标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Iraqi government orders probe over weapons smuggling to Hezbollah in Lebanon

    Iraqi government orders probe over weapons smuggling to Hezbollah in Lebanon

    In a high-stakes move that reshapes regional diplomatic dynamics, Iraq’s Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has ordered the creation of a specialized high-level investigative committee to probe networks smuggling advanced weapons from Iraq through Syria to Lebanon’s Iran-aligned Hezbollah, in direct coordination with Syria’s new post-Assad administration.

    The announcement follows a confirmed seizure by Syrian security forces earlier this Thursday, which foiled an attempted smuggling operation along the Syria-Iraq border. According to Syria’s state-owned news agency Sana, citing an anonymous interior ministry source, the intercepted cache was explicitly bound for Hezbollah and contained a lethal arsenal including long-range missiles, anti-armor guided munitions, and unmanned aerial vehicles.

    Iraq’s Joint Operations Command, a military body that reports directly to the prime minister’s office, has pledged full accountability for any officials found complicit in the smuggling activity. The command emphasized that the investigation is focused on protecting the integrity of Iraq’s shared border, upholding national stability, and blocking actions that threaten the country’s national security.

    The probe comes against a shifting geopolitical backdrop in the Middle East. Syria’s current ruling administration took power in December 2024 after ousting former President Bashar al-Assad, a long-standing close ally of both Iran and Iraq. During Syria’s decade-long civil war, multiple Iraqi armed factions deployed into Syrian territory to back Assad against opposition forces, with some of these factions holding key influence over the Iraqi government that took office in May 2024.

    Like all preceding Iraqi governments, Iraq’s current administration has navigated a precarious balancing act between its eastern neighbor Iran and the United States alongside its Western and regional allies. Even as Baghdad has moved to build constructive diplomatic ties with Syria’s new government and support efforts to stabilize the war-torn country, it has faced sustained pressure from Washington to crack down on Iran-aligned armed groups operating within its borders, particularly those targeting U.S. and Israeli assets across the Middle East.

    The escalating standoff between the U.S. and Iran has pushed Iraqi leaders to reiterate their commitment to cooperation with Washington, with al-Zaidi overseeing negotiations to expand bilateral partnership during an official visit to the U.S. capital this week.

    Hayder al-Shakeri, a research fellow in the Middle East and North Africa program at London-based think tank Chatham House, explained that the investigation serves a clear diplomatic purpose. Al-Shakeri told Middle East Eye that the move allows Baghdad to demonstrate it operates independently of pro-Iran armed factions, sending a clear signal to the U.S. that the Iraqi government is ready to assert tighter control over unregulated cross-border networks.

    However, al-Shakeri also cautioned that the true nature of the policy shift remains to be seen. “But whether this reflects a genuine, sustained policy shift, rather than a tactical gesture, will depend on whether the government follows through with arrests, prosecutions, tighter border enforcement, and action against the political or security figures protecting these networks,” he said.

  • Israeli ministers taunt England and revel in Argentina’s World Cup win

    Israeli ministers taunt England and revel in Argentina’s World Cup win

    In a striking intersection of global football diplomacy and long-simmering political tensions, multiple senior Israeli politicians took to social media platforms on Wednesday to openly celebrate Argentina’s World Cup semi-final win over England, using the match result as an opportunity to taunt the United Kingdom while highlighting close ties between Israel and Argentina’s new right-wing administration.

    The most pointed jab came from Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who published his reaction on X within minutes of the final whistle. Smotrich, who was banned from entering the UK last year over his anti-Palestinian political positions, referenced his travel ban in his provocative post: “I indeed cannot enter Britain because I am exterminating the idea of the Palestinian state, but two goals got in nicely,” a nod to the two late match-winning goals Argentina scored against England.

    Smotrich went on to extend congratulations to Argentine President Javier Milei, whom he explicitly labeled a close friend of Israel. His far-right coalition partner, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir – who was also sanctioned by the UK alongside Smotrich in 2023 – echoed the celebration. In a post on his own X account, Ben Gvir wrote, “Honour to whom honour is due, and now with faith toward the final.” Hours before kickoff, he had already made his allegiance clear, asking followers, “Do I really have to explain to you why I pray with all my heart for Argentina to win tonight and make it into the final?”

    The UK’s 2023 sanctions on Smotrich and Ben Gvir came after then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy accused the two senior ministers of inciting extremist violence and perpetrating serious abuses against Palestinian human rights. Smotrich has spearheaded Israel’s push for de facto annexation of large swathes of the occupied West Bank, while Ben Gvir leads Israel’s prison and detention system – a facility network multiple international human rights organizations have documented as operating what they term “torture camps.” Both men have also been identified as key decision-makers in Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which has drawn widespread international condemnation for mass civilian casualties.

