分类: world

  • Officials in Brazil investigate helicopter crash that killed 6

    Officials in Brazil investigate helicopter crash that killed 6

    A devastating mid-air collision between two civilian helicopters over a Rio de Janeiro suburb left six people dead on Sunday, with Brazilian authorities launching a full investigation into the incident starting Monday.

    The crash sent one of the damaged aircraft plummeting into the parking lot of a local car dealership, leaving a chaotic wreckage scene that local law enforcement and aviation safety officials spent hours systematically inspecting on Monday. Per passenger documents submitted to Brazil’s civil aviation authority, 32-year-old American singer and comedian Oliver Tree was on board that stricken helicopter. As of Monday afternoon, police had not confirmed that Tree’s remains had been recovered from the crash site, leaving his status unconfirmed.

    Authorities have formally identified five of the six fatal victims. Among the dead is prominent Argentine digital content creator Gaspar Prim Díaz, better known to his 2.8 million YouTube subscribers as Gaspi. He was joined by fellow Argentine Lucas Vignale, and three Brazilian nationals: Lucas Brito, Charles Marsillac, and Alexandre Souza. The sixth fatality is an unidentified foreign national, police confirmed.

    Alan Luxardo, a lead Rio de Janeiro police investigator assigned to the case, told reporters at the crash site Monday that human error is the leading preliminary hypothesis for the collision. Investigators are currently probing whether fault lies with air traffic control teams managing airspace over the region or with one of the two helicopter pilots. No other potential causes have been ruled out as the investigation proceeds.

    Tree, who rose to fame for his offbeat musical style and comedic public persona, was in Rio as a stop on his ongoing world tour that includes scheduled performances across Argentina, Brazil, Portugal, and Spain. Just one day before the crash, on Saturday, Tree shared a lighthearted comedic video to his social media channels showing himself playing street soccer with local residents in a Rio neighborhood.

    Within hours of news of the crash breaking, public figures from across entertainment and digital content creation began sharing tributes for the victims, with multiple posts honoring Tree. YouTuber and professional boxer Jake Paul was among the first to share a public statement, remembering Tree as “one of the most kind and funny people in the world.”

    Drew Binsky, a popular travel content creator famous for documenting his trip to every sovereign country on Earth, also shared a heartfelt tribute on Instagram. Binsky wrote that Tree had recently reached out to him for travel tips, as the singer shared a goal of visiting every country around the globe. “We just spoke a few days ago and I was planning to show him around Prague in three weeks,” Binsky wrote. “He has become a great friend of mine and is genuinely one of the kindest and most positive people I’ve ever met.”

    For Gaspi, Argentine streaming channel Blender, which collaborated with the creator, shared a public note of remembrance on X, writing “Every one of us will miss you,” while thanking him for his creative work.

    Associated Press contributes reporting to this story. More coverage of Latin America news can be found at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america.

  • MSF staff abused Sudanese refugees in sex-for-food scandal

    MSF staff abused Sudanese refugees in sex-for-food scandal

    The global medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has publicly acknowledged that its personnel have been accused of committing sexual abuse against at least 59 Sudanese refugees who sought safety across the border after fleeing Sudan’s ongoing civil war. The disturbing allegations detail patterns of exploitation that targeted vulnerable displaced people, including underage girls, with perpetrators often coercing survivors by offering life-saving food or informal employment in exchange for sexual favors.

    All of the reported offenses took place in refugee-hosting regions of eastern Chad, with incidents traced back to 2024, roughly one year after Sudan’s full-scale civil conflict erupted and triggered a mass exodus of civilians seeking refuge outside the country’s borders. According to MSF’s official statement to the Associated Press, the organization has already terminated the employment of 18 staff members linked to the abuse allegations, but investigators have not been able to identify and hold accountable other named suspects in the case.

    Findings from an internal MSF investigation published in July also noted that the documented patterns of exploitation may meet the legal definition of sexual trafficking. MSF further confirmed that many survivors chose to remain silent about their abuse out of fear that retaliation would result in them being cut off from critical humanitarian aid, which is already a scarce and life-sustaining resource for displaced populations. For survivors who did come forward to file official reports, many received no meaningful response or support services, and the organization’s existing formal complaint mechanisms were found to be largely ineffective at addressing allegations.

    In an official response to AP’s investigative reporting on the scandal, MSF acknowledged the gravity of the abuses. “This misconduct represents a serious breach of MSF’s values and responsibilities, and we deeply regret the harm caused,” the organization said.

