博客

  • US and Denmark reach deal over Greenland after Trump annexation threats

    US and Denmark reach deal over Greenland after Trump annexation threats

    After months of high-stakes diplomatic friction sparked by former President Donald Trump’s aggressive threats to forcibly annex the resource-rich Arctic territory of Greenland, the United States and Denmark have formally announced a new security agreement that reshape strategic dynamics across the North Atlantic and Arctic regions.

    Trump first began floating attempts to purchase or seize Greenland more than a year ago, framing the move as a critical national security priority. He argued that the island’s strategic geographic position made it indispensable for defending North America, while its vast untapped reserves of rare earth minerals – materials critical to manufacturing modern technologies from electric vehicles to smartphones – represented an unmatched economic opportunity. The president’s openly stated willingness to use military force to take control of the territory sparked widespread condemnation from Denmark, fellow NATO allies, and the international community, creating an unprecedented rift in transatlantic relations.

    Now, the newly announced deal appears to deliver many of the strategic concessions Trump sought, without formal annexation. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump framed the agreement as a sweeping victory for the U.S., saying it grants America “permanent control over security, and all other needs” in Greenland at “no cost to the United States”. The core terms of the deal, as outlined by an unnamed senior U.S. State Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity, include sweeping new security authority for the U.S.: Washington gains unilateral power to construct additional military infrastructure across Greenland without requiring prior approval from either Denmark or the Greenlandic government, enshrines permanent access, basing, and overflight rights for U.S. forces, and includes a provision that the agreement will remain in force even if Greenland achieves full independence from Denmark in the future.

    Most notably, the deal bars non-NATO countries, specifically named U.S. adversaries Russia and China, from establishing any military presence in Greenland or making investments in the territory’s sensitive strategic sectors without explicit written approval from the U.S. The official noted that prior to the agreement, there was no formal framework to screen foreign investments in Greenland’s sensitive industries, allowing adversaries to expand their economic and political influence in the region unimpeded.

    Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has struck a more measured tone in public comments, confirming that the agreement will be formally signed next week during the United Nations General Assembly in New York. She emphasized that the deal strengthens collective security across the Arctic and North Atlantic while explicitly upholding the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark and the right of Greenlandic people to self-determination. Frederiksen added that the agreement still must undergo mandatory parliamentary review in Denmark before it can enter into force. Jens-Frederik Nielsen, chairman of the Greenland Government, also praised the deal, noting that it recognizes Greenland’s core interests and solidifies its role in international security cooperation, calling the agreement beneficial to all three parties.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed Trump’s positive framing, describing the deal as a historic breakthrough and a “huge win for the United States and the American people” that permanently resolves long-standing U.S. national security concerns in the region. For Trump, the agreement also advances a separate core priority: his proposed Golden Dome missile defense system, designed to shield the U.S. from intercontinental ballistic missile attacks from Russia and China, which he has identified Greenland as a critical location for.

    Notably, the full text of the agreement has not been released to the public, and key questions remain about how the new deal differs from the longstanding 1951 bilateral security agreement between the U.S. and Denmark. That existing deal already grants the U.S. broad authority to deploy unlimited numbers of troops to Greenland, where Washington already maintains the Pituffik Space Base with a permanent garrison of more than 100 U.S. military personnel on the territory’s northwestern tip. The BBC has requested comment from both the Danish Embassy in Washington and the White House, with no formal response provided yet to clarify the full scope of the new agreement.

  • Trump says son has paid back Putin ally for partly funding wedding festivities

    Trump says son has paid back Putin ally for partly funding wedding festivities

    Fresh scrutiny has emerged over links between former President Donald Trump’s family and a Kremlin-aligned Russian oligarch, after an investigative report revealed that Umar Kremlev, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, partially covered the cost of Donald Trump Jr.’s post-wedding festivities held on a private Bahamian island.

    The probe, published by ProPublica, found Kremlev contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund two nights of the three-day celebration, which was held after Donald Trump Jr. wed his partner. The couple later confirmed Kremlev’s financial contribution was a gift, though they have stated the sum was eventually repaid.

    During a conversation with reporters in the Oval Office, Donald Trump defended the arrangement, arguing that hosting and funding wedding celebrations for friends is a widespread, entirely permissible practice. When questioned about Kremlev’s involvement, the sitting president asserted that his son had fully repaid the oligarch, but he offered no details to back up that claim. To date, the BBC has not independently verified that repayment occurred, and reporters have reached out to Donald Trump Jr. for additional clarification on the matter.

    Legally, the scenario raises no explicit violations: as a private citizen, Donald Trump Jr. faces no legal bar to accepting gifts from foreign nationals. Even so, independent ethics oversight organizations have warned that the acceptance of such a high-value gift from an individual deeply connected to the Russian head of state creates the clear appearance of a conflict of interest, regardless of Donald Trump Jr.’s lack of formal position in the U.S. government.

