分类: world

  • ‘You have two million targets in Gaza’: Israeli soldier details killings of Palestinians

    ‘You have two million targets in Gaza’: Israeli soldier details killings of Palestinians

    A veteran Israeli army drone operator, speaking anonymously to Israeli newspaper Haaretz in a bombshell interview published Thursday, has laid bare chilling allegations of widespread, unaccountable violence against Palestinian civilians in Gaza, claiming top military command has effectively marked the entire 2-million-strong Palestinian population of the enclave as legitimate targets.

    The reservist, who began his military service in 2008 and told the outlet he has killed at least 54 Palestinians – including multiple unarmed civilians – by October 2023, served in an Israeli drone attack unit operating in Gaza until he left active reserve duty in July this year. He described a total collapse of established rules of engagement in the opening weeks and subsequent months of Israel’s military campaign, recalling that “in the first days, there were no rules” governing how forces interacted with Palestinian people.

    One of the most graphic allegations the reservist shared centers on a March 2025 attack on a clearly marked ambulance convoy in Rafah’s Tel al-Sultan neighborhood, which left 15 Palestinian medical and aid workers dead. He recalled that even from his aerial drone position, the emergency vehicles were unmistakable, yet ground troops stormed the convoy without warning. “They shot at the first vehicle. The medical staff exited, hid behind the ambulances and pleaded for their lives, and the soldiers shot them, one after another,” he told Haaretz. Following the attack, the Israeli military initially denied any wrongdoing, only announcing an investigation after a mass grave holding the victims was uncovered. To date, no Israeli service members have faced trial or any form of legal accountability for the killings.

    It was after this incident, the reservist said, that he understood the full scope of the impunity granted to soldiers operating in Gaza: “Anyone could kill whoever they wanted, as much as they wanted, and they wouldn’t be held accountable for it.”

    Despite his shock at the Rafah attack, the reservist continued his tour of duty in Gaza, returning to post in late April 2025 after a five-day personal leave in Georgia. When he reported back for duty and met with an intelligence officer to upload target data to his unit’s computer, he was given a staggering directive. He recalled the officer telling him, “You have two million targets in Gaza” – a comment he confirmed referred to the entire civilian population of the enclave.

    The reservist also detailed repeated, unauthorised shifts to the so-called “Yellow Line,” the ceasefire-mandated demarcation that sets the boundary for Israeli military deployments inside Gaza. He explained that senior division commanders routinely move the concrete barriers marking the line hundreds of meters west on their own personal orders, with no public announcement to alert Gaza’s civilian population to the new boundary. Commanders, he added, actively pressure soldiers and drone operators to open fire on any Palestinian who approaches the shifted line, retroactively manufacturing evidence to justify the killings after the fact. “They try to incriminate people without intelligence and without proof, retroactively, just to create a justification for an attack,” he said.

    He described a normalized culture of killing within his attack cell, comparing the rhetoric to that of a cheering sports crowd. “The concept of ‘collateral damage’ quickly disappeared from consideration,” he said. “They fire at anyone they see. Just like they shout to a player, ‘Come on, score a goal’, they shout to a soldier, ‘Kill him, attack him’.”

    Additional allegations include that Israeli forces routinely observe violent crimes committed by pro-Israel militias operating in Gaza from aerial positions, but never intervene to stop the attacks. The reservist said, “They burn rows of houses, and we watch them from above. Arson, looting, shooting.”

    These allegations align with a prior report published by Haaretz last month, which claimed the Israeli military allows mercenaries, criminal gangs and drug traffickers to carry out war crimes in Gaza with full impunity – conduct the outlet compared to the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre in Lebanese refugee camps.

    As of the latest update from Palestinian authorities, at least 73,658 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the start of Israel’s military campaign in October 2023. Over 1,300 of these deaths have occurred after the ceasefire agreement went into effect last October.

  • ‘Never, ever forget’ – America marks 25th anniversary of 9/11 attacks

    ‘Never, ever forget’ – America marks 25th anniversary of 9/11 attacks

    A quarter of a century after the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil, communities across the United States and around the world gathered Friday to honor the nearly 3,000 people killed in the September 11, 2001 attacks, reflecting on lingering grief, unfulfilled justice demands, and the long-term health toll that continues to claim lives decades later.

    Across three key attack sites, the nation’s highest political leaders joined survivors and bereaved families to mark the somber milestone. At the Pentagon, one of the four targets hit by hijacked planes that morning, sitting President Donald Trump led a formal commemoration alongside current cabinet members and Condoleezza Rice, who served as Secretary of State in the aftermath of the attacks. In his remarks, Trump tied the post-9/11 global fight against terrorism to his administration’s ongoing standoff with Iran, reaffirming a hardline pledge: “The Islamic Republic will never, ever have a nuclear weapon.” Echoing a core promise of every 9/11 commemoration, he added, “Today we renew the sacred oath that we first swore in their names a quarter of a century ago. We will never, ever forget. That’s why we fight today.”

