标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Man City consider legal action after Haaland claim

    Man City consider legal action after Haaland claim

    As Real Madrid prepares to hold its first contested presidential election in two decades this Sunday, a bold pledge from an underdog candidate to pry two star players from English champions Manchester City has sparked a major cross-club controversy, putting transfer politics at the center of the club’s leadership race.

    Enrique Riquelme, a 37-year-old renewable energy tycoon who is challenging long-time incumbent Florentino Perez for the club’s top job, made headlines during a televised appearance Wednesday when he unveiled a Real Madrid jersey printed with star striker Erling Haaland’s name. Riquelme claimed Haaland, who scored twice against Real Madrid during their three Champions League matches last season, has a release clause in his City contract and wants to move to the Spanish capital, promising “if I become president, he will play for Real Madrid.” He followed that announcement with a second pledge to sign City’s star midfielder Rodri, adding “he is a great player, in a position where Madrid need to strengthen. We have spoken to his agent. We have to respect his club, but if I’m president he will play for Madrid. I will do everything possible.”

    The claims were immediately met with firm denials from all parties connected to Manchester City and Haaland. In a joint statement, Haaland’s father Alfie Inge Haaland and his agent Rafaela Pimenta called the rumors “all very entertaining but not true” and closed by wishing both candidates well in the election. Manchester City followed with an even stronger rebuke, confirming that no such release clause exists and that a transfer is completely out of the question. “The stories which have emerged from Spain regarding the future of Erling Haaland are untrue. There is no chance of this happening and there is no contractual clause to enable it,” the club said in its official statement. The Premier League side also confirmed it is evaluating legal options over the unauthorized use of Haaland’s image in Riquelme’s campaign stunt.

    The controversial transfer pledge comes as Riquelme wages an uphill campaign against Perez, who has led Real Madrid since 2009 and held the presidency for 20 years total without facing any challenger until this year’s vote. Riquelme launched his bid after two back-to-back trophy-less seasons for the La Liga giant, running on an aggressive populist platform that includes major fan perks: he has promised to build a dedicated member’s leisure complex near the club’s training ground with swimming pools, padel courts and a basketball arena, and pledged to cut annual membership fees by up to 50% if the club fails to win the Champions League next season. He has also publicly opposed Perez’s reported plan to hire Jose Mourinho as the next first-team manager, with his campaign hinting that former Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp is his top target for the role.

    Perez, for his part, has framed his campaign around fixing last season’s underperformance and has dismissed Riquelme’s superstar transfer promises as economically unfeasible and unrealistic. The 79-year-old construction magnate and former city councilor has acknowledged the club’s underwhelming results in the last two seasons, blaming a congested schedule caused by the Club World Cup, which forced the team to skip pre-season preparation, and an unprecedented injury crisis that saw nearly 30 first-team players sidelined in the first half of the campaign. He has already reached pre-agreements to sign two high-profile defenders, Liverpool’s Ibrahima Konate and Inter Milan’s Denzel Dumfries, once he secures re-election, and pledged to end internal squad conflict that disrupted the second half of the most recent season.

    Rodri, the 29-year-old Spanish midfield star whose name has also been dragged into the election campaign, addressed the rumors last month, saying he will finalize his future plans after this summer’s World Cup. “When a player is approaching the final stage of his contract, it’s normal for names to be mentioned,” he said. “I’m very calm, I know exactly where I stand, and I’ll tell you that perhaps if there hadn’t been a World Cup, things might be different now.”

    Founded as a member-owned club, Real Madrid’s presidential election gives nearly 100,000 eligible voting members the chance to shape the future of one of the world’s most valuable sports franchises. Perez called the election early this year to shore up his mandate after growing fan discontent over on-field results at the Santiago Bernabeu, and he remains the heavy favorite to win another term, even as the race has devolved into repeated public attacks between the two camps. During Riquelme’s recent appearance on popular Spanish variety show *El Hormiguero*, Perez’s campaign bought ad time to formally announce Mourinho’s pending appointment and call for voters to back the incumbent.

    Club legends are split along the two campaigns: the majority of former stars, including Karim Benzema, Casemiro and Roberto Carlos, have lined up behind Perez, while former captains Iker Casillas and Fernando Hierro have backed Riquelme’s challenge. Perez first won the Real Madrid presidency in 2000 on a similar promise of signing global superstars, when his pledge to bring Barcelona icon Luis Figo to the club secured his upset victory over incumbent Lorenzo Sanz, launching the iconic ‘Galacticos’ era that saw the club sign Zinedine Zidane, Ronaldo, David Beckham and Michael Owen in consecutive summers. He resigned in 2006 amid poor results, but returned unopposed to the presidency in 2009, holding power ever since until this year’s challenge.

  • A higher ceiling than Messi? What next for Lamine Yamal?

    A higher ceiling than Messi? What next for Lamine Yamal?

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaches, all eyes in global football are turning to 18-year-old Spanish phenom Lamine Yamal, a teenage talent already being hailed as the next generational great of the game – even by the greatest to ever play the sport.

    During a World Cup commercial event, Lionel Messi was asked to name the standout young player of the new era, and he left no room for debate. “It would be Lamine. No doubt about it: for me, he is the best,” Messi said. Just one week later, when US broadcaster CBS asked Yamal point-blank if Spain would lift the World Cup trophy, the teenager smiled and gave a confident one-word answer: “Yes.”

