标签: Asia

亚洲

  • After the frontlines: Palmyra’s fight for cultural and economic revival

    After the frontlines: Palmyra’s fight for cultural and economic revival

    Nestled in Syria’s central desert, the ancient city of Palmyra has borne the full weight of more than a decade of civil conflict, its story woven together from centuries of cultural heritage and years of unspeakable brutality. When the Islamic State (IS) seized control of the city in 2015, Syria had already been torn apart by years of war. In the decade that followed, shifting control between IS and the Assad government, compounded by Russian military intervention, left layer upon layer of destruction: violence displaced tens of thousands, transformed ancient landscapes, and scarred a community that had thrived here for millennia.

    It took 30 days for Palmyra’s residents to grasp the full brutality of the IS occupation. Within days of capturing the city, the militant group brought 20 local men to the iconic Roman Amphitheatre, one of Syria’s most revered cultural landmarks, and publicly executed them under the group’s black flag, turning a monument to ancient civilization into a stage for terror. The victims’ bodies were hung in the streets of modern Palmyra by their wrists, left to decompose in the desert heat for seven days.

    Once IS consolidated its control, its attention turned to Palmyra’s 2,000-year-old ancient ruins. A designated UNESCO World Heritage Site, Palmyra has long stood as a symbol of the cultural and religious pluralism that once defined the Middle East. Its network of polytheistic temples, shrines, and artifacts predates the rise of Islam, making it a prime target for IS’s extremist iconoclastic ideology. In propaganda spectacles broadcast around the world, militants destroyed many of the site’s most recognizable landmarks, while looting hundreds of smaller artifacts to sell on the global antiquities black market for funding.

    “They even burnt 2,000 year-old mummies because they weren’t Muslim,” explained Khalid, a Palmyran tour guide who lived through the occupation, his voice heavy with bitter irony. The famed Arch of Triumph was reduced to two standing columns; the central sanctuary of the Temple of Bel was completely leveled, only its outer enclosure wall remaining recognizable. Stone carvings of human figures were systematically chiseled away, their faces erased in line with the group’s extremist beliefs.

    The damage was not limited to the ancient ruins. Palmyra’s millennia-old oasis, the source of water that turned the city into a prosperous Silk Road trading hub thousands of years ago, has also been transformed. Ahmad, a local resident who began working with tourists at the age of nine, remembers a tree-lined road where families would sit outside their homes inviting visitors in for tea. Today, that road sits exposed to the unforgiving desert sun, flanked by cleared rubble and scorched earth, a testament to successive waves of destruction.

    Modern Palmyra fared no better than its ancient ruins. Homes and public buildings were systematically destroyed and looted during repeated military campaigns. “When I came back, the house was mined and everything had been stolen by regime forces, even the copper pipes,” members of the Saleh family told Middle East Eye.

    Today, the scars of war have become an inescapable part of Palmyra’s identity, drawing a new breed of traveler alongside those who come for its ancient history. UNESCO has developed a formal recovery roadmap for the city, including conservation work for the ruins, improved visitor infrastructure, and livelihood support programs, building on earlier emergency safeguarding efforts. But many local residents and officials say a wide gap remains between international plans and on-the-ground reality. While global frameworks for reconstruction exist, tangible, visible support remains scarce, leaving most of the rebuilding work to the residents who have chosen to return.

    “Palmyra is the hero, it’s the icon of Syria,” said Rami Nawaya, founder of Syrian Guides. “Now, it’s taken on another dimension, attracting the adventurers who are interested in the cultural dimension but also the conflict.” For local leaders working to revive the city’s once-thriving tourism industry, the top priority is not rebuilding the ancient ruins themselves, but restoring the basic infrastructure that allows visitors to experience the site and allows residents to return permanently: reopening hotels, restaurants and guesthouses, repairing roads, and restoring basic services.

    For Palmyrans, tourism is one of the only viable paths to restoring the local economy. Before the war, the industry made up nearly half of the city’s total economic output, supporting thousands of jobs. After the fall of the Assad government in December 2024, visitor numbers began to slowly climb, but renewed regional instability following U.S. and Israeli military campaigns against Iran disrupted travel routes and derailed that early momentum.

    Still, small signs of recovery are starting to emerge. In early June, the Silk Road Lodge welcomed its first guests, becoming one of the first new tourist facilities to open in Palmyra since the fall of the Assad government. Its owner, Radwan Abdullatif, returned to Syria after receiving asylum in Japan, helped by tourists he had met during his earlier work in Palmyra. “If we don’t fix Syria, other people won’t fix it for us. I advise everyone to come and fix the country, and Palmyra, hand by hand, so that the tourists will see, and come again,” Abdullatif said. He added that what local business owners need most from the government is not direct funding, but streamlined bureaucratic processes and easier access to permits to open and operate businesses.

    Local organizations are also working to rebuild sustainable livelihoods for residents. The Caravan Foundation runs the Noor al-Badia women’s cooperative, which has trained 70 local women who lost their homes and family members during the war to make traditional handicrafts and textiles, providing many of them with their only source of household income. The cooperative’s success, however, depends entirely on tourist traffic to its tented shop at Bedouin Corner, a traditional camp and restaurant located beside the ancient ruins.

    Outside of Syria, the country’s gradual reopening to travel has sparked debate over “dark tourism” and the ethics of visiting a post-conflict society. But for Palmyra’s residents rebuilding their lives, attracting any visitor matters far more than debating their motivations. “There are many tourists who entered Syria with the intention of visiting war zones, but ended up having meals with locals, visiting workshops, being introduced to other facets of the country,” Nawaya explained. The destruction cannot be erased or ignored, but it does not have to be the only story Palmyra tells.

    In the absence of coverage from mainstream international media outlets that still label Syria a high-risk destination, independent travel creators and influencers have become one of the most powerful tools for promoting the country. Nick Maddock, a travel YouTuber who spent six months traveling across almost all of Syria’s governorates, says independent creators hold unique influence because audiences trust their perspectives more than official government tourism campaigns. “That trust goes a really long way in breaking down misconceptions in a way that many local folks cannot,” he said.

