标签： Europe

On Wednesday, as Russian President Vladimir Putin prepared to open his country’s flagship annual international economic forum in St. Petersburg, Ukrainian forces launched a wave of long-range drone attacks that penetrated hundreds of kilometers into Russian territory, striking multiple key targets including a coastal oil terminal in the city. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed the attack in a social media statement, noting that the drones successfully traveled more than 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) to reach their target. Footage and on-the-ground reports showed thick plumes of black smoke billowing from the oil terminal near St. Petersburg’s port area following the strike.

Russian official confirmation of the attack was limited, with authorities only acknowledging that the strike targeted civilian infrastructure in the city. In response to the incursion, St. Petersburg’s main airport temporarily halted all flight operations overnight, and local mobile internet services were temporarily shut down as a security precaution.

The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, which Putin is scheduled to address on Friday, has long been framed by the Kremlin as a major prestige event designed to showcase Russia’s global economic standing amid mounting international isolation. Since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than four years ago, however, all major Western business leaders and government officials have boycotted the gathering. This year, Saudi Arabia holds the position of special guest and is set to dispatch a large business delegation to the event.

The brazen attack on St. Petersburg marks a fresh political embarrassment for Putin, coming just weeks after he was forced to drastically scale back Moscow’s annual Victory Day military parade over widespread security concerns about potential Ukrainian drone strikes on the capital.

Wednesday’s wave of Ukrainian strikes was launched just 24 hours after Russian forces carried out a massive, widespread assault across Ukraine using a combination of drones and cruise missiles. That attack killed at least 22 civilians and left 138 others injured, carrying out Moscow’s stated threat to ramp up regular long-range barrages against Ukrainian targets.

After more than four years of full-scale conflict, the front line across eastern and southern Ukraine has remained largely static, with both sides relying heavily on swarms of drones that have slowed large-scale troop movements and stalled major offensives. To break the stalemate, both Moscow and Kyiv have increasingly turned to long-range strike operations to gain strategic leverage over their opponent.

For Ukraine, these strikes on Russian energy and industrial infrastructure serve two core strategic goals: cutting into revenue from Russian oil production, which remains the single largest source of funding for Moscow’s war machine, and disrupting Russian manufacturing facilities that produce weapons and military equipment. Zelenskyy noted that Ukraine has repeatedly targeted oil and port facilities in the St. Petersburg region and surrounding coastal areas in recent months.

Beyond the St. Petersburg oil terminal, Zelenskyy confirmed that overnight strikes also hit two additional high-value targets: the Kronstadt naval base, a historic installation that serves the Russian Baltic Fleet, and a weapons manufacturing plant located in Russia’s Tambov region, roughly 600 kilometers (370 miles) northeast of the Ukrainian border.

Russia’s Defense Ministry reported that its air defense systems intercepted and downed a total of 354 Ukrainian drones launched during the overnight wave of attacks across multiple Russian regions.

The cross escalation of strikes also resulted in civilian casualties on both sides. In Russia-occupied portions of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk region, a Ukrainian strike hit a civilian bus traveling from Moscow to Crimea. Denis Pushilin, the Kremlin-appointed head of the occupation administration, reported that the attack killed seven people and injured 11 others. In Russia’s western Smolensk region, regional governor Vasily Anokhin said a Ukrainian drone strike killed two responding firefighters and wounded two other firefighters plus one local civilian.

On the Ukrainian side, Ukraine’s Air Force reported that Russia launched 198 long-range attack drones at Ukrainian targets overnight, with Ukrainian air defenses successfully intercepting and neutralizing 189 of the incoming weapons. In Ukraine’s northern Sumy region, local authorities confirmed that Russian strikes over the preceding 24 hours killed one civilian and injured 15 more, including three children. In the southern Kherson region, overnight Russian shelling and drone attacks killed an 86-year-old civilian woman and wounded five other residents, according to regional officials.

With both sides continuing to escalate long-range attacks and no diplomatic negotiations underway to end the conflict, the war now stretching into its fifth year shows no sign of a near-term resolution.

A fatal drone strike targeting a passenger bus traveling through a Russia-occupied portion of Ukraine has left seven people dead and 11 others wounded, according to a Moscow-appointed regional official. The attack unfolded in the early hours of Wednesday, when the bus—en route from Moscow to Simferopol, the main city in Russian-annexed Crimea—was hit, stated Denis Pushilin, the Kremlin-installed head of Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk region.

The bus strike comes just 24 hours after a large-scale Russian air offensive against multiple cities across Ukraine claimed at least 22 lives, among them several women and children. In simultaneous overnight developments, Russian defense officials claimed that air defense systems downed more than 350 Ukrainian drones launched across multiple occupied and Russian territories.

