博客

  • UK threatens to ban Eritreans over migrant return policy

    UK threatens to ban Eritreans over migrant return policy

    The United Kingdom has escalated diplomatic pressure on Eritrea over the east African nation’s ongoing refusal to accept the return of its citizens who are irregular migrants and convicted foreign national offenders, with Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood issuing a stark ultimatum: a total ban on Eritrean citizens entering the UK if Asmara does not reverse course.

    Starting this Thursday, new restrictions will come into force that limit all Eritrean diplomats to travel within a 60km radius of London. Any movement beyond that zone will require explicit advance permission from UK authorities. Beyond movement curbs, the UK government is also suspending fast-track visa processing for Eritrean high-level and VIP visitors. A Home Office spokesperson noted that the new travel rules mirror existing restrictions that Eritrea has long imposed on British diplomatic personnel based in Asmara, the Eritrean capital.

    In comments announcing the measures, Mahmood emphasized that Eritrea has been given repeated opportunities to resume cooperation on returns, but has refused to engage unlike other nations that have reached agreements with the UK. She added that the UK government would not hesitate to expand similar punitive measures to any other non-cooperating countries that refuse to accept the repatriation of their citizens who have no legal right to remain in the UK.

    According to the UK government, Eritrean authorities abruptly ended all cooperation on migrant returns earlier this year. Data from the House of Commons Library shows that Eritrean nationals were the largest group of irregular migrants arriving in the UK via small boats across the English Channel in the 12-month period ending in June 2025, accounting for 18% of all arrivals during that timeframe.

    This is not the first time the UK has used visa and diplomatic restrictions to force cooperation on returns. Earlier this year, London threatened similar measures against Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Restrictions imposed on the DRC last year were fully lifted after Kinshasa improved its cooperation on repatriation, while both Angola and Namibia agreed to revised cooperation frameworks before any punitive measures came into effect.

    The latest measures align with a broader asylum and migration policy Mahmood outlined in November, when she announced that visa penalties would be systematically applied to countries that refuse to cooperate with UK repatriation rules. Those penalties include what the government calls an “emergency brake” on visa issuance for nations with high numbers of unresolved asylum claims from their citizens in the UK, which remains in place until the country agrees to take back its irregular residents.

    Recent Home Office data shows that irregular small boat arrivals to the UK have dropped 40% year-on-year in 2026, with just over 20,400 arrivals recorded since January. At the same time, total returns and deportations from the UK increased by 8% year-on-year in the 12 months from July 2025 to June 2026, hitting more than 40,600. Of those returned, fewer than 6,000 had been convicted of a criminal offense in the UK.

    The BBC has reached out to the Eritrean Embassy in London to request a response to the new UK measures, but has not yet received comment.

  • Musk says any limits on Ukraine’s Starlink access down to US, not his firm

    Musk says any limits on Ukraine’s Starlink access down to US, not his firm

    A sudden controversy over speed and connectivity restrictions on SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet for Ukrainian military operations has sent new ripples through already strained relations between Kyiv and Washington, with Elon Musk publicly placing responsibility for the limitations directly in the hands of the U.S. government.

    Starlink has emerged as one of the most critical communications tools for Ukraine’s military since Russia’s full-scale invasion, enabling forces to guide attack drones toward Russian positions, coordinate air defense operations to protect Ukrainian airspace, and maintain command connectivity across frontline positions. On Tuesday night, however, Ukrainian officials reported unexpected new speed caps of 100 mph (160 km/h) on the service that cut off connectivity for any Ukrainian weapons traveling faster than that threshold, directly disrupting active battlefield missions.

    In a post on the social platform X, Serhiy Beskrestnov, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, argued the timing of the restrictions could not be coincidental, linking them to growing recent tensions between Kyiv and the U.S. administration. The restrictions came the same night Russia launched one of its largest mass drone and missile strikes against Ukraine in months, hitting critical civilian and military energy and communications infrastructure across the country, killing multiple civilians in Kyiv, and leaving more than 600,000 households without power.

    As Ukrainian officials appealed for the restrictions to be lifted—including Zelenskyy, who told British media he hoped the issue was an unforeseen technical error and requested full connectivity be restored—Musk responded publicly to clarify the division between SpaceX’s two satellite services. While consumer-focused Starlink is a commercial civilian product, Musk noted that Starshield, the military-grade variant of the satellite network in use by Ukraine, is fully owned and controlled by the U.S. government. “Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the U.S. military and ultimately [the U.S. president],” Musk wrote in his post.

    Musk further added that commercial Starlink, the company’s primary consumer offering, was intended only for “civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.” By Wednesday evening, partial restoration of connectivity had been confirmed by Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s former defense minister, who published an appeal on X urging the complete removal of the speed cap, calling it “critical for Ukraine’s defense” while thanking Musk for his past support.

    The controversy comes amid a period of escalating friction between Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump, who has openly voiced growing frustration with Ukraine’s ongoing strikes on Russian energy infrastructure. Zelenskyy has previously alleged that the U.S. threatened to cut off intelligence sharing if Kyiv refused to agree to a Trump-proposed energy ceasefire with Russia, a claim Trump has publicly denied.

    During a one-day visit to London on Wednesday, where he was greeted by British Prime Minister Andy Burnham at 10 Downing Street and met with King Charles III, Zelenskyy acknowledged to journalist Piers Morgan that he felt betrayed by a recent U.S. deal to import 300,000 tonnes of diesel from Russia. “Really yes… but it’s a little bit more complicated than just my emotions or my feelings,” Zelenskyy said of the betrayal claim. Ahead of the Ukrainian president’s arrival, Downing Street announced it would accelerate deliveries of lightweight multirole missiles to Kyiv—weapons that have proven effective at shooting down Russian drones—with Burnham reaffirming British support: “We are behind you and that will not change.”