    This latest revelation reignites long-running questions about ties between Donald Trump and Russian officials that first surfaced during his 2016 presidential campaign. Those concerns ultimately spawned a special counsel investigation, which centered in part on a previously undisclosed meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a Russian intelligence operative at Trump Tower in New York.

    Beyond his close connections to the Kremlin, Kremlev leads the International Boxing Association (IBA), an organization that draws significant funding from Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy giant. The International Olympic Committee suspended the IBA several years ago, with Kremlev’s failure to fully disclose the organization’s ties to the Russian state energy firm cited as a core reason for the action. ProPublica also notes that Kremlev was part of the official delegation that accompanied Putin on a state visit to China in May, and has been awarded the Order of Friendship, one of Russia’s highest state honors, by Putin himself.

    Spokespeople for both Kremlev and Donald Trump Jr. have framed the pair’s connection as a purely personal friendship, rather than a professional or political one. Donald Trump Jr.’s representative told ProPublica the two have no ongoing business ties, while a spokesperson for Kremlev confirmed that the pair have maintained a friendly relationship since meeting several years ago. The BBC has reached out to Kremlev’s representatives for additional comment on the investigation’s findings.

  • Trump signs sweeping Russia sanctions bill

    Trump signs sweeping Russia sanctions bill

    In a major escalation of Western pressure on Moscow over its ongoing invasion of Ukraine, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed into law a sweeping new sanctions package designed to cripple Russia’s core energy revenue stream by targeting the world’s largest importers of Russian crude oil and natural gas.

    The legislation, which cleared the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this month, grants the White House broad authority to impose tariffs as high as 100% on the top five buyers of Russian oil and gas — a policy that hits the two largest importers, China and India, the hardest. At President Trump’s request, the scope of the sanctions was expanded to also cover Iran’s energy and weapons industries, expanding the reach of the bill beyond its original focus on Russia.

    Formalized as the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, the 48-piece legislation is named in honor of the late longtime Republican senator, who was one of the most vocal and steadfast supporters of Ukraine in Washington before his unexpected death in July. The bill carves out narrow exceptions for nations that source less than 15% of their natural gas from Russia and are actively taking steps to reduce their reliance on Russian energy supplies.

    Beyond targeting energy trade, the legislation codifies new sanctions against Russian President Vladimir Putin, top members of his cabinet and government leadership, major Russian financial institutions, and the so-called “shadow fleet” of oil tankers Moscow has deployed to evade existing international sanctions on its energy exports.

    New York Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal previously framed the legislation as aggressive, far-reaching measures that would effectively cripple the revenue stream funding Putin’s military campaign in Ukraine. “This is scorching sanctions that will throttle Putin’s war machine,” Blumenthal said of the bill ahead of its final passage.

    Recent trade data compiled by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) underscores the potential impact of the new measures: between December 2022 and August 2026, China absorbed 50% of all Russian crude oil exports, while India took in an additional 37%. Turkey and the European Union each accounted for 5% of exports over that period, though EU imports of Russian energy have dropped steadily since the 2022 invasion.

    Graham, a 71-year-old South Carolina Republican, died on July 11 from an aortic dissection linked to cardiovascular disease, just days after returning from an official trip to Kyiv. At the time of his passing, President Trump praised the senator, saying “He died doing the work he was born to do.” For years before his death, Graham had pushed successive U.S. administrations to ramp up punitive measures against Russia, and remained one of Ukraine’s most unwavering allies on Capitol Hill even as congressional Republicans grew increasingly divided over the scale of U.S. military and financial aid to Kyiv.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has publicly voiced strong support for the legislation, praising the House’s passage earlier this month. In a post to his official Telegram channel on September 17, Zelenskyy noted the symbolic timing of the House vote, which passed the same night Russia launched a large-scale missile and drone attack across Ukrainian territory. “It is symbolic that the US House of Representatives’ passage of Lindsey Graham’s sanctions bill took place on the night of yet another Russian attack on Ukraine involving ballistic missiles, other missiles, and drones,” he wrote.

  • When a beloved tree began withering away, locals suspected a killer in their midst

    When a beloved tree began withering away, locals suspected a killer in their midst

    Nestled between rolling mountains just a short distance from Seoul’s bustling city center, the quiet residential neighborhood of Buam-dong has long been a haven for visitors and locals alike. Restricted urban development, a result of its proximity to the Blue House presidential residence, has preserved the area’s quaint, charming character, dotted with independent art galleries, cozy neighborhood cafes, and pockets of lush, mature greenery. For more than a century, one ginkgo tree standing sentinel along a residential sidewalk has stood as a unifying, beloved landmark for the Buam-dong community — a tree locals have affectionately called “Grandpa Ginkgo.”