    One largely overlooked part of Palmyra’s ongoing recovery is the fate of its long-time Bedouin communities, who have roamed the surrounding desert for generations. For these groups, reconstruction starts with making the desert landscape safe again, after years of conflict left it littered with landmines and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Their struggle mirrors that of many rural communities across Syria outside of the major population centers of Aleppo and Damascus: with limited state capacity and most international funding focused on urban areas where larger numbers of people are returning, rural recovery depends entirely on local residents’ limited resources: personal savings, remittances from relatives abroad, their own labor, and the constant risk to their own safety.

    Repeated shifts in control of Palmyra made demining work particularly complex. Each faction that controlled the city used different tactics to lay explosive hazards, resulting in overlapping layers of contamination across large swathes of land. “This can result in overlapping contamination, including conventional landmines, IEDs, UXO, and abandoned munitions,” explained Mouiad Alnofaly, deputy programme manager at HALO, a leading international mine action organization working in Syria. “Each hazard presents different technical challenges and requires different clearance methodologies. Before any meaningful restoration, tourism or wider redevelopment can take place, explosive hazards must first be identified and removed.” The organization is currently seeking funding to expand its demining operations to Palmyra in the coming months.

    Until that work is complete, local residents have no choice but to live with the daily risk of explosive devices. Local officials estimate that around 200 people have been killed or injured by mines and UXO in the Palmyra area since the end of major combat. “When people returned to the city, the houses were full of mines because they were used as weapon stores. Some looked like stones,” said Zahir al-Salim, deputy director of Palmyra. While the main archaeological site and primary access roads have been cleared and declared safe, large areas of agricultural land and the open desert remain dangerous. For Bedouins, whose traditional lifestyle depends on free movement across the desert, this contamination has been devastating, killing not only residents (including children playing in open areas) but also dozens of camels, a critical source of income and transport for the community.

    Despite all it has endured, Palmyra endures. Every Friday evening at sunset, groups of local residents gather beside the ancient ruins: motorbikes pull up carrying families and water pipes for shisha, people spread blankets on the ground to shelter from the wind, and young men gather on the steps of the Roman Amphitheatre—once the stage for mass executions—to smoke and watch the sun set over the desert. Palmyra survived the IS occupation, survived a decade of war. Whether it can once again become a thriving home for its people depends on two critical things: sustained international support to clear explosives and rebuild infrastructure, and the return of tourists who can turn Palmyra’s ancient heritage into a living, sustainable livelihood for the community that calls it home.

  • Israel is carrying out ‘reproductive genocide’ against Palestinians

    Israel is carrying out ‘reproductive genocide’ against Palestinians

    A groundbreaking 188-page report from the Palestinian Feminist Collective, backed by the global advocacy group Progressive International, has leveled explosive allegations that Israel has enacted decades of systemic reproductive genocide against the Palestinian people, a campaign that has intensified to catastrophic levels since the outbreak of full-scale conflict in Gaza in October 2023. The report argues that this deliberate strategy targets Palestinian women, children, and communal life by destroying critical medical infrastructure, causing widespread environmental harm that triggers infertility, and directly killing civilians to erode the possibility of sustained Palestinian existence. The findings align with a separate recent conclusion from the United Nations’ top independent investigative body for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which confirmed Israeli forces have intentionally targeted Palestinian children as a core component of their Gaza military campaign.

    The UN commission’s investigation mapped the full scope of harm inflicted on Palestinian children: from targeted sniper attacks and drone strikes, to systematic torture of detained minors, widespread reproductive violence, and the deliberate leveling of schools and hospitals. Since the start of the campaign in October 2023, more than 21,000 Palestinian children have been killed by Israeli forces, with an additional 5,160 children estimated to remain trapped and dead under the rubble of destroyed buildings. As of October 2024, at least 15,000 children in Gaza have lost their mothers, leaving them orphaned in a war zone. One particularly devastating case documented by the UN involved the Israeli military cutting power to al-Nasr paediatric hospital, leading to the deaths of four newborn infants. Their decomposing bodies were later found still connected to non-functional life support machines.

    When the full-scale assault on Gaza began, UN officials estimated 50,000 pregnant women were residing in the enclave, with 5,500 births occurring each month. The report details that Israel’s military blockade and attacks have eliminated almost all access to emergency obstetric care, creating a public health catastrophe that has pushed miscarriage rates up by more than 300 percent. Widespread malnutrition, widespread anaemia, and a total lack of prenatal supplements have drastically increased the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and fatal maternal hemorrhaging during labor. With Israel blocking entry of clean water, menstrual hygiene products, and basic reproductive health supplies into Gaza, the Palestinian Feminist Collective found that many women have been forced to use homemade sanitary pads or take continuous birth control pills to stop their periods entirely.

    Compiled from research conducted between December 2025 and April 2026, the report draws from a vast array of sources: survivor and witness testimonies, declassified Israeli archival documents, Palestinian oral histories, peer-reviewed academic research, documentary evidence, independent media reporting, human rights documentation, and official UN reports and statements. In Gaza, the vast majority of hospitals have been destroyed or damaged by bombing, leaving facilities without fuel, electricity, anesthesia, or sterile surgical equipment. This has forced pregnant women to deliver babies in overcrowded emergency shelters, damaged private homes, or even on rubble-strewn city streets. International medics who have worked in Gaza have described the unspeakable horror of performing major surgeries, including emergency Caesarean sections, without any form of anesthesia. Even after giving birth, new mothers cannot access basic supplies considered universal across most of the world: diapers, adequate nutrition, clean water, or infant formula.

    The report argues that Israel’s military campaign has systematically targeted the core infrastructure that enables Palestinian life, specifically reproductive healthcare systems, to make sustained Palestinian survival impossible. Israeli forces have destroyed maternity wards and in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics across Gaza. The report adds that the Israeli military’s use of toxic weaponry including white phosphorus has created long-term, intergenerational risks to Palestinian fertility, extending the harm of the campaign to future generations. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian women now serve as the sole breadwinners and caregivers for their families, after being widowed by the conflict or left to raise children alone while their partners are held in Israeli political prisons. Thousands more have been forcibly separated from their families through systematic expulsions and mass incarcerations. “Palestinian mothers in Gaza have been left to shoulder the impossible task of giving life and caring for their children despite the widespread starvation, displacement, and disease,” the report states.