    What makes Yamal’s ascent genuinely extraordinary is not just the avalanche of praise from football royalty that has landed on his shoulders before his 19th birthday. It is the remarkable poise and self-awareness with which he carries that weight, and how clearly he has already carved out his own identity, both as a footballer and a public figure.

    At 18 years old, Yamal already has a resume most senior players can only dream of: he has featured in a UEFA Champions League semi-final, won the 2024 European Championship with Spain, and inherited Barcelona’s iconic number 10 shirt – the same number Messi wore for nearly 15 years at Camp Nou. While his precocity is staggering, the most striking trait of his game and his character is his unshakable serenity under pressure.

    Comparisons to Messi have followed Yamal throughout his rise, whether he seeks them out or not. Both are left-footed players with the same deceptive dribbling intelligence that makes the most challenging on-field moves look effortless. In fact, many experts argue Yamal has already had a far greater impact at Barcelona at 18 than Messi did at the same age, though any prediction that he will ultimately match the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner’s legacy remains far too early to make.

    One telling statistic, however, highlights just how far Yamal has already come: by his 18th birthday, he had already made 151 appearances for Barcelona’s first team. By the time Messi turned 19 in June 2006, he had only notched 41 top-flight appearances for the Catalan club.

    Football greats who have seen both players develop have been quick to draw a clear lineage between the two generations. Ronaldinho, who played alongside a young Messi at the start of Barcelona’s golden era and won the Champions League with him, drew the line directly in comments to FIFA’s website in March. “Messi and I made history, and now it is Lamine Yamal’s turn. What he has already shown at such a young age is extraordinary,” the Brazilian legend said.

    Former Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand went even further when asked if Yamal is already a better player at the same age than Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo were. Ferdinand replied bluntly on ESPN: “Yes. His potential or ceiling might be better than theirs. The body of work at 17 years old – no-one has done it. Pele may have, but I didn’t see Pele.”

    Spain national team head coach Luis de la Fuente, who has watched Yamal progress through the country’s youth age groups, says what sets the teenager apart goes far beyond raw talent. “He is a player blessed by God. Football geniuses have something special, and he has it,” De la Fuente said. “You can immediately see those kinds of footballers who are touched by magic that says: you are going to be special.”

    Barcelona manager Hansi Flick, who works with Yamal in training every day and has watched him perform on the biggest club stages all season, echoes that praise. “He is special, he is a genius. In the big matches, he shows up. Players do not usually reach this level of maturity until they are 24 or 25 years old. If this kind of talent only comes every half-century, I am glad it is for Barcelona,” Flick said.

    What truly separates Yamal from the dozens of previous “next Messis” tipped for stardom at Barcelona over the past two decades is his deliberate rejection of trying to fill anyone else’s shoes. While he openly admires Messi, he holds a quiet, unshakable determination to forge his own path. “For me, Messi is the greatest football player in history. He is a legend and I do not find myself worthy of being compared to him,” Yamal said. “I do not want to be Messi and he knows it. I want to follow my own path.”

    The same mindset applies when comparisons to Ronaldo are raised. Yamal does not dismiss either the comparisons or the legendary legacy of the five-time Ballon d’Or winner – he simply refuses to structure his own ambition around matching anyone else. “It is best not to compare yourself to anyone,” he said at an awards ceremony. “Players like Cristiano Ronaldo did what they did because they wanted to be themselves. I try to be me, play my game, and get people to recognise me for being Lamine.”

    Barcelona’s academy has produced no shortage of young talents anointed as the next great hope, only for many to fade under the weight of expectations: Giovani dos Santos, Gerard Deulofeu, Bojan Krkic, Ansu Fati, and Munir El Haddadi are just a few of the prospects who carried the “next Messi” label at one point or another. Yamal, by contrast, lets the media and fans debate his potential while he focuses on playing, even as speculation about a future Ballon d’Or win has followed him since he was 16 years old.

    He says he plays to bring joy to fans, and wants young children to aspire to be like him – not like Messi or Ronaldo. “I am not thinking about the Ballon d’Or. I want to enjoy myself and win with Barca and the national team,” he said. “Pressure does not exist, it is an excuse. If you just think about enjoying yourself and having fun, there is no pressure.”

    That confidence in his own trajectory is nothing new to the coaches who spotted his talent early. Inocente Diaz, one of Yamal’s youth coaches at Barcelona’s famed La Masia academy, made a bold prediction as far back as 2025. “He is even better than Messi,” Diaz told Spanish newspaper Sport. “He possesses a unique blend of physical attributes reminiscent of both Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo. In six years, he will win the Ballon d’Or.”

    For Yamal himself, the immediate target is clear: the 2026 World Cup. He has already laid out his ambitions for the tournament, where he will be the centerpiece of a Spanish squad ranked among the pre-tournament favorites. “I have always imagined playing in a World Cup, seeing my mother in the stands. I hope I can win it,” he said.

    What many casual observers have missed about Yamal’s game, which La Masia coaches recognized long before the rest of the world, is his evolving tactical profile. While he is officially listed as a winger who terrorizes opposing full-backs from the left flank with elite dribbling numbers, Yamal says his childhood approach to the game was far more focused on football intelligence than individual skill. “When I was small I never dribbled much or got past many opponents. I scored a lot of goals, ran a lot, but above all I had very good vision of the game,” he explained. “I focused on what Messi did because he gave different passes – passes that led to goals. And I looked at Modric, who passed with the outside of his foot. That seemed more interesting to me than dribbling, because it is more about the mind.”