    As of Wednesday, the U.S. government has not issued any public comment on Musk’s claims or the Starlink restrictions.

  • Saudi Arabia cancels death sentence for Sri Lankan who insulted Prophet Muhammad

    Saudi Arabia cancels death sentence for Sri Lankan who insulted Prophet Muhammad

    In a high-profile legal decision that has drawn international attention to Saudi Arabia’s restrictive regulations on online speech, the kingdom’s highest judicial body has reversed a death penalty handed down to a 27-year-old Sri Lankan national convicted of blasphemy over a social media comment.

    The case of Anojan Sivarasa traces back to intercommunal online tensions that erupted earlier this year, when video footage of a Muslim man kicking a dog during the return of a Hindu pilgrimage went viral across regional social platforms. The clip sparked heated arguments between Hindu and Muslim users in comment threads, where one user posted a derogatory remark targeting a Hindu deity. Sivarasa responded to that comment with an insult to the Prophet Muhammad, the act that would ultimately lead to his arrest and prosecution.

    Quickly realizing the severity of his statement, Sivarasa deleted the comment and posted a public apology video to address the offense. But a screenshot of the exchange was already circulating, and it was eventually shared both with his employer, based in Saudi Arabia where Sivarasa resided and worked, and Saudi law enforcement officials. He was taken into custody by authorities in July this year.

    Last month, the Al-Ahsa Criminal Court found Sivarasa guilty of blasphemy against Islam. Alongside the death sentence, the court issued a concurrent 5-year prison term and a fine of 3 million Saudi riyals, equivalent to roughly $800,000. The conviction and capital sentence sparked widespread international backlash, with critics highlighting longstanding concerns over how Saudi Arabia’s legal system targets freedom of expression online.

    On Wednesday, Sri Lanka’s Deputy Foreign Minister Arun Hemachandra confirmed the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the death sentence in an official Facebook post, where he also thanked Saudi authorities for agreeing to commute the capital punishment. As of the latest update, Sivarasa remains in Saudi custody, and there has been no official confirmation on whether additional legal proceedings will be initiated against him.

    The ruling comes against a backdrop of growing international scrutiny of Riyadh’s approach to online speech. The kingdom combines traditional interpretations of Islamic law with modern cybercrime and counter-terrorism legislation to crack down on online expression deemed to violate “public morals,” a policy that has led to a sharp rise in lengthy prison sentences for social media users and a sustained high rate of capital punishment. Data from regional monitoring organizations shows that at least 175 people have been executed in Saudi Arabia so far this year, the vast majority of whom are foreign nationals working and residing in the kingdom.

  • Student protesters attack government buildings in Tirana

    Student protesters attack government buildings in Tirana

    TIRANA, ALBANIA — Tens of thousands of student demonstrators have descended on the streets of Albania’s capital for a second consecutive day, turning a movement rooted in demands for educational reform into a widespread outburst of anti-government unrest that has left multiple government buildings damaged and dozens in custody. What began as a focused demonstration outside Albania’s Ministry of Education on Tuesday, with students calling for improved campus infrastructure, updated academic resources, and greater employment opportunities for graduates, escalated dramatically by Wednesday, when acts of vandalism and arson targeted multiple state facilities. Eyewitness reports and visual footage from the scene show that a section of the Ministry of Education building was set ablaze by protesters, while nearby structures including the Prime Minister’s official office, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of the Interior, and several adjacent private businesses were also targeted with projectiles and vandalism. Groups of protesters wearing gas masks and balaclavas were observed throwing rocks and firecrackers over the gated perimeter of the education ministry, clashing directly with lines of riot police deployed to contain the unrest. Law enforcement responded to the violence with tear gas and water cannons to disperse the crowds, marking one of the most intense confrontations between demonstrators and state security in recent Albanian history. The current wave of unrest is not an isolated incident, but rather the escalation of months of anti-government organizing under the banner of the so-called Flamingo Revolution, a movement that has demanded the resignation of Prime Minister Edi Rama over widespread allegations of systemic corruption and lack of governmental transparency. The movement gained initial momentum back in May, when a high-profile luxury tourism development linked to Jared Kushner, son-in-law of former U.S. President Donald Trump, sparked public fury over allegations that the Rama administration had cut opaque, insider deals to advance the project. Speaking to reporters on the ground, multiple protesters emphasized that their grievances extended far beyond poor university conditions. Enida Bimi, one demonstrator interviewed by Reuters, explained that the protest has grown into a broader movement for all Albanian citizens frustrated by systemic failure. “The people are very angry at the system. They need to change everything. With this corruption all around, the crime and everything else is happening. And the people now are angry. They need to change the system,” Bimi stated. Another protester, Arber Leshi, echoed that sentiment, saying that demonstrators believe the current administration is the most corrupt in Albania’s modern history. Albanian Deputy Prime Minister Albana Koçiu has publicly called for de-escalation, urging protesters to exercise calm and self-control in a statement released Wednesday. “Albania does not need to burn to change,” Koçiu said, emphasizing that peaceful dialogue is the only appropriate path to political reform. Senior government officials have also condemned the violent actions of a subset of demonstrators, noting that damage to public institutions puts civilian lives at risk. Economy Minister Delina Ibrahimaj pushed back against claims that the unrest constituted peaceful protest, saying, “Setting fire to an institution is not a peaceful protest. It is an act that endangers people’s lives.” As of Wednesday afternoon, Albania’s state-run news agency confirmed that 16 people have been arrested in connection with violent acts that occurred during Tuesday’s initial demonstration, with more arrests expected as law enforcement reviews footage from the clashes.