    To illustrate the systemic nature of the violence, the report highlights the stories of two Gaza women, Rania Abu Anza and Jomana Arafa, whose cases are described as only the tip of the iceberg of harm. Abu Anza spent 10 years pursuing IVF treatment before finally giving birth to twin boys, Naeim and Wissam. In March 2024, an Israeli air strike killed both infants and their father, destroying the family Abu Anza had spent a decade building. Just two days after Arafa gave birth to her own twins, she, her newborns, and her mother were killed while seeking shelter in an area Israel had officially designated a “safe humanitarian zone.” Arafa’s husband survived only because he had left to retrieve the twins’ official birth certificates.

    The UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has independently confirmed that Israeli forces have systematically targeted reproductive healthcare infrastructure, all but eliminating maternity services, prenatal care, fertility clinics, and neonatal intensive care units across Gaza. For the first time in Gaza’s history, a full-scale famine has broken out in the enclave, driven by Israel’s severe restrictions on food entry. The Palestinian Feminist Collective’s report also traces this reproductive violence to long-standing ideological roots in Israeli policy, noting that as early as 1995, Israeli geographer Arnon Soffer warned that “the most serious threat Israel faces is the wombs of Arab women,” framing Palestinian birth rates as an existential threat to Israeli national security. Golda Meir, who served as Israeli prime minister from 1969 to 1974, once remarked that her worst nightmares stemmed from the knowledge that “another Palestinian child will be born.”

    Responding to the report, Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, called the document a damning indictment of the entire system of Israeli occupation. “It is an indictment of a system that has transformed Palestinian life – bodies, homes, families, reproductive existence, and even the dead – into instruments of control and domination,” Albanese said. “It is time to understand that the crimes against the Palestinians – including the sexualised and gender-based violence meticulously researched and exposed in this report – is not a total sum of isolated abuses, but a system of domination, oppression and erasure.” This reporting is originally from independent outlet Middle East Eye, which provides unfiltered coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • ‘Board of Peace’ to launch ‘Hamas-free’ camps as Israel tightens grip on Gaza

    ‘Board of Peace’ to launch ‘Hamas-free’ camps as Israel tightens grip on Gaza

    A controversial proposal to establish so-called “Hamas-free humanitarian zones” in the Gaza Strip, led by a U.S.-backed initiative led by former U.S. President Donald Trump, has emerged in recent Israeli media reports, as the Israeli military continues to consolidate its hold over more than two-thirds of the besieged territory.

    According to reporting from Israeli national newspaper Israel Hayom, the first of these controlled humanitarian zones is scheduled to open within the next several weeks at Tel Sultan, a location situated on the outskirts of Rafah in southern Gaza. The site is intended to house Palestinian civilians who have been vetted and confirmed to have no weapon holdings or organizational ties to Hamas, the report says.

    Security and order within the designated zones will be maintained by a newly assembled multinational contingent called the International Stabilisation Force (ISF). The force will be outfitted exclusively with non-lethal weaponry, operating out of Israel’s Amitai Camp located near the Gaza border and falling under the direct command of Trump’s Board of Peace – the body launched in January this year at the former U.S. president’s explicit order to advance a negotiated settlement for the Gaza conflict.

    While the plan promises basic humanitarian support including temporary shelter and aid deliveries to residents of the zones, Board of Peace officials have made a firm commitment to ban the import of concrete into Gaza, a restriction that will heavily limit infrastructure reconstruction amid widespread destruction across the territory. The board is also moving forward with plans to develop large-scale logistics warehouses to support the management of the humanitarian shelters, with site scouting already underway in communities adjacent to Gaza’s border fence, per the report.

    Parallel to these humanitarian planning efforts, the Israeli military is continuing its incremental expansion of territorial control beyond the so-called “Yellow Line”, an existing boundary that was meant to serve as a temporary holding area for Israeli forces during the first phase of an earlier ceasefire agreement. Under the terms of that deal, Israel was required to withdraw from the area during the second phase of the agreement, but Israel has refused to relinquish control, as the second phase has never been implemented. Today, this expanded buffer zone controlled by Israel encompasses approximately 70 percent of Gaza’s total land area.

    An unnamed senior Israeli official speaking to Israel Hayom outlined the country’s current strategic approach: “We are manoeuvring within the American constraints, increasing the pace of targeted killings while remaining below the threshold of international criticism – and this will continue as long as Hamas is unwilling to disarm.”

    In a recent public update posted to the social platform X, the Board of Peace confirmed that the first batch of tactical vehicles has already arrived at the ISF’s base in the Logistics Support Area codenamed Endurance, alongside photographs documenting the delivery.

    Reaction to the plan from Hamas has been cautiously measured. Hazem Qassem, a spokesperson for the group, said Hamas holds out hope that the initiative will mark “the beginning of implementing the tasks assigned to them”, including separating Palestinian communities in Gaza from Israeli military forces and working to put a stop to ongoing Israeli violations against Palestinian civilians. “We call on the Board of Peace to begin the actual implementation of the provisions of the plan to end the war on Gaza,” Qassem added.

    The plan for a concentrated humanitarian enclave near Rafah is not a new proposal. As far back as July of last year, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz first announced plans to corral the entire population of Gaza into a consolidated “humanitarian city” near Rafah, where all residents would undergo mandatory security screenings and be barred from leaving the designated area. Earlier satellite imagery analysis conducted by research group Forensic Architecture and reported by Drop Site News in January of this year already revealed that Israeli forces had carried out large-scale land clearing and ground compaction work in the Tel Sultan area of Rafah, a level of preparatory construction activity unmatched anywhere else east of the Yellow Line.

  • Starmer’s legacy: Labour has a mountain to climb to recover its Muslim voters

    Starmer’s legacy: Labour has a mountain to climb to recover its Muslim voters

    In October 2023, as Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza, Keir Starmer — then leader of the UK opposition — faced a pivotal question during a live interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari. When asked about Israel’s deliberate use of starvation as a tool of conflict against Palestinian civilians in Gaza, Starmer’s response would reshape the future of the Labour Party: he stated he believed Israel held a legitimate “right” to cut off electricity and water supplies to Gaza’s civilian population, a move widely classified as a war crime under international humanitarian law. What Starmer did not anticipate in that moment was the lasting damage his words would inflict on Labour’s standing with its core supporters, particularly the UK’s Muslim community.

