标签: Africa

非洲

  • Why Africa might back controversial Fifa plan

    Why Africa might back controversial Fifa plan

    Global football is currently in the grip of a major governance and commercial storm, centered on FIFA President Gianni Infantino and his controversial proposal to sell minority stakes in FIFA’s flagship competitions to private external investors. As three of FIFA’s six continental confederations have already lined up in open opposition, all eyes are turning to Africa: will the Confederation of African Football (CAF) emerge as the unexpected key bloc of support for the embattled FIFA leader, and what forces are shaping its position?

    Infantino’s plan would establish a new commercial subsidiary, FIFA Forward Enterprise, designed to attract outside investment. FIFA projects the initiative could raise up to $4.2 billion by the end of 2024, with all net proceeds pledged to be reinvested into development programs for football across the globe. So far, UEFA (Europe), the Asian Football Confederation, and CONCACAF (North America, Central America and the Caribbean) have all formally rejected the proposal, with UEFA even threatening to boycott FIFA competitions including the World Cup if the plan moves forward. CAF, however, has maintained notable public silence to date, with its executive committee only set to convene next week to formally assess the proposal and discuss a unified position.

    The roots of CAF’s cautious stance stretch far beyond the current proposal, anchored in a deeply intertwined personal and institutional relationship between CAF President Patrice Motsepe and Infantino that has yielded tangible financial benefits for African football. Since both leaders took their respective posts in 2021, the two confederations have aligned closely. Motsepe has repeatedly praised Infantino as a loyal friend to African football, highlighting the Swiss executive’s key contributions to the continent: most notably, the expansion of the FIFA World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, which secured Africa a guaranteed nine qualification spots, up from the long-controversial previous allocation of just five. That shift alone has been framed as a transformative win for the continent, ending decades of perceived marginalization.

    Ties between the two organizations run even deeper through personal connections. Veron Mosengo-Omba, who served as Motsepe’s deputy at CAF from 2021 until March 2024, previously held a senior leadership role as FIFA’s chief member associations officer. He is a long-time friend of Infantino, having studied law alongside him in Switzerland, and was recently elected president of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s national football federation in May. Under Motsepe and Mosengo-Omba, CAF has already improved its overall financial position, particularly by boosting revenue from its flagship tournament, the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), progress that many in African football credit to the close partnership with FIFA.

    For cash-strapped African national federations, the financial incentive to back the proposal is clear. Most African federations receive minimal government funding, with many struggling to cover core operating costs, let alone invest in infrastructure, grassroots development and women’s football. Under the new proposal, each of CAF’s 54 member associations would receive an upfront payment of $20 million as early as 1 January 2025 if the plan is approved by the 19 September deadline, with a further $20 million to follow. That level of funding is life-changing for many programs across the continent.

    “Football is a very expensive venture, especially on the African continent where resources are not easy to come by,” explained Rogers Byamukama, a representative of Uganda’s national football federation. “What is wrong with making more money and sharing that money with those that need it most?”

    Fleetwood Haiya, president of Malawi’s football federation, echoed that sentiment, noting his government cannot even afford to allocate $1 million annually to football amid broader public resource constraints. “Malawi needs money. Malawi needs stadiums,” Haiya said. “I’m 100% in support (of the FIFA proposal). There is no dispute. I don’t understand why FIFA took so long to do this.”

    Leaders across the continent point to already tangible results from past FIFA funding. Cape Verde’s impressive run to the knockout stage on their World Cup debut in 2026 came after the federation used FIFA grants to upgrade logistical and training support during qualification. Malawi’s women’s national team also pulled off a major upset at the 2024 Women’s Africa Cup of Nations, beating defending champions Nigeria in their finals debut, a result Haiya attributes directly to FIFA development funding. “Gianni Infantino believed in our project for women’s football,” he added. For many African administrators, the promise of additional funding will only strengthen their existing loyalty to Infantino.

    However, the close alignment between CAF and FIFA has not been without controversy, and the proposal has already sparked internal division across African football. Critics note that Motsepe has largely avoided public pushback on controversial FIFA decisions that have harmed African interests: when U.S. authorities blocked Somali referee Omar Artan from entering the country ahead of the 2026 World Cup, and when FIFA controversially overturned a one-match suspension for U.S. striker Folarin Balogun, CAF declined to issue any public criticism, unlike many other global governing bodies. The 2025 AFCON was also forced to reschedule to a disruptive December-January window to accommodate FIFA’s expanded Club World Cup last year, and the recent decision to shift AFCON from a biennial to quadrennial tournament starting in 2028 has been widely criticized as a move that prioritizes FIFA’s global calendar over African interests.

