标签: Asia

亚洲

  • How a man’s fatal fall at a fort in India sparked a media frenzy

    How a man’s fatal fall at a fort in India sparked a media frenzy

    What began as a seemingly tragic hiking accident at one of western India’s most popular scenic tourist spots has exploded into a high-profile criminal case that has captured national attention and reignited debates over media trials in India. On June 18, 26-year-old Ketan Agarwal fell to his death from a steep ravine at Lohagad Fort, a historic trekking destination outside Pune, during an outing with his 20-year-old fiancée, Siya Goyal. The pair had been engaged in February, with wedding preparations fully underway and a date set for later the same year, according to both families.

    Initially, authorities and witnesses treated the death as an unfortunate misadventure. But within days, Pune police made two shocking arrests: Siya Goyal and her 22-year-old friend Chetan Chaudhary, charging both with the premeditated murder of Agarwal. Senior police officials told reporters the pair were carrying on a romantic relationship, and that Goyal had grown unwilling to proceed with her planned marriage to Agarwal. Investigators allege the pair conspired to push Agarwal from the fort’s height to stage his death as an accidental slip.

    Investigators have outlined their case step-by-step to the press. Senior Pune police officer Sandeep Gill told reporters that suspicion first emerged because Agarwal was an experienced trekker, making an unprovoked slip unlikely, and Ketan’s own family had raised early concerns about the circumstances of his death. Senior inspector Dinesh Tayade added that the break in the case came from CCTV footage captured near the fort’s foothills on the day of the death: on a 33-degree Celsius morning, the footage captured an unidentified man wearing a hooded sweatshirt with his head fully covered, clothing investigators deemed unusual for the warm weather. That man, police have confirmed, was identified as Chetan Chaudhary.

    As of early July, both accused remain in police custody and are scheduled to appear back in court Friday. Neither suspect has issued a public statement, but their legal teams have forcefully rejected all allegations, calling the case baseless and the arrest premature. Siya Goyal’s attorney Vipul Dushing told reporters that his client maintains her innocence and is cooperating with investigations, arguing that she was arrested solely on the complaint of Ketan’s family with no concrete evidence to support the charges. “There’s no evidence and police are just drawing inferences,” Dushing said, questioning the validity of the police’s recent crime scene reconstruction and gait analysis to match Chaudhary to the hooded figure on CCTV, noting the process cannot produce conclusive proof of identity. Chetan Chaudhary’s attorney Ram Shahane echoed the criticism, stating there is no direct evidence tying his client to the scene, and that he has only been implicated due to his friendship with Goyal.

    The case has quickly become the latest high-profile crime to stoke a massive media frenzy across India, with unverified investigative details leaked to reporters and personal content from the victim and accused circulating widely on social media. Siya Goyal in particular has faced relentless online harassment: even as the investigation remains ongoing, she has been widely labeled a murderer on public platforms, and a pre-arrest video of her mourning Agarwal’s death has been widely shared to mock her.

    Both families have been shattered by the fallout of the tragedy. Ketan Agarwal’s parents, who have called for the death penalty for the accused and met with Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to demand swift justice, said they cannot understand the alleged motive. “If she did not want to marry, she could have refused. We would have cancelled the marriage immediately,” Ketan’s father Vishal Agarwal said. The state government has appointed high-profile celebrity lawyer Ujjwal Nikam, best known for securing the death penalty for 2008 Mumbai attacker Ajmal Kasab, as the public prosecutor for the case.

    For Siya Goyal’s family, the turn of events has been equally devastating: her father fainted and was hospitalized hours after the arrest, and the family has rejected police claims that Siya was forced into the marriage. Her mother Pooja Goyal said that the family repeatedly checked in with Siya about her engagement, and that she repeatedly confirmed she loved Ketan and wanted to proceed with the wedding. “If Siya had any problems and discussed it with us, we would have called off the wedding. But there was no problem. Siya loved him very much,” she said, noting that the tragedy has devastated both families irreparably, and that whoever is found guilty should face the strictest possible punishment.

  • Pilgrims and tourists detained in Saudi Arabia over online posts

    Pilgrims and tourists detained in Saudi Arabia over online posts

    A damning new joint investigation from human rights organizations Amnesty International and Alqst has uncovered a pattern of arbitrary detention, unfair trial practices, and harsh long prison sentences handed down to international visitors to Saudi Arabia – including religious pilgrims and tourist travelers – purely for peaceful expression on social media platforms. The report, released this week, documents at least nine confirmed cases of foreign nationals targeted for detention between July 2022 and late 2024, most hailing from Middle Eastern nations and Global South countries. Rights groups warn the actual total of those detained is far higher, hidden by Saudi Arabia’s lack of judicial transparency and widespread fear among victims and their families of retaliation for speaking out.

    Among the most high-profile cases detailed is that of Amr Abdelfattah, a French citizen and father of three who was taken into custody in June 2024 while completing the annual Hajj pilgrimage, one of Islam’s most sacred religious obligations. Abdelfattah spent 11 months in pre-trial detention before facing trial in May 2025 on two counts: charges related to peaceful online speech, where Saudi authorities claim he “insulted” the Saudi government and expressed support for individuals previously prosecuted by the state, and a minor visa discrepancy. Rights groups note that visa irregularities of this type almost always result in only a small fine or deportation, never imprisonment. According to Abdelfattah’s wife, the entire incident stemmed from her husband falling victim to a widespread common visa scam targeting pilgrims. He has now spent two full years behind bars, where his family says he has endured repeated physical abuse at the hands of prison guards. Alqst’s investigation confirmed credible reports that Abdelfattah has been beaten by correctional officers. Like other detained foreign nationals, he faces severe restrictions on communication with his family: any discussion of his treatment, trial conditions or legal situation results in an immediate cut-off of phone calls, and he is banned from speaking French during calls – he is only permitted to communicate in Arabic, allowing full monitoring by prison authorities. “Instead of being fined and deported, he has spent two years in detention, where he has endured repeated abuse and faces additional charges over peaceful expression,” Abdelfattah’s wife told Middle East Eye. “It’s time for this ordeal to end and for our family to be reunited.”