    At the ground zero memorial in lower Manhattan, built where the Twin Towers once stood, Vice President JD Vance joined an unprecedented gathering: all four living former U.S. presidents — George W. Bush, who held the presidency during the 2001 attacks, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden — alongside their respective first ladies. For nearly four hours, family members took turns reading the full roll of nearly 3,000 victims killed in the attacks, a ritual that has become the centerpiece of the annual memorial.

    In Shanksville, Pennsylvania, hundreds gathered at the Flight 93 National Memorial, where the fourth hijacked plane crashed after passengers revolted against the hijackers, preventing an attack on the U.S. Capitol that morning. A silent tribute was held at the site’s Wall of Names, honoring the 40 passengers and crew who died.

    For the first time in the 25 years of commemorations, this year’s memorial included a new, somber addition: a seventh bell toll, following the six traditional bells that mark the timelines of each plane crash and the collapse of the Twin Towers. The seventh bell pays tribute to the thousands of people who have since died from 9/11-related illnesses, most commonly cancers caused by exposure to toxic dust and smoke from the collapsing World Trade Center. U.S. health officials estimate that these secondary deaths have now outnumbered the nearly 3,000 people killed in the immediate attacks by more than three to one — a grim reminder of the attack’s long shadow that continues to affect communities.

    Survivors also shared their harrowing firsthand accounts of the morning to mark the milestone. Janice Brooks, who had moved to New York just two weeks before the attacks to start a new job on the 84th floor of the South Tower, described the chaos and terror that unfolded after the first plane hit the North Tower. As she began evacuating, the second hijacked plane slammed into her tower: “There was an almighty thud. I heard one of those horror film screams as a woman was hit by debris. When I looked up, there was a big gaping hole where my office should have been.” Today, Brooks joins thousands of survivors and family members who return to ground zero every year to honor those who did not escape.

    The 25th anniversary also brought renewed calls for accountability from family members of victims. Terry Strada, a 9/11 widow and national chair of 9/11 Families United, used her live-broadcast remarks to criticize the U.S. government’s failure to hold Saudi Arabia accountable for its alleged role in the attacks. “How can it be 25 years and still we have no justice for the role that Saudi Arabia played in your murder?” Strada asked, drawing loud applause from the gathered crowd. While a majority of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi citizens and al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden — who planned the attacks — came from a prominent Saudi family, the 2004 9/11 Commission Report officially cleared the Saudi government of any involvement, a conclusion that many victim families continue to dispute to this day. Saudi officials have repeatedly denied any connection to the attacks.

    Beyond U.S. borders, memorial events were held in major cities across the globe to honor the hundreds of foreign nationals killed in the attacks, and to stand in solidarity with the United States. In London, the UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband and U.S. Ambassador Warren Stephens joined a formal tribute at Buckingham Palace, with additional commemoration events held at Lloyd’s of London. The Toronto Stock Exchange held its own memorial for colleagues lost in the attacks. In Milan, Italy, a group of Italian and American firefighters held a symbolic stair climb at the Galfa Tower, climbing 110 floors up and down to match the number of stories in each of the original Twin Towers, honoring the hundreds of first responders who died rushing into the burning towers to save others.

    Twenty-five years on, the commemorations remain anchored in the core promise that has defined the annual ritual: that the lives lost on September 11, 2001, will never be forgotten.

  • ‘We will never, ever forget’ – Americans remember 9/11 on 25th anniversary

    ‘We will never, ever forget’ – Americans remember 9/11 on 25th anniversary

    A quarter-century after one of the deadliest terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, Americans from across the country came together on Saturday to mark the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, pausing to honor the nearly 3,000 lives lost and reaffirming the collective promise that those killed will never be forgotten.

    Commemorative events were held at the three primary sites forever altered by the 2001 attacks: Lower Manhattan’s National September 11 Memorial, the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense at the Pentagon just outside Washington, D.C., and the Flight 93 National Memorial in the rural hills near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Family members of victims, current and former public officials, first responders, and ordinary citizens joined each gathering, sharing quiet moments of reflection, reading the names of those who perished, and laying wreaths to honor their memory.

    At the New York memorial, which is built around the footprints of the fallen Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the sound of bagpipes echoed through lower Manhattan as relatives took turns calling out the names of loved ones. Many left flowers, handwritten notes, and small personal mementos at the bronze parapets that line the memorial pools, carrying on a tradition that has persisted for 25 years. At the Pentagon, service members and defense officials joined in a solemn remembrance ceremony, paying tribute to the 184 people killed when American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the building. In Shanksville, attendees gathered at the crash site of United Airlines Flight 93, where passengers and crew fought back against hijackers, preventing the plane from reaching its intended target in Washington and costing all 40 on board their lives.

    Across all three events, speakers and attendees echoed a shared sentiment: that the memory of those lost on September 11, 2001, remains undimmed after 25 years, and the nation will forever hold their stories close. “We will never, ever forget,” was the refrain repeated by countless participants, tying together the grief, resilience, and national unity that has defined the annual remembrance for a generation.

  • Jabaroot: Behind the hacker group’s claim of a 70,000‑name leak in Morocco’s police and intelligence

    Jabaroot: Behind the hacker group’s claim of a 70,000‑name leak in Morocco’s police and intelligence

    On August 24, a little-known hacking collective calling itself Jabaroot – a term meaning “power” or “domination” in Arabic – dropped a bombshell: it publicly released a dataset purporting to contain the personal information of 70,000 personnel linked to Morocco’s police and intelligence networks across Europe and inside key domestic Moroccan government institutions.