    Historically, Labour has positioned itself as more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause and more open to Palestinian advocacy than the ruling Conservative Party. So Starmer’s remarks triggered an immediate wave of backlash from voices both inside and outside the party. Within just a few weeks, more than 150 Muslim Labour councillors penned an open letter to party leadership, demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The plea was brushed aside, and the first cracks in the long-standing alliance between the Muslim community and Labour quickly grew into a major political rupture.

    Though Labour had held a consistent lead in national opinion polls since December 2021, translating to a landslide victory in the 2024 general election that delivered a majority government, the election exposed deep, costly rifts within the party. Starmer’s government took power with the lowest popular vote share for any UK ruling party in modern history, and the party lost multiple parliamentary constituencies with large Muslim populations. One of the most high-profile losses was the newly created Dewsbury and Batley constituency in West Yorkshire, a seat where 43% of the population identifies as Muslim.

    Warning signs of this backlash had already emerged in the May 2024 local elections, when thousands of disaffected Labour voters threw their support behind independent candidates across the country. This trend held strong in the most recent round of 2026 local elections, particularly in the Kirklees metropolitan borough that covers Dewsbury and Batley. Yusra Hussain, a local councillor who defected from Labour to run as an independent, and who won a full term in Batley West alongside two other independent candidates, summed up the sentiment of many defectors: “I did not leave because my values changed. I left because I believe the party’s direction has changed.”

    To understand Labour’s current unrest, observers say it is impossible to separate the Gaza backlash from the broader ideological shift the party has undergone over the past decade. Under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, Labour advanced a clear platform of radical left-wing policies centered on renationalization of key industries, massive public investment, and expanded social rights. It was on this platform of Corbyn’s “10 pledges” that Starmer won the 2020 Labour leadership contest — but within months of taking power, Starmer abandoned each pledge one by one, steering the party sharply to the right, further even than the centrist New Labour government of Tony Blair.

    This ideological shift left Labour vulnerable in marginal seats with large Muslim populations. In the 2021 Batley and Spen by-election, for example, then-incumbent Labour candidate Tracy Brabin — now Mayor of West Yorkshire — saw her majority whittled down to just 323 votes, after prominent Palestine advocate George Galloway ran as a spoiler candidate and drew thousands of left-leaning pro-Palestine voters away from Labour. That same lack of a coherent, progressive appeal, paired with the party’s hard turn toward pro-Israel policy, cost Starmer the newly created Dewsbury and Batley seat in 2024.

    Iqbal Mohamed, the independent MP who now holds the Dewsbury and Batley seat, explained the coalition that brought him to power: “What united so many voters was a firm belief that this country is — in a myriad of ways — failing the vast majority of people, their basic needs and their human rights, be that at home or abroad. Along with the abandonment of traditional centre-left viewpoints, moving the party towards a pro-Israel ideology was a devastating shift in this constituency.”

    This electoral backlash is not limited to West Yorkshire. Independents also claimed key seats from Labour in Blackburn and Birmingham Perry Barr, both constituencies with even larger British Asian populations than Dewsbury and Batley. Political analysts note that Starmer’s abandonment of the party’s longstanding pro-Palestine position has proven even more disruptive to Labour’s voter base than his broader shift to the right. For decades, successive Labour leaders had backed Palestinian statehood: Ed Miliband oversaw a parliamentary vote in 2014 where the party voted in favor of recognizing Palestinian statehood, and Corbyn remained a consistent advocate for Palestinian rights throughout his leadership. Though Starmer eventually relented and recognized Palestinian statehood late last year alongside Canada and France, political analysts say the damage to Labour’s reputation among core supporters was already irreversible.

    Post-election polling from 2026 confirms that the backlash extends far beyond the Muslim community. More than half of Labour’s former voters — across demographic groups — now cite the party’s inaction on the Gaza conflict as a key reason they switched their support to the Greens, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, Liberal Democrats, or independent candidates. Beyond the Gaza issue, Labour has also lost much of its historic left-wing base after the ousting of Jeremy Corbyn, who has since reemerged as a prominent independent left voice. Many political analysts compare this sustained net loss of support to the collapse of other traditional center-left parties across Western Europe in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis.

    The Green Party has emerged as the primary beneficiary of this exodus, with a 2026 YouGov poll finding that more than one in five former Labour voters have now switched their allegiance to the Greens. The party’s new viability was on full display in the 2026 Gorton and Denton by-election in Manchester, where the Greens came within a hair’s breadth of taking the seat from Labour.

    In Dewsbury and Batley, the impact of this political realignment is impossible to miss. The most recent Kirklees Council elections returned a minority administration led by the right-wing Reform UK party, whose incoming leader drew widespread public mockery for demonstrating a clear lack of understanding of basic parliamentary procedure. The council remains deadlocked without a permanent leader, with a new vote scheduled for later this month to break the impasse. Across the 16 wards covering Batley and Dewsbury, voters elected 11 pro-Palestine independent councillors and five Reform candidates — and not a single Labour candidate won a seat.

    Mohamed, the independent MP for the area, argues that the result makes clear voters have rejected the UK’s longstanding two-party system entirely. “They deserted en masse a Labour Party that has for too long treated residents with contempt, taken their vote for granted, and aided and abetted the Israeli apartheid, occupation and genocide of the Palestinian people,” he said.

    The original analysis, published by Middle East Eye editor and journalist Joe Gill in a 2026 opinion video, challenges Starmer’s core narrative that he rescued a party left morally, financially, and politically bankrupt by Corbyn. For analysts, the path to repairing Labour’s broken trust with voters will require decisive action to shift the party’s direction on both domestic and foreign policy — a change that has not yet materialized under Starmer’s leadership.

  • How Israeli president’s advisor worked to set up Reform Friends of Israel group

    How Israeli president’s advisor worked to set up Reform Friends of Israel group

    Calls for greater transparency over foreign lobbying in British politics have reignited after a heated parliamentary debate last week, with Nigel Farage’s Reform UK facing fresh scrutiny over its undisclosed links to Israeli lobbying networks. The Westminster Hall debate was convened to discuss a public petition calling for a formal public inquiry into pro-Israel influence over UK politics and democratic institutions. During the debate, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice delivered a fierce rejection of the petition, labeling its core motivation fundamentally antisemitic and calling for it to be thrown out entirely.

