led summit focused on building an international coalition to protect commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz once hostilities end. UK Defense Secretary John Healey will co-chair the meeting alongside his French counterpart Catherine Vautrin, where coalition members are expected to finalize plans for maritime security patrols in the waterway following a potential ceasefire agreement.

  • Suspected boat explosion injures 11 in Miami

    Suspected boat explosion injures 11 in Miami

    A devastating boat explosion at one of Miami’s most frequented recreational destinations has left 11 people hospitalized with serious injuries, and US law enforcement and safety officials have launched a full investigation to pinpoint what caused the blast.

    The incident unfolded on Saturday at Haulover Sandbar, a well-loved shallow-water marina spot that draws thousands of tourists and local boaters every year for its calm, clear waters and accessible on-water gathering space. According to Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Battalion Chief Juan Arias, first responders were dispatched to the area immediately after multiple 911 calls came in reporting a large explosion aboard a private vessel anchored at the sandbar.

    All 11 injured individuals were transported by emergency teams to area medical facilities for treatment of a range of injuries, including severe burns and blunt-force trauma from the blast, Arias confirmed to reporters. As of the latest update, officials have not released any preliminary information on a potential cause, nor have they shared updated details on the current condition of the injured victims.

    Patrick Lee, a local boat charter operator who was on the water near the site of the explosion when it occurred, described the chaotic scene to CBS News, the US news partner of the BBC. “We saw three people fly out of the boat immediately after the blast,” Lee recalled. He added, “I could tell right away it was a really hot, fast-moving fire. It was high-octane gasoline, so it ignited almost instantly. A lot of people got badly burned before anyone could get to them. It was just pure chaos.”

    Footage captured by witnesses at the scene shows an emergency helicopter landing near the adjacent Miami marina, with first responders carrying at least one injured victim on a stretcher to receive urgent medical care. Multiple agencies joined the response effort alongside local fire and rescue teams, including the US Coast Guard and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, which oversees boating safety across the state’s waterways.

    The BBC has reached out to Miami-Dade Fire and Rescue to request additional details on the investigation and the status of the injured, but has not yet received further comment.

  • Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years

    Why Canada is seeing its biggest military recruitment surge in 30 years

    For generations, Canada has been widely regarded as a global underperformer when it comes to defence investment. Just two years ago, recruitment shortfalls grew so severe that a former Canadian defence minister issued a stark warning: the country’s armed forces were caught in an irreversible “death spiral.”

    Today, that narrative is shifting dramatically. The Canadian Armed Forces are now expanding at a pace unmatched in 30 years, posting the largest annual intake of new recruits in three decades, a turnaround that could finally reverse the chronic personnel shortages that have hobbled the military for generations. This surge over the past two years has unfolded against a backdrop of rising global geopolitical tension, with major armed conflicts raging across multiple regions and widespread uncertainty reshaping security calculations around the world. It also comes as the Canadian government has committed tens of billions in new military spending after decades of falling short of its mandatory NATO defence spending obligations.

    This recruitment boom also aligns with a notable uptick in Canadian nationalist sentiment, a shift triggered after former U.S. President Donald Trump’s provocative comment labeling Canada the “51st state” — a remark widely interpreted as a threat to Canadian sovereignty from its closest and most powerful neighbor. According to Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a defense researcher at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, while a so-called “Trump effect” likely contributed to rising enlistment, the spike in military applications actually began in 2022, coinciding directly with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    “When people recognize that the world is no longer as secure as they once believed, and that their own country could face risk, we consistently see more people step forward to join the military,” Duval-Lantoine explained.

    Global instability is far from the only factor driving this surge. Canada’s persistently high youth unemployment rate, which hovered near 14% in March this year, paired with new promises of job security and substantial pay raises following Prime Minister Mark Carney’s announcement of the largest military pay increase in a generation, have also drawn more young people to enlist, Duval-Lantoine added. Since taking office 12 months ago, Carney has centered military expansion and modernization as a core priority of his administration, rolling out what he describes as an “ambitious” roadmap to rapidly grow and upgrade the Canadian Armed Forces.