    To contextualize the scale of vulnerability facing Sudanese refugees, Sudan entered full-scale civil war in 2023 after a brutal power struggle collapsed the fragile partnership between the country’s regular military and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a powerful paramilitary group. Today, the crisis is widely classified as the world’s most severe humanitarian catastrophe: more than 11 million Sudanese have been displaced from their homes, with over a million fleeing to neighboring countries including Chad, and 28 million people across Sudan face acute food insecurity. While no definitive full death toll has been compiled, estimates place the number of conflict-related deaths between 150,000 and as high as 400,000.

    Sexual violence has been extensively documented as a deliberate weapon of war throughout the Sudanese conflict, with combatants targeting men, women, and children of all ages — including infants as young as 12 months old. This recent abuse scandal within MSF also fits into a broader, long-running pattern of sexual exploitation allegations against humanitarian personnel working across the globe, even after repeated public pledges from aid organizations to root out such abuse and protect vulnerable populations.

  • Iranians greet deal to end war with relief, suspicion and uncertainty

    Iranians greet deal to end war with relief, suspicion and uncertainty

    After months of open military conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran, the announcement of a preliminary agreement to end hostilities has sparked a tangled spectrum of reactions across Iran, ranging from cautious relief and guarded hope to deep distrust, anger and outright opposition. For millions of ordinary Iranians who endured months of disrupted daily life, economic chaos and the constant threat of escalating full-scale war, the news brought a long-awaited moment of release, though many still struggle to believe the violence is truly over. Sepideh, a 32-year-old Tehran-based online handmade jewellery seller, summed up the common feeling of cautious joy in an interview with Middle East Eye. “Has it really ended? I can’t believe it,” she said. “Thank God. I still can’t believe it’s over. I just hope everything goes back to normal. We were exhausted. I’m so, so happy.” Sepideh’s small business was pushed to the brink of collapse by the months of conflict. Like thousands of other micro-entrepreneurs across Iran, she relied almost entirely on Instagram to reach customers and process sales. Widespread internet shutdowns implemented amid the conflict froze her operations entirely, and as anxiety about the war dominated public consciousness, consumer demand for non-essential goods like handcrafted jewellery evaporated entirely. Now, after weeks of back-channel diplomatic talks that produced the preliminary ceasefire and framework for broader negotiations, Sepideh is finally allowing herself to plan for the future again. She holds out hope that the tentative agreement will hold, opening the door to a broader pact that eases crippling economic sanctions and creates space for small businesses like hers to recover and grow. Across the country, reactions to the deal split sharply along political and generational lines. While many Iranians are simply grateful for an end to the cycle of missile strikes and military escalation that pushed the region to the edge of full-scale war, others doubt the agreement will survive long term, with some viewing it as a dangerous betrayal of national interests and others seeing it as the only viable alternative to catastrophic regional conflict. For 28-year-old Darya, from the northern Iranian city of Sari, the deal could unlock a life-changing opportunity that has been stuck in limbo for months. Darya has already been accepted to a university program in France, but visa processing ground to a halt amid the uncertainty of war. Now, she says, there is finally a clear path forward for her plans. “It feels like a miracle,” she told MEE. “I know almost nothing about politics, but for months all I did was follow the news.” The constant uncertainty took a severe emotional toll on Darya, who says she was particularly panicked by Israeli strikes on Lebanon just days before the deal was announced, fearing the attacks would derail the fragile diplomatic process entirely. “I was sure [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu was trying to sabotage everything,” she said. “When I heard about the new Israeli attacks on Lebanon, I thought it was over. I thought we were back to square one. Iran would respond, then Israel would respond again, and eventually the United States would get involved.” Even as she welcomes the end of hostilities, Darya says she still plans to leave Iran to complete her studies, at least temporarily. “Yes, I want things to improve in Iran,” she said. “I want sanctions to be lifted. Most of our problems come from sanctions. If sanctions are removed, jobs, businesses and the economy will improve too.” She says she still wants the experience of living and studying in Europe, but holds out hope that when she completes her degree, Iran will be a far more stable and prosperous place. Not all Iranians share Darya’s guarded optimism. For 43-year-old Mohammad, the tentative deal does little to convince him that a lasting, comprehensive agreement is within reach. “Just look at how long it took them to reach this small understanding, which is really more of a ceasefire extension than anything else,” he said. “During that time, the United States attacked, Israel attacked and Iran attacked. All of that makes it difficult for me to be optimistic. People want to believe all their problems are over, but I don’t think Iran and the United States will be able to reach an agreement on difficult issues like the nuclear programme and sanctions relief.” The announcement also sparked deep frustration among opposition activists opposed to