    Unlike most ginkgos in Seoul that grow tucked away in private gardens or wild forested areas, this hardy, centuries-old tree belongs to everyone in the neighborhood. Jung, a local resident who requested anonymity (and is referred to here by a pseudonym) who moved to Buam-dong just four years ago, formed an immediate, deep bond with the tree. “I pass this tree whenever I come home. I would say, ‘Grandpa, I’m home.’ Or ‘Grandpa, I’m heading out now,’” she explained. For 74-year-old lifelong resident Park Jeon-hee, the ginkgo is his oldest friend. Even 10-year-old Kim On, who walks past the tree every school day, feels its loss acutely: “It has stood since before I was born. Thinking it might fall down makes me sad.”

    It was Jung who first noticed something was terribly wrong in the summer of 2026, when Seoul’s normally lush summer foliage turned the city deep green. While other trees thrived under the humid skies, “Grandpa Ginkgo” was visibly ailing. Healthy green fan-shaped leaves were dropping to the ground en masse, an abnormality that should not occur during peak growing season. Within weeks, the base of the tree was blanketed in a rotting carpet of fallen leaves, and its branches began to thin and turn brown.

    Jung’s initial quiet curiosity quickly bloomed into urgent concern, and she rallied neighbors who had also noticed the tree’s decline to form an informal group of amateur investigators to uncover what was ailing their hardy community landmark. The mystery captured national attention across South Korea, making front-page national headlines — a level of scrutiny that left Jung uncomfortable, prompting her request for anonymity. She compares the experience to watching a beloved family member fade: “Imagine a grandfather who silently embraces you every day, listens to you, and has always been strong and full of life. Suddenly, he begins to die. How heartbreaking would that be?”

    As the community dug into the mystery, they spotted 10 white plastic funnels protruding from the soil just behind the tree’s trunk. Jung initially assumed the devices were installed to deliver nutrients to the tree, but soon began to suspect foul play. The group obtained access to nearby home security camera footage, which captured two men in white gloves crouching at the tree’s base with a power drill on an April morning. Though the footage did not definitively show the men installing the funnels, it aligned with a detail local officials had previously shared: the Whanki Museum, located steps from the ginkgo’s trunk, had previously requested permission from local landowners to remove the tree entirely. The museum claimed the ginkgo’s expanding roots were damaging its outer brick perimeter wall.

    Arborists called in to inspect the tree echoed the community’s worst fears: the funnels were almost certainly being used to inject herbicide to slowly kill the 100-year-old tree, and residents placed the blame squarely on the Whanki Museum. A group of residents accompanied by police confronted museum staff shortly after the discovery, and locals allege a museum employee essentially confirmed the institution’s involvement. The museum has never issued a public confirmation or denial of the herbicide claims, and declined repeated requests for comment from the BBC. In a brief May statement, the museum said its outer wall was collapsing due to the ginkgo’s roots, that it had contacted more than 40 local property owners to request a solution, and that after receiving no responses, its staff “attempted to resolve the situation” — offering no further details on what actions were taken. Local council officials, however, told the BBC a 2025 inspection found “no meaningful connection” between the ginkgo’s roots and the claimed wall damage, adding that any legitimate structural issue would have prompted official intervention and public notification.

    The irony of the accusation is not lost on angry local residents, as the Whanki Museum was founded in 1992 to honor the legacy of Kim Whanki, one of South Korea’s most celebrated pioneering abstract artists, often called the “Picasso of Korea.” The museum’s architect designed the space to harmonize with the natural landscape that was central to Kim’s work, and Kim himself wrote nature-focused essays under the pen name Su-wha, which translates to “conversation with trees.” “Treating life that way is ignorance and there was never any apology,” Jung said.

    Residents have adopted Kim’s pen name for their ailing tree, and partnered with local environmental activists to launch a national petition calling for the creation of an official urban tree guardian program to protect landmark community trees. Activist Choi Jin-woo, who joined the campaign, said he initially could not believe the allegations: “When I first heard that a tree next to a museum had been poisoned with herbicide and was dying, I simply couldn’t believe it. But when I saw the ginkgo shrivelling, I realised something this horrific could actually happen in our society.” Residents have filed a formal police complaint against the museum’s director, and authorities confirm an investigation is ongoing, though they have declined to release further details. They are demanding the museum reveal what substance was injected into the tree so arborists can begin targeted treatment to save it.

    Despite the grim prognosis — one arborist concluded the tree is 90% dead — the fight to save “Grandpa Ginkgo” has yielded an unexpected silver lining: it has united the Buam-dong community in a way no other event has. As Jung spent days organizing support and gathering information, neighbors left home-cooked meals on her doorstep, and she in turn shared homegrown vegetable soup with neighbors she had never met before. For Jung herself, who had struggled with mobility issues and depression after a serious illness last winter, the campaign pulled her back into community life: “I felt so depressed and hopeless but those feelings disappeared. I entered a tree-like state. The tree helped bring me back out into life again. Ironically, it was because the tree became sick.”