    In March of this year, Carney announced that Canada had officially hit the NATO target of devoting 2% of its gross domestic product to defence — a milestone the country had not reached since the late 1980s. This year’s defence spending totals more than C$63 billion ($46 billion), and Carney has also committed Canada to the NATO alliance’s new pledge to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. Canada hit the 2% target through a combination of across-the-board salary increases for service members, pledges to purchase new advanced military equipment, upgrades to existing domestic bases, and new infrastructure investments in the Canadian Arctic to strengthen sovereignty claims.

    Even with this surge in new recruits, however, defence analysts caution that the Canadian military still lags far behind many of its key NATO allies, and it will take years for new funding to translate into meaningful operational improvements. Richard Shimooka, a senior defence fellow at the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute public policy think tank, noted that the Canadian Armed Forces currently only have the capacity to deploy a few thousand active soldiers at any given time, alongside a very limited fleet of operational fighter jets. For context, the United Kingdom’s military can deploy 10,000 troops on short notice when required, he said.

    “The Canadian Armed Forces are starting from a very low point right now, and it will take between five and 10 years before we see a real, tangible improvement in operational capability,” Shimooka said. A core underlying reason for this slow pace of progress, he argued, is Canada’s decades-long overreliance on the United States — its southern neighbor and the world’s dominant military power — for collective defence.

    Successive U.S. presidential administrations and senior officials have repeatedly pressured Canada to ramp up defence spending, and critics have long labeled Canada a military “freeloader” that benefits from U.S. security guarantees without contributing its fair share. In 2024, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson publicly accused Canada of “riding on America’s coattails” when it came to defence. Last year, Trump name-checked Canada as one of NATO’s top “low-payers,” telling reporters: “Canada says, ‘Why should we pay when the United States will protect us for free?’”

    Even after hitting the 2% GDP target this year, Canada still ranks among the lowest-spending NATO members when compared to alliance peers, falling behind the U.S., UK and France, according to a 2025 NATO defence report. Still, the sharp rise in new recruits is seen as an early sign that gradual improvement is underway. Canadian Defence Minister David McGuinty says he expects the country to hit its long-term personnel recruitment goals sooner than previously projected.

    The rate of attrition — the share of active service members leaving the military each year — has also dipped slightly, a major reversal from 2024, when then-Defence Minister Bill Blair warned that chronic attrition had pushed the force into a “death spiral.” Active service members deployed on a recent Arctic sovereignty and security operation in Canada’s northern Nunavut territory told reporters the new funding package is widely welcomed, and in many cases, has been decades in the making.

    “We’ve been behind for a couple of decades, but at least we’re finally taking action to fix things now,” said Alden Campbell, a first officer with the Royal Canadian Air Force. Campbell noted that the recent restructuring of military pay has given a major boost to troop morale, as has the government’s promise to deliver long-awaited upgraded equipment. “Hopefully I’ll still be in my career long enough to benefit from these upgrades,” he added.

    In late April, the Canadian military confirmed it had enrolled more than 7,000 new active service members in the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the highest annual recruit total in 30 years. That 7,000 figure only accounts for recruits who completed the full enlistment process; total confirmed eligible applications to the Canadian Armed Forces nearly doubled year-over-year as of February, jumping from 21,700 in 2024-2025 to 40,116 this year, according to data shared by Canada’s Department of National Defence. The total number of people who expressed initial interest in enlistment was far higher, reaching nearly 100,000 over the past 12 months, a massive jump from the 36,000 total applications recorded in 2019-2020.

    Travis Haines, a lieutenant colonel in the Canadian Armed Forces, told reporters he attributes a large share of the recruitment surge to the military’s recent efforts to cut through outdated red tape. For years, the military faced heavy criticism for its slow, bureaucratic application process that left many eligible applicants waiting months for a response. In recent years, the force has digitized key parts of the application process — including allowing electronic submission of required eligibility documents — to drastically cut processing times. “There has always been strong public interest in joining, it was just nearly impossible to get through the old system,” Haines explained.