    Packaged across four spreadsheets, the leak includes sensitive personal details ranging from birth dates and active bank account numbers to purported professional ranks. Most entries correspond to low-profile personnel within the General Directorate of National Security (DGSN, Morocco’s national police force) and the General Directorate of Territorial Surveillance (DGST, the country’s domestic intelligence agency), but the list also names top senior officials – including Abdellatif Hammouchi, who leads both the DGSN and DGST.

    Moroccan authorities have pushed back hard against the claims, arguing that all information released originated from outdated datasets held by private insurance companies, not a recent breach of internal security systems.

    Jabaroot framed the release as a “gift to Spain”, dropping it just weeks after a major migrant crisis that saw more than 72,000 people cross from Morocco into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta, an incident that left 141 people dead. The collective has also threatened to publish classified mission orders it claims prove Moroccan security services colluded to organize the mass crossing, an accusation Rabat has repeatedly denied. Spanish authorities opened an investigation into the crisis after a police report alleged Moroccan law enforcement allowed and even facilitated the crossing.

    The true origins of Jabaroot and the leak itself remain shrouded in mystery. While many observers have speculated the group is Algerian-based, drawing on long-standing bilateral tensions between Algiers and Rabat, reporting from French outlet Le Monde suggests the breach may instead be the work of five former DGST agents living in exile in Europe. To date, there is no conclusive evidence confirming all 70,000 people listed are active Moroccan covert spies; the dataset is thought to include regular police officers, administrative staff and non-clandestine civil servants alongside any intelligence personnel.

    Cybersecurity and regional politics experts warn the leak should be interpreted with significant caution. Dr. Bassant Hassib, an assistant professor of political science specializing in cybersecurity at the European Universities in Egypt’s University of London Programmes, notes multiple red flags indicating the data is largely outdated: the most recent recruitment date listed is 2020, and the dataset includes the name of Abdelhak Khiame, the founding director of the DGST’s Central Bureau of Judicial Investigations, who passed away in 2022.

    Even so, the leak carries tangible risks. A former anonymous Moroccan overseas intelligence officer confirmed to Middle East Eye that at least some of the information is authentic, including the full details of an entire informant family deployed abroad. “Usually informants are placed within embassies; it is common practice for the entire family to be hired and moved to the country to reduce any suspicion,” the source explained. The leak has already rendered all named contacts compromised, the former officer added, saying it “will cause chaos within the system; all those named are now burnt contacts, and will need to return to Morocco.” Hundreds or thousands of deployed agents will likely need to be replaced by recalled personnel.

    Hassib echoed this risk, noting that even partially accurate data poses direct physical danger to covert personnel and their families, whose exposed bank details and identities make them vulnerable to targeting and harassment. She added that Jabaroot stands to gain strategically even from releasing outdated or incomplete data: by framing old stolen information as the product of a new breach, the group can inflate its perceived technical capabilities, boost its standing on platforms like Telegram, and increase its leverage for future cyber operations.

    This latest leak is far from Jabaroot’s first claimed attack on Moroccan state institutions. In April 2025, the group claimed responsibility for a breach of Morocco’s National Social Security Fund (CNSS), leaking 54,000 files that compromised the personal data of nearly two million people, including employees of the Moroccan royal palace. Two months later, it announced a hack of the National Agency for Land Conservation, leaking 4 terabytes of data including 10,000 property certificates and 20,000 civil records. Days after that, it claimed to have compromised the digital infrastructure of Morocco’s justice ministry, exfiltrating sensitive personal data from 40,000 judicial officials and magistrates. Moroccan authorities have denied every one of these alleged breaches.

    Geopolitical analysts say the persistent narrative that Jabaroot is an Algerian-aligned group serves political goals for both Rabat and its critics. Morocco and Algeria have a decades-long bitter rivalry centered on sovereignty claims over the disputed territory of Western Sahara, where Algiers supports the pro-independence Polisario Front. Alec Barcenilla, a North Africa geopolitics researcher and former staffer at the Spanish embassy in Rabat, notes that labeling Jabaroot as Algerian is politically useful for Morocco: “it may then instrumentalise these digital attacks to shift blame and public focus away, in a rather opportunistic way.”

    Despite widespread speculation, no solid concrete evidence exists to confirm Jabaroot’s identity, leadership or core objectives. Investigative journalist Jose Bautista, who has extensive expertise on North African cyber operations, told MEE that one clear throughline has emerged: “What does seem clear is that whoever is behind Jabaroot holds highly professional profiles, significant technical capabilities, and they have access to super sensitive data.” Bautista’s sources suggest the latest leak likely draws on data obtained from a breach of either the Moroccan finance ministry or social security databases, not the internal systems of the security services themselves. Multiple credible theories exist about the group: Le Monde’s reporting suggests it could be a collective of ex-Moroccan intelligence officers angry about corruption, nepotism and institutional abuse within the Moroccan establishment, while other well-informed sources have pointed to possible backing from Algerian or even Spanish intelligence as retaliation against Rabat.