  • Israel’s 2026 election: Who are the main leaders and where do they stand on the key issues?

    Israel’s 2026 election: Who are the main leaders and where do they stand on the key issues?

    Scheduled for 27 October, Israel’s upcoming national election stands as one of the most consequential votes in the nation’s 78-year history. Marking the first national election since late 2022, and unfolding in the aftermath of the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks, the ongoing Gaza conflict, and the recent Israeli campaign against Iran, the vote is shaping up to be a defining referendum on years of controversial policy and failed security strategy. At its center is long-serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is seeking a seventh term in office while facing widespread international isolation and fierce domestic backlash over his handling of multiple concurrent conflicts. Beyond the war and security crises, the election is also being fought over deeply divisive domestic issues: ongoing settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank, the decades-long debate over compulsory military conscription for ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Jewish communities, and the future of judicial independence. Unlike presidential systems, Israel elects 120 members of its Knesset, the unicameral national legislature, through a proportional representation system. Since the state’s founding in 1948, no single party has ever secured the 61-seat majority required to form a government alone, forcing all ruling administrations to emerge from post-election negotiations and multi-party coalition deals. This election cycle is no exception, with pre-election polling consistently pointing to a parliamentary deadlock, meaning small niche and fringe parties will once again hold outsized power to dictate the shape of the next government. One of the most striking inequities of this election is the disenfranchisement of millions of Palestinians. For nearly 60 years, Israel has occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza; Palestinian residents of these territories hold no Israeli citizenship and are barred from voting, a right that is extended to all Israeli settlers living in the same occupied areas. For Palestinian citizens of Israel – the roughly 2.1 million people descended from Palestinians who remained within Israel’s 1948 borders – the path to political participation has been fraught this cycle. In September, all major Arab-led parties were initially banned from competing over unsubstantiated claims they rejected Israel’s identity as a Jewish and democratic state, a ban that was only overturned by the Supreme Court earlier this month. Historically, Arab voter turnout has lagged well below the national average, driven in part by widespread boycotts of a political system that has systematically marginalized Palestinian citizens. However, pre-election polls indicate a significant jump in turnout this cycle, with the Palestinian-led Joint List projecting a 70% turnout among its base, marking a major shift in political engagement. Below is a breakdown of the key parties and candidates vying for power in this historic election: 1. Likud (Incumbent, 32 current seats) Led by Benjamin Netanyahu, who first won election as prime minister in 1996 and has held the office for 20 of the past 30 years, this election marks the toughest challenge of his decades-long political career. Netanyahu has built his political brand on hawkish, uncompromising stances against Israel’s perceived adversaries, championing aggressive expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and consistently blocking all efforts to establish an independent Palestinian state. His current governing coalition, formed after 2022, is the most right-wing administration in Israeli history, and Netanyahu faces an active arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) over allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity tied to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Domestic critics have repeatedly questioned Netanyahu’s decisions in the lead-up to the 7 October 2023 attacks, including his policy of dividing Palestinian factions by playing Hamas against Fatah to weaken the Palestinian Authority, as well as widespread allegations he ignored repeated intelligence warnings of an impending large-scale attack that ultimately killed roughly 1,200 people. Netanyahu has repeatedly refused to allow an official independent commission of inquiry into the attacks. Netanyahu’s broader security agenda has also faced widespread criticism: the Israeli-US military campaign against Iran failed to deliver a decisive victory, and tens of thousands of Israelis in northern Israel remain displaced by ongoing cross-border attacks from Hezbollah in Lebanon. A controversial government push to weaken the independence of the Israeli judiciary, which sparked mass nationwide protests last year, has largely been shelved amid political infighting. Despite these controversies, Netanyahu and Likud retain strong, loyal support among Israel’s hardline right-wing electorate, where he is framed as a no-nonsense defender of Israeli security. He and his party have pledged to fully disarm Hamas and maintain permanent Israeli “security zones” in southern Lebanon, and the administration continues to push forward with the controversial E1 settlement project east of Jerusalem, a plan that would permanently split the West Bank into disconnected segments and draw widespread global condemnation. 2. Yashar (New Party) Leading the anti-Netanyahu opposition bloc, known as the Change Bloc, is former Israeli military chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, the 66-year-old founder of the newly launched Yashar (meaning “Honest” in Hebrew) party. Eisenkot has served as a Knesset member since 2022, and only held brief ministerial experience during the eight-month emergency unity government formed after 7 October 2023. Of Moroccan Jewish heritage, Eisenkot would be Israel’s first Mizrahi prime minister if elected; raised in the southern coastal city of Eilat, far from the country’s dominant Tel Aviv and Jerusalem political elite, and known for his halting English, he has cultivated a strong image as a political outsider. Eisenkot’s personal story is widely known across Israel: his son Gal and two of his nephews were killed in fighting in Gaza between 2023 and 2024, and Gal’s nationally televised funeral resonated deeply with Israeli audiences. Politically, Eisenkot positions himself as a moderate alternative to Netanyahu, and has been critical of the prime minister’s mismanagement of the Gaza war