    A second prominent case in the report involves Ahmed al-Doush, a British national who was working for Bank of America at the time of his arrest. Doush was taken into custody in August 2024 at Riyadh’s international airport as he prepared to board a flight back to the United Kingdom, after completing a family trip to Saudi Arabia with his then-pregnant wife and three young children. His detention stems from social media posts he published years before he even traveled to the kingdom. Notably, Doush had no prior history of political activism, prior reporting from Middle East Eye confirms. Since his arrest, he has been sentenced to five years in prison. His wife Amaher Nour was forced to give birth to the couple’s fourth child without any contact with her husband, just over a week before the report’s release. “Ahmed was taken from me and the children without warning or explanation. His absence has been deeply distressing to me and my children,” Nour said. “Our fourth child arrived only about a week ago and Ahmed wasn’t able to be there, I couldn’t even speak to him on the phone. My children and I just want him home as soon as possible, and seek the active support and help of the UK government to protect his rights.”

    Doush’s family has faced the same lack of transparency and communication restrictions that mark other cases. Despite repeated formal requests, Saudi authorities have refused to share court documents with Doush’s legal team in the UK or his family. Doush has told his wife that he is only permitted to discuss superficial family matters during calls; any conversation about his detention conditions, health, legal proceedings or the charges against him will result in the call being terminated and additional punishment. Most recently, the report confirms, Doush was denied all contact with his family after he spoke to his children in English during a supervised call.

    Other cases profiled in the investigation illustrate how widespread this targeting is across different types of visitors. Four of the nine documented detainees were in Saudi Arabia to complete the Hajj or Umrah pilgrimages – the two most important religious journeys in Islam – while the other five were on family tourist or personal visits. Fahd Ramadhan, a Dutch-Yemeni national, was detained arbitrarily in November 2023 and held for 18 months without ever being formally charged. Ramadhan believes his detention was triggered by social media posts expressing sympathy for a known critic of the Saudi royal family; interrogators presented him with a document listing four X (formerly Twitter) posts he had made and demanded he sign it. He was ultimately released in June 2025. One unnamed pilgrim was arrested in Mecca just hours after posting mild criticism of Saudi authorities on social media while performing Umrah; he was held without trial for 20 months before being released, even though he deleted the posts immediately after publishing them. Another visitor was detained and held for a full year before release after holding up a small sign during Umrah calling for the release of a political prisoner held in another country. In 2022, Lebanese national Haidar Slim was detained during Hajj after filming himself chanting a traditional Shia religious slogan; he was sentenced to five years in prison and a 10,000 Saudi riyal fine, only released in March 2025 after diplomatic intervention from his home government.

    The report also highlights a common exploitative practice: many detainees who do not speak Arabic have been forced to sign legal documents they cannot understand, with no translation provided, to secure coerced confessions. Nadyeen Abdulaziz, a senior representative of Alqst, called on foreign governments to step up action to protect their citizens. “Foreign governments should use the means available to them to protect the rights of their citizens and residents while abroad, including providing consular assistance and monitoring trial proceedings,” Abdulaziz said. “Governments that profess to believe in universal human rights should advocate for the release of all those arbitrarily detained for exercising their right to freedom of expression.” Middle East Eye has reached out to the Saudi embassy in London requesting comment on the report’s findings, as of publication no response has been received.

  • Turkish police beat us with iron rods before we lost limbs to frostbite, Afghans say

    Turkish police beat us with iron rods before we lost limbs to frostbite, Afghans say

    In mid-January, a group of 50 young Afghan migrants, all aged 25 or younger, set out on a deadly journey toward Europe, facilitated by people smugglers who guided them across the Iranian border into Turkey’s eastern Van Province. What followed was a harrowing ordeal of abuse, exposure, and preventable tragedy that has left at least 20 dead and 11 survivors with permanent disabilities, according to testimony from 12 survivors who spoke exclusively to the BBC.

    Temperatures in the mountainous border region had plummeted to -15°C as the group was detained almost immediately after entering Turkey by Turkish border guards. The survivors detail systematic abuse that began in detention: held for several nights in an unheated, open warehouse where snow fell directly on them, the migrants were given only one meager ration of dry bread and water per day and forced to carry out hard labor including clearing snow and hauling wood. Twenty-three-year-old Alwaldin, one of the survivors, says he was cut off from all contact with both his family and the smuggler who had promised him safe passage to the continent.

    The violence escalated dramatically on January 25, the survivors recall. Guards lined the group up again, this time beating them with iron bars. After stripping them of all clothing except a single pair of trousers, binding their hands, and forcing them to crawl stomach-down up a snow-covered hill, multiple migrants suffered severe head wounds that left blood running down their bodies, according to Alwaldin. Some survivors could not move their hands at all after the beating, 21-year-old Shahsawar, one of the most severely injured survivors, told reporters.

    The group was then split into eight-person parties and pushed through barbed wire onto the Iranian side of the border, stranded in the middle of a heavy snowstorm with near-zero visibility and no supplies or footwear. All their warm clothes, shoes, and socks had been confiscated by guards, leaving them exposed to the brutal cold. “The paths were covered in snow. And we didn’t know which direction to go or whether we would survive,” Shahsawar said.

    The death toll mounted quickly in the frozen landscape. A 13-year-old boy named Danial was separated from the group within minutes, and his body was later recovered from the snow. Exhausted and unable to walk farther, Shahsawar took shelter behind a large boulder alongside 13-year-old Asim and another migrant named Ahmed, whose hands had already frozen solid. When Asim left to seek help at dawn, Ahmed died in Shahsawar’s arms, too frozen to even speak in his final hours.