    Another key policy shift that has expanded the applicant pool is the 2022 change opening enlistment to Canadian permanent residents, not just Canadian citizens. Last year, foreign-born permanent residents made up roughly 20% of all new recruits. Now, Canada is laying the groundwork for a major military expansion, with a long-term target of 85,500 active regular service members and a total mobilization reserve force of up to 300,000. Duval-Lantoine noted that Canada has not pursued a mobilization plan of this scale since 2004, a clear sign the country is adjusting its defence posture in response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, where the role of large-scale military manpower has been a defining feature of the conflict. Like its European NATO allies, Duval-Lantoine said, Canada is “preparing for future conflicts by studying the lessons of the current one.”

  • Frontier Airlines plane hit and killed a person on the runway at Denver airport

    Frontier Airlines plane hit and killed a person on the runway at Denver airport

    Late Friday night, a fatal incident unfolded at Denver International Airport (DIA) when a Frontier Airlines commercial flight bound for Los Angeles International Airport struck and killed an unauthorized individual who had illegally accessed an active runway, United States aviation and transportation authorities confirmed.

    According to official statements from the airport, the unidentified person — who is not an airport employee, and has not yet been named by investigators — scaled DIA’s perimeter security fence roughly two minutes before walking onto the runway where Flight was beginning its takeoff roll around 23:00 local time (06:00 UTC+1 BST). A preliminary inspection of the fence after the incident found the main structure to remain fully intact, DIA officials added.

    Unsealed air traffic control audio from the incident reveals that moments after a controller cleared the flight for departure and wished the crew a good night, the pilot immediately radioed the tower to report a collision and an ongoing emergency. “We’re stopping on the runway,” the pilot told controllers. “We just hit somebody. We have an engine fire.” The pilot later confirmed there had been a person walking across the active runway as the aircraft accelerated to takeoff speed. U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy confirmed the plane was traveling at high speed at the time of the impact.

    The collision sparked a small engine fire that was rapidly extinguished by responding Denver Fire Department crews, per airport officials. Passengers reported visible smoke filling the aircraft cabin in videos and photos shared with CBS News, the BBC’s U.S. partner, which also showed visible damage including what appears to be blood on the affected engine.

    As a standard precautionary measure, all 224 passengers and crew on board were immediately evacuated via the plane’s deployed inflatable emergency slides. Once evacuated, passengers were transported by bus back to the main airport terminal. Twelve passengers sustained minor injuries related to the emergency evacuation, with five individuals transported to local medical facilities for evaluation and treatment. Most passengers have since re-booked onto alternate Frontier Airlines flights and departed Denver as planned, airport authorities confirmed.

    Both Frontier Airlines and DIA have released statements expressing profound sorrow over the fatal event. “We are deeply saddened by this event,” a Frontier spokesperson said. DIA’s official statement echoed that sentiment, noting: “We are extremely saddened by this incident and express our sympathies to those involved.” Secretary Duffy emphasized that runway trespassing poses unacceptable risk to all parties, saying: “No one should EVER trespass on an airport.”

    The active runway involved in the incident has been temporarily closed while two leading U.S. aviation safety agencies — the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board — conduct a full on-site investigation to determine the full timeline and circumstances of the event.

  • The UFO community has been waiting for answers. Has the Pentagon delivered?

    The UFO community has been waiting for answers. Has the Pentagon delivered?

    On a historic Friday marked by decades of speculation and demand for transparency, the U.S. government made its first public release of a collection of previously classified documents centered on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), commonly known as UFOs. The 162-document trove, which includes firsthand witness reports, declassified military memos dating back decades, and documentation from the Apollo Moon missions, drew intense attention from long-time UFO enthusiasts and casual observers alike, all waiting for answers about what may lie beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

    The release was quickly celebrated by former President Donald J. Trump, who framed the move as a break from decades of government secrecy. Writing on his Truth Social platform following the public launch of the document portal, Trump noted that prior administrations had failed to deliver transparency on the topic, adding, “the people can decide for themselves, ‘WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?’ Have Fun and Enjoy!”