    That fascination with a midfielder renowned for his spatial awareness and vision, rather than a dynamic winger, hints at the evolutionary path Yamal is already walking. Over the past two seasons, tactical data has shown Yamal increasingly drifting into central areas of the pitch, operating as a second playmaker as often as he stays wide on the flank. That shift mirrors the transition Messi made early in his career, when he moved from the right wing to the false nine position at the center of Barcelona’s attack, a shift that turned him into the greatest player of his generation. It took Messi more than a decade to complete that transition – Yamal may make the move far earlier.

    Julen Guerrero, who worked with Yamal in Spain’s youth system, says he is not surprised by the teenager’s tactical evolution. “Of course I can picture him as a false nine,” Guerrero said. “But it is a less comfortable position because teams block the centre more, there are fewer spaces, you have to be more patient. But he is very intelligent. He knows how to move.”

    As the 2026 World Cup kicks off, Yamal will be just 18 years old – he will not turn 19 until the day before the tournament’s first semi-final. Spain arrives at the competition as one of the title favorites, built around the teenage talent who has already proven he is far more than just the next Messi. He is Lamine Yamal – and he is ready to write his own story on the world’s biggest football stage.

  • How Ukraine-Russia tension hangs over French Open semi-finals

    How Ukraine-Russia tension hangs over French Open semi-finals

    The 2026 French Open women’s singles draw has already delivered a string of stunning upsets and historic breakthroughs, but all eyes will turn to a highly anticipated semi-final match on Thursday that carries far more stakes than just a spot in a Grand Slam final. With Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine entering its fifth year, the showdown between Ukraine’s Marta Kostyuk and Russia’s teen star Mirra Andreeva will play out against the unavoidable, weighty backdrop of ongoing armed conflict between their home nations.

    Kostyuk, the 23-year-old 15th seed, has emerged as one of the most vocal Ukrainian athlete advocates since the 2022 invasion, consistently using her platform as a top tennis player to keep global attention focused on the human cost of the war. Just last week, she revealed that a Russian missile strike hit a building less than 100 meters from her family’s home in Kyiv during a renewed wave of attacks on the Ukrainian capital. Following her hard-fought quarter-final win over fellow Ukrainian Elina Svitolina, Kostyuk reiterated that speaking out about the war is the most critical contribution she can make amid the crisis.

    “The biggest thing I can do is sit here and talk about [the war] so more people can find out about it and don’t get used to this terrible life,” she told reporters.

    Her opponent, 19-year-old eighth seed Andreeva, has repeatedly declined to engage with questions about the conflict, sticking to that stance again in pre-match press conferences ahead of Thursday’s semi-final. This is Andreeva’s second consecutive appearance in the French Open semi-finals, and she says she is focused solely on executing her game plan, regardless of who stands across the net.

    “It doesn’t matter who I play. I really try to play against the ball that is coming at me,” Andreeva said. “It doesn’t matter to me who I’m playing against, so I’m trying to really focus on the game and on the gameplan that I have to use on the court.”

    This match marks the second meeting between Kostyuk and Andreeva in just over a month. The pair faced off in the Madrid Open final last month, where Kostyuk claimed a 6-3 7-5 victory to win the biggest title of her professional career. Following that match, the two players did not share the customary post-match handshake, a policy adopted by all Ukrainian tennis players against competitors from Russia and Belarus (a Russian ally that backed the invasion) that will remain in place at Roland Garros.

    If Kostyuk defeats Andreeva to extend her 17-match clay-court winning streak to 18, she will face a second Russian player, 22-year-old Diana Shnaider, in Saturday’s final. Shnaider earned her spot in her first ever Grand Slam semi-final after pulling off one of the biggest upsets of the tournament, knocking out Belarusian world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, who has publicly condemned the invasion.

    Shnaider has already faced her own share of controversy at this year’s tournament. Before her third-round match against Ukrainian player Oleksandra Oliynykova, Oliynykova publicly accused Shnaider of supporting the invasion, citing Shnaider’s decision to compete in a St. Petersburg exhibition event sponsored by Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy giant. Oliynykova compared participating in the event to playing in a tournament organized by Nazi Germany during World War II.

    Shnaider defended her choice to compete in the event, noting it was her only opportunity in 2026 to play in front of her family in Russia. Like Andreeva, she has declined to comment publicly on the war, a choice that has drawn sharp criticism from Kostyuk.

    “They are all grown-ups. They know what they’re talking about. They know what’s going on. They have phones. They have Instagram. They have news. They are clearly aware of what’s going on,” Kostyuk told reporters. “I don’t know how you can sleep at night peacefully when you know that this is going on and you have nothing to say about it.”

    For Kostyuk, every win she earns at Roland Garros is a tribute to her war-torn home nation. Though she acknowledges the privilege of building her career away from the active conflict zone, she says the ongoing suffering of Ukrainians back home is her core source of motivation to keep competing and winning.

    Former world No. 5 Slovakian player Daniela Hantuchova, speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, says the pressure and adversity faced by players from conflict-affected regions in Eastern Europe creates a unique drive to succeed.

    “This desire comes from there being no other options, when you have war behind your courtyard and you know sport in particular is the only way to escape that,” Hantuchova said. “You don’t question anything you are told to do to get where you want. The starting point creates this incredible hunger and willingness to do whatever it takes.”

    In the other semi-final, Shnaider will face unseeded Polish qualifier Maja Chwalinska, who has continued her Cinderella run through the draw after entering the tournament ranked outside the world’s top 100. Remarkably, all four 2026 French Open women’s semi-finalists hail from Eastern or Central Europe, each carrying their own personal story of resilience amid extraordinary pressure. All four players have outperformed pre-tournament expectations in a wide-open draw that lacked many of the tour’s top contenders.