the Islamic Republic, many of whom had pinned hopes that sustained external military and political pressure would force fundamental political change inside Iran. Amir, a 19-year-old from Karaj, is one of those disappointed activists. “We were fooled,” he told MEE. “We were lied to. Reza Pahlavi said he was on his way to Tehran. Trump said help was coming soon. Netanyahu said he would change the situation in Iran. Was this the help Trump promised? To make a deal with the clerics?” Amir says the deal has left him feeling more hopeless than before. “I could not have imagined worse news,” he said. “Once the agreement is in place and the Islamic Republic no longer worries about war, it will turn its attention back to the people. More repression will follow.” His frustration reflects a broader disappointment among opposition circles, which had hoped the recent conflict would fundamentally weaken the Iranian political system, only to see Tehran and Washington return to the negotiating table. The harshest criticism of the deal, however, comes from hardline supporters of the Islamic Republic, who have organized public rallies and gatherings in recent weeks to denounce negotiations, with some branding Iranian negotiators as traitors to the nation. Emad, a 38-year-old Tehran resident, is one of those hardline opponents. “God curse Araghchi and Ghalibaf for throwing us into another trap like the nuclear deal,” he said. “Only 10 years have passed since the disgraceful agreement between Rouhani and Obama. How can people fall for this again? Especially when the other side is led by the man responsible for killing our leader.” Emad, who is still grieving the death of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, remains deeply pessimistic about the diplomatic process and argues another military confrontation is inevitable. He points to the timing of the ceasefire, which runs for two months, as proof the deal is a cynical political ploy by Trump. “Look at the timing. Why two months from now? Because Trump wanted peace of mind during the World Cup. After that, he will come back for us,” he said. “And under what conditions? We reopened the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices returned to normal, and the United States and Israel have had time to update their plans for another attack on Iran.” Emad argues the entire diplomatic process is a coordinated performance by Trump and Netanyahu, designed to mislead Iran. “Do you really believe Netanyahu drinks a glass of water without American approval?” he asked. “This whole good cop, bad cop act was designed to fool us into thinking Israel opposed the agreement.” He argues Israeli leaders actually benefit heavily from the preliminary deal, because they recognized another prolonged war would be impossible to sustain. “They knew they could not continue resisting Iran and the groups that make up the Axis of Resistance forever,” he said. For many other Iranians, it is simply too early to draw any firm conclusions about the deal, and public reactions on both sides have been overly emotional. Maryam, a 59-year-old political science graduate, argues the deal essentially returns Iran to the status quo that existed before the 40-day war started, raising difficult questions about the human cost of the conflict. “When you read the commitments made by both sides, you realise we have basically returned to where we were before the 40-day war,” she said. “But was it really necessary for so many innocent civilians to die? Did schools, universities and hospitals need to be destroyed just so the Strait of Hormuz could return to normal and the American military could end its siege of Iran?” Maryam also argues the conflict offers clear proof of the outsized influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups on US foreign policy, a point made decades ago in a book by scholars Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer. “I remember reading a book years ago by Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer about the influence of the Israel lobby on American foreign policy,” she said. “Nothing has illustrated the arguments in that book more clearly than what we have seen in Gaza and in the two wars fought by the United States and Israel against Iran.” That perspective leaves her skeptical that a final comprehensive deal will ever be reached. “Israel, Aipac and pro-Israel lobbying groups will not allow a final agreement between Iran and the United States unless the Islamic Republic changes its approach towards Israel,” she said. For now, that shift appears unlikely. As Iranians across the country process the news of the deal, many are focused on the simplest, most immediate outcome: an end to months of uncertainty and fear. For Sepideh, the Tehran jewellery seller, the larger political debates can wait. After months of living on the edge of war, she says her only priority is getting back to a normal life. “I just want life to feel normal again,” she said.

  • Greek minister calls criticism of tougher migration policies a ‘badge of honor’

    Greek minister calls criticism of tougher migration policies a ‘badge of honor’

    In a bold public address to private broadcaster Action 24 on Monday, Greek Migration Minister Thanos Plevris framed growing condemnation from international human rights organizations over his government’s restrictive approach to migration as a mark of pride, while vowing to advance what he calls one of the most uncompromising migration frameworks across the entire European continent.

    Plevris’s hardline remarks come as Greece’s ruling conservative administration confronts a sharp uptick in irregular migrant crossings across the Mediterranean from eastern Libya, and pursues deeper bilateral cooperation with eastern Libyan authorities to stem departures. The Greek government has also thrown its full weight behind broader stricter migration regulations being advanced across the European Union.