and the stalled negotiations to release the remaining Israeli hostages held by Hamas. However, human rights campaigners and Palestinian observers have raised deep concerns over his military background: during Israel’s 2006 invasion of Lebanon, he developed the controversial Dahieh Doctrine, which explicitly advocated for the use of “disproportionate force” against civilian areas to deter adversary attacks. On core policy issues, Eisenkot rejects the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which he argues is no longer viable after 7 October, and also opposes the formal annexation of the entire West Bank, which he argues would only worsen Israeli security. While he has currently leads in pre-election polling and serves as the de facto leader of the Change Bloc, he will almost certainly need to secure coalition agreements with smaller parties to form a government. Eisenkot has set three core conditions for potential coalition partners: recognition of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, a commitment to universal mandatory military service for all communities, and a shared commitment to dismantling Hamas. His requirement for universal conscription effectively rules out any alliance with the major Haredi parties, which have long fought to maintain draft exemptions for their communities. While Eisenkot has explicitly ruled out relying on Arab-led parties for a governing majority, his pledge to form a government “even if we don’t have 61 seats” has left open the possibility of some form of informal cooperation with Palestinian factions. 3. Otzma Yehudit (6 current seats) Once shunned as too extreme for mainstream Israeli politics, Otzma Yehudit (or “Jewish Power”), led by Itamar Ben Gvir, has pulled the entire Israeli political spectrum sharply to the right over the past four years as a key coalition partner for Netanyahu. In September, the party narrowly avoided an attempt by the Central Election Committee to bar it from competing in the election, and pre-election polls predict the faction will gain seats in the new Knesset. Otzma Yehudit draws its core support from hardline Israeli settlers in the West Bank, and openly advocates for the full annexation of the territory; Ben Gvir, 50, is a resident of the Kiryat Arba settlement outside Hebron. Relations between Ben Gvir and Netanyahu have been strained for decades, and Ben Gvir claimed recently that the prime minister intends to form a government without his party. A Knesset member since 2021, Ben Gvir became national security minister in 2022 after his party won an unexpected seven seats, despite prior criminal convictions for incitement to racism and support for terrorist groups. He has been sanctioned by multiple European governments, including the UK and France, for his open support of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. He has repeatedly led provocative incursions into Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa Mosque compound, where he claims exclusive Jewish sovereignty, and has publicly taunted detained Palestinian and international activists. The party openly advocates for the “voluntary emigration” of all Palestinians from Gaza, and its political rallies regularly feature chants of “death to Arabs”. While in government, Otzma Yehudit has pushed for harsh judicial overhauls and legislation to introduce the death penalty for Palestinians, and junior ministers from the party have publicly discussed the option of nuclear strikes against Gaza. Like other hardline factions, Otzma Yehudit supports universal military conscription, putting it at odds with the major Haredi parties. 4. Religious Zionist Party (7 current seats) Once a marginal far-right fringe faction, the Religious Zionist Party (RZP) rose to power as a key partner in Netanyahu’s ruling coalition after the 2022 election. RZP ran on a joint electoral list with Otzma Yehudit in 2022, but the two factions have split to compete separately this cycle, despite repeated pleas from Netanyahu for the far-right to re-unite. The party is led by 46-year-old Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, the son of an Orthodox rabbi, who draws support from a more religiously observant base than Ben Gvir. Smotrich has said that Jewish religious law (halacha) forms the foundation of his policy agenda, and has served as finance minister since 2022. Smotrich openly supports a full judicial overhaul to weaken the judiciary, the full abolition of the 1993 Oslo Accords, the dismantlement of the Palestinian Authority, and the expansion of Israeli settlements into all of Gaza and the West Bank. He has publicly described himself as a “proud homophobe”. Like Netanyahu, Smotrich is the subject of an active ICC arrest warrant on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in the West Bank. While RZP formally supports universal conscription for Haredi communities, the party has repeatedly backed Haredi legislative priorities while part of Netanyahu’s coalition, including voting for laws that halt arrests of Haredi draft dodgers. 5. B’Yachad (24 current seats) Former prime ministers Naftali Bennett, who held office from 2021 to 2022, and Yair Lapid, who served as prime minister for the second half of 2022, announced a joint electoral ticket in April of this year, branding the new alliance B’Yachad, or “Together”. If the alliance wins enough seats to form government, Bennett will serve as prime minister. The pair, who first joined forces to unseat Netanyahu in 2021, have maintained an on-again off-again political partnership for more than a decade. Bennett, 54, is a right-wing former software millionaire who previously served as head of the Yesha Council, the leading umbrella group for West Bank settlers, and is a longtime opponent of Palestinian statehood. He served as Netanyahu’s chief of staff from 2006 to 2008, before the pair had a high-profile falling out. Lapid, 62, a former television host and author, founded the centrist secular party Yesh Atid in 2012. Like most mainstream centrist and right-wing Israeli politicians, Lapid opposes Palestinian statehood and supports the settlement movement in principle, while distancing himself from the extremism of Ben Gvir and Smotrich. In announcing the alliance, Lapid described Bennett as “a clear right-winger, but he is a liberal, decent, law-abiding right-winger, who did not sell his values – neither to Haredi extortion nor to corruption.” Both Bennett and Lapid oppose the Haredi military draft exemption, and have pledged to establish an independent commission of inquiry into the failures leading up to the 7 October 2023 attacks. 