Among the intercepted drones, at least 50 were shot down over Leningrad Oblast, a region in northwest Russia that includes St. Petersburg, according to regional governor Alexander Drozdenko. This interception comes as St. Petersburg prepares to open the annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) Wednesday, a flagship event designed to project Russia’s global standing and economic openness to the international community.

Event organizers confirm that delegations from over 130 countries and territories are scheduled to attend the forum, including high-profile attendees such as Chinese Vice-President Han Zheng, and the sitting presidents of Uzbekistan and Tanzania. The exchange of cross-border attacks comes amid an ongoing stalemate in the Russia-Ukraine war, with both sides ramping up drone and missile strikes on each other’s territory in recent months. A photo of a Ukrainian-manufactured Vampire heavy bomber drone, taken last month, accompanies this report, distributed via Getty Images.

Five years into Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Russian state remains unapologetic in its prosecution of the war, with President Vladimir Putin doubling down on his commitment to achieve Moscow’s stated aims even as the originally planned short operation has devolved into a grinding, costly stalemate.

The defining posture of modern Russia in 2026 is best captured by a blunt remark from popular folk singer Nadezhda Babkina, who, after receiving a state honor from Putin at the Kremlin, declared that Russia’s multi-ethnic national unity would never allow surrender, adding “Anyone who doesn’t like that can go and poison themselves.” That uncompromising tone echoes longstanding messaging from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who once framed Russia as unashamed of its identity and actions on the global stage – a description that fits Putin himself, who has never expressed remorse for ordering the 2022 invasion and shows no intention of halting military operations.

Just ahead of this year’s St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russia’s flagship event designed to attract global investment and showcase the country to international audiences, Moscow launched another massive wave of missile and drone strikes across Ukrainian territory. While high-profile Western investors and political figures abandoned the forum years ago, organizers claim delegations from more than 130 countries and territories are still set to attend. Even so, a years-long active war on a neighboring country is hardly an ideal selling point for a nation courting foreign capital – a contradiction that does little to shift Moscow’s behavior.

Putin’s public demands remain unchanged: he continues to insist Ukraine cede full control of the entire Donbas region to Russia. What has shifted, however, is Moscow’s earlier high hopes for a favorable peace deal brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump. Last year, following the Anchorage summit between Trump and Putin, senior Russian officials repeatedly praised the so-called “spirit of Anchorage”, suggesting the two leaders had reached a mutually beneficial understanding that would force Kyiv to accept Moscow’s maximalist terms. Today, that optimism has faded: Putin’s top foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov recently told Russian state television he has never used the phrase, a quiet signal that the once-touted diplomatic breakthrough has all but evaporated.

That dashed hope is one of many factors fueling Putin’s growing frustration. What was planned as a quick, short-term “special military operation” has become a bloody war of attrition entering its fifth year, leaving Russia with massive battlefield casualties, deep economic damage from sweeping international sanctions, and eroded technological capacity. The conflict has increasingly moved into Russian territory as well: Ukrainian drones now regularly strike deep inside the country, targeting key energy infrastructure including oil refineries. A large-scale drone attack on the Moscow region last month exposed gaps in the capital’s air defense network, prompting officials to scale back the iconic annual 9 May Victory Day parade on Red Square amid security fears. Sanctions and prolonged war have also strained Russia’s public finances, with a growing budget deficit and stagnant economic output becoming persistent problems.

Rather than drawing down military operations to address these challenges, the Kremlin has opted for escalation, as demonstrated by the recent large-scale air raids on Ukrainian cities. Moscow frames the escalation as a response to a Ukrainian strike on a building in Starobilsk, a city in occupied eastern Ukraine, which Russia says was a student dormitory that left 21 dead. Ukraine confirms it targeted the headquarters of Russia’s elite Rubicon drone unit in the area but has not confirmed whether the building matched the one Russia identified.

As Putin prepares to address delegates at the St Petersburg forum – a traditional venue for him to lay out his worldview and criticize the West – there is no indication he will use the speech to signal any shift in Russia’s position on the war. That said, faint signs of a growing domestic debate over the future of the conflict have begun to emerge, even within Russia’s tightly controlled media ecosystem.

Writing in *Russia In Global Affairs*, a journal closely tied to Russia’s foreign policy establishment, prominent political scientist Vasily Kashin recently concluded that the core goal of removing the current Ukrainian government is fundamentally unachievable at this stage without a long-term full military occupation of the entire country – a step that is technically out of Russia’s reach. Other Russian commentators have echoed similar uncertainty: pro-Kremlin tabloid *Moskovsky Komsomolets* quoted political analyst Alexander Nosovich noting that the expert community is split, with one camp pushing to continue the war until all stated goals are met and the other arguing it is time to end the conflict, warning that the worst outcome is not defeat, but an endless open-ended war.