    What has thrown Tice’s comments into question, however, is the record of official trips that senior Reform figures have taken to Israel, all funded by pro-Israel groups tied to the Israeli government. Just six months before the debate, in September 2024, Tice himself traveled to Israel for meetings with senior Israeli ministers, with the trip fully financed by Reform Friends of Israel (RFI), a little-known pro-Israel lobby group founded to coordinate ties between the party and the Israeli government. A separate trip by a delegation of senior Reform party figures in November 2024, which included a stop in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, was funded directly by the Israeli foreign ministry, investigative journalism outlet Declassified UK revealed this week.

    Against this backdrop, questions are mounting over the leadership, funding and objectives of RFI, a group that has never publicly disclosed its donor list. The founding driving force behind RFI is British-born political strategist Jason Pearlman, a figure with deep decades-long ties to both British politics and Israeli official circles. Until December 2024, Pearlman served as international media advisor to Israeli President Isaac Herzog, and he continued to work to secure funding for RFI while holding that official Israeli government role. When Pearlman departed his post with Herzog, the Israeli president praised him for guiding the presidency through some of Israel’s most challenging periods with the global press.

    Pearlman has since confirmed he has stepped back from his role leading RFI, telling Middle East Eye in a recent interview that he left the group after relocating to Israel for personal reasons, and that he was honored to have helped launch the organization. He has repeatedly refused to name the group’s financial backers, though he denied claims that RFI has ever received funding from the Israeli government or any other foreign state, and claimed there was never any overlap between his work for the Israeli presidency and his work setting up RFI.

    Pearlman’s long career in pro-Israel advocacy stretches back decades. Raised in Sunderland, northeast England, Pearlman has deep family roots in the global Zionist movement, with a great-grandmother who famously sat alongside Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, at the 1903 Sixth Zionist Congress. After working as media director for the Board of Deputies of British Jews and later in the public affairs department of the Israeli embassy in London, he relocated to Israel in 2006, taking up a role as foreign press liaison for the Israeli government press office a year later. He returned to the UK in 2010 to serve as deputy director of the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), a Westminster-based neoconservative think tank with a long record of strongly pro-Israel advocacy.

    HJS’s current director, Alan Mendoza, is another key figure connected to both Reform UK and pro-Israel lobbying circles in the UK. Mendoza serves as a senior foreign affairs advisor to Reform leader Nigel Farage, and also holds the role of president of the UK branch of the Jewish National Fund (JNF), an organization that has faced widespread international criticism for its role in facilitating the displacement of Palestinian people. JNF UK has donated £1 million ($1.36 million) to what has been described as “Israel’s largest militia”, and counts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who faces an arrest warrant for alleged war crimes from the International Criminal Court—as an honorary patron. A former Westminster Conservative councillor, Mendoza defected to Reform UK last year and lost his council seat in the May 2025 UK local elections.

    Under Mendoza’s leadership, HJS has exerted significant influence over counter-terrorism policy during successive Conservative UK governments, while maintaining an unapologetically pro-Israel stance. The think tank has faced harsh criticism even from former insiders: co-founder Matthew Jamison later denounced it as a “monstrous animal” and a “deeply anti-Muslim racist organisation”, while former member Marko Atilla Hoare described it as an “abrasively right-wing forum with an anti-Muslim tinge” that publishes superficial, polemical content from aspiring commentators. Last year, Mendoza publicly opposed the UK government’s plan to allow family dependants of Palestinian students from Gaza to enter the UK, telling TalkTV that “we don’t know what they believe. We don’t know what their tendencies are. We don’t know whether they mean us well or ill.”

    Efforts by Israeli lobbying groups to court Reform UK have ramped up significantly since the second half of 2024. Pearlman previously told Declassified UK that he attended a dinner with Farage and key potential donors while still working for President Herzog, to discuss seed funding for RFI. While he would not name RFI’s current backers, he acknowledged that he expects many donors are overlapping with the groups that fund the long-established pro-Israel lobby groups Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). Pearlman is an open, vocal defender of Israeli military actions in Gaza, having written a op-ed for UK outlet LBC earlier this year supporting the US-Israeli attack on Iran and criticizing the current Labour government for failing to offer stronger backing for the strike. He has also repeatedly denied that Israeli forces have committed war crimes in Gaza.

    During his September 2024 funded trip to Israel, Tice met with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, and later wrote that with the current Labour government openly declaring pro-Palestinian positions from the prime minister down, it falls to other parties in UK parliament to stand with Israel as an ally. He added that during the trip he visited an Israeli border crossing into Gaza, and claimed that widespread reports of famine in Gaza pushed by the United Nations were false, saying his own observations and conversations with what he called “credible top people” convinced him the famine claims were untrue.

    Tice’s labeling of the transparency petition as antisemitic during last week’s debate has drawn sharp pushback from the petition’s creator, Andy Kalil. The debate saw most participating MPs who are affiliated with pro-Israel groups echo Tice’s claim that the petition was antisemitic, while a small number of MPs who supported the call for an inquiry raised detailed questions about lobbying and transparency that went unanswered. Kalil has since submitted a formal complaint to Deputy Speaker Nusrat Ghani, obtained by Middle East Eye, arguing that the repeated labeling of the petition, its 118,000 public signatories, and supporting MPs as antisemitic amounts to an sustained attack on a legitimate call for greater transparency and accountability, rather than a serious engagement with the substantive issues raised. Kalil added that the debate failed to address core questions about foreign lobbying, political donations, publicly funded parliamentary trips, and foreign influence, and has called for the debate to be rerun.

    Newly unearthed Israeli government data obtained by Berlin-based journalist Yossi Bartel confirms that the Israeli foreign ministry paid more than £50,000 to a Jerusalem-based events firm called Conexión Israel to organize the November 2024 trip for the Reform UK delegation. The delegation included then-Reform chairman David Bull, Lancashire County Council leader Stephen Atkinson, London Assembly member Alex Wilson, and party board member Gawain Towler. During the trip, the group visited sites of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks, including the site of the Nova music festival massacre. After the trip, Bull called it “life changing”, and said the group had discussed issues including visa overstayers and asylum seekers with the deputy mayor of Tel Aviv. Towler said in a statement after the trip that Israel’s fight is “in many ways, our fight” as a shared struggle for “enlightenment ideals, international norms, democracy and the rest.”