    The political celebration of Argentina’s win was not limited to the two far-right ministers already sanctioned by the UK. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, who has Argentine ancestral roots and held talks with Lammy in London last year, joined in the taunting with a playful jab at England’s iconic fan chant. “How does the song go? ‘It’s coming home.’ Yes, it is. It’s coming home to Argentina. Vamos Argentina,” he wrote on X.

    Sa’ar is currently based in the United States for a series of diplomatic meetings with Latin American allies of Israel. A formal statement from Israel’s foreign ministry confirmed that alongside discussions about political shifts across Latin America and regional security threats, the delegation “also raised a glass to Argentina’s impressive victory in the World Cup semi-final.”

    Israel’s current government has positioned right-wing leaders across Latin America, including Milei, as key strategic allies, with most of these leaders publicly backing Israel’s actions in Gaza. Even ahead of Argentina’s win over England, Sa’ar secured a diplomatic breakthrough during meetings with Colombia’s incoming foreign minister Omar Bula Escobar, where the two sides agreed to restore full diplomatic relations after years of strained ties triggered by Colombia’s criticism of Israel’s Gaza war.

    Other senior Israeli figures also publicly backed Argentina ahead of and after the semi-final match. Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon posted a simple, clear message of support: “Vamos Argentina.” Transport Minister Miri Regev, a senior member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, extended congratulations directly to the Argentine public and Milei, adding, “Keeping my fingers crossed for you in the final” – ahead of Argentina’s upcoming final match against Spain, one of the most vocal critics of Israel’s policies in Europe.

    Argentina’s progression to a second consecutive World Cup final, following their 2022 trophy win in Qatar, has not been without controversy. Multiple contentious refereeing decisions throughout the tournament have sparked widespread accusations that FIFA has shown undue favoritism to the South American side. Scrutiny has been particularly intense across the Arab world: after Argentina’s narrow last-16 win over Egypt, Egyptian head coach Hossam Hassan publicly accused FIFA of pushing Argentina through for commercial and marketing reasons, sparking a broad wave of criticism of both the governing body and the Argentine team.

  • Dua Lipa backs Albania’s ‘Flamingo Revolution’ against Kushner-backed resort

    Dua Lipa backs Albania’s ‘Flamingo Revolution’ against Kushner-backed resort

    Global pop superstar Dua Lipa has thrown her public support behind Albania’s growing environmental protest movement, dubbed the “Flamingo Revolution,” which opposes a $1.6 billion luxury coastal development tied to the Trump family that would tear into one of the country’s most ecologically vulnerable protected landscapes.

    The British pop icon, who has Kosovo Albanian heritage, shared her praise for the grassroots demonstrators during an episode of her Service95 book club podcast, in a conversation with prominent Albanian academic and author Lea Ypi. With grassroots protests entering their 46th consecutive week, Lipa emphasized that she finds the demonstrators’ unwavering commitment deeply inspiring.

    “ I find it so inspiring to see how much people really care. Day after day they’re hitting the streets, because the government has opened up this part of a beautiful nature reserve to a high-end beachfront development,” Lipa said in comments shared widely on social media following the podcast recording.

    Lipa’s high-profile intervention has already shifted global attention back to a months-long movement that Albania’s ruling government has been unable to suppress or dismiss. The protests were ignited by plans for the massive luxury development project led by Affinity Partners, the private investment firm founded by Jared Kushner, former President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior White House advisor. The project calls for construction of roughly 10,000 hotel and resort rooms across a largely untouched stretch of Albania’s Adriatic coastline, spanning ecologically sensitive Sazan Island and the Zvernec Peninsula, adjacent to the protected Vjosa-Narta wetland landscape.

    This coastal wetland system is a critical protected habitat for a wide array of vulnerable wildlife, including greater flamingos, Mediterranean monk seals, endangered sea turtles, and dozens of species of migratory birds that rely on the undeveloped ecosystem for breeding and resting along intercontinental migration routes.

    Critics, including Lipa, have singled out the opaque and controversial process that cleared the way for the development. In 2024, Prime Minister Edi Rama’s administration pushed through amendments to Albania’s national protected areas legislation that rolled back longstanding construction restrictions in environmentally sensitive zones. After the regulatory changes, the government granted Affinity Partners’ project formal “strategic investor” status, which fast-tracked all approval processes and cut down on opportunities for public input and environmental review.

    “What I actually find concerning is the principle that the government could just change the law to remove the environmental protection without any kind of public consultation,” Lipa said, echoing a core grievance held by the protest movement.

    Rama has remained unyielding in his support for the project, dismissing widespread opposition and framing the investment as “a gift to Europe” and “an economic blessing” for Albania. He has repeatedly rejected calls to pause or cancel the development, stating publicly: “There is absolutely no chance that the investment will stop as long as I am here.”

