分类： world

In a seismic shift for the geopolitics of the South Caucasus, dozens of European leaders are set to gather in Yerevan this week for two back-to-back summits that mark a historic turning point for Armenia – a small nation of under 3 million that has long stood as Russia’s closest ally in the region. The unprecedented gathering, which will open Monday with the European Political Community (EPC) summit bringing together more than 30 European leaders plus Canada’s prime minister, will be followed Tuesday by the first-ever bilateral summit between the European Union and Armenia, attended by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa. This high-profile European presence in Yerevan carries profound symbolic weight: Armenia remains a member of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union, and Russia still maintains a permanent military base on Armenian territory. The country also remains heavily reliant on Russian energy, buying natural gas at a heavily discounted rate that Putin explicitly highlighted during Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s April 2025 visit to the Kremlin. At that meeting, Putin noted Russia charges Armenia just $177.50 per 1,000 cubic meters of gas, compared to the $600 price tag for European buyers, calling the gap substantial and meaningful. What brought a country long anchored in Russia’s geopolitical orbit to the point of hosting the entire continent’s top leaders? The turning point came in 2023, when a devastating war with neighboring Azerbaijan upended all long-standing security assumptions for Yerevan. When Azerbaijan launched a rapid military operation to take full control of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, displacing more than 100,000 ethnic Armenian refugees, Russian peacekeepers stationed on the ground took no action to stop the offensive. Earlier incursions by Azerbaijan into internationally recognized Armenian territory also drew no response from the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization, the regional security bloc designed to protect its member states. “We realised that the security architecture that we are in was not working,” explained Sargis Khandanyan, chairman of the Armenian National Assembly’s foreign relations committee, in comments to the BBC. Long before the 2023 war, the EU had already begun building ties with Yerevan: in 2022, Brussels brokered a preliminary border recognition deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and deployed a civilian monitoring mission to the border to oversee compliance. Khandanyan said the on-the-ground presence of European officials fundamentally shifted how Armenian citizens viewed closer ties with the bloc, creating clear public demand for deeper integration. By March 2025, that public and political momentum translated into action: Armenia’s parliament passed a formal law launching the official accession process for EU membership. Parallel to its shifting alignment with Europe, Armenia’s peace process with Azerbaijan has also accelerated dramatically. In August 2025, the two countries’ leaders signed a landmark peace accord at the White House aimed at ending decades of open conflict. As part of the deal, they unveiled the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, a major cross-regional connectivity corridor that will run along Armenia’s border with Iran, linking the South Caucasus directly to European consumer and business markets. Yet for all this progress, significant risks and headwinds remain. The Armenian-Azerbaijani peace process remains fragile, and Europe’s growing embrace of Yerevan has already carried tangible diplomatic costs. Just last week, Azerbaijan’s parliament voted to suspend all formal ties with the European Parliament in response to a resolution calling for the right of return for displaced Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and the release of Armenian detainees held in Baku. For its part, Moscow has made its irritation with Armenia’s pro-European shift impossible to miss. During Pashinyan’s April visit to the Kremlin, the Russian leader openly pushed back on Yerevan’s EU accession ambitions, noting that membership in the Eurasian Economic Union – a Russian-led customs union – and the EU are mutually exclusive. “It is not possible to be simultaneously in a customs union with both the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union,” Putin stated. “It is simply impossible by definition.” In the lead-up to this week’s summits, Moscow has already taken tangible punitive measures: just days before the EPC gathering, Russia banned imports of Armenian mineral water. Armenian analysts say such moves fit a consistent pattern of hybrid pressure from Moscow: pro-EU policy moves or official visits to Brussels are often followed by delays for Armenian cargo trucks at the Georgian-Russian border, large-scale cyberattacks targeting government infrastructure, and coordinated disinformation campaigns. Just weeks ago, the EU approved an expanded two-year civilian mission to Armenia designed to counter these Russian threats: the mission will focus on countering disinformation, cyberattacks, and illicit financial flows, particularly ahead of Armenia’s June 2026 parliamentary elections. The mission is modeled on a similar deployment to Moldova ahead of its 2025 elections, where pro-EU incumbent forces retained power. Artur Papyan, founder of CyberHUB-AM, an Armenian organization that monitors the country’s information and cyber space, says the pattern of Russian interference is clear and consistent with tactics seen in other pro-European post-Soviet states including Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine. In January 2026 alone, his organization documented a large-scale cyberattack on WhatsApp that compromised hundreds of thousands of Armenian accounts – a platform widely used by senior government officials. In a separate incident, hackers created a fake Signal account impersonating EU Ambassador to Armenia Vassilis Maragos, sending invitations to a fake Armenia-EU relations conference that fooled even experienced civil society workers. Investigations traced the attack to IP addresses based in Zelenograd, a city northwest of Moscow that is a major hub for Russian digital intelligence operations. In the 48 hours leading up to the Yerevan summits, Papyan said his team recorded multiple spikes in coordinated Telegram posts pushing a single narrative: that hosting the summits pushes Armenia past a point of no return with Russia, and that harsh retaliation from Moscow is inevitable. Alain Berset, secretary general of the Council of Europe, who will attend this week’s summits, warned that while Armenia’s democratic institutions have made significant progress, they remain under sustained pressure from foreign interference. Berset identified foreign meddling, coordinated disinformation, and online political polarization as the top threats ahead of June’s parliamentary elections, noting that while Yerevan has some legal frameworks to counter these threats, they are not yet scaled to match the sophistication of the attacks. While European leaders are arriving in Yerevan with promises of expanded civilian support and a roadmap for visa liberalization for Armenian citizens within two years, Brussels has offered no firm timeline for membership, no binding defense commitments, and no plan to replace the discounted Russian gas that still powers Armenia’s economy. Without these concrete guarantees, Armenia’s delicate balancing act between its historic alliance with Russia and its new pro-European course remains far from settled.