    The U.S. Department of War launched a dedicated public website to host the declassified files, taking an unusual approach that offers raw material without official analysis or conclusions. In a statement posted alongside the archive, the department acknowledged the massive scope of the declassification effort, announcing that additional materials would be released in periodic tranches every few weeks as they are processed and cleared for public release. The website explicitly notes that all documents posted are unresolved cases, meaning the government has not reached a definitive conclusion on the origin or nature of the reported phenomena. It also called on private sector researchers and experts to contribute their own analysis and information to help unpack the materials.

    For people across the U.S. who have spent decades following UAP research and chasing answers to personal and family connections to sightings, the release marked a long-awaited milestone, even if it delivered no earth-shattering revelations. Elaine Loperena, a 69-year-old grandmother from Clovis, California, has waited for answers since she was a child, when her mother spotted a UFO hovering above while hanging laundry to dry. As an administrator of a large UAP-focused Facebook group, Loperena has seen public interest surge dramatically in recent years: when she joined the group three years ago, it had roughly 40,000 members, and it has now grown to nearly 100,000, with most of the growth coming in just the last few months.

    Loperena called the release a major step forward in the push for full disclosure, crediting Trump for moving the process forward after years of inaction from previous White House administrations. She noted that growing numbers of former military personnel and insiders have come forward with firsthand accounts, even on their deathbeds, making it impossible for the government to continue hiding information indefinitely. “The snowball is getting bigger,” she said, expressing hope that Friday’s release is just the first of many. She also emphasized that any full final disclosure should be bipartisan to overcome U.S. political divides and build public trust in the information released.

    Similar cautious optimism was shared by figures in Texas’s active UFO research community. John Erik Ege, a Texas-based therapist who has been a UAP “experiencer” since childhood and serves as regional director for the Texas chapter of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), called the release “a move in the right direction.” While he noted that most of the material released has been widely known among UFO enthusiasts for years, with no new bombshells or concrete evidence of extraterrestrial bodies or contact, he remains hopeful that future releases will bring more clarity. “I don’t think they’re trying to hide anything,” Ege said, adding that he believes Trump is unique among modern presidents in being willing to push forward with disclosure despite potential pushback.

    Daniel Jones, a 36-year-old Texas musician and fellow administrator of the Texas UFO Network’s 25,000-member Facebook page, who got engaged last year at a UFO festival, echoed that sentiment. He said he never expected the first batch of files to contain major revelations, but welcomed the release as a step toward greater government accountability and transparency for the general public, not just the existing UAP research community. “This first batch of files wasn’t, more than likely, going to contain anything extremely substantial,” Jones said, “but I’m hopeful to see more definition on the part of the government” in upcoming releases.

    Not all reactions to the release were positive, however. A small but vocal segment of the UAP community remains skeptical of the government’s motives. Ege noted that roughly 20 percent of active community members believe the release is a false flag effort designed to distract from other issues, stemming from a deep lack of trust in official institutions. Some skeptics within the community went further, criticizing the quality of the materials released. One prominent contributor to a major UAP discussion group noted that many of the released images are heavily compressed, distorted, or lack critical context or scale to identify what is being shown, with some images being reconstructed overlays based on witness testimony rather than original raw imagery of unknown objects. “That is not the same thing as releasing compelling evidence,” the contributor wrote, adding that the release “feels more like theater than disclosure.”

    Even with the mixed reactions, Loperena and other long-time enthusiasts remain optimistic that full disclosure is coming, and that more definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life will eventually be made public. They acknowledge that even with full official disclosure, there will always be naysayers who demand direct, personal proof. “You’re always going to have the naysayers,” Loperena said. “Some of those, it’s going to take an ET to show up and, you know, ask for dinner.” For now, the UAP community is waiting eagerly for the next tranche of declassified files, expected in the coming weeks.