    Regardless of how the semi-finals unfold, Saturday’s final will crown a first-time Grand Slam singles champion, a result that very few tennis pundits or fans predicted at the start of the tournament two weeks ago. The question remaining is not just who will hold the trophy, but how the weight of geopolitical conflict will shape one of the most politically charged matches in recent Grand Slam history.

  • Ahead of papal visit, Spain pushes forward with reparations for church sex abuse victims

    Ahead of papal visit, Spain pushes forward with reparations for church sex abuse victims

    MADRID – More than half a century after she endured repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a Marist priest as an 8-year-old catechism student in Valladolid, northern Spain, Paula Alonso-Pimentel is finally pushing for accountability. Decades of buried trauma, followed by years of unmet demands for justice, have led her to this moment: a new joint reparations program between the Spanish government and the country’s Catholic bishops that aims to address long-unpunished abuse cases involving deceased or statute-barred perpetrators. For a nation that has lagged far behind other Western countries in confronting the clerical abuse crisis entrenched within its once-dominant Catholic institutions, this launch marks an unprecedented new chapter in a decades-long reckoning.

    Spain’s journey to this reparations framework began in 2018, when leading national newspaper El País published a searchable public database of alleged clergy sexual abuse cases, pulling back the curtain on a crisis the Catholic Church had hidden for generations. As public outrage mounted, Spain’s Parliament tasked the national ombudsman with conducting a full independent investigation. The resulting 2023 report, an 800-page exhaustive assessment, delivered a damning conclusion: based on a representative survey of 8,000 adults, the report estimated hundreds of thousands of people across Spain had experienced sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic clergy over the course of decades. The Spanish Bishops Conference immediately pushed back against the estimate, releasing its own internal count that documented just 728 identified abusive priests since 1945. Church leaders noted that 60% of those accused abusers were already deceased, and most of the alleged crimes occurred before 1990, placing them far outside the window for criminal prosecution.

    In 2024, the Spanish government threatened to mandate church-backed compensation, arguing the Church had consistently minimized the scope of the crisis. The bishops responded by launching their own unilateral victim assistance program, which critics quickly dismissed as toothless: run entirely by the Church, it lacked independent oversight, making it impossible to ensure fair outcomes for survivors. For many victims including Alonso-Pimentel, the idea of seeking compensation from the same institution that enabled and covered up their abuse was unacceptable. “You can’t be a judge and a jury in your own case,” Alonso-Pimentel put it, a sentiment shared by hundreds of other survivors who avoided the Church’s in-house process.

    The new joint reparations program, approved by both the bishops conference and the government months ahead of Pope Leo XIV’s upcoming visit to Spain, was designed to address that core criticism. Under the new framework, claims are first reviewed by an independent panel of experts convened by the national ombudsman, which proposes a package of compensation that may include symbolic recognition, psychological support, or financial payouts. The Church then reviews the proposal, and if no agreement can be reached, the case moves to a joint committee with representation from the Church, the ombudsman’s office, and victim advocacy groups. If the committee deadlocks, the ombudsman – an independent state official – retains final say over payout decisions, a landmark shift that gives government, not Church leaders, the final word on compensation. Survivors have exactly one year to submit claims, and as of the latest update, 420 people have already filed applications.

    For the Vatican, the program aligns with Pope Leo XIV’s recent public commitments to addressing clerical abuse. In his first encyclical, Leo wrote that listening to abuse survivors requires explicit acknowledgment of harm and delivery of “just reparation.” Josetxo Vera, communications director for the Spanish Bishops Conference, framed the new program as a natural expansion of the Church’s ongoing work to address past harm, while emphasizing that the bishops do not view the crisis as systemic within the Spanish Church. “We believe that, indeed, human nature is flawed, that it has a propensity for evil, and that it needs a great deal of reconciliation and forgiveness,” Vera said. “But I can’t say that it’s a systemic issue. We are part of this society. We share some of its virtues, and we also share some of its vices and crimes.” The conference has already paid out roughly 2 million euros ($2.3 million) to survivors through its earlier internal program, and leaders say they recognize why many survivors were uncomfortable engaging directly with the Church.

    Even with these reforms, the program faces widespread criticism from survivors and advocacy groups, who warn it retains critical structural weaknesses. A core point of contention is the one-year application window, which many argue is too short for survivors who have spent decades hiding their trauma to come forward. Critics also note the program lacks a standardized compensation matrix that ties payout amounts to the severity of abuse, meaning outcomes could be inconsistent across cases. Most alarmingly for opponents, the program is not legally binding, leaving no formal recourse for survivors who disagree with final decisions.

    Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of Bishop Accountability, a U.S.-based nonprofit that tracks global clerical abuse cases and institutional cover-ups, called the new protocol “quite fragile.” “It has a very short time frame. It has no matrix to establish minimum awards for various categories of injuries,” she noted. “So will it be fair? Will it be consistent?”

    Those doubts are echoed by Spanish survivor activist Miguel Hurtado, who has spoken publicly about his own abuse at the hands of a monk at the iconic Montserrat Abbey, a historic Benedictine monastery outside Barcelona. As a 16-year-old Boy Scout in a group led by monk Andreu Soler more than 20 years ago, Hurtado says he was molested by Soler. He says the monastery immediately pressured his parents to not report the abuse to law enforcement, and decades later, after an independent 2019 report acknowledged Soler had abused multiple victims over decades, the monastery still refused to accept formal responsibility for compensation, arguing all claims were time-barred under criminal and civil law. Hurtado says he is disappointed that Pope Leo XIV will still visit the Montserrat Abbey during his trip, despite his detailed submission of the allegations to Vatican and church authorities. Like many other survivors, he fears the new reparations program will ultimately fail to deliver meaningful justice. “The problem is that it’s built on sand,” Hurtado said.