    For weeks, roughly 20 residents gathered daily at the tree’s base to pray for its recovery: some read aloud Kim Whanki’s own essays about nature, a local shaman led a traditional healing ritual, and the group joined hands for an “elm dance,” a ceremonial practice some ecological activists believe promotes healing for ailing trees. Notes of support and well wishes are tied to the ginkgo’s trunk, fluttering in the mountain breeze.

    As autumn settles over Seoul, turning the city’s deciduous trees into vibrant shades of gold and yellow, Buam-dong’s most famous tree still stands with mostly crispy, brown, bare branches. Jung says the tree’s fate is now “in the hands of heaven,” and all the community can do is stay by its side and hope for a miracle. For Buam-dong, the tree is far more than just greenery along a sidewalk: it is a centurylong companion, a community landmark, and an irreplaceable part of the neighborhood’s identity. Residents cannot imagine an autumn without pausing to admire “Grandpa Ginkgo” in his full, golden, feathery glory — and they are not ready to let him go.

  • ​​​​​​Sahel instability pushes Algeria to rethink its long-standing non‑intervention doctrine

    ​​​​​​Sahel instability pushes Algeria to rethink its long-standing non‑intervention doctrine

    On August 30, following an official request from Niger’s transitional authorities and direct orders from Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, Algiers made an unprecedented public announcement: it had deployed four Su-30 fighter jets, one refueling aircraft, and one military transport plane to Niger, to support its southern neighbor in countering rising internal instability.

    This deployment came just one day after a foiled mutiny against the government led by General Abdourahamane Tiani, who seized power via a military coup in July 2023. Over August 28 and 29, renegade soldiers attacked multiple key sites across Niamey, Niger’s capital, including the presidential palace, Diori-Hamani International Airport, and Military Base 101, sending tensions surging across the already volatile Sahel nation.

    A senior anonymous researcher from The Sentry, a U.S.-based non-profit investigative and policy organization, explained that the mutineers’ anger stems from deep-rooted institutional and military inequities within Niger’s armed forces. Rank-and-file soldiers have suffered repeated heavy casualties in counter-insurgency operations across the country’s rural regions, while Tiani’s loyal Presidential Guard remains concentrated in the capital, equipped with superior hardware and receiving far better benefits and treatment. The researcher added that a deadly clash that killed approximately 18 soldiers near the city of Dosso just one week before the mutiny was the immediate trigger for the uprising, a tragedy that is part of a years-long pattern of devastating insurgent attacks on Niger’s military. In 2019 alone, Islamic State in the Greater Sahara claimed two major attacks that killed 160 Nigerian soldiers near the Malian border: 71 at the Inates military base in December, and 89 more at the Chinagodrar outpost just one month later. A suicide attack claimed by the group also struck central Niamey in January this year, underscoring the persistent threat Tiani faces from both militant groups and internal military discontent.

    For Algeria, which shares a 950-kilometer porous border with Niger, this spiraling instability has forced a long-overdue reckoning: can Algiers continue to stand on the sidelines as chaos, armed insurgency, human trafficking networks, and political fragmentation take hold along its southern frontier, and across the broader Sahel region?

    Regional analysts broadly view Algeria’s open deployment of military assets to Niger as a potential turning point in the country’s foreign policy, breaking with a strict doctrine of non-intervention in the internal affairs of other states that has been a cornerstone of Algiers’ approach to global affairs since it won independence from France in 1962.

    “Algeria can no longer protect its own national security and core interests just by guarding its own borders. It has to secure its strategic depth,” explained Riccardo Fabiani, North Africa Project Director at the International Crisis Group. What makes this move particularly notable is that Algiers has chosen to openly communicate the operation to the public, a sharp departure from its past preference for quiet diplomacy. Algeria’s official press agency ran full coverage of the deployment, video footage of Algerian aircraft arriving in Niger circulated publicly, and a joint press conference was held between Nigerien officials and the Algerian military delegation led by Major General Rachid Cheblaoui.

    Fabiani noted that this deployment signals the emergence of a new, far more pragmatic foreign policy for Algeria, one where the country is prepared to take on direct security and military roles in the region, rather than relying exclusively on diplomatic engagement to advance its goals in a rapidly shifting regional landscape. This public show of force also serves a second key purpose: it asserts Algeria’s regional influence amid growing competition from outside and regional powers seeking to expand their footprint in the Sahel.