    Days later, Asim was found alive by search parties looking for stranded migrants. Too cold to speak when rescued, the teen pointed searchers toward the rock where Shahsawar remained trapped—a small, deliberate gesture that ultimately saved Shahsawar’s life. By the time the survivors were located, however, extreme frostbite had already caused irreversible damage to their extremities.

    After being stranded, the group says Iranian authorities refused to provide them with urgent hospital care. It was not until four days after the Afghan embassy in Tehran announced it would take urgent action to locate and assist the stranded migrants that the Red Crescent Society transferred the survivors overland to Afghanistan’s Herat Province, and eventually to Kabul for advanced medical care. By that point, the frostbite on 11 survivors had turned tissue black and necrotic, making amputation unavoidable.

    Shahsawar woke up in a Kabul operating room to discover all four of his limbs had been removed. “I raised my hands – they felt light. Both had been cut off,” he told the BBC. “My throat closed up and I couldn’t speak.” Other survivors like Alwaldin lost most of their toes to the same preventable tissue damage. Medical experts note that frostbite is fully treatable if caught early—for these migrants, weeks of delayed care turned a survivable exposure into a lifelong disability.

    Regional human rights activists say this incident is far from an anomaly. Şafak Bozkurt, chair of the Van Bar Association Human Rights Centre Migration and Asylum Commission, told the BBC he has documented dozens of similar push-back operations in the border region, many resulting in hypothermia and death. Zakira Hikmat, a Turkey-based migration rights advocate, says that since the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 2021, thousands of Afghans have attempted to cross this border to reach Europe, and increased Turkish border surveillance has pushed migrants onto far more dangerous, high-altitude routes that cross mountain passes prone to extreme winter weather. Mahmout Keçen, another Van-based migrant rights activist, has documented hundreds of cases of alleged abuse, push-backs, denial of asylum access, and forced returns of irregular migrants in the Iran-Turkey border region.

    When contacted by the BBC for comment on the survivors’ allegations, Turkish authorities did not address the specific claims of abuse, beatings, or forced stranding. In a statement, the Turkish foreign ministry said that its border forces operate in full compliance with national and international law, and provide all detained undocumented migrants with necessary support including food, water, and medical care. The ministry added that the allegations are unfounded and unfairly undermine Turkey’s successful efforts to curb irregular migration, noting that Turkey’s policy has effectively halted almost all irregular migration flows toward the European Union. The statement added that Turkey, which hosts one of the world’s largest refugee and migrant populations, maintains a human-centered, sustainable migration management system aligned with international standards that balances security and humanitarian access. Iranian authorities have also been contacted for comment and have not yet issued a response.

    All 12 survivors who spoke to the BBC have now been returned to Afghanistan, where they continue to recover from their injuries, many facing permanent disability from the amputations they suffered.

  • Banned by Beijing, this comedian is taking his act to Chinese speakers abroad

    Banned by Beijing, this comedian is taking his act to Chinese speakers abroad

    Three years after being abruptly barred from performing in his home country, once one of China’s biggest stand-up comedy stars Chizi, born Wang Yuechi, has launched a sold-out 2026 world tour, with a stop in Taiwan at the top of his ambition list — a choice he describes as equal parts high-risk and deeply compelling.

    The 30-year-old comedian opened his recent Singapore show at the National University of Singapore, where a packed crowd of mostly Chinese Singaporeans and expatriate Chinese greeted a subtle joke about China’s top leader Xi Jinping with loud cheers and scattered approving expletives. “This is fire,” one audience member shouted in Mandarin. For context, public commentary or jokes about Xi, who has consolidated unprecedented personal power over nearly 15 years in office, remain strictly off-limits within mainland China, making even this subtle quip an act few comics would dare attempt.

    Chizi’s path to this 2026 tour began in 2023, when Chinese authorities banned him from all performances across the mainland following a series of international shows that touched on politically sensitive topics. Beijing never issued an official public statement explaining the ban, but the move effectively erased the once-household name from mainland Chinese public life. Today, Chizi resides outside of China, and his name is rarely spoken openly on mainland social media. In a recent post on Threads, he highlighted the pervasive censorship of his image: “In China my face is treated like a sexual organ. It’s not something that can be freely shown or circulated,” he wrote, after learning a fan had their social media account suspended for sharing a photo of him.

    After an extended hiatus from the stage, Chizi made his return in April 2026, kicking off a tour that includes stops in Tokyo, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, and Singapore, with every show selling out within days of going on sale. In an exclusive interview with the BBC following his Singapore set, Chizi framed this tour as his first truly authentic body of work after more than a decade in comedy. While many observers cast his comeback as an act of open defiance against Chinese censorship, Chizi downplayed that framing, noting his core goal is simple: “I wanted to perform for people who speak Chinese, to introduce myself, showing them how I live, or think as someone who lived in China for 30 years.” He added that he has long been drawn to challenging work, a mindset that shaped his comeback: “If something feels risky or dangerous, I find it interesting.”

    That appetite for risk is what led him to prioritize a performance in Taiwan, a self-governing island that Beijing claims as its own territory, making any public performance there by a Chinese-born comedian an inherently provocative act. “No Chinese comedian had ever performed in Taiwan,” he explained. “People speak the same language and the cultures are so similar. But there are so many tensions. So why not? Even if it turns into an argument, that’s okay. We could argue face-to-face.”

    Chizi’s 60-minute tour set centers largely on his own life story: he describes himself as an excessively talkative child who frequently frustrated authority figures, and he discovered his love of comedy in his late teens. Now working outside the constraints of Chinese censorship, Chizi could lean heavily into political humor, but he says he has intentionally limited the share of political jokes in this tour’s material. When he did reference Xi, he avoided using his name, instead calling him “Peng Liyuan’s husband,” a nod to Xi’s wife, the well-known Chinese soprano.