    Beyond past disputes, some prominent African football leaders warn that opening major competitions to private investment threatens the long-term integrity of the game, even if the short-term funding is attractive. “It does not sit well,” said Isha Johansen, former president of the Sierra Leone Football Association, former CAF executive committee member and former FIFA Council member. “As a businessman or woman you want something out of it. You’re not just doing it out of generosity. What price does one have to pay in order to get to this elevated development for football in Africa? I do hope that they (CAF) go along with all the other confederations.”

    Johansen acknowledged that the funding on offer would be transformative for African football, but argued that leaders must draw a line to protect the sport’s core mission. “It is an offer that is hard to refuse,” she said. “We (in Africa) need the money. I think we now come to a point where you really need to know where to draw the line and not sacrifice the beautiful game.”

    The final vote on the proposal requires a simple majority of FIFA’s 211 member associations to pass, meaning 106 votes in favor. If all member associations from UEFA, the AFC and CONCACAF follow their confederation’s leadership in opposing the plan, 136 votes will already be against the proposal. Even if all 54 of CAF’s member associations unite behind Infantino, opposition from the rest of the world is likely to block the plan, leaving African football caught between short-term financial opportunity and a global movement against increased privatization of the world’s biggest sport.

  • At least 25 people killed in Algeria bus crash

    At least 25 people killed in Algeria bus crash

    A devastating highway crash near the Algerian coastal city of Boumerdes, located just east of the capital Algiers, has claimed the lives of at least 25 people and left scores more injured, local government officials confirmed in a statement released Friday.

    Algeria’s national civil protection department has announced that the root cause of the accident remains under active investigation, with no preliminary conclusions released to the public as of press time. All injured passengers have been rapidly evacuated to adjacent medical facilities across the region to receive urgent, life-saving care.

    Algerian Prime Minister Sifi Ghrieb traveled to the crash site shortly after the incident to assess the response and speak directly with first responders and emergency service personnel deployed to the scene. Photographs from the location show the overturned passenger coach resting at the bottom of a deep ravine adjacent to the roadway.

    This fatal crash is the latest in a string of deadly traffic incidents that have plagued Algeria’s road network in recent years. Last August, a separate bus collision close to Algiers resulted in 18 fatalities, per reporting from Agence France-Presse. Just four months later, in December 2024, another bus overturning in the southern Algerian region of Bechar killed 14 people.

    Official data from Algerian road safety regulators underscores the severity of the country’s road safety crisis: in 2024 alone, a total of 3,838 people lost their lives in road accidents across the nation, while more than 37,000 others sustained non-fatal injuries in collisions and other incidents.

  • Nigeria removed from South African pop star Tyla’s upcoming world tour

    Nigeria removed from South African pop star Tyla’s upcoming world tour

    Just days after Grammy-winning South African pop star Tyla unveiled her highly anticipated 34-date world tour to support her newly released second studio album *A*POP*, one major stop has vanished from the official itinerary: Lagos, Nigeria. What began as a routine tour announcement has become entangled in escalating diplomatic and public tensions between Nigeria and South Africa, rooted in a recent surge of anti-migrant violence and xenophobic sentiment targeting foreign nationals in South Africa.

    When Tyla first shared the full tour schedule on Monday following last week’s album drop, her official website listed Lagos alongside two South African dates in Johannesburg and Cape Town. But by Friday, an updated schedule posted to the site removed the Nigerian capital entirely, with no public explanation given for the last-minute change.

    The removal comes amid growing public pressure in Nigeria for Tyla to cancel the Lagos show, triggered by the ongoing wave of xenophobic attacks that have specifically targeted Nigerians living in South Africa. Diplomatic relations between the two African nations have deteriorated sharply in recent weeks over the crisis: Nigeria and several other African countries have publicly criticized South Africa for failing to intervene effectively to protect foreign migrants. Large-scale protests in South Africa have called for the expulsion of all undocumented migrants, driving tens of thousands of foreign nationals – including hundreds of Nigerians – to flee the country on government-arranged repatriation flights.

    While diplomatic leaders have attempted to de-escalate tensions, most recently with a high-level meeting of foreign affairs officials in Abuja, public anger has spilled into the cultural sphere. Earlier this week, Nigerian activists launched an online petition calling to bar Tyla from entering Nigeria until all xenophobic attacks against migrants end in South Africa. The petition has already gathered thousands of signatures. On Tyla’s social media channels, where the original full tour schedule listing Lagos remains visible, Nigerian fans and activists have repeatedly warned the 24-year-old artist against proceeding with the concert, condemning her for not publicly speaking out against the anti-migrant movement in her home country. As of Friday, Tyla has not issued any public comment on the controversy, and did not respond to a request for comment from the BBC.