    Fabiani added that Algeria has deep historical and cultural ties with Niger, and a core strategic interest in protecting the sovereignty of Sahel nations against interference from third parties such as Morocco, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates. “Algeria does not want any foreign interference, official or unofficial, in Niger’s political and security affairs,” he said. In fact, Algiers’ suspicion of foreign involvement in the region escalated to a formal break in diplomatic relations with Abu Dhabi on September 10, after months of growing tensions; Algeria accuses the UAE of indirectly funding armed separatist groups in the Sahel, including through multimillion-dollar ransom payments for released hostages.

    The Sahel has in recent years become a hotspot for competing foreign interests: Morocco has deepened security and economic cooperation with Niger since the 2023 coup, Turkey supplies combat drones to the Nigerien military, Italy maintains a deployment of over 300 soldiers at Military Base 101 in Niamey, and Russia maintains a presence through the Africa Corps paramilitary group, which local reports say assisted in foiling the late August mutiny.

    Beyond security and geopolitical competition, the partnership between Algiers and Niamey carries major economic stakes, particularly in the energy sector. The Senty senior researcher explained that the two countries have rebuilt cooperation around two major projects: the Bilma oil block in northeastern Niger, and the 4,100-kilometer Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline, which plans to transport natural gas from Nigeria through Niger to export markets via Algeria’s Mediterranean coast. Morocco has backed a competing 5,600-kilometer pipeline project running from Nigeria along the Atlantic coast to Morocco, arguing that persistent instability in Niger makes the trans-Saharan route unfeasible. With construction of Algeria’s section of the Trans-Saharan pipeline already kicking off in the Adrar region in June, maintaining a stable pro-Algeria government in Niamey serves both security and economic goals for Algiers.

    Mourad Preure, an Algerian energy and strategy consultant, argues that military support is just one piece of a broader, development-focused Algerian strategy to stabilize Niger. “Algeria already supports Niger’s electricity sector, providing small-scale power plants. The Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline will generate transit fees for Niger, creating a steady source of revenue and affordable energy for the country,” Preure said. “Algeria is also building a trans-Saharan road and rail corridor to enable the transit of goods and people, advancing deeper regional integration.”

    The core question now is whether this military deployment marks a permanent break with Algeria’s 60-year tradition of non-interventionism. It is true that Algeria deployed military forces as part of an Arab coalition supporting Egypt and Syria during the 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars, but these were widely viewed as exceptional cases, rooted in core pan-Arab interests, rather than a shift in doctrine. Non-interventionism, rooted in Algeria’s post-independence non-alignment stance, remained a central principle of its foreign policy even after those conflicts. The principle was never formally codified in the constitution, creating inherent legal ambiguity, but in practice, Algiers long favored quiet diplomacy and mediation over overt military engagement – the 2015 Algiers Peace Accord between Mali’s government and northern Tuareg rebel groups is a key example of this approach.

    A turning point began to emerge in 2020, one year into Tebboune’s presidency, when the government passed a sweeping constitutional revision, born out of the 2019 Hirak pro-democracy movement that toppled long-time leader Abdelaziz Bouteflika. Article 91 of the revised constitution grants the president the authority to deploy Algerian military forces abroad, contingent on approval by a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers of parliament. Article 32 also permits Algerian participation in United Nations, African Union, and Arab League peacekeeping operations, and rules out offensive war that would undermine the sovereignty of other states. At the time of the revision, the amendment sparked significant pushback from civil society and Hirak activists, who opposed any potential deployment of Algerian troops to foreign conflicts.

    Notably, the current deployment to Niger – which for now only includes technical personnel to operate the deployed aircraft, no frontline combat troops – has not received parliamentary approval. Fabiani argues that from Algiers’ perspective, this deployment does not qualify as a long-term combat presence that would require legislative sign-off. “Direct combat deployment would be politically problematic, both domestically and regionally. But deploying equipment and supporting personnel falls outside that framework,” he explained. This is not Algiers’ first recent military support to Niamey: the country donated four helicopters and additional military equipment to Niger in early August, before the late August mutiny. What is new is the open, public acknowledgment of the deployment, designed to send a clear political as well as military signal to regional and global actors.

    Whether this operation is an isolated case or the first sign of a deeper, permanent shift in Algeria’s security doctrine remains unclear. No analysts contacted for the original reporting were willing to make definitive predictions, noting that everything depends on how the Sahel’s security situation evolves in the coming months. Preure emphasized that Algeria’s role remains limited to responding to requests from neighboring states: “When Algeria is asked, it provides assistance as a good neighbor, but it is not Algeria’s role to take on responsibility for the national defense and security of other states.”