    The 2023 ban that ended his mainland career came on the heels of a North American tour where he served as the opening act for Chinese-American comedian Joe Wong. In those shows, Chizi spoke openly about topics that are completely off-limits for mainland comics: widespread state censorship, the rise of aggressive online nationalism and populism, and eroding rights for ethnic minority groups in China. He also pushed well past unwritten red lines by sharing his hope that people in Hong Kong — where Beijing has crushed all large-scale political opposition since 2019 — and Taiwan would get to live happy, self-determined lives. He learned of the ban while still on tour in February 2023.

    Chizi told the BBC his first reaction to the ban was actually relief. “The show was based on reflections and realisations I’d had over the past few years, and I wanted to express how I truly felt,” he explained. Once he accepted that his mainstream comedy career inside mainland China was over, he leaned further into candor for his next show in Toronto, and he says he has no regrets today. He noted that the space for uncensored stand-up comedy inside mainland China has grown far more constrained in recent years, with most permitted material focusing on shallow, non-controversial topics.

    Chizi’s comedy career stretches back more than a decade. A high school dropout, he began performing at open mic nights in 2015, and quickly found his footing: “I was always the chatty one, happy to make people laugh… I was like a fish in water,” he recalled. His big break came when he was invited to appear on a popular national talk show, the first television program in China to feature stand-up comedy regularly. He became a fan favorite, and within a year he was the face of two hit streaming comedy shows that racked up billions of views, cementing his status as one of China’s biggest stand-up superstars.

    He developed a trademark style that won widespread acclaim: he often rapped his jokes, excelled at off-the-cuff improvisation, and dished out sharp but good-natured roasts of A-list celebrities that left guests and audiences alike in stitches. He also became known for weaving current events and social commentary into his sets, a rare choice among mainland comics at the time. In one viral segment with pianist Lang Lang, he joked that Lang practiced piano exclusively at home as a child because “teachers would prick him with needles” — a subtle jab at a high-profile child abuse scandal at a Chinese kindergarten that was largely censored from mainstream media. Even when he was forced to cut forbidden jokes from his aired sets to comply with censorship rules, he saved every cut line in a folder labeled “Things I can’t say,” holding out hope that he would one day get to share them publicly.

    Despite his massive mainstream success, Chizi grew increasingly disillusioned with the constraints of working in China’s entertainment industry. He often questioned whether he was truly able to create meaningful work, rather than just being a popular celebrity, eventually quitting his regular spot on the hit talk show and leaving his talent agency after a public falling out. In late 2021, during the height of China’s zero-COVID lockdowns, he published his final post on his Weibo account, which had 4.7 million followers, announcing he would step away from the toxic, heavily censored social media environment. “It’s not that I don’t want to bring everyone joy. Of course I want everyone to be happy. But this place doesn’t carry joy,” he wrote.

    In his interview with the BBC, Chizi explained he had grown frustrated with the limits on his ability to help his audience even during the country’s most difficult pandemic moments. As lockdowns dragged on, he received hundreds of messages from locked-down residents asking for help accessing medicine, food, and other essential supplies. He reposted most of the requests, but censors repeatedly deleted the posts and warned him his account would be permanently shut down if he continued. “It was a helpless feeling,” he recalled. “The so-called privilege wasn’t that meaningful.” He said his approach to stepping back came from a lesson his father, an oil painter, taught him: “He taught me that when you paint, you can’t keep staring at one spot. You need to step back to see whether it’s any good.”

    Now that he has returned to the stage, Chizi plans to extend his 2026 tour to Australia, New Zealand, and North America. He says he doesn’t know how long he will keep touring, but for now he is relishing the freedom and connection of performing for enthusiastic, uncensored audiences. “Usually you make friends one by one, but on stage, I feel like I’m making 500 friends at once. That feeling – where there is a mutual understanding between me and the audience – I really like that,” he said.

  • Israeli press review: Netanyahu says wars will never end

    Israeli press review: Netanyahu says wars will never end

    In a stark and unprecedented admission to Israeli right-wing outlet Channel 14 on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel’s ongoing military campaigns across the Middle East will have no end, rejecting any prospect of a conclusion to the country’s regional conflicts. The lengthy interview, conducted with a media outlet widely viewed as a platform for Netanyahu’s political messaging, came in response to a question asking whether Israel’s multiple wars across the region were moving toward a close.

    Netanyahu pointed to what he framed as major Israeli achievements to date, including the targeted assassinations of senior Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, and Israel’s ongoing military occupation of swathes of Gaza, southern Lebanon and Syrian territory. He also referenced the two military campaigns launched by Israel and the United States targeting Iranian-linked forces, claiming that “we broke the barrier of fear” that he said had prevented Israeli attacks on Iran for 47 years.

    Pressed on whether his self-coined goal of “total victory” — announced immediately after the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack — remained within reach, Netanyahu doubled down on his indefinite conflict framing, stating simply, “it never ends.” He argued that military strength is a prerequisite for security in the Middle East and globally, asserting that “Israel is stronger than ever” before prompting applause from the studio audience, which complied with his request.

    When questioned about the prospect of what the interviewer called “emigration” for Gaza’s Palestinian population, Netanyahu corrected the framing to specify what he called “voluntary emigration” — a widely criticized Israeli euphemism for the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the besieged enclave. He declined to elaborate further, saying only, “I prefer to talk less and do more.” He used the same vague, action-over-words framing when asked about proposals to establish new Jewish settlements in occupied Gaza, noting that Israel faces mounting international pressure over its policies, and “I don’t have to challenge the entire world at every moment and on every issue.”

    Separate reporting from Israeli outlet Haaretz has shed new light on shifting social attitudes within Israel amid the ongoing Gaza conflict, revealing that a growing share of young Israeli students hold overtly racist views toward Palestinian citizens of the country, with upcoming student elections this October marking the first national student vote since the start of the Gaza war. The outlet cites growing concern from youth workers and academic researchers, who have documented a steady rise in extremist and exclusionary attitudes among Israeli teenagers over recent years.