    “The era when unelected bureaucrats from Brussels or United Nations agencies could arrive in Athens and dictate how we manage our migration crisis is finished,” Plevris stated emphatically. “Every time a United Nations envoy raises concern over my legislation, it only reinforces my pride in that policy. The more groups like Amnesty International, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and UN envoys express irritation with our approach, the more I see that criticism as a badge of honor.”

    Plevris also made clear that human rights organizations and charities that provide support to migrants have no place in shaping Greece’s sovereign migration policy, a stance that puts his government at odds with much of the international human rights community. Currently, Greece and several like-minded EU member states are in negotiations with a number of African nations to establish regional processing centers on the continent for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected by European authorities. This proposal has already drawn sharp condemnation from global rights groups, who warn it risks exacerbating dangerous conditions for vulnerable migrants.

    The push for closer cooperation with eastern Libya came into sharp focus on Monday, with Saddam Hifter, deputy commander of eastern Libya’s armed forces, visiting Athens for high-level meetings with Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis and Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis. To strengthen collaboration on migration control, Athens is offering eastern Libyan authorities specialized coast guard training, alongside support for local employment programs and foreign investment initiatives aimed at cutting off the profit streams of human smuggling networks.

    Just last week, the European Union formally approved a package of stricter EU-wide migration measures, even as overall crossings from North Africa and the Middle East have declined year-over-year. Greece, however, has bucked this broader trend: official data released by Greek authorities on Monday shows that arrivals and interceptions of migrants off the island of Crete, the most common landing point for departures from eastern Libya, have jumped more than 20% to 5,500 in the first five months of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023. The rate of crossings has accelerated even further since the start of June, according to the official figures.

    Libya has emerged as a key transit hub for tens of thousands of migrants from across Africa and the Middle East who aim to reach European shores. More than a decade of political instability following the 2011 overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi has allowed well-organized human trafficking networks to flourish, taking advantage of porous borders with six neighboring countries: Chad, Niger, Sudan, Egypt, Algeria and Tunisia to move migrants toward coastal departure points.

    Jalel Harchaoui, an independent analyst focused on Libyan politics and security, noted that eastern Libyan authorities are actively seeking closer formal diplomatic ties with European nations, alongside much-needed financial assistance to shore up their control over the region – a dynamic that has paved the way for the current migration cooperation agreement with Athens.

  • South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks to shut for staff history lesson after backlash

    South Korea’s Starbucks franchise has announced an unprecedented nationwide early closure of all its retail locations next week, a direct response to widespread public fury sparked by a tone-deaf promotional campaign that coincided with the anniversary of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, a defining pro-democracy movement bloodily suppressed by the country’s former military dictatorship.

    The ill-fated promotion, labeled “Tank Day,” centered on the launch of new “Tank Series” reusable tumblers marketed for their large volume, and it launched on the very date that South Koreans commemorate the 1980 crackdown, in which military forces deployed by authoritarian ruler Chun Doo-hwan killed at least 165 unarmed civilian protesters — many locals and historians believe the actual death toll is far higher. Subsequent official investigations have also confirmed that troops carried out widespread indiscriminate beatings, torture, and sexual violence against civilians during the crackdown, a trauma the nation has only slowly reckoned with in recent decades.

    The Gwangju Uprising stands as a cornerstone of South Korea’s modern democratic journey: it became a unifying rallying point for pro-democracy activists over seven years, ultimately leading to the mass 1988 June Democracy Movement that ended Chun’s 8-year authoritarian rule. Chun was later convicted of treason and corruption in 1996, received a presidential pardon, and died in 2021 at age 90. In recent years, formal acts of accountability have included a 2018 government apology to survivors of sexual violence committed by troops, and a public apology this year from Chun’s own grandson, Chun Woo-won, who called his grandfather a “sinner and slaughterer” and expressed remorse for the delayed apology to victims’ families.

    Beyond the insensitive “Tank Day” name, which echoed the military tanks deployed to crush the uprising, critics also flagged a second problematic slogan used in the campaign: the Korean phrase “tak on the table,” which uses the word “tak” that is identical to the term used in a controversial 1987 police statement about the death of a student activist in custody. The franchise later confirmed that marketing teams selected the slogan after relying on an AI tool for creative suggestions.

    The backlash erupted rapidly last month, drawing condemnation from all corners of South Korean society. President Lee Jae Myung publicly called out the campaign as “inhumane and disgraceful” on social media, while consumer advocates organized boycotts that led to protests outside Starbucks locations across the country and a reported steep drop in sales for the chain.