    The Sentry researcher similarly noted that any future Algerian engagement across the Sahel will be decided on a case-by-case basis, rather than representing a blanket policy shift. Neighboring Mali, where Algiers has recently repaired relations after years of diplomatic tension over the Tuareg insurgency, offers a clear example: even with rapprochement, a similar military deployment to Mali is not on the table in the near term. “Relations between Algeria and Niger are far less complicated, because the Tuareg issue that has long poisoned Algeria-Mali ties does not carry the same weight in Algiers’ relationship with Niamey,” the researcher explained. That allows Algeria to deploy aircraft and provide military support without being drawn into the complex, sensitive internal conflicts that have complicated its engagement with Mali.

    Still, faced with continued deterioration of security across the Sahel, Algiers has clearly concluded that it can no longer rely solely on border defense to protect its national interests. Instead, it must now proactively shape its strategic environment. As Africa’s second largest military power by size and its largest defense spender, a more proactive Algerian role in the Sahel could fundamentally reshape the region’s security dynamics for years to come.

  • Ben Gvir supporters hand out gun-shaped keyrings to Israeli students

    Ben Gvir supporters hand out gun-shaped keyrings to Israeli students

    Ahead of Israel’s upcoming national elections, a traditional high school mock election designed to engage young voters with the country’s political process devolved into chaos this week after far-right supporters distributed inflammatory, weapon-themed promotional items to students.

    Supporters of Itamar Ben Gvir, Israel’s far-right National Security Minister and leader of the Otzma Yehudit party, handed out gun-shaped keyrings emblazoned with the slogan “Guns Save Lives” to 11th and 12th grade students at Blich High School in Ramat Gan on Thursday. Local Israeli newspaper Haaretz first reported that the keyrings – which also double as bottle openers – either carried the shape of a firearm or featured an image of Ben Gvir holding one. Party activists also attempted to distribute noose-shaped keyrings, but the school’s headmaster intervened to stop the distribution before they could be handed out.

    Otzma Yehudit has defended the promotional stunt, framing it as a creative way to educate younger generations on Ben Gvir’s long-standing push for looser gun laws in Israel. The minister’s weapons reform agenda has already resulted in expanded gun access for Israelis living in settlements across the occupied West Bank: in January this year, Ben Gvir approved gun licenses for Israeli settlers in 18 additional settlements in the territory. The far-right party has also championed other hardline policies, including a Knesset-approved law passed in March that makes the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks against Israelis in Israeli military courts.

    The promotional stunt quickly turned the school’s annual mock election into a scene of disorder. Multiple political figures from opposing parties reported verbal harassment and physical intimidation from Otzma Yehudit supporters. Gilad Kariv, a Knesset member for the left-wing Jewish Democrats party, wrote on his social media platform X that supporters of Ben Gvir shoved, cursed, and elbowed his activists during his speech, and threw bottles toward the stage. Merav Ben Ari, a lawmaker from the centre-right Together party, also reported being targeted, writing on X that supporters threw a cup at her while shouting slogans in support of Ben Gvir. She condemned the far-right minister’s time in office as being defined by “violence and racism”.

    When the votes were counted, the centre-right Yashar party led by Gadi Eisenkot secured first place with 32.2% of the student vote, followed by Naftali Bennett’s Together party with 22.4%. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party came third with 15.5%, while Ben Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit placed fourth with 9.4% – outperforming the Jewish Democrats, who earned 7.1%.

    While the results put Otzma Yehudit behind mainstream centre-right and right-wing parties, the 9.4% showing marks a notable increase in support for the far-right party at Blich High School compared to the 2022 election cycle. Two years ago, when Otzma Yehudit ran as part of a joint alliance with Religious Zionism, the bloc only earned 4.6% of the vote at the school. This year, Otzma Yehudit and Religious Zionism combined earned 11% of the vote, with an additional 3.6% going to the new far-right party Amcha Yisrael, which has publicly called for the expulsion of all Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.

    Kariv framed the overall results as evidence that contrary to popular narratives, not all young Israeli voters have shifted sharply to the far right. Blich High School’s headmaster emphasized that the event aligned with the school’s mission of civic education, telling Israeli outlet Maariv that “civic education is also education for pluralism, tolerance, and the ability to conduct disagreement with respect and attentiveness,” and praised participating students for creating what he called a “fruitful and enriching day.”

    This mock election comes as Israel prepares for its first national election since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023, with young voters poised to play a key role in the outcome. Recent independent research has documented rising anti-Palestinian sentiment among segments of young Israeli society, with some supporting the exclusion of Palestinian citizens of Israel from public life. Students who have publicly opposed Israel’s military campaign in Gaza have also faced formal disciplinary action from school authorities: earlier this year, an 11th grade student in Ramat Gan was summoned to a disciplinary hearing after distributing flyers urging classmates to refuse compulsory military service.