    Tyla is not the only high-profile South African cultural figure facing public backlash over their perceived silence on the xenophobia crisis. Former *Daily Show* host and South African comedian Trevor Noah has also drawn widespread criticism after headlining a promotional campaign for the Tourism Business Council of South Africa. The promotional video, shared across the organization’s social media platforms, was flooded with comments accusing Noah of promoting South African tourism while refusing to condemn the country’s growing anti-migrant hostility. Many commenters added public context to the video, framing South Africa as a fundamentally xenophobic nation that does not welcome foreign visitors or migrants.

    South African government officials have pushed back against mounting international criticism. Authorities note that they have taken legal action against individuals engaged in vigilante violence connected to the anti-migrant protests, with more than 900 people arrested in connection with recent unrest. The government also asserts that it retains the sovereign right to regulate immigration and border control into the country, a position that has done little to ease cross-border tensions.

  • Oprah Winfrey says she will close her school for girls in South Africa next year

    Oprah Winfrey says she will close her school for girls in South Africa next year

    Nearly two decades after opening a transformative boarding school for disadvantaged young women outside Johannesburg, media mogul and philanthropist Oprah Winfrey has announced that the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls will cease operations at its current campus at the end of 2025, with full ownership transferred to South Africa’s Gauteng provincial education department. The landmark institution, first opened in 2007, grew out of a conversation with anti-apartheid icon and former South African President Nelson Mandela, who emphasized how investing in girls’ education could unlock widespread, lasting change across the continent. Mandela was in attendance at the academy’s grand opening to mark the launch of the project.

    From its inception, the handover of the 52-acre campus to local educational authorities was always part of the core agreement, academy representatives confirmed. The facility, which boasts 21 classrooms, six specialized science and computer labs, a 10,000-volume library, and a 600-seat performance theater, will now be taken over by the Gauteng provincial government, which has not yet announced its long-term plans for the property.

    Winfrey emphasized in a formal statement released Wednesday that the end of operations at the current campus does not mark the end of her commitment to empowering young South African women through education. “The dream was never simply to build a school,” Winfrey said. “It was to invest in the limitless potential of young women. That mission doesn’t end with one campus. It continues in every girl whose future can be transformed through education.”

    Moving forward, Winfrey’s philanthropic organization, the Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation, will expand its national scholarship program to support academically gifted girls at top-performing schools across South Africa. To date, more than 500 students have graduated from the Leadership Academy, with many going on to pursue higher education at leading universities in South Africa, the United States, and across Europe.

    Gauteng’s Provincial Minister for Education Lebogang Maile confirmed that current students enrolled at the academy will be able to complete their secondary education without disruption, with full financial support remaining in place through their graduation.

    The academy made global headlines shortly after its opening, when multiple students made accusations of physical and sexual abuse against a residential dormitory matron. Winfrey traveled immediately to South Africa to meet with affected students and their families, issued a public apology for the failure to protect students, and commissioned an independent probe into the allegations. The matron was ultimately acquitted of all criminal charges in a 2010 court ruling.

  • US admits ‘unfortunate error’ after mislabelling countries on map of Africa

    US admits ‘unfortunate error’ after mislabelling countries on map of Africa

    A major cartographic blunder, involving an AI-generated map filled with critical geographic errors for key African nations, has thrown the U.S. State Department into the center of diplomatic controversy following a presentation at the 26th International Aids Conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The flawed map, which appeared in a slide deck discussing U.S. funding for global HIV response initiatives, included wildly incorrect positioning and unrecognizable shapes for six African countries central to Washington’s flagship HIV program, the President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar).

    Among the most striking errors, the map incorrectly labeled Nigeria — Africa’s most populous nation — as a landlocked country, when it in fact holds extensive coastlines along the Gulf of Guinea. Ivory Coast was mislocated to East Africa rather than its actual position in West Africa. Three of the six highlighted nations — Nigeria, Mozambique, and Ivory Coast — were placed entirely wrong geographically. While Malawi and Uganda sat in roughly correct regional positions, their shapes were heavily distorted, and Cameroon was referenced in the presentation but not marked on the map at all.

    The mistake was first brought to public attention by HIV/AIDS expert Emily Bass, who shared a photograph of the flawed slide via her Substack newsletter, quickly sparking widespread backlash across social media and diplomatic circles. A subsequent analysis by Reuters confirmed the map carries an artificial intelligence watermark, confirming it was generated using AI tools. OpenAI has confirmed it is investigating the incident in response to the reports.

    The presentation was delivered by a senior U.S. official tasked with overseeing Pepfar, which has been a core component of U.S. global health engagement for decades. In its official response, the State Department acknowledged the incident as “an unfortunate error”, explaining it occurred when a team member “hurriedly altered” the slide deck in preparation for the conference. The department took full responsibility for the confusion and misrepresentation the mistake caused for attendees, including African partner nations participating in the event.