    In the immediate wake of the scandal, Shinsegae Group, which holds the licensing agreement to operate Starbucks in South Korea, terminated the contract of the franchise’s national chief executive. Now, the company has announced sweeping corrective measures to address the public outrage. Starting this Monday, all Starbucks Korea employees will complete mandatory training focused on historical awareness and social sensitivity through educational video content. Next Wednesday, all locations across the country will close at 3 p.m. local time (6 a.m. GMT) for three hours of in-person historical education, and will not reopen until the following day. The company confirmed that Shinsegae Group Chairman Chung Yong-jin will personally participate in the mandatory training alongside frontline staff. This marks the first time Starbucks Korea has ordered a nationwide early closure of all stores since the brand first entered the South Korean market in 1999.

    In an initial statement after the scandal broke, the franchise offered a vague apology for “inconvenience and concern” caused to customers, but the sweeping new measures signal how seriously the company is taking the public backlash over its failure to recognize the sensitive historical context of the promotion.

  • Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    Drone strikes kill over 1,000 civilians in Sudan in the first 5 months of 2026, UN rights chief says

    GENEVA – A senior United Nations official has sounded the alarm over a catastrophic escalation of civilian harm in Sudan’s four-year ongoing conflict, confirming that drone strikes alone have killed more than 1,000 non-combatant civilians across the war-torn northeast African nation between January and May 2026. U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk announced the grim findings during an address to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday, highlighting that the growing deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles has drastically raised the death toll for civilian populations caught in the crossfire between Sudan’s warring factions.

    Türk’s remarks detailed a documented sharp uptick in three devastating trends of the conflict: expanded drone warfare, widespread sexual violence, and mass atrocities that meet international definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Sudanese conflict first erupted on April 15, 2023, when a long-simmering power struggle between Sudan’s formal national military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) broke out into open armed combat, starting in the capital Khartoum before spreading to every major region of the country.

    Data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), a U.S.-based conflict monitoring organization, underscores the scale of the drone-driven surge in fatalities. By ACLED’s count, at least 2,670 people — a mix of combatants and civilians — died in drone-related incidents across Sudan in 2025. That marked a 600% jump in total drone-linked deaths and an 81% rise in the number of drone attacks compared to 2024 figures. Over the full first three years of the conflict, ACLED recorded at least 59,000 total fatalities, though the organization has cautioned that the actual death toll is almost certainly much higher, as widespread insecurity and collapsed communication infrastructure make full, accurate on-the-ground reporting nearly impossible.

    Most recently, a drone strike carried out by the RSF last week hit civilian sites in Sudan’s central city of el-Obeid, targeting a public cemetery and a commercial gas station. Local health officials confirmed that the attack left at least 15 people dead.

    According to Türk’s briefing, both the Sudanese military and the RSF have increasingly deployed explosive-laden drones in their operations, with repeated strikes targeting civilian infrastructure that is protected under international humanitarian law. Documented targets have included hospitals, hydroelectric dams, schools, open-air public markets, and camps for internally displaced people. Today, drone strikes have emerged as the deadliest single threat to civilians in Sudan’s conflict, a crisis that has been largely overshadowed by higher-profile international conflicts in Gaza and Iran in recent months.

    Beyond the growing carnage from drone attacks, Türk confirmed that rape and other forms of sexual violence have become rampant across regions controlled by both warring parties. The United Nations and independent international human rights organizations have documented mass rape and ethnically targeted killings that rise to the level of systematic crimes against humanity.

    The protracted conflict has also spiraled into what the UN describes as the world’s most severe ongoing humanitarian catastrophe. Approximately 34 million Sudanese — nearly two-thirds of the country’s entire population — currently require life-saving humanitarian assistance, while widespread fighting has reduced major urban centers to rubble and left critical basic services nonfunctional across most of the country.

  • Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    Former American businessman detained in Myanmar after alleged financial misconduct

    In a development that has drawn international attention, Adam Castillo, the former president of the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) in Myanmar and founder of a prominent local security firm, has been taken into custody shortly after arriving at Yangon International Airport. The detention comes as AMCHAM Myanmar conducts an internal investigation into suspicious financial activity linked to former board members of the organization.

    An anonymous associate of Castillo, who requested anonymity out of fear for personal safety, confirmed to the Associated Press that the 41-year-old U.S. national was detained on Thursday. Castillo, who leads AGS Myanmar — a risk management and security firm that also offers commercial cleaning and pest control services — has not issued any public response to the detention, and his company declined to elaborate on the situation beyond calling it an “ongoing matter”. Messages sent to Castillo via his personal website also went unanswered.