    In addition to its deepening ties with pro-Israel lobbying networks, Reform UK has also built formal connections with the United Arab Emirates, with Farage meeting senior Emirati ministers earlier this year. Abu Dhabi has reportedly found common ground with Reform over their shared opposition to political Islam, and last September Farage pledged that a Reform government would ban the Muslim Brotherhood, following the lead of multiple Gulf states.

    Middle East Eye, which first reported on many of these connections, provides independent, in-depth coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions. Requests for comment from Reform UK have not yet received a response.

  • Israeli settler group calls for seizing crops in occupied Syrian land

    Israeli settler group calls for seizing crops in occupied Syrian land

    Tensions along the Israeli-Syrian frontier have spiked in recent weeks following the collapse of the former Assad government, as a newly formed Israeli settler advocacy group has publicly called for the systematic cultivation and commercial sale of agricultural produce grown on seized Syrian land in the southern regions of the country.

    Pioneers of Bashan, the organization pushing for permanent Israeli settlement expansion into newly occupied Syrian territories, launched its call to action targeting the fertile lands held by Israel in Daraa and Quneitra governorates. In a public post shared on the social platform X, the group highlighted that roughly 2,000 tons of wheat had already been harvested this year from lands within the small Quneitra District alone. The statement went on to make a controversial, inflammatory claim that the fertile region would produce far higher yields when worked by what the group called “pioneering Jews” rather than the Sunni communities that currently inhabit the area, falsely alleging those communities support Hamas.

    Founded only in April 2025, Pioneers of Bashan emerged just four months after armed opposition groups overthrew the government of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024. That collapse of central state authority, which brought Ahmed al-Sharaa’s transitional government to power, created a power vacuum that Israel exploited to expand its long-standing occupation of Syrian territory beyond the Golan Heights — a region Israel has held illegally since the 1967 Six-Day War. The group has repeatedly framed its settlement advocacy through religious framing, citing ancient Biblical texts as flawed justification for seizing additional Syrian land for Jewish settlement.

    Escalating Israeli ground incursions have already uprooted local communities in the region. Just this past Sunday, Israeli military convoys advanced into the village of Abidin in Daraa governorate, where local residents gathered to block the entry route by stacking stones across the road. According to official Syrian state media, Israeli forces responded to the nonviolent protest with heavy artillery fire, forcing the entire village population to flee to safer neighboring settlements overnight.

    Syria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official formal statement condemning the violation of its sovereignty. “We condemn in the strongest terms the ongoing Israeli attacks, represented by repeated incursions into Syrian territory in Quneitra and Daraa provinces and the deliberate targeting of civilian populated areas with artillery shelling. This is a blatant violation of Syrian sovereignty and territorial integrity that violates all international law and UN resolutions,” the statement read.

    Israeli government officials, particularly far-right members of the current governing coalition, have ramped up warmongering rhetoric in recent weeks, openly framing the new Syrian leadership as an imminent threat to justify further military escalation. Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli, a prominent far-right figure in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, laid out his aggressive stance in a series of recent radio interviews, labeling al-Sharaa’s transitional government as part of what he inaccurately called a “radical Sunni axis of evil” across the Middle East.

    Chikli argued that what he described as a jihadist regime rooted in the ideologies of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, which he claimed holds aspirations to claim Jerusalem, could never coexist peacefully alongside the state of Israel. In an additional interview with Israel’s Army Radio last Thursday, Chikli claimed a new anti-Israel alliance has formed between Pakistan, Turkey and Qatar — a bloc he claimed poses a far greater threat to Israeli security than Iran, even amid Tehran’s recent ceasefire agreement with the United States.

  • First T20 between England and India abandoned because of rain after Sooryavanshi left out again

    First T20 between England and India abandoned because of rain after Sooryavanshi left out again

    The opening match of a five-match men’s T20 international series between England and India in Chester-le-Street, England, was called off due to persistent rain on Wednesday, robbing spectators of a full contest before the host side could even begin its run chase.

    After winning the pre-match toss and electing to take the batting crease first, India recovered from an early top-order collapse to post a competitive total of 189 runs for seven wickets. Captain Shreyas Iyer led the charge with a 68-run knock, while opening batter Abhishek Sharma contributed a steady half-century of 59 runs. All-rounder Shivam Dube delivered a late, explosive hitting spree, scoring 42 runs off just 21 deliveries including three sixes and two fours to push India close to the 200-run mark. For England, pace bowler Saqib Mahmood turned in the strongest bowling performance, claiming three wickets for 33 runs, including the early dismissal of Indian opener Sanju Samson for just 1 run. India’s innings got off to a rocky start, with Ishan Kishan run out for a duck to leave the side reeling at 6 runs for the loss of two wickets before the middle order rallied to build a commanding total.

    By the time India’s 20 overs concluded, heavy rain had moved into the Durham venue, and the downpour never let up enough to allow England to start its innings. Match officials formally abandoned play at approximately 8:15 p.m. local time. The second fixture of the five-match series is scheduled to kick off in Manchester this Saturday.

    The match carried extra off-field attention surrounding 15-year-old Indian batting prodigy Vaibhav Sooryavanshi, who was left out of the playing XI for a second consecutive tour stop, extending his wait for a senior international debut. Fresh off a dominant 2026 Indian Premier League campaign that saw him score 776 runs across 16 innings and earn the league’s Most Valuable Player award, Sooryavanshi earned a call-up to India’s touring squad for Ireland and England. However, he has not yet been able to unseat established openers Samson and Sharma in the starting lineup.

    India’s decision to hold the teenager out comes on the heels of an unexpected 2-0 series defeat to Ireland, a result that left many fans calling for the dynamic young prospect to get an early opportunity at the senior level. If Sooryavanshi does make his debut later in the England series at his current age of 15 years and 96 days, he will break the record for the youngest player to feature in a top-tier men’s T20 international. The existing mark is held by Ireland’s Joshua Little, who was 16 years and 309 days old when he made his T20 debut. He would also become the youngest player to ever represent India’s senior men’s international team, surpassing the legendary Sachin Tendulkar, who was 16 years and 205 days old when he made his Test debut in 1989. The record for the youngest player in the history of men’s international cricket across all formats still belongs to Pakistan’s Hasan Raza, who was 14 years and 227 days old when he made his Test debut in 1996.