    Lipa’s decision to speak out has been widely celebrated by social media users and activist communities, many of whom have praised the pop star for using her global platform to highlight grassroots environmental action at a time when many A-list celebrities avoid taking public stances on contentious political and environmental issues. One widely shared post on X noted that Lipa “really does shatter the imaginary belief that once someone attains a certain level of superstardom, they can’t talk about current events anymore because it’s ‘too complicated.’” Another commenter added that Lipa is proof celebrities can comfortably speak openly on pressing global and local issues, from policy to human rights to environmental protection, a step many in the entertainment industry refuse to take. The renewed global attention brought by Lipa’s endorsement has reignited pressure on the Albanian government to reconsider the project, as demonstrators continue their daily protests to protect the unique coastal ecosystem.

  • Root’s unbeaten 99 rescues England against India and forces an ODI series decider

    Root’s unbeaten 99 rescues England against India and forces an ODI series decider

    On Thursday at Cardiff’s Sophia Gardens, a stunning clinical knock from Joe Root dragged England across the finish line to secure a four-wicket victory against India, forcing a winner-takes-all decider in their three-match one-day international series this Sunday at London’s iconic Lord’s Cricket Ground.

    India won the second match of the series earlier, leaving the two sides level heading into the second ODI, and looked set to claim an advantage after collapsing England’s top order early in the hosts’ run chase. India posted a total of 233 all out after batting first, with 6 overs left unused, powered by solid half-centuries from star batters Virat Kohli (65) and Shreyas Iyer (66). India looked well placed at 178 for 3 before their middle and lower order failed to push the total to a more imposing score, a mistake that would later prove costly.

    The side from the subcontinent was already at a disadvantage before England began their chase: allrounder Washington Sundar suffered a leg injury while batting, forcing him to sit out the entire England innings and leave India one bowler short. With a required run rate of fewer than five runs per over, the chase should have been a straightforward assignment for England. But the hosts’ inconsistent ODI form showed early, as they collapsed to 8 for 2 inside the opening overs. Ben Duckett was dismissed by Jasprit Bumrah on the very first delivery of the England innings, and Jacob Bethell quickly followed, caught off Prasidh Krishna’s bowling. Captain Harry Brook gave the crowd a moment of excitement with a ramped six off Krishna, but he overcommitted to the scoop shot against young fast bowler Gurnoor Brar and was caught for 16, leaving England 17 for 3. Wicketkeeper Ishan Kishan held four catches to dismiss England’s first four batters, putting India firmly in control.

    That was when Joe Root stepped in to rescue England once again, joining the innings after just one delivery and anchoring the chase with trademark patience. He finished the innings unbeaten on 99, his 67th ODI half-century and second consecutive half-century in the series, reaching the milestone off 76 deliveries – his slowest ODI fifty since the 2019 ICC Cricket World Cup. Jos Buttler’s brief cameo ended when he was bowled by Axar Patel attempting another aggressive shot for 17, leaving England at 125 for 5 and reigniting India’s hopes of victory. Will Jacks provided stable support to Root, putting on an unbroken 72-run partnership until Jacks was dismissed by Brar at 197 for 6, leaving Root stranded one run short of his 21st ODI century.

    Tailender Gus Atkinson calmed a visibly frustrated Root, hitting a crucial six over the fine leg boundary off Bumrah’s final over that just missed a seated steward in the stands. Bumrah responded with a bouncer that struck Atkinson on the helmet, but the fast bowler only finished with the one early wicket of Duckett. Atkinson contributed 23 runs off 38 balls in the final stand, and hit the winning runs when he pulled Prasidh Krishna to the boundary, leaving Root not out one run short of a century. England finished on 233 for 6, reaching the target with 5.5 overs to spare.

    All eyes will now turn to Lord’s on Sunday, where the two sides will clash to decide the winner of the ODI series.

  • JD Vance says Epstein had connections to CIA and Mossad

    JD Vance says Epstein had connections to CIA and Mossad

    In a wide-ranging interview with prominent podcaster Joe Rogan this week, U.S. Vice President JD Vance made explosive claims linking disgraced convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to the highest echelons of both American and Israeli intelligence circles, while also accusing hardline elements within the Israeli government of funding a covert influence campaign to derail the recent Iran negotiation agreement he spearheaded.

    Vance, who identified himself as an “original Epstein conspiracy theorist,” doubled down on long-circulated unconfirmed speculation about the late financier’s intelligence connections. When Rogan noted that a widespread popular narrative frames Epstein as an asset for Israel’s Mossad external intelligence agency, Vance said the connections could extend to either the Central Intelligence Agency, deep state actors in the U.S., Israeli intelligence, or a combination of multiple groups. He specifically pointed to ties between Epstein and left-leaning figures in Israel’s deep political establishment, naming former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a key example, noting that Epstein’s connections did not extend to Israel’s center-right political bloc.