  • The race against time to find eagles escaped from Dollywood

    The race against time to find eagles escaped from Dollywood

    A multi-day, community-wide search is underway across East Tennessee’s Smoky Mountains to track down three non-releasable bald eagles that escaped one of the nation’s most respected raptor sanctuaries after a severe storm damaged their enclosure. The breakout, which occurred two weeks prior to the ongoing search, has highlighted the decades-long conservation success story built by country music icon Dolly Parton and the American Eagle Foundation (AEF) at Dollywood, the Pigeon Forge theme park Parton co-owns.

    The incident unfolded when a powerful storm toppled a 100-year-old deciduous tree directly through the netting of the sanctuary’s main enclosure, allowing the three eagles—Rockland, Caesar, and Wesley—to slip away. Unlike the 185 bald eagles the sanctuary has successfully rehabilitated and released into the wild over the past 35 years, all three escapees have permanent disabilities that leave them unable to survive independently in the wild. Rockland lives with a displaced wing that limits his flight range, Wesley has a chronic shoulder injury that restricts movement, and all three have grown accustomed to human care, leaving them ill-equipped to forage for food or avoid natural hazards on their own.

    Immediately after the escape, the AEF issued a public call for sightings, asking community members to watch for the birds’ unique colored leg bands: orange for both Rockland and Caesar, and black for Wesley, the only female of the three. The response was overwhelming, with tips pouring in from as far away as Indiana, Virginia, and Georgia, though the most credible reports have placed the birds within the Smoky Mountains region. Last weekend, search teams successfully recovered Caesar after a local tip led them to a rural pasture, where an experienced avian specialist was able to capture the exhausted bird.

    The search for Rockland intensified the following day, with teams of law enforcement officers, AEF executives, and avian specialists trekking through mountain terrain for hours in pursuit of the injured bird. Sightings carried teams from a downtown hotel to a residential neighborhood across town, but Rockland managed to elude capture twice, soaring away before teams could approach. “The advantage those little stinkers have, that we don’t, is they can take off,” one search member wryly noted of the evasive raptor. As of the latest update, both Rockland and Wesley remain at large, with search crews continuing to follow every credible tip.

    The escape has pulled back the curtain on a 35-year conservation partnership that transformed bald eagle protection in the United States. The Dollywood Eagle Mountain Sanctuary, which opened in 1991, is now the world’s largest sanctuary for non-releasable bald eagles, welcoming more than 3 million park visitors annually for educational programming and daily flying demonstrations. The partnership grew out of a promise AEF chairman James Rogers made decades earlier, after spotting a rare bald eagle on a fishing trip in Florida when the species was still listed as endangered. “I made a silent promise that I would do what I could to keep the bird from becoming extinct, so future generations could see them,” Rogers recalled.

    Rogers, a longtime musician who wrote the 1973 eagle conservation anthem *Fly, Eagle, Fly*, approached Parton with the idea for the sanctuary, and she immediately embraced the project. “I don’t think it ever would have happened if she hadn’t supported it,” Rogers said. “She thought it was a beautiful idea, because it was pure Americana. The eagle isn’t a Republican or a Democrat—it’s our national symbol.” Parton’s longstanding ties to eagle conservation include being honored by the federal government in 2003 for her work, and she even named her 31st studio album *Eagle When She Flies* the year the sanctuary opened.

    Decades of conservation work, paired with national environmental protections like the Clean Water Act and restrictions on the pesticide DDT—once the leading cause of bald eagle population decline, thanks to severe eggshell thinning—led to the bald eagle being removed from the endangered species list in 2007. Wildlife biologists call the recovery of the bald eagle one of the nation’s most underappreciated conservation success stories. “It takes decades for environmental protections to show population-level results, but now we’re seeing bald eagles return to landscapes where they’d disappeared,” explained Michael Patrick Ward, a wildlife biology professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “Every released eagle that goes on to breed for 15 or 20 years makes a huge difference.”