  • Watch: Trump says ban on some news outlets is ‘because they’re fake news’

    Watch: Trump says ban on some news outlets is ‘because they’re fake news’

    In a controversial move that sent shockwaves through American political journalism, former U.S. President Donald Trump announced on a Friday that he was moving immediately to revoke press access to the White House for three prominent media organizations: CNN, MSNBC, and Politico. In direct, on-camera comments that were captured on video and rapidly circulated across social media and news platforms, Trump explicitly tied the restrictive ban to his longstanding public criticism of the outlets, declaring the action was being taken ‘because they’re fake news.’

    The decision marked a sharp escalation of the Trump administration’s ongoing conflict with the national press corps, which had been a defining feature of his tenure from its earliest days. For months leading up to the announcement, Trump had repeatedly taken to social media and public rallies to denounce coverage from the three outlets, framing critical reporting on his administration’s policies, personnel, and conduct as intentionally misleading and biased against his presidency.

    Media freedom advocates and industry groups immediately condemned the ban as an unprecedented attack on the principle of a free press, which is protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Critics noted that restricting access to official government spaces based on a leader’s disapproval of coverage undermines the core role of the press as a watchdog over governmental power, leaving the public without independent information about the actions of their elected leaders. Supporters of the move, aligned with Trump’s base, echoed his claims of widespread media bias, arguing that the outlets had long abandoned objective reporting in favor of sustained opposition to his agenda.

  • Turkey busts Israel-linked ‘scam empire’ behind alleged $266m fraud

    Turkey busts Israel-linked ‘scam empire’ behind alleged $266m fraud

    In a major coordinated law enforcement operation targeting cross-border financial crime, Turkish security forces have taken down an elaborate organized fraud network with alleged ties to Israeli principals that scammed victims across three continents out of at least $266 million over two years, Turkish Justice Minister Akin Gurlek announced Friday.

    The multi-agency investigation, carried out in partnership with Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT) and Interpol, uncovered 42 fraudulent call centers operated under the cover of 28 fake corporate entities, with 239 suspects currently identified as persons of interest in the case. Dawn raids were executed simultaneously across 236 locations in two major Turkish regions, Istanbul and Mugla, to disrupt the network’s operations.

    According to Gurlek, investigators confirmed that individuals with documented links to Israel served as the primary owners and final beneficiaries of all the front companies involved in the scheme. Turkish law enforcement officials have connected this bust to the notorious transnational criminal syndicate widely referred to as the “Scam Empire”, a network that has operated across dozens of countries for more than a decade. The criminal group was first brought to widespread public attention in an expose by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), which previously detailed how scam rings based out of Israel and European countries stole hundreds of millions from defrauded investors via deceptive telephone-based investment schemes.

    The mechanics of the fraud follow a well-worn but effective pattern documented by investigators. The network hired multilingual customer service agents to lure victims from target regions into fraudulent foreign exchange investment schemes. Once victims signed up, they were granted access to controlled, fake investment platforms that displayed artificially inflated fabricated profits. This deceptive display convinced victims to deposit increasingly large sums of money, which was immediately siphoned off by the organizers. All stolen funds were quickly transferred out of Turkey to offshore bank accounts and untraceable cryptocurrency wallets, officials confirmed. Individual victims lost anywhere from $10,000 to hundreds of thousands of dollars each, according to current victim statements and evidence collected during the raids.

    One of the key alleged masterminds of the Turkish operation, identified only by the initials YA, is an Israeli national who also holds Portuguese citizenship, Turkish investigators confirmed. This bust is not the first high-profile case of Israeli-linked investment fraud targeting global victims: in 2016, Reuters exposed a similar scheme run by Israeli trading firm NRGbinary, which stole millions of dollars from European investors before Israeli authorities shut the company down later that year. In a 2025 follow-up investigation, OCCRP mapped out two similar scam call center networks operating out of Israel, Eastern Europe and Georgia that persuaded more than 32,000 global victims to invest a combined total of at least $275 million.

    Investigators familiar with the current Turkish probe say the network mirrored operational structures documented in the earlier OCCRP investigation. Call center agents were required to use entirely false identities and forged supporting documents to build trust with victims. Against a backdrop of escalating diplomatic tensions between Turkey and Israel in recent years, Turkish security officials assess that Israel-based scam networks have actively shifted a portion of their operational infrastructure to Turkey to avoid detection by domestic law enforcement in their home country.

    To avoid being traced, organizers set up empty shell companies that serve as front operations for the scam call centers, then hire local staff fluent in a wide range of target market languages, including Japanese, Hindi, French and Spanish. Employees are hired under specific roles labeled “conversion agents” and “retention agents”, each with a clear function in luring and manipulating victims. All new recruits undergo a one-week training program where they are assigned fake aliases and coached to build entirely false personal backstories designed to impress victims and build false credibility, including common claims that the agent is an elite graduate of Oxford University or another top international institution.