    For her part, Alonso-Pimentel shares that skepticism, but remains cautiously hopeful that the new independent model will deliver the accountability she has chased for 50 years. She declined to participate in the Church’s earlier internal program, distrustful of an institution that enabled her abuse and ignored her claims for decades. When she reached out to the Marist order in Valladolid after Pope Francis’ 2019 global summit on clerical abuse, all she received was the name of her abuser, with no further accountability. Now, she says she will file her claim under the new program no matter what, but is waiting to see if the process lives up to its promises. “It must cost them, the Church,” she said. “It must cost them because this cannot come for free. It cannot be that they can continue doing it without paying a huge price.”

  • Ukraine’s drone strikes set a gloomy tone for Putin’s economic showcase

    Ukraine’s drone strikes set a gloomy tone for Putin’s economic showcase

    In a striking development that overshadowed the kickoff of Russia’s high-profile annual economic gathering, two coordinated Ukrainian drone attacks targeted key infrastructure in St. Petersburg just hours before the opening of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, a signature event where President Vladimir Putin planned to showcase Russia’s claimed economic resilience to global attendees.

    The strikes — one that ignited a large blaze at a city oil terminal and another that hit the historic Kronstadt naval base on a Gulf of Finland island just off St. Petersburg’s coast — delivered another public embarrassment for the Kremlin, which has spent months framing the two-year full-scale invasion of Ukraine as a distant conflict that does not disrupt ordinary Russian life or key national events. Located just 9 miles from the forum’s main venue, the oil terminal strike sent a thick black plume of smoke visible across the St. Petersburg skyline, setting a somber tone for the event that Putin, a St. Petersburg native, was set to address Thursday.

    The attacks underscore a worrying new reality for the Kremlin: Ukraine’s steadily improving drone capabilities now allow it to strike deep within Russian territory, even at heavily protected sites of enormous symbolic importance to the Russian state. Kronstadt, the historic home of Russia’s Baltic Fleet founded alongside St. Petersburg by Peter the Great, remains a landmark of Russian naval heritage despite most of the fleet’s relocation to the Kaliningrad exclave. This is not an isolated incident: in May, Putin ordered a scaled-back version of Moscow’s annual Victory Day military parade over drone strike fears, and just days later, a large drone assault on Moscow suburbs killed three people, confirming the capital’s vulnerability too. In response to the St. Petersburg strikes, local authorities disrupted cellular internet service in an effort to disrupt drone guidance systems, and dozens of flights arriving and departing from the city’s main airport were delayed or rerouted to other airports.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov defended Moscow’s response, saying Russian forces were continuing offensive operations inside Ukraine specifically to prevent further such strikes on Russian territory. He confirmed that the “systematic” strikes on Kyiv that Russia threatened last week are currently ongoing. The escalation follows a massive Russian aerial assault across Ukraine Tuesday that used hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles to hit cities including Kyiv, leaving 23 dead and 151 wounded, according to Ukrainian officials.

    Originally modeled on Switzerland’s World Economic Forum in Davos, the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum has long been Putin’s flagship event to attract foreign investment and highlight Russian economic progress. Following the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, all Western business and political leaders boycotted the gathering, so Moscow has pivoted to courting delegations from the Global South and other partners to advance its stated goal of building a “multipolar world” countering Western dominance. This year, the forum’s guest of honor is Saudi Arabia, which has sent a large official delegation, with other high-level attendees including the presidents of Uzbekistan and Tanzania, China’s vice president, and for the first time in years, a U.S. official: Rodney Mims Cook Jr., head of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts.

    Despite Moscow’s efforts to project economic stability, Russia’s economic outlook has darkened in recent months after an initial post-invasion boost from massive military spending faded. The Russian government has already been forced to raise domestic taxes and increase internal borrowing to keep widening budget deficits under control. While Putin is expected to downplay these ongoing economic challenges during his keynote address, the pre-forum drone strikes have thrown into sharp relief the cascading security and economic risks that the ongoing conflict continues to pose for Russia, even in its most politically and symbolically important cities.

  • Oil prices fall, Wall Street mixed after record-breaking S&P rally runs out of steam

    Oil prices fall, Wall Street mixed after record-breaking S&P rally runs out of steam

    A nine-day winning streak for the S&P 500 came to an end this week, with early Thursday trading bringing mixed results across U.S. markets and a sharp pullback in global crude oil prices, following a fragile new ceasefire deal between Israel and Lebanon and escalating geopolitical tension between the U.S. and Iran.

    Hours before U.S. markets opened Thursday, S&P 500 futures dropped 0.4%, while the Nasdaq 100 futures slid 1.2% pulled down by weak tech sector performance. In a contrast, Dow Jones Industrial Average futures climbed 0.7%, pointing to a split opening for large-cap stocks.