    For decades, unsubstantiated theories have circulated about whether Epstein operated on behalf of a foreign or domestic intelligence service. The disgraced financier, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting new sex trafficking charges, built a sprawling network of relationships with rich and powerful global figures, from former U.S. President Bill Clinton to pro-Israel billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner, senior British politician Peter Mandelson, and Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the late Queen Elizabeth II’s second son. Over his decades in elite social circles, Epstein was widely reported to have collected extensive compromising information on his high-profile contacts, a common intelligence tradecraft tactic for leverage.

    While no conclusive public evidence has ever emerged to confirm Epstein worked as an active intelligence asset for any nation, multiple official and unofficial records have hinted at potential connections. Earlier this year, a senior adviser to the Indian government publicly stated “100 percent” that Epstein was a Mossad asset when asked directly. The publicly released Epstein court documents confirm that the financier made donations to prominent Israeli causes, including Friends of the Israel Defense Forces and the Jewish National Fund, a group that supports Israeli West Bank settlements, and document his repeated personal connections to current and former members of Mossad. A 2020 FBI memo from the bureau’s Los Angeles field office also noted that an anonymous source had claimed Epstein was a “co-opted Mossad agent” who received formal spy training from the Israeli service.

    Beyond his claims about Epstein, Vance used the Rogan interview to level serious accusations about Israeli interference in American domestic and foreign policy, specifically targeting the Iran nuclear negotiation framework he spent months negotiating. The preliminary memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, signed just last month, has already collapsed, and the two nations have resumed direct cross-border military strikes in recent weeks.

    According to Vance, a well-funded, covert campaign is actively working to scuttle the Iran deal to perpetuate ongoing military conflict. He specifically confirmed that some of the funding for this campaign originates from Israeli government-linked actors, referencing a recent Time magazine exposé detailing an organized Israeli influence operation targeting the Make America Great Again (MAGA) conservative base that Vance is courting as he positions himself as a potential 2028 Republican presidential candidate and a political heir to former President Donald Trump. The Time report alleges that Brad Parscale, who served as digital campaign strategist for Trump’s 2020 presidential run, receives $1.5 million per month to run the influence operation. Vance said the operation pays multiple American influencers to attack his Iran negotiation efforts, and that these critics have launched vicious personal attacks against him in an effort to keep the U.S. tied to indefinite military escalation against Iran.

    “I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to, like, actually shift us away from that policy [the Iran negotiations] because they want to continue the military campaign,” Vance told Rogan.

    The vice president pushed back against hardline hawks in the U.S. political system who have opposed the Iran deal, challenging them to present a viable alternative to negotiations. He framed himself as a “reasonable moderate” in the deeply polarized American debate over Israel policy, noting that he has faced widespread baseless accusations of antisemitism for his push for negotiations with Iran, which he called “insane.”

    When asked whether the U.S. would have entered its most recent open war with Iran if not for Israeli influence efforts, Vance replied, “Yes, yes I do.” He clarified that he shares the Biden administration’s core position that Iran must not be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon, a stance he said the president holds independent of external pressure.

    Vance also rejected the theory that Israel is able to coerce former President Trump using the Epstein files or other compromising material, calling that claim “crazy.”

  • UK school with hundreds of Muslim students evacuated after bomb threat

    UK school with hundreds of Muslim students evacuated after bomb threat

    On the last day of the 2023-2024 academic year, a prominent Muslim-faith private school in Birmingham, United Kingdom, was forced to evacuate all 450 of its 11 to 16-year-old students following a emailed bomb threat that disrupted planned end-of-term celebrations, local media has confirmed.

    Hamd House School, an institution rated “Outstanding” and lauded as “highly inclusive” by education regulator Ofsted, received the threatening email early Tuesday morning, with a copy of the message also sent directly to Ofsted itself. The threat came as students and staff gathered to distribute annual academic awards and mark the start of summer break with a day of community-focused festivities, turning a joyful annual tradition into an emergency scenario.

    Israr Khan, the school’s proprietor, told local outlet Birmingham Live that the incident caused significant unnecessary disruption to a day meant for celebration. “School was full and pupils were celebrating the last day before summer, we were giving out awards and having a day of celebration and fun on this special day, and this was hugely disrupting,” Khan said.

    Emergency response teams from West Midlands Police, including canine units trained to detect explosive materials, were dispatched immediately to sweep the entire school campus. After a thorough search of the grounds and buildings, authorities cleared the school as safe and lifted the evacuation order.