    Data from a poll conducted by Israel’s own education ministry shows a sharp increase between 2023 and 2025 in the share of students who believe groups including Palestinian citizens of Israel do not deserve equal membership in Israeli society. The poll breaks down attitudes by school type: 52 percent of students from religious Israeli Jewish schools back the exclusionary view, compared to 35 percent of students from secular Jewish schools and 34 percent of students from Arab-speaking Israeli schools.

    A youth movement official told Haaretz that for Jewish Israeli students, rising nationalist sentiment has been paired with growing demands for a more rigid Jewish identity, alongside increased willingness to enlist in Israeli combat units. Another youth organizer noted that rising fear of Arab communities among Jewish students has been accompanied by a broader erosion of trust in Israel’s own democratic institutions. Beyond the rise in exclusionary views, the report found that most recent graduates of Israel’s secular education system no longer believe a lasting peace agreement with Palestinians is possible. One Jewish high school principal summarized the shift, telling Haaretz that today’s graduates “do not believe in peace or in a political solution to the conflict between the two peoples.”

    In another alarming development, Israeli news outlet Ynet reported Wednesday on a new academic study that warns of devastating, long-term mental health harms facing the children of Israeli reserve soldiers, whose deployments to multiple ongoing fronts have stretched on for nearly two years. The study, conducted by researchers at Reichman University, surveyed more than 2,500 reservist families to measure trauma rates across generations.

    The findings are stark: an overwhelming majority of young children under the age of seven whose parent is a reservist show measurable symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Seventy-five percent of these children meet the threshold for sub-clinical PTSD, while nearly 32 percent of symptomatic children meet criteria for full clinical PTSD. Researchers warned that the emotional and physiological harm being experienced by these children will create long-term costs for Israeli society if widespread, accessible treatment is not rolled out immediately.

    The trauma is not limited to children: the study found that 35 percent of surveyed reserve fathers and 42 percent of reserve mothers also show symptoms of PTSD and other trauma-related conditions. After almost two years of continuous combat across multiple fronts, the study concludes that Israel has effectively become “a nation in trauma,” with reservist families raising young children bearing an especially severe and ongoing burden. Researchers described daily life for many of these families as “at times, utter chaos,” warning that the country is now facing an unprecedented “tsunami of mental health problems.”

    Common symptoms reported in children include insomnia, bedwetting, frequent violent outbursts, and other behavioral disruptions, while 80 percent of parents reported a major, widespread decline across all areas of their daily lives, researchers confirmed.

  • State-backed UAE and Bahrain teams under scrutiny ahead of Tour de France

    State-backed UAE and Bahrain teams under scrutiny ahead of Tour de France

    As cycling’s most prestigious annual event, the Tour de France, prepares to kick off this weekend, two of its competing squads — both with deep state ties to Gulf nations the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain — are facing growing scrutiny over human rights concerns that have reignited debates over sportswashing in global cycling. Leading the odds to claim overall victory at this year’s race is Tadej Pogacar, a Slovenian cyclist widely regarded as the most dominant male road rider in the modern sport. Pogacar has already secured four Tour de France titles across the last six editions, all claimed while riding under the banner of UAE Team Emirates XRG, formerly known as simply UAE Team Emirates. The squad has held the top spot in the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) global team rankings since 2023, cementing its status as the most formidable outfit in professional road cycling. Beyond Tour de France success, Pogacar has notched up an extraordinary array of wins for the team, including the Giro d’Italia crown, two UCI Road World Championship titles, and a long list of victories in prestigious one-day classic races. This year, however, a coalition of leading international human rights organizations has broken its silence ahead of the race, penning an open letter to the UCI calling for the immediate suspension of both UAE Team Emirates XRG and a second Gulf-backed outfit, Team Bahrain Victorious. The letter, co-signed by Fair Square, Sudan Unlimited, the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (Bird), and Christian Solidarity Worldwide, was reviewed exclusively by Middle East Eye ahead of the Tour’s opening stage. Middle East Eye has reached out to the UCI, UAE Team Emirates XRG, and Team Bahrain Victorious for official comment on the allegations, but had not received responses as of publication. Rights groups argue that UAE Team Emirates XRG operates under the direct financial and political control of the Emirati state, a claim backed by the team’s own public messaging. On the squad’s official LinkedIn page, leaders state that the team’s core mission is to “represent an entire nation, the UAE.” The team’s branding mission was on full public display after Pogacar’s 2024 Tour de France victory, when the entire squad chanted “U-A-E! U-A-E!” in unison from the podium in Paris. The team’s two primary sponsors are both state-controlled entities: Emirates airline is owned directly by the government of Dubai, while XRG, the investment arm of the UAE’s national oil company, falls under the control of the Abu Dhabi government. The letter also draws attention to the team’s founding: when it was first launched in 2017, one of its founding sponsors was the International Golden Group, a United Arab Emirates-based military contracting firm. A United Nations expert panel identified the company back in 2013 as a violator of the UN arms embargo on Libya, after it was found to have supplied weapons to unauthorized armed groups in the country. While International Golden Group is no longer listed as an active sponsor, its logo appeared on the team’s racing jerseys as recently as 2021, years after the UN report documenting its embargo violations was released. At the core of the demand to suspend the UAE squad is the human rights coalition’s claim that there is “irrefutable evidence” linking the UAE, which owns and controls the team, to the ongoing atrocities in Sudan. The letter identifies the UAE as the primary financial and military backer of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the paramilitary group that has been fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces in a brutal civil war since April 2023. Middle East Eye has previously reported on the UAE’s extensive supply network, which funnels weapons to the RSF through a web of intermediaries across Libya, Chad, Uganda, and Somalia. Since the conflict began, RSF fighters have been accused of perpetrating widespread massacres, systematic sexual violence, and ethnic cleansing that multiple international bodies have designated as genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region. “We know that the UAE uses sports teams to project a positive, sanitised image of itself while at the same time offering material and political support to the RSF in Sudan, who stand accused of genocide, and who may commit further atrocities in El-Obeid,” Alex Carlen, policy director at Fair Square, told Middle East Eye. The groups argue that allowing the state-owned team to compete in top-tier UCI events gives the UAE a valuable public platform to whitewash its human rights record. “Cycling’s most prominent and celebrated races have become a very public platform that the UAE state is using to project a positive image of the UAE, which stands in marked contrast to the violence and repression that underpins its power,” the letter reads. The coalition is also calling for the suspension of Team Bahrain Victorious, the second Gulf-backed squad set to compete in this year’s Tour de France. The team was founded by Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa, a senior member of Bahrain’s ruling royal family who serves as commander of the kingdom’s royal guard and head of Bahrain’s national youth and sports council. On the team’s official website, leaders acknowledge that the squad “represents a powerful platform for showcasing the ambition, optimism and global outlook of the Kingdom of Bahrain.” Rights groups charge that the team serves to distract from longstanding systemic human rights abuses in Bahrain, where authorities have cracked down on political dissent, arbitrarily arrested opposition figures, and effectively eliminated freedom of expression since widespread pro-democracy protests in 2011. This is not the first time that human rights groups have raised alarms about Team Bahrain Victorious: Bird sent a formal letter to the UCI back in 2019 calling on the governing body to publish the results of an ethical review into the team and to take human rights concerns into account when considering future license renewals. At the time, the UCI dismissed the request, saying that “the question of whether the government of Bahrain mistreats its citizens and its athletes in particular, is clearly beyond the jurisdiction of our Commission.” Carlen says that response is no longer acceptable, and that the UCI has a responsibility to act ahead of this year’s Tour. “The UCI cannot continue to allow state-backed teams to use its highly popular and historic competition to advance their own political interests,” he said. “Cycling as a sport has an opportunity here to set a precedent and put the focus back on the competition rather than an association with human rights violations.”