    The leak also intersects with ongoing international scrutiny of Morocco’s use of Pegasus, the controversial Israeli-made spyware. Bautista was part of an international journalistic investigation published in July 2026 that linked the DGST to a wide-ranging international surveillance program that targeted senior Spanish cabinet ministers and Guardia Civil officers. The report confirmed that Morocco’s surveillance operations began internal testing as early as September 2017 before expanding rapidly across borders. Jabaroot has claimed it holds sensitive data about Morocco’s use of Pegasus, including proof of surveillance targeting Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, and has threatened to release it – though the group has yet to follow through on this threat, just as it has not delivered on its promise to release documents detailing alleged Moroccan collusion in the Ceuta migrant crisis.

    Experts note the timing of the latest leak, which comes weeks before Morocco’s national elections scheduled for September 23, is no coincidence. Hassib argues that Jabaroot’s public framing of the leak is designed to “embarrass Rabat and reinforce a narrative of Moroccan state involvement in the Ceuta crisis, thereby undermining its credibility” with the ultimate goal of causing “internal disruption, psychological impact, reputational damage and political leverage.”

    Hammouchi, the head of both the DGSN and DGST who is widely described as King Mohammed VI’s most trusted “supercop”, has emerged as the primary target of the leak. Jabaroot has publicly called for the king to dismiss Hammouchi, who has faced long-standing criticism from human rights groups including Amnesty International over allegations of torture and enforced disappearances at DGST detention facilities. A 2014 French arrest warrant for Hammouchi triggered a major diplomatic rift between Paris and Rabat. Le Monde’s reporting notes that the five ex-DGST agents suspected of involvement in the leak claim they witnessed widespread misuse of personal data collected through illegal wiretaps and unauthorized background checks.

    While analysts agree the leak is undoubtedly embarrassing for Hammouchi and the institutions he leads, there is no evidence to date that his position within the Moroccan government has been seriously weakened. Barah Mikail, an associate professor of political science and international relations at Saint Louis University Madrid, says the most consequential takeaway from the leak, if Le Monde’s reporting of ex-DGST involvement is accurate, is what it reveals about internal cohesion: “If the reporting that former DGST officers are involved is accurate, that would point to a problem of defection and grievance within the apparatus.”

    Barcenilla added that the attack strikes at the core of Hammouchi’s public reputation as a leader defined by control, foresight and reliability: “Jabaroot’s attack is therefore also an attack on his capacity and reliability.” If the data is confirmed to be largely authentic, it could carry lasting reputational and political damage for the senior official.

    Many experts, including Mikail, suggest the fact that much of the data is outdated does not automatically mean it is fake. It may indicate that the information is substantially authentic but was obtained from older datasets rather than a recent breach of internal security systems. Morocco’s consistent denial of the leak’s validity, Mikail notes, serves a clear damage-control purpose – but “this does not necessarily mean the data is false.”

  • Norway’s Princess Astrid dies two days after attending brother King Harald’s funeral

    Norway’s Princess Astrid dies two days after attending brother King Harald’s funeral

    The Norwegian Royal Palace has confirmed the passing of Princess Astrid, sister of the late King Harald V, at the age of 94, just two days after she joined public ceremonies to lay her brother to rest. Her death marks the end of a decades-long public service career deeply tied to Norway’s modern royal history, and comes as the nation’s royal family concludes a period of national mourning following Harald’s death last month at 89, after 35 years on the throne.

    As the last surviving child of King Olav V, who ruled Norway from 1957 to 1991, Princess Astrid stepped into an unprecedented public role at just 22 years old. After the 1954 passing of her mother, Crown Princess Märtha, Olav chose not to remarry, leaving Astrid to serve as Norway’s first lady for 14 years until her brother Harald’s marriage in 1968. Through every stage of her public life, she became known for her steady, warm commitment to representing the Norwegian Royal House across the country and abroad.

    In a formal statement following the princess’s death, Norway’s new monarch King Haakon VIII paid tribute to his aunt. “Throughout her long life, Princess Astrid represented the Royal House in a warm and dutiful manner,” he said, adding that “In her work, Princess Astrid was always particularly concerned with care and inclusion for the most vulnerable in society.”

    Princess Astrid’s final public appearance was Harald’s funeral, held in Oslo earlier this week, where she attended in a wheelchair. The high-profile ceremony drew dozens of European royals and global heads of state, including the Prince of Wales, three Nordic monarchs, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Thousands of Norwegian residents lined the processional route between the Royal Palace and Oslo Cathedral to pay their respects to the late king.

    In line with royal tradition, the Norwegian government has announced that Princess Astrid will be buried at state expense, and all public flags across Norway will be flown at half-mast to honor her legacy. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre confirmed the arrangements in a public statement Wednesday.