    Critics across the political spectrum have slammed the error, linking it to broader shifts in U.S. foreign policy and staffing under the second Trump administration. Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, wrote on X: “What an embarrassment. This is what happens when [the State Department] fires career experts and tries to have AI conduct diplomacy.” Former State Department official Cameron Hudson echoed the criticism, calling the mistake “stupid and embarrassing” and attributing it to “too junior staff performing work under-supervised.”

    The controversy comes at a sensitive moment for U.S. global health policy, arriving as the 26th International Aids Conference opens against the backdrop of deep cuts to U.S. foreign aid implemented after President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year. The Trump administration has overhauled U.S. global health assistance, implementing sharp across-the-board cuts to foreign aid spending. While core life-saving HIV treatment programs under Pepfar have largely resumed operations, Washington has scaled back funding for prevention and disease surveillance initiatives, and announced plans to phase out the Pepfar program entirely in South Africa.

    Despite the public backlash over the map error, the State Department maintained that discussions at the conference remained “substantive and constructive”, and reaffirmed the U.S.’s long-stated commitment to combating HIV/Aids across Africa and the rest of the world.

  • Rights group says Russia-linked airstrike in Mali killed 8 civilians last month

    Rights group says Russia-linked airstrike in Mali killed 8 civilians last month

    DAKAR, SENEGAL – In a public report released Friday, Human Rights Watch (HRW) has leveled serious accusations against Russia’s state-controlled Africa Corps, claiming that a corps aircraft carried out an airstrike on a central Malian village last month that left eight civilians dead, among them three children.

    According to the investigation compiled by HRW, a Russian Sukhoi Su-24 attack plane dropped two explosive munitions on the village of Kyrnia, located in Mali’s conflict-battered Mopti region, on June 15. The first bomb landed close to the village chief’s residence, killing his wife and three of his children. The second strike hit a small cattle market just a short distance away, killing four adult male civilians. Shockingly, HRW’s investigation found no fatalities among fighters from Jama’a Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the al-Qaeda-affiliated Islamic militant group that has held control of Kyrnia for six years.

    The Associated Press has not been able to independently confirm the accuracy of HRW’s findings, consistent with standard journalistic practice for on-the-ground conflict reporting in inaccessible regions.

    Mali has been trapped in a spiral of violent instability for more than 10 years. The country faces overlapping insurgencies from jihadist groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State – including JNIM – alongside a long-running separatist rebellion led by Tuareg groups in the country’s northern territories. Violence has accelerated sharply in recent months, after a joint offensive by JNIM and Tuareg separatist forces carried out the largest coordinated attack across Mali in more than a decade. The assault targeted key sites including Bamako’s international airport, the nearby military garrison town of Kati, and multiple population centers in northern and central Mali.

    Those April attacks laid bare critical gaps in the Malian government’s counterinsurgency strategy, which has centered heavily on Russian military support since the country’s military junta cut diplomatic and security ties with former Western ally France. Russian military-linked forces have operated in Mali since late 2021, brought in to assist the military-led government in its fight against militant and separatist factions. Last year, Africa Corps – a unit that falls directly under the command of Russia’s Ministry of Defense – took over Russian military operations in the country, replacing the private mercenary outfit the Wagner Group.

    To build its report on the June 15 strike, HRW said it conducted interviews with 19 separate witnesses with direct knowledge of the incident, cross-referenced witness accounts with high-resolution satellite imagery, and reviewed publicly released footage of the strike that was posted online by Africa Corps itself. In that footage, the corps framed the operation as a targeted strike against a gathering of terrorists. HRW’s researchers noted that while roughly 100 JNIM fighters were present in Kyrnia on the day of the strike, the majority of those fighters were gathered in a separate part of the village, far from the two sites hit by munitions. The group concluded that the airstrikes did not appear to target a clear, legitimate military objective, violating international laws of war.

    HRW has called on Mali’s military-led government to open a full, independent investigation into the incident and hold any individuals found responsible for the civilian deaths accountable. The organization warned that failure to do so would make the Malian government complicit in potential war crimes. As of Friday, Russia’s Ministry of Defense had not issued a response to requests for comment on the HRW report.

  • At least 18 die after breach of border between Morocco and Spanish exclave of Ceuta

    At least 18 die after breach of border between Morocco and Spanish exclave of Ceuta

    A devastating humanitarian emergency has unfolded on the border between Morocco and Spain’s North African exclave of Ceuta, where at least 18 migrants have lost their lives in a mass crossing attempt that left thousands of people stranded in the tiny territory with no basic shelter or support.

    The crisis began earlier this week when thousands of migrants breached the fortified border between Ceuta and Morocco, pouring into Spanish territory in an unprecedented surge of arrivals that forced the Spanish government to deploy active-duty military personnel to the area. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is scheduled to travel to Ceuta on Friday morning alongside Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska to assess the unfolding situation firsthand.