    U.S. State Department officials have confirmed they are aware of reports of the American citizen’s detention, but declined to provide further details, citing privacy protections for U.S. nationals abroad. Myanmar’s military-backed ruling administration, which has faced widespread international isolation since its 2021 coup and has limited communication with international media amid the ongoing civil conflict, has not released any official statement regarding Castillo’s arrest. Requests for comment from Myanmar’s central government, the Yangon regional administration, and the Yangon Regional Police Department went unanswered. Multiple military-aligned local media outlets, including NP News, have reported that the arrest followed a formal complaint filed against Castillo by AMCHAM Myanmar. Castillo led the organization, which advocates for American business interests operating in Myanmar, from 2023 through early 2025.

    When contacted for comment on the complaint, AMCHAM Myanmar’s executive director Myat Phyu The declined to share specific details of the case, but directed reporters to the chamber’s May 29 annual report, which addresses the ongoing investigation. According to the document, the current AMCHAM board discovered questionable transactions carried out by former board representatives last year, and immediately turned the matter over to an independent law firm for forensic review.

    The investigation uncovered that an unnamed former board representative signed a November 2024 contract with a Washington D.C.-based public relations firm. The firm paid $300,000 in connection with the deal, and the full sum was collected and disbursed outside of AMCHAM Myanmar’s official financial accounts. The annual report notes that the unauthorized signature exceeded the formal signing authority granted to individual board members, and the full board never approved the agreement. “AMCHAM Myanmar received no funds, made no payments, and received no services, and the matter was not disclosed to the statutory auditors,” the report reads.

    While the report confirms that two former board members are involved in the suspicious activity, it does not name either individual nor outline what internal legal or disciplinary actions the chamber has pursued to date. Myat Phyu The also declined to elaborate on details beyond what is included in the public report. In a June 12 statement posted to the organization’s official website, the AMCHAM board said it “has taken appropriate steps to safeguard the interests of the organization and its members.”

    Myanmar has been engulfed in widespread armed conflict since the military seized power from the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. After the junta violently crushed peaceful mass protests against the takeover, pro-democracy guerrilla groups and ethnic minority militias launched a widespread armed resistance movement that has left much of the country divided and mired in ongoing violence. Since the coup, authorities have increasingly detained foreign nationals, most frequently foreign reporters covering the country’s political and humanitarian crisis.

    Public profiles on AGS Myanmar’s website list Castillo as a former U.S. Marine Corps officer who completed active duty tours in Afghanistan. He also currently serves as chair of Republican Overseas Myanmar, a group founded in 2024 that works to promote former U.S. President Donald Trump’s “America First” policy agenda across Myanmar and the broader Southeast Asian region.

    It remains unclear where Castillo traveled before his return to Yangon, but social media posts to his public Instagram account show he attended a business forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, just one day before his arrest, where he promoted his recently published memoir. Castillo’s book, titled *Finding Our Voice*, chronicles his personal experiences living and working in Myanmar through the political upheaval, rising violence, and economic collapse that followed the 2021 military takeover. It is not yet known whether the publication of the memoir is connected to his detention.

  • Australian PM demands answers after Pakistan police shoot girl on holiday dead

    Australian PM demands answers after Pakistan police shoot girl on holiday dead

    A tragic shooting that claimed the life of a 9-year-old Australian child on vacation in Pakistan has sparked cross-national calls for a full, transparent investigation, leaving communities in both nations reeling from the unexpected loss. Hania Ahmed, a young primary school student from Perth, was traveling with her family in Punjab province’s northern city of Chakwal when armed robbers intercepted their rental vehicle on June 10, taking the entire family hostage at gunpoint.

    According to official accounts from Punjab Police, the armed suspects opened fire on an attending police officer, triggering a shootout at the scene. In the chaos, one officer fired a fatal shot mistakenly, believing the suspects were attempting to escape in the Ahmed family’s vehicle. The gunfire killed Hania and left her father and older brother with non-fatal injuries. The involved officer has since been taken into custody, with police confirming that the suspects fired the first rounds at responding law enforcement. This official narrative has been contested, however: Hania’s father told Australian public broadcaster SBS Urdu that police fired first, contradicting the official version of events.

    During a press briefing in Canberra on Monday, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese publicly called on Pakistani authorities to launch a full, transparent inquiry into the circumstances of Hania’s death. “These circumstances do need to be examined. They need to be examined in a transparent way, so that everyone can know, the family, most importantly, but others as well,” Albanese told reporters. He added that the Australian government expects full transparency and a rigorous, proper investigation into the fatal incident.