    Public health records show the princess’s health had declined gradually over recent months, and she received inpatient treatment for pneumonia in March this year. Her passing comes at a time of significant personal and public upheaval for the Norwegian royal family. Earlier in 2026, two major scandals rocked the household: documents revealed Queen Mette-Marit, Harald’s wife, had repeated prior contact with disgraced American sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a connection she later said she regretted. Separately, Mette-Marit’s son from her first relationship, Marius Borg Høiby, who grew up in the royal household despite not holding a formal royal title, was sentenced to four years in prison in June on two counts of rape. He remains under house arrest while appealing the conviction, and was granted special permission to attend Harald’s funeral earlier this week.

  • Couple charged over Sydney ketamine raid face new gang charges

    Couple charged over Sydney ketamine raid face new gang charges

    A pair of British nationals from Edinburgh have been hit with fresh criminal charges linked to an international drug trafficking operation, after Australian law enforcement seized more than 100 kilograms of ketamine in a series of raids across Sydney earlier this year.

    23-year-old Demi McDaid and her 30-year-old partner Jack Farrelly were first taken into custody at a North Sydney hotel in late June, when officers uncovered 105 kilograms of the class-B drug stashed inside a vehicle parked at the accommodation. Prior to that hotel arrest, investigators had already seized an additional 2 kilograms of ketamine, along with drug processing equipment including weighing scales, protective gloves and other paraphernalia, from a short-term rental unit in Artarmon, a suburb on Sydney’s Lower North Shore.

    Alongside the large ketamine haul, New South Wales Police also confiscated multiple mobile phones, AU$2,000 (equal to roughly £1,060) in untraceable cash, and handwritten documents that investigators have characterized as detailed drug ledgers tracking the trafficking network’s transactions.

    The pair already faced two serious drug charges: one count of supplying a prohibited controlled substance, and a second count of supplying that substance in large commercial quantities. At a recent hearing at Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court, prosecutors added a third charge for both defendants: participating in an organized criminal group and contributing to ongoing criminal activity.

    To date, neither McDaid nor Farrelly has entered a plea on any of the charges brought against them. Law enforcement officials have alleged that the Edinburgh-based couple travelled to Australia with one explicit goal: to coordinate the distribution and sale of large commercial volumes of illicit controlled drugs for a transnational criminal network.

    The UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office has confirmed it is providing consular support to the two detained British citizens, and remains in ongoing communication with Australian local law enforcement and judicial authorities regarding the case.

  • Remembering 9/11 from the still-screaming streets of New York

    Remembering 9/11 from the still-screaming streets of New York

    It has been 10 days since the catastrophic September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, and Ground Zero remains a smoldering, jagged ruin encasing the bodies of nearly 3,000 victims. On that 10th day, for the first time, a fully costumed clown in traditional red-nose regalia stepped into the site, attempting to lift the spirits of gas-masked emergency crews and the thousands of visitors already streaming past the still-smoking wreckage.

    What was once the site of the world’s most iconic twin skyscrapers has quickly become both a massive open-air urban funeral and a chaotic gathering place where grief, opportunism, faith, and political fury collide. Thousands of dazed, mournful people travel to the perimeter of the obliterated site, where armed National Guard troops and police have allowed public access within just a few blocks, despite the lingering acrid stench that still requires responders to wear protective gas masks. Surrounding skyscrapers stand deserted, their infrastructure knocked out by the attack, creating a walled, hollow corridor for wandering visitors who move through the area in solemn silence.

    Crowds jostle for the perfect view and photograph, most aiming to capture three specific elements in their frame: the smoking wreckage, an American flag in the background, and uniformed U.S. Army troops in the foreground. The entire site is bathed in the constant strobing flicker of camera flashes. Many visitors wear newly printed souvenir T-shirts emblazoned with the twin towers and the American flag, while others bear more aggressive slogans: one young man’s shirt threatens Osama bin Laden, the identified mastermind of the attack, while another declares “America Under Attack. I Can’t Believe I Survived.”

    Even as the nation reels from the surprise atrocity, commerce has already reemerged in unexpected, often jarring forms. Mass-produced pre-attack World Trade Center memorabilia—keychains, refrigerator magnets, paperweights, desk decorations, and spoons—are being bought and sold by private vendors, the once-cheerful trinkets now transformed into macabre, commercially priced tokens of the disaster. Near the site, sidewalk vendors hurriedly sell hastily printed postcards and posters showing the towers in flames, while online sellers list charred shrapnel purportedly recovered from the wreckage, including damaged stop signs and other fire-scared debris. Visitors themselves comb through the scattered rubble: one man hesitates over whether to take a handful of broken glass and plaster from the collapsed towers, while a woman bends to pick up small sharp chunks of concrete from the tangled, crushed wreckage. Even lower Manhattan shop displays, coated in a thick layer of ash from the collapse, are photographed as if they are surreal 21st-century Pompeii artifacts.

    Raw grief and anger paint the scene as well. Countless visitors scrawl revenge-filled slogans and the names of lost loved ones across the ash-caked walls and windows of surrounding buildings. One Irish visitor, who traveled to the site just for the day, can barely process the horror of what she sees, noting “Up there, they were jumping out of the windows. It’s too horrible to even think about.” One anecdote shared among visitors encapsulates the scale of personal loss: when a reporter asked a woman wiping ash off a car if it belonged to her, she simply pointed to the ash and said, “No. These are my friends.”