  • Eurovision, eh? Canada will compete at the glitzy song contest in 2027

    Eurovision, eh? Canada will compete at the glitzy song contest in 2027

    One of the world’s most iconic and wildly popular music competitions is crossing a new ocean to expand its global reach. The Eurovision Song Contest, a decades-long staple of European pop culture known for its over-the-top stagecraft, infectious catchy tunes, and cross-continental fanbase, has announced that Canada will become the first new country to join the competition in 12 years, set to compete in the 2027 edition hosted in Bulgaria.

    The joint announcement came from the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), the governing body that oversees the annual contest, and Canada’s national public broadcaster CBC, made purposely to coincide with Canada Day, the country’s national holiday. The invitation to join follows Canada’s recent acceptance as a full member of the EBU, a prerequisite for competing in the flagship song competition.

    First launched in 1956 as a small cross-European broadcasting experiment, Eurovision has grown into a global cultural phenomenon that draws hundreds of millions of viewers annually. Often described as ‘the World Cup of pop music’ for its combination of friendly national competition and mass audience appeal, the contest has launched some of the music industry’s biggest global careers. Most famously, Swedish 1970s supergroup ABBA catapulted to international fame after winning the 1974 contest with their breakout hit ‘Waterloo’, setting the stage for decades of Euro-pop chart dominance.

    For Canada, the participation marks a groundbreaking opportunity to showcase homegrown musical talent to a massive global audience. ‘This partnership will allow Canadian talent to be showcased on one of the most storied music stages in the world,’ said Marie-Philippe Bouchard, President of CBC. EBU Eurovision Director Martin Green framed the move as a natural evolution for the increasingly global competition: ‘Canada’s accession is a further sign that, while born in Europe, the Contest continues to welcome the world.’

    This is not the first time a Canadian musician has claimed Eurovision glory, however. In 1988, legendary Quebec-born singer Celine Dion won the contest representing Switzerland, decades before her rise to global stardom. Canada is the first non-European nation added to the competition lineup since Australia joined in 2015.

    CBC has confirmed that it will release full details on its national selection process for Canada’s debut entry later this year. Selection processes vary across participating countries, with some opting for public, televised national selection shows where fans vote for their favorite act, while others assign the broadcaster to directly select the competing representative.

    The 2027 contest will be hosted in Bulgaria, following Bulgarian singer Dara’s 2026 victory in this year’s 70th anniversary edition of the event. That milestone 2026 contest was marked by significant upheaval, however: five long-standing participating members — Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, Iceland and Slovenia — launched a boycott of the competition over organizers’ decision to allow Israel to retain its participation spot, despite widespread global criticism of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and ongoing violence in the West Bank. Israel has been a Eurovision participant since 1973.

    Organizers report that the 2026 grand final drew a global audience of 130 million viewers, a drop from the 160 million viewers that tuned in for the 2025 contest. Even amid the hit to viewership and organizational finances from this year’s boycott, Eurovision is pushing forward with plans for global expansion. A new spinoff event, Eurovision Song Contest Asia, is scheduled to launch in Bangkok this coming November, marking the competition’s latest push to grow its footprint outside of its European roots.

  • EU issues new steel and e-commerce regulations to reduce trade imbalance with China

    EU issues new steel and e-commerce regulations to reduce trade imbalance with China

    BRUSSELS – Facing a rapidly widening trade imbalance with China that has hit a staggering 1 billion euros per day, the European Union has launched two targeted trade policy changes on Wednesday, designed to shore up its struggling domestic steel sector and curb the flood of unregulated low-value small e-commerce parcels entering the bloc. The announcement marks the most significant shift in Brussels’ trade approach to Beijing in recent years, as growing domestic political and industrial pressure forces policymakers to abandon the status quo of unbalanced trade.

    The first measure ends the decades-old “de minimis” customs exemption that had allowed all parcels valued under 150 euros to enter the EU duty-free. In its place, a new fixed 3 euro ($3.42) customs duty will be applied to all low-value small parcels entering the bloc. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen framed the change as a long-overdue correction to an unfair playing field, noting that the exponential growth of low-value online imports from Chinese firms has placed domestic European retailers at a crippling competitive disadvantage. She added that a large share of these unregulated imports also fail to meet the EU’s strict product safety and environmental standards, putting ordinary consumers at unnecessary risk.

    EU data confirms the scale of the small parcel surge: the bloc received 5.9 billion small parcels from international sources in 2025, up from just 1.4 billion in 2022. At roughly 16 million parcels per day, these shipments account for 97% of all cross-border parcel traffic into the EU, though they make up only 2% of total import value. European officials estimate that Chinese e-commerce giants including Temu and Shein control around 90% of this low-value parcel trade, a concentration that has upended traditional brick-and-mortar retail across the bloc. The U.S. implemented an identical policy change last year, signaling a coordinated global shift toward restricting this trade model. The new rule also addresses widespread environmental concerns, as the majority of these small shipments come wrapped in excessive single-use plastic that adds to the EU’s waste management burden.

    Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s trade committee, welcomed the move in an online statement, saying that “Europe finally shows teeth against flood of cheap package deals.” However, some trade analysts caution that the 3 euro duty may not deliver the transformative change policymakers are seeking. Gary Ng, a research fellow at the Central European Institute of Asian Studies, noted that the fee is negligible compared to the large price gap between Chinese manufactured e-commerce goods and equivalent European products. Ng added that while the duty may reduce casual impulse purchases, consumers and platforms can easily evade the measure by grouping multiple small orders into a single shipment to avoid or reduce fees.

    The second, equally impactful measure targets the EU’s strategically critical steel sector, which has been reeling from years of global overcapacity driven largely by Chinese government production subsidies that have flooded global markets with artificially cheap steel. Under the new rules, the EU will set an annual tariff-free import quota of 18.3 million metric tons for 26 categories of steel products. Any imports that exceed this quota will face a 50% punitive tariff. The framework also introduces strict new transparency requirements for importers, mandating that they disclose where the core “melt and pour” production stage took place to prevent Chinese steel from being rerouted through third countries to skirt EU trade protections.