    To protect the network from infiltration, organizers require all new hires to pass a polygraph test before starting work, designed to uncover any hidden connections to law enforcement or security agencies. Strict internal rules govern day-to-day operations: speaking Hebrew inside call center facilities is completely banned, and agents never identify the actual shell company they work for. Instead, they pose as representatives of fake investment platforms whose names are changed on a rotating basis by the Israeli organizers to evade tracking. One of the most strictly enforced rules, investigators found, is that the network never targets Israeli citizens for scams, limiting all fraudulent activity to victims outside of Israel.

    In their assessment of the network’s structure, Turkish investigators found that transnational scam networks operated by Israeli fraudsters have cultivated what the syndicate describes as a mutually beneficial, “win-win” relationship with the state of Israel, though no further evidence or details of this relationship were provided in the official announcement.

  • Donald Trump says he is banning CNN and Politico from White House

    Donald Trump says he is banning CNN and Politico from White House

    U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited his long-running war with the American press, announcing an immediate ban on White House access for three prominent outlets — CNN, MSNBC (referred to as MS NOW in the original announcement) and Politico. The latest escalation of tensions between the Trump administration and independent media came via a lengthy public post on Truth Social Friday, where the president accused the targeted organizations of a consistent pattern of publishing “fiction or lies” about his administration. Notably, Trump offered no specific examples of alleged false reporting to back up his claim.

    The exact parameters of the ban remain unclear as of publication, with no official confirmation on whether reporters from the three outlets will be fully blocked from entering White House grounds or restricted press access areas. In the hours immediately following the announcement, reporters from both CNN and Politico remained on-site at the White House complex, leaving the implementation of the order uncertain.

    “Media outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report fiction and lies when covering the President of the United States, the Trump administration or the United States of America,” Trump wrote in his post, adding a warning that “Other news outlets to follow.” No specific problematic stories or reporting projects were named as the trigger for the access restriction.

    This latest move builds on months of escalating conflict between the Trump White House and the Washington press corps that began when Trump returned to office in January 2025. Just one month after his inauguration, the administration seized control of the White House press pool — the rotating group of reporters that accompanies the president for on-the-record coverage — ending a 100-plus-year arrangement where the pool was managed by the independent White House Correspondents’ Association.

    That same February, the administration barred Associated Press reporters and photographers from restricted access spaces including the Oval Office and Air Force One. The punishment came in response to the AP’s refusal to adopt the Trump administration’s preferred renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.” The AP immediately filed a federal lawsuit over the restriction, and the case remains pending in court.

    Open conflict between Trump and reporters is now a regular occurrence during on-the-record encounters, with the president repeatedly labeling critical coverage “fake news” and launching personal attacks on reporters he labels “rude.” This is not the first time Trump has targeted CNN specifically: during his first presidential term, he revoked the White House press pass of veteran CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, only restoring the credential after CNN filed a successful lawsuit against the administration.

    Throughout his political career, Trump has pursued legal action against a wide range of major U.S. and international news organizations, including high-profile cases against The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the BBC. The BBC has confirmed it has formally requested comment from the White House on Trump’s latest announcement, and legal experts widely expect the new ban to face immediate legal challenges from the targeted outlets and national press freedom advocacy groups.

  • Is the Kennedy Center losing ‘hundreds of millions of dollars’?

    Is the Kennedy Center losing ‘hundreds of millions of dollars’?

    A viral claim has recently circulated claiming that the iconic John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. is facing catastrophic losses amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars, sparking widespread discussion about the financial health of one of the nation’s most prominent cultural institutions. But a thorough review of the center’s 2024 official financial records tells a far different story. When all sources of revenue—including philanthropic contributions from private donors and public grant funding from federal and local arts agencies—are fully accounted for, the Kennedy Center actually closed its latest financial cycle with a multi-million dollar surplus. The Kennedy Center, which serves as the United States’ national cultural hub, hosts thousands of performances, educational programs, and community outreach initiatives every year, relying on a mix of ticket sales, private donations, and public grants to cover its operating costs. Critics and misinformed sources have focused solely on operating gaps from core ticket revenue to inflate claims of massive financial failure, ignoring the critical role of contributed income that the center has always depended on to fulfill its non-profit public mission. The 2024 financial data confirms that the institution’s balanced budgeting strategy has delivered a positive financial outcome, quelling unfounded rumors about its fiscal stability. The surplus comes as the Kennedy Center continues to expand its access programs, bringing performing arts experiences to underserved communities across the country and maintaining its status as a leading global destination for cultural exchange. Industry analysts note that for major non-profit arts institutions, structural operating gaps covered by philanthropy and public grants are standard practice, and the 2024 surplus reflects strong management of both fundraising and operational expenses amid ongoing post-pandemic recovery for the live performing arts sector.