    Rachid Sbihi, head of a local workers association that represents Civil Guard officers, described the chaotic scene as nothing short of a “serious humanitarian crisis.” Speaking to reporters, Sbihi confirmed that new crossings are continuing even as emergency responders struggle to meet existing needs. “The reinforcements that have arrived are only helping the injured and other humanitarian efforts,” he explained, noting that thousands of migrants — including dozens of unaccompanied minor children — have been forced to sleep on public sidewalks and in city parks, with no access to warm shelter or basic hygiene facilities. Many more wander the streets of Ceuta with no clear destination or plan, leaving the entire territory in disarray. “It’s chaotic,” Sbihi added.

    Of the 18 confirmed fatalities, most drowned while attempting the crossing by sea, while others were killed in a deadly stampede as crowds pushed through the breakwater fence at Tarajal beach, Sbihi said. Video footage captured on Thursday shows large crowds, predominantly of Moroccan origin, walking across Tarajal beach’s breakwaters onto local Ceuta roads. While most of the new arrivals are young adult men, video also captured entire families, including women and young children, making the crossing. Some migrants shouted “Viva España!” to an Associated Press freelance photographer documenting the event.

    By late Thursday, the photographer observed a continued back-and-forth movement: new crowds gathered on the Moroccan side of the border preparing to cross, while some of the people who had already entered Ceuta were attempting to return to Morocco.

    To date, the root cause of the sudden massive surge in crossings remains unclear. Moroccan government authorities have not issued any public statement on the event, and the country’s Interior Ministry did not respond to multiple requests for comment from reporters. Local Ceuta authorities have preliminarily linked the increase in arrivals to a recent ruling by Spain’s Supreme Court, issued earlier this month, which bars Spanish officials from immediately turning back migrants who arrive by sea without first granting them due process. That ruling does not apply to migrants who enter Spanish territory by land, including those who climb over the existing border fence. Even so, some migrant rights activists based in Morocco have cast doubt on that explanation, arguing that most migrants attempting the crossing would not have been aware of the nuanced Spanish legal ruling.

    The chaos in Ceuta has already spilled over to impact other European nations, including Italy, which is another major destination for migrants traveling through North Africa. Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni has threatened to suspend Italy’s participation in the Schengen Area, the European Union’s open-border agreement, with Spain in response to the crisis — a move that experts have called symbolic, as Italy shares no direct land border with Spain. “To defend our borders and ensure the safety of our citizens,” Meloni said in justifying her threat.

    Ceuta is one of two Spanish exclaves located on the northern coast of Africa, surrounded entirely by Moroccan territory. For decades, it has been a primary entry point for migrants seeking to reach the European Union, where many hope to access better economic opportunities or escape conflict and political violence in their home countries. Migrants typically make the short crossing from the Moroccan coastal town of Fnideq, swimming roughly three miles (five kilometers) to reach Ceuta’s shores, while others depart from the closer town of Belyounech where the crossing distance is shorter. Reporting for this story was contributed by Naishadham from Madrid.

  • Africa’s off-grid solar sector courts mainstream investors with landmark financing deals

    Africa’s off-grid solar sector courts mainstream investors with landmark financing deals

    Across sub-Saharan Africa, over 600 million people still live without access to consistent, reliable electricity, leaving millions of households reliant on dangerous, polluting energy sources like kerosene. Now, two of the continent’s biggest off-grid solar companies have closed historic fundraising deals that are sparking cautious optimism that mainstream private capital markets could finally step in to accelerate universal electrification across the region.

    In June, affordable clean energy provider d.light issued a $50 million green bond earmarked for off-grid solar projects, while industry competitor Sun King secured $286 million in securitized debt, set to close mid-2025. Together, these transactions represent the largest-scale test yet of whether large institutional investors will back the sector’s popular pay-as-you-go (PAYGo) business model at a commercial level.

    Both companies operate on the PAYGo framework, which allows low-income households to purchase small-scale solar home systems and appliances in incremental, affordable installments — usually paid via mobile money apps — rather than requiring the full upfront cost that puts systems out of reach for most. To unlock immediate new capital for expansion, the companies bundle the stream of future customer repayments, called receivables, and use them as collateral to issue bonds or other securities sold to outside investors.

    Sun King Global CFO Krishna Swaroop described the twin deals as pathbreaking for the entire African off-grid solar industry. “They demonstrate the entry of a serious scale of commercial capital, investors and instruments not seen before in this sector,” he said. But Swaroop also warned that the transactions are built on years of operational and repayment data that most smaller off-grid firms have not yet had the time to accumulate. Most mainstream investors require five to seven years of consistent repayment performance data before committing to this kind of structured financing, a bar many early-stage startups cannot clear.