    Even as the search for the two remaining eagles continues, AEF CEO Lori Moore says the incident has brought an unexpected silver lining: it has gotten ordinary citizens looking up at the sky, engaging with conservation, and uniting around a common goal. “In a time that our country is a little divided, having something—even if it’s just looking for our national symbol—to unite us all, you can tell people are doing it from the heart,” Moore said. “They are genuinely concerned, as we are. That part of it has been incredibly heartwarming for us.” Many members of the public reported being excited just to spot any bald eagle during their search, with one man contacting the foundation with a cracking voice to say he had never seen a bald eagle in the wild before.

    Search teams remain hopeful that they will recover Rockland and Wesley safe and sound, with Rogers saying the entire team is on edge waiting for the next credible tip. “It just makes you want to cry because you’re afraid he’s going to tangle with something he shouldn’t and get hurt,” Rogers said of Rockland. “Any time we get a truly viable lead, the excitement gets really high—adrenaline starts flowing, because we know we might have a chance to bring our bird home.”

  • Watch: Declassified footage shows ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’

    Watch: Declassified footage shows ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’

    Newly declassified video footage capturing what U.S. officials term “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” commonly known as UFOs, has been released to the public, bringing fresh attention to long-running questions about unexplained aerial sightings across the globe. The declassified material, which documents multiple encounters with objects that do not match known aircraft or natural atmospheric phenomena, has reignited public curiosity about potential extraterrestrial activity and gaps in current government knowledge of airspace activity.

    Following the release of the footage, U.S. government agencies confirmed that after comprehensive analysis of the video and related reports from pilots, defense personnel and civilian observers, they have not reached a definitive conclusion about the nature and origin of the events captured on camera. Multiple sightings of these unidentified objects have been recorded in regions across the world, with many documented near sensitive military training areas and commercial flight routes, prompting ongoing review by national security teams.

    The release of the declassified footage marks a continued shift toward greater transparency from the U.S. government regarding UAP investigations, which were largely shrouded in secrecy for decades. While no conclusive evidence of extraterrestrial visitation has been confirmed to date, the lack of a definitive identification has led to ongoing calls for more rigorous, public research into the phenomena to better understand potential risks to national security and advance scientific knowledge.

  • Hovering objects and flashing lights: what we learned from UFO documents released by the Pentagon

    Hovering objects and flashing lights: what we learned from UFO documents released by the Pentagon

    In a historic move aligned with a presidential directive, the U.S. Pentagon has publicly released 161 declassified documents detailing decades of reported unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) — more commonly known as UFOs — spanning sightings from Earth-bound civilians to Apollo astronauts walking on the surface of the moon. Additional files are expected to be made public in the coming months.

    The disclosure, posted Friday to the Department of Defense’s official website, came at the direction of President Donald Trump, who ordered the release earlier this year after noting overwhelming public curiosity around the topic of extraterrestrial life. Trump first announced his plan to declassify the full cache of UAP-related records after growing public pressure for greater federal transparency, a conversation that gained new momentum following comments made by former President Barack Obama in a February interview.

    During that interview, Obama sparked global headlines when he referenced that aliens are “real, but I haven’t seen them.” He later walked back the provocative statement, clarifying that while statistical probability suggests extraterrestrial life could exist elsewhere in the universe, he never encountered any confirmed evidence of alien visitors during his time in office. Within weeks of Obama’s comments, Trump formally instructed the Pentagon to declassify all records related to UAP, UFOs and potential extraterrestrial life.

    The newly released tranche of documents includes decades of internal military memoranda, civilian witness reports, mission transcripts from NASA’s iconic Apollo program, declassified audio recordings, and military footage captured across the globe. Notably, the files contain previously secret communications from three of NASA’s successful moon landing missions in the 1960s and 1970s, all of which document unexplained sightings by astronauts on the lunar surface and in lunar orbit.

    Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin, the second person to walk on the moon, described a puzzling bright light source during his 1969 mission, according to a 1969 interview included in the release. Aldrin told interviewers the object was bright enough to stand out against the black backdrop of space, and the crew initially tentatively attributed it to a possible laser transmission from Earth.