    Europe’s steel industry has already slid into a deep crisis, with the European Steel Association reporting that crude steel output fell to a historic low in the first half of 2026. Axel Eggert, the trade group’s director-general, warned in March that “Europe’s steel production is shrinking while imports as a share of the EU market are rising.” He urged EU policymakers to quickly enact the full, unwatered-down measures, warning that further delay would put more European industrial capacity and jobs at permanent risk. Notably, while China produces more than half of the world’s total steel output, most of the EU’s steel imports currently come from allied and partner economies including the U.K., Ukraine, India, Turkey, Japan and South Korea. Ukraine has received full exemptions from the new tariffs to support its post-invasion economic recovery, though the rules could still trigger dispute mechanisms under existing free trade agreements with other partners including Japan. This new steel framework builds on emergency tariffs the bloc put in place last October to address diverted steel shipments stemming from new U.S. trade policy under the Trump administration.

    A senior anonymous Commission official confirmed that Brussels intends to work with like-minded global partners to collectively address the systemic issue of global steel overcapacity, noting that “in an ideal world there is fair competition and level playing fields. Unfortunately, we don’t seem to live in an ideal world.”

    The EU’s trade deficit with China ballooned to roughly 360 billion euros ($410 billion) in 2025, and projections show the gap continuing to widen through 2026. Against this backdrop, the new measures have already drawn a sharp rebuke from Beijing, which has repeatedly warned Brussels against adopting what it calls “discriminatory” trade policies. China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a formal warning in May, stating that it would “firmly respond” to any measures targeting Chinese companies. Alicia García-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific and the Middle East at French bank Natixis, noted that even though the measures are not formally labeled as targeting China, Beijing is certain to oppose them, as it views the framework as a potential precedent for broader trade restrictions on Chinese exports across multiple sectors.

    Chinese policy analysts have already warned of growing global backlash against China’s export-led manufacturing model. A recent report from Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy identified what it calls “China Shock 2.0” — a massive surge of heavily subsidized advanced Chinese manufacturing exports flooding global markets — as one of the top 10 security risks facing China. The report warns that the EU’s new tariffs, combined with existing protectionist sentiment in the U.S., could trigger a “wolf pack effect” where dozens of other countries follow suit with steep tariff hikes and stricter investment screening targeting Chinese firms. The report notes that this coordinated response would not only cause direct economic losses but also damage China’s broader strategic and international business reputation globally. Beijing has pushed back against this framing, arguing that its export growth brings shared economic benefits and technological innovation to global markets.

    HSBC economists Frederic Neumann and Justin Feng noted in a recent research note that while the EU has historically taken a less confrontational approach to trade with China than the U.S. under the Trump administration, the overall policy direction in Brussels is clearly shifting toward greater restriction. This shift aligns with a broader G7 push for greater supply chain independence for critical minerals and high-tech goods, with G7 leaders issuing a joint statement in June committing to diversify supply chains away from over-reliance on single sources.

    Chinese officials have pushed back against the idea that China is to blame for the EU’s trade imbalances. “China and the EU are partners, not rivals,” Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said this Tuesday. “The root cause of the EU’s problems does not lie with China.” Trade analysts note that China successfully weathered the Trump administration’s escalated tariff threats last year, in part by leveraging its control over global rare earth supply chains to negotiate a truce with Washington. This experience has left Beijing more confident in its ability to withstand external pressure, leading analysts to predict that China will be unwilling to make major concessions to the EU in upcoming trade talks.

    “If China managed a U.S. tariff ramp-up and the global energy shock during the U.S.-Iran conflict, it may show less inclination to make concessions to the EU,” Neumann and Feng wrote. “The near-term outlook points to limited progress towards a comprehensive China-EU settlement.” García-Herrero added that even though the EU common market is critical to China — 90% of China’s battery exports and 60% of its electric vehicle exports go to the bloc — Beijing believes it can split EU member states through targeted lobbying to prevent unified action. “China thinks Europe has no leverage,” she said. “They do think they have the upper hand, by all means.”

    The new measures come just one day after a high-profile meeting between China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Representative Maroš Šefčovič in Brussels. After the talks, Šefčovič reaffirmed the EU’s commitment to open trade but stressed that the bloc must defend its own industrial base. “The EU remains open for business but we need to defend our industrial base and keep pushing for a level playing field globally, so our industries get a fair shot at competing,” he said. “That is why today’s talks – and the ones to follow – matter.” Šefčovič has set an October deadline for reaching meaningful progress on rebalancing bilateral trade, adding bluntly that “the status quo is not an option.”

  • Australian communist: CPC’s 105-year journey proves determination and action achieve greatness

    Australian communist: CPC’s 105-year journey proves determination and action achieve greatness

    On the 105th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China (CPC), a senior leader of the Communist Party of Australia has shared his reflections on the CPC’s historic journey, crediting the organization’s decades of transformative progress to unwavering determination, grounded theoretical guidance and consistent collective action.

    Christian Goopy, member of the Communist Party of Australia Central Committee, opened up about his own ideological journey in a recent commentary, noting that his decision to join the Australian communist movement has been a defining personal choice. For Goopy, party membership has provided a clear ideological framework that has helped him remain aligned with his core values and expand his capacity to contribute meaningfully to collective progress as a communist activist.

    First established on July 1, 1921, the CPC has grown from a small revolutionary organization into the governing party of the world’s most populous nation, guiding China through a century of unprecedented social, economic and political transformation. Goopy emphasized that the 105-year trajectory of the CPC offers a powerful case study in how aligned ideological commitment, theoretical clarity and deliberate, people-centered action can combine to deliver outcomes that reshape the lives of hundreds of millions and alter the course of global history.

    The commentary comes as global political observers and left-wing movements mark the CPC’s anniversary, with many leaders across the world sharing perspectives on the party’s legacy and its impact on global development over the past century. Goopy’s remarks join a growing chorus of international communist and progressive leaders recognizing the CPC’s century-long track record of delivering equitable development and advancing working-class interests.