    Khan told reporters that the school appears to have been deliberately targeted, noting that this bomb threat is not an isolated event: the institution and its staff have faced a string of separate hostile incidents in recent weeks. He added that law enforcement has formally logged the incident as harassment, with an active investigation still ongoing. “The matter remains an open police investigation. An unusual and bizarre quirk to this situation is that the threat was also sent to Ofsted. The police have logged this incident as harassment,” Khan said, confirming that the school would continue full cooperation with investigating authorities.

    Neither West Midlands Police nor Hamd House School has issued additional public statements beyond the initial details shared by Khan, despite requests for comment from independent outlet Middle East Eye.

    The incident has drawn sharp criticism from the anti-Islamophobia NGO Mend, which says there has been widespread “near silence” from mainstream media and political leaders over the threat against the Muslim-majority school. In a post on social platform X, the organization questioned the double standard in how such incidents are covered and prioritized: “Ask yourself what the reaction would be if 450 children at any other school were threatened this way. The quiet tells you something about whose safety is treated as a story and whose is treated as background noise.”

    Mend has called for authorities to reclassify the investigation as a hate crime probe, arguing the threat intentionally targeted Muslim children against a backdrop of rising anti-Muslim hostility in the UK, consistent with the pattern of earlier incidents against the school and its staff.

  • Israeli opposition tops new poll as Netanyahu allies explore voting restrictions

    Israeli opposition tops new poll as Netanyahu allies explore voting restrictions

    As Israel prepares for its 27 October parliamentary election, a newly released public opinion survey from broadcaster Channel 13 has delivered a potentially game-changing projection: a coalition of opposition parties united by the goal of ousting long-serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would win the slimmest possible governing majority, securing 61 out of the 120 seats in the Knesset. This marks the first major poll released in over a month that shows the anti-Netanyahu bloc capable of forming a majority government without relying on support from Palestinian-majority political parties.

    Breaking down the projected seat shares, the poll forecasts that former Israeli army chief Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party will capture 21 seats, falling just one seat short of Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party, which is projected to take 22 seats. Following the two leading blocs are former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s Together alliance at 15 seats, Yair Golan’s Democrats at 11 seats, and Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu at 10 seats. The final four seats required to push the opposition bloc across the 61-seat threshold would go to a new alliance led by Yoaz Hendel and Chili Tropper.

    By contrast, the current coalition of far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties aligned with Netanyahu falls well short of a majority in the projection. United Torah Judaism is forecast to win 8 seats, while Shas and Itamar Ben Gvir’s Jewish Power take 7 seats apiece, and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s Religious Zionism party is projected to win 6 seats. For Palestinian-majority parties, the poll projects Hadash-Ta’al will win 5 seats and Ra’am will take 4, while the Balad party and former Defense Minister Benny Gantz’s Blue and White both fail to cross the minimum electoral threshold required to gain parliamentary representation. Notably, Channel 13 has not released public details of the poll’s sample size or margin of error, leaving its methodological transparency unconfirmed.

    While Eisenkot has positioned himself as a leading figure in the movement to oust Netanyahu, his past policy stances suggest little substantive shift in Israeli policy toward the Gaza Strip if he enters government. As a member of Netanyahu’s wartime war cabinet in 2024 during the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Eisenkot privately discussed plans to restrict humanitarian access that would exacerbate widespread starvation among Palestinian civilians, a policy that Netanyahu ultimately implemented to push Gaza into a state of famine.

    The release of the poll comes amid growing controversy over efforts by Netanyahu’s allies to restrict ballot access ahead of the vote, moves widely interpreted as an attempt to suppress turnout among voters likely to oppose the prime minister. Israeli newspaper Haaretz recently reported that senior officials in Transportation Minister Miri Regev’s office held discussions about imposing strict restrictions on incoming international flights immediately before election day, including limits on charter travel. Officials involved in those talks acknowledged the policy was motivated by fears that tens of thousands of Israeli citizens living overseas would return home to cast votes against Netanyahu.

    In a separate restrictive move, a Knesset committee has advanced legislation that would eliminate dedicated polling stations at retirement and assisted-living facilities across the country. The change is projected to impact approximately 37,000 eligible voters, a population demographic that overwhelmingly opposes Netanyahu, and that number roughly equals the total number of votes required to secure one full Knesset seat.

    While consecutive recent polls have consistently shown Netanyahu’s incumbent coalition at risk of defeat, Israel’s deeply fragmented political landscape still creates significant uncertainty for the opposition’s path to power. Even if the anti-Netanyahu bloc secures a narrow majority, negotiating a stable governing agreement across its multiple competing factions could prove a major challenge.

  • Iranian press review: Political figures expect continued but limited confrontation with US

    Iranian press review: Political figures expect continued but limited confrontation with US

    Against a tense backdrop of post-June 2025 military exchanges between Iran, the United States and Israel, a broad cross-section of current and former Iranian political leaders have converged on one key assessment: a full-blown, prolonged military conflict between Tehran and Washington is highly unlikely, though low-intensity confrontation and pressure will persist. This consensus emerged from a Tuesday interview conducted by Khabar Online with five political figures spanning Iran’s ideological spectrum, who found common ground despite divergent views on the long-term trajectory of bilateral relations.