    For Apollo 12, which landed on the moon later in 1969, astronaut Alan Bean reported seeing tiny particles and flashes of light “sailing off in space” that appeared to be “escaping the Moon” from his vantage point on the surface. Apollo 17 astronaut Jack Schmitt, who walked on the moon during the 1972 final mission of the Apollo program, similarly described a display of flashing lights so striking he compared it to a Fourth of July fireworks display. The crew of Apollo 17 ultimately hypothesized the lights could have been reflections from stray fragments of ice, but the observation remains formally unconfirmed.

    The records also date back further than the Apollo program: a 1965 audio recording from the Gemini 7 spaceflight captures astronaut Frank Boman reporting an unidentified object, which he called a “bogey,” alongside “trillions of little particles” floating to the left of his spacecraft to NASA mission control.

    Beyond space missions, the declassified files include dozens of civilian sighting reports collected across decades. One 1957 report to the FBI details a civilian witness account of a large, circular craft rising from the ground, while more recent interviews from 2023 include multiple accounts from U.S. residents describing hovering metal objects that emerged suddenly from bright light. The Pentagon also published previously unreleased 2022 military footage captured in multiple locations across the Middle East, including Iraq, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates, that the DoD labels as “unresolved unidentified anomalous phenomenon.” One clip, filmed at an undisclosed Middle Eastern location, shows an oval-shaped object moving rapidly from left to right across the frame, with the accompanying incident report flagging it as a “possible missile” that was never formally identified.

    Reaction to the release has split along political lines, even among members of the Republican Party who have long pushed for greater UAP transparency. Congressman Tim Burchett of Tennessee, a leading GOP advocate for UAP disclosure, praised the release in a post on X, calling it a “great start” toward greater government openness. Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, another transparency advocate, similarly called the disclosure “a massive first step in the right direction.”

    Not all political figures welcomed the move, however. Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a once-close ally of Trump who has since split with the president and left Congress, argued the disclosure was a deliberate distraction from far more urgent issues facing American voters, including persistent price inflation and ongoing conflict in Iran. “I’m so sick of the ‘look at the shiny object’ propaganda,” Greene wrote in a post on X.

    The release comes amid a years-long resurgence of public and congressional interest in UAP in the United States. In 2022, Congress held the first formal hearings on UFOs in more than half a century, and the U.S. military has repeatedly committed to increasing transparency around unexplained sightings reported by military personnel and pilots.

  • Trump claiming Iran war ‘win’ – here’s the reality

    Trump claiming Iran war ‘win’ – here’s the reality

    Two full months have passed since the outbreak of open conflict between the United States and Iran, and the core justifications Washington initially laid out for launching military operations, along with its stated minimum benchmarks for declaring victory, have collapsed into incoherence. The confusion has grown so severe that senior US officials now claim the conflict already ended in an American victory nearly a month ago, when a temporary ceasefire took effect.

    Few examples illustrate the utter failure of Donald Trump’s catastrophic Iran war more starkly than the remarks Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered to reporters on May 5. Rubio told press that Washington’s top remaining priority was restoring the Strait of Hormuz to its pre-war status: open to all commercial traffic, free of naval mines, and unburdened by unauthorized transit fees. This mission, he insisted, was a standalone defensive and humanitarian operation, one that would only escalate back to full war if US vessels came under direct attack. That same day, US ships were targeted. What Rubio failed to acknowledge was the glaring contradiction: the humanitarian operation he touted was only necessary because of the same war he had already declared a success.

    The day’s absurdities did not end there. Within hours of Rubio’s briefing, Trump announced he was suspending “Project Freedom” — the US Navy’s planned tanker escort mission through the strait — just one day after it launched. The president cited “great progress” toward a negotiated settlement with Iran. In a pattern that has repeated throughout the conflict, global stock markets initially rallied on the news of a potential breakthrough before retreating to previous levels as the lack of concrete progress became clear.

    While there is no question Trump is eager to put the disastrous war behind him, especially ahead of his scheduled May 14 trip to Beijing, he has vastly overstated the scale of any diplomatic breakthrough. All Iran has agreed to do is consider a 14-point framework for 30 days of negotiations aimed at reaching a durable end to hostilities — nothing more.