    Alongside grief, competing social and religious forces have also converged on Lower Manhattan. Black Christian evangelists bang tambourines and preach salvation near the site, while a group of Missionaries of Charity nuns from India, clad in their signature white-and-blue saris, distribute prayer cards for the upcoming canonization of Mother Teresa, who died in 1997. Pundits in the immediate aftermath have already predicted the end of “frivolous” pop culture obsessions like celebrity gossip, arguing the attack has permanently shifted American priorities.

    Beyond Ground Zero, the attack has already upended American society and exposed deep political divides over how the nation should respond. In New York’s Times Square, just 10 days after the attack, nearly 2,000 anti-war activists gathered for the first major post-9/11 protest, holding signs challenging planned military action in Afghanistan and questioning political and corporate motives for war. Their demonstration was met with hostility from counter-protesters, who taunted marchers with claims the event amounted to martial law. Above the crowd, giant outdoor screens looped a tribute to first responders killed in the attack, while electronic headlines scrolled below updating the public on plans for a U.S. assault on Afghanistan.

    Protesters challenged the emerging pro-war consensus, with voices ranging from anti-globalization activists to communist organizers to anarchists. Many warned that the attack would be used to justify expanded domestic surveillance, roll back civil liberties, and profit wealthy defense contractors while working-class people paid the price in blood. “This alleged war that is going to start, is going to make a lot of billionaires into multi-billionaires, and a lot of body bags,” Daniel O’Connor, a member of the anti-globalization Direct Action Network, told a reporter over a battery-powered loudspeaker. Even within the protest, tensions boiled over: a blonde activist got into a shouting match with a Palestinian mother over fears that U.S. bombing would kill Afghan children, yelling “Why not? They are only going to grow up to be adult Talibans and attack us!” before the woman left in anger.

    Critics also decry the rapid commercialization of the tragedy, with vendors selling revenge-themed T-shirts calling for bin Laden’s death for profit. “I think it’s revolting that they’re making money off of a tragedy. It’s like a novelty for us,” observed Charlotte Bormann, an accessories designer who attended the Times Square protest. Media figures have also split along pro- and anti-war lines: the New York Post published a column attacking veteran CNN correspondent Christiane Amanpour for anti-U.S. bias in her coverage, while respected human rights writer Nat Hentoff warned that new repressive measures would target any American who spoke out against the coming war on terror.

    In the wider country, the attack has left minority communities fearful of backlash. Narinder Singh, a Sikh man from Lenexa, Kansas, wrote that he planned to wear clothing matching the U.S. national colors out in public, because he feared neighbors would mistakenly blame him and other Sikhs for the attacks carried out by Arab suicide hijackers. “Am I ashamed of myself, my ethnicity or my faith? Am I afraid of my fellow Americans? Did I commit a crime of some sort?” he asked in an open letter, pushing back against the unfair targeting. At the same time, conservative supporters of President George W. Bush pushed back against anti-administration criticism: one Dallas woman wrote to the Village Voice snapping that any critic of Bush should move to Afghanistan, a letter the paper headlined “A Load of Kabul.”

    Across every corner of public life, the attack has already reshaped American culture: advertisers have rushed to add American flags to their branding and publish heartfelt messages about unity and national endurance, while posters calling for Osama bin Laden “dead or alive” for mass murder line shop windows across the city. As New Yorkers grapple with their loss, they also disagree sharply on what comes next—with some optimistic that the nation will rebuild like Japan after World War II, and others bracing for more deadly attacks at home, spurring thousands to buy $85 gas masks out of fear of chemical or biological assaults, even as officials downplay their effectiveness.