Amsterdam has cemented its place in climate policy history by becoming the world’s first capital city to implement a full public advertising ban on both meat and fossil fuel products. Since May 1, all promotions for beef burgers, petrol-powered cars, airline travel and other high-carbon goods have been removed from municipal billboards, tram shelters, and metro stations across the city.

At one of Amsterdam’s busiest downtown tram stops, positioned next to a lush roundabout blooming with bright yellow daffodils and iconic orange Dutch tulips, the transformation of the city’s outdoor advertising landscape is impossible to miss. Where ads for chicken nuggets, gas-powered SUVs and low-cost international flights dominated public display space just last week, posters now promote Amsterdam’s world-famous Rijksmuseum and upcoming local piano concerts.

City policymakers explain the new rule is designed to align the capital’s public spaces with the municipal government’s ambitious environmental goals, which target full carbon neutrality by 2050 and a 50% reduction in local meat consumption over the same timeline. “The climate crisis is incredibly urgent,” noted Anneke Veenhoff of Amsterdam’s GreenLeft Party. “If we claim to be leaders in climate action, but then rent out our public advertising space to products that directly undermine those targets, what message does that send? Most residents cannot understand why the city would profit from promoting products our own policies actively work against.”

Anke Bakker, group leader of the animal rights-focused Party for the Animals in Amsterdam and the politician who spearheaded the new restrictions, has pushed back against criticism that the ban represents overreaching “nanny state” governance. “Every person is still free to make their own purchasing choices,” Bakker explained. “What we are doing is stopping large corporations from constantly pushing these products on the public. In fact, this gives people more freedom to make uncoerced choices for themselves.” Removing constant visual prompts for high-carbon products, she added, both cuts down on impulsive buying and redefines cheap meat and fossil-fuel heavy travel as no longer desirable, aspirational lifestyle options.