    Two major U.S. corporations dropped sharply in premarket trading despite beating quarterly earnings forecasts, as investors reacted to disappointing full-year outlook updates. Semiconductor and enterprise software leader Broadcom tumbled more than 15% overnight. The stock had already surged 38% year-to-date and tripled in value over the past two years, driven by booming demand for AI-related chips. Even with stronger-than-expected top- and bottom-line results, the company declined to upgrade its full-year guidance, leaving investors unimpressed. Apparel and apparel brand conglomerate PVH Corp., formerly Phillips-Van Heusen, slid an even steeper 23% after cutting its full-year outlook. The company flagged ongoing drag from global tariffs and the ongoing Iran conflict as key headwinds for its business, even as it exceeded first-quarter sales and profit estimates.

    Geopolitical developments drove sharp movement in energy markets Thursday. Crude prices pulled back $2-$3 per barrel a day after spiking on escalating retaliatory attacks between the U.S. and Iran that roiled global energy supplies. The drop followed a breakthrough ceasefire announcement: Israel and Lebanon confirmed they had agreed to extend their fragile truce and establish new pilot security zones in southern Lebanon, from which Hezbollah militants will be excluded. As of mid-morning trading, Brent crude fell $2.42 to settle at $95.39 per barrel, and U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude dropped $2.30 to $93.72 per barrel. Both benchmarks remain below the peaks hit when the Iran conflict first escalated, and Wall Street analysts hold cautious optimism that the U.S. and Iran will reach an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipping, which would boost global crude supplies and ease price pressures.

    In fixed income markets, Treasury yields steadied Thursday a day after climbing to levels that pressured equity valuations. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield ticked down slightly to 4.47%, from 4.49% on Wednesday and 3.97% before the outbreak of the Iran conflict. Sustained high yields around the world have created broad headwinds for the global economy, pushing down valuations for equities and other risk assets while raising borrowing costs across sectors. The average long-term U.S. mortgage rate has already hit its highest level in nine months, and higher borrowing costs could slow companies’ plans to invest in the AI data center infrastructure that has powered much of U.S. economic growth in recent quarters. Smaller businesses are disproportionately vulnerable to higher loan costs, as many rely on continuous borrowing to fund expansion.

    Despite these headwinds, major U.S. stock indexes remain near all-time records, even amid persistent inflation pressure and geopolitical uncertainty. Global markets were mixed across regions Thursday: in midday European trading, Germany’s DAX gained 0.6% and France’s CAC 40 climbed 1%, while the UK’s FTSE 100 dipped 0.5%. Across Asian markets, all major indexes closed in negative territory, led by sharp drops in technology and growth stocks. Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.4% to close at 67,470.69, with tech and energy conglomerate SoftBank Group plummeting 11.2% and chemical leader Shin-Etsu Chemical dropping 3.8%. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index lost 1.4% to end at 25,274.98, and China’s Shanghai Composite fell 0.8% to 4,057.78. South Korea’s Kospi dropped 1.8% to 8,639.41, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 closed down 1.1% at 8,686.10.

    In a separate political development that could impact future geopolitical and market outcomes, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution for the first time on Wednesday that would halt U.S. military action against Iran. The vote defied President Donald Trump, with a small group of Republican lawmakers joining Democrats to back the measure, which targets a three-month conflict that has reshaped global and domestic U.S. politics and disrupted global commodity markets.

  • Germany blames Russia for ‘bitter defeat’ in UN Security Council bid

    Germany blames Russia for ‘bitter defeat’ in UN Security Council bid

    In a surprising outcome that has sent ripples through global diplomatic circles, Germany failed to secure one of the two rotating Western European and Others Group seats on the United Nations Security Council in Wednesday’s vote, marking a stinging diplomatic setback for the country’s ambitions to play a more prominent role in global governance. The winning candidates for the two-year terms starting in 2027 were revealed as Portugal, which earned 134 votes, and Austria, which secured 131 votes, while Germany only collected 104 backing ballots from UN member states. Three other countries — Kyrgyzstan, Trinidad and Tobago, and Zimbabwe — also won election to the 15-member body in concurrent voting for the remaining rotating seats.

    The UN Security Council, the only UN organ empowered to pass legally binding resolutions covering everything from the imposition of international sanctions to the authorization of military interventions, comprises five permanent veto-wielding members — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States — alongside 10 rotating non-permanent members elected on a regional basis to two-year terms.

    Senior German figures have been quick to offer explanations for the unexpected defeat, with senior lawmaker Johann Wadephul labeling the result a “bitter defeat” for the nation. In his post-vote analysis, Wadephul argued that Germany’s unwavering public support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia directly contributed to the loss, noting that Moscow has actively worked to turn global opinion against Berlin’s Security Council bid. “It is no secret that Russia stirred up sentiment against Germany,” Wadephul stated, adding that Germany’s clear-cut positions on high-stakes global issues are not shared by all 193 UN member states.

    Beyond the fallout from the Ukraine war, Wadephul also cited Germany’s long-standing commitment to supporting Israel amid the ongoing Middle East conflict as another factor that cost the country critical votes. “The fact that Germany must always assume a special responsibility for Israel in the Middle East conflict may also have cost votes,” he explained. He also acknowledged that Germany’s late entry into the race for the rotating seat created additional obstacles for its campaign.

    To date, Russia has not issued any public response to German claims that it lobbied against Berlin’s Security Council candidacy.

    The failed bid comes as a particularly sharp embarrassment for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has centered his political brand on a pledge to restore and elevate Germany’s standing on the global stage following a series of domestic political challenges. Opposition critics have seized on the result to argue that the defeat highlights Merz’s weakened position at home and failed diplomatic strategy abroad, leaving him beleaguered on the domestic front and embarrassed internationally.