  • Buddhist monk arrested in suspected $3m embezzlement scandal

    Buddhist monk arrested in suspected $3m embezzlement scandal

    Thai law enforcement has taken into custody a former senior Buddhist monk and his female alleged accomplice, uncovering a two-year scheme that siphoned more than 100 million baht ($3 million) from one of the country’s historic temples – the latest high-profile scandal to roil the nation’s long-troubled Buddhist monastic establishment. The suspect, Phra Wachirayan Wi, once served as abbot of Wat Phutthaisawan, a prominent 14th-century temple located in Ayutthaya, Thailand’s ancient former capital. Investigators allege that over 24 months, he diverted donations intended for the temple on more than 20 separate occasions, hoarding the funds for personal use rather than directing them to the institution. In line with Thai Buddhist tradition, all monks are required to take solemn vows of celibacy and renounce personal material wealth. Immediately following his arrest, Phra Wachirayan was formally defrocked, and he has not yet issued any public response to the allegations against him. This arrest comes just 12 months after a separate sex and blackmail ring involving high-ranking monks triggered widespread public outrage and shook the credibility of Thailand’s monastic community. Prior to his removal from office, Phra Wachirayan gained widespread recognition for producing coveted coin amulets – sacred objects that draw significant interest from collectors across Thailand. Reports even confirm that Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul owns several amulets created by the former abbot. For decades, allegations of widespread misconduct have plagued Thailand’s official Buddhist institution, with repeated reports of monks breaking celibacy vows, participating in drug trafficking, and committing various forms of financial fraud. In July of last year, authorities launched a public tip hotline for reporting misbehaving monks, after a criminal scheme was uncovered where at least nine monks were blackmailed for nearly $12 million using secretly recorded photos and videos of their sexual encounters with a woman. Speaking at a press conference this week, lead investigating officer Pattanasak Bupphasuwan confirmed that investigators traced two distinct streams of funds collected under the temple’s official name by Phra Wachirayan. One pool of donations was marked for temple renovation projects, while the other was collected as payment for amulets and other religious artifacts created by the former abbot. “But the money from both streams did not enter the temple’s account. Not a single baht,” Pattanasak stated, according to local media reports. When officers raided Phra Wachirayan’s private residence on Thursday, they uncovered stashes of cash and gold bars valued at more than 100 million baht, with counting operations continuing late into the night, according to Thai national newspaper The Nation. During a review of closed-circuit footage stored at the property, investigators stumbled on an explicit video recording showing Phra Wachirayan engaged in sexual activity with a woman on his personal dining table. The woman was identified as 47-year-old Punyavee Rungrueang, who has since been arrested on charges of aiding and abetting a state official in criminal activity. Like the former abbot, she has not yet issued any public comment on the allegations. In Thailand, most clergy receive government stipends, so monks are officially classified as state employees, elevating the legal severity of financial crimes committed by monastic leaders. Authorities have also seized evidence from Punyavee’s home, including 35 gold amulets, 1.5 kilograms of gold bars, and assorted jewelry, with a total estimated value of 6.04 million baht. Local newspaper the Bangkok Post reports that investigators believe Punyavee played a key role in managing the embezzled funds, noting that tens of millions of baht moved through her personal bank accounts annually. The investigation into Phra Wachirayan was launched in mid-July, after authorities received an anonymous tip outlining allegations of misconduct and misuse of temple funds. Investigators added that two to three additional individuals are suspected of involvement in the scheme, and further arrests are expected as the inquiry progresses.

  • Six Nigerians accused of romance scams to be extradited to the US

    Six Nigerians accused of romance scams to be extradited to the US

    In a landmark cross-border law enforcement milestone, South African police are set to transfer six Nigerian suspects linked to an infamous global organised crime syndicate to FBI agents on Friday. The six men, who were first taken into custody back in 2021, stand accused of orchestrating a large-scale online romance fraud scheme that stole more than $6 million (equivalent to roughly £5 million or 100 million South African rand) from over 100 American women.

    According to South Africa’s elite specialised crime-fighting unit, the Hawks, the vulnerable victims targeted by the group included retirees and working business professionals. The syndicate used carefully crafted, deceptive fake online romantic relationships to gain victims’ trust before manipulating them into sending large sums of money, in a common and destructive version of modern digital fraud.

    Hawks spokesperson Colonel Katlego Mogale confirmed in an official statement that the suspects will be moved from a Cape Town correctional facility on Friday morning, before being formally handed over to representatives from both the FBI and the United States Secret Service at the city’s international airport. Following their extradition to the United States, the six suspects will face formal charges of wire fraud and money laundering in U.S. courts.

    The suspects are believed to be core members of Black Axe, a shadowy, mafia-style Nigerian organised crime network that has been linked to a wide range of global criminal activity including human trafficking, internet fraud, and violent murder. A 2021 investigative report from BBC Eye identified the syndicate as one of the most expansive and dangerous transnational organised crime groups operating globally, with a presence stretching across Africa, Europe, and North America.
    Unlike stereotypes of organised crime, Black Axe draws most of its new recruits from Nigerian universities, with many of its members holding university degrees and being initiated into the network while they are still enrolled in higher education. The group has been a high-priority target for international law enforcement agencies for more than a decade.

    U.S. law enforcement launched major targeted operations against Black Axe in November 2019 and again in September 2021, resulting in fraud and money laundering charges against more than 35 individual members connected to multi-million dollar digital fraud schemes. Since those initial U.S. operations, global policing body Interpol has coordinated multiple joint crackdowns on the syndicate across dozens of countries.
    Just last month, Interpol released the results of its most recent coordinated operation, which ran from November 2025 through June 2026. During that action, law enforcement teams raided seven properties across South Africa tied to Black Axe networks running romance and investment scams. The operation led to 39 new arrests, the seizure of undisclosed sums of criminal proceeds, and the freezing of more than 250 bank accounts used by the syndicate to launder stolen funds.

  • Trump shadow looms large over Brics as Modi hosts Putin and Xi in Delhi

    Trump shadow looms large over Brics as Modi hosts Putin and Xi in Delhi

    As leaders from 11 full BRICS member states and invited guest Saudi Arabia gather in New Delhi this weekend for the bloc’s annual summit, one notable non-member will cast an outsized shadow over every discussion: former U.S. President Donald Trump. Against a backdrop of ongoing conflict in Iran, sweeping tariff threats that have roiled global energy and financial markets, and rising tensions over de-dollarization efforts, the expanded bloc faces a defining test: can it bridge stark internal geopolitical divides to deliver a cohesive agenda, even as it avoids open confrontation with Washington?