In market terms, meat advertising makes up only a tiny fraction of Amsterdam’s outdoor ad industry, accounting for roughly 0.1% of total outdoor ad spend, while fossil fuel-related promotions make up around 4%. Clothing brands, film promotions and mobile phone ads currently dominate the city’s public display space. But the policy carries major symbolic and political weight: grouping meat with air travel, cruises and fossil-fuel cars reframes meat consumption from a purely private dietary decision to a pressing public climate issue.

Unsurprisingly, industry groups have pushed back against the new rule. The Dutch Meat Association, which represents the country’s meat producers, has called the ban “an undesirable way to influence consumer behaviour,” arguing that meat “delivers essential nutrients and should remain visible and accessible to consumers.” The Dutch Association of Travel Agents and Tour Operators has also criticized the ban on air travel advertising as a disproportionate restriction on businesses’ commercial freedom.

For climate and animal welfare activists, however, the ban represents a landmark shift that aims to create what they call a “tobacco moment” for high-carbon food. Environmental lawyer Hannah Prins, whose organization Advocates for the Future collaborated with campaign group Fossil-Free Advertising on the push for the ban, draws a parallel to the widespread shift in public attitudes toward tobacco advertising over the past decades. “Looking back at old photos, you see legendary Dutch footballer Johan Cruyff in tobacco ads – that used to be completely normal,” Prins pointed out. “Cruyff died of lung cancer, and today the idea of allowing cigarette ads in public spaces feels absurd. What we accept as normal in our public spaces shapes what we accept as normal in our society. I don’t think it’s normal to have advertisements for slaughtered animals on public billboards, and it’s good that this is changing.”

Amsterdam’s move is not without precedent. In 2022, the nearby Dutch city of Haarlem, just 18 kilometers west of the capital, became the first city in the world to announce a broad ban on most meat advertising in public spaces, which took full effect in 2024 alongside its own ban on fossil fuel ads. Utrecht and Nijmegen have since introduced similar restrictions on municipal meat advertising – with Nijmegen extending its ban to include dairy as well, on top of existing fossil fuel, petrol car and air travel ad prohibitions.

Globally, dozens of cities have already implemented or are moving toward bans on fossil fuel advertising, including Edinburgh, Sheffield, Stockholm and Florence. France has even put a nationwide fossil fuel ad ban in place. Campaigners now hope Amsterdam’s approach of linking meat and fossil fuel promotion as interconnected climate issues will serve as a legal and political blueprint for other cities around the world to follow.

Still, the new rule leaves a major gap: while meat and fossil fuel ads have disappeared from Amsterdam’s tram stops and billboards, the same promotional offers still appear regularly on consumers’ social media feeds, and most pedestrians spend much of their time waiting for transit staring at their phone screens anyway. This has led to questions: if municipal bans only cover public outdoor spaces and leave digital advertising untouched, how much real impact can they have on consumer habits, or are they just symbolic virtue-signaling?

To date, there is no direct empirical evidence that removing meat advertising from public spaces shifts whole societies toward more plant-based eating patterns. But some public health researchers are cautiously optimistic about the policy’s potential long-term impact. Joreintje Mackenbach, an epidemiology professor at Amsterdam University Medical Center’s Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, calls Amsterdam’s new ban “a fantastic natural experiment” to study the impact of advertising on social norms and consumption. “When we see fast food ads everywhere, it normalizes the behavior of frequent fast consumption,” Mackenbach explained. “If we remove those environmental cues from our shared public spaces, that will inevitably change how people perceive these products and shift social norms.” She pointed to prior research showing London Underground’s 2009 ban on junk food advertising led to a measurable drop in junk food purchases across the U.K. capital.

Prins, for her part, argues the ban will open up opportunities for Amsterdam’s small local businesses. “All the things we love most about this city – neighborhood festivals, local artisanal cheese, the corner flower shop – those don’t need big national advertising campaigns,” she said, standing along the banks of a central Amsterdam canal. “They grow through word of mouth and people walking past them every day. I think local businesses will actually thrive with more public advertising space available. And I hope this makes big polluting companies stop and think, and rethink the products they sell. That’s how change starts.”