6. The Democrats (4 current seats) Formed in 2024 from a merger of the center-left Labor Party and the smaller left-wing Meretz faction, The Democrats brand themselves as a “liberal-democratic Zionist party”, and are led by 64-year-old Yair Golan, one of the few major Israeli politicians to publicly criticize the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, which he once described as a “national psychosis”. Golan, a former deputy chief of staff of the Israeli military who re-enlisted on 7 October 2023 and is credited with saving multiple Israeli civilians during the initial attacks, faced massive domestic backlash for his comments, and later clarified that he blamed the sitting government, not the Israeli military, for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The party led mass public protests against the government’s 2023 judicial overhaul, opposes the annexation of the West Bank, and openly supports the two-state solution. It includes Arab candidate Soumaya Bashir on its list, and is the only major Jewish-led party that has openly committed to including Arab-led parties in a governing coalition. 7. Yisrael Beiteinu (6 current seats) Led by its 68-year-old founder Avigdor Lieberman, an immigrant from the former Soviet Union, the right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu draws its core support from Israel’s 1.5 million strong community of Russian-speaking immigrants. The party has never finished higher than third in national elections, but has served as a coalition partner in seven of the past 10 Israeli governments. Yisrael Beiteinu supports universal conscription, expanded West Bank settlements, and aggressively hawkish policies toward Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah. Lieberman has held nearly every senior cabinet position, including deputy prime minister, and has faced repeated investigations over alleged corruption and plots to assassinate political opponents; he was convicted of physically assaulting a 12-year-old boy in 2001. Known for his brash, confrontational political style, Lieberman was once a close ally of Netanyahu, but their relationship has deteriorated sharply, and Yisrael Beiteinu is currently not part of Netanyahu’s ruling coalition. Lieberman claims he warned both Netanyahu and Eisenkot of an impending Hamas attack in the months leading up to 7 October 2023. 8. Joint List (5 current seats) Three of Israel’s four major Arab-led parties – Hadash, Ta’al, and Balad – are running together on a unified Joint List, led by Hadash leader Yousef Jabareen, 54. Like other Arab parties, the Joint List was initially banned from competing by the Central Electoral Committee in September, before the Supreme Court overturned the ban earlier this month. Balad leader Sami Abu Shehadeh was forced to drop out of the race after the court signaled it would uphold a personal ban against him over an article he wrote that was deemed to celebrate the 7 October attacks. All three parties in the alliance are secular, and advocate for expanded civil and political rights for Palestinian citizens of Israel, particularly around issues of crime and policing. The Joint List unanimously condemns Israeli policy in Gaza and settlement expansion in the West Bank, and supports the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. Jabareen has made the bloc’s priority clear in public statements: “Removing the threat called the Netanyahu-Ben Gvir-Smotrich government is our central goal, and we will act in every possible way to send this criminal government home.” Despite past internal ideological splits that have broken previous unified lists, the bloc is hoping to gain enough seats to become a decisive powerbroker in the next Knesset. However, no Arab-led party has ever been invited to join a governing coalition in Israeli history, and nearly all major Jewish-led parties have publicly ruled out working with the Joint List. 9. Ra’am (5 current seats) Ra’am, the United Arab List, is led by Mansour Abbas, a 52-year-old Palestinian citizen of Israel. It is the only Arab-led party to have ever served in an Israeli governing coalition, as part of the short-lived 2021-2022 Bennett-Lapid unity government. Like the Joint List, Ra’am was initially banned from the election in September, before the Supreme Court overturned the ban. Rooted in political Islam, Ra’am is socially conservative, and criticizes Israeli policy in Gaza and illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank, but takes a more moderate stance on engagement with the Israeli state than the Joint List, making it more acceptable to many Jewish Israeli politicians. Abbas has stated that his core priority for any potential coalition partnership is advancing the civil rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel, rather than focusing primarily on the situation of Palestinians in the occupied territories. For the first time in the party’s history, Ra’am has included a Jewish candidate on its electoral list: former police chief and ex-Yesh Atid lawmaker Yoav Segalovitz. 10. Shas and United Torah Judaism (11 and 7 current seats, respectively) Two major parties draw their core support from Israel’s Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) community, which makes up roughly 14% of Israel’s population, and both prioritize embedding religious authority into Israeli political life. Shas, the larger of the two, draws most of its support from Sephardic and Mizrahi Haredi communities, and has served in seven of the past 10 Israeli governments, including the current ruling coalition. In recent years, the party has shifted sharply to the right, aligning itself closely with Ben Gvir and the far-right. It is led in the Knesset by 67-year-old Rabbi Aryeh Deri, who has held 10 different cabinet positions since the 1980s, and served two years in prison for bribery convictions in the early 2000s. Shas’s core policy priority is protecting Haredi exemptions from military conscription and securing generous state funding for Haredi religious institutions and welfare programs; more than half of working-age Haredi men do not enter the workforce, instead prioritizing full-time Torah study. In exchange for policy concessions, Shas has consistently backed Netanyahu on key issues including the Gaza campaign and West Bank settlement expansion. In 2025, Shas ministers resigned from Netanyahu’s cabinet over the prime minister’s plan to end Haredi draft exemptions, though the party continued to back Netanyahu on other key votes. The second major Haredi party, United Torah Judaism (UTJ), draws most of its support from Ashkenazi Haredi communities, and is a union of two separate factions, the Hasidic Agudat Yisrael and the Lithuanian Degel HaTorah. Like Shas, UTJ