    Punjab Police has responded to the incident acknowledging that no deviation from standard operational protocols can be justified, and stated that it is already conducting a thorough and impartial investigation into the tragedy. Meanwhile, the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade confirmed it is providing full consular assistance to the Ahmed family as they navigate the aftermath of the loss.

    Hania’s death has sent waves of grief through her close-knit school community in Perth, where she attended the Australian Islamic College. Abdullah Khan, the college principal, described the news of her passing as deeply traumatic for the entire school community. “Hania was very friendly, bubbly, and very social,” Khan told the BBC. “She had lots of friends, [and was] very respectful to teachers. She was loved by everyone.”

    Khan confirmed the school has been in contact with the Ahmed family and has put in place dedicated counseling support for both staff and students, particularly Hania’s closest classmates. “Especially the students in her class – they are distressed and in a state of shock,” he added.

  • China detains two leaders of influential underground church

    China detains two leaders of influential underground church

    On a recent Sunday, Early Rain Covenant Church, one of China’s most prominent unregistered Protestant congregations, was violently interrupted mid-worship when armed law enforcement officers stormed the hotel ballroom venue where the congregation had gathered in the southwestern city of Jiangyou. In a formal statement released via the messaging platform Telegram the following day, church representatives confirmed that more than 30 congregants and leaders were forcibly taken from the service to a local detention center for interrogation, with two senior pastors, Yan Hong and Wu Wuqing, remaining in custody as of the latest updates. Members of the congregation estimate that at least 50 officers, including personnel from the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) unit, were on site during the 11 a.m. local time raid. Visual evidence shared by the church, including photographs and video clips, shows uniformed officers surrounding seated worshippers, while plainclothes officers can be seen on stage repeatedly demanding the congregation stop singing hymns. According to the church’s account, even after the raid, worshippers who remained in the ballroom — including elderly attendees and children — were locked in the space for hours while officers conducted mandatory identity checks. While in detention, the congregants detained for interrogation continued to fellowship, sing hymns and pray together, the statement added. Officers attempted to pressure congregants locked in the ballroom to sign an undisclosed affidavit in exchange for their release; all attendees refused to sign the document, but were ultimately released by 6 p.m. local time. All detainees except pastors Yan and Wu were released between 9 p.m. and 11 p.m. Sunday, the church confirmed. No public explanation for the detentions has been issued by Chinese authorities, who have not responded to requests for comment on the incident. This is not the first time either Yan or Wu have been detained by authorities: the pair were most recently summoned by police in January on unsubstantiated charges of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.” Founded in 2008 and originally based in the southwestern provincial capital of Chengdu, Early Rain Covenant Church has been a high-profile target of Chinese government regulation for years due to the country’s strict state control over religious practice. The church’s founding pastor, Wang Yi, was arrested during a large-scale 2018 raid and is currently serving a nine-year prison sentence on widely criticized charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “illegal business operations.” China’s ruling Communist Party officially permits religious practice only through state-sanctioned denominations led by government-appointed clergy. According to official 2018 data, China is home to roughly 44 million Christians, though independent observers note this figure almost certainly excludes millions of worshippers who attend unregistered “house churches” like Early Rain Covenant, which operate outside state oversight. In recent years, Christian advocacy groups say government restrictions on unregistered religious activity have grown significantly harsher, with frequent raids and detentions of independent congregational leaders becoming the norm. Bob Fu, founder of ChinaAid, a non-profit organization that tracks religious freedom violations in China, called Sunday’s raid a clear demonstration of the ruling party’s ongoing framing of peaceful Christian worship as a threat to state authority. The incident comes less than a year after a similar large-scale crackdown on another prominent independent Chinese church: in October of last year, 30 leaders of the Beijing-based Zion Church were detained in coordinated raids across seven Chinese cities, and the church’s founder, Ezra Jin, remains in state custody to date.

  • Iran and US reach an initial deal to end the war and open the Strait of Hormuz but challenges remain

    Iran and US reach an initial deal to end the war and open the Strait of Hormuz but challenges remain

    GENEVA, SWITZERLAND — In a tentative breakthrough that offers a glimmer of relief for strained global energy markets, the United States and Iran have reached an initial agreement Monday to extend their fragile existing ceasefire and reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important oil chokepoint. The path to a permanent end to the ongoing regional conflict, however, remains littered with substantial, potentially deal-breaking obstacles, most notably Israel’s refusal to end its offensive in Lebanon and withdraw from occupied Lebanese territory.