    Ali Motahari, a former moderate Iranian lawmaker, framed the current escalation as unlikely to spiral into broader war, noting that neither side has a strategic interest in open, large-scale conflict. “I don’t think the current exchanges will lead to a full-scale war because neither side wants one,” Motahari stated. His assessment was echoed by Mohsen Kouhkan, a conservative Iranian politician, who argued that Washington has no preparedness for a drawn-out military engagement. Kouhkan emphasized that recent U.S. threats are primarily a tool to ramp up political and economic pressure, not a precursor to launching a wider war.

    Even as political leaders rule out all-out conflict, Tehran’s municipal government is moving forward with sweeping civil defense preparations to protect the capital’s population amid ongoing tensions. The Tehran City Council is drafting a new mandate that would require mandatory bomb shelters in all new construction projects, and retroactively repurpose existing public infrastructure — including metro stations and public underground parking garages — as emergency shelters for civilian populations during attacks. The policy shift comes after widespread criticism from residents, civil society activists and urban planning experts, who highlighted the critical lack of civilian protection infrastructure following two consecutive military campaigns launched by the U.S. and Israel against Iran starting in June 2025.

    According to reporting from Shargh Daily, the proposal would task Tehran Municipality with both constructing new dedicated public shelters and retrofitting existing underground public spaces to serve emergency functions. For all new development projects, the mandate would require developers to include military-attack-rated shelter space in their blueprints; completion permits for new buildings will be denied to projects that fail to meet this safety requirement.

    Amid internal debate over how to respond to ongoing tensions, Masih Mohajeri — a cleric and reformist-aligned politician — has publicly called out Iranian pro-war factions, urging decision-makers to reject pressure to escalate conflict. In an op-ed published in Abrar Daily, Mohajeri criticized hard-line groups that refuse to de-escalate military confrontation with the U.S., instead demanding immediate revenge for the killing of former Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Mohajeri argued that extending open conflict would actually undermine the goal of holding those responsible for Khamenei’s killing accountable, noting that prolonged war plays directly into the strategic aims of Washington and Jerusalem.

    Mohajeri described the U.S. and Israeli governments as “fascist and racist,” arguing that limited military action alone cannot address the long-term threat they pose. “To save contemporary humanity from the crimes of these two criminal regimes, we must think strategically. If we speak of revenge, it must be revenge against the structure [of their ideology] so that the roots of the conspiracies and crimes are eradicated,” he wrote. “Continuing the war is what Israel and hard-line groups in the United States want and said it would ultimately harm Iran. Decision-makers must act wisely and make careful decisions, not allowing the country to fall into the trap of war. Iran must, with patience and perseverance over the long term, build itself in such a way that it can burn out the roots of these two criminal regimes.”

    The reporting also sheds light on internal Iranian power dynamics, following extensive international coverage of recent comments by Mohsen Rezaei, an adviser to Iran’s current supreme leader and former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Rezaei’s remarks describing the Strait of Hormuz as “more important than dozens of atomic bombs” garnered prominent headlines outside Iran, but received almost no coverage within the country. A prominent Iranian domestic political analyst, Ahmad Zeidabadi — a former political prisoner who has been jailed multiple times for his public commentary — pushed back on the international framing of Rezaei’s comments, arguing that the former IRGC commander holds little to no actual sway over Iran’s national and regional policy decisions.

    Writing on his Telegram channel, Zeidabadi questioned why the Times of Israel, which first picked up the comments from Iran’s ISNA news agency, elevated Rezaei’s remarks to front-page news. “Is Mr Rezaei’s role in the Islamic Republic’s decision-making system important enough for his comments to become the front-page story of a major Israeli newspaper? It is not,” he wrote, adding that “The Israeli press is making major stories out of events in Iran that are not really major.” While Rezaei holds the official title of adviser to the supreme leader, Zeidabadi’s analysis aligns with the structure of Iranian politics: many advisory positions for former senior officials are largely ceremonial, designed to preserve the standing of past leaders while all core decision-making authority remains concentrated in the country’s central leadership.

    This report is compiled as part of an Iranian press review, and has not been independently verified for accuracy by Middle East Eye.

  • Iran strikes US base in Jordan as American bombardment continues

    Iran strikes US base in Jordan as American bombardment continues

    A sharp escalation of cross-border strikes between the United States and Iran has sent shockwaves through the Middle East, raising urgent fears of a wider regional conflict after weeks of intermittent clashes that derailed fragile peace talks. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched coordinated drone and missile attacks targeting multiple US military facilities across Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain this week, framing the action as direct retaliation for a previous US strike that landed near a children’s cancer hospital in Iran.