    A far more credible explanation for Trump’s sudden cancellation of Project Freedom is that the initiative was already clearly doomed to fail. Of the roughly 1,500 commercial vessels stranded on either side of the closed strait, most ship owners refused to risk transit even with US naval protection. Meanwhile, Iran’s retaliatory strikes on commercial shipping and missile attacks against the United Arab Emirates had already put the fragile ceasefire itself at serious risk.

    Washington faces a core bargaining obstacle: Iran has made clear that talks cannot formally begin, and the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen, unless Trump first agrees to lift the economic blockade on Iranian maritime trade. The US embargo has already inflicted severe damage on the Iranian economy, and Tehran views its removal as a logical reciprocal gesture to match any opening of the strait. Iranian leaders also recognize that the prolonged closure of the strait — one of the world’s most critical energy and trade chokepoints — is already causing lasting structural damage to the global economy, a reality that strengthens their negotiating hand dramatically.

    Even if formal negotiations get underway, the same fundamental barrier that blocked a deal before the war still stands. Trump lacks the disciplined, well-resourced institutional policy framework that Barack Obama relied on to negotiate the 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal, the agreement Trump has long sought to surpass. Obama’s landmark deal required 20 months of intensive, detailed diplomacy to finalize; Trump has neither the patience, technical policy expertise, nor established direct diplomatic channels to replicate that achievement.

    The war has also introduced new layers of uncertainty. Iran’s internal decision-making process has grown more fragmented, and hardline elites who tolerate higher levels of military and economic pressure have gained greater influence. Most importantly, Iran has now fully recognized the extraordinary leverage it holds through its ability to shut down a critical artery of the global economy.

    On the core issue of Iran’s nuclear program, any eventual agreement will likely be a messy compromise. Iran could agree to a temporary moratorium on uranium enrichment, without committing immediately to shipping its existing stockpiles of enriched uranium out of the country or diluting them — a fudge that would allow negotiations to continue. If relatively more moderate factions in Tehran gain the upper hand (a very large if), this would be a straightforward concession to make: Iran’s geographic advantages and advanced ballistic missile program already provide a credible deterrent against any future large-scale attack.

    The open question remains whether anything short of total Iranian surrender on the nuclear issue will be acceptable to Trump, and whether he is willing to push back against inevitable fierce opposition from Israel to blurring Washington’s stated red lines. If no compromise can be reached, Trump has already threatened to resume bombing campaigns at a far higher intensity than before. Yet analysts widely doubt Trump has the political appetite for a renewed escalation, and even if he does move forward, there is little reason to believe that any amount of US and Israeli bombing can force the Iranian regime into total capitulation.

    Trump’s constantly shifting war aims and frantic scramble for an exit strategy make one conclusion unavoidable: the entire US military enterprise in Iran has been a colossal strategic failure. The war will shape Trump’s political legacy, reorder the balance of power in the Middle East, and deepen the humanitarian suffering of the Iranian people — all outcomes that are the exact opposite of what Trump repeatedly promised to deliver.

    The conflict has also shattered confidence among Washington’s regional allies in the US government’s ability to provide security and predictability. It has alienated long-standing traditional US partners, who have been blamed and punished for failing to resolve a crisis they did not create and could not fix. The combined US and Israeli military campaign has further entrenched hardline rule in Iran, made future negotiation far more difficult, and completely sidelined moderate political voices within the country.

    If negotiations do ultimately succeed, the limited gains that Trump and his advisors have touted — the destruction of portions of Iran’s military industry and naval fleet — are technically real. But the damage to military industrial capacity will likely only be temporary, and the degradation of Iran’s navy has done nothing to meaningfully restore freedom of navigation through the strait.

    The only bright spot in this saga is that Trump’s brief experiment with unilateral military adventurism — an aberration even within his own inconsistent political trajectory — appears to be coming to an end. This analysis is by Christian Emery, Associate Professor of International Politics at UCL, republished with permission from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.