    While securitization — the financing tool Sun King used, which is already common in global mortgage and auto loan markets — can reduce long-term borrowing costs for large established firms, the process requires expensive legal work, regulatory compliance, and credit guarantees. These fixed upfront costs make the strategy unworkable for smaller companies with smaller receivables portfolios. Swaroop added that the biggest ongoing barrier to attracting more mainstream capital remains portfolio quality risk: many off-grid firms still struggle to present their repayment performance data in a standardized format that institutional investors understand and trust.

    The financing tools deployed in these deals are still relatively new to emerging market climate investment. D.light’s green bond, structured similarly to a traditional fixed-income security that pays regular interest to buyers, is backed by a special-purpose entity that holds thousands of d.light’s PAYGo customer receivables, with all proceeds going toward new environmentally beneficial solar installations. Sun King’s securitization structure, by contrast, repackages future customer repayments the same way banks bundle home mortgages to sell to investors, turning years of future scheduled payments into immediate expansion capital today.

    Industry leaders say the deals prove that the African off-grid solar market has matured after decades of reliance on donor funding and development finance. Years of incremental improvements to product quality, independent third-party certification, and consistent repayment track records have turned customer receivables into an increasingly attractive asset class for global investors, explained Sarah Malm, executive director of GOGLA, the global off-grid solar industry association. “These deals are proof that the model works,” Malm said. “Today, PAYGo receivables are rated, listed and bought by institutional investors in London and New York.”

    Data from GOGLA’s 2025 Investment Data Report backs up this trend: African off-grid solar companies are drawing in more sophisticated financing than ever before, with local-currency investment hitting a record high of 47.2% of total sector funding, with the remainder denominated in U.S. dollars. The report also counted 18 first-time investors entering the space, including commercial banks based in Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania, and Madagascar.

    Wangari Muchiri, founder and CEO of Africa-based clean energy transition advisory firm RE.Think Energy, called the transactions an important tipping point for the sector, rather than just one-off isolated successes. “Every successful transaction reduces perceived risk and makes the next one easier to finance,” Muchiri said. She added that broader adoption of this financing model will require building a larger pipeline of investment-ready companies, creating standardized financing frameworks, improving public performance data collection, and enacting pro-electrification regulatory policies across African markets.

    Industry analysts still note that both current deals rely on significant credit enhancements to reduce risk for investors. D.light’s green bond, for example, is fully guaranteed by Green Guarantee Co., an organization that mobilizes private capital for climate investment in emerging markets, which substantially de-risks the investment for buyers, according to Penny Herbst, senior energy adviser at the Rabia Transition Initiative, a nonproift energy transition research organization. Herbst added that because the bond was privately placed, key details including pricing and guarantee terms remain confidential, limiting transparency for the broader sector.

    If this kind of private commercial financing becomes more widespread, supporters say it could fundamentally reshape Africa’s electrification efforts. Technological advances have already reduced costs and improved reliability: lithium-ion batteries used in home solar systems now last up to 10 years, and battery prices have fallen more than 90% since 2010, Malm noted. Widespread independent product certification, consumer warranties, and local repair networks have further reduced risk for investors by turning unpredictable household payments into a consistent, well-understood financial asset.

    Even with this progress, sector leaders warn of one key unresolved challenge: ensuring that the push for commercial market returns does not push companies to serve only higher-income, lower-risk households at the expense of the poorest, hardest-to-reach communities that need electricity access most. “Theoretically, capital markets and institutional investors can provide cheaper and longer-tenured capital,” Swaroop said. “But we also need to ask whether chasing capital-market-level returns leads companies toward larger, more creditworthy customers and away from the hardest-to-reach, lowest-income segment.”

    This coverage of climate and energy issues from The Associated Press is supported by funding from multiple private foundations, with AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • What to know about the conflict in Mali and the world’s most terrorized region

    What to know about the conflict in Mali and the world’s most terrorized region

    In the vast and violence-plagued Sahel region of West Africa, Mali is now confronting its most severe security breakdown in a decade, after two once-disparate armed factions — an al-Qaida-linked jihadi network and a Tuareg separatist group — formed a tactical partnership that has sharply intensified attacks on state military targets.

    This unprecedented alliance between Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the Sahel’s most powerful al-Qaida affiliate, and the newly formed Azawad Liberation Front (FLA), a separatist movement fighting for northern Mali’s independence, marks a dangerous new turning point in a conflict that has stretched across decades. Analysts warn the coordinated campaign has already produced some of the deadliest assaults on Malian security forces and their international allies seen in recent years.

    The scale of the escalation became clear in April, when the allied groups launched large, simultaneous attacks across multiple regions of Mali — the first coordinated offensive of its size in 10 years. Earlier this month, the partnership carried out a deadly ambush on a Malian military convoy, leaving dozens of soldiers dead or captured and ratcheting up pressure on the country’s ruling military junta, which has held power since a 2020 coup.