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – A new suspected attack targeting an unidentified northbound cargo ship has been documented off the coast of Sirik, Iran, east of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), Britain’s leading maritime security monitoring agency, announced Sunday. This incident brings the total number of maritime attacks recorded in and around the world’s most critical energy chokepoint to at least two dozen since the outbreak of the ongoing Iran war, and marks the first reported assault in the region after a lull that began April 22, when another cargo vessel came under fire. All crew members aboard the targeted ship emerged unharmed, UKMTO confirmed, though no group has yet stepped forward to claim responsibility for the attack. The overall threat rating for commercial shipping transiting the area remains classified as critical, as Tehran has effectively disrupted normal traffic through the strait through a campaign of targeted attacks and threats against passing vessels. For months, Iranian officials have maintained that any non-U.S. and non-Israeli flagged vessels may safely pass the waterway only upon payment of a transit toll. The small assault craft used in these attacks, many operated by Iranian forces and outfitted only with twin outboard motors, are notoriously agile, difficult for international naval forces to detect, and have been linked to multiple assaults on commercial shipping in recent months. Tensions in the region remain high even as a fragile three-week ceasefire between U.S.-led forces and Iran has largely held. U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters Saturday that additional military strikes against Iranian targets remain on the table should diplomacy fail to resolve the standoff. Parallel to the maritime security escalation, Iran has submitted a new 14-point peace proposal to the United States through diplomatic intermediary Pakistan, which hosted direct, face-to-face negotiations between the two countries last month. The proposal, reported by Iranian state-linked security outlets Nour News and Tasnim, aims to reach a full end to hostilities within a 30-day timeline rather than just extend the current ceasefire. It calls for the U.S. to lift all sweeping economic sanctions on Iran, end the ongoing American naval blockade of Iranian ports, withdraw all U.S. military forces from the broader Middle East region, and force an end to Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Notably absent from the proposal is any mention of Iran’s controversial nuclear program and its stockpiles of enriched uranium – the core longstanding point of contention between Tehran and Western powers, which Iran has indicated it prefers to address in later negotiations. Pakistan continues to serve as a key go-between for the two adversaries, with the country’s prime minister, foreign minister and army chief all pushing for sustained direct dialogue between Washington and Tehran, according to two unnamed Pakistani officials authorized to discuss the sensitive diplomacy. On Sunday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Abbas Araghchi also held talks with his Omani counterpart Badr al-Busaidi, whose government oversaw previous rounds of pre-war negotiations between the two sides. The strategic Strait of Hormuz, located at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, normally carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily traded oil and natural gas, alongside critical fertilizer shipments that global food markets depend on. Since the outbreak of war on February 28, Iran’s tightening grip on the waterway has sent shockwaves through global energy and commodity markets. During a visit to the strategically vital Larak Island port facilities Sunday, Iranian deputy parliament speaker Ali Nikzad reaffirmed Tehran’s uncompromising stance, saying, “Iran will not back down from our position on the Strait of Hormuz, and it will not return to its prewar conditions.” Nikzad does not hold formal decision-making authority in the Iranian legislature, but his comments signal the hardline position popular among Iranian political elites. The U.S. has responded by warning global shipping companies that any form of payment to Iran for safe transit – including digital assets – could expose them to harsh U.S. sanctions. Compounding pressure on Tehran, the U.S. naval blockade implemented April 13 has cut off most of Iran’s oil export revenue, a critical lifeline for the country’s already ailing economy. U.S. Central Command announced Saturday that 48 commercial tankers have already been ordered to turn back from Iranian ports. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News Sunday that Iran has collected less than $1.3 million in total transit tolls to date – a tiny fraction of the country’s pre-war daily oil export earnings. “They’re going to have to start shutting in wells, which we think could happen in the next week,” Bessent said, noting that Iran’s onshore oil storage facilities are rapidly filling to capacity. Iran’s domestic economic situation continues to deteriorate rapidly, with the national currency the rial hitting new record lows against the U.S. dollar Sunday. On the second day of Iran’s working week, the dollar traded at 1,840,000 rials in Tehran’s central Ferdowsi Street currency exchange, a sharp drop from the already record low of 1.3 million rials per dollar recorded last December. At that time, the currency collapse sparked widespread nationwide protests over the soaring cost of living. Iranian markets remain deeply unstable, with prices for basic consumer goods rising on a daily basis, and local media reports indicate that dozens of factories have failed to renew worker contracts after the Iranian new year in March, leaving thousands unemployed. Yousef Pezeshkian, son and senior adviser to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, acknowledged the stalemate in a Telegram post over the weekend, writing that both the United States and Iran continue to view themselves as the war’s victor and remain unwilling to make concessions. In a separate development Saturday, the Norwegian Nobel Committee issued an urgent public appeal for Iran to immediately allow imprisoned 2023 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi to transfer to Tehran to receive specialized care from her personal medical team, after a sharp deterioration in the human rights lawyer’s health. The committee confirmed it is in regular contact with Mohammadi’s family and legal team, and warned that the activist’s life remains in imminent danger. Mohammadi, who is imprisoned in Zanjan prison in northwestern Iran, fainted twice in custody Friday, and was admitted to a local hospital, according to her personal foundation. Her legal team has said she is suspected to have suffered a heart attack in late March. This report included contributions from Associated Press correspondent Melanie Lidman in Tel Aviv, Israel, with additional reporting from Amir Vahdat in Tehran, Iran, and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad, Pakistan.