    According to Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB, the IRGC strikes specifically hit communication infrastructure and fuel storage depots at US bases in Jordan, alongside radar systems, Patriot air defense installations, and fuel storage at Kuwait’s Ali Al Salem Air Base, and US military sites at Bahrain’s Sheikh Isa Air Base. Bahrain’s military command quickly confirmed it intercepted and destroyed multiple incoming aerial vehicles, issuing a sharp condemnation of what it called Iran’s “systematic hostile approach.” In an official statement, Bahraini officials emphasized that the deliberate targeting of sites that put civilian lives and private property at risk represents a clear violation of international humanitarian law.

    The Iranian retaliation came in response to a sweeping series of US raids carried out over seven hours on Wednesday, which struck dozens of locations across Iran. The Iranian army confirmed that seven of its military personnel were killed in a precision missile strike on a barracks near the southeastern city of Iranshahr. Senior Iranian military officials have issued a stark warning in the aftermath of the raids: if the US moves to strike Iran’s core strategic facilities, Tehran will respond by destroying critical regional infrastructure controlled by American and allied forces.

    This latest escalation follows the complete collapse of US-Iran peace talks that aimed to end the intermittent conflict that has roiled the region since February. The breakdown of negotiations came amid explosive claims from US Vice President JD Vance, who told podcast host Joe Rogan in a recent interview that hardline elements within Israel’s government are actively manipulating American public opinion to derail any peace deal and prolong the conflict with Iran indefinitely.

    In a move that further ratcheted up tensions, US President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he would reimpose a recently lifted shipping blockade on Iranian vessels transiting the Gulf. Trump asserted that the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global energy supplies, would remain open “with or without Iran,” and added that the US would impose a 20 percent transit fee on all ships passing through the waterway to cover what he called “security and safety costs” for commercial vessels. Last week, Trump formally notified Congress that the US had resumed offensive military operations against Iran, granting the Pentagon 60 additional days of military action in the region without requiring explicit congressional approval. The president has also issued an extraordinary threat to destroy Pickaxe Mountain, a deeply buried site near Iran’s Natanz nuclear complex where Western intelligence agencies allege Tehran is constructing an undeclared underground uranium enrichment facility.

    On Tuesday, Iranian state media reported five loud explosions west of the key port city of Bandar Abbas, which lies on the northern edge of the Strait of Hormuz, though no further details on the cause or casualties have been released. Hours before the explosions, Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament’s National Security Committee, announced that a new bill titled the “Strategic Action for the Security and Sustainable Progress of the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf” had been formally introduced to the legislature, timed to coincide with the downing of multiple US drones over Iranian territory. Azizi reaffirmed that Tehran remains unwavering in its commitment to defending its core sovereign red lines, particularly regarding management and control of the strategic waterway.

    Regional powers have already begun moving to de-escalate the crisis. Pakistan, which mediated a preliminary memorandum of understanding (MoU) between Washington and Tehran last month, announced on Wednesday that it would continue working to encourage both sides to end hostilities and return to the negotiating table. Pakistani foreign office spokesman Tahir Andrabi told reporters in Islamabad that while implementation of the original MoU has faced significant obstacles, Pakistan remains committed to facilitating technical-level talks that align with the original framework of the agreement.

    The rapidly unfolding events have left the region on edge, with little immediate prospect of a return to diplomacy as both sides dig in their positions and expand military operations.

  • Inside Khamenei’s funeral: Revealing moments from a week of mourning

    Inside Khamenei’s funeral: Revealing moments from a week of mourning

    Five months after Iran’s long-serving supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a US-Israeli airstrike in February, the 86-year-old leader who steered Iran’s politics for more than three decades was laid to rest on July 9, following a week of multi-city funeral processions that stretched across Iran and southern Iraq. His son, 56-year-old Mojtaba Khamenei, has since taken over the role of supreme leader. State media reports estimate millions of Iranians turned out for official mourning events, but beyond the public displays of grief, the week-long ceremonies laid bare underreported tensions, internal power negotiations and carefully coded political messaging that observers have since dissected to understand Iran’s shifting post-Khamenei political landscape. Middle East Eye’s on-the-ground analysis highlights the most telling of these underreported moments.

    On the opening day of the procession, as foreign diplomatic delegations filed past Khamenei’s open casket, Quranic verses were recited at each stage of the ceremony — but the verse selected for the Saudi Arabian delegation sparked immediate debate among political observers. Organizers chose Verse 13 of Surah Al Imran, a passage that references the Battle of Badr, the first major military clash between the Prophet Muhammad’s outnumbered followers and the Meccan Quraysh, in which Muslim forces secured an unlikely victory against overwhelming odds. The verse reads: “Indeed, there was a sign for you in the two groups that met in battle: one group fighting in the cause of Allah and the other disbelieving. They saw them with their own eyes as twice their number. And Allah supports with His victory whom He wills. Surely in this is a lesson for those who have insight.”