  • HSBC ‘sharia‑compliant’ fund spent over $100m on five Israeli military‑linked firms

    HSBC ‘sharia‑compliant’ fund spent over $100m on five Israeli military‑linked firms

    An exclusive analysis conducted by independent outlet Middle East Eye (MEE) has uncovered that the United Kingdom’s largest sharia-compliant investment fund, managed by global banking giant HSBC, acquired more than $100 million worth of shares in companies directly tied to Israel’s military operations in Gaza during the first half of 2026.

    The findings build on a prior report from outlet Hyphen, which first revealed this week that HSBC’s Islamic Global Equity Index Fund had bought $38.3 million in shares of controversial U.S. technology firm Palantir — a data surveillance company already linked to enabling Israeli military actions against Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip.

    Widely used by UK halal pension providers, the HSBC fund publicly frames its investment strategy as aligned with core Islamic finance principles, claiming it builds “portfolios underpinned by the principles of Islamic investing that deliver both investment returns and better outcomes for society as a whole.” But MEE’s review of the fund’s public semi-annual portfolio disclosures for the first six months of 2026 paints a different picture of its holdings.

    According to the analysis, the single largest new acquisition by the fund was $35.7 million in shares of RTX, the world’s second-largest aerospace and defense contractor. Raytheon, RTX’s major defense subsidiary, operates a joint venture with Israeli arms giant Rafael Advanced Defense Systems to produce interceptor missiles for Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system. UK-based anti-arms trade advocacy group Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) has labeled Raytheon as a “significant supplier of missiles and other goods and services to the Israeli military” and confirmed the firm is “implicated in Israel’s war on Gaza.” The company has reportedly supplied thousands of missiles to Israel, many of which have been used in military operations that have killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians. It also produces key weapons systems and components for F-15, F-16, and F-35 fighter jets, all of which have been extensively deployed in Gaza. RTX did not respond to multiple requests for comment from MEE ahead of the investigation’s publication.

    Beyond RTX, the HSBC fund added $20.3 million in shares of U.S. semiconductor manufacturer Analog Devices (ADI) to its portfolio. In 2024, amid Israel’s large-scale military campaign in Gaza, ADI supplied critical semiconductor components to Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest domestic weapons manufacturer that provides 80% of the Israeli military’s land-based equipment and 85% of its combat drones. In a statement to MEE, ADI noted that as a publicly traded company, its shares are traded freely on open markets, and the firm does not control the investment decisions of third-party funds. “ADI’s products are sold worldwide for a broad range of applications, and all of our sales are subject to U.S. and other applicable export control and sanctions laws, including government licensing requirements where they apply,” the company added.

    The fund also purchased $18.9 million worth of shares in U.S. industrial conglomerate Honeywell International, which designs specialized sensors and guidance components for precision weapons. According to reporting from Al Jazeera, a Honeywell-manufactured inertial measurement unit — a component that improves targeting accuracy for missiles — was recovered from the wreckage of a missile that struck a Gaza school in June 2024, an attack that killed at least 40 Palestinians, including 14 children and nine women. Honeywell’s UK subsidiary also held three valid government export licenses to ship aircraft components to Israel between 2022 and 2023. Honeywell did not respond to MEE’s request for comment.

    Another $17.6 million in new investments went to UK engineering firm Rolls-Royce, whose German subsidiary MTU produces engines for Israel’s Merkava main battle tanks — which have been heavily deployed in ground operations across Gaza — and Israeli naval vessels. In April 2025, Rolls-Royce Solutions America secured a $180 million contract as the primary supplier of engines for Israel’s new Eitan armored personnel carrier under a U.S. Foreign Military Sale agreement with Israel. A Rolls-Royce spokesperson told MEE the company does not comment on the investment decisions of third-party shareholders.

    Alongside these new 2026 purchases, the HSBC fund retains a pre-existing stake in BAE Systems, the UK’s largest defense contractor, valued at $386,784. BAE manufactures key components for F-35 fighter jets, which the Israeli Air Force has used extensively in Gaza. The fund also holds shares in travel platforms Booking.com and Expedia, both of which have been named by the United Nations for listing tourist accommodation in illegal Israeli settlements built on occupied Palestinian territory.

    Ibrahim Khan, co-founder of industry outlet Islamic Finance Guru, told MEE that while the fund’s investment criteria were established decades ago and cannot be revised overnight, changes are both possible and necessary given the strong ethical views of the Muslim communities the fund serves. “That is a question for HSBC to take seriously and figure out,” Khan said. He added that HSBC has a long track record of serving UK Muslim communities and their pension savings, and that while the current holdings represent a clear misstep, “It is right that we put pressure on them and demand better, but also that we deal with them in a fair way.”

    HSBC has not issued any response to MEE’s requests for comment on the investigation’s findings.

    Over the past three years, growing grassroots activist pressure linked to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has pushed numerous large investment funds across Europe and North America to divest from companies tied to Israeli military activities. In a prior report in May, MEE revealed that Border to Coast Pensions Partnership, the UK’s largest public sector pension pool which manages roughly £120 billion ($160 billion) in assets for two million local government workers, quietly sold off all of its holdings in Israeli government bonds in 2025.

  • Why is Starlink internet so important on the battlefield in Ukraine?

    Why is Starlink internet so important on the battlefield in Ukraine?

    Since the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starlink satellite internet network has emerged as one of Kyiv’s most critical military assets. Delivering reliable high-speed connectivity that modern warfare depends on, Starlink became the backbone of Ukraine’s cross-service military communications, serving the country’s land, naval, and air forces alike.

    Unlike conventional radio communications, Starlink gives Ukrainian drones far stronger long-range connections with their operators, while also offering greater resilience against enemy signal jamming. This advantage has made Starlink-connected drones a core component of Ukraine’s offensive operations and its defense against Russian aerial attacks, most notably interception missions targeting Moscow’s jet-powered Shahed attack drones.

    But earlier this week, a sudden, unannounced speed cap imposed by SpaceX upended this capability. A top Ukrainian official, Serhiy Beskrestnov, confirmed that the 100mph (160km/h) limit, rolled out overnight Tuesday, has already disrupted multiple battlefield missions. Crucially, Beskrestnov added that Ukrainian authorities received no advance warning of the restriction, leaving military operations scrambling to adjust.

    The Washington-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) warns that the speed cap renders Ukraine’s primary anti-Shahed interception operations nearly ineffective. Russian Shahed drones fly at speeds exceeding 198mph, far above the new Starlink limit, meaning Starlink-enabled Ukrainian interceptors cannot keep pace to intercept them. ISW’s Director of Innovation and Open Source Tradecraft George Barros explained that Starlink’s integrated connectivity cuts the critical “sensor-to-shooter” timeline, linking drones, artillery batteries, and command posts into a single real-time operational network. Any disruption to this system, Barros noted, carries severe strategic consequences for Kyiv’s frontline efforts.