  • Alibaba to pay $600M to settle allegations it allowed illegal drug and equipment sales

    Alibaba to pay $600M to settle allegations it allowed illegal drug and equipment sales

    One of China’s biggest global technology and e-commerce leaders, Alibaba Group, has agreed to a $600 million settlement to resolve a long-running legal dispute with the U.S. government centered on allegations that the company facilitated the import and sale of illegal pharmaceuticals, controlled substances, regulated chemicals, and unapproved pill manufacturing equipment into the United States.

    Alibaba runs two of the world’s largest cross-border e-commerce platforms, Alibaba.com and AliExpress.com, which connect thousands of third-party merchants based around the globe to U.S. consumers. According to U.S. law enforcement allegations, Alibaba’s U.S.-based payment processing arm, AUS Merchant Services, violated federal requirements by failing to put in place sufficient safeguards to block unauthorized merchants from moving unlawful goods into the U.S. through the company’s two major platforms.

    As part of the non-prosecution agreement reached with the U.S. Department of Justice, Alibaba formally acknowledged that between January 2016 and December 2024, it failed to halt approximately 80,000 illegal product transactions that violated the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and multiple other federal statutes. Official documents from the settlement also confirm that internal Alibaba employees had previously flagged gaps in the company’s compliance systems that left the platforms vulnerable to illegal trade. In a number of cases, bad actors even used Alibaba’s built-in messaging tool to redirect buyers to external third-party messaging platforms, where they could complete illicit transactions away from Alibaba’s official monitoring systems.

    The investigation into Alibaba’s practices involved coordinated law enforcement action across multiple federal agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and IRS Criminal Investigation. As part of the probe, agents carried out more than 40 undercover purchases that confirmed the presence of the restricted, illegal goods for sale on Alibaba’s platforms. Instead of pursuing criminal prosecution, the Justice Department negotiated a non-prosecution agreement alongside the $600 million settlement, a framework that requires Alibaba to implement sweeping reforms to its U.S.-focused compliance protocols.

    In an official statement released after the deal was finalized, Alibaba noted that the agreement represented a mutually acceptable resolution that will help the company enforce stricter product sale rules for the third-party merchants that operate on its U.S.-facing e-commerce platforms. This settlement marks the latest high-profile regulatory clash between Alibaba and U.S. government authorities, coming after recent moves by the Pentagon to label the company a “Chinese military company” — a designation the firm has formally challenged in federal court, and one that has drawn opposition from Chinese government officials.

    Jarod Koopman, chief of IRS Criminal Investigation, emphasized that the resolution sends a clear message to all global companies operating in the U.S. market. “This outcome underscores IRS Criminal Investigation’s commitment to following the money and ensuring that companies operating in the United States comply fully with federal law,” Koopman said in the official settlement announcement.