    A senior anonymous political source told Middle East Eye that sitting Iranian government officials criticized what they called the “deliberate, unapproved selection” of the verse, noting the choice was orchestrated by the hard-line Islamic Ideology Dissemination Organisation. The incident also drew backlash on Iranian domestic social media, with one reformist politician telling MEE that directing a thinly veiled political warning at invited foreign diplomatic guests was inappropriate, and that hospitality and respect should have taken priority over implicit political messaging.

    Another notable incident unfolded involving Hassan Khomeini, grandson of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who had long been named as a potential candidate for the supreme leadership before Mojtaba Khamenei’s appointment. Khomeini joined other members of his family for the opening funeral service to pay tribute to the late leader, but left the ceremony early just as Verse 95 of Surah An-Nisa was recited. The passage contrasts believers who avoid fighting for religious causes without just cause with those who strive in Allah’s name, granting the latter higher spiritual status and greater reward. An anonymous source close to Khomeini confirmed he was deeply uncomfortable with the targeted recitation, which was widely interpreted as a rebuke of his rumoured leadership ambitions, though Khomeini and his brothers later joined the funeral ceremonies in the holy cities of Mashhad and Qom.

    Since Mojtaba Khamenei’s appointment to the supreme leadership in early March, persistent rumours have circulated that he was seriously wounded in the same February airstrike that killed his father, fueling questions about his fitness to rule. To counter these claims, Khamenei’s three other sons — Mostafa, Masoud and Meysam — made high-profile public appearances at nearly all major funeral events, all appearing in full health with no visible injuries or scars. The intentional display was widely read as a calculated signal to both the Iranian public and the international community that Mojtaba was alive, healthy and fit to govern. A senior Iranian source confirmed to MEE that while Mojtaba did sustain minor injuries to his feet and minor facial scarring in the strike, his injuries are healing well and the reports of his poor condition have been wildly exaggerated.

    Mostafa Khamenei, the eldest son of the late leader, took on an unusually high public profile during the ceremonies, even leading the funeral prayer ahead of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s burial at the shrine of Imam Reza in Mashhad and joining events in Iraq. During the Iraqi processions, he held a high-profile meeting with the sons of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq’s most senior Shia cleric, a moment that has fueled new speculation that Mostafa may take on a greater political role in the coming years. A senior Iranian cleric told MEE that Mostafa is a highly trained scholar who studied for decades at Qom’s prestigious seminaries, but chose to stay out of public politics during his father’s lifetime, as he held little personal interest in holding public office.

    Grand Ayatollah Abdollah Javadi Amoli, one of Iran’s most senior and respected clerical figures, also drew widespread attention for his unusual remarks during the Qom funeral prayer. Rather than sticking to the customary, restrained language reserved for deceased supreme leaders, Javadi Amoli used far more elevated spiritual language to describe Khamenei. A cleric familiar with the remarks told MEE that the framing was intentional: Javadi Amoli was not only stating he had only seen good in Khamenei’s leadership, but was publicly declaring the late leader a martyr who had attained a higher spiritual status in the eyes of God after dying in the strike.

    The public appearance of Ali Asghar Hejazi, widely considered the second-most powerful figure in the late supreme leader’s office, also drew significant attention, after prior reports claimed he had been killed or seriously wounded in the same February airstrike. Hejazi appeared in full good health, a choice that observers say was designed to counter rampant speculation of deep internal divisions following the leadership succession. After Mojtaba’s appointment, rumours circulated that Hejazi had backed other candidates for supreme leader and did not have a close working relationship with the new leader. Mohammad Reza Bahonar, a member of Iran’s Expediency Council, told local media that shortly after the late leader’s death, Hejazi addressed the Assembly of Experts to clarify Khamenei’s stance on succession, stating: “The late Imam never held any negative view toward Mr Mojtaba, but he emphasized that, according to both law and Islamic jurisprudence, the supreme leader does not choose his own successor. This is the religious and legal responsibility of the Assembly of Experts.” A source told MEE that while Mojtaba has offered Hejazi a new senior role in his administration, Hejazi has declined the position, saying he plans to step back after decades of public service.

    Finally, the funeral events exposed open hostility toward Iran’s moderate political leadership from hard-line principlist supporters. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and President Masoud Pezeshkian were all confronted by angry crowds who chanted slogans condemning the officials for their past negotiations with the United States. In one widely reported incident, Araghchi was shouted down, called a “scumbag” and had stones thrown at him by protestors during the procession.

    Middle East Eye is an independent media outlet providing original, unfiltered coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.