    There is currently no viable alternative to Starlink for Ukraine’s military: while the network does not operate within Russia itself, Ukrainian drones can use Starlink to communicate back to operators based in Ukraine during cross-border strikes. The speed restriction also complicates all drone navigation across both Ukrainian government-held territory and Russian-occupied regions inside Ukraine, according to Tom Whittington, an electronic warfare expert and associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). Whittington explained that Starlink functions like a distributed smartphone network, capable of moving large volumes of data including video feeds, text updates, and voice communications without relying on vulnerable ground-based infrastructure. The 100mph cap, he noted, effectively blocks any Starlink-connected device from operating above that speed threshold.

    Beskrestnov, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, argues the unannounced restriction is no random technical adjustment. He linked the move to growing geopolitical strains between Kyiv and Washington, pointing to recent public criticism of Ukraine from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who has condemned Kyiv’s long-range strikes on Russian oil refineries and called for a change in Ukrainian leadership – criticisms that Musk has echoed publicly.

    The controversy has also drawn new attention to SpaceX’s Starshield program, a military-grade satellite network developed for the U.S. Pentagon. While Musk has emphasized that commercial Starlink and government-run Starshield are separate programs, the two systems share core underlying satellite technology. In a post on X, Musk pushed back against Ukrainian criticism, shifting responsibility for the speed limits to the U.S. government. “Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the U.S. government,” Musk wrote. “Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the U.S. military and ultimately POTUS.” He added that commercial Starlink is explicitly restricted to civilian or defensive use, and cannot be leveraged for offensive military action, arguing that such use would be inappropriate for a private commercial company.

    This is not the first time SpaceX’s policy shifts on Starlink have altered the trajectory of the war in Ukraine. Earlier this year, Musk cut off Starlink terminal access for Russian forces, a move that slowed Moscow’s frontline advance and sowed confusion among Russian military commanders. Starlink has also been used by Russian forces in a range of operations, including an attack on a moving civilian passenger train. Today, Moscow retains control of roughly 18% of Ukraine’s internationally recognized territory, more than two years after launching its full-scale invasion.

  • Colombia opens embassy in West Jerusalem as new president embraces Israel

    Colombia opens embassy in West Jerusalem as new president embraces Israel

    In a policy shift that has sparked global controversy, Colombia formally opened its new diplomatic embassy in West Jerusalem on Wednesday, a move spearheaded by the country’s newly inaugurated pro-Israeli president Abelardo de la Espriella.

    The high-profile inauguration ceremony drew senior diplomatic leaders from both nations: Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Colombian Foreign Minister Omar Bula Escobar were both in attendance to mark the landmark diplomatic change. For Israeli leadership, the move represents a key step in broader efforts to end the country’s period of increasing international isolation, building on a string of recent diplomatic gains.

    In remarks following the inauguration, Sa’ar highlighted how quickly bilateral ties have shifted since the new Colombian administration took power. He noted that within just two months of Espriella’s presidency, nearly all of the negative impacts on Israel-Colombia relations that stemmed from the prior Gustavo Petro administration have been reversed. Sa’ar added that the two sides have even moved beyond restoring relations to break new diplomatic ground, extending public gratitude to President Espriella for his unwavering commitment to lifting bilateral ties to their highest level in history.

    This remains an evolving breaking story, with additional reporting and analysis to come from Middle East Eye, a media outlet recognized for its independent, in-depth coverage of developments across the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Turkish government raids most-watched TV channel, appoints new manager

    Turkish government raids most-watched TV channel, appoints new manager

    In a sweeping operation that has sparked international condemnation over attacks on press freedom, Turkish law enforcement agencies have stormed the headquarters of Halk TV, the nation’s most-watched television channel, halting live broadcasts on-air and online while installing a government-aligned trustee to run the outlet. The raid forms part of a widening crackdown on critical and opposition-aligned media that has accelerated sharply in recent weeks, drawing alarm from journalistic and civil society groups globally.

    As the operation unfolded on Tuesday, Halk TV itself broke the news on social platform X, confirming that police had entered its headquarters, cut all live transmissions – including its main news feed and YouTube streams – and installed the new court-appointed management. “Police raid at Halk TV headquarters! A trustee [manager] has been appointed, broadcasts have been halted,” the channel posted moments before its signals were cut.

    The operation centers on an ongoing investigation targeting Cafer Mahiroglu, chairman of Halk TV, who faces unproven allegations of bribery, bid-rigging, and money laundering. Mahiroglu, who resides outside of Turkey and has not been taken into custody, has denounced all charges against him and the network as politically motivated fabrications. In a post on X, Mahiroglu called the seizure a “dark day for Turkey”, adding that “the public’s right to information is being seized for political reasons. Using the judiciary as a weapon is the greatest harm inflicted on Turkey.” Authorities have issued arrest warrants for 17 individuals linked to the network, and have already detained 11 people – including seven of Mahiroglu’s own family members, among them his 70-year-old brother.

    Political observers and opposition leaders have linked the timing of the raid to a high-profile ongoing legal case against Ekrem Imamoglu, the jailed former mayor of Istanbul and a key challenger to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The raid took place the very same day Imamoglu was set to begin presenting his legal defense in court on charges of corruption, bribery, and ties to banned organizations – charges widely dismissed as politically motivated, rooted in Imamoglu’s high polling numbers that show him capable of challenging Erdogan in future national elections.

    Ozgur Ozel, leader of Turkey’s New Party – a recent splinter from the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), which Halk TV has long been aligned with – emphasized the explicit political connection between the two cases. The raid, he noted, comes as the Imamoglu case reaches its most critical judicial phase.