  • Israel arrests five women activists in the occupied West Bank

    Israel arrests five women activists in the occupied West Bank

    Overnight raids carried out by the Israeli army across the occupied West Bank early Wednesday led to the arrest of five female Palestinian activists all affiliated with local Palestinian health committees, alongside 15 additional Palestinian detainees. The arrests mark a sharp escalation in ongoing targeting of Palestinian women and healthcare workers under occupation, according to local Palestinian advocacy groups. The five detained women come from three major West Bank governorates: Ramallah-based activists Jamila Abu Dahou and Jamila Kanaan, two Nablus natives — previously released detainee Maysar al-Faqih and 26-year-old accountant Faten Hanaysheh — and 66-year-old Etaf Bader from Hebron. All five have ties to the Health Work Committees, a leading Palestinian health and community development organization. Family members of the detainees have detailed the chaotic and aggressive nature of the pre-dawn raids, which left children traumatized and violated basic cultural norms for several of the arrested women. Etaf Bader, a 20-year veteran of the Health Work Committees’ administrative board who has spent decades leading family support and women’s empowerment initiatives, was taken from her family home in Hebron. Her husband Abdul Rahman Bader recounted to Middle East Eye that Israeli soldiers forced their way into the property, demanded his wife’s identification, and took her into custody without disclosing any charges. Soldiers handcuffed and blindfolded Bader, searched the home’s rooms and storage, and transported her to an undisclosed location. “We don’t know where she was taken, and we hope the arrest is temporary and for questioning only,” Abdul Rahman Bader said. In Nablus, 61-year-old Maysar al-Faqih — who had already spent four months in Israeli administrative detention two years earlier and stepped back from women’s rights activism after her release to avoid re-arrest — was seized during a 2:30 a.m. raid on her family home. Al-Faqih’s three married daughters were visiting with their children at the time, and the young kids were roused from sleep by the soldiers’ shouting and aggressive entry into the home. Wael Abu al-Saba, Maysar’s husband, told reporters that Israeli forces acted brutally during the incursion, frightening the children, seized al-Faqih’s mobile phone, and took her into custody after restraining her. The most high-profile incident of cultural disrespect during the raids was documented in the arrest of Faten Hanaysheh, the 26-year-old accountant with the Health Work Committees. Israeli forces first searched for Hanaysheh at her brother’s home in the village of Beit Dajan, east of Nablus, before surrounding her father’s home in the village center and pounding violently on the entry door. When the family opened the door, soldiers immediately announced they intended to arrest Hanaysheh, who was wearing only pajamas. Hanaysheh’s father Murad told reporters he begged soldiers to allow his daughter time to change into street clothes, a request that aligns with basic Islamic cultural norms for modesty. Soldiers refused his request, pushed him back repeatedly, slammed the home door shut, and dragged Hanaysheh away in handcuffs to an undisclosed location. Hours after her arrest, Hanaysheh was able to contact her family to confirm she was being held at the Salem Detention Centre and would face interrogation by Israeli intelligence. Murad Hanaysheh also added that Israeli forces had raided his daughter’s office at the Health Work Committees Nablus headquarters just two weeks prior, seizing work-related documents and her work laptop. In a formal statement following the arrests, the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club outlined that Palestinian women have faced a steadily rising tide of targeting as part of Israel’s broad arrest campaigns across the West Bank. Tactics used against detained women include night home raids, hostage detention, aggressive interrogation methods, and growing numbers of arrests based on Israeli allegations of “incitement” on social media platforms. Following Wednesday’s arrests, the total number of Palestinian women held in Israeli detention facilities now stands at 99, the organization confirmed. The statement also added that daily Israeli arrest raids across the West Bank are part of a deliberate, systemic state policy. Since the outbreak of the 2023 Israel-Hamas war, the total number of Palestinians arrested by Israeli forces in the occupied territories has surpassed 24,000. The arrests of the five female health activists come on the heels of two recent high-profile detentions of senior Palestinian medical workers: 71-year-old Dr. Mazen al-Rantisi, arrested during a home raid in Ramallah last week, and 63-year-old Dr. Khaled Ayash, taken into custody days later from his home in Biddu, a town northwest of Jerusalem. The Palestinian NGO Network has condemned this string of arrests, framing them as a deliberate attack on core Palestinian civil society and health infrastructure. In a formal statement, the network called on the international community to ramp up pressure on the Israeli occupation to end the targeting of Palestinian doctors, health workers and humanitarian organizations. The group also demanded the activation of international accountability mechanisms to secure the release of all detained Palestinian health personnel. The network emphasized that these arrests constitute a clear violation of international humanitarian law, and represent an expansion of the occupation’s long-running campaign to dismantle Palestinian health systems across both the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Amid the ongoing war in Gaza, widespread destruction of health infrastructure, and state-led policies of forced displacement, these arrests further block Palestinian civilians from accessing life-saving medical care, the statement added.

  • UK: Backlash as Lloyds ‘debanks’ independent media outlet The Canary ‘with no explanation’

    UK: Backlash as Lloyds ‘debanks’ independent media outlet The Canary ‘with no explanation’

    A major crisis has erupted over press freedom in the United Kingdom after prominent independent left-wing news outlet The Canary announced this Tuesday that it has been abruptly de-banked by Lloyds Bank, one of the nation’s largest and most influential banking institutions.

    In an official statement published across its website and social media channels, The Canary confirmed that Lloyds has frozen a significant sum of the outlet’s operating funds, and has failed to provide any formal justification for the decision even after repeated outreach and communications from the outlet’s leadership. The sudden action has left The Canary in an extremely precarious financial position, according to the statement.

    In an interview with Middle East Eye (MEE), The Canary’s chief executive officer Steve Topple explained that the outlet is currently unable to issue pay to its full team of in-house journalists and contracted contributors. “We have a large team, and all of them are now extremely distressed and in limbo. Many of them are marginalised people, and it has hit them very hard,” Topple said.

    Founded in 2015 as an alternative to mainstream corporate-owned UK media, the small left-wing outlet made headlines earlier this May when it announced plans to launch a print edition to expand its reach. The publication operates without a paywall, relying almost entirely on direct reader donations to fund its daily operations. That model leaves it extremely vulnerable to sudden disruptions to its banking services, Topple noted.

    Topple called the unannounced debanking an outrageous attack on independent media. “It is an outrage that the Canary has been unceremoniously dropped into financial instability with no notice or explanation from Lloyds. Our situation is a damning indictment of the treatment of independent media in this country – whereby you can be potentially ruined without recourse by banking giants like Lloyds,” he said.

    News of the debanking quickly sparked widespread backlash across major social media platforms, with users, journalists and activists across the political spectrum condemning the action and calling on Lloyds to immediately release a public explanation for its decision. Critics have raised growing alarm over the incident as evidence of expanding restrictions on independent journalistic freedom across the UK.

    MEE attempted to contact Lloyds Bank directly to request comment on the incident, but had not received a response by the time of this report’s publication.

    Ahmed Alnaouq, a Palestinian human rights activist and co-founder of the advocacy group We Are Not Numbers, warned that the debanking sets a deeply dangerous precedent for independent outlets across the UK. “[This] sets a very dangerous precedent,” Alnaouq said, adding that The Canary’s work must be “protected and supported at any cost.”