Over a 24-hour period, a fresh wave of Russian drone and missile assaults across multiple Ukrainian regions has left at least 10 civilians dead and 76 others injured, marking another escalation in the ongoing aerial campaign targeting Ukrainian populated areas. Fatalities were confirmed across five Ukrainian administrative regions, consistent with Russia’s sustained pattern of regular strikes on urban and civilian infrastructure throughout the country. Three fatalities were recorded in separate incidents in the southern Kherson region, according to the region’s governor. Two deaths each were reported in Odesa, Donetsk, and Zaporizhzhia, while one additional fatality was confirmed in the northeastern Sumy region. Ukrainian air defense forces reported they intercepted the vast majority of incoming Russian weapons, which included one ballistic missile and close to 270 attack drones launched in the assault.

Parallel to these defensive operations against Russian strikes, Ukrainian authorities have confirmed a series of successful cross-border attacks targeting key Russian energy infrastructure and maritime assets. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that a major oil terminal in northwestern Russia sustained extensive damage, while two Russian oil tankers were hit in strikes near the key Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. Zelenskyy confirmed the two damaged tankers were part of Russia’s so-called ‘shadow fleet’ of vessels operated to bypass Western price caps and sanctions on Russian crude oil exports. No official details on the extent of damage to the ships have been released by Russian authorities as of yet.

Zelenskyy added in a Telegram post accompanying black-and-white footage that appeared to show a naval drone approaching one of the targeted tankers: ‘These tankers were actively used for transporting oil. Now they will not be.’ In recent weeks, Ukrainian forces have ramped up a coordinated campaign of long-range drone strikes on Russian oil export infrastructure spread across the country’s western and southern regions. Kyiv officials confirm these strikes have taken out billions of dollars in Russian oil export capacity. Over the weekend, Zelenskyy added that infrastructure at the Primorsk export terminal in Russia’s Leningrad region, located near the Finnish border, was also heavily damaged, alongside three vessels stationed at the facility.

Russian officials reported that in total, Ukraine launched at least 334 drones in cross-border attacks over the same 24-hour period, with the Leningrad region facing the heaviest assault. While Moscow has largely sought to downplay the impact of Ukrainian long-range strikes on its territory, the Kremlin has openly acknowledged growing security concerns over the deep strike range of Ukrainian drones. Most notably, this security anxiety prompted the Kremlin to announce this week it would scale back its annual Victory Day military parade, scheduled for May 9 to mark the Soviet defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, citing what officials described as an elevated ‘terrorist threat’ from Ukraine.