    International press freedom advocates have decried the operation as a deliberate act of intimidation against all independent journalism in Turkey. “Placing Halk TV under a trustee and taking it off air, on the very day Ekrem Imamoglu begins his defence, deprives the public of its right to information at a crucial moment,” said Ricardo Gutierrez, general secretary of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), in comments to Middle East Eye. “Together with journalists being detained, put under house arrest and censored, it sends a clear message of intimidation to the entire press. The EFJ calls on the Turkish authorities to immediately end the trustee appointment, allow Halk TV to resume broadcasting, and let journalists do their work without pressure.”

    The Halk TV raid is just the most high-profile action in a growing tsunami of censorship that has swept Turkey since early September, according to local freedom of expression monitors. In recent weeks, hundreds of individuals and civil society organizations have been targeted in raids and detentions, with a particular focus on pro-LGBTQ+ groups, independent media, and organizations critical of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) government. More than 80 people have been formally arrested and remain in pre-trial detention, facing a range of broadly worded charges including “obscenity”, “assisting prostitution”, and maintaining “unauthorized financial links abroad” – charges the government has framed as part of a push to protect traditional family values.

    Digital censorship has expanded alongside law enforcement actions: Turkish authorities have ordered the shutdown of hundreds of social media accounts and independent media websites, with platform X (formerly Twitter) complying with requests to block accounts belonging to dozens of prominent civil society groups. Among those blocked are Amnesty International Turkey, left-wing daily Evrensel, Academics for Peace, the Media and Law Studies Association, the Sexual Education, Treatment and Research Association (CETAD, which provides support to people living with HIV), and the Psychiatric Association of Turkey.

    Last week, the Freedom of Expression Association (IFOD), Turkey’s leading independent monitor of internet and press freedom, saw its own X accounts restricted – including the EngelliWeb project, which specifically tracks social media censorship across the country. Yaman Akdeniz, founder of IFOD, told Middle East Eye that the current crackdown is unprecedented in modern Turkish history. “It has always been bad but perhaps not this bad for freedom of expression and press freedom in Turkey,” Akdeniz said. “The censorship wave has become a tsunami during September and that is continuing to hit the media, civil society as well as anyone critical of the government.”

    Turkish authorities have a well-documented history of cracking down on opposition-aligned media and political groups over the past two decades, targeting left-wing organizations, pro-Kurdish political parties, and groups linked to late cleric Fethullah Gulen. In recent years, however, the AKP government has expanded its targeting to include institutions tied to the main secular opposition CHP, as well as newer opposition splinter groups, amid rising political tensions ahead of future electoral contests.

  • Yemen’s Houthis vow to continue targeting Saudi Aramco facilities

    Yemen’s Houthis vow to continue targeting Saudi Aramco facilities

    A dramatic escalation of cross-border hostilities between Yemen’s Houthi movement and Saudi Arabia has sent shockwaves across global energy markets, as the Iran-aligned group pledges to sustain its campaign of targeting critical Saudi infrastructure, including key assets operated by state oil giant Saudi Aramco.

    Formally named Ansar Allah, the Houthi movement confirmed on Wednesday that it had launched a coordinated multi-pronged assault targeting three high-value sites: Saudi Aramco facilities in Dhahran, Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport, and a major Aramco refinery in the Saudi capital. Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree detailed that the attack was executed with a large arsenal of weaponry, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and a swarm of drones. In a stark warning that signaled further escalation, Saree confirmed the group would extend its operations to additional airports and oil facilities across Saudi Arabia in the coming days.

    For more than a week, Riyadh has faced near-daily Houthi strikes—an unprecedented intensity of attacks not seen since the start of the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen in 2015. A drone and missile assault on King Khalid International Airport last Saturday left 13 civilians dead and hundreds more injured, marking one of the deadliest single Houthi attacks on the Saudi capital to date. Saudi Arabia has responded with punitive airstrikes targeting Houthi positions in the Yemeni capital Sanaa, ratcheting up the cycle of retaliation that has gripped the region.

    The escalating violence has already forced practical adjustments to high-profile international events hosted by Saudi Arabia. Multiple sources confirm the kingdom is shifting its flagship Future Investment Initiative (FII) — a key annual gathering designed to draw global business leaders and investors to Riyadh — to a hybrid format. The change will allow participating executives to attend remotely if they choose, though the kingdom has arranged alternative travel routes for those still willing to attend in person, including entry via regional airports outside Riyadh or in neighboring Gulf Cooperation Council states. Despite the mounting security risks, Saudi officials have reiterated their commitment to maintaining the kingdom’s appeal for international direct investment, a core pillar of the kingdom’s long-term economic transformation agenda.

    Just one day before Wednesday’s coordinated attack, Saudi Arabia’s Energy Ministry confirmed that an administrative building at Saudi Aramco’s Dhahran headquarters had been struck in a separate Houthi assault, noting that no fatalities or injuries were reported in that incident.

    The global economic ramifications of the escalating conflict are already drawing warnings from top international financial leaders. Speaking at a press conference during the annual joint meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank in Bangkok, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva warned that persistent attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure could push up global energy prices, impacting households and businesses across every region of the world. “The Saudi economy is important for the region and the world, and in that sense, these developments have potentially negative spillovers for everybody, everywhere,” Georgieva told reporters, per Agence France-Presse.

    Analysts note that the current wave of Houthi attacks represents the most severe escalation between the two sides since 2015, when Saudi Arabia assembled a regional military coalition to back Yemen’s internationally recognized government against the Houthi movement, which seized control of northern Yemen including Sanaa in 2014.