    Despite the setback, Merz struck a measured tone in his public remarks after the vote, congratulating Austria and Portugal on their successful campaigns and reaffirming Germany’s long-term commitment to multilateral cooperation. “This result does not alter the tasks we face at the United Nations. Germany remains a reliable pillar of the multilateral system,” Merz said, emphasizing that Berlin would continue to uphold its international responsibilities even without a seat at the Security Council table.

  • Canadian government endorses a plan to move whales from shuttered Marineland park to US and Spain

    Canadian government endorses a plan to move whales from shuttered Marineland park to US and Spain

    NIAGARA FALLS, Ontario — A years-long saga over the fate of dozens of captive marine mammals at a closed Ontario tourist attraction has taken a major step forward, as Canada’s federal government has formally approved a plan to transfer the remaining animals to accredited aquariums across the United States and Spain. The approval removes a critical regulatory barrier to moving 30 beluga whales and four bottlenose dolphins held at Marineland, the iconic Niagara Falls amusement park and zoo that shut its gates to the public permanently in late 2024, and saves the animals from what could have been a mass euthanasia if no permanent new homes could be secured.

    Marineland first hit the market in early 2023, nearly five years after the death of founder John Holer. Holer’s widow Marie, who took over operations after her husband’s passing, put the 1,000-acre property near Horseshoe Falls up for sale before her own death in 2024. Since then, the estate has been working to sell the land, wind down operations and rehome the hundreds of animals still left on site. To date, no buyer for the sprawling property has been announced.

    The park has long faced controversy over its treatment of captive animals, and a major 2024 legal ruling cemented its troubled reputation: a Ontario court found Marineland guilty of violating provincial animal cruelty laws in a case connected to inadequate care for three black bears held at the facility. Provincial data, obtained through freedom of information requests and official disclosures, also shows that 20 cetaceans — 19 belugas and one killer whale — have died at the park since 2019, a statistic that amplified calls from animal welfare advocates for urgent relocation of the remaining creatures.

    Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans has now issued the first round of required relocation permits, including international trade permits under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Additional permits will be issued closer to the transfer date, which is currently projected to take place within the next several months. Federal officials are coordinating across multiple agencies, including the Canada Border Services Agency and Health Canada, to ensure the complex cross-border transfer adheres to all animal welfare and safety protocols.

    Fisheries Minister Joanne Thompson framed the approval as a meaningful milestone for the years-long effort to secure the animals’ future. “I think this is a positive step forward,” Thompson said. “There’s still more work to be done, but it’s a step forward.”

    As of Wednesday, the Canadian government has not made a final decision on whether to allocate public funding to cover the high costs of the relocation, a process that park officials acknowledge is extraordinarily logistically complex. Marineland has reaffirmed its commitment to moving the animals safely, calling the project its top organizational priority. “Relocating these animals is an extraordinarily complex undertaking,” the park said in an official statement released Wednesday.

    The 34 marine mammals will be split among five participating institutions across North America and Europe: Chicago’s Shedd Aquarium, the Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta, SeaWorld parks in San Antonio and San Diego, and Oceanogràfic València in Spain. Mystic Aquarium in Connecticut, which accepted five beluga whales from Marineland in a 2021 relocation effort, will also support the transfer operations, the U.S.-based coordinating consortium confirmed.

  • Henry Nowak murder: What we know about how the events unfolded

    Henry Nowak murder: What we know about how the events unfolded

    An 18-year-old first-year university student lost his life in a senseless, violent random encounter in Southampton in December 2025, with newly released CCTV, police bodycam footage, 999 call transcripts and judicial sentencing remarks shedding full light on the tragic sequence of events that led to his death.

    Henry Nowak, just a few months into his university studies, was killed on his journey back to his off-campus student accommodation on December 3. His killer, 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, was found guilty of murder in late May 2026 and sentenced to life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum term of 21 years behind bars.

    The night’s timeline is clearly laid out through the recovered CCTV footage. At 20:30 GMT, Nowak was recorded entering the lift at his university halls of residence, dressed in a white shirt, tie and quarter-zip fleece and carrying a bottle. He adjusted his hair in the lift mirror before exiting, walking to a local convenience store to purchase a drink, and then continuing on to The Hobbit pub, where door staff checked his identification at the entrance. Internal pub footage captured him moving through the venue, passing a small group in the beer garden before heading back out onto the street. By 23:07, CCTV shows Nowak walking back toward his accommodation, passing a group of pedestrians along a street lit by streetlamps before increasing his pace to jog down the road.

    During Digwa’s sentencing hearing on June 1, Judge William Mousley KC outlined the fateful chance intersection of the two men’s paths. Nowak was traveling north along Belmont Road, which brought him to the junction of St Denys Road – the street where Digwa resided. Digwa was walking south along the same road at exactly the same time, creating an entirely random meeting. Judge Mousley confirmed that Nowak was alone, carried no weapons, and was not intoxicated: post-mortem testing found his blood alcohol level was below the legal limit for driving in the UK.

    As a Sikh, Digwa carried a required religious kirpan knife sheathed at his belt, which Judge Mousley noted is a strict obligation for observant Sikhs. However, Digwa was also carrying a second, larger dagger, a tradition tied to his membership in the Nihang Sikh order – a practice that is not a required religious obligation. Nowak noticed the larger blade and began filming it on his mobile phone, before asking Digwa if he was a “bad man”, according to the judge’s recounting. Digwa responded by confirming he was “a bad man” and seized Nowak’s phone.