    Details of the framework agreement have not been released to the public, and all sides have confirmed the deal will not go into effect until a formal signing ceremony, scheduled for this Friday in Geneva under the mediation of Pakistan. Preparatory closed-door talks between US and Iranian diplomatic teams will kick off this week in Doha, Qatar, a senior diplomat with direct knowledge of the negotiations told the Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

    Even if the strait — through which roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil and natural gas shipments flowed before the conflict — opens as planned on Friday, energy analysts warn the global energy crisis triggered by its near-total closure will take months to abate, as shipping firms and energy producers work to rebuild disrupted supply chains and restore pre-conflict operational capacity.

    The current conflict traces its roots back to 2018, when then-President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the multinational Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the landmark nuclear agreement that had placed strict limits on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The withdrawal sparked years of escalating tensions that eventually erupted into open war on February 28, when the US and Israel launched joint military operations against Iran. The conflict has killed thousands across the Middle East, including top Iranian clerical leaders, and driven sharp spikes in global fuel, food and commodity prices that have impacted consumers far beyond the region.

    One of the biggest threats to the deal’s survival is Israel’s unyielding stance on its military campaign in Lebanon, where Israeli forces have been battling Iranian-backed Hezbollah militants. Israel joined the US in the war but is not a signatory to the new ceasefire agreement. On Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced the country would maintain permanent military control over the roughly 1,000 square kilometers of territory it has seized in Lebanon, Gaza and Syria over the past two and a half years, vowing to stay “indefinitely.”

    A spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office reaffirmed that Israel will continue all military operations necessary to defend its national security against what it frames as ongoing threats from Hezbollah and other Iranian-aligned groups. The spokesman added that Israel remains fully aligned with the US on preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but will not be bound by the terms of the US-Iran agreement.

    Iran has publicly insisted that any comprehensive peace deal must include an immediate end to all hostilities in Lebanon. Israeli officials have already rejected that demand, raising serious questions about whether the preliminary agreement can survive. An Israeli airstrike on Beirut’s southern suburbs just one day before the deal was announced nearly derailed the negotiations entirely, and cross-border exchanges of fire have continued in the weeks since the last temporary ceasefire took effect.

    Hezbollah, for its part, issued its first public response to the deal Monday calling it a “major achievement” for Iran that could eventually lead to the full liberation of Lebanese territory, the return of displaced residents and prisoners, and the reconstruction of war-devastated border areas. The group, however, rejected any return to the status quo that existed before the latest conflict, when a nominal ceasefire was in place but Israel continued regular targeted strikes on Hezbollah positions in Lebanon. It also criticized the Lebanese government’s past efforts at US-mediated direct negotiations with Israel that failed to deliver on the ground, calling on officials to abandon “illusions and losing bets.”

    Beyond the Lebanon impasse, the agreement also faces major unresolved challenges on the nuclear issue that sparked the original tensions. The deal only gives the two sides 60 days to reach a permanent agreement on the future of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium and its overall nuclear program. The US and Israel have long alleged Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, a claim Iran has repeatedly denied, saying its nuclear program is entirely for peaceful energy and medical purposes. Negotiators note it took years of diplomacy to reach the 2015 JCPOA agreement, making a final deal in just two months an extremely high bar.

    Early in the conflict, Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz brought traffic through the waterway to a near standstill, prompting the Trump administration to implement a full blockade of Iranian ports in response. The closure of the strait, combined with Iranian strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure and the US blockade, sent global fuel prices skyrocketing and sent ripple effects through every sector of the global economy, pushing inflation higher in almost every country worldwide.

    Trump, who is facing growing political pressure to end the conflict ahead of November’s congressional midterm elections, initially hailed the preliminary agreement on social media, saying he had authorized the immediate opening of the strait and an end to the blockade. He later corrected his statement to confirm the strait would not open until the formal signing on Friday. Iran’s deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi confirmed the agreement on Iranian state television Monday, saying Iran would not begin implementation until the deal is formally signed.

    Despite the significant uncertainties surrounding the deal, world leaders have broadly welcomed the preliminary breakthrough. French President Emmanuel Macron, who is hosting Trump and other G7 leaders at a summit this week, said France and other Western partners are “ready to take action very quickly” to help restore safe shipping through the strait once the agreement enters into force, noting that France already has substantial military assets in the region, including its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier the Charles de Gaulle. China and other global powers have also issued statements welcoming the step toward de-escalation. Other European leaders have struck a more cautious note, however, with Luxembourg’s Foreign Minister Xavier Bettel noting “It’s a long time till Friday,” a reference to the multiple hurdles that remain before the deal can be implemented.

    The Associated Press contributed reporting from Athens, Islamabad, Washington, Jerusalem, Beirut, Doha, Tel Aviv and Evian-les-Bains.