    Ash Sarkar, author and contributing editor at UK independent outlet Novara Media, framed the action as a worrying development that fits into a broader pattern of politically motivated debanking targeting figures and outlets across both the left and right of the political spectrum. Sarkar pointed to the high-profile 2023 closure of former UK politician Nigel Farage’s accounts with Coutts, a prestigious private bank tied to Lloyds, as evidence of this growing trend.

    Award-winning journalist and author Jonathan Cook also highlighted that The Canary has already faced years of financial pressure following a targeted campaign against the outlet by the pro-Labour group Labour Together in the aftermath of the 2017 UK general election. That campaign cost the outlet a large share of its existing advertising revenue, leaving it even more exposed to the current banking disruption.

    Social media users have launched a coordinated campaign to pressure Lloyds to reverse the decision and explain its actions. Hundreds of users have filed direct complaints with the bank on platforms including X (formerly Twitter), TikTok and Instagram, while many have shared official customer contact information to help other critics escalate their concerns. Some users have called for widespread boycotts of Lloyds, and dozens of TikTok users have announced they are closing their own personal accounts with the bank in protest. Other users have launched fundraising drives to encourage direct donations to The Canary to help the outlet meet payroll and stay operational.

    On Instagram, comments from angry and concerned users have flooded Lloyds’ most recent public post, with nearly all comments demanding the bank issue a full explanation for its treatment of The Canary. Maddison Wheeldon, a reporter on staff at The Canary, echoed the outlet’s call for public support in a post on X, writing: “Please share and support us, we need independent media now more than ever before.”

    The incident is not an isolated case: recent reporting has revealed that debanking has become increasingly common across the UK in recent years. An investigation published by The Telegraph in January found that UK banks closed nearly half a million customer and organization accounts in 2023 alone, representing a more than tenfold increase compared to the number of account closures recorded between 2016 and 2017.

    Earlier this year, The Guardian published an investigation that found Muslim individuals and community organizations in the UK are disproportionately targeted by debanking practices. The report noted that UK banks face intense regulatory pressure to monitor accounts for potential terrorist financing, a pressure that has pushed many institutions to hastily close accounts and block transactions of innocent people and registered charities, in most cases without offering any opportunity for appeal or review.

    Successive UK governments from both major political parties have faced widespread cross-spectrum criticism for failing to address unaccountable debanking, and have recently introduced legislative reforms aimed at curbing the practice. New regulations set to take effect in late April will require banks to provide customers with a minimum of 90 days advance notice before closing an account, as well as a written explanation for the decision. The regulations do, however, include a broad exception for cases where banks suspect an account is being used for criminal activity, leaving a major loophole that critics say will allow politically motivated debanking to continue.

  • California to institute Bruce Lee Day, a first for a Chinese American in the state’s history

    California to institute Bruce Lee Day, a first for a Chinese American in the state’s history

    SAN FRANCISCO — A decades-long movement for recognition of Asian American cultural icons reached a landmark milestone this week, as California formalized an annual honor for San Francisco-born martial arts legend and cultural trailblazer Bruce Lee, making him the first Chinese American in state history to have an official namesake day.

    Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation into effect Tuesday afternoon, officially setting May 17 as Bruce Lee Day, per confirmation from the office of California State Assemblymember Matt Haney, whose district includes San Francisco. The date was not chosen arbitrarily: 64 years ago, on May 17, 1959, an 18-year-old Lee returned to his birth city of San Francisco after spending his childhood and early adolescence in Hong Kong.

    For his family and advocates, the new commemorative holiday is far more than a symbolic gesture. It is a public affirmation of Lee’s decades-long legacy as a bridge connecting Eastern and Western cultures, said Shannon Lee, Bruce Lee’s daughter and chief executive officer of the Bruce Lee Foundation.

    “From young people who found confidence and possibility in his philosophy, to families who finally saw themselves represented on screen, to athletes who still draw on his teachings of discipline and inner strength, his reach is profound,” Shannon Lee shared in a prepared statement following the bill’s signing.

    Haney echoed that sentiment, framing Lee as the quintessential embodiment of California’s core values of diversity, breaking barriers, and cultural exchange. “At a time when Asian Americans were too often absent from or stereotyped on screen, Bruce Lee helped generations see themselves represented with strength and dignity,” Haney said in his statement.

    Moving forward, the Bruce Lee Foundation and a coalition of Asian American advocacy organizations across the state are encouraging communities to mark the annual holiday with voluntary, local activities, including public cultural exhibits, community gatherings, and educational lessons in K-12 and college classrooms.

    To understand the weight of this designation, it is necessary to revisit Lee’s extraordinary, cut-short life. Born in 1940 to Chinese opera performers touring the United States, Lee claimed birthright American citizenship, a status that anchored his lifelong connection to his home state. Just months after his birth, his family returned to Hong Kong, where Lee launched his career as a child actor and began his formal training in Chinese kung fu. He permanently resettled in the U.S. in 1959, enrolling at the University of Washington in Seattle two years later, before leaving his studies to dedicate himself fully to practicing and teaching his martial arts philosophy.

    By the 1960s, Lee had broken into Hollywood, earning his most prominent early role as Kato in the television series *The Green Hornet*. But the industry at the time was rife with anti-Asian bias: studios pushed Lee to conform to demeaning racist stereotypes and paid him a fraction of the salary offered to his white co-stars. Frustrated by the systemic barriers, Lee relocated back to Hong Kong, where he quickly rose to global superstardom as the face of a new wave of martial arts blockbusters, including *The Big Boss* and *Fist of Fury*.

    Lee’s life and career ended abruptly in 1973, when he died at the age of 32 from an unexpected allergic reaction to a common pain medication. But nearly 50 years later, his influence has not faded. His name and image remain widely recognizable across generations, fans gather annually to celebrate his birthday, and an unproduced 1970s action series treatment that Lee wrote served as the creative inspiration for the hit HBO Max original series *Warrior*.