    No witnesses other than the two men saw the immediate confrontation that followed, but Judge Mousley laid out the logical and evidence-based conclusion of events: “It would not be unreasonable to conclude that Henry would have wanted his phone back, believing it had been stolen from him or that he had been robbed.” In the ensuing scuffle, Digwa pulled the larger dagger from its sheath and deliberately stabbed the unprotected student in the chest. He went on to stab Nowak three more times – two additional wounds to the upper leg – and the judge noted that the initial stab wound had such a devastating impact that Nowak never had the chance to raise his hands to defend himself from further attack.

    Footage recorded by Digwa himself shows Nowak desperately fleeing the attack, climbing a residential fence, scrambling onto a communal waste bin before falling onto a car parked in front of the neighboring property. Rather than calling for emergency aid, Digwa continued to film the mortally wounded teen as he suffered, ignoring his desperate pleas for help.

    Roughly 25 minutes after Nowak was captured on CCTV heading home, Digwa’s brother, Gurpreet Digwa, placed the 999 emergency call. He falsely told operators that Vickrum had been the victim of a racial assault by Nowak, telling the handler, “He’s physically attacked my brother. We’re Sikhs, we wear turbans and he’s just attacked my brother.” When asked if weapons were involved, Gurpreet claimed none had been used, but conceded that Nowak required medical attention. The 12-minute call ended with the emergency handler confirming that police and an ambulance would be dispatched immediately to the location.

    Seven minutes after the call was placed, at 23:37, the first police officers arrived at the scene. Police bodycam footage shows four people standing on a residential driveway, with Nowak collapsed on the ground. Digwa repeated his false claim to responding officers, telling them Nowak had racially abused him. Just 71 seconds after officers arrived, Nowak was clearly heard on the bodycam footage repeating that he had been stabbed, saying “I can’t breathe” seven times. Despite this, by 23:38, officers had handcuffed Nowak and placed him under arrest, reading him his Miranda rights before calling for an ambulance a minute later and starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Judge Mousley confirmed that the severity of Nowak’s injuries meant his death was unavoidable, even if emergency medical treatment had been administered immediately. Less than four hours after he was recorded leaving his halls of residence on that Saturday night, Nowak was pronounced dead.

    Five days after the killing, on December 8, Vickrum Digwa was formally charged with murder and possession of a bladed article in a public space. He was convicted of murder by a jury on May 28, 2026, and sentenced three days later to life imprisonment with a minimum of 21 years to serve before eligibility for parole.

    Additional reporting for this story was provided by Marina Costa, covering policing in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.

  • Three dead in Royal Navy helicopter crash

    Three dead in Royal Navy helicopter crash

    A fatal training accident has claimed the lives of three Royal Navy service members after their Merlin Mk4 helicopter crashed on Sourton Down near Okehampton, Devon, in the early hours of the morning.

    Emergency response teams were first alerted to the incident at approximately 3:45 BST, with a major incident formally declared 15 minutes later. Seven fire engines from six local stations were deployed to the remote crash site, located near Dartmoor’s Okehampton battle camp, a well-used training ground for Commando Helicopter Force crews. By 13:30 BST, the main stretch of the A386 between the A30 and Fowley Cross had been reopened, though the A30 eastbound exit slip road remained closed to allow investigation work to continue.

    Local residents, familiar with routine military training traffic in the area, described hearing unusual sounds from the aircraft before the crash. One local resident named Paul, who lives in a nearby hamlet, said he was woken by the extremely low-flying helicopter, which sounded irregular. Another resident, Julie Ricketts, who lives across the valley from the crash site, called the incident devastating, noting “They were only training. It’s just very, very sad for the families.” By the afternoon, local members of the public had begun leaving floral tributes near the site to honor the fallen personnel.

    Senior military and political figures have quickly issued statements of condolences following the tragedy. The Princess of Wales, who holds the honorary position of Commodore-in-Chief of the Fleet Air Arm, said she and Prince William were “holding their families and friends in our hearts” following the loss. The BBC understands the royal couple will contact the bereaved families directly in the coming days, while King Charles III is also aware of the incident and will send private messages of sympathy to the next of kin.

    General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, head of the Royal Navy, described the crash as a devastating shock to the entire naval community. “My deepest condolences go out to the families, friends and loved ones impacted by this tragedy,” he said. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called the fatal crash “utterly tragic” on social media platform X, while Defence Secretary John Healey said he was “devastated by the loss of three service personnel.” Local MP Sarah Dyke, who represents Glastonbury and Somerton, added that her thoughts were with the victims and their grieving families.

    The crashed aircraft was confirmed to be a Merlin Mk4, a variant of the Royal Navy’s Merlin helicopter fleet that entered service in 1999. The Mk4 variant is operated by the Commando Helicopter Force out of RNAS Yeovilton in Somerset, with 25 of the aircraft currently in service supporting Royal Navy operations. The area around north Dartmoor between RNAS Yeovilton and RNAS Culdrose, where the older Mk2 anti-submarine variant is based, is a regular training route for military helicopter crews. This is not the first fatal incident involving the Merlin Mk4: in September 2024, another Mk4 ditched in the English Channel during a training exercise, killing Lt Rhodri Leyshon. A 2004 crash at RNAS Culdrose left five crew members injured, with two trapped in the wreckage.

    An official investigation into the cause of the crash has been launched immediately. The UK Civil Aviation Authority confirmed the Defence Accident Investigation Branch (DAIB) will lead the probe into the circumstances of the incident, while local police continue to support on-site investigation work. The Royal Navy confirmed that the next of kin of all three deceased personnel have been informed, and have requested privacy to grieve before any further details are released to the public.