    BRICS, which has grown exponentially in global clout over the last decade, now counts 49% of the world’s population, 40% of global GDP, and 26% of total international trade within its ranks, per analysis from BBC Monitoring. Its most tangible institutional successes to date include the New Development Bank, which has approved billions in infrastructure and development financing across the Global South, and a $100 billion contingency reserve fund designed to buffer member states against financial crises—though the fund has yet to be put to a major test. This year’s summit comes on the heels of the bloc’s largest expansion, which brought major emerging economies including the UAE and Iran into the fold, expanding its geopolitical reach but also deepening internal disagreements.

    The core tension shaping this year’s gathering stems from conflicting positions toward Trump’s policies. Trump has repeatedly singled out BRICS for criticism, particularly its ongoing efforts to reduce global trade reliance on the U.S. dollar. In a November 2024 threat, he pledged to impose 100% tariffs on all BRICS nations if the bloc moved forward with launching an alternative reserve currency to challenge the dollar’s global dominance. Today, the ripple effects of Trump’s policy agenda are already felt across the global economy: the ongoing conflict in Iran, amplified by U.S. foreign policy shifts, has destabilized global energy markets, while the constant threat of new tariffs on allies and adversaries alike has created widespread uncertainty for businesses and governments worldwide.

    Yet despite calls from some members—most notably Russia and Iran—for a clear, public rebuke of Trump’s agenda, analysts agree the bloc is highly unlikely to produce a consensus statement that openly confronts Washington. Deep internal divisions have made a unified, hardline stance all but impossible. As Michael Kugelman, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, explained to the BBC, New Delhi simply cannot afford to back a statement that openly attacks Washington, particularly as it enters the final stages of negotiating a bilateral trade deal with the U.S. China, too, has remained wary of being seen as using BRICS as a platform to target American interests. Even the UAE, which has suffered Iranian attacks amid Tehran’s retaliation against U.S. and Israeli strikes, is unlikely to back language that aligns with Iran’s position: the Gulf state hosts major U.S. military bases and has long prioritized stable diplomatic ties with Washington.

    “BRICS has become more significant through its expansion, but that has also made consensus harder,” Kugelman noted. “You’ve added a number of members that don’t get along, which leaves host India with the enormous challenge of uniting countries that hold a wide array of views and positions on the global order.”

    While open confrontation with the U.S. is off the table, the bloc is still expected to advance a substantive agenda focused on its core priorities as a leading voice for Global South nations. Leaders are set to explore reforms to streamline cross-border payments using local currencies—a measure of particular urgency for Russia and Iran, both of which face crippling U.S. sanctions that limit their access to dollar-denominated financial systems. BRICS leaders are also expected to reiterate their collective call for reforms to multilateral institutions including the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank, arguing that these bodies fail to reflect the shifting balance of power in the modern global economy.

    For host India, the summit carries uniquely high stakes. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has made leading the Global South a central pillar of its foreign policy, and the gathering offers a critical opportunity to cement that claim, even as it navigates China’s longstanding influence across developing economies. “India’s efforts to gain deeper inroads in Africa and Latin America have had limited success, where China has been more successful,” Kugelman noted, adding that the expanded BRICS bloc gives New Delhi a chance to deepen ties with emerging economies across both regions and build a stronger global profile. Recent months have also seen New Delhi’s global profile overshadowed by Pakistan’s high-profile mediation efforts in the Middle East around the Iran war, making this summit a key moment to reassert India’s diplomatic relevance.

    The challenge of forging consensus was already previewed in May, when BRICS foreign ministers failed to agree on a joint statement after their meeting due to intractable differences over the Iran war, forcing New Delhi to release a chair’s summary instead. India is drawing on its 2023 experience hosting the G20, where it managed to broker a joint declaration despite deep divisions over the war in Ukraine, but analysts caution the gaps are wider this time around. New Delhi is keen to avoid having BRICS dismissed as a mere “talk shop,” and is pushing for substantive announcements on financial cooperation that can showcase the bloc’s progress.

    Beyond plenary discussions, the summit will host a series of high-stakes bilateral meetings that are drawing global attention. A Saturday meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi is widely watched, as the two neighboring powers continue gradual, cautious efforts to repair and rebuild bilateral ties that have been strained for years. Modi is also set to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, where the war in Ukraine and India’s growing trade deficit with Russia will top the agenda. When the two leaders met last month on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Bishkek, Modi issued a highly public appeal for peace in Ukraine—a move some outside observers framed as a rebuke of Moscow, though Russian officials publicly welcomed the outreach and did not interpret it as criticism. Trade imbalances with both China and Russia are also expected to feature prominently in Modi’s bilateral discussions.

    In the end, all sides agree that any language addressing U.S. policy will be carefully crafted to avoid unnecessary confrontation, even as the bloc advances its own priorities of deeper financial integration and greater representation for Global South nations. For India, a successful summit that delivers a unified, if muted, outcome would mark a major diplomatic win that reinforces New Delhi’s rising influence on the global stage. And for BRICS as a whole, the gathering will test whether the expanded bloc can turn its growing economic heft into cohesive, impactful global action—all while navigating the unpredictable landscape shaped by U.S. policy.