In a striking break from the dominant narrative that frames Russia as a nation defined by victory, lawyer Dmitry Krasnov argued in the same outlet that throughout Russian history, lost wars and humiliating truces have often paved the way for critical reforms, breakthroughs and eventual future victories, suggesting major geopolitical setbacks can sometimes be more useful than military triumphs. When reporters attempted to access the article online days later, it had been removed, with a 404 access denied error appearing. While a limited public discourse over the war is emerging, it still operates within clear, strict boundaries set by the Kremlin.

With no shift in Putin’s position and no diplomatic breakthrough on the horizon, an end to the devastating conflict remains as distant as ever.

For nearly a week ahead of the attack, Ukrainians in Kyiv braced for what they knew could be the largest assault on their capital in months. Russian officials had openly threatened to intensify strikes against the city, prompting tens of thousands to seek nightly refuge in underground shelters.

Reporters on the ground described being two levels below the city surface when the first blasts shook the ground, the thunder of explosions echoing through the concrete tunnels. Following the initial missile barrage came Iranian-made drones, some deployed to scout the damage from the first wave, others packed with additional explosives. A second round of missile strikes hit not long after.

Kyiv’s metro system, which has doubled as a massive civilian bomb shelter since the start of the full-scale invasion, reported a new post-invasion record for overnight occupancy: more than 41,000 people, including nearly 4,500 children, crammed into its underground stations and tunnels to ride out the attack.

While Russian officials consistently claim their military operations exclusively target military infrastructure, this assault followed a familiar pattern seen across dozens of prior strikes: civilian neighborhoods and infrastructure bore the brunt of the damage. When residents emerged from their shelters at dawn, they found their once-familiar communities turned into scenes of chaos and destruction. Shattered window glass crunched underfoot, and parked cars were reduced to unrecognizable, charred piles of twisted metal.

The human cost of the assault was steep across the country. In Kyiv alone, at least six civilians were killed in the overnight attack. The deadliest toll came in the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro, where two residential apartment blocks were directly hit, killing at least 16 people. Across Kyiv and Dnipro, more than 90 people were admitted to hospitals with injuries. In Kharkiv, a northeastern city that has faced near-constant bombardment for two years, Russian strikes targeted energy facilities and civilian infrastructure, leaving 10 people injured including one child. Multiple other regions across Ukraine also reported targeted strikes.

In Vynohradar, a typically quiet residential suburb of Kyiv, the aftermath of the attack left a landscape of complete devastation. High-rise apartment blocks had every window blown out, burnt-out car husks lined the sidewalks, and a thick haze of dust and smoke hung over the neighborhood. Local residents reported hearing at least three massive detonations in the space of an hour, and multiple neighbors were evacuated to area hospitals with critical injuries.

Anna, a Vynohradar resident who lives in a nine-story apartment building just steps from one blast site, lost her car in the attack. But as she spoke to reporters through tears, she made clear the damage went far deeper than physical property.

“They can repair the building, but they cannot fix our souls,” she said. “The whole building, the whole of Ukraine, is grieving. What did we ever do to deserve this?”

In the hours after the last strike, a massive coordinated response sprung into action to clear debris and support displaced and traumatized residents. Rescue teams went door to door near the blast sites checking for casualties and trapped residents, while government-provided mental health counselors worked one-on-one with shell-shocked, tearful locals. Volunteer organizations distributed free hot meals and bottled water to residents who could not return to their damaged homes. Police cordoned off damaged high-rises to keep civilians away from falling glass and unstable structural elements.

Near a destroyed children’s activity center, local teenage boys joined municipal workers to clear rubble, the faded purple butterflies painted on the building’s remaining broken window panes still visible through the dust.

Even on a day marked by massive destruction, life in Kyiv quickly began returning to its new normal. Just a block away from Anna’s damaged apartment building, two small children played on a neighborhood swing set, pausing every few minutes to stare at the chaos of rescue work unfolding down the street. Further from the blast zone, road crews laid new asphalt on a city street and public buses ran on their regular schedules, as if the deadly attack that unfolded just kilometers away was just another part of daily life in wartime.

This quiet resilience has become Kyiv’s defining response to the full-scale invasion: no matter how heavy the damage, no matter how great the loss, the city carries on with its daily routines, refusing to be broken by constant bombardment.