    Data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), an independent conflict monitoring organization, confirms the rapid worsening of violence. Fatalities linked to militant attacks across Mali jumped 35% in the first seven months of this year, rising to 3,435 from 2,546 recorded in the same period in 2024.

    “The JNIM and FLA gain clear strategic advantage from collaborating, because each acts as a force multiplier for the other,” explained Heni Nsaibia, ACLED’s senior analyst for West Africa. Nsaibia noted both groups share a core immediate goal: defeating their common enemy, which they identify as the Malian armed forces and Russia’s Africa Corps, the Kremlin-aligned paramilitary group that now supports the junta.

    FLA spokesperson Mohamed Elmaouloud Ramadane confirmed the arrangement to the Associated Press, describing the partnership as “a form of tactical coordination” focused exclusively on military operations. Ramadane added that the groups have agreed that once northern Mali achieves independence, local communities will vote to decide what form of sharia law, if any, will be implemented in the region.

    To understand the current crisis, it is necessary to trace the long arc of instability in Mali. The modern conflict first ignited in 2012, when a Tuareg rebellion in northern Mali opened a power vacuum that jihadi groups quickly moved to fill, pushing the entire Sahel — a vast semi-arid belt stretching from North Africa to the Atlantic coast of West Africa — onto a path of persistent, large-scale violence. In 2020, Malian soldiers seized control of the civilian government, justifying the coup by pointing to the ongoing security failure. That power grab triggered a wave of follow-up coups across the Sahel, which the Institute for Economics and Peace now classifies as the deadliest region on Earth, accounting for more than half of all global terror-related fatalities annually.

    Analysts broadly agree that military rule has failed to reverse the security decline, and has instead allowed armed groups to expand their territorial control across Mali and the wider Sahel. To contextualize the current fighting, a breakdown of the major active factions follows:

    ### Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM)
    Formed in 2017 from the merger of four separate al-Qaida-aligned factions operating in Mali, JNIM is widely recognized as the most powerful armed group in the Sahel and one of al-Qaida’s deadliest global affiliates. Its founding stated goal was to expel French counterterrorism forces, which were deployed to support the Malian government at the time.

    Led by Iyad Ag Ghaly, a veteran Tuareg rebel and former Malian diplomat, JNIM operates across nearly all of Mali’s northern, southern, western and central regions. Last year, the group imposed a continuing blockade on fuel imports into Mali, severely disrupting supplies to the capital Bamako. It has also expanded its operations into neighboring Niger and Burkina Faso, and is pushing its influence into coastal West African states.

    JNIM has forced the Malian military to spread its forces thin across vast swathes of territory, stretching the army’s operational capacity to breaking point. In recent years, the group has increasingly positioned itself as a legitimate alternative to the weak central government.

    “JNIM has progressively expanded its influence, becoming an increasingly unavoidable interlocutor for some local communities and exercising de facto authority in certain areas where state institutions have only a limited presence,” said Beatrice Bianchi, an adviser for the Sahel-Sahara Security Strategies Centre.

    ### Azawad Liberation Front (FLA)
    Founded in 2024, the FLA is the latest iteration of Tuareg separatist movements that have fought for northern Mali’s independence since the 1960s, shortly after Mali gained sovereignty from France. Separatist leaders have long argued that the central government in Bamako has systematically marginalized the northern region both politically and economically.

    In 2012, a coalition of Tuareg rebel groups under the Coordination of Azawad Movements declared independence for the Azawad region, sparking a broader rebellion that aligned with the rising jihadi insurgency. A 2015 peace accord brokered by Algeria between the Malian government and rebel groups paused large-scale hostilities, but the ruling junta withdrew from the agreement in 2024 amid surging tensions, triggering a return to open conflict. In response, leaders from multiple separatist factions merged to form the FLA.

    ### Islamic State Sahel Province (ISSP)
    The Sahel branch of the Islamic State network, ISSP was formed by defectors from al-Mourabitoun, one of the four al-Qaida groups that merged to create JNIM. The Islamic State leadership formally recognized ISSP’s allegiance in 2022. Compared to JNIM, ISSP is far less prominent across Mali, with most of its operations concentrated in the Menaka region bordering Niger.

    Unlike JNIM, which works to build local acceptance alongside its military campaign, ISSP’s explicit goal is to establish a global Islamic caliphate in the region, and it relies far more heavily on violence and intimidation against civilian populations. “Both organizations are responsible for significant violence against civilians, but JNIM has generally sought to combine coercion with efforts to build local acceptance, while the Islamic State has relied more heavily on overt violence and intimidation,” Bianchi said. The two jihadi groups are also frequent rivals, violently competing for territory and clashing over competing interpretations of jihad, reflecting the long-running global rivalry between al-Qaida and the Islamic State.

    ### Africa Corps
    The Africa Corps is a Russian paramilitary force that replaced the disbanded Wagner Group after its 2023 mutiny, and falls under the direct command of the Russian Ministry of Defense. After seizing power, the Malian junta expelled French counterterrorism forces from the country in 2022, framing the move as a defense of national sovereignty amid the worsening security crisis. The junta then abandoned its long-standing Western security partnerships to turn to Russia, first engaging the Wagner Group as a security proxy, before the Kremlin replaced Wagner with the Africa Corps. The paramilitary fights alongside Malian government forces, but has been widely accused of systematic gross human rights violations against civilian populations.

    ### Pro-Government Auxiliary Forces
    A number of smaller ethnic militia groups also support the Malian government, though their alliances are often fluid. These include the Dozo, a faction of former hunters that has become militarized, and Tuareg self-defense groups such as the Imghad Tuareg Self-Defense Group and Allies (GATIA) and the Movement for the Salvation of Azawad (MSA), both active in the Menaka region. One prominent militia, Dan Na Ambassagou, which targets Fulani communities accused of harboring jihadis, was once backed by the government but has since been renounced by state authorities.

  • England edge South Africa thriller to reach semis

    England edge South Africa thriller to reach semis

    At the 2026 Commonwealth Games, England’s national netball team, the Roses, produced a thrilling second-half turnaround to secure a hard-fought 58-54 victory over South Africa’s Proteas, booking their place in the tournament semi-finals and extending an uninterrupted qualifying streak that stretches back nearly 30 years.

    Entering the final Pool A match, both nations sat level on six points, with England holding a narrow advantage over South Africa in goal difference for the second qualifying spot. That meant a loss would have ended England’s tournament, leaving the side with everything to play for from the first whistle.

    South Africa got off to a blistering start, with star shooter Elmere van der Berg in imperious early form. She slotted home 16 of her side’s 17 first-quarter goals, opening up a comfortable six-goal lead that put England on the back foot and facing an immediate uphill battle to stay in the competition.

    The turning point came in the second quarter, when England coach made the call to bring Halimat Adio off the bench into the defensive line. The substitute’s aggressive, high-intensity defensive display immediately disrupted South Africa’s attacking rhythm, creating multiple opportunities for England to launch fast counter-attacks. By halftime, the Roses had clawed their way back to just a one-goal deficit, trailing 29-28.

    England built on that momentum in the third quarter, gradually seizing control of the match and at one point stretching their lead to seven goals. South Africa refused to fold, however, hitting back with three quick goals to cut the deficit heading into the final 15 minutes, with England holding a narrow 43-39 advantage.

    The final quarter turned into a tense, end-to-end battle, with both sides matching each other goal for goal – both notching 15 goals in the closing stanza. England held firm under pressure, though, protecting their lead to seal the four-goal win. The result preserves England’s unmatched record of qualifying for every Commonwealth Games netball semi-final since the sport was introduced to the program in 1998, while South Africa will continue its 28-year wait for a return to the semi-final stage.

    England’s victory was built on a dominant shooting performance, with Olivia Tchine netting an incredible 41 goals from 43 attempts, while Lois Pearson added 17 goals to the final score. Adio, who plays her club netball alongside England defender Funmi Fadoju at London Pulse, formed a formidable defensive partnership that shut down South Africa’s attack after her introduction, and earned widespread praise from her captain after the match.

    “I feel like she was unreal for us from that second quarter,” England skipper Fran Williams told TNT Sports. “So proud of her, bringing that energy to get us back in the game when we needed it.”

    Williams acknowledged that the side has operated under sustained pressure all week to perform and challenge for a medal, but praised her side’s ability to grind out the result against a determined South African side. “So for us to be able to finish out a game like that, riding the wave of goal for goal and to come out on top, just so proud of the team,” she added. “We don’t shy away from pressure. We are the first people to put the pressure on ourselves because we know what we are capable of in our own environment. We’ve got so many young heads out there that are showing experience way beyond their years. I just want to try and be that rock for them and let the others shine around me.”

    The semi-final line-up is as expected, with the world’s four top-ranked netball nations all progressing to the final four. Reigning and four-time champions Australia, ranked world number one, enter the semi-finals as the clear team to beat. They will face fifth-ranked Jamaica, the 2022 silver medalists who have claimed bronze three times in the competition’s history and have never won a Commonwealth gold.

    In the other semi-final, England (ranked third globally) will face second-ranked New Zealand, a two-time Commonwealth champion that last claimed gold with back-to-back titles in 2006 and 2010. New Zealand beat England in the 2022 bronze medal match, setting up a tantalizing rematch for a place in the 2026 gold medal final.

    The semi-finals are scheduled for Saturday, 1 August, with England facing New Zealand kicking off at 09:00 BST, followed by Australia against Jamaica at 13:00 BST. The bronze medal match will take place on Sunday, 2 August at 09:00 BST, with the gold medal final following at 13:00 BST the same day.